Latest / Best of Business / Jenee Tibshraeny: NZ Herald Wellington business editor on Uber fighting back against 2022 employment ruling
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks B Follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Uber's in the Supreme Court this week fighting a twenty
- 0:19Speaker 2: twenty two ruling. This ruling classified four drivers as employees.
- 0:26Speaker 2: The company reckons drivers have too much freedom to be
- 0:29Speaker 2: treated as employees and should not receive leave and kei
- 0:32Speaker 2: we Saver contributions, among other things. Jane tips Trainee is
- 0:36Speaker 2: The Herald's Wellington Business editor and is with us tonight. Hi, Jane, Evening, Ryan.
- 0:42Speaker 2: So the unions presented their evidence this morning. What do
- 0:45Speaker 2: they argue?
- 0:46Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right.
- 0:48Speaker 3: The unions say that these drivers definitely are employees. They
- 0:53Speaker 3: say that the level of control that Uber has over
- 0:56Speaker 3: the way they go about making their income is so restrictive.
- 1:01Speaker 3: They call it a sort of relentless and intensive. They
- 1:06Speaker 3: say it's so intense that there is no way that
- 1:09Speaker 3: these drivers are in fact contractors. So, you know, the
- 1:13Speaker 3: lawyers for the unions ran through a number of things.
- 1:17Speaker 3: They sort of picked apart the contracts that drivers you know,
- 1:22Speaker 3: sign with Uber, saying that the drivers have basically no
- 1:27Speaker 3: power in these so these contracts are non negotiable and
- 1:30Speaker 3: Uber can change the terms and conditions as it wishes,
- 1:33Speaker 3: and the drivers kind of have no choice but to
- 1:36Speaker 3: agree to these.
- 1:37Speaker 2: Yeah, So they basically say they had no choice but
- 1:40Speaker 2: to accept when Uber cut their fares.
- 1:44Speaker 3: That's right. So one of the examples that the lawyer
- 1:46Speaker 3: used was dating back a few years now, but he said,
- 1:50Speaker 3: you know that Uber changed the fares so that the
- 1:52Speaker 3: drivers received less income and also changed the way that
- 1:56Speaker 3: the fares were calculated, and they just had to sort
- 1:59Speaker 3: of suck it up and deal with it. So one
- 2:03Speaker 3: of the things that's been debated in court is the
- 2:06Speaker 3: level of control that Uber had. Another thing that's been
- 2:09Speaker 3: debated is just how related Uber is to the business.
- 2:14Speaker 3: So Uber makes the case it says, well, actually, we're
- 2:16Speaker 3: not that involved. We just provide the platform and the
- 2:19Speaker 3: real agreement is between the driver and the passenger. But
- 2:23Speaker 3: the unions say that's not right. Uber plays a big
- 2:25Speaker 3: role because Uber sets the fair, then Uber collects the fare,
- 2:29Speaker 3: and then you know, gives the driver their cut from there.
- 2:33Speaker 3: And Uber controls things like the sorts of information it
- 2:38Speaker 3: gives the drivers. It penalizes the drivers if they don't
- 2:41Speaker 3: get good ratings. The unions went so fast to say
- 2:45Speaker 3: that Uber actually, you know, penalizes the drivers if they
- 2:50Speaker 3: do something wrong when they're not even driving. So the unions,
- 2:56Speaker 3: the judges just sitting in court for a bit of
- 2:58Speaker 3: the time. The judges seem quite receptive to the union's argument.
- 3:02Speaker 3: But you know, Uber also said, well, our drivers want this,
- 3:05Speaker 3: Like they've surveyed the drivers. They love the flexible they
- 3:08Speaker 3: can apparently apparently they love the flexibility they can choose
- 3:11Speaker 3: when they work. And you know, Uber says they agree
- 3:14Speaker 3: to this contract, no one forces them to sign it.
- 3:16Speaker 3: So it's a tough call.
- 3:19Speaker 2: Yeah, what has Uber's defense been saying.
- 3:23Speaker 3: Well, basically that the flexibility is such that it's that
- 3:28Speaker 3: you can't possibly call the driver's employees. Now, Uber has
- 3:33Speaker 3: been fighting this battle all around the world, and it
- 3:36Speaker 3: says that the sort of contractor model is, I mean,
- 3:39Speaker 3: it's central to the way it operates. So the fact
- 3:43Speaker 3: it's taken it to the Supreme Court, you know, shows
- 3:45Speaker 3: how significant this is for Uber. A thing Ryan that's
- 3:49Speaker 3: happening here in the background is that the government is
- 3:52Speaker 3: actually in the process of changing the law. So it's
- 3:55Speaker 3: a bit more prescriptive on you know, what exactly constitutes
- 3:58Speaker 3: being a contractor versus an employee. So the effect of
- 4:02Speaker 3: this case could be significant for other people in the
- 4:05Speaker 3: goog economy, but perhaps the the salience of it might
- 4:10Speaker 3: not be as great because the government is actually changing
- 4:13Speaker 3: the law to provide some clarity in the space.
- 4:16Speaker 2: Yeah, fascinating case. We'll keep watching that. It's still going.
- 4:19Speaker 2: Is it presumably in the Supreme Court there, Jane.
- 4:22Speaker 3: I think it wrapped up today. It will set down
- 4:24Speaker 3: for two days, so I guess it'll take the judges
- 4:26Speaker 3: some time to deliberate. But it'll be interesting to see
- 4:29Speaker 3: whether the outcome is announced before the law has.
- 4:33Speaker 2: Changed or not.
- 4:36Speaker 3: So it's quite a bit there for the lawyers to digest.
- 4:38Speaker 2: I think absolutely, and one might sort of null and
- 4:40Speaker 2: void the other anyway, Jenny, appreciate your time. Jenne to
- 4:43Speaker 2: trainee and the New Zealand Herald, Wellington Business Editor.
- 4:46Speaker 1: For more from News Talks b listen live on air
- 4:49Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 4:52Speaker 1: go with our podcasts on Irradio.