Latest / Narcisist Psychology / The Folded Dress: Why Someone Returned a Wedding Gown to the Wild

Transcript

The Folded Dress: Why Someone Returned a Wedding Gown to the Wild · Narcisist Psychology

0:03
Speaker 1: At six forty five on the morning of January ninth,
0:07
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, Brenda Kowalski was three miles into her Tuesday
0:12
Speaker 1: run along Glenmore Reservoir when she stopped. Folded against the
0:16
Speaker 1: chain link fence beside the maintenance shed was a wedding dress.
0:21
Speaker 1: Not crumpled, not discarded, folded. It had been worn. The
0:26
Speaker 1: fabric under the arms carried the faint salt stain of
0:29
Speaker 1: a long day. Two hooks on the bustle had been
0:32
Speaker 1: stressed past their original position, the way hooks look after
0:35
Speaker 1: hours of sitting, dancing, leaning into someone. And yet someone
0:39
Speaker 1: had professionally cleaned it, refolded it along its original seams,
0:44
Speaker 1: driven it forty one miles from Orville in the dark,
0:48
Speaker 1: and placed it exactly there, beside a fence on a
0:51
Speaker 1: path that Brenda ran every Tuesday and Friday at the
0:54
Speaker 1: same time. No note, no name, No one had reported
0:57
Speaker 1: it missing that detail. The folding is the thing that
1:00
Speaker 1: pulls at you. A person in panic drops a dress,
1:03
Speaker 1: a person in grief leaves it somewhere meaningful to them.
1:07
Speaker 1: But folding takes time. Folding is deliberate. Someone wanted this
1:11
Speaker 1: object to be found in a particular condition on a
1:14
Speaker 1: particular morning, by whoever came around that bend at first
1:18
Speaker 1: to light. What no one knew yet was that forty
1:22
Speaker 1: one miles away, a woman named Michele Draper had gotten
1:26
Speaker 1: married three days earlier, and she had no idea her
1:30
Speaker 1: dress was gone. Michelle Draper was thirty eight years old
1:34
Speaker 1: and had spent the better part of a decade building
1:37
Speaker 1: a life that was by her own design, stable and particular.
1:41
Speaker 1: She taught freshman composition at Orville Savings College, the kind
1:46
Speaker 1: of work that requires a person to care about precision,
1:49
Speaker 1: a misplaced modifier, a sentence that means something different than
1:53
Speaker 1: the writer intended. She owned her condo outright. She had
1:57
Speaker 1: a forty seven thousand dollars investment account managed by a
2:01
Speaker 1: financial adviser named Jim Castillo. She had weekly phone calls
2:06
Speaker 1: with her sisters, Tara Ogle that she kept without exception.
2:10
Speaker 1: She was not impulsive. People who knew her described her
2:13
Speaker 1: as someone who thought things through. She met Peggy Slater
2:17
Speaker 1: in February of twenty sixteen at a continuing education workshop.
2:23
Speaker 1: Peggy was forty four, a curriculum consultant, someone equally comfortable
2:28
Speaker 1: in professional settings, equally fluent, in the language of institutions
2:32
Speaker 1: and standards. They started spending weekends together by April. By June,
2:37
Speaker 1: Peggy was suggesting they move in together. Michelle said no,
2:41
Speaker 1: she needed more time. That hesitation matters because it is
2:44
Speaker 1: the clearest picture of who Michelle was before. The following
2:48
Speaker 1: eighteen months reshaped her understanding of the year she had
2:52
Speaker 1: just lived. By August, Peggy had moved in. By September
2:57
Speaker 1: they were engaged. The pace of it from first meeting
3:01
Speaker 1: to cohabitation to engagement in seven months was fast, and
3:06
Speaker 1: it was by design, though Michele could not have known
3:09
Speaker 1: that yet. In October, Michele added Peggy to the signature
3:13
Speaker 1: card on her account at Orville Savings Bank, around the
3:17
Speaker 1: same time a prepaid phone was purchased. Investigators would trace
3:21
Speaker 1: it later at the time it was invisible. On December
3:26
Speaker 1: twenty second, Michele sat across from Jim Castilla and signed
3:30
Speaker 1: documents restructuring her investment account. Peggy was added as a
3:34
Speaker 1: joint holder with right of survivorship, meaning if Michele died,
3:38
Speaker 1: the account passed directly to Peggy by passing probate. Castillo
3:44
Speaker 1: was present for the signing. According to later accounts, he
3:47
Speaker 1: was uneasy. He did not say why at the time
3:51
Speaker 1: he signed where he was supposed to sign. On January sixth,
3:54
Speaker 1: Michele and Peggy were married. Michele wore a size eight
3:58
Speaker 1: dress purchased from a bridal boutique in Dreyfield. After the ceremony,
4:03
Speaker 1: Peggy offered to take the dress for preservation. A surprise,
4:07
Speaker 1: she said, a gift. Michele said yes. The dress arrived
4:11
Speaker 1: at Tillman and Sons Fine Garment Care on January seventh,
4:16
Speaker 1: the day after the wedding. Whoever brought it paid cash.
4:19
Speaker 1: The phone number written on the intake form belonged to
4:22
Speaker 1: a prepaid phone purchased two months earlier. No name, no trail,
4:27
Speaker 1: not yet. Brenda Kowalski ran the same path every Tuesday
4:31
Speaker 1: and Friday morning. At six forty five, she knew the
4:35
Speaker 1: reservoir loop well enough to notice what didn't belong. On
4:39
Speaker 1: January ninth, she saw the white mass folded against the
4:42
Speaker 1: base of the chain link fence near the east maintenance shed.
4:46
Speaker 1: She stopped. She didn't touch it. She called the county line.
4:51
Speaker 1: Deputy Frank Ostrotski responded, photographed two sets of footprints in
4:56
Speaker 1: the frozen mud under the shed's overhang size seven coming
5:00
Speaker 1: in from the service road, size six, moving toward the
5:04
Speaker 1: fence and back, and bagged the dress as a found object.
5:08
Speaker 1: He filed his report and set it aside. At that point,
5:12
Speaker 1: nothing about a folded dress beside a reservoir felt like
5:14
Speaker 1: a crime. But here's the thing about that dress. It
5:18
Speaker 1: was worn under arm. Salt stains marked the lining. Two
5:22
Speaker 1: hooks on the bustle had been stressed, then reset. Someone
5:27
Speaker 1: had worn it, then cleaned it, then folded it with
5:29
Speaker 1: care before leaving it beside a path they knew would
5:33
Speaker 1: be walked on a specific morning. That last part took
5:36
Speaker 1: weeks to establish. The Tillman and Son's receipt placed the
5:40
Speaker 1: dress in that shop on the seventh The prepaid phone
5:43
Speaker 1: number on the intake form placed a purchase in November
5:47
Speaker 1: of twenty sixteen. Glenmore Reservoir is forty one miles from Orville.
5:52
Speaker 1: Drayfield is sixteen miles from Orville and twenty five miles
5:56
Speaker 1: from Glenmore. Whoever made that drive knew Brenda Kowalski's schedule,
6:02
Speaker 1: or knew the path well enough to be confident the
6:05
Speaker 1: dress would be found. Meanwhile, back in Orrville, Michele Draper
6:10
Speaker 1: was planning her honeymoon. She noticed nothing unusual. In January,
6:14
Speaker 1: Peggy was present, attentive, normal. The debit card Michelle did
6:19
Speaker 1: not know existed, was already active. Over the course of
6:23
Speaker 1: that month, four transactions drained eleven thousand dollars from her
6:27
Speaker 1: savings account at Orville Savings Bank. The withdrawals were spaced,
6:32
Speaker 1: not one large pull, which might have triggered a call
6:36
Speaker 1: from the bank. Four measured movements, quiet as breathing. The
6:40
Speaker 1: change of a dress form had been submitted on January fourth,
6:44
Speaker 1: two days before the wedding. Someone had walked into a
6:47
Speaker 1: post office or filled out the online form and redirected
6:51
Speaker 1: Michele's mail to a PO box registered to a name
6:55
Speaker 1: Sandrup Fayle. Michele did not know any one named Sandrup Fayle.
7:00
Speaker 1: She had not submitted any form. Her mail simply stopped arriving.
7:04
Speaker 1: She assumed a processing delay. The investment account forty seven
7:09
Speaker 1: thousand dollars restructured on December twenty second, with Peggy added
7:13
Speaker 1: as joint holder, sat untouched. Peggy had not moved on
7:16
Speaker 1: it yet. That detail would matter. Later February twelfth, Michele
7:22
Speaker 1: called Peggy voicemail. She called again voicemail. Three days passed
7:27
Speaker 1: before she got a response, and it was brief, a text, vague,
7:33
Speaker 1: nothing alarming enough to act on. She waited. On February fifteenth,
7:38
Speaker 1: she drove to Dreyfield Art Ziemansky, the building manager, met
7:43
Speaker 1: her in the lobby. He told her Peggy had vacated
7:46
Speaker 1: on January twenty eighth, no forwarding address. The apartment had
7:51
Speaker 1: already been cleaned. Michelee stood in that lobby and understood,
7:55
Speaker 1: in the way the body sometimes understands before the mind
7:58
Speaker 1: catches up, that she was looking at something she could
8:01
Speaker 1: not yet name. She went home. She called her sister,
8:06
Speaker 1: Tara Ogle had been on the weekly calls. She had
8:09
Speaker 1: heard the relationship unfold in real time, the workshop, the
8:13
Speaker 1: week ends, the move, the engagement, the wedding. She had
8:18
Speaker 1: noticed the pace. She had not said so, not directly,
8:22
Speaker 1: because Michele had seemed happy and certain. Now she listened
8:26
Speaker 1: to her sister describe an empty apartment and a building
8:29
Speaker 1: manager who had not been surprised by the question. She
8:32
Speaker 1: called Wendy Bishop. Bishop was a licensed clinical social worker
8:37
Speaker 1: who had spent years working with survivors of financial and
8:40
Speaker 1: psychological abuse. When Tara described what she knew, the timeline,
8:46
Speaker 1: the pace, the sudden disappearance. Bishop asked one question, who
8:50
Speaker 1: had access to Michele's accounts. That question was the one
8:54
Speaker 1: that changed the shape of everything. Bishop began what she
8:57
Speaker 1: would later call a paper autopsy. She walked backward through
9:00
Speaker 1: every document Michelle could locate. The bank signature card added
9:05
Speaker 1: in October, the investment restructuring in December, the marriage certificate.
9:10
Speaker 1: She found the gap where Michelle's mail should have been.
9:14
Speaker 1: She traced it to the Sandra Fayle po box. She
9:17
Speaker 1: called Deputy Ostrowski on February seventeenth. Ostrowski pulled his report
9:23
Speaker 1: from January. The folded dress beside the reservoir, the cash
9:27
Speaker 1: receipt at Tilman and Sons, the prepaid phone number. He
9:31
Speaker 1: had not connected any of it to a missing person
9:34
Speaker 1: because no one had been reported missing. Michelle was not missing.
9:38
Speaker 1: She was simply abandoned. And abandoned people don't always generate paperwork.
9:45
Speaker 1: Now the paperwork found them. Picture the moment investigators laid
9:49
Speaker 1: the Tillman and Sons intake form beside Peggy's signature on
9:53
Speaker 1: the marriage license, the handwriting on the po box registration,
9:57
Speaker 1: the one filed under Sandra fiv matched. Peggy had rented
10:00
Speaker 1: a mail box under a false name and redirected Michele's
10:03
Speaker 1: mail to it before the wedding. The change of a
10:06
Speaker 1: dress form was submitted four days before the ceremony, not
10:10
Speaker 1: after before. That sequence reframes the wedding entirely. One scenario
10:15
Speaker 1: moves through the evidence and constructs something that almost holds.
10:19
Speaker 1: Peggy was erratic, perhaps genuinely confused about what she had
10:24
Speaker 1: accessed him. The account was joint, she had the signature card.
10:28
Speaker 1: She may have believed, however, wrongly, that spending from a
10:31
Speaker 1: shared account was permitted. The dress left at the reservoir
10:35
Speaker 1: was strange, but grief takes strange shapes. Maybe she knew
10:39
Speaker 1: the relationship was collapsing. Maybe she left the dress as
10:42
Speaker 1: a kind of burial, a private gesture no one was
10:45
Speaker 1: supposed to find. But that version collapses the moment you
10:49
Speaker 1: look at the prepaid phone. It was purchased in November
10:52
Speaker 1: of twenty sixteen, before the engagement was even two months old,
10:57
Speaker 1: before the December restructuring. Before the wedding, some one bought
11:00
Speaker 1: a phone with no registered name and used it as
11:03
Speaker 1: a contact number for a dry cleaning shop where a
11:06
Speaker 1: wedding dress would be dropped the day after a ceremony
11:10
Speaker 1: that hadn't happened yet. That phone was not purchased in grief.
11:14
Speaker 1: It was purchased in preparation. Cell Tower records placed Peggy's
11:19
Speaker 1: personal phone in dray Field on the night the change
11:22
Speaker 1: of a dress form was submitted. She had told investigators
11:26
Speaker 1: she was in Columbus that evening. She was not. The
11:29
Speaker 1: tower put her fifteen minutes from the post office branch
11:32
Speaker 1: closest to the p O box. Then Janet Fry pulled
11:36
Speaker 1: the records. Fry was a prosecutorial paralegal, and what she
11:41
Speaker 1: found across seven years in three Ohio regions was a
11:45
Speaker 1: pattern with the same architecture each time. Financially stable women
11:50
Speaker 1: late thirties to early forties, rapid escalation, cohabitation, joint account access,
11:57
Speaker 1: then departure, and each depart included something left behind a
12:03
Speaker 1: coat at one address, ear rings at another, a wedding
12:07
Speaker 1: dress at a reservoir forty one miles from Orville. Donna
12:12
Speaker 1: Wrights had filed a report in twenty fourteen. No charges followed.
12:17
Speaker 1: The case was logged as a domestic dispute and filed away.
12:21
Speaker 1: The dress was not grief, it was a signature. Peggy
12:24
Speaker 1: was located in March of twenty seventeen at a motel
12:28
Speaker 1: in Grenwick, two states from Ohio. She was in the
12:31
Speaker 1: early stages of a relationship with a woman named Karen Bright.
12:36
Speaker 1: Bright had already noticed inconsistencies, she had not yet understood
12:41
Speaker 1: what they meant. When investigator Chris Abade sat across from
12:44
Speaker 1: Peggy in April and laid the documents on the table.
12:48
Speaker 1: The po box registration, the tillman and son's receipt, the
12:52
Speaker 1: cell tower data, the credit card application filed under Michelle's
12:56
Speaker 1: married name and social Security number. Peggy acknowledged the change
13:01
Speaker 1: of address form. She acknowledged the debit card. She said
13:05
Speaker 1: the account access had been a misunderstanding. She said Michelle
13:09
Speaker 1: had verbally authorized but withdrawals. The jury in Morrow County
13:13
Speaker 1: heard all of it. They convicted on all counts in
13:16
Speaker 1: September of twenty seventeen. Four years the investment account, the
13:21
Speaker 1: forty seven thousand dollars had been frozen before Peggy could
13:25
Speaker 1: liquidate it. Michelle recovered most of it through civil proceedings.
13:29
Speaker 1: The eleven thousand from savings was gone. She lost that
13:34
Speaker 1: She still teaches freshman composition at Orville Savings College. She
13:38
Speaker 1: still owns the condo. The wedding dress was held as
13:42
Speaker 1: evidence through the trial. After sentencing, it was released. No
13:46
Speaker 1: one came for it, it was destroyed. What stays with
13:49
Speaker 1: this case, what resists easy filing, is the timeline of
13:53
Speaker 1: the prepaid phone bought in November, used in January, discarded
13:58
Speaker 1: after someone planned this, before the engagement ring was on
14:02
Speaker 1: Michele's finger, before the restructuring documents were signed, before the
14:06
Speaker 1: dress was fitted. The warmth and the scheme ran parallel,
14:11
Speaker 1: indistinguishable from the outside. That is what Wendy Bishop spent
14:15
Speaker 1: two years afterward explaining two advocacy groups. The thing that
14:19
Speaker 1: makes this kind of harm so difficult to name is
14:22
Speaker 1: that everything it borrows trust, intimacy, the architecture of a
14:27
Speaker 1: shared life is real to the person who gives it.
14:31
Speaker 1: The wedding dress was destroyed, no ceremony, no ceremony. In reverse,
14:36
Speaker 1: the court released it after sentencing and no one drove
14:40
Speaker 1: to pick it up. That detail is not incidental. It
14:44
Speaker 1: is the most honest ending this case has. Peggy Slater
14:48
Speaker 1: had used the dress as punctuation a period at the
14:51
Speaker 1: end of Michelle Draper's marriage before Michele knew the marriage
14:55
Speaker 1: was over. After the trial, the dress had no more
14:58
Speaker 1: work to do. Neither apparently did anyone who had touched it.
15:03
Speaker 1: Peggy was arrested in March of twenty seventeen at a
15:06
Speaker 1: motel in Grenwick, two states from Ohio. She was already
15:10
Speaker 1: in an early relationship with a woman named Karen Bright.
15:14
Speaker 1: Bright had noticed inconsistencies, she had not yet decoded them.
15:18
Speaker 1: The pattern per the records pulled by prosecutorial paralegal Janet Fry,
15:24
Speaker 1: stretched back seven years across three Ohio regions, three women,
15:29
Speaker 1: financially stable late thirties to early forties, rapid intimacy, cohabitation,
15:36
Speaker 1: a moment of legal or financial entanglement, then departure each
15:41
Speaker 1: time a deliberate object left behind, a coat, a pair
15:44
Speaker 1: of earrings, a wedding dress. Donna Wrights had filed a
15:48
Speaker 1: report in twenty fourteen. No charges followed. It was logged
15:53
Speaker 1: as a domestic dispute. That classification matters not as an
15:57
Speaker 1: indictment of any single deputy, but as as a structural fact.
16:01
Speaker 1: The conduct Peggy engaged in systematically across years had no
16:07
Speaker 1: clean legal category. That announced itself early. What looked like
16:11
Speaker 1: a turbulent relationship looked exactly like a turbulent relationship. The
16:16
Speaker 1: law caught up only when the financial evidence was specific
16:19
Speaker 1: enough to hold. The charges filed against Peggy were identity fraud,
16:24
Speaker 1: theft by deception, and two counts of financial exploitation. In
16:29
Speaker 1: her partial confession to investigator Chris Abate in April of
16:32
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, she acknowledged submitting the change of address form.
16:37
Speaker 1: She acknowledged the second debit card. She maintained that the
16:41
Speaker 1: account withdrawals had been authorized verbally by Michelle. The jury
16:45
Speaker 1: heard that they also heard the prepaid phone timeline purchased
16:49
Speaker 1: in November of twenty sixteen used to register the dry
16:53
Speaker 1: cleaning drop off in January, discarded after a verbal authorization
16:59
Speaker 1: arranged in advances on a phone bought before the engagement
17:02
Speaker 1: ring was selected. The Morrow County jury convicted on all
17:07
Speaker 1: counts in September of twenty seventeen. Four years the forty
17:12
Speaker 1: seven thousand dollars investment account had been frozen before Peggy
17:15
Speaker 1: could liquidate it. Michelle recovered most of it through civil proceedings.
17:19
Speaker 1: The eleven thousand dollars withdrawn from her savings account was gone.
17:23
Speaker 1: She lost that. She still teaches freshman composition at Orville
17:27
Speaker 1: Savings College. She still owns the condo on the same
17:30
Speaker 1: street where Peggy once signed her name to a signature card.
17:34
Speaker 1: Wendy Bishop spent two years after this case consulting for
17:38
Speaker 1: a victim advocacy office. She gave the same explanation repeatedly
17:42
Speaker 1: to groups who asked how something like this goes undetected
17:46
Speaker 1: The harm this kind of scheme inflis is difficult to
17:49
Speaker 1: name because it borrows real things. The trust was real,
17:54
Speaker 1: the intimacy was real. The shared meals at Patrice's Diner,
17:58
Speaker 1: the week ends together, starting an April, the morning Peggy
18:01
Speaker 1: moved her boxes through Michelle's door in August. None of
18:05
Speaker 1: that was hollow to Michele. She experienced it as a
18:08
Speaker 1: life being built. That is precisely what makes the timeline
18:11
Speaker 1: of the prepaid phone so disorienting to sit with. Someone
18:15
Speaker 1: bought it in November knowing the phone would be used
18:18
Speaker 1: to cover a departure that had not yet been formally
18:21
Speaker 1: scheduled for a ceremony that had not yet been announced,
18:25
Speaker 1: involving a dress that had not yet been purchased. The
18:28
Speaker 1: warmth and the architecture of exit ran in parallel for months.
18:32
Speaker 1: From the outside, they were indistinguishable. Michel Draper did not
18:36
Speaker 1: fail to see something that was obvious. The evidence record
18:40
Speaker 1: makes that clear. She saw what was shown to her.
18:43
Speaker 1: What was shown to her was designed with care. Wendy
18:47
Speaker 1: Bishop's term for the process she performed, working backward through documents, calls,
18:52
Speaker 1: and receipts to reconstruct what had actually happened was a
18:56
Speaker 1: paper autopsy. The metaphor is precise. Something had died. The
19:01
Speaker 1: question was what and when. The answer, in the end
19:06
Speaker 1: was before the wedding dress was ordered, before December, possibly
19:11
Speaker 1: before the engagement. The ceremony at Glenmore Reservoir was real
19:16
Speaker 1: in one direction only. This case resists the comfort of
19:20
Speaker 1: a clean resolution. Peggy Slater served her sentence, Michel Draper
19:24
Speaker 1: recovered her financial footing. The legal system produced an outcome.
19:29
Speaker 1: But what Wendy Bishop kept returning to in those advocacy
19:33
Speaker 1: sessions was simpler and harder. The frame people used to
19:37
Speaker 1: recognize harm, but the assumption that sustained cruelty requires a
19:43
Speaker 1: moment of obvious betrayal does not hold here. The betrayal
19:47
Speaker 1: was in the care It was in the fold of
19:50
Speaker 1: the dress. Michele still teaches, She still goes to work
19:55
Speaker 1: on a campus where she grades essays about argument and
19:58
Speaker 1: evidence and the responsibility a writer has to mean what
20:02
Speaker 1: they say. Bad hole. That is where this case ends,
20:08
Speaker 1: not with a verdict, with a woman at a desk
20:11
Speaker 1: doing the work. This show is made by Oboe Media