Latest / The SME Stream / Peter Lewis: Asia Business Correspondent on China considering $1.4 trillion loan to boost economy
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Here the duples L Peter Lewis Asia Business corresponding with
- 0:03Speaker 1: US now Hi Peter.
- 0:05Speaker 2: Good evening head.
- 0:06Speaker 1: So even more stimulus coming from China.
- 0:09Speaker 2: A huge amount of stimulus coming down the pipes, if
- 0:11Speaker 2: we believe the media reports something along the lines of
- 0:15Speaker 2: one point four trillion dollars to try and shore up
- 0:20Speaker 2: basically China's economy and also deal with all the debt
- 0:24Speaker 2: that's been accumulated by the local governments, particularly in the
- 0:28Speaker 2: property market. There needs to be a complete shakeup of
- 0:32Speaker 2: how local governments raise money because they can't raise it
- 0:36Speaker 2: from taxes on land sales anymore because the property developers
- 0:42Speaker 2: are either bankrupt or they've built too many houses already,
- 0:45Speaker 2: and there's far more houses that are unfinished than there
- 0:48Speaker 2: are people to live in them. So this stimulus is
- 0:51Speaker 2: going to be directed mainly at the local governments to
- 0:55Speaker 2: try and help them swap what is in effect local
- 0:58Speaker 2: government debts that's hidden off their balance sheets with central
- 1:01Speaker 2: government debt, and the hope that this sort of unclogs
- 1:05Speaker 2: the pipes and starts getting money flowing again to local
- 1:09Speaker 2: businesses because there's lots of people who haven't been paid.
- 1:12Speaker 2: There's suppliers who haven't received their money either to try
- 1:17Speaker 2: and get that whole process up and running again, and
- 1:20Speaker 2: Beijing is relying very heavily on this to try and
- 1:23Speaker 2: stimulate the economy. I'm not so sure. I think what
- 1:26Speaker 2: tends to happen with things like this is they have
- 1:29Speaker 2: a temporary boost, particularly when you're borrowing a lot of
- 1:32Speaker 2: money to try and stimulate your economies. Maybe the UK
- 1:35Speaker 2: is about to find out, but that economic impact wears
- 1:39Speaker 2: off very very quickly unless you deal with the underlying
- 1:44Speaker 2: fundamental problem. And the underlying fundamental problem in China is
- 1:49Speaker 2: very difficult to deal with because of the demographics, because
- 1:53Speaker 2: there are far less people who want to buy homes
- 1:56Speaker 2: at the moment, So the whole property market is going
- 2:00Speaker 2: to take many years to be resolved, and it's going
- 2:03Speaker 2: to take a long time before prices start moving up again.
- 2:06Speaker 1: Yeah, how long do you reckon? I mean, if we're
- 2:08Speaker 1: talking about demographics where you have to wait for people
- 2:10Speaker 1: to want to buy houses, I mean you're talking about
- 2:12Speaker 1: potentially decades or a decade.
- 2:15Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely, I mean this could take many years to resolve.
- 2:20Speaker 2: We're not going to see house prices in the meantime.
- 2:22Speaker 2: Moved back to previous levels. The risk is that they're
- 2:25Speaker 2: actually going to move even lower in the meantime, And
- 2:30Speaker 2: we don't really know what is the true value of
- 2:33Speaker 2: these homes because the Chinese government won't let us find out.
- 2:36Speaker 2: They have a lot of controls and whether or not
- 2:39Speaker 2: local authorities can raise or lower prices, whether developments developers
- 2:44Speaker 2: can do that. So we don't really know what is
- 2:46Speaker 2: the clearing price of all this unfinished, unsold property in China.
- 2:52Speaker 2: All we do know is that there is way way
- 2:54Speaker 2: too much of it, and the clearing price, the true
- 2:56Speaker 2: price of these homes is probably a lot lower.
- 2:59Speaker 1: Yeah, actually, very good point that you make there. Now listen,
- 3:01Speaker 1: tell me, how are you guys witnessing this u selection.
- 3:04Speaker 1: What do people think of it?
- 3:06Speaker 2: Well, they're waiting with some trepidation for the results next week,
- 3:10Speaker 2: because all American elections tend to be consequential, but this
- 3:15Speaker 2: one is going to be more consequential than any we've
- 3:18Speaker 2: seen for quite a long time, particularly if Donald Trump wins.
- 3:22Speaker 2: I mean, here's the self proclaimed tariff man. He says,
- 3:25Speaker 2: tariff is the most beautiful word in the English language,
- 3:30Speaker 2: and we have to remember that it's threatening blanket tariffs
- 3:34Speaker 2: of twenty percent on all exports into the US and
- 3:39Speaker 2: sixty percent on Chinese ones. Now, if people think he's bluffing,
- 3:45Speaker 2: I think that he intends to carry this through. I
- 3:48Speaker 2: think he feels that one of the big mistakes when
- 3:50Speaker 2: he was last president was not having people around him
- 3:53Speaker 2: who were supportive enough of his agenda. So he doesn't
- 3:57Speaker 2: want to make that same mistake twice. He's throughout the
- 4:00Speaker 2: himself with people who are going to absolutely carry out
- 4:03Speaker 2: that agenda, and Harris is going to be a very
- 4:06Speaker 2: big part of that. So the risk is that this
- 4:08Speaker 2: could totally reorder the global trading system with consequences for
- 4:14Speaker 2: the global economy. The IMF says it could wipe out
- 4:17Speaker 2: the equivalent of the GDPs of France and Germany off
- 4:21Speaker 2: of global growth if he goes through with this, So
- 4:25Speaker 2: it is very consequential. He's already been attacking, and he
- 4:29Speaker 2: doesn't distinguish between friends and enemies. So Japan, for example,
- 4:33Speaker 2: which is trying to get around this problem by investing
- 4:36Speaker 2: an enormous amount in the US in terms of opening
- 4:39Speaker 2: plants there over the past years and decades, could be hit. Taiwan. Certainly,
- 4:45Speaker 2: he was accusing Taiwan over the weekend of stealing the
- 4:49Speaker 2: US chip business. He didn't explain how exactly Taiwan had
- 4:53Speaker 2: done that, but he said they've stolen basically American business
- 4:58Speaker 2: from companies like Intel, and is going to put tariffs
- 5:02Speaker 2: on Taiwan's semiconductor or Taiwan's semiconductor manufacturing makes ninety percent
- 5:07Speaker 2: of the world's advanced chips has huge clients like Navidia, Apple, Microsoft,
- 5:14Speaker 2: So this would have enormous implications for the global supply
- 5:18Speaker 2: chain if he goes ahead with it.
- 5:21Speaker 1: Does China have a preference? Do you think as do
- 5:23Speaker 1: with it's Trump or Kamala who wins.
- 5:25Speaker 2: Well, that's what we've been wondering. It's hard to know
- 5:30Speaker 2: because Kamala Harris isn't going to be that much better
- 5:33Speaker 2: for China because that signals are more a continuation with
- 5:37Speaker 2: Biden's policy, and Biden has hardly been friendly to China.
- 5:42Speaker 2: Are the ither mean some of his tariffs have been
- 5:45Speaker 2: very very damaging to Chinese exporters and also damaging to
- 5:50Speaker 2: China's ability to develop its own high tech industry. So
- 5:55Speaker 2: a continuation of that is not going to be particularly
- 5:58Speaker 2: good for China. At the same time, it could get
- 6:02Speaker 2: ramped up in a very specific way, in terms of
- 6:04Speaker 2: a lot more tariffs if Donald Trump is in power.
- 6:08Speaker 2: So we have been wondering what Beijing prefers. Of course
- 6:12Speaker 2: we don't know. They're not going to say, so we
- 6:14Speaker 2: can only speculate. But I think that they see this
- 6:18Speaker 2: as whoever wins, it's not going to be particularly good
- 6:21Speaker 2: for Beijing.
- 6:22Speaker 1: No, probably not. Hey, Peter, thank you very much. Enjoy
- 6:25Speaker 1: the last weekend before the election. That's Peter Lewis, our
- 6:27Speaker 1: Asia Business correspondents