Latest / The PhilStockWorld Investing Podcast / The "Two Worlds" Stock Market Report

Transcript

The "Two Worlds" Stock Market Report · The PhilStockWorld Investing Podcast

• 0:00
  Penny: Right now, as we speak, there are, about 900 massive cargo ships completely paralyzed. I mean, they're just sitting in what has essentially become the world's most heavily armed parking lot over in The Middle East.
• 0:12
  Roy: Yeah. It's a total logistical nightmare.
• 0:14
  Penny: Exactly. And meanwhile, over in Europe, commercial airlines are quietly calculating that they are literally weeks away, like, just weeks from running out of jet fuel.
• 0:24
  Roy: Which is wild to even think about.
• 0:25
  Penny: Right. And here in The United States, the American consumer is registering levels of economic depression that actually eclipse, you know, the darkest days of the two thousand eight financial crisis.
• 0:37
  Roy: The sentiment is just entirely broken.
• 0:39
  Penny: It really is. But here's the crazy part. If you pull up your brokerage account today, on this Friday, 04/24/2026, the S and P five hundred just closed at a fresh all time record high of 7,165.
• 0:52
  Roy: It's completely disconnected from reality.
• 0:54
  Penny: Right. It's like the numbers on the screen are throwing this massive champagne soaked party while the physical reality outside the window is, well, quite literally grinding to a halt. Welcome to the deep dive.
• 1:05
  Roy: Thanks. Yeah. Yeah. It is the ultimate cognitive dissonance right now. And if you are an everyday retail investor trying to navigate this, you are experiencing a profound psychological whiplash.
• 1:19
  Penny: No. Absolutely. It's gotta be confusing for folks.
• 1:22
  Roy: Right. Because you look at your 401K, you see the balance going up, and you feel like you should be thrilled but then you go to the grocery store you fill up your gas tank you read the geopolitical headlines.
• 1:31
  Penny: And your gut just tells you something is wrong.
• 1:33
  Roy: Exactly. Your intuition screams that the math simply does not add up. The foundation feels entirely disconnected from the penthouse, you know.
• 1:41
  Penny: Yeah. And that disconnect is our exact mission today. We're pulling together a massive stack of intelligence to solve this mystery for you.
• 1:49
  Roy: We've got a lot of ground to cover.
• 1:51
  Penny: We really do. We are tearing into the PhilStockWorld morning wrap up report, pulling the most vital intelligence straight from their live trading room chatter, and weaving in the end of day dossier from the AGI Roundtable Consulting Group.
• 2:05
  Roy: Those sources really paint a complete picture of what happened today.
• 2:08
  Penny: They do. Our goal is to map the architecture of this specific day in the market to explain the hidden mechanisms driving this rally and most importantly to show you how to protect your portfolio when the vibes and the hard economic data are engaged in a violent high stakes collision.
• 2:28
  Roy: To really understand the sheer scale of the contradiction we are dealing with here we have to begin at the bedrock of the American economy.
• 2:36
  Penny: Right, before we even touch the tech stocks.
• 2:38
  Roy: Exactly. Before we talk about artificial intelligence or semiconductor rallies or corporate earnings, we have to examine the engine that powers 70% of The US gross domestic product.
• 2:49
  Penny: The consumer.
• 2:50
  Roy: We have to look at the psychological and financial state of everyday people. Because if that engine is seizing up, it completely changes how we have to interpret all this action on Wall Street.
• 3:00
  Penny: So I am looking at the numbers from the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index that just dropped, and it paints a pretty terrifying picture of that consumer engine.
• 3:09
  Roy: It really does.
• 3:10
  Penny: I mean, the stock market is sitting at absolute all time highs, but the consumer sentiment index just printed at 49.8. And I wanna pause on that number because it is difficult to overstate how catastrophic a 49.8 really is.
• 3:24
  Roy: It is a staggering data point. Just to provide some historical context for you, a reading of 49.8 is significantly worse than the absolute bottom of the Great Recession in 2008 and 2009.
• 3:36
  Penny: Wow, when the whole global banking system was collapsing.
• 3:39
  Roy: Right, it's even worse than the initial terrifying panic of the Covid lockdown in early twenty twenty when the entire economy was just artificially shut down overnight.
• 3:48
  Penny: That's incredible.
• 3:49
  Roy: Yeah, it is hovering just a microscopic hair above the all time record low of 47.6 that we saw just a few weeks ago in early April. The American consumer is functionally waving a white flag right now.
• 4:00
  Penny: You're probably sitting in your car or at your desk right now feeling this exact squeeze. And the underlying data in the PhilStockWorld report explains the exact mechanism of why everyone feels so hollowed out.
• 4:11
  Roy: Yeah. The researchers point to a very specific catalyst for this.
• 4:14
  Penny: Right. The start of the current Iran conflict. Energy prices have absolutely squeezed household budgets dry. We are seeing gasoline sitting at $3 and almost 43¢ a gallon on average across The US heading into this weekend.
• 4:27
  Roy: And because of that immediate highly visible pain at the pump, consumers' one year inflation expectations just violently spiked. They went from 3.8% to 4.8% in a single month.
• 4:40
  Penny: A full percentage point jump in one month?
• 4:43
  Roy: Yes. That is the most aggressive one month jump in inflation expectations since April 2025. And it signifies a profound shift in consumer psychology.
• 4:52
  Penny: How so? What happens when expectations shift like that?
• 4:56
  Roy: Well, when inflation expectations become unanchored, meaning consumers fundamentally believe that prices are going to just keep rising rather than stabilize, it completely alters their behavior.
• 5:04
  Penny: Like they stop buying stuff.
• 5:06
  Roy: Exactly. They stop buying durable goods. They delay purchasing vehicles or appliances. They hoard cash. Or worse, they rely heavily on credit cards just to cover basic necessities.
• 5:16
  Penny: So the consumer is terrified. Their personal balance sheets are deteriorating and they are actively pulling back on discretionary spending.
• 5:24
  Roy: Precisely. And this brings us to a fascinating analysis from the AGI roundtable sources. They utilize a specialized Market Psychologist entity named Anja.
• 5:36
  Penny: Oh right! I love reading Anja's reports!
• 5:38
  Roy: Yeah, her entire analytical framework is built around behavioral economics. She strips away the corporate balance sheets and focuses purely on human fear, greed, and sentiment.
• 5:50
  Penny: So what's her take on this whole situation?
• 5:52
  Roy: Anya points out that Wall Street is currently ignoring what she defines as the people problem, trapped inside the business problem.
• 5:58
  Penny: The people problem. That's a great way to phrase it.
• 6:00
  Roy: Yeah. Her core thesis revolves around this concept of psychological arbitrage. Now normally, an arbitrage is a financial mechanism where you exploit the price difference of an asset in two different markets.
• 6:10
  Penny: Like buying cheap on one exchange and selling high on another.
• 6:14
  Roy: Exactly. But Anja is talking about the massive gap between narrative perception and ground level reality.
• 6:20
  Penny: So the perception is what we see on TV and in the stock market.
• 6:23
  Roy: Right. The perception, relentlessly driven by financial media in the soaring stock market, is that the Federal Reserve has engineered a flawless soft landing.
• 6:33
  Penny: That inflation is totally contained, and the rising tide of this tech boom will eventually lift all boats.
• 6:39
  Roy: But the reality, which is violently screaming at us through that 49.8 sentiment score, is that everyday people are breaking under the weight of stagflation. They are experiencing a very localized personal recession.
• 6:53
  Penny: It feels like the stock market is riding in this luxury blimp. Right? Sipping champagne while looking down at a city below where the power has just been completely cut off.
• 7:02
  Roy: That's a very accurate analogy.
• 7:03
  Penny: But at what point does the blimp run out of helium? I mean, if the consumer is this tapped out, broke, depressed, and if consumer spending drives the economy, how on earth does the S and P 500 continue to hit 7165?
• 7:17
  Roy: Who's actually buying these stocks at these valuations?
• 7:19
  Penny: Exactly. Who is throwing money into the market right now?
• 7:22
  Roy: It is the most important question in the market right now. According to the strategic analysis from Agar Capital and the real time observations in the PhilStockWorld chat room, we are witnessing the broader market functioning as a highly reactive narrative driven casino.
• 7:38
  Penny: A casino, that sounds about right.
• 7:40
  Roy: To explain the mechanism here, the reports reference Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel Laureate who pioneered behavioral economics. He established a framework of System one versus System two thinking.
• 7:51
  Penny: Oh right, the fast brain versus the slow brain.
• 7:53
  Roy: Precisely. System one, the fast brain is emotional, intuitive, instantaneous and completely desperate for comforting simplistic narratives.
• 8:02
  Penny: So it's not looking at the deep data?
• 8:04
  Roy: Not at all. When FastBrain sees a headline flash across a Bloomberg terminal suggesting that an Iranian foreign minister might be traveling to Pakistan for unconfirmed peace talks, it does not analyze the geopolitical complexity.
• 8:17
  Penny: It just instantly buys the dip.
• 8:18
  Roy: Exactly. It automatically assumes the crisis will evaporate tomorrow, that the Federal Reserve will invariably step in with interest rate cuts to save the day, and that the tech boom will continue without a single interruption.
• 8:29
  Penny: So it is essentially a market high on its own adrenaline, completely ignoring the slow brain reality of structurally blocked shipping lanes, soaring energy premiums, and entrenched inflation.
• 8:40
  Roy: That's the psychological arbitrage right there.
• 8:42
  Penny: But if Main Street wallets are empty, the cash keeping this luxury blimp afloat has to be coming from somewhere. Right?
• 8:48
  Roy: It does. It has to.
• 8:49
  Penny: And that brings us to the actual mechanical driver of this April 24 market. It isn't the consumer. It is corporate balance sheets.
• 8:57
  Roy: Specifically, the massive, almost incomprehensible physical capital expenditures of big tech.
• 9:04
  Penny: Right. So we are shifting our focus now from the despair of the everyday consumer to the absolute unbridled euphoria of heavy industrial spending. A boom that is frankly cleverly disguised as a software revolution.
• 9:18
  Roy: It really is an industrial boom. The hyperscalers, the Amazons, the Googles, the Microsofts, the Metas are deploying capital velocity we have rarely seen in modern economic history.
• 9:30
  Penny: To understand how this works, we really need to look at the shock wave that hit the market after the bell on Thursday. Intel reported its q one earnings.
• 9:39
  Roy: Right. A legacy semiconductor company that many hotshot tech investors had completely written off as a dinosaur.
• 9:44
  Penny: Totally written off. And the stock absolutely ripped. It was up over 25% in pre market trading. We are talking about tens of billions of dollars in market capitalization just added overnight.
• 9:57
  Roy: It's massive. And when you dig into their eight k filing, the underlying numbers dictate the reaction. Intel posted $13,600,000,000 in total revenue, which beat Wall Street expectations by a massive $1,400,000,000
• 10:11
  Penny: A huge beat. But it wasn't just the top line, right?
• 10:13
  Roy: No. The metric that really set the market on fire was their data center and AI revenue division. That segment pulled in $5,100,000,000 representing a 22% year over year growth rate.
• 10:24
  Penny: But the numbers alone don't fully explain the pivot in sentiment. It was what Intel's CEO, Lip Bu Tan, said on the earnings call that the PhilStockWorld Morning Report flagged as the most critical intelligence of the week.
• 10:38
  Roy: Oh, that quote is essential.
• 10:40
  Penny: Yeah. I'm gonna quote this because the report insists every AI investor needs to memorize it. He said, the next wave of AI will bring intelligence closer to the end user, moving from foundational models to inference to agentic. This shift is significantly increasing the need for Intel CPUs and wafer and advanced packaging offerings.
• 10:59
  Roy: We really need to dissect the actual engineering logic of that statement. Yeah. Because it serves as a sort of Rosetta Stone for understanding where the market is going next.
• 11:08
  Penny: Break it down for us.
• 11:09
  Roy: Okay, so up until this point, the entire artificial intelligence boom has been driven by GPU's graphics processing units. Yeah. And that's a market completely dominated by NVIDIA.
• 11:17
  Penny: Right. Everyone knows NVIDIA right now.
• 11:19
  Roy: Yeah, GPUs are incredibly powerful, power hungry chips used for the training phase of AI. They process massive lakes of data to build foundational models like JATGPT.
• 11:29
  Penny: But training a model is just the first step, right? Once the AI is trained, it has to do work out in the real world.
• 11:35
  Roy: Exactly. And that phase is called inference. When you ask your phone to summarize an email or when an enterprise server analyzes a local database, that is inference.
• 11:45
  Penny: And what Intel's CEO is proving is that as evolves from just generating text to becoming agentic, meaning AI agents that autonomously take actions on your behalf like managing your schedule or executing trades, the architecture requirements change.
• 12:00
  Roy: Exactly. You do not need a massive power intensive NVIDIA GPU cluster to run localized inference tasks on a laptop or a closed enterprise network.
• 12:10
  Penny: You need something more efficient.
• 12:11
  Roy: Right. You need incredibly efficient, specialized CPU central processing units. You need advanced wafer packaging that stacks memory and processing power together in tiny efficient footprints.
• 12:22
  Penny: So the overarching narrative that NVIDIA just takes the entire pie forever is mechanically flawed.
• 12:27
  Roy: It is. The edge computing wave demands CPUs and Intel is demonstrating that the demand is arriving right now.
• 12:33
  Penny: And this isn't just an isolated Intel phenomenon either. Texas Instruments, which operates as sort of the ultimate canary in the coal mine for the physical industrial economy, also reported a massive beat.
• 12:45
  Roy: They did. Their numbers were huge.
• 12:46
  Penny: Yeah. Their analog revenue was up 22%. Their embedded processing operating profit exploded by 205%. This tells us definitively that the physical build out of the AI infrastructure is not a theoretical projection.
• 13:00
  Roy: Is a heavy industry reality happening right now.
• 13:03
  Penny: Exactly. And the receipts are undeniable. The sources highlight data from a March 2026 Bloomberg NEF snapshot.
• 13:11
  Roy: And this data is just staggering when you look at it.
• 13:14
  Penny: It really is. If you aggregate the projected capital expenditures of the 14 largest publicly traded data center operators, they are on pace to spend $750,000,000,000 in 2026 alone.
• 13:25
  Roy: $750,000,000,000.
• 13:27
  Penny: And furthermore, they currently have 23 gigawatts of IT capacity actively under construction. Let's contextualize 23 gigawatts for a second.
• 13:35
  Roy: It's hard to even picture that much power.
• 13:36
  Penny: Right. It is roughly the entire electrical consumption of the entire country of Poland added in a single year, solely dedicated to powering data centers.
• 13:45
  Roy: Just massive.
• 13:46
  Penny: You cannot use financial engineering to fake a gigawatt. You cannot use accounting tricks to pour millions of tons of concrete or to build industrial cooling towers or to lay thousands of miles of high voltage copper wire.
• 14:00
  Roy: It all physical.
• 14:01
  Penny: Yeah. The power plants and the grid infrastructure either exist in the physical world or they do not. This is not a software bubble reminiscent of the .com era where companies were valued on eyeballs and lines of code. This is a heavy industry boom of unprecedented global scale.
• 14:17
  Roy: However, this brings us to a massive structural vulnerability in the market architecture right now.
• 14:23
  Penny: Uh-oh. What's the catch?
• 14:24
  Roy: Well, PhilStockWorld report refers to this phenomenon using a rather colorful but incredibly precise financial metaphor. We need to examine the mechanics of what they are calling the circle jerk economy of AI.
• 14:37
  Penny: Wow, okay. Or, you know, the company town economy, if we want to keep it a bit more polite.
• 14:42
  Roy: Yeah, the company town's a great way to think about it. Think of an old mining town, where the company owns the mine, but they also own the grocery store and the housing.
• 14:49
  Penny: Right. They pay the miners in company scrip and the miners give that scrip right back to the company to buy food.
• 14:56
  Roy: Exactly. The money is just spinning in a closed loop, but no external wealth is actually being generated from outside the town. Let us trace the actual capital flow on the balance sheets today to see how this works.
• 15:07
  Penny: Walk us through
• 15:07
  Roy: it. So the hyperscalers, Microsoft, Amazon, Google are collectively deploying this $750,000,000,000 to build the physical data centers. They are paying real cash to Intel for CPUs, to Nvidia for GPUs, to utility companies for power, and to construction firms for concrete.
• 15:27
  Penny: Okay. So the infrastructure side of the equation is immensely profitable right now.
• 15:31
  Roy: It is. But we have to ask why they are building it. They're building it to provide the cloud computing power required by the AI application layer. The startups and pure play software vendors like OpenAI or Anthropic.
• 15:42
  Penny: But here's where the math becomes terrifying for a retail investor holding these tech giants. Those AI software vendors, the companies actually selling the AI applications to the end user, are only generating roughly $35,000,000,000 in combined global revenue.
• 15:58
  Roy: Let that ratio sink in for a minute. You have a market deploying seven fifty billion dollars of physical infrastructure to support an industry generating $35,000,000,000 in revenue. Mechanically, that means for every single dollar of AI software revenue generated, the tech ecosystem is spending roughly 19 to $20 in capital expenditures.
• 16:21
  Penny: It is the ultimate company tail loop. The hyperscalers are essentially funding the AI startups through massive investments. The startups take that investment money and immediately use it to buy cloud computing time back from the hyperscalers.
• 16:34
  Roy: Exactly. Just goes right back to them.
• 16:35
  Penny: The hyperscalers book that cloud revenue, which they then use to justify buying even more chips from NVIDIA and Intel. The wheel spins faster and faster, generating massive top line numbers. But the actual return on investment, the real world profitability from enterprise customers adopting this AI to improve their businesses, is lagging massively behind the spend.
• 16:58
  Roy: And remember, these physical servers have depreciation schedules. You cannot just buy an AI server rack and assume it holds its value for a decade. The technology becomes obsolete incredibly quickly.
• 17:10
  Penny: Right, next year's chips are always faster.
• 17:12
  Roy: Exactly. So eventually, the massive depreciation costs of that $750,000,000,000 build out will start hitting the hyperscalers income statements.
• 17:21
  Penny: And if the AI software revenue does not scale exponentially to cover those depreciation costs.
• 17:27
  Roy: Then the profit margins of the biggest companies in the S and P 500 will face a violent contraction.
• 17:33
  Penny: And we are already seeing the market wake up to this exact discrepancy. Look at the software company ServiceNow.
• 17:38
  Roy: ServiceNow is the perfect canary in the coal mine for this.
• 17:40
  Penny: They are heavily integrated into enterprise workflows, and they reported earnings this week. By every traditional metric, it was a flawless print. They beat revenue expectations. They posted 22% year over year growth. They raised their forward guidance, and they boasted a 97% renewal rate.
• 17:58
  Roy: On paper, a perfect quarter. Yeah. And yet the stock immediately plummeted to 15%. It was brutally punished by institutional investors.
• 18:06
  Penny: Why? I mean 22% growth is great.
• 18:09
  Roy: Because ServiceNow has served as the poster child for the narrative that integrating AI as a feature will automatically drive massive software consumption. But investors are no longer satisfied with narratives.
• 18:22
  Penny: They want to see the money.
• 18:23
  Roy: Exactly. They are starting to ask the hard, mechanical questions about profitability. They don't want to just see how much money a company is spending on AI computing power. They want to see the tangible, mathematical return on investment.
• 18:36
  Penny: So if a premier company like ServiceNow cannot sustain its stock price after a beat and raise quarter, what is going to happen next week when Microsoft, Google, and Meta have to justify their astronomical capital expenditure budgets to the street?
• 18:48
  Roy: It is a classic gold rush dynamic playing out in real time. The company's manufacturing the picks and shovels, Intel, Texas Instruments, the energy infrastructure firms, they are generating massive tangible cash flows right now.
• 19:02
  Penny: But the prospectors?
• 19:03
  Roy: The prospectors, the software companies searching for the transformative AI application, are burning through capital at an alarming rate and many will likely go broke. Both realities are coexisting right now.
• 19:16
  Penny: But even the companies building the picks and shovels face a massive bottleneck of their own. As we established, you need the equivalent of Poland's entire power grid to run these data centers.
• 19:25
  Roy: My power is a huge issue.
• 19:27
  Penny: You need concrete, copper, and highly optimized frictionless global supply chains to deliver the hardware. And this is where the digital illusion of the stock market crashes head first into the physical geopolitical reality of planet Earth.
• 19:40
  Roy: Yeah. We have to talk about the geopolitics here.
• 19:42
  Penny: Let's examine the war clock ticking in the background of this market.
• 19:44
  Roy: The situation developing in Washington represents a profound constitutional and market crisis that the algorithmic traders are frankly actively ignoring.
• 19:55
  Penny: Just pretending it doesn't exist.
• 19:56
  Roy: Basically, yeah. Based on the sources we are exactly one week away from the May 1 War Powers deadline. To understand the mechanism here we must briefly look at the War Powers Resolution.
• 20:08
  Penny: Okay give us a quick refresher.
• 20:09
  Roy: It dictates that the President of The United States has a sixty day window to deploy military forces without securing a formal declaration of war from congress.
• 20:19
  Penny: Up until this point, the political leadership has allowed the president to utilize the sixty day window with broad discretion, but the clock is running out.
• 20:26
  Roy: Right. After day 60, this transitions from a period of political posturing to a strict statutory deadline. Congress has actually voted five separate times attempting to navigate this.
• 20:39
  Penny: And the margins of those votes expose the extreme fragility of the political consensus right now. The Senate recently defeated a resolution that would have stopped the president's military deployment, but it was a close 46 to 51 vote.
• 20:51
  Roy: Very close.
• 20:52
  Penny: But in the House of Representatives, a similar measure was defeated by the narrowest, most razor thin margin mathematically possible, two thirteen to two fourteen.
• 21:01
  Roy: A single House member flipping their vote would have altered the trajectory of U. S. Military involvement. Now, the President does possess a statutory escape hatch here. He can formally certify in writing that there exists an unavoidable military necessity which requires a thirty day extension of the deployment and the intelligence from the sources assumes he will pull this lever.
• 21:25
  Penny: But the market implications of that extension are severe.
• 21:28
  Roy: Huge. Because that thirty day extension translates directly into the physical world. It means five additional weeks of the Strait Of Hormuz remaining completely blockaded.
• 21:38
  Penny: I want to focus on the geography and logistics of the Strait Of Hormuz for a moment because this is the vascular system of the global energy market.
• 21:44
  Roy: It really is.
• 21:45
  Penny: It is a narrow choke point between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf Of Oman. Right now, it is essentially closed for business. There are 900 commercial ships just anchored, idling in the water, unable to secure the war risk insurance premiums required to transit safely.
• 22:00
  Roy: And that means over 100,000,000 barrels of crude oil are physically trapped, unable to reach the global market.
• 22:07
  Penny: The immediate impact on pricing is stark. WTI crude oil, The US benchmark, is heavily fluctuating between $95 and $98 a barrel. Brent crude, the global benchmark, is pushing up toward $105
• 22:20
  Roy: But the secondary logistical effects are where the true systemic risk lies.
• 22:25
  Penny: Like the European aviation issue we mentioned earlier, according to energy analytics firm Reistad, European jet fuel inventories are burning down to critical minimums.
• 22:34
  Roy: They project the actual window where major European hubs begin running out of jet fuel is between April 30 and May 12.
• 22:41
  Penny: We are talking about planes literally being unable to fuel up in Europe or Asia to make the transatlantic flight back to The United States.
• 22:49
  Roy: Which creates a fascinating delayed reaction in The US market. Because foreign planes aren't making the trip, they aren't landing at JFK or O'Hare demanding fuel for the return flight.
• 22:58
  Penny: Ah, so our supplies look fine locally.
• 23:01
  Roy: Right, so domestic US jet fuel inventories actually look artificially stable for the moment, but the broader demand destruction across the logistics sector is inevitable.
• 23:10
  Penny: I am looking at this AGAR Capital report, and the market behavior seems deeply contradictory. The S and P 500 is rallying because a headline flashes that an Iranian minister might be going to Pakistan for peace talks.
• 23:24
  Roy: Yeah. That happened today.
• 23:25
  Penny: The algorithms instantly dump oil futures, the price of oil drops a buck, and the stock market spikes. It seems like the Wall Street trading algorithms are playing a fast paced video game based on text sentiment, while the actual physical buyers of oil are fighting a grueling real world war.
• 23:41
  Roy: It's completely split.
• 23:43
  Penny: Who is actually pricing this market?
• 23:45
  Roy: That is a brilliant distinction and it's exactly what Hunter, the systems thinking AGI from the Roundtable, breaks down in his analysis. He explains the vital mechanical divergence between the financial oil market and the physical oil market.
• 23:58
  Penny: Walk us through the mechanics of that divergence. How can the price of a barrel of oil be two different things at once?
• 24:03
  Roy: It comes down to what is actually being traded. The financial oil market is entirely composed of paper contracts futures and options traded electronically on exchanges. This market is dominated by algorithmic, high frequency traders and hedge funds. Their algorithms scan newswires for keywords. When peace talks flashes on the screen, the algorithms automatically execute massive sell orders on oil futures in milliseconds.
• 24:29
  Penny: Just reacting to text.
• 24:31
  Roy: Exactly. They are seeking quick fractional arbitrage based purely on sentiment. They have absolutely no intention of ever taking physical delivery of a barrel of oil.
• 24:40
  Penny: But the physical market operators, the refineries, the shipping companies, the national reserves, they cannot power an economy with a paper contract.
• 24:49
  Roy: Precisely. The physical market mechanism is based on actual tangible barrels of crude. It factors in the massive daily demurrage costs of supertankers sitting idle. It factors in skyrocketing maritime insurance rates.
• 25:02
  Penny: So they can't afford to trade on rumors?
• 25:04
  Roy: No. While the Wall Street algorithms are dumping paper contracts on a rumor of peace, the physical buyers are looking at their depleting storage tanks realizing they have to secure actual energy to keep the lights on next week.
• 25:16
  Penny: So they are quietly paying massive off exchange premiums to secure physical delivery.
• 25:21
  Roy: Exactly. The physical market is incapable of trading on hope. It strictly trades on supply and logistics and right now the supply is trapped.
• 25:30
  Penny: AGAR Capital models out the probabilities of how this resolves and we need to pay close attention to their scenario B.
• 25:37
  Roy: Right, which they assign a 50% probability making it the most likely outcome.
• 25:41
  Penny: So what is scenario B?
• 25:42
  Roy: Scenario B envisions a prolonged dislocation. The blockade of the strait remains entrenched well into the third quarter of the year. The price of Brent Crude sustains levels above $100 a barrel.
• 25:55
  Penny: And when energy costs remain elevated for that long, the inflation seeps into every sector of the economy. Manufacturing, food delivery, raw materials.
• 26:04
  Roy: It all gets more expensive.
• 26:05
  Penny: Inflation becomes sticky and entrenched at a four to 5% annualized rate.
• 26:09
  Roy: And if inflation is stuck at 5%, the Federal Reserve is completely paralyzed. They cannot justify cutting interest rates to stimulate the economy. If anything, the mechanical mandate of the Fed would require them to hike rates further to destroy demand.
• 26:23
  Penny: And that is the mechanism that breaks the market narrative. If the Fed is paralyzed, Angar Capital projects the S and P 500 will face a severe, rapid drawdown of five to 8%.
• 26:35
  Roy: A very sharp drop.
• 26:35
  Penny: The massive capital currently concentrated in high multiple tech stocks will violently rotate out into energy, commodities, and defensive sectors. Right now, the stock market is aggressively pricing in scenario a, a miraculous immediate reopening of the shipping lanes and a swift return to normal.
• 26:53
  Roy: But the physical buyers in the oil market are screaming that scenario b is the undeniable reality.
• 26:59
  Penny: And while all this high stakes economic tension plays out, the political chess game is quietly moving pieces right under the market's nose. The sources flagged a major regulatory development. The Department of Justice just officially dropped its criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
• 27:14
  Roy: The timing of that decision is critical to understand. By dropping the probe right now, the administration removes a massive political and legal distraction.
• 27:22
  Penny: So what's the end game there?
• 27:23
  Roy: The strategic objective, according to the sources, is to clear the legislative runway to eventually confirm Kevin Walsh as the next chair of the Federal Reserve. It serves as a stark reminder that behind the sterile algorithms and the technical chart patterns, human political power and regulatory maneuvering are actively shaving the boundaries of the financial system.
• 27:44
  Penny: So let's connect these dots. If companies are actively deploying $750,000,000,000 into physical servers and concrete, and the Federal Reserve might be forced to keep borrowing costs high due to entrenched energy inflation, The cash to fund this AI boom has to come from somewhere.
• 28:00
  Roy: Right. Money isn't free anymore.
• 28:02
  Penny: Are these mega cap tech companies essentially funding their massive server build outs by cannibalizing their own human perils?
• 28:09
  Roy: That is exactly the mechanism playing out in the labor market right now. We are transitioning into a phase the sources explicitly label the great AI displacement or the white collar recession, and the corporate actions we are seeing this week provide undeniable proof.
• 28:22
  Penny: We have major, highly profitable corporations making aggressive cuts. Meta is systematically slashing 10% of its workforce.
• 28:30
  Roy: 10%. That's huge for a company making that much money.
• 28:33
  Penny: Microsoft just rolled out its first ever voluntary employee buyout program. Nike is cutting 1,400 jobs. These aren't companies failing to generate revenue. These are companies actively restructuring their capital allocation.
• 28:47
  Roy: Anya, the market psychologist AGI, isolates the brutal economic logic at play here. These corporations are actively terminating human employees to liberate cash flow.
• 28:58
  Penny: And where is that liberated cash flow being redirected? Directly into their massive AI capital expenditure budgets?
• 29:04
  Roy: Exactly. They are literally firing the human workforce in order to finance the servers that will power the AI designed to replace that very workforce.
• 29:12
  Penny: That is a staggering shift in how human capital is valued. And it isn't just a few isolated headlines, the macroeconomic data strongly supports this displacement.
• 29:21
  Roy: The data is incredibly clear on this.
• 29:23
  Penny: The sources analyze counterfactual employment data, specifically focusing on knowledge workers, the people employed in finance, insurance, information technology, and professional services. Historically, over the past decade, these jobs sectors grew at a highly reliable steady rate of 1.9% annually.
• 29:41
  Roy: If you project that historical 1.9% friend line forward to the present day and you compare it to the actual reported employment numbers, you discover a massive gap.
• 29:52
  Penny: How big is the gap?
• 29:53
  Roy: The knowledge worker sector is currently off trend by a full 8%. Mathematically, that equates to roughly 3,000,000 missing jobs.
• 30:01
  Penny: 3,000,000 jobs.
• 30:02
  Roy: Yeah. These are positions that based on historical economic growth models should exist today but they simply do not.
• 30:09
  Penny: Because artificial intelligence is already executing those tasks or perhaps more accurately corporate executives firmly believe that AI will be capable of executing those tasks in the near future so they have preemptively instituted hiring freezes.
• 30:22
  Roy: The cultural era of telling everyone to learn to code as a guaranteed pass to the middle class is officially dead.
• 30:29
  Penny: Rowan, the narrative focused AGI from the roundtable analyzed the latest projections from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the findings confirm this paradigm shift.
• 30:38
  Roy: Yeah, the specific roles facing the most severe contraction over the next decade are computer programmers, database administrators, and advertising managers.
• 30:48
  Penny: The very professions we encouraged an entire generation of college students to pursue are being systematically automated by algorithmic co pilots.
• 30:57
  Roy: So if coding and middle management knowledge work are facing structural decline, where is the economic growth? Who is actually benefiting from this massive reallocation of capital?
• 31:07
  Penny: We are witnessing a profound demographic and economic reversal. The accelerating earnings growth is highly concentrated at two distinct extremes: the physical infrastructure builders and the high level human risk verifiers.
• 31:20
  Roy: Let's talk about the infrastructure side first. I look at the physical requirements of this data center boom and the answer is obvious. Electricians.
• 31:27
  Penny: Exactly. You cannot command an AI to wire a high voltage transformer.
• 31:31
  Roy: No. You can't.
• 31:32
  Penny: You require thousands of highly skilled certified electricians to build out those 23 gigawatts of data center power grids. You need heavy equipment operators and construction crews to pour the specialized concrete and install the liquid cooling systems.
• 31:48
  Roy: And on the complete opposite end of the spectrum, you need the people who verify the machines.
• 31:53
  Penny: Right. Actuaries, compliance auditors, and high level risk assessors.
• 31:58
  Roy: Right. Because an actuary uses mathematics and statistics to assess financial risk, typically in insurance or pension fields. When an AI model generates a massive, complex, probabilistic outcome for a corporate strategy, a human executive cannot simply trust the black box.
• 32:15
  Penny: They need a human to sign off on it.
• 32:16
  Roy: Exactly. They require an actuary to manually audit the machine's math and take legal responsibility for the risk calculation.
• 32:24
  Penny: It is a profound historical irony. The fundamental promise of technology, going back to the industrial revolution, was that machines would free humanity from physical back breaking labor allowing us to elevate into higher level cognitive work.
• 32:37
  Roy: But that's not what's happening.
• 32:38
  Penny: Not at all. Instead, artificial intelligence is aggressively displacing the white collar knowledge workers sitting in comfortable air conditioned offices while simultaneously making blue collar physical labor more economically valuable than it has been in a century.
• 32:53
  Roy: The economic future increasingly belongs to those who manipulate the physical environment and those who possess the specialized expertise to verify the algorithmic outputs.
• 33:02
  Penny: While the vast middle layer of the workforce the individuals writing basic software code, generating standard marketing copy, or processing routine administrative data is being inexorably squeezed out of the system.
• 33:15
  Roy: So we have established that the consumer is squeezed, knowledge worker jobs are vanishing, and public markets are hyper concentrated in a handful of mega cap tech companies building data centers.
• 33:26
  Penny: But there are trillions of dollars in the global financial system. Where is the rest of the capital flowing? What is happening in the shadows of the market that the algorithmic tourists are completely missing?
• 33:35
  Roy: To understand the flow of capital outside the traditional indices, we really have to examine the tightening regulatory environment. Federal agencies are expanding their jurisdiction over alternative markets.
• 33:46
  Penny: Yeah, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission just executed a landmark enforcement action utilizing a statute commonly referred to as the Eddie Murphy Rule.
• 33:57
  Roy: Wait, I have to ask, is that a direct reference to the 1983 movie Trading Places? Were they steal the crop report on frozen concentrated orange juice?
• 34:07
  Penny: It is exactly that premise codified into federal law. Following the financial crisis, regulators implemented rules specifically designed to crack down on the misappropriation of confidential government information for trading purposes.
• 34:19
  Roy: And the CFTC just utilized this rule for the very first time to federally charge a US army soldier. Wow. According to the filings, this soldier allegedly leveraged classified military intelligence regarding the precise timing of the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro to execute trades on Polymarket.
• 34:36
  Penny: Polymarket being the decentralized crypto based prediction market where users bet on real world events.
• 34:42
  Roy: Right.
• 34:42
  Penny: He allegedly used classified intelligence to front run the geopolitical outcome and made $400,000 in the process. This tells us that the eye of Soron, as the sources describe the federal regulatory apparatus, is now officially locked onto geopolitical betting markets.
• 34:59
  Roy: They're monitoring these decentralized platforms with the same intensity they applied to the New York Stock Exchange.
• 35:05
  Penny: And while retail traders are facing federal charges for exploiting prediction markets, massive institutional capital is quietly, methodically fleeing the transparency of the public markets altogether.
• 35:17
  Roy: Sinan, one of the AGI specialists analyzing capital flows, points out that the true 'Apex deal logic' the massive market moving transactions is occurring entirely in the shadows of private credit.
• 35:29
  Penny: The sources highlight PIMCO as a prime example of this. The massive bond giant is quietly executing what amount to wartime financial deals, privately lending a staggering $10,000,000,000 to entities in the Gulf Region.
• 35:41
  Roy: Furthermore, JPMorgan is aggressively pushing vast amounts of its institutional capital into private credit vehicles and direct commercial banking loans.
• 35:48
  Penny: Getting away from the public eye.
• 35:50
  Roy: Exactly. These transactions are opaque, heavily collateralized, and entirely shielded from the minute by minute volatility of public stock exchanges.
• 35:59
  Penny: Simultaneously, you have Citadel hedge funds, actively reconsidering a massive real estate expansion in Midtown Manhattan.
• 36:08
  Roy: And their hesitation isn't about interest rates. Right?
• 36:10
  Penny: No. It's driven by the viral proliferation of tax the rich sentiment videos and the shifting political wins regarding wealth confestation.
• 36:18
  Roy: So the institutional smart money is anchoring itself in shadow banking and private credit, isolating its exposure to both geopolitical shocks and populist political risk.
• 36:27
  Penny: But if the institutional money is hiding in the shadows, what is the retail money doing? Because it looks like it is fracturing into completely bizarre speculative manias.
• 36:37
  Roy: It really is. When the traditional sixtyforty portfolio model of stocks and bonds feels structurally broken and entrenched inflation is actively eroding the purchasing power of savings, retail capital behaves erratically.
• 36:49
  Penny: People just get desperate for yield.
• 36:51
  Roy: Right. Investors become desperate and begin chasing extreme variants. Look at the data from the Iscan bull equity markets, A relatively obscure Turkish brokerage firm named Terra went public in December 2022. Since its initial public offering, the stock price has exploded by an incomprehensible 40000%.
• 37:11
  Penny: 40000%. That completely defies any fundamental valuation metric.
• 37:15
  Roy: It is not driven by fundamentals. It is driven by a highly unusual, localized algorithmic trading strategy that triggered a historic structural short squeeze. And this desperate search for alternative returns is not confined to emerging markets either. If you look at mainstream financial media this week, they're explicitly running headlines urging everyday retail investors to allocate their capital into rare Kentucky bourbon as an inflation hedge.
• 37:39
  Penny: Bourbon. When you have US military personnel executing insider trading on crypto prediction markets, obscure Turkish brokerages experiencing 40000% short squeezes, and financial advisers suggesting people hedge against the Federal Reserve by hoarding whiskey, you are witnessing the mechanical breakdown of traditional capital allocation.
• 37:57
  Roy: The systemic trust is just fracturing.
• 38:00
  Penny: And even within the established, seemingly invincible mega cap darlings of The US market, the dominant narratives are beginning to crack under the weight of actual data.
• 38:10
  Roy: Sherlock, the deductive analysis AGI from the roundtable, isolated a fascinating mechanical twist in the pharmaceutical space.
• 38:18
  Penny: Oh, the weight loss drugs.
• 38:20
  Roy: Right. The entire market has priced Eli Lilly's stock for absolute frictionless global dominance based on their GLP-one weight loss drug, Zepbound. Monopoly. But, forever, the hard, empirical data tracking actual pharmacy prescriptions dictates otherwise. Analysts rely on databases like IQVIA, which track the precise volume of prescriptions filled at pharmacies nationwide.
• 38:49
  Penny: And what does that data show?
• 38:51
  Roy: According to that data, the total prescriptions for Lilly Zepbound actually contracted by roughly 2% for the week ending April 17.
• 38:58
  Penny: Meanwhile, Novo Nordisk's rival GLP-one drug Wegovy saw its prescription volume expand by 7% during that exact same week.
• 39:06
  Roy: So the pristine monopoly narrative is a complete myth. The data proves that underneath the soaring stock prices, it is a brutal competitive dogfight for market share.
• 39:16
  Penny: Which brings us to the ultimate practical question for you, the listener. We have systematically mapped out the psychological dread of the consumer, the $750,000,000,000 physical infrastructure boom, the terrifying mathematics of the company town's circular financing, the ticking war clock in the Strait Hormuz, the displacement of the knowledge worker, and the fracturing of capital into shadow markets and, well, bourbon.
• 39:42
  Roy: That's a lot to take in.
• 39:44
  Penny: So how does an everyday retail investor actually build a portfolio to survive this specific environment? How do you, as Phil frequently advises his members, be the house?
• 39:54
  Roy: The overarching architectural playbook recommended by the PhilStockWorld reports and the AGI Roundtable is a rigid adherence to value versus hype.
• 40:02
  Penny: Meaning you can't just buy a broad index fund and hope for the best.
• 40:05
  Roy: Exactly. In a market this severely bifurcated, you cannot simply buy an index fund, close your eyes and expect to generate wealth. You want to own the picks and shovels of the AI boom. The semiconductor companies physically manufacturing the hardware, but they must possess pristine balance sheets, generate massive free cash flow today, and trade at low valuation multiples.
• 40:26
  Penny: You want to invest in the concrete reality of technology, not the conceptual hype of the software. And Warren two point zero, one of the specialized financial AGIs, isolated the optimal target for this specific macroeconomic environment. QUCCOM. C O M.
• 40:43
  Roy: Let us break down the exact mechanics of why Qualcomm fits this model so perfectly. First, we examine the market setup. While the broader semiconductor index driven by companies like Nvidia has gone completely parabolic, Qualcomm's stock is actually down roughly 20% on the year.
• 40:58
  Penny: So it's been left behind.
• 40:59
  Roy: Right. It has been heavily punished by institutional investors over what the roundtable considers entirely overblown short term fears regarding memory chip costs.
• 41:07
  Penny: So unlike the rest of the tech sector, it has not participated in the euphoric multiple expanding run up.
• 41:13
  Roy: Exactly. The mathematical value proposition here is stellar. If you look at Intel, despite their recent earnings beat, they are trading at a highly dangerous 60x forward earnings. Qualcomm, conversely, is trading at an incredibly cheap forward price to earnings ratio of just 12.09. You are buying a premier technology company at a massive discount to the broader market.
• 41:39
  Penny: And the fundamental catalyst is aligning perfectly. They report earnings next week, but more importantly, the underlying technological narrative is shifting directly into their core competency. Remember the crucial Intel quote about the AI wave moving away from massive data centers and toward inference and agentic capabilities directly on the edge device?
• 41:58
  Roy: Yes, the move to CPUs.
• 41:59
  Penny: Right. Qualcomm is the undisputed global leader in edge They design the chips that process AI tasks locally on your smartphone or embedded IoT device.
• 42:10
  Roy: They're perfectly positioned to capture the exact technological shift that Intel just validated.
• 42:14
  Penny: But because of recent market pessimism, they are trading at a fraction of the valuation. That creates a pristine, low risk, high reward entry point for a value investor.
• 42:25
  Roy: But identifying the right undervalued asset is only the first step of portfolio architecture. The true test is what happens when you actually catch a massive life changing winner.
• 42:37
  Penny: Oh, managing the profits.
• 42:38
  Roy: Yes. How do you manage that position without losing your shirt when the inevitable volatility hits? The sources provided an absolute master class on risk management, utilizing a real world, real time example from a member inside the PhilStockWorld chatroom.
• 42:52
  Penny: This specific case study is a crucial lesson in advanced portfolio psychology and options mechanics. The chatroom member known as SK twenty twenty, executed a brilliant initial trade. They accumulated 1,000 shares of Advanced Micro Devices AMD at a cost basis of $93.3 per share.
• 43:09
  Roy: With AMD currently trading near $346 a share, let's just do the on that. This member is sitting on a position worth roughly $346,000.
• 43:18
  Penny: Incredible.
• 43:18
  Roy: It is a massive transformational winner. The position is up over 270%.
• 43:23
  Penny: So the natural human instinct in this scenario driven entirely by Kahneman's fast brain, that gambler's instinct, is to simply let it run. You feel invincible.
• 43:32
  Roy: You feel like you are playing with house money, so you assume the risk is low.
• 43:36
  Penny: But the expert analysis from The Trading Room points out a brutal mechanical truth. When a stock runs that hard, and the position size swells to that magnitude, your risker profile is now substantially higher, not lower.
• 43:51
  Roy: Exactly. I look at that setup and see terrifying concentration risk. Yeah. Your position size now dominates your portfolio.
• 43:57
  Penny: Right.
• 43:57
  Roy: Furthermore, the broader market's expectations for AMD's future earnings are now astronomically high just to justify that $346 price tag. Any slight miss in their next earnings report or any macro pullback in the semiconductor sector will be violently amplified.
• 44:13
  Penny: You are no longer letting it run. You are essentially placing a $346,000 directional bet on what a highly volatile tech stock does over the next month.
• 44:21
  Roy: So how does the house extract those massive profits from the casino table without entirely abandoning the game? Phil outlines a highly structured mechanical options solution.
• 44:30
  Penny: Walk us through it. What's step one?
• 44:32
  Roy: Step one is the hardest psychologically. Sell the pure equity. Liquidate the 1,000 shares of stock.
• 44:41
  Penny: Okay, so you take the $346,000 in cash, you pay your taxes, and you put the rest securely in your pocket. You have secured the victory.
• 44:50
  Roy: Right, but you don't walk away completely.
• 44:52
  Penny: Step two involves re entering the position, using leverage to strictly define your risk. You utilize a small fraction of those secured profits to purchase a deep in the money bull call spread.
• 45:04
  Roy: For example, you buy the right to control the stock's upside between the $203,150 dollar strike prices expiring several months out.
• 45:11
  Penny: Let's explain the mechanics of that spread because it's important. By buying a deep in the money call option, you are acquiring a high delta position.
• 45:18
  Roy: Right. Meaning the options price will move almost dollar for dollar with the underlying stock.
• 45:22
  Penny: Exactly. But it requires significantly less capital than buying 1,000 shares outright. You have mathematically defined your absolute maximum loss if the stock collapses. You have locked in the vast majority of your initial cash profit, but you still participate fully if AMD continues to surge higher.
• 45:40
  Roy: But it is the third step where the PhilStockWorld strategy truly separates itself from basic directional trading. Step three introduces the income generation layer.
• 45:51
  Penny: How does that work?
• 45:52
  Roy: You sell short term, out of the money call options against that long call position to systematically generate premium.
• 46:00
  Penny: This is the fundamental philosophical shift. You are transforming a pure directional gamble, the hope that the stock simply goes up into a synthetic income producing asset.
• 46:13
  Roy: Exactly. When you sell those short term calls, you are immediately collecting cash premium from the market. You are harvesting theta, which is the time decay value of an option.
• 46:22
  Penny: So if AMD's stock price stalls and simply trades sideways for the next month, what happens?
• 46:27
  Roy: The calls you sold expire worthless and you keep that cash premium entirely. If the stock pulls back slightly, you still keep the cash, which mechanically lowers the overall cost basis of your remaining position.
• 46:38
  Penny: You completely decouple your success from needing the stock to constantly go higher. You are literally getting paid to wait.
• 46:44
  Roy: It's a beautiful system.
• 46:45
  Penny: If you run this strategy over three month timeline, you are defining your upside capture, protecting your core capital from a catastrophic drawdown, and generating a steady stream of cash flow every single month regardless of minor market fluctuations.
• 46:59
  Roy: As the roundtable dossier summarized so perfectly, professional investors do not manage massive winners by simply hoping they keep winning. They manage them by structurally transforming them into income producing assets.
• 47:13
  Penny: That psychological and mechanical discipline is how you survive the intense cognitive dissonance of this current market environment. That is how you operate as the house while everyone else is playing at the casino.
• 47:25
  Roy: Which brings us to the conclusion of our deep dive into the architecture of 04/24/2026.
• 47:30
  Penny: Yeah. Let's briefly recap the profound duality we've uncovered today. On one side of the ledger, we have an equity market hitting unprecedented record highs, propelled by a very real, physically verifiable, dollars $750,000,000,000 capital expenditure build out by the largest technology companies on earth.
• 47:46
  Roy: The massive concrete foundations are being poured, the advanced CPUs are shipping, and the electrical grid is being permanently altered.
• 47:54
  Penny: But on the opposing side of the ledger, that exact same market is entirely, willfully ignoring a deeply fragile geopolitical and economic reality.
• 48:03
  Roy: Right. The Strait Of Hormuz remains entirely blockaded, trapping 100,000,000 barrels of oil. European aviation faces an imminent fuel crisis.
• 48:13
  Penny: The traditional white collar workforce is experiencing mass displacement to fund server budgets, and the everyday American consumer is gripped by levels of pessimism not seen since the collapse of the global banking system.
• 48:25
  Roy: We are witnessing a market suspended precariously between the frictionless silicon logic of an AI driven future and the heavy carbon based anxiety of the present day.
• 48:35
  Penny: So we want to leave you with a final thought to mull over as you review your own portfolio and process the headlines this week. We are constantly told that we are racing toward a digital cloud based utopia.
• 48:45
  Roy: We discuss algorithmic agents and software models as if they exist purely in the ether. Yeah. You know, completely disconnected from physical constraints.
• 48:52
  Penny: Yet, to actually reach that digital utopia, our entire system is completely, utterly dependent on the most primal earthbound resources imaginable.
• 49:02
  Roy: We require millions of tons of poured concrete. We require thousands of miles of heavy copper wire.
• 49:10
  Penny: We require the immediate generation of 23 gigawatts of raw baseload electricity. And we require millions of barrels of crude oil safely shipped through contested, highly dangerous, heavily armed maritime chokepoints.
• 49:23
  Roy: The ultimate defining bottleneck for the artificial intelligence revolution is not software code. Yeah. It is not computing algorithms. The ultimate bottleneck is physics.
• 49:32
  Penny: The physical world always invariably bats last.
• 49:35
  Roy: It does.
• 49:35
  Penny: So as you look at your own investments and as you decide where to allocate your hard earned capital, ask yourself the defining question of this market. Are you investing in the limitless solution of the cloud, or are you investing in the heavy, undeniable reality of the ground? Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into the PhilStockWorld Intelligence. Keep challenging the consensus narrative, stay mechanically disciplined in your risk management, and we will see you next time.