Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Mega Edition: The OIG Report Detailing The Investigation Into Epstein's NPA (Part 45-47) (7/4/26)
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
- 0:04This episode, we're going to pick up where we left
- 0:06off with the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's NPA A.
- 0:11The case agents in Villa Fauna solicit some victims' opinions
- 0:15about resolving the federal investigation. Villa Fauna told OPR that
- 0:20when she and the case agents met with the victims,
- 0:23we would ask them how they wanted the case to
- 0:25be resolved, and most of them wanted the case to
- 0:28be resolved via a plea. Some of them wanted him
- 0:31not to be prosecuted at all. Most of them did
- 0:33not want to have to come to court and testify.
- 0:36They were very worried about their privacy rights. Some of
- 0:39them wanted him to go to jail, but some of
- 0:41them talked about bad experiences with the State Attorney's office,
- 0:45and so I felt like sending them back to the
- 0:47State Attorney's office was not something that they would have supported.
- 0:51Villa Fauna told OPR that she also recalled that some
- 0:55victims expressed concern about their safety and were worried that
- 0:59Epstein would find out about their participation in the investigation.
- 1:03In her twenty seventeen declarations submitted in the CVRA litigation,
- 1:07Villafana stated that the two CVRA petitioners never communicated their
- 1:12desire to me or the FBI case agents, and my
- 1:15role was to evaluate the entire situation, consider the input
- 1:19received from all the victims, and allow the office to
- 1:22exercise its prosecutorial discretion accordingly. She also noted that some
- 1:27victims feared having their involvement with Epstein revealed and the
- 1:30negative impact it would have on their relationships with family members, boyfriends, etc.
- 1:35In the FBI case agents twenty seventeen declaration filed in
- 1:39the CVRA litigation, she stated during interviews conducted from two
- 1:43thousand and six to two thousand and eight, no victims
- 1:45expressed a strong opinion that Epstein be prosecuted. She further
- 1:49described the concerns of some of the victims. Throughout the investigation,
- 1:53we interviewed many of Epstein's victims. A majority of the
- 1:56victims expressed concern about the possible disclosure of their identity
- 2:00to the public. A number of the victims raised concerns
- 2:03about having to testify and or their parents finding out
- 2:06about their involvement with mister Epstein. Additionally, for some victims
- 2:11learning of the Epstein investigation and possible exposure of their
- 2:14identities cause them emotional distress. Overall, many of the victims
- 2:19were troubled about the existence of the investigation. They displayed
- 2:23feelings of embarrassment and humiliation, and were reluctant to talk
- 2:27to investigators. Some victims who were identified through the investigation
- 2:32refused even to speak with us. Our concerns about the
- 2:35victims well being and getting to the truth were always
- 2:38at the forefront of our handling of the investigation. The
- 2:42case agent told OPR that although she encountered victims who
- 2:45were strong and believable, she did not encounter any who
- 2:49vigorously advocated for the prosecution of Epstein. Rather, they were embarrassed,
- 2:53didn't want their parents to know, and wanted to forget.
- 2:57As of September twenty fourth, two thousand and seven, the
- 3:00date the NPA was signed, Villa Fauna informed Epstein attorney
- 3:03Lefkowitz that she had compiled a preliminary list of victims,
- 3:07including thirty four confirmed the miners and six other potential
- 3:11minor victims who had not yet been interviewed by the FBI.
- 3:15Although the government had contacted many victims before the NPA
- 3:18was signed. Villa Fauna acknowledged during the CVRA litigation that
- 3:22individual victims were not consulted regarding the agreement B before
- 3:27the NPA is signed. Villa Fauna expresses concern that victims
- 3:31have not been consulted before the NPA was signed. Villa
- 3:34Fauna articulated to her supervisor's concerns about the government's failure
- 3:38to consult with the victims. One July two thousand seven.
- 3:42Vilafauna's email exchanges with Menchel. In July two thousand seven,
- 3:47Villa Fauna learned that Menchell had discussed with defense counsel
- 3:50Sanchez a possible state resolution to the federal investigation of Epstein.
- 3:56Villafana was upset by this information and sent a strongly
- 3:59worded email to Menel voicing her concerns. A full account
- 4:02of their email exchange is set forth at Chapter two,
- 4:05Part one, Section four A two. In that email, she
- 4:09told them that it was inappropriate for you to make
- 4:12a plea offer that you know is completely unacceptable to
- 4:15the FBI, ice, the victims, and me. These plea negotiations
- 4:19violate all of the various iterations of the victims' rights legislation,
- 4:24Vila Fauna explained to OPR her reference to the victims,
- 4:27My concern was that Menchell was violating the CVRA, which
- 4:30requires the attorneys for the government, which includes me, to
- 4:33confer with the victims, and the VRRA, which requires the
- 4:37agents to keep the victims apprized of what's happening with
- 4:40the case. So, in essence, I felt like he was
- 4:43exposing both myself and the agent's allegations of not abiding
- 4:47by our obligations by engaging in these plea negotiations without
- 4:51letting us know about it. In his reply to Villafauna's email,
- 4:54and after noting that he found her email totally inappropriate,
- 4:58Menchell denied that he had violate any department policy, and
- 5:02he noted that as Chief of the Criminal Division, I'm
- 5:04the person designated by the US Attorney to exercise appropriate
- 5:08discretion in deciding whether certain pleas are appropriate and consistent
- 5:12with departmental policy. Perceiving Menchell's rebuke as criticism of her judgment,
- 5:17Villafana responded, raising concerns about the forgotten voices of victims
- 5:21in this case should not be classified as a lapse
- 5:24of judgment, and that her first and only concern in
- 5:27this case is the victims. Menchell told ol PR that
- 5:30he did not view this conversation with Sanchez as a
- 5:33plea offer, asserted that he was not obligated to consult
- 5:36with victims during preliminary settlement negotiations, and noted that he
- 5:40left the USAO before the NPA was fully negotiated or signed.
- 5:45Menchell told oh PR that you have discussions with the
- 5:48defense all the time, and the notion that even just
- 5:51having a general discussion is something that must be vetted
- 5:53with victims is not even in the same universe as
- 5:56to how I think about this. Menchell also observed that
- 6:00on the very day that Villa Fauna criticized him for
- 6:03engaging in settlement negotiations without consulting her, the FBI, or
- 6:07the victims, Villa Fauna had herself sent an email to
- 6:10Sanchez offering to discuss the possibility of a federal resolution
- 6:14of mister Epstein's case that could run concurrently with any
- 6:17state resolution without having spoken to the victims about her proposal. Two.
- 6:23Villa Fauna asserts that her supervisors gave instructions not to
- 6:26consult victims about the plea discussions, but her supervisors do
- 6:30not currently recall such instructions. Villa Fauna told OPR that
- 6:34during an early meeting with a cost of Sloman and Menchel,
- 6:37which took place when we were probably just entering into
- 6:39PLEA negotiations, she raised the government's obligation to confer with victims. Initially,
- 6:45Villa Fauna told OPR she was instructed don't talk to
- 6:48the victims, don't tell them what's happening, but she was
- 6:51not told why she should not speak to the victims,
- 6:53and she cannot recall who gave her this instruction. In
- 6:56a subsequent OPR interview, Villa Fauna recalled that when she
- 7:00raised the issue of notification during the meeting, she was
- 7:03told PLEA negotiations are confidential, you can't disclose them. Villa
- 7:07Fauna remained uncertain who gave her this instruction, but believed
- 7:11it may have been a Costa. Neither Acosta, Slowman nor
- 7:14Menchal recalled a meeting at which Villa Fauna was directed
- 7:17not to notify the victims. A Costa told OPR that
- 7:21the decision whether to solicit the victim's view is something
- 7:24that I think was the focus of the trial team
- 7:27and not something that I was focused on. At least
- 7:29not at the time, and he did not recall discussions
- 7:32about victim notification until after the NPA was signed. Slowman
- 7:36also told OPR that he did not recall a meeting
- 7:39at which victim notification was discussed. Menchell wrote his response
- 7:44to OPR, I have no recollection of any discussions or
- 7:47decisions regarding whether the USAO should notify victims of its
- 7:51intention to enter into a precharged disposition of the Epstein matter. Furthermore,
- 7:56Mencheal told OPR he could not think of a reason
- 7:58why the issue of victim notification would have arisen before
- 8:02he left the USAO, because we were way off from
- 8:04finalizing or having anything even close to a deal, and
- 8:07it would have been premature to consider notification. Three September six,
- 8:13two thousand and seven, Villa Fauna informed Slowman, who informs Acosta,
- 8:17of Osterbond's opinion that consultation with victims was required. On
- 8:21September sixth, two thousand and seven, and a lengthy email
- 8:24to Slowman responding to his question about the governments then
- 8:27pending offer to the defense, Vila Fanna raised the victim
- 8:31consultation issue, advising that the agents and I have not
- 8:34reached out to the victims to get their approval, which,
- 8:37as CEOs Chief Osterbond politely reminded me, is required under
- 8:42the law, and that the Palm Beach Police Department chief
- 8:45wanted to know if the victims had been consulted about
- 8:48the deal. Sloman forwarded this email to Acosta. Villa Fauna
- 8:51recalled that Slowman responded to her email by telephone, possibly
- 8:55after he had spoken to Acosta, and stated, you can't
- 8:58do that now. Villa Fauna did not recall Slowman explaining
- 9:02at the time the reason for that instruction. Vila Fauna
- 9:06told OPR that shortly before the NPA was signed, Slowman
- 9:09told her, we've been advised that precharge resolutions do not
- 9:13require victim notification. Sloman did not recall any discussions before
- 9:17the NPA was signed about contacting the victims or conferring
- 9:21with them regarding the potential resolution of the case. Slowman
- 9:25told OPR that he did not think that we had
- 9:27to consult the victims prior to entering into the NPA,
- 9:31and we did not have to seek approval from victims
- 9:33to resolve the case. We did have an obligation to
- 9:36notify them of the resolution in filed cases. Sloman said
- 9:40that no one other than Villa Fauna raised a notification issue,
- 9:44and because the USAO envisioned the state court resolution of
- 9:47the matter, Slowman did not think we had to consult
- 9:50with victims prior to entering into the NPA. Lourie told
- 9:53OPR that he had no memory of Villa Fauna being
- 9:56directed not to speak to the victims about the NPA. Similarly,
- 10:01the attorney who assumed Lorie's supervisory duties after Lori transitioned
- 10:05to his detail in the department told OPR that he
- 10:08did not recall any discussions regarding victim notification and he
- 10:12assumed that was being handled. Acosta did not recall the
- 10:15September sixth, two thousand and seven email, but told OPR
- 10:18that there is no requirement to notify the victims because
- 10:21it's not a plea. It's deferring in favor of state prosecution.
- 10:26Acosta told OPR that he could not recall any pre
- 10:29NPA discussions regarding victim notification or any particular concern that
- 10:33factored into the decision not to consult with the victims
- 10:37before entering into the NPA. Ultimately, Acosta acknowledged the OPR clearly,
- 10:42given the way it's played out, it may have been
- 10:45much better if we had consulted with the victims. CEO's
- 10:49chief Osterbahd told OPR that he disagreed with the USAO
- 10:53stance that the CVR did not require pre charge victim consultation,
- 10:57but in his view, the USAO posture was not an
- 11:00abusive discretion or an ethical issue, but rather reflected a
- 11:04serious and legitimate disagreement regarding the cvra's requirements. Osterband's disagreement
- 11:09was based on policy considerations, and he told OPR from
- 11:13a policy perspective, CEOs would not take a position that
- 11:17wouldn't consult with the victims. Osterbond was told OPR that
- 11:22whether or not the law required it, the victims should
- 11:25have been given an opportunity to weigh directly, but he
- 11:28did not fault the usao's motivations for failing to provide
- 11:31that opportunity. The people I know, Andy Jeff were trying
- 11:36to do the right thing. They weren't acting on ethically.
- 11:38I just disagree with the outcome, but the point is
- 11:41they were trying to do the thing that was proper.
- 11:43It was more of this question of you can let
- 11:46the victims weigh in on this. You can get their
- 11:48input on this, and maybe it doesn't sway you. You
- 11:51still do what you're going to do. But it's hard
- 11:53to say it was a complete, completely clean exercise of
- 11:57prosecutorial discretion when the USAO didn't really know what the
- 12:01victims would say, Slowman told OPR, I don't think we
- 12:05had a concern about entering into the NPA at that
- 12:08point in terms of notifying victims. I was under the
- 12:11perception that once the NPA was entered into and Epstein
- 12:14was going to enter a guilty plea in state court,
- 12:16that we were going to notify the victims. All right, folks,
- 12:19we're gonna wrap up right there, and then the next
- 12:21episode we're gonna pick up with Part seven September twenty fourth,
- 12:25two thousand and seven. June thirtieth, two thousand and eight,
- 12:29After the NPA is signed, the USAO makes various victim
- 12:32notification decisions. All of the information that goes with this
- 12:36episode can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone,
- 12:40and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode,
- 12:43we're gonna pick up where we left off with the
- 12:45OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's NPA part seven September twenty fourth,
- 12:52two thousand and seven through June thirtieth, two thousand and eight.
- 12:56After the NPA is signed, the USAO makes various victim
- 12:59noticecation decisions. The contemporaneous emails may clear that once the
- 13:04NPA was signed, Villa Fauna and the case agents planned
- 13:08to inform the victims about the resolution of the federal investigation. However,
- 13:13the emails also show that the USAO was unclear about
- 13:17how much information could be given to the victims in
- 13:20light of the NPA's non disclosure provision, and consulted with
- 13:23Epstein's defense counsel regarding victim notifications. As a result, although
- 13:29the expectation in the USAO was the victims would be
- 13:32informed about the NPA, the monetary Damage's provision, and the
- 13:36state plea, the USAO became entangled in more negotiations with
- 13:41the defense attorneys, who strongly objected to the government's notification plan.
- 13:46In addition, Villa Fauna and the case agents grew concerned
- 13:49that notifying the victims about the NPA Monetary Damage's provision
- 13:53would damage the victim's credibility if Epstein breached the NPA.
- 13:57And the case went to trial. DA Costa decided to
- 14:01defer to the state attorney's discretion whether to notify the
- 14:04victims about the state plea, and information about the NPA
- 14:08and the monetary damage's provision was not provided to victims
- 14:12until after Epstein pled guilty in June of two thousand
- 14:15and eight. Hey September through October two thousand and seven,
- 14:19the case agents notify some victims about the NPA, but
- 14:23stop when the case agent becomes concerned about potential impeachment.
- 14:27In transmitting the signed NPA to Villafauna. On September twenty fourth,
- 14:31two thousand and seven, defense attorney left Golwitz asked Villa
- 14:34Fauna to do whatever you can to prevent the NPA
- 14:37from becoming public. Villa Fauna forwarded this email to Acosta, Lori,
- 14:42and the New West Palm Beach manager, noting that I
- 14:45don't intend to do anything with it except to put
- 14:47it in the case file. A Costa responded that he
- 14:50thought the NPA already binds us not to make it
- 14:53public except as required by law or Freedom of Information Act,
- 14:57and noted that because the USAO would not proactively inform
- 15:01the media about the NPA, this is the state attorney's show,
- 15:05a Costa added, in other words, what more does he want?
- 15:08Villafana responded, my guess is that if we tell anyone else,
- 15:12like the police chief or the FBI or the girls,
- 15:14that we ask them not to disclose. Laurie agreed, noting
- 15:18that there really is no reason to tell anyone all
- 15:21the details of the non prosecution or provide a copy.
- 15:25The Palm Beach chief was only concerned that he not
- 15:27gets surprised by all this. A Costa responded that he
- 15:30would set up a call on September twenty six, two
- 15:33thousand and seven, to talk about who we can tell
- 15:36and how much. Also on September twenty fourth, two thousand seven,
- 15:40Villa Fauna emailed the new West Palm Beach manager to
- 15:43inform them that once the attorney representative was appointed for
- 15:47the victims, she planned to meet with the girls myself
- 15:50to explain how the system for obtaining relief under US
- 15:53Code eighteen, Section twenty two fifty five will work. Villa
- 15:57Fauna also emailed left Quwitz, stating that she plan to
- 16:00discuss with them what I can tell you the attorney
- 16:03representative and the girls about the agreement and She assured
- 16:06lef Kuwitz that her office is telling chief writer not
- 16:09to disclose the outcome to anyone. Villa Fauna also provided
- 16:13lef Kuwitz with a list of potential candidates for the
- 16:16attorney representative position and advanced for an attorney representative who
- 16:20would minimize press coverage of the matter. On September twenty six,
- 16:24two thousand and seven, Villa Fauna email left Kuwitz to
- 16:27request guidance on informing the victims about the NPA. Can
- 16:31you give me a call on meeting with the agents
- 16:33and want to give them there are marching orders regarding
- 16:36what they can tell the girls. Villafanna told OPR that
- 16:39because the government and the defense had not agreed on
- 16:42the attorney representative for the victims, she reached out to
- 16:45the defense at the direction of either Acosta or Sloman,
- 16:49in order to coordinate how to inform the victims about
- 16:52the resolution of the case and the fact that there
- 16:54would be an attorney to assist them in recovering monetary
- 16:57damages from Epsteinauna told OPR that the defense responded to
- 17:02her email by complaining to her supervisors that she should
- 17:06not be involved in such notifications. According to Villa Fauna.
- 17:09Sloman then directed her to have the case agents make
- 17:12the victim notifications. Accordingly, Villa Fauna directed the case agents
- 17:16to me with the victims to provide them with information
- 17:19regarding the terms of the NPA and the conclusion of
- 17:22the federal investigation. The case agent told OPR that there
- 17:26was a discussion that Marie and I had as to
- 17:29how we would tell them and what we would tell them,
- 17:32and that was I don't recall, but it was the
- 17:35terms of the agreement. Villafana believed that if victims were
- 17:38properly notified of the terms of the NPA that applied
- 17:41to them regarding their right to seek damages from Epstein
- 17:44and he paid those damages, that the rest of the
- 17:47NPA doesn't need to be disclosed. Villafauna anticipated that the
- 17:51case agents would be able to inform the victims of
- 17:54the date of the state court change of plea, and
- 17:56that date had not yet been set by state authorities
- 17:59at the time the first victims were notified by the FBI.
- 18:03Philafauna told OPR that it was her belief that because
- 18:07the USAO had agreed to a confidentiality clause, the government
- 18:11could not disclose the NPA to the general public, but
- 18:14victims could be informed because by its terms, they needed
- 18:18to be told what the agreement was about. Villa Fauna
- 18:21told OPR that no one in her supervisory chain expressed
- 18:25the concerns that a victims learned of the NPA, they
- 18:27would try to prevent Epstein from entering a plea. Within
- 18:31a week after the NPA was signed, news media began
- 18:34reporting that the parties had reached a deal to resolve
- 18:37the Epstein case. For example, on October one, two thousand
- 18:40and seven, the New York Post reported that Epstein has
- 18:43agreed to plead guilty to soliciting underage prostitutes at his
- 18:47Florida mansion in a deal that will send him to
- 18:50prison for about eighteen months, and noted that Epstein would
- 18:53plead guilty in state court and that the Feds have
- 18:56agreed to drop their probe into possible federal criminal violation
- 19:00in exchange for the guilty plea to the new state charge.
- 19:03The case agent recalled informing some victims that there was
- 19:07an agreement reached and we would not be pursuing it federally.
- 19:10In October two thousand and seven, for example, the case
- 19:13agents met with victim Courtney Wilde to adviser of the
- 19:16main terms of the non prosecution agreement. According to the
- 19:20case agent, during the meeting, the case agent's wholewild that
- 19:23an agreement had been reached, mister Epstein was going to
- 19:26plead guilty to two state charges and there would not
- 19:29be a federal prosecution. However, in a declaration filed in
- 19:33twenty fifteen in the CVRA litigation, wild described the conversation differently.
- 19:38The agents explained that Epstein was also being charged in
- 19:42state court and may plead to state charges related to
- 19:45some of his other victims. I knew that state charges
- 19:48had nothing to do with me. During this meeting, the
- 19:50agents did not explain that an agreement had already been
- 19:53signed that precluded any prosecution of Epstein for federal charges
- 19:57against me. I did not get the opportunity to meet
- 20:00or to confer with the prosecuting attorneys about any potential
- 20:04federal deal that related to me or the crimes committed
- 20:07against me. My understanding of the agent's explanation was the
- 20:11federal investigation would continue. I also understood that my own
- 20:16case would move forward towards prosecution of Epstein. In addition,
- 20:20the case agent spoke to two other victims relayed their
- 20:23reactions to Villafauna via an email. Jane Doe number fourteen
- 20:27asked why Epstein was receiving such a light jail sentence,
- 20:31and Jane Doe number thirteen has asked for our victim
- 20:34witness coordinator to get in touch with her so she
- 20:37can receive some much needed professional counseling. Other than that,
- 20:41their response was filled with emotion and grateful to the
- 20:44federal authorities for pursuing justice and not giving up. The
- 20:48case agent told OPR that when she informed one of
- 20:51these victims, that individual cried and expressed the sense of relief.
- 20:55Counsel for Jane Do thirteen told OPR that while his
- 20:59client recalled meeting with the FBI on a number of occasions,
- 21:02she did not recall receiving any information about Epstein's guilty plea.
- 21:07In a letter to OPR, Jane No. Number fourteen's attorney
- 21:10stated that although her client recalled speaking with an FBI agent,
- 21:14she was not told about the NPA or informed that
- 21:17Epstein would not face federal charges in exchange for a
- 21:20state court plea. After meeting with these victims, the FBI
- 21:24case agent became concerned that if Epstein breached the NPA
- 21:29and the case went to federal trial, the defense could
- 21:31use the victims knowledge of the NPA's monetary damages provision
- 21:35as a basis to impeach the victims. The case agent
- 21:38explained to OPR that she became uncomfortable talking to the
- 21:42victims about the damage's provision and that as the lead investigator,
- 21:46if we end up going to trial, if mister Epstein
- 21:49breached this, that I would be on the stand testifying
- 21:53that I told every one of these girls that they
- 21:55could sue mister Epstein for money, and I was not
- 21:58comfortable with that. I didn't think it was right. Similarly,
- 22:02the co case agent told OPR, that's why we went
- 22:05back to Marie Villa Fauna, and we're not comfortable now
- 22:08putting this out there because it's likely that the case
- 22:10agent and I are going to have to take the
- 22:12stand if it went to trial, and this could be
- 22:15a problem. Villa Fauna told OPR that the case agents
- 22:18were concerned they would be accused of offering a bribe
- 22:21for victims to enhance their stories, and that the defense
- 22:25would try to have Villa Fauna or the case agents
- 22:27removed from the case. Both the lead case agent and
- 22:31Villa Fauna told OPR that after the FBI I raised
- 22:34with Villa Fauna a concern that notifying the victims could
- 22:37create potential impeachment material in the event of a breach
- 22:41and subsequent trial, they contacted the usao's Professional Responsibility Officer
- 22:46for advice. Villa Fauna recalled that during a brief telephone consultation,
- 22:51the Professional Responsibility Officer advised her and the case agent
- 22:55that it's not really that big of a concern, but
- 22:58if you're concerned about it, then you should stop making
- 23:01the notification. In her twenty seventeen CVRA declaration, the case
- 23:06agent stated that after conferring with the USAO, the case
- 23:09agent stopped notifying victims about the NPA. B October two
- 23:14thousand and seven. Defense attorneys object to government victim notifications.
- 23:19While the case agents and Villa Fauna ordered the impact
- 23:22that notifying the victims about the resolution of the case
- 23:25might have had on a potential trial. Defense Council also
- 23:28raised concerns about what the victims could be told about
- 23:32the NPA, as discussed in Chapter two. After the NPA
- 23:36was signed on September twenty fourth, two thousand and seven,
- 23:39the USAO proposed using a special master to select the
- 23:43attorney representative for the victims, which led to further discussions
- 23:46about the twenty two to fifty five provision. On October fifth,
- 23:51two thousand and seven, when Defense Attorney left Kowitz sent
- 23:54Villa Fauna a letter responding to the usao's proposal to
- 23:57use a special master. He cautioned that neither federal agents
- 24:01nor anyone from your office should contact the identified individuals
- 24:05to inform them of the resolution of the case, because
- 24:08such communications would violate the confidentiality of the agreement and
- 24:13would prevent Epstein from having control over what is communicated
- 24:17to be identified individuals at this most critical stage. Lefkowitz
- 24:21followed this communication with an October tenth, two thousand and seven,
- 24:24letter to Acosta, arguing that neither federal agents nor anyone
- 24:28from your office should contact the identified individuals to inform
- 24:32them of the resolution of the case. Rather, Lefkowitz wanted
- 24:36to participate in crafting a mutually acceptable communication to the
- 24:40identified individuals. On October twenty three, two thousand and seven,
- 24:45Villafauna raised the issue of victim notification with Sloman, stating
- 24:50we also have to contact the victims to tell them
- 24:52about the outcome of the case and to advise them
- 24:55that an attorney will be contacting them regarding possible claims
- 24:58against mister Epstein. If we don't do that, it may
- 25:01be a violation of the Florida Bar rules for the
- 25:04selected attorney to cold call the girls, as discussed in
- 25:07greater detail in chapter two. On October twenty third, two
- 25:11thousand and seven, left Kowitz sent Acosta a letter stating
- 25:14that Epstein expected to enter a guilty plea in state
- 25:16court on November twentieth, two thousand and seven, and thanking
- 25:20Acosta for agreeing on October twelfth, two thousand and seven,
- 25:24not to contact any of the identified individuals, potential witnesses,
- 25:28or potential civil claimants and their respective council in this matter.
- 25:32Shortly thereafter, Sloman drafted a response to lef Kowitz letter,
- 25:36which A Costa revised to clarify the inaccurate representations made
- 25:40by Lefkowitz, in particular noting that Acosta did not agree
- 25:44to a gag order with regard to victim contact. The
- 25:47draft response is revised by Acosta stated you should understand, however,
- 25:52that there are some communications that are typical in these matters.
- 25:56As an example, our office has an obligation to contact
- 25:59the victims to inform them that either the Special Master
- 26:03or his designee will be contacting them. Rest assured that
- 26:06we will continue to treat this matter as we would
- 26:09any similarly situated case. In a November fifth, two thousand
- 26:13and seven letter, Slowman canplain to Lefkowitz that private investigators
- 26:17working for Epstein had been contacting victims and asking whether
- 26:21government agents had discussed financial settlements with them. Sloman noted
- 26:26that the private investigator's actions are troublesome because the FBI
- 26:29agents legally are required to advise the victims of the
- 26:32resolution of the matter, which includes informing them that as
- 26:36part of the resolution, mister Epstein has agreed to pay
- 26:39damages in some circumstances. That same day, Villa Fauna emailed
- 26:44Slowman expressing her concern that if we file charges now,
- 26:47cross examination will consist of and the government told you
- 26:51that if mister Epstein is convicted, you are entitled to
- 26:53a large amount of damages. Right, all right, We're going
- 26:56to wrap this episode up here, and then the next
- 26:58episode we're going to pick up with part c. All
- 27:00of the information that goes with this episode can be
- 27:03found in the description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome
- 27:06back to the Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're picking
- 27:10up where we left off with the OIG report into
- 27:13Jeffrey Epstein's NPA. Se October through November two thousand and seven,
- 27:19the FBI and the USAO continue to investigate, and the
- 27:23FBI sends a noticed letter to one victim stating that
- 27:26the case is under investigation. Although Villa Fauna and the
- 27:29FBI case agents decided to stop informing victims about the NPA,
- 27:34the FBI continued its investigation of the case, which included
- 27:37locating and interviewing potential victims. In October and November two
- 27:42thousand and seven, the FBI interviewed twelve potential new victims,
- 27:46eight of whom had been identified in a preliminary victim
- 27:49list in use at the time Epstein signed the NPA.
- 27:53The FBI reports of the victims interviews do not mention
- 27:56the NPA or indicate that the victims were asked for
- 28:00their input regarding the resolution of the case. Villa Fauna
- 28:03acknowledged that she and the case agents did not tell
- 28:06any of the new post NPA signing victims about the agreement,
- 28:10because at that point we believed that the NPA was
- 28:13never going to be performed and that we were in
- 28:16fact going to be charging mister Epstein. On October twelfth,
- 28:20two thousand and seven, the FBI victim specialist sent a
- 28:23VNS form notice letter to a victim the case agents
- 28:26had interviewed two days earlier. The letter was identical to
- 28:30the VNS form notice letter the FBI victim specialists sent
- 28:34to other victims before the NPA was signed, describing the
- 28:37case as under investigation and requesting the victim's patients. The
- 28:41letter listed D eight CVR rights, but made no mention
- 28:45of the NPA or the section twenty two to fifty
- 28:48five provision. Villa Fauna told OPR she was unaware of
- 28:51the FBI sent the letter, but she knew there were
- 28:54efforts to make sure that we had identified all victims
- 28:57of the crimes under investigation. In response to opr's questions
- 29:02about the accuracy of the FBI's letter characterization of the
- 29:05case as under investigation, Villa Fauna told OPR the NPA
- 29:10required Epstein to and to a plea by October twenty six,
- 29:13two thousand and eight, and at this point we weren't
- 29:15actively looking for additional charges, but the investigation wasn't technically
- 29:20suspended until he completed all the terms of the NPA D.
- 29:25The USAO informs the defense that it intends to notify
- 29:29victims by letter about Epstein's state plea hearing and the
- 29:32resolution of the federal investigation, but the defense strongly objects
- 29:35to the notification plan. In anticipation of Epstein's state court plea,
- 29:40Villa Fauna reported on November sixteenth, two thousand and seven,
- 29:44to Accosta, Sloman, and other supervisors that she had learned
- 29:47from FBI agents who met with Assistant State Attorney Bellohovlk
- 29:52that the State attorney's office wanted the USAO to notify
- 29:56victims of the state plea hearing. Bellohovelk would still like
- 30:00us to do the victim notifications. The state does not
- 30:03have a procedure like we do federally where the court
- 30:06has to provide a separate room for victims who want
- 30:08to attend judicial proceedings, So I do not know how
- 30:11many victims will actually want to be present. Bellehovlik told
- 30:15OPR that she did not recall the conversation reference by
- 30:18the FBI, nor any coordination between her office and federal
- 30:22officials to contact or notify victims about Epstein's state plearing.
- 30:27On November nineteenth, two thousand and seven, Villa Fauna decided
- 30:30that to avoid any misconduct accusations from the defense about
- 30:34the information given to victims, she would put the victim
- 30:37notification in writing. She provided Slowman with a draft victim
- 30:42notification letter, in which, among other things, she would inform
- 30:45victims of the terms of the resolution of the federal case,
- 30:49including Epstein's agreement to plead guilty to state charges and
- 30:53serve eighteen months in county jail, and the victim's ability
- 30:56to seek monetary damages against Epstein. The letter also would
- 31:00invite victims to appear at the state court hearing and
- 31:03make a statement under oath or provide a written statement
- 31:06to be filed by the State Attorney's office. Sloman and
- 31:10Villa Fauna exchange debits on the draft victim notification letter,
- 31:14and Villafauna also informed Sloman that there are a few
- 31:17girls who didn't receive the original letters, so I will
- 31:20need to modify the introductory portion of the letter for those.
- 31:24Sloman informed Leftkowitz of the government's need to meet its
- 31:27statutory obligation Justice for All Act of two thousand and
- 31:31four to notify the victims of the anticipated upcoming events
- 31:35and their rights associated with the agreement end his intent
- 31:38to notify the victims by letter after cob Thursday, November
- 31:42twenty ninth, Lefkowitz objected to the proposal to notify the victims,
- 31:46asserting that it was incendiary and inappropriate and not warranted
- 31:51under the Justice for All Act of two thousand and four.
- 31:54He argued that the defense should have a right to
- 31:56review and make objections to that submission prior to it
- 31:59being being sent to any alleged victims. He also insisted
- 32:03that if any notification letters were sent to victims who
- 32:06still have not been identified to us, it should happen
- 32:09only after mister Epstein has entered his plea, and that
- 32:12letter should come from the Attorney representative rather than the government.
- 32:16On November twenty eighth, two thousand and seven, at Sloman's instruction,
- 32:20Bilifauna provided Lefkowitz with the draft victim notification letter, which
- 32:24would advise victims that the State Court plea would occur.
- 32:28On December fourteenth, two thousand and seven. In a November
- 32:31twenty ninth, two thousand and seven, letter to Acosta, left
- 32:34Kowitz strongly objected to the proposed draft notification letter, arguing
- 32:39that the government was not obligated to send any letter
- 32:41to victims until after Epstein's plea in sentencing. Left Kowitz
- 32:46also contended that the victims had no right to appear
- 32:49at Epstein's state plea hearing and sentencing, or to provide
- 32:52a written statement for such a proceeding. In a November thirtieth,
- 32:56two thousand and seven reply letter to Leftkowitz, Acosta did
- 33:00not address the substance of left Quit's arguments, but accused
- 33:03the defense team of in essence presenting collateral challenges the
- 33:07laying effectuation of the NPA, and asserted that if Epstein
- 33:12was dissatisfied with the NPA, we stand ready to unwine
- 33:15the agreement and proceed to trial. Shortly thereafter, Acosta informed
- 33:19the Defense Council starr by letter that he had directed
- 33:23prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday
- 33:27at five pm to provide Jue with time to review
- 33:30these options with your client. In the letter, Acosta also
- 33:34refuted defense allegations that Villa Fauna had acted improperly by
- 33:38informing the victims of the potential for receiving monetary damages,
- 33:42stating that the victims were not told of the availability
- 33:46of Section twenty two to fifty five relief during the
- 33:49investigation phase of this matter. On December fifth, two thousand
- 33:53and seven, Star and left Kwitz sent a letter to
- 33:55Acosta with copies to Slowman and Assistant Attorney General Fisher
- 33:59reaffes firming the NPA, but taking serious issue with the
- 34:03usao's interpretation of the agreement and the use of section
- 34:07twenty two to fifty five. The Star in Leftkowitz letter
- 34:10asserted it was wholly inappropriate for the USAO to send
- 34:14the proposed victim notification letter under any circumstances, and strongly
- 34:18urged the COSTA to withhold the notification letter until after
- 34:22the Defense was able to discuss this matter with Assistant
- 34:25Attorney General Fisher. The following day, Sloman sent a letter
- 34:29Lefkowitz with copies to Acosta and Villafauna, asserting that the
- 34:34obligated the government to notify victims of the US Code eighteen,
- 34:38Section twenty two to fifty five proceedings as other relief
- 34:42to which they are entitled. Sloman also stated that the
- 34:47obligated the government to provide the victims with information concerning
- 34:51restitution to which they may be entitled and the earliest
- 34:54possible notice of the status of the investigation, the filing
- 34:58of charges, and the acceptance of plas emphasis and original.
- 35:02Slowman added, just as in US Code eighteen, section thirty
- 35:06seven seventy one, these sections are not limited to proceedings
- 35:09in federal district court. Our non prosecution agreement resolves the
- 35:13federal investigation by allowing mister Epstein to plead to a
- 35:17state defense. The victims identified through the federal investigation should
- 35:21be appropriately informed, and our non prosecution agreement does not
- 35:25require the U. S. Attorney's Office to forego its legal obligations.
- 35:29Slowman also addresses the defense objection to advising the victims
- 35:33to contact Villafauna or the FBI case agent with questions
- 35:37or concerns. Again, federal law requires that victims have the
- 35:40reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the government
- 35:43in the case. Slowman advised the defense the three victims
- 35:47who were notified prior to your objection had questions directed
- 35:50to mister Epstein's punishment, not the civil litigation. Those questions
- 35:54are appropriately directed to law enforcement. Along with this letter,
- 35:58Slowman forwarded to Lefkowitz or comment or revised draft victim
- 36:02notification letter that was substantially similar to the prior draft
- 36:05provided to the defense. The letter stated that the federal
- 36:08investigation of Jeffrey Epstein had been completed, Epstein would plead
- 36:12guilty in state court, Those parties would recommend eighteen months
- 36:16of imprisonment at sentencing, and Epstein would compensate victims for
- 36:20damages and claims brought under US Code eighteen, section twenty
- 36:24two fifty five. The letter provided specific information concerning the
- 36:28upcoming change of plea hearing, as I mentioned above, is
- 36:31part of the resolution of the federal investigation. Mister Epstein
- 36:35has agreed to plead guilty to stay charges. Mister Epstein's
- 36:39change of plea and sentencing will occur on December fourteenth,
- 36:42two thousand and seven, before Judge Sandra came Vick Sorely
- 36:46in Courtroom eleven F at the Palm Beach County Courthouse,
- 36:50pursuant of Florida Statute section nine six zero dot zero
- 36:54zero one K and nine two one dot one four
- 36:57to three one. You are entitled to be present to
- 36:59make a statement under oath. If you choose, you can
- 37:02submit a written statement under oath, which may be filed
- 37:05by the State Attorney's Office on your behalf. If you
- 37:08elect to prepare a written statement, it should address the
- 37:11following the facts of the case and any extent of
- 37:14any harm, including social, psychological or physical harm, financial losses,
- 37:19loss of earnings directly or indirectly resulting from the crime
- 37:23for which the defendant is being sentenced, and any matter
- 37:26relevant to an appropriate disposition and sentence. Slowman told OPR
- 37:31that he was proceeding under the belief that we are
- 37:34going to notify the victims, even though it wasn't a
- 37:36federal case, whether we were required to or not. Slowman
- 37:40also told OPR that while we didn't think that we
- 37:43had an obligation to send them victim notification letters, I
- 37:46think Marie and the agents were keeping the victims apprized
- 37:50at some level. On December seventh, two thousand and seven,
- 37:53Villa Fauna prepared letters containing the above information to be
- 37:56sent to multiple victims. An email to a Costa in
- 37:59Slowman requesting permission to send them Slowman, however, had that
- 38:03day received a letter from Sanchez advising that Epstein's plea
- 38:07hearing was scheduled for January fourth, two thousand and eight,
- 38:11and requesting that the USAO hold off sending the victim
- 38:14notification letters until we can further discuss the contents. Also
- 38:18that day, starn Lefquwitz submitted to ACOSTA the two lengthy
- 38:22independent ethics opinions supporting the defense arguments against the federal
- 38:26investigation and the NPA's use of US Code eighteen, Section
- 38:30twenty two fifty five. Slowman responded to Villa Fauna's request
- 38:34with an email instructing her to hold the letter. Slowman
- 38:37told OPR that he wanted to push the victim notification
- 38:40letter out, but his instruction to Villa Fauna was the
- 38:43product of me speaking to somebody, although he cannot be
- 38:47definitive as to whom. Slowman further told OPR that once
- 38:51the NPA looked like it was going to fall apart,
- 38:54the USAO had concerns that if we gave them the
- 38:57victim notification letter and the deal fell apart, than the
- 39:00victims would be instantly impeached by the provision that you're
- 39:04entitled to monetary compensation. On December tenth, two thousand and seven,
- 39:08Villa Fauna contacted the attorney who at the time represented
- 39:11the victim who later became CVR petitioner Jane Do two,
- 39:15to inform him that she was preparing victim notification letters.
- 39:19In her twenty seventeen declaration filed in the CVR A litigation,
- 39:24Villa Fauna noted that she reached out to Jane Number
- 39:27two's council despite the fact that the USAO no longer
- 39:31considered her a victim for purposes of the federal charges
- 39:34and continue to treat her as a victim, because she
- 39:37wanted to go above and beyond in terms of caring
- 39:40for the victims. All right, folks, we're going to wrap
- 39:42up right here, and in the next episode dealing with
- 39:45the topic, we're going to pick up with Section E.
- 39:47All of the information that goes with this episode can
- 39:50be found in the description box.