Latest / Unleashing Intuition Secrets / Lewis Herms & Michael Jaco: California Is Under Siege — Time to Take It Back

Transcript

Lewis Herms & Michael Jaco: California Is Under Siege — Time to Take It Back · Unleashing Intuition Secrets

• 0:01
  Hello, everyone.
• 0:02
  It's Michael Jaco with Unleashing Intuition Secrets.
• 0:05
  We're coming up on the January sec- or June 2nd primary in California.
• 0:11
  Now we've seen President Trump, all the people that he's been
• 0:14
  promoting to basically take down the RINOs, have been advancing.
• 0:19
  We see some horrific Democrat candidates that are being put
• 0:24
  up, the worst I've ever seen.
• 0:27
  I think we're gonna have… I don't think I know we're gonna have a massive
• 0:30
  red tsunami coming up in the midterms.
• 0:33
  Now part of that, we're going to be looking at the January 2nd primary…
• 0:39
  Why do I keep saying January?
• 0:40
  June 2nd primary in California.
• 0:44
  So that's gonna be very revelatory as to what's coming and events in the future.
• 0:51
  So let's look at some of the things that are out there right now.
• 0:53
  I've been covering this.
• 0:54
  I know that there's going to be a lot of cheating that's gonna go on.
• 1:00
  We'll see if that cheating goes to levels.
• 1:02
  It's already happening.
• 1:04
  Louis Herms is by far the best candidate that's out there.
• 1:08
  I see other candidates steal- Steve Hilton basically stealing a
• 1:14
  lot of the points that Louis came up with because they're so good.
• 1:18
  But he's still not as good in his points as Louis is.
• 1:23
  He's talking about tax reform and so forth.
• 1:25
  Louis has talked about completely doing away with taxes.
• 1:29
  And Steve Hilton is only gonna do away with taxes up to a certain point.
• 1:33
  He's still a one-party system guys, right?
• 1:36
  Even though President Trump has backed him, he had no other choice.
• 1:39
  It's-- he was the best of a bunch of knuckleheads, right?
• 1:44
  So I think he's It looks like Steve Hilton is, part of- he's British
• 1:49
  part of the City of London crew.
• 1:51
  So I don't know.
• 1:53
  Will he win?
• 1:54
  Will Louis somehow be able to move ahead?
• 1:57
  Remains to be seen.
• 1:58
  Now we've seen Pratt has done really well and we're gonna talk about that now.
• 2:03
  But first of all let's look at what could happen.
• 2:06
  Now, we could have a clean Republican sweep in California.
• 2:12
  But listen to what Gavin Newsom says, and we're gonna talk about, his comments and
• 2:17
  what that could mean, just like what it meant for Donald Trump in his first term
• 2:24
  All have agencies.
• 2:25
  We can shape the future.
• 2:26
  There's still a lot at… Look, I, th- I've said this before so I'll repeat it.
• 2:31
  I don't anticipate this n- needing to be the case, but there is a bl- break the
• 2:34
  glass scenario, and I, there's m- many pe-
• 2:40
  Yeah.
• 2:40
  No.
• 2:41
  All right, I want you to h- listen to what he says.
• 2:43
  He s- just quite, didn't quite get it to that point.
• 2:46
  I thought I had it.
• 2:47
  But he's gonna mention we have agencies, right?
• 2:52
  Key point.
• 2:54
  So I'll just kinda front load this a little bit and you can
• 2:57
  listen to what he's gonna say.
• 2:58
  So if we have worst case scenario, which he's thinking the Republicans
• 3:04
  win s- God forbid the people of California want this to happen.
• 3:08
  But if in the worst case scenario for Democrats, of course, these communist
• 3:14
  vampires, like every time I look at Gavin Newsom I think vampire and of course
• 3:18
  they're blood-sucking Californians.
• 3:21
  And Californians, some, a lot of them for a long time have let the vampire in.
• 3:26
  They just didn't, they just thought they were doing the right thing.
• 3:29
  Let 'em, let it, let themselves get blood sucked, right?
• 3:32
  But people are starting to wake up to it.
• 3:34
  They're tired of getting their money stolen from them.
• 3:37
  It's not going into, the programs they've been lied to they were going into.
• 3:41
  It's these political elites in California, which are all Democrats,
• 3:46
  are running the whole state now.
• 3:48
  There's hardly any Republicans left.
• 3:50
  And will that become even worse going forward is a possibility.
• 3:55
  But if it doesn't, if, like I'm saying we do get fortunately, hopefully some
• 4:02
  Republicans that move into positions to start to turn things around,
• 4:06
  will all of the agencies that Newsom is talking about work with them?
• 4:12
  I think not.
• 4:13
  And he's telling us what's gonna happen.
• 4:17
  I, we don't dream of regretting.
• 4:18
  We we all have agencies.
• 4:20
  We can shape the future.
• 4:21
  There's still a lot at… Look, I, th- I've said this before so I'll repeat it.
• 4:25
  I don't anticipate this n- needing to be the case, but there is a bl- break the
• 4:29
  glass scenario, and I, there's m- many people that have a deep understanding of
• 4:33
  what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we're gonna do everything
• 4:38
  to make sure that doesn't happen.
• 4:39
  I'll leave it there.
• 4:39
  All right.
• 4:39
  You're-
• 4:40
  So again, God forbid that the people of California are tired of the, The
• 4:46
  incredible incompetence to put it lightly, of the Democrat Party in California.
• 4:52
  And they vote in somebody that could possibly change the future for them.
• 4:57
  Democrats that are heavily involved in lots of agencies just happened
• 5:03
  when Trump came in his first term.
• 5:05
  Russia hoax.
• 5:06
  Two times they tried to impeach him.
• 5:08
  It was like that whole presidency was almost… He
• 5:12
  could barely get anything done.
• 5:14
  And then you had RINOs that were backstabbing him, like Caesar.
• 5:18
  It's like it's crazy.
• 5:20
  It's unbelievable the level of incompetence and entitlement
• 5:25
  that the Democrats have.
• 5:27
  The t- the entitlement to they are-- they should be in charge
• 5:31
  of our lives, not us, right?
• 5:33
  That's communist system, guys.
• 5:35
  So we have to fight back a- against this at every level because
• 5:39
  they have entrenched themselves.
• 5:41
  We trusted them.
• 5:43
  We thought that, you guys get in, you work your side, the Republicans are
• 5:46
  gonna get in, they work their side.
• 5:47
  That used to be the way it is.
• 5:48
  It's not like that anymore, right?
• 5:50
  So the deep state has basically completely entangled octopus themselves
• 5:56
  around Democrat Party and squeezed the Democrat Party to the point where
• 6:00
  they're completely manipulated like Pinocchio, puppet Pinocchio, right?
• 6:04
  And they lie, and their noses are long, and it's like ridiculous, right?
• 6:08
  So let's let's look at some more of this.
• 6:10
  It's obv- it's obvious that people are done
• 6:14
  It's obvious.
• 6:15
  It looks to me like 2016 for President Trump.
• 6:21
  Now, I lived in California then, and you quietly voted for Trump, right?
• 6:27
  'Cause you had radical liberals that would get in your face and, probably
• 6:32
  break the lights of your car if you had a pro-Trump sticker or something like that.
• 6:37
  You just knew it.
• 6:38
  You didn't wear pro-Trump, shirts or hats or anything back then.
• 6:42
  You would have these radical liberals that would physically assault you
• 6:47
  and you're like, "Are y- you were scared?" No, I wasn't scared.
• 6:51
  I d- I knew that if I like, knocked these knuckleheads out that, there was a
• 6:55
  system that would probably come after me.
• 6:58
  Me.
• 6:58
  It's you're big, bad Navy SEAL and somebody was like assaulting,
• 7:02
  threatening you with your life and you like protected yourself?
• 7:05
  How dare you?
• 7:07
  That's the way the system is for these Democrats, guys.
• 7:09
  It's horrorful, horrific.
• 7:12
  Horrorful.
• 7:14
  I just make it up as I go along sometimes.
• 7:16
  But it's fun.
• 7:17
  Fun with words.
• 7:18
  Right?
• 7:19
  So this is amazing.
• 7:21
  All right?
• 7:21
  So this is South Central.
• 7:24
  Very liberal, Black, and always vote Democrat Maybe not this time.
• 7:32
  So it's almost flipped now.
• 7:34
  So all the people that were, Trump derangement from 2016 on
• 7:39
  now they're the ones that are quietly going to vote for Pratt.
• 7:45
  consultants across Los Angeles choking on their oat milk lattes because
• 7:49
  this was not supposed to happen.
• 7:51
  The political machine, they thought that Spencer Pratt was just some
• 7:54
  reality TV punchline, a meme candidate.
• 7:56
  Somebody they could just laugh off while Karen Bass kept talking about experience
• 8:00
  for the 9,017th time, like she was applying for assistant manager at Chili's.
• 8:06
  But then something happened that just completely terrified the establishment.
• 8:10
  People actually started listening to him, not because he sounded polished
• 8:14
  and probably because he didn't sound polished is why they listened, right?
• 8:17
  Not because he talks like a consultant-built robot assembled
• 8:20
  in Sacramento basement, but because he sounds normal.
• 8:24
  And when Spencer Pratt walked through neighborhoods politicians usually
• 8:27
  avoid like a gym membership in January, people started crowding around him.
• 8:32
  Phones came out, social media exploded.
• 8:34
  Suddenly the clips were everywhere.
• 8:36
  And then of course the panic started immediately because Democratic
• 8:39
  leads, they understand something very dangerous is happening right now.
• 8:42
  I love the Block Party.
• 8:44
  I've been speaking to Spencer.
• 8:45
  I said, "Get to South Central, get to South Central." And he sent me
• 8:48
  a flyer right as I was saying it.
• 8:50
  I was like, "Oh. Oh he's coming. This is it." And I loved it.
• 8:54
  I grew up in St. Louis, Missouri, the inner city.
• 8:57
  And so I couldn't even imagine having something like this.
• 9:01
  And so this is just beautiful just to get the community together, just to show
• 9:06
  people that he's for all of LA, not just some of it, not just parts, but all of LA,
• 9:11
  that he's gonna represent the entire city.
• 9:13
  We can look back, we can go decades.
• 9:16
  Candidates avoid cities like thi- areas like this.
• 9:20
  Where I'm from in St.
• 9:21
  Louis, it was called the State Streets.
• 9:23
  Politicians avoided the State Streets at all costs.
• 9:27
  And so him coming out, he's showing that I care.
• 9:30
  He knows exactly what neighborhood this is.
• 9:33
  That's exactly why he's here.
• 9:35
  And so that's just it.
• 9:38
  I'm honored to even be here.
• 9:40
  My main thing is just for Spencer to just keep going.
• 9:43
  Keep spreading your message, keep bringing hope and positivity
• 9:47
  to the people out here.
• 9:48
  For the other candidates, you were in office this entire time Why did you not
• 9:53
  stop the issues that were happening?
• 9:56
  Something like in LA, we have eight per- black people are 8% of the
• 9:59
  population, but 35% of the homeless.
• 10:04
  We have a black mayor in office.
• 10:07
  Do you not see your people out there suffering?
• 10:10
  Spencer Pratt wants the suffering to stop.
• 10:13
  We want the suffering to stop.
• 10:15
  So that's what today is about.
• 10:16
  It's showing that we're gonna come to the place where people avoid.
• 10:22
  This is a new Los Angeles.
• 10:23
  Ordinary people in California, they're starting to trust regular human, human
• 10:27
  beings more than the career politicians.
• 10:29
  And that, my friends, is the nightmare scenario for the machine.
• 10:33
  Imagine that, right?
• 10:34
  So now here's where the story gets really nuclear, because this
• 10:37
  viral moment wasn't just Spencer Pratt walking into South Central.
• 10:40
  It was what people started saying once the cameras started rolling.
• 10:44
  Residents, they blasted the condition of Los Angeles right in front of him.
• 10:48
  Crime and homelessness and drug addiction, unsafe streets, businesses
• 10:53
  collapsing, kids growing up around tents and needles, and then came the
• 10:56
  line that hit like a freight train.
• 10:58
  We need help.
• 10:59
  That's it.
• 11:00
  Raw, simple, real, and suddenly the entire identity politics game started
• 11:05
  falling apart on camera, because voters weren't talking about race.
• 11:09
  They weren't talking about party slogans.
• 11:11
  They were talking about survival, safety, their neighborhoods, their children,
• 11:15
  and this is what really made this moment so dangerous for Democrat leadership.
• 11:19
  For years, tell me if I'm wrong, guys, for years, voters were told that they
• 11:23
  had to stay loyal no matter what.
• 11:24
  Stay loyal to the party.
• 11:26
  Vote Democrat no matter what.
• 11:28
  But now, people are looking around, they're saying, "Wait a second.
• 11:31
  We've been voting this way forever. Why does everything keep getting
• 11:35
  worse?" Folks are waking up here, guys and let's be honest here.
• 11:38
  Yeah.
• 11:39
  Folks are waking up, and it's it's a wonderful thing to see, and, but not
• 11:44
  everybody, but, we're not, it's sometimes we're not gonna get everybody awake.
• 11:48
  It's just the way it is.
• 11:49
  I look at people that just recently this man, this 40-year-old man,
• 11:54
  but back in the day, back in 9/11 day he was probably about, I don't
• 12:00
  know, 15, 17 or something like that.
• 12:02
  I'm- I'm in my 30s back then, so now, 35, 37, I think it was.
• 12:09
  And now I'm 65, so I've lived through this.
• 12:12
  I've seen this.
• 12:14
  I watched 9/11 and I watched the towers collapse the two towers.
• 12:18
  And then a lot of people forget a- because that wasn't part of
• 12:22
  the narrative, that there was a third tower that collapsed as well.
• 12:26
  It was a third tower that collapsed that was not hit by any jets, right?
• 12:31
  And it was just, some stuff that fell off of one of the other
• 12:35
  buildings and landed on it.
• 12:37
  A fire started, and it collapsed in its footprint at free fall speed,
• 12:41
  just like the other two towers.
• 12:43
  So I'm a demolition expert in Seal teams, and when I saw that, when
• 12:46
  I first saw the first tower coming down, I was like, "Somebody got
• 12:49
  in there and planted demolitions.
• 12:50
  There's no way a tower falls to free fall speed perfectly in its footprint."
• 12:54
  You can take the word of someone like myself and call it a conspiracy
• 12:58
  theory, which a lot of people still do.
• 13:00
  So some, a lot of people are still stuck in 9/11 the narrative.
• 13:05
  It b- it baffles me, but I can see why that is.
• 13:09
  This one gentleman that I'm speaking of had all these friends that
• 13:13
  were New York, police and cops and so forth and firefighters that
• 13:17
  he knew that had died that day.
• 13:19
  So to honor them, he doesn't go down the conspiracy theory line, 'cause he
• 13:25
  wants to honor them, and he thinks that if he goes down the conspiracy theory
• 13:28
  line, that dishonors them Because it brings up another narrative, and we wanna
• 13:33
  focus on the narrative where they died doing something of service to others.
• 13:38
  Yes, they did die of service to others, but I'm someone that I
• 13:42
  want to hunt down the people that did this and bring the truth.
• 13:47
  So when you dr- when you latch onto a narrative like that is not based
• 13:52
  in truth, and you want to discount, which a lot of people still do,
• 13:56
  unfortunately the real narrative and saying that, anyone that doesn't accept
• 14:01
  the narrative is a conspiracy theorist.
• 14:04
  I'm a conspiracy theorist because I have the knowledge of how a
• 14:07
  building would collapse into its footprint at free-fall speed.
• 14:10
  I know this.
• 14:11
  So with all my, background as a Navy SEAL 35 years, serving our
• 14:17
  country, I'm a conspiracy theorist?
• 14:20
  We have a lot of people to wake up, and we have a lot of people still
• 14:22
  to wake up in California, right?
• 14:24
  So we have an expert like myself that's here to help us unwind some of this.
• 14:31
  Lewis Sorcher, California governor.
• 14:34
  You're talking right in my wheelhouse, actually.
• 14:37
  I I was doing some math today- … today on this exact subject.
• 14:42
  Wow!
• 14:43
  To… Let's talk about symbiotic.
• 14:45
  And you know I'm all about the math.
• 14:47
  Yeah, you- So- … good.
• 14:48
  You've done a good job with it.
• 14:49
  Thank you
• 14:51
  … there were, Here's what's interesting, and this is about the most compelling thing.
• 14:57
  I even got AI to m- to, to admit that based on this following content
• 15:04
  I'm gonna give you right now, that it wa- it is a conspiracy.
• 15:06
  That's how powerful what I'm gonna tell you is right now.
• 15:09
  So the total passengers that passed away, quote-unquote,
• 15:19
  "hitting the towers," right?
• 15:21
  That's a whole nother story.
• 15:23
  According to the narrative, w- would've been 157, or I think including the flight
• 15:29
  attendants and everybody, 157 total.
• 15:33
  Think about that.
• 15:35
  The total, Out of all the hijackers, there were supposedly nine, right?
• 15:42
  Yet, now here's the math.
• 15:44
  There were four passports from hijackers found during these t- terrorist attacks.
• 15:53
  Four of them.
• 15:54
  So four out of nine.
• 15:56
  There were zero identifications or passports found from the two
• 16:04
  planes that hit the Twin Towers.
• 16:06
  Oh, my God.
• 16:08
  How about that?
• 16:09
  Zero.
• 16:09
  Oh, dude, good job.
• 16:11
  I see where you're going with this.
• 16:12
  This is amazing.
• 16:12
  So I love math, and I just did this with the elections, right?
• 16:16
  And yeah, now, and there was like… it was st- it was
• 16:18
  obviously stolen, so fantastic.
• 16:20
  Exactly.
• 16:21
  55, 55 trillion to one, so I said, "You know what? Let me
• 16:23
  do the math on something else."
• 16:25
  Yeah.
• 16:26
  So how is it possible that four passport, passports out of the nine
• 16:32
  supposedly terrorist attackers were found, by the way, undamaged and AIs
• 16:37
  can say one of them had fuel on it."
• 16:39
  Whatever.
• 16:40
  Okay.
• 16:41
  So- yeah … four out of nine were undamaged, yet zero of
• 16:47
  the passengers' passports or identifications were f- were found.
• 16:53
  There's your answer right there.
• 16:55
  It is, it is- Oh, yeah … a trillion to one, quadrillion to one, whatever the
• 16:59
  number is, that wouldn't even be possible.
• 17:01
  So when I asked AI this today, I said, "Based on Occam's razor, what's more
• 17:08
  likely, a conspiracy, A, or B, your narrative on how the towers fell?"
• 17:14
  'Cause it was, I was talking about how the towers fell.
• 17:16
  That was my conversation.
• 17:17
  And it flipped it.
• 17:18
  It said, "You're right.
• 17:20
  It would be a conspiracy is more likely based on using Occam's ra- razor."
• 17:26
  So I, I'm telling you, this is the n- way I'm taking all of this, and I know
• 17:31
  I'm giving it away, and somebody's probably gonna steal this idea too,
• 17:34
  is in the next coming weeks, I'm gonna just use math with all of this stuff.
• 17:39
  Because here's where I think we all made a mistake.
• 17:42
  Because we have discernment, because we can see the truth, because we
• 17:47
  want to get out to the truth, we go right to, "It's election fraud."
• 17:54
  We go right to, "It's a conspiracy.
• 17:56
  It's free-fall demolition." It's obvious, right?
• 17:58
  The challenge is, what we're missing is people have been indoc-
• 18:02
  indoctrinated for well over 100 years through gener- generations.
• 18:08
  Us saying that is just blank to them.
• 18:11
  They cannot assimilate the information.
• 18:14
  So I'm taking another tact and proving mathematically how their
• 18:19
  scenario would be impossible.
• 18:22
  Now that should open them up to say, "Okay then what really did happen?"
• 18:27
  And I think the mistake of all of us truthers is we went right to the truth.
• 18:32
  And sometimes you have to figure a way to speak their truth, which is
• 18:38
  in their mind science and math, and therefore it gives us an opportunity
• 18:42
  to bring in the real truth.
• 18:44
  So this is the tact I'm taking moving forward.
• 18:48
  Yeah, very good.
• 18:49
  And of course, the most secure and safe and great
• 18:52
  presidential election in history.
• 18:54
  So these narratives, comment as it's conspiracy theory if you believe that
• 18:58
  the 9/11 attack was anything other than, The planes, crashing into them.
• 19:03
  So it's okay.
• 19:05
  So they still have that … they built that narrative over and over, and they
• 19:09
  show the aircraft blasting into the
• 19:12
  blowing up.
• 19:13
  And with all that fuel blowing up and crashing into the building, ma-
• 19:17
  magically those four passports flew out, only from terrorists, but not
• 19:22
  from any of the other passengers.
• 19:23
  That was great way you came up with that.
• 19:25
  Now I want you to listen to this, 'cause I had prepared it for you, and I
• 19:29
  didn't even know that you had done that.
• 19:32
  So this is amazing the way this is gonna work out.
• 19:34
  So I want you to listen the way they basically come at Spencer Pratt.
• 19:38
  Of course, this is CNN, try and set him up.
• 19:41
  And they talk about 9/11.
• 19:43
  So brilliant that you are tapped in like this.
• 19:47
  Let's listen to this little clip, and I wanna get your comments on
• 19:51
  this, how you would've responded.
• 19:54
  I, I just talked about how I would respond.
• 19:56
  I'm a … My background's Navy SEAL, demolitions, blah, blah, blah.
• 19:59
  Three towers fell, not two.
• 20:01
  And I would ask that question first: how many towers fell?
• 20:04
  And usually you're gonna get two.
• 20:06
  And they fell in 110 minutes.
• 20:08
  That's pretty quick, right?
• 20:09
  But what about that third building?
• 20:11
  And the one that BBC said, what, 20, 40 minutes before it fell, and they
• 20:15
  said it was … it had already fallen.
• 20:16
  A lot of it's in the background right behind them.
• 20:19
  They're giving narratives.
• 20:20
  We could break all this stuff down for people.
• 20:22
  But like I said, people are stuck on a certain narrative, and it's hard for
• 20:27
  them to get out of it because it's been programmed into them so many times they
• 20:31
  don't know how to get outside of it.
• 20:34
  So let's listen to this.
• 20:35
  And something incredible happened.
• 20:37
  Emerson College yesterday releasing their latest poll from the 27th to the 28th, so
• 20:43
  the last two days, showing Spencer Pratt leading in dark solid blue Los Angeles.
• 20:48
  Pratt with 35%, Karen Bass at 33%, and 16% undecided.
• 20:54
  Now, the media, they want you to laugh at Spencer Pratt the same way they
• 20:59
  did during 2015 with President Trump.
• 21:02
  He's just a TV guy, a reality TV personality, just like Donald Trump.
• 21:08
  In fact, CNN this morning, they tried doing the bidding
• 21:11
  of the Karen Bass campaign.
• 21:13
  They invited Spencer on for an interview to talk about your campaign,
• 21:17
  Spencer, to talk about the race.
• 21:19
  Tell us how you think people in LA are feeling right now.
• 21:23
  And he went on CNN And guess what happened?
• 21:27
  Jake Tapper tries trapping him, asking him about comments he
• 21:31
  made 20 years ago about 9/11.
• 21:35
  "Do you think September 11th, Spencer, was an inside job?"
• 21:39
  Something LA voters would obviously be turned off by.
• 21:43
  Watch what happens.
• 21:44
  Do you still think that 9/11 was an inside job?
• 21:49
  What I've learned, almost 20 years later is it's actually the
• 21:53
  negligence of the people in power.
• 21:55
  I would've loved to have gone along with when my house burned down
• 21:58
  and my parents' house burned down, everyone saying, "It was lasers.
• 22:02
  It was a land grab.
• 22:03
  It was just like Maui." But it's not.
• 22:06
  The reality is people in charge fail us as taxpayers.
• 22:09
  And when you're listening to that audio, that's a 21, 22-year-old person.
• 22:14
  I'm now 42 and have experienced city negligence, state negligence,
• 22:19
  and I've learned a lot about it's actually worse than a conspiracy.
• 22:23
  It's that we have people in charge that make s- mistakes that get people killed.
• 22:28
  So unfortunately, I was young and naive to understanding how there
• 22:33
  is people that will fail citizens across the board, and I would have
• 22:37
  to go back and look at all that.
• 22:38
  That's- Yeah … I haven't watched any of those things in 20 years or whatever.
• 22:42
  But I bet now with my fresh eyes of surviving the city's negligence that
• 22:47
  burned 12 people in my neighborhood alive, 7,000 structures- It was horrible … and
• 22:51
  seeing how fast the internet said that was a conspiracy, and how I had to be
• 22:55
  like, "No, this is how it happened this, and this." Now with new fresh eyes, I'm
• 22:59
  sure I would look at that a lot different.
• 23:01
  I think any time we see something that's just so shocking and
• 23:04
  unbelievable, we as humans wanna try to find excuses, but sometimes
• 23:09
  the excuses are just real simple.
• 23:11
  People failed us as taxpayers.
• 23:13
  Perfect.
• 23:14
  All right, so kinda where we're just going your commentary I think
• 23:17
  was pretty apropos as far as, he took a tact that's very political.
• 23:23
  But still breaching the problem areas.
• 23:26
  People allowed this to happen.
• 23:29
  So Karen Bass she told her fire chief that she was leaving town.
• 23:35
  She was leaving the city.
• 23:36
  She's leaving the state.
• 23:38
  She didn't say she was going to God and she was leaving the country.
• 23:41
  She didn't even tell him that.
• 23:42
  Or he, she, whatever the fire chief was.
• 23:46
  So the fire chief is "This is not a good time. We have a red,
• 23:49
  fire problem possibly." And so of course Karen left anyway.
• 23:56
  And then the fire happened.
• 23:57
  It's interesting how that same scenario where the people in charge that would
• 24:03
  make decisions in Maui had also left.
• 24:08
  So we see a pattern in all this, but we can't, claim conspiracy
• 24:12
  theory because that would be wrong 'cause it would be sensitive,
• 24:17
  over-sensitive for sensitive people.
• 24:19
  So we keep it in a category and a frame that people can understand
• 24:24
  and not get all, hurt about.
• 24:26
  Butthurt.
• 24:27
  But that's my language.
• 24:28
  That's the way I talk.
• 24:29
  I'm a Navy SEAL.
• 24:30
  I'm a nuke dragger.
• 24:31
  I go after the enemy and kill the enemy.
• 24:33
  I engage with the enemy.
• 24:34
  So the enemy, unfortunately, I'm fighting the enemy overseas, and the enemy is
• 24:40
  even worse here in the United States now.
• 24:42
  So it's hard for me to stay calm and cool, right?
• 24:46
  But you have done a really good job of it.
• 24:48
  How would you have responded to, let's say you are, you went on CNN.
• 24:54
  Now, if you went on CNN, you would be at the, at that point you would be
• 24:59
  number one for governor right now, and there would be no one could touch you.
• 25:02
  We know that you've been suppressed.
• 25:04
  N- it's… Is that a conspiracy theory?
• 25:06
  All right, so all these conspiracy theories, they hurt
• 25:09
  people, so we can't go there.
• 25:12
  What would you say?
• 25:13
  First, not a theory anymore.
• 25:15
  Grok just admitted yesterday that I'm 92% suppressed on my X just alone.
• 25:21
  Admitted it.
• 25:22
  So put that one out the window.
• 25:25
  Fu- Facebook admitted that their employee took me off of a poll.
• 25:28
  So it's never a conspiracy anymore, right?
• 25:32
  That's right.
• 25:32
  But the way I would have approached it with that question, and I would say
• 25:37
  it's fascinating that you would answer the question, 'cause it literally
• 25:39
  has nothing to do with California.
• 25:41
  I said, "So it's very clear what your objective to do is
• 25:43
  try to smear me of some sort."
• 25:45
  Yeah.
• 25:45
  "But I'm gonna answer this anyways." And so I would ask you is should we
• 25:50
  be shamed in asking questions about something that seems so nefarious?
• 25:55
  Is that what you're suggesting?
• 25:57
  I would suggest that we should ask as many questions, and I would
• 25:59
  suggest that our government would always be more open to suggestions.
• 26:04
  In fact, I just think is it not weird, though, that nobody knew
• 26:08
  about Tower 7 felling, falling?
• 26:11
  I- is that not a great question?
• 26:13
  Did you know that it, the BBC announced Tower 7 falling 26
• 26:17
  minutes before it actually fell?
• 26:19
  Did you know that the plane did not hit Tower 7, but it fell anyways?
• 26:26
  Did you know it was on f- on fire and abandoned?
• 26:28
  Did you know that somebody actually said, "Pull it," as if it was demolition?
• 26:32
  I would say there's just so many things that there's questions.
• 26:35
  So to say it's a conspiracy, I think… I think it's an investigation is what it is.
• 26:40
  You can call it conspiracy if you want, or say I call it conspiracy.
• 26:44
  I know it should be an investigation.
• 26:46
  I'll give you another one.
• 26:48
  We know something weird happened in Paradise.
• 26:50
  We know something weird happened in, in Maui.
• 26:52
  We know there's weird connections there.
• 26:54
  But how about this one for the Palisades?
• 26:56
  It's just basic math.
• 26:59
  On Edison International in 2012, they posted that they are going to put smart
• 27:04
  meters in houses in 12 to 14 cities out of 97 cities in LA and Ventura County.
• 27:11
  Ironically, mathematically it may seem impossible, but those are the
• 27:15
  same 12 cities that burned down.
• 27:18
  The other ones were untouched.
• 27:20
  I don't know if there's something there, but wouldn't you agree we shouldn't
• 27:23
  just buy the narrative anymore, and we should really start asking questions?
• 27:28
  Wow, that's
• 27:29
  You should be governor.
• 27:30
  You should be president.
• 27:32
  Gee God that's brilliant.
• 27:34
  Good job.
• 27:35
  I never would've came up with that, so that's why I'm not running.
• 27:37
  But I look at some other- I look at a lot of things and I see people in our chat.
• 27:42
  They're like, "Of course Lewis should be the governor.
• 27:45
  He's far and above everybody else." You look at Karen Bass, you look at all the
• 27:49
  people there were … AOC or Gavin Newsom or, some of these other people that may
• 27:55
  be running for president and you're like, "They just pick dumb people." It's very
• 28:01
  obvious these people are not intelligent.
• 28:04
  They don't speak intelligently.
• 28:06
  They don't they don't respond to questions like you just did intelligently.
• 28:10
  That was out of the blue that I came out of that for you, and that
• 28:12
  was, like, absolutely brilliantly.
• 28:14
  Everybody should share that.
• 28:15
  That was brilliant.
• 28:16
  Good job.
• 28:17
  I'm gonna put that in a clip and share that everywhere.
• 28:19
  It's gonna get a lot of views.
• 28:20
  Mike,
• 28:20
  let me ask- Why?
• 28:21
  Why do they do that?
• 28:22
  Why do they pick stupid
• 28:23
  people?
• 28:23
  Yeah.
• 28:23
  Let me ask you a question.
• 28:25
  Yeah.
• 28:26
  If you're dumb, which you're not, and if I'm dumb, which I hope to
• 28:30
  not be one day- But so if we're not dumb, but if we are dumb, right?
• 28:36
  Okay.
• 28:36
  And somebody comes and they said, "We're gonna make you a millionaire. Just do
• 28:40
  what we s- we say." Guar- guaranteed.
• 28:43
  What are these dummies gonna do?
• 28:45
  They're gonna go along with it.
• 28:46
  Absolutely.
• 28:47
  And then they say, "And if you do anything, we're
• 28:48
  gonna take out your family.
• 28:50
  We're gonna expose you.
• 28:50
  It's gonna be the absolute worst.
• 28:52
  You're gonna just absolutely wish that you'd never lived." "Okay, I'll take
• 28:58
  a million dollars," because they are dumb, and they don't think about the
• 29:02
  ramifications because people th- people that do not think about out of the
• 29:06
  box or the ramifications of anything, I would say Marxists are like that.
• 29:11
  They think, "What's in it for me today?" But they don't think about playing it
• 29:14
  out and seeing what's down the road.
• 29:16
  It's the same mentality.
• 29:17
  So they don't think how bad their life can be when they're
• 29:19
  under a control mechanism, right?
• 29:22
  All they think about is I can have this car and this house and travel, and I can
• 29:26
  get the exposure that I always wanted because I know I'm a knucklehead."
• 29:30
  Yeah, they're gonna take it.
• 29:30
  So those people are really easy to find.
• 29:33
  But here's the funniest part.
• 29:35
  What people don't understand and they need to realize is these people are
• 29:39
  tracked from when they're very young.
• 29:42
  Yeah.
• 29:42
  Very young.
• 29:43
  And they capture them when they're primed to be captured probably right after knee
• 29:49
  pad Harris took care of Willie Brown
• 29:53
  Yeah
• 29:53
  that would be an, that would be an example.
• 29:55
  Yep.
• 29:56
  Now I've spoken to a woman that comes to your events and she had a very
• 30:02
  high-end house I think in Palisades.
• 30:05
  I'm not sure exactly where it was, but she showed me her house and she
• 30:09
  had watched my program years before where I, me and Patty Greer talked
• 30:13
  about smart meters in Colorado in January where they had this fire and it
• 30:19
  seemed like all the houses with smart meters seemed to burn up mysteriously.
• 30:22
  And those that didn't if they didn't have a smart meter.
• 30:25
  Now, she made sure she didn't have a smart meter in her house, and she
• 30:31
  told everyone in her neighborhood.
• 30:33
  There's only one other person, and I'm not gonna name names, but he's… Y-
• 30:36
  you would know his name if I said it.
• 30:38
  And he took off his smart meter.
• 30:42
  All the other houses burned.
• 30:44
  So it's not a conspiracy theory when you start to scientifically go with a certain
• 30:51
  idea and you do the research, and you find that, yes, there is something here.
• 30:56
  There is a there.
• 30:57
  And we m- further research, you go around the country, you go into Canada, you go
• 31:03
  wherever you want, and you can find that smart meters seem to have their houses
• 31:07
  burn more often than those without.
• 31:10
  What are your thoughts?
• 31:12
  Yeah.
• 31:12
  I, my first film ever is called 2020 Vision, which I did six years ago, and
• 31:16
  the theme inside of that is when does it become mathematically impossible?
• 31:21
  Yeah.
• 31:21
  And that's what we're, that's what we're dealing with in, in regards to this.
• 31:25
  Mathematically, what are the possibilities that, that…
• 31:29
  By the way, you can still go on International, on
• 31:31
  Edison International today.
• 31:33
  I recommend everybody go on there, hit the search bar on
• 31:36
  there, and put in smart meters.
• 31:37
  If I continue to talk like this, they're gonna delete it.
• 31:40
  They've deleted a lot of stuff I've talked about in the past.
• 31:42
  Yeah.
• 31:42
  They'll do this.
• 31:43
  Screen capture, do everything.
• 31:45
  I ar- already screen captured a little bit of it myself.
• 31:48
  So what are the odds that they say, "By 2012, our goal is to have smart
• 31:52
  meters in these certain amount of cities," and that's about 12, 14% of
• 31:59
  how many cities there are in the area that they're talking about, yet those
• 32:02
  are the same cities that burn down.
• 32:05
  I'm g- I'm j- just as logically, mathematically, logically, any
• 32:10
  investigator, even Inspector Clouseau, would figure out that, hey, maybe
• 32:14
  we should take a look at that.
• 32:16
  Yeah.
• 32:16
  Yeah.
• 32:16
  And it, but it goes across the board on all the stuff we're talking about.
• 32:21
  It just doesn't add up.
• 32:23
  And the best thing to do is use logical equations.
• 32:26
  Here's why.
• 32:27
  Because the s- the segment of the population that we are talking about
• 32:32
  already thinks they're smarter than us.
• 32:37
  So let's play to that.
• 32:39
  Okay, you're smart, so let's do the math.
• 32:42
  You like science, let's do the science, right?
• 32:44
  'Cause it always comes down to science with them.
• 32:47
  Great.
• 32:47
  Let's scientifically, let's logically, let's just take a look at this.
• 32:52
  And then after that, it's what you say.
• 32:54
  So they can even, they can either choose to stay indoctrinated after that, or
• 32:58
  they can make a conscious decision.
• 33:00
  Now, we have to understand that their ego's not gonna let them
• 33:03
  tell you you- you're right there.
• 33:06
  But you spark that thought with inside their head, and if they can somehow
• 33:10
  turn around like it's their idea to expose this, then they're gonna do it.
• 33:14
  Fine.
• 33:14
  Whatever it takes.
• 33:16
  Yeah.
• 33:17
  So let's watch a- another video.
• 33:19
  So let's let's break down.
• 33:20
  So LA is one of the most prosperous cities in America.
• 33:26
  And will that continue?
• 33:28
  'Cause Detroit at one time was one of the most prosperous cities in America.
• 33:34
  Great
• 33:34
  point.
• 33:34
  And it is no longer.
• 33:36
  Nope.
• 33:36
  It, had 100 or m- 1.5 million people.
• 33:40
  I think it has the last I saw it was, like, well under 700,000.
• 33:44
  And you can look at pictures of before and after Detroit, and it's staggering.
• 33:49
  So we're starting to move in that- That direction with LA.
• 33:54
  And people will say that.
• 33:55
  I've s- I've seen people, and I might have one here I might have to dig for a little
• 33:59
  bit, but I'm a show with this one guy who's basically going around and asking
• 34:02
  people in LA how they're gonna vote.
• 34:04
  And it's staggering.
• 34:07
  What, and I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna, front load, who y- who most
• 34:10
  people say they're gonna vote for 'cause it's gonna be interesting.
• 34:12
  So let's look at this particular article right here and get your response on this.
• 34:18
  Because, as governor LA would be, of course one of the
• 34:23
  cities that you would manage.
• 34:25
  You would work with the mayor, and so you would want the best.
• 34:29
  So would Spencer Pratt possibly be the best?
• 34:33
  It remains to be seen.
• 34:34
  Soft on crime, LA allows ghouls to steal from Pacific Palisades.
• 34:39
  Now, Spencer Pratt, of course, had a home there.
• 34:41
  It burned.
• 34:42
  His parents had a home there.
• 34:44
  It burned.
• 34:45
  His family-- So his family and his friends, he's lived there for, decades.
• 34:50
  They had their homes burned.
• 34:52
  So now they're trying to rebuild.
• 34:54
  Now, I'm gonna come to your location starting tomorrow, and I'm gonna
• 34:59
  go to the Pacific Palisades, and I'm going to video what's happened
• 35:02
  there over the last year and a half.
• 35:04
  There's not a lot.
• 35:05
  There's not a lot of homes being built.
• 35:07
  But the ones that are being built where they come in and they drop off lumber
• 35:11
  and, copper coil, to, do the piping and so forth, is being stolen because
• 35:17
  there's no sec- there's no police there.
• 35:19
  The lighting is gone and it's incredible.
• 35:23
  So Nina Maddock, sixty-five-year-old resident, has seen this coming.
• 35:27
  She tracks incidents in a community spreadsheet attributing the
• 35:30
  crime wave to law enforcement feeling not empowered to deter.
• 35:36
  Now, when I worked in the casinos in just on the Nevada-California side
• 35:43
  sometimes we would get the California police involved because some of the
• 35:47
  people that had done the ripping off or whatever went over to California.
• 35:51
  And they'd stolen a certain amount of stuff, and so we would contact
• 35:55
  the California side police.
• 35:57
  Say, "Hey, we got a, we got somebody that stole from our, our casino.
• 36:00
  They're-- We saw them going down this street.
• 36:02
  They're heading there right now." And they'd l- they'd always ask, "How much?
• 36:06
  What is the value of what they stole?" And if it wasn't over about a thousand
• 36:12
  bucks, they would not respond.
• 36:14
  Yep.
• 36:17
  Yeah.
• 36:18
  We're in a deep sickness is what we are.
• 36:21
  And it's interesting.
• 36:23
  So I talk about, as WARF, waste, abuse, redundancy, and
• 36:26
  fraud in our s- in our state.
• 36:29
  And I say to everybody I s- you know it's what I hear constantly, what I heard from
• 36:33
  Spencer, is it's, is it's mismanagement.
• 36:36
  It's bureaucracy.
• 36:38
  It's red tape.
• 36:39
  It's this excuse.
• 36:40
  I believe that the baddies love that language because they can hide
• 36:45
  behind that as it's this mammoth, unmanageable bureaucracy that we can't
• 36:51
  do anything about when they're stealing.
• 36:54
  That's what it is.
• 36:55
  It's theft.
• 36:56
  When they're stealing we the people's f- funds.
• 37:00
  So I say, when does WARF become intent and not mismanagement?
• 37:06
  I believe it's completely intent.
• 37:09
  And it can… I have procedures that can be used in every single city in the whole
• 37:15
  nation that if they were to interact a few procedures that I've already developed
• 37:21
  their cities would thrive immediately, and we would take our nation back.
• 37:26
  And that's why I say the micro will fix the macro.
• 37:30
  Good.
• 37:31
  Good.
• 37:32
  So here's another video that talks about the $2.5 billion that
• 37:37
  was allotted for relief for the Eaton and Palisades fire victims.
• 37:42
  Let's see exactly what transpired with that 2.5 billion.
• 37:48
  San Altadena, destroying homes and neighborhoods.
• 37:51
  Thanks for joining us, everyone.
• 37:52
  I'm Carolyn Johnson.
• 37:53
  And I'm Robert Kovacik.
• 37:54
  Donations poured in to help those who lost everything.
• 37:57
  Governor Newsom promised billions of dollars to help survivors, but
• 38:01
  NBC4 Investigates has traced some of the spending, and it wound
• 38:06
  up in places you may not expect.
• 38:08
  Investigative reporter Eric Leonard joins us now from the newsroom with
• 38:11
  more on what happened to all that money.
• 38:14
  Eric.
• 38:14
  Hi, Carolyn and Robert.
• 38:15
  You may remember seeing Governor Newsom and a bunch of local leaders out in
• 38:19
  Pasadena in the days after the Eaton and Palisades fires pledging a $2.5
• 38:25
  billion relief package for fire victims.
• 38:28
  Now we know a lot more that, about all of that money, that a lot of it
• 38:32
  hasn't been used, and the portion that was distributed actually sent
• 38:35
  very little directly to fire victims.
• 38:37
  Instead, much of the spending circulated through state agencies for their
• 38:41
  fire-related work, and we learned some of the money was even diverted to pay
• 38:45
  for crowd control in last summer's protests against immigration enforcement.
• 38:50
  This is where nearly $14 million of the state's relief money for the victims of
• 38:55
  the Palisades and Eaton fires was spent.
• 38:58
  Overtime for CHP officers sent to demonstrations in downtown LA,
• 39:03
  where protesters marched against immigration enforcement operations.
• 39:08
  According to this-
• 39:09
  All right, so there's more to this, but let's get your
• 39:11
  thoughts on this at this point.
• 39:13
  So they diverted 14 million to law enforcement for another, other
• 39:19
  incident that had nothing to do with the Palisades or Eaton fire victims.
• 39:23
  What are your thoughts?
• 39:25
  That's the game, Mike.
• 39:27
  This is what they do.
• 39:28
  They put up these big balloons and they use it to steal money and
• 39:31
  completely move it in other sectors.
• 39:33
  I'll give you the biggest one in California, for
• 39:35
  example, the California lotto.
• 39:37
  The California was, the lotto was developed to add more mon- money into
• 39:42
  funds to enhance the schools, keep music programs going give them all the
• 39:48
  supplies they need, and make sure the facilities are air-conditioned and they
• 39:51
  have new books and so on and so forth.
• 39:53
  So what happens is you have a billion dollars or whatever the number is
• 39:57
  coming in f- from the California lotto.
• 39:59
  You would think, "Wow, this is fantastic." No, that's not what wor- how it happens.
• 40:03
  These sickos go, "There's a billion dollars coming in to the
• 40:06
  education system, so let's do this.
• 40:08
  Let's take a billion dollars out and allocate it someplace else."
• 40:14
  Oh my God
• 40:15
  And that's exactly how it runs through, with the California lotto and virtually
• 40:19
  every other system that's there.
• 40:22
  It's all a game.
• 40:23
  It's all manipulation and theft.
• 40:26
  And I believe, this is not a popular statement, I believe we need to
• 40:30
  clean house through virtually everything from townships to our
• 40:37
  federal government and completely reset and get the elections fixed.
• 40:42
  Repaired, I should say.
• 40:43
  They're already fixed.
• 40:44
  And- … get the elections repaired, and then we should have special
• 40:48
  elections all across the country, and I don't care if it takes a year, to
• 40:51
  put the right people that are really gonna do great things for us in there.
• 40:57
  Yeah.
• 40:57
  And that's it.
• 40:58
  That, it's a m- it's a m- it's a mammoth that has to be taken care of.
• 41:02
  The good news, fraud vitiates everything, so we really should
• 41:05
  be focusing on the fraudulent elections so we can reset this mess.
• 41:10
  Yeah.
• 41:10
  Good point.
• 41:11
  And JD Vance, who's the frauds tsar for the government, has said that if
• 41:15
  they were able to reverse all the fraud that they're finding so far, they would
• 41:20
  completely negate the federal debt.
• 41:24
  There would be no federal debt just if they, got ahold of the
• 41:27
  fraud and got recompensated for the fraud that was stolen, which I
• 41:31
  don't think they're ever gonna get.
• 41:32
  But that's very interesting.
• 41:34
  Memo, the Department of Finance in June 2025 used some of the fire money for
• 41:39
  law enforcement unrelated to the fires.
• 41:42
  But diverting the relief money for crowd control was
• 41:45
  pre-authorized by state lawmakers.
• 41:47
  I definitely would not want funds directed to anywhere but in the hands
• 41:52
  of the survivors who's lost everything.
• 41:54
  Zaire Calvin has been working to help the victims of the Eaton Fire
• 41:58
  that claimed the life of his sister and destroyed his family's homes.
• 42:02
  You're looking at my lots, plural, which we had five homes on.
• 42:09
  Lost so much.
• 42:10
  I've been a advocate since the fires fighting for my community
• 42:15
  rebuild everything Altadena.
• 42:16
  I had no idea $2.5 billion was designated for fire victims.
• 42:21
  Governor Newsom announced the relief fund near the Eaton Fire burn zone in the
• 42:26
  days after the fires, and fire victims told us back then they needed the help.
• 42:31
  People who live in Altadena are hoping this is the beginning
• 42:34
  of more aid and more resources.
• 42:37
  I would say thank you, obviously, right?
• 42:39
  Because we, we need it but we need more The bill the governor flashed at that
• 42:44
  news conference was ABX 14, co-authored by Encino Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel.
• 42:51
  It directed the emergency money to protect health, protect the safety of persons
• 42:55
  or property, and expedite recovery.
• 42:59
  NBC4 Investigates has found that much of the $605 million spent from the
• 43:04
  fund went right back to state agencies.
• 43:07
  The latest figure from the state finance department shows about
• 43:11
  75% of the relief money promised was never released by the state.
• 43:15
  $2.5 billion is a whole hell of a lot of money, and, off the top of my head, I was
• 43:21
  like, "No, I don't remember that at all."
• 43:23
  Nicole Vasquez is a community advocate in Altadena, helping fire survivors
• 43:27
  while also being one herself.
• 43:30
  We asked her if she remembered any fire messaging from state health officials.
• 43:35
  Do you feel like you got information from the state health department?
• 43:39
  From the state health department?
• 43:41
  I don't remember getting anything from them.
• 43:44
  That's because the spending records show it received $13
• 43:47
  million from the relief fund.
• 43:49
  The department says it used some for air monitoring or testing and spent some
• 43:53
  making YouTube videos like this one.
• 43:56
  Cleaning soot, ash, and smoke damage from your home after a wildfire.
• 44:00
  It was posted nine months after the fires.
• 44:03
  It's been viewed 181 times.
• 44:06
  13 million for a video to help them clean up the ash.
• 44:11
  Nine months after the fire and only 181 views.
• 44:16
  So that's the… it goes on and on.
• 44:18
  It's pathetic how they steal this money.
• 44:21
  The fraud is incredible.
• 44:23
  So the people that have been, defrauding the, you, the people, and
• 44:27
  me when I was living in California, defrauding us of our money are s-
• 44:32
  have been there for a long time.
• 44:34
  Karen Bass, said when she came in, four years ago, however long it
• 44:37
  was that by 2026, that the homeless situation will be corrected.
• 44:43
  It's gotten worse.
• 44:44
  It's almost twice as worse, as bad, a- as when she came in.
• 44:49
  So the, these people keep getting elected or selected or whatever's
• 44:53
  going on there in California.
• 44:54
  Now you're trying to rectify that.
• 44:56
  You're up against some s- some tough very tough things.
• 45:00
  But it does look like we're looking around the country right now that
• 45:04
  things are starting to really turn against the Democrats in a
• 45:09
  lot of ways, in a lot of ways.
• 45:11
  Yeah, and I honestly hope it just turns against the establishment.
• 45:14
  Yeah.
• 45:15
  Because, 'cause the reality is Republicans are just as complicit as the Democrats.
• 45:18
  They just hide under a different letter at the beginning of their title.
• 45:22
  Just wanna preface back on something I was just made sure of.
• 45:26
  In 2012, Altadena was fully implemented with smart meters.
• 45:30
  In 2013, 52,000 houses in Palisades had smart meters.
• 45:34
  So I'm just saying.
• 45:37
  But not conspiratorial, that's just math.
• 45:39
  Yeah.
• 45:39
  So interesting enough, in regards to the election and the suppression and
• 45:46
  so on and so forth, I really don't even know where I stand at this point
• 45:49
  because the major outlets refuse to poll.
• 45:53
  They won't poll me.
• 45:54
  They just, they will not put me on a poll, which is amazing considering
• 45:58
  the non-Democrat, non-Republican electorate is 30% in California.
• 46:03
  The Republicans are only 24%.
• 46:05
  So at this point, Mike, I can't tell you if I have 1,000
• 46:09
  voters or a million voters.
• 46:11
  I would I would have no idea.
• 46:14
  I know we did a damn good job.
• 46:15
  I know we went all up and down the state.
• 46:17
  Yeah.
• 46:17
  I know we're battling against a Goliath and this is literally David versus
• 46:23
  Goliath in regards to this battle.
• 46:26
  Now, regardless of what happens on June 2nd, that's primary day, by the way,
• 46:30
  go out and vote if you haven't voted.
• 46:33
  There's already been people in the chat said they voted for you
• 46:35
  already, so that's a good sign.
• 46:37
  Awesome.
• 46:37
  So now I have three.
• 46:38
  So So you know- But here's the good news.
• 46:42
  I've already figured this part out Did you notice that Louisiana had
• 46:49
  something that went through the Supreme Court in regards to redistricting that
• 46:52
  was overturned because it's racist?
• 46:55
  Two other states are trying to tag onto that.
• 46:57
  Several other states are talking about it.
• 46:59
  We had something called Proposition 50 go through through California, which
• 47:03
  is the most massive redistricting in the history of the country, right?
• 47:07
  And w- the reasoning behind it, which is about as shady, is literally the same.
• 47:11
  Because Tru- because of President Trump and what they're doing in Texas,
• 47:14
  that's why we're gonna do this here, which is nonsensical if you're really
• 47:18
  trying to run the state properly.
• 47:20
  So guess what?
• 47:21
  June 2nd, we're on completely redistricted maps.
• 47:25
  Completely.
• 47:26
  That's still gonna go up to SCOTUS to see if that can get overturned.
• 47:30
  It went up once and they turned it back, but now they're rewriting
• 47:33
  it based on some information and based on the Louisiana ruling.
• 47:36
  So imagine that goes up to SCOTUS and gets overturned.
• 47:42
  What does that do with the primary?
• 47:44
  They're gonna have to reset the whole primary.
• 47:48
  So I don't even know what the future holds, but I do believe, 'cause I've
• 47:52
  been tracking it, the elections are going to become paramount in the
• 47:59
  zeitgeist of us knowing that they're stolen, and I think that's huge.
• 48:03
  Here's what I see.
• 48:04
  I see in the last week, just on X alone, there's been more election
• 48:10
  fraud information that has stuck, and when stuck, not been taken down,
• 48:14
  than in the five years previous.
• 48:16
  Yeah.
• 48:17
  That's huge.
• 48:18
  It's astronomical.
• 48:19
  So we can see the direction everything, everything is moving.
• 48:24
  Something good is happening, and I'm gonna go total tinfoil
• 48:28
  hat on everybody right now.
• 48:30
  My wife and I have been looking at chemtrails for years.
• 48:35
  We haven't seen one in the last 30 days.
• 48:38
  Something is up.
• 48:40
  And that was shortly after Lee Zeldin from the EPA said they're gonna
• 48:44
  do a full investigation on this.
• 48:46
  So I don't know.
• 48:48
  I feel like there's a turn.
• 48:50
  I feel like Congress is now finally in- investigating the vaccine
• 48:55
  injuries and the vaccine deaths.
• 48:56
  I see all this information coming about, out about the elections.
• 49:01
  I see amazing young people that are attracted to our campaign
• 49:05
  that would just blow you away.
• 49:07
  I can tell you since you just mentioned JD Vance and his f- fraud exposure
• 49:13
  organization and what he said.
• 49:16
  His chief guy that's in charge of doing that, his son saw my bus, and his son is
• 49:22
  very young, I think maybe 20-ish, and he came to ask me a whole bunch of questions.
• 49:26
  I- we ended up interviewing him for about eight minutes.
• 49:29
  Wow.
• 49:30
  He is extraordinarily bright and awake, and I'm telling you, we have so
• 49:36
  many young people that have attached themselves to this message that
• 49:40
  are ready to take our country back.
• 49:45
  And I didn't feel like that with our 30-somethings, to be honest with you.
• 49:49
  The 20-somethings, they were raised by the mama bears that
• 49:53
  saved our country during COVID.
• 49:55
  Oh, good point.
• 49:57
  And they're the ones that are coming forward and saying, "We are not gonna put
• 50:01
  up with this stuff." I have 14-year-olds coming up to my bus literally in
• 50:06
  Alpine, California, and says, "What do you think about transgender?"
• 50:10
  I'm like I think it's a psychosis." He's… and he's "Exactly." I'm like, wow.
• 50:15
  So it's huge.
• 50:17
  Oh, my gosh.
• 50:18
  So I'm telling you, we're going in the right direction regardless
• 50:21
  of the outcome of the election.
• 50:23
  It doesn't even matter at this point, 'cause we're going in the right direction.
• 50:26
  We're gonna make a big impact.
• 50:27
  I do feel like they're gonna kinda reset these elections, and they're all…
• 50:31
  we're gonna have to redo a lot of them just based on what the Supreme Court
• 50:36
  is starting to decide on some things.
• 50:38
  So get out on June 2nd.
• 50:39
  Let's make the biggest push for this as possible.
• 50:42
  And if we're through the primary, fantastic.
• 50:44
  If we're not, it's not even a big deal because there's so much more
• 50:47
  that's happening that I'm just… I'm jacked about the future for
• 50:51
  the first time in a long time.
• 50:54
  Very good.
• 50:54
  Very good.
• 50:55
  And of course, let's put your site up here so people can get involved here.
• 51:00
  Let me see if I get the right…
• 51:01
  There we go.
• 51:02
  I can help you with the next two days.
• 51:03
  So we're gonna be at, in on, actually on campus at UC Santa Barbara
• 51:08
  8:00 AM in the morning tomorrow.
• 51:10
  I'm not asking anybody to go there.
• 51:11
  If they're in the area, fantastic.
• 51:13
  I'll get to speak for four minutes, but it'll be very
• 51:15
  powerful four minutes, I hope.
• 51:17
  But then what's really cool is on June 1st, we're gonna be at our buddy's med
• 51:24
  spa in Westlake Village, and we'll be speaking there, and you get to see what he
• 51:30
  has at this med spa will blow people away.
• 51:33
  The best frequency technology that's on the planet.
• 51:36
  He's got Tesla technology there that we can use.
• 51:40
  It's just amazing.
• 51:41
  And you and Tracy Joe will be there on June 1st?
• 51:46
  Yes
• 51:47
  Good.
• 51:47
  So meet Michael Jaco.
• 51:49
  It'll be at Westlake Village, 6:00 PM at Sports IQ in Westlake Village.
• 51:54
  The address is right there on the screen.
• 51:56
  That is going to be a lot of fun.
• 51:59
  Everybody should show up for that.
• 52:00
  That's the last event on the agenda until after the election, so that should
• 52:06
  be the one people wanna show up with.
• 52:07
  The owner of that is just absolutely amazing.
• 52:11
  He's helped cure a lot of our friends of some crazy stuff.
• 52:15
  He's got brain technology.
• 52:16
  He's got PEMF technology.
• 52:18
  You name it, it's just incredible, so you're gonna have a lot of fun there.
• 52:22
  Oh, that sounds fantastic.
• 52:23
  Yeah.
• 52:24
  Looking forward to it.
• 52:25
  There's one other one I want you to… Are you, do you have time?
• 52:28
  Sure.
• 52:29
  Okay.
• 52:29
  For Mr. Jaco, of course I do.
• 52:32
  Oh, wow.
• 52:33
  So I know he's your fan, so I appreciate that.
• 52:35
  So-
• 52:35
  you are older than me, so I can still call you mister.
• 52:38
  Very good.
• 52:40
  All right.
• 52:40
  So here's an interview that this gentleman did to a lot of people on the streets of
• 52:45
  LA, and let's listen to a few of them.
• 52:47
  Karen of LA.
• 52:48
  Karen Bass.
• 52:49
  And why Karen Bass?
• 52:52
  Black pride.
• 52:53
  Okay.
• 52:53
  Anything else?
• 52:54
  No.
• 52:55
  I just flew across the country to ask- no … people in LA who they're voting for mayor.
• 52:59
  LA County is the largest economy in the nation, and that makes this the
• 53:03
  most consequential mayoral election since Mamdani won in New York.
• 53:07
  Will LA take a similar direction or go the opposite way with Pratt?
• 53:11
  This video will aim to shed light on who will win on June 2nd between Nithya
• 53:15
  Raman, Karen Bass, and Spencer Pratt.
• 53:17
  I started this channel by asking people who they're voting
• 53:20
  for, and it's good to be back.
• 53:22
  Welcome to the Nate Friedman Show.
• 53:23
  We're asking people in LA who they want to win as mayor.
• 53:27
  Oh, Karen Bass.
• 53:28
  And why Karen Bass?
• 53:30
  I'm gonna tell you something really specifically.
• 53:33
  Every this is the… been the last two years where in Leimert Park,
• 53:38
  she has supported the Ramadan Fest, and it's been amazing.
• 53:45
  And I- Okay.
• 53:46
  Yeah.
• 53:46
  So you voted Democrat all your life.
• 53:48
  What is the specific thing that made you say, "I'm gonna vote for Pratt"?
• 53:51
  It's a lot of things.
• 53:52
  It's been a process, but it's just seeing what's going on in the city, right?
• 53:55
  It's just, I guess the whole woke extreme ideology, I just don't like it.
• 54:02
  I consider myself a liberal, but it's just too extreme going on right now.
• 54:06
  I just don't like it, so I'm gonna vote for something different.
• 54:08
  Was there a specific cause?
• 54:09
  You mentioned homelessness, but did you see something that made you snap?
• 54:13
  No.
• 54:13
  Yeah.
• 54:13
  Not one particular thing.
• 54:14
  It's just everything.
• 54:15
  I just see… for example, we had a trillion dollars in surplus budget- Yeah
• 54:21
  … when Gavin Newsom took in, and now we have a deficit of $500 million, $500 billion.
• 54:27
  So I think that's a great reason- Yeah … to question what's going-
• 54:32
  A systematic issue at play there.
• 54:35
  Personally, I've- met some people who have been unhoused, and I think
• 54:40
  that there's a diaspora of different reasons and places that they come from.
• 54:48
  So I think maybe assuming that they're all just bussed in and are on drugs is maybe
• 54:56
  oversimplifying- Yeah … the problem.
• 54:58
  Yeah.
• 54:58
  I think he was saying some of them.
• 54:59
  But anyway, what would you like… My last question is, what would you like
• 55:01
  to see Nifia do with homelessness?
• 55:03
  How would you like to see her tackle it?
• 55:05
  You mentioned she had some good ideas.
• 55:07
  Karen Bass.
• 55:08
  From what I see I would prefer Spencer Pratt.
• 55:11
  Okay.
• 55:11
  And why Spencer Pratt?
• 55:13
  I think we need something new in LA.
• 55:16
  We need to clean the city.
• 55:17
  We need to clean the street, too many homeless, too many insecurity.
• 55:20
  We've tried Karen Bass.
• 55:22
  Maybe- Yeah … we need to try someone else.
• 55:23
  So I noticed in this next part of the conversation that he was subtly
• 55:26
  referencing small business quite a bit, so the conversation got to be very
• 55:30
  interesting once I just asked him this.
• 55:32
  Are you a business owner?
• 55:33
  Yes.
• 55:34
  Okay.
• 55:34
  What kind of things for business owners would you like to see?
• 55:37
  Like, how can the mayor help business owners?
• 55:40
  I think they can help with maybe choosing more things to happen minimum wage.
• 55:44
  I've been in business for 10 years.
• 55:46
  The minimum wage has increased at double since we opened- Yeah … our
• 55:49
  business, so- The problem that the politics don't understand is that,
• 55:54
  minimum wage increasing, it's okay.
• 55:56
  For the people, 3% increase is fine.
• 55:59
  But for the business owners it's related and connected to the workers'
• 56:02
  prens- workers' compensation, who is connected to the gross revenue
• 56:06
  of the people despite the craziness, like you see a better future for LA?
• 56:11
  Are you optimistic about it?
• 56:12
  I do.
• 56:12
  I am, absolutely.
• 56:12
  I think LA is a unique, resilient city.
• 56:15
  I think, you got the best year-round climate.
• 56:17
  Where else can you enjoy what we enjoy in May?
• 56:20
  So- Yeah … yeah, I'm absolutely bullish on LA.
• 56:23
  And why do you think just it's blue and like every governor is blue,
• 56:26
  mayor is blue, ev- everything's blue.
• 56:28
  Yeah.
• 56:28
  Why do you think they're continuously voting blue?
• 56:31
  Honestly, I do not know, but it seems like we just continue to do
• 56:34
  the same thing over and over, hoping for an alternative result, and that
• 56:38
  just doesn't seem to materialize.
• 56:40
  So I don't know, but you have to vote red in order to see any new change.
• 56:44
  Investigate it all, and I'll see you there.
• 56:47
  people were willing to do an interview.
• 56:49
  I can only share what I think for Bass.
• 56:52
  Maybe it's like 2024, where people that were voting for Kamala largely
• 56:56
  didn't want to talk, but it's also tough to say because Pratt
• 56:59
  people also didn't want to talk.
• 57:01
  In LA, I had the highest rejection rate by far that I've ever had.
• 57:04
  Only about 5% of the people were willing to do an interview.
• 57:08
  I can only share what I saw.
• 57:10
  And to me, I am seeing very close similarities between this
• 57:13
  election and Trump in 2016.
• 57:15
  There were a lot of people who were enthusiastic, but much like
• 57:18
  the last interview that we did, they were a bit more reserved
• 57:21
  because of the potential backlash.
• 57:23
  If you want to see why there are massive protests in
• 57:25
  Spain There is a spot in there where he says that of all the people that would
• 57:32
  willingly, because he says that most people did not want to say that they were
• 57:36
  gonna vote for Spencer Pratt most of the people wanted Spencer Pratt to be elected.
• 57:44
  So it sounds just like in 2016 I don't know if how it was for you, but I remember
• 57:48
  you didn't wear anything, supporting Trump 'cause you'd get attacked.
• 57:54
  You didn't put anything on your car that supported Trump
• 57:56
  or your car would get bashed.
• 57:58
  And so we just quietly went out and voted for Trump, and of course Trump won.
• 58:02
  It seems to be the same situation now in in throughout California where people
• 58:09
  are probably liberal Democrat normally voting, and they're gonna vote Republican.
• 58:17
  What are your thoughts?
• 58:19
  Yeah.
• 58:19
  I think so.
• 58:20
  I believe if the truth was out there, I think most of them
• 58:23
  would actually vote independent.
• 58:24
  But that, we're under that illusion of choice system, unfortunately.
• 58:28
  So I think that it's gonna be overwhelmingly at least people
• 58:34
  not voting that are Democrat.
• 58:36
  So I think what you're gonna see is you may not see this complete influx
• 58:41
  of c- coming over to vote for the other side- but I think you're gonna
• 58:45
  see a massive attrition of Democrats.
• 58:47
  The problem is will we know it?
• 58:49
  Because if there's election fraud, they'll just fill in those ballots for them.
• 58:54
  Yeah.
• 58:54
  So this may be an, a bigger sting operation than 2020 in, in my opinion.
• 58:59
  I think it's something to look for.
• 59:01
  They've already got the goods on 2022 in Arizona, so what better
• 59:06
  to put a cap on everything by getting the goods- … on 2026?
• 59:10
  So is that what I want?
• 59:12
  No, I don't.
• 59:13
  But I don't think we're completely there yet on the exposure
• 59:16
  phase, so I wouldn't doubt it.
• 59:19
  And I can tell you there are some mechanisms in place already that are
• 59:22
  gonna test my theory right after June 2nd
• 59:26
  Wow
• 59:26
  so which, which will be huge in my opinion.
• 59:30
  I felt it interesting listening to these interviews that, you would have s- some
• 59:34
  person, how racist is, will vote for Karen Bass based on the melanin of her skin.
• 59:40
  I think that's sad.
• 59:42
  Yeah.
• 59:43
  And really sad.
• 59:43
  And you'd be okay with people dying a- as, as long as she's Black.
• 59:48
  That if that was in reverse, would that not be racism?
• 59:52
  I'm thinking it would be- Yeah … if somebody said that.
• 59:55
  And then you have somebody that wants to vote for Bass because she's supportive
• 1:00:00
  over, of this massive Islamic attempt to take over the United States.
• 1:00:05
  Yep … and the support of Ramadan.
• 1:00:07
  So that tells you the mindset in general, right?
• 1:00:12
  And then so you have Bass, you have Spencer Pratt, and
• 1:00:16
  then you have Miss Netanyahu.
• 1:00:18
  I know that's not her name, but it's fun to say it.
• 1:00:23
  Absolutely.
• 1:00:24
  Wow.
• 1:00:25
  Good good points, Lewis.
• 1:00:26
  And I like your point about, this could be a big sting operation
• 1:00:29
  that's gonna happen on June 2nd.
• 1:00:32
  We'll see, how that turns out.
• 1:00:34
  If I think it's pretty clear that Spencer Pratt is probably going to
• 1:00:38
  win, but will he win is the point.
• 1:00:41
  And if he does not win, what will the blowback potentially be?
• 1:00:46
  Yeah, and e- exactly right.
• 1:00:48
  I'm thi- I think it's clearly ahead, and I would- … I would agree
• 1:00:52
  with you and what the person was indicating, that I don't think all the
• 1:00:57
  Spencer Pratt voters are public yet.
• 1:01:00
  I believe a lot of them are gonna cast their votes privately.
• 1:01:04
  So we're gonna find out what happens.
• 1:01:07
  Yeah, it's gonna be interesting.
• 1:01:09
  Thanks for coming on and and sharing with us.
• 1:01:11
  It's… i'm so proud of you for doing this.
• 1:01:15
  It's I know you did it 'cause God said, "You're gonna do it,"
• 1:01:18
  and you're like me, "Okay, God."
• 1:01:20
  I learned, not to go against God, so things don't work
• 1:01:24
  out so good when you do that.
• 1:01:25
  Y- and it's not that God's gonna punish you, it's just like He's trying
• 1:01:28
  to help you, and He's trying to help the world, and definitely California.
• 1:01:34
  So what- whatever has transpired through your your, going out there
• 1:01:39
  and politicking throughout California, you've been all over California.
• 1:01:42
  I think all 58 counties, right?
• 1:01:45
  Yeah, all 50 counties.
• 1:01:46
  Unprecedented.
• 1:01:47
  Nobody's ever went in and tried to attempt to interview all 57 election supervisors.
• 1:01:53
  We're the first ever to do that.
• 1:01:55
  No kidding.
• 1:01:56
  Wow.
• 1:01:57
  And you just don't get the credit that you deserve.
• 1:01:58
  It's sad.
• 1:01:59
  Maybe at some point you will.
• 1:02:01
  And- I,
• 1:02:02
  you know what I tell my wife-
• 1:02:03
  maybe
• 1:02:03
  God's watching you work,
• 1:02:04
  … my wife feels the same thing.
• 1:02:05
  I said, "In the eyes of God, I know I'm doing the right thing,"
• 1:02:08
  so that's good enough for me.
• 1:02:09
  Absolutely.
• 1:02:10
  And that's the way, like the f- four agreement type thing, you always do your
• 1:02:14
  best and whatever happens, you know you've done your best and that's, it seems to
• 1:02:18
  work out pretty good in the long term.
• 1:02:20
  All right, Mr. Louis Herms, it's been a, been an honor pleasure as always
• 1:02:25
  to have you on, and great wisdom.
• 1:02:27
  I appreciate your time and look forward to seeing you on the 1st and 2nd.
• 1:02:31
  All right.
• 1:02:32
  All right, my brother.
• 1:02:32
  See you Monday.
• 1:02:33
  Take care.
• 1:02:33
  Cheers.
• 1:02:34
  Bye-bye.