Latest / Man in America Podcast / It’s Far Worse Than We Thought - Dr. Jane Ruby Interview

Transcript

It’s Far Worse Than We Thought - Dr. Jane Ruby Interview · Man in America Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. So after more than two years of censoring anything and everything that went against the COVID narrative, there are now indisputable facts that can no longer be hidden. Their treatment is killing people at an alarming rate. Joining me today is doctor Jane Ruby to discuss the overwhelming data that's emerging, what you can do if you already took the jab, and much, much more.
• 0:29
  And folks, look. If you're watching me on YouTube right now, please click on the Rumble link in the description below to go to watch this interview over there where free speech is allowed. They'd honestly probably delete my account if I put this show on YouTube, so please click the Rumble link below. Dom, go ahead and please cut the YouTube stream. So before we get started, today's show is brought to you by Rise TV, a Patriot owned streaming platform.
• 0:55
  With all the big tech censorship and demonetization going on right now, the subscribers at Rise TV are literally the reason I can bring you this critical information today. Over at Rise, our mission is to uncover the truth no matter how dark and difficult while always holding on to hope and even having a few laughs along the way. We have a massive content library and an amazing community of patriots, and you get to hang out with me and my guests the second half of every show and ask your questions and share your thoughts and ideas. So if you have any specific questions for doctor Ruby, make sure you join us on Rise TV. There's a link for a free trial in the description below.
• 1:30
  You should go ahead and click it now so you're all ready when we cut the public streams for the exclusive q and a during the second half of the show. Also, make sure you're following me on Telegram and truth social at man in America. You can also catch every episode as a podcast if just wanna listen. The links to my podcast and social media are all in the description below. And folks, by now, we've all sensed it.
• 1:52
  We're in for a bumpy ride for the foreseeable future. Russia and China are truly flexing their muscles in the world stage, and they've aligned with India, Brazil, South Africa, and dozens of other countries to transition away from the US dollar as the dominant global currency. So what does this mean? Well, for most of us Americans, the US dollar is all we know. Right?
• 2:12
  All of our hard earned money is completely tied to it, whether it's the stock market, our bank accounts, pensions, four zero one k's, etcetera. But you see, the rest of the world, they're fed up with The US printing money out of thin air and demanding to trade it for things of real value. So this is why Russia's already backed its currency with gold and many other nations are expected to follow. But what happens if the dollar loses its global reserve status? Well, the value of our dollars, our life savings, could literally be wiped out overnight.
• 2:40
  And look, I'm not a financial adviser, so please do your own research. But I believe that now more than ever, it's a good time to consider transferring at least some of your wealth into physical gold and silver. Real world assets have stood the test of time even during crisis. And for this, I'm confident recommending Noble Gold. You can buy gold and silver directly.
• 3:01
  We'll ship it to your front door, or you can even transfer your IRA into physical gold and silver with zero taxes or penalties. And most importantly, you can trust Noble Gold with your wealth. They have an a plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and hundreds and hundreds of positive reviews from the folks like you they've helped out. Now look. I wanna be really, really clear with you.
• 3:21
  You don't buy gold and silver to get rich. You do it to protect your wealth. But if things get really tough, history has left us many stories of folks scooping up land and other valuable assets for a few gold coins. So now's the time, folks. If you wanna learn more about this, open up a new tab right now and go to goldwithSeth.com.
• 3:40
  Or you can just call (877) 646-5347 to speak to someone right now. The folks at Noble Gold will answer all of your questions and take care of you every step of the way. Again, that's (877) 646-5347. Alright, folks. I am very honored to have my show today, doctor Jane Ruby, who has been a freedom fighter on the front lines.
• 4:03
  She's been canceled and banned and everything, but she keeps going because the information she's been bringing to the public is extremely important. And as we're gonna look at the data right now, we can see that this is life saving information. So let's go ahead and bring her on. We've got a great show planned for today. So Doctor.
• 4:21
  Jane Ruby, thank you so very much for joining me on Man in America.
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: Hi, Seth. The pleasure and the honor are all mine. Really happy to be here.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: Great. So there's a lot to cover today. I know we're gonna be looking at, you know, the the clots. We're gonna be looking at the death rates, and even looking at some of the information for people who, you know, were coerced into taking the jab and what they can do and maybe get into some information on vaccine shedding. But, you know, first, I you know, you and I were talking ahead of the show.
• 4:52
  And, basically, there is now so much evidence of death coming out. Like, they can no longer hide it. We're seeing increases across all of the different statistics. So can we first dive into that? Just tell me, like, what's the information that you're seeing?
• 5:08
  What is the data that you're seeing out that's coming out regarding the death rates of people right now?
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, thanks. Well, me, you know, my background is, is medicine, it's a nurse practitioner. I've been a professor in medical colleges and I've had my own independent research labs. But for the bulk of my career, Seth, I spent twenty years in pharmaceutical research. You know, for me, the data is very, very clear.
• 5:37
  It was clear early on when you talk about these threshold numbers. Now it's undeniable. For me, it was undeniable like a year ago or a year and a half ago Because before this very bizarre thing unfolded in 2020, it didn't and rightfully so, it didn't take very much to shut down a pharmaceutical program of research or a distribution of medication even after it was approved. So I recognized early on that something was very, very wrong. Because as I started to say, I originally started out as the medical contributor on The Stu Peter Show.
• 6:17
  And then, of course, because the audience was was growing so much and wanted to hear more, Stu asked me to add my my own show to it. And so like I've I've just said, you know, I used to all along the way, I was saying there there doesn't seem to be a threshold, for death, right, to stop this. When this began, I started thinking, oh, this is never going anywhere because they're going to shut it down like that. But I realized very soon into the game that nothing was going to shut it down. And that should have been a red flag maybe to some portions of the general public because you've seen in the past how sensitive the pharmaceutical industry is, for example, in terms of public relations, right?
• 7:00
  If just the slightest little negative information comes out, they're holding press conferences. They're telling you know, I I left pharma almost two years ago, but they're telling the employees in the company, hey, button it up. Only PR or, investor relations is allowed to speak on this. And so we would be very quiet and they would do the damage control and get out the word and the press releases and all that. You don't see any of that.
• 7:27
  You don't see any public concern expressed by not only these pharmaceutical companies that are primarily conducting the murders, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, J and J, Novavax. I mean, we can add a bunch more to those. But it's not just, it's them. The entire industry is silent, right? In the old days, you would have had hundreds of pharmaceutical companies pounding on the door of the FDA saying, woah, wait a minute.
• 7:55
  How come they're getting away with not doing a step by step series of studies for safety and efficacy and the rest of us have to do it. And they still have to do it, Seth, for the most part. It's only these vaccine, these bioweapon injection companies that are off the hook. And now, as you probably all know, the FDA had a meeting of the agency formerly known as the FDA that's now a department at Pfizer, had their meeting in June when they also approved and authorized this poison for six month old babies and up. You know, they also had a meeting in late June that really wasn't paid very much attention, except, you know, in my show, to try to get people to be aware that the FDA sort of gave a green light from now on.
• 8:42
  These companies don't have to do anything, Seth. They don't have to and let me explain something. The terms safety and efficacy, in my world of pharma FDA regulations, I have experience in interfacing with the FDA. I've written real informed consent documents. I've executed them.
• 9:05
  In our real world before this whole sham thing, safety and efficacy were actually legal terms. And there were thresholds of type of research and amount within those types that had to be done before you could then get to a point where you had a sufficient, what we call package of data from various studies showing a foundation of minimal safety. And then the later trials, in fact, then help you start to build your efficacy. Well, they don't have to do that anymore. You all should be appalled.
• 9:41
  You should be literally pounding the doors of the FDA saying, you're going to let them just pump out materials without or just after giving them to eight mice for a week? I mean, come on. It's ridiculous.
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: And It's basically if I understand correctly, it's almost like for a car manufacturer. Let's imagine that, you the car manufacturer is making cars. You know, say there's probably a threshold for that. Right? So maybe after your brakes fail and cause, say, 10 accidents, you must issue a recall and then fix all hundred thousand of those vehicles.
• 10:12
  So it's like what we're experiencing now is the equivalent of a car manufacturer putting a car out there. The brakes have actually gone out on, say, a million cars, and there's been a quarter million deaths, and they're not even talking about it. And, actually, not only are they not talking about it, but the regulatory agency that would normally say, hey. Look. You've passed the threshold.
• 10:33
  They're just turning a blind eye. Is that a good way of understanding what's happening with these vaccines?
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah. But let's take it a step further. They're doing more than turning a blind eye. The federal agencies that we previously relied on and don't get me wrong, I'm not naive. There was plenty of corruption to go around and rumors and all kinds of other stuff that I saw when I was in the industry.
• 10:54
  But nothing like we're seeing now. Let's be very clear. These federal agencies like the FDA, the NIH, the CDC, they've collapsed, Seth. They don't really exist, as they were set up to do. They should be torn down.
• 11:08
  Unfortunately, we have a congress, both republican and democrats, are all in name only, and they sit on their thumbs. A couple of them do a dog and pony show to pretend so that they have a reason to send out their donate card when it comes time for election, but nobody's really doing anything about it. And and congress has tremendous power. They could haul these companies in, tie them up in discovery, have them unveil their paperwork, what they have done, what their real safety work has shown, all the animals that died that they did experiment done. We can talk about it whenever you want, but I did bring a particular depiction today of the way the process is supposed to go when you have a drug that's can
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: pull it up now actually for our viewers.
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: Sure. When you have a drug that's a new entity, we run studies chemically, not even on animals yet, that are called proof of concept. If we start to see some petri dish stuff, we start to see some evidence of mechanism of action where there is some activity that appears to be what we're going for in a disease state, then you can get And by the way, all this is predicated on approval after approval after approval by the FDA in numerous stages and numerous submissions to them of work that you've done as a pharmaceutical company. Starts out with what we call preclinical. And that's your first column here.
• 12:42
  Preclinical is defined in the research world as animals and petri dishes. And this is where you are primarily looking for dangerous safety signals, safety signals that jump out at you. And let me give you a very quick brief story. In the beginning of my career, I worked for the American company that represented the antidepressant Celexa. And I came in at a time when we were going to look at the left enantiomer.
• 13:13
  It's a chiral molecule. We looked at the, it's a mirrored image. We looked at the other side, which became Lexapro. But here's the point of the story. When I had to study the history of the predecessor Celexa, during that preclinical period, Seth, they had six beagle dogs that dropped dead in the preclinical.
• 13:33
  The FDA shut them down. They said you're going have to figure out why those dogs had a heart attack. Anyway, they shut it down for about two years. And what happened was they were able to discover that it was not only was it just those beagle dogs, it was beagle dogs only, not even all dogs. And they demonstrated that this would not be a danger to human beings.
• 13:57
  The research program went on into the subsequent phases, which I was going to get into. But I wanted to share with you how sensitive the FDA systems were back then, where even if the animals got sick or died, you stopped it. You might never go forward again as a pharma company. You could lose hundreds of millions of dollars, but it was like, the thinking was too bad. You've saved lives and you'll make money on your other drugs that do make it through.
• 14:24
  So getting back to the chart, if you make it through preclinical, mostly the animal studies, and by the way, animals like certain rats and mice are bred to be similar in certain ways, Seth, to human reactions, but never would any scientist in their right mind tell you or reassure you that, oh yes, if we get perfect safety in an animal, like these knockout mice or these other bred mice, you'll be okay. No, no, that's just one step, okay? So if you get past all that, Seth, then you go to this first phase one. Phase one, now when you look at the title of the protocol in clinicaltrials.gov, the criminal Pfizer protocol for what was the initial of their shot, their title said phase one, two, and three, phase onetwothree. That meant they were doing them simultaneously.
• 15:22
  Now let let me take you back to this chart. You can't do them simultaneously because each phase is predicated and designed based on the findings of the preceding phase. So phase one is designed in a certain way to look at certain things based on what the findings were in the animals. What do I mean by that? Phase one has very small numbers of subjects.
• 15:48
  Like they're healthy people, they're young because they're going to be the first humans exposed to this. And you're talking about maybe ten, fifteen people. And in phase one, we're looking at things like pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, half life, where does the drug go in the body? How does it get absorbed? How does it get excreted?
• 16:09
  Where does it concentrate? Things like that. What's the half life? Because those are the issues that will later inform us on dosing, how to dose in other populations like liver impairment and kidney impairment and children, things like that. So once you've got your phase one, which is all of those parameters, and now you also have another you have your first safety data in human beings, right?
• 16:34
  And if there is nothing major, nobody died, nobody had what's called a serious adverse event or SAE, which is much different than an AE in the world of pharma research, is an adverse event. A serious adverse event is something requiring hospitalization. It's life threatening. You can see it's much more severe. And that's going to become important because, for example, when Pfizer admitted in their documents that there is shedding, they talked about if a jabbed partner was then in close proximity to say his wife or partner who is of childbearing age, just the exposure from the jabbed in front of the unjabbed was constituted a serious adverse event.
• 17:18
  So that told me, woah, they know there's something dangerous about that because they already pre qualified it as a serious AE. But getting back to the chart, after you've got your first safety in a very small number of healthy people, you then design your phase two trial. What do we look at in phase two? You can see greater numbers of people. You start to enlist people into the study that have the disease state that you're studying, for example, if you're studying diabetes or depression or something like that, but they're not with a lot of confounding comorbidity.
• 17:57
  But you're still looking you're starting to look now at hundreds of people and maybe thousands of people. And you're designing that on what you saw in phase one. And then it goes into phase three, which are conducted generally in probably tens of thousands of people across many different research sites in The United States, sometimes a few in world in Europe or Asia, so that you've got a mix of cultures and different types of races and things like that. And so those are your phase three trials. When you finish those, again, if you have been allowed at each step by the FDA to go along, and your phase three, by the way, is designed based on everything you learned in phase two.
• 18:39
  Everything is predicated on the preceding. So once you've got that, you've essentially got what we call the package to submit to the agency, the FDA. And then they look at that, Seth, and they determine if you've done enough studies, if you've given them enough information, if you've complied with all the basic things that they require in their template, and if you don't, it sets you back because you've got to go back and do more studies. If they do accept it, they're accepting it for review. Now you have to wait a year or two traditionally until somebody in pharma got their maybe got some people in Congress to develop what's called the PDUFA date, which is the Pharmaceutical Drug Users Fee Act.
• 19:25
  That enabled the companies to legally pay off the FDA if you paid them a certain amount. Normally, Seth, it was about 50,000, maybe 100,000. Not a lot of money to pharma. It is a lot of money to the rest of us, but what you got for that Seth was a date certain of their decision. So they would prioritize.
• 19:46
  And so you might get a decision in nine months, but you got a date. We called it the PDUFA date and we could plan the launch of the drug if we got approval based on that date. We learned that Pfizer paid in some of the leaked documents last year in the FOIA releases that Pfizer paid the FDA, I believe it was somewhere around 2 or 3,000,000. That could be off by a million, but it was just exorbitant and something we've never heard before. I don't even think they need to do anything like that.
• 20:19
  They've basically been running the tables. Pfizer, Moderna that was never a company before Anthony Fauci breathed life into it, he actually created it. So these two companies, but primarily Pfizer, are essentially using the FDA as their own department. These agencies are gone. I'm going to come full circle back to my original statement.
• 20:39
  They're gone.
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: And so did they basically take that chart you showed us, is really put in place to protect people. It's put in place to make sure that they're not pushing drugs out that are gonna kill people or maim them or cause infertility, etcetera. So did they bypass the majority of that and and compress it into just some short time and just rush this to market? And are they now ignoring and hiding any evidence of harm and and death and infertility that these things are causing to people?
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: Well, there's a lot to unpack there in your question. But, yes, let's start from the top. Yes. They they have sped up ahead. There are a lot of features of that.
• 21:27
  There's the warp speed program. President Trump bragging that nobody ever spoke to the FDA like he did. He pushed them. He told them, you're gonna do it in three months or six months. And as I've said, I've said to you in conversation, and I've said to audiences, you don't want something like that at warp speed.
• 21:45
  I don't know who was advising him, how he calculated it, how anybody in that task force, but you don't want anything relative to your health done at warp speed. You don't want your brain surgery. You don't want something critical that's never been tested in humans before, like this stuff that killed animals, that was on record as killing animals. You don't want that pushed out at warp speed. So yes, they did move ahead.
• 22:13
  The FDA violated its own regulations, the federal laws around this, the title, you know, nine laws. They violated their own guidance documents to industry that are well founded. And so these companies were allowed to push ahead. So it's really a sham. And you know, Seth, in the beginning, they told us, well, in the package insert for Pfizer's shot, they talk about a group of 40 some thousand people.
• 22:47
  They talk about how they started in a randomized placebo controlled trial where half were assigned to the placebo, the other half were assigned to the BNT162 shot, but they very quickly broke the blind. And when they broke the blind, you have now transferred your randomized placebo controlled trial, which is the gold standard for developing pivotal trial data to submit to the FDA for safety and efficacy, into an open label. It's open label. That's a term for everybody knows what they're getting. And the investigators, the researchers know what they're giving, the people.
• 23:33
  So it's wide open. Open label, observational, long term observational study. Now that's great after a drug's been out in the real world for a number of years, you've got good safety record, good efficacy, maybe you're testing it in something else. Maybe you're trying to just collect observational data to make sure that there are no new safety signals. But it's not fine for something that's never been used or tested in humans, right?
• 24:00
  So when people say, Oh, you're still in the trial. You're not in anything right now. You know, supposedly the trial goes on till 2023. We used to say that in the beginning, but there is no placebo arm. And I want you to know this is a tactic that Anthony Fauci used many times.
• 24:17
  He used it with remdesivir. He used it with a lot of different things. The technique, the tactic is when you break the blind or you tell a company, break your blind, that you go to the computer, the computer opens everything up. And what that does, Seth, when you break the blind is you remove, by removing your placebo, operational placebo function, you bury safety signal. So you have no comparator, right?
• 24:45
  They're all each person getting it is their own control, which is not how you get safety data. You don't get any safety data, but it hides that in itself. And actually Bobby Kennedy talks about that in the real Anthony Fauci. He talks about the various examples of how Fauci demanded and told these pharmaceutical companies at various times in history, as well as that they worked together on breaking the blinds here. Again, when you break your blind, you lose your placebo control.
• 25:15
  And this is unheard of. I mean, those of us like Doctor. Michael Yeaden, those of us who have worked closely and inside pharma, we know this is unprecedented. It's dangerous. It's criminal.
• 25:28
  It should have been stopped a long time ago. And you know something, Seth? These congressional members sitting on their thumbs, they have no excuses anymore because we've all gotten the data to them. Doctor. David Martin has said over and over again, he knows for sure that he's gotten that information to them through people that have verified it.
• 25:45
  So the excuse of, well, we didn't know is never going to fly for our entire U. S. Congress because they are and have been aware for quite a while that these regulations, these guidance documents, these appropriate steps have all been abandoned for the financial. Maybe they're benefiting and that's why they're keeping their mouth shut. I mean, those are just logical assumptions.
• 26:11
  But I've never seen a more quiet congress in my life.
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: And so in terms of the data that's coming out, I know that this is very difficult to assess. But in America, for instance, how many people do you think have died from taking the vaccine, you know, the the COVID nineteen vaccine? And even if it if it's just a rough number, I mean, is it are we talking, you know, say ten thousand twenty thousand? Or is it much larger?
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: Well, I'll tell you how I use how I'm going to calculate my estimate. The VAERS system is not without value. It is a self reporting system. Nurses and doctors are obligated to report to it when they have suspicion of a correlation between a treatment or something. But families can do it.
• 27:06
  Patients themselves can do it. Victims. So I just want to start there. The history of the VAERS database is that there was a study done by the NIH itself, conducted by the NIH, paid for with The US tax dollars, called the Harvard Pilgrim Study. And they looked at the data.
• 27:26
  They looked at the VAERS system and you can look it up. It's a well published paper. And they determined that And people mess up the numbers all the time, Seth, I'm going tell you why. There's a preceding sentence before you get to vaccine adverse events, it's all drug events. And that statistic that they found in the study was that the error rate was ten percent, right?
• 27:54
  So people often misquote that, even frontline doctors do. But they're quoting something because they look too fast. Several lines down, the researchers made the statement that with regard to vaccine adverse events, the report the real reporting or the actual reporting was literally, quote, less than one percent. So if you if you read what I just said
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: That if there's an adverse effect, say I I take the vaccine and my nurse administers it and say that I go into seizure immediately, hypothetically, she is supposed to report that adverse event into this VAERS database. And so what you're saying is that this database, even the people running the database, are saying that less than one percent of these adverse events are actually being
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: And actually gets into it. Actually gets into the VAERS system. So that means if you do your math, it's very simple, that there's a missing multiplier of a hundred. So if the VAERS database right now, and I don't know what the exact number is, is it thirty something thousand have have died? If that's the number, let's just say for the sake of conversation, I don't know, twenty five thousand, thirty thousand that actually are there.
• 29:11
  And by the way, it's probably less than less than one percent because we have proof that the CDC has been throttling numbers, changing birth dates to high baby deaths, moving in and out. They stopped reporting on their MMWR for weeks at a time. They're manipulating numbers. So the Carver Pilgrim study was conservative, right? So if it's a thirty thousand reportable deaths right now attributed to the vaccine, you're really looking at over three million Americans dead from the shots.
• 29:49
  But we are such a big country, Seth, that these are spread out. And as Doctor. Zelenko said, he predicted and because he started to see signals when we talked about it, I was fascinated. There were three time periods of death. One, and it depends on what's in there.
• 30:08
  We know from Team Enigma's work at any given day, there could be any multiple different things in these vials even within the same lot number. But Doctor. Zelenko used to say there were three time periods. The first is the first few days to two weeks. Those are those sudden, they drop dead, whether you're five years old or 100.
• 30:28
  And then there's a second time period of like three to six months ish where people develop an aggressive cancer and they just died. Or they developed something that was not as acute as the heart attack and they had comorbidities and they died. And then he said he anticipated he could see what was coming, that then there's the third group that would die over the long haul, two to three years. This may be what someone like Doctor. Dolores Cahill is referring to, the two to three year thing.
• 31:05
  Those people in the later months and several years are never going to put it together with the shot. They can't even do it now when they die two days later because they're in such denial. But the further out you get, and by the way, it's cleverly and diabolically spread over a lot of different ailments. So people just go, Well, he died. He was getting older.
• 31:29
  Or, Well, it just happened. Act of God. But even like Doctor. Peter McCullough interestingly last year cited what he thought they would fall into four buckets, right? The illnesses.
• 31:40
  But even within those buckets, you can have thousands of different illnesses. And they were like neurological, immunological, hematological, cardiopulmonary. But so even within those four, like I said, you could have just hundreds and hundreds. So it's not one thing to get the public to go, woah, everybody who took a shot died from that one thing. They're very clever.
• 32:06
  They're very clever stuff. And let me tell you something else. These companies are highly experienced and they're very careful with their money. They know exactly what they're doing. They know exactly what's in these vials within the same lot number no matter where it is.
• 32:28
  And most chilling of all, I would bet my entire career on the fact that they know exactly who got what. Now I'm not saying they planned or targeted people. I mean, after the fact they know by lot number, they know who got what. And they're yeah, they're testing okay. They're testing a lot of things we don't know yet.
• 32:54
  And they're certainly not testing an innocent substance for safety and efficacy, but they're testing for something.
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: My goodness. So we're looking at, you know, easily potentially two or three million Americans that have died from this. And that seems to be on the low end. And that's not even looking at what's gonna be happening over the next one to two years. I'm seeing so many reports of insane increases in cancer, you know, five hundred percent, a thousand increase, a thousand percent increase in cancer.
• 33:27
  We're seeing so much. So this is this is just, it's frightening. It's it's evil. It's hard to even describe the words. And the fact that they're now pushing this into young children, you know, pushing it into babies.
• 33:44
  I mean
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: They must have a reason. Must have a reason, you know, and that they want it. They want multiple amounts of it. They want you to keep taking it like they're priming you. They're beefing you up with it.
• 33:57
  There are reasons for all this. So I'm saying, one thing I can tell you about the industry, they know exactly what they're doing and there's a reason for what they're doing. We just are kind of feeling our way. When I say we, the good scientists, Doctor. Arna Burkhardt in Germany, Doctor.
• 34:15
  Sukrit Bhakti, Doctor. Zandre Bathe in South Africa, just Doctor. David Martin's work. I mean, there's hundreds of good people. We're just all figuring it out, putting the pieces, but they know.
• 34:29
  They know what they're doing. So
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: doctor Ruby, let's talk little bit about these blood clots because you've been someone that has really brought this information out to the public. And it's it's frightening. And I and I you gave me a picture that we can show during the show today, and I will give viewers a quick, you know, viewer discretion advised because this is
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: Well, don't don't don't show it. It's not a blood clot. And so I wanna have a would like to have a few minutes to separate that out for the audience if you So there are two issues of clots. It's very easy for people to mix the two and I want you to have a good understanding. There are two types of clots we're going to talk about.
• 35:11
  Let me just get the blood clots out of the way because they have nothing to do with what the embalmers are finding. Blood clots, we believe, are being caused as a downstream event from the mRNA codes that are wrapped in the lipid nanoparticle which enables them to get into every cell in the body within hours. They get in there through the CRISPR technology is the way we've read the patents. They get into the nucleus of your cell, which is the only place genetic material can survive. And they cut a piece out and they replace that piece with itself.
• 35:50
  That's how it's been described. And that code was, is, I don't know, but for the longest time directing the body of the injected to produce, you just follow it like a blueprint, to produce billions of toxic spike proteins, not the normal spike, which is theoretically on the coronavirus for the common cold and other flus and things like that, if you're talking about that. These are chimeric molecules that were developed on a computer in silico based on different animal genetic pieces. It's very tricky and dangerous. These are not like cold materials.
• 36:34
  These are dangerous synthetic spikes. Your body recognizes them as toxins. Here's the problem: every cell in the body, or almost every cell, gets this instruction. What do you think the lining of your blood vessels are going to do? They're aligned with epithelium, individual cells that line your blood vessels.
• 36:55
  Those cells are not potted plants. They're going to respond and grow those spikes. And those spikes are getting released. Some of them are sticking out. Blood has to flow within vessels at a certain velocity and there are pressures to that velocity.
• 37:12
  If the body senses, oh, the blood is slowing in this area, it then complicates it in trying to protect you by sending inflammatory cytokine markers in there, white macrophages, white blood cells and platelets. And there's probably some micro bleeding, so it's trying to react to everything. And so those spikes start to generate the development of blood clot, the micro blood clots, Eventually, maybe bigger ones. I don't know if people live that long, but you don't need something very big as a blood clot. When it gets into smaller vessels further out from the heart, it gets stuck.
• 37:51
  And when it gets stuck in your head, it's a stroke. When it gets stuck in your heart, it's a heart attack. If it gets stuck in your kidney, you're gonna have a renal infarct, and you're gonna have kidney shutdown. Okay? So that's the whole blood clot story, and that has nothing to do with what the embalmers are finding.
• 38:10
  But I think it's important that your audience know what it is.
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: Okay, that makes some sense to me as best as I can understand that, yes.
• 38:19
  Speaker 2: Right. And there are other things that researchers have found in these vials of Moderna and Pfizer that have metal pieces, the strange objects. Some of them have declared by spectroscopy that it's graphene, some carbon material. We don't know. But those things all have to be very inflammatory to the system.
• 38:40
  They have to be damaging. And that in itself is reasonable to me that would cause blood clotting. We've seen the blood from Doctor. Philippe Van Welbergen, a family doctor in The U. K, has shown us countless times the blood of his injected patients.
• 38:58
  They're stacking into clumps, rouleaux formation, which could be a lot of different things, but for the jabbed, their blood is just damaged, the red blood cells, and clumped. Those could be sources of blood clots and other strokes and heart attacks and all that. But I I must put that aside to discuss what the embalmers are finding. So let you know, if if I could do that, let me know.
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: Absolutely. I just wanna put a quick message out there to the the folks that are watching Sure. Is that it's so important for us to get this information out to people because there are people that maybe they got their first shot, and perhaps it was saline or they didn't have anything. But if they're going back for this their first booster, second booster, etcetera, it's increasing every time the chance of harm. And so for those of you that are watching, please share this video.
• 39:50
  Share this kind of content, and I hope that you can see I I don't have some agenda. I'm not anti medicine. You know, doctor Ruby is not here. Our agenda is to help humanity. That's what's driving this.
• 40:03
  And so I hope that that comes across in the information we're presenting here because we care about people, and this is really, really important information. So I just I hope that all of you watching can send this to people, even folks that maybe you haven't gotten to or gotten through to before, because this is this is life or death information that we're talking about here.
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: Very much so, Seth. And, you know, we now have these fall boosters that they're literally telling you that they're putting two mRNA codes. Do know how dangerous that is? This is something they don't know. There are federal documents in the FDA website.
• 40:44
  You can all go look it up. They don't know where it goes. They don't know how long it lasts. They don't know how to turn it off. And now you're going to get two?
• 40:53
  And then you had recently the CEO, Stefan Vansel of Moderna, saying that by next year, you're going to have, his words, a universal flu shot, which will have COVID, influenza A, B, D, C, whatever they want. And he said they'll have about 10 mRNA codes in them. God help us. God help us. So let me go on to the embalmer story because this is really very important.
• 41:24
  In January of this year, I'm going to come out and just tell you the whole chronology. One of the three DOD whistleblowers, right, that Thomas Renz named in the Ron Johnson hearing in January. I'm connected with all three. I speak frequently with all three. One of them accidentally met an embalmer.
• 41:50
  And I started talking to that gentleman. He wants to be known. He's a Christian man. He said, I'm doing God's work. I don't care if someone tries to hurt me, I wanna stop this from going into babies and children.
• 42:05
  This is killing people. The story was, he said that back in the fall of twenty twenty one, he started having difficulty embalming people. And not to get too graphic, I'm not an expert in embalming or end of life preservation. But when he went in, he said, I have to go in and what I do is essentially push the embalming fluid through the vessels, the blood vessels. Your blood comes out the other end, it's drained.
• 42:29
  We clean the person up, they're preserved. Okay. He said, I had trouble getting that system started. And I started to have trouble. And I would go in and try to remove the blockage because sometimes you might have a blood clot or some tissue clot or something.
• 42:46
  By the way, clot just means a congealment or collection. People say, well, it's blood. How can you call it a clot if it's a white? Clot does not mean blood. You have to say what it is and then say clot.
• 43:01
  So what happened was he started pulling these very strange, as he described them, never before seen. This is a man with twenty years of experience. He's board certified. He's also a board certified funeral director, I don't mean to say Justin embalmer, but his role is varied. His expertise, his credentials are varied.
• 43:22
  And he said, I've never seen it before, 2021. It started to dawn on me. Around October, November, it was about 20%, twenty five % of the people I was taking care of, preparing. By January, February, he said to me, Doctor. Ruby, it's about 80% of the people that I'm taking care of.
• 43:45
  And he to and he told me that he's stretched them, they're nothing like what he's ever seen before. They're tough, they're fibrous, They they don't break apart very easily. He said, in contrast, and I know this as a medical professional, when blood congeals, it's very it's like jelly. It's like, you know, Sorry, like grape jelly. It just is wobbly, you touch it, it just dissolves.
• 44:12
  These don't do anything like that. And the reason this is important, Seth, is because I said to him, you've got to get a chemical analysis. You can reach out to a lot of people try to get maybe one of the frontline doctors. To be honest with you, he was stonewalled by a few people, some whose names you recognize, which is a red flag to me. But when he hit the wall and everybody kept gaslighting him, they wouldn't do anything with it, I said, let me make a phone call.
• 44:43
  And I called Mike Adams, the health ranger, who's the founder of Brighteon TV and naturalnews.com. And Mike, I was on Mike's channel with my live show on Monday nights, but I knew of him, worked with him, felt very good with him. He has an ISO certified, nationally certified lab. He's an expert microscopy examiner. And he said, Doctor.
• 45:12
  Jain, I'll do it. I'll do it. No problem. So he started to do intense microscopy on what I call the Hirschman clot if you want to show people.
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: Is this the picture that you sent me?
• 45:24
  Speaker 2: Yes. And Mike Adams' analysis, which I'll talk about in a minute, again, is based on pieces or slices of what you're seeing right now. Now this is a very grotesque plot. I've seen hundreds of them that mister Hirschman and by the way, I about 15 or 20 other embalmers who don't want their names or faces shown they have corroborated with hundreds of pictures like mister Hirschman's. But this particular clot that you're looking at, this is hanging in Times Square because we wanted a gross visual to stop people in their tracks and to start doing some damn research before dragging their babies and toddlers in there.
• 46:02
  This was pulled and listen very carefully to what I'm about to say. This was pulled through a carotid artery, not from a carotid artery. Now those of you, if you know the carotid, they sit on the Arteries sit deeper than veins, veins are on the surface. You have carotid veins, carotid arteries, okay? You always have correlates.
• 46:24
  The carotid artery is like a third, if that in a grown big man, it would be a third of that width. Okay? Maybe less, maybe a fifth. But the point is he pulled it through the carotid, exploded everywhere. He's got the video.
• 46:41
  I've shown the video multiple times in social media in the reawaken tour in my presentation. He pulled this out and it's huge. And so he was speculating that it came out of something larger. When you go closer to the heart, the vessels are wider in circumference. So this is likely from something like the innominate artery, the subclavian artery, something like that.
• 47:06
  They're really close to the heart. They're widest. And so Mike Adams got a fairly good piece of this from mister Hirschman, and he started examining it. When he you can look at his nat naturalnews.com article. I've published it on my Telegram channel, which is t.me/drJaneruby.
• 47:27
  You just put in the search at the top, you know, Hirschman clot, you know, something you'll see, you'll see or Mike Adams, you'll see I brought up a lot of Mike's pictures. But what Mike said was at fifteen hundred times magnification, a slice of this clot, you could see wire like material that he that he he couldn't pull. It wouldn't come out. Right? And these things always kind of have a bloody chunk or a blood clot on either end of them, Mr.
• 47:58
  Hirschman says. And in his words, he has said to me, It looks like they're growing out of the blood clot or they're feeding off of it. Now those are his impressions of it. And so Mike Adams went on to do chemical analysis, Seth. It's really fascinating.
• 48:18
  And so what he did was very, very it was brilliant. He took human blood and he used it as his control and he started to do chemical analysis, you know, elements, electrolytes, metals. And the conclusion he came to, Seth, was that these white clots are not organic. They're not living. Protein.
• 48:50
  They're not proteins. They're not amyloid, which is a form of protein by the way. They're not platelets. They're nothing of the body. There are super high levels of metals that would never be found in the body in high amounts, like tin, like exorbitant amounts of aluminum.
• 49:10
  And you can see these side by side analyses to human blood and very little to no iron in the white clot. And you know, of course human blood is loaded with iron because of the red hemoglobin in your red blood cells, which is part of their responsibility to transfer oxygen.
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: So these clots that they're finding, even cancer or a blood clot, that's still organic human matter. It's human cells. So you're telling me that the clots that these embalmers are finding, they're not even substances that are coming from the human body. Is am I correct
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: understanding that? Not human or correct. They're not human organic material at all. And I'm getting frustrated, Seth, I'll be honest with a number of people in social media that think they're frontline doctors. I won't name any names, but they know who they are who go on these shows and say, well, it's amyloid or it's this or it's that.
• 50:13
  They've never spoken to me or Mike Adams. They've never had a sample of the material. They've never done any due diligence in examining the material by any scientific means. Beware, audience, beware of where you're getting the information. Right now I would stay with Mike Adams.
• 50:31
  He's chronologically kind of putting it out as he does more and more work on this. He did another experiment. You could see this on his channel where he dropped lactic acid into the white clot. That normally he said to me would just dissolve like dog meat or a hot dog or something like that, right? Flesh.
• 50:58
  But in this material, there was a huge combustion and some of it was combusted, but there was a lot left over. It was turned black and dark and stiff. So he said similar to what metals would do under that kind of Plastic arms. Something like that. So I would say to people, stick by Mike and his work, follow his publications because that's where you're going to get the most accurate and timely information.
• 51:33
  Mike and I communicate very frequently. He's been kind enough you know, share with me the information and then he puts it out. And then we can both talk about it in social media and we do interviews with each other to help educate people. So but I would say stay close to us.
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: Actually, Mike, funny enough, is my guest on Thursday. So in two days at 2PM Wonderful. Eastern, I'll have Mike live. And now we're not gonna be talking about the clots. We're gonna be talking about famine and prepping, which is also, you know, something else that Mike is is really, really an expert on.
• 52:10
  It really is.
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: Yes. He is.
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: So, doctor Ruby, pretty soon here, we're gonna be heading over to Rise TV just for the q and a over there exclusively. But, you know, one other question I have before we go over is for people that took the jab, because I know a lot of people, they just didn't know, and and maybe now they did. What would you tell them? Are they is it a death sentence? Is there hope?
• 52:34
  What can you tell them?
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: Let me start out with a couple of basic things, Seth. Because it's got to be very frightening, you know, to think that you took this and you don't know what's happening in your body. First of all, nobody knows the time of death except God. Right? Number two, speaking of God, yes, this is bad.
• 52:57
  Yes, it's dangerous. It's of great concern. But we don't know the extent to how God designed this system. Over time, we don't know what our bodies are capable of in terms of protecting us, reversing things, defending us. We don't know.
• 53:18
  I'm not giving you false hope, but I'm not going to give you no hope because I didn't make the design. And I think it's pretty amazing and pretty intelligent. But what I would say is this: If you want to start healing, the very first thing, and I'm becoming known for saying this, that you must do is you must admit that you made a mistake. You must stop saying I was forced, I had no choice, my boss made me, my company, I had to travel. No.
• 53:46
  And I'm going to tell you why, Seth. It's not a blame game. It's about taking power back. Because if you don't admit that you made you know, most days we all make about a hundred judgments. And most of the time we do pretty well, right?
• 53:59
  We're proud of ourselves. We do good in life. But we all make the wrong choice sometimes. You made a bad choice. Okay.
• 54:08
  This again, not a judgment because if you can admit that to yourself, Seth, here's the important thing about it. When it happens again, you're not going to do it. If you believe you had no choice, they forced me, you're going to get sucked into the next and I'm going tell you something, the next one, the next wave is going to be 10 times what you experienced in 2020. I'm not making predictions. I'm just saying, if you think they're not going to come at us again.
• 54:36
  Admit you made a mistake, it was in your control because the next time you're not going to do it. You're going to save yourself. And that will help you begin the emotional and spiritual healing. And then of course in your physical healing, you're going to do whatever you can to keep your body healthy. Take good supplements that boost your immune function because you probably have some damage to your immune system and it's external surveillance portion.
• 55:02
  So you to give your body everything it needs to try to repair as much as it can. Those are my recommendations.
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: You know, I've heard a lot of different doctors that give different protocols and everything. But the fact that you start off with the psychological, and I think really is the spiritual level, think, is the most important, and I couldn't agree more. So we're now gonna head on over to Rise TV for our q and a portion. I also want to ask I'll start the q and with my own question, which is about vaccine shedding. And so we'll get into that because I wanna know how risk we are.
• 55:36
  Should I just be staying in my home all day, or is it safe to go out to grocery shop around people that have definitely had the vaccine? So we're gonna get into that over there. And, also, for those of you watching, if you have some questions for doctor Ruby or you wanna share your thoughts, please do. I wanna encourage everybody to follow doctor Ruby on Telegram. I'll share her channel after the show on my own Telegram.
• 55:59
  It just go to the the the URL is t.me/doctorJaneRuby. It's d r Jane Ruby. And so if you wanna come join us now over on Rise TV, there's a link for a free trial in the description below. You can get an account set up really quickly, and you can finish the rest of the show with us over there. And I I just wanna thank all of you for watching and just encourage everyone to, a, keep your head up, keep your faith strong, but, b, share this video with your friends and family.
• 56:30
  Alright. So, Dom, you can go ahead and cut the public feeds on Rumble, Facebook, etcetera.