Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Peace, Balance, Purification, Positive Exponentiation

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: Peace, Balance, Purification, Positive Exponentiation · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Uh peace. Peace sare come to those who say peace,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: and war to those or seek war peace that debet peace.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: The word peace is an ancient beginner and the opposite
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: of it. It's a war. In the history of the universe,
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: in the history of man, human beings, and male dominant society,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: many wars have been fought. I mean, if you go
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: back to the genesis and the history of the Bible,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: if it's a history, if it's a clinology of history,
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: faith or myth. But one thing is clear, if you
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: go back to the history of human to the history
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: of man, it's always been war. From ancient empires or
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: kingdoms or tribes, or the force of nations or religions
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: or alliances, or the amplification of conspiracies pagandas, or the
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: birth of new things, of acquisitions or exploitation or exploration
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: or discovery, or the spread of religions, to the crusade
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: and inquisitions, to slavery and colonizations, to the wars of liberations,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: the wars of independence, and the strife for equality and
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: justice and peace and fairness. War. War has been the
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: thing the ability of humans to kill fellow humans with impunity,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: with impunity on other peace makers, for without them, the
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: world is at war with itself. Respect those who take
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: peace the quick to congratulate and applaud those who initiate
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: unscientials of peace. Peace is on energy that is lacking
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: in the world. Humans talk about good and evil of
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: God and Satan, or die and die our reminding of
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: peace and war, peace and war, I got an evil?
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: If that binary, it's true. But peace and war is ambivalent.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: It's complicated. We get out of nuances sometimes having peace
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: on their dictator on the Tian and oppression it's brutal,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: and sometimes having wars that goes into perpetuity for the
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: sake of good that's free humans and fir civilizations. It's good.
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: So the ambiguity of complexity of peace of war, it
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: is nuanced. Peace can sometimes behavior based on the long
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: term reprecausion. War can sometimes the good based on the
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: long term positive exponentire causality that it brings. Sometimes be
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: talking about peace when the main war. Some might be
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: talking about war when they've been piaced for peace. To orders,
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: it's war to sun and war to others. It's peace
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: to some. The word peace must not be mistaken for
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: the war. For the world war. Because sometimes when people
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: talk about peace at the same time, there's a piece
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: to strength. The same time they say peace and they
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: sell weapons, and they use weapons. They are calling peace
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: by killing fellows humans. And sometimes people talk war war
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: and they don't fight any war. They use war as
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: a threat to take peace. And all those people who
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: use war as a threat by sake peace the world
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: of those people who use peace, they say war. Don't
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: confused this to those who talk war, threaten war to
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: forge pace and those who talk about pace, and which
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: war one group U sap the name pace, one group
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: faster than name pace. You know a peaceful person and
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: a peaceful nation through their policies, through their outrage, through
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: their respect for human dignity, human life, life, the human
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: eco system, the cosmos, energy of positive being, the flourishment,
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: the happiness, the content, the safety and security of a people.
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: We say a lot if they're in peace or at
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: war in the name of peace. Some will tell you
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: to be at peace on need to be at war,
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: And some will tell you we'll go to war because
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: we want peace. Every war that is fought is fought
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: under the name of peace, and it's fought under the
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: name of God. People use peace to go to war,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: people use God to go to war. But peace is peace,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: and God is God, and good is good. But it
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: becomes a matter of subjectivity and rationality or relativity. Peace
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: to one is war to the other a war to another.
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: It's the peace of others. That question becomes what is peace?
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Is it what one person says, one tradition says, one
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: religion says, one castier says, one political system says? Is
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: what one country of people just to say? Or is
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: it based on one gender says, or one race or
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: one group of dominant humans that decide the matters of wars,
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: wars and peace? It's peace the thing of the lade
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: of the powerful that they choose when the world should
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: be peaceful, and they choose when the world should be
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: at war. Is the right to say that the powerful
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: can wish a ward that the want and still get
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: credit for peace. They create a war, the wich the war,
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: they signed the peace, and they take credit for the peace.
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: So is it the same thing? Peace and war by
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: the same person? What is peace to the powerful? What
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: does it mean? Capitulation, surrender, acceptance of chorus terms? Do
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: it my way, the highway? As a piece of your
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: destroyer or killed and present, or canceled or fired, or
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: exile or sanctioned or abandoned or excommunicated. The conditionalities of peace.
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: What does peace mean to the wake and powerless or poor?
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: That piece is word accepting their faith, accepting the faith
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: the read occur. The price of peace is the price
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: of peace, the weakness of the loser, the capitulation of
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: the loser. These are questions asked by the Synics by
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: those who don't believe in peace. There are some humans
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: who actually don't believe in pace. That peace is a word.
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: Peace come with spirit. That peace comes with the dignity
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: of life. That peace, that word peace comes with respect
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: of the sanity of life, the sanity of life. The
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: word peace come with respect, dignity, reciprocity, equity, justice, fairness,
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: that humanity within the human being. The word is good
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: for me, is good for others. Now in the care
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: of that human being is a yarn for inner peace.
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Until the externality of that being peace becomes safety and
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: security and flourishment and stability and continuity. It's not just
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: a document, It's not just a number. Price for peace.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: Peace is not an award as it's political. Sometimes the
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: number Prize for peace is called with with with an escalation,
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: for war, for division, for position. Sometimes that number Prize
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: for Peace it's a portfolio to an opposition candidate to
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: destabilize the country. So sometimes that award in itself it
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: is a sword, it's a weapon. It's a validation to
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: bring chaos in the names of political genders. Sometimes that
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: Nobel Prize for Peace is emasquerade is to pay the
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: blind eye for what comes next is to shape a narrative,
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: is to convince the people for a force hero upon
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: which blood shall be spilled and many people shall die.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: We should hope at the Nobel prize given to this
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: hero in Venezuela is not used as a catalyst for
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: blood to spell. Don't use peace, I use that name
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: piece for blood. Don't use the name piece of blood.
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: If you choose to give somebody an award for peace,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: let it be for the sake of humanity, for the
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: good of humanity, not a political agenda, not a political connotation,
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: not a divide, not autocracy and democracy. Don't attach peace.
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: Don't coote peace with something that would spell human blood.
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: Use diploma, say and dialog and the consolation and consensus
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: beaulting to forge political grievances. Don't use war and strength
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: or weapons as as tools for peace. It cannot be
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: destroyed the same thing that you are creating, unless you
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: are creating a narrative of what peace you be. So
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: peace becomes subjective, that peace must come from a particular
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: part of the war, from a particular organization. Peace is
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: not a scientific invention. It's a human state of being.
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: It's not an experiment. It's a state, just like truth.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: Truth is not an experiment, it's a state. You cannot,
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: as scientists, retain anything about truth. The scientific method is
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: that to prove facts, not truth, just as human society
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: shouldn't decide on what peace is because peace, onready is
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: a thing. It's a state within the human being. Just
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: as humans cannot compare equality for fairness. Equality again is
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: a political word used to create instability. For they now,
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: those creators of instability, They now now what every human
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: being youd for is fairness. You don't you know, I
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: hear a war weighs on the grounds of fairness. It's
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: about equality. That means nothing. They don't hear an award
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: for fairness because fairness is natural. Fairness is like the truth.
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: The truth is natural, fairness is spiritual. Fairness and peace
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: is the true God and they. Fairness is to God
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: as peace is to humanity. You put fairness and piece together,
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: you get good, fairness, peace and God. That which is good,
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: it is true, that which is good is fair, and
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: I wish is good and fair, it's peaceful. You must
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: remember this ancient truth, the stability within the life of
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: the human being. That whole monste says, it's fairness and
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: peace with them. Fairness and peace with them brings forth
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: a good human and a positive being. I'll say it again,
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: Fairness and peace with him brings out a good person
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: and a positive human being. That is the care of
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: triangulism and the philosophy of multiversality. But the God in us,
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: the infinity in the being itself, the infinity of being,
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: a good within the God with him, the peace with
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: him must not be taken on since we don't teach
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: truth anymore, since everything has been organized through the scientific
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: through the lens of the scientific method. So truth becomes
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: artificial creation through this, replaced with facts and peace inside
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: is the place with war, and fairness is replaced with equality,
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: and the pacide of life becomes subjectivity and relativity. Peace
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: is peace because I say so. Truth is true because
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: my traditional religion and culture says so. So the thing
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: itself has been forgotten and the place with something else.
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: So when humans talk about God, they talk about something
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: they've created to that satisfaction. That's called God. A human
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: talk about peace, it's peace based on their own terms.
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: A human talk about goodness or good and evil. It's
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: based on what is good for them and the experts
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: of others. So therefore, when when the group is celebrating
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: peace and that our group is crying, peace becomes a
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: victory and power and might and plood that they be
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: Peace did not mean let there be war. Don't fight
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: wars in the name of peace. That's a contadiction. You
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: don't care people and then talk about peace. The dead
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: are not peaceful by sacrificing their lives for peace. The
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: dead are not peaceful for sacrificing their life for peace,
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: because they can be peace whether people die. They don't
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: need to make people die in the name of peace.
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: Because there is peace. People die because we are refusing peace.
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: Sometimes we conflict and convince humans from the truth. The
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: peace that humans celebrate, it's actually the victure of war
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: or peace, because that is not true peace. They don't
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: need to go to war for true peace. They don't
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: need to go to war for fairness. Equity. It's a
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: legal term that borrows from the moral code, from Jesus,
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: the Confucius. Not due to others, what you like them
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: do unto you. That in itself it's different from fairness.
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: It's different from fairness because due to others who like
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: them do to you is if you go to war
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: with me, it's fed out. Go to war with you.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: It means an eye of one eye. But my philosophy
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: talks about fundamental fans right action, doing what you know
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: within is right. The God within, the greatest omnidisign now
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: within that good, within that thing in you that spark
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: that truth, truth that the human being is a set
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: of nature. But the jink of God, the jink cod
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: of the infinity, Infinity canly be good, Infinity cannot be negative.
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: You don't want to live into perpetuity in pain and
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: suffering and cruelty and hurt or death. They won't perpet
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: your death. You won't prepare your life. So infinity is good.
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: The infinity in you is God in you. That connection
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: to that cosmos, eternity, the multiversality of being, that course
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: upon you to connect to that whole. To be peaceful
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: means to be fair, means to be God. That's the truth.
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: You don't go to war in the name of God.
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: You know that's a contradiction. You don't go to war
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: the name of peace. You know that's a contradiction. You
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: don't subjugate, enslave, and exploit people in the name of justice.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: You know that's a contradiction. You don't take from others
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: and deprive others fundamental freedoms and top of fairness. You
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: know that's the contratation. The world order has been turned
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: upside down. Truth is not what truth is. Truth is
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: what lies, what accepted organized lies is. The society in
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: which we live in is artificially constructed to deny the truth,
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: to deny fairness, to deny peace, upon which artificial constructs
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: has been created. A type of interpretation of God. That's
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: so I choosing as some are not. A type of
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: interpretation of race, a type of interpretation of gender, a
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: type of interpretation of what wealth is. He must only
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: live for wealth anymore. He must live for money. He asks,
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: where is money just a feared paper system and number
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: system that some I just give you more numbers than
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: others for no fundamental fair reason. Because you don't have
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: that power to question. You'll have that power to doubt
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: and ask question. You have that power to raise your voice.
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: He must have the conditions to accept artificialities. You must
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: are programmed to induct the nation and orthodoxy. Do not
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: believe in truth, to read the good truth, do not
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: believe in peace, to read the good peace, do not
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: believe in fundamental goodness. To reader cook goodness. Do not
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: believe in the God within? To reader, could that God
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: with him? The God internal today is the true God.
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: The God external today is given today like a given name.
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: The given name is not you well without a name,
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: as just you. Anything added as to you, I impulse
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: on you. It's just meant to take you away from you.
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: But the being is a being itself and nothing else
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: by itself or that which you have come to be.
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: Nobody else can be that but you. You can only
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: seek to know that which you are, the knowledge of
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: the self. That's the peace with her and wants to
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: know the self, that's the truth with it. And within
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: this truth and peace with them, there is God. And
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: when there is that good, that's what I call the
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: positive causality. The positive causality in you is that which
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: you're supposed to exponent it, but exponent in that positive
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: causality and purifying your negativity. That purified positive causality is
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: a God in you. And once you exponentiate that into infinity,
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: you become that divine being in that universal state of
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: pain that motive us are intelligence, that infinity intelligence of good.
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: The gene code of God is a gen cold of
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: the peace within the knowledge of truth. There is a
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: thing in you now when you seek the truth, you
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: find peace. The enlightenment of the ban is sick in truth.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: Once you get to know the truth, you're not sick
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: to go to war. People go to war because the
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: fundamentals of logic it's broken. People fight because the fundamental
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: of wisdom is broken. People kill one another because the
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: fundamentals of good that God in them has been corrupted.
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: The basic formula to the triangles, to the tangleism of
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: wisdom is that the opposite of things in themselves finds
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: peace within the harmony of themselves. The opposite of things
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: in themselves finds peace within the harmony of themselves. Within themselves,
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: the opposite of things in themselves finds peace within the
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: harmony of themselves. Or find harmony within the peace peacefulness
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: in themselves, the simplicity of the philosophies. The negation of
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: the opposite finds itself in the middle. And our middle
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: is acceptable because our media is part of the opposites.
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: The negation of the opposite finds a balance within itself
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: that MPP measurement, proportionality and balance. The negation of the
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: opposites finds balance and peace within itself. That's why, based
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: on the Triangleism in America system, you start counting with
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: minus one, zero, one, and two three on your go
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: there is a negative, there is a positive, and in
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: between the negative and the positive, it's zero is neutral.
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: The neutrality that zero there is peace. It's neutral. Neutrality
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: is part of the negative and part of the positive.
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: A neutral charge is a combination of the posits, the
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: negative and positive. So in Zianism and Triandalism philosophy, the
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: neutral it's the opposites. The neutral is the negative and positive.
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: And based on the artificial intelligence, says a AI intelligence
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: is philosophy. The human being is born with the AI
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: intelligences of android intelligence, artificial intelligence, and alien intelligence, the
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: infinity intelligence in you, but you cannot develop this guarding
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: you and me. It's this knowledge, this intelligence in you.
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: When philosophers were looking for the philosopher's stone, they were misled.
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: They didn't just understand that the philosopher's stone is not external.
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: The philosopher's stone is internal. The philosopher's stone is coded
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: in your in your AI intelligences. The call to my philosophy,
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: the philosopher's stone is in you, is coded in your
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: AI intelligences. The means you must develop your android intelligence,
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: your HumanID intelligence in you, and purified that human intelligence
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: to develop that dificial intelligence in you, the software necessary
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: to therefore ignite the infinity or the alien intelligence in you.
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: It means the intelligence of God, of omni, good, of omnipresence,
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: of omni purity, of positive causality at peace that humans
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: do about. It's creedit this the justice that is sick.
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: It is called that fairtas acordad. It's quit a so
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: based on Zarianism philosophy based on trianglism philosophy a moti
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: versalism philosophy. The philosophy is that I've written apart I can.
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: I've come to represent the opposite of things gets the
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: peace with her or their neutrality. There is no war
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: or wisdom and understanding. Argue you an example, or you
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: say positive and a negative and finds the balance. Or
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: I'll use I'll make a declarative statement, an absolute statement,
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: because humans fight and go to war because of absolute absolute.
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: But when it diffuses absoluteism, the condensation of absolute, of
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: app solutism and determinism creates a neutral code. Then neutral
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: code is balanced, and that balance can be exponentiated or
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: purified before being exponanciated. Because balance in itself it's not zero,
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: it's not purified form of the thing itself. Balance it's
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: the good and bad, is right a wrong, it's a
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: positive and negative. Balance is a state of stability, but
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: stability in itself it needs to cultivate sustainability, and sustainability
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: therefore needs to be replicated, amplified, multiplied, and exponentiated on
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: conditions that through the stable times humans have purified themselves.
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: Is the purification form of the human being, that is
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: the truth or the good in the being that can
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: be explot appreciated. Stability, it's not the pure vacation or
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: the purified state of things. It's just homostenesis. That's what
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: humans called peace. So peace is sufficient and necessary for
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: human functioning. That the base to the human existing is peace.
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: It means peace. It's at least common. They don't need
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: to necessary for life to mean something. They see life
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: meaning something in itself. It's nothing but just something. So
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: therefore you need to build on peace to be the
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: thing that you want to be to live a life
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: of purpose or meaning or something. So peace is the
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: fund of matters to it. So without that peace, we
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: have the world that we have to die because peace
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: in itself has been something that's artificial. Peace in itself
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: in the world after they create chaos, wars and divisions, inequalities,
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: iniquities and justice. People use peace to there as a
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: weapon to self destroy, just as people miss use truth
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: to self destroy. I'll remind people, if it's truth, then
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: everybody should know it. If it's fair, then everybody should
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: feel it. If it's good, then it's internal. If it's good,
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: it's internal. The truth is the mind. Good it's the
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: soul because it's internal good. Is the soul because he's
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: internal peace. It is the mind because it's infinity. And
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: that piece that is infinity is the intelligence of God.
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: The God is not the theologian God. The tailor young
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: God is a form of God. The God I'm talking
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: about is the greatest omni designer, the thing or the
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: being or the essence of itself, that is itself upon
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: which anything else was made under its name, or a
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: variation of that which is, or a misapprobation of that
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: which is. I'm not talking of the gods of humans
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: from the philosophical God, the greatest omni designer. That's the intelligence. Indeed,
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: that gives you the greatest of peace. That's the truth
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: in there. That's the fairness in there that has been
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: taken away by the gods of the earth by corruption
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: of the truth. You know within you that what you're
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: doing is not fair. See that is right and wrong,
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: opposite words. There is war and peace, opposite words. But
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: there's no fairness or anything else, because fairness is true.
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: Fairness is true because fairness is good. Is God, not
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: the good of humans. Fairness is God, a god with them,
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: not rely just God, the thing within that you're the
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: jink could of can't thattin doing with the religious God.
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: Religious God is a prescription. It's a prescription, it's a treatment.
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: It's not a care. It's something to believe in. We
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: are not connected to the conspoms of your own being.
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: It is something that slves ignorance upon which that ignorance
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: is exploited and use to create a world that we
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: have to day where the true God means nothing, where
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: the true God is an intelligence. It's knowledge of God,
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: of right and wrong, of truth, of that power with
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: them the mystic of being. People go to war because
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: they are foster, because they know within that they shouldn't
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: go to war with other humans because based on Zarianism
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: and Entangleism principles, you don't need to go to war
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: because there is always a middle ground between the complain,
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: the contrary and the complain obituary. There is a why
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: make away where there is no way, because there is
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: always a why. It's because we refuse the why. Now
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: we go to war. It's because we refuse the way
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: that we fight. It's because we refuse the why that
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: we had one another. I will give you an absolute statement,
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: I can't say anything to you and I and I
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: can neutralize it to prove to you that there is
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: no conflict as the principle of neutrality, the principle of balance,
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: the jangleism principle, triangleism geometry. Some people talk about secret geometry.
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: I talk about trianglism geometry. You decide if it is
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: the secret geometry or it's just a thing of itself
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: and is no definition, but a thing that is. I
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: cannot be taken away if I tell you I love America.
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: If you don't like me saying that you cannot go
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: to war to me and with me, you go to
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: war with me because you have not understood the tanglism
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: principle or tanglism geometry. Tanglism geometry is an infinity principle
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: that things are meant to continue, not to stop. No
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: for ways to continue, thanks, not to stop, thanks, conflict,
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: you stop, thanks, fighting stop Thanks. Triangleism geometry is the
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: call to the infinity principle, and there's always a way,
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: and you have continuity. It cannot be continue that which
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: is not good, that which is hateful, hurtful, harmful, destructive, negative.
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: You cannot be continuing that which is good, which is helpful.
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: You can early continue the positive, not the negative. If
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: all the brain is intelligent enough, are knowledgeable enough to
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: know right around, But most humans are not given the
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: power to know right around. The intelligence is dead. The
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: intelligence are right around. It's not dead, but just dumbant.
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: It's not activated, it's been muted, and the mutation, like
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: the human being fall asleep and not of the rip
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: of that human ignorance, ignorance is born. So the human
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: being is in hibernation. Why the ignoring funt of that
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: being is in existence. That's the world in which we
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: have today. Until that thing ignites, that being unsplacked that
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: light inside to seek truth and knowledge, for the being
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: to know itself. That are not supposed to fight with anything.
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: They're not supposed to be in conflict with anything because
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: of the triangulism neutralization principle, the tanglism geometry, seeking balance,
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: purifying that balance into a positive, and exponentiating that positive
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: to infinity. If I tell you, for example, I hate
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: uh A, the next thing your brains you say immediately
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: is that I like A. And then the third thing,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: look for the balance I might or my not like
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: a For example, I'll say it again, I like apple.
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: The second thing that comes to your many. The first
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: thing that comes to your mind is that I don't
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: like apple. It means you must negate the equivalent of
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: what I've said in negation. The equation must be equal
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: to itself until that which you said as a triangleism equation,
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: the tanglism equation. Everything that's said to you must be
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: negated immediately in your brain, and then you reconcided too
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: to it. If I said I don't like apple, automatically
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: your braincher said I like apple, and you need to
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: merge the two together to get the true statement. The
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: true statement is that I might like or don't like apple.
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: I might just don't know what I'm talking about, like
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: my main hate. But to be correct, I might like
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: or not like apple. That's a true statement. Without true statement,
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: there is no conflict, there is no disagreement, there is
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: no war. It's just understanding. And that is wisdom in
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: itself of understanding. The thing to those who don't like Israel,
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: if somebody tells if somebody tell you I don't like Israel,
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: you must equivocate the opposite of that statement by saying
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: you mean you like Israel, and now you must muge
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: the two together. He might or might not like Israel,
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: and I'll be a true state man, and the next
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: wee can't. Then who cares? Then then you can't give
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: the benefit of doubt and things. We just move on.
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: But that's the true statement. I believe in God, the
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: equivalent I don't believe in God. The balance, I might
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: or I might not believe in God. That's the true statement.
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: Because you don't understand the minds of humans. What humans
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: actually say. They're believing, they might not believe in That's
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: why I got this word in English, may might or
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: this world of ambivalence of reconciliations. So if you follow
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: the triangleism equation, you know are getting confluent with anybody.
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: You're not fighting buters because the fighting takes away your
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: time from the log from seeking truth. And you cannot
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: seek the truth unless you expand your knowledge. You can
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: expire your knowledge unless you initiate your air intelligences, your
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: android intelligence, artificial intelligence, and infinity intelligence. But humans waste
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: time fighting and killing one another, and using and misappropriating
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: the word piece to mean fighting another. D You can
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: see you go back in the Bible. It's all about war, wars,
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: people fighting, and you got the gods of wars promising.
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Go back to the history of humans, to the all
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: the gods that humans have created, to all their god,
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: even the God of peace. It's linked to war war
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: because they have not understand this code. Changlism, geometry, geometric principle, tangleism.
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: Balance the power of positive exponentiation says that you can
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: exponentiate a purified balance where you must seek balance to
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: get paced against the ability. The balance might not be right,
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: but it's conducive. You can only work on balance, and
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: that balance is what they call peace in the peace.
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: In the peace in order to purify your intelligence, your soul.
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: Why impuify your soul, you can seek eternity. If you
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: purify your intelligence, you can seek infinity. Your being is
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: a being of infinity and the being of eternity. They
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: cannot have that without balance. Balance in geobetic terms, peace
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: in human terms point zero. But in the complaint, I'll
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: be trying and completely contraary the source that will make
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: your way with the rest way and based on triangulism
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: press upon philosophy, the being is here to purify itself,
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: purify intelligence, and purify it soul in order to sick
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: infinity intelligence. God is not somewhere else. God is in
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: the infinity intelligence of positive causality. But God is already
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: in you. You know, I just don't know that God.
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: God is knowledge. God is knowledge. It's not a physical thing,
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: it's knowing. You cannot know that God if you don't
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: have peace. Philosopher Prince They are intelligences. Philosopher Prince Israe'sar
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: October thirteen, twenty twenty five from the Philosophical City of Philasophegus.
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: Thank you