Latest / Commentary - TJ Meadows / Proposed Legislative Rule Could Change Electricity in West Virginia
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Throughout the legislative process. Bills often direct state agencies to
- 0:05Speaker 1: write detailed rules implementing the laws passed by the legislature.
- 0:10Speaker 1: That's where consequential public policy can hide in documents most
- 0:15Speaker 1: citizens will never read. Consider House Built twenty fourteen, the
- 0:19Speaker 1: Data Center legislation passed a few years back. The law
- 0:23Speaker 1: directs West Virginia's Public Service Commission to develop rules requiring
- 0:28Speaker 1: utilities to maintain thermal baseload plants so they can achieve
- 0:33Speaker 1: at least a sixty nine percent capacity factor. Capacity factor
- 0:39Speaker 1: measures how much electricity a plant generates compared with how
- 0:43Speaker 1: much it could generate by operating continuously. The debate is straightforward,
- 0:50Speaker 1: how frequently should West Virginia's power plants run and how
- 0:53Speaker 1: often should utilities purchase cheaper electricity from the regional market.
- 0:59Speaker 1: PJM normally relies on economic dispatch. Power producers submit bids,
- 1:05Speaker 1: and the lowest cost available plants generally run first, but
- 1:10Speaker 1: the PSC's proposed rule says utilities are expected to use
- 1:14Speaker 1: quote self scheduling. That means telling PJM a plant will
- 1:19Speaker 1: operate regardless of whether its bid clears the market. The
- 1:24Speaker 1: plant may run even when producing its electricity costs more
- 1:28Speaker 1: than the market price. Who pays the difference? You do?
- 1:33Speaker 1: The electric customer? Supporters argue that running West Virginia's coal
- 1:37Speaker 1: plants more frequently would preserve jobs, strengthen coal producing communities,
- 1:43Speaker 1: and provide dependable baseload power. Coal Association President Chris Hamilton
- 1:48Speaker 1: also argues pjm's dispatch system is susceptible to anti coal
- 1:54Speaker 1: political pressures, But natural gas advocates say the policy would
- 1:58Speaker 1: interfere with economic day dispatch, increase electric bills, and subsidize
- 2:03Speaker 1: coal at the expense of natural gas, another major West
- 2:08Speaker 1: Virginia industry. Gas currently produces far more of pjam's electricity
- 2:13Speaker 1: than coal. West Virginia sits atop the Marcellus Shale, and
- 2:17Speaker 1: several gas fired power plants have been proposed this year alone.
- 2:22Speaker 1: So should state government favor one domestic energy industry over another.
- 2:27Speaker 1: Delegate Kayla Young warns that mandatory self scheduling will guarantee
- 2:31Speaker 1: higher bills. She points to Ohio, where customers repeatedly paid
- 2:36Speaker 1: roughly four hundred thousand dollars a day to support uneconomic
- 2:40Speaker 1: power plants before the policy was repealed. The proposed rule
- 2:44Speaker 1: still faces public comment review by the legislature's Rulemaking Review
- 2:49Speaker 1: Committee and eventually a vote by the full legislature. Boiled down,
- 2:54Speaker 1: the question is this, should West Virginia require coal plants
- 2:59Speaker 1: to run even when their electricity is more expensive because
- 3:02Speaker 1: doing so may produce broader economic benefits? And how does
- 3:07Speaker 1: that square with the need for affordable electricity, especially in
- 3:11Speaker 1: these times. One principle seems fundamental. Government rarely produces lasting
- 3:18Speaker 1: public good by picking winners and losers. Citizens must now
- 3:22Speaker 1: weigh in before the policy becomes final, and they must
- 3:26Speaker 1: live with the consequences. This is the lesson, a lesson
- 3:30Speaker 1: in paying attention. Legislative rules carry the force of law,
- 3:34Speaker 1: even though most of us never read them. Then when
- 3:38Speaker 1: the consequences arrive, we wonder how things became the way
- 3:43Speaker 1: they are. This is how