Latest / Inside The Criminal Mind / The Model That Shaped Profiling: Rethinking Organized vs. Disorganized

Transcript

The Model That Shaped Profiling: Rethinking Organized vs. Disorganized · Inside The Criminal Mind

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Today we're going to be looking at
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: the famous organized versus disorganized killers. Does the FBI distinction
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: actually hold up? So picture investigators entering a homicide scene.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: The victim appears to have been specifically targeted. Restraints were used.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: The offender apparently brought a weapon and removed it afterward.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: There are signs that efforts were made to conceal evidence.
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: The traditional FBI framework might describe this as an organized
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: crime scene. Now imagine another scene. The attack appears spontaneous.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: The victim was encountered opportunistically. A weapon was obtained at
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: the scene and abandoned afterward. Traditionally, this might be classified
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: as disorganized. The organized-disorganized distinction emerged from the FBI's early
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: research into sexual homicide in the late 70s and 80s
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: from investigators Ressler and Douglas. Remember them? Interviewed incarcerated offenders
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: and attempted to identify patterns connecting crime scene behavior with
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: offender characteristics. The resulting model was appealing because it offered
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: investigators a way to move from behavior to hypothesis. An
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: organized offender was generally described as someone who planned the offense,
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: selected victims deliberately, maintained control, and attempted to avoid detection.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Such offenders were theorized to be more socially capable and methodical.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: The disorganized were described as more impulsive. The crime scenes
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: contained more evidence of sudden violence, limited planning, They hypothesized
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: they have greater social or psychological difficulties for the disorganized. However,
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: there's one problem. Real offenders do not necessarily cooperate with
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: the categories. Researchers have questioned whether organized and disorganized behaviors
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: actually form two distinct types. In a study in 2004,
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: they examined crime scene characteristics from 100 U.S. serial homicides.
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: They found that many behaviors traditionally considered organized appeared frequently
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: across cases while evidence for a separate clearly defined disorganized
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: type was considerably weaker. In other words, a killer might
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: plan one aspect of an offense carefully while behaving impulsively
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: doing another. If you think about Dennis Rader, the BTK killer,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: Rader demonstrated extensive planning, stalking, and efforts to control victims,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: yet even highly planned offenders can encounter unexpected resistance, make mistakes,
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: alter their methods, or leave behind evidence. Crime scenes are interactions,
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: not personality tests. Victims resist, offenders panic, plans fail. Alcohol
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: or drugs can be part of it. That is why
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: modern profiling is most useful when treated as a hypothesis
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: generator rather than psychological certainty. Finding an organized crime scene
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: does not allow investigators to simply reverse engineer an offender's personality.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: The enduring lesson of the organized-disorganized model may therefore be
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: different from the original one intended. Behaviors do matter, patterns
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: do matter, but categories can become dangerous. when investigators begin
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: treating them as facts rather than possibilities. The best profile
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: is not the person who looks at a crime scene
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: and confidently announces what happened or what kind of killer
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: committed the scene. It is the investigator who knows exactly
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: how uncertain the conclusion still is.