Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Rumble Under Attack From NY Times Hit Piece

Transcript

Rumble Under Attack From NY Times Hit Piece · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: From Chris Pavlovsky, who's the CEO and founder of Rumble,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: which we are on right now and which we love.
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: So apparently he's saying, apparently the New York Times is
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: coming after Rumble.
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: That's no big surprise.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: In the email correspondence, Blow, it's because Rumble creators are
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: warning people of the potential of nuclear war.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: I've warned you guys about that.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: This is even after Putin has spoken about the potential
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: of nuclear war and a new nuclear doctrine. So, Jake Pentland,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: beware Rumble video and all Saint Americans. The New York
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: Times is running another hit piece on real news organizations
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: to cover up their blatant bullshit. My response in the
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: second slide, You know, they should still be so ashamed
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: of their work in the run up to the Iraq
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: War with the weapons of mass destruction and Judith Miller.
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: And all of that. They should be so ashamed of.
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: They shouldn't.
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: It's amazing they have still to this day. They should
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: be so ashamed of that. It should be unthinkable of
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: them to accuse other people of fake news or propaganda.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: All right, regarding New York Times inquiry, Hi, Jake, I'm
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: writing from The New York Times. We're working on a
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: story about Rumble that briefly mentions the Roseanne Bar podcast,
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: the streams on the platform. I'm contacting you to let
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: you know and also seek comment the Roseanne Bar podcast.
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is what The New York Times has
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: come to. I like Roseen Bar, by the way, but
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: this is I mean, this is immediately you see, Okay,
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: this is just going to be propaganda, propaganda, hit job.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: This is just narrative control from the narrative controllers. The
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: overall story is about the universe of content that exists
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: on Rumble, it's audience, and how the news opinion on
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: Rumble contrasts with coverage from other news sources. To complete
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, do they mean the New York Times or
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: the CIA, or FBI or EDSA or ten other different
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: three letter agencies start to know, to compete this. To
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: complete the story, I deleted my other news sources and
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: relied on Rumble for all my news for a week.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Here is how the work is mentioned in the story
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: as a video that shows Jake and Roseanne advertising TWC
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: Health with ad copy that says we are on the
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: brink of nuclear war. This clip is included in a
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: portion of the story that talks about how many rumble
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Craters emphasized how nuclear war with Russia was more or
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: less imminent, and how sometimes those warnings turned into ads
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: for products. I'm hoping the show would have a comment
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: to share about this or it's work more broadly on Rumbo.
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: We are hoping to publish the story later this week.
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: The New York Times aware aware that the United States
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: is in a proxy war with Russia right now? Are
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: they aware of the concept of the doctrine mutually assured destruction?
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: Mad? Right?
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: It kind of is got two sides with enough nuclear
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: weapons to just end civilization. Russia has enough to win civilization,
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: just them alone has enough.
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: They're real.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: There really exists six thousand nuclear weapons, and there is nothing.
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: There's no defense shield, there's no Star Wars defense shield,
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: there's nothing to stop them. They exist, and their purpose
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: is to vaporize you and if released, if released to
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: fulfill their purpose, and this is their purpose, they will
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: vaporize you. They'll vaporize cities. That's real. So you've got
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: a proxy war going on. You just have Biden aggravating
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: the situation by allowing Ukraine to use American missiles inside
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: of Russian territory, which is kind of a big deal.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: If you're saying that you're not at war with them,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: you kind of are at that point. Well, you kind
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: of are right from the start. So I don't know,
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: it seems reasonable to me to talk about this, to say, hey,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: maybe we shouldn't make this worse. You know, there's all
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: these weapons that can vaporize everybody. You know, maybe let's
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: not aggravate the situation. Why take a step closer. You
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: don't know what the unintended consequences of your actions are
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: going to be.
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: History.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: I've said this before trademark radio belone. History is the
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: history of unintended consequences. You just have to wait long enough,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: and let's check out the next thing. So here's the reply.
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Are you covering the ad revenue between Pfizer and CNN
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: in this article as well? I am asking because I'm
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: curious if this article is actual objective news or the
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: standard New York Times hit piece against people who cover
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: the real news. Petitors of the New York Times. You
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: might say, if it's actual news, then you are welcome
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: to quote me here. Biden's authorization of long range missiles
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: is widely believed to be an escalation in the Ukraine conflict,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: and Pewden has floated the idea of nuclear war in response.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: This is all very true. You think the New York
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: Times would know about this. Maybe they saw it and
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: then they just ignored it for some reason. We want
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: Americans safe and protected from this wildly corrupt administration, whether
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: that's through education or highlight highlighting specific products that can
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: protect them. So this is a brilliant response to it,
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: and it just exposes how how what what a fraud?
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: What a fraud? The New York Times is now again
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: short memories. It's not that long ago that they were
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: tricking the country into going to an insane war over
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: fake weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist. But if
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: you read the New York York Times, they did funny
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: funny how that worked out?
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: Huh?
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: Not very long ago? When was this October twenty six,
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. Guess what the Washington Post Rana hit piece.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: So what's that? That's not very long ago. That's just
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: a little over a month ago. The Washington Post Rana
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: hit piece on Chris Pavlovski and Rumbull isn't that funny.
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: Let's see, in the months after Donald Trump was thrown
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: off social media for inciting a mob assault on the Capitol,
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: they just can't help themselves.
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: They can't. They can't help right away.
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: Just in with the framing, with the deceptive framing, a
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: little known technology mogul moved decisively into the former president's circle,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: thrown off social media for inciting a moba salt democracy
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: dies in darkness.
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: Apparently, according to the Washington.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: Post, Let's See, Pavlovski's once obscure video streaming site received
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: a cash infusion from a contree of conservator of investors,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: including jer Ed E.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: Vance, now Trump's running mate.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: Created as a YouTube alternative eight years earlier, Rumbull had
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: recently gained traction with worrying more users chafing against the
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: guard rails erected by major social media services during the
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: Corona virus pandemic. There's another way of saying that, say guardrails.
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: There's another way. Some people see it not so much
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: as guardrails as as blatant censorship of descent, blatantly censoring
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: descent to preserve a narrative, an approved narrative. Some people
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: think that Some people say that. A lot of people
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: say that.
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: I think.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: I think that myself. A lot of people say that.
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: I say it too. They are so so they're so corrupt,
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: so insanely corrupt, and they don't care who knows it.
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: They just assume that enough of their oddit it's is
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: stupid enough to just buy all of their bullshit and
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: never wake up. To some extent they're right, but not
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: enough for them to make any money.
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: Where's this one?
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: From October thirty one, twenty twenty two, The New York
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: Times has been after Rumble before, company backed by j
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: d Vance gives platform for Russian propaganda. Let's see they
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: have something here. Rumble has become a leading destination for
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: conservat content by positioning itself as a platform for unfettered speech. Ooh,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: that's terrifying, an alternative to the content moderation or censorship
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: as they say, censorship, it's just content moderation. Too many
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: on the right of mainstream social media sites like Facebook
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: and Twitter. But Rumble has become a leading destination for
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: conservative content by positioning itself as a platform for unfettered speech.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: So how about this at Conservatives don't get censored on Rumble.
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: Rumble is a platform for free speech where nobody gets
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: censored for legal speech. They could just say that, right,
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: that could be their framing, right there, just neutral an
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: alternative to the content moderation or censorship. Uh huh, sure, censorship,
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: it's really just content moderation. It's really just being responsible
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: by not allowing things that The New York Times disagrees with.
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: They could just say, rumble doesn't censor legal speech, So
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: conservatives who have been censored for legal speech are moving there.
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: You could say that that's good, that's actually good framing.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: That's what an objective journalist would do. I'm sorting to
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: think that these people are just psychopaths. To be honest
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: with you, you know, they're just psychopaths.
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: I mean, how could you just lie and lie and
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: lie and lie.
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: And lie and persecute and persecute and persecute anyway. That's
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: all I'm going to say about that. Please like, share,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: and subscribe, subscribe. Being really helps me out. I thank
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: you for that. I will see you next time.