Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / New Mexico's Lawsuit Filed Against Epstein Executors Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1) (10/22/26)

Transcript

New Mexico's Lawsuit Filed Against Epstein Executors Darren Indyke And Richard Kahn (Part 1) (10/22/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to start taking
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: a look at the lawsuit filed by the state of
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: New Mexico against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. Case number 126-CV-03543.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: State of New Mexico, Plaintiff. First, Darren K. Indyke, in
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: his individual capacity and his capacity as the executor for
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: the estate, of Jeffrey E. Epstein, an administrator of the
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: 1953 Trust, Richard Kahn in his individual capacity and his
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: capacity as the executor for the estate of Jeffrey Epstein
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: and the administrator of the 1953 Trust, estate of Jeffrey E.
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: Epstein and the 1953 Trust. Jury trial demanded. The state
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: of New Mexico, by and through its Attorney General, Raul Torres,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: files this action to ensure the defendants, Darren K. Indyke,
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: and Richard D. Kahn, who facilitated and concealed Jeffrey Epstein's
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: sexual abuse and human trafficking during his life, do not
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: profit after his death from the illegal activity that they
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: enabled and furthered. Through this action, the state seeks to
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: hold these individuals accountable to the fullest extent possible, and
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: to ensure that Epstein's assets are distributed to the survivors
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: of his horrific crimes. Introduction For decades, Jeffrey Epstein groomed
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: sexually abused and trafficked hundreds of vulnerable girls and young women,
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: both for his own gratification and to expand his wealth
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: and social influence by making them available to other powerful men.
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: Epstein's abuses were aided, abetted, and enabled by a number
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: of others, including his longtime personal attorney, defendant Darren K. Indyke,
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: and his longtime accountant, defendant Richard D. Kahn. By the
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: time of his death, Epstein was the center of of
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: an informal network of associates bound together by a single purpose,
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: knowingly facilitating and concealing the decades-long criminal conduct to preserve
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: and grow Epstein's fortunes and influence. Those who helped Epstein
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: in his exploits included official employees of Epstein, or his
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: various corporate entities, such as several personal assistants, household staff, pilots,
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: his lawyer, defendant Indyk, and his accountant, defendant Kahn, as
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: well as social and or business connections such as the
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: confidant and co-abuser Glenn Maxwell, and the late model agency
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: founder and accused trafficker Jean-Luc Brunel. Epstein, with the help
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: of his associates, trafficked isolated and abused survivors at alluring
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: locations including Zorro Ranch in Stanley, New Mexico, a remote
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: and sprawling estate that served as one site for almost
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: 20 years. In exchange for furthering Epstein's criminal project and
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: remaining silent about it, His associates received generous salaries, access
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: to elite social circles, and lavish gifts, including being named
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: beneficiaries of his multi-million dollar estate. These associates with Epstein,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: at its core, constitute what's referred to herein as the
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: Epstein Enterprise. Indyk served as Epstein's personal lawyer and part
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: of the Epstein Enterprise for over two decades, from approximately
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: 1995 or 1996 until Epstein's death on August 10, 2019.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: In fact, in a 2009 hearing in the U.S. Virgin Islands,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: subsequent to Epstein's guilty plea for sexual offense in Florida,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: Indyk described Epstein as a kind of my mentor for
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: whom Indyk had been working as an attorney, advisor, and
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: personal representative for over 20 years now. Indyk was deeply
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: embedded in Epstein's affairs well beyond official responsibilities as legal counsel.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: Among the various roles Indyk played for Epstein, he served
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: as an officer and director for on numerous Epstein-related corporate
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: entities and foundations, as a trustee of Epstein-related trusts, including
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: the trust that is the beneficiary of Epstein's estate, and
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: as a facilitator of Epstein's sex trafficking and sexual abuse,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: arranging payments to survivors to purchase their silence and leave
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: them indebted to Epstein. Indyk benefited substantially and personally from
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: his work enabling Epstein's sexual abuse and trafficking. Indyk received
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: financial compensation and other benefits, including more than $ 16 million
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: from Epstein and Epstein-related entities over the period from 2011
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: to 2019, a loan of $ 7 million from Epstein that
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: was never repaid, financial assistance from Epstein to purchase homes
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: in New Jersey and Boca Raton, Florida, and coverage for
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: multiple rounds of in vitro fertilization. Kahn served as Epstein's
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: in-house accountant for over a decade, from approximately 2005 or 2006,
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: until Epstein's death. And during that time, he too furthered
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: and concealed Epstein's criminal operation. Like Indyk, Kahn served as
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: an officer and director of numerous Epstein-related corporate entities and foundations,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: as a trustee of Epstein-related trusts, including the trust that
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: is the beneficiary of Epstein's estate, and as a facilitator
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: of Epstein's sex trafficking and sexual abuse. In that role,
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: he provided Epstein cash and handled costs for expenses such
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: as Victoria's Secret lingerie, haircuts at the high end Frederick Fakai,
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: and doctor's visits. Kahn additionally monitored the spending of Epstein's
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: survivors and even prepared tax returns for some. When bank
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: compliance officers questioned Epstein's payments of tuition for young women,
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: Kahn vouched for Epstein. Kahn stated publicly that gifts made
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: to women were a very small fraction of Epstein's spending,
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: and he did not see them as red flags for
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: abuse or trafficking. Kahn benefited substantially and personally from his
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: association with Epstein, receiving financial compensation and other benefits, including
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: more than $ 10 million from Epstein and Epstein-related entities over
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: the period from 2011 to 2019, and payment of $ 4. 9
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: million from Epstein JPMorgan Chase accounts to Kahn's company, HBRK Associates,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: for the period from approximately 2005 to approximately 2013. Indyk
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: and Kahn are both now co-executors of Epstein's estate. The estate,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: or the Epstein estate, both beneficiaries of the 1953 trust,
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: which inherits the assets of the Epstein estate, and together
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: with two current trustees of the 1953 trust. The Epstein
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: estate remains under the administration of Indyk and Kahn while
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: the probate case is managed in the Superior Court of
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: the U.S. Virgin Islands. As beneficiaries, Indyk and Kahn are
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: respectively eligible for bequests of $ 50 million and $ 25 million
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: from the estate, which is currently valued at over $ 107 million.
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: The Attorney General brings this action, parens patriae, to enforce
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: the laws of New Mexico. to assure its residents that
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: the New Mexico Department of Justice will act to protect
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: them from the harmful effects of criminal sex trafficking enterprises
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: flourishing in the state, particularly given the attempts at sex
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: trafficking in New Mexico might well reoccur, to ensure that
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: participants in human trafficking are unable to profit from the
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: criminal enterprise, and to recover damages for survivors victimized by
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: the Epstein enterprise in New Mexico. Jurisdiction and Venue The
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to U.S. Code 28,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: Section 1331 and 1367. This court has personal jurisdiction over
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: each defendant pursuant to N.M. Statute Section 38-116, 1971, because
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: defendants engaged in conduct in New Mexico through their participation
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: in business, financial transactions, and accounts registered, held, and operated
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: in New Mexico, and by filing documents with the state,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: of New Mexico. More specifically described in further detail, defendant
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Indyke served as secretary of Zorro Development Corporation, which was
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: registered at Zorro Ranch's address, and was a signatory on
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: its bank account from December 20, 2016 through July 8, 2019.
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: Defendant Kahn served as treasurer and director of Cypress Incorporated,
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: which held title to Zorro Ranch, the site of criminal
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: activity described herein. Defendants thereby purposefully direct and or directed
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: their actions toward the state of New Mexico, where Zorro
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: Ranch served as a hub for the criminal enterprise. Venue
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: is proper under U.S. Code 28, Section 1391B2. Venue is
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: proper in this district because a substantial part of the
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: conduct giving rise to the state's claims occurred in this district.
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: It is the location where a plaintiff is situated, and
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: because the defendants transact or transacted business In this district,
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: the parties. Plaintiff's State of New Mexico is a sovereign
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: state of the United States. The Attorney General of New
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: Mexico brings this action on behalf of the State of
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: New Mexico. Pursuant to his authority under Intra Elea N.M.
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: Statute Section 8-51-217-1933, the New Mexico Racketeering Act Statute 30-426,
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: the Trafficking Victims Protection Act U.S. Code 18 Section 1591-1595,
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: and his parents' patriae authority to enforce the laws of
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: New Mexico and protect the public interest, safety, health, and
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: well-being of persons in New Mexico. Defendant Indyke is named
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: in his individual capacity as a person associated, in fact,
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: with the Epstein Enterprise, and is additionally named in his
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: capacity as executor for the Epstein estate and administrator of
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: the 1953 Trust. Defendant Kahn is named in his individual
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: capacity as a person associated, in fact, with the Epstein
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: enterprise and additionally named in his capacity as executor for
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: the Epstein estate and administrator of the 1953 Trust. Defendant
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: estate of Jeffrey Epstein was established upon Epstein's death and
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: serves as the vehicle for through which civil claims may
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: be brought against Epstein after his death for legal liabilities
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: related to sexual abuse, trafficking, and kidnapping, as alleged herein.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: Defendant the 1953 Trust, or 53 Trust, was established by
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: Epstein on January 18, 2019. Epstein amended and restated the
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Trust most recently on August 8, 2019, two days before
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: his death. Pursuant to the last will and testament of
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey E. Epstein, Also dated August 8, 2019, Epstein gave
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: all of his property, real and personal, wherever situated, following
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: payments and distributions for estate expenses to the 1953 Trust. Thus,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: the Trust is named as a defendant not because it
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: engaged in racketeering activity or violations of the TVPA, but
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: because it holds the assets of the estate through which
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: the state seeks to satisfy any relief granted. pursuant to
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: NM statute section 3042.6 C and D. All right, folks,
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: we're going to wrap up episode one right here. And
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: in the next episode, we're going to pick up with
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: the factual allegations. All the information that goes with this
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: episode can be found in the description box.