Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Door Dasher Done Goofed, MarryLisa.com | HBR News 527

Transcript

Door Dasher Done Goofed, MarryLisa.com | HBR News 527 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five twenty seven Nordon asher
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Brook done goofed Marylisa dot com, where we discussed the
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: news of the week and give it the Badger Treasure.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. Hope you
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: at all of the absurdity so that you are not
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: consumed by it. I am your host, Brian. I am
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: joined by doctor Randamercam. Hannah is trying to get in.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: She'll be in. I'm pretty sure she'll figure it out,
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: but I had to get the show started, so as
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: soon as she gets in, I'll give her a voice.
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: As you know, we men, we like to control women's voices.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: So we have a great show line up for you
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: guys today, So please be sure to continue the conversations
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: both in the chat as well as the comments section,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: and please try to smash that like button so that
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: we can maybe reach more people. It's always helpful to
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: get a like button smashed because, like the YouTube algorithm,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: dark lords may allow us to slip through the cracks
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: if you do that. So on today's HBI News show,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: we're going to be looking at mankeeping because it is
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: something that we talked about a while ago, and it
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: looks like the rest of the world is catching up,
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: or at least some people in the red pill space
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: are A California woman gets desperate and tries marketing herself
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: Scottish eugenics. No, I'm not kidding, and more so, stick around,
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: it's going to be a good time and be sure
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: to join us afterwards for the Patron Only Show. So
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: the Patron Only Show, we got this article from I
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: don't remember the website, but it doesn't really matter. It's
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: some rag, but it's a big one. It's like Washington
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: Post or New York New York or New York Times
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: or something like that. And apparently the Department, the US
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: Department of Labor, is putting out a social media campaign
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: to try to get like know men back in the workforce.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: And well it's a problem because apparently there's too many
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: white men in the imagery. They're using like a retro
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: sort of style and it's probably all AI generated. But
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: that that doesn't really matter because it upset the right people.
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: So it says here the Labor delevent ah, I see
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: what you did there?
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: Uh?
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: The Labor Department social media campaign depicts a white male workforce.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: The campaign has drawn scrutiny, with critics saying the agency
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: is not realistically portraying the diversity of the country and
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: is setting messages that feel exclusionary. Yes, that happens.
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: This is gonna pick your cotton and your vegetables. As
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: I said, what the problem.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Is, Yeah, right, who's gonna these are the guys that
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: are gonna mow your lawns and uh, you know, watch
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: your kids where you're at work or something. So we're
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: gonna be reading through this article in the Patron Show.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: And if you guys want to join us, you have
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: to become a member by going to feed the Badger
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: dot com forward slash subscribe five bucks a month. They're
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: gonna get you into Discord where you will be able
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: to watch all of the additional content, like all of
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: our Patron shows and works in progress. And there's also
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: lots of community things that are going on, like movie
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: nights and game nights and such. I think they usually
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: do game nights today or tonight. They play Cards against
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: Humanity for example, Still Going Strong and uh yeah, so
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: like please consider if you just want to check it
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: out for free, you can just go to Badger Nations
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: dot online. You'll get access to some of the like
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: the public parts of the discord and uh yeah, come
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: check us out there. And if you don't want to
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: wake up one morning to find that we've been yeaded
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: from the Internet, then go to where our archive content
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: is at, which is badgerfeed dot com or Honey Badger
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com. And also follow us on Rumble because
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: I don't think Rumble's gonna be getting like yeading us
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: from the internet, so our content will continue to go
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: up there and we would really appreciate it. So let
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: me just do a quick well up there goes Hannah.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: She's here sell you things. Yes, yes we can. Let
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: me just give you a voice because the audience can't yet,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: so I'm just gonna plug you in. Uh, here we
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: go because you can only speak because I allow it. Okay,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: there we go. All right, yeah you're here. Okay, So
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: with that said it, yes exactly, Uh that said, let
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: us get into today's stories. So first off, we gotta
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: follow up Allison and I covered it, but I figured
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: you guys would want to get a swing at this
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: topic as well. Yes, uh yeah, So I don't think it.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: See that's the thing. Like also like well we already did.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: It's like yeah, but they they're they got words, they
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: got words for this, and we gotta let them have it.
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: And and so we're just gonna we're gonna revisit this
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: because it's awesome. So in October of twenty twenty five,
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: Olivia Henderson, also known on I Guess TikTok as Lee
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: liv Rose Henderson Uh, the twenty three year old door
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: dash delivery driver in Oswego, New York, went viral on
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: TikTok after posting a video claiming she was sexually assaulted
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: during a contactless food delivery on October twelfth. She alleged
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: that the customer had deliberately left his door open and
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: was passed out on his couch with his pants down,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: exposing himself as she approached. Henderson recorded the scene from
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: inside the home and shared the footage online, accusing the
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: man of intentional exposure. The video sparked widespread debate about
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: gigworker safety, with many initially supporting her, while DoorDash quickly
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: deactivated her account, stating it was due to a privacy
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: violation for filming and posting inside a customer's home without consent,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: not for reporting the incident. Following the investigation, Oswego Police
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: found that basically they have arrested her, arrested and charged
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: with two class E felonies, second degree unlawful surveillance and
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: first degree dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image. So they
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: found no evidence of criminal intent or sexual assault on
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: the part of the customer who was intoxicated and unconscious
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: inside of his own private residence. Okay, so these these
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: are under New York law. Each carries potential penalties of
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: a four years in prison. Authority cited her entering the
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: home beyond what was necessary for a contact was drop
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: off literally just leave it at the door, I know,
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: because people will get DoorDash all the time around here
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: and that's what they do, uh, to record and then
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: publicly sharing the video. She was released with an appearance
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: ticket and is scheduled to appear in Oswego City Court
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: on December fourth, twenty twenty five. The customer faced no charges,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: but both parties were banned from door dash like as
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: as clients and yeah, so uh this has there are
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: still people supporting her thinking that she's the victim here
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: but this is what this is what happened. Close up?
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: Good lord, look at the state of that.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I know that's I figured this is a good
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: a good face.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: All right, So yeah, I was. I was pretty fuming
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: last time we talked about this, not not just because
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: it's highly unprofessional conduct for a delivery person, but because
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: it's yet another example of a woman somehow painting herself
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: as the victim of her own predatory behavior. Frankly, but
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: anger does subside when justice is done, and I really
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: wasn't expecting quite so much justice. I didn't even think
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: she'd get like one misdemeanor, let alone two felonies. It
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: almost seems a bit overboard, But whatever, I didn't know
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: those were felonies. That's just that's just my ignorance. I'm
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: guessing she didn't either, But ignorance of the law is
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: no defense against it. And to be fair, what she
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: did was pretty fucked up, especially when you scan it
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: for men's rear, which is a legal term meaning mind
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: with guilty mind guilty mind. And now that I've seen
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: the footage of the incident and the last I have,
• 8:18
  Speaker 2: it has cleared a few things up. Yes, the door
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: was wide open, and you could see from the doorstep,
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: albeit at an angle or rather cute angle, that there
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: was a person lying on a sofa, But he clearly
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: wasn't moving or looking up from his reclined state, and
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: at a glance, it wasn't at all apparent that what
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: he was wearing or not wearing, unless you go out
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: of your way to examine the scene. And that's what
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: she did. She very much examined the scene. She called
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: it sexual assault, and only a deluded feminist darv artists
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: could possibly call that a sexual assault. The remaining question
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: is was it indecent exposure? And I'd give it a
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: fairly confident no, and it seems like the law agrees.
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: But did she even act like it was indecent exposure?
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: How do people normally react when they become the victim
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: of indecent exposure? I mean, you'd probably scream and run
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: right or at least you'd make some kind of startled
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: noise and then walk away pretty fucking quickly. If she
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: had made a startled noise, it probably would have woken
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: him up, as you can see by the footage if
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: you have seen it. What she did was quietly take
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: her phone out film the scene for several seconds, even
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: zoomed in on the centerpiece of the scene, and it
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: was an optical zoom. And then she walked away down
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: the driveway, still recording. She held the phone up to
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: her face and nonchalantly said, that's worked up. She did
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: the meme, folks. What about how when men want to
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: show you a picture of something, they show you the thing,
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: But when women want to show you a picture of something,
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: they show you the thing with her face in front
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: of it. And that's what she posted on the internet.
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: She couldn't help herself. It would still be a double
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: felony with or without her face, but this self insertion
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: of her face gives a reasonably clear indication of her motive.
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: She wanted to be famous. She wasn't filming evidence of
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: a crime so she could show it to the police
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: or even to dow Dash. She was filming an episode
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: of the Livvy Rose Henderson Show. She could display it
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: to the whole world for clout for entertainment points and
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: indy for victim points. Those two kinds of points are
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: one and the same in the fucked up mind of
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: a feminist. Of course, ironically enough, the filming was itself
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: the crime, and the insertion of her face only proved
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: bang to rights that she was the criminal. She went
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: ahead and shot herself in the face figuratively and kind
• 11:34
  Speaker 2: of literally. So all in all, it's kind of hilarious.
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: I can't stay mad mad as someone who does something
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: as hilarious as that. She deserves applause. If anything, it's
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: the greatest self phone of the year, and she did
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: it with a self phone. It almost makes you wonder
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: if that's why they're called cell phones. You just love
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: it when a plan comes together, a cell phone plan.
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: I'm just milking out at this point. Yeah, yeah, rotten
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: Jelly's stupid, bitch, fucking deserve and so on.
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah. I I only have one one caveat to to
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: add to to that in terms of agreeing with you know,
• 12:20
  Speaker 3: the description of what she did, because the video does
• 12:25
  Speaker 3: not contain evidence that the door was open before she
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: interacted with it. This is something that you have to understand.
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: We don't know still that she walked up and found
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: a door a jar enough for her to not be
• 12:46
  Speaker 3: able to avoid seeing, right, we don't. We don't know
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: in fact, that it was even a jar at all.
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: Actually we do, we do, Actually know that she there.
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: She basically re up loaded the video editing out the
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: part where she pushes the door open, and there's actually
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: like a screenshot of that.
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: She didn't add out the part where she put her
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: face in at the end of it.
• 13:12
  Speaker 3: Fuck yeah, but that's not what's important. I mean, that's
• 13:15
  Speaker 3: the funny part. But the important thing is this, all right,
• 13:20
  Speaker 3: according to the law, if you have been told not
• 13:26
  Speaker 3: to interact with someone's property, right you've been told drop
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: the thing off on the porch and leave, Entering the
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: property is trespassing. So anything she did after that is
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: on her, not on him. So she if she pushed
• 13:43
  Speaker 3: the door open, which in you know, the video shows
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: that she did, and there's no evidence that she could
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: see in there prior to doing that, that she could
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: have been exposed to anything prior to making it possible
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: for herself to see in there, and her pushing that
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: door open is a huge part of what makes this
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: a crime. If that had been a female on the couch,
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: even if she was completely buck naked, the bare ass
• 14:21
  Speaker 3: bear tits everything. The fact that the guy entered her
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: place without her permission would have gotten him arrested. Everybody
• 14:34
  Speaker 3: would be arguing that it was his fault. Nobody would
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: be arguing that he was a victim of sexual assault,
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: much less any kind of harassment or any other inappropriate behavior.
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: Nobody would be mistaking this for anything other than a
• 14:52
  Speaker 3: crime of voyeurism, which is what she did. She committed voyeurism,
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: and then she compounded it, and if her state has
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: revenge porn laws, she's really in deep chick. She compounded
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: it by publishing a nude image of a person against
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: their will. Now, voyeurism has been illegal for generations, so
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: it's not something like, you know, you can't really blame
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: voyeurism laws on feminists, right, but revenge porn laws you can,
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: because they're the ones who advocated to get those laws passed.
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: That if you are in possession, even of nudes that
• 15:41
  Speaker 3: somebody gave you, and you put those on the internet
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: against the will of the individual who gave them to you,
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: that that is a crime and it's considered a felony
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: and you can go to jail for that. They knocked
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: down several revenge porn sites, and I'm not saying they're
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: any objection to that, but I did say when that
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: passed that, you know, the first state that passed that.
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: My my response was that this is going to come
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: back to bite feminists in the ass, and here is
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: where it did. She's going to go probably to jail
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: for both entering this individual's home after he told her
• 16:23
  Speaker 3: not to, He explicitly told her not to, and then
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: also if her state, if their state has revenge porn laws,
• 16:35
  Speaker 3: she's going to go to jail for that. So I
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: don't feel bad for her. What she did was predatory.
• 16:43
  Speaker 3: She exploited a passed out, drunk naked man for clicks,
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: and she publicly humiliated him for clicks. And no man
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: would get away with doing that to any woman, And
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: you know, rightfully, so nobody should have that done to them.
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: But yeah, I've been arguing with somebody on x recently
• 17:07
  Speaker 3: that keeps wanting to portray this as her as the
• 17:11
  Speaker 3: victim of this. This woman has psychoized. This wasn't fear,
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: She wasn't afraid of this guy. She wasn't victimized by
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: this guy. He didn't pose anything on her. This was
• 17:24
  Speaker 3: a person who saw an opportunity to exploit a past out,
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: drunk naked man for clicks on the internet, took it
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: and is now regretting her choices, and that's it. That's
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: all that is. More power to the state in this
• 17:42
  Speaker 3: instance because they did the right thing. You know, it's
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: just one time you'll hear me say more power to
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: the state in any instance. Women need to know, you know,
• 17:53
  Speaker 3: being a woman doesn't mean that you can do this,
• 17:56
  Speaker 3: and it doesn't make you a victim when you prey
• 18:01
  Speaker 3: on someone else. This is the same praying sexually on
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: someone for clicks, which is sexual pleasure in its own right.
• 18:13
  Speaker 3: For for this chick, like she's she's getting her ego
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: fed by doing this. Isn't really any different than sexually
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: praying on someone so you can masturbate. To the photos,
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: she's masturbating her ego instead of her genitals. Big whoop.
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: It's the same thing, and she deserves exactly what she's getting.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: All right, sounds good to me, So yeah, again, this
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: is good news.
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: Maybe we'll call back in like in a few months
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: when we've got the results of her trial. Yeah, because
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: she was found not guilty on both charges.
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: I hope that she's going to be appearing on court
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: in December fourth, so we'll probably find something by that time.
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: Unless you know, these things take time. They might be
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: multiple hearings, but we'll definitely follow when we know more.
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: So let us know what you guys think about this
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. We're going to move on to
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: the next story. So on November fourteenth, and I found
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: this out the other day and I thought it was crazy.
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: An independent expert group chaired by Professor Anna Gasler, Scotland's
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: Women's Health Champion, published a report commissioned by the Scottish
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: government recommending sweeping reforms to abortion laws. The key proposals
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: include fully decriminalizing abortion for women, removing all criminal penalties
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: for self managed terminations, allowing abortion abortion on request for
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: up to twenty four weeks without needing any specified grounds
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: or approval from two doctors, and regulating the procedure purely
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: as healthcare rather than under the nineteen sixty seven Abortion Act.
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: The group explicitly advised that any new legislation should not
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: include a specific prohibition on sex selective abortion, arguing there
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: is nope, there is no robust evidence of it occurring
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: in Scotland, that such a band would be unworkable, requiring
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: intrusive questioning of all women or racial profiling of certain
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: ethnic communities, and that it could deter access to care.
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: The recommendation sparked immediate controversy, with politicians, pro life groups
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: and some media outlets accusing the SNP led government of
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: paving the way to legalize sex selective abortions, a practice
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: currently unlawful under interpretations of existing UK law as fetal
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: sex is not a valid ground. Critics called it morally
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: repugnant and dystopian, warning that it disproportionately affects female fetuses,
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: So sex selective abortion exists, female fetuses most affected, or
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: at least they're proposing sex specific abortion, so if you
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: find out you have a boy you didn't want a boy,
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: you can abort the boy, for example. The expert panel
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: and supporters rejected these claims as misleading, emphasizing the focus
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: on decriminalization and women's autonomy, not endorsement of sex selection.
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: The Scottish government, via Minister Jenny Minto, stated it is
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: only the first stage of review, will gather further evidence
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: and stakeholder views, and has made no decisions on implementing
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: any changes. Sex selective abortion remains illegal under current law
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: and no bill has been proposed, so this is just
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: like tabling an idea from the let me just go
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: back and get this person's name again, Professor Anna Glazier,
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: Scotland's women's health champion. Apparently it's just like some kind
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: of warrior, I don't know, bring forth your champion of
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: women's health. But yeah, she's the ones proposal she won
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: two cun center or one cunt leaves. So anyway, so yeah,
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: what are you there? There? You go, there's there's there's.
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: Been outraged from both sides, well from many sides, but
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: as you already heard what the outrage sounds like from
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: the feminist side, this is going to allow people to
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: kill female babies. I mean abot female babies, I mean
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: abought female not babies yet, I mean abought birth giving,
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: not babies yet, not babies yet who were assigned female
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: at birth, I mean before birth. It's it's a wonder
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: they can discuss this ship at all when every aspect
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: of it is something they have to twist into this
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: euphemistic spaghetti. And when they're quite finished with all that ship,
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: you have to ask them, but who would do that?
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: In what kind of culture would people make a habit
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: of killing female babies, like specifically female babies, And that
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: sends them into another tailspin of cognitive dissonance, because the
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: only option in their playbook is to blame everything on
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: white men, and white men don't do that. Men in
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: general don't do that unless you count the doctors. But
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: even they don't have the power to elect such elective procedures.
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: They can't blame it on religious people either, because religious
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: people generally aren't allowed to do it to any fetus.
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: At the very least, they heavily frown upon it. They're
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: thinking of China, aren't they. That's the stereotype they're thinking of,
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: and it stops them in their tracks because they haven't
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: done all that much thinking about it. There used to
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: be a one child policy in China, and at the time,
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: daughters were not legally obliged to financially support their families
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: like sons were. You know, Chinese mothers got into the
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: habit of drowning their baby daughters and it was the mothers.
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: But hey, when you remind people that men are raped
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: more often than women are, when you include prison statistics,
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: you're invariably told, yeah, but those men don't count as
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: victims because they're raped by other men. Okay, okay, doki.
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: Then females don't count as victims when they're killed by
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: other females. Wamp WANMP, no harm done, not my fucking problem, right,
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: And to reiterate, every elective abortion in this country is
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: ultimately an unilaterally, unilaterally elected for by women. The Scottish
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: government report we're talking about has been conducted by largely
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: women and chaired by a woman, So any females who
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: fall afoul of it do not count as victims.
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: Do I have that right?
• 25:02
  Speaker 2: Is that accurate? In any case? It's all by the bye,
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: by the way, all of this is a formality because
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: we appear to be pretending that it wasn't always perfectly
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: possible for a woman to abort her baby because of
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: its sex. For as long as abortion has been legal,
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: a woman can choose to abort her baby for any
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: reason or for no reason. The vast majority of abortions
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: fall into that category. Not rape, not incest, not the
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: health of the mother, not the health of the child,
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: but simply because she wants an abortion. She doesn't need
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: a reason, and she doesn't have to give one, and
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: she can get this abortion up to twenty four weeks
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: what's it, And the baby's sex can be determined at
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: sixteen weeks by ultrasound, as early as six weeks by
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: blood test. So there is already nothing stopping a woman
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: from finding out the sex of her baby and then
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: aborting it because it's not the sex she wanted. She
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: doesn't have to tell the doctor that that's why she
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: wants it aborted. She can just say because I say so,
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: and that's enough. She can keep her secrets to herself.
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: So we already know that this can happen. We have
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: no idea how much it does happen. What do you
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: suppose we can suppose about how often it happens to
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: male babies? Bear in mind, this isn't China under the
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: one Child policy, it's Scotland after a hundred years of
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: demonic feminist death spiraling. A good fellow friend of the
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: show did a video about this story of days ago,
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: and he did a quick but extensive Twitter search for
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: a certain key phrase that comes up quite a lot.
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: Does anyone know the keyphrase we're talking about?
• 27:12
  Speaker 3: Is that women saying is it a girl? Or an abortion?
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: A girl? Or many times yeah yeah. It's something pregnant
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: women like to chant when they're about to get their
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: clinical gender reveal. Am I about to have a girl
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: or an abortion. Now, maybe they're joking. Maybe most of
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: them are joking. Maybe one hundred percent of them.
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: Are just joking.
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: What do we suppose are the chances that one hundred
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: percent of them are just joking given the aforementioned century
• 27:45
  Speaker 2: of bloodthirsty feminist insanity. So don't give me this shit
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: that this is going to cause people to kill female babies.
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: All it's going to do is provide further justification for
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: the male baby is they're already killing. The only thing
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: I'm emergently worried about is whatever clause is indicated by
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: this phrase? What was it? Removing all criminal penalties for
• 28:15
  Speaker 2: self managed terminations self managed term terminations? Does that mean
• 28:23
  Speaker 2: what I think it means? Unless I've got the wrong
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: end of the stick here, that does seem to be
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: a significant change to the law, not just by the
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: spirit but by the letter. Someone please correct me if
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: I'm wrong. But does that mean the coat hanger?
• 28:38
  Speaker 3: I think you're wrong. I think you're wrong on that
• 28:40
  Speaker 3: there is an abortion pill. Don't ask me to pronounce
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: the name of the drug. I haven't looked at the
• 28:47
  Speaker 3: name of the drug in weeks so and it's not
• 28:50
  Speaker 3: one that I regularly pronounced, but it starts with a name.
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: It is it causes a miscarriage, and it is used
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: usually during the first two weeks after sex, when an
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: individual thinks she might be pregnant, and there's also a
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: procedure to cause early miscarriage beyond that, and they call
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: it self managed. Even if you go to a doctor
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: and get the abortifatient and take it home and use
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: it and then have your miscarriage at home and dispose
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: of the remains at home, because it's too small to
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: count as biological waste. It's not called a self managed
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: abortion if you have the procedure done in a medical
• 29:44
  Speaker 3: facility or if you have to go to the hospital
• 29:47
  Speaker 3: to manage the abortion, so it's probably not a coat hanger. However,
• 29:54
  Speaker 3: that does bring up a salient point. People keep blaming
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: for this, the concept of abortion itself, the incidence of abortion,
• 30:08
  Speaker 3: the fact that women quote unquote have to abort, which
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: is a lie. In the modern Western world, women have
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: access and in the UK women have access to like
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: sixteen or fifteen different categories of birth control paid for
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: by the national healthcare system, so they don't even have
• 30:34
  Speaker 3: to pay their own birth control bill, somebody else pays
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: for their birth control. If a guy wants a condom,
• 30:43
  Speaker 3: I don't know if he has access to that for
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: free or not. But if a woman wants birth control pills,
• 30:50
  Speaker 3: if she wants the shot, if she wants the implant,
• 30:53
  Speaker 3: if she wants an IUD, which I always reference the
• 30:58
  Speaker 3: fact that I like to get that confused with ied.
• 31:00
  Speaker 3: Please don't do that. If you're getting the implant, it's
• 31:03
  Speaker 3: not healthy. But if she wants any of those things,
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: anything that requires a medical procedure for her to use
• 31:11
  Speaker 3: it and has a medical cost for her having access
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: to it, it is provided to her free by the taxpayers.
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: So it's not Women don't have the excuse that they
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: can't afford to use birth control and they need to
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: substitute abortion as a means. It's not a good excuse anyway,
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: because abortion costs more. But I suppose under u UK
• 31:41
  Speaker 3: med systems it's probably covered too. In the United States,
• 31:48
  Speaker 3: it's not always, And so there's no excuse whatsoever for
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: a woman to need an abortion unless she has been
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: raped or she's in the rare circumstance where her baby
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: cannot survive delivery. Before the pregnancy will kill her from
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: from complications. Right, every other abortion outside of those two
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: circumstances is elective, and it's arguable that abortion following a
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: rape is also elective because you don't have to abort
• 32:28
  Speaker 3: if you've been raped. That's a choice even even in
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: that circumstance, but it is a choice that you're making
• 32:37
  Speaker 3: because somebody imposed it on you in that circumstance instead
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: of you know, you were pleasure seeking. And I will
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: say this as well, prior to the legalization of abortion
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: for elective circumstances, you had sex, you didn't use sufficient
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: birth control, and you didn't partner with somebody to make
• 33:02
  Speaker 3: a baby and raise a family. You know that there
• 33:07
  Speaker 3: were thousands of women who had abortions for health reasons,
• 33:13
  Speaker 3: at least in the United States, and they extended health reasons,
• 33:17
  Speaker 3: not just to she's going to die if she tries
• 33:20
  Speaker 3: to carry that baby to term, but she's going to
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: have mental health problems like depression if she's going to
• 33:28
  Speaker 3: carry that baby to term. There were two hundred some
• 33:31
  Speaker 3: thousand abortions in the United States the year before Roe
• 33:36
  Speaker 3: versus Wade that were legal and done in medical facilities
• 33:41
  Speaker 3: medical settings. Women will also abort even if it's illegal.
• 33:46
  Speaker 3: So women do not care about the law of the
• 33:49
  Speaker 3: land when this issue comes up. They don't They Men
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: cannot stop women from aborting by saying that it's not
• 33:57
  Speaker 3: approved of under the law of our nation. We will
• 34:01
  Speaker 3: stop you by making it illegal and prosecuting the doctor
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: you go to and prosecuting the woman. Women will still
• 34:10
  Speaker 3: go to an unsanitary environment in a back room in
• 34:14
  Speaker 3: some women's home and have this procedure done. So there
• 34:18
  Speaker 3: is no instance where it is arguable that abortion is
• 34:25
  Speaker 3: under the control of men. Most abortion doctors are women.
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: Most most of the majority of physicians who perform abortions,
• 34:37
  Speaker 3: and especially at abortion clinics as opposed to in emergency
• 34:41
  Speaker 3: rooms because it is an emergency, are women. And then
• 34:47
  Speaker 3: in addition to those medical professionals, most of the staff
• 34:52
  Speaker 3: are nurses or nurses, aids, medical texts, candy stripers, those
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: are mostly women. Also those those different categories, and so
• 35:05
  Speaker 3: the professional end of it mostly women. Planned parenthood is
• 35:11
  Speaker 3: mostly run by women. The promotion of abortion in various
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: nations has been done by women's organizations who have used
• 35:25
  Speaker 3: government funding funding without the knowledge or consent of most
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: taxpayers to do it, and then on top of that,
• 35:36
  Speaker 3: it's been mostly women fighting against having this outlawed. So
• 35:42
  Speaker 3: for the people that are blaming men for this, oh,
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: this is a sign of how exploitative men are that
• 35:47
  Speaker 3: women want more expanded abortion. No, women choose whether or
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: not they consent. If they don't consent, it's a felony
• 35:56
  Speaker 3: to not stop. Women choose whether or not they're going
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: to use birth control. If you sabotage their birth control.
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: In a lot of countries, that's rape. So you can't
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: even argue that women aren't in control of that. Women
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: in Scotland in particular, should should be getting care through
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: the national health system. They're they're able to use birth
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: control without having to pay for it. And then on
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: top of that, you know they can choose more than
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: one type of birth control, so they can refuse to
• 36:31
  Speaker 3: consent without a condom, use two types of birth control
• 36:35
  Speaker 3: of their own, and then you know, no pregnancy, Like
• 36:40
  Speaker 3: it's your chances of getting pregnant are so infinitesimally small
• 36:45
  Speaker 3: at that point as to be statistically zero, and yet
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: hundreds of thousands of abortions are done annually. Women have
• 36:54
  Speaker 3: made abortion the leading cause of human death in the world.
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: If you count it as a human death, which anybody
• 37:03
  Speaker 3: who knows me knows that I do. A zygote counts
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: as a living human organism under scientific rule for what
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: counts as a living organism and what species it is,
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: So it is a living human organism. When you do
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: have an abortion, you are causing a death, and it
• 37:23
  Speaker 3: is not just slightly past the leading cause before that.
• 37:28
  Speaker 3: The leading cause before that is cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary issues,
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: heart related issues, and the if you put the two
• 37:39
  Speaker 3: next to each other in a bar graph, the bar
• 37:42
  Speaker 3: for abortions would be half again as high as the
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: bar for cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular issues. So it's not even close.
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: It's a huge cause of death. Three in ten pregnancies
• 38:03
  Speaker 3: around the world are aborded, and people are wondering, you
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: know what's the cause of low birth rates? Well, three
• 38:13
  Speaker 3: in ten pregnancies around the world are aborded, and before
• 38:18
  Speaker 3: people are like, oh, you're misogynistic, you hate women, blah
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: blah blah. Name one instance where men have a legally
• 38:26
  Speaker 3: protected right with legal impunity, to use deadly force against
• 38:32
  Speaker 3: an innocent third party to avoid the natural consequences of
• 38:37
  Speaker 3: their own pleasure seeking and then blame their co pleasure
• 38:42
  Speaker 3: seekers as a socially acceptable means of not taking accountability
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: for it. Oh wait, load something into the comments. Say
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: one thing in the comments that you think involves society going. Yeah,
• 38:58
  Speaker 3: men can seek this type of pleasure and then go
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: out and kill someone to avoid the consequences, the naturally
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: occurring consequences of that pleasure seeking and and then blame
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: the person they were they were pleasure seeking with instead
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: of themselves for their perpetration of that violence, because I
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: don't I don't think anybody can. So this is a
• 39:26
  Speaker 3: women perpetrated, female worker lead industry that serves female consumers
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: at the behest of women's advocates, doing women's bidding by
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: women's exclusive choice. No man can be blamed for this,
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: not one.
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: And yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if there is a
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: loophole in this proposed set of laws that does include
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: the coat hanger or any pair of tweezers that you
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: can get hold of. If she finds out it's a boy,
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: she's perfectly within her rights to to hook it by
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: its barely formed testicles and yankee straight out into the
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: kitchen sink and then eat it. Or something is that
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: what's coming next. Women can just eat their babies alive
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: like starving rats. Did I just do that thing where
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: I tell the darkest joke I can think of and
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: then it comes true six months later. I do that
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: all the time. I fucking hate myself for it. So
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna stop talking for the good of humanity.
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, guys, let us know what you guys
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: think about this one. I mean, again, it's still in
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: the proposal stage, but could you imagine if they Well
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: I don't. I don't want to think about it because then, yeah,
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: like Mike said, I might, I might manifest it into being.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: So just let us know what you guys think about
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. I got a super child
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: from mereth g and she just simply says, five dollars
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: for five dollars HBr News five twenty seven, Honey for
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith. I really appreciate it. And
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: all right, we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guess king about this one
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: in the comments. So on September in September, so this
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: is not like new but I'm I'm learning about it now.
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: Forty two year old is the beer that of mine.
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: Forty two year old San Mateo resident Lisa Patilano, a
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: vintage clothing seller and content creator who lost her fiance
• 41:39
  Speaker 1: to a terminal illness in twenty twenty three, launched an
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: unconventional search for a husband by renting a dozen digital
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: billboards along Highway one oh one in the San Francisco
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: Bay area from Santa Clara to South San Francisco, displaying
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: her photo and the url Marylissa Marylisa dot com. Frustrated
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: with dating apps, she created a detailed application form on
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: the site seeking college educated, drug free, left leaning men
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: aged thirty to fifty ready for marriage and children. Within
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: a few years, the campaign quickly went viral, attracting over
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: thirty eight hundred applications in weeks from the US and abroad,
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: national media coverage, supportive messages, and even a forthcoming docu
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: series on local station KRON four. While Catialano has been
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: dating applicants or has begun dating applicants, reporting several promising
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: first and second dates and expressed no regrets, the attention
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: also brought some criticisms such as and this is according
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: to the article misogynistic insults, Accusations of desperation. I mean,
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: I don't know if that's an accusation and abusive messages
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: she compiles in a separate binder. Oh, she's a victim
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: of this now. A Fox News set notably labeled her
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: efforts negatively contributing to what she called next level hate mail.
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: Despite the vitriol, she emphasized safety protocols, views the supportive
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: responses as a bright spot, and maintains the bold approach
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: was worth it for potentially finding a lifelong partnership.
• 43:20
  Speaker 3: Woman gets treated like a man misogyny.
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: I suppose it's better than doing only fans. At the
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: end of the day, it's just another way of getting
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: thousands of symps to line up to give you a
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: free dinner. But hey, it doesn't count as prostitution because
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: you're not even giving them a glimpse of what they're
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: never going to get. Thirty eight hundred men. Eh, I'm
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure what it is she finds so frustrating
• 43:49
  Speaker 2: about dating apps. That's a normal day on Tinder for
• 43:53
  Speaker 2: a normal woman. Your cup will still runneth over with
• 44:00
  Speaker 2: and who you still have to vet for all the
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: criteria you've outlined and all the criteria you did not
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: if you're.
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: In you said liberal men, so it's her cook runn
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: it's over very good.
• 44:12
  Speaker 2: And yeah, if you're in the San Francisco area, then
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: left leaning is kind of redundant, a drug free though. Yeah,
• 44:20
  Speaker 2: I guess that does narrow it down. It's fucking San Francisco.
• 44:25
  Speaker 2: Even the Starbucks is lace with fentanyl and human shit.
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: And yeah, college educated doesn't mean college educated, does it.
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: It doesn't include the millions of men who completed their
• 44:41
  Speaker 2: college education and have been flipping fast food burgers ever since.
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: It means rich, It means raking in at least six
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: figures a year, preferably seven. And I do mean that
• 44:54
  Speaker 2: because she's probably going to want a man who's at
• 44:56
  Speaker 2: least as rich as she is. And Jesus tap dancing
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: juggling on a unicycle, Christ, just how loaded do you
• 45:06
  Speaker 2: have to be to afford a dozen digital billboards on
• 45:10
  Speaker 2: a highway in San Francisco. There are fortune five hundred
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: companies who can't afford that kind of swag, Like no one.
• 45:19
  Speaker 2: She got thirty eight hundred potential suitors. Most of those
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: will be like temp worker bums who thought they'd shoot
• 45:27
  Speaker 2: their shot with a filthy.
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: Rich milf.
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's San Francisco. Thirty seven hundred of them
• 45:34
  Speaker 2: are probably Indians who work in it or so burderful.
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: Most of them are calling from Calcutta. Untelegr. Do not
• 45:44
  Speaker 2: redeem I mean, God bless her for trying. I'm not
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: I'm not throwing her any shade like like, well done
• 45:53
  Speaker 2: for doing what you can. I just don't know how
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: what the fuck she's doing or what she's supposed to
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: do with that many candidates. I assume she has like
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: an office of paid administrators spreadsheeting all of these men
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: to try and weed out the overwhelming saturation of perfetic, insufferable,
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: left leaning college educated men. It's kind of a curious
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: inversion of what a pimp is, what a madam is.
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: I guess it's a network of black market pen pushes,
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: all trying to get one woman laid. It's fascinating. Actually,
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: let me know how it goes. Let someone at Netflix
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: know how it goes. There's at least three seasons of
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: shenanigans in this, for sure, as long as you turn
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: out to be a truon of course, because it's Netflix.
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: And then if your husband turns up alive and he's
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: a trune as well. He only faked his death so
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: he could go off and live the truon life. But
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: then he finds out you're a trune too, so he
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: he falls in love with you all over again. But
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: but you don't want him back because you want to
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: conquer a battalion of suspended underage boys. Like so many
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: truths do so much potential for ochs and whatnot. I'll
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: write it myself if I have to. All right, I
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: think I think I'm already doing it. It's all right,
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna work at it. Call me, but not for sex.
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: I don't do truths.
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: There we go. I I my my initial statement is
• 47:29
  Speaker 3: pretty much my main take on this. I don't know
• 47:33
  Speaker 3: what she's complaining about. I mean, if she was a man,
• 47:35
  Speaker 3: that's exactly what would have happened, except that he wouldn't
• 47:38
  Speaker 3: have had the excuse. You're being misogynists for criticizing this.
• 47:42
  Speaker 3: Men who put their profiles on Tinder often get you know, oh,
• 47:48
  Speaker 3: nobody's gonna date that guy. Look at that guy. That's
• 47:50
  Speaker 3: a terrible picture. What the heck? Uh? You know? Always
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: he's under six week tall. No, nobody's gonna date that guy.
• 47:57
  Speaker 3: I'm I'm not I'm not interested, you know that kind
• 48:00
  Speaker 3: of thing. And on top of that, the idea of
• 48:05
  Speaker 3: actually approaching a woman is discouraged. There are even dating
• 48:12
  Speaker 3: sites that women will flock to where you know, the
• 48:16
  Speaker 3: men can put their profiles up and everything, but they
• 48:19
  Speaker 3: can't be the first one to message. She has to
• 48:22
  Speaker 3: be the first one to message, so you know, it's
• 48:27
  Speaker 3: women treat it like, you know, the dude being the
• 48:30
  Speaker 3: first one to message makes him creepy, and men get
• 48:35
  Speaker 3: treated like creeps for approaching women in social settings where
• 48:41
  Speaker 3: people usually go to find someone they might want to date,
• 48:46
  Speaker 3: men get deemed creepy, weird, or otherwise illegitimately bad, you know,
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: any kind of nasty, negative characteristic, for preferring that a
• 49:04
  Speaker 3: woman be college educated, preferring that a woman be healthy
• 49:10
  Speaker 3: and not not you know, a land will if they
• 49:14
  Speaker 3: want a dator, preferring that you know, she has the
• 49:17
  Speaker 3: same some of the same kind of interests as he does.
• 49:20
  Speaker 3: Like if if a guy regularly likes to work out
• 49:23
  Speaker 3: and he wants to get together with a woman who
• 49:24
  Speaker 3: also is into exercise, instantly he's fat shaming and how
• 49:30
  Speaker 3: dare he not be interested? Further, if he requires that
• 49:35
  Speaker 3: she be a biological female. He can get shamed for
• 49:40
  Speaker 3: that as well. So I don't I don't see why
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: this this is even a news article, Like this woman
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: didn't get anything message to her that is any worse
• 49:54
  Speaker 3: than would be sent to a man who did this,
• 49:57
  Speaker 3: and in fact, people might accuse him of being a
• 50:01
  Speaker 3: sexual predator looking for victims, and in fact, a man
• 50:08
  Speaker 3: who did this might even be investigated by police after
• 50:12
  Speaker 3: getting reported as a sexual predator looking for victims, because
• 50:19
  Speaker 3: of the misogyny narrative, because of the bare narrative, because
• 50:23
  Speaker 3: of the xyz percent of this particular that particular so
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: called gender based violence is male perpetrated, despite the fact
• 50:37
  Speaker 3: that you're talking about less than one tenth of one
• 50:41
  Speaker 3: percent of the population's perpetration, as if the gender balance
• 50:46
  Speaker 3: of that perpetration relates on or reflects on either sex.
• 50:52
  Speaker 3: So yeah, it's it's really this is a nothing burger.
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: You know, some woman looking for attention, she got attention,
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: she didn't get universally positive attention, and now she's mad
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: and making a big deal about it. And because she
• 51:14
  Speaker 3: is a woman, the media is listening.
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, it's unfortunate about her late husband, but
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: I do think this was a lead. Like she's still
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: she doesn't have kids, so she seemed to have waited
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: too long to start thinking about it. And that's why
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: she's putting this out there. It's kind of like, I'm
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: almost out of time. I have to have kids. Now
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna put out an ad. And I mean it's
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: you know, like I said, it's a shame about your
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: husband and everything. But this is a cautionary for people,
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: you know, like if you're a younger you're a younger
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: woman and you happen to see this. I'm just all
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: I'm asking is that you think about this and take
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: it seriously, because you don't want to be forty looking
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: for you know, someone if you want, if you want children,
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: you have to think about that early. So I and
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: that's the thing too, is that she's trying to, like,
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: you know, find a guy really fast, get married right away,
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: and start a family. I don't I'm surprised at that
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: many men were like willing to do that, because I
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: feel like that's really I don't. I don't think that's
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: the thing you rush into and she's ready to rush
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: into it. So this this could be a mistake. But
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: but yeah. I mean there's also the you know, it
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: is definitely an attention grabbing thing, and it probably helped
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: her reach more men because there's a lot of thirsty
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: simps out there. But uh, yeah, I don't know. I'm
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: this is just all I'm saying is like, if you're
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: if you're young, and you're fertile, don't waste your time.
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: You know, if this is what you want, If you
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: want this, get on it right away, or at least
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: start thinking about it and taking it seriously, and don't
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: do this thing where it's like, well, I have so
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: many things I want to do, and then you're like
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: forty and you're you know, you finally find somebody and
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: then he dies and now you're like scrambling. So I
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: don't know, but let me know what you guys think
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: about this one of the comments. We're gonna move on
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: to the next story. So all right, so mankeeping is
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: now in the mainstream and it's being covered by Vice. Now.
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: I talked about this on this channel a while back.
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: I think I did a thing with Alison. I may
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: have done a thing with you guys, but I definitely
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: had on this guy named James Nuzzo who does a
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: lot of research into un women and various academic research
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: into you know, sort of like where feminists get their
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: funding from, all the ways that they are publicly funded,
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: by NGOs, by independence, et cetera, and the way that
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: they operate. A lot of times it revolves around like
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: a new form of missing, basically a new kind of
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: terminology that they get pushed into the mainstream. And he
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: was like right on the edge of when man keeping
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: was a thing. Now mankeeping is just a new name
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: for an old idea. It's emotional labor. But they're rebranding
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: it because I think, you know, it's this what they do.
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: This is what it's all about. So Vice, they're they're
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: a part of that whole network, and they have an
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: article on it. The Vice article called man keeping is
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: why women are done with dating. So it's not the
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: men that are walking away, guys, it's to women. You
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: know that this is a cop By the way, defines
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: man keeping as the extensive, often invisible, emotional labor that
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: women in heterosexual relationships perform for the male partners, also
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: pointing out that they usually they only directed to heterosexual relationships.
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: They don't they don't say this about other kinds because
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: that's not what's under attack. Okay, it's only the heterosexual stuff.
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: That's why they have a term called hetero fatalism, because
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: that's what they're trying to do. They are trying to
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: destroy normal sexuality. This includes managing amen's a man's stress
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: and moods, acting as his primary or only emotional support system,
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: interpreting his needs, and serving as an unpaid therapist with benefits.
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: All are receiving little reciprocation. The piece frames this as
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: an evolution of traditional emotional labor exacerbated by the male
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: loneliness epidemic, where men reportedly have fewer close friendships than
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: women and thus dump their emotional processing onto romantic partners,
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: according to these assumptions, turning relationships into one sided burden
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: on women. Drawing on research from Stanford and Pew, the
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: author argues that this dynamic is the key reason many
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: millennial and Gen Z women are opting out of dating. Altogether,
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: only thirty eight percent of single American women are actively
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: seeking relationships versus sixty one percent of single men, preferring
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: the piece of being alone over constantly keeping an adult
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: man emotionally afloat. The article portrays women's choice to stay
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: single not as defeat but as a rational boundary, concluding
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: that that until men build better support networks and relationships
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: become more mutually supportive, more women will walk away because
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: solitude is far easier than managing someone else's inner life
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: without help. The tone is empathetic towards women's exhaustion and
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: unapologetically supporting, supportive of prioritizing personal peace.
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: With I have to jump in on this one. This
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: pisses me off. One hundred years ago, if a man
• 56:39
  Speaker 3: wanted to make friends with other dudes, there were dozens
• 56:45
  Speaker 3: of different clubs and organizations just for men where they
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: could go and associate with people based on common interests,
• 56:58
  Speaker 3: whether it was a an interest in sports and interest
• 57:02
  Speaker 3: in a particular job or hobby. Whether they were men
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: with high income who were philanthropic and trying to relate
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: with other men who were also high income and philanthropic.
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: There were organizations just for that, Guys who wanted to
• 57:21
  Speaker 3: be involved in civics, guys who wanted to be involved
• 57:25
  Speaker 3: in business. In general, all of these organizations could be
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: male only. They could bar women, and they could allow
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: men a female free environment in which to hang out
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: relate to each other, organize their thoughts organized socially, and
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: just do their thing, be dudes without women, without female supervision,
• 57:58
  Speaker 3: without getting told they're doing it wrong, without being called
• 58:02
  Speaker 3: misogynist for for any complaints they might have about their wives,
• 58:07
  Speaker 3: without being called a misogynist for any ideas they might
• 58:12
  Speaker 3: have about dating nothing right. And then on top of that,
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: you also had bars that were called stag bars, and
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: a stag bar for the younger generation was also male only.
• 58:29
  Speaker 3: Women could not go in they were they were not
• 58:33
  Speaker 3: legally barred, but the bar owner could say no women,
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: and under the law that was that was his right.
• 58:41
  Speaker 3: He could say no women in this bar, you can't
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: come in here, go home, or go to another bar.
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: And it wasn't really all that common for women to
• 58:49
  Speaker 3: go to bars by themselves anyway. But in a stag
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: bar you had the same situation that was, you know,
• 58:56
  Speaker 3: men hanging out with men, just shooting the shit. They
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: didn't have to have a particular subject why they were
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: hanging out. They could just hang out and have something
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: to drink, have a meal, and then go home. And
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: and women didn't have the modern practice down of keeping
• 59:24
  Speaker 3: a man from having a social life and then complaining
• 59:28
  Speaker 3: because he doesn't have a social life. And I talked
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: to other married women, and everybody, you know, loves their
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: husbands and they talk about how great their marriage is
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: and how happy they are with their man. And a
• 59:42
  Speaker 3: lot of times these women will talk about, you know,
• 59:45
  Speaker 3: he doesn't go out with the boys. He stays at home,
• 59:48
  Speaker 3: and that's something that they're happy about. That would drive
• 59:51
  Speaker 3: me nuts. I want my husband to be able to
• 59:55
  Speaker 3: do whatever the fuck he wants. I don't want to
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: have responsibility for his social life. And I think that
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 3: feminist pushes to stop or men from having the ability
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 3: to go out and do things without a woman's permission
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: are detrimental to both sexes mental health. But it's not
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: men's fault that women did that. It's women's fault. It's
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: not men's fault that women sued for access to male spaces.
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 3: It's not men's fault that women sued to prevent male
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: spaces from being created. Women are even trying to invade
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 3: men's therapeutic male only spaces, men's sheds where men engage
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 3: in therapy by working side by side on a project
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: together while they're discussing their issues, because it is easier
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 3: for men to things out with each other about a
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: particular subject if they're engaging in some sort of collaborative
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 3: effort on something that doesn't necessarily have anything to do
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: with it. Two men building a bookshelf will have an
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 3: easier time talking about why one of them is having
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: difficulty getting over the death of his father, getting getting
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: his grief to that stage where you know, yeah, it
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 3: still hurts, but you can function and you know, or
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 3: or handling his emotional responses to the abuse he's suffering
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 3: in his divorce. They'll be have an easier time talking
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: about that while doing something than just sitting around chit
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 3: chatting the way women do. It's a different behavior that
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: is different between the sexes, and there's nothing wrong with
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: men having their different way of doing it. So this
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: complaint that women have all this emotional labor over men
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 3: not having any friends, this idea that men don't have
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 3: any friends, all right, If it were true that men
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 3: did not have deep friendships, long standing friendships, frequent friendships
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 3: like women do, it would be women's fault. But the
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: other end of it is it's not. Men and women
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 3: do friendship differently too, And I've seen this with male
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 3: friends and female friends. A woman will have. She'll call,
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: you know, ten different gals her close friends. But if
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 3: you judge the closeness based on how she trusts those
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: friends and how she interacts with those friends, she has
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 3: one or two, maybe three, and the other seven, eight
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: or nine of them are people that you can't tell
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 3: anything too without having it plastered all over social media
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 3: or being judged for it. Instead of giving advice, and
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: you have, you know, people that will literally sabotage each
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 3: other and still claim to have a friendship. And it's
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 3: it's not just competitive, you know, friendly competition. It's cutthroat, angry, hateful,
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 3: lashing out behind each other's back with claws and teeth,
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: and then the moment somebody turns around, just like cats,
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 3: all of a sudden, it's all, you know, cute and
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: cuddly and looking innocent, except that there's no innocence there
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 3: at all. They've just torn each other other to shreds
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 3: and you didn't notice. Men seem to be more upfront
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 3: about that. So if you know, if two men are
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 3: not friends, if they're they're not in a real friendship,
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: you know it, and they can do rivalry without being
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 3: mean to each other about it if they are friends
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 3: and maintain that friendship, and even men who are cutthroat
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 3: with each other can maintain mutual respect that women have
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: forgotten how to do. So you have a very different
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: situation between men and women and how they treat each
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 3: other as friends and how they treat the same sex
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 3: as friends. You also have a situation wherein if a
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 3: woman has a male friend who is just a friend,
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 3: and her guy is not allowed to complain, criticize suggests
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 3: that there's something else going on, and you know, she
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: needs to keep a distance and not hang out alone
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: with that guy, and that kind of thing. And if
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 3: anybody says any differently, they're a misogynist and they're slutshaming
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 3: and they're all that. But if a guy is hanging
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: out alone with another woman for for more than five minutes,
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 3: something's wrong, right, He's accused of something. He's accused of
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 3: something going on. A guy often in relationships can't even
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 3: say hi to a classmate and and talk about when
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 3: the next class reunion is coming up without his wife
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 3: or girlfriend going. How do you know her? You know?
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 3: How close are you?
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: Guys?
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 3: What have you talked about? Why are you going there
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: because she's going to be there. It's it's completely different
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 3: between the sexes and how people react. And as a
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 3: result of this, you know, men are very limited and
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 3: who they can associate with. But at the same time,
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 3: men will form deep, trusting, supportive and very closely understood
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 3: between the friends friendships with other men where maybe they
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 3: haven't hung out in a week or a month or
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 3: even a year, but if they call the other guy up,
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 3: the conversation starts back up like it never ended. If
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 3: they call the other guy in for a favor, he's
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 3: right there. And uh, you know, if if one of
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: them is with somebody who is doing something that she
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 3: shouldn't be to him, the other guy will be there
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 3: for him when he falls without going I told you so.
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 3: You should have known better well that guy that that woman, uh,
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 3: she saw an easy mark. You're gonna have to to,
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 3: you know, make up for that. In her friendships you
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: threw me over for you a bit like they just
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: helped the guy pick up the pieces and move on.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: And whereas women women, we'll step on another woman in
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: a situation like that, tear her down further before helping
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 3: her because it gives them power. So I don't want
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 3: to hear any bullshit about women being frustrated with the situation,
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: because first of all, you created it, and second of all,
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 3: you're lying about the dynamics of it. So until you
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 3: can be honest about those two things, don't come bitch
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 3: into me, you know, learn to learn to live with
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 3: men who are men, and learn to let them be
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 3: themselves and let them be together without bitching about it,
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 3: and then get back to me.
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this this shit just baws the crap out of
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 2: me at this point. It's the same bollocks repackaged over
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: and over. Mankeeping is just a rebranding of emotional labor,
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: of male fragility, of toxic masculated see of patriarchy, of
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 2: the problem that cannot be named as it was called
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: in the fifties, even though they find a new name
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: for it every couple of fucking years. Men are damned
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: if they do, and damned if they don't, and damned
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 2: if they neither do nor don't do, or anything in between.
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 2: Men spend more time at work and then nagged for
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 2: being absent. Men spend more time at home and then
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 2: nagged for being deadbeats. Men throw themselves into their hobbies
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: and then nagged for being boring. Men abandoned their hobbies
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: and then nagged for being boring. Men are nagged for
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: doing anything other than devoting themselves to the women in
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: their lives. So men devote themselves to the women in
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 2: their lives, and then those women resent them for being
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: needy men. Men invent machines and build those machines, and
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 2: pay for those machines, and maintain those machines so that
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 2: women can have more free time to spend with their friends.
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: But if he goes to the pub with his friends
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: maybe once a month, he gets a fucking ear full
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 2: of nagging when he comes home an hour later than
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 2: he's supposed to. It is just men do everything they
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 2: can to make women's lives easier, and women respond by
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: doing everything they can to make men's lives more difficult.
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: It with what it looks like is an abusive relationship,
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: and it is, but what it really resembled is What
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: it really resembles is the relationship between parents and their
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: teenage children. At that age, children are never satisfied with
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: what their parents do. All they can be is annoyed
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: and ungrateful. Most teenagers, I mean, everything is either too
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: much or not enough. Parents can never find themselves in
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 2: the goldilocks zone. They're always pushed away from it like magnets.
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: But you know this is to be expected from teenagers.
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 2: It seems to be a natural phase. Evolution pushes us
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: into it, presumably to prepare us for adult independence. You
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: just have to stick it out until it's over, and
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: when it's over, you can finally appreciate each other as
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: fully formed adults. But it is not a natural dynamic
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 2: when it comes to men and women. They're already supposed
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 2: to be fully formed adults who have already got over
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 2: this phase. But for whatever reason, a perturbing amount of
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 2: women can never stop acting like spoiled teenagers, perpetually resenting
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: the men in their lives for any protracted, irrational reason,
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: even though those women have complete social and legal power
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: over those men. They have all the rights that parents have,
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: despite having all the lack of responsibilities that teenagers have.
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 2: And to be honest, i'm understating it. If anything, there
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 2: are many women who never even make it as far
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: as the emotional maturity of a teenager. They never progress
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 2: beyond toddler mentality. I mean, they they can learn how
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: to use language, to a college educated level. They can
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: learn how to obfiscate and redefine, and euphemize and gas light,
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 2: but they never get beyond the fundamental dynamic of I
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: get what I want and you just have to give
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: it to me the end. What's mine is mine, what
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 2: yours is well, not even ours, it's mine, me, mine,
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 2: I want, and so on. Everything they learn about squirrely
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: language is in service to this selfish hypocrisy, this never
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 2: ending game of peekaboo. To anyone with a fucking brain
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: in the nogin, it's obvious why this is happening, because
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: this is what women are being taught from the cradle
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: to the grave. They are taught that men have everything
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: and women have nothing, and so men owe women everything.
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: And we finally get to the point where men are
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 2: getting really fucking sick of it, but they are powerless
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 2: to change it because men don't get to teach women
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: or girls, not as teachers and not as parents. The
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: few men who do are compelled to teach them nothing
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 2: but the feminist narrative that men have everything and women
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 2: have nothing, and so men owe women everything. If they
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 2: don't teach them that and only that, then they don't
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 2: get to be teachers or parents. They'll get bum rushed
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: out of the place on the grounds of muthodny. Can
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: everyone please hurry up and finish arguing about immigration and
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: the economy and the goddamn Epstein filest Remember the shit
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: we were talking about ten years ago. Yeah, still happening,
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: still worse than ever. We could send all the foreign
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: freeloaders home. We could reverse inflation and increase the GDP,
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: We could arrest everyone who was ever on that island,
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 2: and it would not make a goddamn dent on the
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: near vertical decline of the West and indeed the global
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 2: situation in general. We got here because of this, because
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 2: our world has been split down the middle, not between
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: left and right, but between men and women. The whole
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 2: left right paradigm is just a projection, a two dimensional
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 2: projection of the three dimensional problem that set the whole
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 2: apocalypse apocalypse in motion. This is the problem between men
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: and women. Yes, I know no one's listening. I know
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 2: no one cares. I know the left and the right
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: are gonna keep arguing about hokey shite while they both
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: agree that women need to be protected at all costs
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 2: and that men need to be punched in the face.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: But I'm gonna keep saying this shit until I'm dead
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: and buried, buried in a rolled up newspaper by the
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: side of the road and slowly eaten by blue bottles.
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 2: I don't care. This is what's going wrong. This is
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 2: the lesson we're supposed to be learning. So on the
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: off chance that this is all a simulation that in
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 2: reality we're all living in a Dyson sphere in deep
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 2: space and we're playing an elaborate educational video game, I'm
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: playing to win non principle. I'm maxing out this stat
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 2: and that is what I will tell my maker when
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 2: I die. I I played the misogyny meta. I played
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: the the maybe we can blame women for some things
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: some of the time meta. No matter how much you
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 2: have nerved us. Oh lord, if hell awaits so be it.
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: Bottom text.
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 3: All right, bring back stag bars.
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, Well that's that's well said. You guys
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: get it. So okay, I got a super chow. Let's
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: take a look at that. Zarangs gave us ten dollars.
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Zaraangs and says on the subject of mankeeping.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: The following article is two years old. Better Bachelor has
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: covered the author more than once. The pool of men
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: these women draw from is ridiculously small, and it's their
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: own doing. The husband's store joke is something few women
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: appear to stop, and you think they benefit from it
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: if they could. The article is by Jana Hawking, archived
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: of course, and she realizes that she and other women
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: she knows are sharing men. They're called spit sisters ew
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: and he includes a link. I'll go ahead and look
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: at it really quick.
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 3: I couldn't find a nicer way to say that.
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: Huh, I just read it. I probably should have. I
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: feel bad, but okay, superchow, let's click on it archive
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: dot iss Uh what a reason Sydney. Sydney, Australia's dating
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: scene is one sortid hot mess right now. This is
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: kind of familiar. Actually, l's wee guy. I went out
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: to drinks when few Yeah, so show. I feel like, yeah,
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: I feel like I've seen this before. And yeah, the
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: man keeping thing, like I said, it's not new, it's
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: it's been covered, it's just been rebranded. It's it's always
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: like you know, and I don't know for whatever reason,
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: Like I don't know if it's the media or what
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: But like a lot of people just eat this stuff up.
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: They just they just are so comfortable blaming men for
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: for whatever. I mean, because this is the thing about
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: man keeping is, or at least what they're calling emotional labor.
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: It's like the opposite of toxic masculinity. It's literally what
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: they want supposedly men to do. It's like what they're asking.
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: And when men say, okay, then I will I will
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: share my feelings and concerns and my anxieties and my problems,
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: then they're like, oh no, no, that's no, we we
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 1: actually don't want that, and let let's just like I mean, like,
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: let's just be honest about what it is. Then if
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: women don't want that, then just say you don't want that,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: but stop telling men that you do want that, and
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: let men form their own spaces, because that's what men need.
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: They need, they need, like Hannah said, stag bars, they
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: need some places and women have basically taken all of
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: those away, like even the workplace. So the this is
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: like what we get, and I think that more I
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: guess on the On the on the plus side, the
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: more I look around online, the more I'm seeing that
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: a lot of people are discussing these these things and
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: they're they're not you know, like anisphere people. They're not
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: MRAs or not red pillars or anything like that. But
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: that just shows you that the problem is getting, you know,
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: to the point where people are all being forced to
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: see it and they're going to reckon with it in
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: some way.
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: So you know what's funny about that article. Women will bitch, right,
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 3: They'll they'll bitch and moan that a guy cares about
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 3: their body count because he cares about their sexual hygiene.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 3: He doesn't want to get herpies or HPV and get
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 3: cancer or AIDS and have to take pills for the
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: rest of his life, you know. But then they bitch
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: about it if the top five percent or ten percent
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 3: of guys that they're all going for are dating the
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 3: other women that are also going for them. Like, again,
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 3: it's women bitching that guys do what women think they
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 3: should be able to get away with.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, yeah for sure. So yeah, not a new thing.
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: I just think that they're you know, like just trying
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: to look for new ways to rebrand it. And I
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 1: don't think there's any goal, Like they don't really want
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: a solution. They want to make normal women more and
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: more repulsed by normal men. They're intentionally driving men and
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: women apart. And it's been that way forever from the beginning.
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: That's what it was about. So every time they come
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 1: up with a new term. And the thing is, most men,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: I mean I don't think. I think most men don't
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 1: really take it seriously and they don't really react to it.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: They don't really take it to heart that much. But
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: women do. And that's all you have to do is
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: get half the population on board, and they do, and
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: so it is having an effect. I mean women are basically,
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: like I think they're radicalized, like politically radicalized, and it
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: is because they are put in a perpetual state of
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: insecurity and fear and of men. So like, this is
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: what they're going to do. I think that we have
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: like not we, but like are I guess the cathedral
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: they have. They have done this to women, and women
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 1: don't know that things are that they're that their lives
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 1: are not like in as much danger as they think
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: they are, but they're reacting as though it's true. So
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 1: it's a problem. And the man keeping thing is just
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: it's always these little things, right, and you just look
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: at like women on TikTok or social media talking about
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: what they want from men, or just like shitting on
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: men because they voted the wrong way or whatever it is,
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 1: just being men. They're looking at the data of women
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 1: going far far, far left, and they're saying, well, it's
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: the men's fault that like when when women overreact and
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: they earn ship down, they destroy, you know, things, they
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: blame men for it, like you made me do this,
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: And that's kind of like where we are right now.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: That's the kind of dynamic in the in the sort
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: of meta sense that's happening. So if men are going
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: to react and you know it's not going to be
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: pleasant when its overt I'm ready for it.
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 3: So what Yeah, we need to start spelling it overy
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 3: acting instead of over reacting, because it is something that
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: is unique to women. The way the way that women
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: overreact is completely unique to women.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, So anyway, that was that article. Let
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: me know what you guys think about man keeping in
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 1: the comments. I know that we've talked about it briefly.
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: I just noticed that more people are talking about it
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: that are just sort of like finding it for the
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: first time, and I thought it was worth bringing up
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: that it's going into like the sort of like the
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: the let's say, the broader zeitgeist. So uh, and yeah,
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: it was basically a slow newsweek. So that's all I
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: have for you guys today. So we're gonna go into
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: the Patron Show. Now we're gonna look at this article.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is a sausage of the correct size anyway,
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 1: which is from the Washington Post and it's entitled Labor
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: Department social media campaign depicts a white male workforce. Oh no,
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: so let's find out what the problem is with this.
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, like, ultimately it's a male America. American male
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 1: workforce is the focus because that's what we want to
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: focus on. So I think that's what they're doing. But
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: we'll find out in the Patron Show. So if you
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that, go to feed
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: the badgel dot com ford slash subscribe and become a member,
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: join us in the Patron show chat or in the
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 1: discord and the discord whatever badgination done online. Hopefully I'll
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: see you guys there. And I want to thank Mike
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: and Hannah for joining me on the show. But I
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: want to thank you guys most of all for tuning
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 1: in because without you, we wouldn't be able to do
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: this thing that we do, which is I think it's
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: unique because not a lot of people are having these conversations,
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: at least not as early as we are often having them,
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: and they're not willing to say the things that we're
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 1: willing to say. So anyway, with that said, thanks you
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 1: guys for coming on the show today. If you guys
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: like this video, please hit like subscribe if you can
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 1: not already subscribe to the bellflonifications, leave us a comment,
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about what we
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: discussed on the show today, and please please please share
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: we will see you next Tuesday.