Latest / Reformed Thinking / Christ Before Caiaphas and Peter at a Distance (Matthew 26:57-58)

Transcript

Christ Before Caiaphas and Peter at a Distance (Matthew 26:57-58) · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to reformed thinking. Glad to be here talking about
• 0:03
  this with you. So to start this off, I want you
• 0:06
  to imagine something for a second.
• 0:07
  OK, I'm tracking. Picture of the Supreme Court,
• 0:09
  right? But they are convening at like 2
• 0:13
  in the morning. Oh man.
• 0:15
  Yeah, meeting quietly in some judges private living room to to
• 0:20
  sentence a man to death before the public even wakes up.
• 0:23
  Completely in the dark. Right in the dark, they just
• 0:26
  bypass all standard procedures. They lock the doors and they
• 0:29
  rush a verdict. Why?
• 0:31
  Because they're scared of the public.
• 0:33
  Precisely, the defendant is way too popular to be tried in the
• 0:36
  light of day. That is, I mean, that's a
• 0:38
  terrifying scenario. It is, but that is the precise
• 0:41
  level of illegal, panicked corruption we are looking at
• 0:44
  today. Yeah, we are doing a real deep
• 0:46
  dive into our historical and theological horses today.
• 0:50
  We are. We're examining a midnight trial
• 0:52
  that, well, it changed human history.
• 0:54
  And we're focusing on the Gospel of Matthew, right?
• 0:57
  Chapter 26. Yes, specifically verses 57 and
• 1:00
  58. It's just such a scene of
• 1:02
  intense contradiction. It really is.
• 1:04
  On one hand you have the Lord of glory, the encarted Son of God,
• 1:09
  and he's just voluntarily submitting to physical bonds.
• 1:13
  And then on the other hand, you have the Apostle Peter.
• 1:17
  Right, who is physically free? Yeah, physically free, but
• 1:20
  entirely paralyzed by fear, just trailing behind at a safe
• 1:24
  distance. The contrast there is, well,
• 1:26
  it's staggering when you look at the mechanics of what is
• 1:29
  actually happening. It really is.
• 1:30
  The scene we are examining today defines theological paradox.
• 1:34
  You. Know.
• 1:34
  Oh, absolutely. I mean, you have the creator of
• 1:37
  the universe allowing himself to be arrested.
• 1:39
  And dragged before the high priest Caiaphas.
• 1:41
  Yeah, dragged right into his house.
• 1:43
  It's a historical moment that redefines what it means to be
• 1:46
  bound and what it that means to be free.
• 1:48
  And it exposes this glaring disparity between the Savior's
• 1:51
  steadfast obedience to the Father's decree and then the
• 1:54
  terrifying ease with which a self reliant disciple slips into
• 1:58
  spiritual compromise. It really happened so fast for
• 2:01
  Peter. It does, but to understand how
• 2:03
  all this unfolds, I think we need to build the historical
• 2:06
  stage a bit. Yeah, let's set the scene for
• 2:08
  the listener. So we are in Jerusalem.
• 2:10
  The season is spring, likely in the year 8030 or 33.
• 2:14
  And the city is just overflowing with pilgrims.
• 2:17
  Because it's the bustling Passover feast.
• 2:19
  Yeah, Passover. I mean, Jerusalem's population
• 2:22
  would swell from maybe 50,000 to over 1/4 of a million people
• 2:27
  during this week. That is a massive influx of
• 2:29
  people. It's huge and you have to
• 2:31
  understand the political climate to grasp the tension in the air.
• 2:35
  Right, Israel is existing as a subjugated territory under the
• 2:39
  iron grip of the Roman Empire. Yeah, and the Roman prefect,
• 2:43
  Pontius Pilate, he's actually in town.
• 2:45
  With extra troops. Right, extra troops stationed at
• 2:47
  the Antonia fortress which it overlooks the temple.
• 2:50
  So they are watching everything. Oh, very closely.
• 2:53
  They are watching for any sign of a riot.
• 2:56
  And operating under that heavy Roman shadow is the Sanhedrin.
• 2:59
  Right, the supreme Jewish ruling body.
• 3:02
  So that's a council of 71 elders, scribes and priests.
• 3:06
  And they are desperate. I mean, they want to maintain
• 3:09
  their localized authority, their wealth, their status.
• 3:12
  And they know that keeping the peace with Rome is the only way
• 3:15
  to hold on to those positions. Yeah, if a riot breaks out
• 3:19
  during Passover, which is a festival that literally
• 3:21
  celebrates Jewish liberation from foreign oppression, mind
• 3:25
  you. Oh, the irony there is thick.
• 3:26
  It is. If that happens, Rome will just
• 3:29
  send in the legions and strip the Sanhedrin of whatever
• 3:32
  limited autonomy they have left. So sitting at the very top of
• 3:36
  that fragile hierarchy is Caiaphas.
• 3:38
  Right, he is the acting high priest.
• 3:41
  But he was appointed by Ron, wasn't he?
• 3:43
  He. Was, and from everything we see
• 3:45
  in the historical sources, he operates much more like a
• 3:48
  political pragmatist than a spiritual shepherd.
• 3:50
  He's a politician. Very much so, and he's also
• 3:53
  heavily influenced by his father-in-law Anis.
• 3:56
  Who held the High priesthood before him?
• 3:58
  Yeah, and Anis still pulls a massive amount of strings behind
• 4:01
  the scenes. So that political pragmatism, it
• 4:03
  basically drives everything that happens next.
• 4:06
  Totally. When we look at this midnight
• 4:08
  trial at the House of Caiaphas, what stands out is the sheer
• 4:11
  illegality of the entire event. Yeah, the Sanhedrin was bound by
• 4:15
  strict Mishnaic laws of jurisprudence.
• 4:18
  These were rigid legal requirements designed
• 4:21
  specifically to protect the accused.
• 4:23
  Like for a capital trial trial where a life was on the line,
• 4:27
  the proceedings had to take place in broad daylight.
• 4:29
  The Mishnah explicitly states that a capital case must be
• 4:32
  tried during the day and concluded during the day.
• 4:35
  So doing this in the dead of night is totally out of bounds.
• 4:38
  Completely illegal. I am stuck on something here
• 4:40
  though. If the Sanhedrin hated Jesus so
• 4:44
  much and they had a mob out in the Garden of Gethsemane, why
• 4:48
  not just assassinate him right there in the dark?
• 4:50
  That's a great question. I.
• 4:52
  Mean why bother dragging him back for a fake trial at all?
• 4:55
  Well, that is the political pragmatism of Caiaphas kicking
• 4:58
  in. OK, how so?
• 4:59
  Because an assassination creates a martyr.
• 5:02
  Oh, oh, I see. Right.
• 5:03
  If Jesus just disappears in the dead of night, the crowds will
• 5:06
  venerate him. The rumors of his messiahship
• 5:08
  would just explode. Exactly.
• 5:10
  Precisely. But a formal legal condemnation
• 5:13
  by the highest religious body in the nation?
• 5:16
  That creates a heretic. Yes, they needed to destroy his
• 5:20
  credibility, not just his body. They needed the public to see
• 5:23
  him cursed by the law. But to get that formal
• 5:26
  condemnation before the crowds could rally to his defense, they
• 5:30
  had to break their own rule. Yeah, and they broke a lot of
• 5:33
  them. Like besides the requirement for
• 5:35
  daylight, they absolutely could not hold a trial on the eve of a
• 5:38
  Sabbath or a festival. And this is the eve of the
• 5:41
  biggest festival of the year, right?
• 5:43
  Furthermore, even if a guilty verdict was reached, the law
• 5:47
  required a full 24 hours to pass before sentencing.
• 5:50
  Yeah. The judges were supposed to go
• 5:51
  home fast, discuss the case in pairs and sleep on it.
• 5:55
  To allow time for clemency or new evidence.
• 5:58
  Yeah, none of which happened here.
• 6:00
  The clandestine midnight nature of this trial just exposes the
• 6:04
  blinding hatred and the systemic corruption of these men.
• 6:07
  The righteous lawgiver is being judged by men who are
• 6:09
  frantically trampling their own laws.
• 6:11
  Just to secure a predetermined outcome.
• 6:14
  Yeah, they maintain the outward forms of elite legal proceeding,
• 6:17
  but the verge was decided long before Jesus ever stepped foot
• 6:21
  in that courtyard. They are terrified of his
• 6:23
  authority. They really are.
• 6:24
  Which makes perfect sense when we look at where Matthew places
• 6:27
  these events in his Gospel. Yeah, the literary context is
• 6:30
  crucial here. If we zoom out and look at
• 6:32
  chapters 24 and 25, we just had the Olivet Discourse.
• 6:37
  Right where Jesus is speaking with absolute divine authority.
• 6:40
  Talking about the end of the age, the destruction of the
• 6:42
  temple and his returning glory. Then we move straight into the
• 6:46
  agony in Gethsemane. And right after the verses we
• 6:49
  were discussing today, we hit Peter's tragic threefold denial.
• 6:53
  Matthew is a master of narrative structure.
• 6:56
  He uses verses 57 and 58 as a transition hinge.
• 6:59
  So the narrative shifts abruptly.
• 7:02
  Yes, we move from the violent, chaotic physical arrest in the
• 7:06
  garden right into the intense psychological and judicial
• 7:09
  interrogations. Inside the high priest's
• 7:11
  residence, yeah. Matthew intentionally places the
• 7:14
  bound, arrested Jesus and the physically free trailing Peter
• 7:19
  side by side. To draw a massive dichotomy
• 7:21
  between divine fortitude and human frailty.
• 7:25
  That's the whole. Point of placing them together
• 7:26
  in the text. I get why Matthew does that, but
• 7:29
  I do have a concern here. What's that?
• 7:31
  If we spend so much time analyzing Peter's failure, his
• 7:35
  cowardice, his physical distance, does that distract us
• 7:40
  from the suffering of Christ? Like are we making the story
• 7:43
  about Peter instead of Jesus? I completely understand that
• 7:46
  concern, but I think Matthew designed this whole literary
• 7:49
  framework specifically to magnify Christ.
• 7:52
  How does looking at a failure magnify Christ?
• 7:55
  Well, we look at Peter's wretched weakness only long
• 7:58
  enough to realize our own need for a substitute.
• 8:01
  I see. Think about Peter's background.
• 8:03
  Peter represents the absolute best of human intention and
• 8:06
  self-reliance. Earlier in chapter 26, verse 33,
• 8:10
  Peter arrogantly boasted, Though they all fall away because of
• 8:13
  you, I will never fall away. Right.
• 8:15
  He was entirely confident in his own fleshly resolve.
• 8:18
  He genuinely believed his willpower was stronger than his
• 8:21
  fear. He was ready to fight.
• 8:22
  I mean, he even pulled a sword in the garden and cut off the
• 8:25
  ear of the high priest servant. He did.
• 8:27
  He was ready to go to war. But fleshly bravado evaporates
• 8:30
  when the reality of suffering sets in.
• 8:32
  Yeah, it really does. By showing how quickly that
• 8:35
  resolve shatters, Matthew actually forces our eyes back
• 8:38
  onto the majestic suffering of the king.
• 8:40
  Because Christ stands firm precisely where the best of
• 8:44
  humanity fails. Yes, Matthew wants us to see
• 8:47
  that Jesus is walking a path that no sinful human could ever
• 8:51
  walk. OK, to truly see this contrast,
• 8:55
  I think we should look closely at the original Greek vocabulary
• 8:58
  Matthew uses. Oh, the lexical choices here are
• 9:01
  fascinating. The.
• 9:02
  Words chosen to describe the actions of the mob and the
• 9:05
  actions of Peter are remarkably revealing.
• 9:08
  Let's look at verse 57, OK? The text uses the Greek
• 9:11
  participle kratosantes, which comes from the root word
• 9:14
  kratich. And this is not a gentle
• 9:16
  apprehension. No, this means to arrest or
• 9:19
  seize with physical force and aggressive authority.
• 9:22
  When you look at extra biblical literature from that era, like
• 9:25
  the Oxurinkus papyri. Right, those ancient documents.
• 9:28
  Yeah, the word croce is heavily utilized in judicial and
• 9:31
  military contexts. It describes the violent
• 9:34
  apprehension of dangerous insurrectionists by state
• 9:37
  authorities. It implies overwhelming physical
• 9:40
  domination. Jesus is aggressively
• 9:43
  manhandled. They treated him like a violent
• 9:46
  threat to the Empire. Very much so.
• 9:48
  Which raises an interesting psychological point.
• 9:51
  Why did the Roman and Jewish guards need to use overwhelming
• 9:54
  military force against a peaceful teacher?
• 9:57
  Why do you think? Well, they brought swords and
• 9:59
  clubs. I think they were genuinely
• 10:01
  terrified of him that. Makes a lot of sense.
• 10:03
  They had seen him calm storms cast out demons raise the dead.
• 10:07
  They approached him like a military threat because he was a
• 10:10
  massive threat to their entire power structure.
• 10:13
  Yeah, they used Kratif because they were scared.
• 10:15
  That is a very accurate assessment of their psychology.
• 10:18
  They bind him tightly because they fear his strength.
• 10:20
  Yet grammatically, Matthew constructs the sentence so that
• 10:23
  Jesus allows himself to be the passive, direct object, right?
• 10:28
  He is the one being acted upon, even though he holds all
• 10:30
  authority. He could have called down 12
• 10:32
  legions of angels. But he restrains himself.
• 10:35
  He subjects himself to Kratif. Then we hit verse 58 and the
• 10:39
  text shifts violently. We get the Greek conjunction
• 10:42
  day, which translates to but. But Peter and the verb used for
• 10:47
  Peter's following is okaluthi. Yes, this is an imperfect active
• 10:52
  indicative verb. And that verb tense is vital for
• 10:55
  our understanding, isn't it? It is the imperfect tense in
• 10:59
  Greek denotes continuous linear lingering action in the past
• 11:04
  time. So it means he kept on following
• 11:06
  or was following. Well, right.
• 11:08
  It paints a picture of a hesitant, lingering action.
• 11:10
  He took a step. He stopped.
• 11:12
  He looked around. He took another step.
• 11:14
  Yeah, he's trailing cautiously. Meanwhile, the scribes and
• 11:18
  elders are taking decisive action.
• 11:20
  The text says they were gathered together using the verb synexism
• 11:24
  and. That specific verb synexism,
• 11:26
  feels like it carries a lot of Old Testament baggage.
• 11:28
  It does? Oh, definitely.
• 11:30
  It is a premeditated, coordinated assembly.
• 11:33
  It actively fulfills a prophetic lament of Psalm chapter 2, verse
• 11:36
  2. Where the rulers take counsel
• 11:38
  together, or gather together against the Lord and against His
• 11:41
  anointed. Right.
• 11:42
  The enemies of Christ are decisive, unified, and active.
• 11:46
  While the disciple of Christ is hesitant, solitary and
• 11:49
  lingering. Yeah, the contrast is stark.
• 11:52
  Think of this grammatical shift like a cinematic technique.
• 11:55
  First, the camera captures a decisive, violent mob
• 11:59
  successfully capturing their target.
• 12:01
  Right. The action is sharp, aggressive,
• 12:03
  definitive. They are moving with purpose.
• 12:05
  Then the focus softens, the camera pans away, and it
• 12:09
  captures a slow, hesitant spectator dragging his feet in
• 12:13
  the shadows. We are watching a man caught
• 12:15
  between his previous bold claims and his current paralyzing fear.
• 12:20
  The sharp action of the enemies versus the lingering hesitation
• 12:23
  of the disciple. And that hesitant walking
• 12:25
  eventually leads Peter to a specific physical location.
• 12:28
  A location that carries massive theological weight for the
• 12:31
  narrative, yes. The text says Peter followed
• 12:33
  Appamakrithan, which translates to from a distance.
• 12:37
  Let's just established the physical layout of where he ends
• 12:39
  up. He follows the mob to the high
• 12:41
  priest residence in the wealthy upper city of Jerusalem.
• 12:43
  And the architectural layout of a typical 1st century high
• 12:47
  priest's house included an open central courtyard surrounded by
• 12:51
  elevated room. This means Peter can sit down
• 12:53
  below in the damp, chilly courtyard.
• 12:55
  And observe the trial happening in the brightly lit elevated
• 12:59
  rooms above him. The phrase up O macrotham is
• 13:02
  incredibly telling. If we look at these Septuagint,
• 13:05
  which is the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the
• 13:08
  equivalent of that phrase translates the Hebrew Gird
• 13:11
  Rashock. And where do we see that used?
• 13:13
  We see the specific concept in Psalm 38, verse 11.
• 13:17
  The psalmist writes about companions and friends standing
• 13:20
  far off, standing aloof from someone suffering a plague.
• 13:24
  Oh wow, so Peter's physical geography in that courtyard
• 13:28
  perfectly mirrors his spiritual alienation and his internal
• 13:31
  terror. Yes, he is physically distant
• 13:34
  because his faith has faltered. The text adds another crushing
• 13:37
  detail. Says Peter sits with the guards
• 13:39
  or the servants. The Greek phrase is meta tune
• 13:42
  hipperetton. He sits down at the charcoal
• 13:44
  fire to see the end or to see the outcome.
• 13:46
  He is sitting with the very men who just tied the ropes around
• 13:50
  Jesus's wrists. Peter sitting with the guards is
• 13:53
  like a whistleblower hiding out in the corporate break room of
• 13:57
  the corrupt company he just exposed.
• 13:59
  That's a great way to put. It he wants the comfort and
• 14:02
  warmth of the room, but he is utterly terrified someone is
• 14:05
  going to recognize his face. It is the ultimate cognitive
• 14:08
  dissonance. He is seeking the warmth, the
• 14:11
  comfort and the anonymity of the enemy.
• 14:13
  'S fire. That detail really exposes the
• 14:17
  immense danger of his position. He has abandoned active
• 14:20
  participation in the Kingdom. He is no longer walking the path
• 14:24
  of a disciple. He has adopted A degraded
• 14:26
  spectator mentality. He wants to know what will
• 14:29
  happen, but he refuses to share in the suffering.
• 14:32
  You know, when you think about your own work place or social
• 14:34
  circles, it is so easy to judge Peter.
• 14:37
  Though for sure. But how often do we do the exact
• 14:39
  same thing? We don't want to outright deny
• 14:41
  our faith, but we definitely want to warm our hands at the
• 14:44
  cultural fire. We want the world's come fault
• 14:46
  without the world's scrutiny. Is it possible Peter thought he
• 14:51
  was being strategic here? What do you mean?
• 14:53
  Could he have rationalized this as a tactical move?
• 14:56
  Like I will act as an undercover agent, I will gather
• 15:00
  information, I will stay close enough to know what is happening
• 15:03
  but blend in so I don't get arrested too.
• 15:05
  The text completely dismantles that idea.
• 15:08
  It does, yeah. There is no such thing as
• 15:09
  undercover Christianity in the biblical framework, right?
• 15:12
  Trying to hide among the enemies of Christ is a direct result of
• 15:16
  placing the fear of man above the fear of God.
• 15:19
  So discipleship at a distance is internally unstable.
• 15:23
  Yes, you cannot secretly follow the Lord while openly seeking
• 15:27
  the comfort of those who hate Him.
• 15:29
  When you sit with the servants of the high priest to watch from
• 15:32
  the sidelines, your tongue will eventually be tested.
• 15:35
  And as we know, Peter's testimony collapses completely.
• 15:38
  It is a devastating reality check, but as we established
• 15:41
  earlier, this passage is not primarily about Peter.
• 15:44
  No, his failure is the dark backdrop that makes the main
• 15:47
  subject shine brighter. Let's shift our focus to the
• 15:51
  Christological fulfillment here. The text presents Jesus as the
• 15:54
  silent lamb. This historical moment is a
• 15:57
  direct fulfillment of the Old Testament office of the
• 15:59
  Suffering Servant. This explicitly mirrors the
• 16:01
  prophecy found in Isaiah 23 verse 7.
• 16:04
  Right, it says he was oppressed and afflicted, yet he opened not
• 16:09
  his mouth. LED like a lamb to the
• 16:11
  slaughter, and like a sheep silent before its shearers.
• 16:14
  Jesus is walking into the machinery of judgment not
• 16:17
  because he is guilty, but because he is sovereignly
• 16:20
  bearing the guilt of others. We also see a striking
• 16:23
  connection to the Old Testament levitical system here.
• 16:26
  Because Caiaphas is rushing this illegal midnight verdict.
• 16:31
  But there is a sick irony here, right?
• 16:33
  Oh. Absolutely.
• 16:33
  Because Caiaphas isn't just a corrupt judge, he is the high
• 16:36
  priest, right? Doesn't Jewish law require the
• 16:39
  high priest to meticulously inspect a sacrifice before it is
• 16:42
  slaughtered? Yes, the high priest was
• 16:44
  required to painstakingly examine the sacrificial.
• 16:48
  Lamb to ensure it was completely without physical blemish before
• 16:51
  it could be offered on the altar.
• 16:52
  The irony is staggering. The true eternal Lamb of God is
• 16:56
  brought before the corrupt earthly High Priest.
• 16:59
  Caiaphas is sitting in judgement to condemn from him, completely
• 17:02
  unaware that his wicked actions are actually facilitating the
• 17:06
  ultimate sacrifice. He is inspecting the true lamb,
• 17:09
  finding no valid fault in him and preparing him to be
• 17:12
  slaughtered for our transgressions.
• 17:14
  When we look at this through the lens of Reformed theology,
• 17:17
  specifically the Westminster Standards, we have to talk about
• 17:21
  Christ's obedience. Yes, there are two facets to
• 17:23
  this His active obedience and His passive obedience.
• 17:26
  How do both of those manifest in this courtyard scene?
• 17:30
  In federal theology or covenant theology, this distinction is
• 17:33
  vital. In his active obedience, Christ
• 17:35
  consciously chose to fulfill all the righteous demands of the law
• 17:39
  on our behalf. He walked this harrowing path
• 17:42
  without resisting the Father's decree.
• 17:44
  He actively obeyed where Adam failed, where Israel failed, and
• 17:47
  where Peter is currently failing.
• 17:49
  He kept the covenant of works perfectly.
• 17:51
  Yes, and then in his passive obedience, he voluntarily
• 17:55
  endured the physical violence, the false accusations, and the
• 17:58
  unrighteous judgement. To legally secure our
• 18:00
  justification. He submitted to the penalty of
• 18:02
  the law, paying the debt we owed.
• 18:04
  So on one side of the courtyard, up in the elevated rooms, we
• 18:08
  have perfect divine grace and steadfast obedience.
• 18:11
  Down below by the fire, we have a vivid display of total
• 18:16
  depravity. Let's unpack the mechanism of
• 18:18
  that depravity. If human willpower was enough to
• 18:21
  sustain salvation, Peter would have been the one to prove it.
• 18:24
  He had the physical proximity to Jesus, the theological
• 18:27
  knowledge, and the explicit warning from Christ himself just
• 18:31
  hours earlier. Yet in the span of a few hours,
• 18:34
  his free will folded completely it.
• 18:36
  Physically illustrates the mechanism of total depravity
• 18:39
  that without divine intervention, the default human
• 18:42
  posture under pressure is treason.
• 18:44
  Peter's catastrophic failure in this moment proves that no human
• 18:48
  being can save themselves through power.
• 18:50
  This text completely shatters Armenian theology.
• 18:53
  It really does, because that theology places the weight of
• 18:55
  perseverance upon human free will.
• 18:57
  If salvation depended on Peters free will and his ability to
• 19:01
  choose righteousness that night, all would be lost.
• 19:03
  Total depravity does not mean Peter is as evil as he could
• 19:06
  possibly be, It means his will is bound by his sinful nature.
• 19:10
  He is a slave to his fear and his desire for self
• 19:13
  preservation. The contrast highlights our
• 19:15
  total inability to remain faithful by our own merit.
• 19:19
  Peter's cowardice demonstrates that we desperately require a
• 19:22
  savior who succeeds Florida State precisely where we fail
• 19:26
  miserably. Christ's steadfast obedience,
• 19:29
  His perfect record, is imputed to the failing disciple.
• 19:33
  The irony of the scene is heavy. Think about this.
• 19:35
  What's that? The Maker of the universe, the
• 19:37
  one who holds every single atom together by his spoken word,
• 19:41
  voluntarily submits to the ropes tied by his own rebellious
• 19:45
  creatures. It's hard to wrap your mind
• 19:47
  around he. Allows the hands he designed to
• 19:49
  bind him. It is the ultimate display of
• 19:51
  sovereign humility. And because Christ stood firm
• 19:54
  where Peter failed, this historical reality confronts us
• 19:58
  today. We cannot just leave this in the
• 19:59
  in the 1st century. No, we have to look at how this
• 20:01
  addresses your daily life and the current state of the modern
• 20:04
  church. When Matthew originally wrote
• 20:06
  this Gospel, he was writing to a specific demographic.
• 20:09
  He was writing to a community of Jewish Christians who were
• 20:11
  facing severe trials. They were dealing with social
• 20:14
  ostracism, economic boycotts and formal excommunication from
• 20:18
  their synagogues. They knew what it meant to be
• 20:20
  hated by the religious and cultural establishment.
• 20:23
  They knew the real cost of confessing Christ.
• 20:25
  The original audience faced the daily terrifying temptation to
• 20:28
  compromise their gospel testimony to avoid societal
• 20:32
  wrath. They were tempted to blend in,
• 20:34
  just like Peter. And the text acts as a stern
• 20:37
  warning against that compromise. The direct application for you,
• 20:41
  the listener, is clear. Seeking cultural acceptability
• 20:45
  and associating closely with the world's authorities inevitably
• 20:48
  leads to denying the Lord of glory.
• 20:50
  When you prioritize the approval of your peers over the commands
• 20:53
  of Christ, you are walking in Peter's hesitant footsteps.
• 20:57
  We see this playing out on a massive scale in modern
• 21:00
  Christianity. We see pragmatic and seeker
• 21:03
  sensitive church movements that try to adapt the message to the
• 21:06
  culture. They want to make the gospel
• 21:08
  more palatable, less offensive. They survey the culture to see
• 21:11
  what the culture wants and and then they design their church
• 21:14
  services to meet those fleshly desires.
• 21:16
  Those modern pragmatic movements deliberately attempt to remove
• 21:20
  the offense of the cross. They adopt secular business
• 21:23
  models, entertainment driven worship and softened moral
• 21:27
  stances. Simply to draw crowds and game
• 21:30
  social capital. By doing so, they're teaching
• 21:32
  their congregants to act exactly like, well, similarly to Peter.
• 21:37
  They are training the church to warm its hands at the world's
• 21:40
  cultural fires. Seeking comfort rather than
• 21:42
  bearing the reproach of Christ outside the camp.
• 21:45
  The law of God demands total loyalty.
• 21:48
  There is no middle ground. And we failed the standard
• 21:51
  daily. We shrink back from sharing the
• 21:53
  exclusive gospel at work because we fear what our colleagues will
• 21:57
  think. We remain silent on biblical
• 21:59
  truth because we are afraid of the cultural backlash.
• 22:01
  Or afraid of losing our jobs or our social standing.
• 22:05
  We let the fear of man dictate our actions.
• 22:07
  But the solution to this failure is not moralism.
• 22:10
  Right. The pulpit must not simply
• 22:11
  declare. Try harder to be brave.
• 22:14
  Don't be a coward like Peter. That is a man centered message
• 22:17
  that relies on the very flesh that failed Peter in the first
• 22:20
  place. The true solution is looking
• 22:22
  strictly to the substitutionary atonement of Christ.
• 22:26
  His inexhaustible grace pardons the cowardly disciple, He
• 22:29
  restores the one who fell. We rely entirely on the Holy
• 22:32
  Spirit's sanctifying work, motivated by immense gratitude
• 22:37
  for what Christ endured in that courtyard.
• 22:39
  So for the local church, how should a congregation
• 22:42
  practically respond to the heavy reality of this text?
• 22:46
  How do we build a culture that stands firm when the world
• 22:49
  brings the pressure? The local church must respond by
• 22:52
  maintaining strict confessional boundaries.
• 22:54
  We have to know what we believe and state it clearly.
• 22:57
  The Church must rely entirely on the ordinary means of grace, the
• 23:00
  faithful preaching of the Word, the right administration of the
• 23:03
  sacraments, and corporate prayer.
• 23:05
  Furthermore, the Church must completely reject ecumenical
• 23:08
  compromise with liberal denominations that deny the
• 23:11
  supernatural realities of the faith.
• 23:13
  Stand distinct, boldly confessing Christ, refusing to
• 23:16
  soften the truth for the sake of false unity.
• 23:19
  To recap our time today, the passage we examined is dark.
• 23:22
  It pulls back the curtain on human cowardice and
• 23:24
  institutional corruption. It shows us the ugly reality of
• 23:28
  our own self-reliance. But simultaneously it shines A
• 23:31
  blindingly bright light on the sovereign substitutionary
• 23:35
  sacrifice of the King. He stood firm as a pillar of
• 23:38
  iron when all others fled into the night.
• 23:41
  I want to leave you with a thrilling eschatological
• 23:45
  reality. Oh, this is good.
• 23:46
  Based on a biblical premillennial view of the future
• 23:49
  found in Revelation Chapter 20, we know that one day the roles
• 23:54
  we saw in this passage will be terrifyingly reversed.
• 23:57
  Reverse how? The wicked Caiaphas, the
• 23:59
  arrogant Sanhedrin and all the corrupt rulers of this present
• 24:03
  age will be resurrected. But they will not be sitting in
• 24:05
  comfortable elevated seats of judgment.
• 24:08
  No, they will stand bound and terrified before the great White
• 24:11
  Throne, Judgment seat of the triumphant Christ.
• 24:13
  The corrupt judges will face the true righteous judge.
• 24:17
  It's an awe inspiring thought. Cast off yourself, Reliance.
• 24:19
  Step out of the shadows of the courtyard and bowl oldly.
• 24:22
  Confess Christ before a hostile generation.
• 24:24
  Keep seeking truth.