Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Origins of life (featuring Dr. Katrine Whiteson)
Transcript
- 0:07Speaker 1: How do you go from a barren planet being bombarded
- 0:10Speaker 1: with asteroids to a planet that, over four billion plus years,
- 0:14Speaker 1: has been home to what is probably billions of species.
- 0:18Speaker 1: This is Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe, so you're not
- 0:21Speaker 1: going to be surprised to learn that we're not one
- 0:23Speaker 1: hundred percent sure yet, but as this is one of
- 0:25Speaker 1: the most profound questions humans can ask, scientists have certainly
- 0:29Speaker 1: been working on it.
- 0:30Speaker 2: So on today's show, we're going to.
- 0:32Speaker 1: Talk about what we know so far about the origins
- 0:34Speaker 1: of life. Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe.
- 0:52Speaker 3: Hi. I'm Daniel.
- 0:53Speaker 4: I'm a particle physicist who likes to think about aliens,
- 0:56Speaker 4: and I consider the origin of life to be sort
- 0:59Speaker 4: of the Big Bang of biology.
- 1:01Speaker 2: Oh hello, I'm Kelly.
- 1:02Speaker 1: I study parasites and space and go ahead elaborate. Why
- 1:06Speaker 1: is ool origins of life analogous to the Big Bang?
- 1:11Speaker 4: Because it's so important, it's so mysterious, it's not widely
- 1:15Speaker 4: understood by scientists in the sense that it's still, you know,
- 1:19Speaker 4: an open question, and how much we don't understand about
- 1:22Speaker 4: it is deeply misunderstood by the public.
- 1:25Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I learned so much when I was researching
- 1:28Speaker 1: this episode, so I would definitely agree with you. This
- 1:31Speaker 1: was quite a journey to go on, and it's a
- 1:33Speaker 1: journey that a bunch of our listeners have wanted us
- 1:35Speaker 1: to go on for a while. So we've gotten a
- 1:37Speaker 1: lot of requests for early life episodes. When you study
- 1:41Speaker 1: early life, that sounds like a biology question, But it's
- 1:45Speaker 1: a chemistry question, guys.
- 1:47Speaker 2: It's a chemistry question.
- 1:48Speaker 1: So I've been trying to avoid this for a while,
- 1:52Speaker 1: but I could put it off no longer because it
- 1:54Speaker 1: is actually a fascinating topic.
- 1:56Speaker 4: And turns out chemistry is kind of unavoidable.
- 1:58Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
- 1:59Speaker 1: So so hat tip to Jeff for asking us for
- 2:02Speaker 1: episodes on early life, and to Frank who suggested that
- 2:05Speaker 1: I check out doctor Nick Lane's work. He wrote a
- 2:07Speaker 1: great book called The Vital Question, for example, and I
- 2:10Speaker 1: did read that.
- 2:11Speaker 4: And because neither of us are chemists, but I'm married
- 2:14Speaker 4: to somebody who has a PhD in biochemistry, we decided
- 2:17Speaker 4: to bring on the podcast our favorite pinch hitter.
- 2:20Speaker 1: Yay, So let's waste no time because nobody really wants
- 2:24Speaker 1: to hear you and I talk when they could hear
- 2:25Speaker 1: Katrina talk so let's bring Katrina on the show.
- 2:28Speaker 4: Okay, then it's my pleasure again to welcome back to
- 2:31Speaker 4: the podcast our favorite guest, or maybe co host, Katrina Whitson,
- 2:37Speaker 4: Director of the Whites and Institute Center for Fermented Beverages
- 2:40Speaker 4: of Dubious Safety. Katrina, Welcome back to the podcast.
- 2:44Speaker 5: Wow, these interests have taken a very interesting turn. But
- 2:48Speaker 5: I just want to say I'm way more of a
- 2:49Speaker 5: sidekick on this one. This is not something where you know,
- 2:53Speaker 5: I've spent a lifetime learning, but it's something I'm very
- 2:56Speaker 5: interested in. So I'm glad we're going to get to
- 2:58Speaker 5: talk about it.
- 2:58Speaker 4: Well, we're always very happy to have your my crobial
- 3:00Speaker 4: expertise on these questions.
- 3:02Speaker 1: And a lot of this stuff is philosophical and so
- 3:04Speaker 1: just having another, you know, fun person to bounce philosophical
- 3:07Speaker 1: ideas off of is good.
- 3:08Speaker 2: And Daniel, are.
- 3:09Speaker 1: You ever gonna move past this kombucha thing? Because it
- 3:13Speaker 1: feels like it's living rent free in your head and
- 3:16Speaker 1: we hear about it all the time.
- 3:19Speaker 4: When she turns into a billion dollar business.
- 3:22Speaker 5: I'll accept it, all right, Well that did happen here
- 3:25Speaker 5: in so Kyle, but I doubt that's going to be
- 3:26Speaker 5: my life plan. There was a guy, the GT Kombucha.
- 3:30Speaker 4: Guy Katrina's Crunchy Kombucha. Oh wait, no, that's a terrible acronym.
- 3:35Speaker 2: No, no, no, yep.
- 3:37Speaker 1: So let's run away from this conversation and into another
- 3:41Speaker 1: conversation that's a bit safer.
- 3:43Speaker 2: So how about what is life?
- 3:45Speaker 1: So you know, when you're trying to figure out where
- 3:47Speaker 1: life came from, what you need is a definition so
- 3:51Speaker 1: that when you see a thing, you can say, Okay.
- 3:53Speaker 2: That's that's life. And so that's what we're working towards.
- 3:55Speaker 1: And it would be helpful if you had a definition
- 3:57Speaker 1: for life that worked tire or anywhere else in the universe.
- 4:01Speaker 1: But we're kind of constrained to what we know is
- 4:04Speaker 1: happening here, and so what we've observed happening on Earth.
- 4:09Speaker 1: Here are some features of life on Earth that can
- 4:11Speaker 1: sort of get the ball rolling. One of those features
- 4:14Speaker 1: is that it's carbon based. And we did a whole
- 4:17Speaker 1: listener question on why we think it's carbon as opposed
- 4:20Speaker 1: to something like silicon silicone.
- 4:22Speaker 2: Silicon silicone is different, Yeah, that's right, that's right. Silicon.
- 4:28Speaker 1: It depends on water and information is carried in DNA
- 4:34Speaker 1: or RNA and so it's genetic. We used to think
- 4:37Speaker 1: that you also had to get energy from the sun,
- 4:40Speaker 1: either directly or indirectly by like eating plants that got
- 4:43Speaker 1: energy from the sun. But in like the seventies, we
- 4:46Speaker 1: discovered that you can get energy from hydrothermal vents. So
- 4:49Speaker 1: even in the last you know, fifty sixty years, we've
- 4:51Speaker 1: been like changing our definition of what we think life is.
- 4:54Speaker 1: So is there anything you too would add to like
- 4:57Speaker 1: features of life on Earth?
- 5:00Speaker 4: It's a pretty good list, but I want to highlight
- 5:02Speaker 4: the difference between features of life on Earth and what
- 5:05Speaker 4: we think life is because we're interested in this question
- 5:09Speaker 4: what is life? Because we're also curious about like where
- 5:12Speaker 4: is life and how common is life? And so we're
- 5:14Speaker 4: interested in, like is there life on Enceladus or you know,
- 5:17Speaker 4: on that other planet, And we don't necessarily expect it
- 5:20Speaker 4: to have all these features, but it's really important to
- 5:23Speaker 4: have a definition so that when we do see it,
- 5:25Speaker 4: we're like, well, is it life? And also so we
- 5:28Speaker 4: can like have a conversation because you know, every good
- 5:31Speaker 4: philosophy conversation starts with the definition, so you make sure
- 5:34Speaker 4: you're at least talking about the same thing and not
- 5:37Speaker 4: discovering you know fifty pages later that you're having two
- 5:40Speaker 4: different arguments.
- 5:41Speaker 1: So do you really think that this is a situation
- 5:43Speaker 1: where we need to have a definition? Because I was
- 5:45Speaker 1: listening to an interview with Nick Lane, who's a guy
- 5:48Speaker 1: who does a bunch of work on this, and it
- 5:50Speaker 1: was actually he was on Brian Keating show and Brian
- 5:53Speaker 1: Keating asked, how, like what is life? How would you
- 5:55Speaker 1: define it? And he said, well, I can't tell you.
- 5:58Speaker 1: It's one of those funny questions. If you get an
- 6:00Speaker 1: answer from someone, it'll be a bad answer. And then
- 6:03Speaker 1: later he actually referred to coming up with the definition
- 6:07Speaker 1: as quote actively unhelpful. And so what do you do?
- 6:13Speaker 1: Does a definition hamstring us? Because we like, especially if
- 6:17Speaker 1: you're searching for life out in the universe, it might
- 6:19Speaker 1: be totally outside of.
- 6:21Speaker 2: What we're familiar with. So how important do you think
- 6:24Speaker 2: a definition is?
- 6:25Speaker 5: I mean, I have to say I find the definition
- 6:28Speaker 5: thing a little boring, if not unhelpful, and I'm.
- 6:32Speaker 2: Glad we're starting with it, yes.
- 6:34Speaker 5: Because so for you know, I've studied viruses a lot,
- 6:39Speaker 5: and viruses are always there's this debate about whether they're
- 6:43Speaker 5: alive or not, and it's something that you teach in
- 6:46Speaker 5: every virology class, and I honestly, I just I can't
- 6:50Speaker 5: get excited about that debate. I'm not exactly sure why.
- 6:53Speaker 5: I guess I just feel like we understand how the
- 6:55Speaker 5: viruses work. We know in what ways they fail the
- 6:58Speaker 5: definition that you just brought up, which is that they
- 7:00Speaker 5: are not able to replicate by themselves. They have to
- 7:02Speaker 5: go borrow a host cell. It's like, you know, if
- 7:05Speaker 5: you rent an Airbnb, you're not going to bring a
- 7:08Speaker 5: washing machine, You're just going to borrow the one that's there.
- 7:10Speaker 5: And that's what viruses do. But they have a program,
- 7:13Speaker 5: they know what they're doing, and they also are probably
- 7:17Speaker 5: the most diverse entity on the planet when it comes
- 7:21Speaker 5: to biology. They are like rocking it in terms of
- 7:24Speaker 5: what information they create because they are so diverse, and
- 7:29Speaker 5: so to leave them out of the definition of life
- 7:31Speaker 5: just never made any sense to me.
- 7:33Speaker 4: I mean, if you landed on an alien planet and
- 7:34Speaker 4: only found viruses, you wouldn't be like, yawn, I guess
- 7:38Speaker 4: this place is.
- 7:39Speaker 5: Boring, right, No, definitely not. But if I only saw viruses,
- 7:43Speaker 5: I would think, oh, this is like a weird shadow
- 7:45Speaker 5: of something that happened somewhere else, or they killed all
- 7:48Speaker 5: the cells, I guess, because that's not a stable system
- 7:51Speaker 5: that is actually able to sustain life. So I mean,
- 7:54Speaker 5: in that sense the definition matters, of course, because you know,
- 7:58Speaker 5: viruses can't do that by themselves.
- 8:00Speaker 1: Can I ask you a question that I absolutely should
- 8:02Speaker 1: know the answer to, but I don't. So okay, So
- 8:05Speaker 1: people always say, you know, like life arose once, and
- 8:08Speaker 1: so I don't usually think about where viruses are on
- 8:11Speaker 1: the tree of life. Did viruses arise separate from bacteria?
- 8:15Speaker 1: Are Chia and eu carryoutes or did they branch off
- 8:18Speaker 1: at one point?
- 8:20Speaker 2: Do we know? I think they got.
- 8:21Speaker 5: There first, and I hear this whole only evolved one's thing.
- 8:25Speaker 5: But I mean, I don't think we really know that
- 8:27Speaker 5: we know what we have now. Yeah, I think it's possible.
- 8:32Speaker 5: I mean, whatever happened in the very very beginning was
- 8:35Speaker 5: probably you know, this biochemical soup, and there were probably
- 8:41Speaker 5: little self replicating genetic entities going on there which were
- 8:45Speaker 5: not yet cells, and we're also not yet viruses. But
- 8:49Speaker 5: I would say that as soon as we had any
- 8:51Speaker 5: kind of successful entity going there were quickly genetic parasites,
- 8:57Speaker 5: which in a way are akin to virus ruses. I
- 9:01Speaker 5: think that probably started very early, if not right away.
- 9:04Speaker 5: I mean I think the second there was something good
- 9:06Speaker 5: going on, there were like hitchhikers jumping in.
- 9:09Speaker 4: You know, you're totally pandering to Kelly with genetic parasites.
- 9:13Speaker 2: Nice.
- 9:14Speaker 1: Yeah, I say the same thing to people, and I
- 9:16Speaker 1: was like, no, I don't know this for sure, but
- 9:17Speaker 1: I'm so glad that a very smart persons the same thing.
- 9:20Speaker 2: Now I feel very confident.
- 9:22Speaker 4: But I think it is important that we have a definition,
- 9:24Speaker 4: even if there are fascinating things that fall outside of it, right,
- 9:28Speaker 4: And like, I have nothing against airbnb guests and it's wonderful. Yeah,
- 9:32Speaker 4: and I'm a guest myself. I hope the viruses clean
- 9:35Speaker 4: up after themselves and don't you know bother the neighbors
- 9:37Speaker 4: and all that time, they're not very constrained. But I
- 9:43Speaker 4: do think we want to sharpen the question. We want
- 9:45Speaker 4: to know what we're talking about. I don't care people
- 9:49Speaker 4: agree when we find aliens, whether it's life or not,
- 9:53Speaker 4: but we're interested in the questions. We have to, like,
- 9:55Speaker 4: at least know what we're talking about. Why is this
- 9:58Speaker 4: question interesting? And maybe continuing saying it's a spectrum and
- 10:02Speaker 4: there's you know, a blend of stuff, and you can
- 10:04Speaker 4: call it life or not. But you know, there's an
- 10:07Speaker 4: interesting into it, and there's a non interesting into it,
- 10:09Speaker 4: like you know, rocks, like basically everything we've only found
- 10:12Speaker 4: so far. But I think we at least need to
- 10:15Speaker 4: identify the direction of that interestingness so that even if
- 10:19Speaker 4: we aren't sure where the threshold is, we can say, like, oh,
- 10:21Speaker 4: look what.
- 10:22Speaker 3: We found here.
- 10:22Speaker 4: This is fascinating and it's similar in some respects to
- 10:25Speaker 4: what we're doing over here on Earth.
- 10:27Speaker 1: Well, so then let's let's go through a couple definitions
- 10:30Speaker 1: that I've identified. Know that Katrina has told us this
- 10:33Speaker 1: is not an interesting question, let's dwell on it.
- 10:37Speaker 4: Let's dig into the boring question of what is life.
- 10:40Speaker 2: I'm just kidding. I got to pick on you too sometimes, Yeah,
- 10:44Speaker 2: you can just yes, no, okay.
- 10:49Speaker 1: So Irwin Schroedinger in nineteen forty four said that life is.
- 10:53Speaker 2: A thing that famous biologist I thought he was a physicist.
- 10:56Speaker 3: Yes, exactly, that's the joke.
- 11:00Speaker 1: Well, I was starting with a not so good definition,
- 11:02Speaker 1: so I wanted to I'm going after bulls of the
- 11:07Speaker 1: whites and today.
- 11:08Speaker 2: All right, so life is.
- 11:09Speaker 1: A thing that avoids the decay into equilibrium, and so
- 11:13Speaker 1: I feel like this focuses on metabolism because you need
- 11:16Speaker 1: metabolism to like push against the decay into equilibrium.
- 11:19Speaker 2: But what do you think of that definition?
- 11:22Speaker 5: I think it works both in a metabolism way and
- 11:26Speaker 5: in an information way, information being more about the genetic
- 11:30Speaker 5: organization where we store our information. I mean that is
- 11:33Speaker 5: the opposite of just like a total neutral chaos where
- 11:35Speaker 5: there's no organization. So I think that kind of works.
- 11:39Speaker 5: I don't know, does that help us when we send
- 11:40Speaker 5: a mass back up to Mars and look for molecules
- 11:44Speaker 5: and we're like, does this tell us that something was
- 11:46Speaker 5: alive here? I'm not sure, because those things could happen
- 11:49Speaker 5: randomly here or there, and you would need to see
- 11:52Speaker 5: like interesting concentrations of things maybe, But even then, I
- 11:55Speaker 5: don't know. That's where the definition gets helpful. I see
- 11:58Speaker 5: what you're saying.
- 11:59Speaker 4: No disrespect the of course, but I think that's interesting,
- 12:03Speaker 4: but I'm not sure it captures everything like that. You
- 12:05Speaker 4: could also, for example, build a robot like a rumba is,
- 12:09Speaker 4: you know, organizing and cleaning and fighting against entropy and stuff.
- 12:13Speaker 4: But nowbody would say a rumba is alive, and so
- 12:16Speaker 4: maybe I don't know the metabolic aspect of it, there
- 12:19Speaker 4: would disqualifier rumba. I think it's getting at something, you know,
- 12:23Speaker 4: it's capturing the sense that life is self maintaining. It's
- 12:27Speaker 4: fighting against you know, the laws of thromodynamics.
- 12:30Speaker 5: Yeah, but the rumba will eventually disintegrate. I mean, I
- 12:33Speaker 5: don't know the details about the plastics in there, but
- 12:35Speaker 5: you know what I'm saying, it's not going to be
- 12:37Speaker 5: able to sustain that over generations.
- 12:40Speaker 1: But so well, we we're going to disintegrate. Is it
- 12:43Speaker 1: that the rumba doesn't make babies? That's the Yeah? What
- 12:46Speaker 1: what did you what were you thinking of in particular
- 12:49Speaker 1: that like the plastic is going to fall apart, Because
- 12:50Speaker 1: I'm falling apart pretty quicklyly.
- 12:52Speaker 2: It feels like, well.
- 12:54Speaker 5: I guess I was saying there might be something that
- 12:57Speaker 5: is still organized in a way that it wasn't there
- 13:00Speaker 5: before the room, but it was manufactured eons from now,
- 13:03Speaker 5: despite the fact that they won't have progeny. Okay, But
- 13:06Speaker 5: I guess I was, Yeah, I was saying it wasn't
- 13:08Speaker 5: sustainable because they won't reproduce.
- 13:10Speaker 2: Okay.
- 13:11Speaker 1: I feel like Katrina was mentioning that this is like
- 13:14Speaker 1: not super helpful, because how what do you do with this?
- 13:17Speaker 1: Like if you go to Mars, what are you looking for?
- 13:20Speaker 1: In particular? From this definition? It doesn't really tell you that.
- 13:23Speaker 1: It's kind of like too vague to be helpful, I
- 13:26Speaker 1: guess is my thought. But this was from you know,
- 13:28Speaker 1: like eighty years ago, right, and so we've got some
- 13:30Speaker 1: other definitions to chat about.
- 13:32Speaker 5: And that was before we knew DNA. I mean, that
- 13:34Speaker 5: was a really early moment. Yeah, thinking about that.
- 13:37Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a good point. That's a good way we
- 13:39Speaker 1: shouldn't be too harsh on Schroeder. Yeah, it was a pioneer.
- 13:43Speaker 1: So in nineteen ninety four, NASA had a working group
- 13:46Speaker 1: and they came up with a definition. And their definition
- 13:50Speaker 1: is that life is a self sustaining chemical system capable
- 13:53Speaker 1: of Darwinian evolution. That's a little more specific, So self sustaining,
- 14:00Speaker 1: like it's its own entity, it can acquire its own
- 14:02Speaker 1: food and like keep itself going. It's a chemical system
- 14:06Speaker 1: and undergoes Darwinian evolution. So like DNA is sort of
- 14:09Speaker 1: implied in there, or at least some information that gets
- 14:12Speaker 1: passed from generation to generation, and like reflex changes that
- 14:17Speaker 1: are happening over time. So this is like, at least
- 14:20Speaker 1: a little bit more specific. What do you all think
- 14:21Speaker 1: of this one?
- 14:22Speaker 4: I like that it's more specific. It also seems more descriptive, though,
- 14:26Speaker 4: right it doesn't feel like it's unearthing a core concept here.
- 14:32Speaker 4: It's just like, what is life having in common? And
- 14:35Speaker 4: I think that's a step towards it.
- 14:36Speaker 3: Right.
- 14:36Speaker 4: It's like you start out with a bunch of observations
- 14:39Speaker 4: and then later you understand the underlying concepts that are
- 14:43Speaker 4: unifying it all. And we're not there yet. We're still
- 14:46Speaker 4: just like understand the pieces, you know. It's like when
- 14:49Speaker 4: we saw magnets and we saw lightning, we did realize, oh,
- 14:52Speaker 4: these are two sides of the same coin, and there's
- 14:54Speaker 4: a reason why they both come from the same thing.
- 14:57Speaker 4: So I feel like we're sort of at that stage here.
- 14:59Speaker 4: We're like making lists without understanding where they come from.
- 15:03Speaker 1: Well, I've got another list to throw at you, and
- 15:04Speaker 1: then we can move on to something more interesting. So
- 15:06Speaker 1: the last definition that I found was a definition that's
- 15:10Speaker 1: sometimes called the Seven Pillars of Life. It's came out
- 15:15Speaker 1: of UC Berkeley in two thousand and two. Daniel, when
- 15:17Speaker 1: were you at Berkeley.
- 15:18Speaker 4: I was Berkeley ninety eight to two thousand, and that
- 15:20Speaker 4: was a Fermi lab while still a Berkeley student until
- 15:22Speaker 4: two thousand and three.
- 15:24Speaker 1: Okay, so you were there, Well, Daniel Koshland was working
- 15:28Speaker 1: on this.
- 15:28Speaker 5: Oh yeah, we had. I studied biology at Berkeley ninety
- 15:32Speaker 5: six to two thousand and one of our buildings was
- 15:34Speaker 5: named Koshlin. So that's interesting.
- 15:36Speaker 1: Oh fantastic. Okay, all right, Well, so here we go.
- 15:39Speaker 1: Here are the seven pillars. One pillar is program and
- 15:43Speaker 1: for us that's DNA. It's the thing that sort of
- 15:46Speaker 1: like carries the instructions for life. And then you've got improvisation,
- 15:51Speaker 1: and this I think is meant to cover like natural selection.
- 15:55Speaker 1: Improvisation doesn't feel quite like the right word to use for.
- 15:58Speaker 5: That, yeah, because that's it's just like mutants arise and
- 16:01Speaker 5: then the best ones arrives. That's not like on the spot,
- 16:04Speaker 5: they like invented a new thing. That's interesting, right Yeah.
- 16:07Speaker 1: Yeah, So I'm not loving the word, but I get
- 16:09Speaker 1: that The point is they're like things that change through
- 16:12Speaker 1: natural selection.
- 16:13Speaker 5: Yeah, like a roomba couldn't do that.
- 16:14Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, Yeah, Ruma's going to be our go to thing.
- 16:17Speaker 1: I can see now compartmentalization, so like it's not just
- 16:22Speaker 1: like part of an ooze. It sort of separates itself
- 16:24Speaker 1: from the rest of the environment in some way, like
- 16:27Speaker 1: you know, often a lipid bilayer is how cells do that.
- 16:30Speaker 1: They separate themselves from other cells energy, so they take
- 16:34Speaker 1: in energy and use that energy to do things like
- 16:38Speaker 1: replicate themselves. Regeneration and this is things like growing the
- 16:43Speaker 1: size of your population, having babies, Healing covers a lot
- 16:47Speaker 1: of things. Adaptability, so this is adapting to like responding
- 16:52Speaker 1: to your environment. Adaptability felt like that's the word I
- 16:56Speaker 1: associate with natural selection. It's kind of I'm still stuck
- 16:58Speaker 1: on improvisation, not feeling a good word.
- 17:00Speaker 5: Yeah, those are interesting sides of the same coin. I
- 17:03Speaker 5: don't quite get the difference. I have to think about that.
- 17:06Speaker 1: I bet this person was a physicist. And then seclusion,
- 17:11Speaker 1: which is like having your own chemical processes that are
- 17:14Speaker 1: going on inside of you. And so now I'm not
- 17:16Speaker 1: sure what the difference between seclusion and compartmentalization are. But anyway,
- 17:20Speaker 1: so I feel like there's some redundancies in here as
- 17:24Speaker 1: I understood the definition, and a couple words that maybe
- 17:26Speaker 1: I wouldn't have picked.
- 17:27Speaker 2: But with these letters.
- 17:29Speaker 1: You can have the acronym picarus or piscerius, and I
- 17:32Speaker 1: don't know, maybe they were going for that, but how do.
- 17:34Speaker 2: Those feel as criteria for life?
- 17:37Speaker 1: So, Daniel, this is getting a little more specific, but
- 17:40Speaker 1: I really know if it's a theory as opposed to
- 17:42Speaker 1: like a summary of observations, it's.
- 17:44Speaker 4: Still a summary of observations, and I feel like it's
- 17:46Speaker 4: too biased towards the kind of things we see here
- 17:49Speaker 4: on Earth. I'm especially not a fan of this compartmentalization
- 17:54Speaker 4: and seclusion business. I feel like that's not even very
- 17:57Speaker 4: well defined, Like where exactly does my and anyway is
- 18:02Speaker 4: not very clear, Like I have a surface covered with microbes,
- 18:05Speaker 4: Are they part of me?
- 18:06Speaker 3: Are they not part of me?
- 18:08Speaker 4: I feel like that's just a cultural framework we're imposing
- 18:13Speaker 4: on even Earth biology where it doesn't really work. And
- 18:17Speaker 4: I can imagine situations where you have life that doesn't
- 18:21Speaker 4: have clear boundaries, but you would still understand it to
- 18:24Speaker 4: be life, and then they might think of themselves differently.
- 18:27Speaker 4: And you know, we've talked about this on the podcast before,
- 18:30Speaker 4: like plasma currents in the atmosphere of a star could
- 18:33Speaker 4: be self sustaining and interesting and even intelligent but they
- 18:38Speaker 4: might not have the concept of like counting numbers if
- 18:41Speaker 4: they don't have like boundaries between their bodies and other
- 18:44Speaker 4: people's bodies, and so they might like just think in
- 18:47Speaker 4: real numbers instead of integers. And so this feels like
- 18:50Speaker 4: a little too earth centric to me. But again, it's
- 18:53Speaker 4: it's like a list. It's a description of what we
- 18:56Speaker 4: see on Earth, which is mostly accurate. And I think
- 18:59Speaker 4: the next big leap would be, like, let's understand the
- 19:02Speaker 4: core concepts. But it doesn't seem like we're there yet.
- 19:04Speaker 1: Sounds like Kashlin needed to smoke some banana peels. I
- 19:07Speaker 1: have a ba broader view of things, and while you
- 19:11Speaker 1: were talking, I was one totally listening, but two I
- 19:14Speaker 1: also looked up seclusion and compartmentalization again to see what
- 19:18Speaker 1: I was getting wrong. And it looks like maybe seclusion
- 19:21Speaker 1: is more about like stuff that's happening intracellularly and anyway.
- 19:25Speaker 1: But still the point is sort of like separation of stuff.
- 19:28Speaker 1: So your point still stands, all right, Well, I think
- 19:32Speaker 1: we have had enough of a chat about this. The
- 19:34Speaker 1: point is people are trying to identify things that are
- 19:38Speaker 1: important for life. Here are thinking about what might be
- 19:40Speaker 1: important for life and other places in the universe. But
- 19:43Speaker 1: at the end of the day, we've only seen what
- 19:45Speaker 1: has succeeded here on Earth. And as Katrina was alluding
- 19:48Speaker 1: to earlier, life could have popped up multiple times, but
- 19:52Speaker 1: there was like one instance that gave rise. There was
- 19:54Speaker 1: one instance we think that gave rise to everything that
- 19:56Speaker 1: we see today. But maybe life popped up and then
- 19:59Speaker 1: just kind of died, and so we don't really know
- 20:01Speaker 1: what the other options could have been. And so anyway,
- 20:04Speaker 1: we are going to plow forward in our conversation without
- 20:08Speaker 1: a definition that everybody agrees on, because this is biology
- 20:12Speaker 1: and that is what we do.
- 20:14Speaker 4: If this was philosophy, we would just stay here for
- 20:16Speaker 4: four hundred years arguing.
- 20:17Speaker 2: About that's right, that's right.
- 20:20Speaker 1: The good news is that there have been a lot
- 20:21Speaker 1: of experiments and that we are moving forward despite having
- 20:24Speaker 1: a definition, towards trying to get something life like happening
- 20:28Speaker 1: in the lab. So let's take a break and when
- 20:30Speaker 1: we get back, we'll talk about when we think life
- 20:34Speaker 1: arose and what Earth was kind of like at that time,
- 20:37Speaker 1: so that we can ground our experiments in something sort
- 20:41Speaker 1: of reasonable.
- 21:01Speaker 4: All right, we're back. We're talking about what is life?
- 21:04Speaker 4: The origins of life and we're trying to keep Katrina
- 21:06Speaker 4: from being too bored. Kelly, what are we talking about next?
- 21:10Speaker 1: Oh no, well the good news is we're talking about
- 21:12Speaker 1: bacteria related stuff.
- 21:14Speaker 2: So I think that's gonna Yeah, there we go. All right,
- 21:16Speaker 2: so I'm on track.
- 21:17Speaker 3: Now she's interested, folks.
- 21:19Speaker 2: That's right.
- 21:21Speaker 1: So if you're trying to figure out how life came
- 21:24Speaker 1: to be, you want to sort of know what the
- 21:27Speaker 1: environment was like when life started. And to do that,
- 21:31Speaker 1: you need to know when life started. And so basically
- 21:34Speaker 1: we have to go to the fossil record to try
- 21:35Speaker 1: to figure out where is the first evidence that we
- 21:38Speaker 1: see something that could be life showing up.
- 21:42Speaker 4: Also, this is like amazing fascinating history, right, like the
- 21:45Speaker 4: deep history of life on Earth, like how things began. Wow,
- 21:48Speaker 4: I would love to jump into time machine and see
- 21:50Speaker 4: all this stuff happen. And it's our history, right, and
- 21:53Speaker 4: it happened a certain way and there might be clues
- 21:55Speaker 4: that reveal it. So it's like some of the most
- 21:57Speaker 4: fascinating science there is in my opinion.
- 21:59Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I agree with you, physicist, because it's myology
- 22:03Speaker 1: that we're looking at.
- 22:05Speaker 2: Okay, so.
- 22:07Speaker 1: There's a bunch of fossils out there from varying time points,
- 22:12Speaker 1: and some of them we agree are definitely evidence of bacteria,
- 22:17Speaker 1: way more than we agree about some other stuff. So
- 22:19Speaker 1: the most widely agreed upon fossil as far as I
- 22:22Speaker 1: could tell, was from Australia, and it's stromatallites that are
- 22:27Speaker 1: three and a half billion years old.
- 22:29Speaker 5: Yeah.
- 22:29Speaker 2: Wow, about three and a half billion.
- 22:31Speaker 1: Yeah, And so Katrina, at this point I was hoping
- 22:33Speaker 1: I could throw to you and be like, what are stromatallites?
- 22:35Speaker 1: But I didn't prepare you for that at all.
- 22:38Speaker 5: So stromatolites are amazing evidence we think of life that's
- 22:44Speaker 5: three point five billion years old, and it comes from
- 22:48Speaker 5: microbial mats. We've talked about biofilms before, and so the
- 22:52Speaker 5: stromatolites are layered rock structures that built up over time
- 22:58Speaker 5: by microbial mats. We think they were primarily cyanobacteria, and
- 23:02Speaker 5: they change the shape of the rocks. This is like
- 23:04Speaker 5: a morphological piece of evidence. So they would trap sediment
- 23:08Speaker 5: and calcify the rock and they created this huge macroscopic
- 23:12Speaker 5: evidence of life on Earth. And it is a little
- 23:15Speaker 5: controversial because there's questions about whether that could have been
- 23:18Speaker 5: created by something that's not alive. But we think that biofilms,
- 23:23Speaker 5: essentially microbial mats of the cyanobacteria that did an ancient
- 23:28Speaker 5: form of photosynthesis. So they were getting energy from sunlight,
- 23:30Speaker 5: we think, and maybe also from some of the sediments
- 23:35Speaker 5: in the rocks, and they left behind massive changes in
- 23:40Speaker 5: the shapes of the rocks and that's why we think
- 23:42Speaker 5: there was life there.
- 23:43Speaker 3: Wow, what is it.
- 23:44Speaker 4: About these things that makes it convincing that there's no
- 23:46Speaker 4: abiotic way to reproduce them?
- 23:49Speaker 5: Well, we know what those look like in modern times,
- 23:52Speaker 5: and it really is the shape of the leftover calcified
- 23:56Speaker 5: sediment that happened in a massive scale, and so so
- 24:00Speaker 5: you know, it's a guess, you know, or that's maybe
- 24:03Speaker 5: the wrong.
- 24:03Speaker 3: Word, but it's an inference.
- 24:04Speaker 5: Yeah, it's just based on how they look. I don't
- 24:06Speaker 5: think we have like great other kinds of chemical physical evidence.
- 24:11Speaker 5: There is some some isotope ratio carbon isotope ratio evidence,
- 24:16Speaker 5: but you know that signal can be debated.
- 24:20Speaker 4: Also, they look really weird. There are these funny blobs
- 24:25Speaker 4: sitting in the ocean. Right, it's cool.
- 24:27Speaker 2: Gotta be aliens.
- 24:28Speaker 4: Yeah, aliens don't go with the conspiracy theories.
- 24:31Speaker 3: Come on.
- 24:33Speaker 2: To what I do, all right.
- 24:35Speaker 1: So in Australia, there's this stromatallite that is pretty broadly
- 24:38Speaker 1: agreed upon as like definitely being a stromatallite, and that
- 24:42Speaker 1: age is to about three and a half billion years old.
- 24:45Speaker 2: There's also some other.
- 24:47Speaker 1: Things that we found in like Canada, Greenland, some other
- 24:50Speaker 1: parts of the world that could age older something like
- 24:54Speaker 1: three point seven, maybe even up to four point two
- 24:57Speaker 1: billion years old, and so only older than what we've
- 25:00Speaker 1: seen in Australia. But all of these other instances are
- 25:03Speaker 1: things where people debate, like is that a strum matallite.
- 25:06Speaker 2: We're not really sure.
- 25:07Speaker 1: So we feel pretty good about this three and a
- 25:10Speaker 1: half billion year old date, but it could be even older.
- 25:14Speaker 2: It's just really hard to date stuff that's that old.
- 25:16Speaker 4: And you're saying three point seven and it might not
- 25:19Speaker 4: sound like a big difference, like three point five three
- 25:21Speaker 4: point seven, but that's two hundred million years. Remember it's
- 25:25Speaker 4: been sixty six million since the dinosaurs, so like two
- 25:28Speaker 4: hundred million years.
- 25:29Speaker 3: It is a long time. It's a lot of podcasts.
- 25:32Speaker 2: Yes, that's the best way to measure things.
- 25:34Speaker 1: When I was a kid, we used to measure things
- 25:36Speaker 1: in uh Ghostbuster episodes, but cartoon that was so I'd
- 25:41Speaker 1: ask my dad how many more Ghostbuster episodes?
- 25:43Speaker 2: Anyway?
- 25:44Speaker 1: Zero point two billion years is a lot of Ghostbuster episodes,
- 25:47Speaker 1: so exactly. So we're not totally sure. But now, Daniel,
- 25:50Speaker 1: I'm gonna put you on the spot. Oh boy, there's
- 25:53Speaker 1: a limit for how much we know about what the
- 25:56Speaker 1: early Earth was like, or even our ability to like
- 25:59Speaker 1: age the early and we usually have to go outside
- 26:02Speaker 1: of Earth to get these estimates for like how old
- 26:04Speaker 1: Earth is, For example, why is that, Daniel.
- 26:07Speaker 4: Well, the early Solar system was hot and nasty.
- 26:11Speaker 5: You know that sounds like a judgment.
- 26:12Speaker 4: Called I mean that only in a positive way.
- 26:18Speaker 2: This is getting too personal.
- 26:20Speaker 4: Move on, Like you know, somebody asks me, how's that
- 26:25Speaker 4: pasta sauce of it? Ooh, hot and nasty? That sounds
- 26:28Speaker 4: delicious anyway. So the early solar system, you know, collapses
- 26:34Speaker 4: from a big cloud of gas and you get the
- 26:36Speaker 4: Sun and then you have little other gravitational seeds that
- 26:39Speaker 4: coalesce heavier stuff to make like the Earth in a
- 26:43Speaker 4: rocky planets, and then the radiation from the Sun blows
- 26:46Speaker 4: off most of the gas and so you expose the
- 26:49Speaker 4: you know, heavier stuff silicon and carbon and all this
- 26:52Speaker 4: kind of stuff and oxygen that makes up the Earth.
- 26:54Speaker 4: But it's hot, and so you know, the rocks are
- 26:56Speaker 4: constantly being reformed and because of pressure with gravitational pressure,
- 27:02Speaker 4: so the early stuff is mostly destroyed. And so like
- 27:05Speaker 4: if you want to find out the age of the Earth,
- 27:07Speaker 4: you have to find like the age of the oldest rock.
- 27:10Speaker 4: But a lot of the rocks from the early days
- 27:12Speaker 4: had been remelted, right, they're gone. So that's why the
- 27:16Speaker 4: age of the Solar System is easiest to discover away
- 27:19Speaker 4: from the Earth and like asteroids, right, smaller chunks that
- 27:21Speaker 4: were still molten early but cooled and have been frozen
- 27:25Speaker 4: essentially ever since and have been like pushed down into
- 27:28Speaker 4: the Earth magma and melted.
- 27:30Speaker 2: Yeah awesome.
- 27:31Speaker 1: Yeah, And so there's a limit on what we can
- 27:32Speaker 1: even say about the early Earth because it doesn't really
- 27:35Speaker 1: exist in the same form anymore. It's been like melted
- 27:38Speaker 1: and reorganized. And so we have found life that's three
- 27:41Speaker 1: point five billion years old. Maybe there's life that's four
- 27:45Speaker 1: point six billion years old.
- 27:46Speaker 2: I doubt it.
- 27:47Speaker 1: That's the oldest Earth in the Solar System is, but
- 27:49Speaker 1: if it had shown up right, at the beginning, it
- 27:51Speaker 1: would have been just like obliterated and we wouldn't have
- 27:54Speaker 1: fossil evidence of it anymore.
- 27:56Speaker 4: But it's really important to understand this gap between when
- 27:59Speaker 4: the Earth formed and when life formed, because it's the
- 28:02Speaker 4: only piece of data we have to speculate about how
- 28:05Speaker 4: long it takes life to form, which is a big question.
- 28:08Speaker 3: Right.
- 28:08Speaker 4: If life forms like almost as soon as possible after
- 28:11Speaker 4: conditions are ready for it, that suggests with an equals
- 28:14Speaker 4: one that it forms off it when conditions are ready, right,
- 28:18Speaker 4: Whereas if it took like billions of years, that suggests
- 28:21Speaker 4: that it might take a long time on average, and
- 28:23Speaker 4: we shouldn't expect to find it everywhere. So it's like
- 28:26Speaker 4: super valuable piece of information.
- 28:28Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, that's really interesting. But I feel like it
- 28:30Speaker 5: also depends on having gradients of temperature and water and
- 28:35Speaker 5: those conditions. I mean, if you got those right, you know,
- 28:38Speaker 5: maybe really just takes a much smaller amount of time. Yeah,
- 28:41Speaker 5: with those conditions, which we obviously are not going to
- 28:44Speaker 5: triangulate from evidence on Earth, but it's fun to think about.
- 28:48Speaker 2: Yeah, totally. But another nice thing about knowing about when life.
- 28:52Speaker 1: Popped up is that then you can try to figure
- 28:54Speaker 1: out what Earth was like at that time, so that
- 28:58Speaker 1: then you can say, Okay, what things were in the atmosphere,
- 29:02Speaker 1: what are like the starting materials that we're likely to have,
- 29:06Speaker 1: what's the temperature like? And this isn't I'll know this
- 29:08Speaker 1: isn't perfect because just because the Earth was an average
- 29:12Speaker 1: of I'm making a number up one hundred degrees fahrenheit
- 29:15Speaker 1: or something everywhere, there's still a ton of variability, right
- 29:18Speaker 1: depending on if you're at the bottom of the ocean
- 29:20Speaker 1: or something like that. And so it's helpful to know,
- 29:23Speaker 1: but it doesn't necessarily tell us everything we need to
- 29:26Speaker 1: know because there was a lot of variability depending on
- 29:28Speaker 1: where you are on the Earth. But now that I've
- 29:31Speaker 1: gone ahead and been like, we're going to tell you
- 29:33Speaker 1: what Earth is like, but it's not interesting because there
- 29:35Speaker 1: was variability, let's go ahead and talk about what Earth
- 29:39Speaker 1: was like about three and a half billion years old.
- 29:42Speaker 1: And we call this time period the Haydian, which is
- 29:46Speaker 1: like the hell like hot, nasty, hot, and nasty, which
- 29:49Speaker 1: Daniel's into, and so.
- 29:52Speaker 5: We could also call it like an auto cleave. Oh,
- 29:55Speaker 5: because you know, these days, if we want to sterilize something,
- 29:58Speaker 5: we put it in an autocla, which is hot and
- 30:01Speaker 5: high pressure, and I would call it extremely clean.
- 30:05Speaker 2: So you know, oh good, that's good. Maybe not great
- 30:08Speaker 2: for life, but clean is good.
- 30:11Speaker 5: Useful, yeah, useful, that's right.
- 30:13Speaker 4: Well.
- 30:13Speaker 1: So another thing is that the Sun back then was dimmer,
- 30:17Speaker 1: but because we didn't have an ozone layer, space radiation
- 30:21Speaker 1: UV radiation hit the surface a lot more often, which
- 30:25Speaker 1: probably also contributed to some of this sterilizing of the surface.
- 30:29Speaker 2: Like an autoclave, the.
- 30:30Speaker 1: Temperature and the atmospheric pressure were probably different than what
- 30:34Speaker 1: we experienced today, and partly that's because the atmosphere we
- 30:38Speaker 1: think was made of different stuff than we see now.
- 30:41Speaker 1: So eventually, when life came around, we started producing a
- 30:44Speaker 1: bunch of oxygen that got into the atmosphere, produced ozone, etc.
- 30:48Speaker 1: But we think that some of the starting materials in
- 30:50Speaker 1: Earth's atmosphere were things like carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, and
- 30:55Speaker 1: water vapor, but again not a lot of oxygen, and.
- 30:59Speaker 3: This mostly came from volcanoes. Right.
- 31:00Speaker 4: We talked earlier about how Earth's first atmosphere, like most
- 31:04Speaker 4: of the universe and most of the Solar System, is
- 31:06Speaker 4: hydrogen and helium, but that was blown away because of
- 31:10Speaker 4: the Sun's radiation, and then we had a second atmosphere
- 31:13Speaker 4: which came from volcanic outgassing, and also you get like
- 31:16Speaker 4: bombardment from asteroids, and so some of the stuff on
- 31:19Speaker 4: those melt and that's where the second atmosphere comes from.
- 31:22Speaker 3: Cool.
- 31:22Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you for that.
- 31:23Speaker 1: And yeah, so the asteroids that you're talking about, a
- 31:26Speaker 1: lot of those fell during the Late Heavy Bombardment, which
- 31:29Speaker 1: was four point one to like three point eight billion
- 31:31Speaker 1: years ago, where we were just getting absolutely hammered.
- 31:34Speaker 4: Though it sounds like a battle in World War Two,
- 31:36Speaker 4: doesn't it.
- 31:37Speaker 2: It does, it does, but yeah, we got totally hammered.
- 31:40Speaker 1: And as I understand it, a lot of the craters
- 31:42Speaker 1: on the Moon are evidence of the Late Heavy bombardment
- 31:46Speaker 1: because our craters got sort of like eroded away over
- 31:48Speaker 1: time and you can't see them anymore, but there's evidence
- 31:51Speaker 1: on the Moon of them still.
- 31:53Speaker 4: Although I think that's suspect now because we only landed
- 31:55Speaker 4: in a small region on the Moon and that might
- 31:57Speaker 4: have been unrepresentative. So this we're seeing now about whether
- 32:00Speaker 4: the Late Heavy Bombardment was a real thing or not.
- 32:03Speaker 5: Really, I thought we knew a lot about the geography
- 32:07Speaker 5: of the Moon. We only know about the areas where
- 32:09Speaker 5: we landed.
- 32:10Speaker 4: We know a lot from observations, but we don't have
- 32:12Speaker 4: samples from a lot of the moon.
- 32:14Speaker 5: Oh I see.
- 32:14Speaker 4: Anyway, that's a whole other topic we can dig into
- 32:16Speaker 4: in another episode.
- 32:17Speaker 1: But yeah, well, but that's actually totally related to my
- 32:19Speaker 1: next point because now that we've laid out like, Okay,
- 32:22Speaker 1: this is what the early Earth was like, there are
- 32:24Speaker 1: other people you can talk to, other experts who are like, yes,
- 32:27Speaker 1: this story of what the early Earth was like has
- 32:30Speaker 1: become very popular, very well known. But actually there's a
- 32:33Speaker 1: lot of evidence that we can't be totally sure that
- 32:36Speaker 1: the early atmosphere had exactly the compounds that we were
- 32:40Speaker 1: talking about.
- 32:41Speaker 2: We could be wrong about a lot of this stuff,
- 32:43Speaker 2: and it could be that.
- 32:44Speaker 1: The early Earth wasn't super different than Earth today, except
- 32:48Speaker 1: that it definitely wouldn't have had as much oxygen in
- 32:50Speaker 1: the atmosphere because that's definitely a sign of life. But
- 32:53Speaker 1: so we're doing our best to guess what it was like,
- 32:56Speaker 1: you know, billions and billions of years ago. It's amazing
- 32:59Speaker 1: that we have anything to work from for something that's
- 33:02Speaker 1: that old.
- 33:03Speaker 2: But yeah, so I'm.
- 33:04Speaker 1: Waving my hands in the air a little bit what
- 33:06Speaker 1: I'm telling you about what Earth was like four billion
- 33:07Speaker 1: years ago, because this is just the best evidence that
- 33:10Speaker 1: we have right now.
- 33:11Speaker 4: And it's amazing that we know anything about what happened
- 33:13Speaker 4: billions of years ago, like what incredible detective work, right,
- 33:17Speaker 4: And as Hazel likes to say, science is like stuff happened,
- 33:20Speaker 4: and we're trying to figure out what.
- 33:24Speaker 1: Yes, that's that's totally that's a good depth, that's a
- 33:26Speaker 1: good explanation. Okay, So now that we have talked about
- 33:31Speaker 1: what early Earth was like, or now that we've admitted
- 33:33Speaker 1: that we're not totally sure, let's talk about how life arose.
- 33:38Speaker 1: And to figure out how life arose, we tend to
- 33:42Speaker 1: want to think about how certain things that we usually see.
- 33:46Speaker 2: In life popped up.
- 33:47Speaker 1: So, for example, lipids, these are things that are usually
- 33:51Speaker 1: used to make the cell membrane, so to like give
- 33:53Speaker 1: you a compartment that you can use to separate yourself
- 33:56Speaker 1: from the rest of the world. For example, carbohydrates. These
- 33:59Speaker 1: are like sugar and cellulose. They are delicious. Amino Acids
- 34:03Speaker 1: these are used to make up proteins and nucleic acids,
- 34:06Speaker 1: which are used to make up DNA and RNA, and
- 34:09Speaker 1: so a lot of the folks who study origins of
- 34:12Speaker 1: life are looking for conditions where you mix stuff together
- 34:16Speaker 1: that were likely to be together about three and a
- 34:20Speaker 1: half billion years ago or older, and then you wait
- 34:23Speaker 1: to see do any of these things pop up? And
- 34:27Speaker 1: so like what do you need to do to start
- 34:28Speaker 1: getting these But this is actually a pretty hard problem
- 34:32Speaker 1: to think about because like often to get one of
- 34:35Speaker 1: these things that we're talking about, you need others. So
- 34:38Speaker 1: for example, to get DNA or to copy DNA, that's
- 34:41Speaker 1: done with proteins. So what came first, the protein or
- 34:46Speaker 1: the DNA? And so trying to figure out how these
- 34:49Speaker 1: things pop up and work together and in what order
- 34:52Speaker 1: they show up is like a huge part of what
- 34:54Speaker 1: this field.
- 34:55Speaker 2: Is doing as I understand it, Yeah, one hundred percent.
- 34:58Speaker 5: I mean, most things that happen biology are possible without
- 35:02Speaker 5: the help of all of our fancy proteins and cellular machinery.
- 35:05Speaker 5: They're just very unlikely. They just take like a massive
- 35:09Speaker 5: amount of time and energy. The biology is just easing
- 35:12Speaker 5: the process and making it faster and more doable. So
- 35:16Speaker 5: if you were to give things a lot of time
- 35:18Speaker 5: and a couple of lightning strikes, for some energy. Then
- 35:22Speaker 5: that's the theory, is that a lot of these molecules
- 35:25Speaker 5: may have started to just form on their own without
- 35:27Speaker 5: any biology to guide them. And then maybe you're going
- 35:30Speaker 5: to get into the RNA world hypothesis, Kelly. But you know,
- 35:34Speaker 5: we don't have to debate between DNA and protein because
- 35:39Speaker 5: we have this intermediate molecule RNA revenucleic acids that are
- 35:44Speaker 5: able to do some of this chemistry that proteins are
- 35:47Speaker 5: good at, and also they can store information, so they're
- 35:50Speaker 5: kind of a jack of all trades of a molecule.
- 35:52Speaker 5: So we think that life probably started there.
- 35:55Speaker 4: But RNA doesn't have the same pr that DNA has,
- 35:57Speaker 4: Like fewer people know about it and seem to get
- 36:00Speaker 4: as much pressed.
- 36:01Speaker 5: Like does Starbucks put it in their coffees with the
- 36:04Speaker 5: big sign about protein shakes and stuff.
- 36:08Speaker 1: So Katrina was talking about ribozimes, right, Yeah, we're going
- 36:11Speaker 1: to jump into that a little bit more when we
- 36:13Speaker 1: come back, but I wanted to end this segment if
- 36:15Speaker 1: that's okay with aliens again, and so.
- 36:20Speaker 5: That was Daniel right up, Yeah, what Yeah.
- 36:23Speaker 1: Before we go to the break, let's real quick jump
- 36:26Speaker 1: into aliens again. And so there are some people who are,
- 36:28Speaker 1: you know, talking about like, well, how do you get
- 36:30Speaker 1: these four things with the conditions that we had here
- 36:33Speaker 1: on Earth four a billion years ago or something?
- 36:35Speaker 2: And there are.
- 36:35Speaker 1: Others that say, well, what if life just came here
- 36:40Speaker 1: from space? And this is the panspermia idea, where you know,
- 36:44Speaker 1: maybe life arose on Mars, something smashed into Mars and
- 36:47Speaker 1: that rock eventually lands on Earth and now Earth is
- 36:49Speaker 1: seated with life that started somewhere else.
- 36:52Speaker 4: What do you think, Daniel, I think that's a really
- 36:55Speaker 4: cool story, and it's really important to understand whether life
- 36:59Speaker 4: started on Earth or somewhere else because it changes how
- 37:03Speaker 4: we feel about ourselves and who we are.
- 37:05Speaker 3: And it's interesting.
- 37:07Speaker 4: But I don't think it's really relevant to this scientific
- 37:09Speaker 4: question of how life starts because it just sort of says, well,
- 37:13Speaker 4: maybe life started on Earth or maybe it started somewhere else.
- 37:15Speaker 4: It doesn't answer the question of how did it start.
- 37:18Speaker 4: It doesn't really matter to me if it started on
- 37:20Speaker 4: Mars and then landed here for the biological question of
- 37:24Speaker 4: how does life start. Of course, I'm curious about whether
- 37:27Speaker 4: we're all secretly Martians, But you know, it sort of
- 37:30Speaker 4: seems to me like kicking the question down the road
- 37:32Speaker 4: instead of answering it.
- 37:33Speaker 5: Yeah, it also impacts how often these things happen, though,
- 37:37Speaker 5: getting back to understanding the initial conditions, I mean, if
- 37:41Speaker 5: the conditions are so rare that it really only happened
- 37:43Speaker 5: once somewhere in the universe, not even on Earth, that
- 37:47Speaker 5: makes it seem even harder.
- 37:49Speaker 3: Yeah.
- 37:49Speaker 4: And I think we have no evidence at all really
- 37:52Speaker 4: for like pant spermia, especially directed panspermia as some like
- 37:57Speaker 4: professor from Harvard likes to talk about, or stellar visitors
- 38:01Speaker 4: maybe being like alien capsules containing seeds of life. Like,
- 38:04Speaker 4: there's no evidence for that, And if anybody was gonna
- 38:07Speaker 4: be excited about that, it would be me. So the
- 38:09Speaker 4: fact that I'm being skeptical about I should tell you something.
- 38:13Speaker 1: Daniel's never an alien's wet blanket, but in this case
- 38:17Speaker 1: he is. So that's all you need to know.
- 38:18Speaker 3: Follow the data.
- 38:20Speaker 2: All right, let's.
- 38:20Speaker 1: Take a break, and when we get back, we'll talk
- 38:22Speaker 1: about the miller Uri experiment and whether metabolism or RNA
- 38:27Speaker 1: came first.
- 38:47Speaker 2: All Right, we're back. Do you too.
- 38:50Speaker 1: Remember learning about the miller Uri experiment when you were
- 38:53Speaker 1: in school?
- 38:53Speaker 5: Definitely?
- 38:54Speaker 4: Yeah, They had like a flask of some stuff, and
- 38:57Speaker 4: they sapped it and it turned into more interesting lifelife stuff.
- 39:00Speaker 3: Is that right?
- 39:00Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't need to explain it. I mean, that's
- 39:05Speaker 1: almost exactly what my notes have like. I mean, in particular,
- 39:08Speaker 1: they had ammonia, methane, and hydrogen, so they had stuff
- 39:12Speaker 1: that they thought was present on early Earth. Actually, they
- 39:14Speaker 1: were using Jupiter's atmosphere as sort of a proxy for
- 39:18Speaker 1: what they thought early Earth was like, which we no
- 39:20Speaker 1: longer necessarily think was the right thing to be working with.
- 39:23Speaker 1: But anyway, then they zapped it with some electricity to
- 39:27Speaker 1: simulate lightning strikes, and they ended up getting some amino acids.
- 39:32Speaker 1: But one of the problems is that we no longer
- 39:34Speaker 1: necessarily think that the world they created in this flask
- 39:38Speaker 1: is necessarily like what we thought early Earth.
- 39:40Speaker 2: Was going to be like.
- 39:41Speaker 1: But it did show that, like, you throw some stuff
- 39:44Speaker 1: together that isn't life, and you start getting the building
- 39:46Speaker 1: blocks of life out of it, which is pretty darn exciting.
- 39:51Speaker 1: And since we've done a bunch of experiments where we've
- 39:53Speaker 1: sort of updated the gases that are in there, the
- 39:55Speaker 1: sources of energy that are being input into the system,
- 39:58Speaker 1: and surprisingly pretty all you do still get like things
- 40:02Speaker 1: that look like the building blocks of life popping up,
- 40:05Speaker 1: and so getting things like amino acids just sort of
- 40:09Speaker 1: randomly in the environment doesn't actually seem like it's that hard.
- 40:14Speaker 1: And so then the question is how do you go
- 40:15Speaker 1: from there to something that you know responds to Darwinian
- 40:18Speaker 1: evolution or something like that. And so the question there
- 40:21Speaker 1: is do you start with metabolism, so the ability to
- 40:25Speaker 1: do like chemical reactions that give yourself energy so that
- 40:28Speaker 1: then you can do other stuff. And I've probably done
- 40:31Speaker 1: a really bad job of defining metabolism because it still
- 40:33Speaker 1: kind of blows my mind. So I'm gonna throw to
- 40:35Speaker 1: Katrina in a second. And then the other hypothesis is
- 40:37Speaker 1: the RNA world that maybe you started with RNA first,
- 40:40Speaker 1: and then from RNA you sort of structure things together
- 40:44Speaker 1: and then start using metabolism to build things that are
- 40:46Speaker 1: more complicated.
- 40:47Speaker 2: So Katrina go, I don't even really know.
- 40:51Speaker 1: This is where I start to feel overwhelmed, because this
- 40:53Speaker 1: is where it becomes a lot of biochemistry.
- 40:56Speaker 5: Yeah, well, metabolism as a word I find fascinating. And
- 41:00Speaker 5: when I get asked that question when I'm over at
- 41:03Speaker 5: the Integrative Health Center and the teaching kitchen and people
- 41:06Speaker 5: ask me about metabolism. They're asking, you know, how can
- 41:10Speaker 5: I boost my metabolic rate? So I can, you know,
- 41:14Speaker 5: lose weight and eat lots of delicious things, and which
- 41:19Speaker 5: is a good goal. But for you know, what we're
- 41:21Speaker 5: talking about for life is the chemistry of getting energy
- 41:24Speaker 5: and using that energy. So yeah, it's really interesting to
- 41:29Speaker 5: think about that in the context of early life. I
- 41:31Speaker 5: think it gets back to some of the seclusion and
- 41:33Speaker 5: compartmentalization definitions that you were bringing up earlier, because everything
- 41:38Speaker 5: runs on gradients, and so building up differences in concentration
- 41:43Speaker 5: of molecules against a membrane of some kind is a
- 41:47Speaker 5: way to store energy and to use energy to propel
- 41:50Speaker 5: your processes forward. So in my mind, metabolism comes down
- 41:55Speaker 5: to being able to organize systems for obtaining energy and
- 42:00Speaker 5: using chemicals to do that.
- 42:03Speaker 4: So let me see, if I understand from a physics
- 42:05Speaker 4: point of view, you're saying that we're looking for a
- 42:08Speaker 4: process that we see a lot in life, which is
- 42:11Speaker 4: use of energy to run yourself, and that we do
- 42:14Speaker 4: this chemically by storing stuff upgradients, which sounds complicated, but
- 42:18Speaker 4: it's basically like if you carried a bunch of rocks
- 42:21Speaker 4: up a hill and left them at the top of
- 42:22Speaker 4: the hill. That would have stored energy in it which
- 42:25Speaker 4: you could release when you wanted to by rolling them
- 42:27Speaker 4: down the hill. And then the rock gets all this
- 42:29Speaker 4: speed which you could then use to like you spin
- 42:32Speaker 4: a wheel and grind your.
- 42:33Speaker 3: Flower or something.
- 42:34Speaker 5: Exactly. Yeah, that's a really good analogy. I like that
- 42:36Speaker 5: a lot. But yeah, it's exactly. It's like pushing chemical
- 42:40Speaker 5: molecules onto one side of a barrier and then that
- 42:44Speaker 5: stores energy.
- 42:46Speaker 1: I'm going to do my best to summarize one hypothesis
- 42:51Speaker 1: for how life could have started around hydrothermal vents. But
- 42:54Speaker 1: I'm gonna preface this by saying this is pretty chemistry heavy,
- 42:58Speaker 1: which we all know how I feel about that. Okay,
- 43:01Speaker 1: So here's here's one idea for how life could have started. So,
- 43:03Speaker 1: if you are at a hydrothermal vent, the stuff that's
- 43:06Speaker 1: getting pushed out of the vent is at a very
- 43:09Speaker 1: different pH than the water outside of the vent, and
- 43:13Speaker 1: so this is a gradient that can be used to
- 43:15Speaker 1: generate energy. And so at these hydrothermal vents, you've got
- 43:18Speaker 1: this energy source. These hydrothermal vents also have rocks that
- 43:23Speaker 1: tend to be sort of sponge shaped, and if you
- 43:25Speaker 1: look at a sponge, there's like all of these little
- 43:27Speaker 1: sort of like pores and holes in it, and each
- 43:30Speaker 1: one of those pores or holes could have acted sort
- 43:33Speaker 1: of like a cell membrane, sort of separating into compartments,
- 43:37Speaker 1: so that stuff could happen in each of those different compartments.
- 43:40Speaker 1: And so now you have like primitive compartments, and you
- 43:43Speaker 1: have a source of energy, and some of the minerals
- 43:46Speaker 1: in that area can be used to catalyze reactions. And
- 43:49Speaker 1: when I say used to catalyze reactions, I'm not even
- 43:52Speaker 1: totally sure I know what that means. But anyway, so
- 43:55Speaker 1: hydrothermal vents are supposed to have all of these different
- 43:59Speaker 1: features where you can imagine metabolism arising first, and then
- 44:04Speaker 1: you're able to, through some other kind of chemistry magic,
- 44:08Speaker 1: get RNA and the ball gets rolling. And for anyone
- 44:10Speaker 1: who wants a really great book on it by a
- 44:12Speaker 1: chemist who knows what he's talking about, check out Nick
- 44:14Speaker 1: Layane's book The Vital Question, which is all about the
- 44:17Speaker 1: metabolism first hypothesis. What do you think did that make
- 44:21Speaker 1: any sense?
- 44:21Speaker 2: Katrina?
- 44:22Speaker 5: Yeah, very much so. I mean, I really like that
- 44:26Speaker 5: idea of almost like a life rock hybrid scenario where
- 44:31Speaker 5: the shapes of all those porous rocks around the hydrothermal
- 44:35Speaker 5: events are providing some of the structure that modern cells provide,
- 44:39Speaker 5: and so they could just kind of borrow that, and
- 44:42Speaker 5: you know, I could imagine like little seals of lipids
- 44:47Speaker 5: forming at the surface of a little pore, and then
- 44:50Speaker 5: that's almost like a little prototype for a cell where
- 44:53Speaker 5: you could get concentrated organic molecules on one side or
- 44:57Speaker 5: the other. And yeah, I really love thinking about that.
- 45:00Speaker 5: There's so much room for heterogeneity and diversity in that environment.
- 45:04Speaker 1: Yeah, And is it going to be ironic if, like,
- 45:07Speaker 1: down the road it turns out that this worked, and
- 45:09Speaker 1: like life depended on rocks and all the time we're
- 45:12Speaker 1: like you go from a gradient of rocks to life.
- 45:15Speaker 1: It's like the rocks would be like, you really didn't
- 45:17Speaker 1: appreciate us, so you couldn't be here without us totally.
- 45:19Speaker 5: Yeah, they're not just this like impartial, inert bystander. They
- 45:23Speaker 5: were like important.
- 45:25Speaker 4: Yeah, So you're saying essentially that, like you're building a
- 45:28Speaker 4: little chemical engine here, something that's taking advantage of energy
- 45:32Speaker 4: to do something there's no like genome, there's no heredity.
- 45:37Speaker 4: You just have like little bags of stuff that have
- 45:40Speaker 4: an energy source and some kind of driving reaction and
- 45:44Speaker 4: it's being contained by these little rocks. And you know,
- 45:48Speaker 4: if we found just that on an alien planet, would
- 45:50Speaker 4: you call that life?
- 45:52Speaker 3: No?
- 45:52Speaker 1: And I don't think that the people who study origins
- 45:55Speaker 1: of life would call that life either. But I think
- 45:58Speaker 1: that they would argue that this is a first step.
- 46:01Speaker 1: And I should say that there are like many, many,
- 46:04Speaker 1: many different hypotheses for where this stuff started. Maybe it's
- 46:07Speaker 1: not hydrothermal vents. Maybe it's hot spring somewhere. And maybe
- 46:10Speaker 1: it's not the white smokers, it's the black smokers, because
- 46:13Speaker 1: there's different kinds of hydrothermal vents. I've been talking about
- 46:15Speaker 1: a very early step for one hypothesis, but there's a
- 46:21Speaker 1: ton of different other ideas, And I suspect the people
- 46:23Speaker 1: who study the idea that I tried to summarize would say, yeah,
- 46:28Speaker 1: and then we have like a whole different set of
- 46:30Speaker 1: hypotheses for what happens next.
- 46:32Speaker 2: But first we're just trying to get this one step going.
- 46:35Speaker 1: And what's kind of amazing is that by creating these
- 46:38Speaker 1: very specific hypotheses. They've created scenarios that they can recreate
- 46:42Speaker 1: in the lab, and they do a bunch of these experiments.
- 46:45Speaker 1: They're actually trying to you know, create the origin of
- 46:48Speaker 1: life in the lab or you know, simulate the conditions
- 46:51Speaker 1: under which life started in the lab, and then they
- 46:53Speaker 1: go out in the field and they try to see, well,
- 46:55Speaker 1: are we seeing similar things happening in the field. So
- 46:57Speaker 1: this isn't just a philosophical debate, although the ophical debate
- 47:00Speaker 1: part is amazing. This is actually like there's experiments going
- 47:04Speaker 1: on where, you know, year after year we're sort of
- 47:06Speaker 1: whittling away at which one of these options that we
- 47:08Speaker 1: talk about are feasible and which ones aren't. So we're actually,
- 47:11Speaker 1: you know, we're making progress. It's chemistry progress. So it's
- 47:15Speaker 1: hard to share exactly what's happening, but people are working
- 47:19Speaker 1: on it. And then there's the RNA world hypothesis. Katrida,
- 47:23Speaker 1: could you go into a little bit more detail about ribozymes,
- 47:26Speaker 1: which are amazing because they both store genetic information and
- 47:29Speaker 1: replicate themselves, which we used to think you needed proteins for.
- 47:32Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly, so, and you know, in my mind, this
- 47:35Speaker 5: hypothesis about the RNA world goes hand in hand with
- 47:38Speaker 5: the metabolism first thinking, because you're gonna need energy in
- 47:41Speaker 5: those building blocks of life to build up the kinds
- 47:45Speaker 5: of polymers that have been so important for the basis
- 47:48Speaker 5: of life. But RNA ribon nucleic acids are very similar
- 47:52Speaker 5: to DNA. Just one of the important building blocks, the
- 47:56Speaker 5: ribonucleic acid molecule itself has an additional oxygen, and so
- 48:02Speaker 5: RNA molecules are inherently both more unstable but also more
- 48:08Speaker 5: creative and capable of interesting kinds of catalysis. And so
- 48:12Speaker 5: when you build a chain of RNA molecules, they have
- 48:16Speaker 5: the capacity to fold over on themselves and build structures
- 48:21Speaker 5: that you can use to do the same kind of
- 48:23Speaker 5: projects that proteins do. So the chains of RNA that
- 48:27Speaker 5: build themselves up into a little macromolecule called a ribozyme,
- 48:33Speaker 5: they are capable of some of the same chemistry that
- 48:35Speaker 5: proteins can do. So what proteins do is they go
- 48:39Speaker 5: grab a couple of substrates that they want to put
- 48:42Speaker 5: together into a reaction, and they hold them in a
- 48:44Speaker 5: position that makes it favorable for that reaction to happen.
- 48:48Speaker 5: And so ribeozins can do that too. They can build
- 48:51Speaker 5: a little structure and then they can grab onto molecules
- 48:54Speaker 5: in their environment and put the two substrates near each
- 48:58Speaker 5: other and like let the magic happen. So that's it's
- 49:00Speaker 5: really all they're doing. They're not like forcing the reaction,
- 49:02Speaker 5: they're just making it way more likely. And so ribozymes
- 49:06Speaker 5: are chains of RNA. There's still a big part of
- 49:09Speaker 5: the molecular central dogma of how molecular biology works in
- 49:13Speaker 5: our current modern cells. But in those days we probably
- 49:16Speaker 5: didn't have DNA or prouteins yet, we only had RNA.
- 49:20Speaker 5: So that's the RNA world hypothesis was that the first
- 49:22Speaker 5: molecules to form were chains of RNA that can store
- 49:27Speaker 5: energy just like DNA. They're very The molecules that comprise
- 49:31Speaker 5: RNA are super similar to DNA. There's just one extra
- 49:33Speaker 5: hydroxyl group. But then because of that extra hydroxyl group,
- 49:37Speaker 5: they have more capacity for catalysis. They're not as good
- 49:40Speaker 5: for storing genetic information because they break more easily that
- 49:44Speaker 5: oxygen makes them less stable.
- 49:46Speaker 2: Huh.
- 49:47Speaker 1: I didn't know most of that, which probably means I
- 49:49Speaker 1: slept through a really important lecture.
- 49:51Speaker 2: But that's amazing.
- 49:54Speaker 5: It's such a good story. Yeah, I love getting to
- 49:56Speaker 5: tell that one to students because it's like so apparent
- 49:58Speaker 5: to just look at that joxile hanging off the ribos
- 50:01Speaker 5: and you're like, look at all the stuff that made happen,
- 50:04Speaker 5: you know, mm hm.
- 50:05Speaker 1: So you're clearly team RNA in the RNA versus DNA debate.
- 50:10Speaker 5: I mean, I would not give up my DNA. Man
- 50:13Speaker 5: DNA is like rile, yeah, but I mean.
- 50:15Speaker 1: But you did have a sparkle in your eye when
- 50:17Speaker 1: you were talking about the RNA.
- 50:19Speaker 5: But yeah, I think it's fun to imagine that world
- 50:22Speaker 5: before we had the DNA or the protein, and I
- 50:25Speaker 5: think it's cool that we understand why. But when it
- 50:28Speaker 5: comes down to it, you know, I trust my DNA.
- 50:33Speaker 1: Okay, So you know this is a Daniel and Kelly's
- 50:36Speaker 1: Extraordinary Universe episode. So we talked a lot about what
- 50:39Speaker 1: we don't know and sort of the limits of our knowledge.
- 50:43Speaker 1: But I am still super excited about how far we've gotten,
- 50:47Speaker 1: like how many different conditions we've considered in the lab
- 50:50Speaker 1: and in the field, and how we've seen the building
- 50:53Speaker 1: blocks of life showing up in these different sorts of environments.
- 50:56Speaker 1: I mean, there have been papers that I read where
- 50:57Speaker 1: like something had to happen in the ocean, and it
- 51:00Speaker 1: got thrown up on top of the land, and then
- 51:02Speaker 1: it dried, and the drying was important for a step,
- 51:04Speaker 1: and then it gets washed back into the ocean, and
- 51:06Speaker 1: that's important for the next step. And they've simulated all
- 51:08Speaker 1: of this stuff in the lab.
- 51:09Speaker 2: Amazing, totally amazing.
- 51:11Speaker 1: But of course, the more steps that are involved, the
- 51:13Speaker 1: more complicated it probably is for life to arise. And
- 51:16Speaker 1: one of the questions that really stuck with me while
- 51:19Speaker 1: I was doing this reading was, you know, in situation
- 51:22Speaker 1: after situation, it seems like we were figuring out how
- 51:25Speaker 1: to come up with the building blocks of life, which
- 51:28Speaker 1: makes it surprising to me that we don't see life
- 51:31Speaker 1: popping up more often. And I guess the point is that,
- 51:35Speaker 1: you know, if you're talking about it, you know, first
- 51:36Speaker 1: it happens in the ocean, then it gets washed up
- 51:38Speaker 1: on a volcano bank, and then it has to you know,
- 51:40Speaker 1: fall back in. There's a lot of steps, and it's
- 51:42Speaker 1: super complicated, but it's kind of amazing that this thing
- 51:45Speaker 1: may have only happened and then really taken off once
- 51:49Speaker 1: and now here we all are and I don't really
- 51:52Speaker 1: know where I'm going with this. But I had a
- 51:54Speaker 1: lot of fun researching this, even though there's a lot
- 51:56Speaker 1: of chemistry.
- 51:58Speaker 4: And I'm really fascinating this question of like how often
- 52:00Speaker 4: did it happen? Like it's true that there's a lot
- 52:03Speaker 4: of evidence that all life on Earth has a single
- 52:06Speaker 4: common ancestor, but I'm not sure that rules out an
- 52:09Speaker 4: independent strain of life developing and then getting squashed by
- 52:13Speaker 4: or out competed.
- 52:14Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, And that was a point that I saw
- 52:17Speaker 1: made in these articles over and over again, is that
- 52:19Speaker 1: what we see is the one instance where life sort
- 52:22Speaker 1: of really got going and then stuck around and diversified.
- 52:25Speaker 1: But then to me, there's this other question of are
- 52:28Speaker 1: the conditions so different now that it just could never
- 52:31Speaker 1: happen again?
- 52:32Speaker 2: Like why does life not start fresh now?
- 52:36Speaker 1: And maybe it is something about the Earth being so different,
- 52:39Speaker 1: our conditions being so different now that you just couldn't
- 52:41Speaker 1: get it happening again.
- 52:42Speaker 2: But it makes me feel pretty lucky to be here.
- 52:45Speaker 5: I think. Yeah, I also thought about that a lot.
- 52:48Speaker 5: I think that the oxygen in the atmosphere I'm sure
- 52:50Speaker 5: you read all about this, is a major reason that
- 52:53Speaker 5: it's harder for these delicate initial life forms that were
- 52:57Speaker 5: probably emerging three and a half billion years ago. You know,
- 53:00Speaker 5: those guys could not stand the site of a molecule
- 53:03Speaker 5: of oxygen. It would immediately croak. So I think our
- 53:06Speaker 5: current conditions make that harder. But you know, it could
- 53:08Speaker 5: be that down in the deep sea thermal vents, those
- 53:11Speaker 5: conditions are still ripe for new origins, and so it
- 53:16Speaker 5: could be that some of those initial steps are happening.
- 53:19Speaker 5: They might not make it that far these days because
- 53:21Speaker 5: there's so much competition, but I would not be surprised
- 53:24Speaker 5: if there are places where those conditions still exist on Earth.
- 53:28Speaker 1: And check out our interview with doctor Andrew David Thayler
- 53:31Speaker 1: where he's talking about what's happening at hydrothermal events and
- 53:34Speaker 1: why we might want to be careful about mining them,
- 53:36Speaker 1: because this could be these vents could be a really
- 53:39Speaker 1: great place for us to be studying the origins of
- 53:41Speaker 1: life and trying to see if you know, maybe it
- 53:43Speaker 1: could ever happen again. But if we mind the heck
- 53:45Speaker 1: out of them and destroy them, we'd lose the ability
- 53:48Speaker 1: to study them.
- 53:49Speaker 4: Well, we don't know, but I suspect the origins of
- 53:51Speaker 4: life are hot and nasty and not very boring. Thanks
- 54:02Speaker 4: everybody for listening. Please go and do us a favor
- 54:04Speaker 4: and rate the show on.
- 54:05Speaker 3: Whatever podcast app you're using. It really helps people find us.
- 54:09Speaker 1: Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is edited by the amazing
- 54:13Speaker 1: Matt Kesselman.
- 54:14Speaker 4: He really is a wizard. You can also find us
- 54:17Speaker 4: online on Blue Sky, Instagram, and x D and K Universe.
- 54:23Speaker 4: Come engage with us.
- 54:24Speaker 1: You can email us at questions at Danielankelly dot org.
- 54:28Speaker 1: We really do want to hear.
- 54:29Speaker 4: From you, and you can find our website www dot
- 54:32Speaker 4: danieland Kelly dot org, where you'll also find an invitation
- 54:36Speaker 4: to join our discord where everybody comes and talks about
- 54:39Speaker 4: the amazing universe.
- 54:41Speaker 1: And we also have the most amazing moderators. This is
- 54:45Speaker 1: an iHeart podcast. Thanks for joining us.