Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / The Experiment That Could Change Our Understanding of Time
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the Core side Quantum Physics podcast, an exploration
- 0:05Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
- 0:27Speaker 2: I want you to.
- 0:29Speaker 3: Imagine something for a second. Picture a clock sitting on
- 0:32Speaker 3: the desk right in front of you.
- 0:33Speaker 2: Okay, I'm picturing it right.
- 0:34Speaker 3: So you were watching the second hand tick forward, tick tick.
- 0:38Speaker 2: Tick, Just a normal clock exactly.
- 0:41Speaker 3: But now I want you to imagine that exact same
- 0:43Speaker 3: clock sitting in the exact same spot, but the second
- 0:47Speaker 3: hand is moving at a well, a completely different speed.
- 0:51Speaker 3: Wait what Yeah, it is ticking faster, and at the
- 0:54Speaker 3: exact same moment, it is also ticking slower.
- 0:57Speaker 2: That is I mean, that's incredibly hard to even visualize, right.
- 1:00Speaker 3: It entirely defines everything you know about how reality is
- 1:03Speaker 3: supposed to work. You are looking at a single object
- 1:06Speaker 3: experiencing two completely different timelines literally at the same time.
- 1:10Speaker 2: It sounds like a riddle honestly, or maybe like a
- 1:13Speaker 2: broken piece of machinery, but it is actually the absolute
- 1:16Speaker 2: bleeding edge of modern physics.
- 1:18Speaker 3: Which is just wild. So what we're doing today is
- 1:21Speaker 3: figuring out how physicists are attempting to combine the flexible,
- 1:25Speaker 3: bendable nature of time from Einstein's relativity with the absolutely
- 1:29Speaker 3: bizarre multi state nature of quantum mechanics.
- 1:31Speaker 2: Yeah, colliding two totally different rule books exactly.
- 1:35Speaker 3: And the ultimate goal here is to prove that time
- 1:38Speaker 3: itself can exist in a quantum superposition. Okay, let's unpack
- 1:42Speaker 3: this because to understand how a single clock can ticket
- 1:46Speaker 3: two different speeds simultaneously, we kind of have to look
- 1:49Speaker 3: at the underlying mechanics governing reality, and.
- 1:53Speaker 2: That conflict between those mechanics is exactly where modern physics
- 1:56Speaker 2: is currently stuck. I mean, time plays very very different
- 1:59Speaker 2: roles depending on which rule book you are reading.
- 2:02Speaker 3: From, like relativity versus quantum theory.
- 2:04Speaker 2: Right in Einstein's relativity, time is a physical malleable fabric.
- 2:09Speaker 2: It bends, its stretches, it reacts to gravity, press, yeah, gravity, speed,
- 2:12Speaker 2: all of that. But then you look at quantum theory,
- 2:15Speaker 2: which is the rule book governing the tiniest building blocks
- 2:18Speaker 2: of our universe, and time is completely rigid.
- 2:21Speaker 3: Just a background ticker exactly.
- 2:23Speaker 2: It acts as the static background metronome that just ticks
- 2:26Speaker 2: away steadily. While particles do all sorts of strange things.
- 2:30Speaker 2: So forcing these two fundamentally opposed concepts together is what
- 2:35Speaker 2: reveals these hidden quantum signatures of time flow that classical
- 2:40Speaker 2: physics simply cannot explain.
- 2:42Speaker 3: We already know from macroscopic relativity that time bends with speed, right,
- 2:47Speaker 3: and we know from quantum mechanics that particles can exist
- 2:50Speaker 3: in superpositions.
- 2:51Speaker 2: Right like Schrodinger's cat exactly, the.
- 2:53Speaker 3: Cat is alive and dead at the same time. But
- 2:55Speaker 3: what happens when you smash those two realities together. Because
- 2:58Speaker 3: when I was trying to wrap my head around Einstein's relativity,
- 3:01Speaker 3: I realized it is kind of like a personalized algorithm.
- 3:04Speaker 2: Oh, I like where this is going.
- 3:05Speaker 3: Yeah, think of it like a Spotify rapped but for time.
- 3:08Speaker 2: A Spotify rapped for time.
- 3:10Speaker 3: Yeah. You don't just log into like a universal music
- 3:13Speaker 3: stream that everyone on Earth listens to. You get a
- 3:16Speaker 3: completely customized experience based on your specific behaviors, right, your speed,
- 3:20Speaker 3: your location in a gravity.
- 3:21Speaker 2: Well, that is a remarkably good analogy.
- 3:24Speaker 3: Thanks, So every single object in the universe is basically
- 3:28Speaker 3: experiencing its own, unique, personalized flow of time. But to
- 3:32Speaker 3: really grasp the mechanics of why that happens. You almost
- 3:36Speaker 3: have to picture space time as a dense medium, like
- 3:39Speaker 3: a fluid.
- 3:40Speaker 2: And that fluid analogy actually works perfectly for the mechanics
- 3:43Speaker 2: of time dilation. So well, think about it. If you
- 3:46Speaker 2: are moving through a dense fluid, the faster you move,
- 3:49Speaker 2: the more resistance are like drag you.
- 3:51Speaker 3: Encounter, right, it's harder to push through.
- 3:53Speaker 2: Exactly. In physics, as an object moves faster through the
- 3:57Speaker 2: fluid of space time, the internal mechanisms of that object,
- 4:01Speaker 2: it's atoms, it's chemical reactions, biological aging, all of it
- 4:06Speaker 2: literally encounter a form of temporal drag. Temporal drag, Yeah,
- 4:09Speaker 2: they slow down relative to an object that is just
- 4:11Speaker 2: standing still. So you sitting there listening to this right now,
- 4:15Speaker 2: are experiencing a slightly different flow of time than someone's
- 4:18Speaker 2: standing on top of Mount Everest.
- 4:20Speaker 3: Because of the distance from Earth's gravity.
- 4:22Speaker 2: Exactly. The difference is completely microscopic in our daily lives,
- 4:25Speaker 2: but it is entirely real and it's measurable.
- 4:28Speaker 3: I mean, don't GPS satellites have to account for this?
- 4:30Speaker 2: They absolutely do. The satellites orbiting the Earth have to
- 4:33Speaker 2: constantly adjust their internal clocks because they are further away
- 4:37Speaker 2: from Earth's gravity. Well, and they're moving at orbital speeds.
- 4:40Speaker 3: Wow.
- 4:41Speaker 2: If they didn't mathematically account for that temporal drag, the
- 4:44Speaker 2: navigation app on your phone would literally have you driving
- 4:47Speaker 2: into a lake within a single afternoon.
- 4:50Speaker 3: That is terrifying but also amazing. But okay, to measure
- 4:54Speaker 3: a time difference that minute. To actually observe this happening
- 4:57Speaker 3: in the laboratory, you can't just use a rolex, right,
- 5:01Speaker 3: or even a standard digital clock.
- 5:03Speaker 2: No, definitely not.
- 5:04Speaker 3: You would need a clock that operates on the scale
- 5:06Speaker 3: of individual atoms, which naturally forces us right down into
- 5:10Speaker 3: the quantum realm. Right, So take the classic twin paradox.
- 5:13Speaker 3: Usually the story goes one twin stays on Earth, the
- 5:16Speaker 3: other travels at near light speed and comes back younger.
- 5:19Speaker 2: The standard thought experiment, Right.
- 5:21Speaker 3: The math checks out. Yeah, but let's look at the
- 5:23Speaker 3: staggering subtlety of this at lower speeds. If you had
- 5:28Speaker 3: a clock moving at just ten meters per.
- 5:30Speaker 2: Second, which is what like twenty miles an hour, Yeah.
- 5:32Speaker 3: About twenty two miles per hour, essentially just a casual
- 5:35Speaker 3: drive through a suburban neighborhood. If it kept moving at
- 5:38Speaker 3: that speed, for fifty seven million years, fifty seven million,
- 5:42Speaker 3: fifty seven million years, it would fall exactly one second
- 5:46Speaker 3: behind a stationary clock that.
- 5:47Speaker 2: Is just fifty seven million years just to lose a
- 5:50Speaker 2: single second. It is a fantastic demonstration of how incredibly
- 5:54Speaker 2: subtle the warping of time is at everyday human speeds.
- 5:58Speaker 3: It's almost imperceptible, but not quite.
- 6:01Speaker 2: Scientists have actually confirmed effects exactly like this using highly
- 6:05Speaker 2: precise aluminum ion clocks. But what's fascinating here is what
- 6:10Speaker 2: happens when we push this macroscopic paradox into the quantum domain.
- 6:14Speaker 3: Okay, brace yourselves, right.
- 6:16Speaker 2: Because instead of two separate clocks moving at different speeds,
- 6:18Speaker 2: we take a single clock and put it into a
- 6:20Speaker 2: quantum superposition.
- 6:21Speaker 3: So we force the clock itself into a state where
- 6:23Speaker 3: it is simultaneously moving and not moving exacts. So it
- 6:26Speaker 3: becomes its own twin.
- 6:27Speaker 2: It becomes its own twin. According to the mathematics of
- 6:30Speaker 2: quantum theory, that single clock must simultaneously experience two entirely
- 6:34Speaker 2: different rates of time.
- 6:35Speaker 3: That is so weird.
- 6:37Speaker 2: It is aging at two different speeds, occupying the exact
- 6:40Speaker 2: same space.
- 6:41Speaker 3: Okay, but wait, if this is a natural consequence of
- 6:44Speaker 3: combining quantum mechanics and relativity. Physicists must have known about
- 6:49Speaker 3: this theoretical lostibility for.
- 6:50Speaker 2: A while, right, Oh, absolutely, Physicists like Igor Pikowsky propose
- 6:54Speaker 2: the math for this idea over a decade ago.
- 6:56Speaker 3: So why are we only talking about physically testing this
- 6:59Speaker 3: in a laboratory right now? Like what shifted in the
- 7:02Speaker 3: landscape of physics that allows us to finally move this
- 7:05Speaker 3: from a whiteboard into the real world?
- 7:07Speaker 2: Well, simply put, our technology finally caught up to our theories. Okay,
- 7:11Speaker 2: to measure an effect this unbelievably subtle, where a single
- 7:14Speaker 2: particle is experiencing a microscopic time dilation while in a superposition,
- 7:19Speaker 2: you need the most precise measuring tools in the history
- 7:22Speaker 2: of human civilization, no pressure, right, And that brings us
- 7:26Speaker 2: to the work of experimental teams like those led by
- 7:29Speaker 2: Christian Center at Colorado State University and Dietrich lb Fred
- 7:32Speaker 2: at NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- 7:35Speaker 3: What are they building over there?
- 7:37Speaker 2: They have developed ultra cold ion clocks. We are talking
- 7:40Speaker 2: about trapping a single atom of aluminium or ter bum
- 7:45Speaker 2: using intersecting lasers, single atom, a single atom, and then
- 7:49Speaker 2: they cool that single atom down to temperatures hovering billionths
- 7:53Speaker 2: of a degree above absolute zero.
- 7:56Speaker 3: Okay, wait, I got to push back here for a second,
- 7:58Speaker 3: or at least ask for a sanity each other on
- 8:00Speaker 3: the mechanics sure come bad because if I remember my
- 8:03Speaker 3: high school chemistry correctly, temperature is essentially just a measurement
- 8:07Speaker 3: of kinetic energy. Right. Heat is movement, That's right. So
- 8:11Speaker 3: if you cool a single atom down to absolute zero
- 8:14Speaker 3: or functionally near absolute zero, that means all thermal movement stops.
- 8:19Speaker 3: Is the theoretical ground state of the universe.
- 8:21Speaker 2: Correct.
- 8:22Speaker 3: If the atom is completely frozen in place, how can
- 8:25Speaker 3: it function as a clock? I mean, how does an
- 8:26Speaker 3: atom tick or measure time if there is zero energy
- 8:29Speaker 3: for movement.
- 8:30Speaker 2: That is a highly logical objection, and it gets to
- 8:32Speaker 2: the very heart of why quantum mechanics is so wonderfully weird.
- 8:35Speaker 3: Okay, lay it on me.
- 8:36Speaker 2: In classical physics, your high school chemistry definitely holds up
- 8:40Speaker 2: at absolute zero, all thermal energy is gone and the
- 8:43Speaker 2: system basically freezes completely solid. But an atomic clock doesn't
- 8:48Speaker 2: use gears or physical pendulums to tick. It uses the
- 8:52Speaker 2: internal energy states of the atom itself. Oh interesting, Yeah,
- 8:56Speaker 2: and these ultracold clocks. A laser fires at the tra
- 9:01Speaker 2: The electron orbiting that ion will only jump to a
- 9:04Speaker 2: higher energy level if the laser hits it with an
- 9:06Speaker 2: incredibly precise frequency of light.
- 9:09Speaker 3: How precise are we talking.
- 9:10Speaker 2: We are talking about a frequency of over a quadrillion
- 9:13Speaker 2: oscillations per second.
- 9:15Speaker 3: A quadrillion, that's a million billion.
- 9:17Speaker 2: Exactly, And that precise frequency required to make the electron jump.
- 9:21Speaker 2: That is the actual tick of the clot ah.
- 9:23Speaker 3: So the atom doesn't need to be physically bouncing around
- 9:26Speaker 3: the room to measure time. The ticking is happening inside
- 9:29Speaker 3: the architecture of the atom itself exactly.
- 9:32Speaker 2: But there is an additional quantum layer.
- 9:34Speaker 3: Here, of course, there is.
- 9:35Speaker 2: Even when you remove all the heat, reaching that absolute
- 9:38Speaker 2: zero ground state where thermal movement stops, there is a
- 9:42Speaker 2: fundamental rule. Nothing in the universe can ever be completely still.
- 9:47Speaker 3: No, even at absolute zero.
- 9:48Speaker 2: Not even then. There are microscopic inescapable vibrations, called quantum fluctuations.
- 9:54Speaker 2: They are basically the inherent jitter of the universe, bubbling
- 9:58Speaker 2: up from the quantum vacuum itself.
- 10:00Speaker 3: The inherent jitter of the universe. I love that phrasing
- 10:03Speaker 3: it's true.
- 10:04Speaker 2: Gabriel Sourcey, a researcher at the Stevens Institute of Technology,
- 10:08Speaker 2: points out that atomic clocks have become so incomprehensibly sensitive
- 10:12Speaker 2: that their internal ticking rate is actually affected by these
- 10:15Speaker 2: inherent quantum fluctuations. Wow, it is like a faint hum
- 10:19Speaker 2: in the fabric of space time that you can never
- 10:21Speaker 2: quite turn off, and the clock feels it.
- 10:24Speaker 3: Here's where it gets really interesting, because the scientists aren't
- 10:27Speaker 3: just trapping an atom, freezing it and passively listening to
- 10:30Speaker 3: that quantum hum rung.
- 10:31Speaker 2: Oh. No, they are way more active than that, right.
- 10:34Speaker 3: They're actively manipulating the vacuum of space around the atom
- 10:37Speaker 3: to create something called squeeze. States Yes, and if we
- 10:41Speaker 3: are manipulating uncertainty, we are basically forcing the atom to
- 10:45Speaker 3: forget its exact speed. And if it doesn't have a
- 10:47Speaker 3: single defined speed, relativity dictates it can't have a single
- 10:51Speaker 3: defined timeline either. Am I tracking the logic? There?
- 10:53Speaker 2: You are tracking it perfectly. It relies on a fundamental
- 10:56Speaker 2: quirk of nature, which is in the quantum world, you
- 10:59Speaker 2: can never know both the exact position and the exact
- 11:02Speaker 2: velocity of a particle. With perfect precisions simultaneously.
- 11:05Speaker 3: Right Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
- 11:07Speaker 2: Exactly, it is a strict physical impossibility, So a squeezed
- 11:12Speaker 2: state is essentially a physic sloophole. The researchers use lasers
- 11:17Speaker 2: to intentionally squeeze the uncertainty of the ion's position, making
- 11:21Speaker 2: it extremely like unnaturally precise in space. They pin it down,
- 11:25Speaker 2: they do, but nature demands balance to compensate for knowing
- 11:29Speaker 2: exactly where the ion is. The ion's velocity becomes wildly uncertain.
- 11:33Speaker 3: It freaks out.
- 11:34Speaker 2: Basically, it doesn't just become unknown to us. The velocity
- 11:37Speaker 2: literally smears out. The atom enters a superposition of moving
- 11:41Speaker 2: at multiple different speeds at the exact same time.
- 11:44Speaker 3: Let me just anchor the scale of this for a second,
- 11:46Speaker 3: because it is staggering. We were talking about a single
- 11:50Speaker 3: solitary ion. It is less than a nanometer across kiny.
- 11:55Speaker 3: It is trapped in a cage of pure light, cool
- 11:58Speaker 3: to a fraction of a degree above the absolute zero
- 12:01Speaker 3: floor of the universe, and by squeezing its physical position,
- 12:05Speaker 3: we force it to travel at multiple speeds simultaneously. Yes,
- 12:09Speaker 3: and because as we established earlier, speed governs the flow
- 12:13Speaker 3: of time due to temporal drag, while the clock must
- 12:16Speaker 3: be experiencing multiple time flows.
- 12:18Speaker 2: The clock becomes entangled with its own velocity because the
- 12:21Speaker 2: ion is in a superposition of moving and not moving.
- 12:25Speaker 2: The internal ticking of the clock, the passage of time
- 12:27Speaker 2: experienced by that electron jumping between energy levels, becomes intimately
- 12:32Speaker 2: tied to that uncertain motion that is mind bending. The
- 12:35Speaker 2: result is a single physical object aging at two distinct
- 12:38Speaker 2: rates at the exact same moment. The clock is literally
- 12:41Speaker 2: both older and younger than itself.
- 12:43Speaker 3: And this isn't just a mathematical thought experiment anymore. As
- 12:46Speaker 3: Christian Saner or Kloro State pointed out, we now actually
- 12:48Speaker 3: possess the laboratory technology to generate that required squeezing.
- 12:52Speaker 2: We do. We have a clear engineering path right now
- 12:55Speaker 2: to reach the clock precision needed to observe these effects
- 12:58Speaker 2: in the real world. For the very first time, we.
- 13:00Speaker 3: Are standing on the precipice of watching time literally split
- 13:05Speaker 3: into two simultaneous realities in a physical laboratory.
- 13:09Speaker 2: And if we connect this to the bigger picture, it
- 13:11Speaker 2: becomes clearer why thousands of hours and millions of dollars
- 13:15Speaker 2: are being poured into trapping single ions.
- 13:17Speaker 3: It's not just a parlor trick.
- 13:19Speaker 2: Proving time superposition is definitely not just about winning a
- 13:22Speaker 2: Nobel prize for making a microscopic clock act weird. These
- 13:26Speaker 2: incredibly sensitive quantum technologies are forging new tools to solve
- 13:31Speaker 2: the absolute deepest mysteries of the universe.
- 13:34Speaker 3: We are building the scaffolding for the next great revolution
- 13:37Speaker 3: in physics. Absolutely, and the biggest mystery of them all,
- 13:40Speaker 3: like this stubborn outlier in all the physics, is gravity.
- 13:43Speaker 2: Gravity is the big one. In the standard model of
- 13:46Speaker 2: particle physics, we have beautifully identified the fundamental particles that
- 13:50Speaker 2: carry almost all the forces of nature. We know that
- 13:53Speaker 2: photons carry electromagnetism. We have gluons for the strong nuclear
- 13:58Speaker 2: force and w and z boses for the weak nuclear force.
- 14:02Speaker 2: We can measure them, we can predict them. They fit
- 14:05Speaker 2: perfectly into the quantum rule book.
- 14:07Speaker 3: But gravity refuses to cooperate.
- 14:09Speaker 2: It refuses. Einstein described gravity as the smooth, continuous warping
- 14:15Speaker 2: of space time, but quantum mechanics demands that everything is chunky, discrete,
- 14:20Speaker 2: and quantized. We have never been able to prove how
- 14:23Speaker 2: gravity works at the quantum.
- 14:25Speaker 3: Level, but theoretically there must be a discrete particle that
- 14:27Speaker 3: carries the force of gravity right exactly, the graviton, the
- 14:30Speaker 3: elusive white whale of modern physics.
- 14:32Speaker 2: It remains completely hypothetical, but Igor Pokofski's work has shown
- 14:36Speaker 2: that these exact same quantum technologies, these ultra coold entangled
- 14:40Speaker 2: squeeze state clocks, might be the key to finally seeing it.
- 14:44Speaker 3: Wait, really, how well?
- 14:45Speaker 2: If we can prove that time can exist in a superposition,
- 14:48Speaker 2: we prove that the fabric of relativity can operate by
- 14:51Speaker 2: quantum rules, we prove that space time itself can be chunky. Oh,
- 14:55Speaker 2: I see a clock sensitive enough to measure a superposition
- 14:58Speaker 2: of time could theoretically be sensitive enough to detect the
- 15:02Speaker 2: minuscule discrete kick of a single graviton passing by or
- 15:06Speaker 2: interacting with the atoms mass.
- 15:08Speaker 3: So if space time can play by quantum rules, then
- 15:11Speaker 3: gravity must play by quantum rules.
- 15:13Speaker 2: Too, exactly. It's the missing link.
- 15:14Speaker 3: It is the ultimate bridge between the two rule books.
- 15:17Speaker 3: I mean, we started with Einstein's flexible, personalized fluid of time.
- 15:21Speaker 3: We moved into the microscopic world of atoms existing in
- 15:25Speaker 3: multiple states simultaneously yep, and we ended up with ultra
- 15:28Speaker 3: coold laser trapped ions at the absolute zero floor of
- 15:32Speaker 3: the universe, manipulating the vacuum itself to squeeze uncertainty. It's
- 15:36Speaker 3: a journey, all of this just to prove that a
- 15:39Speaker 3: single clock can exist in two different timelines simultaneously, which
- 15:42Speaker 3: might just give us the tools to finally uncover the
- 15:44Speaker 3: particle that holds the entire cosmos together.
- 15:47Speaker 2: It is a profound reminder that knowledge is most valuable
- 15:50Speaker 2: when it forces us to question our deepest assumptions about reality.
- 15:54Speaker 2: You know, we take the forward, steady universal march of
- 15:57Speaker 2: time as an absolute given.
- 15:59Speaker 3: I really do.
- 16:00Speaker 2: This isn't just abstract math happening on a whiteboard somewhere.
- 16:03Speaker 2: This is the fundamental fabric of the reality you were
- 16:06Speaker 2: sitting in right now. The mechanics that govern the universe
- 16:09Speaker 2: are so much stranger and more intricately connected than our
- 16:14Speaker 2: everyday human perception allows us to see.
- 16:18Speaker 3: So what does this all mean? We know that our
- 16:20Speaker 3: bodies are brains. The very neurons firing as you listen
- 16:24Speaker 3: to this right now are made up of the exact
- 16:26Speaker 3: same quantum particles we've been talking about.
- 16:29Speaker 2: That's right.
- 16:29Speaker 3: They're governed by the same rules of uncertainty and relativity.
- 16:33Speaker 3: So I want to leave you with the thought to
- 16:34Speaker 3: chew on.
- 16:35Speaker 2: Let's hear it.
- 16:36Speaker 3: If time can flow at different simultaneous rates for a
- 16:39Speaker 3: single quantum particle, well, what does that mean for human consciousness?
- 16:44Speaker 3: What does it mean for our perception of the present moment?
- 16:46Speaker 2: That's a deep question.
- 16:48Speaker 3: If the particles inside us are constantly shifting through these
- 16:51Speaker 3: microscopic superpositions of time dictated by their own chaotic quantum velocities,
- 16:56Speaker 3: are we truly experiencing a single, unified reality, or, as
- 17:00Speaker 3: our human experience, our deeply held feeling of right now
- 17:02Speaker 3: simply the clumsy, smooth out average of countless different quantum
- 17:06Speaker 3: time flows, all happening at once inside our own bodies,