Latest / V / SAVE Act Fight Heats Up as Dems Spin Desperation | Episode 222

Transcript

SAVE Act Fight Heats Up as Dems Spin Desperation | Episode 222 · V

0:00
Speaker 1: Hey, everybody.
0:00
Speaker 2: Welcome to Vince on Tuesday. Good to have you with us. Man,
0:03
Speaker 2: we've got a lot going on in the world. The
0:05
Speaker 2: SAVE Act gets another big shove. Members of Congress are
0:08
Speaker 2: now breathing down John Thune's neck to finally do the job.
0:12
Speaker 2: We'll discuss all of that coming up on the program. Also,
0:17
Speaker 2: you know, Democrats continue to freak out about this. The
0:20
Speaker 2: White House is actively getting involved. The SAVE Act, it's
0:24
Speaker 2: a great push. You are doing great work. I'll Also,
0:31
Speaker 2: the left, they're cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. We've got more
0:34
Speaker 2: of that today. And Democrats claim that the reason you
0:38
Speaker 2: don't like them, or at least some of them, is
0:40
Speaker 2: because you're morally depraved. I've got the details on it.
0:44
Speaker 2: It's all ahead on the program. And the great Dan
0:47
Speaker 2: Bongino makes an appearance on the Fox News channel last night.
0:49
Speaker 2: Now he's a contributor at Fox. Did you see that? Congratulations, Dan,
0:52
Speaker 2: adding yet another job to his long resume. He, uh,
0:57
Speaker 2: He jumps in to talk about what's going on in
1:00
Speaker 2: the case of Savannah Guthrie's missing mother. What is happening there?
1:04
Speaker 2: Dan has some theories. We'll kick them around, see what
1:06
Speaker 2: we think of these theories as we try and get
1:08
Speaker 2: to the bottom of that wild case. All ahead on
1:11
Speaker 2: this edition of Vince, great to have you with us.
1:14
Speaker 2: As always, the best audience anywhere. Hey, are you worried
1:17
Speaker 2: at all about upcoming credit card bills after the holidays?
1:19
Speaker 2: If you're a Homeowner, well, there's no better time than
1:22
Speaker 2: right now to call American Financing and wipe out that debt,
1:26
Speaker 2: eliminate the stress, and set yourself up for a very
1:28
Speaker 2: strong 2026. The Fed dropped rates for the fourth time
1:32
Speaker 2: in December. American Financing can help you access that equity
1:35
Speaker 2: in your home at an interest rate in the low fives.
1:38
Speaker 2: You heard that right. In the low fives, there's a much,
1:40
Speaker 2: that is a much lower rate than the average 20
1:43
Speaker 2: or 30% or more credit card rates. American financing is
1:47
Speaker 2: saving their customers an average of $ 800 a month. That's
1:50
Speaker 2: like a $ 10, 000 raise to start the new year. There
1:54
Speaker 2: are no upfront fees, no obligation. You can see how
1:56
Speaker 2: much you can save. And they're closing some in as
1:58
Speaker 2: fast as 10 days. They're even delaying two mortgage payments.
2:02
Speaker 2: American Financing, America's home for home loans. Call today, 888-879-6460.
2:05
Speaker 2: That's 888-879-6460. AmericanFinancing.net slash Vince.
2:20
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah.
2:21
Speaker 2: Okay, save back update. Here we go. Let's dive in.
2:24
Speaker 2: What the hell is happening? We're going to get this
2:26
Speaker 2: thing across the finish line. Well, your phone calls and
2:29
Speaker 2: emails to Congress are clearly having an effect. All of
2:32
Speaker 2: Congress is very rattled right now that the American people
2:35
Speaker 2: are so fixated on saving our elections by verifying that
2:39
Speaker 2: only American citizens are registering to vote and that only
2:41
Speaker 2: American citizens are voting when they demonstrate with their ID
2:45
Speaker 2: that they should be. They hate this on Capitol Hill.
2:49
Speaker 2: They hate that you care. They hate that you're involved.
2:51
Speaker 2: And Democrats hate that the fraud may be ending. But
2:54
Speaker 2: I love it. So please keep up the pressure. Anna
2:57
Speaker 2: Paulina Luna, who has been a standout on this particular fight,
3:02
Speaker 2: the congresswoman, she is among 13 members of the United
3:07
Speaker 2: States House of Representatives who yesterday have issued a warning
3:12
Speaker 2: to John Thune that he's delayed this long enough. Now,
3:16
Speaker 2: they don't say that he delayed it, but they make
3:19
Speaker 2: it pretty clear that he's in charge in the Senate,
3:22
Speaker 2: which he is, and that the Senate has been delaying
3:24
Speaker 2: this legislation for now over 300 days. And her position,
3:30
Speaker 2: quite frankly, is that's garbage. And now it's time to
3:34
Speaker 2: move on this. Look at this. This is Anna Paulina Luna,
3:37
Speaker 2: a message to Leader John Thune from herself, 12 other
3:41
Speaker 2: members of the House. She says, dear leader, soon we
3:44
Speaker 2: are writing to make our position unmistakably clear. The United
3:48
Speaker 2: States Senate must invoke the standing filibuster and vote on
3:55
Speaker 2: the Save America Act. The American people are not confused
3:59
Speaker 2: at all about what this bill does or why it matters.
4:02
Speaker 2: The Save America Act simply requires proof of U.S. citizenship
4:06
Speaker 2: to register and vote in federal elections. It's not extreme.
4:11
Speaker 2: It's not partisan. It's the most basic safeguard necessary to
4:14
Speaker 2: protect the integrity of our elections and restore public confidence
4:18
Speaker 2: in our democracy. And they go on and they say
4:21
Speaker 2: that it's been over 300 days now. This common sense
4:24
Speaker 2: legislation has been delayed by the Senate. And this delay
4:29
Speaker 2: has consequences. Every day that this happens, another day voters
4:33
Speaker 2: see a political class unwilling to do what the vast
4:36
Speaker 2: majority of Americans do. already support. I got to tell
4:40
Speaker 2: you something, what this is, and yes, it's a letter
4:44
Speaker 2: that these lawmakers are sending to John Thune, but it's
4:47
Speaker 2: a public declaration that John Thune is on notice. And
4:51
Speaker 2: it's coming from Republicans, elected Republicans, who up until this
4:55
Speaker 2: point have been pretty kind to John Thune, despite the
4:59
Speaker 2: stakes of this fight. They've been pretty kind to him
5:02
Speaker 2: in public. They've resisted these kinds of declarations. But here
5:07
Speaker 2: they are. And she's saying, they're saying election integrity is
5:10
Speaker 2: not optional at all. It's not negotiable. When the Senate
5:13
Speaker 2: refuses to act, it forces the House to use every
5:15
Speaker 2: procedural tool available to compel action. They say it's not
5:20
Speaker 2: escalation for its own sake. It's leadership in the face
5:23
Speaker 2: of prolonged inaction. And then they get on to say
5:28
Speaker 2: that Basically, they've heard John Thune pay a lot of
5:32
Speaker 2: lip service to the SAVE Act, but they think that
5:35
Speaker 2: that lip service is not enough, right? You and I
5:38
Speaker 2: are sick of the talking. We want the acting. We
5:41
Speaker 2: want people to start acting on this. And here's what
5:45
Speaker 2: the members of Congress say. Recent statements suggesting that the
5:48
Speaker 2: Senate may finally consider the SAVE America Act are a
5:53
Speaker 2: step in the right direction, but words are no longer sufficient.
5:59
Speaker 2: The Senate must deliver results. The Save America Act should
6:04
Speaker 2: be brought to the floor, debated openly, and passed without
6:07
Speaker 2: delay or dilution. Any attempt to weaken, repackage, or indefinitely
6:10
Speaker 2: postpone this legislation will be viewed for what it is,
6:13
Speaker 2: a continuation of a broken status quo that voters overwhelmingly reject.
6:20
Speaker 2: If the only barrier to passage is a willingness to
6:22
Speaker 2: engage in real, visible debate, then the standing filibuster provides
6:27
Speaker 2: the appropriate path forward. The path is simple. Bring the
6:32
Speaker 2: SAVE Act to the floor. Require real debate. Pass it.
6:36
Speaker 2: Send it to the president's desk. The American people are watching. Now,
6:40
Speaker 2: if you're interested in who's on your side here, we've
6:43
Speaker 2: got a bunch. And by the way, there should be
6:45
Speaker 2: more signatories to this. There are not enough. We've got
6:48
Speaker 2: 13 signatories on this. Anna Paulina Luna, Mike Collins, Michael Cloud,
6:56
Speaker 2: Congressman Stubbe is in there. Ryan Zinke, Russell Frye, Lauren
6:59
Speaker 2: Boebert is on the list. And then we've got Jeff
7:03
Speaker 2: Van Drew. Wasn't he a Democrat at one point? Then
7:06
Speaker 2: he became a Republican. John James, Randy Fine, John McGuire,
7:09
Speaker 2: John Rose, and Keith Self. Those are the guys, all
7:13
Speaker 2: the guys who are standing up for us today and
7:16
Speaker 2: telling John Thune, hey, you've got to act. It's, you know,
7:21
Speaker 2: gum flapping time is over. You know, get to it, son.
7:25
Speaker 2: Get to it. The American people are watching and we
7:27
Speaker 2: sure are. We sure are. Please keep up the pressure.
7:30
Speaker 2: Please keep calling your member of Congress. Keep calling your
7:32
Speaker 2: senator and let them know what you want. Right now,
7:36
Speaker 2: the the big obviously the big debate is getting the
7:40
Speaker 2: Senate to do this. But there's another iteration of the
7:44
Speaker 2: legislation currently being considered in the House. Remember, we have
7:47
Speaker 2: the SAVE Act. It's been it's been passed a bunch
7:49
Speaker 2: of times by the House, never by the Senate. and
7:52
Speaker 2: now the Save America Act is being generated, and they're
7:55
Speaker 2: drafting the bill. The reason it's a little bit different
7:58
Speaker 2: is because they're adding the photo ID requirement. But the
8:01
Speaker 2: pressure is on from the White House to also restrict
8:05
Speaker 2: mail-in voting, that is absentee ballots, to only people who
8:09
Speaker 2: actually need them. No more everybody gets an absentee ballot,
8:12
Speaker 2: only if you have a legitimate excuse for not showing
8:15
Speaker 2: up to the polls, is the position that President Trump
8:18
Speaker 2: is taking. And so there is... Right now, reportedly, and
8:23
Speaker 2: the White House apparently has confirmed this, conversation going on
8:26
Speaker 2: with Congress to add this to the legislation. Here's what
8:31
Speaker 2: NBC reported overnight. The White House is keeping pressure on
8:34
Speaker 2: House Republicans ahead of a crucial vote on mail-in voting.
8:39
Speaker 2: The Trump administration, this is NBC's version, so I'll have
8:42
Speaker 2: to translate it. The Trump administration continues to press congressional
8:45
Speaker 2: Republicans to add a provision to their voter requirements bill
8:48
Speaker 2: that would either ban mail-in voting with limited exceptions or
8:52
Speaker 2: limit the way voting by mail can be used. Yeah,
8:55
Speaker 2: that makes sense. These absentee ballots for only when you
8:58
Speaker 2: have a legitimate absence from the polls. A senior administration
9:03
Speaker 2: official telling NBC, quote, we have had productive conversations with
9:07
Speaker 2: House Republicans as recently as last night, and we are
9:10
Speaker 2: optimistic about the inclusion of the president's wish to ban
9:14
Speaker 2: the use of mail-in ballots with limited exceptions. You know,
9:21
Speaker 2: this goes a very long way towards achieving what Jimmy
9:26
Speaker 2: Carter said in the early 2000s about our elections. Remember,
9:32
Speaker 2: as you talk about this with your family and your
9:34
Speaker 2: friends and why this is so important, there was a commission,
9:38
Speaker 2: a bipartisan commission done in the early 2000s called the
9:41
Speaker 2: Carter-Baker Commission, a Democrat and a Republican. The Democrat in
9:45
Speaker 2: this case is Jimmy Carter, the former president, now the
9:48
Speaker 2: late president, late former president, rather, of the United States.
9:51
Speaker 2: And Carter, at the time in this study, concluded that
9:57
Speaker 2: in order for us to have safe elections, you need
10:00
Speaker 2: to show photo ID. You need to limit absentee ballots
10:06
Speaker 2: as much as possible. And these things would make the
10:09
Speaker 2: elections more credible. So limiting absentee ballots at one point
10:14
Speaker 2: was a Democrat priority. Many years ago, they operated when
10:20
Speaker 2: there was some concern at all about the credibility of
10:22
Speaker 2: our elections that, you know, we need to limit the
10:24
Speaker 2: number of mail-in and absentee ballots because that particular vector
10:30
Speaker 2: for fraud is immense. Absentee ballots are a hotbed of
10:36
Speaker 2: fraud opportunities. And in fact, like just to give you
10:40
Speaker 2: an example of how this works, you know, in California,
10:43
Speaker 2: they have legal ballot harvesting, legalized ballot harvesting. You understand
10:46
Speaker 2: what that is? Ballot harvesting is when a third party
10:49
Speaker 2: political operative takes a ballot out of your hands and
10:52
Speaker 2: then claims they're going to deliver it on your behalf.
10:56
Speaker 2: And the left specializes in this. They've done it both
10:59
Speaker 2: illegally and legally in the states that allow it. And
11:02
Speaker 2: it's insane that that even happens. What they do is,
11:05
Speaker 2: for instance, they will send their operatives to a nursing home,
11:08
Speaker 2: to an old folks home. They'll get everybody inside the
11:11
Speaker 2: old folks home to fill out ballots, oftentimes the way
11:14
Speaker 2: that they tell them to fill them out. Go ahead, grandma,
11:16
Speaker 2: just fill out the ballot like this. And then they
11:19
Speaker 2: take the ballot from them and then they hand deliver
11:22
Speaker 2: all the votes for Democrats that they possibly need to. Now,
11:25
Speaker 2: what about votes for Republicans? What if they believe they're
11:27
Speaker 2: holding a ballot that is a vote for a Republican? Well,
11:30
Speaker 2: what's to stop them from dumping it in a trash
11:32
Speaker 2: can and not actually bringing it to its final destination? Obviously,
11:37
Speaker 2: if you've got somebody who has built in political motivations
11:41
Speaker 2: to the way that they handle ballots, that increases the
11:44
Speaker 2: likeliness that this will be a rigged affair and not
11:48
Speaker 2: in any way a credible one. So ballot harvesting is
11:51
Speaker 2: an insane thing. And in fact, if you want to
11:54
Speaker 2: do something at the federal level, ban ballot harvesting nationwide.
11:58
Speaker 2: There is no excuse for for that kind of handling
12:02
Speaker 2: of America's election ballots. Add that to the Save America Act,
12:06
Speaker 2: a ban on ballot harvesting so that California can't get
12:09
Speaker 2: away with this garbage or any other Democrat-run state that
12:12
Speaker 2: claims they've legalized it. So basically, that's a form of
12:17
Speaker 2: absentee voting, though, where you're not actually going to the polls.
12:20
Speaker 2: You're handing your ballot to a third-party political operative, and
12:24
Speaker 2: then they're supposedly delivering it, and you actually don't know
12:27
Speaker 2: if that's the case. It's a crapshoot. So in other words,
12:31
Speaker 2: that is, again, a massive vector for fraud. So let's
12:37
Speaker 2: not do that. This is why President Trump wants to
12:39
Speaker 2: ban the use of absentee ballots with limited exceptions. That,
12:44
Speaker 2: in a way, kind of does ban ballot harvesting. Like, no,
12:47
Speaker 2: you have to have a legitimate reason for being absentee. Now,
12:52
Speaker 2: but I do think that the legislation should go a
12:54
Speaker 2: step further. Ban ballot harvesting. Craziness. But this is a
12:59
Speaker 2: productive development. So here you have the White House is
13:01
Speaker 2: having conversations with House Republicans. Now, I want to know,
13:05
Speaker 2: why is it hard for House Republicans to add this?
13:07
Speaker 2: Why is it even a debate right now with the
13:09
Speaker 2: White House? Why is there any arm twisting going on
13:12
Speaker 2: at all on this? The White House says that they're
13:16
Speaker 2: having productive conversations with House Republicans. As recently as last night,
13:21
Speaker 2: we're optimistic about the inclusion of the president's wish. They're
13:24
Speaker 2: optimistic about it. To ban the use of mail-in ballots
13:26
Speaker 2: with limited exceptions. NBC goes on to say that the
13:29
Speaker 2: Save America Act is expected to pass in the House
13:32
Speaker 2: this week or expected to get a vote. It would
13:34
Speaker 2: require proof of citizenship to register to vote and presentation
13:37
Speaker 2: of an ID to cast a ballot. Currently, no provisions
13:41
Speaker 2: in the bill would limit mail-in voting. Speaker Johnson confirmed
13:46
Speaker 2: to NBC Republicans are, quote, thinking and talking. They're thinking
13:53
Speaker 2: and talking. Uh-oh. They're thinking and talking, everybody. What a change.
13:59
Speaker 2: About whether to restrict mail-in ballots, but said no final
14:02
Speaker 2: decisions have been made. He also seemed to question some
14:07
Speaker 2: of Congress's authority in the space. I mean, I'm sorry.
14:12
Speaker 2: Speaker Johnson, look at the Constitution, sir. Look at the Constitution. Look,
14:19
Speaker 2: Speaker Johnson's a lawyer. He spent a lot of time
14:21
Speaker 2: in courtrooms defending religious liberty, standing up for the First
14:24
Speaker 2: Amendment to the Constitution. He's familiar with the document. He
14:28
Speaker 2: may want to brush up on it, though. Congress has
14:30
Speaker 2: a role here. Clean up our elections, Mr. Speaker. And
14:37
Speaker 2: he might say, but Vince, I got the SAVE Act through.
14:40
Speaker 2: Isn't that enough? No. No, I want it all. I
14:44
Speaker 2: want these elections to be credible. And the president has
14:47
Speaker 2: made it really clear over and over on Truth Social, especially,
14:50
Speaker 2: that he wants to make it so that these absentee
14:52
Speaker 2: ballots don't continue to be a massive source of fraud
14:55
Speaker 2: in the United States. Here's your chance. Fix it. No
14:58
Speaker 2: more thinking and talking. And we're not sure if we've
15:01
Speaker 2: got the power. What do Democrats do when they when
15:04
Speaker 2: they take power? What do Democrats do? What's happening in
15:09
Speaker 2: Virginia right now? Democrats just took over the governor's mansion.
15:12
Speaker 2: They took over the state house, the state Senate. They've
15:15
Speaker 2: got a trifecta. They've got everything going on right now
15:17
Speaker 2: for them. And instantly they've moved on the people of Virginia.
15:21
Speaker 2: They're violating the constitution of the state of Virginia. They
15:24
Speaker 2: don't care. They're going after everybody's guns. They're raising everybody's taxes.
15:27
Speaker 2: They're allowing illegals to run roughshod over the whole state.
15:30
Speaker 2: They do that in a second. and they don't have
15:33
Speaker 2: any consideration whatsoever for the founding documents of the state
15:36
Speaker 2: in which they occupy. Meanwhile, it's like pulling teeth to
15:39
Speaker 2: get Republicans to read the United States Constitution and do
15:42
Speaker 2: the constitutional and legal thing just to stand up for
15:45
Speaker 2: us and sanctify our elections. Just do it. This is
15:56
Speaker 2: not complicated. It's very simple. You know, It'd be hard
16:08
Speaker 2: to blame us. It'd be hard to blame us if
16:10
Speaker 2: we started to conclude or if we long ago concluded
16:13
Speaker 2: that you're just bought and paid for if you can't
16:16
Speaker 2: fight for the most obvious things for us. They're having
16:21
Speaker 2: conversations right now about whether or not absentee ballots should
16:26
Speaker 2: be limited to legitimate reasons. So what does Speaker Johnson say?
16:34
Speaker 2: The answer is wait and see, he says. The answer
16:37
Speaker 2: is wait and see. As always, it's wait and see.
16:39
Speaker 2: There's a lot of discussion about it. I don't know
16:41
Speaker 2: what the possibility is to act in that regard concerning
16:44
Speaker 2: federal elections, but we'll have to see. Get to it, son.
16:50
Speaker 2: You know the Constitution, and you know you can do this,
16:53
Speaker 2: so do it. A House Republican familiar with the internal
16:56
Speaker 2: discussion said it's ultimately a leadership call whether to attach
16:59
Speaker 2: any mail-in ballot provisions to the legislation. A leadership call.
17:04
Speaker 2: So here we go. So you see this? So Speaker
17:06
Speaker 2: Johnson says, we're having lots of discussions. And then another
17:08
Speaker 2: House Republican, a different member, says, well, it's actually up
17:11
Speaker 2: to leadership. There's a lot of, oh, look at this.
17:12
Speaker 2: Everyone's passing the buck. It's somebody else's responsibility to deal
17:16
Speaker 2: with this. But an idea being kicked around is to
17:19
Speaker 2: mandate that mail-in ballots can be sent only if they
17:22
Speaker 2: are requested instead of sent to voters automatically, a provision
17:27
Speaker 2: that falls well short of Trump's demands to prohibit mail-in
17:29
Speaker 2: ballots altogether. So, in this particular case, they're saying, look,
17:42
Speaker 2: we want to add something, but not what the president wants.
17:44
Speaker 2: Why is that? What are you even doing? Explain yourself.
17:52
Speaker 2: The SAVE Act as written includes provisions that could pass
17:54
Speaker 2: with only Republican votes in the House. Adding limitations to
17:58
Speaker 2: voting by mail could risk votes. What, among Republicans? The
18:05
Speaker 2: current bill, I guess, is the lowest common denominator, a
18:07
Speaker 2: person familiar with the House's process told NBC News. In
18:11
Speaker 2: other words, they could risk, why would the Republicans risk
18:14
Speaker 2: losing votes to make sure that absentee ballots are only
18:19
Speaker 2: for legitimate voters? The hell is that? Somebody explain that
18:24
Speaker 2: to me? Any member of House Republicans listening right now,
18:27
Speaker 2: could you get in touch with me? Explain to me
18:29
Speaker 2: what the hell that means. Are there House Republicans who
18:34
Speaker 2: are in their seats by mail-in voting fraud right now?
18:37
Speaker 2: Is that what that is? Explain yourselves. The White House
18:42
Speaker 2: also has been putting pressure on the Senate. Good. Pushing
18:46
Speaker 2: leadership to get around the 60-vote threshold required to pass
18:49
Speaker 2: most legislation to get around it. I love how NBC
18:52
Speaker 2: doesn't bother explaining to you that the pressure is to
18:55
Speaker 2: get Republicans to live up to the rules of the Senate.
18:59
Speaker 2: Actually take the floor. get Democrats to filibuster this thing
19:03
Speaker 2: and get it across the finish line. John Thune has
19:05
Speaker 2: been noncommittal. NBC correctly reports he's been noncommittal. He's been talking,
19:10
Speaker 2: not doing. The bill already faces an uphill climb in
19:14
Speaker 2: the Senate. Adding mail-in ballot restrictions would further alienate Republicans
19:19
Speaker 2: who could come around to support the SAVE Act. Have
19:21
Speaker 2: you noticed that, like, in this entire article, not a
19:24
Speaker 2: single person is cited as being the Republican opposition to this?
19:29
Speaker 2: There's no names. It's just sort of randomly gesticulating to
19:33
Speaker 2: anonymous Republican lawmakers who would be uncomfortable with restricting mail-in ballots.
19:39
Speaker 2: Who are they talking about? Is it Thumbelina?
19:42
Speaker 4: Is it?
19:43
Speaker 2: Is it Thom Tillis? Is that the guy? Is it Murkowski?
19:47
Speaker 2: Is it Susan Collins? Is it any of the usual suspects?
19:50
Speaker 2: Is it Mitch McConnell? Mitch McConnell, who can't leave the
19:53
Speaker 2: Senate soon enough? Can we get Nate Morrison there, please?
19:56
Speaker 2: What is going on? So in case you're wondering what's
20:01
Speaker 2: going on with the SAVE Act, right now, according to
20:04
Speaker 2: at least this report, and again, it's NBC, so take
20:07
Speaker 2: it with a massive grain of salt, but they claim
20:09
Speaker 2: that there are Republicans, and I believe this. I'm not
20:13
Speaker 2: shocked at all by this particular recitation of the available facts.
20:17
Speaker 2: They say that there are Republicans who are hesitating on
20:21
Speaker 2: restricting absentee ballots to people with legitimate reasons to be absentee. Oh,
20:28
Speaker 2: serenity now. Serenity. Pray for your country. And keep calling
20:33
Speaker 2: your lawmakers. Let them know exactly what you want. You
20:36
Speaker 2: want election integrity. And the president's made it really clear.
20:39
Speaker 2: He's posted multiple times to Truth Social. There's just three
20:43
Speaker 2: elements that he really wants in this SAVE Act. Americans only,
20:46
Speaker 2: when you register to vote. ID, when you vote. And then,
20:51
Speaker 2: of course, you know, Absentee ballots only for legitimate absentee voters,
20:56
Speaker 2: like members of the military. This is not complicated. Just
20:59
Speaker 2: make it what it used to be, a legitimate and
21:02
Speaker 2: believable election. All right, more ahead on this edition of Vince,
21:05
Speaker 2: including the pawing around in the dark for a reason
21:10
Speaker 2: why the SAVE Act shouldn't pass by the Democrats. They're
21:13
Speaker 2: coming up with the most insane possible excuses right now.
21:17
Speaker 2: And you can watch them actually craft their lies in
21:20
Speaker 2: real time. It's hilarious. It's ahead on this edition of events.
21:26
Speaker 2: You know, trying to figure out what's going to happen
21:28
Speaker 2: in the future is always a fun thing. In politics,
21:32
Speaker 2: you can do that with an interesting website. This is
21:35
Speaker 2: called Kaoshi. Have you ever looked at Kaoshi? It's kind
21:38
Speaker 2: of interesting what's going on here. So basically, they have
21:43
Speaker 2: all sorts of predictive features, including some things that have
21:46
Speaker 2: already been pick. Like who will Trump nominate as the
21:49
Speaker 2: Fed chair? Kevin Walsh, obviously. People were trying to guess
21:51
Speaker 2: on that particular thing. Next U.S. presidential election winner. That's
21:56
Speaker 2: one that I always like checking in on. What's the
21:58
Speaker 2: deal there? J.D. Vance, the most likely right now at 25%.
22:03
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom at 21%. And Marco Rubio is at 8%.
22:08
Speaker 2: You can see here he's down by two points from
22:11
Speaker 2: a recent assessment. Those numbers change all the time. And
22:14
Speaker 2: this is basically where people are placing real money. in
22:17
Speaker 2: order to make these predictions because they expect that they're
22:20
Speaker 2: going to come true. Kind of neat to watch. You
22:22
Speaker 2: get the pulse on what's going on in the world.
22:25
Speaker 2: Cauchy is one of the only places where you can
22:26
Speaker 2: actually trade on real world events in 50 states, all
22:29
Speaker 2: 50 states. It's not just politics, economics. They've got markets
22:32
Speaker 2: on everything from inflation numbers to sports, pop culture. I
22:35
Speaker 2: like checking Cauchy just to track the odds, see what
22:37
Speaker 2: people are actually putting their own money on. It's like
22:39
Speaker 2: getting a pulse on what the world thinks is going
22:41
Speaker 2: to happen. So go to calchi.com slash Vince, and you
22:43
Speaker 2: can get a free $ 10 credit when you trade $ 100.
22:45
Speaker 2: That's calchi.com slash Vince. Once again, calchi.com slash Vince. You
22:51
Speaker 2: must be 21, and the purchaser must be present in
22:53
Speaker 2: the state where the trade is placed. See important details
22:55
Speaker 2: at calchi.com. Calchi is subject to U.S. regulatory oversight by
23:00
Speaker 2: the CFTC. Okay. Thanks, Calchi. Great sponsor of our program, too.
23:05
Speaker 2: Really appreciate that.
23:07
Speaker 4: Okay.
23:07
Speaker 2: Let's... Let's take a look at how Democrats are trying
23:10
Speaker 2: to lie about the SAVE Act now. Here's an example
23:12
Speaker 2: of it. One of the most hilarious Democrats for her
23:20
Speaker 2: lies is Elizabeth Warren, who, of course, lied about being Indian. She's,
23:25
Speaker 2: according to her DNA test, in fact, exactly 1 in 1,024th.
23:28
Speaker 2: I knew I could say that. Native American, obviously. And
23:42
Speaker 2: given her love for abortion and human sacrifice, clearly she's Aztec.
23:48
Speaker 2: Here's Elizabeth Warren. And she was just confronted by the
23:52
Speaker 2: great reporters over at Lindell TV, who asked her a
23:55
Speaker 2: really simple question. Why do you oppose the SAVE Act?
23:58
Speaker 2: Americans need ID for everything. So why do you oppose
24:01
Speaker 2: ID for voting? Here's Elizabeth Warren. The SAVE Act is
24:06
Speaker 2: expected to be brought this week to the floor for
24:08
Speaker 2: a vote. Do you support voter ID for elections?
24:10
Speaker 5: Well, it depends on what you mean by voter ID.
24:12
Speaker 5: When you want to say that everyone has to produce
24:14
Speaker 5: a birth certificate, including women whose married names are not
24:18
Speaker 5: on their birth certificates, that creates a real problem for me.
24:21
Speaker 2: Well, isn't that just one of the first steps in
24:23
Speaker 2: getting married is getting a new ID?
24:25
Speaker 5: Actually, it's not getting a new birth certificate because part
24:29
Speaker 5: of what the SAVAG does is it says most driver's
24:31
Speaker 5: licenses around the country won't work as an ID. And
24:34
Speaker 5: that creates a terrible problem.
24:36
Speaker 2: But you need an ID to do just about anything
24:37
Speaker 2: in America. Shouldn't you need one to.
24:39
Speaker 5: Vote in elections? You don't need a birth certificate. I
24:41
Speaker 5: hope you know that. Thank you.
24:45
Speaker 2: You don't need a birth certificate. I hope you know that.
24:49
Speaker 5: All right.
24:50
Speaker 2: Thanks, Mickey Mouse. You know.
24:52
Speaker 2: Warren, of course, is lying. And you can hear her
24:55
Speaker 2: craft the lies in real time because the reporter asked
24:57
Speaker 2: her really simply, like, what? Like married women, married women.
25:02
Speaker 2: They when you get married, you go through the process.
25:05
Speaker 2: If you're going to change your name of doing that
25:06
Speaker 2: with the government. So, of course, there's documentary evidence that
25:09
Speaker 2: you're both an American citizen and that you changed your name.
25:12
Speaker 2: This is not an impediment for married women. They've all
25:16
Speaker 2: been through it. They know what they're talking about. They've
25:18
Speaker 2: got the documents to prove it. And let me tell
25:21
Speaker 2: you why this is so freaking phony on her part.
25:24
Speaker 2: There's a number of explanations for this. Who do married
25:27
Speaker 2: women vote for? Chat, who do married women in the
25:32
Speaker 2: United States of America vote for? Democrats or Republicans? Let
25:39
Speaker 2: me know. Who do they vote for?
25:40
Speaker 5: Hmm.
25:42
Speaker 2: Hmm. Jeopardy theme. Hmm. Married women. The chat, the chat's
25:50
Speaker 2: getting it. Oh, here we go. Are, are Republicans, conservatives,
25:54
Speaker 2: married women vote Republicans, says Zoidborg. Yeah, they vote for Republicans.
25:58
Speaker 2: So the idea that Elizabeth Warren is all of a
26:00
Speaker 2: sudden very concerned about the plight of married women being
26:02
Speaker 2: able to vote. She, I mean, if she thought that
26:04
Speaker 2: she could block married women from voting, she'd do it
26:07
Speaker 2: in a heartbeat. It's so stupid. She's just like. Well,
26:12
Speaker 2: I'd hate for married women to be disenfranchised. If married
26:15
Speaker 2: women couldn't vote, that would make Democrats permanently in charge
26:18
Speaker 2: of everything. She's so full of shit. It's so crazy.
26:25
Speaker 2: And it's so true. I mean, that really is the phenomenon,
26:28
Speaker 2: by the way. Single women vote Democrat, majority of them,
26:32
Speaker 2: and married women vote Republican, the majority of them. That
26:35
Speaker 2: has and will continue to be the case because... it's
26:39
Speaker 2: pretty obvious married women, especially who have children or are
26:42
Speaker 2: often an obvious thinking about what does the future look
26:45
Speaker 2: like for my country? What kind of country am I
26:47
Speaker 2: leaving to my family and my kids and my grandkids?
26:49
Speaker 2: And as a result of that kind of thinking, you
26:52
Speaker 2: think maybe we shouldn't waste the precious gift that we have,
26:56
Speaker 2: that we call the United States of America. And that's
26:59
Speaker 2: why they vote Republican over Democrat. Um, Now, the text
27:04
Speaker 2: of the SAVE Act, in terms of this lie, it's
27:07
Speaker 2: not going to be the first time you hear this.
27:08
Speaker 2: It won't be the last time you hear it. The
27:10
Speaker 2: left is going to keep pushing this thing. Let me
27:13
Speaker 2: show you the text of the SAVE Act here, because
27:16
Speaker 2: she makes a claim, Elizabeth Warren, that the only kind
27:19
Speaker 2: of identification you could possibly use is a birth certificate.
27:23
Speaker 2: That's not true at all. Here it is. And they
27:26
Speaker 2: want to ensure only citizens are registered to vote in
27:28
Speaker 2: elections for federal office. And then there's a, this is
27:31
Speaker 2: section two of the bill. And here's the definition of
27:33
Speaker 2: documentary proof of United States citizenship. You ready? Here are
27:38
Speaker 2: the options. As used in this act, the documentary proof
27:41
Speaker 2: of U.S. citizenship means any of the following. One, a
27:45
Speaker 2: form of identification issued consistent with the requirements of the
27:49
Speaker 2: Real ID Act that indicates the applicant is a citizen
27:53
Speaker 2: of the United States. So this means not even those
27:56
Speaker 2: phony baloney illegal alien real IDs that are being handed
28:00
Speaker 2: out to truck drivers. illegal alien truck drivers in the
28:03
Speaker 2: United States by Democrat states, those won't satisfy the requirement.
28:07
Speaker 2: It has to demonstrate that you are a citizen of
28:10
Speaker 2: the United States. That's one option. Two, a valid United
28:13
Speaker 2: States passport. Three, a military identification card. Four, a valid
28:18
Speaker 2: government issued photo identification card issued by a federal state
28:22
Speaker 2: or tribal government showing that your place of birth was
28:25
Speaker 2: in the United States. But Vince, not every state shows that. Okay,
28:30
Speaker 2: start showing it. Show it on your state IDs whether
28:33
Speaker 2: or not you are a U.S. citizen. Five, a valid
28:37
Speaker 2: government-issued photo ID issued by a federal, state, or tribal
28:41
Speaker 2: government other than an identification described in the first four paragraphs,
28:45
Speaker 2: but only if presented with additional information, a certified birth certificate,
28:50
Speaker 2: an extract from a U.S. hospital record of birth created
28:54
Speaker 2: at the time of the applicant's birth, which indicates that
28:56
Speaker 2: they were born in the United States. By the way, Yes,
29:01
Speaker 2: birthright citizenship should pop up in your mind right now,
29:03
Speaker 2: which is like, well, wait a second. Some people are
29:06
Speaker 2: just like illegal aliens have babies and then the babies
29:08
Speaker 2: become citizens. That's crazy. Yes, that is crazy. And that's
29:11
Speaker 2: currently being litigated in our court system. And may the
29:14
Speaker 2: Trump administration win on this fight. But right now that
29:17
Speaker 2: that is a feature of the United States, which is
29:20
Speaker 2: that people who are being born here are being made
29:22
Speaker 2: American citizens right now due to that warped interpretation of
29:26
Speaker 2: the Constitution. So the legislation just addresses that for now. C,
29:30
Speaker 2: a final adoption decree showing the applicant's name and the
29:34
Speaker 2: applicant's place of birth was in the United States. D,
29:37
Speaker 2: a consular report of birth abroad of a citizen. of
29:40
Speaker 2: the United States. And then a naturalization certificate, a certificate
29:45
Speaker 2: of citizenship, an American Indian card issued by DHS. So
29:49
Speaker 2: you see what I'm telling you? Look at this. All
29:52
Speaker 2: of these things, there's a million different options to demonstrate
29:55
Speaker 2: that you are a U.S. citizen, and they're not merely
29:57
Speaker 2: that you have to produce a birth certificate and know
30:00
Speaker 2: married women are not going to be obstructed. It's just
30:03
Speaker 2: Elizabeth Warren doing what she does best, which is lying
30:07
Speaker 2: to you. And you can hear her craft the lie
30:08
Speaker 2: in real time as the reporter straight up asked her,
30:11
Speaker 2: but wait a second, can't you just show an ID
30:13
Speaker 2: in every other facet of life? But you can't show
30:16
Speaker 2: a birth certificate, says Elizabeth Warren. Nobody's demanding that you
30:21
Speaker 2: do that all the time. You just have to do
30:22
Speaker 2: it once to register to vote. That's it. Or you
30:24
Speaker 2: have to show any of those other five bajillion documents
30:27
Speaker 2: that prove the same thing. Elizabeth Warren. She's lying again.
30:34
Speaker 2: She's lying again. There she goes. Pocahontas herself lying. All right.
30:40
Speaker 2: Coming up on the program, we've got some more to
30:43
Speaker 2: get to, including Democrats going crazy. You see that Texas Democrat,
30:47
Speaker 2: that member of Congress? who is fantasizing about some sort
30:52
Speaker 2: of race war in the United States. It's a psychotic
30:56
Speaker 2: clip going around. And I'm going to dive into it
31:00
Speaker 2: and unpack what's really going on here. And additionally, speaking
31:04
Speaker 2: of Democrat psychos, Jasmine Crockett is as crazy as ever.
31:10
Speaker 2: And she says, you're morally depraved if you don't support her.
31:15
Speaker 4: What?
31:16
Speaker 2: More ahead on this edition of Vince. Coming up. Hey,
31:20
Speaker 2: you ever think about aging? Does aging ever force you
31:23
Speaker 2: to think about it? I notice as I get older, well,
31:27
Speaker 2: my energy has gone down a bit. I've been trying
31:28
Speaker 2: to figure out ways to get my energy back. I'm
31:31
Speaker 2: always doing maintenance. I'm always trying to figure out, how
31:33
Speaker 2: do I get it all back? How do I become
31:34
Speaker 2: young again? Well, I'm excited to share something with you
31:37
Speaker 2: called C15 from Fatty15. I love this. It's the first
31:40
Speaker 2: essential fatty acid to be discovered in more than 90 years.
31:43
Speaker 2: Fatty15 co-founder, Dr. Stephanie Van Watson, discovered the benefits of
31:47
Speaker 2: C15 in while working with the United States Navy. And
31:50
Speaker 2: based on studies, we actually do know that when our
31:51
Speaker 2: cells don't have enough C15, they can age faster. Fatty
31:56
Speaker 2: 15 can help you repair or protect age-related damage to
31:58
Speaker 2: your cells and help activate pathways in the body that
32:02
Speaker 2: repair mechanisms that support your overall wellness. Fatty 15 is science-backed, award-winning, vegan,
32:07
Speaker 2: 100% pure C15 supplement, And refills are all shipped right
32:11
Speaker 2: to your door. Super convenient and super wonderful for your body.
32:15
Speaker 2: I love it. I think you're going to love it too.
32:17
Speaker 2: Fatty 15 is on a mission to optimize your C15
32:20
Speaker 2: levels to help support your long-term health and wellness, especially
32:23
Speaker 2: as you age. You get an additional 15% off of
32:26
Speaker 2: their 90-day subscription starter kit by going to fatty15. com slash
32:32
Speaker 2: Vince and use the code Vince at checkout. Use the
32:37
Speaker 2: code Vince at checkout, fatty15. com slash Vince. These statements have
32:41
Speaker 2: not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not
32:43
Speaker 2: intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Thank you, Fatty15.
32:49
Speaker 2: And thank you, as always, to BrickHouse Nutrition. Talking about
32:53
Speaker 2: taking care of your body. BrickHouse is so good at that.
32:57
Speaker 2: They have so many great products to help you do it.
33:00
Speaker 2: And people, you know, you take these weight loss injections,
33:02
Speaker 2: there's a lot of people, you probably know someone who
33:04
Speaker 2: takes the weight loss injections, and you see the results,
33:06
Speaker 2: they're dramatic, no question. They actually work by helping to
33:09
Speaker 2: lower your blood sugar, reduce appetite. But what if you're
33:12
Speaker 2: looking to lose weight and you don't want the painful
33:15
Speaker 2: weekly injections, especially when you hear about some of the
33:18
Speaker 2: side effects? This is why the doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition
33:21
Speaker 2: created a weight loss supplement called Lean. And the results,
33:25
Speaker 2: they're totally remarkable. The studied ingredients in lean have been
33:28
Speaker 2: shown to help lower your blood sugar, to help you
33:30
Speaker 2: burn your fat by converting it into energy, and they
33:33
Speaker 2: help you curb your appetite and your cravings so you're
33:35
Speaker 2: less hungry. Listen, lean by BrickHouse Nutrition is not for
33:39
Speaker 2: any old casual dieter. It's for people who are serious
33:42
Speaker 2: about losing the weight, people who really want to do it.
33:44
Speaker 2: You want to lose 10 or more pounds? Well, let's
33:46
Speaker 2: get you started with 20% off and free rush shipping.
33:51
Speaker 2: Just visit TakeLean.com. Enter Vince for your discount. That's promo
33:56
Speaker 2: code Vince at TakeLean.com. These statements have not been evaluated
34:00
Speaker 2: by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure,
34:04
Speaker 2: or prevent any disease, and it's not a substitute or
34:06
Speaker 2: alternative for care from a healthcare provider. Thank you to BrickHouse. Again,
34:11
Speaker 2: promo code Vince at TakeLean.com. Speaking of medical stuff. Some
34:16
Speaker 2: people in the chat I know are mentioning that I've
34:19
Speaker 2: got a procedure on, let's see, tomorrow. I've got a
34:22
Speaker 2: procedure tomorrow afternoon. I don't know if I announced it
34:26
Speaker 2: here on the podcast or if I announced, I think
34:28
Speaker 2: I did, or on the radio show. Sometimes they blur together,
34:31
Speaker 2: so I forget where I've said these things. Coming up
34:35
Speaker 2: tomorrow afternoon, I'm going in for a surgery for a
34:40
Speaker 2: hernia that's on my hip. I've got a hip hernia
34:43
Speaker 2: that I've got to get taken care of. Uh, and
34:45
Speaker 2: it should be a relative, it's like an hour, I
34:47
Speaker 2: think for the procedure. Um, surgeon's like super nice and competent.
34:51
Speaker 2: And she actually did a surgery, the same similar surgery,
34:54
Speaker 2: I think on a buddy of mine. So she came
34:56
Speaker 2: very highly recommended. So I'll be in very good hands.
34:59
Speaker 2: I think it's going to be a very quick thing,
35:01
Speaker 2: which is great. And then, uh, I'll be back up
35:03
Speaker 2: and running in no time. I said, I think I,
35:06
Speaker 2: I said on one of the shows, I said, uh,
35:08
Speaker 2: And my wife wants me to take the day off
35:11
Speaker 2: on Thursday just to recover. She's like, well, you should
35:14
Speaker 2: take a day, pause, and then come back on Friday.
35:18
Speaker 2: And I said, okay, I'll do that. But when I
35:20
Speaker 2: said that my wife wanted me to do it, somebody
35:22
Speaker 2: suggested somewhere in the chat, they're like, oh, so you're
35:26
Speaker 2: getting a vasectomy. No, I'm not getting a vasectomy. But
35:32
Speaker 2: thank you for your concern. Thank you for your attention
35:34
Speaker 2: to this matter. No, it's going to be totally fine.
35:38
Speaker 2: But I got to knock that out. So what does
35:39
Speaker 2: that imply for the shows, which is the most important
35:42
Speaker 2: thing as far as you're concerned? Wednesday, producer Jim will
35:46
Speaker 2: do the radio show for me. And then Thursday morning,
35:49
Speaker 2: the amazing Sean Farish is filling in for me on
35:51
Speaker 2: the podcast. And Thursday afternoon on the radio show, you've
35:55
Speaker 2: got Jim. And then I'll be back Friday. I'll be
35:58
Speaker 2: ship shape back on Friday. doing great stuff. The only
36:02
Speaker 2: thing I'm worried about, fellas, is I won't be able
36:05
Speaker 2: to consume any calories tomorrow morning ahead of the surgery.
36:08
Speaker 2: They said only clear liquids and all this other stuff,
36:11
Speaker 2: which is fine. I said, I did ask, I was like,
36:13
Speaker 2: can I have coffee? And I drink my coffee black.
36:16
Speaker 2: Is that okay? And they're like, yeah, yeah, that's fine.
36:17
Speaker 2: You can drink black coffee. So I'll be caffeinated tomorrow.
36:20
Speaker 2: The thing I'm worried about is will I have a
36:21
Speaker 2: calorie deficiency such that I'm incapable of even like talking
36:26
Speaker 2: to you. We'll see. We'll all experience that together. It'll
36:29
Speaker 2: be a lot of fun. But I'll be on the
36:31
Speaker 2: podcast tomorrow morning. That's the update. And thank you. You
36:34
Speaker 2: guys are the best. People are saying they're going to
36:36
Speaker 2: say some prayers. And no, I don't think, well, I
36:39
Speaker 2: don't know. Somebody, preacher retired asks, and thank you for
36:42
Speaker 2: being a preacher. So Vince, you're not going to need
36:44
Speaker 2: a package of frozen peas, two crying emojis. I don't know.
36:48
Speaker 2: Maybe I will, but just not, I won't have to
36:52
Speaker 2: sit on it. Oh, it's going to be good. It's
36:58
Speaker 2: going to be good. Come back Monday. No, but you know, Buss,
37:01
Speaker 2: I hadn't even really thought about it. Honestly, I didn't
37:04
Speaker 2: want to take Thursday off. I was like, well, whatever.
37:06
Speaker 2: I mean, they told me it's going to be fine,
37:08
Speaker 2: so I should be able to work Thursday. But Allison insisted,
37:11
Speaker 2: which is probably good because I'll be I'll be they
37:14
Speaker 2: do have to knock me out for the procedure tomorrow.
37:17
Speaker 2: And so as a result, I won't be able to
37:18
Speaker 2: stare at the news and develop smart thoughts for you
37:20
Speaker 2: on Thursday. And so it's probably it's probably better for
37:24
Speaker 2: all of us on Thursday. But that's just that's the update.
37:27
Speaker 2: Just to let you know. Thank you. You guys really
37:29
Speaker 2: are the best chat anywhere. You're the best.
37:32
Speaker 3: All right.
37:33
Speaker 2: Clear liquid does include vodka. I think that's right. I
37:37
Speaker 2: think I'm going to skip the vodka. But thank you.
37:39
Speaker 2: That's a that's a great recommendation. OK, let's get into
37:44
Speaker 2: some of the craziness that the left is producing this week.
37:48
Speaker 2: We've got. Well, this clip is going around. It's actually
37:52
Speaker 2: not from this week. This is from December of 2024,
37:54
Speaker 2: but it's finally getting some attention. A Texas Democrat who
38:01
Speaker 2: was born in communist China. Yes, you heard me correctly.
38:05
Speaker 2: An elected Texas Democrat by the name of Gene Wu,
38:10
Speaker 2: who was born in communist China, was on a podcast
38:15
Speaker 2: in December of 24 fantasizing about about various racial groups
38:20
Speaker 2: banding together to take over this country from white oppressors. Yes,
38:27
Speaker 2: I know, it's crazy. Let me play the clip and
38:30
Speaker 2: then I'll explain to you what's actually going on in
38:34
Speaker 2: it as if it needs any more explanation. But here's
38:36
Speaker 2: a demented Democrat, China-born Congressman Gene Wu saying that the
38:44
Speaker 2: non-whites in this country need to band together to take
38:47
Speaker 2: on their oppressor? Watch.
38:50
Speaker 6: I always tell people the day the Latino, African-American, Asian,
38:55
Speaker 6: and other communities realize that they share the same oppressor
39:01
Speaker 6: is the day we start winning. Because we are the
39:04
Speaker 6: majority in this country now. We have the ability to
39:07
Speaker 6: take over this country and to do what is needed
39:10
Speaker 6: for everyone and to make things fair. But the problem
39:14
Speaker 6: is our communities are divided. They're completely divided.
39:17
Speaker 2: And I talk about this. So he straight up says
39:25
Speaker 2: that you have to get all of the non-white racial
39:28
Speaker 2: groups in the country together. to join together to go
39:33
Speaker 2: after the quote, same oppressor. Now, what could he possibly
39:37
Speaker 2: be talking about? If not white, what is he referencing?
39:41
Speaker 2: What do you mean the same oppressor? Let's say for
39:44
Speaker 2: a moment that he's not talking about people based on
39:47
Speaker 2: their skin color. At least white people in this case. Well,
39:51
Speaker 2: then why wouldn't he lump in white people into his
39:55
Speaker 2: list of races that we all share the same oppressor,
39:58
Speaker 2: that it's like something– it's like the system of governance,
40:02
Speaker 2: the powers that be, the rich people, whatever it is
40:04
Speaker 2: that he wants to say. It's pretty obvious what he's
40:06
Speaker 2: talking about. Now, there's a lot of excuse-making going on
40:09
Speaker 2: online right now saying– Well, he didn't say white. Well,
40:13
Speaker 2: that's the most heavily implied reference to white you could
40:17
Speaker 2: possibly imagine. And if that's not good enough for you,
40:20
Speaker 2: that's fine. That's fine. Here, let me take this a
40:23
Speaker 2: step further. I've actually got the actual original video pulled
40:29
Speaker 2: up here. And I'm going to go through. Let me
40:32
Speaker 2: just do this. I didn't even tell the guys I
40:33
Speaker 2: was going to do this, but I want to make
40:34
Speaker 2: sure to do it for you. I've got the transcript
40:37
Speaker 2: pulled up, and I'm going to sort through it. In it,
40:39
Speaker 2: he refers to white nationalism. And so, in other words,
40:44
Speaker 2: he attacks the white people. He says it's white nationalism
40:49
Speaker 2: that's causing your concern with illegal immigration in the country
40:53
Speaker 2: right now. Take a look at this. Here he is.
40:55
Speaker 2: This is the original interview. It's called Define American. He's
40:58
Speaker 2: doing an interview. By the way, the guy who's interviewing
41:00
Speaker 2: him is an illegal alien. His name is Jose Antonio Vargas.
41:04
Speaker 2: At one point, he worked for the Washington Post. He's
41:06
Speaker 2: an illegal alien interviewing this congressman. And here's the congressman saying, yeah,
41:12
Speaker 2: the only reason you're concerned right now about illegals in
41:14
Speaker 2: the country is because you're a white nationalist. Watch.
41:16
Speaker 6: The scary thing for me is that what is driving
41:21
Speaker 6: this newest round of anti-immigrant sentiment is purely a sense
41:27
Speaker 6: of white nationalism. That there is a sense of America
41:32
Speaker 6: really just belongs to white people.
41:35
Speaker 2: That a lot.
41:36
Speaker 6: Of people believe that God gave America to white people
41:40
Speaker 6: to rule.
41:40
Speaker 2: Okay, that is insane. This is attempting to stoke the flames.
41:49
Speaker 2: of racial tension in the United States. And let there
41:53
Speaker 2: be no doubt about what that original now viral clip
41:56
Speaker 2: is saying. He's saying that, well, racial groups need to
41:59
Speaker 2: band together to go after their oppressor, which is quite
42:01
Speaker 2: obviously white people. And he's saying that the only reason
42:04
Speaker 2: that illegal aliens are a concern to anybody right now
42:06
Speaker 2: is quote, white nationalism. Now, remember the time in which
42:08
Speaker 2: he's saying this. This is December of 2024. In other words,
42:12
Speaker 2: you just made the election too big to rig. Donald
42:16
Speaker 2: Trump was sent back into office on a wave of
42:20
Speaker 2: concern about our borders being wide open. And it's not
42:24
Speaker 2: just white people who sent President Trump back into office.
42:27
Speaker 2: Every racial category in the United States, insofar as anybody's
42:31
Speaker 2: trying to track racial categories, they all moved in Donald
42:34
Speaker 2: Trump's direction. And that includes Black Americans, definitely Hispanic Americans
42:39
Speaker 2: who voted for President Trump in somewhere in the vicinity
42:42
Speaker 2: of 50% or more of Hispanic Americans in the country
42:46
Speaker 2: voting for him. And like I said, black Americans moving
42:49
Speaker 2: in his direction. You ask them why in the exit polls,
42:52
Speaker 2: they say it's our borders are wide open. Our borders
42:55
Speaker 2: are wide open and we need to restore order. I
42:57
Speaker 2: liked my life economically under President Trump. It got crappier
43:01
Speaker 2: under Joe Biden. And I want President Trump back because
43:04
Speaker 2: I want our borders secure and I want illegal aliens deported.
43:07
Speaker 2: A majority of Americans in 2024, the reason they vote
43:11
Speaker 2: for Trump, a majority of Americans say they want mass deportations.
43:15
Speaker 2: So this guy is lying, lying. And I know you
43:20
Speaker 2: know that, but I'm giving you the details as to
43:21
Speaker 2: why he's lying and how that lying is being crafted.
43:24
Speaker 2: He's lying to you. And he's trying to stoke racial
43:30
Speaker 2: chaos in the United States. That is a demonic move.
43:36
Speaker 2: And so Gene Wu, yes, he's coming under fire right
43:39
Speaker 2: now is what everybody's saying for this resurfaced clip. Not
43:42
Speaker 2: only does he deserve to come under fire, he does
43:45
Speaker 2: deserve to be kicked out of Congress, denaturalized, and thrown
43:49
Speaker 2: the hell out of the country. This guy is an
43:54
Speaker 2: agent of chaos, born in communist China. Here he is
43:58
Speaker 2: sitting in the House of Representatives and telling the rest
44:00
Speaker 2: of us that we should be at some sort of
44:02
Speaker 2: racial strife against one another. How despicable can you possibly be? Well,
44:07
Speaker 2: the answer is within the audio and the video that
44:10
Speaker 2: you just heard and saw. And he's not alone. These
44:15
Speaker 2: Democrats are so casually adhering to these racial themes. In fact,
44:22
Speaker 2: it kind of washes over you, doesn't it? It's not shocking,
44:25
Speaker 2: but it is appalling that we've become numb to the
44:28
Speaker 2: fact that they're constantly trying to wield claims and false
44:32
Speaker 2: claims specifically about racism. Meanwhile, they're the ones who are
44:36
Speaker 2: absolutely racially obsessed in every aspect of American life. It's
44:41
Speaker 2: all a power thing to them. It's not about principle
44:42
Speaker 2: at all. So, for instance, here is Jasmine Crockett, who
44:48
Speaker 2: just did another podcast, because apparently that's all she does.
44:50
Speaker 2: She has podcasts and she whines. And she whines that
44:54
Speaker 2: the reason people don't like her is because she's black
44:59
Speaker 2: and she's a woman. In other words, you're a racist
45:01
Speaker 2: and a sexist bigot because Jasmine Crockett is disliked.
45:06
Speaker 3: Watch.
45:07
Speaker 7: You know, there are those that have their own motivations
45:10
Speaker 7: for critiquing and they're You know, I think that the people.
45:14
Speaker 2: Is it just racism and sexism?
45:15
Speaker 1: Like, what do you think it is?
45:17
Speaker 7: I mean, I think there's a lot of things. I
45:19
Speaker 7: think it depends on who it's coming from. But I've
45:22
Speaker 7: been a Black woman my whole life. So this idea
45:24
Speaker 7: that I'm going to go and be like, oh, well,
45:26
Speaker 7: they're being racist or misogynistic towards me. Like, you think
45:29
Speaker 7: I didn't know I was a Black woman when I
45:30
Speaker 7: woke up and decided that I was going to run
45:32
Speaker 7: for the United States Senate? You think I didn't factor
45:34
Speaker 7: in and make sure that we had enough room to
45:36
Speaker 7: account for that?
45:37
Speaker 2: We did. We did. Yeah, I knew that there were
45:41
Speaker 2: going to be a lot of people who are racist
45:43
Speaker 2: and sexist against me. I had to account for that
45:46
Speaker 2: when I decided to throw my wig into the ring
45:49
Speaker 2: to run for Senate in Texas. Got it. It's like,
45:52
Speaker 2: what are you even talking about? I mean, just like
45:54
Speaker 2: it's craziness. It's just totally crazy. It couldn't possibly it's
45:59
Speaker 2: got to be because you're racist and sexist. It couldn't
46:01
Speaker 2: possibly be because of things like. Jasmine Crockett accusing Lee
46:05
Speaker 2: Zeldin of taking money from Jeffrey Epstein when she knew
46:08
Speaker 2: it was a completely different person with the same name.
46:10
Speaker 2: It couldn't be that Jasmine Crockett recently said that just
46:13
Speaker 2: because somebody commits a crime doesn't mean they're actually a criminal,
46:16
Speaker 2: despite the fact that that's the definition of what a
46:19
Speaker 2: criminal is, someone who commits a crime. It couldn't be
46:22
Speaker 2: because she's been comparing ICE agents to slave patrols, demonizing
46:25
Speaker 2: the good men and women of law enforcement who are
46:27
Speaker 2: actually getting secure of our country's borders and ejecting illegal
46:30
Speaker 2: aliens who are, in many cases, very violent and shouldn't
46:33
Speaker 2: be here. It couldn't be because she said Trump supporters
46:37
Speaker 2: are mentally ill on multiple occasions, alleging and dehumanizing, you know,
46:43
Speaker 2: half the country or more. saying that, you know, something's
46:46
Speaker 2: wrong with you mentally for wanting secure borders and a good,
46:51
Speaker 2: strong economy. It couldn't be because she voted against a
46:54
Speaker 2: resolution honoring Charlie Kirk and then was upset that, in
46:58
Speaker 2: her words, only two Caucasians were among the Democrats who
47:02
Speaker 2: joined her. No, she's not the racist idiot. You are,
47:07
Speaker 2: in her tellings. That's Jasmine freaking Crockett. And she's a
47:12
Speaker 2: member of the House. And she wants to become a
47:14
Speaker 2: United States Senator. She really wants to. Oh, Texas, you
47:21
Speaker 2: better stop her. I think Texas will. But come in for,
47:26
Speaker 2: you know, help us, Texas. You're our only hope. Hey,
47:33
Speaker 2: Jasmine Crockett continues here. She says that, you know, that
47:36
Speaker 2: lie I told you about Lee Zeldin, where she was like, oh,
47:38
Speaker 2: Lee Zeldin took money from Jeffrey Epstein. It was a
47:40
Speaker 2: completely different person. Even the interviewer that she's sitting down
47:43
Speaker 2: with says, don't you think that was a little far?
47:45
Speaker 2: Don't you think maybe you should admit you screwed that
47:49
Speaker 2: one up? Here's Jasmine Crockett saying, no, actually, I have
47:52
Speaker 2: an obligation to lie to the American people. Here she is,
47:55
Speaker 2: cut five, watch.
47:56
Speaker 1: You know, when I see the moment on the House
47:57
Speaker 1: where you seem to accuse Republican Lee Zeldin of taking
48:00
Speaker 1: money from Jeffrey Epstein, but it seemed like if it
48:02
Speaker 1: was not the same person, I wonder, like, is there
48:05
Speaker 1: times in which the rhetoric goes too far? Are there
48:06
Speaker 1: times in which you should say, you know, maybe I
48:08
Speaker 1: messed that one up?
48:10
Speaker 2: No.
48:11
Speaker 7: Not in this environment.
48:12
Speaker 3: I don't.
48:13
Speaker 7: I think that, you know, we are really in uncharted territory.
48:17
Speaker 1: So I hear your argument that you're reflecting the urgency necessary.
48:20
Speaker 1: And so that's why it won't give an inch.
48:23
Speaker 2: Correct. I love how he accepts that insane and totally
48:30
Speaker 2: depraved answer as like, oh, I get it. Okay, so
48:33
Speaker 2: you're reflecting the urgency of the moment. By lying? No,
48:37
Speaker 2: this moment requires, we're in uncharted territory. I've just got
48:40
Speaker 2: to do a lot of lying to navigate my way
48:42
Speaker 2: out of it. Are people listening to this? Do people
48:44
Speaker 2: listen to this and think, oh, yeah, that makes a
48:45
Speaker 2: lot of sense? Doesn't make any sense. No, it means
48:48
Speaker 2: you shouldn't be a member of Congress. This is insane
48:50
Speaker 2: to me. In fact, you should be kicked out of Congress.
48:54
Speaker 2: You want to do something good for us today, Speaker Johnson?
48:56
Speaker 2: Advance a vote to kick her out of Congress for
48:58
Speaker 2: endorsing lying as a strategy for being in that position. Yeah,
49:02
Speaker 2: this moment calls for a lot of lying.
49:05
Speaker 4: What?
49:06
Speaker 2: Just, okay. So she didn't screw it up. She knew
49:09
Speaker 2: she was lying. She just admitted it on a podcast,
49:12
Speaker 2: and now she's saying that's actually a strategy she's using
49:14
Speaker 2: for power. Okay, get her the hell out of Congress, please.
49:19
Speaker 2: It's crazy. Oh, and by the way, she's a genius.
49:23
Speaker 2: Do you know this? She is, well, she's intellectually superior
49:27
Speaker 2: to you and to me. She is God's gift to thinking.
49:33
Speaker 2: Here is Jasmine Crockett explaining this.
49:38
Speaker 7: I've always been someone who has been intellectual. I was
49:41
Speaker 7: top 10% of my class at Texas Southern my first
49:45
Speaker 7: year in law school. I was always very much kind
49:49
Speaker 7: of digging in and wanted to understand. I was always
49:52
Speaker 7: the person that would bring the receipts and wouldn't back down.
49:56
Speaker 2: You were always clapping back, too? I was always, yeah,
50:01
Speaker 2: there was always a pushback.
50:02
Speaker 7: If I feel like I am right on something, I
50:04
Speaker 7: have always been very clear about that.
50:11
Speaker 2: She's an intellectual. She's always been so far advanced, well
50:15
Speaker 2: beyond the rest of us slow-witted people. She's not dull
50:21
Speaker 2: like us. No, she's just very impressive. How much would
50:26
Speaker 2: you pay to see a real IQ test administered to
50:30
Speaker 2: Jasmine Crockett? She's a genius. Oh, it's so crazy. All right,
50:47
Speaker 2: enough Crockett. I've tortured you enough. But she's crazy. She
50:52
Speaker 2: is crazy. Hey, I've got an update for you. You know,
50:57
Speaker 2: the search for Nancy Guthrie, which has dominated the news
51:01
Speaker 2: this past week, it continues. And you know what's frustrating
51:04
Speaker 2: about it? There's something deeply frustrating about it. There's no answers.
51:07
Speaker 2: Nobody knows what happened. The FBI has been very involved,
51:09
Speaker 2: although I have seen reports now that apparently local authorities
51:13
Speaker 2: held off for a while before they requested help from
51:15
Speaker 2: the feds. What was that about? Why are you wasting time?
51:18
Speaker 2: Why don't you just request help from the world's premier
51:21
Speaker 2: law enforcement agency right away from the FBI? But anyway,
51:24
Speaker 2: the FBI eventually gets in there and at the president's direction,
51:27
Speaker 2: they've been working really hard to try and find Nancy Guthrie.
51:31
Speaker 2: And that brings us to the last 24 hours. A
51:35
Speaker 2: bunch of apparent deadlines have been passed from whoever claims
51:39
Speaker 2: to have her. And Savannah Guthrie released a heartbreaking video
51:46
Speaker 2: where she's now calling on the public to help find
51:50
Speaker 2: her mother. She seems to be out of options. She's
51:52
Speaker 2: now asking for the whole public to be on the
51:54
Speaker 2: hunt for where her mother might be. Here's Savannah Guthrie
51:59
Speaker 2: making a plea to the rest of us.
52:01
Speaker 4: Hi there, everybody. I wanted to come on and just
52:08
Speaker 4: share a few thoughts as we enter into another week
52:15
Speaker 4: of this nightmare. I just want to say, first of all,
52:21
Speaker 4: thank you so much for all of the prayers and
52:28
Speaker 4: the love that we have felt, my sister and brother
52:31
Speaker 4: and I, And that our mom has felt. Because we
52:38
Speaker 4: believe that somehow, someway, she is feeling these prayers. And
52:43
Speaker 4: that God is lifting her even in this moment and
52:45
Speaker 4: in this darkest place. We believe our mom is still
52:51
Speaker 4: out there. We need your help. Law enforcement is working
53:00
Speaker 4: tirelessly around the clock trying to bring her home. trying
53:04
Speaker 4: to find her. She was taken and we don't know where.
53:09
Speaker 4: And we need your help. So I'm coming on just
53:15
Speaker 4: to ask you, not just for your prayers, but no
53:19
Speaker 4: matter where you are, even if you're far from Tucson,
53:22
Speaker 4: if you see anything, if you hear anything, if there's
53:25
Speaker 4: anything at all that seems strange to you, that you
53:30
Speaker 4: report to law enforcement, We are at an hour of desperation.
53:39
Speaker 5: And we need your help.
53:43
Speaker 2: It is heartbreaking. And she's doing what I think any
53:48
Speaker 2: child who loves their parents would do in this situation,
53:51
Speaker 2: which is exhausting every possible option to try and locate
53:55
Speaker 2: your mother to get her back. So that's the update.
54:01
Speaker 2: And so in other words, like it sounds at this moment, unfortunately,
54:03
Speaker 2: kind of helpless. Our friend Dan Bongino was on with
54:08
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity last night, and he was assessing some of this.
54:13
Speaker 2: And he detects three possibilities as to what actually happened here.
54:18
Speaker 2: And I'm glad to hear Dan vocalize this. And I think,
54:21
Speaker 2: by the way, Dan really excels at this particular thing,
54:23
Speaker 2: coming right out of the FBI, former deputy director now,
54:26
Speaker 2: with a clear view of what their capabilities are. And
54:29
Speaker 2: he says that, look, I'm staring at this case, and
54:31
Speaker 2: I'm thinking... You know, there are some elements to this
54:35
Speaker 2: that suggest that this may not be what everybody else
54:38
Speaker 2: thinks it is right now. Watch Dan assess this.
54:41
Speaker 3: So what's going on right now? I see three possibilities, Sean,
54:45
Speaker 3: and I'm not going to weight them. I'm just these
54:48
Speaker 3: are three possibilities. If you apply Occam's razor, I see
54:51
Speaker 3: could apply. The first would be obviously it's a kidnapping.
54:55
Speaker 3: That was an intended kidnapping for a ransom payment. That
54:58
Speaker 3: would be the first possibility, Sean. Again, I'm not waiting
55:00
Speaker 3: any of them. The second possibility would be this was
55:03
Speaker 3: just a crime that went awry.
55:06
Speaker 2: Someone was at the house.
55:07
Speaker 3: Maybe it was a burglary. Maybe something went bad and
55:09
Speaker 3: that you've got some bad actors committing another crime unrelated,
55:14
Speaker 3: in other words, requesting a ransom for something you didn't
55:17
Speaker 3: do just to take advantage of a situation like this.
55:19
Speaker 2: OK, let me pause on this particular scenario. Imagine how
55:26
Speaker 2: dynamic of a thinker you would have to be to
55:31
Speaker 2: be that kind of criminal you know what dan is
55:34
Speaker 2: suggesting here the second scenario which is that they went
55:37
Speaker 2: there maybe they're trying to burglarize the house and then
55:40
Speaker 2: in the process they encounter nancy guthrie and then maybe
55:43
Speaker 2: they kill her or something and then they have to
55:45
Speaker 2: figure out what to do with the body and they
55:47
Speaker 2: take her now we haven't heard evidence by the way
55:50
Speaker 2: you know as far as i can tell that they
55:52
Speaker 2: found you know remnants of her dna suggesting a struggle
55:56
Speaker 2: or murder or what i We're still waiting on so
55:59
Speaker 2: many details. It feels like there's just not a lot
56:01
Speaker 2: of answers. Um, if that's the case, they took her.
56:06
Speaker 2: So they thought, okay, well, we accidentally killed her, take
56:09
Speaker 2: the body. And then we'll see if we can't turn
56:11
Speaker 2: this into a payday. Maybe we'll just like claim we've
56:13
Speaker 2: got the body and get a rate. I mean, you'd
56:15
Speaker 2: have to imagine being that creative. Couldn't you apply that
56:18
Speaker 2: kind of thinking to something much more productive than robbing
56:22
Speaker 2: people and then using their bodies in order to like solicit,
56:27
Speaker 2: elicit random, uh, ransom payments. It's crazy. But it's a scenario,
56:32
Speaker 2: and Dan's just exploring all of the possibilities here.
56:35
Speaker 3: The third possibility, again, this is where I think you
56:40
Speaker 3: have to kind of think out.
56:41
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, you said they found her blood. Okay, so
56:43
Speaker 2: there is some evidence. Yeah, okay, so the chat is
56:46
Speaker 2: reminding me they found her blood. So there is some
56:48
Speaker 2: evidence of her DNA at the scene. Okay, but again,
56:51
Speaker 2: we have very limited information, but that would support the
56:53
Speaker 2: theory that Dan is expressing here. And here's more from Dan.
56:57
Speaker 3: And this is where I think you have to kind
56:59
Speaker 3: of think outside of the boxes. especially given some of
57:02
Speaker 3: the messaging that we've seen lately, is the possibility that
57:05
Speaker 3: there may have been some kind of maybe a medical
57:08
Speaker 3: emergency or something, and maybe this was not a kidnapping.
57:14
Speaker 3: And I say that only because, and again, I'm not
57:17
Speaker 3: weighting these possibilities. We're just, when you can't find someone
57:21
Speaker 3: at a crime scene like this right away within the
57:24
Speaker 3: first couple of days, you either have really good surgical
57:27
Speaker 3: type operators or Or the story you've been told or
57:31
Speaker 3: you may have believed may not be the story.
57:33
Speaker 2: I mean, may not be the story. In other words,
57:36
Speaker 2: like the prevailing narrative here that she's been taken by kidnappers,
57:41
Speaker 2: holding her for ransom. And, you know, the way that
57:45
Speaker 2: she's going to be returned is if the ransom payment
57:47
Speaker 2: is made, which, of course, the Guthrie's, by the way,
57:49
Speaker 2: have said, we'll pay. We're ready to pay. Just tell
57:52
Speaker 2: us what to do. We're going to do it. Um,
57:54
Speaker 2: a frustrating story, uh, especially for the Guthrie's, but just
57:57
Speaker 2: as for the rest of us, as we're watching this, just,
58:00
Speaker 2: just frustrating that it seems like there really are no
58:02
Speaker 2: good leads right now. They were doing everything. They were,
58:05
Speaker 2: they were searching the septic tank at the house. They
58:07
Speaker 2: were doing everything. Uh, and, and not a lot of
58:09
Speaker 2: new or important information here. Everybody hoping for a break.
58:13
Speaker 2: I do hope they get one. I hope we get
58:14
Speaker 2: one soon. Uh, but there's Dan. Nice to see Dan
58:17
Speaker 2: in that venue. Just kind of talking about this. Um,
58:19
Speaker 2: really good stuff, Dan, by the way. You'll hear more
58:22
Speaker 2: from him coming up today on his live program. That's
58:24
Speaker 2: 10 o'clock Eastern, rumble.com slash Bongino. And then the wonderful
58:28
Speaker 2: Haley Karania is going to be doing her program at
58:32
Speaker 2: noon Eastern at rumble.com slash Haley, H-A-Y-L-E-Y. There's two Y's there.
58:38
Speaker 4: Why?
58:39
Speaker 2: Because she's awesome. She's great. And that's coming up today.
58:42
Speaker 2: And then I'll be doing the big national radio show today.
58:44
Speaker 2: If you want to watch that live on Rumble, you
58:46
Speaker 2: can watch it from 1 to 3 Eastern time. The
58:49
Speaker 2: final two hours of the program are live on Rumble.
58:51
Speaker 2: If you want to hear the whole thing, go to
58:53
Speaker 2: any of our affiliates across the country, TheVinceShow.com, 12 to
58:57
Speaker 2: 3 Eastern time. I know there's a lot to do.
58:59
Speaker 2: There's a lot of great options you have out there.
59:01
Speaker 2: I appreciate you spending any time with me whatsoever. You
59:04
Speaker 2: really are the best audience anywhere. I am back with
59:07
Speaker 2: you tomorrow on the podcast. We will be together. on
59:10
Speaker 2: the podcast. And please, if you don't mind, if you're
59:14
Speaker 2: not yet subscribed, please subscribe to the podcast. Even if
59:18
Speaker 2: you're a Rumble viewer and you think to yourself, like,
59:21
Speaker 2: I just like watching on Rumble. I love that. Would
59:23
Speaker 2: you also please subscribe on the podcast just so we can,
59:27
Speaker 2: you know, win that race too. I want to do
59:30
Speaker 2: as much as, I want to dominate. I just want
59:31
Speaker 2: to dominate. Is that too much to ask? Just total domination?
59:35
Speaker 2: Is that too much? I don't want to be too much.
59:37
Speaker 2: I don't want to be over the top, but total
59:38
Speaker 2: domination is my preference. So if you can help me
59:41
Speaker 2: in that pursuit of that, I appreciate it. You guys
59:43
Speaker 2: are the best, really are. And again, I'll be back
59:45
Speaker 2: with you tomorrow. Thanks as always for tuning into the program.
59:53
Speaker 2: The Dan Bongino Show.
59:54
Speaker 3: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
59:57
Speaker 3: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
1:00:00
Speaker 3: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
1:00:03
Speaker 3: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
1:00:06
Speaker 3: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue.
1:00:09
Speaker 2: That is it. This is not a football game. If
1:00:13
Speaker 2: you vote, we will win. It is not complicated. The
1:00:16
Speaker 2: Dan Bongino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.