Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Hodgepodge of follow-ups | HBR Talk 400

Transcript

Hodgepodge of follow-ups | HBR Talk 400 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk four hundred, a hodgepodge
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: of follow ups. So, uh, this this one. We've been
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: talking about some different things over time that after we
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: discussed them, new information or new happenings you know, occurred
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: or came out or whatever. So we're going to be
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: looking at a series of news stories. We're not going
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: to go through and read every word of each one,
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: so uh, you know, I'm basically going to get the
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: conversation started on each one by reading part of the
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: story and and we'll go from there. And I am
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: your host, Hannah Wallen here with nonsense Annihilator Lauren Brooks,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: the qualification and the personification of perceptivity, Mike Stevenson, Richard
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: the Lionhearted Hello, and then we have the dog in charge,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: Brian Martinez, working in the background to make everything happen.
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: And before we get into all of that, we've still
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: got to do what we've got to do. As always,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio dishes out a S. Morgasboard of thought
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: provoking discussions, and as experiences both recent and long past
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: have demonstrated, the provoked thoughts are fighting back, and they've
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: made it clear that for people like us, relying on
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: third party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our work
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: is treading on thin ice or building our house in
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: the path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this,
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: we strongly encourage our supporters to switch at least their
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: support for us to Feed the Badger dot com the
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: most stable way to help us out, And if you
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: want to tip us directly instead of relying on any
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: social media platforms, tip jar. The link for that is
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. And
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms,
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: which is why you should further provoke the thought police
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: by tracking our thought provoking discussions on Honeybadger Brigade dot com,
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: where you can find your way to all of our content,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: as well as a link to feed the Badger dot
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: com in a drop down menu at the top of
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: the page. And with that we will get into it.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: So the first one, a while back, we did a
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: story where we ended up talking about this, and we've
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: talked about it a couple of times as part of
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: the discussion of other stories. I think I've mentioned it
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: a bunch of times that the House of Representatives in
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: the United States had a slush fund out of which
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: they had paid out basically sexual harassment settlements. Now, just
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: so people understand, if the representative has a bunch of
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: interns at their office and some employees and so on,
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: and one person in that group sexually harasses someone else
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: in that group, they pay out of that fund, whether
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: it was the senator they're sorry, the representative, or one
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: of the subordinates. So this information doesn't tell us per
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: se just yet who the parties were that were making
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: the accusations, who the accusations were made against. We only
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: know that instead of investigating, getting to the bottom of
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: it and ensuring that the behavior would have consequences, or
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: making false allegations would have consequences if those occurred, they
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: just paid settlements instead. And you know, occasionally some people
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: were fired, but mostly they just paid settlements. So that
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: is where we are here. Get this video out of
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: the way because it is actually unrelated. House lawmakers doled
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: out more than three hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: in taxpayer funds from a so called sexual harassment slush
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: fund between twenty seven and twenty seventeen, according to data
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: released by Representative Nancy Mace this week. The figure is
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: higher than previously known, but a much lower portion of
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: the eighteen million total paid out and responds to workplace
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: complaints on Capitol Hill than had been rumored. So this
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: slush fund covers other things besides sexual harassments. They paid
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: out eighteen million in workplace complaints. Besides sexual harassment, there
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: can also be discrimination. There can be workplace injuries. Somebody
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: getting overworked, somebody actually experience seeing an injury due to
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: something like a slip, trip, or a fall, which is
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: the most common type of injury people have in workplaces
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: that aren't that The actual most common type of workplace
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: injuries have to do with driving. But unless you're driving,
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: for the representative, most workplaces where it's not driving, it's slips,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: trips and falls. Right, So those kinds of things pay differences,
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: like they have somebody that's getting unfairly discriminated against in
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: their paycheck. But I think I said in the past
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: more than once. It may have only been once, but
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: it may I'm pretty sure it was more than once
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: that I've wanted to see this list, and I would
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: bet you that there would be names from both major
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: parties on it. Well, what Mace put out there, she
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: had confirmed for former legislators, and lo and behold, there
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: is a Republican, a Democrat, a Democrat, and a Republican.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: So two Republicans, two Democrats on that short list there,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: All four were previously known to have faced sexual misconduct accusations,
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: so they paid to make accusations go away, all four
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: of them, two Republicans, two Democrats. And then we have
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: the numbers, and each one had thousands of dollars. All
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: four were included in the House Ethics Committees list. Two
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: offices on her list were not previously known, and that
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: was another Republican, another Democrat. And this name is interesting
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: because this is not a man's name, Carolyn McCarthy, who
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: reached an eight thousand settlement. So we get a lot
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: of accusations against men, we don't necessarily know right if
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: they're true or false, and if they're not investigated, then
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: it's never determined whether they're true or false. Don't get
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: as many accusations against women. Usually it's very difficult to
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: make an accusation stick against a woman unless you have evidence,
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: so that's probably more likely to be a solid accusation there,
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: but it's it must not have been a major one
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: because or it was made by a man one or
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: the other. And she had the smallest payment of any
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: of these listed. We're looking at double and triple digits
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: here and then fifteen thousand here, and she had eight
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: thousand as her payment. And since since she died last year,
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: it's hard to tell. There's there's not going to be
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: an investigation, right Alexander has said that the payout was
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: a former staffer who was fired. Basically, somebody on his
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: team did something to somebody else on his team, and
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: the someone else on his team got naughty complaints money.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: So this is this is where your tax dollars are going.
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: That these these politicians, these people who are above you
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: in their own mind, right above the law, are are
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: taking your tax dollars putting them in a slash fund,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: and then anytime they do a bad they're paying to
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: to make it go away so other people don't know
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: that they did a bad. That's that's their big thing.
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: We have.
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: Senior Stix gave us two dollars and asked, what do
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: we get on the fourth hundredth stream? We get a hodgepodge,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: we get we get Hannah has been looking for more
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: information on each of these things and couldn't make one show,
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: one whole show, out of any of them. And so
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: we're just gonna talk about all of them tonight, or
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: as many of them as I can shove into this show.
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: So there's your situation. There's another bit to this too.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: Here we go, all records. It's not selecting what I
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: wanted to select. Why is it doing that? There we go.
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: All records prior to two thousand and four were destroyed,
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: which tells you everything you need to know about how
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: long this has been buried. So the only information we
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: have we have a thousand pages from two thousand and
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: five on or two thousand and four on, but everything
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: before two thousand and four. There were payouts then, and
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: this has been going on for a long time, but
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: we don't have that information. We can't get that information
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: because it's been destroyed. So this is essentially the story.
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: Any any comments, I.
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: Wonder what the hell happened before two thousand and four, Yeah,
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: that needed to be destroyed. I wonder how much abuse
• 10:43
  Speaker 3: was going on that was so damning that it needed
• 10:47
  Speaker 3: to be destroyed. And all I can do is wonder,
• 10:51
  Speaker 3: because it's been destroyed. I what what do you all
• 10:56
  Speaker 3: suppose happened before two thousand and four, Ladies and gentlemen,
• 11:02
  Speaker 3: the patriot Ah, there's the thing.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that did happen that followed nine to eleven. So
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: that did happen before two thousand and four. There are
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: a few other things that happen. You know. What's interesting
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: is that these are the people who every two years
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: vote to renew the Violence Against Women Act. So if
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: you're at work and one of your coworkers claims to
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: be sexually harassed, the repercussions you face are dramatically different.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: In fact, you can go to jail if your coworker
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: accuses you of sexual harassment. If they make a criminal complaint,
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: you can be jailed for it, and you will be
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: treated like you should be jailed for it, unless and
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: un until you can solidly prove that no, you shouldn't.
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: And even then, there will always be people in your
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: workplace and anybody who heard the news of your allegations
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: that will still assume you must have done something to
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: get accused. Right there there, You'll never have the ability
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: to just pay uh for for what they get paid
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: every year. That's nickels and dimes right, pay pay lunch
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: money out and uh, and then it goes away and
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: you never have to hear about it again. Nope, that's
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: only for our senators and our congressmen, our House of Representatives,
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: and as long as that fund's been in place. You know,
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: we have had people clamoring for the Epstein files, but
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: we haven't had people clamoring for this information, information about
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: the people who pass the laws that you have to
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: obey and that determine what your settlement might be. If
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: you are treated unfairly in the workplace, Do you have
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: to work more hours to get the same paycheck as
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: your coworker because they're afraid to pay her less for
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: less work? Do you have to deal with labor that
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: is not expected if you're coworker because your male and
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: your coworker is female. Do you get recourse for that
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: under the law? And does that recourse pan out in court? Well,
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: they're not focused on that. They're focused on whether or
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: not they can use your tax dollars, your money that
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: they took out of your paycheck to cover their asses
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: when they get accused of sexual misconduct. So no, we
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: don't have the full list, but it's coming because a
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: thousand pages, that's a lot. I like that she said
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: accountability is not a threat, it's a promise because it
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: is interesting. A lot of people are suggesting that this
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: is some sort of retaliation. Interestingly, by the way, retaliation
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: is one of the things that somebody was accused of.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: So yeah, Office Congressional Workplace Writes report is probably what
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: it's going to look like. And that's what this all
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: came out in previously. And yeah, since a very large
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: chunk went too sexual misconduct claims, I want to know
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: what the rest went to as well. I know there
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: was at least one that that was somebody somebody got
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: retaliated against and got paid for that, meaning that they
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: got paid for something else, and then the representative that
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: had to pay that out retaliated and they got paid
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: for the retaliation too, So that would be called an
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: abuse of power. That the uh, the representative engaged in
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: retaliating against a whistleblower is an abuse of power. So
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: you've got people in Congress. Obviously we know about other
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: abuses of power, but this this is quite an interesting,
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: like I said, keeping track of it. So that's the
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: first thing the House of Representatives that list that I've
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: been demanding is coming. But we're not going to find
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: out all of it. We're only going to find out
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: what happened after two thousand and four. And there must
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: have been, like Mike said, there must have been something
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: so bad prior to two thousand and four, so more
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: likely than not in two thousand and three that they
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: just didn't want anybody to be able to find out
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: about it. The next one, we have two new stories
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: to go together here. This is ilan Omar. Ilan Omar
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: has gotten herself into a jam, and she she's now
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: trying to bluster her way out of it. She's trying
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: to important her way out of it. So the earlier story,
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: I hate these. It's never related to the story either.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: It's always some other thing. But so about a couple
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: of days ago this came out and I noticed it,
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: and then my attention was drawn to this one yesterday.
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: This has to do with the food stamp programs, right, So,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: I don't know if you all remember a program if
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: you were from the United States called twenty seven to
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: seven Cars for Kids.
• 17:36
  Speaker 4: Yes, yes, it's still all over the place.
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: Really are they still getting donations? And it turned out
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: to be a giant scam. They're not helping get cars
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: for kids, No they are. They're sending their kids on
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: vacation to a foreign country.
• 17:58
  Speaker 4: Yeah, no, I did a parent any song of that
• 18:01
  Speaker 4: jingle and I won't I won't sing no because it's nah.
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: Get the channel taken down. Yes, this is a very
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: sanitized version of events. What I just gave you is
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: in a highly highly sanitized version of events. But if
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: you look it up and attach the name scam to
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: your search, you'll find all kinds of information.
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: It is.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: It is definitely don't don't sign your card to those people.
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: Don't donate your card of those people. They're not doing
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: what they say they're doing, and it's been demonstrated, very
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: clearly demonstrated. But this is this is kind of like
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: that in a way. So the gist of this is
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: elan Omar pushed for legislative changes that made a particular
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: tie type of fraud with regard to food stamps much
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: easier to achieve. It killed a lot of oversight, So
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: she personally was responsible for encouraging that to happen, and
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: it did happen. And then she also was involved in
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: this Feeding Our Future nonprofit that has now had it's
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: been convicted of wire fraud. So Amy Bach that, the
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: founder of Feeding Our Future, was convicted of wire fraud, conspiracy,
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: and bribery for masterminding a scheme that falsely claimed to
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: serve millions of meals to children while pocketing federal funds
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: through bogus food sites and shell companies. She's in custody
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: waiting sentencing hearing, so she's not She's started to find
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: out after the fuck around portion of her life. But
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: the other shoe in the find out process hasn't fallen yet.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: But obviously elon Omar is being asked about this. Her
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: name came up six times in this trial because of
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: communications between herself and this company. So this email chain, uh,
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: the subject line was helped with USDA Food program. And
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: she she just looks like she's ready to smack a bit.
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: But her meals act loosen oversight. Uh and especially during
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: the pandemic, right and and uh caused it to be
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: easier for this to happen. So now now this this
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: woman you know that that stole all this money, was
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: able to steal can considerably more before getting caught than
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: she would have been prior to that act. So that's
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: the first thing to know. And like I said, she
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: is multiple times mentioned in this case, so she has
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: now been facing questions. The first thing she does is
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: fail to show up. She failed to show up last
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: week to a hearing of the Minnesota Fraud Committee on
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: the case, so they sent her a letter demanding she
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: turnover correspondence, and her response has been to refuse. She's
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: refusing to show up and answer questions in person. She's
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: refusing to respond to our request for data, and I mean, honestly,
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: she's even refusing to respond at all. When I say
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: she ghosted it or they ghosted us, it's because we've
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: had no replies. She's an elected public official. She should
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: at least want to share with the public how her
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: office was involved in this, and I think taxpayers deserve that.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: But again, they gave her a deadline which they can't
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: enforce because there's no they don't have the votes to
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: actually penalize her for missing the deadline. So she's aware
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: of that, so she failed to comply. So on the
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: fifth this comes out Democratic Representative Elon Omar of Minnesota
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: did not meet the deadline set by a Minnesota state
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: committee to produce documents related to its investigation into the
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: Feeding our Future fraud scandal. The House Fraud Prevention and
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: State Agency Oversight Committee of Minnesota took a vote on
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: Tuesday to subpoena the congresswoman, but failed, falling short by
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: just one vote. So one person decided, really, because they
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: could have one person vote the other way and she
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: would have to show up or be in contempt. Whether
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: they could actually arrest her for being in contempt or not,
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: I don't know. They might have to extradite her, but
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: they can't get the legal procedure, legal process started, if
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: they can't even get a vote to to actually subpoena her.
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: And this is the interesting thing, and she's this this
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: is part of a full set of investigations, and they're
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: talking about a huge amount of fraud in regard to
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: like food stamps and other assistance programs. I believe at
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: all it doesn't stem from COVID. But it all got
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: done during the COVID crisis because various changes in the
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: law made it easier or more possible to h to
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: to do this. And instead of cooperating, all right, the
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: supposed protector of the American citizen, the representative of the
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: American citizen have a few few words. If she couldn't
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: jail time for oh heck no, no, I doubt it.
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: I sincerely like, maybe she will get she won't get
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: jail time, but maybe she'll get pushed out of office
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: by some other candidate. At best, that's all that's gonna
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: happen into her. Like And I'm not even sure that
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: there are certain districts. And I think I think Nancy
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: Pelosi is the one who said it. She said it
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: about Alexander Alexandria Occasional Cortex's district. You could run a
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: glass of water and as long as it had D
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: written behind it, it would get elected.
• 25:31
  Speaker 5: Of course, she said, if you if you want a
• 25:33
  Speaker 5: broomstick and you put a d mm hmm and next
• 25:37
  Speaker 5: to the broomstick, the broomstick wild elected.
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, heck, half the people would think it was
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: transportation in that area. Uh but uh but yeah. So
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: we have two stories of representatives that are just completely unaccountable. Right,
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: We've got first we have of the the sexy time
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: slush fund for the House of Representatives and then elan
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: Omar and her complete and utter defiance of Now, the
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: thing about this is We've talked about foodstamp fraud before,
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: We've talked about Omar and her fraud before. And the
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: other thing is I believe that this is this connected
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: to the Somali daycare fraud and so on. There are
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: set of people in the United States, large populations within
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: the United States, that have figured out that a quick
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: and easy way to make a lot of money without
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: doing a lot of work is to figure out how
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: to convince the government that you are doing the thing
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: a social safety net was created to do, and that
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: they've contract out to various businesses, and you just build
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: the government for providing services, and you don't have to
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: prove that you provided those services. In a lot of instances,
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: all you have to have is paperwork. You don't have
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: to have physical bodies where you know they can say, well,
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: this is the person we're feeding, this is the person
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: we're housing, this is the person we're taking care of.
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: And the thing that's really that really pisses me off
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: about it is is, you know, you get companies that
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: are legitimate that that actually do provide services, say for
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: people with disabilities, people with mental health conditions, people with
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: varying degrees of you know, I lost my ability to
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: work because X y Z happened, or you know, my
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: entire industry just became a non thing in the economy
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden, And so now I'm relying on
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: this social safety net until i can get my shit
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: together and go in a different direction. Right, all of
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: those there are services for people in those circumstances. But
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: if you provide those services and you are a legitimate
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: provider that actually takes care of people, helps people in
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: those circumstances to either survive those circumstances or get out
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: of those circumstances, they're up your butt, right, the government
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: is up your butt. Even the slightest little thing that
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: might possibly be an infraction against some policy, even if
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: the policy is outdated, you're gonna hear about it. They're
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: going to give you roough time about it. They'll give
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: you a deadline to fix it. You have to fix
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: it by that deadline or you lose your funding. And
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: it doesn't even matter if it can be fixed or not.
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: You you better be able to do something, uh, to
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: prove that you should keep your funding. But if you
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: have somebody like Omar on your side, you can fleece
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: the government for hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars,
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: and then nobody's allowed to ask questions. If you ask questions,
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: you're sexist, you're a misogynist, you're a racist, you hate children,
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: you're just trying to starve them. But at no point
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: do you get any answers.
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: We have.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: Richard Bierre has pointed out look at how many PPP
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: loans scams that were that there were all kinds of
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: companies materialized overnight during that program. Yeah, you know, feminist
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: frequency got one of those PPP loans.
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: Awful they off they are on a company level.
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: They got a PPP loan. I remember looking that up
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: that they were on the list of feminist organizations that
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: got funding from the US government. And when I looked
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: at what kind of funding they got, that's what it was.
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: COVID relief, which is what those PPP loans were.
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: Was it to pay for her for her self wedding?
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: I don't know. It doesn't say what it was for
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: other than that it was COVID relief, which she got.
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: She got married, Yeah, she got she married herself.
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: Oh, I wonder how much that cost. I mean, how
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: do you pose with your partner that's going to be
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: quite an interesting The wedding photography alone had to be
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: a fascinating experience there.
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: He said it was worth photographing.
• 31:00
  Speaker 5: Herself her married herself.
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that would be I don't even know what I
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: would try to cover there, because it it flabbergasted me.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure I would figure out a way,
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: you know, if she made a big production of it.
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: But I feel silly the whole time. I don't know
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: how she knew that without feeling silly.
• 31:24
  Speaker 5: She wo she wore like a white dress and all
• 31:26
  Speaker 5: our friends and family were there, Sir, that's bizarre.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: That's that's coddling someone's mental illness like that is oh uh.
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: Richard Bierre says she had a wedding themed birthday party, like, uh,
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: I don't know, See, that's beyond me. I don't even
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: want to do parties on my birthday. I just want
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: to chill at home with my husband, that's it, which
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: is kind of what I do anytime I get time off.
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: So it's not really any different from any other day.
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: But all right, so past ilan Omar, I'm surprised you
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: guys didn't have any comments on that. Ilkan Omar, Yeah,
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: ilhan Omar.
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: I don't have much to say about ilkan Omar except
• 32:21
  Speaker 4: deport her, denaturalize her citizenship, get her the fuck out
• 32:25
  Speaker 4: of here, and uh, let's do the same thing for
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: the rest of the fucking Somalians. I am just so
• 32:34
  Speaker 4: over it. I don't care if I sound like a
• 32:37
  Speaker 4: fucking racist. I don't care. Get the fuck out.
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's fair, especially after all the all
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: of the scams are scamming.
• 32:49
  Speaker 4: How how how do you immigrate to this country, become
• 32:56
  Speaker 4: a member of Congress and you're openly talking about how
• 33:01
  Speaker 4: you hate America, you hate white men and white men,
• 33:05
  Speaker 4: you should be afraid of white men. Meanwhile, she goes
• 33:09
  Speaker 4: home and fucks a white man every goddamn night. So
• 33:13
  Speaker 4: I am I have to calm down.
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: It's it's so reductive to call any of this racist
• 33:29
  Speaker 3: because it's it doesn't just come down to Negroids and
• 33:35
  Speaker 3: Caucasoids and Mongoloids. It's like, the reason we have countries
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: is because every country sort of represents a different ethnicity.
• 33:49
  Speaker 3: Like West Africans are not the same as East Africans
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: or indeed South Africans. That's a whole different cattle of fish.
• 33:59
  Speaker 3: You need to recognize that people from certain countries are
• 34:04
  Speaker 3: just fucking wrongs. And one of those countries is Somalia.
• 34:10
  Speaker 3: Like there's there's a number of countries in West Africa
• 34:13
  Speaker 3: where we haven't seen much grief from anyone. And then
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: there's North Africa. But North Africa is a whole different
• 34:22
  Speaker 3: gattle of fish. North Africa is almost entirely populated by Arabs.
• 34:29
  Speaker 3: So to to umbrella, everyone as Africans is retarded. That's
• 34:36
  Speaker 3: it's it's a fucking huge place. And and yeah, the north,
• 34:43
  Speaker 3: the northern part of it is completely fucked because it's
• 34:47
  Speaker 3: not even run by niggas anymore. It's run by Arabs
• 34:51
  Speaker 3: and well, and it always has been, like even back
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: in the in the ancient days, like like North Africa was,
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: it has has never been the stuff of Sub Saharan Africans.
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: Has always been this Arab ship and andy and even
• 35:12
  Speaker 3: even then. Two to umbrella, every African and under African
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: American is retarded because you know, Africa is as diverse
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: as any other continent, more so because it's kind of
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: fucking huge.
• 35:31
  Speaker 4: China, Yeah, it's China is encroaching on Africa, like majorly, majorly,
• 35:42
  Speaker 4: But anyway, I'm sorry, I'm taking.
• 35:45
  Speaker 3: And that's on top of Islamic Africa and Christian Africa.
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: There's there's there's been invasions from all sides this whole time.
• 35:57
  Speaker 3: And you know, it's important to notice the different between
• 36:00
  Speaker 3: African countries and between completely different coasts of Africa. Right,
• 36:07
  Speaker 3: we don't have many problems with Kenyans. All they do
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: is win marathons as far as we know. But Kenya
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: is right next door to Somalia, and for whatever reason,
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: Kenyans seem to be good people and Somalians seem to
• 36:27
  Speaker 3: be fucking scammers. It will just do whatever they can.
• 36:31
  Speaker 6: To fucking steal from you, and they will lie their
• 36:35
  Speaker 6: asses off in the process of stealing from you. And
• 36:41
  Speaker 6: does this sound racist of me? Yes, it probably is
• 36:44
  Speaker 6: because the Kenyans and Somalians are different races. It's not
• 36:50
  Speaker 6: that they're black.
• 36:52
  Speaker 3: That the fact that the skin is like darker than
• 36:56
  Speaker 3: it is in other consonants is not the point. There
• 37:00
  Speaker 3: is something about countries that that that drive people in
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: one way or another. That the Kenyans are marathon runners
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: and the Somalians are pirates. Right, Let's that's not racist,
• 37:18
  Speaker 3: that's that's recognizing certain cultural proclivities in various different races.
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: And then there's Ethiopians and fucking Tanzanians who are I
• 37:31
  Speaker 3: believe neighbors of both of those countries, and they're famous
• 37:35
  Speaker 3: for different things as well. Like it's it's it's just
• 37:40
  Speaker 3: like pointing out that, uh, Swiss people tend to keep
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: tend to keep themselves to themselves, whereas German people like
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: to start a lot of wars. Now, ethnically there's not
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: much difference between the Swiss and the Germans, but culturally
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: there's a great deal of difference. And it's and it's
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: the fucking wars they start, you know, it's it's it's
• 38:08
  Speaker 3: it's a simple observation, and it's not racist. It is xenophobic.
• 38:14
  Speaker 3: Now that's that there's an important difference between racism and xenophobia. Like,
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: we don't hate you just because you're black anymore than
• 38:24
  Speaker 3: we hate the Germans just because they're black. We hate
• 38:27
  Speaker 3: the Germans because of the fucking wars, and we hate
• 38:30
  Speaker 3: the Somalians because of the fucking scams.
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: All right, yeah, it shouldn't be difficult.
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: It's like Indians scams.
• 38:44
  Speaker 3: Well, you should be hating on the Bangladeshis and the
• 38:46
  Speaker 3: pakistanis as well, because they're just as bad as not worse.
• 38:51
  Speaker 3: That's what I'm saying. Thank you, Richard. That was the
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: point you were trying to make, right, Yeah, Yeah.
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: That's that's fair.
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: Man.
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: There's there's always gonna be exceptions too in every country,
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: and there's always gonna be people that are like God,
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: I hate it being of this particular population within the
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: world because most other people when they run into somebody
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: from my country, that that person is like this, and
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: then they expect me to be that way too. And
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: I can see that I run into that actually personally
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: at work where I've worked with people that are like
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: you know, they'll they'll tell you. One lady that was
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: here studying to be a nurse actually from Nigeria told
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: me that when you are preparing to come to the
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: United States from Nigeria, you get if you if you
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: go through an organization to come here, like a church,
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: they will teach you how to scam people. And it's
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: not necessarily the you know, the Nigerian Prince scam, you know,
• 40:01
  Speaker 1: the email kind of scam, but things like I shouldn't
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: have to do that task because in my country it
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: is considered sacrilege for somebody like me to have to
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: do that task. And like me, could be a woman
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: or a man, or a married person, an unmarried person,
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: whatever it is, somebody else has to do that work
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: because I can't. It's it's an offense to my religious
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: heritage or my cultural heritage or blah blah blah, and
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: therefore you have to give me something easier and give
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: that task that I don't like to somebody else. And
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: most of the time it's bullshit. And we had a
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: guy that was working at the same time that she
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: was who was getting out of doing all of the
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: tasks that were related to household chores because of that.
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: And he said, oh, no, in my country, men don't
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: do that kind of work, only women do. I don't
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: know how how to mop the floor, I don't know
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: how to do the dishes and so on. So once
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: she outed him as a liar. When it came to
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: that kind of stuff, the manager just came in and
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: took a shift and demonstrated. She would she described to
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: him how to do it, and then she would have
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: him do the task, and he was so mad that
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: he quit. But that's that's essentially, and it's not a Again,
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: it's not a hating on a group of people because
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: of who they are, where they're from. Uh, it's simply
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: a fact of life that when you're in a country
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: that's different from your own country, and you know your
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: culture is dramatically different, and so do they, and people
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: have been browbeaten into I must accommodate this person because
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: this person's demographic has historical victimhood points, and so I'm
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: not allowed to argue with them, and I can get
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: accused of hate, and I can get fired from my job,
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: and I can get sued and all kinds of things.
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: If I push back on this at all, you can
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: get away with all kinds of shit. And that happens here,
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: and I think that's what Omar's trying to do. Look,
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: I have all these historical victim points. You cannot question
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: anything I'm doing. And therefore it doesn't matter how embroiled
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: I am in this horrible scandal of taking money from
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: the taxpayers by taking advantage of programs that were intended
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: to help the taxpayers and then using them to enrich
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: themselves instead of helping the taxpayers. It doesn't matter. You
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: can't say anything because my victim points are going to
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: be my shield. If you criticize me, you shall be
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: accused of infection and with the isms and the phobias
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: and except that, go ahead.
• 43:06
  Speaker 2: And that's why they should never be a female president.
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, exactly, because misogyny is one of the biggest
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: isms and phobias out there right. But people are getting
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: ism and phobia accusation fatigue, and it's starting to not
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: matter if people get accused of at least not racism
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: or things like Islamophobia or homophobia, you know, or or
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: not supporting civil rights when when actually what's being alleged
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: is is closer to you don't support rights that don't exist,
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: and and we're only claiming them because we can use
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: our victim points as a shield for your criticism that
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: we're claiming rights that you don't have. But but yeah,
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: so that's the situation. And I do I do think
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: that a lot of this is, you know, it's victim
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: ode is a shield, and I think the public is
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: getting tired of it, and I don't think it's going
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: to work for her for very long. So this one
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: is about jobs. I don't know if you guys remember
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: during his first term, this pipeline, the Keystone XL pipeline
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: was started in a huge number of jobs were created
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: and they were in they were working in full force
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: when the election occurred and Biden took office and almost
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: immediately one of the first things he did was to
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: shut this down and take away all those jobs. So
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: this mhi.
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: When he signed that, he said he didn't know what
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: he was signing.
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: Oh Biden didn't say he said he didn't know what
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: he was signing to shut this down. I'm calling bullshit.
• 45:23
  Speaker 1: I believe it was to actually destroy something that good
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: that Trump created. I think he knew. I think he
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: knew damn well what he was signing.
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: Was that was it before the dementia took cold.
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: Or See, this is the difficult thing, right. I've known
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: people that were so crazy or so moody and so
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: out there and things that they said or did in
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: the past that when they got old, if they developed
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: senile dementia, you wouldn't you'd have a rough time being
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: able to tell because the behaviors they engage in that
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: that would normally alert someone to senile dementia are like
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: their norm And I would I would say that about
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden it's hard to tell when he stopped just
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: being a run of the mill, your your average fucking
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: dumbass and became a demented, senile old man because he
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: was already a pathological liar and he would forget the
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: lies that he told, so his storytelling was always really inconsistent.
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: He wasn't very smart, he didn't have any self control.
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: He was he used to well he was. He was
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: actually really racist, like actually racist, not isms and phobia's
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: alley gaishens racist. He was really vocal about it during
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: the nineties when he was trying to get his his
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: crime bill passed, and he was He's the one that
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: actually uttered the line that was often well, no, what
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: it was was, he uttered the line throw him up
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: against the wall and Friscom. Hillary Clinton was the one
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: who referred to gang members black gang members as super predators,
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: and it gets attributed to Joe Biden, but he didn't
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: come up with anything quite that clever as a nickname
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: like that. He just threw him up against the wall
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: and Friscom. So he was he was very much for
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: stopping frisk and it's it's effectiveness kind of questioned on
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: one side and on the other end. You know, it's
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: as as a you can do this, its effectiveness is
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: discussed in terms of like, yeah, you actually catch people
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: if you can do this, But if it's a routine thing,
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: then it starts to become a problem. You start to
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: harass people that clearly have nothing to do with what
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: crime happened in the neighborhood. So I don't know, with
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: his attitude and the things that he's said and done,
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: it's really hard to tell he could have been senile
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: in the nineties.
• 48:33
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it almost seems like wasted effort to throw our
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: shade at any politician, let alone an eighty year old politicians,
• 48:46
  Speaker 3: as many of them are now, because we can point
• 48:48
  Speaker 3: in them and say, well, they don't know what the
• 48:50
  Speaker 3: fuck they're doing. They're just they're just signing whatever papers
• 48:55
  Speaker 3: that told to sign. That just they're just saying whatever
• 48:59
  Speaker 3: the teleprompter it tells them to say.
• 49:04
  Speaker 7: Yeah, they're plaseholders, yeah, and and and it's no different
• 49:11
  Speaker 7: for the young politicians, like the aocs of the world.
• 49:16
  Speaker 3: It's kind of a distraction to to pretend that the
• 49:20
  Speaker 3: these octagenarian politicians are only doing this because they're told to. Well,
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: the fucking thirty something year old politicians are only doing
• 49:29
  Speaker 3: what they're told to that it's it's it's a it's
• 49:33
  Speaker 3: a waste of effort to even get annoyed at the
• 49:35
  Speaker 3: politicians that that that make up the the public faces
• 49:43
  Speaker 3: in in in in the maystream media and whatnot, because
• 49:47
  Speaker 3: they're not really doing anything. They they are selected to
• 49:51
  Speaker 3: be public faces for the most part, they don't make
• 49:56
  Speaker 3: the decisions. The spin doctors behind them make the decisions.
• 50:03
  Speaker 3: And as it always is, and as it always has been,
• 50:09
  Speaker 3: it's sort of it. It wouldn't matter if it's a
• 50:13
  Speaker 3: fucking chihuahua in office. It would be obvious at that
• 50:17
  Speaker 3: point that the chihuahua is only barking the orders told
• 50:23
  Speaker 3: to it by the spind doctors behind it. And yeah,
• 50:28
  Speaker 3: like I say, it almost doesn't matter. You could put
• 50:32
  Speaker 3: children in charge of the country, just like you could
• 50:35
  Speaker 3: put octagenarians in charge of the country, just like you
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: could put thirty something year olds in charge of the country.
• 50:42
  Speaker 3: None of it matters if they are just doing what
• 50:46
  Speaker 3: they are told to do. And the escape room at
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: that point is trying to figure out who the fuck
• 50:56
  Speaker 3: is telling them what to do. And yeah, that's, like
• 51:01
  Speaker 3: I say, that's next level.
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: Now, the difficult thing is that they often don't realize
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: they're being told what to do. For instance, Joe Biden
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: wrote the Violence Against Women Act. By that, I mean
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: he created the legal language of the Violence Against Women Act,
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: because we all know that Gloria Steinem wrote the Violence
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: Against Women Act. Right, the National Organization for Women and
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: other feminist organizations told the Democrats what they wanted in
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: the Violence Against Women Act over and over again over
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: the course of like twenty years, and then dumb ass
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden came along and put it in there and
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: got it passed. And of course the other congressmen voted
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: for it because it was what they wanted all along.
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: They wanted something that would give them the power to
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: take away more due process rights. They just didn't want
• 52:08
  Speaker 1: to take responsibility for penning it. And once it's out there,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: once it exists, and they can vote for it, and
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: they can say, well, we were told this was to
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: protect weomen protect the women. It'll all be good, right,
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: we will now vote for this on the word of
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: the individual whose legacy can be lynched for having created this.
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: Once people figure out what a pile of shit it
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: actually is. Fifty years later after he's dead and gone,
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: and most of them are also gone, although the younger
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: ones may have fifty year careers in Congress if America
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: doesn't wake up and start maybe not having incumbents keep
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: office for that long in Congress. But in the meantime,
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: you know, we had dipshit Joe. He did that one
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: the crime bill, and there was a third bill. I
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: can't remember what the name of it was, but all
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: three of them attacked due process in various ways, and
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: all of them.
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: Was it which one the three strikes you were out bill?
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: I believe the three strikes was California legislation, not federal legislation,
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: but if it was in federal legislation, it would have
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: been in the crime bill. But there was another bill
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: that was separate. Like there's two politicians that feminists got
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: to that did real dipshit things one of them. There
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: are many other ways in which he seemed very very intelligent,
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: and he's still did one of the most dipshit things
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: ever done in the history of American politics. That is
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan, who is a hero of the Republican Party,
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: but he's the guy who ushered in no fault divorce
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: and no fault. Divorce is the reason why a woman
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: can cheat on you, lie about it for ten years
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: while you're supporting your child that isn't your child, and
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: then divorce you and get alimony and half your shit,
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, child support because you are
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: the reputed father of this child and you've been supporting
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: this child for ten years without asking questions, so the
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: judge can now name you the father and demand that
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: you pay support, but you don't get visitation because you're
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: not the father, right. And that was Ronald Reagan. And
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: between Ronald Reagan and Joe Biden, the worst things that
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: have happened to men legal in this country happened in
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: the end of the eighties in the beginning of the nineties,
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties, so and both of them ended up
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: with some version of sinility when they got old. Ronald
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: Reagan was a victim of Alzheimer's disease, so he definitely
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know what it is that's causing Biden's dementia,
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: whether it's just that he got cancer and the chemo
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: did it to him, or whether he's got something like Parkinson's,
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: or whether it's just natural dementia. Or whether he's got
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: Alzheimer's like Reagan. But both of those men lost their
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: minds in just the difference is Biden didn't have much
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: of a mind to begin with. But in the meantime,
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: what's this is good news. So most of this is
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: about numbers regarding oil and gas prices and everything, but
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: I believe that quite a bit of the construction that
• 56:14
  Speaker 1: had had taken place during the Trump administration was dismantled.
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: What what they didn't dismantle, they left in place, and
• 56:22
  Speaker 1: it's just been let to sit and they need repairs.
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: So they're gonna need men to do those jobs. They're
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: gonna need men to build, they're gonna need men to repair,
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: They're gonna need men to do the the the math
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: that needs to be done in order to direct those men.
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: They're gonna need supervisors, right, and they're gonna need that's
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: gonna be in an environment where they're gonna need most
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: likely lodging as well, and they're gonna need care takers
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: for that. So you know, there's going to be jobs
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: created by this, and then the oil prices will go
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: down after it's done. But the first thing being that
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: those jobs will come back, So the quick and dirty
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: of it. The pipeline goes from Canada into the US.
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: It's by a Canadian company and it's US partner, so
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: there's going to be jobs created in both countries for this.
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: It's going to take a different route than the Keystone pipeline,
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: so there's going to be a whole new set of
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: a pipeline that's gonna have to be laid because obviously
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: what was in place isn't going to be used, so
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: if they haven't torn it down, it will have to
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: probably be torn down. And you know it's going to
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: it's going to involve there we go six hundred and
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: forty five miles through Montana to I think that's Guernsey, Wyoming.
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: So it's going to be a rather large project. It'll
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: be great. And then of course it'll also increase the
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: demand for so there will be oil refinery jobs that
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: are also created because of this. And then the best
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: part about that is most of the jobs that this
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: is going to create are going to be things that
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: men do, and in a lot of ways, women don't
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: just not do those jobs. They can't. They aren't strong enough,
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: they don't have the endurance, right, they don't have the
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: the constitution for it. So the people who will be
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: employed by this project are going to be mostly men.
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: Any comments from the Peanut Gallery.
• 59:23
  Speaker 4: Not as of now. I think Mike is going out
• 59:25
  Speaker 4: to smoke again.
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: Because.
• 59:29
  Speaker 5: So there won't be any my dance TikTok failures on
• 59:32
  Speaker 5: the oil fireway.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: No, probably not with their masks on and and well
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: the patients are in the background suffocating. Uh huh, No,
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: that will that won't They're going to have time for that.
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: If there are videos put up from that that workplace,
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: somebody is probably gonna get fired because I'm sure that
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: quite a bit of what they're doing is going to
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: be proprietary. I mean obviously, yeah, there's the security risk exactly. Uh,
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: they'll have Anything that they put out on video is
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: going to be very curated, very cultivated, and it's not
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: going to just be randomly. If somebody just randomly puts
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: out a video, they're going to get in trouble because
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: that's infrastructure and it it's a target.
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 5: That was a there was a Chinese there's a Chinese
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 5: nationalist that got arrested for spying for China in the UK.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: Oh, that's interesting.
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 5: We recently I saw it I saw it on I
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 5: saw it on two earlier today. I wish I saved it.
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 5: So it was like he was like a Chinese nationalist spy.
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 5: And of what the Chinese government mm hmm.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: You know, we've we've got spies here doing the same
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: thing too, and we've had some quite quite a few
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: incidents where the public has actually been witnessed to it
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: and wondered what the hell the government is doing because
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 1: they hadn't stopped it fast enough. Uh, like the balloon
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: the balloon guy that went across the the halfway across
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: the country before.
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 4: They go oh yeah, yeah yeah.
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 1: And and of course there have been I mean Swallwell
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: was involved with a spy, like personally involved in in yeah.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 4: Bang Bang Fang.
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: Yes, not to be confused with Fenn Fenn, although I
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: bet he did have a bit of a heart attack
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: when he discovered that he was caught. Ye. But now,
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 1: I just I just put up a video on x
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: that that talked about all the drugs that came out
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: in the nineteen eighties that are illegal now or off
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: the market because they were like and they started with
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: one that was really from the seventies. But uh, people,
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 1: people might not know this, but pharmacists you to prescribe ludes.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: Not kidding. They used to be. You could just go
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: to the pharmacy and they would fill your prescription and
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 1: you'd take them home and you had a bottle of
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: kualudes right there here.
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 2: So COSPI did nothing wrong.
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Cosby did nothing wrong with that. He probably had
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: them by prescription. They were not an illicit drug at
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: that time. They were they were right there on the market. Oh,
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: we have a super chat. Oh I see and Wowie
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: gave us two dollars and said, hello, what did I miss?
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: Who's the fourth guy? Richard's been on the show for
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: like the last what two months?
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: Three months?
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: Three months? See, even I'm not all the way back.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: We also got Meredith gave us five dollars and gave
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: us and said, HBr talk four hundred honey for the Badgers,
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: congratulations on four hundred episodes, Thanks for all the thought
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: provoking conversation. And yeah, I didn't even think about it,
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: but four hundred is a lot. So when we talked
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: about this before, I believe at the time that Biden
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: shut this down. I think I might have gone off
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: because there were a lot of industries that had closed.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: There were a lot of job losses because of COVID
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: at that time, because it was twenty twenty one. So
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty the shutdowns started, right, Remember, people couldn't
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: go grocery shopping at certain hours during the day. Stores
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: reserved certain hours for people with vulnerabilities, like having a
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: whole bunch of them in the store together wasn't just
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: as problematic. And you were expected to pick a point
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: person in your house that did all the shopping, and
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: everybody else was supposed to stay home, and so many
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: people were transferred to you. You work from home instead
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: of going into the office. Obviously my job didn't change
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: in that way.
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 4: I want to work from home. I'm so sick and
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 4: tired of these people. I just want to work from home.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 4: It is like such a wonderful option, right, like God,
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 4: and you know those places that never went back. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 4: I mean that's what it. That's what happened. Like COVID
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 4: exposed just the inadequacy or the I'm looking for a
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 4: word that I can't think of, but it's just too much.
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 4: Like if you can sit at home and do your job,
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 4: then no, we don't need you to come in and work.
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 4: But I don't know whatever. I'm just saying that I would,
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 4: like I want to sit on my couch. I would
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 4: have worked in my pajamas, right. If I could go
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 4: to work in my T shirt and pajamas every day,
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 4: or sweatpants or whatever, I would so happily take that.
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: See that's and a lot of people did. Yeah. And
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: then you also had people that went on unemployment. And
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: they changed the unemployment system so that it was it
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: didn't just pay half of what you were earning before
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: you became unemployed. It actually paid one hundred percent for
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: a lot of jobs and then some So there were
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: people that earned more money on unemployment after they they
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 1: raised that unemployment for for COVID such a high amount.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: They earned more money on unemployment than they did on
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: their their jobs. It's like people at worked at fast
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: food joints much more money on unemployment. They had a
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: minimum amount like essentially they treated it like universal basic income.
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: And interestingly, people couldn't afford anything, right, They still ended
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: up in debt. They still ended up relying on their
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: credit cards, couldn't pay their couldn't pay their bills. My
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: bank sent me a notice that if I was having
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: difficulty paying my card. Uh, there was a they had
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: a COVID forgiveness thing, like it was so tempting to
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: just but you know, the interest builds up and and
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: and all that if you're not paying your bills. And
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: of course everybody that at the end of the whole
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: thing had to go back to work and had to
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: you know, give up that extra unemployment money and everything
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: discovered that their credit card bills had skyrocketed because they
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: did get interest tacked on when they weren't when they
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: were getting forgiveness for not paying the debt wasn't forgiven
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: just the well you didn't pay this month, here's the
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: extra interest you owe on the whole thing, rather than
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: the amount minus what you would have paid. You know.
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: But in the meantime, a lot of a lot of
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: places just went belly up. The factory my husband was
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: working at just that that one closed, and it was
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: partly because of COVID and partly because of the plastics
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: fire in China. The material that they used it was
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: a plastics molding facility and they actually did molding for
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: they made baby car seats for a company that is
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: owned by China. But in any case, that loss of
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: materials basically made it so that they couldn't make anything
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: for quite some time. And then the company that they
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: were working for ended up contracting with somebody else and
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: that that factory just went blly up. So he had
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: to find a different job. And there were a lot
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: of people in that position. There were several companies here
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 1: in the Dayton area that that went belly up because
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: of all of that, and so a lot of job losses.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: A lot of people pivoted from twenty and thirty dollars
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: an hour factory jobs to ten to twelve dollars an
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: hour fast food jobs, and so it doesn't count as
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 1: a job loss because they're still employed. They just lost
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: half their income, right, And so you end up in
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: a situation where the economy is hit, but you don't
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: see what really happened. And at the same time, when
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 1: the job started coming back, a lot of them were
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: you know, those big corporations that don't pay the bigger paychecks.
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: And it looked good on paper, but again people really
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: weren't making the money they were making before. But this
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: kind of job, this is not a low paying job.
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: This is construction work, this is oil, oil, refinery, work.
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: You know, this is you have to have skills and
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: actually know what you're doing doing. You have to have
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: a level of toughness and strength and endurance and character
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: to do this kind of job. And the companies that
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: have people do this kind of work then know they
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: have to pay for that, so it'll it'll be interesting. Oh,
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: I see, and wow, we gave us another dollar and
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: said based Richard also gave us a whole bunch of
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: those emojis.
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 3: By the way, for all the people congratulating us to
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 3: make for making it to four hundred episodes. Bro, we've
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: done over two thousand episodes. We're pretty close to three
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 3: thousand at this point. And I know because I've been
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 3: archiving this ship.
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 4: Yeah, that is it has it been that?
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: It's hard Top doesn't have that many episodes, but Honey
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: Badger Radio altogether, if you count all the different shows does.
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 3: Since since since we changed the name of the Thursday
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 3: show to something else, and since we've changed the name
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 3: of the Tuesday shows to something else, and since Brian
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 3: and Allison have been doing like three shows a week
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 3: like this whole time, that they've just given up on naming.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 3: They're just they're not calling it. They're just they're just
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 3: they're just pumping out these fucking shows. And we've been
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 3: pumping out these fucking shows for twelve years, thirteen years.
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: There's there's never any shortage of ship to talk about.
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 5: That's that is pretty much pretty much name or the
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 5: incarnations off the shows of off hand. So there's batche
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 5: that's batcha game Gate podcast, there was, it was.
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 2: It was all lived after.
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 3: We're gonna be here for a while, aren't we, Richard, because.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: Over these years, but yes, yeah, probably, and.
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 3: And and we we haven't gone through this by fucking
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 3: sacking people. If people ever wanted to leave, they fucking left.
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 3: And yes, there's been a couple of people who've fucking left,
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 3: but we've we've maintained ourselves as a if you want
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 3: to be here, fucking be here, and we'll fucking bring
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 3: you on and will make you famous. And there's a
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 3: whole bunch of people out there who fucking came to
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 3: Honeybadger Radio when they weren't famous, and then they and
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 3: then they stuck with us for for for like a
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 3: year or so, and then they became famous. Well and
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 3: has been here in the background. It's still not being
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 3: all that famous and who knows why these discrepancies exist.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 3: It doesn't al really.
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 4: Matter, it doesn't. And I think, you know, there's a
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 4: thing to be said about familiarity and or you know,
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 4: being samous. You know, I think where we belong is
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 4: right under the radar, because that's what hasn't gotten our
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 4: channel newt right, like they the YouTube fuck YouTube, right,
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 4: that's just what it is. But you know, we've been
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 4: here and we've been doing this for so long. You know,
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 4: we we stick to the truth. And you know, people
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 4: come and go and that's fine, you know, I understand it,
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 4: but it's.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: Hot. Well, the other the other aspect of it is
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: you have two different types of social commentary, right. You
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: have the gatling gun social commentary that takes out all
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: the targets that are up close and that every target
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: that's easy picking. It's going to touch that target, right,
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: it's going to hit that target. But there will always
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: be a few things that you have to have that
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: long vision in order to capture that target. And that's
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: the sniper that that is required for that job. And
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: a lot of times the sniper doesn't always get there
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: the level of recognition as as say, you know, maybe
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: not a gatling gun, but somebody who has the modern equivalent,
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: like anything that sprays bullets as up close as opposed
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: to firing one round to take out a target that's
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: half a mile away. So we don't we don't necessarily
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: get famous. What because we do hit that target that
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: is way out there, we get noticed by the people
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: who are famous, and then they talk about the thing
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: that we were talking about. And I think that the
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: way that we get things into the public discourse is
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: by inspiring people up the ladder to talk about them.
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: We may be more effective if we don't become famous
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: then we would be if we did.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 3: This is the manisphere they don't talk about, because nowadays
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 3: the manisphere means you know, fucking that sneaks to fit
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: and uh fucking fresh and fit and all that ship.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: And Andrew Tait I've said his name, fuck it, I said,
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: but but but yeah, this is this is what people
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 3: mean by the manusphere. Now, this is what people mean
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 3: by the red pill.
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: Right, it's because they don't know what they're talking about.
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well, it's because this is what the mainstream media
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: are pointing to and calling the manisphere these filthy, rich,
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 3: fucking dating Gurros, guries.
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: Or yeah, I'll tell you what.
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 2: Though.
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: The reason that they do that is because if they
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: can create that association, right, if they can say, well,
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: when people talk about the manisphere and people talk about
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: men's rights, they're talking about Andrew Tate, and and they
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: can convince enough people's moms and sisters with all the allegations,
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: because regardless of you know his actual character, who he is,
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: what he is, and all that, the level and scope
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: of allegations that Andrew Tate has faced makes him the
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: perfect boogeyman for women. Like any any woman who isn't
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: isn't smart enough to keep up with what's going on
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: in politics and what's going on in the world, or
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: at least question what she's being told about someone, right,
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: she she'll hear that shit about that guy, and she'll
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: be like, Oh, I don't want my son getting involved
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: in any of that. I don't want my brother getting
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: involved in any of that stuff. I'm not gonna date
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: a guy that's that uses any talking points like that.
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: I don't want anything to do with that. If my
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: coworkers say anything that sounds remotely like that, I'm gonna
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: file a sexual harassment complaint, you know, And and that's
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: why they're doing that, not because it's what they really think,
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: not because they know anything specifically about us. What they
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: do know is it's a lot harder to talk to
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: people about father's paternity rights, father's rights to raise and
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: nurture their children, right, And it's a lot harder to
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: talk to people about due process rights and how domestic
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: violence law has damaged the concept of due process and
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: the structure of due process in the United States and
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: in a lot of other countries, Like, it's really hard
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: to talk to people about that if they're hung up
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 1: on But this guy that you're associated with, even though
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: we're not by your red pill status, is accused of
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: rattles off long list of shit that never happened, right,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: And so it's it's a highly effective tactic that the
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: media is using there. It is a brilliant tactic, very dishonest, right,
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: poor sportsmanship. But whoever said that they were honest.
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: Well, it's just speaking the demise of the rest. If
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: they're not going to talk about the process.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: There's no bigger bunch of scam artists than the media,
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: not scammers from Bangladesh, not Nigerian princes with millions of
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: dollars that they need your bank account to sneak into
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: the United States. You know, not not Somali pirates. None
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: of them pulled a candle to the media. They've been
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: scamming the public hook line and sinker for one hundred
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: years at least, and nobody noticed until the twenty first
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: century was already like ten percent gone. That's sad. That's
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: sad for people, and it's scary because people rely on
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: the media to tell them what's going on, and instead
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: they're getting lied to all the time, every day, every minute,
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: every time they turn on their television, every time they
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: turn on the radio, every time they get online. Even
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: in these stories. These not that these stories are all lies,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: but I guarantee you each of these outlets has a
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: slant right. They're going to have their outlook on it,
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: their take on it. If I were to look up
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: the same story in left wing media outlet, it would
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: probably be all about how they think this is going
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: to hurt the environment, and there would be nothing about
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: what the actual structure is going to be, who's involved,
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: and stuff like that, or it would just be crammed
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: into one little paragraph and the whole rest of the
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: story would be claims about how pipelines damaged the environment
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: and they go through, which, interestingly, I believe the Alaska
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: Pipeline there were a bunch of claims like that about
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: the caribou, that the caribou were going to be wiped out,
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: but the population actually increased after the pipeline because they
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: started using it as a means of escaping from the
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: polar bears that were eating them.
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 4: Good lord, caraboo are all gonna die.
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: They all remind me of and Adam Sandlers skit with
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: the all the kids around the table going Mom, let's
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: go do this, Mom, let's go do that. Mom keeps yelling.
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 4: No, they're all gonna laugh at you.
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 1: It's very much like that, right, So if you had
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: a left wing source, you'd get that and there'd be
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: some grains of truth of you know, oh, it does
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: this thing that's real, in that thing that's real that
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: maybe they're really bad, maybe they're not so bad, but
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: they're buried in amount of lies, so you have trouble
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 1: getting getting to what's actually true. And if you put
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: them both together, you might have ten or twelve grains
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: of truth inside a mountain of lies to sort through.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: It's a lot of fun trying to play that game,
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: like looking for a needle in a haystack. Speaking of
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: gams and lies, this one is kind of interesting. So
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: you remember we talked about the Hole Barisma thing, the
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: Biden crime family, the the the scam that they were
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: pulling where basically, in order to not get into trouble
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: with the United States government, companies in foreign countries put
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden on their board or otherwise give him a
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: job so that that the president his father would not
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: deal deal badly with them instead of dealing well with them.
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 4: I mean, why why would you need a job? If
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 4: you're such a prolific artist that can sell paintings for
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 4: millions of dollars? Why would why would he need a job?
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: It's totally not like the art industry is all about
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: money laundering.
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 4: Yeah yeah.
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: I wonder how many people were aware of that twenty
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: years ago that weren't involved in the industry, because I
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: think most people were probably not.
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 4: I though, I wonder how many people actually looked at
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 4: these things and said, oh, yes, that is totally worth
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 4: millions of my dollars.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, no, yeah, yeah, It's like all of the foreign
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: leaders that contributed to the Clinton Foundation because they were
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: so charitable. Yeah, they were. They were trying to do
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: some good in the world. Those guys totally no.
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 4: What they ended up doing was funding Chelsea Clinton's fucking wedding.
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 1: Uh huh uh huh. It's it's called money laundering m hm. Yep.
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: And that's what we've got here. So the US intercepted
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 1: Ukraine government messages, which of course means that we were
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: spying on them, which is is what governm mins do.
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: They're spying on us too, so it's fair play, uh,
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: discussing a plot to route money to Biden reelection? What
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: were they routing money from that thing that we were discussing.
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: I don't know if it's going to mention it in
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: the story, but I know I saw it in a
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: couple of other places. USA.
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 4: Here it is USA US aids.
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 1: Jesus Christ, so USAID for those that that weren't here
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: a few months ago when we were talking about it
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: was essentially the government's uh money laundering, like their their
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 1: middleman mm hm. You know, and and they had all
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: of these things that they funded, uh that you know,
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 1: you go into foreign countries and they start teaching the
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: women there to accuse men of domestic violence. I'm not kidding.
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: We showed several examples where they go into foreign countries
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: and start teaching the women there to accuse the men
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: of domestic violence, and then under the guise of AIDS prevention,
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 1: they went in and no, no, no, not giving any
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: education on how to avoid infection through things like careful
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: selection of partners, controlled abstinence, use of birth control. Nope,
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: just cutting off part of your dick.
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 4: How has this not been recognized as like a feminist
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 4: not camp but and not indoctrination. I'm losing my words.
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry, guys.
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: I'm like a feminist project.
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 4: Yeah, basically, yes, because that's all that it is.
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, here's how that works. So let me see if
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: I can actually open up another I think I might
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: actually have a have it on my page, my Twitter page.
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: How do I fucking get to my profile there? It
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 1: is all right, media, because I just sent this to
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 1: somebody else. Oh, I didn't post the full version. So
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 1: let me see. I wonder if I have a graphic
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: I'm going to show you here, but I have to
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 1: figure out how to open it online because it's not
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 1: actually online. So that's what's going on right now. And
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: I think if I get the fuck out of IMP
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: and close the window that has Twitter, I think I
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: can actually show it to you this way because I
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: downloaded it. If I have the downloaded version, I just
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: have to make sure I have the downloaded verse or
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: have downloaded the correct version, because I have other versions
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 1: of it, and no I didn't, So just give me
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 1: a second. But there is a history, and it goes
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: through stages where it started out as one thing, and
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 1: then it became another thing, and then it it well,
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 1: it meshed with another thing and then became another thing.
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: So this goes back to a much older HBr talk
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: one that the opener for it was disappeared by YouTube
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: a while back for quite some time, and that was
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: the one where we talked about cultural Marxism and feminism
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: and how they intersect. So what I'm showing you here
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: Frankfurt School. Cultural Marxism started overseas, not in the United States,
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: but it came here with some of the Frankfurt School
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: professors who are not professors but researchers. Because it wasn't
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: a school where you like go get an education. It
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: was a school of thought, but some of those researchers
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 1: came to the United States to escape the Nazi regime,
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: and among those was Herbert Marcusa, who became a professor
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: at I believe Berkeley in California. One of his students
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 1: was Angela Davis, who was a prominent feminist also a criminal.
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: But I'm not going to go through that her whole history,
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 1: but she had come up through like women's studies and
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: other feminist coursework, and so Marcusa actually was the kind
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 1: of the author, the original author of a lot of
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: the ideas behind critical theory, the Marxist critical theory, and
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 1: so Angela Davis was the author behind intersectionality. She applied
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: his critical theory to feminism and came up with intersectionality.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 1: So from her comes intersectional feminism, which evolved into interdisciplinary academics.
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: And I'm covering like multiple shows worth of information that
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: we've talked about in the past. But essentially at the
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: same time as all this was happening, like women's studies
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 1: had started out as a class somewhere in Australia in
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 1: the early sixties or the late fifties, and then it
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: spread to several universities in Australia and the United States.
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: By the seventies, it was starting to become departmentalized, so
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: they had women's studies departments. After Angela Davis became a
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: icon in a feminist movement, women's studies departments started to
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 1: become intersectional departments, and then interdisciplinary departments and interdisciplinary departments,
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: which pushed under various names what we refer to right
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: now as diversity, equity, and inclusion started sending out little
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: cedar or leaching vines into other departments. So the department
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: of psychology, for instance, you suddenly would start to see
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: feminist ideas worming their way into the field of psychology.
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: The department of sociology was pretty much taken over by
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: feminists early on. The Department of education in your teacher
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: education in your university, if they had a department of
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 1: teacher education, feminism would begin to leak in there under
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: the guise of interdisciplinary academics. The idea that in order
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: to understand the nature of your students, the struggles that
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: your students might be experiencing as a result of their gender,
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: their race, their religion, blah blah blah, class culture, and
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: all that jazz that you had to get that understanding
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: from feminism, and so feminism began to it like the
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: political science department of any university totally infected with feminism,
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: and it ended up everywhere as a result of that,
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 1: the long march through the institutions that took communists into journalism,
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: into the education system, into govern into the administrative boards
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 1: of like the medical, medical professions, the field of psychology,
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: the field of nursing, so on, that all used feminism
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: as as a crowbar. You can't criticize us, because you're
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: a misogynist if you do. And so, yeah, that's where
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: that that's where that comes from. That's why people don't
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 1: see it. That's why they don't recognize that feminism is
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: a cause of this, because they don't see These people
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: aren't coming in going by the way, we're feminists and
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: we're telling you this because you should understand feminism. They're
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: coming in under the guise of an into interdisciplinary approach
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 1: that combines various academic stuff, these areas of study to
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: uh to fully explore a particular topic psychology or business
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 1: or religion or whatever.
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 4: It's it's almost like it's it's reminiscent of me. For sorry,
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 4: the George Carlin bit where he says that you know,
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 4: when you have certain things, what they do is add
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 4: words to them to make them seem more more important
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 4: and more difficult. And that's just what that is to me.
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's the same thing that advertisers do. They
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 1: relabel things like, yeah, I remember when jello became a
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: fat free dessert. There was never a fat jello, right,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: but when it became fashionable in the diet world that
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: you're diet should be fat free, all of a sudden,
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 1: yellow became fat free.
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 4: Wracle.
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 1: I have beheld the miracle of fat free yellow, and
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 1: I have been saved. Granted it still had sugar.
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah, well yes, but you know, well, I mean, you know,
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 4: we're still so like confused about how because we've been
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 4: lied to about how food and nutrition works in the
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 4: human body. Right, So you know, now we've got the
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 4: the what is that, the food table, the whatever, I
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 4: don't know, it's side down. So now the food yes,
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 4: the food pairmid thank you, thank you, But now it's
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 4: like turned upside down on its head. Because these are
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 4: the lobbyists that get paid to.
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: Tell us what to eat, what.
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 4: To eat, how to eat, how much to eat, when
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 4: to eat it, and it just doesn't make sense. It's
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 4: obviously doesn't make sense because look at how unhealthy this
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 4: country is.
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 1: I mean how Peer has pointed out by the way,
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: cotton candy is also fat free. That's ly made out
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 1: of sugar, but it is fat free, that is, yes, yes, yes,
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: And by the way, I learned in the twenties, yeah,
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: in the two thousands, the early two thousands, that jello
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: also happens to be completely free of hydrogenated oils. Yes,
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 1: but yeah, you can't trust, like, don't let the government
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: tell you what to eat, don't let no anyone. You
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: have to start reading about nutrition, and you have to
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 1: be able to gather the ten percent of truth out
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: of the ninety percent of lies that are that are
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: in all the different articles. If you see something that
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: says a piece of research found xyz, you go look
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: because half the time the person who wrote the article
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: doesn't know jack shit about research and doesn't know what
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: they're talking about. And sometimes the research found exactly the
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: opposite of what they're telling you. Yeah, and there was
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: one testosterone There was a study done on testosterone, right
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: according to this article, This one article that I read
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: study done on testosterone shows that dosing people with testosterone
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: causes heart attacks. Well that sounded like bullshit to me, because.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 4: Right now with.
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 8: Testosterone and teenagers get get a rush of testosterone, and
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 8: sometimes women when they are pregnant with a boy, get
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 8: a testosterone dump in their system.
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 1: That's why we get hair on our chin afterwards for
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 1: the rest of our lives.
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean, but but but they make they they
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 4: make you think that like testosterone is just a male
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 4: only hormone. Well, it's not a thing. It's it's present
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 4: present in women as well, and it's natural and healthy
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 4: at certain levels.
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 1: There was no study the art. What the article was
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 1: describing as a study was a report written by one
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 1: guy about the death of another guy. And because it
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: was written by a heart doctor, uh, they treated it
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: as a study. So there was a sample size of
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: one Jesus, no control group, no nothing. And now they've
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: found that under certain circumstances, certain levels of testosterone dosing
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: can have a protective effect for men against heart conditions,
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: certain heart conditions. So for years and years, doctors if
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: a guy you know, as he got old, started to
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: lose his levels of testosterone, that his testosterone started to
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: get low, they wouldn't do anything to fix it because
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: you might have a heart attack. And the whole time
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: there was no real evidence that this was a problem
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: that they should be concerned about. Now, Dosing women with
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 1: testosterone when they don't need it can be disastrous and
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: it can have severe effects on your heart because you're
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: changing their hormones in an unnatural way. Actually really dangerous.
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: And they'll probably find out years from now that giving
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 1: men estrogen has some some type of an effect that's
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: equally bad. But yeah, it's Some journalists somewhere failed to
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: understand the difference between a study study like an actual
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: rigorous study with a large sample size and a control
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 1: group and evaluation and everything, and what is known as
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: a case study, which is when you look at one
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: example and you learn what you can gather from that
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 1: one example. You know, does this seem like that the
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: things that we know about this particular situation disorder whatever work,
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: or or are we wrong about anything? Is this an exception?
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: Is this the rule? You know? And so on? And
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: then you look for things that maybe give you an
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 1: idea of what research needs to be carried out, and
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 1: things like that, or a therapy that worked with this
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: person might be tried with other people to see if
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: it was a one off fluke or it works really well.
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: But definitely not. It's not a study like people are
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: thinking of when you say, oh, the study showed that
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: blah blah blah, so oh I see and Wawi says,
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 1: gave us a dollar and said USAID it's a disease
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: caused by the woke mind virus. Yes, it's contracted under
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 1: the Humanitarian Initiative VEIL. Indeed indeed so, But back to
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 1: where is it here? USAID and all of their money laundering.
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 1: What we have here, and I think I'm going to
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: summarize this because there's a lot to it, and I
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: have two articles. But what we have here is the
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 1: documents show that the Ukrainian officials were looking at using
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 1: USAID as a vehicle for laundering money that was donated,
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 1: not donated, but sent there from the US as war
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: aid Jesus, funneling it back into the Biden campaign as
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: campaign contribution. I kid you not. They're trying to figure
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 1: out a way to funnel the money through USAID into
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 1: the campaign because they wanted him back in office, because
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 1: they they.
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 4: They want more Gibbs. They want more money.
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 1: Right, and they feared that Trump would end the conflict
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 1: and uh, and we'll be able to trade, uh trade
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 1: dead guys for dollars anymore.
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 4: Which is something that and I think this. You know,
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 4: we talk about these things everybody, you know, we hear
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 4: these things and we talk about them, but you know,
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 4: we have a very layman's understanding of what is actually happening. Right,
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 4: So this conflict between Russia and Ukraine, I there's so
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 4: much more that happens behind the scenes that that we
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 4: just don't know. And so you know, we're looking at
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 4: now Iran. Well, Iran was the biggest funder of oil
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 4: to China and Russia. Yep, there is so much in
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 4: play that we really don't understand. But everyone is so
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 4: quick to make judgments when you just you don't have
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 4: the information. That is, actually you're not one of the
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 4: people in the room when they shut the door and
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 4: there's all of the heads of state in that room.
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 4: You don't have that information, right, So making judgment calls
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 4: about what should happen here or what should happen there
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 4: is just you just sound stupid, like just stop talking,
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 4: you're just talking, just to talk.
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: So I think the biggest problem is people have forgotten
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: that Iran is RMS in the first place.
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 4: Yes, yeah, yeah.
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: Everything that we're seeing today traces back to US interference
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: in Iranian politics going back to the early part of
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: the twentieth century, not just you know, straight on, but
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: also during the course of two World Wars and so on.
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: All of the fucked up shit in the Middle East
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: that had has come back on the United States came
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: from the United States interfering over there in the past.
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 1: And so now what we have going on are it
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: is we have there's no way that this mess is
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: going to clear itself up, and we have no choice
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 1: at this point but to deal with it. And I
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: hope that the Trump administration is able to do that.
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 1: Past administrations have just made the mess worse, prolonged the situation.
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 5: You know.
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: And I'm not going to hold my breath with Trump,
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 1: but if I was going to have faith in a politician,
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 1: out of everybody, it's him, that it's going to be him.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 1: As much as I want to complain and whine and
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: say this is not what I wanted it is, you know,
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 1: it's it. This is not the way that I wanted
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: it to happen. Right, But yeah, you know that's that's
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: the woman in me going, well, we should have found
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 1: a peaceful way to do this. It's like saying, yeah,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: you should find a peaceful way to uh, you know, silence,
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: silence the the hat Fields and the McCoys.
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly didn't stop.
• 1:47:27
  Speaker 1: Until somebody, somebody started executing them for murder every time
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 1: one of them killed one of the other ones.
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 4: Right, It's it's like, how do you make peace with
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 4: an ideology that does not want the Western world to exist?
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 4: They do not like anything that happens in America. You know,
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 4: also we say they.
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 1: Hate, they do have that history to point out, Look
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 1: what America did to us, therefore we have a right
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 1: to do to them.
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 4: I mean, listen, and I I'm not gonna sit here
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 4: and say that we are, you know, just not responsible
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 4: for any of this.
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 1: Right, It's just it's not going to go away because
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: of that unless you make it go.
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 4: Away, correct, correct. And I don't like what that means
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 4: in the because in my mind I'm thinking for total annihilation.
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 4: I don't like that option. I don't want that option.
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 4: There are people the the society, like the people in Iran,
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 4: they are not all. They do not represent the leaders
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 4: the Taliban, They do not represent the the ones that
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 4: we just took out, you know, they're they're not extremists.
• 1:48:59
  Speaker 4: And you know, who, how can you gauge even how
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 4: much a person is extreme when it comes to that, right,
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 4: because the country is majority Muslim, they do not like
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 4: the way that the western country works like they do.
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 4: It is incompatible. So how are you to say that?
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 2: All right?
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 4: Well, so okay, all right, all right, all right, So
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 4: even if you don't obliterate the actual people and you say, okay, well,
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 4: this country can't exist in this fashion, what are they
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 4: going to do? Are they going to come to the
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 4: United States and assimilate? Absolutely not. It's not going to happen.
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 4: So what do we do? I'm sorry, I'm like getting
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 4: off into the weeds about faces are not really even
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 4: what we were talking about, but.
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 1: But it is. It is the situation, right, Yeah, when
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 1: you when you look at it that way and you
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 1: look at you know, compare it to Ukraine, and the
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 1: difference is pretty stark. And we've had I think we've
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: talked about this before, Like the history behind the current
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 1: war in Ukraine is a totally different history, and you know,
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: they they had good reason to fear that Trump was
• 1:50:38
  Speaker 1: gonna gonna end that war, like the people, the warmongers
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 1: there had good reason to fear that because he had
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: said that's what he wanted to do. And I do
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: believe he's still working on that. He's still working on
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 1: like completely ending the conflict. And uh, this this is
• 1:50:56
  Speaker 1: kind of part of it. There's a lot of corruption
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 1: that has gone into sending money there, and a big
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 1: part of it was what happened when Biden was president.
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: You have to remember that he was he was firmly
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: entrenched in their politics, and his son was firmly entrenched
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: in their politics to the degree of getting officials fired, yeah,
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 1: for investigating the company that he was.
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 4: With, Yeah, which which which people seemed to just conveniently forget.
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 1: Right, right, and they they were essentially shaking down that
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: country in the process for for campaign money and of
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 1: course just playing enrichment of the Biden family. And as
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: a result, Uh, we have we have these Well one
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 1: of the things that I didn't find the the documents
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: that this article is about, but I went looking and
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 1: I did find a document I think this is yeah,
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 1: here it is, so this is going to be difficult
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: to read because of the way the text is. But
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: let's see if the paragraph. Now, I believe CHS is
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 1: the representative of the FBI, and it gives a name,
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 1: but it's it's redacted, right, And of course it says
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 1: here CCHS might be the whistleblower. But in twenty fifteen
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 1: or twenty sixteen, during the Obama Biden administration, CHS was
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: first introduced to officials at Ukraine natural gas business Barisma.
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 1: And then there's a lot of blah blah blahs there
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 1: going over the logistics where the officers were and stuff.
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 1: Then we have the purpose of the meeting was to
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: discuss Barisma's interest in purchasing a US based oil and
• 1:53:08
  Speaker 1: gas business for purposes of merging it with Barisma for
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 1: purposes of conducting an IPO in the US. Barisma was
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 1: willing to or was willing to purchase the US based
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 1: entity for twenty to thirty million dollars. And then it
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 1: goes on during the meeting. Then we're going to get
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 1: into hard to pronounce names here, but I believe this
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: is Pujarski asked Chs whether CHS was where Borisma's board
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: of directors. Chs replied no, and Pajarski advised board members
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: included the former president or Prime Minister of Poland and
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden. When they were asked about
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: this they hired, they said, they hired Hunter Biden to
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 1: protect us through his dad from all kinds of problems,
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 1: and that was a quote to protect us there it
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: is through his dad from all kinds of problems. Chs
• 1:54:18
  Speaker 1: was certain. Pajarski provided no further specific details about what
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 1: that meant. But then it goes on down here. No,
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 1: it was up here. Cchs asked why Barisma needed to
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: get Chs's assistance regarding the purchaser merger when Biden was
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: on their board, and Pajarski replied that Hunter Biden was
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: not smart. They wanted to get additional counsel. The group
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 1: had a general conversation about whether the purchase merger with
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 1: US company would be a good business decision. So essentially,
• 1:54:59
  Speaker 1: he didn't know any thing about the business that he
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 1: got this this job with. They didn't hire him because
• 1:55:05
  Speaker 1: he had any skill or capability. They didn't hire him
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: because he had any particular insider knowledge in in in
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: the area that he could share with them that they'd
• 1:55:15
  Speaker 1: be like, oh, this, having this information will help us
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: make these decisions. They hired him so that his father
• 1:55:23
  Speaker 1: would not abuse government power to harass them.
• 1:55:28
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it was pay for play.
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: Right or or sad not be bullied. Yeah, it was shakedown.
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: Money were being shaken down exactly which this is? This
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 1: is interesting. Chs told this is another uh difficult name,
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: but I believe it's is Lacktewski. Uh that due to
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: show in this investigation into Barisma, which was made public
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 1: at this time, it would have a substantial negative impact
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 1: on Borisma's prospective IP in the United States. Slokwski replied
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 1: something effective, Slukwski, Slakevski, it is hard Slakevski.
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 4: You know you're right there.
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: It's easier though if your mouth was not dry. I
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: had your name Chaplinsky when I was in school, so
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 1: this should all be easy for me, right, But replied
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 1: something to the effect of, don't worry, Hunter will take
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 1: care of all those issues through his dad Jesus Christ. Yeah,
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 1: that's not corrupt. But then there's someplace else in this
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 1: document where he refers to Hunter Biden as less intelligent
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: than his dog.
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 4: That's the both accurate fucking statement I've heard I think
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 4: this entire year. Jesus Christ, Oh my god. It's like
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 4: it's it's what is it called an open secret, right
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 4: where everybody knows that this ship is going on, and
• 1:57:27
  Speaker 4: they all just go along with it just because it
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 4: it you know, it helps them.
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and of course, oh my god.
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 4: Like I can I stop fucking paying taxes. I'm sorry,
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 4: I'm sick of fucking putting my money into this country
• 1:57:50
  Speaker 4: that just disrespects me every fucking point in turn. Yeah,
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 4: and I mean I I am serious, Like this is
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 4: egregious to a point where I don't know who the
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 4: people involved are that need to, uh, you know, do
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 4: something about this, like uh, the federal government maybe. Yeah,
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 4: they're all just sitting by and just watching this shit happen, like, oh,
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 4: nothing's going on. Are you stupid? Are you stupid? How?
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 2: How?
• 1:58:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah? And it's definitely going on, Like you look here,
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: this document actually contains the statements Biden was paid fifty
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 1: thousand and hunter Biden was paid five million. I forget
• 1:58:50
  Speaker 1: that right now. It's the other way around. But the
• 1:58:56
  Speaker 1: they were discussing the payment, sole Kevski laughed at the numbers, saying, uh,
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 1: you know, it costs five million to pay one Biden
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 1: and five million to another Biden. Cis you know, suggested
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 1: that maybe it was a good idea to not pay
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 1: them and you know, not not being sure if the
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 1: money had been paid or not. This paragraph goes through
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: and explains that it had already been paid. Essentially, uh,
• 1:59:25
  Speaker 1: so that everything would be okay?
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:59:30
  Speaker 4: Do you know five thousand dollars would have change my situation?
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 1: And this is five million whole.
• 1:59:39
  Speaker 4: Lean shit, And this is the type of of money
• 1:59:42
  Speaker 4: that we're talking about, and you know, essentially, I guess
• 1:59:45
  Speaker 4: for these people at this level, it's a drop in
• 1:59:49
  Speaker 4: the bucket. Right, what's five million dollars between friends?
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 2: You like?
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 1: And in this paragraph, it's not just five million dollars
• 2:00:00
  Speaker 1: between friends. No. No, paragraph directly admits that Bearisma paid Joe
• 2:00:06
  Speaker 1: Biden to get rid of the prosecutor that was investigating Barisma,
• 2:00:12
  Speaker 1: and he kept Hunter Biden on the board so that
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden would do that, and Joe Biden did he
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 1: held was it a billion dollars in aid?
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 4: Hostage?
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 1: Right? I am so curious, like held a billion dollars
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 1: hostage for that firing?
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 4: What do you do with this money? Like, like what
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 4: do they do? Like I just don't understand, Like do
• 2:00:40
  Speaker 4: you have some kind of insane credit card bills that
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 4: you have.
• 2:00:43
  Speaker 1: To find pay mansions? They buy security, they do things,
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 1: they owned property.
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 4: You know, it's disgusting, you know, and and so you know,
• 2:00:57
  Speaker 4: people always say, like, you know, the more money make,
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 4: the more money you spend, And I understand that, but
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 4: at one point, are you just being financially irresponsible with
• 2:01:10
  Speaker 4: all of this money that you're fucking getting, you know?
• 2:01:14
  Speaker 4: And trust me, I do not believe any of these
• 2:01:19
  Speaker 4: people are being financially responsible with anything. They're just it's
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 4: fun money. They're just taking it and fucking blowing it.
• 2:01:28
  Speaker 4: And they're looking at us in our face and saying, oh,
• 2:01:33
  Speaker 4: you have to believe in this cause, and we need
• 2:01:36
  Speaker 4: more of your money because oh my god, Russia's gonna
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 4: fucking kill the entire Ukraine, which is fucking stupid on
• 2:01:45
  Speaker 4: the face of it, because most of the Ukrainian people
• 2:01:51
  Speaker 4: are nationally they are Russian.
• 2:01:55
  Speaker 1: Yes, so the area that was in dispute Crimea, the
• 2:02:02
  Speaker 1: people there actually elected to become part of Russia. Yeah,
• 2:02:10
  Speaker 1: so it's Ukraine is is basically fighting over territory that
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 1: tried to secede from the nation. That Ukraine became after
• 2:02:22
  Speaker 1: the collapse of the Soviet Union. Before the Soviet Union,
• 2:02:26
  Speaker 1: it wasn't Ukraine, it was the Ukraine, and it was
• 2:02:31
  Speaker 1: that that section that that segment in that direction. I
• 2:02:35
  Speaker 1: can't remember what exactly the word means, but it's it's uh,
• 2:02:41
  Speaker 1: it's it's it's a segment of Russia. It was part
• 2:02:44
  Speaker 1: of Russia before the USSR. So there they're basically it
• 2:02:51
  Speaker 1: would be like if if we lost Texas and then
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 1: that little portion that's sticks up and has a squared
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 1: edge decided that they wanted to rejoin the United States,
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 1: you know, like eighty years later, and and and they said,
• 2:03:12
  Speaker 1: you know, oh, no, Texas is gonna gonna fight a
• 2:03:14
  Speaker 1: war to keep that little segment. How dare you the
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 1: nation of Texas is going to to drag this war
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 1: out for years until you give up and make sure
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: we can keep them, when actually all those people wanted
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 1: was to go back to a nation that was their
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 1: nation to begin with. Yeah, like they never wanted to
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 1: secede in the first.
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 4: Place, right right, And And the fact that American dollars
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 4: are being spent in other countries that what are we doing?
• 2:03:49
  Speaker 4: What are we doing? We're we're spending money to fight wars.
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 4: And I guess this is like, right, like part of
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 4: the NATO thing, which is why we should absolutely not
• 2:04:02
  Speaker 4: be in NATO, because we seem to be the only
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 4: country that actually pays into any kind of you know,
• 2:04:11
  Speaker 4: conservative efforts that they do. But why, why why would
• 2:04:18
  Speaker 4: we be sending money to either Russia or Ukraine. I
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 4: don't give it, right, which was.
• 2:04:26
  Speaker 1: Not any of those are But again, you know, the
• 2:04:32
  Speaker 1: UN was our baby, that Wilson.
• 2:04:37
  Speaker 9: Yeah, So, as far as I can tell, the war
• 2:04:42
  Speaker 9: between Ukraine and Russia was won by Russia, like shortly.
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 3: After it was waged back right, Russia took off the
• 2:04:56
  Speaker 3: Donbass region, just like they took of the Crimea region
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 3: back in twenty fourteen. Well, Russia can just sue that
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 3: they can just roll on into Ukraine, they can take
• 2:05:08
  Speaker 3: over the the dom Bas region or anything. And from
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 3: that point on, what we mean by the war is
• 2:05:22
  Speaker 3: Ukrainian forces forcing men to go die for an impossible.
• 2:05:33
  Speaker 4: Cause, frivolously, Yeah.
• 2:05:36
  Speaker 3: To try and prevent Russia from taking over the down
• 2:05:39
  Speaker 3: Bass region or the Crimea region. And it's never going
• 2:05:43
  Speaker 3: to happen, and.
• 2:05:44
  Speaker 1: We've established that if they don't go, the Ukrainian government
• 2:05:50
  Speaker 1: sends agents out to beat them to death. Yeah, that's
• 2:05:54
  Speaker 1: like it's it's incredibly corrupt. Yeah, but you're right, it's
• 2:05:59
  Speaker 1: a lot like that. I told people you know about
• 2:06:02
  Speaker 1: when I say I wrestled a bear. I got into
• 2:06:06
  Speaker 1: a wrestling ring with a wrestling bear and he knocked
• 2:06:11
  Speaker 1: me on my ass in the first first second. Then
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 1: of course you flip over on your belly really quick.
• 2:06:18
  Speaker 1: You have to flip over on your belly because it's
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 1: it's part of the rules. They don't want you on
• 2:06:22
  Speaker 1: your back under this bear. And so I was assisted
• 2:06:27
  Speaker 1: by the bear's handlers in flipping over, and then the
• 2:06:32
  Speaker 1: bear sat on my back and chewed on my ass
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: for five minutes before the bell went off. That would me.
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 4: Again, This is such a better version of the story
• 2:06:45
  Speaker 4: that you always tell. The bear chewed on your as,
• 2:06:50
  Speaker 4: chewed on my He used my ass as a cheety.
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 4: Do you have scars?
• 2:06:55
  Speaker 1: Oh no. He was definitely very gentle for a bear.
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 4: Liked he liked you, He liked you.
• 2:07:04
  Speaker 1: Ask the play toy he was playing a dog place. Yeah.
• 2:07:07
  Speaker 1: The thing is now I wouldn't recommend this to anybody
• 2:07:11
  Speaker 1: in that was in nineteen ninety two, ninety one or
• 2:07:18
  Speaker 1: ninety two. Right in twenty ten, that's staying bear. He
• 2:07:25
  Speaker 1: mauled one of his handlers to death in his cage
• 2:07:29
  Speaker 1: and there wasn't any discernible trigger for it.
• 2:07:33
  Speaker 4: Well, he didn't his ass. His ass wasn't as nice
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 4: as your scanna.
• 2:07:37
  Speaker 1: Yes, that's what it was. I'm sorry, but you know,
• 2:07:41
  Speaker 1: it's it's just the thing that the Russia Ukraine battle
• 2:07:46
  Speaker 1: makes me think of is that, you know, like you say,
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 1: it's a war, it's a war. Ukraine is fighting a war.
• 2:07:52
  Speaker 1: Ukraine is fighting a war the way that I wrestled
• 2:07:54
  Speaker 1: a bear.
• 2:07:56
  Speaker 3: M And this this was what took my brain over
• 2:08:01
  Speaker 3: when King Charles was was was talking to whatever that
• 2:08:07
  Speaker 3: fucking conference was, and he was like, oh, yes, there's
• 2:08:11
  Speaker 3: all things going on, right dad, but we really ought
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 3: to be focusing on on we should be giving resources
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 3: to Ukraine even in the event of this Iran war.
• 2:08:24
  Speaker 3: And you know, I'm not on board with this fucking
• 2:08:27
  Speaker 3: Iran war or whatever. But there's so many English people
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 3: who were were like looking at that King Charles speech
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 3: and going, oh, it was wasn't he so good? Wasn't
• 2:08:38
  Speaker 3: he so witty? Wasn't wasn't he making such very good
• 2:08:42
  Speaker 3: points when he said, you should be focusing or your
• 2:08:48
  Speaker 3: your your strengths on the on the Ukraine War. And like, bitch,
• 2:08:54
  Speaker 3: it's been four years, Like Ukraine lost that war fucking
• 2:09:01
  Speaker 3: four years ago. It was pretty fucking ghosts. Like all
• 2:09:06
  Speaker 3: Russia wanted was to take over the Donbass region, just
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 3: like they took over the Crimea region in twenty fourteen,
• 2:09:13
  Speaker 3: and they fucking did it. But Charles and that here
• 2:09:16
  Speaker 3: going no, no, no, never mind around, no, no, no,
• 2:09:20
  Speaker 3: that's not important. You need to be pumping more and
• 2:09:23
  Speaker 3: more money into the Ukraine government, never mind that it's
• 2:09:28
  Speaker 3: the most corrupt government in the history of everything. No, no, no,
• 2:09:34
  Speaker 3: keep pumping more money into Ukraine even though they already
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 3: lost the war fucking three years ago.
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 4: I don't know why anybody is listening to a bunch
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 4: of fucking in breads.
• 2:09:50
  Speaker 3: Well, indeed, I have some things to say in favor
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 3: of monarchy, but not when it comes to the House
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 3: of Windsor The House of Windsor is indeed a bunch
• 2:10:04
  Speaker 3: of in bred fucking sausage fingered like like I'm happy
• 2:10:12
  Speaker 3: that my country has has has has some influence monarchically speaking.
• 2:10:23
  Speaker 3: But just like I hate my fucking government, I also
• 2:10:26
  Speaker 3: hate my fucking king. He's a dickhead, He's a communist,
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 3: he's an Islamist, He's he's both, Yes, he is both.
• 2:10:35
  Speaker 3: He is he is a communist Islamist. Is that possible? Yes?
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 4: Yes?
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 1: And cultural Marxism, Yeah it is.
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 3: Ask Lenin. Lenin was was was quite explicit in it
• 2:10:52
  Speaker 3: in when it comes to the UH, the alliance between
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 3: communism and IS and that and that's and that's the
• 2:11:03
  Speaker 3: unfortunate situation we found ourselves in. When it comes to
• 2:11:06
  Speaker 3: the King of England. I still can't get over calling
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 3: it the King of England.
• 2:11:11
  Speaker 4: I was just gonna ask you that, Like.
• 2:11:16
  Speaker 3: It was so much easier when we called it the
• 2:11:19
  Speaker 3: Queen of England.
• 2:11:21
  Speaker 1: So what did they do?
• 2:11:22
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry I have to have to fucking ask, so
• 2:11:25
  Speaker 4: what did they do with the national anthem?
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 4: Because you're not stinging to the queen, we.
• 2:11:32
  Speaker 3: Just have to say king instead of queen. We just
• 2:11:34
  Speaker 3: have to get used to it. And you know, I've
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 3: been saying I've been saying this for years now, Like
• 2:11:41
  Speaker 3: the moment we changed from God Saved the Queen to
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 3: God Save the King. Feminists are not going to have that,
• 2:11:53
  Speaker 3: Like you know, you know the feminist problem you have
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 3: in America. We have the same feminist problem in.
• 2:11:59
  Speaker 4: The UK twice as worse.
• 2:12:03
  Speaker 3: The only reason they've been okay with monarchy over the
• 2:12:06
  Speaker 3: last seventy years is because there was a queen. And
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 3: I've been saying for ages, the moment we have a
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 3: king instead of a queen, the feminists are going to go,
• 2:12:16
  Speaker 3: we will abolish them. We cannot be doing with a
• 2:12:21
  Speaker 3: monarchy with that has a king at the head of it.
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 3: And yeah, they are going to abolish that as soon
• 2:12:29
  Speaker 3: as possible. I'm amazed that there are so many European
• 2:12:33
  Speaker 3: countries that still have kings. I think there's only six.
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 3: It's like Norway, Denmark, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium and the UK.
• 2:12:48
  Speaker 3: I think I missed one. But whatever, whatever it is, like,
• 2:12:58
  Speaker 3: it's it's all been buttressed on on on the British one.
• 2:13:06
  Speaker 3: Because Britain has been colonizing the world for a long time.
• 2:13:14
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm gonna get there. I'm gonna get there.
• 2:13:18
  Speaker 3: For better or worse, and and and the only reason
• 2:13:23
  Speaker 3: we've been allowed to get away with this for so
• 2:13:26
  Speaker 3: long is because we have a female monarch. This is
• 2:13:31
  Speaker 3: this has been happening during this feminist takeover, where everything
• 2:13:37
  Speaker 3: is fined as long as a woman is in charge.
• 2:13:40
  Speaker 4: I think that's the reason, though it's.
• 2:13:43
  Speaker 3: It's got a lot to do with it. And I
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 3: think I think now that we have a king in
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 3: charge and that and that his next of kin will
• 2:13:52
  Speaker 3: also be a man, and that his next of kin
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 3: will also be a man, the British monarchy is not
• 2:14:00
  Speaker 3: long for this world. I think the fucking, the the
• 2:14:05
  Speaker 3: the the feminist democratic, fucking government is not going to
• 2:14:13
  Speaker 3: put up with this for long. They're gonna be like,
• 2:14:15
  Speaker 3: we don't want we don't want to be ruled by kings,
• 2:14:18
  Speaker 3: even though those kings have nothing to do with anything
• 2:14:21
  Speaker 3: and they have no power. We we just can't stand
• 2:14:24
  Speaker 3: the idea that there's a man who is head of state.
• 2:14:30
  Speaker 3: We can't have a man being head of state.
• 2:14:36
  Speaker 4: They're gonna they're gonna have to purse that. I'm sorry,
• 2:14:38
  Speaker 4: go ahead, finish.
• 2:14:40
  Speaker 3: No, yeah, they I mean ever since the French Revolution,
• 2:14:46
  Speaker 3: the rest of Europe has been walking on eggshells in
• 2:14:53
  Speaker 3: stead of going how do we how do we get
• 2:14:57
  Speaker 3: through this existential crisis while still having royalty. And you know,
• 2:15:10
  Speaker 3: if the French revelation is probably the source of all
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 3: our problems.
• 2:15:16
  Speaker 4: Don't blame it on the French, but so so and
• 2:15:20
  Speaker 4: so this is just something that I wanted to touch on,
• 2:15:23
  Speaker 4: you know, being that we were talking about, you know,
• 2:15:26
  Speaker 4: the British royalty and and their colonization of almost the
• 2:15:31
  Speaker 4: entire world. How can we sit back and be mad
• 2:15:37
  Speaker 4: at Russia when they want to take back what they
• 2:15:41
  Speaker 4: believe is their territory and that's it. You know, I'm
• 2:15:46
  Speaker 4: just gonna leave it. There doesn't have to be a
• 2:15:49
  Speaker 4: whole discussion. But you know, the these fucking Brits they yep,
• 2:15:56
  Speaker 4: uh huh, fucking Brits. They colonized so much of this
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 4: country or it's this country, this world that how can
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 4: we like just ignore that when it's it's it's inconvenient.
• 2:16:18
  Speaker 3: Well, at some point in history, people attempted to abolish
• 2:16:26
  Speaker 3: kings and replace them with emperors. This goes back to
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 3: the Roman Empire and did long before that. Kings were
• 2:16:35
  Speaker 3: the thing for the longest time, and then people like
• 2:16:40
  Speaker 3: the Roman Empire came along and said, let's do away
• 2:16:43
  Speaker 3: with kings. Let's do something better like emperors, and you
• 2:16:49
  Speaker 3: can imagine how that went. It was even worse.
• 2:16:55
  Speaker 1: Well, it's it's it's kind of a valid point. You
• 2:16:59
  Speaker 1: can't you can't do something and then get mad at
• 2:17:01
  Speaker 1: someone else because they also did it right that at
• 2:17:05
  Speaker 1: the same time, you know, the other the other end
• 2:17:08
  Speaker 1: of it is, it's it's not even just about Russia.
• 2:17:11
  Speaker 1: It's also about the people in the area that's under
• 2:17:15
  Speaker 1: dispute not wanting to remain part of Ukraine. So there's
• 2:17:21
  Speaker 1: there's like three parties involved, and two of them agree
• 2:17:25
  Speaker 1: right that that that area should be part of Russia.
• 2:17:30
  Speaker 1: So that's the that's the deal. But what I wanted
• 2:17:34
  Speaker 1: to highlight here is what we had in office, what
• 2:17:39
  Speaker 1: we had making decisions about laws that would affect the
• 2:17:42
  Speaker 1: lives of men all over the United States in the
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 1: last four years was a family that was pretty much
• 2:17:51
  Speaker 1: an organized crime family, uh. And they exploited their government
• 2:17:56
  Speaker 1: connections and they abused government power to engage in mafia
• 2:18:04
  Speaker 1: style shakedown tactics against other countries. And they used the
• 2:18:09
  Speaker 1: US AID program that we discussed a few months ago
• 2:18:13
  Speaker 1: to do it. In some instances, this one included and
• 2:18:18
  Speaker 1: you know, to round out the story while that that
• 2:18:22
  Speaker 1: investigation was going on before the prosecutor was fired, after
• 2:18:30
  Speaker 1: Barisma aid Biden to get him fired, and Biden held
• 2:18:37
  Speaker 1: us US money hostage that was going to be given
• 2:18:43
  Speaker 1: as foreign aid to to make that firing happen. As
• 2:18:49
  Speaker 1: all that was going on, the firm landed a deal
• 2:18:53
  Speaker 1: with the USAID program. So you have this going full circle, right,
• 2:18:59
  Speaker 1: And and as I said, those documents which those will
• 2:19:04
  Speaker 1: be published eventually, right, those will be published eventually, but
• 2:19:11
  Speaker 1: they aren't. They aren't published as of yet, but just
• 2:19:15
  Speaker 1: the news has seen them. And this this route that
• 2:19:23
  Speaker 1: Ukraine was taking to get the money to the Biden
• 2:19:29
  Speaker 1: campaign was USA usaid. So again yet another thing that
• 2:19:36
  Speaker 1: we've mentioned. Further news has come out, and I think
• 2:19:40
  Speaker 1: there's gonna be more come out about this that's gonna
• 2:19:42
  Speaker 1: end up being a big There's gonna be a big
• 2:19:46
  Speaker 1: hole there because I don't know that anybody is necessarily
• 2:19:52
  Speaker 1: going to be held accountable but scapegoats from from the
• 2:19:57
  Speaker 1: that we're involved with the Biden crime family. Biden is
• 2:20:01
  Speaker 1: going to die at home of cancer, and I don't
• 2:20:05
  Speaker 1: think that the American people are going to pay for
• 2:20:08
  Speaker 1: his cancer treatment in some federal prison. I think that's
• 2:20:13
  Speaker 1: all going to be the American people paying for his
• 2:20:16
  Speaker 1: cancer treatment out of whatever fund it is that pays
• 2:20:19
  Speaker 1: for President's health care.
• 2:20:20
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean, Jesus Christ, have we not paid this
• 2:20:23
  Speaker 4: man enough money? Does he not have enough money to
• 2:20:27
  Speaker 4: pay for his own fucking cancer treatment?
• 2:20:30
  Speaker 1: And I meant million dollars from Ukraine, so you know.
• 2:20:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, And like, I'm not sorry, I'm not I'm not
• 2:20:38
  Speaker 4: trying to make light of the situation.
• 2:20:41
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 2:20:42
  Speaker 4: I don't wish cancer on anybody. I think it's just
• 2:20:48
  Speaker 4: it's something that happens, and right, so you know, I
• 2:20:53
  Speaker 4: have to deal with it.
• 2:20:55
  Speaker 1: Who are struggling to pay their rent because they are, right,
• 2:21:01
  Speaker 1: and it's low end five figures, yeah, who have cancer? Yeah,
• 2:21:06
  Speaker 1: And this man it's not that I don't have sympathy
• 2:21:09
  Speaker 1: for him and his cancer. It's that I do think
• 2:21:12
  Speaker 1: that he's probably rich enough to pay for whatever cancer
• 2:21:15
  Speaker 1: treatment he wants.
• 2:21:16
  Speaker 4: Oh, absolutely absolute.
• 2:21:18
  Speaker 1: In any case, My point being like the place that
• 2:21:21
  Speaker 1: we're we're going to be shafted for it is in
• 2:21:25
  Speaker 1: his home, not in his in a prison system. Because
• 2:21:27
  Speaker 1: I don't think he's ever going to be arrested. I
• 2:21:29
  Speaker 1: don't think Hunter Biden's ever going to go to jail
• 2:21:32
  Speaker 1: for this either.
• 2:21:32
  Speaker 4: No, No, And and that's all.
• 2:21:35
  Speaker 1: Of their all of their subordinates.
• 2:21:37
  Speaker 4: Will I don't know, well, yes, like the lower levels,
• 2:21:42
  Speaker 4: but there's not a president that is going to go
• 2:21:47
  Speaker 4: to jail. It's just not going to happen, you know.
• 2:21:50
  Speaker 4: And every you know, all of these leftists were, you know,
• 2:21:54
  Speaker 4: just waiting for Trump to go to jail. He got
• 2:21:58
  Speaker 4: convicted of thirty seven charges. I think you fucking assholes
• 2:22:02
  Speaker 4: people are so stupid. Do you think he's gonna go
• 2:22:06
  Speaker 4: to jail? No, because guess what he has for the
• 2:22:11
  Speaker 4: rest of his life Secret Service duty, which means that
• 2:22:15
  Speaker 4: you would also have to prison the Secret Service. That's
• 2:22:20
  Speaker 4: not going to fucking happen. It's just not gonna happen.
• 2:22:23
  Speaker 4: Get it out of your mind, people. And what they
• 2:22:27
  Speaker 4: would have.
• 2:22:27
  Speaker 1: To do was each pull they'd have to pull shifts
• 2:22:30
  Speaker 1: as his security in prison, and then yeah, I do
• 2:22:36
  Speaker 1: the same way they do at his home.
• 2:22:38
  Speaker 4: But that's not gonna happen. It's not going to happen.
• 2:22:42
  Speaker 4: And and it's not going to happen for the presidents
• 2:22:47
  Speaker 4: that you like or you don't like, right, So.
• 2:22:52
  Speaker 1: That's pretty much all I wanted to uh cover today,
• 2:22:57
  Speaker 1: I mean I have. I had some other things that
• 2:22:59
  Speaker 1: I could have gone over, but they weren't quite as
• 2:23:02
  Speaker 1: solid and like the connection to things we talked about,
• 2:23:06
  Speaker 1: I would have had more explanation to give. And it
• 2:23:09
  Speaker 1: is like almost nine thirty, so I'm going to cut
• 2:23:12
  Speaker 1: the show short. It's not short. It's not I know,
• 2:23:18
  Speaker 1: I like dragged you guys through a whole series of
• 2:23:20
  Speaker 1: stories here, so but it's always we will will have well,
• 2:23:27
  Speaker 1: probably next week we'll probably get back into the article
• 2:23:32
  Speaker 1: that we were reading previously, the in Cell Trap, which
• 2:23:39
  Speaker 1: we may have to backtrack a little in it just
• 2:23:43
  Speaker 1: to just to remember where we were. But this is
• 2:23:47
  Speaker 1: the one where the writer was had interviewed some in
• 2:23:52
  Speaker 1: cells and was essentially making fun of them. So we'll
• 2:23:58
  Speaker 1: finish that. We won't be probably done with it next week,
• 2:24:03
  Speaker 1: but we'll finish that in the next couple of weeks.
• 2:24:07
  Speaker 1: We have a super Chow. We just got a super chow.
• 2:24:09
  Speaker 1: It's a good long one too, uh dark.
• 2:24:16
  Speaker 4: I was gonna say something dirty, but I'm not going
• 2:24:18
  Speaker 4: to do that.
• 2:24:22
  Speaker 1: Oh wait, there's two that came through all right. One
• 2:24:26
  Speaker 1: of them says it was earlier but they both came
• 2:24:28
  Speaker 1: through just now. Richard Beer gave us five dollars and said,
• 2:24:32
  Speaker 1: when people are talking about how much they hate the rich,
• 2:24:35
  Speaker 1: why don't these rich people ever fall under that categorization.
• 2:24:39
  Speaker 1: Pretty sure Asthma Gold doesn't draw that kind of hate,
• 2:24:45
  Speaker 1: And then he gave me a link. Caleb recommends Asthma
• 2:24:49
  Speaker 1: Gold spend two million a year. Oh, he recommends to
• 2:24:58
  Speaker 1: spend two I don't yeah, if he has that much, like, yeah,
• 2:25:03
  Speaker 1: one of the rich people.
• 2:25:05
  Speaker 4: I literally this year I've found out about asthmen Gold.
• 2:25:11
  Speaker 4: I had no idea who this person was, and so
• 2:25:15
  Speaker 4: I started getting into his content, and you know, I
• 2:25:20
  Speaker 4: like his opinions. I really have not heard anything different
• 2:25:25
  Speaker 4: than what I actually believe. I'm more taken aback by
• 2:25:33
  Speaker 4: the amount of money that he might possibly actually be making.
• 2:25:37
  Speaker 4: I don't know. I don't pocket watch people, so I
• 2:25:42
  Speaker 4: don't know what the fuck he makes. But he's a
• 2:25:46
  Speaker 4: lot broke. He doesn't have to do anything for the
• 2:25:49
  Speaker 4: rest of his life. He could stop streaming right now
• 2:25:52
  Speaker 4: and be good.
• 2:25:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 2:25:54
  Speaker 1: Here's the thing. If people are working and they're earning
• 2:25:57
  Speaker 1: that kind of money because they've created something that people
• 2:26:01
  Speaker 1: like enough that it results in that level of income.
• 2:26:05
  Speaker 1: There's nothing wrong with that. Yeah, It's just like, I
• 2:26:08
  Speaker 1: don't begrudge stars that are entertaining making that kind of money.
• 2:26:15
  Speaker 1: I don't, you know, I don't begrudge any of that.
• 2:26:17
  Speaker 1: What I do begrudge is when a big company takes
• 2:26:20
  Speaker 1: advantage of them and uses them for like they did
• 2:26:22
  Speaker 1: the Three Stooges yea, or the hair bands in the
• 2:26:25
  Speaker 1: in the eighties and nineties, where they like were insanely popular,
• 2:26:31
  Speaker 1: white and yeah, and then they walked away with nothing.
• 2:26:35
  Speaker 1: They made nothing. And and like the fashion that came
• 2:26:39
  Speaker 1: in of wearing jeans with holes in him and stuff
• 2:26:43
  Speaker 1: like that came from those guys being up on stage
• 2:26:45
  Speaker 1: dressed like that. But they were not dressed like that
• 2:26:48
  Speaker 1: because it was cool. They were dressed like that because
• 2:26:50
  Speaker 1: they couldn't afford new pants. Seriously, they actually one of
• 2:26:54
  Speaker 1: the guys actually said that in an interview that the companies,
• 2:27:00
  Speaker 1: the contracts the companies kept them under, made them so
• 2:27:04
  Speaker 1: broke that they they could not afford to replace their
• 2:27:07
  Speaker 1: clothes when their clothes were out. Yeah.
• 2:27:09
  Speaker 2: And the.
• 2:27:12
  Speaker 1: Only people that deserve any kind of I won't say hatred,
• 2:27:16
  Speaker 1: but criticism for being rich are the rich people that
• 2:27:19
  Speaker 1: are that are telling other people to eat the rich
• 2:27:22
  Speaker 1: while excluding themselves because they have good intentions, right right,
• 2:27:30
  Speaker 1: and and that really what they deserve is to be
• 2:27:33
  Speaker 1: called hypocrites. Yeah, yeah, dark Kiki Morris said it gave
• 2:27:39
  Speaker 1: us ten dollars and said, Doc, don't forget your king
• 2:27:41
  Speaker 1: was to make tobacco illegal. Can I get an epic
• 2:27:44
  Speaker 1: rant from you on that ago tobacco? I smoked a
• 2:27:52
  Speaker 1: serious pipe when I was eighteen decades ago. I quit
• 2:27:56
  Speaker 1: vaping nicotine six months ago in an impress out. But
• 2:28:01
  Speaker 1: I will probably be filling the gap when I drop
• 2:28:05
  Speaker 1: weed with nasal tobacco. In some African countries, the majority
• 2:28:10
  Speaker 1: of nasal tobacco users are female, and majority of females
• 2:28:13
  Speaker 1: use nasal tobacco.
• 2:28:16
  Speaker 4: That is ever heard of?
• 2:28:19
  Speaker 1: It? Yeah? Great, The safest tobacco is also the one
• 2:28:23
  Speaker 1: most like blow. So that was quite a rant. And
• 2:28:30
  Speaker 1: I don't Mike, you got anything to say about the
• 2:28:32
  Speaker 1: tobacco thing.
• 2:28:34
  Speaker 3: Fucking make weed legal, but keep illegal, like we can
• 2:28:40
  Speaker 3: find like a happy middle ground, right like, just like
• 2:28:50
  Speaker 3: America tried illegalizing alcohol. It didn't fucking work, right, Just
• 2:29:00
  Speaker 3: like a bunch of other countries have tried illegalizing weed. Like,
• 2:29:07
  Speaker 3: I'm not a total libertarian, right, I don't think every
• 2:29:11
  Speaker 3: drug should be legalized. I think fantinal is probably a
• 2:29:17
  Speaker 3: fucking disaster area. I think heroin is probably a fucking
• 2:29:21
  Speaker 3: disaster area. I think meth is probably a disaster area.
• 2:29:25
  Speaker 3: Like we we can find a middle ground. Like again,
• 2:29:32
  Speaker 3: I'm not a total libertarian when it comes to legalizing drugs,
• 2:29:37
  Speaker 3: but we can. We can find a middle ground somewhere
• 2:29:40
  Speaker 3: beyond where where we're currently at. If if alcohol is legal,
• 2:29:48
  Speaker 3: that's fine, okay, But alcohol is a really dangerous drug
• 2:29:53
  Speaker 3: and weed is much less dangerous. Meth is much more dangerous,
• 2:30:00
  Speaker 3: and fentanyl is much more dangerous. So yeah, I'm just
• 2:30:05
  Speaker 3: here trying to settle the middle ground. Like, if alcohol
• 2:30:11
  Speaker 3: is going to be legal, then maybe weed should probably
• 2:30:14
  Speaker 3: be legal too, because weed is much less dangerous than alcohol.
• 2:30:20
  Speaker 3: And we can go on to make fentanyl and meth
• 2:30:25
  Speaker 3: illegal because they are fucking horrible drugs. I I not
• 2:30:31
  Speaker 3: that I would know, because these things are legal and
• 2:30:35
  Speaker 3: these things are illegal, and I would never do anything illegal.
• 2:30:39
  Speaker 3: But you know, to anyone with a fucking brain in
• 2:30:45
  Speaker 3: their noggin, they can figure out, you know, which which
• 2:30:49
  Speaker 3: drugs will ruin your life and which drugs will not.
• 2:30:54
  Speaker 3: I mean, alcohol will ruin your life. But we should
• 2:30:57
  Speaker 3: keep it legal anyway because we it's it's been legal
• 2:31:06
  Speaker 3: for a fucking long time, and we seem to have
• 2:31:09
  Speaker 3: been getting along with it for a while. And so
• 2:31:13
  Speaker 3: maybe weed should be legal as well, because it doesn't
• 2:31:19
  Speaker 3: destroy any more lives than alcohol does, like and and
• 2:31:24
  Speaker 3: if and if people could smoke weed, then they would
• 2:31:28
  Speaker 3: drink less alcohol. But that doesn't mean that I'm some
• 2:31:35
  Speaker 3: libertarian who thinks heroine and ventanyls should be legal. No
• 2:31:42
  Speaker 3: fucking we need to. It's all about drawing a line.
• 2:31:48
  Speaker 3: And we have drawn a line. We we live in
• 2:31:53
  Speaker 3: a society, all right, a line as a society that
• 2:32:00
  Speaker 3: has decided that alcohol is fine and caffeine is fine. Well,
• 2:32:07
  Speaker 3: I'm like, well we can draw the line elsewhere, like
• 2:32:16
  Speaker 3: maybe weed. Maybe weed is fine too, but fentanyl is not.
• 2:32:22
  Speaker 3: And I'm like, I don't think I'm a wido for
• 2:32:27
  Speaker 3: drawing that line, Like I think most people would draw
• 2:32:31
  Speaker 3: the line somewhere. I would, just I would. I would
• 2:32:36
  Speaker 3: draw the line where it's okay to have a fucking
• 2:32:38
  Speaker 3: joint every now again, as long as you don't fucking
• 2:32:42
  Speaker 3: inject fentanyl. I don't know this.
• 2:32:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 2:32:50
  Speaker 1: You know what's interesting if you are trying to use
• 2:32:56
  Speaker 1: a drug that comes in a pill form or that
• 2:33:00
  Speaker 1: that you inject comes in the liquid form, and you
• 2:33:02
  Speaker 1: inject it on the street and it turns out to
• 2:33:08
  Speaker 1: be laced with ventanyl, it can kill you because the
• 2:33:12
  Speaker 1: dose is not measured properly. It's just put in there.
• 2:33:18
  Speaker 1: It's just cheap ass enhancer that increases the strength of
• 2:33:25
  Speaker 1: the drug well cheapening the ingredients list essentially. And so
• 2:33:33
  Speaker 1: when when manufacturers, makers whatever put that in there, they're
• 2:33:39
  Speaker 1: not being careful. They're they're just you know, winging it.
• 2:33:44
  Speaker 1: But if you're in the hospital and you have had
• 2:33:48
  Speaker 1: a surgery and you have your pain, and you have
• 2:33:52
  Speaker 1: the pain medicine, whatever pain medicine they have you on,
• 2:33:56
  Speaker 1: and the pain medicine is working, but you have something
• 2:34:00
  Speaker 1: that they refer to as breakthrough pain, meaning it still
• 2:34:04
  Speaker 1: is at a level that's high enough that it's unbearable
• 2:34:08
  Speaker 1: to you. They give you a bump of fentanyl to
• 2:34:15
  Speaker 1: tone it down. So it's the reason that laws end
• 2:34:24
  Speaker 1: up addressing this stuff is largely because something is a
• 2:34:30
  Speaker 1: threat to the public where you know you're being told
• 2:34:35
  Speaker 1: you're getting one thing, but they've added fentanyl to it,
• 2:34:40
  Speaker 1: and therefore you know it's now it's potentially deadly. Well,
• 2:34:47
  Speaker 1: if something was legal and it was subject to the
• 2:34:52
  Speaker 1: same rules and regulations and standards and practices that other
• 2:35:01
  Speaker 1: legal items are subjected to, where you know, if somebody
• 2:35:07
  Speaker 1: lies to you about what's in a product and there's
• 2:35:12
  Speaker 1: an ingredient not listed in the ingredients that are listed,
• 2:35:15
  Speaker 1: or not in the amounts that that you're told you can,
• 2:35:19
  Speaker 1: you know, you've got to You've got to recourse to
• 2:35:21
  Speaker 1: sue them, sue the ship out of them, take all
• 2:35:23
  Speaker 1: their profits. Unfortunately, what we've had in the United States,
• 2:35:31
  Speaker 1: we've got this history where if somebody is selling something
• 2:35:35
  Speaker 1: like that on the street, yeah, they go to jail. Yep,
• 2:35:40
  Speaker 1: Fenttel can also be given as an epidural. Richard Beer
• 2:35:45
  Speaker 1: pointed that out. But at the same time, you know,
• 2:35:50
  Speaker 1: we have other sellers that have been peddling dangerous drugs
• 2:35:58
  Speaker 1: for like a century almost and the federal government gives
• 2:36:06
  Speaker 1: them approval, often for dangerous drugs that they later have
• 2:36:12
  Speaker 1: to pull off the market. Actually just tweeted a video
• 2:36:16
  Speaker 1: of this about this maybe half an hour before the show,
• 2:36:21
  Speaker 1: and we were talking about it because it reminded me
• 2:36:25
  Speaker 1: that in the seventies and parts of the early eighties,
• 2:36:31
  Speaker 1: quaaludes were legal. You could be prescribed quaaludes as a
• 2:36:38
  Speaker 1: treatment for certain conditions, and of course now they're not,
• 2:36:45
  Speaker 1: but back in the day they were, and people did
• 2:36:48
  Speaker 1: receive prescriptions for them. There was a drug mentioned in
• 2:36:53
  Speaker 1: this video, cell dinge, which was in a histamine that
• 2:36:57
  Speaker 1: caused a heart problem. I was prescribed seldane. I took
• 2:37:02
  Speaker 1: seldane for a couple of years before it was they
• 2:37:09
  Speaker 1: stopped giving it to me because it was causing a
• 2:37:12
  Speaker 1: heart problem, and so I was one of the people
• 2:37:16
  Speaker 1: that was affected by this drug before it was taken
• 2:37:18
  Speaker 1: off the market. I've had actually several medications in my
• 2:37:23
  Speaker 1: history that pharmaceutical companies put on the market as safe
• 2:37:29
  Speaker 1: to use for purposes that my doctor determined that I
• 2:37:32
  Speaker 1: needed something, you know, for and later they turned out
• 2:37:38
  Speaker 1: to be dangerous drugs and there were class action lawsuits.
• 2:37:43
  Speaker 1: Some of those drugs were pulled off the market and
• 2:37:45
  Speaker 1: have never been sold again. Some of them now have
• 2:37:50
  Speaker 1: contraindications with each other that you know, well, if you're
• 2:37:54
  Speaker 1: taking this, you shouldn't also take that. But they were
• 2:37:57
  Speaker 1: combined when I was a kid, and I'm one of
• 2:37:59
  Speaker 1: the people that was dosed with them. Uh, the weird
• 2:38:02
  Speaker 1: guinea pigs when it comes to drugs in the US,
• 2:38:06
  Speaker 1: like the government just uh you know, pretends to regulate
• 2:38:12
  Speaker 1: and uh to actually care what happens to us. And
• 2:38:16
  Speaker 1: we would probably be better off if people didn't have
• 2:38:20
  Speaker 1: a reason to trust drug companies at all, if we
• 2:38:24
  Speaker 1: we didn't have an agency out there going yeah, this
• 2:38:26
  Speaker 1: is safe, because it's kind of Russian roulette, they'll tell
• 2:38:31
  Speaker 1: you it's safe. But you know, half the drugs on
• 2:38:36
  Speaker 1: the market you later find out, well, this does liver damage,
• 2:38:39
  Speaker 1: and that does heart damage. And if you combine these
• 2:38:43
  Speaker 1: two drugs together, you're gonna you're gonna have a stroke.
• 2:38:47
  Speaker 1: And if you combine these two drugs together, it's gonna
• 2:38:50
  Speaker 1: do brain damage. You're in real trouble now, you know.
• 2:38:53
  Speaker 1: So when it comes down to it, oh, soldamide, Yeah,
• 2:38:58
  Speaker 1: that was before the FDA. That was that was before
• 2:39:01
  Speaker 1: In fact, that was the cause of the FDA. We
• 2:39:05
  Speaker 1: got the FDA because of solidamide, and it didn't fix
• 2:39:09
  Speaker 1: the situation. It just made people think the situation was fixed.
• 2:39:15
  Speaker 1: And drug companies are still putting drugs out there and
• 2:39:18
  Speaker 1: telling doctors they're safe to prescribe to their patients and
• 2:39:23
  Speaker 1: they're not, or doctors are using them incorrectly. Yeah, Finfinn
• 2:39:29
  Speaker 1: was listed in that video as well. Somebody mentioned that
• 2:39:32
  Speaker 1: mister Nube, mister Nube, so we got mister Nube and
• 2:39:35
  Speaker 1: we got Richard Bierre was the one who mentioned solidamide.
• 2:39:38
  Speaker 1: Solinomide is an interesting one too. I had an argument
• 2:39:41
  Speaker 1: with a feminist about that. She was mad that drugs
• 2:39:45
  Speaker 1: are not tested on women, and the reason is because
• 2:39:50
  Speaker 1: women can be pregnant. So if you're testing drugs on women,
• 2:39:54
  Speaker 1: there's a chance you might be testing them on children.
• 2:39:58
  Speaker 1: And I couldn't get her to a She was just
• 2:40:01
  Speaker 1: saying that it was better that some children should suffer
• 2:40:05
  Speaker 1: than that no women should be able to be tested on.
• 2:40:09
  Speaker 1: So I asked her exactly how many children should we
• 2:40:11
  Speaker 1: be testing drugs on, and she never was able to
• 2:40:15
  Speaker 1: answer that one. So, but in any case, as far
• 2:40:20
  Speaker 1: as that's concerned, honestly, I think that the libertarian position
• 2:40:27
  Speaker 1: is probably the best one, because when you lull people
• 2:40:32
  Speaker 1: into a false sense of security by telling them that
• 2:40:36
  Speaker 1: the government is protecting you, when the government is doing
• 2:40:39
  Speaker 1: no such thing, you end up with a lot more deaths,
• 2:40:42
  Speaker 1: whereas if people are less likely to trust these companies
• 2:40:48
  Speaker 1: and more likely to retaliate if the companies do something wrong,
• 2:40:53
  Speaker 1: you're a lot safer. But like I said, it's late,
• 2:40:57
  Speaker 1: and with that, I'm going to call it a night.
• 2:41:00
  Speaker 1: So thanks everybody for listening. Thanks to all my co
• 2:41:03
  Speaker 1: hosts for the interesting conversation. We have provoked the thoughts
• 2:41:08
  Speaker 1: enough for one night. Thanks Brian for sticking out this
• 2:41:13
  Speaker 1: long haul. It's now almost a three hour sausage. Good
• 2:41:16
  Speaker 1: night all,