Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Man Assaulted by Streamers, Cons for Pr0ns | HBR News 525

Transcript

Man Assaulted by Streamers, Cons for Pr0ns | HBR News 525 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five, Man assaulted by streamers
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: cons for Ponds, where we discuss the news of the
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: welcome back to Honey Badger Radio because they're doing well
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: this week and that you're laughing at all of this
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: absurdity so that you are not consumed by it. I
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: am your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: lovely co hosts, doctor Rand mccam and Hannah Wallin. We
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: have a great show line up. Oh what's up, Mike,
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: I said?
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: Hello? Oh, hello, hello, yep, yes, hello, goodin Doug.
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: We have a great showliner for you guys today, so
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: please be sure to continue the conversations both in the
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: chat as well as the comment section and this week's
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: HBr News we're gonna be looking at you know. Last
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: week we covered the sexual assault of twitch streamer Ameiru
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: and we have a follow up one that is even
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: more interesting, and there are prison guards that are using
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: convicts to make content for their OnlyFans and more so,
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: stick around, it's going to be a good time and
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: be sure to have joined us afterwards for our patron
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: only show. So I was trying to find, like, you know,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: opinion pieces to look at, because usually those are good
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: for patron only show. I did not look up to
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: see what Arwa Madawi was up to. I just couldn't
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: be bothered. But I did get in something kind of
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: interesting came across my desk. First of all, there was
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: a really good substack that's been making the rounds by
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: a woman named Helen. I believe Helen Smith. It's really straightforward,
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: but she wrote a substack and she's been doing the
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: rounds on the internet called the Great Feminization, and I
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: thought it was pretty interesting. But also there is a
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: pretty big gamergate YouTuber right now who has his own
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: website called smash jt, and he recently gave me a
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: shout out on his channel and said he knew who
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: I was and that he was a fan. So he
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: must know about this channel because my channel doesn't get
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: any views, So we might look at that. And once again,
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: it just shows that Honey Badger Radio was basically like
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: on the cutting edge of the culture War. So people
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: who are talking about the culture war now that are
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: trying to understand what's going on in it and so on,
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: they're kind of like gonna have to come across content
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: like ours, if not our content.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: So this channel is at least gaining subscribers, by the way.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we are where we are.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: Unlike my channel, which which loses thirty subscribers every month
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: and another thirty subscribers every time a video. Badgr live
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: streams is gaining about one hundred subscribers a month, which.
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Is Helen Andrews, by the way, not Helen Smith.
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry, go ahead, but yeah, that's that's why you
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: should all come to this channel and give it some love,
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: because it hasn't been a line of code, hasn't been
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: added to an algorithm with regards to this channel as
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: of yet, so please please give it some love. It's
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: the only channel in our empire that is on the up.
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: Now. If you can also smash smash that like button,
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: it really helps us reach more people if you're if
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: you're able to, And for those of you guys who
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: are following on Rumble, thank you for doing so, because
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: we want to make Rumble the more viable platform if
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: at all possible. So shout out to the Rumble gang,
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: shout out to all of you guys for supporting us.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: And now we're going to get into.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: And shout out to Helen Andrews for saying feminization when yes,
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: simply another word for feminism.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: Well she's she's she's not avoiding the topic of feminism,
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: but she's taking it further on.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: So the in the title she is and that's quite clever.
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I guess so yeah, yeah, Well you have
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: to be careful because what she's talking about is essentially
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: that feminists run everything, and so you have to figure
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: out how to get around it so you can talk,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: you know, because they're otherwise they'll shut you down. But yeah,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: so we might look at this a bit in the
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: Patron Show and other things. So if you want to
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: join us for that, you have to become a Badger
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: yourself by going to feed the Badger dot com uh
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: and starting a monthly subscription. As I said, five bucks
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: a month will get you into our discord. We'll be
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: able to watch all of the additional content and that
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: includes patron shows and things of that nature. And if
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: you don't want to wake up one morning to find
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: that we've been needed from the internet, go to badgerfeed
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: dot com. That's Badger Feed. No, yeah, it is badgerfeed
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: dot com. That's where all of our content lives, all right,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: So now we get into today's stories. So oh, let
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: me get my write ups here, excited to them all.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: So it's fine though. So we have this Twitch streamer
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: Nina Lynn pictured here known as Nina Daddy is back,
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: I guess and Zoe Spencer faced Swift backlash in October
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: last week when a May four live scream live stream
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: clip resurfaced. So there was an older live scream, that
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: sort of livestream that resurfaced in I guess surrounding like
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: you know, all these things about Twitch sexual harassment and
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: things like that, and it showed them restraining and toerking
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: on phase. Silky's assistant said, I don't know any of
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: these people because I'm old who appeared visibly uncomfortable and
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: attempted to escape in the video, lin Holds said down
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: on a bed while instructing Spencer to do your shit,
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: prompting accusations of on stream sexual assault. So let's actually
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: have the video, So why don't we just look at it? Well,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: so I have here, this is a clip, it's about
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: two minutes long, and this is is the the event,
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: and then I'll read the rest of my right up. Okay,
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: let me know if you guys can hear this?
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: So what if he says, I.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: Feel like you did some shit wrong? No, so the
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: o SI you thang?
• 6:08
  Speaker 3: No one say that's why today I let you're looking
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: for say, I'm gonna talk the who definitely.
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: Felt disrespected as a person me.
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: I think it's und on what I do. If you
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: did askbout.
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: Respected, I don't know.
• 6:19
  Speaker 4: I will walk the home, just go with people.
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: But if I him to.
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: Walk around say all that crazy ship, you never think
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: about what I he's thinking too, though, Like who wants
• 6:25
  Speaker 3: to walk around being called that?
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: That's a bad thing for him.
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: I'm a guy today, I feel him.
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: I was where for him.
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: I gotta cash that up too. But I didn't say
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: about what's on it?
• 6:34
  Speaker 4: You just appeared the moment people by it.
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: He was an here it is.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: Always hold on?
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: Is this like skinny kid kind of nerdy? He's the
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: one that these chicks are like messing with.
• 6:47
  Speaker 3: I don't here, I've got you twenty three say nothing.
• 6:58
  Speaker 4: Hold on, hold on, hold on project a second.
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: I don't think you.
• 7:04
  Speaker 4: Want are you able to project there?
• 7:07
  Speaker 2: Right there?
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: Then?
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: Right hold on?
• 7:09
  Speaker 4: Hold on?
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: Sit down?
• 7:12
  Speaker 5: You bum me in that one video, Bryan pose, it's
• 7:18
  Speaker 5: like my car. Oh my wait, bro, he runs down
• 7:26
  Speaker 5: from Well, you don't want it, bro, you did not
• 7:30
  Speaker 5: tell you that I don't want it?
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: Bro?
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: Take all this.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: Hey, you cut the cameras. Cut the cameras. You'll cut
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: the cameras.
• 7:51
  Speaker 3: Bro, So do you said, bitch?
• 7:56
  Speaker 4: No?
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: Off?
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: Look at that. This is a nice bag. They're trying
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: to take his pants off. Now all right, I'm gonna
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: stop it.
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: There.
• 8:16
  Speaker 4: Can you go back to the beginning.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Yet, to the beginning of the video where she's talking the.
• 8:21
  Speaker 4: Whole beginning, Yeah, the beginning of the not the beginning
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: of the video, the beginning of the assault.
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: Oh, thanks, by the way, just so you yeah, I
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: don't know.
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: All right, here is that the bit you want to see?
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: Nope, the part where I asked you to pause it.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: Oh I'm sorry. I couldn't hear you tell me that.
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: Yeah, you're a little more, Just a little more.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: She's gonna say something, Did I miss it?
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: Going? Keep going right there?
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 9:08
  Speaker 4: Right, here's here's here's what she did. Okay. This guy
• 9:12
  Speaker 4: is going no, no, no, He is trying actively to
• 9:16
  Speaker 4: get away from her. He's he's acting embarrassed. That's an embarrassed. Laugh,
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: that's not, and I'm having fun laugh and you can tell.
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: I can tell, and I'm autistic, that's not and I'm
• 9:29
  Speaker 4: having fun laugh. And she says that because of his age,
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: it's consensual. Right, So when women, when women talk about
• 9:41
  Speaker 4: age of consent, they don't talk about it the way
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: men talk about age of consent. Right When when men
• 9:47
  Speaker 4: talk about age of consent, they talk about it in
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: terms of somebody cannot consent before a certain age. Right,
• 9:54
  Speaker 4: when women talk about age of consent, they're talking about
• 9:58
  Speaker 4: it as I can assault this guy and it doesn't
• 10:03
  Speaker 4: count because he's old enough. Women presume men's consent even
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: when it's quite obvious that he's not consenting. This is
• 10:16
  Speaker 4: what's wrong with the enthusiastic consent narrative. Men will get
• 10:20
  Speaker 4: treated under a circumstance like that where a guy you
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: know is actively saying no, no, no, and a woman
• 10:32
  Speaker 4: is embarrassing herself by engaging in an aggressive action as
• 10:38
  Speaker 4: though they have done something wrong because they didn't ask
• 10:43
  Speaker 4: the woman's permission and she didn't enthusiastically say yes. But
• 10:49
  Speaker 4: they will not have their discomfort recognized. And women will
• 10:54
  Speaker 4: go through actions like that all the way into the bedroom,
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: all the way into trying actively while he's fighting back
• 11:02
  Speaker 4: as best he can without injuring her, trying to take
• 11:07
  Speaker 4: his clothes off. Yeah, and and say he consented because
• 11:13
  Speaker 4: he's not underage, right. That is that is the gap
• 11:18
  Speaker 4: in accountability for sexual conduct. A man is accountable for
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: a woman's feelings about a sex act, even if she
• 11:30
  Speaker 4: willingly engaged in it, even if she verbally said yes,
• 11:36
  Speaker 4: even if she verbally agreed in in other ways, and
• 11:43
  Speaker 4: even if her physical actions demonstrated consent. But a woman's
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: not even accountable for a man's feelings when he is
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: actively trying to escape from her and later says he
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: didn't want it.
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: Yep, and don't.
• 12:00
  Speaker 4: And if he defended himself and he hurt her in
• 12:03
  Speaker 4: the process, they would consider that to be him assaulting her.
• 12:10
  Speaker 4: But if I tried to do that to me, I
• 12:12
  Speaker 4: could go so far as to rip his fucking balls off,
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: and people would be like, well, he asked for it,
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: he was assaulting you.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, And don't think for a moment they wouldn't do
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: this to a thirteen year old on the grounds that
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: he would enjoy it because.
• 12:28
  Speaker 4: Here was a thread.
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Because he's so young, an unexperienced that he's obviously going
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: to enjoy it if he's say enough.
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: That was their first experience what you just describe. There
• 12:41
  Speaker 4: was a thread on Twitter back in the Twitter days,
• 12:43
  Speaker 4: there was a thread on Twitter of guys saying that
• 12:45
  Speaker 4: was their first experience, and eventually it got deleted, but
• 12:49
  Speaker 4: there were hundreds of guys commenting that what you just
• 12:53
  Speaker 4: described was their first experience.
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: I'll show me finish. Let me finish the ride up
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: because I just want to show the clip and and
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: they tell you what happened afterwards. Okay, and more about
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: let's say so, said the guy who was assaulted in
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: the video, who appeared visibly uncomfortable and attempted to escape.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: In the video, Lynn holds Sayid down on a bed
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: while instructing Spener to do your shit. Spencer was the
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: other girl. The black girl, prompting accusations of on screen
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: sexual assault, said later shared on x that he had
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: voiced his discomfort multiple times before but felt invalidated, reigniting
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: public outrage as viewers highlighted double standards in content moderation.
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: Twitch suspended both streamers channels on October twenty fourth, citing
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: violations of community guidelines, with prominent figures like Asmen Gold
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: decrying the literal video evidence of misconduct Lynn, who pictured here.
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: Lynn issued a public apology, admitting her actions were really
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: really wrong and expressing regret for hurting said, while Spencer
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: remained silent. However, the bands proved short lived, so basically
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: was just like a day. Their accounts were restored within
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: a day or two, Trying criticism for Twitches perceived leniency
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: compared to longer suspensions for similar offenses by male creators.
• 14:06
  Speaker 4: So contrast, I have to say about this, all right,
• 14:13
  Speaker 4: if the sexes were reversed, she would not have to
• 14:19
  Speaker 4: report the crime to police for him to get charged
• 14:24
  Speaker 4: for sexual assault, just saying he's he's clearly been sexually assaulted. There,
• 14:32
  Speaker 4: she would not have to go to police for him
• 14:38
  Speaker 4: to get a charge, to catch a charge if he
• 14:41
  Speaker 4: did to her what she did to him. But you
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: notice that there's not even a discussion about a criminal
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: charge here, just a twitch band. That's another part of
• 14:54
  Speaker 4: that gap.
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: Bit more serious than the attempted hugging and kissing we
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: addressed last week, isn't it? And it wasn't just us
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: I knew about the EMRU story in advance because it
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: was covered by several channels to whom I subscribe and listen,
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: which for the most part, as you can imagine, is
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: people who are ostensibly based, people who I expect not
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: to get embroiled in the whirlwind of female victim mentality.
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: But sure enough, within hours of the Emru incident at
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: twitch Con, everyone was falling over each other bemoaning the
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: besmirched honor of some airheaded twitch thought whose bread and
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: butter is titillating thirsty randos and so lo and behold
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: a thirsty rando thought he'd shoot his shot and attempt
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: to hug and kiss Emru. Outrage across the board. Oh mg,
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: it's a sexual assault. Get me my smelling salts. Something
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: must be done. Cut to this week, when we find
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: out about this, said chap, someone's personal assistant, a man
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: who is absolutely not in the business of titillating anyone,
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: gets pinned down and attacked with an anus. Yes, attacked
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: with an anus. You can call it twerking when it's
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: just hitting air, but when it's making contact with a person,
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: it's it's it's hitting someone with an anus, not punching,
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: but definitely hitting. To offer the and be heard quote
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: unquote defense, and to further invoke, is heard shitting in
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: someone's bed isn't a million miles away from thrusting your
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: anus onto someone. You may or may not consider it
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: to be a serious sexual assault, but even if it
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: is risen, it's certainly unsanitary. I mean, a man's lips
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: can be unsan sure, but it's surely a hell of
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: a lot worse when it's a woman's anus. I put
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: it to you, I don't. I don't. I don't put
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: my woman's anus to you. I'm not. I would. I
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: wouldn't do that. It would be rude at best, sexual
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: sexual sexual assault at minimum, and chemical warfare at worst,
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: depending depending on what's going on in the vicinity of
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: the anus in question. And I wouldn't want to speculate
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: what kind of diseases go on in the anus of
• 17:34
  Speaker 2: the average twitch thought, But I get a feeling it's
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: less like a Japanese toilet and more like an Indian toilet.
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: If you catch my drift, yeah, and again I have
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: no intention of you catching my drift. That would be disgusting.
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: And the the the icing on the ship cake is
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: This incident happened six months ago. For six For six months,
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: Twitch was sitting on this shit doing fuck up. Sorry,
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: I'm not making these innuendos on purpose. They tend to
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: appear spontaneously when you're talking about ars attacks razing. But yeah,
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: not only did Twitch do nothing about this ass attack
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: for six months, nobody else talked about it either. The
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: supposedly based misogynists of the supposedly far right didn't care
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: about it either. They're still not talking about it. It's
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: apparently a total non issue. I didn't even know about
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: it until it appeared in the Honey Badger Discord last week,
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: as is so often the case, So I suppose I'm
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: not one to judge either. All I do is doom
• 18:48
  Speaker 2: scroll through Twitter. Sometimes. I don't go looking for these stories.
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: I have a small regiment of tenacious, autistic news hounds
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: to do it for me. But I think there's a
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: reason everybody heard about the Emru story immediately while this
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: story remained in the shadows. It's because the mainstream left
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: wing media jumped on the Emru thing instinctively. Why wouldn't they.
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: It's an opportunity to paint a woman as a victim,
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: and that's why the online right picked up on it
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: instantly because it's what the legacy left is talking about.
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: The right makes a living watching the left like a hawk.
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: That seems to be the pecking order. The left gets
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: outraged about any possible feminist blood in the water, and
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: then the right addresses that outrage, and that makes sense.
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: The left is in charge of everything when it comes
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: to the legacy media, and the right is trying to
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: push back against it. And again, I'm not one to judge.
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: I'm I'm I'm at least one rung below all of
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: that shit and getting outraged about the outrage about the outrage,
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: But I'm I'm glad that honey Badger, the honey Bade
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: Brigade is here with its tenacious, artistic news hounse. It
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: seems to be the only place that picks up on
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: the stories that don't even make it into the pipeline
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: having not been picked up by the leftist legacy media
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: in the first place, namely the stories where a man
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: has been the victim of something and or a woman
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: has perpetrated something. And yes, that is what is entailed
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: in most of the stories you're going to talk about tonight.
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: It's not big, it's not popular, it's not even necessarily clever,
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: but somebody's got to do it. Doctor Random mccam wanted
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: news honeybuger radio.
• 20:47
  Speaker 4: So I got a question, actually, was that that guy
• 20:50
  Speaker 4: wasn't a streamer that they assaulted. He was he was
• 20:55
  Speaker 4: an assistant or something, right he was? Was he a
• 21:00
  Speaker 4: paid worker? I don't know, because I mean if he's
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: a personal assistant. If he's a paid personal assistant, that's
• 21:09
  Speaker 4: workplace harassment on top of being sexual assault.
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: Sure, Like again, you know, this is something you should
• 21:17
  Speaker 4: be able to go to work and do your job
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: without having to experience anything like this on a job.
• 21:25
  Speaker 4: This is this is something that women have established that
• 21:29
  Speaker 4: this is inappropriate workplace behavior toward an employee, and it
• 21:37
  Speaker 4: doesn't It's not limited to just the employer. If a
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: company interacts regularly with other companies and their their employees
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: are experiencing something like this from employees of the other company,
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: there can be lawsuits. So, uh, this is this just
• 22:02
  Speaker 4: got one step bigger if it was again, if it
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: was a woman, there would be and this was a
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: paid woman who you know, had had to pay taxes
• 22:14
  Speaker 4: on her employment and everything, like somebody who was getting
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: money for the job. This was an on the job assault. Uh,
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: there there would be lawsuits. There would definitely be lawsuits.
• 22:25
  Speaker 4: Women have established a right to cash in on this
• 22:31
  Speaker 4: because after something like this happens, Uh, it's hard to
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: go back to the same workplace and you often need
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: therapy to get over it, and so you have expenses
• 22:45
  Speaker 4: related to it. And also it's to punish the employer
• 22:49
  Speaker 4: for allowing it to happen. Uh. So yeah, this like
• 22:54
  Speaker 4: this is this is a woman engaging behavior that uh,
• 22:58
  Speaker 4: and and treating it as ordinary behavior and nothing, you know, Uh, inappropriate,
• 23:04
  Speaker 4: No big deal, she's she's treating it even you know,
• 23:08
  Speaker 4: the idea of just apologizing public Oh my actions were
• 23:11
  Speaker 4: really really wrong. I'm sorry, But in the moment, she
• 23:15
  Speaker 4: had no like was she drunk or something, or was
• 23:19
  Speaker 4: she sober?
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: If she I don't know, I mean they look they
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: look drunk because of the way they're acting, but that
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: could just be them just being ratchet.
• 23:29
  Speaker 4: Yeah, if she did this, if she did this drunk,
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: she should never drink again, you know, because clearly she
• 23:35
  Speaker 4: cannot prevent herself from engaging in criminal acts while drunk.
• 23:38
  Speaker 4: But if she did this sober, that's even worse because
• 23:43
  Speaker 4: she knew fully. You know, the she was fully able
• 23:46
  Speaker 4: to appraise her actions. She was clearly not too drunk
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: to to be the aggressor, right, But yeah, this, this
• 23:56
  Speaker 4: is she should be criminally charged for.
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: This, both of them, there were two twos.
• 24:03
  Speaker 4: These two women should both be criminally charged for this,
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: and they should both be sued for this. But neither
• 24:11
  Speaker 4: of those things is likely to happen because they're female.
• 24:16
  Speaker 4: And when when you hear about the accountability gap, it's
• 24:19
  Speaker 4: not just how how women think, it's how the law
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: treats them. But women women won't be aware of the
• 24:30
  Speaker 4: accountability gap because they don't take it seriously. When women
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: behave this way toward a guy at all.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: M but you know what, twitch gave them what for?
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: Ban them both for twenty four hours. That'll show them
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: the Yeah.
• 24:49
  Speaker 4: See, I care very little about what social media does
• 24:53
  Speaker 4: in terms of if if somebody does behave this inappropriately, Okay,
• 24:59
  Speaker 4: maybe maybe they should be banned. It should happen the
• 25:04
  Speaker 4: same to men and women. But getting banned from social media,
• 25:09
  Speaker 4: as much as it sucks, it's it's nothing compared to
• 25:13
  Speaker 4: a jail sentence. A man who did this wouldn't just
• 25:17
  Speaker 4: get banned from some social media profile or you know,
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: some social media website. He would go to jail.
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, no, I know. That's that's my point is
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: not making a joke about the actual penalty, which is
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: basically nothing. Yeah, twenty four hours suspension on Twitch. That
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: was basically the extent of what's happened, and the thing
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: is too.
• 25:46
  Speaker 4: Definitely.
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: One of the things worth pointing out is when the
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: Emerald thing happened, people knew about it the moment it happened. Yeah,
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: this is This is a livestream clip from May of
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, so over a year ago, and it
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: probably only resurfaced because of the AMRU thing. Someone may
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: have come across and say, hey, wait a minute, why
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: isn't this Why wasn't this being talked about, and then
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: like put it up, you know, because if you think
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: about it, I guess in a way we have we
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: have the AMRU clip to thank for this one resurfacing
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: and getting more traction than it did originally. That happened.
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: This is over a year old.
• 26:30
  Speaker 4: Yeah, there was when we looked at a while back
• 26:31
  Speaker 4: that I thought of and didn't say anything at the time.
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: It probably should have. Do you remember, God, I can't
• 26:36
  Speaker 4: think of his name. Uh.
• 26:38
  Speaker 6: He he was a competitive gamer and he won some
• 26:45
  Speaker 6: sort of competition. This story is old enough that I
• 26:49
  Speaker 6: cannot remember all the details. The only thing I remember
• 26:52
  Speaker 6: was a meme that came out of it.
• 26:53
  Speaker 4: Because this this chick that was a supporter of another
• 26:59
  Speaker 4: game who didn't win, came up and grabbed him by
• 27:04
  Speaker 4: the shirt. And this guy, you know, he kept his
• 27:08
  Speaker 4: hands back and he leaned away from her and just
• 27:14
  Speaker 4: just yelled for you know, whatever guy she was associated
• 27:16
  Speaker 4: with to come get her. But the the memes that
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: came out of it came out of it because you know,
• 27:22
  Speaker 4: he was he was really really you know, it was
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: real slang, kind of like who bitch is this or
• 27:30
  Speaker 4: something like that. Oh yeah, But this kind of stuff
• 27:34
  Speaker 4: happens to guys all the time, and people just expect
• 27:40
  Speaker 4: them to take it in stride. They act like it's
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: no big deal. Women can be very childish in terms
• 27:47
  Speaker 4: of their boundaries towards guys, and can can portray themselves
• 27:55
  Speaker 4: as having a childlike innocence while engaging in all forms
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: of assault on a guy, and people will treat it
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: like they'll they'll ignore it, they won't notice that it happened.
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: They won't care that it happened. And if you bring
• 28:13
  Speaker 4: it up and you start talking about it, people will
• 28:16
  Speaker 4: actually get upset that you dare compare it to quote
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: unquote what women go through, and like, women will get
• 28:24
  Speaker 4: more outraged at a guy who notices if a woman
• 28:29
  Speaker 4: is half naked in public, then they will at a
• 28:33
  Speaker 4: woman who has done something like this, somebody who has groped,
• 28:37
  Speaker 4: somebody who has grabbed a guy in a way that
• 28:41
  Speaker 4: is aggressive, like like the chicken and who bitches this mean,
• 28:48
  Speaker 4: they'll get upset if you notice that that that behavior
• 28:52
  Speaker 4: is inappropriate and a guy would not be tolerated engaging
• 28:57
  Speaker 4: in that behavior rather than recognizing that. Actually women get
• 29:03
  Speaker 4: a lot of lenience and guys get a lot of
• 29:06
  Speaker 4: flack for the most minor things.
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah all right, so yeah, so like one one last
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: thing I'll say is now I got a super chat here.
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: And by the way, guys, you send us uh, send
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: us some super chows if you want to, just go
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com forge last, just the tip, uh,
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: and we'll read your super childs on stream. So that's
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: feed Thebadger dot com fords last, just the tip. But anyway,
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: I will read the super chat. But before I do that,
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: remember this generation of women, this youngest generation that's sexually active,
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: is the rapist in recorded history. So they're generally fearless
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: in more aggressive sexually than any previous generation. And this
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: it usually expresses itself in the form of entitlement, which
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: may have come from, you know, like downstream of the
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: sex positive feminist movement of the sixties, where you get,
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: you know, women that were allowed to be sexual, and
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: then now you get women that are like aggressively sexual
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: towards men just for fun too. It's really just like,
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: you know, not because they like those men or whatever,
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: they just have something to prove, so and yeah, so
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: we're in uncharted territory, all right. Anyway, ZARAANX gives us
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: five dollars, thank you, ZARAENNX and says, years ago, there
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: was a Law and Order SVU episode where a man
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: was assaulted by three women. They showed Stabler or Stabler,
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: the man dismissed the situation. I guess Stabler is a
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: character on the show that dismissed the situation, which that's
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: usually and I guess the other the women corrected him
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: and said, no rape can happen to men too, and
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: it can you know, so he like learned something And
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: the thing is I think that Yeah, I mean this
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: is just the way they frame things. But anyway, thank
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: you zarians for that. Let me know what you guys
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: think about this one in the comments. Let's move on
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: to the next story.
• 31:08
  Speaker 4: All right, to that last super chat. Yeah, historically the
• 31:18
  Speaker 4: crime of rape was was described in terms of only
• 31:22
  Speaker 4: being perpetrated against female victims historically, but when feminists started
• 31:30
  Speaker 4: changing the definitions of different sex crimes, they bent over
• 31:35
  Speaker 4: backward to preserve it and then claimed that they solved
• 31:40
  Speaker 4: the problem by extending the terms describing other forms of
• 31:45
  Speaker 4: sexual assault to men but not rape, just saying.
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: All right, I got another super chat. Wells way, but Mike,
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: did you want to say anything else to that or no?
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: Well no, just historically by us, it's still the case
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: in the UK that women can't be charged with rape
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: no matter what.
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: Wow, well they can't be charged with rape here, they
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: can be charged with like sexual.
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: So if you charge, if you charge a woman with rape,
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: pier and they use the definition that feminist wrote the lawyers, now,
• 32:18
  Speaker 4: based on a Supreme Court decision in Ohio, can argue
• 32:22
  Speaker 4: that because she didn't penetrate the victim, it wasn't rape,
• 32:27
  Speaker 4: and she can get off scott free. So she she
• 32:30
  Speaker 4: will more likely get charged with other sexual assaults, other
• 32:34
  Speaker 4: forms of sexual assault. All right, So feminists, feminists didn't
• 32:38
  Speaker 4: do jack shit for men when they changed the definition.
• 32:41
  Speaker 4: What they did was change it so that more men
• 32:44
  Speaker 4: could be charged. That that's that's all that they changed
• 32:48
  Speaker 4: it to.
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: All right. So I got another super chat from Master
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: Rogue nine to seven eight zero for five dollars, and
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: he says, I don't know why I got so many
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: weird looks the other day. All I said was, do
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: you guys take walk ins? Maybe I shouldn't have gone
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: to the morgue, but ompsh and I got a super
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: chow Thank you Meredith for five dollars, and she says,
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: HPI news number five twenty five, honey for the Badgers,
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: thank you.
• 33:13
  Speaker 4: What is it?
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: Why do you guys have like weird numbers next to
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: your names?
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: Now?
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: Is that like some new thing YouTube did? It was
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: like Meredith G seven seven one six what is that?
• 33:22
  Speaker 4: Probably?
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: And anyway, and let me know what you guys think
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: about that story in the comments. All right, Moving on
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: to the next one. A significant shift in UK family
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: law was announced on October twenty first, repealing the presumption
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: of parental involvement under the Children Act nineteen eighty nine
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: in England and Wales under the ChIL YEAH under the
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: Children Act nineteen eighty nine in England and Wales. Previously,
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: courts assumed contract contact with both parents was in a
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: child's best interest unless proven otherwise, often leading to unsafe
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: arrangements for children exposed to domestic abuse. The change requires
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: judges to evaluate each case individually, prioritizing evidence based assessments
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: of the child's safety, well being and voice over automatic
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: parental access. This reform, stemming from a twenty twenty Government
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Harm Panel report and recent findings on court failures, aims
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: to prevent instances where abusers exploit the system for continued control,
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: with implementation pending parliamentary time. Domestic abuse campaigners, survivors and
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: legal experts have welcomed the move as a victory for
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: children and a step toward justice, though they stress it's
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: not a complete fix. Figures like barrister doctor Charlotte Proudman
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: highlighted YEAH highlighted how it could save lives by curbing
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: forced contact with abusers, while Women's Aid CEO Parah Nazir
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: noted its re orientation of court priorities towards survivor's safety.
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: Campaigner Claire Throssel, whose sons were killed by their abusive
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: father after court granted contact, expressed cautious hope for future protections. Experts,
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: including DOMES Abuse Commissioner Dame Nicole Jacobs, call for mandatory
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: judicial training to recognize abuse patterns and eliminate pro contact biases,
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: ensuring the reform truly safeguard's vulnerable children.
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: Okay, okay, Well, wasn't the idea always about the safety
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: of children above all else? It was framed as the
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: best interests of the child. But what that means in
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: practice is the mother gets custody because women are better
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: than men. So surely the safety of children above all
• 35:34
  Speaker 2: else also means in practice, the mother gets custody because
• 35:39
  Speaker 2: women are better than men. Seems kind of like painting
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: over the military gray with ocean gray, or is it
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: the other way around? We can't tell because they're exactly
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: the same color. And that may seem like it's nothing
• 35:54
  Speaker 2: and that it changes nothing, but the fact that it
• 35:57
  Speaker 2: has a different name is all to take for these
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: corrupt identity politicians to now claim that they get to
• 36:05
  Speaker 2: change everything else in a direction that always, without fail,
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: favors women over men. Their their modus operandi is reality
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: is whatever we say it is. After all, we've decided
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: that a man is a woman if and when we
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: say so. Therefore, public toilets have no rules, sports tournaments
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: have no rules, and prisons have no rules other than
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: men will be rewarded when they disavow their masculinity. And
• 36:39
  Speaker 2: it'll be the same shit here. We've changed best interests
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: to safety. Therefore, a man will never get custody of
• 36:48
  Speaker 2: his children unless he identifies as a woman. It'll be
• 36:51
  Speaker 2: that It'll be some stupid shit like that. We've called
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: a thing a different thing, therefore we can call a
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: bunch of other things other things. And every institution in
• 37:01
  Speaker 2: the country has to gut itself and turn itself inside
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: out based on these toothless linguistic shakeups on which we're insisting.
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: Needless to say, we can still call ourselves the good guys,
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: and you can't call us the bad guys, or else
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: you're the bad guys. I mean, if Charlotte fucking Prowdman
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: is in favor of this. I don't know how much
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: more evidence you need that it's a scam and a
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: lie and a power grab. If the Guardian is talking
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: about this like it's the best thing since sliced bread,
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: I mean, for fox's sake, there's your answer. I didn't
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: read the Guardian article in question because they don't let
• 37:44
  Speaker 2: you read their online articles unless you tick the accept
• 37:47
  Speaker 2: cookies box or the reject and subscribe box. Those are
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: the only two options. And that's the legacy media in
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: a nutshell, isn't it. It's heads I win, tails you lose.
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: If this so called significant shift is supposed to change
• 38:08
  Speaker 2: anything for the better, I will believe it when I
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: see it, and I'm not going to see it, because
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: the family courts in the UK are still operating in secret,
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: in mandatory secret, presumably for the sake of the safety
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: and best interests of women who, let's not forget, are
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: better than men. If anything needs to change, it's that
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: you need to show us what happens in these fucking
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: kangaroo courts, or at least don't injunction everyone from even
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: talking about it in any context. You need to show
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: us these trials, show us the women who beat their
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: kids and alienate their fathers and still somehow get custody.
• 38:57
  Speaker 2: We need to see it, we need to cataloze how
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: often it happens. But that's never going to happen because
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: then the public would get to see how often this
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: shit happens, and that would shatter the miss andrac oricophobic
• 39:15
  Speaker 2: narrative into a thousand pieces, or at least, so at
• 39:20
  Speaker 2: least let people use the Freedom of Information Act to
• 39:24
  Speaker 2: gain access to all this secret, sequestered information, even if
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: the people asking for this information under the Freedom of
• 39:34
  Speaker 2: Information Act happen to be people who are skeptical of
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: this miss andrac chophobic narrative. If we don't have transparency,
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: we don't have freedom of speech. So yeah, give me
• 39:51
  Speaker 2: transparency or give me death narrator's voice. He was given death.
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: I I hereby die, all right, Hannah.
• 40:06
  Speaker 4: Interestingly, if a nation makes their statistics more public, like
• 40:12
  Speaker 4: the United States, did you find out that the majority
• 40:18
  Speaker 4: of children who have been subjected to maltreatment they refufer
• 40:23
  Speaker 4: to all the various types of abuse, physical, sexual, and
• 40:28
  Speaker 4: neglect in one term maltreatment who have have been fatally
• 40:37
  Speaker 4: or terminally maltreated by one parent acting without the other,
• 40:44
  Speaker 4: are killed by their mothers, are killed by their mothers,
• 40:50
  Speaker 4: not their fathers, their mothers. But when you hear talk
• 40:55
  Speaker 4: about how the courts should discriminate against parents universally by
• 41:03
  Speaker 4: denying them equal custody on the basis of the possibility
• 41:09
  Speaker 4: that a percentage and we're talking about a fraction, tiny
• 41:14
  Speaker 4: fraction of parents you know that that do this, but
• 41:19
  Speaker 4: the majority of them are women. The courts are being
• 41:23
  Speaker 4: admonished to discriminate against fathers. And this isn't one that
• 41:31
  Speaker 4: can be like, I know a lot of people, Oh,
• 41:33
  Speaker 4: it's the stepfather, it's the step No, there's a statistic
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: for parent and other. And in the US statistics, stepfathers
• 41:45
  Speaker 4: are counted as fathers and stepmothers are counted as mothers.
• 41:48
  Speaker 4: So it's the female parent in all those cases. Now
• 41:52
  Speaker 4: maybe mostly stepmothers, I don't know, But it's not biological fathers.
• 42:01
  Speaker 4: And that is the point. Only about thirty percent are
• 42:05
  Speaker 4: killed by a father, whether it is the stepfather or
• 42:08
  Speaker 4: the biological father. And the majority of abuse perpetrated is
• 42:16
  Speaker 4: done to boys. The majority of abuse perpetrated by one
• 42:22
  Speaker 4: parent acting without the other is done by mothers. The
• 42:26
  Speaker 4: majority of abuse perpetrated in conjunction with another person that
• 42:32
  Speaker 4: isn't the other parent. Is done by mothers, So we're
• 42:38
  Speaker 4: talking all of the statistics. When you look at other
• 42:44
  Speaker 4: areas outside the home where children get abused, it's most
• 42:49
  Speaker 4: often in daycare, which is run by women. In fact,
• 42:55
  Speaker 4: it's very hard for a guy to get a position
• 42:59
  Speaker 4: as a day care worker at all, and he's treated
• 43:03
  Speaker 4: as suspect, not as an equal worker when he does
• 43:08
  Speaker 4: get a job. So again, the majority of perpetrators of
• 43:15
  Speaker 4: child abuse are women. The majority of killers of children
• 43:21
  Speaker 4: are women. And that is not counting the three and
• 43:25
  Speaker 4: ten pregnancies that is in the world that is terminated
• 43:30
  Speaker 4: by elective abortion. Because if you counted that, the leading
• 43:37
  Speaker 4: cause of human death in the world is abortion. Is
• 43:42
  Speaker 4: being aborted, being killed by your mother, in other words,
• 43:48
  Speaker 4: before you're born. So this idea that men are dangerous
• 43:53
  Speaker 4: to children women are not utter bullshit, absolute utter bullshit.
• 44:00
  Speaker 4: And the courts favoring mothers on the idea that mothers
• 44:09
  Speaker 4: are safer than fathers are going to kill children.
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: All right, well, thank you for those thoughts on that story,
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: and yeah, I agree, transparency is what we need. When
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: you hear Charlotte proudman. Red sirens should be going off
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: for sure, all right. I got a super chow from
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: ZARANX for ten dollars, and he says the idea that
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: the current gen is downstream of the sex positive types
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: gives them an out look at Simone de Beauvoir's history
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: with girls. Consider Eve Ensler's good rape. The current teachers
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: are no different from Mary kay Letourno. Remember the stories
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: of men wearing kilts and women trying to see if
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: they're wearing them authentically. They're not new. We're just noticing
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: more now than we're allowed ourselves to in the past. Well,
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying it never happened. I'm saying that there's
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: a certain like level of because then the data, like
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: I said, bears out that, at least for as long
• 45:16
  Speaker 1: as we've been recording it, this generation of women, the
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: generation z the Zoomer women are the rapist in recorded history,
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: which means they're the Maybe we are changed the way
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: we measure these things. I'm not saying that doesn't happen.
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: I'm saying the scale and perhaps the brazenness to where
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: it's to which it happens is a lot worse than
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: it was and I think that that part is.
• 45:43
  Speaker 4: I think I think part of it is that we're noticing,
• 45:46
  Speaker 4: and part of it is that feminists have taught women
• 45:49
  Speaker 4: to be entitled. Yeah, in our day, like graduating high school,
• 45:55
  Speaker 4: going to college, women's studies was a class, not a
• 46:01
  Speaker 4: you know, some colleges may have made it a department
• 46:05
  Speaker 4: and there may have been you know, women's studies one
• 46:07
  Speaker 4: oh one, two O two, three oh three and so
• 46:10
  Speaker 4: on four oh four, graduation not found. But uh, you didn't.
• 46:16
  Speaker 4: You didn't major in women's studies very often, and there
• 46:20
  Speaker 4: was no interdisciplinary studies, and there wasn't a women's studies
• 46:26
  Speaker 4: infection in every area of academia, including medicine and business.
• 46:32
  Speaker 4: But there is now. You can't take a course of
• 46:37
  Speaker 4: study that that is touched by any area of psychology,
• 46:43
  Speaker 4: whether it is you know, how to sell things to people,
• 46:47
  Speaker 4: how to help people medically, how to how to counsel people,
• 46:52
  Speaker 4: anything like that, or any area of the soft sciences,
• 46:56
  Speaker 4: social sciences in any way without a feminism infection in
• 47:02
  Speaker 4: your curriculum. And among the things that feminism teaches is
• 47:08
  Speaker 4: that it is not the same for a woman to
• 47:12
  Speaker 4: victimize a man or a girl to victimize a boy
• 47:16
  Speaker 4: or a woman to victimize a boy, as it is
• 47:20
  Speaker 4: the gender reverse, and so you have this sense of
• 47:24
  Speaker 4: entitlement you have, and they do push this duel. They're
• 47:30
  Speaker 4: sex positive toward women and sex negative toward men. Men's
• 47:36
  Speaker 4: sexuality is aggressive, dirty, you know, taking damaging, harmful, but
• 47:44
  Speaker 4: blah blah blah. Women's sexuality is giving, helpful, it's it's passive,
• 47:52
  Speaker 4: blah blah blah. And so if a woman engages in
• 47:56
  Speaker 4: any kind of sexual behavior, it's supposedly good, it's her right,
• 48:04
  Speaker 4: she's entitled. You're shaming her, slept shaming her if you
• 48:09
  Speaker 4: criticize what she did, even if she's trampling someone else's boundaries,
• 48:16
  Speaker 4: even if she's engaging in something a man would go
• 48:19
  Speaker 4: to jail for, even if you know she's she's not
• 48:25
  Speaker 4: she's not welcome to engage in it, even if she's
• 48:29
  Speaker 4: hurting somebody. Right. But but if a guy engages in
• 48:34
  Speaker 4: sexual behavior, even if it's at the behest of the
• 48:38
  Speaker 4: woman that he was engaging with, they treat that as
• 48:44
  Speaker 4: either you know, he got away with something, or he's
• 48:49
  Speaker 4: guilty of something. And as a result, you do see
• 48:56
  Speaker 4: more women, more girls, young women and girls engaging behaviors
• 49:01
  Speaker 4: that they think are playful and they think are cute,
• 49:04
  Speaker 4: and they think they're entitled to engage in and you
• 49:09
  Speaker 4: can't criticize them because you're slut shaming them right where.
• 49:15
  Speaker 4: You know, in previous generations, we would have recognized that
• 49:20
  Speaker 4: you were trampling on someone else's boundaries and you don't
• 49:24
  Speaker 4: have a right to do that because you have a
• 49:27
  Speaker 4: right to expect someone not to do it to you,
• 49:30
  Speaker 4: and that means other people have a right to expect
• 49:33
  Speaker 4: you not to do it to them. That's been overwritten
• 49:38
  Speaker 4: by feminism where girls are concerned, and it takes parents
• 49:44
  Speaker 4: teaching their daughters, and particular fathers teaching their daughters. That know,
• 49:49
  Speaker 4: if you have a right to expect other people to
• 49:51
  Speaker 4: not do it to you, then they have a right
• 49:53
  Speaker 4: to expect you to not do it to them for
• 49:56
  Speaker 4: girls to understand that. But unfortunately, over the last fifty years,
• 50:02
  Speaker 4: there has been a systematic removal of fathers from the home.
• 50:06
  Speaker 4: And so who's teaching them. They're mothers. They're sexually entitled
• 50:12
  Speaker 4: single mothers, so of course they're going to be more raping.
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you for the super child zaranks. All right,
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: let us move on to the next story. This one
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: is wild. So pictured here is Linda Desuza Abreu, a
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: former prison officer at HMP Wandsworth. This is in the UK,
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: That's why it sounds like a wizard's town in Wandsworth
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: was jailed for fifteen months in early twenty twenty four
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: after pleading guilty to misconduct in public office for engaging
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: in sexual activity with an inmate in June of twenty
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: twenty three. The incident of this crime, this misconduct, this
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: miscond of crime, and captured on video by another prisoner
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: and shared widely online, showed Desusa Abro, who ran an
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: OnlyFans account under a pseudonym, promoting herself as a sexy
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: Latina swinger, performing sex acts in her work uniform before
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: full intercourse. She claimed that she acted under duress, fearing
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: assault if she resisted, but the judge rejected this, highlighting
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: how the virabl footage undermined prison discipline and in danger colleagues.
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: She didn't look like she was resisting. The scandal exposed
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: vetting gaps as her explicit content evaded initial checks due
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: to the alias. So, just to reiterate this woman, Linda
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: Desuza Abreo was she's a prison guard and she has
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: an OnlyFans account and she made a pornographic movie with
• 51:53
  Speaker 1: inmates of the prison that she guards. Okay. So despite
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: the high profile, what one's.
• 52:00
  Speaker 2: Worth is in London by the way, in case you're
• 52:02
  Speaker 2: wor one's worth out in the stakes, it's it's a
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: borough of oh Okay.
• 52:08
  Speaker 1: Okay, It's like a neighborhood in London.
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: It's where that happens to be a huge prison. Makes sense.
• 52:15
  Speaker 4: Borough in the UK is similar to county in the Yeah.
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: No, it's like Burroughs. Like in New York you have
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: the five boroughs in Okay. In London we have the
• 52:24
  Speaker 2: thirty two boroughs. Okay.
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: Despite despite this being a high profile case, Priven Office
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: prison officers remain permitted to operate only fans accounts, with
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: the Prison Service clarifying that the platform hosts non pornographic
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: content from various creators and does not automatically bar applicants.
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: Officials have since bolstered procedures to detect pseudonyms and reject
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: unsuitable candidates, but no outright ban has been imposed. Critics
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: point to the risks of such activities compromising professional integrity,
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: while the service maintains high standards without prohibiting personal side
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: hustles outright, fueling debate over boundaries between private online expression
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: and public sector roles.
• 53:06
  Speaker 4: So wait, they're not talking about the fact that these are.
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: Inmates that she made pornograph.
• 53:14
  Speaker 4: Well, no, no, no prison inmates over whom.
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: She has authority.
• 53:21
  Speaker 4: It's not just an unprofessional thing here. We're right back
• 53:25
  Speaker 4: to the issue of if a man did this, all right,
• 53:28
  Speaker 4: if this was a women's prison and a mail guard
• 53:31
  Speaker 4: did this, there would be a whole discussion going on
• 53:36
  Speaker 4: in the public about this. This is a man in
• 53:40
  Speaker 4: a position of authority, and these women would have been
• 53:44
  Speaker 4: afraid to say no. These women would have faced potential
• 53:48
  Speaker 4: repercussions for saying no, because this is a man in
• 53:53
  Speaker 4: a position authority. But in this situation, she is in
• 53:58
  Speaker 4: the position of authority, and these are men who are
• 54:02
  Speaker 4: under her authority, and it's not just authority to hire
• 54:05
  Speaker 4: and fire. They can't leave. They are in jail, they can't.
• 54:09
  Speaker 4: They're in a cage, all right, uh, And their whole
• 54:12
  Speaker 4: building is a cage, So they're in a cage within
• 54:15
  Speaker 4: a cage, and she has the ability to write them
• 54:18
  Speaker 4: up for for infractions that she doesn't have to prove
• 54:23
  Speaker 4: they did it. All she has to do is indicate
• 54:27
  Speaker 4: that they were were unruly in some way or another.
• 54:31
  Speaker 4: And if they they get get in trouble like that,
• 54:34
  Speaker 4: they lose rights in in prison that are that are
• 54:39
  Speaker 4: considered to be privileges, things that you get to do
• 54:41
  Speaker 4: any time that you want, like go shopping. You know
• 54:46
  Speaker 4: that they're they have an internal i think it's called
• 54:49
  Speaker 4: the canteen, an internal uh place where they can get
• 54:53
  Speaker 4: items like deodorant and cigarettes and stuff like that, and
• 54:58
  Speaker 4: things that they use as an internal currency in the prison.
• 55:03
  Speaker 4: And you know, if they've traded favors with somebody and
• 55:07
  Speaker 4: they owe some of that currency and they can't get
• 55:12
  Speaker 4: it because she's written them up for an infraction, they
• 55:16
  Speaker 4: get their shit beaten out of them by other prisoners.
• 55:19
  Speaker 4: So this is a situation where there is a physical threat.
• 55:23
  Speaker 4: If if these men tell her no, they cannot be
• 55:28
  Speaker 4: considered eligible to consent to this, and she involved them
• 55:34
  Speaker 4: in it. This is sexual exploitation. This is no different
• 55:40
  Speaker 4: than sexual exploitation of students or patients suffering from dementia
• 55:49
  Speaker 4: or intellectually disabled adults under your care. They can't be
• 55:55
  Speaker 4: considered capable, fully capable of telling her no, not because
• 56:01
  Speaker 4: they can't appraise their actions, but because they can face
• 56:05
  Speaker 4: penalties for telling her no, and they know it, and
• 56:09
  Speaker 4: it doesn't matter whether she threatened them or not. Her
• 56:12
  Speaker 4: authority represents a threat. That is the standard that women
• 56:16
  Speaker 4: have set for men, that if a man in authority
• 56:21
  Speaker 4: does something like this, that the women can't be considered
• 56:26
  Speaker 4: capable of consent. So because of that, again, this is
• 56:32
  Speaker 4: a situation where you know, we're we're talking about whether
• 56:35
  Speaker 4: or not this woman gets fired. She should be in jail.
• 56:38
  Speaker 4: This is a woman who should be arrested and prosecuted
• 56:43
  Speaker 4: because she has done something that feminists have deemed that
• 56:49
  Speaker 4: men get charged for rape for doing, and she's getting
• 56:56
  Speaker 4: away with it. If all she's getting is fired or
• 57:00
  Speaker 4: publicly embarrassed, she's essentially getting away with what, because of feminists,
• 57:07
  Speaker 4: could be prosecuted as rape if a man did it.
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, she's she's fleeting to misconduct in public office. So
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: I don't know how like serious that she's basically pleaded
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: guilty to miss good not that serious.
• 57:22
  Speaker 2: I didn't initially plead guilty. She pleaded duress.
• 57:26
  Speaker 4: You know, Hell, yeah, she initially pleaded duress, which makes
• 57:29
  Speaker 4: it even worse, like, oh poor me. And again you're
• 57:34
  Speaker 4: in a position to authority there, you're the one who
• 57:37
  Speaker 4: could put the cabash to the whole thing. In fact,
• 57:40
  Speaker 4: you know this is something she should have blown a
• 57:42
  Speaker 4: whistle on, not participated in. But you know, I'm gonna
• 57:47
  Speaker 4: go right back to a misdemeanor. Is still getting away
• 57:52
  Speaker 4: with it in that instance. Can you imagine when when
• 57:56
  Speaker 4: Brock Turner got uh six months for sexual assault instead
• 58:02
  Speaker 4: of years for rape when he and a gal were
• 58:09
  Speaker 4: going back to God drunk together and we're going back
• 58:11
  Speaker 4: to his dorm together to have sex and started in
• 58:15
  Speaker 4: an alley and then she passed out and and feminists
• 58:21
  Speaker 4: showed up in my area because he came back to
• 58:26
  Speaker 4: community in the Dayton metro area. Feminists came here with
• 58:32
  Speaker 4: guns capable of shooting through brick and mortar and and
• 58:38
  Speaker 4: patrolled the streets outside of his neighborhood, which means they
• 58:42
  Speaker 4: protested with these guns in a neighborhood where other families
• 58:47
  Speaker 4: lived and had kids. Uh, And they don't know if
• 58:50
  Speaker 4: you know, those people wanted those guns in their neighborhood.
• 58:54
  Speaker 4: They didn't know if those people wanted guns on the
• 58:56
  Speaker 4: street in their neighborhood. They didn't know if they were
• 59:00
  Speaker 4: uh setting off you know, alarm bells for for for
• 59:03
  Speaker 4: gang activity in that neighborhood or anything. They just knew
• 59:07
  Speaker 4: that they were protesting this guy not getting heavy enough sentence.
• 59:11
  Speaker 4: And that was in a situation where the the the victim,
• 59:17
  Speaker 4: according to the court, was older than him, had graduated
• 59:21
  Speaker 4: university and had gone back gone to the party, partied
• 59:25
  Speaker 4: with him all night. And again like they're they're not
• 59:30
  Speaker 4: going back to the dorm room to play totally winks, right,
• 59:33
  Speaker 4: They're not going back to play Parcheesi monopoly, and they're
• 59:37
  Speaker 4: they're going back to to play hide the Salami. And uh.
• 59:42
  Speaker 4: But but according to the law, since she passed out
• 59:46
  Speaker 4: during it was a rape and uh and then and
• 59:51
  Speaker 4: and they didn't they didn't agree with the with the sentence. Right,
• 59:57
  Speaker 4: So this this chick, like, in my opinion, what she's
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 4: pleading guilty to is nothing compared to what would happen
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 4: if she was a dude.
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 2: Yep, you know how I said earlier about how prisons
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 2: have no rules, just like sports tournaments have no rules
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: and whatnot. What with identity politicians scrambling our language with
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: their arbitrary identity politics. Well, it doesn't just apply to
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: the inmates you like to pretend they're women. It applies
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: to the screws, the prison officers in the event that
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: they are females. If the inmates identify as women, they
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 2: can go wherever they like within the prison system, And
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: if the screws identify as women, they can do whatever
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 2: they like within the prison system. Like I don't even
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: care about the only fans thing. That's fine. There's nothing
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: wrong with having a side job where you can and
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 2: some extra coin and maybe eventually earn enough to quit
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: your day job. That's fine, even if your side job
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 2: is a bit dodgy. I mean, online prostitution is arguably
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: more than a bit dodgy. It's well, prostitution is a crime.
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 2: It's only a legal loophole that it doesn't count as
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 2: a crime as long as no bodies are touching each other.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 2: Whatever you've gained the system, best of luck to you.
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: My issue lies in this laughable notion that a prison
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: officer acted under duress from a prisoner, as we've already covered. Sorry,
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: what in what world, if you please can that happen
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 2: under YOURSS? Means that in one way or another, you
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 2: are or you were unable to escape the situation. Do
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: I need to repeat that for those of you in
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 2: the back row of upside Downland? Do I need to
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: repeat that the jailer was unable to escape the jailed.
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: How in the electric blue fuck does that even happen?
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 2: How can it happen? I suppose if the jailer is
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 2: a small child and the jailed is a fully grown,
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 2: prison sculpted adult. Yeah, all right, I can see how
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: that can happen. And that's why we don't put children
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: in charge of jailing adults. No kind of Stamford prison
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: experiment is going to shift that balance, no matter what
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: kind of weapon you give to the children. For the
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 2: same reason, you probably shouldn't put one hundred pounds sucking,
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: wet women in charge of prison sculpted monsters. You shouldn't
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: even put paunchy, wheezy, out of shape men in charge
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: of prison sculpted monsters. You'll just be feeding lambs to
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: the lions. Maybe the screws should be subject to physical qualifiers,
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 2: just like fire fighters and police officers are supposed to
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 2: be given in the absence of DEI, maybe Pete Hegseth
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 2: should get involved, they get on the ground, give me
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: fifty at a moment's notice, or you can't be trusted
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: to control a bunch of hench psychopaths who have nothing
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 2: to lose. Yes. No, and I'm not for a moment
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: suggesting that this woman was actually overpowered in any way
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: or was actually under duress as she initially testified. I
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 2: think she was indulging in this fetish that so many
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: women have for violent criminals. You all know the meme
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: random man women bored and uninterested and drier than the
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: Gobi desert, whereas random man serial killer women lose their
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: shit and get wet them an otter's pocket. And I
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: imagine it's the same for lesbians. In the event that
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: they're attracted to women, they're just as likely to be
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: attracted to criminally violent women. It seems unfathomable to so
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: many people, but yes, it's complicated. Women are complicated. They
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: want to be with someone who is capable of anything
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: up to and including acts of extreme violence, but someone
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: who does not exact that violence on her on the
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 2: woman with the fetish, and that archetype is perfectly encapsulated
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: in the prisoner situation one who is capable of whatever
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 2: it was that landed them in prison, but situationally incapable
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: of enacting that violence on her the gatekeeper of that
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: prisoner's freedom. Hashtag not all blah blah. This is a
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: fetish that in extremists only affects probably a minority of women,
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 2: hopefully just a minority of women, but it's a large
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: enough minority to make it very important that women are
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 2: vetted thoroughly in the event that they want to become
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: prison guards. And what should be controlled for above all
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: else is any possibility that a woman thinks she can
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: get away with claiming duress as a defense against raping prisoners.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 2: And yes, it is rape. It is prison rape. No
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: less when the woman is in complete control of any
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 2: and all applicable freedom, it is rape. She is the
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 2: one applying the duress. If she can even entertain the
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: notion that she can davo that shit and get away
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 2: with it, just slip into upside downland and act like
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: the rape victim is the rapist, she should never, under
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 2: any circumstances, be permitted to hold that position of authority.
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 2: And alas we live in a society, yes we do.
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: We live in a society where an alarming amount of
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 2: women think they can do that and get away with it.
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: It's very probably because so many of them can do
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 2: that shit and get away with it. This is just
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 2: the story of a woman who didn't get away with it.
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: We almost certainly never hear about the women who did
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: get away with it because their victims are already prisoners.
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 2: They don't have all that much legal protection. The only
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: legal protection they can possibly have comes in the form
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 2: of video evidence. Video evidence beyond reasonable doubt, video evidence
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: that is not simply ignored or destroyed. That appears to
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 2: be what swung the verdict in this case, and that's
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: what makes it such an anomaly, an anomaly that has
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: brought it to our attention in the first place. So yeah,
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: in conclusion, maybe don't put women in charge of prisoners,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: not male prisoners, not female prisoners, not miscellaneous prisoners. At
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 2: least at least like put a hold on this ship
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: until we can figure out what's going on. Spoiler alert.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: What's going on is the society we live in is
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: one of which women have been taught to do whatever
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: they like, to indulge in whatever fantasies they like, sexual
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: or otherwise, and they will do so. Like, first, we
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: need to stop de eyeing women into these grossly inappropriate
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: positions of power. Then we need to overhaul this society
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: we live in and deprogram these women from this insatiable
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: victim mentality. And then maybe we can reintroduce women into
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: these roles of power once they are no longer by
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: and large warped and twisted and fucked up beyond all
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 2: recognition into this psychotic victim mentality. It's going to be
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 2: a long haul, ladies and gentlemen, because we're dealing with
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 2: at least four generations of this bullshit, of this teaching
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: women to be victims and nothing else, no matter what
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 2: they do. Maybe it will take another four generations before
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: we can get back to normal, but at least I
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 2: can draw it there. At least I can perceive of
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 2: an exit plan of roughly four generations. We won't get
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: there in my lifetime, but at least I can conceive
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 2: of when we can, in theory, get back to where
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 2: we want to be. That is far more than the
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 2: feminists ever gave us. Feminists have no exit plan whatsoever.
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: They will keep going, not for four generations, not for
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 2: eight generations, not for two hundred and fifty six generations,
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: but forever, until all positions of power are held by women,
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 2: all men who are rare, or men who have disavowed
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 2: their masculinity, or indeed, until the human race is extinct,
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: which will probably come first. I'm best of luck everyone,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: and godspeed. Sorry I'm supposed to be dead. Yeah, I'm dead.
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: Sorry.
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 4: By the way, just so you know, this starts in juvi.
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 4: What this woman has done, she did with adults. But
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 4: when juvenile detention inmates in the US were surveyed, approximately
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 4: fifty fifty eight to sixty percent of sexual misconduct that
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 4: they reported being victimized by they reported staff perpetrators, not
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 4: other inmates, and approximately ninety five percent of that was
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 4: perpetrated by women alone, and another two to three percent
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 4: was perpetrated by groups of adults that included women. So
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 4: women were involved in between ninety five and ninety eight
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 4: of the majority of incidents as sexual victimization, and these
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 4: were minors. These are boys, not men that are reporting this,
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 4: mostly minority boys. And it goes as young as ten
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: years old.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: Well, let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: one in the comments and Yeah, let's move on to
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: the last story. So pictured here as Sean McMaster, and
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: a federal jury has just awarded former Detroit police officer
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: Sean McMaster fifty eight point four million dollars this month
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 1: after dismissing charges of sexually assaulted and assaulting his young daughter,
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: which stemmed from a twenty nineteen prosecution by Michigan Attorney
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: General Diane nessel amid a bitter custody dispute with his
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: ex wife, Joanna McMaster. The allegation serviced during parenting visits
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: in Michigan, but a twenty sixteen recording revealed Joanna offering
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: to halt a criminal probe in exchange for McMaster terminating
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: his parental rights. McMaster, who maintained his innocence and dured
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty one days in solitary confinement in
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 1: Oakland County Jail before charges were dropped following scrutiny from
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: the seven investigators, which highlighted investigative flaws including omitted exculpatory
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 1: evidence like a therapist's report of the child admitting to lying,
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: and no medical confirmation of abuse. McMaster's twenty twenty one
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: civil lawsuit targeted Michigan State Police trooper David Bussaka and
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: a former Assistant Attorney General, Brian Cologiege, for constitutional violations,
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: malicious prosecution, and excessive pre trial punishment. US District Judge
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: Stephen J. Murphy the Third ruled that there was no
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: probable cause for warrants, setting Busaka's omissions and Colodiege's probe
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: allegedly motivated by a personal relationship tied to the ex wife. COLODIEJ.
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: Later resigned and was disbarred for unrelated misconduct. After a
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: three week trial, the jury deliberated for a day and
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: a half before massive award, which McMaster's attorney said compensated
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: for lost job, reputation and family ties. Despite the findings,
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: Busaka was promoted to lieutenant, sparking criticism over accountability and
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: law enforcement and prosecute prosecutorial oversight. So there was a
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: bitter divorce apparently, and a child custody hearings were going on,
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: and his ex wife accused him of sexually assaulting his
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: which apparently went through, and it resulted in him McMaster
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: here enduring one hundred and fifty one days in solitary confinement.
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: And it was all done just so that you can
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: get access, but he you know that the uh I
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: guess the case was turned over, it was found that
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: he was innocent and that the wife was trying to essentially,
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: you know, pressure him into giving her full custody in
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: exchange for his freedom, and he didn't take it. So anyway,
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: what do you guys think.
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 4: This is? This is the kind of case that actually
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 4: got me started with the online portion of the men's
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 4: Rights Movement. I. One of my earlier articles for a
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 4: Voice for Men is titled seven Years in Hell. And
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 4: fortunately in that case, the attorney was prepared for things
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 4: like this. Unfortunately the reason is because this is this
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 4: use of false allegations of abuse of various types is
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 4: frequently used by women in divorce cases to try to
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 4: leverage the court in custody battles. It's one of the
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 4: reasons why it is not a good idea for the
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 4: courts to to have as their default, the idea that
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 4: maternal custody should be presumed. And you know, men, men
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 4: should have to prove that they're a good parent in
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 4: order to continue parenting their child after a divorce, because
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 4: women then turn around and say, well, he's he's he
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 4: abuses the child, he engages in sexual assault and so on,
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 4: And these these allegations often are not criminally vetted at all,
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 4: and they don't have to be in order for them
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 4: to be used in a custody battle. And the only
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 4: way to fix this, the only thing that will put
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 4: a stop to this is when it is proved in
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 4: court that the allegation itself is a lie. And the
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 4: mother using that allegation in court to try to obtain
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 4: custody knew when she leveled the allegation that it was
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 4: a lie. That should result in prosecution of the mother,
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 4: And depending on what the victim suffered, it should be
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 4: commensurate with the type of crime that would cause a
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 4: violent crime victim to suffer the same thing. So in
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 4: this case, he was kidnapped violently by armed kidnappers and
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 4: he was held against his will, so he was prevented
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 4: from leaving the area where he was left. He was
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 4: tortured because solitary confinement is tortured. So this this should
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 4: go back on her for uh hiring, hiring uh hitman
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 4: to to kidnap, incarcerate, falsely, wrongly imprisoned, and torture her
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 4: ex husband. You know that that should be the equivalent
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 4: of what she's prosecuted for, and she should go to
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 4: jail for the amount of time that a man would
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 4: go to jail for if he kidnapped, wrongly, imprisoned, and
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 4: tortured a woman for that period of time. That is
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 4: the only type of accountability that will stop women from
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 4: doing this in the In the seven years in Hell case,
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 4: this this continued with allegations as serious as rape that
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 4: were demonstrably false. In fact, the accuser couldn't find a
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 4: time in the life of the accused when he couldn't
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 4: account for his whereabouts because the rest of us that
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 4: were friends with him were dividing our visitation time with
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 4: him like our time hanging out with him, so that
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 4: there was no point in time when he didn't have
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 4: a witness that could could say where he actually was
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 4: and what he was actually doing. He stayed on camera
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 4: as much as he could, He kept receipts from every
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 4: place that he went. He documented his whereabouts extensively in
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 4: order to ensure that she could not do this to him,
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 4: because the uh the situation had already gotten that bad
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 4: by the time that she made that allegation. The most
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 4: bizarre and minor allegation that the seven years accus are
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 4: made was a drive by greeting that never happened. She
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 4: had a restraining order on him, and she claimed he
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 4: drove past a location where she shouldn't have been able
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 4: to say she was because she was claiming to another
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 4: judge that she was going to be out of state
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 4: for two weeks, and claimed that he waved menacingly, which
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 4: I'm not sure exactly what that entails, you know, like
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 4: one fingerwave or what. But it never happened. It wouldn't
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 4: it wouldn't matter. So this this type of thing, like
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 4: I've had a lot of experience with this, Women get
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 4: false restraining orders. They then use the restraining order as
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 4: a launchpad for a false allegation. A lot of times
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 4: they'll try to make an allegation that can't be disproved.
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 4: You know, while I was here and he showed up
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 4: and he didn't leave, or I got a crank call
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 4: from him, or a number of other things. They'll show
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 4: up in his workplace and get him arrested. They'll go
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 4: into his neighborhood in the and if he goes outside,
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 4: he gets arrested. You know, just all kinds of things
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 4: like that. And and it's all to leverage false allegations
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 4: in custody battles. And so this this instance, it happened
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 4: to an officer, and because he was an officer, they
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 4: kept him in solitary confinement because if they didn't, he's
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 4: an officer in the prison system, he's going to get killed, right,
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 4: And so they use that as an excuse to keep
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 4: him in solitary And that's torture. But this case is
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 4: by far not rare. The other thing is after the
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 4: seven years, the accuser in the seven years case was
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 4: deemed a vexatious lit again, there was a lawsuit in
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 4: which the you know, the accused only sued her. He
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 4: didn't sue everybody that he could have sued. He only
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 4: sued her for vexatious litigation and Melissia's prosecution. And all
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 4: he sued for and sue for money. All he sued
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 4: for was for her to be deemed a vexatious litigant
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 4: and to not be able to make any more allegations.
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 4: That's the only thing that stopped it in his case,
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 4: but it won't stop other women from doing it. And
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 4: the first thing that I saw happen after that was
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 4: a bunch of feminist articles came out about how to
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 4: counter those types of lawsuits. So yeah, the accuser herself
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 4: needs to face jail time in situations like this, and
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 4: it is important for collaborating law enforcement and prosecutors to
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 4: face repercussions as well. But it's only fair if they
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 4: face those repercussions if their actions aren't dictated by law.
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 4: And unfortunately, in the United States, the Violence Against Women
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 4: Act does dictate their actions, so that would have to
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 4: be changed, but it wouldn't have to be changed at
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 4: all in order to prosecute false accusers. False accusation is
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 4: a violent crime. When you falsely accuse somebody of a
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 4: crime for which they will be arrested, You are hiring
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 4: thugs to go to that person's place of residence or
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 4: their workplace wherever they can be found and violently kidnap
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 4: them and wrongfully imprison them and subject them to at
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 4: the very minimum hours worth of psychological torture, possibly days,
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 4: possibly years. It is not a peaceful crime, it is
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 4: not a minor crime. It is a violent crime. Be
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 4: treated as such.
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: Well said, thank you, Mike, Did you want to say
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: anything about this?
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 2: I didn't write anything down, but yeah, the swamp of
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 2: lies is so difficult to legislate because if you give
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: the government the opportunity to legislate on lies, then I mean,
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 2: all the government does is lie, and all they do
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 2: is uphold these lies based on whatever the station's care
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: happens to be. And again, we live in a society.
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 2: We live in a society in which in which lies
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 2: told by women are truth and truth is told by
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 2: men are lies. And it's fucked up. I don't again,
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: I don't know how to fix this, and I don't
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 2: know if it's going to get fixed in any of
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 2: our lifetimes. So yeah, again, again, I didn't have time
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: to write anything up about this because of daylight saving time.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: I'm currentlying out you guys, like for us, it doesn't
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: happen until like Sunday.
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we're we're in. We're in that one week where
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 2: I'm an hour behind. You'll so and and and that
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: caught me off guard, so I couldn't think of anything
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 2: to say. But you'll know what I have to say
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 2: by what I said about the last three stories. Yeah, yeah, Yeah,
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 2: it's fucking fucking men get fucked in every opportunity and
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: and women get pedestalized by their victimhood at every opportunity.
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 2: So yeah, just just just stop doing that, Just just
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 2: fucking stop doing that. Folks. Welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 2: This is the message we send you every opportunity and
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 2: I and I know no one's listening except the already
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 2: converted or already deprogrammed, should I say? But yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 2: this like good luck sending all the immigrants away, good
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 2: luck undoing all of the the trans bullshit. But once
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 2: you've done that, we still have this. We still have
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 2: we still have the head vampire to deal with. So please, please,
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: for the love of all of your gods, can we
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 2: deal with this first?
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah, good idea.
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 4: I you know, the more that we cover stories like
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 4: the ones we did tonight with a complete lack of
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 4: female accountability, the more I look at history and in
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 4: some countries, the current situation of coverture and guardianship and
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 4: wonder if those systems were maybe put in place, because
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: this is how women behave when those systems are not
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 4: in place, that they're completely unaccountable, that they fight for
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 4: unequal treatment, for unequal lenience toward women who behave as
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 4: sexual predators and as false accusers and violent criminals and
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 4: so on, like no wonder men felt like they had
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 4: to be If they're going to be the shield between
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 4: women in the state, they also have to be in
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 4: charge and they have to be women's chaperones. Like if
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 4: women can't be adult enough to take accountability for their
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 4: own actions, and that includes the the the consequences other
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 4: people face from their actions, then women shouldn't have the
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 4: right to make their own choices just the same as teenagers.
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 4: Like I I hate to say that, especially being female,
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 4: being you know, a co breadwinner in my family and
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 4: being someone who has worked very hard to be better
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 4: than that. And I value my freedom of choice, but
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 4: if this is what happens when women have that freedom
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 4: of choice, I'd rather live under a system like what
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 4: Islam does to women, knowing that at least men would
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 4: be protected from this ship and this wouldn't be happening.
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 4: Then then have that freedom of choice. Man, this is
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 4: this is insane that half the population can behave this
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 4: way and get away with it and not non face
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 4: any repercussions, and society doesn't even think anything needs to
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 4: be done about it because the other half the population
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 4: is treated like they're just disposable as to stop.
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 2: The Islamic situation would not fix this either. That's the
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 2: thing to feminism.
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 4: Either we have to go back to something like that.
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 4: Either we have to go back to something like coverture. Well,
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 4: we have to start teaching women to be as accountable
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 4: for the consequences of their choices as we expect men
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 4: to be. Those are our only two choices going forward.
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 4: If we go a different direction than one of those
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 4: two choices, the world ends. Right, we are already in
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 4: a situation where again three and ten is almost a third, right.
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 4: Almost a third of pregnancies in the world ends an
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 4: elective abortion. The leading cause of human death in the
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 4: world is being aborted, being killed by your mother. We're
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 4: in a situation where false allegations are common and they're
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 4: getting denied. We are in a situation where men are
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 4: being subjected to levels of abuse that cause them to
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 4: commit suicide just because they want to parent their children,
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 4: and then they're getting called deadbeats because the mother won't
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 4: allow them to see their child. We're in a situation
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 4: where women can be in charge and still claim to
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 4: be victims of things that they did to other people.
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 4: If we don't change that we're going to be in
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 4: a situation where the world just goes down the toilet
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 4: vanity will be an extinct species. Nature will heal because
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 4: we'll be gone. So if if we don't, if we
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 4: don't fix this, and you know, the women can can
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 4: learn to be accountable and men can stop tolerating unaccountability.
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 4: And that's what has to happen because otherwise, you know,
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 4: like I said, we have to go back to something
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 4: like coverture guardianship. Maybe women will figure out that they
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 4: can't act like this. If that happens again, I hate
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 4: to call for that. I'd rather see women be accountable.
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 4: But it's got to be one or the other. You
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 4: can't it can't be wavering between the two for all
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 4: of eternity, because we don't have that long.
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not going to concede to this idea that
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 2: we have to go backwards to something, because we would
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 2: be going backwards to something that never really existed. We
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 2: need to go forwards to something. And this is why,
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 2: it's why, why, what what we talk about is something
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: that the right and the left I can't conceive of,
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 2: neither the right nor the left, because we're talking about
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 2: going forward to something that has never really been achieved
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: at any point in history, and it's it's it's men
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: and women having equal rights under the law. Now, I
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 2: know that sounds leftist because it involves equality, and I
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: know it sounds right ist because it involves law and order.
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 2: But we're we're at a point that's historically has never
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 2: been predicted. We're at an absolutely mad time in history
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 2: where technocracy is and democracy have have skewed us out
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 2: of all recognition. And you know, a lot of people
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: like you'd like to say that progression is giving women rights,
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 2: and if you go back as far as ancient Greek times,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 2: you could say that they got so far in the
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 2: first place because men were given so many more rights
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 2: than women. And yeah, those those things, those things are
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: both historically conceivable. But like the world has changed so
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 2: much in the past one hundred years, in the past
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 2: two hundred years, and indeed in the past thousand years
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 2: since romantic chivalry. Let's not forget that the world hasn't
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 2: been changing since the advent of feminism. Feminism has only
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 2: been around for one hundred years, but romantic.
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 4: Chivalry has one hundred and fifty years.
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: The Romantic chivalry has been around for a thousand years
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: at least, and and until we can get our heads
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: around that, we're not going to be able to fix
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 2: the problem that we in the manisphere are all talking about.
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 2: We all in the minisphere. There is a whole different
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: parts of the manusphere red pills and p uas and
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 2: I raising magtails and such. But yeah, no, it's that
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: that's what makes it so difficult to find the right answer.
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 2: And the right answer is not regressive or progressive. It's
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 2: just looking at men and women and the fact that
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 2: they are different, but there are many ways in that
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 2: they should not be treated differently among the law. And
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: and then we have to address what the law even
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 2: is and what and how we've been going wrong with
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 2: our approach to the law. And that's where we get
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 2: into the subject of democracy and whether that was even
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 2: a good idea in the first place. And that's you know,
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 2: there's this can splinter off into all manner of things
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 2: and yeah, sorry, there's there's no one easy solution. But
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 2: but we we can't let our left wing opponents describe
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 2: what progressivism means, because it's not progressivism, it's just left wing.
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 2: Not can we prescribe everything that our right wing opponents
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: consider it to be traditionalism, because traditionalism is it's I mean,
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: romantic chivalry has been around for so long that it's
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 2: it's made feminism a part of our tradition. Just just
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 2: because it looks traditional doesn't mean it.
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 4: And it's very important to understand the the cure for
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 4: unaccountability in women is for girls to be raised by
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 4: their fathers. Yes, even if their mothers are part of that,
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 4: even if even a mother and father in conjunction with
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 4: each other, they cannot be raised without their fathers. And
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 4: while in the overwhelming majority of men's issues there's very
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 4: little difference between left and right, there is a stark
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 4: difference here between left and right. We can appeal to
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 4: traditionalists on this. Traditionalism includes the understanding that a family
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 4: is two parents and their children, not one parent and
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 4: their children, and that it should be only the worst
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 4: of extenuating circumstances. Somebody dies, somebody genuinely is abusive, somebody
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 4: is you know, forced to go into rehab because of drugs,
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 4: or their mental health is so bad they have to
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 4: be institutionalized or separated from their family. Aside from that,
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 4: you know that it should be both parents and their children.
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 4: We can appeal to that that understanding that father should
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 4: not be excluded from their children's lives, and we have to.
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 4: It is vital to the future of the entire human
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 4: race that the men's movement recognize that appealing to government
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 4: officials that are on the right side of the aisle
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 4: to ensure that fathers are not going to be removed
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 4: from their children's lives is a way to get equally
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 4: shared parenting, a way to get accountability put back into
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 4: the divorce system for women, and a way to reduce
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 4: divorce and reduce single parenting. And this is even unmarried.
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 4: Fathers should have equal custody rights as just as much
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 4: as the mother does, as long as they are able
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 4: to prove they are the father of the child. And
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 4: we should be writing to politicians, we should be influencing
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 4: the public through comments on social media and news articles.
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 4: It is absolutely vital. This is the biggest push that
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 4: should be happening in the entire men's rights movement that
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 4: fathers must not be excluded by outside forces from their
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 4: children's lives. If he chooses to abandon, that's on him,
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 4: But most of the time it's not him choosing to
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 4: abandon she doesn't think that he needs to be there
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 4: and she doesn't let him in, or the state doesn't
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 4: think that he needs to be there and the state
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 4: doesn't award him custody. That is what needs to happen.
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 4: And you can't appeal to the left with that because
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 4: they are anti family. You can only appeal to the
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 4: right With that. You appeal to what works. And if
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 4: you think that you can split families up and have
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 4: the children benefit from it, you need to do some
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 4: research because that is not the case. So father's rights,
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 4: out of everything that the men's rights movement does, father's
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 4: rights are probably fundamentally the most important thing that we
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 4: can support, and we need to step that up beyond
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 4: everything else. And then fathers need to teach their girls
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 4: to be just as accountable as they are teaching their
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 4: boys to be. And without that, we don't have a
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 4: way forward.
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 2: Join us on the uphill struggle as gentlemen. Unlets us
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 2: not be sisyphus on our way up that hill.
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, take us t going to go into the Patron
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: show now and we're gonna continue this conversation there. So
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 1: if you guys want to join us, go to feed
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com for slash subscribe to become a
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: member five bucks a month. We'll get you into the
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: discord where you'll be able to watch all the additional
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 1: content and you will make us happy. So yeah, go toe,
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 1: it'll help us out. It'll make it easier for us
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 1: to keep doing this work. And we welcome the company
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: in our discord server. And if you don't want to
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 1: wake up one morning to find that we've been needed
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 1: from the internet again, that's Badger feed dot com for that.
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 1: I don't know why I said that again, but anyway,
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: Uh yeah, so thanks guys for coming on the stream.
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: Thank you to Mike and Hannah for helping me out.
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: If you guys like this video, Oh I got ano
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 1: the super chow. That's right. Richard Rio gave us five
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: and said, what do you get for the woman who
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: as everything penicillin?
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 4: Oh?
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 4: Penicillin doesn't It doesn't cure that much anymore. A lot
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 4: of stuff is antibiotic. You know, there's antibiotic resistant goner rhea.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 4: Now body count matters.
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: Oh god, yeah, right, if you don't want to make
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: super gonorrhea super chlamydia, maybe.
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 4: Uh well, what's really scary is Syphilis is a bacteria,
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 4: it's not a virus. So if it becomes antibiotic resistant,
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 4: we are fucked.
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying. Yeah for sure.
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 4: Yeah, BodyCount matters a lot. It's a hygienic issue. It's
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 4: not a moral issue, and you have every right to
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 4: reject a woman whose body count is too high.
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: Well, anyway, let us know what you guys think about
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 1: all these stories in the comments. If you guys like
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: this video, please h like, subscribe you're not already subscribed
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 1: to the buffalodifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we discussed on the
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: show today, and please please please share this video because
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 1: sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: on today's episode of HBr News, and we'll talk to
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: you guys in the next one. See you next.
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 2: Lamia is the way forward.
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 1: See Chlamydia you next Tuesday.