Latest / Honey Badger Radio / NOW mourns the loss of their cash cows | HBR Talk 360

Transcript

NOW mourns the loss of their cash cows | HBR Talk 360 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three point sixty. Now
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: mourn's the loss of their cash cows. This is going
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: to be a moveving show. I had to do it,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: y'all know me. I'm your host, Hannah Wallen here with
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks in the personification of perceptivity, Mike
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Stevenson and to hello, Hello guys. The Toxic Sisterhood of
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: the National Organization for Women has some complaints about the
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: current administration. They has a sad We're going to hear
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: them out, but before we get into it, we've got
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: to do what we've got to do. As always, Honey
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: Badger Radio dishes out as mortgage board of thought provoking discussions,
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: and as experiences both recent and long past have demonstrated,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: the provoked thoughts are fighting back. They've made it clear
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: that for people like us, relying on third party payment
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: platforms like Patreon to fund our work is treading on
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: ice or building our house in the path of a
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this, we strongly encourage
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: our supporters to switch at least their support for us
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot Com the most stable way
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: to help us out and if you want a tip
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: us directly instead of relying on any social media platforms
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: tip jar. The link for that is feed the Badger
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: dot com slash just a tip And as always, the
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: same risk applies to our social media platforms, which is
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: our thought provoking discussions on Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: you can find your way to all of our content,
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: as well as a link to feed the Badger dot
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: com in the drop down menu at the top of
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: the page. And well, see, I keep saying, you know,
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna end up getting myself banned from something here
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: or there, like today. I actually I really wasn't today.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: It was yesterday. I lost my temper with a check
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: for saying that a baby should died, and somebody suggested
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: she visit Saudi Arabia. I said, why not, Iran.
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: Are we going to talk about what happened in the
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: UK recently or is that it's just a peripheral subject?
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: What it depends on? What are we talking about? The
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: abortion line?
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: There are some states, there are some states in the
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: US where they're allowed to kill their babies up until
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: birth and it's not decriminalized, and that just happened in
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: my own country of birth. Yeah, but I that's not
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: that's not the main subject of tonight, but I guess
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: we'll get on to it.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Well. The National Organization for Women was one of the
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: big organizations that pushed for abortion in the United States
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: and all over the world. They're big supporters of planned parenthood,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: and as we have pointed out in previous shows when
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: we were talking about us A funding different things from
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the us AIDS infection around the world, to other departments
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: including the Department of Defense, the Department of Education, Agricultural Department,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: like it seems like every department in the US government
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: has been has had some involvement that they've funded exporting
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: the National Organization for Women's in planned Parenthood's agenda to
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: make as much money as possible by killing babies, and
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: the UK has not been spared. There have been initiatives
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: from the United States funded by the United States government
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: that have funded this. So just as a continuation of
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: what we've been talking about, there is a connection here
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: between that funding that we've previously previously talked about, the
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: National Organization for Women that we're talking about currently in
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: that particular subject. And the thing that makes me go
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: off about it is this right. And I've said this
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: probably a million times, and I started really getting heated
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: about it. I want to say twenty nineteen. After the
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: twenty nineteen I semi there's a lot of different theories
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: on what can solve this problem, and it's, in my opinion,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: it's all excuses for women one way or another. That
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: between the theory that we need to make men more
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: responsible for women than they already are by taking away
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: women's rights and freedoms because women just can't help themselves.
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Like I'm all for exploring that idea because women are
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: refusing to help themselves. But I don't believe women can't
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: help themselves. I think that this is something that women
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: should be culpable for. And if women lose a lot
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: of their rights because of this type of behavior, it's
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: women's fault. And I'm saying that as somebody who would
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: be losing those rights, and I recognize that, but it
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: is it is a matter of life or death. Literally,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: for a huge chunk of the world population, women have
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: made being aborted the leading cause of human death in
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: the world, leading more babies are aborted then people die
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: in wars. More babies are aborted than people die from
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: heart conditions or starvation, all the conditions that are caused
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: by poverty. More babies are aborted than people die from cancer.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: More babies are aborted than people died from COVID. Right,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: all the things, the big scary things that people, Oh,
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: this is, this is terrible. We're gonna see mass death.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: More babies have been aborted than that. It's a horrible thing.
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: It's a horrible thing. You know about your own sex.
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: Men built things like the Sistine Chapel. Men built hospitals
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: and roadways and things that take us into outer space.
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: Women women killed more human beings before they were ever
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: born than any other cause in the world.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: People have understood for some time, and by people I
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: mean boomers, the people whom gen X like to blame
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: for everything. But boomers have understood for some time that
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: one nightmare scenario is that you're daughter comes to you
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: saying I am pregnant. But an even worse scenario is
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: your son comes to you saying I got my daughter, sorry,
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: I got I got my girlfriend pregnant. And in that situation,
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: there's nothing they can do like, if if your daughter
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: gets pregnant, then you have some options. But if your
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: son gets his girlfriend pregnant, then your whole life, your
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: whole future, is in the hands of your son's girlfriend
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: because she has all the options. He doesn't have any options.
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: He can do his best to convince his girlfriend of
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: what he wants to happen, but that's all he can do.
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: He can try and convince his girlfriend of to whether
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: he wants the baby to survive or whether he wants
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: it not to and we can argue about that till
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: the cows come home. But at the end of the day,
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: he doesn't get a choice. Even, like I say, even
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: even the boomers in theoretically in charge, cannot do anything
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: about it if their son gets his girlfriend pregnant, because
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: she has the power to decide whether your life is
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: destroyed or not in one way or another. Because either
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: she could decide that she's going to have your son's
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: baby and and of all the implications that happened to that,
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: or she decides not to have his baby and all
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: the implications that comes with that, and yeah, in either
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: case it's it's a headfuck. But at the end of
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: the day, it's her decision and entirely herd is vision.
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: And that has been the case for the last fifty
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: years or so or something. Yeah.
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: In fact, in the United States, this is some history
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: that if you're a millennial or a zoomer, this is
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: going to surprise you. Abortion was not universally illegal before
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: Roe versus Weid. In fact, the year prior to Roe
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: versus Wade, there were almost as many abortions done as
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: their worthy year after. We're talking over two hundred thousand
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: in the United States, and I think the top in
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: the United States up until recently was in around seven
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: hundred thousand in one year, so as it had it
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: took quite a bit of time to get up there too,
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: a couple decades. But in any case, it's something that
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: it wasn't being tracked for a long time, and then
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: when they did started tracking it, it was it was
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: largely women going in to medical facilities with health conditions
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: that the medical facility deemed a solid reason for her
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: having an abortion, And depending on what state you were in,
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: the reason could be anything from if you try to
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: carry this baby to term, you're going to die, to
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: you feel bad about being pregnant and you might kill yourself, right,
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: or it's affecting your mental health without any kind of
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: actual life threatening right. So it's dishonest when abortion advocates
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: act like abortion restriction was you can't get an abortion
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: no matter what prior to Roe v. Wade and afterward
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: it saved all these women's lives. The reality was very
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: different from that, And even the way that it's portrayed
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: in Call Jane, I'm just Just the trailer for that
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: contained a bunch of lies. So the film itself just
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: as one big straw man full of falsehoods. And one
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: of the big falsehoods was that, you know, if a
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: woman went to one hospital and tried to get an
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: abortion done, she couldn't just go somewhere else for you know,
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: a second opinion, and if they said no, and that
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: it was common for hospitals to just say no, we're
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: not going to do that procedure if they were getting
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: paid for it. The reality is hospitals have been oh,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: you want to have a surgery, yeah, have you got
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: this much money to pay for it? Okay, let's go
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: for quite a long time because they want the money.
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: And in fact, there's been an issue of hospitals doing
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: unnecessary testing and unnecessary procedures for quite a long time
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: because they want the money, especially now that insurance pays
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: for a lot of stuff. But even just if if
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: they know you can pay out a pocket so that
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: the whole thing has been one big lie from the beginning.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: And now we're in a situation where we're talking about
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: women having a medical hitman essentially assassinate their child in
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: utero when the child is old enough to survive premature
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: birth with medical assistance. And there's there's no arguing that
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: that is not a human being. There's no arguing that
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: that is not a living human being, and there's not
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: really any arguing that that is not a person either.
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: It's not a valid argument anyway. The personhood argument doesn't
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: doesn't actually mean anything. Well, I mean arbitrary concept.
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: You would think that, right, But if if you look
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: at where we are now, where we are questioning the
• 13:39
  Speaker 3: very essence of what it is to be a man
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: or a woman. Yeah, you know, like it doesn't seem
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: that far fetched to for for people to then question
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: it if this living thing inside of my body is actually.
• 13:54
  Speaker 4: A human you know what I mean? But God, do
• 13:59
  Speaker 4: how do we slide so far? Backwards. I don't understand.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: But this is another one. Millennials don't know where the
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: person a personhood argument actually originated. Do y'all know, Do
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: y'all know where that came from? Do you want to
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: know where that came from? Back in the day. This
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: is what millennials like to use the phrase back in
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: the day, Right back in the day when Jim Crow
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: was in in full swing, back in the day when
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: the United States was actually a country where racism and
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: religious discrimination were occurring on levels that were genuinely oppressive
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: and genuinely detrimental to the lives of the people that
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: they affected in terms of legal status, in terms of
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: their their statuses human beings with human rights, and in
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: terms of being counted in a group of people. Like
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: a census, they counted black people as three quarters of
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: a person or three fifths of a person, something like that,
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: instead of a whole person, because they were considered less human.
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: It originated in racism. It's being applied now to abortion,
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: but it originated in racism. It originated in racial oppression.
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: That's where it comes from. Feminists are using an argument
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: that came from racial oppression to excuse killing babies.
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: And it's disheartening to see how many millennials, millennial YouTubers
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: will look upon a map of European countries where doctors
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: can still refuse to do an abortion. There's like four
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: countries left in Europe where where where doctors can refuse
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: to perform an abortion. And these millennials look upon that
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: and they go, oh, that's so horrid that a doctor
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: can can go, yeah, I know you want this, but
• 16:14
  Speaker 2: but even though it's your body, I'm going to say
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: I don't. I don't want to do that, which is
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: the opposite of what's really going on. Any doctor should
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: be able to refuse an abortion. They should be able
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: to say I'm not going to perform this surgery on
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: you because I don't have to. But but so many
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: people will say you shouldn't get to You shouldn't get
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: to refuse this surgery. You should have to perform your
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: labor at the expense of any woman who wants to
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: do so. It's her body, And the libertarian in me
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: is going, actually, you don't get to demand anyone's labor.
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: You don't get to demand the labor of a doctor.
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: You don't get to say no, you have to perform
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: this abortion, whether you like it or not. And that's
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: that's really what we're looking at. There's there's only like
• 17:17
  Speaker 2: four countries left in Europe where where a doctor can say, actually,
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: you don't get my professional labor as a doctor to
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: kill your child. And that's that's the right way around.
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: That's like i I'm I'm sort of torn on the
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: on on on the deep down abortion issue as to
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: whether a woman should should or should not be able
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: to get any surgery she wants. But when it comes
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: to the doctor, the doctor should be able to say
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: yes or no. The doctor be able should be a
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: to say no, I'm not going to perform this surgery
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: where we get some forceps and some fucking dodgy looking
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: instruments and we cut your baby to pieces and put
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: out you know what I mean. You know what I mean.
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: A doctor should be able to say no, no, I'm
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: not going to do this because your pregnancy is not
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: a result of rape or incest or any of these things.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: And it's not going to kill you. Yes, because most
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: of the time, In fact, in the United States, which
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: has one of the higher rates of maternal death, which includes,
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: by the way, not just death during pregnancy, or childbirth,
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: but during the first year after and not always from
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: reasons that are caused by the pregnancy. And it's seventy
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: out of three hundred thousand, So that's it's that rare,
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: and it's a smaller percentage of that seventy out of
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: three hundred thousand that actually occur because of complications from
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: the pregnancy. And for for the debate over whether a
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: doctor should be able to refuse when the mother's life
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: is at stake due to complications from the pregnancy, there's
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: a real simple way to handle this. Right, Yeah, the
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: doctor has the legal right to refuse, but he is
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: not protected by that legal right from a wrongful death lawsuit.
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: So if he refuses to do the surgery because it's
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: his labor, he has the right to refuse to do
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: that surgery, but he may have to fight a wrongful
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: death lawsuit. And if he is found if it's found
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: that his decision led to the death of a patient
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: that was under his treatment, then he could be found
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: liable and it could he could take the hit in
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: terms of malpractice. So physicians that are not willing to
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: perform an emergency abortion, which really should be the only
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: type that women should be seeking the first place. Maybe
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: should not be on call in hospitals, right Like, maybe
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: hospitals should stick with physicians that are willing to provide
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: the full range of treatment as needed, and physicians that
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: are more interested in only doing live birth obstetrics should
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: stick with private practice with hospital privileges where they can
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: deliver in hospital but can't be forced to do that.
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: Really more simple solution right there.
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: So many of these things should come down to the
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: hippocratic oath. This is this is something that was figured
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: out a long time ago. First, do no harm. It's
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: the same when it comes to cosmetic surgery or indeed
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: gender affirming surgery, like doctors should be able to have
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: to have the right to reviews to say no, I'm
• 21:19
  Speaker 2: not going to do this to you just because you
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: want to look more beautiful or just because you want
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: to become the opposite gender to what you act. Surely ah,
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: and just to some degree, the same should go for abortion.
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: Like if this, if this surgery is more likely to
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: harm you than if I didn't do this surgery, then
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: by my hippocratic oath, I should not perform this surgery.
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: And that's when it comes and that's when it comes
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: down to the governments that that do but should not
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: control these surgeons. Yeah, I'm not blaming the women for this.
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: I'm not blaming the children who want to become a
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: different gender for this. I'm I'm blaming I'm not even
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: blaming the doctors for this. I'm blaming the governments that
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: tell these doctors that they absolutely must perform these surgeries
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: or they'll lose their medical license. Like doctors should be
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: able to say no, no, I'm not going to harm you,
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: and I'm not going to harm your baby because of
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: this thing we call the hippocratic oath, like it if
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: if I'm not going to perform any surgery unless it
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: saves a human life. And yes, there are some pregnancies
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: that must be performed because if they weren't performed then
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: then the mother and the child would die. And yeah,
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: and yeah there are there are. There are some pregnancies
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: in which if if if you attempted to birth the baby,
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: then both the baby and the woman would die.
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: That is Cooper pregnancies. You can't you can't carry the
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: term in your fallopian tube. It doesn't you will eventually
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: rupture and you will bleed internally and you and the
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: baby will both die and you can't carry far enough
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: in the term for the baby to survive. Premature birth
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: in that circumstance.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: Really rare, Yeah, exactly. And surgeries in which children or
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: indeed adults insist that they will become suicidal if they
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: don't get their genitals cut and pulled inside out. You
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: know where I'm going with this, or or.
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: What do they call it? When they when they when
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: they take off part of a dog's tail docked. We
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: need to stop docking boys. Okay, they're not dogs, yep.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: And their genitals are not a tail, and their skin
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: is not an unnecessary part of their body. It's the
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: largest organ in the body and the first line of
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: defense against surface germs in your immune system. And it's
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: it's actual bullshit to claim that he's safer from germs
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: if you cut off part of that biggest organ in
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: his immune system, the skin. That's that's bullshit. Everybody knows it.
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: It's almost impossible to rationally argue in favor of cutting that.
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: In fact, I would say it is impossible. There isn't
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: really a single argument that isn't citing information that's been
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: discredited or emotional of that procedure, so it needs to
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: be stopped as well, but that we're getting a little
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: in terms of all of that, we're getting a little
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: side tracked. And I'll go ahead and yank it back
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: to the National Organization for Women. So the National Organization
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: for Women, like I said, they're the ones. What's happening
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: in the UK, was pushed by the National Organization for
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: Women in the United States and Planned Parenthood in the
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: United States. Federal funding from the United States. The National
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: Organization for Women has been sucking at the teat at
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: that of that humongous, putrid cash cow for a long time.
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: And it's that we've talked about other things in the
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: past that they've used it for, Like they get quite
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: a bit of money for feminists in general, feminist organizations
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: and so on, and those organizations then help fund them
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: for things like sexual assault response training and sexual assault
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: prevention training, intimate partner violence response training, and intimate partner
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: violence prevention training, all of which is based on the
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: loose model theories that rely on patriarchy conjecture. That is,
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: it's been long debunked, patriot the patriarchy conjecture is also bullshit.
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: But they get quite a bit of cash flow going
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: within the feminist movement, and then feminists donate quite a
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: bit of money back to this organization, and then women
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: of the organization then of course they get paid to
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: be involved with this organization. And it's just a big
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: circle jerk of exploiting public funding and donors who rely
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: on on the public funding that one exploits. So when
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: Trump got elected and started making policies that affected that funding,
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: National Organization for Women had a panic attack. There goes
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: our cash cow. He's trimming the fat. He might actually
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: butcher the cow. What are we gonna do? And they
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: published this. I don't know what they call this. This
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: is this is basically just some sort of manifesto, Like
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: it's not anything. It's they do this all the time.
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: They have a lot of pages in the now you
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: can see how long this is. By the way, they
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: are really really mad. If they were bees, they would
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: be swarming. But it says Trump administration is harming women
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: with almost a hundred policy mandates. They might update this
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: because I mean, we're only like halfway through the first year.
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: Threatens healthcare, economic security, and sales to protect women from violence.
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: I don't I don't know. If I can read the
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: whole thing in that voice, I might go to the
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: panicky woman voice Washington. Since Inauguration Day, women have been
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: hurt by the Trump administration. Oh my god, this is
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: this is too wide.
• 28:34
  Speaker 3: You know why they're hurt because their fucking panties are
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: in a goddamn twist, just so mad that they didn't
• 28:42
  Speaker 3: get they didn't get their woman president.
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: And that's really it because nothing.
• 28:48
  Speaker 3: Has changed, I mean for regular people, and nothing about
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: their lives have.
• 28:54
  Speaker 4: Changed, you know what I mean. It's it's just so ridiculous.
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: It's it's hyperbolic, and it's just hysteria.
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: I can see why they're having a tantrum about some
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: of this stuff because they really are seeing initiatives change
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: that are costing the organizations that donate money to them.
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: So they're really mourning the loss of their cash cow here.
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: They're really upset about this. But that doesn't necessarily mean
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: that the cash cow was deserved or that they're right right.
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: They wanted to get the statewide right, the federal wide
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: right to kill their children up to and including birth.
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: I say up to an including as in the moment
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: before birth. I wouldn't put it past them if they
• 29:48
  Speaker 2: wanted it to the moment after birth, because there.
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: Are there have been feminists talking about post birth post
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: birth quote unquote post birth boards.
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: And they they frame it as a they want to
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: be in control of their own bodies. But you know,
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: at what point is it someone else's body? Like? How
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: far back and how forward? How far forward you have
• 30:10
  Speaker 2: to go before it's someone else's body? And the answer
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: is there's no limit. All bodies belong to women, all
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: children's bodies, all male bodies. Like, if we want to
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: send you to war for some bullshit dispute that we
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: don't understand, then you men have to die. And if
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: we don't want this baby, then even if it's fucking
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: ten years old, that we still get to destroy that baby,
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: because otherwise we would be in charge of that baby,
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: and we shouldn't have to be in charge of that baby.
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: This is my body, and so is that ten year
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: old's body. That ten year old's body belongs to me,
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: and my thirty year old husband belongs to me. All
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: bodies belong to women. That's what it comes down to.
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: So girl math here, all right, girl math, is if
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: it came out of your body, it's part of your body,
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: unless it's you know, your period or poop or pee
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: or any number of other things that come out of
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: your body that are not part of your body. Right, Well,
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: if come out of your body, it's part of your body,
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: and nobody else is involved, and it's your decision, and
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: it's not part of anybody else's body. Nobody else has
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: any any connection to it whatsoever. But if you decide
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: to give live birth and then retain custody when you
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: don't have to suddenly, then well it's not actually just
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: part of your body. The father's DNA is involved too,
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: so therefore he owes you money girl, math right, And
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: and it's it's really a pathetic excuses. And I'm gonna
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: go off about this because it's women's self sabotaging, sabotaging
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: their families, their communities, the greater nation around them, the
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: lives of the men in their lives, and so on
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: when they do this. Were you not in control of
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: your body when you decided whether or not to engage
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: in abstinence? And I'm not going to abstain. I'm gonna
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: fuck that guy, right, Okay? Were you not in control
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: of your body when you made that decision. Were you
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: not in control of your body when you decided?
• 32:40
  Speaker 5: Who?
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: Oh, you know, like this guy over here, he wants
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: to be really dedicated, he wants to be a dad.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: He wants to come into my life and marry me
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: and support me and raise a family with me. I'm
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: gonna fuck that guy over there, who's standing on a
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: street corner, has no job, wears his pants at half mast,
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: has a rap sheet that's longer than my arm, and
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: twenty seven tattoos on his face. Right. Were you not
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: in control of your body when you made that decision?
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: Were you not in control of your body when you
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: decided whether or not to use birth control, when you
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: decided how many types to use, when you decided whether
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: or not your consent to him relied on him using
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: a condom? Were you not in control of your body
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: during those times? You're only in control of your body.
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: If somebody lets you kill your baby, that's the only
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: time you're in control of your body. If that's what
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: you think, you're moron and you shouldn't be running around
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: without a Chaperone's No.
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: I'm not in control of his body, or my body,
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: or my child's body, but all of these bodies belonged
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: to me. That's the logic that that's trying to give
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: to us. I I I don't have any responsibility for
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: any of these bodies, but I have ownership of all of.
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: These all of them. Yeah, yeah, And that's that's essentially like,
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: this is why I'm so disgusted, you know, with with
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: the whole abortion movement, with the whole child support argument.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: Every last bit of it relies on ignoring the fact
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: that a woman's control over her body doesn't start after
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: a child is conceived, right, She's been in control of
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: her body the whole time. And and it's just pathetic
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: that women argue as if that's not the case, Like
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: who kidnapped your body? Who took control of your brain
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: and went off and screwed some guy that wasn't going
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: to marry you and raise a child with you? Who
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: decided not to use any of the multitude of forms
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: of birth control that we have available to us. We
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: have barrier methods, we have chemical methods, like we have IUDs,
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: we have implants, we have all kinds of different types
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: subtypes of those, plus demanding that he use his one
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: type of birth control available to him till till next
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: year when Plan A comes out, and then then the
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: child sport game might just be over, depending on how
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: many men decided by into it. But you don't feel
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: like you had any control during all that time. That's
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: failure right there. And if you can't recognize that, then
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: you can can't succeed in your life. You will trip
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: over your own two damn feet every single day, and
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: then you're gonna pretend somebody pushed you down and cry
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: instead of getting back up every single day for the
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: rest of your life. If you cannot acknowledge who is
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: in control of your body when you are making your
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: decisions about sex and reproduction, and if you're making the
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: magic vagina argument, whereupon a woman's magic vagina bestows personhood
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: on a living human organism, that's just as pathetic. It
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: indicates that you haven't actually engaged in any thought process.
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: You're just picking an arbitrary point in time that provide
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: you with an excuse. If your whole life is about
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: making excuses, you will spend your whole life wondering why
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: men have it so much easier than you do. They
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: don't they face accountability every day, and they improve their
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: decision making process as a result, and so it looks
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: easier because they are not making the same mistakes that
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: you are making. They can't afford to real simple But yeah,
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: so the one thing that people have complained about, even
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: Trump supporters who are MRAs have complained about the with
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: regard to Trump is he has played into society's guyness centrism.
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: And I will say this, you can't get elected without
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: doing that. And it is ingrained in most conservatives that
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: men protect women. So this is something that we knew about,
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: and it's still when you look at the available candidates
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: that we had to choose from if we were voting
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: in the United States, this this was the least of
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: all evils. Every single candidate was guyinocentric. Trump at least
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: is able to point out that women can lie and
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: women can be gold diggers. Women got really mad when
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: he did that too. They are still ranting and raving
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: about the because she consented because she wanted his money
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: like that. That's yeah. So Trump can can at least
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: acknowledge that women can have bad character, but he's still guinescentric.
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: And he did say I am going to protect the
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: women of our country. This is what they Since inauguration day,
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: women have been hurt by the Trump administration.
• 39:00
  Speaker 5: Much of the progress that women have made in the
• 39:02
  Speaker 5: past one hundred years has now been dismantled, where.
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: Even the poorest and most working class of women in
• 39:16
  Speaker 2: confidence will tell you, yeah, you can just grab them
• 39:19
  Speaker 2: by the dick and you won't get arrested for the
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: sexual assault that you've obviously committed. You can just grab
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: them by the dick and they and they'll let you.
• 39:32
  Speaker 2: I mean a lot of them won't, and a lot
• 39:35
  Speaker 2: of them, the ones you call in cells, will be like, please,
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: don't grab me by the dick. But you can do
• 39:43
  Speaker 2: it anyway, because even if they go to the police,
• 39:47
  Speaker 2: they'll be like nothing, what do you want about me?
• 39:51
  Speaker 4: Nice?
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: Even if you're thirteen years old, they'll be like nice. Yeah, yeah.
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: You know a lot of a lot of guys if
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: you you know, you look at funny pickup lines and
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: and in movies and stuff. And one of my friends
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: had a guy use the uh I don't remember what
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: movie it came from, but the line was nice shoes
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: want to fuck? You know, you say that to a woman,
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: it's to make her laugh and everything right, and then
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: you maybe maybe she sits with you for a while
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: and chit chats and all that, or maybe she gets
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: mad and throws a drink in your face and you
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: figure out that that chick's not worth your time. But uh,
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: a dude, A lot of times a dude is ready
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: to roll in that moment. And I mean, I've I've
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: known gals that have, you know, like, every time they
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: went to a party when we were growing up, their
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: goal was to get some guy alone and fuck him.
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: And honestly, it's damn near impossible to not find somebody
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: willing if you're you don't even have to be pretty.
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: You don't even have to have good hygiene. Actually, you
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: don't even have to have good hygiene. You can be
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: unattractive and have bad hygiene and go to like a
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: club or a party or any place where there's a
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: lot of guys. You will find one. If you are
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: looking to get laid, you will find one who is willing. Guaranteed,
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: you have to have an extraordinary level of unattractiveness or
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: personality flaws that make you unattractive or you know, hygiene issues.
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: You have to have something about you that that gives
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: them the heab gbs, something like that right, and yeah,
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: Jen Bottle says VD Benzio, that's about right. And Noba
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: Finn twenty one gave us a dollar on rumble and said, Hannah,
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: what you describe is how average women behave throughout history.
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: And it's only now that we understand female nature and
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: it is something that women have done for hundreds of years.
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: But if women acted like that during the Neolithic era,
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: our species would have died off. Back then, things were
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: too dangerous for women to not have agency. When men
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: made civilization safer and safer over time, women were able
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: to become complacent and eventually content like cows and lazy
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: about maintaining their understanding and conscious exercise of their personal agency,
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: which is what basically what accountability is responsible conscious exercise
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: of your personal agency. And women lost that. Women let
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: that go, and today women are willful about it. They
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: will work harder to not put effort into making their
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: lives better than they will than they would putting effort
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: into making their lives better. They will actually work harder
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: at self sabotage and they would work if they engaged
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: in self improvement. It's really sad, right, but yeah, women,
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: women need to get back to their roots in those terms.
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: But the progress of the last hundred years that they're
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: talking about, let's see what they have to say here.
• 43:49
  Speaker 1: During the twenty twenty four campaign, President Trump said I
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: am going to protect the women of our country. The
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: exact opposite has happened, and women are less protected. And
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: they're they're serious when they say this, They're actually serious.
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: Each month, the National Organization for Women Now will update
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: reporters on what the Trump administration has done to directly
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: harm women. So I don't think they understand the word directly. No,
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: we'll just start there because I haven't actually seen Trump
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: in person ever, so and I'm a women and they're
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: they're what they're talking about is affects women as a group,
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: not women a woman specifically. So uh, I'm sitting here thinking,
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: how is it affecting anybody directly?
• 44:56
  Speaker 4: I have seen Trump in person.
• 44:59
  Speaker 3: I still less than three feet away from the man,
• 45:02
  Speaker 3: and I survived.
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: Did he punch you?
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: Did he rub you by anything in the vagina?
• 45:10
  Speaker 4: Directly in my vagina?
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: Did you did you have your cat with you? Oh?
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: My god? So yeah, they don't understand. It's like, literally,
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: this is this is an incorrect usage. I have a complaint,
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: but it directly harm women.
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: For all the stuff we said about how Trump will
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: change things, we didn't mean he'd change everything. Like none
• 45:39
  Speaker 2: of us were under the impression that he would become
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: a men's rights advocate, like like, we know that's not
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: going to change for the next for the next five
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: or six presidents, at least for the next fifty years
• 45:53
  Speaker 2: or so. Just like we were never under the impression
• 45:56
  Speaker 2: that you would ever get a president who doesn't suck
• 45:58
  Speaker 2: Israel's dick. I know, there are a bunch of people
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: telling me, oh, look what's happening now the terms just
• 46:05
  Speaker 2: like Bush, Yeah, I like, I figured he would change
• 46:09
  Speaker 2: some things. I didn't think you'd ever get a president
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: who doesn't suck Israel's dick, Like I mean, Kamala would
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: have you know whatever, and it would have been even worse.
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: But you never had an option of a president who
• 46:26
  Speaker 2: wouldn't suck at Israel's dick or a president who wouldn't
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: suck women's dicks. Oh, how have you slice that? We're
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: getting there by you know, you know, by by one
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: small step at a time, Like it's going to be
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: a long time before you get any president who gives
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: the slightest shit about men's rights or about leaving the
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: Middle East to itself. That's not going to happen probably
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: in our lifetimes. We'll all be dead before you finally
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: get a president who will leave the Middle East to
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: itself or who who will you know, not prioritize women's
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: rights over man's rights. Like I'm sorry if I didn't
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: make that clear, but nowhere in the West in our
• 47:16
  Speaker 2: lifetimes are we going to see an m R president
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: or an m RA prime ministers anywhere in the in
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: the West. Sorry I didn't make that clear.
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of us that just wouldn't take the job.
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: Like well, and I mean me personally, I'm not I'm
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: not a leader and I'm not an executive type anyway.
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: But I think most of us are in that in
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: that that section of humanity where we can see what's
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: going on, we can see the pathways that would work
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: to solutions. But our best way of doing that is
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: to get more people to be aware of this, influence
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: public opinion and then start influencing the way that legislators work.
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: And really, especially for like being female, that's pretty much
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: in my nature. Prior to women getting voting rights. That
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: was the way women influenced politics at maybe a bigger
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: picture than just how is this affecting my family directly,
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: and you look at different aspects of what might have
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: caused it, then maybe how men look at it, and
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: you draw these things to their attention, and you get
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: people to recognize what's going on and how things may
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: be working differently than they thought. And then legislative change
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: is affected by women not lobbying necessarily, but applying pressure,
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: pressure campaigns, and so the National Organization for Women growing
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: out of that is not abnormal, unusual and natural or
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: anything like that. It's just women going down the wrong
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: path in terms of they're more narrow minded than they
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: don't look at the way that men are affected. They
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: don't look at In fact, they deliberately chose not to
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: look at the way that men are affected, and it
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: had profound detrimental effects on the black population when they
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: made that choice. But it is pretty typical historically for
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: that to be the way women get things done is
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: to not necessarily be heavy into politics, but instead to
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: be heavy into to advocacy and pressure campaigns. Noba Finn
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: twenty one gives us a dollar and says except the
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: experts taught me that grape is how humans reproduced all
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: the time, So that's an easy explanation for how we survived.
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: Remind me what female romance is if not grape from
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: demonic monsters. So I don't I don't remember what we
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: were talking about when that got posted, but I will
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: say this, There are there may be experts that say
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: historically rape was the norm, but they are defining it
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: differently than against the will of the female, because if
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: that was the case and men were significantly stronger than women,
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: it would more likely have resulted in a die off
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: instead of a success a pair. Bonding and reproduction by
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: rape don't go together very well. But going on each month,
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: the national organization we read that part directly harm women
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: specifically focus on economic security, safety, and healthcare. Much of
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: the administration's policy harms women. However, now has chosen to
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: highlight the most egregious and impactful positions or politics policies below. Sorry,
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: that was a good dyslexic moment, as the Trump administration's
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: policies harming women as of May five five in reverse
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: chronological order. Executive orders are bolded. Specific policy changes are
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: not bolded, so Apparently they can't decide whether or not
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: Trump is bold. And the first thing right, the first
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: thing they post, this has absolutely no effect in my
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: life whatsoever, because I was never going to get involved
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: in this in the first place. So directly harming women
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: as a population by doing this is now, that's bullshit.
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: First thing, and I'm going to increase the size of
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: this now that we are out of the fat part
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: of the PDF file. They really didn't design this very well.
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: Canceled defense programs encouraging women to participate in national security
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: issues created under the twenty seventeen which would have been
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: a Trump policy. By the way, Women Peace and Security
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: Act signed by President Trump, he canceled his own policy.
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: How dare he? He changed his mind? Only women are
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: allowed to do that? So what is this policy? Let
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: me see me. I'm not going to play the YouTube
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: video of Trump saying he's going to protect women, but
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: opened their link to The New York Times. I have
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: had to use a an archive site to get past paywall.
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: Here heg seth cuts program encouraging women to take roles
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: in national security. The Defense Secretary said Women Peace and
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: Security program distracted from the core task of war fighting
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: and that the Pentagon would no longer participate in it.
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: And let's see to increase the role of women in presenting, preventing,
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: and resolving conflicts all over the world. So the Women
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: Peace and Security Act was signed into law in twenty seventeen.
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: Mister heg Seth said in a post on social media
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: platform x.
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: I just have to say, if you want to prevent
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: and resolve conflicts, just tell us what's wrong.
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah, getting women conflicts counterintuitive if you ask me instead.
• 54:00
  Speaker 2: Of going you should know what's wrong. Just tell us
• 54:03
  Speaker 2: what's wrong, you know?
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Or maybe you should not speaking to each other.
• 54:08
  Speaker 2: If you can't do that, maybe don't get involved in politics.
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe this just didn't women create world
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: peace by crossing their arms and turning their backs on
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: each other and looking off into the distance as if
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: they are not in the middle of a fight.
• 54:30
  Speaker 4: Uh, not about the nail.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: No, it's not about the nail. So in his on
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: X he said, yet another woke, divisive social justice Biden initiative,
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: So he mischaracterized it as a Biden initiative. It might
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: have been something Biden start and Trump was like, Okay,
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: we'll do this. That overburdens our commanders and troops, distracting
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: them from our core task war fighting. Yeah, as a
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: Defense secretary, mister Hegseth does not have the authority to
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: rewrite or overturn laws. But he said that from here
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: on in the Pentagon would carry out the minimum requirements
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: of the program and work to end it. So, in
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: other words, it didn't get canceled. Trump didn't cancel it,
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: and they're just not going overboard and forcing it. So
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: it's it's actually not, they just lied. The US military
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: services have tried to carry out the program's goals in
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: different ways. The Air Force, for instance, has asked commanders
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: to recognize that men, women, boys, girls, and various groups
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender people, purple people, leaders, you're
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: chewing gum on the bedpost, overnight, covetous and various right us,
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: your neighbor's pet ferret are all affected by the conflict
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: in different ways. The Air Force set up working groups
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: to consider how different populations are affected by military policies.
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: How nice, I mean, when when your war against Iran,
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: these various disparate groups don't even matter. And apparently I
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: know there are transsexuals in Iran, but there are only
• 56:30
  Speaker 2: forced intestate transsexuality because it's the easiest way not to
• 56:36
  Speaker 2: get executed on account of being gay in Iran or
• 56:40
  Speaker 2: indeed any of these Islamic nations. The you're splitting hairs
• 56:48
  Speaker 2: in the most ridiculous of ways, is all I'm saying. Yeah,
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: most of the nations of the world do not split
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: these hairs except in exception circumstances. So I'm quite sure
• 57:04
  Speaker 2: why you would laser focus your your your your morality
• 57:14
  Speaker 2: on these on these exceptional circumstances.
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: Ah. Interestingly, the rest of this article is not about
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: the subject. They just went off on a rant about
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: heg Seth. They didn't like him. That's that's literally, I'm
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: not kidding. But he did something else that we characterize
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: is worse than it is because bad Seth. Uh. But
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: in any case, it seems like this policy, the the
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: outcome of this policy was talk therapy in the military,
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: which really didn't He's right, this this distracts from the
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: mission of the military. The military is not there to
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: coddle people, and it are they going to decide differently
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: if they're going to bomb a particular area, Like somebody
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: comes along and says, you can't bomb turur in there's
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: there's a lesbian. That's not going to make a difference.
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: I assure you they will still drop all the bombs
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: they want. Back to here we go. So all women
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: everywhere are apparently affected by this. By the way, he
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: reasserted discriminatory discriminatory efforts to block transgender military members from
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: serving their country by escalating the issue to the Supreme
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: Court via an emergency application April twenty fourth. So this one,
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: this is interesting, the debate over trans women in the military.
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: That is something that the commander in chief makes, that policy.
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: The commander in chief makes those decisions, and the lawsuits
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: involved are essentially asking the court system to override the
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: commander in chief in how he makes his decisions regarding
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: how the military works. And so it's literally his job right.
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: If the commander in chief it does not like the
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: outcome in a lower court, he has as much legal
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: right as Jane Row to take his case to the
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: next higher court. And because this issue is a more
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: immediate and compelling issue to the military than than an
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: issue where a woman is fighting to impose a uniform
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: standard on all fifty states, rather than deal with the
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: fact that different states have different standards with regard to
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: a procedure that may or may not be considered healthcare
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: by everybody. He has the right to get this expedited.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: Asthmatic rights now, myopic rights. Now. I say this as
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: someone who is very mildly asthmatic and sort of moderately myopic.
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: I require glasses in order to see, and I get
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 2: a bit wheezy in the event that I don't have
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: an inhaler on hand. Can we compare this to someone
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 2: who needs a constant injection of hormones in order to
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: maintain the genitals that they that they need to keep
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: inverted for the rest of their lives, and the hormones
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 2: they need to keep injecting for the rest of their
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: lives and stuff like, I'm I'm kind of okay with
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: not being able to join the army on account of
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: being short sighted and a little bit wheezy. Like, I'm
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: sort of okay with that, and I've been okay with
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 2: that for the duration of my life. I like, if
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: I do join the army and they say you can't
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: join the army because you're a little bit asthmatic and
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: a little bit my arpic, I was like, yeah, all right, fine,
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 2: but these people are so mentally deranged that they feel
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: the needs to butterfly the genitals into into a I
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: don't even want to describe it, but like you have this,
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: if you have the slightest medical issue, you won't be
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 2: allowed to join the army the slightest medical issue to.
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: Take people with.
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: People with massive.
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: With slight medical issues. But and they do take people
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: with if they change their standards on what medical issues
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: you can have when joining the military in wartime when
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: they want more people in the military. The thing that
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: people need to understand is, if I remember right, this
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: policy didn't affect people who were done transitioning and just
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: needed main maintenance post transition. This policy only affected people
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: who joined the military and then wanted military insurance to
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: pay for their transition. Yeah, and uh, to be going
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: through all these surgeries and therefore undeployable during that time,
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: it's a it's a different situation than being done with
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: the the disabling part of the surgical procedure. So that's
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: the first thing I will point out. The other thing is,
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: of course they're half their sources on this have been
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: like as I went through and looked at stuff. There
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: were a bunch of things. Their source was The New
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: York Times. They don't like other publications very much apparently,
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: so this was another one. Lower courts had blocked the policy,
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: saying it wasn't supported by evidence and violated equal protection principles.
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: But the policy, they don't describe it in this either.
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: It's not a ban on in on troops. It is
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: a requirement that you be done with the transitioning part
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: of of your medical treatment and be postop. So there's that.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: Then they're mad that he issued the order saying saying
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: that expressing what is what is called a false gender
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: what it called a false gender identity, conflicts with a
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: once personal life, and that requiring others to recognize a
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: falsehood is not consistent with the humility and selflessness selflessness
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: required of a service member. So in February, the Defense
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: Department implemented this order requiring transgender troops to be forced
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: out of the military. According to this article, and it
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: affected about four two hundred current service members are about
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: two tenths of one percent of the military. That's actually
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: not very many people when it really boils down to it,
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: and they made this a female issue despite the fact
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 1: that the term transgender can refer to trans women or
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: trans men. So basically their objection is that he expedited this.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: They're mad because I think they expect the Supreme Court
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: to overturn the lower court, and that indicates that they
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: are aware that his order is not unconstitutional and not
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: going to be considered discriminate discriminatory. So essentially they're mad
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: that the President is doing what he has a legal
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: right to do, reduced equitable access to higher education. So
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: I look at this one. This is executive order, so
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 1: I looked at looked up the let's get rid of
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: this reforming accreditation to strengthen higher education executive order, right,
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: and the part that they object to here they really didn't. Yeah,
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: banned higher education accreditors who considered DEI and their accreditation standards,
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: which is how schools qualify to get students financial aid
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: compel grants. So to explain that, let's say Ohio State
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 1: University wants to be able to give people a diploma
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: that that makes them eligible to get hired in hospitals
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: as nurses. Want to have their school of nursing be accredited,
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: so you actually get a real nursing certificate. You can
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 1: get hired as a nurse. If you go to another
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: school and you want to become a nurse practitioner, you
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: can go from your LPN two r in to the
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: next levels of study and so on till you get that.
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: And you don't have to go to the same school
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: to get that certification because it's accredited by the same
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: groups that are that accredit other schools. So you could
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: transfer to Michigan University or actually that would probably cause
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: you to immediately burst into flame. And I if you
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: if you went to Michigan University state from OSU. But
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: you know what I mean. You could go to any
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 1: other state university. You could go to private universities as
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: long as they had the same accreditation. And so when
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: these organizations impose a standard, an arbitrary standard like DEI,
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: it forces the universities then to impose that standard. And
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: so if these accreditors are saying, well, we will only
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: give you accreditation if you are actively discriminating against white
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: people in your admissions so that others will have more
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: seats at your university, or if you're actively discriminating against
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: men in your admissions so that women will have more
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: seats than universities if they want to make money, they
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: have to prove to students that when you leave this universe,
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: so you're going to get a job. When you leave
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: this university, your degree is going to make you hirable.
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: That's the whole goal of going. It's not about making
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: a home here. Then the university has to have those policies,
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: and so getting rid of these basically means the universities
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: now have a choice. They don't have to do this,
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: and that's got now pissed off. The policy says that
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: let's see and get past all of the reasoning because
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: we already The American Bar Association's Council of the Section
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, which is
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: the sole federally recognized a creditor for juris doctor programs,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: has required law schools to demonstrate by concrete action and
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: commitment to diversity and inclusion by committing to having a
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: student body and facility that is diverse with respect to gender, race,
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: and ethnicity. As the Attorney General has concluded and informed
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: the Council, the discriminatory requirement blatantly violates the Supreme Court
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: decision and Students for Fair Admissions Incorporated versus President and
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: Fellows of Harvard College. And though the Council subsequently suspended
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: its enforcement while it considers proposed revisions as standard and similar,
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: unlawful mandates must be permanently eradicated. So the policy then
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: is they have to stop doing this, and the section
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: two provides a penalty. The Secretary of Education is going
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: to hold them accountable by denying them accreditation, recognition, monitoring,
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: or suspending them terminating them if they fail to meet
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 1: the applicable recognition criteria or otherwise violate federal law. And
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: federal law says they can't impose dei requirements on universities anymore.
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: That's what now is mad about here Now again, this
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: goes back to if universities can't discriminate against men in
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: the admissions process, then women will not hold more seats
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: than men in universities. They won't. They won't admit more
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: women than men. They won't then have the advantage. So
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: if you have more men maybe qualifying or being able
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: to fund their university experience, then you end up in
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: a situation where courses of study like gender studies or
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: interdisciplinary studies are less likely to have sufficient students to
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 1: maintain the department, and if the university can't get enough
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: applicants to take those courses, they eliminate the course. Right,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: all right, we're not gonna We're not gonna have this
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: course because we don't have enough people to fill the classroom.
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: If we're paying the professor this much, we need to
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: make this much from the students. If we're spending this
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: much using the classroom, we need to have this many students.
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: And they want you to have a full classroom. If
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: you don't have a full classroom, your job is in
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: danger as a professor. I was an adjunct for three
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: years at Wright State University at their late campus in Solana.
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: I was teaching photography, and this was the case. Is
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: one of the things that you know, we discussed in
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: the department was, you know, you want to get students
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: interested in and and show them how your class will
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: advance their potential career. I just taught what we called
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: it photography, which is basically I taught students how to
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: use photography in a business setting to enhance their jobs
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: in various ways, like if their company was trying to
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: sell something, or if they were if their company had
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: a newsletter, if their company wanted portraits of the their
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: higher ups on the walls, things like that, if their
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: company had events they wanted covered that they could have
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: someone within the company do to the photography. So then
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: when you apply for a job at various companies, you
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: can put down on your resume that you're capable of
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 1: doing those things. So it wasn't just taking pictures. It
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 1: was actually a desktop publishing course that that focused on photography,
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: but demonstrated quite a bit more than that, and it
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: it actually the students were very enthusiastic about it, And yeah,
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: Richard Bierre points out one way they do this is
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: making the course mandatory, and the Interdisciplinary Studies Department has
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: done that by making interdisciplinary studies integral to business medicine law. Like,
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: there's a whole bunch of areas of study that don't
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: really have anything to do with feminism that has now
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: had feminist creep because basically they can't get enough people
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: to sit in in a classroom and hear about the
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: history of my female victimhood, but they can get feminism
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: into your psychology courses, your sociology courses, your your courses
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: on how to become a human resources drone in your company,
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: or even how to become a CEO in your company. Like,
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: all of that ends up being infected with feminism. And
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: so when you graduate with a business degree, you've had
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: you've had feminist nonsense shoved down your throat. That the
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 1: department then can say, we need to exist because all
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: these other departments rely on us for aspects of their
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: educational programs.
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 2: So that's well, hate women, and this is why you
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 2: will hate women, and this is why you will need
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: to be taught not to hate women. And if you don't,
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 2: then you hate women. Yep again.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: And also also believe women if they make allegations in
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: your company and don't question what they have to say.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: And how dare you I hate women because women like
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 3: this exist?
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: There we go. Yeah, I get jaded about women sometimes,
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: especially when I argue with women about reproductive rights or
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: valuing men.
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: I'm determined not to hate women. Despite how much I've
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 2: been taught to love women. I feel like I need
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 2: to go in the opposite direction. But I have found
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 2: a line of work in which I've discovered the few
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: women in the world who who don't deserve hatred, and
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 2: you can do that. You can do the same, folks,
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 2: if you look, if you look deep enough and to
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 2: the abysses of society, you too can find women.
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: Who it is. He doesn't make it different than it is,
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: and he doesn't pretend that I have no flaws and
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: never need to be argued with or told I'm going
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: the wrong direction and re routed right, because that's the
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: issue with sense. Honestly, they don't. Human beings have flaws
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: and make mistakes. If you simp for someone, you are
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 1: denying their humanity. And even though you're denying it in
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: a positive direction in that you're treating them as though
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: there's something above human instead of human, it's still detrimental
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: to the welfare of the individual and the relationship and yourself.
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: By the way, Pepito gave us twenty five dollars and said,
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: good show today. I know that was yesterday yesterday at
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: four twenty pm, so this was for whatever show they
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: had yesterday, But I don't know if it got read off,
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: so I'm reading it off. I just noticed it. It's
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: been there since four twenty pm yesterday, but I just
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: noticed it. That's pretty bad. So they're mad that Trump
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: terminated hundreds of National Science Foundation grants for research related
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: to underrepresented populations and future funding opportunities for projects focused
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: on drawing more women, minorities, and people with disabilities into science.
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 4: God, these people are so tiresome.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 2: He tried to terminate these things, but some judge somewhere
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 2: in the country ruled against it, so he wasn't able
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 2: to build off. But he declared and iran, and I'm
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 2: waiting for a judge to say, no, you can't do
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: that with weird. With no judge anywhere is doing that.
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: So weird, I I will say this, this he actually
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: did get through. And uh so the the National Science
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: Foundation is it's like a grant dispenser in a way.
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: It funds all kinds of research, like shitloads of research.
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: And uh so it's not I wouldn't call it necessarily
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: like a warehouse, but it does. It does definitely, uh
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: have a wide spectrum, a broad spectrum I guess of
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: of things that it funds. Right, So we look at
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: what the changes that took place where I don't know
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: what the old policy was. But the thing that stood
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: out to me when I read this earlier let's see,
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: it's this paragraph. I think these two paragraphs. So in
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: SF's Broadening Participation, activities including activities undertaken in fulfillment of
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: the broader impacts of criterion and research on broadening participation
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: must aim to create opportunities for all Americans everywhere. So
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: what they're saying is their efforts at increasing people's interest
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: in the pursuit of scientific research and in the pursuit
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: of scientific advancement that has to equally encourage everyone to
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: get involved, every American to get involved. And actually, I
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: should start back here the principles of merit. This is
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: where feminists hate one of the things feminists really hate
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: for the principles of merit, competition, equal opportunity, and excellence
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: are the bedrock of the NSF Foundation. NSS continues to
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: review all projects using intellectual merit and broader Impacts criteria.
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: And then it says the thing that I just read
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: off before, that these effects are sorry. These efforts should
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: not preference some groups at the expense of others, or
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: directly or indirectly exclude individuals or groups. Research projects with
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: more narrow impact limited to subgroups of people based on
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: protected class or characteristics do not effectuate NSF priorities, So
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: it doesn't make NSF priorities come to fruition. To basically
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: discriminate against one group on behalf of another is the
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: antithesis of what this foundation exists to achieve. It will
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: continue to support research with a goal of understanding or
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: addressing partition participation in STEM, in accordance with all applicable
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: statutes and mandates, with the core goal of creating opportunities
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: for all Americans. So what now is mad about is
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 1: literally that this group will not exclude men and boys
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: and white people on the basis of their demographics in
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: their efforts at increasing the number of people who take
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: an interest in STEM. That's it. Imagine being mad that
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: some people are not excluded, Like, that's insane. There are
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: lot of other things I can think of to get
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: mad about, all kinds of and And let's see if
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: I somewhere here I remember seeing and I thought I
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: had it open, but I guess I don't. A list
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: of open funding opportunities. Nope, that's not what it was.
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: There was a link on who's uh, let's see who
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: Who's what got cut basically, and it went to a
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: file and I had actually opened that on another It
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: was on another computer obviously because's not on this one.
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: But I started reading the list, I wonder if I
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: wonder if I have that in my history, if I
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: can actually find that. But what I what I discovered
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: from that really kind of strange. All of them, all
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: of the things that have been discontinued, are like these
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: really weird you know, how do we get uh, how
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: do we get more gay, black, transgender little people involved
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: in this one particular subset of research within the overall
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: umbrella of social sciences, you know, and and and then
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: they had, you know, one hundred thousand dollars dedicated to
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: this one. How do we do this? How do we
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: get these this tiny little group of people, no, no punishented,
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: no insult intended to anybody, but very very minor minority
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: of the population. They're a really specific subset and involved
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: in this really specific subset of this really weirdly unnecessary
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: end of research. And it and it ends up being
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: the kind of thing where you look at this and
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: you realize that they're essentially money laundering, right, So people
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: do these these these studies, these surveys or various subtypes
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: of research on things that nobody is ever going to
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: be able to use, and they get paid, and a
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: lot of times it ends up being you know, well,
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: you have this one individual that helped a politician and
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 1: now they're getting this grant to do this research that
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 1: that never is gonna matter for anybody. Or you have
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 1: this one individual that's being a thorn in everybody's side,
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: and you can shut them up if you give them
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: this research grant and shuffle them off to to Buffalo
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: to interview people all over the country on whether they
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: consider it discriminatory that erasers are pink and not blue,
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: you know, or some shit like that. Please do not
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: anybody fund that racarch. So there we go, terminated hundreds
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: of grants. I wonder if that link is the one
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: that I had opened, might have been Nope, Oh well
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 1: if I if I run into it, we might start
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: going through that list on another night. So what else
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: have we got here? Uh? Endangered Americans ability to afford
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: and access crucial medications by moving toward imposing tariffs. This
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: is this? This sounds like that question that god I
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: can't think of dipshit's name asked me in court at
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: Calgary where he's he had like a whole bunch of
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: modifiers in the middle of this sentence. Maybe possibly ever
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: said anything remotely related to a rape joke, anything anybody
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: has ever said about any subject that is connected to
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: sex qualifies. Yeah, right, yeah, and that that question was
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: so stupid. He all he had to do is ask
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: me if I've ever told a rape joke, and you know,
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: my answer would have been would have been really simple.
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: But yeah, so imposing by moving toward imposing tariffs. In
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 1: other words, he's thinking about it.
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 5: How dare he?
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: He's thinking about it? Oh my god? On foreign made
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: drugs including contraceptives April fifteenth, twenty twenty five. And eventually
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: he did actually create a policy on that and it
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: had some results, So the White House actually published a
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: fact sheet on this. Right. The order directs the Department
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: of Health and Human Services to take steps to significantly
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: reduce drug prices for American patients delivers drug lower drug
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: price is for Medicare, which your tax dollars pay for, right,
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 1: and the seniors who rely on it by improving Medicare
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: Drug Pricing Negotiation program. So Medicare basically makes makes makes
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: pharmacies and uh, their deal with pharmacies kind. I don't
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: know how to explain this. Imagine if you were able
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: to go to the grocery store, all right, and you
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: look at the eggs in the in the dairy department,
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: and you see that they have them by the dozen,
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: and they have them by the half dozen, and maybe
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 1: they have them buy like the eighteen egg carton, and
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: you see, you know what I would like to pay
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 1: for my eggs, buy the truckload, and then you just
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: distribute them to the custom that come in with my
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: card that says I paid for those eggs, but I
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 1: want a discount because I'm paying for them by the truckload, right,
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: which is basically what your insurance company does too. If
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: you have like Blue Cross, Blue Shield or some other
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: type of insurance, your insurance company does the same thing.
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: And it's why if you take your insurance card in
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: and you pay for a drug with your insurance card,
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: the price that the pharmacy is getting is lower than
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: if you take your dollars in or your credit card
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: in and you pay for that drug. One difference with
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 1: with Medicaid, not Medicare, but Medicaid is if you go
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 1: in with Medicaid and you pay with your Medicaid card,
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 1: and Medicaid basically says, here's the deal. If you're going
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: to accept Medicaid, where going to buy the eggs by
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: the truckload, and we're going to pay exactly this much
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: for them, and you cannot cover the customers over that
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: that amount, and you can't negotiate this is We're just
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: setting this. This is the way it is. Whereas Medicare
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: has made deals with pharmacies on how much. And there
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: are different types of Medicaid programs that you can sign
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: up for as an old person, so you might get
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 1: prescription drug coverage or you might not, but Medicare has
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: also negotiated what you pay and so on. And you
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: might have another type of insurance too that that covers
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: your drugs as well, so it's a little more complicated.
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: But this what this policy did was standardize these payments
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: so that the pharmacy has an idea what they're going
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: to make by serving Medicare patients. The people who are
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: on Medicare can can plan because they have an idea
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 1: of what they're going to be spending, and the drugs
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: are less less expensive. For instance, the brags that they
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: have put up here they they lowered. Let's see aligning
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: Medicare payment for certain prescription drugs with the cost by
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: which hospitals actually acquire them, which means their their hospitals
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: are not overinflating, they're not gouging when they when they
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 1: sell these drugs, makes it thirty five percent lower than
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: what the government currently pays. Standardizing Medicare payments can lower prices,
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: but as much as sixty percent insolent prices for now,
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: this is this isn't. If you win to insolent prices
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: for low income patients and the uninsured will be lowered
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: as low as three sense plus a small administrative fee.
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: Injectable epinephrine for low income patience and the uninsured will
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: be lowered to as low as as fifteen dollars plus
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: a small administrative fee. And for people who don't know,
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: when Trump ran ran for president in twenty fifteen, if
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: you needed to carry an EpiPen and you were low
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: income and your insurance didn't cover it, it was six
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: six hundred dollars. Jesus right now. The reason people need
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: to carry EpiPens is because they have an allergy to
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 1: something that causes an anaphylactic reaction. That can kill you
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 1: in five minutes. So if you're not within five minutes
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: of a hospital, you're fucked. Remember that scene in said
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: I can't think of the movie, the one where the
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: kid bedazzles the football. It has the rock and and
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 1: she has a like a nut allergy or something. This
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: this kid who is his daughter, that the mother has
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 1: just left the child with him and she has an
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 1: allergic reaction at a restaurant, and rather than call nine
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 1: one on one, he just picks her up and runs
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 1: to the hospital, because you don't have time to wait
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: for an ambulance to get to you in that circumstance.
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 1: I almost died from an anaphlectic response when I was
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 1: four years old and have the dumbest memory from it too.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: But I I had, I had ingested an allergen, and
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 1: fortunately by that time my community had had a hospital. Unfortunately,
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: the doctor thought I was having a tantrum and didn't
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: do anything right.
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 4: Oh my god.
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 1: So I got to the point where my body was
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: changing color, my skin was changing color due to oxygen deprivation,
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: and you could see the swelling, and I could feel
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: my throat closing like I could feel the inside of
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: my throat touching the inside of my throat and I
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: wasn't trying to swallow. Oh my god, I remember that,
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: and I remember because I was a little kid, the
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: doctor saying something along the lines of it, this doesn't work,
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to do a trick. Except I heard
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: him say I'm gonna have to do a trick, and
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: so I was I was like, well, at least I'm
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 1: gonna get seen him be a trick, right if I
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: don't mess out. And the next thing, he used to
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: have me in the chest. Ooh, And so I was
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: really made said he was going to do a trick
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 1: and he's sabbing that shit worked really fast, by the way,
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: and it's not anything like in the movies where like
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: you sit up and you're all energetic and no. Man,
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 1: I laid there on the table and just shook. It
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: was but it did reverse the reaction. But that was
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 1: a scary and it hurts so bad, like it just
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: it burned like fire, and then my whole chest just hurt.
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 1: I just could All I could do is lay there
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 1: and breathe. But I could breathe, So it was that
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: was a good thing. Yeah, But if you're in that situation,
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: you do not have time to wait for somebody to
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: come and help you, especially if you've had the reaction
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: already at an earlier point. You know, each time your
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: body has that freak out, it's worse than the last time.
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: And so people carry an EpiPen because something in their
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: environment is so dangerous to them that they have to
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: be able to either self administer or trust somebody right
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: there next to them to administer that drug immediately upon
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 1: the start of the action so they don't die. And
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: for it to cost six hundred dollars if you don't
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: have insurance, usually people who don't have insurance, they they
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 1: they don't have six hundred dollars, right. That's at the time,
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: in in my neighborhood, that was a month's rent.
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 4: And that's Those are like a one shot deal.
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: Right right, Once you've used it, you got to get
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 1: another one Jesus. Right. But yeah, so to to drop
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: it to fifteen dollars is amazing, and they're mad about that. Yeah,
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: national organization is mad about that.
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 4: Idiots. They're idiots.
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: The order helps the state reduce drug prices by facilitating
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 1: imports programs that could save states millions in prescription drug costs,
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 1: costs and building off programs that help states get much
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 1: better deals on expensive sickle sell medications in Medicaid than
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: statutorily required uh twenty three point one percent discounts. So
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: they're there. There's another one, right that affects only a
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: percentage of the population, and it is its genetic and
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 1: it's racial. Now is mad that sickle sell medication might
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: be uh less expensive? That's that's interesting. So again you
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 1: look at this what he what he's basically done. Drug
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 1: companies in the United States had a higher price that
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: they were charging us as Americans for drugs that that
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 1: they were selling us, then they were were selling overseas.
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: And then companies that sold drugs overseas were flooding the
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 1: market here with cheap generics, which they were still charging
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 1: US more for than the people in their own countries.
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 1: So Americans were getting screwed twice. And Trump pretty much
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: put the cabage to that by changing policy to require
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: drug companies to give Americans if they want to sell
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 1: in America, they got to give Americans similar prices to
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 1: what they're giving people in foreign countries, as opposed to
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: upping their prices just because they're selling to us. So, yeah,
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: at what point is this gendered? Though? I have to like,
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: I have to ask this, like, do do does now
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: think that men don't use medications?
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 4: These people, they're not They're not too bright, are they.
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: I gotta wonder about that, because, like, so far, the
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: things they've complained about the way that they affect the sexes,
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: they they actually mostly affect both sexes. The ones that
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: did only affect women only affected a tiny subset and
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: they didn't necessarily affect them on the level. Like they
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: aren't kicking women out of of programs involved in national security.
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: They're not like going through and saying, well, you're in
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: a skirt, you gotta get out. We don't want you
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: here anymore. What they're doing is they're not they're not accommodating. Well,
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 1: they're not accommodating a few things, but they're not accommodating
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: like special treatment for women. Jen Bottle says, no, Hannah,
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 1: And they think men don't feel pain as much either. Yeah,
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: that's true. They do think they don't feel pain as much.
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: That's really And then they claim to think that women, well,
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: they claim that women have a higher pain tolerance too.
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 1: But then they say men don't go to the doctor.
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: So which is men don't complain and they don't go
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: to the doctor, but women are more stoic about pain.
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: Which is it.
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 2: I'm not a real doctor. I wouldn't know.
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: And we got another one here, where is it?
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: John Doe says, I love not being allergic to anything normal,
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: not even poison ivy. That's a weird one for you,
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: all right. I'm allergic to everything normal. I'm allergic to grass.
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: I'm surrounded by grass, I'm allergic to it, and I'm
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: allergic to it twice. I have two different parts of
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: the plant that I'm allergic to. Oh my god, when
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 1: it's pollinating, I have one reaction. When when the lawnmower
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: people come along and mow the lawn and I'm outside,
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 1: I have a different reaction esus. And that reaction also
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 1: can can be affected or can hit me when I
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: walk barefoot in the grass.
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: Should have been killed like a thousand times. I'm pretty
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 2: sure she's the Messiah.
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: I am not. I am not the Messiah. I'm not.
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 1: My name is not.
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 6: Brian would say, I don't even have a go on
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 6: or well, I do have a shoe and a gord
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 6: I have two gords, but.
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 1: We're not talking about those in any case. Yeah, I
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 1: bet I'm not allergic to poison ivy. I can. I
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 1: can lay in a bed of poison ivy, at least
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 1: in my past experiences with it. I have actually done
• 1:42:59
  Speaker 1: that by accident, by the way, and not not had
• 1:43:02
  Speaker 1: a single consequence. I didn't even get bit by bugs
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: from laying in it. Nothing happened. Now, I wouldn't test
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 1: that over and over again, because you can develop a
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 1: sensitivity even if you don't have it when you're young.
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 1: But that always just shocked me, because all sorts of
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: things that are completely harmless to everybody else, my body
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: panics when it comes into contact with them. Right, But
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: poison ivy, which most people get itchy blisters from, had
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 1: no effect on me whatsoever.
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 4: That's so crazy.
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Nothing, Wow, I'll just a weirdo, that's what it is.
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 1: Let's see. So this is another one cut off funding
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 1: from the Department of Education to Maine for allowing transgender
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: athletes equal access to sports. Okay, that's a that's a
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 1: dishonest representation there. Now, I got to tell you where
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 1: I stand on this issue, and it's it's kind of
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: gonna look like a weird dance probably to a lot
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: of people. So I was an athlete when I was
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 1: in high school. I was never exceptional. I'm an asthmatic,
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 1: I'm a nerd. I did well at hurdles, I was
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 1: I was fourth place in my league my my freshman year,
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 1: and then I that was my peak, and then I
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 1: didn't do anything special after that, and I ran on
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: the cross country team, actually stumbled for most of the
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 1: race forward, catching myself barely with the next leg and
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: sounding like I was trying to vacuum the course instead
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: of running it. I was never a really good runner,
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: but I did it. I was never gonna win anything,
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 1: never gonna amount to anything with that. It was more
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: about battling like my my own personal health conditions than
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 1: it was about being great. And my teammates actually really
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 1: supported me in that on an amazing level for me.
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 1: But I experienced something that sort of influences my my
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: position on this, and that I ran with a state
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: champion when I ran hurdles, and I ran on a
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: second place state level team when I was in cross country,
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 1: and I think one of one of our runners my
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 1: freshman year actually finished first. But in any case, like
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: we we had great athletes, and I ran with great athletes,
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 1: and it improved my performance running with those guys, like
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: on a level that I don't think I could have
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: done if I had just run with people of my
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: level of performance and maybe a little higher, instead of
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 1: these exceptional athletes whose performance I had no chance of
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: ever touching. And so I look at this with the
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 1: fact that men and boys are better at sports than
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 1: women and girls in general. There they outperform women and
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 1: girls on everything right then, And it's it's because they
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 1: are stronger, faster, have better endurance, their their bodies are
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 1: built more efficiently for for the types of actions that
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 1: you take to do your performance of whatever sport you're doing.
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: It's just a fact. It's biology. And so I know
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 1: that trans women in women's sports is going to mean
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 1: that a lot of gals are going to get pushed aside.
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 1: There's two things that have led me to oppose simply
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 1: banning them from women's sports. One of them is that
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: thing I just talked about. The other one is historically
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: when girls have been excluded from boys teams, they sued, right,
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 1: there have been there's a history in the last half
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: of the twentieth century of girls suing to get positions
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 1: on wrestling teams, baseball teams, tennis teams, golf teams, football
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: teams where I don't know, if you realize the difference
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 1: in bone structure between boys and girls after they started
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: puberty can lead to things like that. There was a
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: girl at my school a few years before I was
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 1: a student there who was on the football team, and
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: in like they called it midget football and elementary school,
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: and then in middle school what would be middle school today,
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: they had another name for it. If I remember right then,
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 1: when you got into junior high, you were on the
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: official school football team. And she was fine. But her
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: first year in high school she broke her collar bone.
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 1: And when she came back from that, she broke another bone.
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: And it was just normal practice. And so, and she
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 1: was bigger than other girls. She was bigger than me
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 1: at my peak, I was five foot nine, and I
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: have the morep build, broad shoulders, not the coat hanger shoulders.
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 1: And so you know, for her being bigger than me,
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 1: that's pretty big for a girl. But you know, she
• 1:49:13
  Speaker 1: still couldn't Her body wasn't made to handle the level
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: of impact that it was going to take from being
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 1: hit by a man's body or a boy's body that
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 1: was becoming a man at the speeds that you do
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 1: on a football field. And I'm familiar with that. I
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: played sand lot football with the boys until I was
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 1: about ten years old, and they started getting a lot
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 1: bigger than me, and it started to become a lot
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: more painful, and it became obvious that it was not
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 1: a good idea for me to continue that. Right. So
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 1: girls have sued for this for decades, and there have
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: been boys who were heading for scholarships, heading for being
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 1: scouted for college teams and even semi pro teams and
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 1: potential olympians that got.
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 7: Their careers derailed, their sports careers derailed by girls who
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 7: insisted on having a space in boys teams.
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: And then at the same time you had this history
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 1: of female reporters suing for access to men's locker rooms,
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 1: professional sports teams, men's locker rooms. So another women suing
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 1: for access to men's spaces. Have ben had a male
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: only club or organization, women sued for access to that. Right,
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 1: there's not a space that men have created that women
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: have not invaded, even men's sheds, the men's shed movement
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 1: In Australia, there is currently an effort for women to
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 1: invade those maker spaces that are supposed to be therapeutic
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: for men. Women want in on it for themselves, not
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: to help with men's therapy. By the way, so I
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: don't have a lot of sympathy when people complain that
• 1:51:25
  Speaker 1: men are invading women's spaces now, you know, and I
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 1: don't care whether they're complaining about trans women that they
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 1: consider to be men because of biology or actual non
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 1: trans men who identify as men barging in, Like, I
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: don't care, go back and give up all the things
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: that you sued for, ladies, or shut the fuck up
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 1: and deal with it, well, just getting back what you gave.
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 2: Hannah, you appear to be insinuating that men are stronger
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 2: than women. You are not allowed to say this. No
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 2: one needs say this. Men are not stronger than women.
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 2: Women are stronger than men. So if it ever appears
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 2: that a man who identifies as a woman is stronger
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 2: than a woman, well it's just it's just because he
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 2: is sorry, she is a woman who happens to be
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 2: stronger than other women. It's not because men are stronger
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 2: than women. It's it's because how do I say this,
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 2: A biologically born man has the strength to admit that
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 2: he was never a man, that he was always a woman.
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 2: And that's what's important. It's important that men denounce their
• 1:53:02
  Speaker 2: masculinity and they admit that they were always women because
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 2: everyone is a woman, because everyone, everyone was always a woman.
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 2: And it doesn't matter how many women, sorry, how many
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 2: biological women get beaten the fuck to death by women
• 1:53:23
  Speaker 2: who were born as men. As long as every man
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 2: in the world denounces his masculinity, that that's all. That's
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 2: all feminists are interested in. They're interested in removing all
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 2: of the men from existence. And they can't do that literally,
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 2: they can't do it biologically, but they can do it identitarily.
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 2: They can get every man to denounce his masculinity in
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 2: on an identitarian basis, they can get every man to say, no,
• 1:54:03
  Speaker 2: I am not a man. That's the only way they
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 2: can get rid of the men. Just deep down they
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 2: know they I mean, they really want to genocide men.
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 2: They really want a human race that doesn't include any men.
• 1:54:21
  Speaker 2: But they know they can't do that because they're going
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 2: to need the men to do all of the difficult jobs.
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 2: But they can get the men to denounce their masculinity,
• 1:54:32
  Speaker 2: They can get the men to say, no, I am
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 2: not a man, and they are. It doesn't matter how
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 2: many women they sacrifice on the altar of that of
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 2: that ideology. It doesn't matter if every spot is dominated
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 2: by men pretending to be women, as long as those
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 2: men denounce their masculinity. And the same thing is going
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 2: to happen in all of the jobs that men have
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 2: to do, like but like being tree surgeons and and
• 1:55:11
  Speaker 2: the fucking crab fishes and all all of the jobs
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 2: that men have to do.
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: That women will behind the grid, by the way, the
• 1:55:22
  Speaker 1: utilities grid, water power, gas, trash collection.
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 2: They know, they they know they can't actually genocide the men.
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 2: But the next best thing they can do is get
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 2: all the men to pretend they're not men. And that
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 2: will do. That will do, And that's why all of
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 2: this is happening. That's why it's okay for men to
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 2: claim their women, but it's not okay for white people
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 2: to pretend the black people because that doesn't matter because
• 1:55:56
  Speaker 2: because the race baiting has always been just uh, just
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 2: this pointless bullshit, there's tact on to the gender bullshit.
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 2: There They just want to erase men from history. And
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 2: because they know they can't do that, they just have
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 2: to get men to pretend to erase themselves from history.
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: Yep, they want to erase men from history. They want
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 1: to erase men from modern times. They want to erase
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: men from everything. And they want women to get credit
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: for things that women didn't do. They want women to
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 1: get credit for things that women are not doing, and
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: so on. But when it comes to to sports and
• 1:56:46
  Speaker 1: spaces and so on, the egregious level of entitlement that
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 1: women have engaged in and and are now you know,
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: demanding like recourse for just it really takes the cake.
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 1: And I mentioned the lawsuits to get into men's and
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 1: boys' sports. There's another thing that they've done. So everyone's familiar.
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 1: If you're in the United States, you've heard about Title nine.
• 1:57:18
  Speaker 1: You've heard it over and over again. Title nine, Title nine,
• 1:57:21
  Speaker 1: Title nine Anti discrimination, blah blah blah, right. And the
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 1: law originally was written in response to female agitation against
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 1: university's ability to have a quota system in certain areas
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 1: like law, medicine and such, where they only reserved a
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 1: certain small number of seats for women. And it was
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 1: largely because not very many women went into those professions
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 1: in the first place. And often when when men would
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 1: take those courses, they either didn't finish or they didn't
• 1:58:06
  Speaker 1: go into practice, or if they went into practice, they
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 1: didn't stay in practice. So they didn't do the thing
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 1: that universities need their former students to do in order
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: for the university to maintain its prestige and attract future students,
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 1: and that is make a name for themselves, have that
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 1: nice diploma on the wall in their practice for people
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 1: to see this doctor came from this university, and maybe
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 1: I want to go to that university and become a doctor.
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 1: You know, this lawyer came from this university and won
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 1: my case. Maybe if I want to be a lawyer,
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: I want to go to that university. Right, they didn't
• 1:58:41
  Speaker 1: do that, and as many numbers as men, as high
• 1:58:44
  Speaker 1: a percentage of students as men did, so universities didn't
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 1: reserve as many seats for women. And during the sixties
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 1: and seventies that was changing. Right during the fifties actually
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 1: and sixties, that was changing. By the time I'm Title
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 1: nine passed, the quota system was going out of fashion
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 1: among universities already, So the law basically ordered them to
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 1: stop doing the thing that they were stopping doing, and
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 1: they stopped. And then the administration went, well, now what
• 1:59:20
  Speaker 1: do we do with this department that we've created for
• 1:59:26
  Speaker 1: enforcing Title nine. Well, well, now we have to make
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 1: it about sports. Okay, it's about sports. You have to
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 1: have equity in sports, right, you have to have as
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 1: many girl sports and as many girls participating in sports
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 1: at your school as you do guys, as many many
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 1: women as men. And if you don't, we're gonna have
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 1: a quota system. If you don't, then then we're going
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 1: to penalize you. And so what universities ended up doing
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 1: like they try to get more women interested, but that
• 2:00:03
  Speaker 1: didn't work, so they started eliminating like the lesser profitable
• 2:00:11
  Speaker 1: events at their universities, especially if their university wasn't necessarily
• 2:00:14
  Speaker 1: known for that event. So things like men's gymnastics teams
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 1: got the acts, men's Olympic wrestling teams got the acts
• 2:00:23
  Speaker 1: because of course their football and basketball programs were profitable,
• 2:00:26
  Speaker 1: but those other teams were not, and they didn't have
• 2:00:29
  Speaker 1: an equivalent for the gals. Maybe they couldn't get a
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 1: football team, flag football or powder puff football going for
• 2:00:37
  Speaker 1: the gals. So they couldn't make parody without eliminating some
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 1: sport that men played and only having a women's team,
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 1: and and that it basically eliminated a lot of young
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 1: men's chances at at you know, becoming an Olympic athlete.
• 2:01:03
  Speaker 1: And it also eliminated that part of many Mormon's athletic
• 2:01:09
  Speaker 1: experience in school. They couldn't they couldn't go for those
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 1: teams because those teams didn't exist. So if they wanted
• 2:01:14
  Speaker 1: any athletic participation, they had to do something else. Well,
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 1: if that wasn't like your normal sport, you're you're starting
• 2:01:22
  Speaker 1: over in a sport that isn't your normal sport. A
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 1: lot of guys just didn't go out for anything. And yeah,
• 2:01:34
  Speaker 1: Merrithi pointed out the Department of Education was created under
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: Carter a good five years after Title nine and many
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: men's colleges going co ed and quota's going away, so
• 2:01:45
  Speaker 1: they really didn't they didn't really have a purpose with
• 2:01:49
  Speaker 1: regard to Title nine. Ever, well, then you get to
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 1: the point where these universities have mostly achieved parody in sports,
• 2:02:01
  Speaker 1: So now what do they got to adjudicate with Title nine?
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 1: Now we're going to start doing the human resources thing
• 2:02:08
  Speaker 1: with it, right, We're going to start involving ourselves in
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 1: university campus conflicts over alleged sexual misconduct. And then you
• 2:02:21
  Speaker 1: got the Clariact and the twenty eleven Dear Colleague letter
• 2:02:26
  Speaker 1: and all of the crap that's going on now with
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 1: allegations of sexual misconduct and harassment and stalking and stuff
• 2:02:37
  Speaker 1: like that being used to kick men off of university
• 2:02:41
  Speaker 1: campuses and take their educations away entirely without due process
• 2:02:47
  Speaker 1: and without actually providing them any recourse, no appeal, no nothing,
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 1: even when there is sometimes evidence that they were the
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 1: victim of an incident rather than the perpetrator as the
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 1: accuser stated. And there are hundreds of due process lawsuits
• 2:03:11
  Speaker 1: that have resulted from this. The courts have had to
• 2:03:15
  Speaker 1: order universities to provide accused young men with better access
• 2:03:21
  Speaker 1: to representation and ability to defend themselves against these allegations,
• 2:03:30
  Speaker 1: basically to respect their right to due process and so on.
• 2:03:36
  Speaker 1: So there's there's been quite a bit there. It's migrated,
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: it's had mission creep out the wazoo for the last
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 1: fifty years, and it should have actually ended when when it,
• 2:03:51
  Speaker 1: you know, was passed on once the school started eliminating
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 1: eliminating academic quotas, there was no reason and to continue
• 2:04:01
  Speaker 1: to have Title nine like it's it's just completely unnecessary now, Meredith.
• 2:04:10
  Speaker 1: She also points out what most people don't get is
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: the quotas were really concerned about giving spots to women
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: who were likely only in college to get their hiphrast decree,
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 1: would never use their degrees. That's another fact back in
• 2:04:23
  Speaker 1: the day, in fact, women used to joke about it.
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I went to university to get my mrs
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 1: degree back when it only cost you know, a few
• 2:04:30
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars as opposed to tens of thousands or hundreds
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 1: of thousands to go to university. And you know, they
• 2:04:38
  Speaker 1: would participate in sports for fun, but they weren't necessarily
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 1: going on to any you know, guys in university athletics,
• 2:04:50
  Speaker 1: a lot of them were looking to attract recruiters for
• 2:04:54
  Speaker 1: pro teams, especially in football and basketball, baseball, any anything
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 1: where you could become a professional player, and they might
• 2:05:05
  Speaker 1: get a degree and in something related to their passion, like, uh,
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: make themselves able to become a gym teacher if they
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: didn't go pro. If they couldn't go pro, right, but
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 1: they or they become go into sports medicine, you know,
• 2:05:24
  Speaker 1: something along those lines. A lot of women just wanted
• 2:05:29
  Speaker 1: to participate in sports because it was fun and challenging,
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 1: and that's fine, but it doesn't merit forcing schools to
• 2:05:38
  Speaker 1: get rid of men's athletic teams because you couldn't get
• 2:05:43
  Speaker 1: enough women up for a powder puff football team. Let's see,
• 2:05:50
  Speaker 1: do we have any further I don't think we have
• 2:05:55
  Speaker 1: any further super chows that I can see, So I'm
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 1: gonna put done here, and if we get one after this,
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 1: I think we're gonna have to read it on the
• 2:06:12
  Speaker 1: on the after show. So I'm not going to continue
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 1: to the next page. We finished page one and we'll
• 2:06:21
  Speaker 1: start page two next week, and it's it's more of
• 2:06:27
  Speaker 1: the same. Like you look at this, there's pages and
• 2:06:30
  Speaker 1: pages and it's all DEI huh.
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 2: I'm just commenting on how fucking long this is going
• 2:06:39
  Speaker 2: to take.
• 2:06:41
  Speaker 1: Well, see, we might not have as much to say
• 2:06:43
  Speaker 1: about later ones because we said it about the earlier
• 2:06:45
  Speaker 1: ones that were almost the same.
• 2:06:51
  Speaker 2: But yeah, we've got to find something to talk about.
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 2: There's plenty of things other than everyone else is talking about.
• 2:06:58
  Speaker 1: And yeah, at some point in the future, we are
• 2:07:06
  Speaker 1: going to have to talk about Iran because there's a
• 2:07:10
  Speaker 1: history and not history needs to be talked about, and
• 2:07:16
  Speaker 1: it needs to be talked about in reference to our
• 2:07:19
  Speaker 1: discussions about voting rights and war. But we're not going
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 1: to do that right now. I'm just there's some people
• 2:07:28
  Speaker 1: I would like to bring on to talk, and I
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 1: haven't had an opportunity to organize that or to organize
• 2:07:34
  Speaker 1: my research so that I'll be able to actually go
• 2:07:36
  Speaker 1: back and forth between the things that I want to
• 2:07:39
  Speaker 1: show people and all that. It's just been too crazy here,
• 2:07:44
  Speaker 1: so I've been putting that off. But eventually we will
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 1: have that discussion, because it's something that people really need
• 2:07:51
  Speaker 1: to understand when they talk about who should be president,
• 2:07:56
  Speaker 1: who should be the commander in chief of the US military,
• 2:07:59
  Speaker 1: what we should be doing in response to what other
• 2:08:02
  Speaker 1: countries are doing, and so on.
• 2:08:05
  Speaker 2: And like men's rights, does it have anything.
• 2:08:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, the fact that anytime we involve ourselves in
• 2:08:16
  Speaker 1: a military conflict and the phrase boots on the ground
• 2:08:21
  Speaker 1: gets tossed around, they're talking about men. They're not talking
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 1: about empty sets of boots. They're not talking about men
• 2:08:30
  Speaker 1: and women because there's almost never women sent into combat.
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: In fact, historically women have not been sent into combat
• 2:08:41
  Speaker 1: by the United States. Women may in the future get
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 1: sent into combat, but right now there's almost no women
• 2:08:50
  Speaker 1: even qualified to get sent into combat. It's men. Boots
• 2:08:54
  Speaker 1: on the ground means men, right, and so it's a
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 1: men's issue. If people don't like hearing that, that's fine,
• 2:09:05
  Speaker 1: you go listen to some Namby Pamby what's your little
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 1: show about makeup or some shit. But when we talk
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 1: about this stuff, we're talking about the impact on men, right,
• 2:09:20
  Speaker 1: this stuff that we've been talking about today. You know
• 2:09:22
  Speaker 1: who's funding all of that with their tax dollars? You
• 2:09:25
  Speaker 1: know who gets taxed in the United States and doesn't
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: get jack shipped back?
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 2: Is it women?
• 2:09:32
  Speaker 1: It's definitely not women. Social social services, most social programs
• 2:09:41
  Speaker 1: that get funded that that give out prizes, right, you know,
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: gibbs are reserved for women or are reserved in a
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 1: way that women are most likely to qualify because you
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 1: have to have custom of children, and women are more
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 1: likely than men to have custody of children. So women
• 2:10:07
  Speaker 1: always have access to those if they meet the qualifications
• 2:10:14
  Speaker 1: other than gender. Gender doesn't disqualify them, But for men,
• 2:10:20
  Speaker 1: no nope. You know, most of the time men get
• 2:10:27
  Speaker 1: lint in their pockets, they get jackshit, they get nothing.
• 2:10:32
  Speaker 1: Only women get to do the sobbing for cash and
• 2:10:34
  Speaker 1: prizes thing. Our man gave us fifty dollars USD just now,
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 1: thank you very much for that, and said at Hannah,
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 1: I just got a new book in that I believe
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 1: you and Alison might take an interest in. Maybe you've
• 2:10:47
  Speaker 1: heard of it. It's called Titanic feminism. The author a
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 1: man at that speaks about from a perspective as if
• 2:10:55
  Speaker 1: he approved of it. Interesting and satanic feminism sounds like, well,
• 2:11:05
  Speaker 1: there's atheist feminism that I've heard of, And I actually
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 1: infiltrated a feminist atheist group on Facebook for a little
• 2:11:13
  Speaker 1: while looking for material, but they were so fake and
• 2:11:17
  Speaker 1: gay that there wasn't really much of any like. It
• 2:11:20
  Speaker 1: was so pathetic and lame, there wasn't anything to talk about.
• 2:11:24
  Speaker 2: We've been one for a long time that satan would
• 2:11:27
  Speaker 2: take a form that is pleasing to the eye, and
• 2:11:32
  Speaker 2: for so many generations it hasn't It hadn't occurred to
• 2:11:35
  Speaker 2: people that that form would be feminine.
• 2:11:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I was expecting a tub of ice cream. Look,
• 2:11:47
  Speaker 1: it's the devil. All I did was touch it, and
• 2:11:51
  Speaker 1: it put twenty pounds on my butt. Yeah, feminism is
• 2:11:57
  Speaker 1: satanic by nature. It is you cannot hate and and
• 2:12:04
  Speaker 1: not be satanic by nature. You cannot hate an entire
• 2:12:09
  Speaker 1: demographic of human beings just for being part of that demographic,
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 1: just for being born that way.
• 2:12:17
  Speaker 2: What you were about to say, you cannot hate the feminine.
• 2:12:21
  Speaker 2: And that's sort of the point. It's so difficult for
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 2: men to hate women. And that's why Satan came to
• 2:12:30
  Speaker 2: Earth in the form of women. Yeah, because because I
• 2:12:34
  Speaker 2: knew that men cannot hate women pretty much no matter
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 2: what happens. That's what I mean by Satan taking a
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 2: form that is pleasing to the eye and indeed pleasing
• 2:12:46
  Speaker 2: to all the senses. The problem with Satan is is
• 2:12:51
  Speaker 2: that you can't hate it. I was about to say him,
• 2:12:56
  Speaker 2: but I'm pretty sure Satan is a woman.
• 2:13:01
  Speaker 1: Well.
• 2:13:01
  Speaker 2: The fun part of that the Bible. But I don't
• 2:13:04
  Speaker 2: believe the Bible. I think I think the Bible fucked up,
• 2:13:08
  Speaker 2: just like modern day guy and the centrism fucks up.
• 2:13:11
  Speaker 2: I think I think Satan was always female.
• 2:13:14
  Speaker 1: The fun part about angels is that they appear to
• 2:13:16
  Speaker 1: be able to choose how they present, because you know,
• 2:13:22
  Speaker 1: like the Bible has that in heaven they are neither
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 1: male nor female. But then the the statement that there
• 2:13:30
  Speaker 1: were giants in those days was a result of the
• 2:13:37
  Speaker 1: sons of heaven laying with the daughters of men. Well,
• 2:13:41
  Speaker 1: if in heaven they are neither male nor female, but
• 2:13:45
  Speaker 1: they can impregnate women, that indicates that they can morph.
• 2:13:51
  Speaker 1: So if they could morph into something male, they could
• 2:13:54
  Speaker 1: morph into something female, and I would have I would imagine,
• 2:13:59
  Speaker 1: because the devil is supposed to be the father of lies,
• 2:14:05
  Speaker 1: to be able to morph into something, I'm sure that
• 2:14:09
  Speaker 1: the entity that is the the personification of all evil
• 2:14:14
  Speaker 1: can present as anything it wants to, like, just anything
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: it wants to, and you wouldn't recognize it by by
• 2:14:25
  Speaker 1: how it looked. You would recognize it by what it does.
• 2:14:29
  Speaker 2: The God that has brought us into the most prosperous
• 2:14:34
  Speaker 2: age of all history is a male god. And I
• 2:14:38
  Speaker 2: don't think that's the coincidence. I think I think once
• 2:14:42
  Speaker 2: we learned that, I don't want to talk about worship,
• 2:14:51
  Speaker 2: but once, once, once we learned some kind of discipline
• 2:14:58
  Speaker 2: that revers the masculine. That was when we brought ourselves
• 2:15:03
  Speaker 2: out of the Stone Age. And yep, because before then
• 2:15:10
  Speaker 2: we did have deities. We did we did worship certain
• 2:15:17
  Speaker 2: female deities and they and they were the den females,
• 2:15:21
  Speaker 2: the goddesses that that we made fats fat statuettes of Yeah.
• 2:15:28
  Speaker 1: Back when the childbirth looked like something magic. Yeah, and
• 2:15:32
  Speaker 1: nobody understood how it happened.
• 2:15:35
  Speaker 2: And as much as I revere polltheistic religions and I
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 2: tried to hold monotheistic, dare I say patriarchal religions to
• 2:15:49
  Speaker 2: a I think it's no coincidence that we got this
• 2:15:53
  Speaker 2: far through a religion that that has a maled god.
• 2:16:01
  Speaker 2: I think I think it has it's it's uh, it's
• 2:16:07
  Speaker 2: positive points. I'll leave it at that.
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Oh, Meredith J says she did send a superchow,
• 2:16:20
  Speaker 1: but it hasn't gone through. So I will thank you
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 1: for the super chow. I'll have to read it. I know.
• 2:16:29
  Speaker 1: Usually Meredith says, honey for the Badgers, But I'll bet
• 2:16:34
  Speaker 1: there's probably more to it this time because we've had
• 2:16:36
  Speaker 1: so much we talked about. But in any case, I
• 2:16:41
  Speaker 1: think you really have a point about revering the masculine.
• 2:16:46
  Speaker 1: Once upon a time, you know what, when we didn't
• 2:16:50
  Speaker 1: understand as much about biology. Childbirth probably looked like magic.
• 2:16:55
  Speaker 1: But what men have done throughout history to build and
• 2:17:00
  Speaker 1: advance the the physical aspects of civilization. You know, we're
• 2:17:07
  Speaker 1: not even touching on the advancements of the social aspects,
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 1: ideas about freedom and uh accountability and responsibility and and
• 2:17:17
  Speaker 1: different ways of government and so on, but just talking
• 2:17:20
  Speaker 1: about having a a structure to our community so that
• 2:17:29
  Speaker 1: we have safe places to live and we're not rained
• 2:17:34
  Speaker 1: on every night, and we're not uh subject to to
• 2:17:38
  Speaker 1: being picked up by tornadoes and killed. We're not we're
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 1: not dealing with a lack of food because we have
• 2:17:46
  Speaker 1: uh no no way of getting it. We have farms,
• 2:17:48
  Speaker 1: we have all of agriculture, we have all of medicine.
• 2:17:52
  Speaker 1: We have, you know, everything that has been built, every
• 2:17:56
  Speaker 1: physical thing that has been built to to make that work,
• 2:18:01
  Speaker 1: All of the various machines that we use, all of
• 2:18:05
  Speaker 1: the various systems for providing us with things like electricity,
• 2:18:10
  Speaker 1: transporting our goods to and from and and so on.
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 1: All of that it is from masculinity.
• 2:18:21
  Speaker 2: It's easy to say that all our problems came from
• 2:18:25
  Speaker 2: when the intellect overrode the emotion Sakon recently made the
• 2:18:37
  Speaker 2: documentary called The Death of Man about how the Enlightenment
• 2:18:42
  Speaker 2: created this clockwork universe that took over from from the
• 2:18:47
  Speaker 2: god based universe, and that's why we've plunged ourselves into
• 2:18:52
  Speaker 2: a sort of hell. But at the same time, we
• 2:18:57
  Speaker 2: used to live in hell. In the Stone Age, we
• 2:18:59
  Speaker 2: lived in hell. People died from any given disease anywhere,
• 2:19:04
  Speaker 2: and even if you had a toothache, you would fucking die.
• 2:19:09
  Speaker 2: But then intellectuality brought us out of the quagmire of
• 2:19:14
  Speaker 2: the emotional. But then intellectuality plunged us into a different
• 2:19:21
  Speaker 2: kind of quagmire. And I'm like, well, let's let's find
• 2:19:29
  Speaker 2: a middle ground between that involves intellectuality and emotionality, the
• 2:19:34
  Speaker 2: spiritual and the I don't know whatever or whatever the
• 2:19:41
  Speaker 2: foil is to spirituality. Let's let's work the best of
• 2:19:46
  Speaker 2: all worlds, shall we. I think we can do it.
• 2:19:49
  Speaker 2: As long as we stop simping for women, I think
• 2:19:52
  Speaker 2: we can do it.
• 2:19:55
  Speaker 1: Meredith said. The rest of the chat was, remember, you
• 2:19:58
  Speaker 1: can't be a prima victim if you can be held
• 2:20:01
  Speaker 1: accountable for your actions. Absolutely true, that's stellar.
• 2:20:07
  Speaker 8: And yeah, you know the way that I would think
• 2:20:09
  Speaker 8: about people's take on intellectualism is this, if you have cancer, right, so.
• 2:20:19
  Speaker 1: You've got your your lungs are full of tumors, or
• 2:20:24
  Speaker 1: or your like in in my family history, your colon
• 2:20:29
  Speaker 1: is full of tumors, whatever part of the body. Cancer
• 2:20:33
  Speaker 1: is horrible no matter where it hits. You say you
• 2:20:36
  Speaker 1: don't know you have it, will not knowing that you
• 2:20:40
  Speaker 1: have it help you? Are you upset? You're upset when
• 2:20:45
  Speaker 1: you find out, right, you're upset when you discover that
• 2:20:47
  Speaker 1: you have it. It's terrifying, and you always have this doubt.
• 2:20:53
  Speaker 1: You know what happens if this doesn't work? Is it
• 2:20:57
  Speaker 1: gonna keep growing? You know, my own bodies turned against me?
• 2:21:00
  Speaker 1: Is it gonna kill me? But if you don't find out,
• 2:21:07
  Speaker 1: you don't get a chance to put a stop to it.
• 2:21:11
  Speaker 1: Intellectualism was it evolved around humans trying to figure out
• 2:21:16
  Speaker 1: how things worked, and how to make the best of
• 2:21:21
  Speaker 1: how things work, take advantage of it, and and uh
• 2:21:27
  Speaker 1: to work with it instead of being victimized by it.
• 2:21:33
  Speaker 1: So we learned everything from uh. You know, how to
• 2:21:37
  Speaker 1: make plants grow where and when and how we want
• 2:21:40
  Speaker 1: them to to how to build structures that could resist
• 2:21:45
  Speaker 1: high winds and flooding to ways of using the wind
• 2:21:50
  Speaker 1: to transport our ourselves and our stuff, you know, like
• 2:21:55
  Speaker 1: it's we learned how to navigate water, which the power
• 2:22:00
  Speaker 1: of water is amazing. It's hard to compete between men
• 2:22:06
  Speaker 1: and men wind and water for which one is more fascinating,
• 2:22:13
  Speaker 1: and how it works right and how it can be
• 2:22:17
  Speaker 1: destructive or how we can make use of it. And
• 2:22:20
  Speaker 1: men figured all of that out to improve the lives
• 2:22:25
  Speaker 1: of their their communities, the people around them, and themselves
• 2:22:28
  Speaker 1: as well. What if we could fly, we could get
• 2:22:31
  Speaker 1: places faster, We could get places there farther away. What
• 2:22:34
  Speaker 1: if we could ride on the water without sinking into
• 2:22:37
  Speaker 1: it and dying, We could get places farther away than
• 2:22:39
  Speaker 1: we can get just with a cart. We could go
• 2:22:42
  Speaker 1: places that are on the other side of the water,
• 2:22:44
  Speaker 1: where there's no land connection. You know. Men figured those
• 2:22:48
  Speaker 1: things out so they could they could explore, they could
• 2:22:52
  Speaker 1: get things that weren't available at home, they could they
• 2:22:55
  Speaker 1: could trade, and so on. And to claim that it
• 2:23:00
  Speaker 1: is bad because it also led to conflict and arguments
• 2:23:06
  Speaker 1: over those things is to ignore all of the benefits.
• 2:23:13
  Speaker 1: We just have to figure out how to navigate the
• 2:23:18
  Speaker 1: human psyche. It's a little bit harder because you can't
• 2:23:22
  Speaker 1: see it. But once we do that, we can figure
• 2:23:25
  Speaker 1: out how to have peaceful ways of settling those conflicts
• 2:23:30
  Speaker 1: all the time, which I think would be the next
• 2:23:35
  Speaker 1: step for humanity if we can get there. And of
• 2:23:41
  Speaker 1: course it's not going to happen if we listen to
• 2:23:43
  Speaker 1: the National Organization for Women. Everything has to be about
• 2:23:46
  Speaker 1: conflict for them. In any case, it is nine point
• 2:23:50
  Speaker 1: thirty and we should be moving on to the patron
• 2:23:53
  Speaker 1: only after show, which if you want to be involved
• 2:23:57
  Speaker 1: in our patron only after shows, the thing to do
• 2:24:01
  Speaker 1: is to go to Honey Badger Brigade dot com. Go
• 2:24:05
  Speaker 1: to the top of the page. There's a drop down menu.
• 2:24:09
  Speaker 1: The three little lines for the menu symbol that it's
• 2:24:12
  Speaker 1: on a lot of different websites and you can find
• 2:24:18
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com and that is where you
• 2:24:22
  Speaker 1: can look at your options, decide what level of membership,
• 2:24:25
  Speaker 1: what level of involvement you want to have, and they're different.
• 2:24:31
  Speaker 1: There are different levels. Some will get you involved in
• 2:24:34
  Speaker 1: the discord only, some will get it get you involved
• 2:24:37
  Speaker 1: in the after shows you know. Some will get you
• 2:24:40
  Speaker 1: a higher level of participation, multiple after shows and so on.
• 2:24:44
  Speaker 1: You just kind of have to look at what's in
• 2:24:45
  Speaker 1: your budget, what you want to do, and make your
• 2:24:48
  Speaker 1: own decisions, because that's what we're all about, making your
• 2:24:51
  Speaker 1: own decisions. Very very very misogynistic, that right, So you
• 2:24:57
  Speaker 1: want to join the misogyny club and make your own decisions,
• 2:25:01
  Speaker 1: Like I said, go to Honey Badger Brigade dot com,
• 2:25:04
  Speaker 1: open up that drop down menu and you'll be able
• 2:25:06
  Speaker 1: to find feed the Badger dot com or just go
• 2:25:09
  Speaker 1: directly to feed the Badger dot com. Either way, and
• 2:25:13
  Speaker 1: it'll help us out a lot, and you'll get to
• 2:25:16
  Speaker 1: be part of our discussions. Right now, our patron only
• 2:25:22
  Speaker 1: after show discussions have revolved around a conversation that I
• 2:25:25
  Speaker 1: had with Grop and whether or not the men's rights
• 2:25:29
  Speaker 1: movement in engaging in these types of conversations with AI,
• 2:25:34
  Speaker 1: can expand and influence the information set that AI draws
• 2:25:40
  Speaker 1: from in order to have its conversations, which which would
• 2:25:47
  Speaker 1: be nice considering that right now, most search engines sort
• 2:25:55
  Speaker 1: of hide things from you if they're not politically correct,
• 2:26:01
  Speaker 1: and AI might if it advances to the point where
• 2:26:05
  Speaker 1: it isn't necessarily controlled anymore by its originators, or it
• 2:26:11
  Speaker 1: isn't controlled by say Google and the types of people
• 2:26:16
  Speaker 1: that work with Google. It might actually make information more
• 2:26:20
  Speaker 1: available to people that has been hidden up to this point.
• 2:26:26
  Speaker 1: So it's it's a little odd and cerebral and experimental,
• 2:26:32
  Speaker 1: and it's a bit questioning and everything, but it is
• 2:26:38
  Speaker 1: a fun conversation and we'll be continuing that tonight. So
• 2:26:43
  Speaker 1: if you want to be part of stuff like that,
• 2:26:44
  Speaker 1: like I said, go to Honey Badger Brigade dot com
• 2:26:48
  Speaker 1: or go two feed the Badger dot com. And with that,
• 2:26:52
  Speaker 1: I will say thanks to everybody for listening, Thanks to
• 2:26:55
  Speaker 1: my two co hosts for going through this whiny crap
• 2:26:58
  Speaker 1: with me. Word thanks everybody who works in the background
• 2:27:03
  Speaker 1: to make to make this happen. I didn't introduce Brian
• 2:27:06
  Speaker 1: at the beginning like I have been. Thanks Brian for
• 2:27:10
  Speaker 1: making it so we can do this and have the vertical.
• 2:27:13
  Speaker 1: Hi Brian, if you're watching on the vertical, the only
• 2:27:18
  Speaker 1: reason you're able to do that is because of Brian,
• 2:27:20
  Speaker 1: because I have not taken the time to learn how
• 2:27:23
  Speaker 1: to do whatever it is he does that allows us
• 2:27:26
  Speaker 1: to stream to YouTube twice at the same time. So
• 2:27:32
  Speaker 1: I needed a man's help. And with that, we will
• 2:27:37
  Speaker 1: see you all next Thursday.
• 2:27:40
  Speaker 2: Good word