Latest / Mechanical Engineering Made Simple / Bias, Bolts & Blueprints | The Mechanical Engineer’s Survival Guide

Transcript

Bias, Bolts & Blueprints | The Mechanical Engineer’s Survival Guide · Mechanical Engineering Made Simple

• 0:00
  Get ready to torque your nuts, harden your springs, and forge
• 0:03
  your mind into a bulletproof study guide.
• 0:06
  We are mechanical engineering made simple.
• 0:09
  Welcome to the deep dive. Today we're really digging into
• 0:14
  something big, the essence of mechanical engineering.
• 0:18
  We're going to try and map out that journey, you know, from
• 0:20
  just an idea, thinking about the whole system, all the.
• 0:22
  Way to a real physical product. Something tangible, efficient,
• 0:27
  and powered up. Exactly.
• 0:29
  It's a massive field, obviously. Oh, huge.
• 0:31
  But we've tried to structure this based on the source
• 0:34
  materials, breaking it down into maybe 3 core areas for you.
• 0:37
  First up is the strategy, part systems and strategy, how you
• 0:41
  even define the problem. Then we get into the making of
• 0:44
  the thing, design and manufacturing, and finally, how
• 0:46
  we powered all think fluids, power and efficiency.
• 0:49
  All right. Let's jump into that first
• 0:50
  pillar then. Yes, strategy, systems
• 0:52
  engineering. The sources really hammer home
• 0:55
  this idea of issue formulation. Yeah, and it's fundamental how
• 0:58
  you frame or or formulate the problem at the very beginning.
• 1:01
  Well, that pretty much decides how you're going to solve it.
• 1:03
  It sets the whole direction. So getting that definition right
• 1:06
  is key. Absolutely key.
• 1:08
  It involves figuring out the client's objectives, what they
• 1:11
  really want, what they value. That's value system design, and
• 1:15
  then brainstorming all the possible ways to get there.
• 1:17
  The alternatives? Well.
• 1:18
  Yeah, there's a catch, right? A human.
• 1:20
  Catch. There always is, isn't there?
• 1:21
  Yeah. Yeah.
• 1:23
  Relying purely on human judgement, even from experts,
• 1:26
  well, it opens the door to cognitive biases.
• 1:29
  We all have them. Right.
• 1:30
  We like to think engineers are purely logical, but these biases
• 1:34
  creep in like selective perception.
• 1:38
  That's a big one. It's basically looking for
• 1:40
  evidence that confirms what you already believe or want to be
• 1:43
  true. You filter out anything that
• 1:45
  contradicts your preferred conclusion.
• 1:47
  It's like wanting a self fulfilling prophecy.
• 1:49
  And expectations is similar. Kinda with expectations you give
• 1:53
  more weight, more validity to information that just confirms
• 1:56
  what you already thought. It feels right because it
• 1:58
  matches your existing beliefs. It's easy to see how it happens
• 2:01
  when you're drowning in data. You grab onto what looks
• 2:04
  familiar, and then there's ease of recall.
• 2:06
  Right. That's where you overestimate
• 2:08
  the likelihood of something, just because examples spring to
• 2:11
  mind easily. Think dramatic failures versus
• 2:15
  quiet successes. The dramatic stuff sticks, so
• 2:17
  you might think it's more common than it really is.
• 2:20
  So if we know about these biases, why are they still such
• 2:23
  a problem? Because, well, knowing isn't
• 2:26
  always enough, is it? Biases aren't just about not
• 2:28
  knowing something. They're like mental shortcuts
• 2:30
  our brains take. So acknowledging this human
• 2:34
  factor, this potential for error right at the start, it means we
• 2:37
  need really solid objective processes later on.
• 2:41
  Which brings us neatly to how we enforce that rigor in the
• 2:44
  physical design stage. DFM and a design for
• 2:47
  manufacturing and assembly. Exactly.
• 2:49
  That's the framework, and it's useful to kind of separate the
• 2:52
  two arts in your mind. OK?
• 2:53
  DFA designed for assembly is all about the labor part.
• 2:56
  How can we make putting this thing together faster, simpler,
• 2:59
  with fewer steps? Makes sense and D FM.
• 3:01
  D FM, designed for manufacturing, focuses more on
• 3:04
  the components themselves, reducing material waste, making
• 3:07
  parts easier to fabricate, thinking about tooling costs,
• 3:09
  things like that. And using them together, the
• 3:13
  results can be pretty dramatic. Oh, absolutely staggering.
• 3:16
  Sometimes the sources give this fantastic example a Motor Dr.
• 3:20
  redesign. They applied DFM and A
• 3:23
  principles. Then what happened?
• 3:25
  They slashed the number of parts went from 19 components down to
• 3:28
  just 7. Think about that.
• 3:29
  Wow, 19 down to seven. That's huge simplification.
• 3:33
  And that simplification ripples through everything.
• 3:36
  Assembly time. It dropped from over 213 seconds
• 3:39
  down to about 86 seconds less. Than half the time.
• 3:42
  And the bottom line, the unit manufacturing cost, the UMC, it
• 3:45
  went from $47.22 down to $30.21. That's a massive cost reduction
• 3:51
  per unit, almost $17.00. That's not just savings, that's
• 3:54
  a competitive weapon. Precisely.
• 3:55
  That's the power of thinking about manufacturing and assembly
• 3:58
  right from the design stage. It's strategic.
• 4:02
  So when you have potentially thousands of parts, how do you
• 4:05
  keep track? How do you manage that
• 4:06
  complexity, especially for retrieving old designs or
• 4:09
  planning manufacturing? Good question.
• 4:11
  Engineers use classification systems, basically codes for
• 4:14
  parts. There are two main flavors.
• 4:16
  You'll see Monocode. Yeah, it's hierarchical.
• 4:18
  Think like a library system. You know, broad category than
• 4:21
  subcategory. Getting more specific like
• 4:23
  animals than mammals than primates than humans.
• 4:25
  Got it. And the other type.
• 4:27
  Is polycode or sometimes called feature based?
• 4:30
  This is more like using filters. When you shop online you tag
• 4:33
  apart based on specific features.
• 4:36
  Does it have holes? Is a round?
• 4:38
  What material, regardless of its parent category?
• 4:42
  OK, more flexible in some ways. Can be the sources mentioned a
• 4:45
  really detailed example, an 8 digit code that captures shape,
• 4:48
  key features, size, precision level, even the material with
• 4:52
  eight digits. Structured like that, you can
• 4:53
  represent something like over 25,000,000 unique part families.
• 4:57
  25,000,000 That's incredible granularity.
• 5:00
  It's like a universal language for parts within a company.
• 5:03
  That's the goal. It helps you find if you
• 5:05
  designed something similar before or helps automate the
• 5:07
  planning for how to make it. Saves venting the wheel.
• 5:10
  OK, so strategy set parts are organized, but before we
• 5:14
  physically make anything, we need to predict how it's going
• 5:17
  to behave. That means math, right?
• 5:20
  Mathematical models. Absolutely essential because the
• 5:22
  things we design, they're dynamic, they move, they change
• 5:26
  over time. A robot arm cursus engine
• 5:29
  airflow over a wing. They're not static.
• 5:31
  Exactly. So mathematical models, usually
• 5:34
  differential equations or different equations, are how we
• 5:36
  write down the rules. Yeah, they say based on where
• 5:40
  the system is now, here's where it's going to be next.
• 5:43
  It's prediction quantified. And there's a kind of unified
• 5:46
  theory for this. Control engineers don't need
• 5:48
  totally different math for electrical versus mechanical
• 5:52
  systems. It's one of the beautiful
• 5:53
  things, actually. We use these idealized system
• 5:56
  elements. Think of them as building
• 5:57
  blocks. Some store energies like a
• 5:59
  spring or a capacitor. Some dissipate energy, like a
• 6:02
  damper or a resistor. Some transform it.
• 6:05
  And these same blocks apply across different physical
• 6:07
  domains. Broadly, yes.
• 6:10
  You can model mechanical, electrical, fluid, even thermal
• 6:12
  systems using these core energy concepts.
• 6:15
  It gives us a common language. And the modern way to express
• 6:18
  this, especially in control theory, is the state variable
• 6:21
  model. Yeah, that's become really
• 6:23
  central. It's a very compact way to
• 6:24
  package up the system's dynamics.
• 6:27
  You use vectors, A state vector, usually six time do that
• 6:31
  captures the system's internal condition.
• 6:32
  Like position and velocity. Could be, yeah.
• 6:35
  Then an input vector representing external forces or
• 6:38
  signals acting on it, and an output vector for the things you
• 6:41
  can measure or care about. It's powerful for handling
• 6:44
  complex multi input, multi output systems.
• 6:47
  And this model lets you analyze the system's response, how it
• 6:51
  reacts to inputs. Precisely.
• 6:53
  We look at things like transient performance.
• 6:56
  When you kick the system, does it overshoot the target?
• 6:59
  How quickly does it settle down to a steady state?
• 7:01
  These are critical for performance and safety.
• 7:03
  How? Do you measure that?
• 7:04
  We often analyze it in the frequency domain using poles and
• 7:07
  zeros. Their location on the complex
• 7:09
  plane tells you a lot. And for simpler systems like
• 7:12
  standard 2nd order systems, think mass spring damper.
• 7:15
  You can calculate things like overshoot and settling time
• 7:18
  exactly. Based on what?
• 7:20
  Based on two key parameters, the damping ratio, which tells you
• 7:23
  how much oscillation there is, and the natural frequency, which
• 7:26
  tells you how fast it wants to oscillate.
• 7:29
  Knowing the poles and zeros which come from these instantly
• 7:32
  tells an engineer if the system is stable, if it's sluggish and
• 7:35
  it's too bouncy. It's the mathematical core of
• 7:37
  stability analysis. OK, so math predicts behavior.
• 7:41
  Now let's get back to the physical world, making sure the
• 7:43
  actual parts meet the specs. You mentioned materials earlier.
• 7:47
  They're complicated. Incredibly, even defining a
• 7:51
  property isn't always straightforward.
• 7:53
  Take hardness, Seems simple right?
• 7:55
  How resistant is it to scratching or indentation?
• 7:59
  Well, the source point out there are at least 15 different common
• 8:02
  tests for penetration hardness and guess what?
• 8:04
  They give different numbers. They all give different
• 8:06
  numerical results, so just saying a material has a certain
• 8:09
  hardness isn't enough to specify which test was used.
• 8:13
  It highlights how critical standards and clear
• 8:15
  communication are. 15 Wow. OK, so assuming we can specify
• 8:19
  the material, what about efficient manufacturing powder
• 8:22
  metallurgy? PM sounds interesting.
• 8:24
  It is. It's a neat process.
• 8:26
  You take very fine metal powders, press them into a dye
• 8:29
  shape and then heat them. Center them so the particles
• 8:32
  bond together. And the advantage?
• 8:33
  Several big ones first, usually very little material waste.
• 8:38
  Unlike machining where you cut away material, often the part
• 8:41
  comes out needing no extra machining it's net shape or
• 8:44
  close to it. Saves steps and material.
• 8:46
  Exactly, plus you can get unique properties.
• 8:49
  You can control the porosity, leave tiny gaps which is great
• 8:52
  for filters or for making self lubricating bearings.
• 8:55
  The pores hold oil. Clever.
• 8:58
  What about processes involving deformation like hot working?
• 9:02
  Right. So hot working means shaping the
• 9:04
  metal plastically, permanently deforming it, but above its re
• 9:08
  crystallization temperature. Now hot is relative.
• 9:11
  How so? Well, for lead that temperature
• 9:13
  is basically room temperature, but for some steels you're
• 9:15
  talking 2000°F or even higher. OK, let's talk about extrusion.
• 9:20
  Pushing metal through a shaped hole?
• 9:22
  A dye. That's the idea.
• 9:24
  Works great for aluminum, copper, but steel?
• 9:27
  Steel's tough. It's yield strength is very
• 9:30
  high, even when hot under the immense pressure of extrusion.
• 9:34
  It really wants to friction Weld itself to the steel dye.
• 9:36
  Which would be. Bad.
• 9:38
  Catastrophic. Yeah.
• 9:39
  So for extruding steel you need serious lubrication technology,
• 9:43
  often phosphate coatings on the steel billet, or even using
• 9:46
  molten glass as a lubricant layer between the hot steel and
• 9:49
  the dye. Molten glass is lubricant.
• 9:51
  That's wild and piercing, making seamless tubes.
• 9:55
  How does that work without a seam?
• 9:57
  It's counterintuitive. You heat up a solid cylindrical
• 9:59
  billet, then force it over a pointed mandrel wall.
• 10:01
  It's also rotating. The forces cause the metal to
• 10:05
  shear in a specific way, and it actually creates a crack, an
• 10:08
  opening right in the center of the billet ahead of the mandrel.
• 10:10
  The mandrel then just enlarges and smooths out that internally
• 10:13
  generated hole into a tube. It relies on controlled failure
• 10:16
  in a way. Fascinating controlled internal
• 10:18
  crack. OK, parts are made.
• 10:21
  How do we ensure consistent quality?
• 10:23
  Statistical Quality control, SQC.
• 10:25
  Right, you can't inspect every single dimension on every single
• 10:29
  part. Usually it's too slow and
• 10:30
  expensive. So you use statistics.
• 10:33
  Control charts like X bar and R charts are common tools.
• 10:36
  What do they track? The X bar chart tracks the
• 10:38
  average of samples over time, showing if the process center is
• 10:42
  drifting. The R chart tracks the range
• 10:44
  within samples, showing if the variability is changing.
• 10:47
  And there are rules for interpreting these charts.
• 10:50
  Yes, one key rule of thumb mentioned is if you get say, 5
• 10:55
  to 7 consecutive points all falling on the same side of the
• 10:58
  center line, even if they're still within the upper and lower
• 11:01
  control limits. Something's likely shifted.
• 11:03
  Exactly, it suggests a non random change has occurred in
• 11:06
  the process and you should investigate even if you aren't
• 11:09
  making bad parts yet. It's an early warning system.
• 11:11
  What about the processes inherent ability capability
• 11:15
  limits? That's crucial.
• 11:16
  Capability limits, often calculated as the process
• 11:19
  average ±3 standard deviations, tell you the natural spread of
• 11:23
  the process, where 99.73% of the output is expected to fall if
• 11:28
  the process is stable. Now here's the critical
• 11:30
  comparison. You compare those capability
• 11:33
  limits to the tolerance specified by the design
• 11:35
  engineer, the required precision.
• 11:38
  And if the tolerance is tighter, narrower than what the process
• 11:41
  is capable of. Then you have a problem.
• 11:43
  That process physically cannot reliably produce parts within
• 11:47
  the required specification. You're guaranteed to make scrap
• 11:51
  or parts needing rework. Your only option then is 100%
• 11:54
  inspection, sorting good from bad, which is super inefficient.
• 11:58
  SQC helps ensure your process is actually capable of meeting the
• 12:01
  requirements in the 1st. Place makes sense.
• 12:03
  OK, let's shift gears from making things to powering them.
• 12:07
  Fluids and energy first principles.
• 12:10
  What is a fluid? Fundamentally, it's a substance
• 12:13
  that continuously deforms or flows when you apply a shear
• 12:16
  stress. Doesn't matter how small the
• 12:18
  stress is. Unlike a solid.
• 12:19
  Right. A solid will deform a bit under
• 12:21
  shear then resist. A fluid just keeps moving.
• 12:24
  Think of water, air, oil versus steel or wood.
• 12:28
  We also sometimes talk about ideal fluids, non viscous
• 12:31
  imaginary versus real fluids which have viscosity internal
• 12:34
  friction. Got it.
• 12:35
  And the most famous equation here is probably Bernoulli's.
• 12:38
  Has to be. It's basically a statement of
• 12:40
  energy conservation applied along the streamline in a fluid
• 12:43
  flow. It says the sum of the kinetic
• 12:46
  energy due to velocity, the displacement energy related to
• 12:50
  pressure, and the potential energy due to higher elevation
• 12:53
  stays constant. Foundational stuff.
• 12:56
  When we need to move fluids, we use pumps or fans, turbo
• 12:58
  machinery. How are they selected?
• 13:00
  I heard something about fan pressure.
• 13:02
  Yeah, the units it's a bit quirky.
• 13:06
  Even though a fan moves gas, usually air, the pressure
• 13:09
  increase recreates. The fan head is very often
• 13:11
  measured and specified in inches of water column or in H2O.
• 13:15
  Inches of water for air. Yeah, it's just an old
• 13:18
  convention that stuck. It relates to the height
• 13:20
  difference in a simple YouTube manometer filled with water for
• 13:23
  selecting pumps. Though a really important
• 13:25
  parameter is the non dimensional specific speed to end.
• 13:28
  Specific speed? What does it tell you?
• 13:30
  It's a calculated value based on the desired flow rate, the
• 13:33
  required head pressure increase, and the pumps rotational speed.
• 13:37
  What it does is characterize the type of pump, impeller geometry,
• 13:40
  radial, mixed flow, axial that will be most efficient for that
• 13:44
  specific combination of flow and head.
• 13:46
  It helps you pick the right kind of pump for the job, ensuring it
• 13:50
  operates near its best efficiency point.
• 13:52
  So it matches the pump design to the system's needs.
• 13:55
  Let's talk power generation gas turbines.
• 13:57
  They seem incredibly complex, especially with emissions
• 14:00
  controls. They are.
• 14:01
  Modern gas turbines, especially large ones for power generation,
• 14:05
  have extremely sophisticated combustion systems to meet
• 14:08
  strict environmental limits, particularly for niche ox oxides
• 14:11
  of nitrogen. How do they do that?
• 14:13
  One key technology is the dry Lonox combustor or DLN.
• 14:16
  The dry means they don't inject water or steam, which used to be
• 14:19
  a common way to lower combustion temperatures.
• 14:21
  And that's not Sox. DLN systems use clever fuel
• 14:25
  nozzle designs and premixing chambers.
• 14:27
  Premixing. Yeah.
• 14:28
  They mix the fuel and air very thoroughly before they burn.
• 14:31
  The goal is to maintain a very consistent, lean excess air,
• 14:34
  fuel air ratio everywhere in the combustion zone.
• 14:38
  This avoids localized hotspots where most Nos forms, allowing
• 14:41
  low emissions over a wide range of operating loads.
• 14:44
  It's tricky control and. When we talk about efficiency
• 14:47
  overall, there's a concept beyond simple percentages,
• 14:49
  exergy, and EGM. Right.
• 14:53
  Exergy or availability is arguably the true measure of
• 14:56
  energy quality or work potential.
• 14:58
  Standard efficiency often just compares energy in versus energy
• 15:01
  out. But exergy accounts for the
• 15:03
  irreversibilities in any real process.
• 15:05
  Friction, heat transfer across a temperature, different things
• 15:08
  that destroy the potential. They do useful work.
• 15:10
  So minimizing lost work potential.
• 15:12
  Exactly. And that leads to EGM entropy
• 15:14
  generation minimization. Entropy generation is directly
• 15:18
  linked to exergy destruction, so EGM is a powerful modern
• 15:23
  optimization technique. It tells engineers how to choose
• 15:25
  design parameters like the diameter of a pipe, the length
• 15:28
  of heat exchanger tubes, specifically to minimize the
• 15:31
  destruction of power exergy while the device does its job.
• 15:36
  It's a more fundamental approach to optimization than just
• 15:39
  maximizing simple efficiency. That sounds powerful, but
• 15:42
  applying it must run into real world messiness like in heat
• 15:45
  exchangers. Oh definitely.
• 15:47
  Heat exchangers look simple on a diagram.
• 15:49
  Fluid A flows pass, fluid B heat transfers.
• 15:52
  But in reality getting the fluid to flow uniformly across all the
• 15:56
  heat transfer surfaces is a huge challenge.
• 15:58
  The big issue is flow Mal distribution.
• 16:00
  Some of the fluid finds shortcuts bypassing the main
• 16:03
  heat transfer area. Some might leak between passes.
• 16:06
  The sources mentioned that in some situations, especially with
• 16:08
  viscous fluids and laminar flow, these ineffective streams,
• 16:12
  bypass and leakage can actually account for as much as 60% of
• 16:15
  the total flow. 60% that's crippling the performance.
• 16:19
  It is so real. Heat exchanger design involves
• 16:22
  lots of clever mechanical details.
• 16:25
  Things like adding bypass ceiling strips inside the shell
• 16:28
  just to force the fluid to go where it's supposed to.
• 16:31
  It's not just about the thermodynamics.
• 16:33
  The fluid mechanics inside are critical and complex.
• 16:35
  Thinking bigger picture, system choices have global impacts.
• 16:38
  Refrigeration, for example. We hear about ODP and HDWP,
• 16:42
  right? Two key environmental metrics
• 16:44
  for refrigerants ODP is ozone depletion potential.
• 16:48
  It measures how much a substance damages the stratospheric ozone
• 16:52
  layer relative to a baseline refrigerant R11.
• 16:55
  OK. Ozone layer impact and HDWP.
• 16:58
  That's Halo carbon global warming potential.
• 17:00
  It measures how much refrigerant contributes to global warming,
• 17:03
  again relative to R 11 / a certain time horizon.
• 17:06
  So we moved away from ozone depleting CFCS to HFCS.
• 17:10
  Correct HFCS. Hydrofluorocarbons generally
• 17:12
  have zero ODP because they don't contain chlorine.
• 17:15
  That was a success for the ozone layer, but many HFCS turned out
• 17:18
  to have very high HGWP values. They're potent greenhouse gases.
• 17:22
  So solving one problem created another.
• 17:24
  To some extent, yes. Now the push is towards
• 17:26
  refrigerants with both 0 ODT and very low or 0 HTWP.
• 17:32
  Things like hydrocarbons, propane, isobutane.
• 17:35
  The challenge there is that many of these are flammable, which
• 17:37
  introduces safety considerations that the old inert refrigerants
• 17:41
  didn't have. It's complex trade-offs.
• 17:43
  These efficiency and environmental concerns tied
• 17:45
  directly into managing energy use in buildings and industry
• 17:49
  right energy audits. Absolutely.
• 17:51
  An energy audit is basically a systematic investigation of how
• 17:55
  energy is being used and where it's being wasted.
• 17:58
  What does an auditor look for? It's usually 2 main things.
• 18:01
  First, eliminating unnecessary energy use altogether.
• 18:05
  Are lights or HVAC systems running when nobody's there?
• 18:08
  Can we use time clocks or occupancy sensors?
• 18:11
  Are there drafts? Core insulation?
• 18:13
  What they call leak Plugging? Simple stuff often yields big
• 18:15
  savings. And the second thing.
• 18:17
  Minimizing the energy required for the tasks that are
• 18:19
  necessary. Can we use more efficient
• 18:20
  motors? Can we optimize process heating?
• 18:23
  Can we recover waste heat? Like with industrial furnaces
• 18:26
  you mentioned, they're more sophisticated now.
• 18:27
  Yeah, exactly. Modern continuous furnaces, say
• 18:30
  for heat treating metals aren't just big hot boxes anymore.
• 18:34
  They often have carefully designed temperature zones and
• 18:37
  maybe a Preheat zone using waste heat from hotter zones than the
• 18:39
  main firing zone, then a soak zone to ensure uniform
• 18:42
  temperature. Why the zones this zoned
• 18:45
  approach? This temperature profile allows
• 18:47
  them to process more material faster, improve capacity, but do
• 18:51
  it without just burning way more fuel.
• 18:53
  It increases throughput and maintains fuel efficiency.
• 18:56
  Smart design. So looking back, we've traced
• 18:58
  this path from grappling with human biases in the initial
• 19:03
  strategy. Yeah, that messy human element
• 19:05
  to the. Rigor of mathematical modeling
• 19:07
  for predicting system stability. Quantifying reality.
• 19:10
  Then driving down costs and complexity with DFM and a the.
• 19:13
  Practicalities of making things efficiently.
• 19:16
  And finally, chasing ultimate thermodynamic efficiency with
• 19:19
  concepts like exergy and EGM and power and fluid systems.
• 19:23
  It really covers a huge range doesn't it?
• 19:25
  From psychology to to advance thermodynamics.
• 19:27
  It does. So what's the big take away for
• 19:30
  someone trying to grasp mechanical engineering?
• 19:32
  What's the core tension here? I think if you boil it down,
• 19:35
  it's this constant balancing act.
• 19:37
  On one hand, you have the inherent variability and let's
• 19:40
  face it, the flaws in human judgement, those cognitive
• 19:44
  biases we started with. You have to manage that, right?
• 19:47
  But on the other hand, you're striving for absolute
• 19:49
  mathematical precision and physical optimization.
• 19:52
  EGM state variable control, tight tolerances.
• 19:56
  You need designs that are rigorously engineered, cost
• 19:59
  effective, safe, durable and now increasingly environmentally
• 20:03
  sound. Managing the subjective while
• 20:05
  pursuing the objective. That's a good way to put it,
• 20:08
  navigating that tension using structured processes and deep
• 20:11
  technical knowledge to bridge that gap.
• 20:13
  That, I think, is the real heart of the engineering mission we've
• 20:15
  been talking about. Keep your nuts torqued and
• 20:18
  spring hard design junkies.