Latest / The Bill Handel Show / U.S. Alternative to World Health Organization | Is ‘Brain Rot’ Real?

Transcript

U.S. Alternative to World Health Organization | Is ‘Brain Rot’ Real? · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: six forty.
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: Bill Handle here on a Monday morning, February twenty third.
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: Some of the stories we're looking at. The Department's Homeland
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: Security has reversed this decision to suspend the TSA pre
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: check program hours after it suspended it, then it unsuspended it.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: There was a lot of backlash, and that was I
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: think they undid the first suspension, and then we did
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: the suspension after a suspension, and then they turned around
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: and we unsuspended it. A little complicated, but we've seen
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: a lot of that. I'll tell you else we've seen
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: on a level that got me stunned, and a lot
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: of other people's done. As you know, the President pulled
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: us out of the World Health Organization at the beginning
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: of the second term, and we spent about six hundred
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: and eighty million dollars a year in dues and voluntary contributions.
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: And the World Health Organization basically it's exactly what it says.
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: It's the World Health Organization working with countries all over
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: the world in dealing with pandemics, epidemics, diseases AID. You know,
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: for example, one of the things that the President said,
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: why we wanted to pull out. There is a program
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: in which one hundred million dollars in condoms were bought
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: to be used in Africa, and then the next day
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: it became fifty million dollars and in reality it I
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: think it was several hundred thousand dollars. So look at
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: the stupidity. How can we buy condoms for people? Well,
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: it happens to do with aid with AIDS, the AIDS
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: issue to somehow not eliminate, but certainly reduce the amount
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: of AIDS that are being transmitted in Africa. So does
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: that make sense? Yeah, I think it does. So what
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: is as a result of this? Because the government still
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: wants us involved in global health? So the administration is
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: proposing a two billion dollar a year program to fight
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: global disease and surveillance and outbreaks around the world.
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: Now who was.
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: Basically built by the US, And we spent last year
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: six hundred and eighty million dollars and we spent too
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: much money.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: That was what the President said.
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: We are just spending way too much money and we
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: don't control and we're not happy or he's not happy
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: with what the World Health Organization does.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: And there's not enough control.
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: So the big issue is the money that we're pissing
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: away with these people. So instead of spending six hundred
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: and eighty million dollars a year, let's spend two billion
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: dollars a year to save some money because we're spending
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: way too much. And naturally, the statement from the White
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: House is all of this is to protect Americans. Get
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: a lot of that. Everything that's done is protecting Americans. Well,
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: the public, the medical sector and private medical center and
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: governmental medical center outside of the administration are saying this
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: was a disaster. It was the decimation of foreign aid
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: for health, including dismantling of USAID, which was specifically created
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: to help emerging countries deal with their health issues and
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: epidemics dealing with for example, malaria, malaria control, and others.
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: And this guy from Harvard Medical School, a tool Gwande,
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: who's an expert in all this, said, we're spending more
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: money than we spent on WHO to create an institution
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: that's number one unlikely to survive.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: Will accomplis show only a fraction of what.
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: Who did Because the entire world was acting together, even
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: Russia and China that don't share health data directly with
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: the United States did share their health data with the
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: World Health Organization. This was a truly cooperative venture among
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: the world. This was an easy one where everybody could agree,
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: we want to save lives around the world, and the
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: President simply did not want to have anyone else other
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: than the United States control it. And by the way,
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: the United States did control it. It was the major contributor.
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: It really made all the major decisions. But it doesn't matter.
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: So global health experts were stunned, International authorities were stunned
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: at it. And so I think the big issue here
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: is creation of a whole new bureaucracy. And we're talking
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: about laboratories, administrator buildings, programs, transportation warehouses. We're going to
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: create our own all over the world and effectively undo
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: what WHO does let them have WHO.
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: We are going to have our own.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: Well, I know at some point international cooperation should be
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: and is necessary, and this one was really really a
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: tough call. I remember well I talked about this a
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: lot when the President withdrew from WHO, and the same
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: thing withdrawing from NATO, and the same thing from withdrawing
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: from the United Nations, for example. And as you know,
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: his peace program is and he said, it's to control,
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: is to outdo the United Nations not interested in world involvement.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: At the same time world involvement.
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: Let's let's get Greenland, Let's get can as our fifty
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: first date. Let's go ahead and pick up Maduro, which
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: everybody thought was a great idea, although the government of
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: Venezuela is exactly the same, although they are now listening
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: to the United States. So everybody thinks. Most people think
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: that was a pretty good deal. I certainly do. And
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: at the same time, now with Iran, are we going
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: to go to war with Iran? If the President is
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: unhappy with Iran, does if Iran does not come to
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: the table and does not give up as nuclear capabilities,
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: it's in Richmond program, it's ballistic missile program. Then the
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: President said, well, President made it pretty clearer. If we
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: can't do it the easy way, we'll do it the
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: hard way. And I don't think anybody doubts that. Well,
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: that's not staying out of world events. That's jumping in
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: with both feet and both arms. So the shame of
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: it is is the World Health Organization just how can
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: we not stay in it? I mean, we're talking about
• 7:07
  Speaker 2: a Bola a time I was studying a Marburg virus
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: and just aids around the world fighting all of those
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: diseases with the World Health Organization. And we're gonna do
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: it ourselves.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: All right, sure? Why not?
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: All right?
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: Coming up? I want to get rid of this. I
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: have a hard.
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: Time, and we can't do any more Trump. I'm telling
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: you right now, no more Trump, no more Trump, but
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: segments at all, never again until tomorrow, when we're probably
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: gonna do three more brain rots. It describes being very
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: online and it's harming our brains. That's one brain rot.
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: The feeling of coming up for air after spending too
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: many hours scrolling through social media. That can be brain rot.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Viving the content itself. Brain rot. It's a noun and
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: it's a verb. It's an adjective, depending on how you
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: look at it. So there's a woman who wrote a book,
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: How to Break Up with Your Phone, Catherine Price, and
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: she not only looked at the studies of people going
• 8:18
  Speaker 2: through their phone and scrolling, etc. And there are studies
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: out there. She has heard from thous This is anecdotal.
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: Lee has heard from thousands of people since her book
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: was published. Struggling to Focus, for example, p people used
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: to love reading in books are unable to finish a book.
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: The smartphones, what they've done is increase, exacerbate, exacerbated our
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: inclination to be easily distracted.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: That's what this is about. So here's research.
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: Shows that scrolling through short videos TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, shorts
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: is affecting our attention, our memory, our mental health. There
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: is scientific literature out there that shows increase use the
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: short form video is linked to poorer cognition and increase anxiety.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: And here is the interesting part. Our brains are distractable naturally.
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: For example, you're reading a book, or you hear a
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: loud noise, you're wired to look up and go, well,
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: was that a gunshot?
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: Was that a car backfiring.
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: The problem is with constant interruptions, whether it's phone notifications
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: or switching from topic to topic as you scroll, it
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: fragments our attention. Now, the question is are there long
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: term implications If you look at the science again. Jason Chen,
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: the professor of psychology and neuroscience at Temple University, says,
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: we do know there are certain parts of the brain,
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: certain connections between regions of the brain that look like
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: they're differentiated between people who are online more.
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: They can see it when they do cat scans.
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: More people who spend more time on social media, who
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: are more attached to their phones show less ability to focus. Now,
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: now that doesn't mean that causation is a correlation. Is
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: causation for exec get you don't know? Are people easily
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: distracted go to phones?
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: You know?
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: For example, here's the example I give. There was a scandal,
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: a little tiny bit of a scandal of Catholic priests
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: dorking little boys.
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: You remember that. Now the argument is.
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: The church responsible for the door curiosity or is the
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: church just a safe place for people who do that?
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: Not the church's fault. It's just it's the people's fault
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: who then go to the church. You see the problems.
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: So there isn't a real, real close connection. There was
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: a twenty twenty five study that was up published in
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: the journal Translational Psychiatry, and researchers looked at data for
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: more than seven thousand kids around the country. More screen
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: use was associated with it's a little complicated cortic little thickness,
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: I mean just the way the brain works. And the
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: science has said that this is important for controlling addictive behaviors.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: So the more use, the more scrolling you do, the
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: more you.
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: Pay attention to the phones, the more addictive you can be.
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: And again, are addictive people going to phones or are
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: phones causing the addiction adhd? ADHD is a big, big
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: problem and another important factor. Screen time usually means nighttime use.
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: You're in bed, scrolling happens a lot. You're just that's
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: where you spend an enormous amount of time scrolling. And
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: here is what some of the research says. The number
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: one reason why kids are not getting the eight hours
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: recommended eight hours is they're.
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: Using the screens just too much. That's it. And over time,
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: not getting enough sleep. Sleep, especially in.
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: Adolescents, reduces the white matter in the brain. And what
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: does that mean. Well, white matter is what grows among teenagers.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: You've heard about adolescents, and you really don't have your
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: full brain functioning, your full brain ability to look at
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: factors and see what's dangerous, which is why teenagers and
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: young people are crazy. They will do things. They're invulnerable.
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: No one's going to kill us, nothing's going to kill us. Well,
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: that is a question of the brain not evolving, and
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: it doesn't evolve till you're in your late twenties. So
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: the bottom line is this ain't good for you. And
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: here are some suggestions. No screens in the bedroom for anyone.
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: Make conscience decisions when using chatbots. Our brains love shortcuts,
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: but if you don't use a skill, you lose the skill.
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: And the chat bots do all your thinking for you.
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: You don't spend a lot of time analyzing.
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: They do it.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: And the problem is, again, if you don't use it,
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: you lose it. And that's a real problem. We're gonna
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: find some major, major problems with screening. I don't have
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: that problem because I don't.
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: Screen very much. I don't scroll very much. I don't
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: I don't get my news from the internet. I don't
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: get my news. I just don't. We would have never
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: guess that by the term you just used. I don't
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: scroll very much. I don't scroll my screen very much.
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: I don't screen my scroll.
• 13:43
  Speaker 3: Okay, you have the attention span of a net already long.
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: But that's true. But that has nothing to do.
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: That's true because I don't have the patience to actually
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: screen by scroll. Okay, now let me tell you about
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: something that happens governmentally and even privately when businesses are
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: bought and sold in contracts are written, or you have
• 14:11
  Speaker 2: new laws that are written, or in this case ICE
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: and that is the concept of unintended consequences, and that
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: is a big deal.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: So let me tell you what's going on with ICE.
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: There is a little town called Socorro near the Rio
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: Grand It's a border wall.
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: Town, and rumors were swirling around that.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: ICE folks were buying some serious amount of warehouse space.
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: This is actually the Department Homeland Security had bought one
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: hundred and twenty two million dollars for eight hundred and
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: twenty six thousand square feet of warehouses in Sicoro.
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: Sacoro has forty thousand people.
• 14:56
  Speaker 2: That is a problem because they're putting in more people
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: in warehouses around the country because they just need more
• 15:04
  Speaker 2: warehouse space. One of the things about picking up a
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: lot of detainees, picking up a lot of putative illegal.
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: Aliens, not just the worst of the worst.
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: Let's get real here, picking up a lot of people
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: and detaining them.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: They need a space and there isn't enough space.
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: And as the Department Homeland Security and ICE is falling
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: precipitously in the way Americans view them they're going straight
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: uphill with buying these warehouses for detention centers. Sakuro is
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: among twenty communities with these large warehouses across the US
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: that have become targets, actually stealth targets for ICE. They're
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: forty five billion dollar expansion of detention centers.
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: Forty five billion dollars just for detention centers.
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: So here are the unintended consequences Because ICE comes in
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: and it builds this massive destension center for five seven thousand,
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: ten thousand people. Well, guess what the communities have to
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: do when you have an extra seven thousand people in
• 16:18
  Speaker 2: little towns like SoCoRo, they have to build increase sanitation services,
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: lighting roads. And these are poor towns. I mean, you
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: cannot bring ten thousand people into a town where there
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: are forty thousand people increase it by twenty five percent
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: without building infrastructure.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: And these towns are just going Come on.
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: Also, list the political fallout of this too. I mean,
• 16:49
  Speaker 2: I don't know if anybody is offended by forty five
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: billion dollars just for new detention centers.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: I kind of am.
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: And there are fewer and fewer people that are getting
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: in line saying ICE is doing a great job, and
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: they're pulling back.
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: They are pulling back. We know that.
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: Tom Holme, who is the the immigrations Zar the detentions
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: are is it has pulled back all of or many
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: of the federal ICE agents. A matter of fact, the
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: vast majority from the various towns now they, by the way,
• 17:26
  Speaker 2: they have not walked back at all. Christy Nomes's statement
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: about the two people that were killed, right, Renee Good
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: and Alex Pretty as far as they are concerned, they
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: both of them were still domestic terrorists that were trying
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: to kill ICE agents. They never walk that back. We'll
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: see what happens with these warehouses. The problem is the
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: land has already been bought. The warehouses have already been bought.
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: These are empty warehouses, tribution centers. Because these various businesses,
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: well they guessed there were going to be a lot
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: more and the business is not as strong as they
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: assumed it was going to be. All right, I want
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: to have fun now, all right, let me tell you
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: what happened at the Munich Security conference this month. The
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: beginning of this month, Marco Rubio said in a speech
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: that the entire I'm going to quote the entire romance
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: of the cowboy archetype that became synonymous with the American
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: West was born in Spain. All the Mexican went nuts.
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: Mexico went, oh, no, no, no, let's stop it right there,
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: unintended consequences. You throw a line out, it's fairly benign, saying, hey,
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: American cowboy came from you guys.
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: He's talking to the people from Spain.
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: And you know why not, Well, Mexico went completely nuts
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: and said, no, no, no, cowboys came from Mexico.
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: Why because if you look, if.
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: You look at the horses that were brought over from Spain,
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: we're the ones that russelled cattle, were the ones that
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: had We had the cattle herds. We had what cowboys
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: do that was developed here in Mexico.
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: And when you think.
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: About it, Rubio said that the cowboy lineage can be
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: traced to Spain the Iberian Peninsula because the animals were
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: brought the horses were bought over there. But no, no,
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: not at all as far as Mexico is concerned, because
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: here were the horses and sheep and donkeys brought over
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: to the New World, and we have the grasslands, planes
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: and deserts, and the animals just absolutely thrived. So cattle
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: had to be managed, and so the job of refining
• 19:54
  Speaker 2: the techniques of riding and roping fell to the Mexican cowboy,
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: the vecanos, which is the standard, the Mexican word for cows,
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: and the Mexican cowboys, they were adept at everything from
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: caving to branding to overseeing the long distance cattle drives.
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: And if you.
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: Look at the language of dealing with cattle, words such
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: as corral, lasso, bronco, lariat chaps, which by the way,
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: are a very big part of gay porno films, that
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: all came from the Mexican version.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: Well the Spanish version certainly the language well the language
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: king it from white Spain. Yes, And that's the point.
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: And I think that's the point that.
• 20:47
  Speaker 3: Music is German because brass came to Mexico by way
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: of Germany.
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the point that that is being made, I think,
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: and the Mexican cowboy experts, if you will, as well
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: as historians say it's all mixed up.
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: You cannot claim anything came from.
• 21:10
  Speaker 2: Any particular group, because it was indigenous people in the
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: Portuguese and people from Spain. And so you put all
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: that together and you get the Cowboy. Now, a couple
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: things are historically correct. Horses did come from the Iberian Peninsula,
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: but that was before Spain was Spain.
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: Is when horses came over.
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: So it is just this mishmash and the point I'm saying,
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: and this is where going back to unintended consequences, something
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: is benign as cowboy because he's speaking to a Spanish
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: group from Spain and he said, by the way, our
• 21:46
  Speaker 2: cowboys come from Spain and we basically want to thank you.
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: And what happens with people on the internet, what happens
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: with the response from Mexican authorities and people of Mexican descent,
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: go berserve.
• 22:00
  Speaker 3: I also believed it came from Mexico, and I want
• 22:03
  Speaker 3: to stick with that. And I know that John Wayne
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: is turning in his great SAPs probably saying offensive words
• 22:18
  Speaker 3: like shaps.
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: Okay, I've made that point. Okay, fair enough, I've milked
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: that on the way. Yeah, I've milked that one to death. Okay,
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: We're done, guys, Gary and Shannon up next. We're back
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: again tomorrow morning. Cono is one of the few people
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: that actually laugh at that stuff. Will and Amy come
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: aboard at five o'clock with wake up call. Will you
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: may want to try to comb your hair at some point,
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: and then Neil and I jump in from six to nine.
• 22:48
  Speaker 2: Of course, Cono, you can't tell if he combs his
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: hair because he always wears that hat, and Neil, who
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: rarely combs his hair because he has.
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: Starting it different today. Nobody noticed that's true.
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: All Right, We're done, guys. Gary Shannon up next. Catch
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: it tomorrow kf I am six p forty.
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show.
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: Catch My Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app