Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Greenland; Board of Peace; Syria & ISIS; Canada; Army-Navy; ICE | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Greenland; Board of Peace; Syria & ISIS; Canada; Army-Navy; ICE | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of fundamentals outdo what actual self interest and
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: an individual ONTs. This is the show. Oh right, everybody,
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: welcome to here on book Show on this Monday, January nineteenth.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: This is our second show of the day. If you
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: caught the interview earlier today with our healthcare experts. All right,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: so this evening show we kind of reversed it. Usually
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: we do the interview in the evening, but today we're
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: going to do our news update in the evening and
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: the interview we did already. All right, anything to remind
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: you of not really remember Tuesday show. Tomorrow's show is
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: typically an hour later than usual, and it might be
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: even later than that, so tomorrow will not be a
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: usual time. It'll be late anyway. Other than that, the
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: rest of the week should be fine, not traveling until
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: the week after that. And what else do I want
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: to remind you of? Nothing? Really, let's just jump into
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: the insanity. Today's show is all about insanity. I mean
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: one insane individual in particular. I mean almost every show
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: is about him because he dominates through us. He sucks
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: there out of any other news story that exists. But
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: today is all about all about the insanity. The Trump
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: is creating. Let's start with Greenland. Greenland, Greenland, the island
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: of Greenland. The Trump has had his ion really in
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: the first administration, didn't do much then, and now it's
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: come back in the second administration to demand the den
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: cand over Greenland or the Greenland sell to the United
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: States or whatever. But the rhetoric is getting more and
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: more and more aggressive with time. It's becoming more and more.
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: You know, we're just going to take it. And that
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: was the rhetoric last week. Last week, the rhetoric got
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: to to the point of Donald Trump saying we're just
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: gonna take it. We're going to annex it. Stephen Miller
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: said on television. He said, the new know bane of
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: international competition is going to be polar competition. As if
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: I mean that's true, there's going to be increased polar competition,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: but this competition lots of other places. Look at Ukraine,
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: look at the South China. See anyway, there is more
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: and more resources are being spent by our nations adversaries
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: and rivals. Is the ability to control movement, navigation, lanes
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: of travel in the polar an Arctic region. And that's
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: why we need Greenland. We're told Remember, we have NATO
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: allies to control much of the Arctic region. Big ally
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: is you know, We've got Norway, and then we've got Denmark,
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: who controls Greenland, who controls a big chunk of the
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: Arctic region. And then of course the biggest chunk of
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: the Arctic region that is not held by the Russians
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: is held by Canadians. You would think we would be
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: really nice to Canadians because we need them for the
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: defense of the Artic Region, but no, we're nasty the Canadians,
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: and indeed have encouraged the Canadians, or not encouraged, but
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: created an incentive structure where it makes sense of the
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: Canadians to rush of the Chinese and get attention and
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: love from them instead of from us. But again, overall,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: NATO controls a big chunk of the Artic and through
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: our NATO allies and working with a NATO alas, we
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: could secure the Artic Region against Russia and China. China's
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: at a huge, huge, humongous disadvantage because it actually has
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: no access to the Arctic region. It is not an
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: Arctic nation, it doesn't have any allies other than maybe
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: now Canada, with access to Artic region. China's at a
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: huge disadvantage. It doesn't have a navy that can really
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: leave the South China see easily without without sacrificing deterrence
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: in the South China. See there is, there is you
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: know what is exactly the risk? Anyway, Miller adds that
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: Denmark cannot defend Greenland. It just it's too weak of
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: a military, too small of an economy. He says, quote
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: to control the territory, and this is according to he says,
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: five hundred years of law, five hundred years of law.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: To control a territory, you have to be able to
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: defend the territory, improve a territory. Inhabita to Denmark has
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: failed at every single one of these tests. Really, it
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: seems to control the territory. It's been able to defend
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: it because nobody's attacked it, and it's improved both Greenland
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: and of course inhabited of the territory. Here they will
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: wants to live in Greenland only about fifty five thousand people.
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: But by this logic, and this is the logic, by
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: the way of might makes right. In other words, we
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: the United States can take Greenland, and therefore we shouldn't
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: take it, Denmark cannot defend it, and then for five
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: hundred years of law says that they should not own it.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Miller has stated previously, nobody's going to fight the United
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: States militarily over the future of Greenland, So might makes right.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: We're just gonnaals in there and take it. I mean,
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: if that's the logic, then why not just take Denmark
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: as well? You know they have this incredibly value pharmaceutical company,
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: notice the one that makes the GP one drugs. We
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: should just take Denmark. What the hell? They can't defend it,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: not against the United States. And while we're at it,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: why don't we just take Scandinavia. I mean, Bernie Sanders
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: keeps saying he wants America to becomes Scandinavia instead of
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: it becomes Scandinavia. Could just take Scandinavia over because we're
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: stronger and they can't defend it against us. Stay don't
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: deserve it. Might makes right. Anyway, Trump increased the rhetoric
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: last week about all this, and the Europeans kind of said, Okay,
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: we're sending some troops over to reinforce our position in Greenland.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: You know, it's a strategic risk. Russian's Trump says everywhere,
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: the Chinese everywhere. There's no sighting of any Chinese ships
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: in Greenland. I mean Russia, sure, but they no, No,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: Chinese are not there anyway. So and this is kind
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: of funny, funny and sad, but really really funny. A
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: stand up comedian in Israel did a whole skit about this,
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: and I said, I have to recreate, kind of try
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: to recreate the skit for you. So, so Germany, Sweden, France, Norway,
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: and the Netherlands and Finland. So Germany, Sweden, France, no, Way,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: the Netherlands, and Finland all confirmed that descending this is
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: last week military personnel to Greenland again in order to
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: boost its capabilities and protect it. We'll see how Trump
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: interpreted in a minute. This is wow. These people are serious.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: This is big stuff. So Finland announced that it is
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: sending to military layers on offices. I mean these two,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: I mean the Vikings. After well, no, I think I
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: think actually Finland is not technically Vikings, so I don't
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: know what they are, but you know, there are two
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: big fins, so you know, I think they can stand
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: down the US or the Russian fleet or the Russian
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: whatever or American's ad two. I mean this is major
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: European commitment. The Netherlands. The Netherlands in a in a
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: you know, in a in a massive show of solidarity
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: with with with Denmark and uh in order to boost
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: the ability. So what do they do here, you know,
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: the boost ability of Greenland to defend itself. It's sending one, one,
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: one whole soldier from the Netherlands is gonna stand up,
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: stand up to I don't know, the Americans, the Russians,
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: whoever lands up invading the place. I mean, imagine imagine
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: being the soldier of the Netherlands who gets chosen right, Hey, yohn, congratulations,
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: you just got a plumb assignment. We're sending you to Greenland.
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: I mean it's cold enough right now in the Netherlands.
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: He's going going to Greenland. It's like, how many troops
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: am I commanding? No? Just too, You're going all alone?
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: What am I supposed to do that help defend Greenland
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: against Germany? Germany, the mighty Germination is sending thirteen military
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: personnel to Greenland. I mean this is I don't know,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: Europe is outdoing itself. I'm not sure how military in
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: the world will be able to stand up to the
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: forces that Europe is a reign in Greenland. Anyway, Trump,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: give me one second, you know, Trump, They're not like this.
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: He felt like this was an insult because because hey,
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: uh this this, these troops might be used against the
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: United States of America, and uh, this is an insult.
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: And and you know, of course, the back and forth
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: all last week was around NATO and the United States.
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: You know, basically, uh so Trump decided over the weekend
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: to raise tariffs on European countries. There's a scent troops,
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: all those that poor one soldier from the Netherlands is
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: going to cost the Netherlands and so one, you know,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: the one soldier is going to have tariffs of ten
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: percent escalating after June to much high twenty five percent
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: on the European countries to send troops to Greenland, because
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: how dare they They should just hand Greenland over to
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: the United States. So Trump was furious, and then Europe
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: went back and said, all right, if you're going to
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: put Travis on us were withdrawing from our previous trade agreement,
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: and we are going to we're threatening to initiate this.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: You know, I guess the nuclear option of trade where
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: it would fall out of this provision of the EU,
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: they would basically make it very very hard for American
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: businesses to sell anything in Europe. So anyway, yesterday, I
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: mean last week and weekend, massive escalation in rhetoric around
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: around Greenland, tariffs, troops were just going to take it over.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: We don't need any any of it. And speculation about
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: NATO falling apart, NATO should be broken up, in United
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: States leaving NATO. It's just unbelievable. I mean, it's it's
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: the anyway, the rhetoric escalated to levels of hysteria and
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: again threats, a lot of threats, and a trade war,
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: biggest trade war potentially between the United States and Europe
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: since Smooth Holly in the nineteen in the nineteen thirties.
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: So and to this mixture, right, mixture United States and
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: and to this the fact that Trump feels snubbed over
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: the Nobel Peace Prize. I mean, I think you saw
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: I didn't talk about this, but you saw last week
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: that Machado, the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize from Venezuela,
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: came to the White House and literally handed over to
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: Trump her Nobel Peace Prize and he proudly represented, and
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: he didn't do you know, no, no, no, no need
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: it's yours. It's got your name on it. You keep it. No,
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: he took it. He took it. I mean a lot
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: of good memes about Trump demanding all the gold medals
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: from all gold medal recipients and the Olympics, and he
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: got a photo Machado and him, and he's all proud
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: with his Nobel Piece prize. Anyway, Norway has kind of
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: a little pissed off about this because they awarded it
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: to her and it didn't order to him, and he's
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: taken it, and it just I mean, you can't make
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: this up. I mean, if Finemand has written this into
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: Atlas shrug, everybody would have said, no, this is ludicrous.
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: No human being of this character and this mentality and
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: this stupidity could ever be president of the United States.
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: It's just impossible. It would never happen. She can't. I mean,
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: her villains are just just ridiculous. No, this is I mean,
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: even Iman couldn't even imagine this anyway, So anyway, he's
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: pissed off of that. So over the weekend. Over the weekend,
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: he wrote the following letter to the President to the
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister sorry of Norway. And and notice, you know,
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: I'm linking Trump being upset about the Nobel Prize to
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: his attitude towards Greenland. And people would say, Joan, that's
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: just TDS Again, TDS, it's got nothing to I mean,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: he's upset about the Nobel Prize, fine, but the Greenland
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: is strategic. The strategic reason has nothing to do with
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: the Nobel Prize. You know, you're just as TDS. You're
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: making that connection. So this is Trump in a president
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: sorry in a letter to the Prime Minister of Norway
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: that has been released and was actually distributed to some
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: other people. It was forwarded by the White House National
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: Security Council to ambassadors in Washington, different country, ambassadors, right,
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: de Johannes, considering your country decided not to give me
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped eight wars plus.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: I no longer feel an obligation to think purely a peace,
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: although it will always be predominant, but can now think
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: about what is good and proper for the United States
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China.
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: And why do they have a right of ownership anyway.
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: There are no written documents. It's only a boat that
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: landed there three hundred years ago. But we had boats
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: landing there. Also. I have done more for NATO than
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: any person since it's founding, and now NATO should do
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: something for the United States. The world is not secure
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: unless we have complete and total capitalized control capitalized of Greenland.
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: Thank you. So President Trump is pissed off, I mean
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: royally pissed off, not a little bit, royally pissed off
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: that he did not get the Peace Prize. He is
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: blaming the Norwegian government and by extension, all of NATO
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: for not giving him a peace prize. And now it's
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: time for him, since he hasn't in the past to
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: pursue American self interest at the expense of peace towards
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: war because he knows he's not going to get the
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: Peace Prize anyway. So he's demanding he's demanding no way
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: support the claim and NATO support the claim of the
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: United States to Greenland. Now, you can't make this stuff up.
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: You can't make this stuff up. I mean, you know,
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: it's it's stupid, it's a historic hall, it's ridiculous by
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: Greenland's being Danish territory for centuries Danish citizens. It's residents
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: of Danish citizens. They vote in Danish elections. In nineteen sixteen,
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: the United States actually signed the document that recognized Greenland
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: as part of Denmark. So the United States has officially
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: recognized Greenland as part of Denmark. There's just nothing, nothing,
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: nothing there, and you know he is, there's no national
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: security reason to take Greenland. The United States as the
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: ability and the European countries of Denmark have reconfirmed the
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: United States ability to stage whatever weapons systems they want
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: in Denmark. They have the ability to put you know,
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: there were thirty thousand American troops in sorry, in Greenland
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: or in Greenland during the Cold War. They could return
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: to those levels. Denmark has no problem with that any
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: The US Navy can patrol the coast of Greenland to
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: prevent Russia Russian boats from reaching it. There's zero, there's zero.
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: I mean, if rare earth materials is the issue, the
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: problem with Greenland rare earth materials is not that they
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: don't want to try to go and get them, it's
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: that nobody will invest in getting them. That is, it's
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: super expensive. Why why is it expensive to mine? For
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: railroad materials in Greenland because it's cold, because it's Greenland,
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: because it's covered with ice, because only fifty five people,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: fifty five thousand people live in this place, which is
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: the size of a quarta of continental United States. It
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: is massive. It's twenty five percent larger than Alaska. It's huge.
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: But nobody lives there because it's well. I won't say
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: it's cold, because you know, Michigan is cold and all
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: you Michiganians Michigan is live in Michigan. But no, but
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: it's it's cold even for Michiganians or whatever, right it.
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's really cold, and it's rocky, and it's
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: difficult in it to get from and it doesn't have
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: the infrastructure in the sense of the roads, railroad or
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: whatever infrastructure you need to get the mining material to
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: the ports. Somebody would have to invest a lot of
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: money to do all that. And the fact is that
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: the that the private sector is not edgeded. It's just
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: too expensive. There are other sources of very oath materials
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: that are easier to get to it. But if the
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: United States companies want to invest in it, or if
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: the US companies want to invest in mining, the resources
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: are Arctic. Whatever that involves. Denmark is not going to
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: stop them. Denmark is gonna sign agreements with them and
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: let them do it. So it's all bogus now not
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: according to Secretary Bessin. Now, remember Secretary bestn't. This is
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary's supposed to be the adult in the room.
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: He's supposed to be the one person in the Trumpet
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: administration that actually still has a mind. They say, now,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: I don't think he ever had. I don't think there's
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: any reason to believe he has. Given his pronouncements on
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: tariffs and everything else and budgets and things. The guy's
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: completely lost it. The Fed interestrates completely lost it. It's
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: become a Trump zombie. This is the Secretary Besson quote.
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: Greenland is essential to the US national security. President Trump
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: is being strategic. He's looking beyond this year, he's looking
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: beyond next year to what could happen for battle in
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: the Arctic. We are not going to outsource our national security.
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: Nobody's asking you to. And by the way, NATO is
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: not outsourcing. You dominate NATO, We dominate NATO. That's not
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: outsourcing our national security. I mean, what can't you justify
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: kah By by these kind of arguments, any any kind
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: of military action you want. Uh hmm. So it's a
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: national emergency taking Greenland by force. There's no justice in
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: it is. You know, it's illegal under US law. It
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: should go to Congress. I mean, I don't think it
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: would even get a majority of Republicans in the Senate.
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: I doubt it would even get a republic majority of
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: Republicans in the House. It's unbelievably unpopular. It's a stupid idea.
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: It's uh, it won't it wouldn't get it wouldn't get
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: congressional approval, and it's clearly illegal without congressional approval. There's
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: just no justification for it. It would be a major
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: decoration of war on Denmark and really on NATO. I
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: mean Article five of the NATO Charta would be triggered
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: and Canada would be at war with US. And Canada
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: said that they would supposedly view it as an active
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: war against them if Greenland was invaded. Is that the priorty?
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: You would think that if we actually had a strategic
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: view about Russia and China and wanted to combat them,
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: we would be showing up our allies. We would be
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: investing in our alliances. We would be building those up
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: to present a United Fund, which I think could not
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: be defeated Russia on the European side and without Asian
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: allies visa of Eachina. But we're not doing either one
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: of those things. We're just pissing everybody off and establishing
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: it unequivocally that we are not to be relied on,
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: that we cannot be trusted, that we function from whim
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: and nothing else. So we're doing exactly the opposite of
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: what you'd expect if you had a you know, interestingly enough,
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: if you think about strategic views. The Trumpet administration put
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: up a national security document which we talked about on
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: the show a few weeks ago, which was a Russia
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: and China and you know, the new Monroe Doctrine and
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: all of that. But guess what wasn't mentioned in that
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: this is the strategy to take on Russia and China
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: in a multi polar war and world and how to
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: dominate our hemisphere was the one country not mentioned in
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: the entire frigging document. One not mentioned as a is Greenland.
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: You would think that if Greenland is so important for
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: American national security, then in the national security strategy document
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: that the Trump administration put together for scratch, they would
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: mention the Greenland is importance. They don't even mention it. Now,
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: a conflict with Europe is going to be problematic for
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: everybody involved, but primarily for the Europeans. Europeans in trouble.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: The reality is that Europe it depends on the United States.
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: For example, for natural gas, used to depend on Russia,
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: now depends on the US. Now there's a sense in
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: which this is just perfect right, because the reality is
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: the Europeans have enough natural gas in mainland Europe to
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: deal with to power their energy needs. They don't need
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: to import it from the US or anywhere else. It's
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: right there. And you're UK has vast resources of natural gas,
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: so does Poland in Germany. In order to get to it,
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: you would have to do a guess what the Europeans
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: consider the unthinkable, the unthinkable, what is the unthinkable? You
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: would have to frack that anti life, anti humanity, anti whatever,
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: fracking you'd have to frack. But the reality is that
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: fracking would unleash a massive quantity of natural gas in Europe,
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: in Europe, which would not I mean, yeah, it would
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: take some resources, but Europeans have the money, the infrastructures
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: there in terms of roads and everything. Pipelines exist in Europe.
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: It's not that hard now. It couldn't be done from
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: today's tomorrow. It would take years. But they could have
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: started this twenty years ago. They could have started it
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: ten years ago. They could have started it the day
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: the Ukraine War started. They could have started it many
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: times over and they haven't. So the fact that they
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: depends on US oil natural gas. They get forty five
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: point three percent of the natural gas from l and
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: G from the United States. You know, they get some
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: from Russia, still still from Russia, and then they get
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: some from the Middle East and no Way has no
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: way for one country. It still provides natural gas and
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: other things. Petroleum oil they get sixteen point one percent
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: from the United States, and then they get most of
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: the rest in the Middle East. And again Norway provides
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: a big chunk north Sea drilling in Norway. I mean
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: the UK could have it, could track, there's more oil
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: in the North Sea. There are lots of things that
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: are made possible. I mean, look, the reality is that
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: if Trump tries to take Greenland by force, NATO is finished.
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: I don't think Trump cares, but NATO is finished. I
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: don't know how he justifies it constitutionally, but we have
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: already discussed the fact that our constitution is not working
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: right now because Congress is not willing to do its job. Now,
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: if he invaded Greenland, would he be impeached? Supposedly this
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: is supposedly Republicans in Congress are telling Trump that if
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: he invades Greenland, his presidency is over. Do you believe that?
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know if to believe that,
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: but that's what I'm hearing now. You know, taking Greenland
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: is on you. Evy Truman made it off in nineteen
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: forty eight to buy Denmark, and buying makes a lot
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: of sense, although we'll get to buying in a minute.
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: But no president in history the United States has threatened
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: Denmark with taking it by force. And who is the
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: one party in the world out there, who is the
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: one party that will rejoice at the collapse of NATO?
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: Who is the one party, you know, just rubbing their
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: hands just with the prospects of the United States taking
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: over Greenland? Who thinks this is amazing and uh and fantastic? Right?
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: The Kremlin putin his Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peshkov. International experts
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: believe that by resolving Greenland's incorporation, Trump will suddenly go
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: down in history, not only in US history, but world history.
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: They're egging him on that, they're poking him. Good do it,
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: good do it, You'll go down in world history. So yeah,
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: they want it. They want NATO to do, whether it
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: shadows or not. They want the US and Europe to
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: be at loggerheads. They want uh, the US and and
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: and Europe UH to be fighting Russia, saying we're not
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: threatening Greenland, but we're happy to watch Trump destroy NATO
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: trying to protect it from US Russias Vun minister says it.
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: Were saying last week that it's unacceptable for the worst
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: to claim Russia and China threaten Greenland while Trump literally
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: literally threatens to take it. They just having a blast
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: over this. They you know, they can't, they can't hold
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: themselves Kirol. The betrayal of Russia rights rights, collapse of
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: the Transatlantic Union, finally something actually worth discussing. A DeVos
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: devas are starting I think tomorrow. They're thrilled. They cannot
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: imagine how this has been given to them on a
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: silver platter, gold platter, while silver is pretty high these
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: days too, silver and gold platter, two platters. You know,
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: basically NATO shattered. They crush Ukraine. I mean even Nigel
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: Farage is mad at Trump. Even Nigel Farage, I mean,
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: it's that bad for it's saying. I will be having
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: some words with the American administration. What Trump has said
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: is wrong. It's very hoodful to us. We have stood
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: by America for years. This is not how friends treat
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: each other. We will not be bullied into silence on
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: Greenland for whoa. Anyway, this is where we are. It is,
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: It is bizarre, It is weird, it is crazy. By
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: the way, Davos is starting, Trump is on the way
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: to Davas. Trump, a huge American entourage is on the
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: way to Davas. Davis is the World Economic Forum. It's
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: that place where you know Klaus Close Close has been
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: fired from Davos for sexual harassment, where the elites of
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: world conspire to take it over. Well, this year it's
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: going to be dominated by Trump administration people. I wonder
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: if the anti elites and mega are a little upset
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: that Trump is going to Davas. You think they would say,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: don't go to Davas. Doavass where the devil, Where the
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: devil lives. That's not good anyway, All these leaders are
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: going to be in Davas. It's going to be interesting.
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: The interaction between them will be kind of cool. Now, supposedly,
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: here's another report that I haven't been able to verify
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: from anywhere else, but this is a report that says
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: it's going to sky News. It says that on Sunday,
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: Trump actually had a phone call with Keith kia Kier,
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: not Keith kir Starmer about Greenland, in which Trump admitted
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: that he might have had inaccurate information about the motives
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: for deploying a European military contingent to Greenland. The US
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: president stated position could become the basis for de escalation,
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: de escalating and attention surrounding Greenland. One of the main
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: reasons for Trump's threats of tariffs related to Greenland was
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: the deployment of a small number, as I said, one
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: guy from the Netherlands, a military personnel on the island.
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: At the end of last week, Kissed Arma tried to
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: convince Trump that these military movements serve to strengthen US
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: security interests and are not actions directed against America, so that,
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: according to Sky News, who knows I mean again, Trump
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: is driven by whoever whispered in his ear last last.
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: On the other hand, the Germans are getting tougher right.
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: Germans are saying this is a prime minist of Germany.
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: The American government knows that we can also take reciprocal
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: steps on outside. I do not want that, but if necessary,
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: we will certainly defend our European interest and also our
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: German national interests. The economy of the United States is
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: not working as well as the American government expected a
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: year ago in my assessment. This is somewhat related to
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: the tariff policy as well. We know that Trump often
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: threatens with tariffs, sometimes imposes them, but just as often
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: engages in negotiations, which usually forces him to back down
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: from these decisions. Trump point like that the United States
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: once had more than thirty thousand troops stationed in Greenland,
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: told you today there are fewer than two hundred days.
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: So it is clear that the threat assessment from the
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: United States itself is not as dramatic as it is
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: currently portrayed, although the security situation may still worsen. So
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: they have it from the Prime Minister of Germany. All right,
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: so let's go from the I don't know if we're
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: crazy to the insane. Is there any different from the
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: vicious to the nutty to the I don't know? Anyway,
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: let's talk about this border piece board of peace. So
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: if you members part of the Gaza cease fire deal,
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: there was supposed to be three stages to the Gaza
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: ultimately peace program, and stage two included a establishment of
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: some kind of technocratic government that would replace Hamas in
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: actually governing the territory the territory of Gaza. In addition
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: to that, there was supposed to be something called the
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: Gaza Executive Board. And then on top of that there
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: would be a Founding Executive Board or the Executive Board.
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: But on top of all of it would be a
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: board a piece, a board a piece. This would be
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: supposedly an international organization shared by Trump, he said at
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: the time, and would run Gaza, right, run Gaza, and
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: then it would delegate to the executive Founding Executive Board,
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: you know, a smaller appointed group under the boarder piece
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: that would handle operations and implementations. Below that would be
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: the Gauze Executive Board, which would run things on the ground,
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: and below that would be a government of technocrats, which
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: has already been a name fifteen Technocrats at the bottom. Now,
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: all of this is of course contingent. The goal of
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: this boarder piece is first of all to dismantle and
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: to disarm Hamas and then to start the process of
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: rebuilding Gaza. That is its purpose. Anyway, it turns out
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: as on Friday, Trump finally sent out invitations to people
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: to join at the Board of Peace, and it turned
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: out that it has very little to do with Gaza.
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: It is supposed to be some a board of leaders
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: that basically devils in whatever crises exist out there in
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: the world. This boarder piece has a chairman for life.
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: His name is of course, Donald Trump, who stays chairman
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: of the boarder Piece even after leaving office as President
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: of the United States and would have the right to
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: name his successor. Donald Trump as part of this board
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: of Piece would also have complete veto power on all decisions.
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: Now I invited to join the boarder piece. What countries
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: like Canada, France, Britain and Saudi Arabia, you know, supposedly
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: allies of the United States, although I don't know if
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: how how long. And there was some discussion about this
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: really replace as the Security Council of the United States,
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: just this time with Trump running everything and running it
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: for life and running it was veto power. And maybe
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: if you only include the good countries, this is a good,
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: good improvement. But then it turned out that Trump also
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: said sent invitations to be on the Board of Peace.
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: Two who do you think, well, he sent it to
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: Putin and to the dictator of Belarus. So Putin's going
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: to be on a boat to piece the guy who
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: started the one. You came now to be a permanent
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: member on the board a piece, to be on the
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: board to piece forever. I guess you have to pony
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: up one billion dollars and then you become a permanent
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: member on the board a piece, and you get it
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: be involved in all kinds of global conflicts which will
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: be determined by Donald Trump in addition to these countries.
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: To Ki and Katarara, UH invited is always not. It's
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: always not, even though it involves Gaza. UH. And the
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: idea is this is a new international body that would
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: supervise the rebuilding of Gaza, but also engage in any
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: other stuff. Again, Trump there for life, uh to. Only
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: two people so far have accepted. Jordan was invited, as
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: I said Britain. The two people that have accepted Ami
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: Lay from Argentina and Victor Auburn from Hungary. I hate
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: to see the company that Milay keeps, but what can
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: you do now. The founding executive board, which is not
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: being said, will include Marco Rubio, Jared Kushner, Steve Whitkoff.
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: Steve Whitkoff who is not blamed for the fact that
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: Trump did not act against Ivan, Tony Blair, Mark Rowan,
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: who I know the private equity executive, Ijai Banja from
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: the World Bank, the World Bank President, and Robert Gabriel,
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: the host National Security Advisor. And then the Gaza Executive
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: Board responsible for Gaza and working with directly with the
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: Technocratic National Committee the kind of government there and it's
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: going to handle day to day administration. The Gaza Executive
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: Board will include Blair, Kushna, and Witkov but also include
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: representatives from Turki Kata, Egypt, a Yue and suppose the
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: I think one Israeli businessman now Israel is flipping out
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: over this and basically saying we will absolutely not accept
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: a role for Turki and Kata in this governing board
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: of Gaza. They are enemies and we will not give
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: them a position. They are they are the forefront of
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: the Muslim brotherhood, and we will now give them a
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: position on this. Yui is fine, Tuki Kata are not
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: fine than not acceptable. So this has become a contentious
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: issue between Israel and the United States. Uh So. According
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: to the charter of the organization, the Board of Pieces
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: an international organization. It seeks to promote stability, restore dependable
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: and lawful governance, and secure and during peace in areas
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: affected or threatened by conflict. The charter does not mention Gaza.
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: Dal Piece requires pragmatic judgment, common sense solutions, and the
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: courage to depart from approaches and institutions that have often failed.
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: Countries that join the Board will serve a limited three
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: year term unless they contribute over one billion dollars within
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: the first year of its operation. The money, by the way,
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: to be managed and controlled by guess who. Donald Trump,
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: which has been invited, has said the Kingdom has received
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: the invitation to join. The voterpiece in the US administration
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: is being reviewed. As per our internal processes. We are
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: supportive of President Trump's efforts to resolve the conflict and
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: bring lasting peace to Gauza and the region. It's the
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: voting on this voorder piece. All decisions would be made
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: by a majority of members states present and voting, subject
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: to the approval of the Chairman, who may also cast
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: a vote in his capacity as chairman in their vent
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: or attie, but he can also veto because he has
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: to approve the decisions. It also provides the chairman with
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: exclusive exclusive authority to create, modify, or dissolve subsidiary entities
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: as necessary or appropriate to fulfill the boat's peacemanship, such
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: as the executive committees that we talked about. So basically
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: gives Trump all the power in the world. But the
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: whole idea is stupid anyway. The border piece, the border piece,
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump running the world in the
• 45:20
  Speaker 1: name of piece. Nonetheless, All right, Uh, let's see what
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: did I wanna? Yeah, Lukashenko has been invited. He's another
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: another one of those advocate, big advocate for peace. Uh.
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: It's gonna be interesting to see what happens with Israel,
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: right Uh, and to what extent Israel is willing to
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: play along with this stuff. I mean, this is this
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: Phase two of the Gazad is really a joke, according
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: to According to some reports, naw has said, I want
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: to make it clear there will be no Turkish or
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: Katari soldiers in Gaza. We're currently in a dispute with
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: the United States over the makeup of the Advisory Council
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: or executive board for Gaza. I mean, imagine if Biden
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: had suggested the Turkey and Katal have authority over Gaza.
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: I mean, you can't make this stuff up. You just
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: cannot make this stuff up, all right. Next in the
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: why should I debate you yourself? I'm not going to
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: debate you. I mean, sorry, but I don't debate nobody's
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: I have to have a self interest in the debate.
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: And the self interest is that you can bring people
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: that people show up to see you. That that's the
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: value to me is larger exposure. I can have fun
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: in lots of different ways. A self is suggesting I
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: debate him because he says it would be fun. I
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: can think of many, many more things that would be
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: fun than that. All right, the right would go ballistic
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: if Biden had proposed any of this stuff, and if
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: he did any of this stuff. I mean, at this point,
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: I think Peter Schiff had a right. Peter Schiff posted
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: on Twitter he said, the one thing that Trump has
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: achieved in his first year as president is uh, oh god,
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: I wish I had the tweet basically is to show
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: that it was possible to be worse than Biden. Yep,
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: and yes, I think it would be worse than Biden.
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: Does Juan read Twitter chat? I mean depends I read Twitter.
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: I don't know what twitter chat is. All right, let's see,
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: so staying in the Middle East today with Middle East
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: heavy stay in the Middle East. Okay, we've talked about Syria,
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: but let me give you some background on Syria. Syria
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: is a significant strategic country in the Middle East. It
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: sits between Turkey and Israel, Turkey and Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon,
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: and and it sits between Lebanon, Israel and Iraq and
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: Iraq on the other side. It is why Iran wanted
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: to be in Syria, why the Russians had a significant
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: base in Syria. And of course, uh, you know, the
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: the the Asad regime that ruled Syria for a very
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: long time was overthrown by by Ahmadel Shallah, the former
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: ISIS commander who overran the Acid regime, took Damascus, established
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: herself as president quad i e. Dictator of of Syria,
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: and announced to the world that while he was an Islamist,
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: an Islamist, he was no longer filiar with ISIS and
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: now was committed to peace and wanted a peaceful Syria,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: Syria integrate into the Middle East and peaceful. And immediately
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: the Saudis came and tugged him and showered him with
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: compliments and money, and the Europeans came with I think
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: five eight billion dollars, as if Europe has extra money
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: to spend on Syria. I guess the main reason the
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: Europeans wanted to get money to Syria was with the
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: hope that Syria would become a normal country and all
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: the Syrians and europe would go back to Syria. And
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: then Donald Trump came and said, WHOA, this guy's cool.
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: I like this guy, and he brought him to the
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: White House and he celebrated him and they had a
• 50:33
  Speaker 1: good conversation, and the United States is financially assisting. Now.
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: Syria is still the base for ISIS, mostly in its
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: eastern part the part closer to uk Isis was defeated
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: through a combination of efforts the Russians bombing them with
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: no regard to to anything really getting tough with them
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: in his first term, and the Kurdish the Kurdish SDF,
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: the Syrian Democratic Forces which are mainly Kurdish forces basically
• 51:13
  Speaker 1: fighting ISIS and ultimately defeating them and capturing thousands of
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: them and holding them in prison camps which the Syrian
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: Democratic Forces managed and held. The Syrian Democratic Forces as
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: a Kodesh force was wanted, was pushing the new government
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: in Theamascus for to create a federation, a federal type
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: of government where the Kurds would be given some autonomy
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: in the northeast of the country. Another and the Syrian
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: president made it clear that he was not interested in
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: the federation. There would be one Syria, and that he
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: intended to occupy all of the all of the land
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: that is was Syria, and he intended to too great
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: the soldiers in the Syrian from the Syrian Democratic Forces
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: into the Syrian Army, you know, the ones that were
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: still alive after they massacred the ones he didn't like,
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: rape their women, stole their kids, the rest could could
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: could fight generally in in in the Syrian army. Anyway,
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: There's been back and forth and there's been fighting going
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: on in the north and the northeast of Syria between
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: the Kurds and the Syrian the regular Syria Syrian army
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: and uh you know, Syrian army has been gaining gaining
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: ground on the Kurds, in particular, given that they get
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: help from the Toks. Turki has allowed Islamists to cross
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: the border from Turkey into northern Syria and to fight
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: on the side of the Syrian army in opposition to
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: the Kurdish. The Kods that established kind of a a
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: kind of a autonomous region with democracy and and and
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: women you know who writes women and no hijab and
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: know this. And of course the Syrian government is an
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: Islamist government and the Turkish government is a government that
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: is super sens super supportive of Islamism. The courtis stood
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: in their way. Anyway, fighting continued, the Syrian Army made
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: significant ground recently. And then the United States and it's
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: emissary this guy Barak who is who is Lebanese and
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: fund the Middle East anyway, to negotiate a deal and
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: this weekend we got a deal. We got a ce fire,
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: a peace deal between the Syrian military and the Syrian
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: Democratic Forces. Basically, this deal is a deal of surrender
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: by the Syrian Democratic Forces, completely supported, encouraged, promoted by Trump.
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: In other words, Trump has completely turned his back on
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: the one force in the Middle East that has been
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: fighting ISIS on outside helping us. It involves an immediacy
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: fire on all funds and the withdrawal of all military
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: formations affiliated with the Syrian Democratic Forces to areas east
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: of the Euphrates close to the Iraqi border. Second handing
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: over the governance of the areas in northern Syria immediately
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: to Syrian government. Now, this by the way, includes many
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: of the prisons in which ISIS ISIS commanders, ISIS fighters
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: were being held, thousands of them. We'll talk about what
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: happened once they were hand it over in a minute,
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: you know, Integrating all the civil institutions Assyrian government, taking
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: over all the border crossings and oil and gas fields
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: in the region. This is the one region Assyria that
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: has some oil and gas. Integrating all military and security
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: elements of the SDF into the structure of the Syrian
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: military not as independent units but as individuals, as individuals,
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: and basically a complete surrender of the SDF and its
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: retreat from all its strongholds and all its cities and
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: all its political places. In other words, a complete compulation.
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: This is exactly what Turkey wants, because Turkey has of
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: course been in conflict with the with the Coods for
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: a very long time. And yep, and Toky has achieved
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: what it wanted was the capitulation of the goods and
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: Syrian now controls Syrian forces. Over the weekend, fighting continued
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: after this this idea was and you know, Syrian forces
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: entered into the towns and in places Kurdish women, who
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: are about forty percent of the entire fighting force of
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: the Kurdish of the Kurdish forces, they erected a big
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: sculpture of a woman fighter as a symbol of women's
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: freedom in Raka, a city in the north. That statue
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: was immediately dragged down and in destroyed, right destroyed, God forbid,
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: God forbid. The women. Now, I don't know what they're
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: gonna do, but you know many of them will become,
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: it would be my guess, sex slaves to the new
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: you know, new Syrian army and and to the ISIS elements.
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: One of the first things the Syrian army did in
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: northern Syria was released all the ISIS. Remember, the president
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: of Syria was a former ISIS fighter, So thousands of
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: ISIS fighters who, if you remember in the mid twenty teens,
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: were going to Europe and committing terrorist attacks. Thousands of
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: these ISIS fighters have now been released from their prisons.
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: This all at the urging of the United States. The
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: Trump basically told them that he was pivoting away from them, yeah,
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: towards the Syrian arabomby UH. They this ambassador Baraque was
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: urged the Codes to make deep compromises and the Syrian
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: government got everything it wanted with the help of the
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: United States and the Europeans. Turkey is the winner here.
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: Turkey now basically UH has a huge influence on Syria,
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: has troops inside Syria on the Syrian side of the
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: border with Turkey, and now is your faces on its
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: northeastern border. An Islamist regime, UH, you know, are manned
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: by ISIS fanatics who make I think Hamas see moderate right,
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: I mean, these are these are these are people who
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: you know, committed September seventh, like atrocities on a daily
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: basis in Ywalk and Syria when they had control over
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: their territories. Now, Israel has created a buffer zone in
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: its northeastern period northeastern region, which includes the Jews minority.
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: The Jews have not yet surrendered to the Syrian army,
• 59:21
  Speaker 1: and Israel is at least for now, protecting them as
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: a buffer between it and Damascus. But the United States
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: conturn in Israel like that, like that, and forced them
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: to basically abandon the Jews. The US is a backstabbing
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: is a backstabbing country under Trump. Under Trump, the US
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: stabs its allies in the back. It stabs Europe, It
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: stabs the demonstrators in Iran, and it stabs the Kods.
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: It is a backstabbing regime that does not care one
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: iota for its allies. And of course, think about this,
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: think about this in the context of future national security.
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: If we have no allies because we stabed them on
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: in the back. American sold just died in Syria fighting
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: alongside the Cords to put ISIS terrorists in prison. This
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: United States government, Donald J. Trump has just basically released
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: them all. I don't know if how long US troops
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: will stay in Syria. There's still a few US troops
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: in Syria. My guess is they will leave. I hope
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: they leave because they're in danger nowt but there's video
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 1: now of escaped ISIS elements from the prisons and camps.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: We're talking about thousands of them. One of these, just
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: one of these prisons hold five thousand ISIS members and
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: Trump just handed them their freedom, handed them their freedom.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is from one of the from the Kods.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: I really want to say to the people who are
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: watching right now. The world asked the Coods to fight
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: the most brutal terrorists they are in the world ISIS.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: They fought bravely, and we have over fifteen to twenty
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: thousand martyrs and fifty thousand wounded. And then the world
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: asked us to be ruled by the same terrorists. That's
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: what's happening now. It's exactly the same as to ask
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: the Jews now you should be ruled by Hamas. And
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: when you see us being slatted, our girls being raped,
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: killed and sold as sex slaves, please don't think we
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 1: didn't fight, because we did. But you me adding this
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: betrayed us. You betrayed US. So, yeah, America the wonderful
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: ally again. Ambassador Tom Barack is out there celebrating this
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: wonderful ceasefire deal that has feed thousands of ISIS terrorists. Again,
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: Tokya is the winner here. Tokia is ultimately a hostile force.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: It is a member of NATO, and yet it conspires
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: against the United States, against Israel, and against American interests
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: in the Middle East. And it has ambitions to become
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: a major force in the Middle East, and it is
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: teaming up with Saudis to do exactly that. Even the Saudis.
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: The more, the more and more I see, the more
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: they see how America behaves, the more they're turning away
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: from America towards trying to establish kind of an Islamic
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 1: Islamic NATO. Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey. Saudi Arabia has the money,
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: Pakistan has the nukes, and turky as the military forces.
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: That is a powerful combination. And that is not what
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: was expected. After the collapse of Chris Balah and the
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: failure of US side. It was not expected that we
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: would create an even worse alliance. And yeah, Maria says,
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: maybe Egypt, Yeah, I think Egypt will join that alliance.
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: All right, it's depressing. Sorry, but it's just frigging depressing.
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: All right, Let's do a few of these topics quickly,
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: and then we'll go to your to your questions. We
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: are way behind on our targets. We're about eighty dollars
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: short of our first hour target. And yet and yet
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: we are into our second hour already. So let's get
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: that first hour done. Eighty bucks to get to our
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: first hour targets. And so you can do a sticker,
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: you can ask a question. I'll answer the questions in
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: a little while they are it's a great way to
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: shape the show, and it's a great way to yeah,
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: to get me to talk about what you want me
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: to talk about, whatever you want me to talk about,
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: just to ask a question, and that way, that way
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: will will be up. Comment on it, all right. The
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: one of the consequences of the Trumpet administration's policies tariffs
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: and Greenland and just just Trump's insanity. Insanity is too
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: nice of word, I guess, but Trump's immorality, Trump's immortality
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: isn't basically incentivizing our allies to not consider themselves allies anymore.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: And really seek out partnerships elsewhere in the world, and
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: clearly Canada last week exhibited what that looks like. Canadian
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister Connie visited China last week and met was she,
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 1: and from all evidence seems like they had a great meeting.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: They both called their agreement a new strategic partnership. Connie
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: has committed Canada to reducing tariffs on electric cause, which
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: were matching the United States at one hundred percent, reducing
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: those dramatically to allow the importation of Chinese electric cause
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: into Canada. Canada. China, on the other hand, is reducing
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: taists significantly on certain agricultural products that Canada produces. I
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: think you can also think of Canada supplying China with
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 1: with oil. There is talk of another pipeline off there's
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: already a pipeline to the Pacific coast to load up
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: ships to take them to take them west to China.
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: As the United States become less of a lesser reliable
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: trading partner, she is really trying to present himself as
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: a stabilizing global force, as the United States is clearly
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: a destabilizing force. She China, of all people, is trying
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: to present themselves as we're pro fee trade. We're postability.
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 1: We'll do what we say we do. We're not gonna
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: stab people in the backs. You know, we're just stable.
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: We're just there. Canada have used the world as now
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: having a new world ODA. Uh And Uh, the United
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: States is not necessarily on Canada signed in this new
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: world ODA. And given how Trump is treated to Canada,
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: why should they think that. By the way, Trump freaked
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 1: out when he heard about these low tariffs on Chinese
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: cause just just made him not so we're gonna do
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: have to do something about it. He's gonna raise taffs
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: again on on Canada. Who knows what he's gonna do. Yeah,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: I mean Washington. Trump is not gonna be happy with this. Uh.
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: They're gonna review trade with Canada. They're gonna review the
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: the the US m c A, which is the United States,
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: Mexico Canada trade packed. Uh. And it wouldn't be surprising
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: if they squeeze Canada even further in the future given
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: the closer relationship. Of course, this goes far beyond Chinese TVs.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: It's just it's you know, Canada's a very very strained
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: relationship with China. You know, it arrested way wise Uh,
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: with the daughter of the way Wise founder. She was
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: a she was the CFO of Way Why and and
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: they've had a very strained relationship. And but but you know,
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: part of this agreement involves Chinese increased investment in and
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: in Canada, particularly around auto production. This is, by the way,
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: not good for American order companies who sell a lot
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: of cars in Canada and produce a lot of cars
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: in Canada. Uh. Chinese evs are high quality, very low cost,
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: and American makes nothing that really can compete with Chinese
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: evs right now, if you want evs, not it's not
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: clear that the Canadians want EV's, But if you want EV's,
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: there's nothing America produces that can compete with it. Uh.
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 1: So uh, you know, Canadian farmers will be able to
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: sell they can only seed. American farmer are still not
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: being able to sell any of the poke valleys to China.
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: Remember when Trump said He's got a deal and the
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: Chinese will buy a ton of Poke valleys, Not a
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: nothing's happened five months since that, and not a single
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: pok belly has moved from the United States to China.
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: It's just the Chinese. She is a master, just like Putin.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: Putin and she are just masters at manipulating Trump, manipulating Trump. Uh.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: Canada also said today that it would it would as
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: I said before, I think it would consider American taking
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: over Greenland as an attack on NATO and would right
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: to Greenland's defense or whatever that's worth. All right, all
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: right on the in the category of there's nutty Trump,
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: but then there's really nutty Trump. And by the way, right,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: none of this is indication of TDS. You're like the
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: Greenland thing, I'm not making anything up. All this is
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: just Trump on you know, on this board of peace.
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: I'm not making it up. This is just Trump. You
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: can have no TV, you know whatever. You can just
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: read the news straight with no intonation and no point
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: of view. And this is just what falls out on
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: him is stabbing in the back. The COODS doesn't quite
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: TDS to see that. I don't know what you think
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: about this one. So this is a post by Donald Trump.
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: When was this two days ago? Saturday? He says, the
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: Army Navy game. This is football, for those of you
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: who don't know, It's one of the greatest American traditions.
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: Unmatched patriotism, courage, and honor. This incredible tradition is now
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: at risk of being pushed aside by more college playoff
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: games and big TV. Not anymore all Caps. Under my administration,
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: the second Saturday in December belongs to Army Navy and
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: only Army Navy. I will soon sign a STARWIC executive
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: order securing an exclusive four hour broadcast window, so this
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: national event stands above commercial postseason games. Nor the game
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: or team can violate this time slot. On the field
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: their arrivals, but on the batter field, they are America's
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: unstoppable patriots, defending our country with tremendous strength and heart.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: We must protect the tradition and the players who protect us.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: Please let servers notice to all TV networks, stations and outlets.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: God bless America and God bless our great Army Navy game.
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: President Donald J. Trump, I mean, this is not set tire.
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 1: I didn't make this up. This is not a consequence
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: of whatever. This is just a post he made it. So.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: In other words, it's now in the United States going
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: to be illegal to play football. When the government says
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: it's playing football, you have to watch the great Patriotic
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: Government football game. It's now mandatory hmm. I mean yeah,
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: I mean, I mean this is a clear violation of
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: the First Amendment, a clear violation of the First Amendment,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: even just the threat of it, even if he never
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: implements it is a violation. I mean, if you'll profit them,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: if you'll profit them in any respect, and if you
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: value the First Amendment, you cannot defend us. And again,
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: you know, to all those people who think Trump is
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: the greatest president ever, how do you defend us? He's
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: basically telling TV stations what they're allowed to show and
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: what they're not allowed to show, all in the name
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: of nationalistic patriotic glory. It sounds like not mean so TDS.
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: It just sounds like, you know, nationalistic fascist bs. I
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: get to decide what football you can watch, only patriotic
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: games on this day, only the games I approve of
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: on this day. I mean, it's nuts, all right. Finally, Ice,
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: you know, the craziness in Minnesota continues. It is uh.
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: I want to remind everybody that Minnesota has very few
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: illegals in capaciton to other states around the country. Most
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: of the Somalis in Minnesota, and almost all the Samalis
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: committing fought in Minnesota are actually legally in Minnesota. You
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: might I like it, but they are, they're legal, So
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: whis I Ice there? It's just it's just it's just
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: you know Waltz, you know leftists, Somali fraud, you know
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: race blacks. It just demands let's go in. Then it
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: really is insane. Uh, you know, more videos come out,
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: more testimonies come out about the shooting. It's also now
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: clear that officer Jonathan Ross was not injured. If the
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: car scraped him, it barely touched him. He was clearly
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: not injured. He didn't go to the hospital as some
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: people claimed, and Ice indeed blocked the doctor from starting
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: CPR when she was still alive after the shooting. So
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: all of that, it just it just gets. The more
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: information gets released, the worse it is for and Yet,
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: and yet, while the FBI opened a probe a Minneapolis shooting, originally,
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: it doesn't exist now. The Justice Department is not investigating.
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: There's no investigation of this murder. They're not interested in
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: the truth. They don't care. These officers have full immunity.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: In other words, you can shoot a woman in her
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: car from almost point blank range because I don't know,
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: because you are a coward who feels threatened even though
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: you scooted away and got away, and you will suffer
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: no consequences, no consequences. The Trauma Degistration is pushing for
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: an investigation of Renee Goods, the victim's partner, but not
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: of the officer who shot him. There's no investigation planned,
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: even though the FBS thought it was shut down. Now.
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: Also with regard to Minnesota, I got an email from
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: a friend who lives in Wilma, or she actually lives.
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: Her and her husband live tite of Wilma, Minnesota. WIM
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: I told you last time. Wilma's basically what two and
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: a half hours due west of Minneapolis. Just drive straight.
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: I forget the name of the highway. Woman has a
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: population of about twenty thousand people. It's not a large
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: metro area. It's a small Rule Minnesota town. It has
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: some Somalise who have settled there and lived there. Some
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: percentage of the population is from Somali Somalia. Last week,
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: starting on Wednesday, ice showed up in Wilma in Wimar, Minnesota,
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: not just in Minneapolis, but in Warma on Monday. This
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: is on the sixteenth, Sorry, on the on the on
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: the twelfth, Monday to twelfth, from six to eight agents,
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: well out Monday afternoon there. So I'm reading from a
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: news story in the local you know, car eleven ka
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: r E eleven news right local news from six to
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: eight agents one Monday afternoon in downtown Wilma, arresting and
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: dragging a nineteen year old Somali woman to an unmarked vehicle.
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: You can find the video of this on on Instagram.
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: They give the link. The Somali woman is a nineteen
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: year old still in high school and it's here on
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: Form I ninety four. Her family did apply for green
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: Cord status, which they also got a paper in the
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: mail saying that they did the paperwork and they are
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: in the process. As of Tuesday morning, the ICE website
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: showed the woman as being booked into the agency system,
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: but the location has not yet been listed. The family
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: has not received a phone call. They don't know where
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: she is. The young woman's mother told uh told the
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: cultural liaison at the woman public schools that the federal
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: agents were following her daughter from a parking lot to
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: her home and then to drop her mom off at work.
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: They then followed her into downtown while she was picking
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: up food for her family. She did put the window
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: down just to ask them what they wanted, and then
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: the agent reached in and took her out of the car.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: Family and friends of the nineteen year old woman, who
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: was still in high school, state they were not They
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: do not even know that. They did not even know
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: she was arrested if not a bystander and not captured
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: the video of her arrest, So nothing from ice. God
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: forbid you let the you know. At the same time
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: or the same period, agents arrested a man doing shift
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: change at Jenny O'touki store processing plan in Wilmat Avenue, Southwest.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: According to witnesses interviewed, you know, it goes on well
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: in our Parents continue to keep their kids home from
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: school due to this week's ice activity in town. Walmart
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: School Superintendent doctor Bail Adams says and fourteen kids were
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: absent on Tuesday nine and forty five on Wednesday. A
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: Tuesday's anti ice protest in downtown Wilma, the Somali woman
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: said parents are afraid of ice. Adams sent a message
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: distinct parents Tuesday saying ICE agents can then cannot enter
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: district schools without to want and if they have one.
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: They won't be allowed to take anyone without parent being present.
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: Adam said they remain committed to keeping schools a safe
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: place as if ICE cares about what the school superintendent
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: thinks about any of this. Right, A number of businesses
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: are now closed in Wilma right because their workers have
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: been arrested. Generally, downtown Wilma is quiet. The businesses they
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: have no business because ICE is in the streets and
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: therefore nobody wants to be out there and be harassed
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: by them. Republican state representative the Dave Bakup said he
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: normally supports ICE's efforts as they look for criminals. He says,
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: I want all these folks gone, he means the criminals.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: Everyone supports that, but we can't get answers. We can't
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 1: get answer from anybody about why they're taking a high
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: school student. Baker said his community is on fire right now,
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: with people scared to bring their children to school or
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: go out and spend their money in business. About seventeen
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: percent of wilmart population is far on board, according to
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: the US Census Viewer. You know, he says, yeah, one
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: of the stories, which is just ridiculous. Four ICE agents
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: went an ate lunch at a family owned Mexican restaurant
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: in Wilmot. He says, here, yesterday's this is on Thursday.
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: This is on Thursday last week. They ate lunch, they paid,
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: they left, and then four hours later they came back
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: and arrested three members of the restaurant's staff. The restaurant
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: and closed. It's not open for business, so the aid lunch.
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: I wonder if they tipped. You know. This is from
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: again from this is from Walmart radio. The effects of
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: ice in the local area continue to be defelt. Two
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: popular Walmar restaurants were being closed. You know. The Star
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: Tribune says ice agents ate at the restaurant and then
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: went over and arrested the people who worked there. Well,
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 1: no states have to be made directly tying the closure
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: to the presence of ice. Many restaurants have closed in
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: Minnesota with the elevated ice operation. A group of students
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: walked out of class about fifteen minutes at Walmart High
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: School yesterday afternoon. Many health signs asking ice to get
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: out of town a Monday afternoon. That's a nineteen year
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: old was taken right. It continues this as having a
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: signific an impact on the town. So, Kathy, you send
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 1: me this is saying, this is having a significian impact
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: on Lawen and myself, law as her husband. Uh, you know,
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: the long time and very generous supporters of the Ironman Institute.
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: I visited Wilma because Lawen, you still a factory, a
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 1: business out there, a factory out there, and he invited
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: me to come and speak to his executives years ago.
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: I think I think I've been in Wimart twice. I mean,
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: these are amazing people. It's not exactly what you would consider,
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: you know, a highly liberal town, fairly conservative people out
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: there in Wrule Minnesota. And yet these people are pissed off. Uh,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: she says, we can hardly focus on anything else. I
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: wonder if ICE agents will be permanently stationed in Wilma.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 1: It's just, this is just one week of news articles
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: about ice rays and a normally quiet little town in rural,
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: rural Minnesota, USA. This is not just in metro areas.
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: It's not just in blue areas. It's not just it's
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 1: hurting people everywhere with no upside, no benefit, no no
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: value created, no nothing. You know, you've taken three I
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: don't know people who worked at a Mexican restaurant. Maybe
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: they hear illegally who kids, They're not crooks, They're not criminals.
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: By the way, illegally, you know, not having papers and
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: working in the United States is not a criminal act.
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: It's not criminal law. The disrupting lives of people, the
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: treating human beings human beings in the ugliest of fashion,
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: with real brutality. They have no respect for human life,
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: as we sail with the shooting, no respect for human life.
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: I mean, the arrogance and the police state tactics of
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 1: these goons is just pathetic. And I know every time
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: I say this, by the way, I lose a bunch
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: of subscribers. I mean, I think more than even when
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: I attacked Trump during the elections. In the last few
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 1: days I've lost I mean I lost NET about twenty
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 1: so people add but then Net on a particular day
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: I lost twenty subscriber. That's a lot, and that's purely
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: because of my comments on ICE. But I'm glad good riddance,
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: and I'm gonna keep saying it because if we don't
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 1: if we don't stand up to them, if we don't
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: talk about it, if we just acquiesce, then that tells
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 1: the people in power that they can get away with
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 1: it and things will only get worse, only get worse,
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: significantly worse. Now they're going after illegals next their goal,
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: after any one of us for anything. Remember it's not
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: a criminal act, so we all commit some misdemeanors. I mean,
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: the law is written in such a way that it's
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: hard not to write. All right, thank you, guys, and
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: thank you Kathy for sending me those eclips for Walmart.
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: And so let's turn now to a super chat. We're
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: way behind on our goals today, guys. We're well into
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: second hour, probably going to a third hour given the
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: number of questions we have, but to all like two
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: and five dollars questions. So if you want to ask
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: a question moving forward, I encourage you to do twenty
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 1: dollars or fifty dollars, one hundred dollars, you know, so
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: we can we can chip away at these goals and
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: get to some reasonable reasonable competition for the for the
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: for the show. Let me remind you of our sponsors
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: that ran Institute is upon woting their conference in Porto, Porto, Portugal, Portugal, Portugal,
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: beautiful place. Porto's a beautiful place. If you're in Europe,
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: coming over. Ryan A has cheap flights and the hotel
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: was staying at is not expensive and the probably cheap
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: hotels nearby. Uh So, come on over spend the weekend
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 1: with us. It's gonna be a lot of fun. These
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: conferences are always a lot of fun. You know, we're
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 1: gonna have a nice, a nice group of people there.
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: If you're under thirty four, you can apply for a scholarship,
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 1: so please consider coming and applying for a scholarship. You
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: can find out about registration and everything else. I will
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 1: be there for I will be speaking there, so it
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 1: would be great to hang out with you guys. So
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: to register and to find out about scholarships and everything else,
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 1: you can go to Iinran dot org Inran dot oak
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: slash start here, Iran dot oak slash start here. And
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: you guys who are in Israel who are listening to
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 1: the show, you should come too. There's always a good
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: is really contingency at these conferences. Now I know now
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 1: the Iron Instudent is doing Iron Ran conferences in Israel
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: every year. It's difficult to get you to come to Europe,
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: but Potto is such a cool city. You should come. Uh.
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: Michael Williams h Defenders Defenders of Capitalism dot com. Defenders
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 1: of Capitalism dot com. Michael's a friend, a colleague. We
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: work together on Defenders of Capitalism dot com. Check out
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: the website and yeah, great work for leadership program the
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: Rockies and really teaching capitalism the way it's supposed to
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: be taught. Right. Handershot Wealth dot com, slash ybs. Hendershot
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: Wealth dot com slash ybs. Hander Shot Wealth has products
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: Hendershot by the way, with Tutti's as products that help
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: with deferring or eliminating your capital gains tax liability. If
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 1: you have a huge payoff, big capital gains event coming up,
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: selling a business selling stock in the video that you
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: bought at zero and it's not worth a fortune, you
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: might want to check them out. Check him out Hendershot
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: Well dot com, slash ybs. Check out the video I
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: did with Robert Hendershot in my on my channel on
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: YouTube under the under the sponsors playlist and see if
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 1: you think this is a product that would be valuable
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 1: for you. And finally, Alex Epstein, the world authority on
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: all things energy, check out a substack. Alex Epstein dot
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: substack dot com. Alex Epstein dot substack dot com. Uh,
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: alex is uh is also now running a lobby organization
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: a lobbying for Freedom and energy lobbying Congress. Uh. Uh
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: for for really economic liberty, economic freedom, so incredibly valuable. Uh.
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 1: To read Alex to and to follow what he does.
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: Alex Epstein substack dot com. Okay, you should become a
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: monthly supporter of the Youron book show. Uh. You should.
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: You should just get on on On on a regular schedule.
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 1: You can do that on patreon dot com, Patreon dot com. Uh,
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: just put in your On Book show and become a
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: monthly supporter. I know many of you have. We are
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 1: I think, uh, two people one not two people short
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 1: of our monthly goals. So uh, we're doing well for
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 1: the month, but we we need more, you know. And
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 1: and uh, I've got ambitious goals for the show for
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: funding so we can take really takes on the marketing
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 1: efforts that we do here, uh to the next level.
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: We'll have more information later this week about the oconn
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: oconn god oh pa OPA study group, which I hope
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: to launch in February, So we will have more information
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 1: about that soon. I am planning an event in London
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 1: on February twenty eighth, I think it is. It's a Saturday,
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: so stay tuned for information about that. If you're in
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: the UK an event in London February twenty eight like
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: at one of these seminars, four hours, topic to be
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: determined and more information, more information coming to you. What else, Yeah,
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: go to Patreon, become a supporter, and don't forget right
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 1: here right now. If you're on YouTube, or if you're
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 1: not on YouTube, come to YouTube and contribute. You could
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: do so with a sticker two dollars all the way
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: to five hundred, or with a question two dollars all
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: the way to five hundred, although twenty dollars and above
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 1: appreciated right now because it's so late. And what else?
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: Did I want want to say? Uh? Yeah, all good,
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 1: All right, let's let's jump in with some of our questions. Yeah,
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: those of you who are watching later or listening by podcast,
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: support the show through Patreon, trade with me, value for value.
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 1: I want to say that, all right, Alex is not
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: close to Trump, and he's not close to Mega. He
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: is he is trying to influence the better elements within
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: the Republican Party to do better things than they would
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 1: do without him his influence. That's how I read it,
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: all right. Let me just thank the stick of people, John,
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 1: thank you, and Apollo, thank you, Apollo zeus? And who
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 1: else do we have? Who else? Who else? Who else? Yes?
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: I see Gail, thank you. And that might be it
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 1: for stickers. We're shortened stickers. Guys, jump in with stickers please,
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: all right? That that that is it? All right? So
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: coming over with your stickers and uh and questions and
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: everything else, and let's get let's get the numbers up.
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: Let's let's uh, let's uh, you know, make this number
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: reflect the value that you get from the show. All right.
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: I think it's all twenty dollars, So let's jump in
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 1: with the twenty dollars. Questions. Is the Trumpet? This is Liam?
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 1: Is the Trumpet? Administration starting to get worried the population
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: is turning against them? Or they such delusional megalomaniacs. They're
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: even more confident and bold with their random acts of fascism.
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: I think they all worried the population is stunning against them,
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: although I think people like Miller don't really care, and
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: they are bold. Somebody gave the example of you know
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: when Hobbs, when when Rovers's weight was overturned and the
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 1: American population was against Republicans and they took a beating
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: in the next election. Right, but any of the pro
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: life Republicans regret all the fighting that led to the
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: reversal of Rovers's weight. No, they don't. They'll take the
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 1: electoral loss because they got it. If I mean Miller's perspective,
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: I think is if we can, if we can kick
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 1: out all the legal immigrants and some legal ones that
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: we don't like, and if we can take Alaska, you
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: know Alaska, could we take Greenland, and we can you know,
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: whip into shape the world or however they think, or
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: have tariffs or whatever, even if we lose an election
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: and still be worth it because long term these things
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 1: will survive and reshape America. I think he's wrong. But
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: they're doing it in spite of the fact that it's unpopular.
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: I mean, poll aft to poll left to poll show
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: it's unpopular, and yet they're doubling up on it because
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 1: they don't know how to admit failure and walk it back,
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 1: walk it back objective. AI, thank you for the support.
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: I appreciate that Wyatt, What did Ran mean by quote
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: You're letting this greatest of countries be devoured by any
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: scum from any corner of the earth. Well, you concede
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: that it is selfish to live for your country, and
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: your moral duty is to what Where is this quote?
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: Can you? Can you give me a citation? Give me
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: a citation of where this is? Right Wyatt? Wherever you are.
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: And by the way, I you know, given that Imand
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: would consider h a scum. She would concern anybody with
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 1: bad ideas, no matter where they came from, including or
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: maybe Pinmelli from Europe. But I'm interested in where that
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 1: quote actually comes from. Val And by the way, it's
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: you know she is uh yeah, val finished E is UF.
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure what he is in UF means inspiring,
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: loved was was his childhood memory of his dad, a creator,
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: someone crafting good. Shocked by the antitrust laws Microsoft first,
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: but then use them on Google. Great les lessons, inequality
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: ain't poverty? What is e of U is uf? Where
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: is he is he? Here? Is Vale here? To tell
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: me which book he's referring to? It sounds like a book?
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 1: Or am I just flaking because it's obvious. What it
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: is the book? Which book? Equal is unfair? Oh? My book,
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: Equal is unfair. I'm glad you enjoyed it. It's a
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: good book. It's a good book. And I'm hoping anti
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 1: just laws are as bad as written in the book.
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: They're actually worse. I've learned even more about anti just
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: since then, and they're even they're even worse. So yeah,
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: I'm glad. I'm glad you liked it. Everybody should read it.
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 1: I hope everybody reads it. All right, let's see, Okay,
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 1: twenty Australia dollars, we'll take that. In regard to the
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 1: toppling of authoritarian regimes, would it be correct to say
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 1: sovereignty is not determined by borders. It is determined by
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: the degree to which individual rights are protected within those borders. Yes, absolutely, absolutely,
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: I think that's right. I'd like the but why it
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: says it's from Atlas Shrugged. I'd like the passage. I
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: want to get the full context of what she's saying
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 1: so I could comment on it. I don't remember that
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: that line. And by the way, you know what I
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 1: think is going on because in Atlas Shrugged there's no immigration,
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 1: so she's not talking about immigration. What is happening in
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 1: Atlas Shrugged is the United States is funding the rest
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 1: of the world. Right, the United States is being devoured
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 1: by the scum from any corner of the earth because
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: it's sending money to every corner of the earth. This
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: is the money that Ragnar is stealing. Right. So what
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: she's meaning here is not immigration. Iron Land was very
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 1: pro immigration. And while you can see that it's selfish
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: to live for your country, yes you can see that,
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: but they think that selfishness is bad and you're and
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: they therefore they meet. They believe them all duty is
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 1: to live for the globe, and therefore they are subsidizing
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: the globe. They're funding the globe. Well, just like today,
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: to some extent, our far and aid is not quite
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 1: as robust as it is in Atlas Shrugged, and we're
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: not as poor as we are in Atlas Shrugged. But yeah,
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: a far and aid should be zero. It should it
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: should be focused on those countries that provide us with
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: a clear a clear uh value. It should be only value.
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 1: But the reality is that we spend what fifty billion
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: dollars on fearn aid, maybe it's most sixty billion dollars
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: in foreign eight. Even if you got that sixty billion,
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: that's nothing. The real problem in America today is not
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: that we are sending money overseas. The real problem of
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: America today is that we're taxing young people and they're
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: giving them money to rich people, to old people who
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: often are rich. The biggest scam in the world right
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 1: now is the fact that the United States has a
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: massive redistribution program from young to old. That's what bankrupt
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: in the country. The global policy is not bankrupt in
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: the country. And indeed, the United States global policy has
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 1: not been fundamentally altruistic in other than in the sense
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 1: that of not defeating its enemies. She didn't want us
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: in a global alliance with other people's states. How do
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: you know that? How do you know that if you've
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: got a quote from mind Rand which she says we
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: shouldn't be in a global alliance with other people's states.
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: She supported the United States defending its interest and if
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: that meant being an alliance with other countries, then that
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: served our interests. She believed in the United States defeating
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: our enemies. She believed in crushing you on. She believed
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: in crushing on She called them the People's States, and
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: Ala shrug atlastruct is I hate to break it to
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 1: you fiction fiction. It was not a description of the
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: United States as it was. It was a exscription of
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 1: the United States as it would become as it got worse.
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: But Ala Shrugg is not. She's not when she's talking
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: about the People's States. She's not talking about Europe of
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: the time she's talking about Europe of Atla Shrug time.
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: I mean, if this is to suggest somehow that Ironman
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 1: would support Donald Trump's phone policy, You're nuts. You're nuts.
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 1: Would never support Donald Trump's uh covering favor with Putin,
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: She would never support his brown nosing. She he she
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 1: wouldn't support you know, annexing Greenland. You have today is
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 1: far from the People's state that is described in Atlas Shrugged.
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: I mean, again, you're making stuff up. You don't know
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 1: what you're talking about. And uh, you know, Iran explicitly
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: said she supported Israel, so and she also said she
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 1: supported attacking you on so I don't think she would
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 1: advocate for a anti alliance. Uh you know, uh uh
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 1: you know, do what Trump is doing, bullying bullying countries
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 1: around the world for what exactly now I've in the
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 1: past said I'm all in favor of leaving NATO. And
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: you know, you could imagine leaving NATO. You do it properly.
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 1: You don't do it through confrontation over Greenland. You do
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: it by leaving NATO. You set a plan out five
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 1: ten years out and you say we're gonna move troops
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 1: out of Europe and Europe take over responsibility for defending yourselves,
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 1: and we're gonna leave NATO. And I think Iinman would
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: be in favor of that. I'm certainly in favor of that.
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: And at the same time you would say we're against Russia.
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: You know, we'll help you with arms to fight the Russians.
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: We just don't think you need NATO anymore because you
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 1: can do it yourself. Not Trump, nothing close to Trump, Jamie.
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 1: A lot of conservatives here unhappy with China deal due
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 1: to interference in elections, bounties placed on Canadian heads see
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: police in our soil, kidnap citizens. Is this alliance good
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 1: for Canadian perspective? Well, I mean it depends what the
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 1: alliance involved. I think trade is good for the Canadian perspective.
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 1: I think low tariffs with China is good from the
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 1: Canadian perspective, I think it's more than that. It's bad,
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: but Canada is facing lots of bad alternatives created by Trump.
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 1: Trump is the source of that. Trump is the source
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: of that. So you know, Trump is the one who
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: has again stabbed an ally in the back. That's his
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 1: m that's his motus of purandi. It's to stab allies
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 1: in the back. He stabbed Canada in the back. You know,
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 1: there's no reason Canada shouldn't trade with China, and lowering
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: tariffs is what Canada should do generally, and having better
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 1: trade relations with China is a good thing. So yeah,
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 1: if it's more than that, if it's giving them any
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 1: kind of concessions, given all these other things that you mentioned,
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: that's bad. But trade is a good thing Canada. I mean,
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 1: in my view, you should just go unilaterally zero tariffs.
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 1: Chaws Bud. I suspect that even if loved even if
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 1: loved Ice, I wouldn't love them for very long if
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: they robbed me of my enchiladas. That's probably why the
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 1: agents didn't arrest anyone during lunchtime. Probably the enchiladas came first.
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: I think that's absolutely right. No, Trump is completely wrong
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: in Greenland. The United States saysn't need Greenland. There's zero
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: reason for the United States to do Greenland. It's just
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: it's all got to do wrapped up with Trump's ego.
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with national security. Trump is
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 1: wrong on this. While you know, he was right about
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 1: European's not paying enough into to NATO. He was right
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: in pressuring them to do that to increase their payments
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 1: in NATO, although they were ready doing it because of
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. You know, Russian war with Ukraine that started
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen. But no, Trump is wrong on the way.
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 1: He's approaching it, wrong in his desires. He is just
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: a whim worshiping thug. There's nothing more than that. There's
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 1: no strategy here, there's no strategic necessity here. Cst whatever
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 1: high doctor book. I'm dealing with a very painful breakup
• 1:46:38
  Speaker 1: that involved betrayal and deception from someone I thought I loved.
• 1:46:42
  Speaker 1: Now it's time to work on myself, and Yuan's rules
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 1: for life will suddenly help. Thanks for all that you do.
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: I am sorry that you're having to deal with a breakup.
• 1:46:52
  Speaker 1: It's sad, But if it really did involve betrayal and deception.
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 1: It had to be done, and you have to move on,
• 1:47:00
  Speaker 1: and and it wasn't good for you even if they
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 1: even if you love them. So you've got to get
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 1: over it, working yourself. I hope Rules for Life helps,
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: you know, check out check out virtual selfishness. And yeah,
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 1: good luck, good luck getting over it. It's not easy,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: not easy. Ce V Milkins says, twenty fifth Amendment. Now, yes,
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: I mean if the Republicans had balls, which they don't,
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 1: so it won't happen, they would, they would put pressure
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: on the cabinet to enforce the twenty fifth Amendment and
• 1:47:33
  Speaker 1: rule Donald Trump incapacitated, not not in a mental position
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 1: to be able to govern. I think I think he's
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: just as bad in a sense in terms of mental state,
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 1: as as Biden was worse than a sense because because
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 1: you know, he still projects competence even though he's completely
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: completely not there in a sense of he's completely emotional.
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 1: But nobody will do it. And this cabinet, as I
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: told you before the election, this cabinet is just a
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 1: bunch of yes men. There's no talent on the cabinet,
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 1: and there's no and there's no there's no courage, there's no,
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: And there's no commitment to the United States of America.
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 1: The commitment is to Trump. There's no there's no loyalty
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 1: to America, and there's no loyalty to the Constitution. Nobody
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 1: cares about the Constitution. And if ICE needs to be
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 1: filmed and it's a public service, should more objectivists be
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: filming or is objectivesm more about ideas for others to
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: put into action. No. I mean, if there's ice in
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 1: your neighborhood, you should go out and film them. I
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 1: think filming ice is important. I think it's a it's
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 1: an incredible value. But I don't think you should drive
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: to Minnesota in order to do it. There's enough people
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 1: already doing it in Minnesota. But if they're in your neighborhood,
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 1: do it. But there's no objectivists, it's too small of
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: group at this point to have a major impact on
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 1: something like that. But to the extent that this is
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 1: an issue with that pisses you off, that upsets you,
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: and that you want to get engaged and you want
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 1: to get active, yeah, go go. You know, if ICE
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: is in your city, go to where they are and
• 1:49:13
  Speaker 1: film them. Be careful, you know, you know, don't don't
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 1: put yourself in physical danger, but do what you can
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 1: to document what they are doing. Clark, my trouble with
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 1: Trump isn't that he's Hitler. My problem with Trump is
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 1: that he's not Hitler. Yes, that's nick foyintis. There's a
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: quote from Nick foyintis. Trump is not Hitler enough. Trump
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: is not fascist enough. Trump is not allowing ice to
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: be brutal enough. That's nick foyints. Nick foyinters want Trump
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: to be more like Hitler. That's a direct quote, by
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 1: the way, direct quote. So for those of you who
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: think Nick Foyintis is not that bad, that's about as
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: bad as it gets. Clark. Where anti semitism is to
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 1: control society as a death wish, Yeah, and certainly parts
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 1: of the right right now have that. I guess. There
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 1: was a number of influencers last over the weekend, nick
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: Foyd's being one of them, with a bunch of other
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 1: other people, including what's the name the brothers from Romania
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 1: UH went to a nightclub with this nightclub explosively advertising
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: that they were playing they were going to play Kadio
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: West's anti semitic song about Hitler UH and rap song
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 1: about Hitler and so all these anti Semitic influencers went
• 1:50:38
  Speaker 1: to the nightclub and partied to West's anti semitic song,
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 1: as if eventually tomorrow same quote is set to release
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 1: more decisions, maybe on teriffs. Do you think the public
• 1:50:56
  Speaker 1: reaction has played a part in the delay or is
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: the calle really this divided? I don't know. I just
• 1:51:01
  Speaker 1: don't know what has caused the delay over the Tavis issue.
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 1: It could be trying to build a larger majority. It
• 1:51:09
  Speaker 1: could be getting the decisions, writing the decisions to such
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 1: a way as to garden more support, because if they're
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 1: going to tell Donald Trump that he's done something that's unconstitutional,
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 1: I think the majority wants to be as large as possible,
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: and I wouldn't be surprised if, given you know the
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 1: nature of you know, Chief Justice, he is trying to
• 1:51:36
  Speaker 1: build as big of a coalition as many people to
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 1: support the decision as possible. And I think that's probably
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: the nature of the debate. But I think we'll know
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 1: a lot more about that when the decision is released.
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 1: Everything else is speculation at this point. James, what happens
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: when true masculinity is demonized? It is replaced with these
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 1: sorry uses for alpha males like Trump and Tate, which
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: miss used to stosterone. Yes, I think that's right. Of course,
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 1: the whole idea of what true masculinity is is a
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: question which needs to be thought about and really considered.
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: It's it's it's not a click out and obvious what masculinity,
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: What true masculinity is. I also think it's a concept
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 1: that needs rethinking in the modern world. True masculinity today
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: is not the same as true masculinity in the Bronze Age,
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 1: and it needs to be It needs to be thought
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 1: about what it actually means and what it relates to.
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: But yes, when men broadly are demonized, then uh, and
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 1: and and when men are viewed as toxic by the
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 1: very nature, then people like Taits and Trump rise up
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 1: to kind of fill in a void that's created sadly,
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 1: and and particularly when there's nobody out there advocating for
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: proper masculinity, a healthy masculinity. Okay, James, having Jason Ryans
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 1: on to hear his takedown an assessment of Trump so
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 1: far would be beautiful. Did he ever get back to you? Yeah,
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: I mean he's gonna be on. It's just it's just
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 1: an issue of when you know. So there's just a
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 1: there's a schedule, I think Greg. We've got Greg coming up.
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 1: Greg Selma is coming up. You can ask him about Trump.
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 1: He'll give you here's assessment of Trump. We've got terror
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: Smith scheduled. We've got a couple of other people schedule.
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 1: So the schedules are Indeed, we got Agustina coming up,
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: So we're going to get a big update from Augustina
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: about me Lay. She's been to Argentina. She's really following
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 1: me Lay closely. She was there during the parliamentary elections,
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 1: so we talk about me Lay well. Also were talking
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 1: about immigration. She's an immigration expert. So yeah, we've got
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 1: a bunch of people to talk to in the weeks
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 1: to come. Next week I think is Greg. No, No,
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 1: next week is not Greg. Who's next week on? Let
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: me see who's next week? Oh, next week has been Bear.
• 1:54:21
  Speaker 1: Next week has been Bear, and then I'm gone the
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: following Monday, and then the week after that is Greg.
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 1: And then two weeks after this Tara. And I'm not
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 1: sure when we have Augustina, but I know we have Augustina.
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 1: I guess we're still negotiating with Augustina. The date and
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: Jason's in the pipeline. Liam was Hitler much more popular
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 1: than Trump in his early years of power? Well, I
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 1: think so, but it's hard to tell because I don't
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: think there were any polls in those days. I don't
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: know how reliable the polls. Well, I don't know, but
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: I think he was, but I'm not for sure. Man,
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: But when Hitler became for me, he didn't have he
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 1: didn't have majority, he didn't win a majority, So it's
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 1: hard to tell. Did you see the Finnish action film
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: she Sue wrote to Revenge? It showed Russians as bad
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 1: guys went to Finns in World War Two? Sort of
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 1: on the German side. No, Finland was invaded by Russia
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 1: and it fought a war against Russia against the Soviet
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 1: Union during the war, so they would only be considered
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 1: on Germany side because they were fighting against Russia and
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: Russia was fighting against Germany. But I don't think they
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 1: were in Germany side. I think they were just fighting
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: Russia because Russia had invaded them. How about Campbell, How
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 1: do Republicans think they're going to keep the Hispanic vote
• 1:55:50
  Speaker 1: after what they unleashed on that community. I just don't
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: see how Maga is sustainable. Who knows? Why did people
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: even vote for him? He told them this is what
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: he would do. He said it he was gonna deport
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: millions of people he and yet people voted for him.
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 1: So I don't know if these things how many minds
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 1: this actually changes? Happa Campbell, the ice thugs who killed
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 1: that woman received over a million dollars on GoFundMe. This
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: is the inverted clown world we live in. It really
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: is hubbable and demodelizing, demodelizing. Not you have a job
• 1:56:29
  Speaker 1: with him? Could you do a show reacting to gooble speeches? No?
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 1: Why would I do that? Comparing his rhetoric to the
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: rhetoric we're hearing today from Steven Miller and other trumpgoons. God,
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: I mean that would be that would be hard. I
• 1:56:44
  Speaker 1: mean I could I could go read them. I couldn't
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: listen to them. I could go the German anyway, but
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 1: I could read them and see see if I wanted
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 1: to do that. I mean, somebody paid me a thousand
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: dollars like a show sponsorship. Maybe I do it, but
• 1:56:59
  Speaker 1: just like that for I don't know, real spuck, did
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 1: you do much marching and the IDF. Does it help? No,
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 1: and no, I don't know what it helps. And no,
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 1: we didn't do much marching. Marching is you know, authoritarian
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 1: regimes do a lot of marching because it's important, the
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: little details important. Our uniforms were crap. We were pretty disheveled.
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: And you know, the Israeli army is quite informal as
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 1: compared to a lot of other armies, and partially what
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 1: makes it good and marching is very formal. Canadian news
• 1:57:40
  Speaker 1: Mark Connie makes a deal with Kutau. Yeah, I mean,
• 1:57:44
  Speaker 1: sadly everybody's made making deals with Katza because they're willing
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 1: to hand out lots of lots of money. That's pretty disgusting,
• 1:57:52
  Speaker 1: but it's not surprising. I mean, Trump is their best friends.
• 1:57:55
  Speaker 1: So why wouldn't the Canadians get in on the act? Okay,
• 1:58:02
  Speaker 1: Steve O how Ron, what do you think of sovereign immunity?
• 1:58:05
  Speaker 1: Is there a good objective reason to declare government immune
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 1: from all lawsuits? No? You know, as long as we
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 1: have a rational legal system where you can only suit
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: people for something that deserves suit, gross negligence or something
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 1: that exeed, you know that is clearly bad. Right. Problem
• 1:58:30
  Speaker 1: is we live in a very litigious society, where the
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 1: courts allow lawsuits that shouldn't be allowed for things that
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 1: shouldn't be You shouldn't be allowed to sue over But no,
• 1:58:41
  Speaker 1: I don't believe in solveign immunity and and releasing government
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 1: from all again. I would like to see our liability
• 1:58:52
  Speaker 1: system reformed so that rationality is brought back into lawsuits
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 1: over liability issues. Steve, Wo, do you know all the
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 1: names of all the different types of syllogisms? No, I
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 1: don't not at all. STEVEO, to whom must one provide
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 1: a holiday and birthday gifts should run by a gift
• 1:59:18
  Speaker 1: for his boss? Oh, I don't know. I mean it
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: depends on your relationship. Generally, I'd say probably not. But
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 1: please don't buy me a gift if I'm your boss
• 1:59:31
  Speaker 1: and I never expected wanted gifts from my employees. I
• 1:59:36
  Speaker 1: mean gifts. Gifts should be genuine, so family members, close
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: family members and friends and even then, I mean, I
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 1: think at a certain age, at a sort of level
• 1:59:49
  Speaker 1: of wealth, you should agree not to give gifts. So
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 1: we with our friends basically made the agreement no gifts
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 1: on Christmas, no gifts on on both days. It's just
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: too difficult to figure a gift a good gift out.
• 2:00:05
  Speaker 1: And you know, most of these people have what they want.
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 1: It's not like they're going to get something they really
• 2:00:11
  Speaker 1: need for me that they don't have. So I'm not
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 1: big on gift giving. I mean, I think it's nice
• 2:00:18
  Speaker 1: and it's great and with kids and family and yeah,
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 1: all that's amazing, But at a certain age it just
• 2:00:25
  Speaker 1: becomes irrelevant. But I certainly don't think you should buy
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 1: a gift for your boss. I mean, again, less expect it.
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 1: Maybe some bosses expect it, ask other employees. Don't do
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 1: it unless it's expected. Steve, Or do you have a
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 1: judge other than the Supreme Court who you know about
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 1: and would recommend reading. I'm sure there's someone who thinks differently. Yeah,
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 1: I just don't remember names. I mean, there's a Supreme
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 1: Court judge in the state of Arizona, Arizona Supreme Court
• 2:00:55
  Speaker 1: judge who used to be at the Institute for just
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 1: this and then was at the Goldwater Institute and then
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 1: became a Supreme Court judge in the state of Arizona,
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 1: who is influenced by objectivism and is a really interesting guy.
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 1: I haven't read his opinions, but they strike me as
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 1: as they would be good. There's some judges in the
• 2:01:22
  Speaker 1: Court of Appeals that has Texas as part of it
• 2:01:25
  Speaker 1: that are good at economic issues, property right issues, terrible
• 2:01:28
  Speaker 1: on social issues, good at economic issues. But no, I
• 2:01:31
  Speaker 1: don't really follow individual judges. Real Spock is Russia Ukraine
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: invasions similar to you rock quait, Yes, except that you
• 2:01:42
  Speaker 1: rock quait. I wuk took over Quit in a day
• 2:01:45
  Speaker 1: or something. There was no real fighting and just held it.
• 2:01:49
  Speaker 1: And it's much smaller and it didn't resist, and it
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 1: was on explicity for the oil. But in a sense
• 2:01:58
  Speaker 1: it's the same kind of territorial expansion and aggression. Yep.
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 1: And oh here's another difference. Quait was you know, a
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 1: kingdom or shik them or whatever, an authoritarian regime. Ukraine
• 2:02:15
  Speaker 1: was a free country. So Russia invading Ukraine as much
• 2:02:19
  Speaker 1: worse because it's invading a free country. Cook says man.
• 2:02:25
  Speaker 1: This is both manding and demoralizing. Yep, it really really is.
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 1: Jamie from Canada. Mehdi Hassan says that what's happening to
• 2:02:34
  Speaker 1: Iranian people is terrible, but the US and Israel should
• 2:02:37
  Speaker 1: stay out of it. Why does he say this, shouldn't
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 1: they act to save lives? I don't know why he
• 2:02:42
  Speaker 1: says that, and I don't agree with him. I think
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: the US and Isola should do what they can to
• 2:02:46
  Speaker 1: help the Iranian people from the air without putting troops
• 2:02:49
  Speaker 1: on the ground Israel with massade agents on the ground.
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 1: But I don't see any reason why Iran shouldn't get
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 1: some external help. Marius Trump talked about suspending midterms twice. Now, yeah,
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 1: I know, I know we talked about they shouldn't be elections,
• 2:03:09
  Speaker 1: but I still think that's his talk. But who knows
• 2:03:13
  Speaker 1: what Trump and if they do happen, does he overturn them?
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 1: So do they counted out? Gabriel discovered you V Peterson Academy. Wow,
• 2:03:24
  Speaker 1: thought you were finance guy, but your work taught me
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 1: way more after congrats on MVP of the Year. More
• 2:03:32
  Speaker 1: classes and PA, well, I think you if you're on PA,
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: you know I've got five courses on PA, so not
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: just finance, and I've got five capitalism, Finance, Trade, corporation,
• 2:03:45
  Speaker 1: and money. Those five courses. You know, they haven't asked
• 2:03:51
  Speaker 1: me to do more courses yet. They claim they will,
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 1: but they haven't yet. I have nothing scheduled if you
• 2:03:59
  Speaker 1: you know right, I mean well, or send them attack
• 2:04:01
  Speaker 1: saying hey, Ran was great. Please having on some more
• 2:04:05
  Speaker 1: that would be fantastic. Anything to help me get on
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 1: would be great. But thank you Gabriel and wow, I'm
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 1: excited by the fact that some people have discovered me
• 2:04:15
  Speaker 1: Y Peterson Academy and are coming over to the show
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: and and and getting more. That's great, Marias, Why does
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: no one sue Ice Violin du posters? They are sering?
• 2:04:29
  Speaker 1: There are lawsuits already is one by ij there are others.
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 1: There will be a whole bunch of lawsuits. Just takes
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 1: time before they make the courts and make the news.
• 2:04:39
  Speaker 1: But there are lawsuits out there. Jason says, I missed
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 1: the start. Why do you think the EU is not
• 2:04:45
  Speaker 1: demanding a shared greenland enclaves for the natives? Then zero
• 2:04:49
  Speaker 1: tells to the EU and a lib overformed immigration policy
• 2:04:53
  Speaker 1: between the US and EU. I don't know. I mean,
• 2:04:57
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure that's even on the table. They just
• 2:04:59
  Speaker 1: don't Why should why should they cut a deal with
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 1: Trump at all? Why didn't they just say greenlands are
• 2:05:04
  Speaker 1: Greenland belongs to Denmark? But out I'm not sure what
• 2:05:07
  Speaker 1: immigration has to do with it, or any of these
• 2:05:09
  Speaker 1: other things have to do with it. They don't believe
• 2:05:12
  Speaker 1: in zero tabs, and I don't think they want reformed.
• 2:05:18
  Speaker 1: They don't want an open immigration system, they don't want
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 1: to give up. They don't want to be bullied. I
• 2:05:24
  Speaker 1: think it's the bottom line. I think if Trumpet approaches differently,
• 2:05:27
  Speaker 1: maybe you could have cut a deal. But I don't
• 2:05:29
  Speaker 1: think Europe wants to be bullied, and I don't think
• 2:05:31
  Speaker 1: they should be bullied. Jamie from Canada Appeal Courting Canada
• 2:05:36
  Speaker 1: calls use of Emergency Act wrong. What should Trudeau's punishment be?
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 1: Anything you didn't like about Trucker's protests? Was it a
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 1: kada poker on roads? What was your overall take? I
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: didn't like the fact that they parked in roads and
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 1: they honked all night and kept people awake, and they
• 2:05:54
  Speaker 1: shut off I think big chunks of Toronto, if I'm
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: remember right. I wasn't a support of that. I understand
• 2:06:02
  Speaker 1: their frustration, I understand what they were trying to do.
• 2:06:05
  Speaker 1: I side with what they were demanding. I'm just not
• 2:06:09
  Speaker 1: a big fan of that technique. I'm glad that Pe'll
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 1: call the pell quote said the Emergency Act was wrong.
• 2:06:19
  Speaker 1: I don't know. You don't really punish Trudeau. What you
• 2:06:22
  Speaker 1: do is you reverse all the damage that was done
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 1: and maybe these people there'serve penalties, that the government pay
• 2:06:29
  Speaker 1: a penalty to the people involved. Jamie says, asked, Alex
• 2:06:37
  Speaker 1: if you prefer Biden Trump said Trump due to energy policies,
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: do you agree? I mean, I don't because you know,
• 2:06:43
  Speaker 1: I agree Visa v Energy, but I have to take
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 1: a broader perspective, and from a boarder perspective, that's not enough.
• 2:06:51
  Speaker 1: I mean, Trump is doing so much damage to America,
• 2:06:55
  Speaker 1: so much damage to America's constitutional order, to the psyche
• 2:06:59
  Speaker 1: of America, to America standing in the world, to national security,
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 1: to its allies, that I don't know if energy is
• 2:07:08
  Speaker 1: enough to trump all that. Jeffrey Miller, I am of
• 2:07:14
  Speaker 1: seven thirty as of seven thirty Eastern Si'm a Patreon member.
• 2:07:17
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Jeffrey. I appreciate that. Thank you. Coming to
• 2:07:23
  Speaker 1: New York in June, I think first week in June,
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 1: so let's do something together. My wife and I will
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 1: be there, so let's plan on something. Jamie, when is
• 2:07:35
  Speaker 1: it too late to abord I'm pro choice, but a
• 2:07:38
  Speaker 1: cump of self seems awfully different from a fully formed baby.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: There's just a week or two from both, you know,
• 2:07:45
  Speaker 1: it depends what you mean, too late to abord. The
• 2:07:48
  Speaker 1: fact is that no doctor will abort a fetus a
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: week or two before both unless there's something very wrong
• 2:07:57
  Speaker 1: with it or this other crazy condition that's happening. It
• 2:08:05
  Speaker 1: just doesn't happen, you know. So Again, ninety three percent
• 2:08:08
  Speaker 1: of all abortions happened in the first twenty one weeks,
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 1: and almost none happened in the first in the last month,
• 2:08:16
  Speaker 1: so it's a very rare thing, and it only happens
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 1: when there's something very wrong with the baby. So it's
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 1: okay to aboard until until birth. But it just doesn't
• 2:08:28
  Speaker 1: happen because doctors won't do it. It's not healthy, it's
• 2:08:31
  Speaker 1: not good for the mother, and it's and and they
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 1: don't like doing it, and there's no reason to do
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: it if the mother has carried it to that point.
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 1: There's zero reason rational reason to aboord at that point
• 2:08:47
  Speaker 1: unless unless something's wrong with it. All right, I'm gonna
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 1: take this from the chat because this is good. The
• 2:09:00
  Speaker 1: real Elvish rope says, hey, you on, would you ever
• 2:09:03
  Speaker 1: come to Canada and do a TX seminon objectives and capitalism. Yes,
• 2:09:07
  Speaker 1: I mean if you can, if you can round up
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 1: the money for me to come and do it, then absolutely.
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 1: So if we can get a group together that will
• 2:09:17
  Speaker 1: do it, and uh there's enough money to pay me,
• 2:09:21
  Speaker 1: then I will come. So I mean bottom line is,
• 2:09:25
  Speaker 1: if if you can do that, email me you on,
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 1: you on at your run brookshow dot com. You're on
• 2:09:33
  Speaker 1: at your run brookshow dot com. Just send me an
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: email and we'll coordinate it. But you know, there has
• 2:09:38
  Speaker 1: to be the the and I'll tell you how much
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 1: I need depending on what exactly you want. But yeah,
• 2:09:42
  Speaker 1: absolutely'd love to do it. Uh more, Jamie from Canada.
• 2:09:48
  Speaker 1: Are soft covers hard covers of your books identical? Sometimes
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 1: authors include extra in the latter identical, no difference between them. Jonathan,
• 2:10:00
  Speaker 1: should DEM's impeach Pam Bundy for violining epstock file with
• 2:10:04
  Speaker 1: ease law if they win the midterms forcing Senate Republicans
• 2:10:07
  Speaker 1: to vote on the issue. Yes, but they should also
• 2:10:09
  Speaker 1: impeach Trump. They should impeach. Uh you know, well, I
• 2:10:16
  Speaker 1: guess if they do Bondy, I don't know if they
• 2:10:19
  Speaker 1: can do home And you know they should impeach. Yeah, absolutely,
• 2:10:23
  Speaker 1: and not just depsign File. They should impeach them over Ice, oh,
• 2:10:27
  Speaker 1: homeland security. They shouldn't peach Nome, they should impeach Gnome
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 1: and Bondy and Trump. Yes. Absolutely, There's plenty of reasons
• 2:10:36
  Speaker 1: to do all of them. Jonathan says, seems Destiny was
• 2:10:41
  Speaker 1: vindicated over the allegations. There seemed to be always new
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 1: allegations around Destiny. I don't know, and I don't have
• 2:10:47
  Speaker 1: the time to look into it. G get free. Thank
• 2:10:50
  Speaker 1: you for the sticker I think I caught all the
• 2:10:54
  Speaker 1: other stickers before. Okay, last question, Je Jamie from Canada.
• 2:10:57
  Speaker 1: Canada has no term limits for PM. Why does you?
• 2:11:01
  Speaker 1: Why does US? Should they not or should Canada have
• 2:11:04
  Speaker 1: a limit? I think because it's very different systems. I
• 2:11:07
  Speaker 1: think the executive in the US has more power than
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 1: a PM. A PM has has checks and balances in
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 1: a sense within this political party and and usually there's
• 2:11:20
  Speaker 1: coalitions in parliamentary systems. In the US is a presidential system.
• 2:11:26
  Speaker 1: They basically did it because FDR won four elections and
• 2:11:30
  Speaker 1: everybody thought that was ridiculous and it was becoming imperial.
• 2:11:35
  Speaker 1: There was an understanding of only doing two because George
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 1: Washington left after two, but it became a constitution in
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 1: the Constitution after FDR one four, and that seemed to
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 1: be too much and too much power. It was an
• 2:11:50
  Speaker 1: effort to reduce the power of the president, and I
• 2:11:53
  Speaker 1: think it's a good idea. I think it's a good idea.
• 2:11:57
  Speaker 1: All right, guys, thank you. I appreciate to support. Thanks
• 2:12:00
  Speaker 1: for all the super chat is. I will see you
• 2:12:02
  Speaker 1: guys tomorrow for another news show and have a great,
• 2:12:07
  Speaker 1: great rest of your week. Bye, everybody.