Latest / Predictable with Stu Burguiere / Ep 1054 | The Left’s 2028 Democratic Prospects Are Totally IMPOTENT! | Guest: Dan Andros

Transcript

Ep 1054 | The Left’s 2028 Democratic Prospects Are Totally IMPOTENT! | Guest: Dan Andros · Predictable with Stu Burguiere

• 0:01
  Stu does America.
• 0:07
  Subscribe to the program,
• 0:07
  YouTube.com/SuosAmerica.
• 0:09
  Of course,
• 0:09
  we're also available on Blaze TV.
• 0:11
  It's blazetv.com/Stew.
• 0:12
  Promo code is Stew.
• 0:13
  Should know tonight,
• 0:14
  big,
• 0:15
  uh,
• 0:15
  interview with Glenn Beck and Donald Trump going to be airing
• 0:18
  in the Glenn Beck,
• 0:19
  uh,
• 0:19
  TV slot,
• 0:20
  so make sure to check that out.
• 0:21
  But we're gonna start
• 0:22
  tonight
• 0:23
  by doing.
• 0:24
  The left's impotent 2028 field.
• 0:27
  It's never too early to look ahead.
• 0:29
  Who the heck knows what's going to happen,
• 0:31
  uh,
• 0:31
  when in 4 years or three years,
• 0:33
  I guess now,
• 0:33
  in the 2028 election cycle,
• 0:35
  but
• 0:36
  I was fascinated to see that they,
• 0:38
  the left's trying to put together some sort of group of people that
• 0:42
  they will select from for 2028,
• 0:43
  and I will say it's not a promising list.
• 0:45
  It's not looking that good.
• 0:47
  Uh,
• 0:47
  The Hill did this,
• 0:47
  by the way,
• 0:47
  the top 10 Democratic contenders
• 0:49
  for 2028.
• 0:52
  And I,
• 0:52
  I think we should just go through them.
• 0:53
  Is there anyone here you're scared of?
• 0:55
  Anyone here that you think is going to potentially win
• 0:58
  or could actually even win the nomination?
• 0:59
  It's hard to believe.
• 1:01
  Um,
• 1:01
  they have this,
• 1:02
  this is from their contender rankings.
• 1:03
  They,
• 1:04
  they literally have at number 10,
• 1:05
  Stephen A.
• 1:06
  Smith.
• 1:07
  Now Stephen A.
• 1:08
  Smith is.
• 1:09
  He's an ESPN personality who kind of just barely
• 1:12
  sort of confirmed he might think about running,
• 1:15
  and already he's on the list at number 10.
• 1:17
  This is how pathetic this field is.
• 1:19
  This is how thin the bench is
• 1:21
  for the Democratic Party.
• 1:23
  Now I mean you look over at the opponents.
• 1:24
  I know a lot of people are talking about the 3rd term thing for Donald Trump,
• 1:27
  you know,
• 1:27
  it's not my bag,
• 1:28
  but I will say
• 1:29
  JD Vance looks like the clear leader.
• 1:32
  Unless things go particularly poorly
• 1:35
  for the Trump administration.
• 1:36
  You still see people like Ron DeSantiss on the other side,
• 1:38
  a couple of others that could sneak in there.
• 1:40
  But like,
• 1:41
  you know,
• 1:41
  the right has a,
• 1:42
  I,
• 1:42
  I think a,
• 1:43
  a sane,
• 1:44
  sensible
• 1:46
  path forward.
• 1:47
  It's kind of logical where they might go.
• 1:49
  Uh,
• 1:49
  on the other side,
• 1:50
  not so much.
• 1:51
  I mean,
• 1:51
  Stephen A.
• 1:51
  Smith is making the list.
• 1:53
  I mean,
• 1:54
  honestly,
• 1:54
  would you even have known he was a Democrat?
• 1:55
  Uh,
• 1:56
  I mean,
• 1:56
  he surely kind of sounds like that sometimes,
• 1:57
  but I don't think that was even really public information very recently,
• 2:01
  but he's number 10.
• 2:02
  Number 9,
• 2:03
  Rahm Emanuel.
• 2:06
  Like the chief of staff for Barack Obama,
• 2:08
  I know
• 2:10
  the right,
• 2:11
  you know,
• 2:12
  looks at the Obama era a little bit differently than the left.
• 2:14
  They like,
• 2:14
  they,
• 2:14
  the left thought the Obama era was a huge success.
• 2:17
  I would say it was not.
• 2:18
  And I know they want to go back to the Obama era
• 2:20
  because everything they've done since has been an obvious and overt failure,
• 2:23
  but.
• 2:24
  Rahm Emanuel,
• 2:26
  really,
• 2:26
  uh,
• 2:26
  he wound up being mayor of Chicago,
• 2:28
  uh,
• 2:28
  after that,
• 2:29
  but really,
• 2:30
  has anyone talked about him in years?
• 2:31
  It's hard to imagine he would even have a chance.
• 2:34
  Number 8 is Pete Buttigieg.
• 2:37
  Now,
• 2:37
  Mayor Pete was a mayor of a town.
• 2:41
  Uh,
• 2:41
  he was criticized by the Biden campaign for not filling potholes.
• 2:45
  That was his,
• 2:46
  his wonderful run.
• 2:47
  I guess he did better than the typical mayor no one had ever heard of.
• 2:50
  Like,
• 2:51
  usually that happens,
• 2:52
  you get into,
• 2:52
  you get into that race and.
• 2:54
  You know,
• 2:54
  like,
• 2:54
  even like on the right,
• 2:55
  the mayor of Miami ran and people weren't really familiar with him,
• 2:58
  didn't really go anywhere.
• 3:00
  Mayor Pete did kind of rise up,
• 3:01
  get to the high single digits
• 3:03
  when he ran back in the day,
• 3:05
  but
• 3:05
  does anyone really think
• 3:07
  that he's a threat?
• 3:08
  Um,
• 3:09
  he was kind of promoted.
• 3:10
  As this big guy,
• 3:11
  and I swear,
• 3:12
  the Biden administration was like,
• 3:13
  you know,
• 3:14
  Pete Buttigieg might be some competition for us.
• 3:17
  Let's bring him into the role that is the worst possible role in government,
• 3:22
  Transportation Secretary,
• 3:23
  which he idiotically accepted,
• 3:26
  and then just watched as trains derailed all
• 3:28
  over the place and poisonous gas was released.
• 3:31
  Uh,
• 3:31
  that was his legacy.
• 3:32
  So I don't know.
• 3:33
  The fact that he's number 8 is a real,
• 3:35
  it's got to be terrifying for you if you're on the left.
• 3:37
  Number 7.
• 3:38
  JB Pritzker.
• 3:41
  I mean,
• 3:41
  who put together this list?
• 3:43
  This is a catastrophe.
• 3:44
  There he is,
• 3:45
  JB,
• 3:46
  um,
• 3:47
  attractive man,
• 3:48
  sure,
• 3:49
  but is he really a contender?
• 3:51
  The one reason,
• 3:52
  of course,
• 3:52
  he would be talked about at all in this context is he has a lot of money.
• 3:56
  He's a billionaire,
• 3:57
  so
• 3:57
  you can never count out a billionaire,
• 3:59
  you know,
• 3:59
  you can,
• 4:00
  you can spend a lot,
• 4:01
  you can buy a bunch of votes.
• 4:02
  Didn't work for Michael Bloomberg.
• 4:03
  I doubt it's going to work for JB Pritzker.
• 4:06
  But he's,
• 4:07
  he's there at all.
• 4:08
  Now you might say like,
• 4:09
  OK,
• 4:09
  this field sucks so far.
• 4:10
  Then where's the big names?
• 4:12
  Because so far,
• 4:12
  this is a bunch of,
• 4:13
  a bunch of nobodies
• 4:15
  outside of Stephen A.
• 4:16
  Smith,
• 4:16
  who
• 4:17
  almost certainly won't run.
• 4:18
  But number 6,
• 4:20
  you get the big name start.
• 4:21
  Kamala Harris.
• 4:23
  Yeah.
• 4:24
  I mean they are actually
• 4:26
  putting her on the list of contenders.
• 4:30
  For 2028,
• 4:31
  after what happened,
• 4:32
  she ran in 2020,
• 4:34
  she failed miserably in 2020.
• 4:37
  She then,
• 4:38
  uh,
• 4:39
  became vice president as a gift,
• 4:40
  because I guess when you call Joe Biden racist,
• 4:43
  you get rewarded by becoming the vice president of the United States.
• 4:46
  She runs that into the ground.
• 4:48
  She somehow,
• 4:48
  without getting any votes,
• 4:49
  becomes the nominee because suddenly people are convinced that the thing that we
• 4:53
  all saw with Joe Biden over all of these years was actually true.
• 4:57
  And then she gets,
• 4:57
  you know,
• 4:58
  demolished in the actual
• 4:59
  campaign.
• 5:00
  I mean,
• 5:00
  she didn't get demolished and she lost a somewhat close election,
• 5:03
  but she lost all seven swing states.
• 5:05
  That's kind of bad,
• 5:06
  right?
• 5:07
  Again,
• 5:07
  it's in between a blowout
• 5:09
  and a super razor thin election.
• 5:10
  It wasn't 2000,
• 5:12
  but it wasn't 2008 either.
• 5:13
  I mean,
• 5:13
  it was in the middle there,
• 5:15
  but.
• 5:16
  Kamala Harris,
• 5:16
  really?
• 5:17
  If she's on your list,
• 5:18
  you should flush the list.
• 5:20
  Number 5,
• 5:21
  and this is what I see a lot of hype for,
• 5:23
  uh,
• 5:23
  on the left,
• 5:24
  is Governor Wes Moore.
• 5:26
  You might not know him at all.
• 5:27
  He is the governor of Maryland.
• 5:30
  Hasn't really accomplished an awful lot,
• 5:33
  kind of a,
• 5:33
  uh,
• 5:33
  uh,
• 5:34
  uh,
• 5:34
  an unknown nationally.
• 5:36
  But he's generally a pretty good communicator,
• 5:39
  a guy who is on the left would hit some
• 5:41
  of the intersectional barriers that must be breached each time
• 5:45
  you pick someone.
• 5:46
  You can't pick based on merit,
• 5:48
  obviously
• 5:49
  alone.
• 5:49
  It has to be skin color or genitals have to be mixed into the conversation,
• 5:53
  so.
• 5:54
  West Moore is a guy who does have some.
• 5:56
  He seems to be an Obama favorite,
• 5:58
  seems to have some buzz on the left.
• 6:00
  I wouldn't be surprised if he kind of remains in
• 6:02
  the top half of a top 10 here over the next
• 6:04
  few years.
• 6:06
  I am more surprised that they're even trying this with number 4,
• 6:09
  Gavin Newsom.
• 6:10
  Newsom.
• 6:11
  Look,
• 6:12
  he's been a catastrophe for the,
• 6:13
  for the state of California.
• 6:14
  Let's be honest about it.
• 6:15
  He was awful
• 6:17
  during COVID.
• 6:18
  He went out to dinner when he was trying to
• 6:19
  convince everyone else they needed to be in lockdown.
• 6:22
  Uh,
• 6:22
  that was just a total disaster.
• 6:24
  Uh,
• 6:24
  he almost got recalled and people were like,
• 6:26
  well,
• 6:26
  he won that election by a large margin.
• 6:28
  Yeah,
• 6:29
  I mean,
• 6:29
  just getting recalled at all is pretty bad,
• 6:31
  and it was pretty close.
• 6:33
  I mean,
• 6:33
  he was going up against Republicans who obviously Republican
• 6:37
  candidates in California have a very low chance of actually winning an election.
• 6:40
  And yet it was still pretty close
• 6:43
  up until the last couple of weeks where he opened up a lead,
• 6:46
  and then after that burned the state to the ground.
• 6:49
  Now I don't think he actually lit the fires,
• 6:51
  at least I'm not fully convinced that he specifically himself,
• 6:54
  you know,
• 6:55
  you know,
• 6:56
  lit a match and threw it into a field.
• 6:58
  I don't know that he specifically did that,
• 7:00
  but the recovery has been a disaster.
• 7:02
  The the situation with the way he responded was terrible.
• 7:06
  It wasn't all his fault,
• 7:08
  just mostly.
• 7:09
  So,
• 7:10
  that's going to turn him into a presidential candidate.
• 7:12
  I don't even understand it.
• 7:13
  By the way,
• 7:13
  Newsom is commenting on the future of the party.
• 7:15
  He says,
• 7:15
  I don't even know what the party is.
• 7:17
  And,
• 7:18
  you know,
• 7:18
  of course,
• 7:18
  he,
• 7:19
  he,
• 7:20
  he,
• 7:20
  how could he know?
• 7:21
  He changes his opinions every 5 days.
• 7:23
  How could he possibly know
• 7:24
  what's going on with the party?
• 7:25
  Just the other day,
• 7:26
  he was like,
• 7:26
  oh,
• 7:26
  I'm,
• 7:27
  of course I'm against men and women's sports.
• 7:29
  Like,
• 7:29
  where did this guy come from?
• 7:30
  He's trying to come off as this sensible Democrat,
• 7:34
  which
• 7:35
  is a path that is dangerous to Republicans,
• 7:38
  someone who actually sounds sensible
• 7:40
  on the left,
• 7:40
  who isn't constantly embracing 9 month abortions and
• 7:45
  you know men and women's sports and
• 7:49
  trans porn for your 3rd year grader in school,
• 7:52
  like all that crap.
• 7:54
  Uh,
• 7:55
  if you go away from that and shun that and sort of
• 7:57
  outwardly run against it and say I'm not that kind of Democrat,
• 8:00
  there's a real vulnerability for the right,
• 8:03
  uh,
• 8:03
  with that type of person.
• 8:04
  I'm scared of it,
• 8:05
  frankly,
• 8:05
  because,
• 8:06
  uh,
• 8:07
  you know,
• 8:07
  there's not a lot of Republicans who can handle this,
• 8:09
  and we will see.
• 8:11
  Gavin Newsom is not the guy to pull off that strategy though.
• 8:13
  He is a far left,
• 8:15
  insane person.
• 8:17
  But here is what he says about the party itself.
• 8:20
  We have not done a forensic
• 8:22
  of what just went wrong.
• 8:23
  Period.
• 8:24
  Full stop,
• 8:24
  Newsom said.
• 8:26
  I don't think
• 8:27
  I know it.
• 8:27
  I mean,
• 8:28
  to the extent that I'm marginally part of this party now,
• 8:30
  he's like distancing himself.
• 8:32
  See,
• 8:32
  I'm not really a Democrat.
• 8:33
  I'm sensible.
• 8:34
  Um,
• 8:35
  I represent the state larger than 21 state populations combined,
• 8:38
  and I can assure you that there has not been a party
• 8:40
  discussion that I'm aware of that has included the state of California.
• 8:43
  Later in the interview,
• 8:43
  Newsom said he wasn't sure what the Democratic Party truly represents,
• 8:47
  who it's leading,
• 8:48
  uh,
• 8:49
  and where it wants to go.
• 8:50
  I don't know what the party is.
• 8:52
  I'm still struggling with that.
• 8:53
  Well,
• 8:53
  no one knows what the party is.
• 8:55
  I mean,
• 8:55
  it is,
• 8:56
  there's a battle going on.
• 8:57
  On the left,
• 8:58
  and you're kind of seeing how that play out.
• 8:59
  Now Gavin Newsom is not a representative of the same wing,
• 9:02
  if there is one,
• 9:03
  of the Democratic Party.
• 9:04
  He is completely nuts and up until last week was a far leftist.
• 9:09
  You know,
• 9:09
  he's going to go back bounce back and forth because
• 9:12
  I mean he doesn't truly believe in much of
• 9:14
  anything other than the fact that Gavin Newsom's awesome.
• 9:17
  Like that is the kind of the beginning and end of his belief system,
• 9:20
  but that's where he is right now.
• 9:22
  Number 3 on this list is Gretchen Whitmer again.
• 9:26
  Gretchen Whitmer at number 3 is a disaster.
• 9:29
  She's terrible.
• 9:31
  Uh,
• 9:31
  she's,
• 9:32
  she was terrible during COVID.
• 9:34
  She,
• 9:34
  uh,
• 9:34
  you know,
• 9:35
  she had some sympathy because of what they said was a,
• 9:38
  a kidnapping scheme,
• 9:40
  uh,
• 9:40
  of,
• 9:41
  of her in,
• 9:41
  in Michigan,
• 9:42
  and so she was able to kind of hang on to power,
• 9:45
  uh,
• 9:45
  but she is not a national figure.
• 9:47
  She's not someone who I think is a real threat to win the nomination,
• 9:50
  let alone the presidency.
• 9:52
  And,
• 9:53
  uh,
• 9:53
  you know,
• 9:53
  the fact that you're that close,
• 9:54
  you've got her at number 3 is a real,
• 9:57
  it's got to make you really nervous
• 9:58
  as a Democrat.
• 10:00
  Now,
• 10:00
  number 2 on the list is somebody who I think does have uh uh some potential
• 10:04
  and is,
• 10:05
  I think,
• 10:05
  a bit scary to the right.
• 10:06
  It's Josh Shapiro.
• 10:07
  Shapiro's handled a lot of the situations in his state
• 10:10
  pretty well,
• 10:11
  and I mean that not necessarily that he runs the state well,
• 10:14
  but that he,
• 10:14
  he is able to kind of navigate the PR.
• 10:17
  Windfall
• 10:19
  that has hit him on the positive and negative side.
• 10:21
  He did a pretty good job coming out talking about against political violence
• 10:25
  and he kind of talked about it on either side of the aisle
• 10:27
  when it came to his house being burned down.
• 10:30
  He has the same sort of sympathetic
• 10:32
  view,
• 10:33
  at least among most Americans,
• 10:35
  because of that incident.
• 10:37
  Now,
• 10:37
  look,
• 10:37
  those incidents were totally different.
• 10:38
  His house really was lit on fire,
• 10:40
  by the way,
• 10:40
  lit on fire by a crazy person who was anti-Israel.
• 10:44
  That he didn't get the same sympathy from the media because of that,
• 10:47
  because they of course are sympathetic with the Hamas side of the argument.
• 10:51
  And I think for that reason,
• 10:53
  it's the reason why he was not the VP candidate and dummy Tim Walls was,
• 10:58
  uh,
• 10:58
  because he's Jewish and there is an anti-Jew,
• 11:01
  anti-Israel vibe on the left,
• 11:04
  a good chunk of it.
• 11:04
  There's a Hamas wing of the party.
• 11:07
  That's not going to let this happen.
• 11:09
  And so Josh Shapiro is running up against not
• 11:11
  only any conservative candidate that might be out there,
• 11:14
  uh,
• 11:14
  JD Vance,
• 11:14
  which would be a difficult person to go up against in,
• 11:16
  in,
• 11:17
  in,
• 11:17
  in,
• 11:17
  in a nomination battle,
• 11:18
  um,
• 11:19
  uh,
• 11:20
  for a presidential battle.
• 11:21
  This is,
• 11:22
  of course,
• 11:22
  if he wins the nomination.
• 11:24
  But also he's got to win that side of his party and he's got to go up against,
• 11:26
  I don't know,
• 11:27
  what's the percentage
• 11:28
  that just hates Israel and anything aside,
• 11:30
  uh,
• 11:30
  you know,
• 11:30
  associated with Jews,
• 11:31
  30%,
• 11:31
  40%,
• 11:32
  50% of the party.
• 11:33
  I don't know what it is.
• 11:34
  It's really high.
• 11:35
  And it prevented him from being the VP nominee.
• 11:37
  It may have prevented Kamala Harris from winning.
• 11:39
  I mean,
• 11:40
  again,
• 11:40
  Tim Walls was a real negative on that,
• 11:42
  on that campaign.
• 11:43
  He,
• 11:43
  he was a disaster.
• 11:43
  By the way,
• 11:44
  you notice Tim Walls,
• 11:45
  I'm not gonna spoil the rest of this list.
• 11:47
  He's not number 1.
• 11:49
  Um,
• 11:49
  he's not even anywhere on this top 10 list.
• 11:51
  He was a disaster.
• 11:53
  Josh Shapiro would have been formidable,
• 11:54
  and I,
• 11:55
  I,
• 11:55
  you know,
• 11:55
  I'm,
• 11:56
  I'm glad they didn't put him in there because remember,
• 11:58
  as I said,
• 11:59
  it was not 2008.
• 12:01
  This was not a 2000 election that was,
• 12:02
  you know,
• 12:02
  within 500 votes in one state,
• 12:04
  but there were 7 swing states.
• 12:06
  Trump did win them all,
• 12:07
  but the one he won
• 12:08
  in the biggest blowout of the 3 blue wall states he needed,
• 12:12
  uh,
• 12:12
  to,
• 12:13
  to win,
• 12:14
  uh,
• 12:14
  you know,
• 12:14
  she needed to win one of those states.
• 12:16
  The biggest blowout was 2 points,
• 12:17
  2%.
• 12:19
  This,
• 12:19
  this was a relatively close election,
• 12:21
  and who knows?
• 12:22
  I don't think Shapiro would have made the difference,
• 12:24
  but
• 12:25
  certainly would have been closer.
• 12:26
  But the number one,
• 12:27
  and this is fascinating,
• 12:28
  this used to be a joke.
• 12:29
  We've joked about this before.
• 12:31
  We joked about how they,
• 12:32
  they'd never run AOC as a nominee.
• 12:35
  Yeah,
• 12:35
  AOC number one,
• 12:37
  the number one
• 12:39
  possibility,
• 12:40
  according to The Hill
• 12:41
  for 2028.
• 12:42
  And I,
• 12:43
  I will say there is a path there.
• 12:45
  The path is people really don't like Donald Trump,
• 12:47
  the,
• 12:47
  the,
• 12:48
  the presidency goes terrible and they'll just reflect to whatever Democrat wins,
• 12:52
  and she's seen as the only one taking this seriously.
• 12:54
  Look,
• 12:54
  she is
• 12:55
  blatantly,
• 12:56
  and this is happening with,
• 12:57
  I believe,
• 12:57
  Bernie Sanders,
• 12:59
  um,
• 12:59
  OK.
• 13:00
  They are trying to give her the Bernie Sanders position in the party,
• 13:04
  which is lead contender to the establishment,
• 13:06
  right?
• 13:07
  They want to make AOC the face of the party.
• 13:09
  There's nothing better to me.
• 13:11
  When it comes to Democrats
• 13:13
  than AOC becoming the face of the party
• 13:14
  with the possible exception of Jasmine Crockett,
• 13:16
  right?
• 13:17
  Like I,
• 13:17
  I,
• 13:17
  you know,
• 13:18
  that would be awesome too,
• 13:19
  uh,
• 13:19
  to be,
• 13:20
  uh,
• 13:20
  to be truthful.
• 13:21
  But
• 13:22
  like
• 13:22
  making AOC the voice of the left is a good thing for,
• 13:27
  for Republicans generally,
• 13:28
  but
• 13:28
  If things go very badly,
• 13:30
  like if there's a massive economic crisis,
• 13:33
  then any Democrat will win.
• 13:34
  And if she can win the nomination,
• 13:35
  she can.
• 13:36
  That's where the energy of the party is.
• 13:38
  We will see if that happens.
• 13:39
  The next AOC Young Democrats are aiming
• 13:41
  to topple incumbents inside their own party.
• 13:43
  There's a
• 13:44
  for many of these young candidates.
• 13:46
  are centered around a shared dissatisfaction with how
• 13:48
  sitting lawmakers have fought back against Trump's second term.
• 13:51
  This is the argument for AOC and how she could potentially win.
• 13:54
  Democratic leaders are divided on whether to support this effort.
• 13:57
  They'll come up with a reason not to support it because they're
• 13:58
  going to want to put an establishment type person in there,
• 14:01
  and AOC doesn't get along with a lot of them,
• 14:03
  but.
• 14:04
  It's not impossible,
• 14:05
  boys and girls.
• 14:06
  By the way,
• 14:06
  uh,
• 14:06
  also in the mix,
• 14:07
  Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear,
• 14:09
  I don't buy it.
• 14:10
  Senator Cory Booker,
• 14:11
  he gave that big long speech and now he's all the way down here in the,
• 14:14
  uh,
• 14:14
  also-rans.
• 14:15
  Senator John Fetterman,
• 14:16
  which I don't believe would happen.
• 14:17
  Rona,
• 14:18
  again,
• 14:19
  probably not.
• 14:20
  Amy Klobuchar,
• 14:21
  no.
• 14:21
  Senator,
• 14:22
  uh,
• 14:22
  Chris Murphy,
• 14:23
  no.
• 14:24
  Jon Ossoff,
• 14:25
  probably more popular,
• 14:26
  more possible than many of the others on this list.
• 14:29
  And finally,
• 14:29
  the last one on the also-rans,
• 14:32
  Governor
• 14:33
  Tim Stupid Walls.
• 14:45
  Do you ever catch your reflection and think,
• 14:47
  gosh,
• 14:48
  uh,
• 14:48
  did my jeans shrink?
• 14:50
  Or is the last month's great diet and all that,
• 14:53
  those lost pounds,
• 14:54
  maybe the diet's already staging a comeback.
• 14:56
  The pounds you fought off,
• 14:58
  love an encore,
• 14:59
  they creep back and then invite friends very,
• 15:01
  very quickly.
• 15:02
  Uh,
• 15:02
  every glossy magazine headline,
• 15:05
  you know,
• 15:05
  gonna give you some sort of miracle,
• 15:06
  and then of course they slip away
• 15:08
  while you chase the next trend.
• 15:11
  Your confidence,
• 15:11
  your closet,
• 15:12
  your health all pay the cover charge.
• 15:15
  The revolving door is exhausting and there's that sort of ping pong back and forth.
• 15:18
  It was why a team of physicians built something called Lean.
• 15:22
  It's a simple daily supplement,
• 15:24
  no needle drama,
• 15:25
  no pharmacy line,
• 15:27
  natural clinically.
• 15:28
  Few ingredients work on what they call the lean three.
• 15:31
  First,
• 15:31
  the steady blood sugar.
• 15:33
  They steady the blood sugar so that the 3 p.m. candy bowl stops.
• 15:38
  They end hopefully.
• 15:40
  You've got of course,
• 15:41
  the second step in this process,
• 15:42
  they silence the signal that says the fridge light.
• 15:45
  Uh,
• 15:46
  is something you want to keep popping on over and over again.
• 15:49
  You don't need to stand there at the fridge,
• 15:50
  nothing's going to change inside.
• 15:51
  Third,
• 15:51
  they flip stored fat into energy you can use.
• 15:54
  Lean will not do the push-ups for you,
• 15:56
  unfortunately,
• 15:57
  uh,
• 15:57
  but they will make sure that the work that you do finally sticks.
• 16:00
  Are you ready to lock the door on the comeback tour of your former
• 16:04
  failed diet?
• 16:05
  Grab 20% off today
• 16:07
  with the code stew 20 at
• 16:09
  takelean.com.
• 16:10
  It's Talean.com,
• 16:12
  the code is stew 20,
• 16:13
  Takelean.com.
• 16:18
  I'm joined now by Dan Andros.
• 16:20
  He's managing editor of CBN News and host of CBN's Quick Start podcasts,
• 16:24
  which you can subscribe to wherever you get your podcasts.
• 16:28
  Dan,
• 16:28
  welcome to the program,
• 16:29
  the program.
• 16:30
  Hi,
• 16:30
  too.
• 16:31
  Thanks for having me.
• 16:32
  Yeah,
• 16:32
  I appreciate it.
• 16:33
  Um,
• 16:34
  I wanted to bring you on and talk about
• 16:36
  Carmelo Anthony,
• 16:37
  and normally we,
• 16:37
  we do talk sports a decent amount.
• 16:39
  I'm not talking about the,
• 16:40
  uh,
• 16:40
  NBA Hall of Famer,
• 16:41
  although I do feel a little bit bad for him,
• 16:43
  frankly,
• 16:43
  in this particular situation because
• 16:46
  Uh,
• 16:46
  the Carmel Anthony we're about to talk about starts with a K,
• 16:49
  and uh,
• 16:49
  he is a teen accused of fatally stabbing
• 16:52
  Austin Metcalf.
• 16:54
  He's now moved to an undisclosed location after reported death threats.
• 16:58
  Um,
• 16:59
  now it's interesting that people are concerned
• 17:01
  that he's being threatened by death,
• 17:03
  which you should of course never ever do,
• 17:04
  and not,
• 17:05
  not threaten anyone.
• 17:06
  Uh,
• 17:06
  in any way.
• 17:07
  However,
• 17:08
  he actually
• 17:09
  did kill somebody.
• 17:10
  Um,
• 17:11
  so I don't know,
• 17:12
  we're supposed to feel bad for a murderer who's being threatened
• 17:16
  with the thing he did to a totally innocent person.
• 17:19
  Right?
• 17:19
  And of course,
• 17:20
  too,
• 17:20
  it's
• 17:20
  alleged
• 17:21
  murderer
• 17:22
  until,
• 17:23
  uh,
• 17:23
  until we have this trial,
• 17:24
  but I mean,
• 17:24
  it sure looks bad,
• 17:25
  right?
• 17:26
  Like
• 17:26
  whatever their disagreement they had in the tent,
• 17:29
  alleged,
• 17:29
  you know,
• 17:29
  like they had these team tents set up at the track.
• 17:32
  Uh,
• 17:33
  area and he was apparently in the wrong,
• 17:36
  you know,
• 17:36
  at,
• 17:37
  at the other team's tent,
• 17:38
  which would seem as kind of instigating
• 17:41
  under,
• 17:41
  uh,
• 17:42
  I mean,
• 17:42
  again,
• 17:42
  we weren't there,
• 17:43
  I don't know,
• 17:43
  but
• 17:44
  that's sure what it seems like if he was there in the other team's tent.
• 17:48
  And then,
• 17:48
  OK,
• 17:49
  if someone tells you to get out.
• 17:51
  Uh,
• 17:52
  you don't get to stab them because of that.
• 17:54
  I don't,
• 17:55
  you know,
• 17:55
  I don't really see how you're,
• 17:56
  you're,
• 17:57
  they're claiming that his life was in danger.
• 17:59
  Uh,
• 18:00
  not really sure how.
• 18:02
  Uh,
• 18:02
  they,
• 18:02
  I don't think the other guys had any weapons that we're aware of.
• 18:06
  So it's a very odd,
• 18:07
  and I've seen,
• 18:08
  you know,
• 18:08
  articles saying it's a quote unquote,
• 18:10
  uphill battle,
• 18:11
  but,
• 18:12
  uh,
• 18:12
  it's also bizarre seeing his sort of PR team come out and,
• 18:17
  Make it seem like he's the victim here.
• 18:19
  Almost.
• 18:19
  Yeah,
• 18:19
  I will say it is a bit of an uphill battle when your client has murdered someone,
• 18:25
  a young person in cold blood for absolutely
• 18:28
  no reason whatsoever other than being touched,
• 18:31
  quote unquote touched.
• 18:33
  When he dared him,
• 18:34
  he said,
• 18:34
  Touch me,
• 18:35
  you'll find out
• 18:36
  what's going to happen.
• 18:37
  You know that did go on.
• 18:38
  He did wind up stabbing a young man in the chest who's dead.
• 18:43
  And then they kind of bring out this
• 18:46
  PR team
• 18:47
  and spokesperson.
• 18:49
  The spokesperson,
• 18:50
  I don't,
• 18:50
  I don't know if he's helping all
• 18:52
  that much so far.
• 18:53
  It seems like a kind of a disaster,
• 18:55
  doesn't it?
• 18:57
  Uh,
• 18:57
  yeah,
• 18:57
  it really does.
• 18:58
  And I'm,
• 18:59
  I'm forgetting this guy's name off the top of my head,
• 19:01
  but it's,
• 19:01
  uh,
• 19:02
  I think it's,
• 19:02
  uh,
• 19:03
  Dominique Alexander,
• 19:05
  Alexander.
• 19:06
  He's,
• 19:07
  he's apparently the head of one of these groups,
• 19:09
  like,
• 19:10
  like,
• 19:10
  kind of like a,
• 19:11
  I don't know,
• 19:12
  one of these pop-up.
• 19:13
  Progressive activist groups that like just like
• 19:16
  Soros funds and gives them $1000 and they,
• 19:19
  they exist.
• 19:20
  It's like called the Next Generation Action Network,
• 19:23
  whatever
• 19:23
  that is.
• 19:24
  So he does this press conference and he'd like
• 19:27
  releases all this stuff like these POV videos of
• 19:29
  him walking from inside to his car while the
• 19:32
  press is trying to get an interview with him,
• 19:33
  just very odd behavior.
• 19:36
  Well,
• 19:36
  Metcalf's dad
• 19:37
  shows up to this press conference that this guy,
• 19:41
  Dominique Alexander is having with,
• 19:43
  uh,
• 19:44
  Uh,
• 19:44
  with his client and.
• 19:47
  They kick him out and he calls it disrespectful
• 19:50
  that the dad was showing up and I'm just,
• 19:52
  I like trying to wrap my head around this logic.
• 19:55
  And then,
• 19:56
  of course,
• 19:57
  you know,
• 19:57
  somehow,
• 19:58
  the guy with a dead son,
• 20:00
  he's got a dead son.
• 20:02
  And you're mad at him for showing up,
• 20:04
  you can't show any
• 20:06
  sympathy or empathy for this dad who just
• 20:09
  lost his son because your client stabbed him
• 20:12
  for absolutely no reason.
• 20:14
  And,
• 20:15
  uh,
• 20:16
  it's just bizarre that they can be this,
• 20:18
  and again,
• 20:19
  it makes you
• 20:20
  wonder,
• 20:20
  Stu,
• 20:21
  and we,
• 20:21
  we've played this game many times,
• 20:23
  but like,
• 20:23
  let's play switch the race,
• 20:25
  and would,
• 20:26
  would any of these tactics,
• 20:28
  PR wise be allowed even remotely.
• 20:31
  If the situation was the melanin counts
• 20:33
  were reversed on the individuals involved here,
• 20:36
  yeah,
• 20:36
  it really is a,
• 20:38
  it really is shocking to see,
• 20:40
  and it's funny because like you go through kind of these standard stories,
• 20:43
  the,
• 20:43
  you know,
• 20:44
  look,
• 20:44
  this is not the first time race is being used to inflame a situation.
• 20:48
  Um,
• 20:48
  but usually there's at least a case,
• 20:50
  right?
• 20:50
  Like,
• 20:51
  like,
• 20:51
  you know,
• 20:51
  Michael Brown,
• 20:52
  where he robbed a store and then he wound up attacking a police officer,
• 20:56
  and there was,
• 20:57
  there was this argument as to whether he did it and whether he had a hands
• 20:59
  up don't shoot moment and all this stuff that wound up later on not being true.
• 21:04
  Um,
• 21:04
  you know,
• 21:04
  there was the uh the
• 21:06
  several of these stories have kind of turned this way.
• 21:08
  Will there,
• 21:08
  there will at least be some
• 21:10
  argument about it.
• 21:12
  This particular case,
• 21:14
  there doesn't seem to be one at all.
• 21:15
  It was a guy who came up to,
• 21:17
  uh,
• 21:18
  to,
• 21:18
  uh,
• 21:19
  Carmelo Anthony,
• 21:20
  told him he was in the wrong tent.
• 21:21
  They kind of had a bit of a disagreement.
• 21:23
  He said,
• 21:23
  touch me,
• 21:24
  and I'll,
• 21:25
  uh,
• 21:25
  and you'll see what happens or whatever.
• 21:27
  He,
• 21:27
  I guess,
• 21:28
  touches him kind of like in a,
• 21:29
  maybe a little bit of a,
• 21:30
  I'll,
• 21:31
  I'll do what I want type of thing,
• 21:32
  but not like a punch,
• 21:33
  not an assault,
• 21:34
  nothing like that.
• 21:35
  No one's even accusing.
• 21:36
  Um,
• 21:37
  uh,
• 21:37
  him of that,
• 21:38
  Metcalf.
• 21:39
  And
• 21:39
  now we're supposed to suddenly turn the man who just stabbed
• 21:43
  somebody in the heart for no reason into the victim here.
• 21:46
  I,
• 21:47
  I,
• 21:47
  because of his skin color,
• 21:48
  I can't even follow this.
• 21:50
  No,
• 21:51
  and I was shocked that there was a Giveend Go account,
• 21:54
  and I mean,
• 21:54
  I haven't looked at it in a few days,
• 21:55
  but
• 21:56
  last I looked,
• 21:57
  it was approaching half a million dollars
• 21:59
  for this kid,
• 22:00
  and,
• 22:01
  and they,
• 22:01
  they've got him like holed up in a.
• 22:04
  Upscale gated community there in near Frisco and
• 22:08
  you know,
• 22:09
  really nice houses out there and the close to million dollar houses and they,
• 22:12
  the report was that they might have bought a new car.
• 22:15
  It's like what is going on here and uh that the sentiment is falling on this side.
• 22:20
  I mean this is almost.
• 22:22
  Hamas level stuff where you're like,
• 22:24
  you know what,
• 22:25
  I know the Israelites,
• 22:27
  you know,
• 22:27
  the Israel lost,
• 22:28
  you know,
• 22:28
  1500 Jewish people that day,
• 22:30
  but you know what's really bad,
• 22:32
  it's what's happening to these Hamas terrorists over here.
• 22:34
  It's like,
• 22:35
  uh,
• 22:36
  it's almost on this level because it's,
• 22:38
  it's that absurd
• 22:40
  what this kid did.
• 22:41
  You,
• 22:41
  you can't imagine,
• 22:43
  I mean,
• 22:43
  you talk about wild west,
• 22:44
  everyone's worried about the wild west,
• 22:45
  too.
• 22:46
  Oh,
• 22:46
  we can't have guns because of the wild west.
• 22:49
  That's what this is.
• 22:50
  I mean this is like,
• 22:51
  don't touch me.
• 22:52
  I'm gonna,
• 22:52
  and then I shoot you or I stab you.
• 22:55
  You don't get to do that because someone,
• 22:57
  that's not a life threatening situation if someone gives
• 23:00
  you a nudge or tells you to get lost and
• 23:02
  even shoves you,
• 23:03
  even if they did punch you,
• 23:04
  you don't get to stab them.
• 23:05
  Yeah,
• 23:06
  it's very,
• 23:06
  very strange,
• 23:07
  and I,
• 23:07
  I've noticed,
• 23:07
  and let me run this theory by you here,
• 23:09
  Dan.
• 23:10
  Tell me what you think.
• 23:12
  Because there seems to be a change.
• 23:13
  We,
• 23:13
  we,
• 23:13
  you know,
• 23:14
  you used to work here at The Blaze.
• 23:15
  You worked on Glenn's TV show,
• 23:17
  and we talked a lot about how the left wing,
• 23:20
  the liberals in the country
• 23:22
  always would work very hard to find.
• 23:25
  The most sympathetic character to carry their torch,
• 23:28
  right?
• 23:28
  Like,
• 23:28
  you know,
• 23:28
  Rosa Parks is a great example.
• 23:30
  There was another
• 23:31
  African American woman,
• 23:32
  I believe,
• 23:33
  who was on the bus and had the same experience as Rosa Parks before Rosa Parks,
• 23:37
  but they didn't make her into the example because she had some,
• 23:40
  you know,
• 23:40
  private,
• 23:41
  you know,
• 23:41
  I think she was an unwed mother at the time,
• 23:43
  it was controversial.
• 23:44
  They wanted to find the perfect person to carry this torch.
• 23:48
  It seems like they've gone the other direction on this now,
• 23:51
  where
• 23:52
  we're seeing people who are suspected MS-13,
• 23:54
  gang members with accusations of domestic violence.
• 23:57
  Well,
• 23:57
  they're going to be the ones that are going to go
• 23:59
  down and visit and become the torchbearer for illegal immigration.
• 24:03
  Here's another situation our racial
• 24:06
  example,
• 24:06
  the person we're going to hold up as the example
• 24:08
  in our racist or racial conflicts in this country,
• 24:11
  is going to be a person who,
• 24:13
  without any
• 24:14
  argument at all,
• 24:15
  just stabbed a young boy for no reason.
• 24:18
  And they're not even searching for good examples of people
• 24:21
  who maybe are in tough times to challenge these policies.
• 24:24
  Now it seems like they'll run to the worst possible examples of people
• 24:27
  and just
• 24:28
  give them a full out embrace.
• 24:30
  Yeah,
• 24:30
  I feel like we've seen that this is like the laziness factor.
• 24:33
  I,
• 24:34
  if I could
• 24:35
  guess and put the blame on any one major factor that's kind of
• 24:40
  Shift led to this shift that you're talking about here.
• 24:42
  It's gotta be social media.
• 24:44
  Social media has made us as a culture insanely lazy.
• 24:49
  People just,
• 24:49
  they,
• 24:50
  they,
• 24:50
  now they have their narrative,
• 24:52
  and they settle into that,
• 24:53
  and they don't care.
• 24:54
  They'll just throw anything out there.
• 24:56
  And we've seen the tribalism get worse and worse and worse,
• 24:59
  and people will just defend anything.
• 25:01
  And this is not just a left issue.
• 25:03
  I think the left is 100 times worse at it.
• 25:05
  But the right does it too.
• 25:07
  They'll defend undefensible things on issues.
• 25:10
  Now,
• 25:10
  again,
• 25:11
  the,
• 25:11
  the major qualifier there is the left,
• 25:13
  I believe is 100 times more egregious on this phenomenon than the right is.
• 25:18
  The right has,
• 25:19
  I feel like been more consistent over the years to their values,
• 25:23
  um,
• 25:23
  and trying to
• 25:25
  stay consistent on those.
• 25:26
  Whereas I feel like the.
• 25:27
  The left now,
• 25:28
  it's completely has jumped the shark and just seems like they,
• 25:31
  it's like social media in real life.
• 25:33
  Like people who just scroll,
• 25:34
  they don't really know the story at all,
• 25:37
  but share it
• 25:38
  and it goes viral and then oops,
• 25:41
  sorry,
• 25:41
  that story was incorrect.
• 25:43
  That was a fake meme that I just made up.
• 25:45
  And then
• 25:46
  the retweet apology gets like,
• 25:48
  you know,
• 25:48
  4 tweets.
• 25:49
  And the other one got like 50 million.
• 25:51
  So I,
• 25:51
  I,
• 25:51
  but I feel like that phenomena on social media now,
• 25:55
  it's like those people that grew up with this.
• 25:59
  Are bringing it into real life.
• 26:01
  Yeah,
• 26:01
  I think that's true.
• 26:02
  You notice this on social media a lot where,
• 26:04
  you know,
• 26:04
  again we've worked together for a long time.
• 26:06
  I remember going back to the 2004 election,
• 26:10
  and that was John Kerry and George W.
• 26:12
  Bush and
• 26:13
  The big controversy in that election
• 26:15
  was John Kerry saying,
• 26:17
  you know,
• 26:17
  I actually did vote for the $87 billion
• 26:20
  before I voted against it.
• 26:21
  And it was like they put it in every single ad.
• 26:24
  Like they couldn't believe that someone would have
• 26:27
  this ridiculous justification and,
• 26:29
  and kind of flip-flop,
• 26:30
  and that was kind of the image
• 26:31
  that was,
• 26:31
  you know,
• 26:32
  put on John Kerry with,
• 26:33
  with good,
• 26:33
  with good meaning.
• 26:35
  But like now,
• 26:37
  you see people,
• 26:37
  and I see this on the right and the left,
• 26:39
  where people will support one position.
• 26:42
  And they will be completely convinced of it.
• 26:44
  And then 2 days later,
• 26:46
  whatever
• 26:47
  mechanism in social media,
• 26:48
  whether it's leadership from political leaders or whatever,
• 26:52
  changes,
• 26:53
  and they just completely flip flop to the other side of the argument,
• 26:57
  and
• 26:57
  they're not embarrassed by it at all.
• 26:59
  It's just normal state of affairs.
• 27:01
  I mean,
• 27:02
  we used to joke about this with like Richard Nixon saying like,
• 27:04
  you know,
• 27:05
  when we were watching what happened to Bill Clinton and everything else,
• 27:07
  like,
• 27:07
  Richard Nixon's got to be rolling in his grave going,
• 27:09
  really?
• 27:09
  Like all,
• 27:10
  all I had to be was in a different era and there's
• 27:12
  no way I would have had to resign over this thing.
• 27:14
  I mean,
• 27:14
  John,
• 27:15
  I didn't think about John Kerry,
• 27:16
  but that's a great point.
• 27:17
  I mean,
• 27:17
  he's,
• 27:18
  You know,
• 27:18
  we had the John Kerry's Waffle House thing going because of that.
• 27:21
  He
• 27:22
  would have survived that.
• 27:23
  I mean,
• 27:23
  there's no way that
• 27:24
  that would have been a,
• 27:25
  a,
• 27:25
  a massive negative impact on his game.
• 27:27
  It would have been a blip on the radar,
• 27:29
  his flip-flopping.
• 27:30
  On that nobody cares about flip flopping now,
• 27:33
  so John Kerry's probably sitting there going,
• 27:35
  Teresa,
• 27:36
  yeah,
• 27:37
  yeah I know
• 27:38
  Teresa,
• 27:39
  uh,
• 27:39
  yeah,
• 27:39
  it's,
• 27:39
  you're right,
• 27:40
  it's true because like it must be frustrating for
• 27:42
  those politicians who had to go through that period
• 27:44
  because now
• 27:45
  you're criticized by your own side if you don't flip flop.
• 27:49
  If you,
• 27:49
  if you are consistent with the same views that you had 10 years ago,
• 27:52
  you're all of a sudden the bad guy,
• 27:54
  you're weak,
• 27:54
  you're folding to the left or whatever.
• 27:56
  It's amazing.
• 27:59
  Yeah,
• 28:00
  it really is.
• 28:00
  It's like a loyalty test first before it is,
• 28:02
  uh,
• 28:03
  actually,
• 28:04
  this is what I believe and this is what I don't believe.
• 28:06
  And like,
• 28:06
  I look,
• 28:06
  and this case is no different than others.
• 28:09
  I kind of
• 28:10
  call me crazy and old fashioned,
• 28:11
  Stu,
• 28:12
  but I kind of like
• 28:14
  looking for the facts and letting
• 28:16
  that play out.
• 28:17
  I don't have allegiance on this case one way or another.
• 28:20
  I don't know either one of these people.
• 28:22
  I don't know them.
• 28:23
  So,
• 28:24
  Everyone else just wants to take it and say,
• 28:26
  I think this one fits my agenda,
• 28:28
  so yay,
• 28:28
  I'm gonna yell about it.
• 28:29
  Like,
• 28:30
  how about we just wait and see for the facts to come in.
• 28:33
  And then make a judgment.
• 28:34
  Everyone would rather judge first facts later.
• 28:36
  And then if the facts don't match up,
• 28:37
  it's like,
• 28:38
  uh,
• 28:38
  we'll move on from that.
• 28:39
  Yeah,
• 28:39
  I don't know.
• 28:39
  You you call me crazy,
• 28:40
  but like maybe siding with a victim
• 28:42
  of the murder would be
• 28:44
  maybe the way to go.
• 28:45
  I know that's a,
• 28:45
  it's a crazy thing these days.
• 28:48
  Amazing.
• 28:48
  Dan Andros,
• 28:49
  uh,
• 28:49
  managing editor,
• 28:50
  CBN News.
• 28:50
  Be sure to check him out on the Quick Start podcast,
• 28:52
  CBN's Quick Start,
• 28:53
  uh,
• 28:53
  over on,
• 28:53
  uh,
• 28:54
  where,
• 28:54
  I guess it's wherever you get your podcast,
• 28:55
  you can get Quick Start.
• 28:56
  Uh,
• 28:56
  Dan,
• 28:57
  thanks so much for coming on the program,
• 28:58
  man.
• 28:58
  Appreciate it.
• 28:59
  All right,
• 28:59
  thanks,
• 28:59
  too.
• 29:08
  Well,
• 29:08
  the economy has been a bit of a rollercoaster over the past few weeks.
• 29:11
  Uh,
• 29:12
  Dow today bouncing back,
• 29:14
  rallying
• 29:15
  900 points after Trump softened stance on Powell and China tariffs,
• 29:20
  actually popped as high as I think 1100 points,
• 29:22
  then dropped back down to about 600 points up.
• 29:24
  I'm not sure.
• 29:25
  I haven't checked in a little while.
• 29:26
  I'm not sure where it ended up today.
• 29:28
  Um,
• 29:28
  but I will say,
• 29:29
  uh,
• 29:31
  it's a difficult thing,
• 29:32
  uh,
• 29:33
  you know.
• 29:33
  You know,
• 29:34
  Glenn is going to be talking to Donald Trump tonight
• 29:35
  and I'm sure he'll be asking about the economy and,
• 29:37
  and which,
• 29:38
  you know,
• 29:38
  what the long-term plan here is,
• 29:40
  because I think that's the difficult
• 29:42
  situation.
• 29:42
  If you think about yourself of someone who,
• 29:44
  if you're running a factory and maybe you're producing your stuff over in China,
• 29:47
  and you're thinking to yourself,
• 29:48
  you know what,
• 29:48
  I want to bring this back.
• 29:50
  I,
• 29:50
  I'm gonna bring my manufacturing back to the United
• 29:52
  States or at least a more allied nation.
• 29:55
  But you don't know what that policy is,
• 29:57
  and it might be a situation where you need those big tariffs on
• 30:01
  Chinese competition to be able to afford to build the stuff here.
• 30:05
  And what happens when you build a factory
• 30:07
  and you're finally ready to open it
• 30:08
  and then the policies change,
• 30:10
  it's impossible for people.
• 30:11
  to navigate right now.
• 30:12
  I mean that's the biggest problem.
• 30:13
  This is why you want these things,
• 30:14
  you know,
• 30:14
  if you've gotta do tariffs,
• 30:15
  you do it over a longer period of time.
• 30:17
  Trump,
• 30:17
  uh,
• 30:17
  one of the things that by the way,
• 30:18
  made this rally happen today,
• 30:20
  Trump says tariff on China will come down substantially from 145%,
• 30:25
  uh,
• 30:25
  is the headline from The Hill.
• 30:27
  And I think,
• 30:28
  you look at that and you say,
• 30:29
  well,
• 30:30
  there's lessons to be learned here,
• 30:31
  I think,
• 30:32
  uh,
• 30:32
  you know,
• 30:33
  if you're gonna do this type of policy,
• 30:34
  it needs to be kind of a longer term thing that's probably passed through Congress.
• 30:38
  But also the situation that all these problems that we had
• 30:42
  probably can reverse themselves relatively quickly if we kind of abandon
• 30:46
  some of these bigger tariffs and kind of come back to a more,
• 30:51
  more free trade-like
• 30:52
  approach.
• 30:53
  The
• 30:55
  bumps that we've had in the economy and
• 30:57
  the market probably do go away relatively quickly.
• 30:59
  You might say,
• 31:00
  well,
• 31:00
  long term those problems wouldn't be solved.
• 31:02
  We'd still have the same situation.
• 31:04
  That's probably true,
• 31:05
  but the short term situation would probably get a lot better,
• 31:09
  a lot faster.
• 31:09
  We're seeing that day by day,
• 31:11
  honestly,
• 31:12
  as these policies change.
• 31:13
  So we'll continue to follow it and see what happens.
• 31:29
  There's a difference between investing for profit and investing with purpose.
• 31:33
  Most people never ask where their money goes once it leaves their account.
• 31:36
  But the truth is,
• 31:37
  your investments may be funding companies that push political agendas
• 31:41
  and social experiments that do not match your values.
• 31:44
  Now you work hard,
• 31:45
  your investments should work hard as well,
• 31:47
  but they should work hard for what you believe in.
• 31:49
  Constitutional Wealth helps you make sure that they do.
• 31:51
  This is a team that believes in faith,
• 31:53
  freedom,
• 31:53
  and the idea that financial decisions should reflect moral convictions.
• 31:58
  They help you take a real look at your portfolio,
• 32:00
  you know,
• 32:01
  no pressure,
• 32:01
  just a clear,
• 32:02
  honest conversation,
• 32:03
  and they help you find out what your money is doing and who is it,
• 32:06
  is it,
• 32:06
  is it helping,
• 32:07
  and they can help you.
• 32:08
  Make sure your portfolio is align with your values.
• 32:11
  Start your free consultation today at constitutionwealth.com/Blaze.
• 32:15
  Check it out now,
• 32:16
  Constitutionwealth.com/blaze.
• 32:19
  Now Constitutional Wealth is a registered investment advisor.
• 32:21
  You should review Constitutional Wealth disclosures at
• 32:24
  constitutionwealth.com to understand their services and fees.
• 32:27
  All investing,
• 32:28
  of course,
• 32:28
  involves risk,
• 32:29
  including the risk of loss.
• 32:30
  I am a client of the firm,
• 32:31
  and this is a paid endorsement.
• 32:33
  My opinions,
• 32:33
  however,
• 32:34
  as always,
• 32:35
  are my own.
• 32:38
  I'm joined now by Jeff Fisher,
• 32:39
  Blaze TV host of Chewing the Fat.
• 32:42
  With Jeff Fisher.
• 32:44
  Jeffy,
• 32:44
  welcome.
• 32:45
  Good to see you.
• 32:46
  And now,
• 32:46
  I was thinking of you this week because
• 32:49
  whenever something happens with the Pope,
• 32:51
  and the Pope
• 32:52
  passes away,
• 32:54
  I always think of you because I think one of the
• 32:56
  first times I've ever talked to you back in the day,
• 32:59
  I remember you saying that
• 33:01
  you did not have to be Catholic to be the Pope
• 33:04
  and that you were considering running for Pope.
• 33:06
  I did run for Pope.
• 33:08
  You did run for Pope.
• 33:09
  That was before they elected that
• 33:10
  darn Benedict.
• 33:11
  Was it really?
• 33:12
  OK.
• 33:13
  So it was a little bit later than I'm remembering,
• 33:14
  but I do remember it was a long time ago.
• 33:15
  It was a long time ago.
• 33:16
  And then,
• 33:17
  uh,
• 33:17
  they kind of changed the rules and rearranged the thing.
• 33:19
  So apparently,
• 33:20
  OK,
• 33:20
  you gotta be baptized Catholic now to be a Catholic
• 33:23
  Pope.
• 33:24
  And,
• 33:25
  uh,
• 33:25
  so it seems to be like a really
• 33:28
  important part of the process.
• 33:29
  And then,
• 33:29
  and then.
• 33:31
  It was at one point anyone could be anyone as long as you were,
• 33:35
  as long as long as you were Catholic,
• 33:37
  you could be Pope.
• 33:38
  Now you gotta be a cardinal.
• 33:40
  Wait,
• 33:41
  did they really change the rules in that time period?
• 33:42
  You have to be a cardinal,
• 33:43
  or were you,
• 33:44
  did you always have to be a cardinal?
• 33:45
  They.
• 33:47
  Always for a long time,
• 33:48
  like the last pope to get voted in that wasn't a cardinal was,
• 33:52
  I don't know,
• 33:53
  100,
• 33:54
  200,
• 33:54
  300 years ago or whatever.
• 33:56
  But so it's kind of been an unwritten rule.
• 33:58
  OK,
• 33:58
  so it is theoretically possible
• 34:01
  because like it's like when they say Speaker of the House,
• 34:03
  when they're selecting Speaker of the House,
• 34:04
  there's always somebody that's like,
• 34:05
  well,
• 34:06
  what if we put Donald Trump in or whatever,
• 34:09
  because you don't technically.
• 34:10
  Have to be a member of the House.
• 34:12
  So I'm just speaking,
• 34:12
  I'm willing to,
• 34:13
  I'm willing to take over,
• 34:14
  uh,
• 34:15
  you know,
• 34:15
  Francis's job,
• 34:16
  uh,
• 34:17
  you know,
• 34:17
  his funeral is on Saturday.
• 34:18
  Uh,
• 34:19
  they start voting,
• 34:20
  um,
• 34:20
  either right after that or a few days after,
• 34:22
  depending on when everybody gets in town and
• 34:25
  starts glad-handing.
• 34:26
  If they want to blow the white smoke for me,
• 34:28
  I'm in.
• 34:29
  Really,
• 34:29
  what would you do?
• 34:30
  What would be your platform?
• 34:31
  I would turn,
• 34:32
  uh,
• 34:32
  the Catholic,
• 34:33
  uh.
• 34:34
  The whole Catholicism around.
• 34:37
  Bring it back to Catholicism.
• 34:38
  Really make Catholicism great again?
• 34:40
  Yes.
• 34:40
  You would do that?
• 34:41
  I would.
• 34:42
  I don't think anyone,
• 34:43
  any Catholic would trust you to do such a thing.
• 34:45
  In fact,
• 34:45
  I don't think most of them will let you in their homes.
• 34:49
  That hurts.
• 34:51
  That hurts.
• 34:51
  It does.
• 34:51
  I'm just saying.
• 34:52
  It might hurt,
• 34:53
  but I do think it's accurate.
• 34:54
  I'm glad I stopped by.
• 34:56
  Um,
• 34:57
  I,
• 34:57
  I,
• 34:57
  I wanted to,
• 34:58
  uh,
• 34:58
  to bring you on because I did a monologue today on,
• 35:01
  uh,
• 35:01
  the 2028
• 35:02
  possibilities,
• 35:03
  not for Pope,
• 35:04
  but for the Democratic
• 35:05
  nomination.
• 35:06
  I mean,
• 35:06
  I think people look at this now.
• 35:07
  I mean,
• 35:08
  I know there's some people who have this,
• 35:09
  you know,
• 35:09
  uh,
• 35:10
  I want a third term of Donald Trump thing.
• 35:11
  Setting that aside though,
• 35:13
  a lot of people are on the,
• 35:14
  would say JD Vance is the clear leader.
• 35:16
  I think there's some people saying Ron DeSantiss maybe,
• 35:19
  there's a few others on,
• 35:20
  on the right.
• 35:21
  But the left is in this open field,
• 35:22
  right?
• 35:23
  Who do they have?
• 35:24
  Yeah,
• 35:24
  ready for this list.
• 35:25
  I went through it earlier today.
• 35:26
  Can we bring this list up?
• 35:27
  I want you to look at this.
• 35:29
  Um,
• 35:30
  again,
• 35:30
  this is the countdown.
• 35:31
  This,
• 35:31
  it came from,
• 35:31
  uh,
• 35:33
  uh,
• 35:33
  I can't remember who it was from A.
• 35:35
  Smith.
• 35:36
  The Hill.
• 35:37
  That's right.
• 35:37
  It was from the Hill.
• 35:38
  Um,
• 35:38
  so
• 35:39
  number 10,
• 35:39
  Stephen A.
• 35:40
  Smith.
• 35:40
  Number 9,
• 35:41
  Rahm Emanuel.
• 35:42
  Number 8,
• 35:42
  Pete Buttigieg.
• 35:43
  He's still around.
• 35:44
  Who?
• 35:44
  Rahm?
• 35:45
  Yeah,
• 35:45
  I guess.
• 35:46
  It's funny because he was like a mayor of Chicago for a while.
• 35:49
  They shipped him off.
• 35:50
  He was in,
• 35:50
  he was,
• 35:51
  he was in,
• 35:52
  uh,
• 35:52
  in the Beltway,
• 35:53
  and then they shipped him off to Chicago.
• 35:55
  Yeah,
• 35:55
  they just kind of shipped him out of there because he was like a,
• 35:57
  he was an Obama guy.
• 35:58
  He was a chief of staff for Obama.
• 36:00
  I don't think there's any.
• 36:01
  Any,
• 36:02
  uh,
• 36:02
  any like desire for him.
• 36:04
  Buttigieg is falling off.
• 36:05
  He's now out at number 8.
• 36:06
  He was kind of one of the higher ones.
• 36:08
  Uh,
• 36:08
  it was JB Pritzker,
• 36:09
  I think was number 7.
• 36:10
  Again,
• 36:11
  like some rich.
• 36:12
  And
• 36:13
  Pritzker's,
• 36:14
  first of all,
• 36:14
  does not look healthy.
• 36:15
  Let's be honest about it,
• 36:16
  Jeffy.
• 36:16
  I know you
• 36:18
  people know,
• 36:18
  don't know this about Jeffy maybe that you are fashion,
• 36:21
  you,
• 36:22
  but you also are health.
• 36:23
  I think when people,
• 36:24
  everything in moderation,
• 36:25
  Stu,
• 36:25
  that's my motto.
• 36:26
  That's my life goal.
• 36:27
  Totally your life.
• 36:28
  Live my life.
• 36:29
  You've lived it that way.
• 36:30
  JD Prisker doesn't look like he lives.
• 36:31
  No,
• 36:32
  he does not.
• 36:33
  He spends his money.
• 36:34
  He spends a lot of money on food.
• 36:36
  And why not?
• 36:37
  He's a billionaire.
• 36:38
  Yeah,
• 36:38
  he can do that.
• 36:38
  He can do what he wants.
• 36:39
  Yeah,
• 36:39
  I,
• 36:39
  I,
• 36:40
  I suppose.
• 36:40
  Who else do we have on the list today?
• 36:41
  It was number 7 was JB Fritzer.
• 36:43
  Number 6 was Kamala Harris.
• 36:44
  Can you imagine if they went back to Kamala?
• 36:46
  She,
• 36:46
  they,
• 36:46
  they,
• 36:47
  they won't do that,
• 36:48
  right?
• 36:48
  I mean,
• 36:48
  they can't,
• 36:48
  they can't allow that to happen.
• 36:50
  She's terrible,
• 36:51
  will always be terrible,
• 36:52
  and she,
• 36:53
  I mean.
• 36:55
  She left herself
• 36:57
  scorched earth.
• 36:59
  I mean,
• 36:59
  she,
• 36:59
  there's,
• 37:00
  what's next for her?
• 37:01
  Well,
• 37:01
  when you,
• 37:02
  when you run for president in her situation,
• 37:04
  she's a vice president with it doesn't make any impact,
• 37:06
  right?
• 37:06
  She runs for president in a situation where everyone's saying,
• 37:09
  oh,
• 37:09
  we gotta beat him.
• 37:10
  It's Donald Trump.
• 37:10
  He's a Nazi.
• 37:12
  And then she loses.
• 37:14
  What,
• 37:14
  what's next for her?
• 37:15
  I don't know.
• 37:15
  You know,
• 37:16
  they,
• 37:16
  everybody was talking about her being a governor,
• 37:18
  right?
• 37:19
  I don't know that.
• 37:20
  Why?
• 37:20
  Why does she want to be a governor?
• 37:22
  That's a step down from vice president,
• 37:24
  right?
• 37:24
  Yeah,
• 37:24
  I guess,
• 37:25
  but I mean,
• 37:25
  it's something for her to do.
• 37:26
  What else is she gonna do?
• 37:28
  Just stay home and leave us alone.
• 37:30
  Yes,
• 37:31
  please.
• 37:32
  I mean,
• 37:32
  part of me is OK with her going to California because
• 37:34
  then at least I don't have to live in California.
• 37:36
  That's a choice.
• 37:37
  Uh,
• 37:38
  I don't have to go over there.
• 37:39
  That's a good point.
• 37:39
  I'm here.
• 37:40
  As long as she's not governor of
• 37:41
  Texas.
• 37:42
  I mean,
• 37:42
  leave that to the poor people of California to deal with.
• 37:45
  Maybe,
• 37:46
  but I mean,
• 37:46
  I,
• 37:46
  I just don't see her doing much.
• 37:48
  Uh,
• 37:48
  just,
• 37:48
  just go away,
• 37:49
  go away.
• 37:50
  Go be with hubby and bake cookies and pretend like you're happy.
• 37:54
  Go away.
• 37:54
  Uh,
• 37:55
  we have a few more on the list here.
• 37:56
  Number 45,
• 37:57
  West Moore.
• 37:58
  I heard,
• 37:58
  uh,
• 37:59
  West,
• 37:59
  he was the,
• 38:00
  he was,
• 38:00
  he's the guy with the lightning bolt,
• 38:02
  right?
• 38:02
  He's,
• 38:03
  I mean,
• 38:03
  he's just a front runner.
• 38:04
  Yeah,
• 38:05
  people seem to like him.
• 38:06
  Yeah,
• 38:06
  he,
• 38:06
  he,
• 38:07
  uh,
• 38:07
  he's got a lot of
• 38:08
  big pub.
• 38:08
  He's the mayor,
• 38:09
  uh,
• 38:10
  governor of Maryland,
• 38:11
  right,
• 38:11
  right,
• 38:12
  right,
• 38:12
  right.
• 38:12
  Um,
• 38:12
  I don't,
• 38:13
  I mean,
• 38:13
  honestly,
• 38:13
  like.
• 38:14
  There hasn't been a ton that has come.
• 38:16
  I,
• 38:16
  I don't think there's been a lot of attacks against him yet,
• 38:18
  so he's kind of in that,
• 38:19
  and nobody knows who he is losing er era.
• 38:21
  Yeah,
• 38:21
  I don't think there's more of that.
• 38:22
  The rest of them though,
• 38:22
  Newsom,
• 38:23
  he's not good.
• 38:24
  I don't think Newsome terrible.
• 38:25
  Newsom's terrible.
• 38:26
  He's terrible.
• 38:27
  Why do people even try it?
• 38:28
  I don't know.
• 38:29
  I don't know.
• 38:30
  If you had to pick one off that list,
• 38:31
  show us that list one more time.
• 38:32
  AOC,
• 38:32
  you think she would be the one?
• 38:34
  Absolutely.
• 38:34
  No,
• 38:34
  they're not gonna give it to Shapiro.
• 38:36
  I mean,
• 38:37
  I mean,
• 38:37
  Shapiro would be scarier to me.
• 38:39
  He's Jewish.
• 38:40
  Yeah,
• 38:40
  I know.
• 38:41
  OK.
• 38:43
  That is,
• 38:43
  that's fascinating though.
• 38:44
  It is really seemingly the only reason that Whitmer,
• 38:47
  no way,
• 38:47
  she's a nightmare from Michigan.
• 38:49
  Uh,
• 38:49
  AOC is the one.
• 38:51
  Gosh,
• 38:51
  that's scary.
• 38:52
  AOC AOC is the one,
• 38:53
  and I don't know that she wants to run.
• 38:54
  I mean,
• 38:54
  maybe she does,
• 38:55
  but she wants to,
• 38:57
  she wants the Senate seat,
• 38:58
  right?
• 38:58
  She wants to take Schumer's seat,
• 39:00
  but she's the Senate seat.
• 39:01
  Yeah,
• 39:01
  she would take that.
• 39:02
  But she,
• 39:02
  if she could get president,
• 39:03
  I think she would definitely
• 39:05
  be all over that,
• 39:05
  and she would be,
• 39:07
  people are like,
• 39:07
  Oh,
• 39:07
  Trump's a dictator.
• 39:08
  Wait till you see AOC in action,
• 39:10
  the Senate
• 39:11
  for her.
• 39:12
  I mean,
• 39:12
  that's
• 39:13
  That's a position she can win.
• 39:16
  Yes,
• 39:16
  I don't,
• 39:17
  I think realistically
• 39:19
  she can't win
• 39:20
  president.
• 39:21
  Oh God,
• 39:21
  I hope you're right.
• 39:22
  I don't know,
• 39:22
  man.
• 39:23
  No way.
• 39:24
  I don't know.
• 39:24
  I mean.
• 39:26
  Usually what happens is when you have a president that goes one way,
• 39:29
  there's the reaction the other way,
• 39:31
  right?
• 39:31
  Like you have whatever this person was,
• 39:33
  like when,
• 39:33
  when George W.
• 39:33
  Bush was always criticized about not being able to speak clearly,
• 39:36
  right?
• 39:36
  And then you had the slick Barack Obama came in and
• 39:40
  and then it went to Donald Trump,
• 39:41
  right?
• 39:41
  Kind of the opposite,
• 39:42
  like no longer the slick academic.
• 39:44
  It was a guy who talked like normal people,
• 39:46
  right?
• 39:46
  Yeah,
• 39:47
  and then,
• 39:48
  then,
• 39:48
  you know,
• 39:48
  Donald Trump was an erratic and crazy chaos.
• 39:50
  We have to have a return to normalcy with a guy who.
• 39:53
  You can't figure out,
• 39:54
  you know,
• 39:55
  he can't walk and or say complete sentences,
• 39:57
  but that was his pitch,
• 39:58
  right,
• 39:58
  a return to normalcy,
• 39:59
  this old school guy,
• 40:00
  and then you have,
• 40:01
  you go back to Trump.
• 40:02
  Uh,
• 40:03
  I,
• 40:03
  I,
• 40:03
  I think there is a possibility that people react
• 40:06
  and go,
• 40:07
  they wanna go the extreme opposite way,
• 40:09
  and they see AOC as that person.
• 40:10
  I mean,
• 40:11
  she's such an idiot though,
• 40:12
  it's hard to imagine people would see that.
• 40:16
  He really is.
• 40:17
  I mean,
• 40:18
  she's not as bad as,
• 40:20
  as,
• 40:20
  uh,
• 40:21
  Kamala though.
• 40:24
  Oh,
• 40:24
  that's a statement.
• 40:25
  That's I have to think about that.
• 40:26
  I had to pause and think about that.
• 40:27
  I,
• 40:27
  I mean she's farther,
• 40:28
  I think she's even farther left than Kamala,
• 40:32
  or Kamala,
• 40:33
  but.
• 40:34
  Man,
• 40:35
  I don't know.
• 40:35
  I,
• 40:35
  I,
• 40:36
  she,
• 40:36
  she,
• 40:37
  she certainly is a,
• 40:38
  a bigger like
• 40:40
  celebrity and multimedia force,
• 40:42
  right?
• 40:42
  Like she,
• 40:43
  she's big on social media,
• 40:44
  she can attract that attention.
• 40:47
  I mean,
• 40:47
  if the,
• 40:48
  look,
• 40:48
  the country picks her.
• 40:50
  She's an,
• 40:50
  uh,
• 40:51
  I don't know,
• 40:51
  they're both idiots.
• 40:53
  But I,
• 40:53
  I will say this,
• 40:54
  if this country picks that direction,
• 40:56
  like you just unplug the machine,
• 40:57
  right?
• 40:59
  You put the paper bag,
• 41:00
  you put a plastic bag over the head of the nation,
• 41:03
  you turn off the,
• 41:04
  she's not gonna be JD or
• 41:06
  uh.
• 41:08
  Um,
• 41:09
  DeSantis or one of those guys.
• 41:11
  Yeah,
• 41:11
  I mean,
• 41:11
  I think,
• 41:12
  and certainly JD Vance is the overwhelming favorite,
• 41:14
  unless this goes really poorly,
• 41:16
  right?
• 41:16
  Like if the Trump administration winds up in some negative position,
• 41:19
  then maybe JD Vance is hurt by that.
• 41:21
  But that's what I'm worried about.
• 41:22
  Like if this goes wrong,
• 41:24
  like we have another financial crisis or something like that,
• 41:28
  they're gonna pick the Democrat and she's got a shot to win that primary,
• 41:31
  AOC.
• 41:32
  That's terrifying,
• 41:33
  Jeffy.
• 41:34
  Yes,
• 41:34
  she does.
• 41:35
  That's why you just wanna wake up Friday morning,
• 41:38
  Stu,
• 41:38
  and look up at the sky and
• 41:40
  see the smiley face in the sky.
• 41:42
  5:30 a.m. we're gonna have Saturn and Venus and the moon,
• 41:46
  and it's gonna look like a smiley face in the sky.
• 41:49
  And it's just.
• 41:51
  I don't follow,
• 41:52
  I don't follow astrology as closely as you.
• 41:54
  They're gonna line up in the sky like a smiley face.
• 41:57
  Yes,
• 41:57
  and then everything will be OK.
• 42:00
  Is that what we're supposed to believe?
• 42:01
  Everything will be OK.
• 42:03
  There you go.
• 42:03
  So what time does this happen again?
• 42:04
  Uh,
• 42:04
  5:30 Eastern time,
• 42:07
  uh,
• 42:07
  in the sky.
• 42:08
  Look up
• 42:09
  and,
• 42:10
  uh,
• 42:10
  toward the moon you'll see it,
• 42:11
  and you'll see the moon is what the,
• 42:13
  it's a crescent smiley face,
• 42:14
  crescent,
• 42:14
  and you'll see that Saturn and Venus,
• 42:17
  and it'll look like a smiley face,
• 42:18
  and that's when you'll know too.
• 42:20
  Everything's gonna be OK.
• 42:21
  OK,
• 42:22
  see,
• 42:22
  Jeffy's soothing you.
• 42:23
  Everything's gonna be OK.
• 42:24
  Just sleep at the end of the show.
• 42:26
  Uh,
• 42:26
  Jeff Fisher,
• 42:26
  be sure to check out
• 42:27
  Chewing the Fat with Jeff Fisher to get
• 42:29
  all your astrology information that you might need.
• 42:32
  It's right here on Blaze TV and on the Blaze pod podcast,
• 42:34
  uh,
• 42:34
  network.
• 42:35
  Jeffy,
• 42:35
  appreciate it,
• 42:36
  man.
• 42:36
  Thanks so much for coming on.
• 42:37
  Thank you.
• 42:37
  No,
• 42:37
  thank you.
• 42:45
  Yesterday,
• 42:45
  Blaze TV dropped the final chapter of
• 42:47
  its exhaustive investigation into January 6th,
• 42:50
  and the locked vault is open.
• 42:52
  Dozens of uncut camera feeds now trace every corridor and staircase.
• 42:56
  Timelines that once clashed and the headlines unfold in a single screen.
• 43:00
  Officer Harry Dunn,
• 43:01
  we've talked about him a lot,
• 43:02
  his sworn account stands beside synchronized radio traffic,
• 43:05
  door logs,
• 43:06
  and cell phone data,
• 43:07
  raising serious questions
• 43:09
  that never reached prime time before.
• 43:12
  It's the truth about January 6th,
• 43:14
  a day in the life of Harry Dunn.
• 43:15
  The entire series streams exclusively on Blaze TV.
• 43:18
  Subscribe today,
• 43:19
  blazetv.com/J6.
• 43:21
  Start with episode one,
• 43:22
  follow the trail,
• 43:24
  uh,
• 43:24
  through yesterday's brand new finale,
• 43:26
  and decide what really happened for yourself.
• 43:29
  It's blazetv.com/J6.
• 43:31
  You'll also get access to Glenn's program,
• 43:33
  including his interview tonight
• 43:34
  with Donald Trump.