Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Pierre Poilievre Vs Woke Reporter On Women's Spaces

Transcript

Pierre Poilievre Vs Woke Reporter On Women's Spaces · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Pierre Paul have destroyed a CTV news reporter when she
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: asked if men should be allowed in women's washrooms or
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: to compete in women's sports. Listen closely to his answer.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: Does it make sense? I spoiler alert, I think it does.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: What's your response to trans women's fears that they'll be
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: harmed if they're not allowed to use bathrooms appropriate for
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: their gendle.
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: My common sense view is that we women's spaces should
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: be preserved for women.
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: You refer to biological men. Do you believe that trans
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: women are women?
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: I believe that women's spaces should beew reserved for women,
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: and that's a common sense approach. For example, we need
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: to have women's sports that are reserved for women because
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: of the biological differences that men and women have. If
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: we didn't have those biological difference, well we wouldn't have
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: separate sporting competitions. We've just put everyone together other but
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: because they're men have certain physical advantages, we have separate leagues.
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: And therefore it's common sense, of course that you would
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: have women's sports reserve exclusively for women. And that's the
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: approach that I take, and I think it's common sense.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: I'm glad to see that he has brought in this
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: these two words common sense, and he uses them a lot,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: and it's a big part of his whole his old campaign,
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: his whole persona political persona common sense right, because really,
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: at the end of the day, a lot of what
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: we see, a lot of the conflict that we can
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: see it is just simply a matter of crazy versus
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: saying right, crazy, utopian lunacy versus common sense, crazy idealism
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: versus reality versus common sense. What we see is woke
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: lunacy being confronted by reality. Reality is always going to have,
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: at the end of the day, a better argument than
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: woke lunacy or crazy idealism, far leftist idealism. It's always
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: going to have a better argument because it's real, because
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: it's dealing with reality. But you have to just say
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: it plainly, like you can't be embarrassed of being for reality.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: You have to be quite proud. You have to say
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: this is just common sense after all. Now we could
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: have been a little bit more like, let's go back,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: where was it here, Jess, do you believe that trans
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: women are women? Now there's an answer to this, there's
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: a definite answer to this backed up by biology and everything.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: What is I think he missed an opportunity here to
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: just be more even more forthright, even though everything he's
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: it's implicit and everything he's saying afterwards. But I would
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: like to hear him just say no. But he says this, My.
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: Common sense view is that we women's spaces should be
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: preserved for women.
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: I would have preferred for him to have first just
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: said no and then said that. I mean, it's simplicit
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: in what he's saying, and it does make sense, and
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: we need more of this. This is what's been missing
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: from Canadian conservatism. Again, common sense and just not being
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: ashamed of common sense, being quite proud of common sense
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: because it's infectious. Right when you start describing the world
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: accurately for people, that's infectious. I think people go, oh, yeah,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: this thing that's obviously true is actually true. I'm glad
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: that he said that. I'm glad that he I'm glad
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: that he noticed that what's obviously true is true. I'm
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: glad that he remarked that what's obviously true is true
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: and what's obviously false is false. It's infectious. So this
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: is a collision between woke reporter and a politician, a
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: conservative politician who's not ashamed of being conservative. And I
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: guess maybe that's really the heart of it. It seems
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: like conservative politicians in Canada, because of Sigma through the media,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: have been ashamed of actually being conservative. And there's naturally
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: nothing really particularly conservative about what he just said. Even
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is this, this is just
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: a moderate is this would be considered just absolutely middle
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: of the road not that long ago. The vast majority
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: of liberal MPs would have given that same answer twenty
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: years ago. But this is what we needed. When when
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: woke lunacy is interrogated by reality, reality tends to win.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: It tends to be infectious. It tends to be infectious
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: when somebody just says, no, this thing that's obviously true
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: is true and anybody can see that anyway. That's all
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna say about that. Please like, share and subscribe.
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you for that.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: I will see you next time.