Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / WPATH Files Reveal Disturbing Truth Behind Gender Affirming Care

Transcript

WPATH Files Reveal Disturbing Truth Behind Gender Affirming Care · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

0:03
So Michael Schellenberger the w PATH files. Now, the word expert has taken
0:08
quite a beating the last few years, hasn't. It doesn't feel like it
0:12
means the same thing it used to, and these appeals to authority, to
0:17
the experts are not nearly as convincing as they used to be. This is
0:22
one of the reasons why, because institutionally there has been a bias that has
0:29
crept in a far left, to my mind, extremist bias that has crept
0:33
into everything and taken over institutions. So let's take a look. Advocates of
0:40
gender affirming care say it's evidence based, hmmm. But now newly released internal
0:46
files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health WPATH prove that the practice of
0:53
transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical. Well that you didn't really need to
0:59
actually eve and be an expert to figure that out. I mean, it's
1:03
also incoherent, I mean just right from the start. So is it that
1:08
everything's a social construct, including gender? So is it that or is it
1:14
that it's set Because apparently at the same time and the duality of all this
1:19
far left Marxist lunacy, a five year old can be bored in the wrong
1:23
body and absolutely no for sure. So which is it social construct or is
1:29
it fixed? Well, I guess it just depends on on the whim,
1:34
on what's most convenient for the moment. But let's hear as Schollenberger talking about
1:40
it himself. Here, let's go through this video. A year and a
1:42
half ago, a video of gender medicine experts went viral on it. They
1:47
talked about how hard it is to talk with teenagers about whether they might want
1:49
to have kids one day. It's always a good theory that you talk about
1:53
fertility preservation with a thirteen year old. But I know I'm talking to a
1:59
blank wall, and the same would happen for assist gender kid right thimly you
2:02
kids, babies, growths or usuals back answers, I'm going to adopt.
2:06
I'm just going to adopt. And then you ask the world, which does
2:08
it evolved? Like, how what does it cost? Oh? I thought
2:10
you just like went to the orphanage and they gave you a baby. No,
2:15
it's not quite like that. That's doctor Daniel Metzger, and he's talking
2:19
about the challenge of getting what's known as informed consent from children and adolescents to
2:23
undergo procedures that will result in their sterilization. Over the last several years,
2:29
doctors, medical experts on the media have all said that the best way to
2:32
help adolescents in distress about their gender is to give them puberty blockers, hormones,
2:38
and surgeries to align their physical sex with their gender identity. The alternative
2:44
to doing so, they said, was suicide. But now a new study
2:47
released last month found no scientific evidence to support the claim that drugs and surgeries
2:52
prevent suicide among people with gender dysphoria. Now, I agree we should be
2:57
concerned about children adolescents experiencing distress about their biological sex, but now there's even
3:02
more evidence to warrant greater caution in how we treat them. Whistleblowers have given
3:07
me the internal files from the main gender medicine organization, which is known as
3:12
w PATH and stands for the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. The w
3:17
PATH files show surgeons, therapists, and activists discussing it internally how to treat
3:23
people with gender distress. What they show is that what's happening is neither good
3:27
science nor good medicine. There's a discussion for example about the blocking of puberty
3:32
of a ten year old girl. There's a discussion of doing general surgery and
3:37
a people with schizophrenia and its dissociative identity disorder which used to be called multiple
3:42
personality disorder. At the core of medical ethics is getting this informed consent from
3:47
the people receiving the medicine or from their caregivers. The w PATH files show
3:52
overwhelming evidence that the professionals within w PATH know they're not getting consent from children,
3:58
adolescents, and vulnerable adults or from their caregivers. They know that so
4:02
called gender affirming care can result in lifelong complications and sterility. Their patients do
4:09
not understand the implications. Many patients are unaware that they will lose sexual function,
4:14
including the ability to experience orgasm. After I received these files, my
4:17
colleagues and I tried to report on them as we would journalists. We quickly
4:21
became overwhelmed by the size and complexity of the project, and so we decided
4:27
to write a full report about the files for Environmental Progress, our nonprofit research
4:31
institute, in order to put the w PATH files in the context of the
4:35
best available science about gender distress. The result is a new report w path
4:41
files pseudoscientific surgical and hormonal experience. So what we're going to find in this
4:46
is that there's no guardrails anymore. Right, everything is just, everything is
4:53
just what feels left wing, what feels you know, I would use the
4:58
word fashionable at this point. You know, this feels like it's left,
5:03
it feels progressive. You know, we've been told that anybody who's opposed to
5:08
it is one of those far right people, one of those scary far right
5:11
people. Any person with common sense is scary and far right. You know,
5:15
the real question is, well, it's not even a question. It's
5:18
obvious and obviously American Medical Association, Indocrine Society, American Academy of Pediatrics,
5:26
there's no guardrails. These could no longer be considered legitimate institutions. And let's
5:30
see why. And I think the thing if you remember about kids, is
5:33
that we're often explaining these sorts of things to people who haven't even had biology
5:38
in high school yet. And and and I know I've heard others in this
5:44
kind of a in this kind of a studying say, well, people who
5:46
haven't even had biology in high school yet, we think adults are like really
5:51
slick biologically even picked. Lots of people have very little medical understanding of stuff
5:58
like that. We just medical professional and mental health professionals take for granted.
6:01
But I don't know still what to do for the fourteen year olds. The
6:04
parents have it on their minds, but the fourteen year old, you just
6:09
it's like talking to with diabetic complications. With the fourteen year old, they
6:12
don't care. They're not going to die there, They're going to live forever.
6:14
Right, So I think I think when we're doing informed consent, I
6:18
know that that's still a big lacuna. So informed consent, right, I
6:24
mean from these conversations, it's clear, I mean it. Obviously they don't
6:29
there's no any sensible person understands that the child does not have cannot give informed
6:33
consent to these life, life changing things that are going to affect their body
6:40
in ways that they can't possibly understand. How could you before you've even gone
6:44
through puberty, if we're talking about puberty blockers, you haven't had a chance
6:47
to live in your fully developed body yet. Obviously, informed consent is impossible,
6:54
and they're talking about it themselves. These are these are internal discussions from
6:58
w path. These the people that are used to justify doing these things.
7:02
These medical experiments is what I consider them to be. Medical experiments on children.
7:09
Here at fourteen years old, trans female wants gender affirming surgery fourteen years
7:14
old. Hello, my dear colleagues, I would like to know how to
7:18
proceed on a fourteen years old trans female who started transition since she was four.
7:26
She wants to have gender affirming surgery male to female, and her parents
7:30
are supporting her decision. But I have never done this on such a young
7:33
patient. What are your recommendations for this case? Just making it up?
7:42
I mean, obviously there's not even any any kind of strict formal rules around
7:46
this. They're just making it up. It's a giant social experiment. Obviously.
7:53
How about this blockers for preteens height potential. I have been reading hearing
7:59
some conflict information about the effects of puberty blockers on total height achievement. Ten
8:05
year old patient about whether blockers will stunt his growth if he starts them now
8:11
as his doc has approved. So doctors already approved this. I understand blockers
8:16
can slow the rate of growth, but for those who start them at say
8:20
age ten, before they have hit their growth spurt and remain on them for
8:24
a total of three to four years. What happens afterwards if they opt to
8:28
begin testosterone rather than resume the puberty consistent with They don't. They're just making
8:35
it up as they go along, make changing children's lives forever in irreversible ways.
8:43
I'm curious as to how medical docs approach important issues such as stature when
8:48
starting blockers, especially in earlier stages of development. Are there ways to maximize
8:52
growth potential for young patients? They're making it up as they go along.
8:56
It's hard to understand how people could be involved in all of this and just
9:03
keep going like they know that. They don't really know what they're doing.
9:07
There's not even any real rules around it. They don't understand the processes.
9:13
It's hard to imagine how an adult with a conscience could just keep going.
9:18
How about this, Many young patients experiencing gender distress do not appear to understand
9:22
that they may suffer serians serious consequences from long term homone use and genital surgery.
9:31
Hi all, I've been thinking more about what it looks like to obtain
9:33
fully informed consent. This is really the crucial issue around all of this.
9:37
Informed consent you're talking about children, Children that you don't allow to buy cigarettes,
9:45
or to drink alcohol, or to drive a car. I've been thinking
9:48
more about what it looks like to obtain fully informed consent. I was curious
9:52
to what degree if any other mental health providers discuss actual rates of surgical complications
10:00
clients when providing assessments for surgical care i e. Pain or loss of sensation,
10:05
need for additional surgeries, necrotic tissue infection, hematosis strictures, implant related
10:11
complications, etc. Geez, sounds like maybe you shouldn't even be doing it
10:16
at all, right. I'm also curious if others think it is safe to
10:20
assume that surgeons disclose actual complication rates versus informing clients that these complications may happen.
10:28
I realize research on some of these complications may be limited for various reasons.
10:33
Yeah, like since this is a fad that started like fifteen minutes ago,
10:39
like that, like, since none of you have any idea, like
10:41
what the fuck you're doing? Like this is just a giant experiment. How
10:48
is it even possible that this could happen to any child? When there are
10:54
these questions around consent? How is it even possible to me, you'd have
10:58
to be a sociopath to just go along with this. We don't really know
11:03
what we're doing, but we're going to keep doing it to kids, and
11:05
well if it destroys their life, well, you know, so be it.
11:09
I guess I just wanted to piggyback on all of the importance that comes
11:15
up with the informed consent issues. I often see people who, because there's
11:22
such a backlog of therapists to do some of the mental health therapeutic support,
11:33
I often see people who have already engaged in some sort of and this is
11:37
again with youth who've already engaged in some sort of medical intervention. And so
11:45
one of the things I do is I just kind of I'm sitting with the
11:46
youth and their parents, and I say, oh, well, so tell
11:48
me more about what you know about that medical intervention. And kind of like
11:54
what Dan was saying, you know, children and young adolescents, we wouldn't
11:58
really expect them. It's kind of a developmental it's out of their developmental range.
12:03
Sometimes to understand the extent out of their developmental range. Sometimes to understand,
12:11
okay, to which some of these medical interventions are impacting them we do
12:16
it. We try to talk about it til most of the kids are nowhere
12:20
in any kind of a brain space to really, really really talk about in
12:24
a serious way. That's always bothered me, But you know, we still
12:28
want the kids to be happier in the moment. Right. But let's go
12:33
back to what was this guy saying. We try to talk about it till
12:37
most of the kids are nowhere in any kind of a brain space to really
12:41
really really talk about in a serious way. That's always bothered me, But
12:46
you know, it's always bothered him. You'd think it would bother them.
12:52
You would think it would bother them when they're walking kids into these irreversible life
12:56
changing sterilizations. For example, I appreciate that much less with than nine to
13:03
ten or eleven year old who's who's who's starting puberty suppression? And like Wren
13:11
said, if they continue on then and and I mean, it's it's like
13:16
developmentally not in their space to be able to have to think about that,
13:24
and it shouldn't be right, And so I think it is. I think
13:28
it is a real growing edge in a field to kind of figure out how
13:33
we can how we can approach that. I'm definitely a little stumped on it.
13:39
So they know that these children cannot possibly give in four consent. They're
13:43
just saying it right here. So why are all these Why why are American
13:48
Medical Association, Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics. Why are they
13:54
relying on them as an authority? How does this happen? It happens when
13:58
the truth doesn't matter anymore, That's how it happens. Let's go back to
14:03
the chat. The air Rifles says, how can they not be child abuse?
14:07
To my mind, it's obvious child abuse, don't I don't see any
14:13
other option there? Right? What is the other option? Exactly? These
14:18
people are admitting that they're making it up as they go along. It's the
14:22
Invin says, it's not informed consent if the patient is incapable of understanding the
14:28
information. Exactly. Yes, you see, like normal people understand that you
14:35
don't need to be an endocrinologist, you don't need to be a pediatrician,
14:39
Like you don't need to be an expert to know that. Anybody can know
14:43
that. Right. So, just we've reached a point where literally literally just
14:48
the layman understands the issue better, or at least as better no, No,
14:56
it does actually actually understands the issue better than these so called experts,
15:01
and certainly has a much more moral foundation for questioning it than the experts have
15:07
for defending it. I don't see how that could be any more clear.
15:11
I mean, we're seeing it here. This isn't even surprise anybody. By
15:16
the way, Let's see what does this one say in a developmentally delayed thirteen
15:20
year old adolescent currently on pubertal suppression. You know, this is I always
15:28
say this all the time. This is like alternate universe kind of stuff here
15:31
like that, this is real. They're talking about a developmenttally delayed thirteen year
15:37
old on pubertal suppression. Okay, that may not reach the emotional and cognitive
15:43
development bar set by SEC within the typical adolescent time frame, if at all.
15:50
What is the ethical approach to care? What is the ethical approach to
15:54
care? So you've already got a developmentally developmentally delayed thirteen year old on puberty
16:03
blockers, and now you're asking what is the ethical approach to care? You've
16:08
got a thirteen year old that may not reach the emotional and cognitive developmental bar
16:15
necessary. Now's the time I get Now is the time to ask, what's
16:19
the ethical approach? I mean, this is just moral blindness. I mean,
16:26
I guess the person in this communication is maybe starting to go, well,
16:30
hold on a second, maybe that maybe somewhere there's a couple in urns
16:33
in the back of their head that's going, uh oh, maybe I'm doing
16:37
something evil. Let's see. So the standard would be that the adolescent demonstrates
16:41
emotional and cognitive maturity required to provide informed consent assent for the treatment. Again,
16:47
wouldn't a sane person, a person with a conscience, or just like
16:52
just an your average human being. Just wonder if a thirteen year old can
16:59
give informed consent to things that they don't understand. Clearly don't understand if you've
17:03
never been through puberty, if you if you don't have an adult body,
17:07
you don't know what that's like, clearly, Like you kind of have to
17:11
go through it to know what it's like. Right, So, right from
17:15
the start, the whole thing is fucking insane. And I think now that
17:19
I follow a lot of kids into their mid twenties, I'm always like,
17:22
oh, the dog isn't doing it for you? Right? Yeah, They're
17:26
like, no, I just found this, you know, wonderable partner,
17:27
and now you're kids, and so I think, you know, it doesn't
17:32
surprise me. Jesus, Jesus, dog's not doing it for you. So
17:40
following them into their mid twenties and they're saying that, well, actually I
17:42
kind of wanted I think I kind of want to have kids. I found
17:45
this partner. I want to have kids now. And the response is,
17:49
well, the dog's not doing it for you. So that's somebody who's now
17:55
in their twenties that this person sterilized as a child, going on the assumption
17:59
that they could get informed consent as a child. You think that if this
18:04
were even a remotely decent person, they would be screaming from the rooftops about
18:08
this. It wouldn't need to be leaked footage or anything like that. Did
18:14
they be on the rooftops saying, no, this is wrong. I've seen
18:18
it. This is wrong. This is what's happening. I find it's I
18:23
find it baffling. A lot of people say, eventually people who do this,
18:29
the children are going to be put in prison. Perhaps it's interesting,
18:33
isn't it. Anyway? That's all I gotta say about that. Please like,
18:36
share, and subscribe, subscribing really helps me out. I thank you
18:40
for that. I will see you next time.