Latest / Man in America Podcast / The Truth is in the COVER-UP | Trump Assassination Plot Analysis (Part 3)

Transcript

The Truth is in the COVER-UP | Trump Assassination Plot Analysis (Part 3) · Man in America Podcast

• 1:34
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse, coming to you live for yet another show trying to understand exactly what happened at the rally where president Trump there's an attempted assassination. And this is the the third show on this in, you know, these past couple of days, but I can't think of anything more important to cover right now. I know a lot of folks are all you know, they've moved on to the RNC, and they're talking about, you know, oh, look at, you Vivek's speech and the the weird, you know, the weird, you know, religious song that was being played. And I just I can't get over the fact that the deep state, in my belief, just tried to assassinate president Trump in a way that would forever permanently scar us and completely change the trajectory of our country.
• 2:24
  And since that time, we're seeing a massive, massive cover up effort from the Department of Homeland Security, from Mayorkas, from the Cheadle, the the head of the Secret Service. We're seeing the a lot of other information coming out indicating that this wasn't just some lone gunman, but this was a a massive plan in place and that there were, actors and companies and knowledge of this, it looks like, well before this happened. So and, you know, I don't know. I just think that this is such an important topic to understand and to dig into. And every hour, there's new information coming out.
• 3:06
  So, you know, even do my research earlier, I'd I'd find things, and three hours later, the that gets updated with new information. So there is a lot to be covering tonight. I wanna thank you all for joining me live. Have a few messages before we jump into the show. First off, we are giving away silver.
• 3:22
  Yes. You heard me right. Here at Man in America, we are doing a huge giveaway where literally every Friday, we're announcing a new winner. We're giving away five free ounces of pure silver. These are buffalo rounds.
• 3:35
  You can hear the nice silvery clank. So every Friday, we're giving away five ounces of silver pure silver. If you want to win, it's simple. It doesn't cost you anything. Go to maninAmerica.com/win.
• 3:47
  The link will be in the description below. This is the website you see right here. All you gotta do is put your first name and your email, and you're entering into win. You enter once, and you're automatically entered into every single drawing. So every week, we're gonna do a new drawing to give away five ounces of silver, which at today's prices with a little bit of premiums, you're looking at, you know, a couple hundred bucks worth of silver.
• 4:05
  We're giving away every Friday. So if you want a chance to win, go to ManinAmerica.com/win right now. Enter in, and hopefully, you get that email from me on a Friday. And and the thing is is that you might be the winner multiple times because you're you're gonna be keep going in that same pool. So it be you know, maybe it's this Friday you win, and maybe in a month from now, you win again.
• 4:25
  So, again, maninAmerica.com/win. 1 other thing is that if you actually want to purchase gold and silver, I do have a message for you. So, folks, we all see it. Everything's getting more expensive. We're paying two, three, four times what things cost just a few years ago, And we know they're lying.
• 4:43
  3% inflation. Come on. Think about it. Why are they telling us to keep our hard earned money in the banks and the stock market while they're all rushing to buy gold and silver? That's right.
• 4:53
  Folks, governments and central banks around the world are dumping the dollar, and they're scrambling to buy up gold and silver right now. These are smart people. They see the signs just like you do. They know the crash is coming. The dollar has lost more than half its value in the last five years, and our national debt's increasing a trillion dollars every hundred days.
• 5:14
  It can't go on like this. Even Bank of America is now warning about a dollar collapse. And if they're right, it's only a matter of time before our savings, our I r IRAs, our four zero one k's could be wiped out. Look. Right now, it's still easy to buy gold and silver, but not it may not be in the future.
• 5:32
  So experts are saying that prices are gonna keep surging, and UBS says gold could even go up to $5,000 an ounce. Kirk Elliott's phone has been ringing off the hook because of folks who get it aren't wasting time. Now look. I can't tell you what to do with your hard earned money, but I can tell you that even if just some of your savings are in gold and silver, you can rest assured that money is safe. So call Kirk Elliott and protect your wealth today.
• 5:57
  It's better to be six months early than one day late. So I'll pull up the website for you folks right here. Okay. So this is the website. Go to goldwithseth.com, and you fill out this really simple form here to set up a free wealth consultation.
• 6:13
  So it's goldwithSeth.com, or just call (720) 605-3900 and start. It's a really easy process. They'll answer all your questions. It's a free consultation. So if you're considering moving some of your assets into gold and silver, you feel safe about that, you wanna protect it, you know, it's an insurance policy, I highly recommend Kirk Elliott.
• 6:33
  So, again, goldwithseth.com or (720) 605-3900. Alright. So, folks, jumping into today's show, we've got a lot of important stuff to cover. Most importantly is that there's a new round of indictments. Let me pull this up for you.
• 6:48
  They're coming after Trump yet again. So here we go. Breaking district attorney Alvin Bragg files two new criminal charges against Donald Trump, including avoidance of a targeted projectile and obstruction of an assassination attempt. Of course, this is a joke, but it's it's I saw this. I came across this online on Twitter.
• 7:09
  I I I could not show you this because this is this is literally what they're doing. This is about how funny it really is. Right? That that there's new two new criminal charges that Trump is, quote, avoidance of a targeted projectile and obstruction of an assassination attempt. So, of course, we have to have a little bit of levity in this.
• 7:28
  It's such a serious time. It's a serious matter, so, of course, we gotta smile. But getting into the more serious stuff, I I wanna take a step back in time and look at some events surrounding nine eleven because we look at history. It helps us to understand what's happening today. So I have an article here I'm gonna pull up, which is really, really important.
• 7:47
  Okay? It's it's extremely important for us. Okay. So this article here, nine eleven terrorists made millions on the stock market. So, okay, I'll I'll read a little bit of this.
• 7:59
  So terrorism, the ultimate insider trading. It's a Charles Stewart University researcher says that what happens to the financial markets after a terrorist attack and how terrorists make money from these market movements is illustrated by the suspicious trading that occurred immediately before the successful attacks in in New York, Madrid, and London. So this guy, doctor Hugh McDermott, a senior lecturer in law enforcement at the CSU, Australian Graduate School of Policy, whatever. He basically says that terrorists make money by speculating on the markets. He says, quote, when terrorists have inside information about an imminent attack, they purchase financial derivatives before the attack and make millions from the subsequent market movements.
• 8:47
  Okay. Now this came out in '2 this is back in 02/2011. This this article came out. So I wanna read a little bit here. I'll just zoom in, make it a little bigger.
• 8:55
  So it says terrorism, the ultimate in insider trading. So this researcher just says that what happens to financial markets after a terrorist attack, how the terrorists make money from these market movements is illustrated by the suspicious trading that occurred immediately before the successful attacks on New York, Madrid, and London. So this guy says that let's continue here. So he said, when terrorists have inside information about an imminent attack, they purchase financial derivatives before the attack and make millions. Says global financial markets reacted swiftly to the news of the terrorist attacks in New York two thousand one, Madrid two thousand four, and London Two Thousand Five with a general flight to quality.
• 9:35
  Gold gold, bonds, and defense stock strengthened, and investors flocked to highly liquid developed markets. In contrast, less mature markets suffer as do stocks such as reinsurance and aviation. So American Airlines share price dropped 39% after the nine eleven attacks, and United Airlines dropped 42%. So even a novice trader can see the windfall that could be achieved in shorting these stocks before a terrorist attack. Take note of that right there.
• 10:07
  Okay? I'll read it again. Even a novice trader can see the windfall that could be achieved in shorting these stocks before a terrorist attack. Okay? Now so let's take a look here.
• 10:23
  So market movements. So this doctor McDermott, a former senior manager with the Australian, you know, whatever, notes that the German Stock Market Commission reported that in the days before nine eleven, derivatives traded on underwriter Munshur RUK were twice normal volumes. So this RUK's share price dropped 22% after the attacks. On 09/07/2001, the number of put options on British Airways was four times normal volumes. British Airways shares dropped 42% over the following week.
• 10:58
  Between September, almost 5,000 put options were bought on United Airlines six times the normal volumes, Assuming that 4,000 of these options were bought by terrorists with advanced knowledge of the imminent attacks, these insiders would have made almost $5,000,000. On September 10, '4 thousand '5 hundred and '16 put options were bought on America Airlines two hundred and eighty five times normal volume. So they're $4,000,000 profit there. So I can keep going. You can keep going.
• 11:29
  There's a lot of references here. But the key the key, which I'm gonna read it again. Okay? I'm gonna read this sentence to you one more time because this is gonna really set things up for the next thing we're gonna talk about. He's saying, even a novice trader can see the windfall that could be achieved in shorting these stocks before a terrorist attack.
• 11:48
  Okay? Now think about it. You you don't you know, Trump with his TMTG, his, you know, you know, DJT shares. Basically, if you if you knew if you knew that Trump was going to be killed, right, you could call this absolutely a terrorist attack the same way people knew that nine eleven was gonna happen beforehand because they were involved in it. Now granted the article talks about it makes you think that, oh, maybe there's all these these kind of people over in Afghanistan or these Arabs or these terrorists over there that, you know, Bin Laden's cousin is buying.
• 12:21
  He's shorting the airline stocks. No. It's actually probably our own government, probably our own officials, our own, you know, people tied into the Bush family, etcetera, that we're probably the ones shorting these things because we know that well, I guess we assume through our research as, you know, truth seekers that nine eleven wasn't just some random terrorist attack and that people within our own country were highly, highly involved in orchestrating and carrying out and profiting from it. Right? It's like, I think it was what Larry Silverstein buying insurance on the World Trade Center shortly before that.
• 12:52
  Maybe he had a little bit of insight into what might happen. So we can see though that as that article pointed out that people short a stock. Right? So shorting a stock and look. I'm not a financial trader.
• 13:04
  I'm not that kind of guy, but as I understand it, it's basically placing a bet that the shock the stock will go down. Right? So if you think that Blockbuster is going to go down significantly, you short Blockbuster. Okay? Because then if you if it's successful, then you make money off of the the lessening of Blockbuster's share values.
• 13:24
  So if we're looking at what happened with with Trump over the weekend, and if we look at stocks and we look at were there any major short positions taken on stocks that would potentially fall if Donald Trump was assassinated, that might give us some good indication. So this is one of the big things that I I think that needs to be talked about right now. So I pulled I've got a variety of of of threads and different information that I wanna read to you here. So this is from earlier today. This is on the shadow of Ezra account on Twitter saying that someone or a group of individuals shorted millions of shares in Trump's Truth Social stock in the week leading up to the assassination attempt.
• 14:07
  Short positions against Truth Social stock doubled between July 1 and July 12 going from 7 to 15,000,000 shares. Now in this here, this person he quote, he says that a similar occurrence was observed on 09/11/2001 when substantial bets were placed against the stocks of major airlines, American Airlines and United Airlines the day before the attacks, which I just read that to you in that other article. Something similar happened before the terrorist attacks in Israel on October 7 where bets against the value of Israeli companies spiked in the days prior, suggesting some traders may have had advanced knowledge of the looming terror attack and profited from it. They anticipate that Trump will be dead by Monday morning and try to profit from that scenario, follow the money. So this little chart here, I'll pull up.
• 14:54
  This is the from what I understand it, this is the shorts taken against DJT. Right? So you can see a a vertical line. Right? That a lot of people, not so a lot of people, but a lot of shares were shorted, and this is happening right there 07:15.
• 15:12
  So this is within twenty four hours or so, a day or so before the attempted assassination. So more information has come out. Okay? So we now so this is Champagne Joshi, who I've you know, great reporting great great reporting. So what he's come out with in discovering is that a company called so, okay, the question is, if there's these shorts being taken on, you know, you know, basically Trump stock, which company is shorting and who runs a company?
• 15:43
  Who are they tied to? What groups are they donating to? Etcetera. So we're gonna be digging into that because this is very revealing. Now, you know, I mentioned the Bush's nine eleven, and maybe we'll come back to the Bush's.
• 15:53
  We'll see where this little journey, this little rabbit hole takes us. So Joshie says, a company called Austin Private Wealth LLC shorted 12,000,000 shares of DJT via a put option. The filing date is July 12, the day before the assassination attempt. They have around 1,000,000,000 in assets under management, and this is by far the largest put placed. According to a source, the trade represents 6% of total shares and over 16% of the flow of the stock given the fact that Trump owns 60% of the company.
• 16:26
  Right? So this is a company that Trump owns 60% of. This is a giant bet when you consider the total AUM, but wait, there's more. Okay? So this is just showing the the actual bet itself.
• 16:40
  Okay. Now continuing, it says, okay. To make things more interest interesting, my source tipped me off with the following two images from their Bloomberg terminal. The screenshot on the left shows the put by Austin Private Wealth LLC that was taken earlier this morning. It shows he says a hundred and 20 thousand.
• 16:57
  I think he meant to be, say, 24,000,000 puts. As you can see, their position is by far the largest. The next closest is Citadel Advisors with 16,000. Right? So 12,000,000 to 16,000.
• 17:10
  That's a big difference. Huge, huge difference. Okay? Here's where it gets interesting. The screenshot to the right was taken later in the day, and poof, Austin Private Wealth LLC is nowhere to be found.
• 17:21
  Right? These just all their shorts just disappeared. Okay? So let's take a look at this company, Austin Private Wealth. Okay?
• 17:29
  So this is the company that placed a significant short on, basically, on Donald Trump. Right? They they perhaps it was just blind luck. I doubt it. Right, because you'll follow the money.
• 17:44
  They always say, follow the money, you'll see where it takes you. That basically, within a day or so of this assassination, which they potentially they believed would happen, they put a they put a massive, massive short position against Trump's stocks. Okay? So let's look at this company a little bit. Let's dig dig in.
• 18:04
  So Austin Private Wealth. Okay. You know, empowering you to envision to envision and plan for a life of growth. Okay. Now keep in mind.
• 18:11
  Look. I'm I am not saying that this company was involved in the assassination or anything like that. I'm not I'm not saying all I'm looking at here is the anomaly of what I showed you from this guy's tweet that this particular company had a massive short on Trump's stock within a day or two of the assassination attempt. Draw your own conclusions. Okay?
• 18:33
  Draw your own conclusions. So okay. You know you know, fancy website. Okay. You know?
• 18:38
  This is kinda funny. With us, you'll experience no hidden agenda. It's almost comical to think about that. No hidden agenda. Okay.
• 18:47
  Maybe there's no hidden agenda. Alright. But let's go ahead and look at let's try okay. Lot of times you you go to these big websites, these big big companies, financial companies. Companies are moving around a lot of money.
• 18:56
  They're oftentimes gonna talk about where they're donating money. They're oftentimes involved in philanthropy, and you can trace this stuff to figure out a lot of what's running the show. Okay? So if we go to in the community, to me, it looks like the web page where they're talking about, right, who they're supporting and their their their good deeds. Right?
• 19:13
  Giving back to our community drives our passion for success. Okay? So they are proud supporters, okay, of these organizations. Right? We've got the Children's Cancer Research Fund, American Cancer Society, the Jewish Community Center, Boy Scouts of America.
• 19:28
  Okay. Typical, you know, big you know, lots of people donate to these companies. Goodwill, the Catholic school, Shalom Austin, so some Jewish organizations, congregation Beth Israel, ACLU, ADL, right, the Austin Jewish. So what what I'm seeing here, again, is just looking at this website is that they're, you know, by donating to, say, the ACLU or the ADL, right, Anti Definition League, these are are are companies that have a very, very strong, you could say it, liberal agenda, to to put it lightly. Okay?
• 20:03
  Like the ADL. Like, this is a company that's getting all kinds of conservative people canceled online. It's attacking people. It's it's it's a it's a pretty significant company in this battle. It's the one that is Elon Musk is going back and forth with about their antisemitism.
• 20:18
  So you can see there's the, you know, congregation Beth Israel, Jewish, you know, academy. So what we can see is that, okay, that there's some more liberal things, and there's some Jewish and Catholic organizations that they're involved with. Now does this mean anything? No. Right?
• 20:31
  It could be just that they're trying to they're they're following maybe there's a list of the top hundred companies you can donate to to look good to the public, and they pick the top 10. It could be that simple. Okay? But it's worth showing you. Now let's go to the next development though in looking even further into this.
• 20:51
  Okay. This is interesting. So breaking Austin private wealth with connections to the Bush family. So we mentioned the Bushes earlier and okay. Coincidence.
• 21:02
  Now, again, this is this is just pulling together information. You can draw your own conclusions. Okay? But I'm reading you what this tweet is saying. It says breaking.
• 21:13
  Austin private wealth with connections to the Bush family shorted 12,000,000 shares of DJT via a put option on July 12, just one day before the assassination attempt. This the author of this post asked, did the put did the Bushes know something was gonna happen to Donald Trump? It says this massive trade represents 6% of total shares over 60% of the float given Trump's sixty percent owners ownership. Their 1,000,000,000 AUM makes this a significant bet. So what what are the ties to the Bush family?
• 21:44
  Now keep in mind, a lot of these ties it's not like, you know, oh, the chairman of the board is George Bush junior. Right? It it's rarely like that. It's usually a person that served politically that has these ties, and it's it's not always easy to trace these things. But as this tweet continues, it says, Austin Private Wealth is connected to the Bush family through James a Baker the third, a senior policy director with long standing ties to the Bushes, having served as secretary of state under George h w Bush and in various roles under Ronald Reagan and George w Bush.
• 22:15
  Okay? So it's connected through this guy, James a Baker the third, a senior policy director, right, with long saying ties to Bushes, and he was the secretary of state under George Bush. Okay? So is it a coincidence that the secretary of state under George Bush is now a senior policy director with this company, with this financial firm that is shorting Donald Trump. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
• 22:41
  I don't know. You think for yourself. You're smart. Says George W. Bush has strongly shared his support against Trump despite everything happening in our country.
• 22:50
  While these connections don't imply direct involvement, they highlight significant professional relationships, which is true. Okay? So, again, whether this ties back the bushes, I don't know. But what we do know is this company, Austin Private Wealth, placed a massive short on the DJT stocks via a put option. Right?
• 23:16
  And it was, like, right before happening. So going back again. So going back to the article I talked about where I mentioned that even a novice trader can see the windfall that could be achieved in shorting these stocks before a terrorist attack. Now didn't go and crunch the numbers and see how much money was shorted and how much money could potentially be earned if, say, that, you know, these stocks fell 50%. Right?
• 23:42
  Which you'd imagine they would. Right? I mean, if if you're a betting man and you look at the company that, you know, Trump owns 60 percent of the shares of, if if the guy is killed, then you would probably expect that the company wouldn't do very well. Like, you know, not, you know, implying anything, but, like, Elon Musk, for instance. If me if if Elon Musk went up in a rocket and died, right, going to Mars or something, you could probably speculate that if that happened, shares of Tesla and SpaceX and these different companies probably wouldn't fare so well.
• 24:13
  Right? Because they need they need the leader. They need the guy that started the company that pushes it forward. So, anyway, it's just this is worth looking at. Right?
• 24:22
  And then there's also getting into BlackRock, which I see as a comment from, you know, Ron Rumbleson, don't forget BlackRock, which that that gets into a whole different discussion. And then black rocks I don't have the thread here, but I came across it that, you know, black rock also has some involvement of this. And when you look at the and we talked about this in one of the more recent shows on this. I think it was yester I forget whether in the past couple of days, where the supposed shooter, right, Crook, if that's the same pronunciation, think it's Crook, was featured in a BlackRock commercial, right, about two years ago. So there was someone forget who it was.
• 24:58
  Someone that commented in one of chats made a good point. It's like, that black rock that's actually making a statement? Right? Are they in some way, right, in some sort of you know, chess power play by doing that, are they showing, hey. This is the kind of control that we have.
• 25:14
  Right? That if if BlackRock and think about it. Take a step back. Like, what is this communicating? If this if the company is is powerful as BlackRock, produces this commercial two years ago, and one of the main kids that was in the school in the commercial ends up being the kid who supposedly was the guy that was going to assassinate Donald Trump, Is that in any way painting a picture that BlackRock may have been involved?
• 25:40
  Again, draw your own conclusions, but it's it's just too suspicious. Right? It's it's way too suspicious. There's too many coincidences for it to be just random. And I'm not I don't believe in this random.
• 25:52
  Right? You look into things, you can see what what's happening. So, anyway, it's pretty damning evidence no matter how you look at it. That there what this to me, what this paints is that the picture this paints is that this assassination attempt was a highly coordinated, deeply planned event. It was not something that was spur of the moment.
• 26:15
  It was not some screwed up lone gunman who who just wanted to go, you know, kill kill this guy because he was getting bullied at school. It was something absolutely massive. I mean, I'm not gonna say it's the scale of nine eleven in terms of the orchestration. That was a serious, you know, massive event, but it's up there. Right?
• 26:35
  In terms of the the how high of a level this goes to, right, with within the the, you know, the DHS or within the DOJ or what like, this isn't something that just randomly happened, and all this evidence points to something very, very big in terms of coordination. So continuing on. Okay. So we've covered our stocks. Now the other thing too is that, you know, I my my video a few nights ago, I played different, you know, kind of discussions.
• 27:01
  I think I played it was Joe Manchin and then also talking about Mickey Haley, did they know this in advance? Well, I've got a little video here. This is Victoria Newland, who you're probably familiar with. This is Benny Johnson put this out. He says this is his words, not mine.
• 27:16
  He says, why was the deep state's bloodthirsty regime change expert, Victoria Nuland, guaranteeing that Trump won't be president with a crooked smile on her face just hours before a Biden donor was allowed by secret service to shoot Trump in the head? Okay? So I'll play this video. I'll play it a couple times just to it's only thirteen seconds, but let's just take a look at this. So supposedly about what from what Betty Johnson's saying is that she made this statement a couple hours before the actual shooting.
• 27:46
  Let's just just check it out.
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: Our economy, etcetera. So I don't think that Donald Trump is gonna be president. So if that's what Putin's betting on, he's gonna get a unhappy surprise, I think. That's that is, number one, our economy, etcetera. So I don't think that Donald Trump is gonna be president.
• 28:04
  So if that's what Putin's betting on, he's gonna get a unhappy surprise.
• 28:11
  Seth Holehouse: Now okay. So you see her saying a couple hours before, I don't think Donald Trump is gonna be president. She, you know, she's smiling. She's happy to say that. Now, again, does this mean she's involved?
• 28:21
  No. Not necessarily. She could just be so confident that Trump's not gonna be president because she thinks that Biden is a great candidate and Trump doesn't stand a chance. Maybe. But, again, take them take them for their words.
• 28:34
  Right? Take them for their words. And there's been a lot of other videos that have surfaced from people, very powerful people that seem eerily confident in predicting that Trump won't make it to be president. There's been compilations going around about people, you know, talking about assassination and all kinds of stuff. So you can see that this is coordinated.
• 28:50
  My my worry, right, one of my worries sincerely is just that this is just step one of it. Right? Like, if they, you know, try try again. Right? So my concern is that are they gonna try something else?
• 29:00
  Is there gonna be some sort of of explosion? I mean, who knows? I mean, these people potentially, it's the same people that were behind nine eleven for all we know. So they they have no worries, and they have no kind of moral code that says you can't kill a bunch of innocent people. Right?
• 29:16
  They'll do it left, right, and center all the time. They they'd rather that we weren't really around. They don't like they don't really like us. Okay? So that's one of my concerns.
• 29:24
  But, anyway, so you you have Newland saying that. So another thing that that gets into what we're looking at here let me pull up this this next thing is this image. Okay? So this is an image that has created a lot of discussion. And this is so if if we I'll zoom in for you here.
• 29:41
  There's a line going past Trump right here, which was one of the bullets. Okay? And so there's been a lot of discussion about, like, just what are the odds of a camera catching a the image of a bullet. Right? Now for people that say, why is it aligned?
• 29:58
  Well, because the bullets the bullets traveling x amount of distance or x amount of speed, right, depending on how how long of a an open the shutter has, right, it'll create a blur. So if you have a really slow shutter speed and you take you say you're holding a golf ball and you move it across as you take a picture, that will it'll form a a line. Right? The golf ball will become a line. So it's not abnormal for a bullet to be showing up as a line because it's a moving object, and the speed of the shutter will indicate how much of that movement is captured like that.
• 30:31
  Okay? I'm trying to simplify it a little bit for you. So what's interesting is so Michael Jan, who is is a friend of mine and is a he's a war photographer. I mean, this guy this guy knows guns. He knows ballistics, and he knows, you know, photography.
• 30:46
  I want to just read through this post that he put out because it makes a very important point. And, again, what it does is it paints some sort of intent. Right? That's the key here is it's showing that there's people that potentially knew about this ahead of time. So I'll read this.
• 31:04
  He says, bullet trace and interesting matters. So this is one of his mind dumps, Stan edit. You know? So San's at it because this is what he does. Right?
• 31:13
  If if you see my interviews with him, he'll talk for forty minutes about a thousand different topics, and you're like, man, this guy's really smart. He's read a ton of books. And so he's dumps. He opens his brain and dumps. Alright?
• 31:24
  And you should listen when he does because he's smart. So here he says, okay. It's nearly four, you know, o 400 here in Japan. Interesting on bullet trace. Scratching my memories, I do not recall seeing any bullet trace photos from close to 90 degrees from bullets flight path.
• 31:39
  I'm not saying it can't be done. It probably can be done with modern cameras and high shutter speeds. Now keep in mind, I'm pretty handy with weapons and with cameras. I was a special forces weapon specialist. As a photographer, I shot some of those famous photos in Iraq and Afghanistan.
• 31:53
  Substantial crossover knowledge. My first thought was I've never seen a trace shot from that angle. Second thought was it should be possible. Third thought was that would be a very fast shutter speed. I was preparing to reach out to the photographer hunting and pecking online.
• 32:09
  I found New York Times quoting the shutter speed at one eight thousandth of a second. It happens that I have sitting on a table here the top three DSLR Sony makes these cameras. These the cameras most people salivate over, I have three here because I know how important serious gear is. I use only the very best camera and lenses cameras and lenses. Top gear help make some of the most interesting and often intense photos in two wars.
• 32:35
  Unfortunately, I often broke lenses while jumping on the ground or hitting against a wall or doorway. No camera ever broke. I use the cameras regularly, though rarely published photos from them these days. The maximum shutter speed on all three of these cameras is one one eight thousand. The New York Times photographer Doug Mills Mills is quoted as shooting at 30 frames per second, k, one eight thousand, the shutter speed.
• 33:01
  Right? So what that means, if I recall correctly, I used to, you know, be really in photography, is that basically the the shutter when the shutter opens up, that's when the image gets imprinted on the sensor. Right? So a one second shutter speed, which is one, shutter speed of one, it goes up, open, close. It takes a second to open and close.
• 33:19
  So a shutter speed of one eight thousandth of a second is like like boom boom. Like, it's it's as it's as as you can see here, it's it's insanely fast. Now I've personally I've never heard of photographers using a shutter speed like that. Like, there's no need to. Even even if you're photographing football where you're, you know, where active movement and everything, maybe you're you're getting closer to that.
• 33:40
  But, like, maxing out the shutter speed, you do that only when you're trying to capture insanely fast motion. Right? That's what you do. So he continues, and he says, those are settings I would choose if I were to if I were trying to catch extremely fast action, such as a head exploding. I'm not suggesting anything at all.
• 34:03
  Just as a war correspondent, I never crank shutter that high even for anything. I wanted to keep ISO lower. Other professionals choose other settings. So, again, he's saying that as a war photographer, he never ever cranked his shutter speed to that high. And so, again, as he's saying here, those are settings I would choose if I were trying to catch extremely fast action such as a head exploding.
• 34:29
  So maybe look. Say you're you're photographing the Isle of Man race with these, you know, motorcycles that are going hundreds of miles an hour. You might have a really, really fast shutter speed because you can then what what it means is is if the bike drives by really fast, you can click it. You can shoot a ton of shots, and you'll get a nice frozen image because it's that fast. Right?
• 34:46
  If your shutter speed is too slow, it'll create a blurred image across your your in your image. Right? So the just this is an interesting point, though. Right? It's a very, very interesting point of why would the New York Times photographer use this insanely fast shutter speed?
• 35:07
  A shutter speed so fast that it can literally capture the image of a bullet as it's grazing past Trump's head. Right? Draw your own conclusions. He makes a good point, though, that if you were trying to capture the image of a head exploding, you would use a really fast shutter speed because you'd get a bunch of pictures of it, and you'd get this perfect crisp image of the gore of what that would look like. Okay?
• 35:37
  Now I'm not saying the photographer knew the shooting was gonna happen. Look. Maybe this is just how the photographer uses his camera. Maybe he's somebody that he he just always shoots on a really high shutter speed and he hates, you know, whatever. I don't I don't know.
• 35:51
  But, again, it's another one of these things that doesn't really make sense. Michael Jan, a seasoned war photographer who's been in situations where he's filming the exact same things and photographing them, says he's never come close to using that shutter speed. So to me, this is another one of these anomalies that really makes you scratch your head and say, gosh. Like, how big was the coordination for this? Right?
• 36:13
  It's worth mentioning. So I did so I now wanna pivot and talk a little bit about just the the cover up, and I'm not gonna be diving too much in this because you can see it. But you can see it all over the place. So here, I've got a short video from Dan Bongino. Right?
• 36:28
  So Dan Bongino, I I trust a lot of his intel. This guy's former secret service. He he knows his stuff. So this is from a Western Lindsman on Twitter who put this out who said from Dan Mangino. Secret service director Cheadle is being silenced.
• 36:44
  So Dan cites unimpeachable sources that tell him they're lying. Here's the other piece of news you're gonna hear for the first time. Here, I'm hearing from very reputable, again, unimpeachable sources that the failed secret service director is being silenced right now by the Biden admin. DHS secretary Mayorkas, they are coming out to defend her publicly. Why?
• 37:05
  She knows where all the cookies are in the cookie jar. So I'll play this for you. It's a minute fourteen, but this is this is an important one to listen to against Dan Bongino. This I think this is this is him today at the RNC. He's gonna boost that up there.
• 37:19
  Robert Kiyosaki: They're
• 37:19
  Speaker 4: lying. Here's the other piece of news you're gonna hear for the first time here. I am hearing from very reputable, again, unimpeachable sources that the failed secret service director is being silenced right now by the Biden administration and DHS secretary Mayorkas. They are coming out to defend her publicly. Why?
• 37:42
  Because Paula, this is my friend, Ed. It's a guy in a white jacket.
• 37:46
  Speaker 5: Can you bring him? He's a
• 37:47
  Speaker 4: good friend. Sorry, folks. This guy, I love this guy. We used to work together in the Secret Service. He's outside.
• 37:51
  He's got a white jacket up. Here's what I'm hearing. They are being silenced. They are silencing the secret service director. It is not an accident that Mayorkas came out publicly defending her Cheadle.
• 38:06
  She knows where all the cookies are in the cookie jar. They know if she goes rogue right now, everything I told you was going to come out in the wash. The failure to secure Mar A Lagoa proper properly, the repeated turning down of additional security assets. She knows they know this is going to come out in the wash. So they're silencing her right now.
• 38:27
  I'm getting this from the highest levels. They told her shut up or your job is at stake.
• 38:34
  Seth Holehouse: So here's a another indication of that. Right? So Mayorkas is blocking secret service director from testifying. Right? So now they're they're looking into this.
• 38:44
  You know, lot of the folks are they're saying, look. This assassination attempt never should have happened. We gotta look into it. And, of course, it's being blocked. Right?
• 38:52
  So here's a town hall article. Mayorkas is blocking secret service director from testifying. Okay? So, again, to me, there's something up with this. Right?
• 39:04
  There there's a massive cover up happening. It goes deep. It goes to the highest levels. Let's just keep we we have to watch how this unfolds. We have to watch how this unfolds.
• 39:15
  Alright. So continuing now. So more and more information is coming out though that's showing that it's it's undeniable this is allowed to happen. Absolutely undeniable. So this is an article that was on, I think, Daily Mail.
• 39:28
  It says that so Donald Trump's would be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks was at the former president's rally three hours before shooting him and sparked the suspicions of the Secret Service because he was carrying a rangefinder used by hunters to take long shots. So, again, here you go. Secret Service spotted Thomas Crooks at Trump rally three hours before shooting. Right? So they they knew this they knew this guy was coming.
• 39:51
  Now, again, whether this guy was the actual shooter, my belief is that he's the Patsy. He's the he's the Oswald. He's the guy that was just supposed to take the fall for it. They're gonna kill him, make sure that he can't talk about it, and they can try to create this narrative of the lone gunman. Right?
• 40:08
  It it's it's the best way to cover up a crime. Right? There you know, just just to say, hey. Look. There's this one guy.
• 40:13
  He was this crazy guy. Look at his, you know, his his post on social media. He was bullied. It was him. I want to say one thing is I I played I think in the first show I did, this is Sunday night, I played a video that was supposedly him saying he got the wrong guy, and he was talking.
• 40:27
  And a few people point out on social media that I think that actually wasn't him, that it was someone that I think was a TikTok pranker that was pretending to be him. Either way, I just wanted to acknowledge that because, you know, it's it's part of what happens when you're reporting on stuff this quickly. You have some stuff that comes in that you you find out later that actually wasn't the right information. Right? So, again, I apologize for that, and so it is what it is.
• 40:51
  But, anyway, they had three hours. Right? They had three hours before the shooting, so it just you you can't deny this. The other thing is that so there's this interview that was recently done. I think it was maybe today earlier talking about the police officers finding this guy and then putting out this alert to a blanket tactic channel.
• 41:10
  So I'm just gonna instead of reading through this, this is a post by Kyle Becker, I'm gonna go and just play you this video. It's about it's a minute forty, and so this is one of the officials that was overseeing and responsible for this event locally. Right? So what go ahead. I'll play this for you a minute forty because this is some really, really helpful information to come out.
• 41:30
  So check this out. Here we go.
• 41:31
  Speaker 6: Did in fact see an individual on the roof with a weapon.
• 41:35
  Speaker 7: He saw the shooter?
• 41:36
  Speaker 6: He did.
• 41:36
  Speaker 7: Your officers are on patrol. They hear that there is a suspicious person on the rooftop. What did your officers do?
• 41:42
  Speaker 6: So our officers in the area started to converge on the building. My understanding is they did a full perimeter walk of the building, weren't able to see up on the roof. Two of the officers went to what appeared to be the lowest point from ground to roof. One of the officers actually boosted the second officer up high enough for him to grab hold of the roof. When he was able to pull his head up over the roof, he did in fact see an individual on the roof with a weapon.
• 42:08
  Speaker 7: He saw the shooter?
• 42:09
  Speaker 6: He did.
• 42:10
  Speaker 7: And what did the shooter do?
• 42:11
  Speaker 6: Turned towards him, had the barrel of his weapon pointed at the officer.
• 42:16
  Speaker 7: At that point, the officer's hanging on to the side of the roof?
• 42:20
  Seth Holehouse: Yes.
• 42:21
  Speaker 7: Unable to pull a gun out.
• 42:22
  Speaker 6: Unable to
• 42:23
  Speaker 7: Unable to defend himself. Unable to reach his radio.
• 42:26
  Speaker 6: Any of that. Yeah. Yeah. Strictly defensive movement for him to lower his head, duck, lost his own grip, right, fell approximately eight feet to the ground.
• 42:37
  Speaker 7: That's a steep drop.
• 42:37
  Speaker 6: That's a good drop.
• 42:38
  Speaker 7: Yes. Did he get hurt?
• 42:39
  Speaker 6: He did.
• 42:40
  Speaker 7: In that moment, did they realize there's a threat right now to the former president?
• 42:44
  Speaker 6: They did. So both the boosting officer and the officer that fell were both on the radio indicating that there was an individual on the on the roof that did, in fact, have a weapon.
• 42:54
  Speaker 7: Who did they radio?
• 42:55
  Speaker 6: So there was a blanket tactical channel
• 42:58
  Speaker 7: being Everyone heard it.
• 43:00
  Speaker 6: Everyone that was on that tactical channel heard it, yes.
• 43:02
  Speaker 7: How much time between that radio communication and the gun being fired at the former president?
• 43:09
  Speaker 6: That I don't I don't have that information.
• 43:12
  Seth Holehouse: So that's helpful. And the fact that he so that they put this out, this blanket radio you know, this blanket channel, I forgot how they refer to it as. What is it? The one they call it? The a blanket tactical channel.
• 43:24
  Right? So, again, more evidence that this is known ahead time and nothing was done. Now so what's interesting is that actually, I'll show you this because this is worth looking at. Right? So this right here, it's showing that what happened after Trump moved his head.
• 43:42
  So you can see that based upon where he was grazed in the ear from moving his head that just, you know, I think it was a point three seconds before that, that's where his head was. Right? So it makes sense that there's that there was an absolute headshot lined up. Now let me go ahead. I wanna dig into a few other things now.
• 44:02
  So let's see. There's one post I wanna read you from Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, because this is this is important information as a potential. Right? And, again, this is still we're we're in the early stages. We're speculating.
• 44:16
  Okay? So I guess by by watching a channel like this, you know that. Like, what we're doing is we're asking questions. I'm not coming out there in front of know, on on Fox News saying this is exactly what it is. No.
• 44:25
  I'm just saying, okay. This doesn't make sense. And we think about this. And Mike Adams is someone that he speculates. He draws conclusions.
• 44:31
  He's been right a lot. He's been wrong. Right? So it just happens. But what he says here is interesting.
• 44:37
  Right? It's it's interesting. So I'll read through this. He says, there is now a very credible explanation emerging that says US Secret Service agents on orders from Kimberly Cheadle and Mayorkas placed a Secret Service team inside the building where the shooter was crawling on the roof, and that the actual shots targeting Trump may have been taken by the Secret Service from the inside of the building. He says this will be consistent with the audio forensic of the shooting recording since the distance would be nearly identical to the rooftop shooter.
• 45:09
  This also explains why counter sniper teams held their fire until after the shooter killed Trump. Their job was to eliminate the patsy. Note that US Secret Service had eyes on this young man for at least thirty minutes watching him with an actual rangefinder, scoping the range of the shot, then with the backpack, then scaling the ladder and going onto the roof. They watched him and reported on his progress. They had nothing to stop him.
• 45:32
  They did everything but load his rifle and pull the trigger. We need an immediate criminal investigation into this. Right? He says this sinks to high heaven. He says, note that in the assassination of JFK, they also had a patsy while the real shot was taken by a CIA run sharpshooter.
• 45:49
  Cheetos' bizarre sloped roof excuse doesn't pass the smell test. Now speaking of JFK, I do wanna pull something up here. This is from salty goat over on Twitter. He says, here's a little fun fact you wanna know. He says, when the motorcade was leaving Love Field Airport in Dallas, the secret service agent that always rode on the back bumper behind JFK was ordered away from his position.
• 46:12
  Right? Now there's actually a video of this. So this right here, I'll play this for you. So what you can see here let me start back over for you. Okay.
• 46:21
  I'll I'll go play it for you. So you'll see there's a guy that's that is on the back of the car that is asked to get off of the car, and you can see that he's confused. He's kinda like, why are you telling me to, like, abandon my post? Right? So this is the because, obviously, we know that the coordination behind JFK, but this watch this at seventeen seventeen seconds.
• 46:41
  Speaker 5: Directly in front of the president and the wife of the governor of Texas is sitting in front of missus Kennedy. The secret service are following the car out. They're standing on the running board of the follow-up car and as is their custom until directly in front.
• 46:58
  Seth Holehouse: So you saw I'll play it one more time. You can see the guy that someone tells him to get off, and he throws his hands up in the air. He's like, why are you telling me to to to exit? This is my spot.
• 47:06
  Speaker 5: Of the president and the wife of the governor of Texas is sitting in front of missus Kennedy. The secret service are following the car out. They're standing on the
• 47:18
  Seth Holehouse: So there you go. I mean, okay. There's nothing new. Right? Nothing new.
• 47:23
  So there is something else I wanted to show you as we round out tonight's show is understanding the role of this guy, this 20 year old. And I touched on this in the, I think, in in the previous show on this topic, and the whole idea of of a Manchurian candidate. Right? This gets into MK Ultra mind control. And, you know, I think if you're watching this show, you're not gonna be the one people saying, oh, this is all conspiracy stuff because you know it's not.
• 47:53
  It's declassified. I can show actually, I will show you some declassified documents about this exactly. Right? So this is this is what my where I'm at with my kind of formation of understanding. What happened is that this guy, the gosh.
• 48:10
  His name is just off the tip of my tongue. The the supposed shooter, right, that basically that he is someone that was set up as a patsy and potentially as a mind control victim even. Right? This is what we know because they don't take chances. Right?
• 48:26
  They're not gonna have someone go in to fulfill a certain purpose and, you know, get nervous and pull out on something like that. So, typically, I think Oswald is probably the same. We have Oswald. Is that whatever role he was supposed to play, that he was able to be controlled into doing that. And you might say, okay.
• 48:42
  Does mind control really exist? That's some crazy conspiracy. It does actually. Like, they've I go watch some of the original maturing candidate. It's not a it's not a fiction film.
• 48:50
  It's a documentary. Right? These are there's government programs in culture being being at the center of them that basically were able to turn people into mind control victims. And so the question I have is that the shooter, a crook, right, crook, is was he part of some sort of operation where they had set him up to be the killer, but he's just the patsy. He's the fall guy, and he was under mind control.
• 49:15
  So I'm gonna pull up this. And this may be they say, oh, this is a little bit too wild. Okay. Well, take a look at it with me. So I'm gonna make this a little bit bigger because it's it's it's a little more difficult to see.
• 49:25
  Okay. This is a document that is literally on CIA.gov. This is a FOIA requested document on CIA.gov. Okay? The headline to this, the title of this is ex CIA doctor leads fight to limit hypnosis.
• 49:46
  Okay? So this is a document. This is from 01/01/1980. That was now then it was document was released back in 02/2010. So I think the original document was produced in 1980.
• 49:59
  It was classified, and I think through a FOIA, it was then declassified. That's my my guess. Okay? So I'm just gonna read a little bit about this because this this shows you what can be done. Okay.
• 50:12
  So it says, x CIA doc leads fight to limit to limit hypnosis. Now I apologize I can't make the font bigger because this is just a scan of, I think, of some sort of PDF or something. So it's not like I said, maybe it's a weird document. It's hard to change the size of this font. Right?
• 50:32
  So, basically, what it says, during the early sixties when the CIA was covertly funneling millions of tax dollars into a variety of brainwashing experiments involving LSD, other hallucinogens, and electroshock. Klein provided expertise on hypnosis. He was out spoken in his belief that one of the central goals of these experiments to create a hit was to create a hypnotized remote control assassin. It was entirely possible, though he denies knowledge of any terminal experiments that would have tested his theories. The fictional Manchurian candidate presented in Richard Condon's thriller and later in a movie starring Frank Sinatra is, in Klein's mind, still a frighteningly real specter.
• 51:21
  Quote, it cannot be done by everyone, and circumstances by using hypnosis could produce such a killer in three to six weeks. Right? So what this is is this the hypnosis Klein actually, what they sorry. Just take a step back. So the hypnotherapist is doctor Milton Klein.
• 51:38
  He's a former consultant to the CIA's super secret behavior modification project Bluebird. Okay? So CIA, we have MK Ultra, but there's also a Project Bluebird, which they describe as a super secret behavior modification run by the CIA. Okay? So what he's saying here is that this technique of coercive persuasion to produce antisocial criminal behavior are one reasons he advocates for legal restrictions.
• 52:08
  I think this is what a hypnotherapist who saw what they're actually doing and then came out to speak out against it saying, hey. You shouldn't be doing this. Right? But here, what it says, okay, looking at it, is saying that it was done. Let's see.
• 52:22
  Let me find the so, basically, this this okay. This is this is describing MK Ultra programming. Right? Saying that the that the CIA was covertly funneling millions of tax dollars into a variety of brainwashing experiments involving LSD, other hallucinogens, and electroshock. Right?
• 52:41
  They torture people. Right? I I've I've done deep dives into NK Ultra stuff, and it it's scary stuff. You get into SRA, and it's it's it's frightening stuff, but it's real. Right?
• 52:51
  But then what's crazy is he's saying that his hypothesis, he could produce such a killer in three to six weeks. Right? So here you have one of the consultants, a hypnotherapist consulting the CIA on a top secret program called, you know, project bluebird where they use they they are able to hypnotize people and turn them into assassins and him saying that it can be done in three to six weeks. Right? Now keep in mind, this is back in the sixties.
• 53:18
  Alright? Imagine what kind of technology they have now. So is was this guy, right, was this crook, this this, you 20 year old kid who just randomly showed up and became became the fall guy for this entire thing, whose parents happened to, I think, both be in I think they're either therapists or, like, I guess, both his parents were in a profession that raises some flags. But the question is that was this guy put into some sort of program where he became this controlled, you know, patsy that he was he was the one that's gonna go up there and whether he's gonna go up there and pretend to take the shot or to try to take the shot and miss or, you take the shot and and be successful and then be killed. It doesn't matter, but it shows you to me this is a very strong possibility.
• 54:02
  Right? This is like I I think if you look back at whether it's Adam Lansing or a lot of people that are involved in these shootings, these mass shootings, lot of times they're on all kinds of psychiatric meds. There's a lot of information coming out about that, about the role of psyche psychiatric meds in opening up people to be controlled through mind control programs. So that that whole I mean, maybe I'll do a whole show on that at some point because that rabbit hole goes absolutely deep. I mean, it goes it goes deep.
• 54:29
  Right? And there's a lot to discover there. So that is the the kind of the wrap up of today's show. And I think I'll I'll end up probably covering this again, this topic, because it's gonna be an ever unfolding thing. But to me, the big takeaway is that there this is a a massive coordination.
• 54:47
  I do believe personally that there are individuals that were trying to benefit financially from this through shorting Donald Trump stocks as we looked at in the beginning of the show. It's apparent there's a massive cover up going on, and they're trying as much as they can to sweep this whole thing under the rug because it was unsuccessful. Right? And now they're kinda caught. It's like they're they're kinda screwed because they played their hand.
• 55:10
  They tried to assassinate Trump. It failed, but now everyone knows they tried to assassinate Trump. Everyone's focused on that. Right? Because if Trump if Trump was was killed, hypothetically, it'd be terrible, obviously, but, you know, they they they would have accomplished their goal.
• 55:25
  So if they could just just kick the can down the road and just, you know, push things away like they usually do, you know, the the next administration gets in, and before you know it, no one's even talking about it anymore. But the fact that they didn't kill him and he and he actually came back, and he's up this photo fight fight fight and everything, it's like their whole plan backfired. Absolutely backfired. So, folks, okay, a quick few quick reminders as we finish up. First off, if you're watching, make sure that you hit that green follow button.
• 55:52
  If you're on Rumble, make sure you're hitting the green follow button. If you're watching on YouTube, go to Rumble. Alright? There's free speech over there. Right?
• 55:59
  Green follow button is huge. Leave a thumbs up or a like whatever platform you're using. Leave me a comment. Let me know in the comments. Honestly, I read all your comments.
• 56:06
  I really do. Read your you know, let me know what you think in the comments. And a lot of times, the theories I get, the ideas that I get come from you. Now I I don't always remember who said what. I I try to give credit where it's due, but I I I love reading your comments because you're smart people.
• 56:19
  You're really, really smart people. I can tell a lot of you are actually smarter than me. Right? You're you're you're you've got great research. You come in, and you're intelligent.
• 56:27
  So I appreciate that. So please let me know what you think in the comments. Also, big, big reminder of our silver giveaway. So ManinAmerica.com/win. It's now the end of the show.
• 56:39
  You open up a new browser. You're not gonna miss anything. ManinAmerica.com/win. Enter your name and your email for the chance to win all this yummy silver. Right?
• 56:49
  This stuff is is is great. Bare it in your backyard. They're not gonna be able to take it away from you. Last, have a two other two other responses I wanna talk to you about. One is sweetamine.
• 56:59
  I'm not sure if you've seen my interviews with doctor Joel Bryan, the guy behind sweetamine. But if you have inflation, if you have joint pain, any issues like that, it's it's a body's response to an injury. Right? Is this inflation you get sorry. Inflation.
• 57:14
  I keep saying inflation. This the inflammation is the word I'm looking for. Right? So you have this inflammation. Now people think that inflammation is just normal.
• 57:24
  It's like if you get hurt, it swells up as inflammation, but, actually, what a lot of people have have found, especially doctor Joel Bryan, is that or Joel Bryn, is that the inflation comes from a lack of glycine. So glycine is a substance that comes you get out of animals. If you're eating a a cow, for instance, you get glycine, but glycine only exists primarily in the collagen, the the tendons, the bones, the bone broth, the bone marrow, etcetera. Most people are just eating the the the muscle meat. Right?
• 57:50
  You're growing a steak. You're making burgers, etcetera. So most people aren't getting glycine. So what sweet meat is is literally this it's I think it's eight milligrams of glycine with some sweeteners. So and it's not a sugar sweetener.
• 58:01
  It's a natural it's not it's not like a bad one for you. You dump it in your coffee in the morning, whatever, you get your glycine you need, and people you read the reviews on the website, people have massive, massive decreases in inflation. Inflation. I keep saying it. My mind's always on inflation in finance these days.
• 58:18
  Inflammation. Right? So huge increase in inflammation. So to try it out, they yes. It's a money back.
• 58:23
  You can try it. Order it. If you don't like it, let them know. They'll they'll give you money back. You can even keep the product if you want to.
• 58:28
  So you go to mysweetamine.com/Seth. You're gonna save some money on your order, or I think there's a promo code you can use. It's a Seth as well. So and other one, finally, is Balance of Nature. So this is a it's kind of a cool company.
• 58:42
  What they do is they have these these supplements. Right? And so they look like. And what they are is basically it's freeze dried the essence of fruit that's put in these capsules of fruit and vegetables. So say, you know, we all know that, hey.
• 58:55
  You gotta eat your fruits and veggies, of course. Right? So what it is, though, is that there's fruits and veggies in these little capsules. So say you're not getting enough fruits and veggies, but you wanna get the nutrients from them. Instead of going and getting these vitamins, which, know, there's all kinds of really bad ways of extracting these different, you know, vitamins and different chemicals out of things.
• 59:13
  These are literally just little capsules that you can open up and taste them. It just tastes like fruit and veggies. Like, my little daughter was eating them one day. It's kinda funny. But you get your fruits and veggies in one capsule.
• 59:22
  So for me, though, I look at this as a prepping material. I look at this as like, okay. I've got a bunch of these things stuffed in the back of my basement saying worse comes to worse. If I need to get the nutrients of fruits and vegetables, I've got these. It's a great backup.
• 59:34
  So this is Balance of Nature. You go to BalanceofNature.com, or you call +1 802468751. So +1 802468751. They've got a massive sale going on. So to get that discount, use promo code Seth, s e t h.
• 59:53
  Alright, folks. It is 11:00 on the dot. It's been a great show. Thank you all for joining me today. If you wanna share the video, I appreciate it.
• 1:00:03
  That helps a lot. Sharing, liking, following, etcetera. Again, thanks everyone for being here, and we'll probably have some more updates on this assassination attempt because more information is coming out every single day. So this is a really important topic. So, again, thank you all for being here.
• 1:00:18
  I love you all. Take care. God bless. Have a great night. Alright.
• 1:00:22
  Bye, folks.