Latest / The Financial Exchange Show / Retail Sales Miss, Big Data Week Ahead, and What 15% “Growth” Really Means
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: The Financial Exchange is produced by Money Matters Radio and
- 0:03Speaker 1: is hosted by employees of the Armstrong Advisory Group, a
- 0:06Speaker 1: registered investment advisor. All opinions expressed are solely those of
- 0:09Speaker 1: the hosts. Do not reflect the opinions of Armstrong Advisory
- 0:11Speaker 1: or anyone else. Investments can lose money. This program does
- 0:14Speaker 1: not offer any specific financial or investment advice. Please consult
- 0:18Speaker 1: your own financial, tax, and estate planning advisors before making
- 0:20Speaker 1: any investment decisions. Armstrong Advisory and the advertisers heard on
- 0:24Speaker 1: this program do not endorse each other or their services.
- 0:26Speaker 1: Armstrong and Money Matters Radio do not compensate each other
- 0:29Speaker 1: for referrals and are not affiliated. This is the Financial
- 0:35Speaker 1: Exchange with Paul Lane and Mark Fandetti, Your exclusive look
- 0:39Speaker 1: at business and financial news affecting your day, your city,
- 0:43Speaker 1: your world. Stay informed and up to date about economic
- 0:47Speaker 1: and market trends plus breaking business news every day. The
- 0:51Speaker 1: Financial Exchange is a proud partner of the Disabled American
- 0:54Speaker 1: Veterans Department of Massachusetts. Help us support our great American
- 0:58Speaker 1: heroes by visiting das V five K dot Boston and
- 1:02Speaker 1: making a donation today. Face is the Financial Exchange with
- 1:06Speaker 1: Paul Lane, and Mark Vandetti.
- 1:11Speaker 2: Welcome, welcome, welcome to this Tuesday edition of the Financial
- 1:15Speaker 2: Exchange as we shake off some of the Super Bowl
- 1:18Speaker 2: hangover that didn't really go our way in the New
- 1:21Speaker 2: England area. But this week for US and the Financial
- 1:24Speaker 2: Exchange is sort of like our super Bowl week in
- 1:27Speaker 2: terms of the amount of economic data that is coming
- 1:29Speaker 2: out this week. It is truly a very busy week
- 1:33Speaker 2: in terms of what we'll see. We have a retail
- 1:35Speaker 2: sales report that we're going to get into and just
- 1:37Speaker 2: a moment that was released at eight thirty this morning.
- 1:40Speaker 2: We're gonna get a jobs report tomorrow, and then we
- 1:44Speaker 2: are also going to get a CPI inflation report on Friday.
- 1:48Speaker 3: Is very rare that you have all those reports within
- 1:51Speaker 3: the span of one week.
- 1:52Speaker 2: Typically they are broken out into the one a week
- 1:57Speaker 2: cadence by the way the scheduling is released. But our
- 2:00Speaker 2: super Bowl mark, we got it all this week. We
- 2:02Speaker 2: got a little bit of labor, a little bit of inflation,
- 2:05Speaker 2: and then a little bit of the consumer pulse with
- 2:08Speaker 2: retail sales, and we'll start with that this morning. A
- 2:11Speaker 2: very weak retail sales report that came out for the
- 2:15Speaker 2: month of December, and US, we're expecting for spending to
- 2:18Speaker 2: grow zero point four percent month over month in the
- 2:21Speaker 2: month of December. We saw that the spending for the
- 2:24Speaker 2: holiday season in the month of December was flat, and
- 2:27Speaker 2: if you look back year over year on the spending trend,
- 2:31Speaker 2: it basically was down in effect, where you had retail
- 2:34Speaker 2: sales from last year in December of twenty twenty four
- 2:37Speaker 2: to December of twenty twenty five growing two point four percent.
- 2:40Speaker 2: But that's against the backdrop of inflation that was running
- 2:43Speaker 2: about two point seven percent over the same span of time.
- 2:46Speaker 2: So really a not a very strong report here at all.
- 2:51Speaker 2: There were sever areas that were quite weak. Some of
- 2:54Speaker 2: this was a little bit anticipated. We did see some
- 2:56Speaker 2: soft spending on autos and home furnishing and appliances, and
- 3:00Speaker 2: that was sort of perhaps baked in, but but worse
- 3:03Speaker 2: than anticipated here. And as a result of that, you've
- 3:06Speaker 2: got markets that are in relatively mixed territory, slightly positive.
- 3:10Speaker 2: On the equity side of things, I don't think they're
- 3:12Speaker 2: as concerned. We do see that the bond markets are
- 3:15Speaker 2: having a pretty sharp reaction here, where we've got the
- 3:18Speaker 2: US ten year treasury off about five bass points down
- 3:21Speaker 2: from four point two percent to four point one five percent,
- 3:25Speaker 2: and so Mark, I'll throw it right to you. Just
- 3:26Speaker 2: initial reactions from this release this morning on the retail
- 3:30Speaker 2: sales side.
- 3:30Speaker 3: Of things, I have no reaction.
- 3:32Speaker 4: You really shouldn't.
- 3:33Speaker 3: It's like, oh God, we're up to a rough start.
- 3:36Speaker 3: Have to I'm going to throw them out the window.
- 3:38Speaker 4: Do I have to do it yet? Said kidding, I
- 3:41Speaker 4: really don't. Though you made a good you made a
- 3:43Speaker 4: good analogy, because it's it's not the right way to
- 3:46Speaker 4: think about markets to the super Bowl, and in a
- 3:48Speaker 4: game any sport, every play matters, you could always look
- 3:52Speaker 4: off you hadn't missed that free throw or whatever, the
- 3:55Speaker 4: game's outcome would have been different. That is not true
- 3:58Speaker 4: of day to day movements in market, nor is it
- 4:01Speaker 4: especially not true, nor is it true with respect to
- 4:04Speaker 4: day to day movements and statistics in economic statistics. Nobody
- 4:08Speaker 4: looks back in the fourth quarter of two thousand and
- 4:10Speaker 4: eight and says I, had retail sales just gone the
- 4:13Speaker 4: other way, we would And I'm using an extreme example there,
- 4:16Speaker 4: because that the the individual observations, the data we get
- 4:20Speaker 4: from month to month, they're not it's gonna send it's
- 4:23Speaker 4: gonna sound a little silly, but they're not like individually,
- 4:27Speaker 4: They're not as important individually as is the trend that.
- 4:30Speaker 3: They point to.
- 4:31Speaker 4: So and you could say, well, each one is the
- 4:33Speaker 4: sequence is an important part of the trend. So you
- 4:37Speaker 4: can't while you can't dismiss any one data point, nor
- 4:40Speaker 4: can you read much into it. Now, you guys do
- 4:43Speaker 4: a daily show here, so you have to come on
- 4:45Speaker 4: the air and talk about whatever the news is and
- 4:48Speaker 4: try to make some inference from it. But that's not
- 4:50Speaker 4: the way a researcher would would look at it. So
- 4:52Speaker 4: I always kind of I struggle with how to how
- 4:56Speaker 4: to make these minute to minute releases kind of relate
- 5:00Speaker 4: and relevant. If something falls through the floor and it's
- 5:04Speaker 4: confirming what other data is saying, that might be interesting.
- 5:07Speaker 4: But this is kind of an anomally, Paul, because all
- 5:10Speaker 4: other indicators, with the exception of some softness in the
- 5:13Speaker 4: labor market, which we'll get to YEP, are pointing toward
- 5:16Speaker 4: reasonably strong economic growth, which we measure using GDP. Another
- 5:20Speaker 4: topic we're going to get to, A big component of
- 5:23Speaker 4: which just in an accounting sense, is spending.
- 5:26Speaker 2: Is consumption, and the month of November's numbers were quite
- 5:29Speaker 2: strong so that is the backdrop heading into this month
- 5:32Speaker 2: that we did see in November a over half percent
- 5:35Speaker 2: increase month of a month on retail sales. You know
- 5:38Speaker 2: some mentioning today that perhaps what we saw in December
- 5:43Speaker 2: was some of the effects from some of the tariffs,
- 5:46Speaker 2: just because of some of the areas. But like you said,
- 5:48Speaker 2: it has to be a larger trend before you're willing
- 5:50Speaker 2: to go and point in that direction. Like like you said,
- 5:54Speaker 2: you're trying to analyze these on the fly and do
- 5:56Speaker 2: the best that you can to pick out where the
- 5:58Speaker 2: trends could really be good analogy.
- 6:00Speaker 4: Maybe you know the people who say global warming it's
- 6:03Speaker 4: called out today. Well, first of all, it's called global
- 6:05Speaker 4: warming because it's not just how you feel when you
- 6:07Speaker 4: walk outside your house. But secondly, you get to look
- 6:09Speaker 4: at average temperatures and there is something funky going on.
- 6:13Speaker 4: I'm not saying what its cause is, I'm not qualified to,
- 6:16Speaker 4: but that's an example of focusing on one like data
- 6:19Speaker 4: point and not thinking about larger trends over not just
- 6:23Speaker 4: weeks and months, but really years.
- 6:26Speaker 2: Right and on the spending front, if you look back
- 6:30Speaker 2: at some of the larger trends, like you were mentioning
- 6:33Speaker 2: we have had really strong economic growth. It is important
- 6:35Speaker 2: to point that out. Q three GDP was at four
- 6:38Speaker 2: point four percent as of its most recent revision. We're
- 6:42Speaker 2: looking at for Q four of GDP about four point
- 6:46Speaker 2: two percent at the moment, though that's.
- 6:47Speaker 3: Supposed to be revised a little bit here today.
- 6:50Speaker 2: Of that growth that we've seen in the economy, there
- 6:53Speaker 2: has been a three and a half percent growth in
- 6:56Speaker 2: consumer spending. That does make up a bulk of some
- 6:59Speaker 2: of the GDP growth that we've seen.
- 7:01Speaker 3: It's about two thirds.
- 7:03Speaker 2: When you're looking at economic growth is tied to what
- 7:05Speaker 2: is the consumer getting out there and spending. So it
- 7:08Speaker 2: is worth noting that, hey, December did come in weaker
- 7:11Speaker 2: than anticipated from a spending perspective, but like Mark has mentioned,
- 7:16Speaker 2: you got to string together a couple months of that
- 7:18Speaker 2: data to really point to it being significant. Because we
- 7:22Speaker 2: did have that November number was quite strong.
- 7:25Speaker 4: And it's not a natural way to react because somebody
- 7:28Speaker 4: presents you with a number, it's either big bigger than expected.
- 7:32Speaker 4: It's always relative expectations that matters, I guess, because markets
- 7:34Speaker 4: are pricing in in theory what's expected. It's natural to think, well,
- 7:40Speaker 4: I'm supposed to react to this. The media is talking
- 7:42Speaker 4: about it. These guys on the radio were talking about it.
- 7:45Speaker 4: It must mean something, and not necessarily.
- 7:49Speaker 2: On the other front, retail sales just anything else. I
- 7:53Speaker 2: think that it is worth pointing out here I mentioned
- 7:55Speaker 2: the weakness on autos and home furnishings and appliance. We
- 7:57Speaker 2: did see some other areas that saw a little bit
- 8:01Speaker 2: in the way of gains. We saw building materials for
- 8:05Speaker 2: garden equipments accrease one point two percent. We saw gains
- 8:10Speaker 2: at sporting goods stores almost up a half percent there,
- 8:14Speaker 2: But it was those furniture stores and clothing retailers that
- 8:17Speaker 2: saw a bit of a decline. As I mentioned to
- 8:20Speaker 2: kick off the show, really big week in terms of
- 8:22Speaker 2: economic reports being released. The retail sales one was one
- 8:25Speaker 2: that came out this morning, but tomorrow we'll get the
- 8:29Speaker 2: jobs report, which I would argue is probably the most
- 8:31Speaker 2: significant of the week, just given the amount of scrutiny
- 8:35Speaker 2: and focus on the labor market, and in particular, not
- 8:38Speaker 2: only will we get what we anticipate for January's gains
- 8:42Speaker 2: in the labor market, which is estimated to be around
- 8:45Speaker 2: seventy thousand jobs that were added for the month of January.
- 8:49Speaker 2: We had fifty thousand that were added in the month
- 8:52Speaker 2: of December. The unemployment rate it sits at four point
- 8:55Speaker 2: four percent. But not only are we going to get
- 8:57Speaker 2: updates on those figures, we will also get a backward
- 9:01Speaker 2: looking revision as to how many jobs were added from
- 9:04Speaker 2: March of twenty four through March of twenty five. So
- 9:07Speaker 2: certainly that is going to be of a lot of
- 9:10Speaker 2: focus for what the Federal Reserve does from an interest
- 9:14Speaker 2: rate policy perspective, and what markets will be looking at
- 9:16Speaker 2: tomorrow morning when that comes out.
- 9:18Speaker 4: Mark yeah for perspective. In twenty twenty two, coming out
- 9:22Speaker 4: of what twenty twenty one, coming out of COVID, four
- 9:24Speaker 4: million new jobs were added according to the so called
- 9:28Speaker 4: Establishment Survey of Payrolls. That number jumped in twenty twenty
- 9:33Speaker 4: two to six point two million, just staggering. So the
- 9:35Speaker 4: economy was growing fast, too fast. That's why we had inflation.
- 9:38Speaker 4: The economy was exceeding it's it's speed limit, it's productive capacity,
- 9:42Speaker 4: if you'll like, and then things started to cool off.
- 9:44Speaker 4: Three point three million jobs in twenty twenty two, two
- 9:46Speaker 4: point one million jobs in twenty twenty three. Excuse me,
- 9:49Speaker 4: three point three million, two point one million in twenty
- 9:52Speaker 4: twenty four, and we twenty twenty five through we had
- 9:59Speaker 4: we got December, right, this is we're gonna get January.
- 10:01Speaker 4: So we got yeah, this is for the full year
- 10:02Speaker 4: one point four a million, but subject to revision, right right,
- 10:06Speaker 4: So clear downward trend, but off a feverish, unnaturally hot pace.
- 10:12Speaker 4: So the question I struggle with is not that you asked,
- 10:15Speaker 4: but uh, is this just a normalization? I mean, unemployment
- 10:18Speaker 4: it's at four point four percent. If you put that
- 10:21Speaker 4: in a hat, that rate, and you pulled that out
- 10:22Speaker 4: of the hat, and whatever you pulled out of hat
- 10:24Speaker 4: was going to be the unemployment rate, you'd be really
- 10:26Speaker 4: proud of yourself. That's extraordinarily low in historical terms. But
- 10:30Speaker 4: there are some people who think what it should be
- 10:32Speaker 4: three I guess or I don't know.
- 10:35Speaker 2: Well, it's it's something that just looking forward, that is
- 10:39Speaker 2: worth scrutinizing, because if you do see a significant uptick
- 10:42Speaker 2: on the unemployment rate, you would imagine that you'd see
- 10:45Speaker 2: weakening consumer spending and there would be.
- 10:49Speaker 3: From it.
- 10:49Speaker 4: But maybe that's just the norm. I don't know, is
- 10:51Speaker 4: that just the normalism? And I'm throwing a lot, a
- 10:52Speaker 4: lot of thrown out, a lot of rhetorical stuff here
- 10:54Speaker 4: that's not very helpful. But my point is as a researcher,
- 10:57Speaker 4: you never really know what if the economy is so
- 10:59Speaker 4: called natural rate, it's non inflationary rate has jumped to
- 11:01Speaker 4: five and a half. I don't think so, but historically
- 11:05Speaker 4: it was between five and six. It got below five
- 11:09Speaker 4: in the late nineteen nineties in the productivity miracle that
- 11:14Speaker 4: was brought about by it allowed unemployment to be very
- 11:21Speaker 4: low without inflation. Taking up question is where are we now?
- 11:25Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break here on the
- 11:27Speaker 2: Financial Exchange. When we come back, a lot more to
- 11:29Speaker 2: talk about in what is a very busy week, previewing
- 11:33Speaker 2: inflation as well as some other economic reports that are
- 11:35Speaker 2: due out in this busy week.
- 11:36Speaker 3: Right after this break.
- 11:38Speaker 1: Face is your home for the most comprehensive coverage of
- 11:41Speaker 1: the economy and the trends on Wall Street is the
- 11:44Speaker 1: Financial Exchange Radio Network. The Financial Exchange streams live on YouTube.
- 11:51Speaker 1: Subscribe to our page and stay up to date on
- 11:53Speaker 1: breaking business news all morning long. Face is the Financial
- 11:57Speaker 1: Exchange Radio Network.
- 12:02Speaker 5: Remember you can watch the show live every day on
- 12:04Speaker 5: our YouTube page. While breaking business news, and all of
- 12:07Speaker 5: our content is also archive, so if you want to
- 12:10Speaker 5: go back and see an interview or a discussion about
- 12:13Speaker 5: a specific topic, it's all there with the click of
- 12:16Speaker 5: a button. Just search the Financial Exchange Show on YouTube
- 12:20Speaker 5: and hit that subscribe button.
- 12:23Speaker 2: As I was mentioning in the earlier segment, really big
- 12:26Speaker 2: week this week in terms of economic reports. We'll get
- 12:29Speaker 2: the jobs report tomorrow, and then on Friday we will
- 12:32Speaker 2: get the CPI inflation report for the month of January.
- 12:35Speaker 2: So we're gonna spend a couple minutes here just talking
- 12:37Speaker 2: about that report that is due out on Friday. Inflation
- 12:41Speaker 2: has run at two point seven percent year over year
- 12:45Speaker 2: in terms of what we're anticipating for Friday's release we're
- 12:49Speaker 2: looking at I believe it was two point four percent
- 12:52Speaker 2: in terms of what they're anticipating for the inflation on
- 12:56Speaker 2: the consensus for Friday's numbers. But something that is in
- 13:01Speaker 2: big focus as you head into to twenty twenty six.
- 13:05Speaker 2: There has been perhaps some arguments mentioned out there that
- 13:08Speaker 2: I don't put a lot of weight in that there
- 13:09Speaker 2: will be post holiday adjustments by retailers that will be
- 13:14Speaker 2: reflected in this January report. These price adjustments will will
- 13:17Speaker 2: tick up. A lot of that is seasonally adjusted, when
- 13:20Speaker 2: you know typically retailers will go in in January and
- 13:23Speaker 2: adjust prices, so a lot of these reports adjust for
- 13:26Speaker 2: that fact of seasonality. So I don't know if necessarily
- 13:30Speaker 2: that will be a huge piece of it, but certainly
- 13:34Speaker 2: that is a big focus part of the dual mandate
- 13:36Speaker 2: for the Federal Reserve, and dovetails into the next item
- 13:40Speaker 2: here to address is not only are we going to
- 13:42Speaker 2: get the inflation report on Friday, but also it is
- 13:46Speaker 2: going to be another indicator for the Federal Reserve to
- 13:50Speaker 2: sort of assess in terms of what they're going to
- 13:51Speaker 2: do from an interest rate perspective. If we take a
- 13:54Speaker 2: look right now at the CME futures market, about a
- 13:58Speaker 2: week ago, you had, in terms of the probabilities of
- 14:01Speaker 2: where interest rates were going to go from the Federal
- 14:03Speaker 2: Reserve a ninety percent probability that they were going to
- 14:07Speaker 2: continue to stay the course in the next upcoming meeting
- 14:10Speaker 2: on March eighteenth and keep interest rates at three and
- 14:13Speaker 2: a half to three point seventy five percent on that
- 14:15Speaker 2: Fed funds rate. With some of the retail sales reports
- 14:18Speaker 2: numbers that we got this morning, and just some of
- 14:21Speaker 2: the trends over the course of the last few days
- 14:23Speaker 2: or so. It is now at about close to an
- 14:25Speaker 2: eighty ten split of holding rate static versus potentially pricing
- 14:29Speaker 2: in a little bit more of a likelihood of a
- 14:32Speaker 2: cut here heading into this next meeting.
- 14:34Speaker 4: Yeah, this relate the fed's UH dilemma, and it's always
- 14:37Speaker 4: in a bit of a pickle because unemployment and inflation,
- 14:40Speaker 4: and you could substitute for unemployment vacancies GDP relative to potential.
- 14:46Speaker 4: There are a lot of ways to measure slack in
- 14:47Speaker 4: the economy, and the best way changes over time. That's
- 14:50Speaker 4: a challenge in and of itself. The FED is always
- 14:53Speaker 4: trying to determine is the economy running too hot, too cold,
- 14:57Speaker 4: or just right? Just right means demand is grow swing
- 15:00Speaker 4: no faster than supply. The FED you can think of
- 15:04Speaker 4: as controlling demand. They print money, lower interest rates, or
- 15:08Speaker 4: take money out of the economy. It's a little more
- 15:11Speaker 4: complicated than I'm obviously portraying it, but this gives you
- 15:14Speaker 4: the gist of it. Take money out of the economy,
- 15:16Speaker 4: they slow demand and thus slow inflation. Fed's always asking
- 15:21Speaker 4: is the economy again growing too fast relative to its
- 15:23Speaker 4: productive capacity. Is demand outpacing supply. Demand really outpaid supply.
- 15:27Speaker 4: In twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three, we saw
- 15:30Speaker 4: the result inflation was that all the Fed's fault. No, Now,
- 15:34Speaker 4: the FED can control inflation in the very long run,
- 15:37Speaker 4: money supply lines up, money supply growth lines up well
- 15:40Speaker 4: with inflation in the long run, doesn't line up well
- 15:42Speaker 4: with it in the short run. There too many other
- 15:43Speaker 4: factors buffeting the economy globally that impact inflation. So the
- 15:50Speaker 4: Fed's job, needless to say, is hard. But ultimately responsibility
- 15:55Speaker 4: for stable, low, long term inflation lies with the Fed
- 15:59Speaker 4: because that's driven by the supply of money, which they control.
- 16:03Speaker 2: Sure, what we're looking at is also a focus is
- 16:07Speaker 2: the neutral rate, which is basically this idea of hey,
- 16:10Speaker 2: where where should interest rate policy be? That neither, like
- 16:14Speaker 2: you were just kind of alluding to as some of
- 16:15Speaker 2: the responsibility stimulates or constraints growth. That is sort of
- 16:18Speaker 2: what the FED is always trying to feel around and find.
- 16:21Speaker 2: But it's something that is abstract. You're never going to
- 16:23Speaker 2: know exactly where it is. It's more of a feeling
- 16:27Speaker 2: out process, and some of these reports help to give
- 16:29Speaker 2: a little bit of guidance, but as you mentioned, it's
- 16:32Speaker 2: really hard to balance. The two focuses are that inflation
- 16:35Speaker 2: and job grop of the feder Reserve. And on the
- 16:39Speaker 2: inflationary front, it is about two and a half percent
- 16:41Speaker 2: that we're anticipating on the year over year over year
- 16:45Speaker 2: number from an increase on the inflationary front. But right
- 16:50Speaker 2: now investors are pricing in that there would be two
- 16:52Speaker 2: rate cuts this year. You've got the FED on their
- 16:56Speaker 2: most recent projections projecting in one of course, will have
- 17:00Speaker 2: Kevin Warsh succeeding Jerome pal in May of this year,
- 17:04Speaker 2: so that is going to be a focus. On the
- 17:07Speaker 2: last Federal Reserve meeting vote, you had ten people who
- 17:10Speaker 2: had voted to keep rates where they were at about
- 17:13Speaker 2: three and a half to three point seventy five percent,
- 17:15Speaker 2: and two dissenting.
- 17:16Speaker 3: So that is all on the table.
- 17:19Speaker 2: Over the course of the next couple of days, we'll
- 17:22Speaker 2: get more economic data points there and then that meeting
- 17:24Speaker 2: though is not going to be to the middle of March.
- 17:27Speaker 4: If you want a little framework for thinking about the FED,
- 17:29Speaker 4: the Thermostat analogy is Okay, I use it a lot,
- 17:31Speaker 4: you love it, but it's flawed. Yeah, as much as
- 17:34Speaker 4: I can love anything. I guess ah, but that's it.
- 17:37Speaker 4: Dose My emotional issues are not what we're talking about here.
- 17:39Speaker 4: The idea with the thermostat analogy is, well, the fed's
- 17:43Speaker 4: job is to heat the economy up when it's running
- 17:45Speaker 4: too cold, and vice versa. The problem with that analogy
- 17:48Speaker 4: is that the FED doesn't know what the actual temperature
- 17:51Speaker 4: is right now, so it's got to guess at that.
- 17:53Speaker 4: The FED doesn't know when the furnace is going to
- 17:55Speaker 4: come on or the HVAC system is going to come on.
- 17:57Speaker 4: You bump it up a couple of degrees because somebody
- 17:59Speaker 4: in the house can lanes. It might not come on
- 18:01Speaker 4: for six months if you're the FED. This is that
- 18:03Speaker 4: that's another problem with my little thermistat analogy. Another problem
- 18:06Speaker 4: is that you don't know what the temperature is going
- 18:07Speaker 4: to be outside by the time the freainging hvac does
- 18:10Speaker 4: come on.
- 18:11Speaker 3: Yeah, in my house, different rooms kind of heat up
- 18:13Speaker 3: in different ways just to do the piping there too,
- 18:16Speaker 3: so that that probably plays in.
- 18:17Speaker 4: These are the problems you have when you live in
- 18:19Speaker 4: a seventy five hundred square.
- 18:20Speaker 3: Foot yeah right home.
- 18:22Speaker 4: Most of us never we'll just never know those struggles no,
- 18:25Speaker 4: but the thermostat analogy is okay. But it's actually if you
- 18:27Speaker 4: think about why it's a bad analogy, it helps you
- 18:30Speaker 4: understand the challenges the FED faces. Imagine if when you
- 18:33Speaker 4: went to change your thermostat, you didn't know exactly what
- 18:35Speaker 4: it was outside, and you didn't know exactly when the
- 18:38Speaker 4: HVAC was going to come on, and you don't really
- 18:40Speaker 4: know exactly how the temperature in one room relates to
- 18:43Speaker 4: the room in another, so you can sort of adjust
- 18:46Speaker 4: the temperature in your house, but good luck. That's the
- 18:48Speaker 4: challenge the FED faces. And that's why the thermostat analogy,
- 18:52Speaker 4: although it's the best I can come up with to date,
- 18:54Speaker 4: why it kind of fails.
- 18:56Speaker 2: It's it's hard and you only they only have so
- 18:58Speaker 2: many tools to fix it, and one of the ones
- 19:00Speaker 2: that we talk about most frequently is the interest rate one.
- 19:03Speaker 2: They can also control the monetary supply.
- 19:05Speaker 3: Those are really the.
- 19:06Speaker 4: Well those are by controlling the supply of money, you
- 19:08Speaker 4: control I mean, ultimately they print money.
- 19:10Speaker 2: Right taking a look at markets here, we've got the
- 19:13Speaker 2: Dow Jones up about two hundred and fifty plus points.
- 19:16Speaker 2: They're rallying about a half percent plus. We've got the
- 19:19Speaker 2: S and P five hundred up about sixteen points or so,
- 19:22Speaker 2: or a quarter of our percent. We're gonna have much
- 19:24Speaker 2: more on the markets when we come back from this rate.
- 19:27Speaker 2: We've got Wall Street Watch and much more here on
- 19:29Speaker 2: the Financial Exchange.
- 19:30Speaker 3: Stick with us, Like.
- 19:40Speaker 1: Us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter at TFE show.
- 19:44Speaker 1: Breaking business news is always first right here on the
- 19:48Speaker 1: Financial Exchange Radio Network. Time now for Wall Street Watch.
- 19:54Speaker 1: A complete look at what's moving markets so far today
- 19:57Speaker 1: right here on the Financial Exchange Radio Network.
- 20:00Speaker 5: Well, markets aren't positive Territory modestly, as Walter reacts to
- 20:04Speaker 5: a somewhat underwhelming retail sales report from the month of
- 20:07Speaker 5: December to cap off the holiday season, where sales climb
- 20:11Speaker 5: zero point four percent, down from zero point six percent
- 20:14Speaker 5: in November. Traders are also sifting through more fourth quarter
- 20:18Speaker 5: earnings from the likes of Coca Cola, CBS Health, and Spotify.
- 20:23Speaker 5: Right now, the Dow is up over half a percent,
- 20:25Speaker 5: or two hundred and sixty two points higher, S and
- 20:28Speaker 5: P five hundred up about a quarter percent or seventeen
- 20:31Speaker 5: points higher. NASDAC also up about a quarter percent or
- 20:35Speaker 5: fifty points higher. RUSTED two thousand mostly flat, edging higher.
- 20:39Speaker 5: Tenure treasure reel down four basis points at four point
- 20:42Speaker 5: one four to nine percent, and crude oil up about
- 20:46Speaker 5: a third of a percent higher, trading at sixty four
- 20:48Speaker 5: dollars and fifty five cents a barrel. Beverage giant Coca
- 20:52Speaker 5: Cola reported earnings this morning that missed revenue expectations for
- 20:55Speaker 5: the fourth quarter, while it's adjusted earnings beat. The company
- 20:59Speaker 5: guided for twenty twenty six organic revenue growth of four
- 21:02Speaker 5: to five percent and comparable earnings growth of seven to
- 21:06Speaker 5: eight percent. Coke stock is down over one and a
- 21:09Speaker 5: half percent to this point. Meanwhile, audio streaming company Spotify
- 21:13Speaker 5: seeing its stock rally eighteen percent after the company saw
- 21:17Speaker 5: its monthly active users grow to seven hundred and fifty
- 21:20Speaker 5: one million, up eleven percent from the same period a
- 21:24Speaker 5: year ago and above street forecasts. Spot excuse me. Spotify's
- 21:29Speaker 5: premium subscribers also increased ten percent to two hundred and
- 21:34Speaker 5: ninety million. Elsewhere, Taiwan Semiconductor posted its higher highest monthly
- 21:39Speaker 5: revenue ever to four hundred and one point three billion
- 21:42Speaker 5: dollars in January, up thirty seven percent from a year ago.
- 21:46Speaker 5: Shares are up by one percent, sticking with the chip sector,
- 21:49Speaker 5: where On Semiconductor saw its sales decline and its two
- 21:53Speaker 5: biggest businesses and narrowly missed revenue expectations for the previous quarter.
- 21:58Speaker 5: That stock is up by about three percent. CBS Health
- 22:02Speaker 5: reported fourth quarter earnings and revenue that beat expectations with
- 22:05Speaker 5: a health insurer also held its twenty twenty six profit guidance. However,
- 22:10Speaker 5: the stock is up by two percent, and after today's close,
- 22:14Speaker 5: we'll see more earnings from the likes of Ford, Robinhood
- 22:18Speaker 5: and Gilead Sciences. I'm Tucker Silvan.
- 22:21Speaker 1: That is Wall Street watch.
- 22:23Speaker 2: President Trump stating that his federal pick for or his
- 22:27Speaker 2: pick for the Federal Reserve chair, Kevin Warsh, can get
- 22:29Speaker 2: the economy to hit fifteen percent growth. Unclear what statistic
- 22:34Speaker 2: he was trying to tie that to. Perhaps GDP growth,
- 22:38Speaker 2: that's what you'd think when you're economic growth, But that
- 22:40Speaker 2: fifteen percent is an absolutely staggering number. Over the course
- 22:43Speaker 2: of the last five decades, GDP growth in America has
- 22:47Speaker 2: averaged two point eight percent, So the idea that it's
- 22:50Speaker 2: going to do five times that is particularly as developed
- 22:53Speaker 2: as the economy that we are, is a little bit staggering.
- 22:57Speaker 4: Let's let's talk about that. Let's is that plausible? Is
- 23:00Speaker 4: that a plausible statement? Can the Fed get the economy
- 23:02Speaker 4: to grow fifteen percent just a year over year? The
- 23:05Speaker 4: answer is, what do you think it is? No, yes, absolutely,
- 23:07Speaker 4: if they can do that, actually it would all be
- 23:10Speaker 4: it would all be inflation. I assume, Yeah, it's obvious.
- 23:14Speaker 4: It's almost a trick question. Yes, say come on, are
- 23:16Speaker 4: you kidding me? But and I don't think this is
- 23:18Speaker 4: what the.
- 23:18Speaker 2: We're gonna have to hide her into the desk if
- 23:19Speaker 2: we run at fifteen percent inflation.
- 23:22Speaker 4: It's useful to keep this in mind. You can measure
- 23:23Speaker 4: what's GDP gross domestic product. It's just an accounting construct.
- 23:27Speaker 4: It's what we spend, what the government spends, what businesses spend,
- 23:30Speaker 4: and then a little adjustment for so called net exports.
- 23:33Speaker 4: But just think of it as the sum total of
- 23:35Speaker 4: all the spending in the economy. There are other ways
- 23:37Speaker 4: to look at economic output. You can look at the
- 23:39Speaker 4: income side of the equation. For example, they should give
- 23:42Speaker 4: you roughly the same answer. So GDP is for better
- 23:45Speaker 4: for worse. How we measure how we're doing, how the
- 23:49Speaker 4: economy is doing? So could the FED get the economy
- 23:53Speaker 4: to grow at fifteen percent. Yeah, I can get the
- 23:55Speaker 4: economy to grow at one hundred percent. The problem is
- 23:57Speaker 4: that you're not adjusting for inflation. In the nineth teen seventies,
- 24:00Speaker 4: for example, the mid nineteen seventies. In seventy three, GDP
- 24:04Speaker 4: grew was quite an inflation every year. The CPI year
- 24:08Speaker 4: over year was about six percent, but GDP growth even
- 24:12Speaker 4: nete of that was high, but total they growed eleven
- 24:14Speaker 4: and a half percent. The highest GDP again nominal, which
- 24:19Speaker 4: is a fancy way of saying without the not adjusting
- 24:22Speaker 4: for exactly Yeah, GDP growth in nineteen seventy eight was
- 24:25Speaker 4: thirteen percent. Seven percent of that was inflation. Right now,
- 24:29Speaker 4: I'm this is a little bit sloppy the way I'm
- 24:32Speaker 4: doing it, But the point is the fedkin engineer any
- 24:35Speaker 4: growth rate, but it's not leading to higher living standards.
- 24:40Speaker 4: If most of that growth or half of it, and
- 24:43Speaker 4: some of the examples I gave is coming from increases
- 24:46Speaker 4: in the price level, nobody's any better off. Now. I
- 24:49Speaker 4: don't think that level of subtlety was happening in the
- 24:52Speaker 4: analysis that lie behind whatever it is you're reading there.
- 24:57Speaker 4: But I will tell you just in the interest of
- 24:59Speaker 4: not just saying, well, what a stupid statement. Who would
- 25:01Speaker 4: say something like that? A more interesting question maybe because
- 25:03Speaker 4: we try to learn together on this show and maybe
- 25:06Speaker 4: impart something to the audiences. Could that happen? Yeah, fed
- 25:09Speaker 4: can do that. You wouldn't probably wouldn't like that, but yeah,
- 25:12Speaker 4: the Fedkin engineer really any growth rate?
- 25:15Speaker 3: No, I don't think it's very interesting, dude, It is
- 25:17Speaker 3: very interesting.
- 25:17Speaker 2: That is interesting because no one would speak glowingly about
- 25:21Speaker 2: the nineteen seventies for those levels of economic growth. No
- 25:25Speaker 2: one would reminisce back is how great things where. It's
- 25:27Speaker 2: quite the contrary.
- 25:28Speaker 4: This is why it's important to when someone's telling you something,
- 25:31Speaker 4: ask for perspective. You gave some good perspective. You pointed
- 25:33Speaker 4: out in the last fifty years, GDP growth has been
- 25:36Speaker 4: you said, you're talking about real GDP growth adjustment for
- 25:39Speaker 4: replace it has been nearly three percent. Three percent was
- 25:42Speaker 4: about the average of the second half of the twentieth century.
- 25:44Speaker 4: Since then, it's been about two percent. That that's a
- 25:47Speaker 4: big slowdown. It doesn't sound like a lot, but in
- 25:49Speaker 4: terms of standards of living, we'd be about forty percent
- 25:52Speaker 4: richer had GDP continued to grow at the rate of
- 25:55Speaker 4: the previous century. It's useful to have some of these,
- 25:59Speaker 4: some of these fact about the economy in your back
- 26:01Speaker 4: pocket if you're into this stuff, even if you're only
- 26:04Speaker 4: into it casually, so that you know how to call
- 26:08Speaker 4: BS on something that's obviously BS.
- 26:11Speaker 3: It's interesting the fifteen percent.
- 26:12Speaker 2: It's good you put in perspective that it is possible
- 26:15Speaker 2: because I wasn't thinking about the inflationary part.
- 26:18Speaker 3: Of it, that it could make it possible.
- 26:20Speaker 4: So, yeah, it's like I said, I can make everybody
- 26:23Speaker 4: a millionaire. Give me control of the money supply. I'll
- 26:25Speaker 4: make you all million billionaires, trillionaires, pick how many zeros
- 26:28Speaker 4: you want. You're not gonna be any better off than
- 26:30Speaker 4: you are today. It's just gonna have to tag a
- 26:33Speaker 4: bunch of zeros onto.
- 26:34Speaker 2: The prices of everything. Yeah, a little bit like that.
- 26:38Speaker 2: Kevin Warsh is set to be appointed in May of
- 26:41Speaker 2: this year, but also there is the current hearing going
- 26:45Speaker 2: on regarding the federal budget building renovation products, so perhaps
- 26:50Speaker 2: he gets delayed his appointment a little bit. But certainly
- 26:54Speaker 2: President Trump has some high expectations for him, so we'll
- 26:56Speaker 2: see how that all plays out.
- 27:00Speaker 4: But you understand in light of what we've been talking
- 27:01Speaker 4: about for the past forty five minutes. Now nearly you
- 27:04Speaker 4: can't come into that job with a preconception about interest
- 27:07Speaker 4: rates thinking they only need to come down, because, as
- 27:10Speaker 4: we've been discussing, it's about striking the right balance given
- 27:14Speaker 4: where unemployment or whatever your measure of slack is in
- 27:17Speaker 4: the economy, and where not only inflation is today, but
- 27:19Speaker 4: where you think it will be.
- 27:21Speaker 2: Exactly a great piece here today in the Wall Street Journal,
- 27:24Speaker 2: this is by Greg ibb. The big money in today's
- 27:28Speaker 2: economy is going to capital, not labor, and he did
- 27:31Speaker 2: a fantastic view sort of of where we've been. If
- 27:34Speaker 2: you look back in nineteen eighty, IBM was the bell
- 27:39Speaker 2: of the ball, the most valuable company in the United
- 27:41Speaker 2: States with over four hundred thousand employees and the largest
- 27:45Speaker 2: market cap at that point in time. Today, if you
- 27:48Speaker 2: look at the same sort of pinnacle position of the
- 27:51Speaker 2: most valuable company in the United States, Nvidia has that
- 27:54Speaker 2: slot where he makes the point that they are twenty
- 27:57Speaker 2: times more valuable and five times more and this is
- 28:00Speaker 2: adjusted for inflation compared to where IBM was back in
- 28:05Speaker 2: the nineteen eighties, though it only has one tenth of
- 28:09Speaker 2: the workforce, and Vida employs about forty thousand people compared
- 28:12Speaker 2: to the four hundred thousand that IBM employed. And specific
- 28:16Speaker 2: to this broader context of these two behemoth companies of
- 28:21Speaker 2: one of yesteryear, though still around today but not in
- 28:23Speaker 2: the same scope and scale, and the one today in
- 28:27Speaker 2: video that dominates the markets is in particular just a
- 28:31Speaker 2: analysis on where all that money, where are the profitability
- 28:35Speaker 2: is going And it breaks down first from a broader perspective,
- 28:38Speaker 2: and we just hit it on a little bit that
- 28:40Speaker 2: GDP is just trying to encompass economic growth, all the
- 28:44Speaker 2: value that's being added to the economy. And if you
- 28:47Speaker 2: look specifically at a manufacturing business what it produces in
- 28:52Speaker 2: terms of its goods, it has its sales and then
- 28:57Speaker 2: it has its input the costs that are associated that
- 28:59Speaker 2: go in to building out those goods.
- 29:01Speaker 3: The difference between the two the sales less the costs.
- 29:04Speaker 2: All that excess is usually distributed out through wages and
- 29:08Speaker 2: profits and interests. And what has changed so dramatically over
- 29:13Speaker 2: the last forty years, as Greg get pointed out in
- 29:15Speaker 2: this piece here, is that much more of that profitability
- 29:19Speaker 2: was going to the labor force back in nineteen eighty
- 29:22Speaker 2: and that percentages has dramatically decreased over the course of
- 29:26Speaker 2: the last forty years. That fifty eight percent of those
- 29:29Speaker 2: gains from what businesses we're selling were going to the
- 29:32Speaker 2: labor force. That number sits at about fifty one percent today.
- 29:36Speaker 2: And he does that by measuring out gross domestic income
- 29:40Speaker 2: just to sort of get a sense for what is
- 29:42Speaker 2: the labor force actually taking away from the profitability of
- 29:45Speaker 2: the firms. Rather a lot more of that money and
- 29:48Speaker 2: profitability rather than going to the actual workforce and form
- 29:52Speaker 2: of wages, is going to household wealth in terms of
- 29:55Speaker 2: people who have stock ownership. And I just thought it
- 29:58Speaker 2: was an interesting analysis that you the.
- 30:02Speaker 4: Right statistic, And I don't know why he didn't use it.
- 30:03Speaker 4: His share of labor compensation. It's actually this series is
- 30:06Speaker 4: reported by it's in various databases. You can actually get
- 30:10Speaker 4: it on FRED sometimes we talk about FRED. It's accessible
- 30:13Speaker 4: and it's easy to read. You can make your own
- 30:15Speaker 4: charts and all that crap. If you're into that SHAREFF
- 30:18Speaker 4: labor comp Yeah, is now And it's exactly the definition
- 30:21Speaker 4: is exactly what it sounds like. How much of the
- 30:24Speaker 4: economy's income goes to labor it's at zero point five
- 30:26Speaker 4: six eight today about fifty seven percent. In nineteen seventy
- 30:31Speaker 4: it was about sixty five percent. So that's the most
- 30:35Speaker 4: widely followed measure of how well how income's being abortioned.
- 30:42Speaker 4: And one way to think about this is that productivity
- 30:45Speaker 4: has been going up faster than wages. If you think
- 30:48Speaker 4: about a unit labor cost is compensation divided by what output?
- 30:56Speaker 4: Am I thinking about that?
- 30:57Speaker 1: Right?
- 30:57Speaker 2: Well? Basically, yes, this idea that then of Daniel actual
- 31:00Speaker 2: employees in this country relative to it, there were forty
- 31:03Speaker 2: years ago, far fewer people who work in manufacturing, but
- 31:05Speaker 2: more goods produced, right that general concept, Yeah.
- 31:08Speaker 4: And the composition of the labor force is a result
- 31:13Speaker 4: how much of it is unionized bargaining power. When comp
- 31:18Speaker 4: is not rising as fast as productivity, that so you're
- 31:24Speaker 4: not get you're not reaping the full benefits of your
- 31:26Speaker 4: increased productivity. When that happens, by necessity, the share of
- 31:34Speaker 4: income that goes to workers has to fall.
- 31:36Speaker 2: And that's what we've seen in since twenty nineteen. Profits
- 31:39Speaker 2: are up forty three percent from the S and P
- 31:42Speaker 2: five hundred companies, but average hourly wages are only up
- 31:45Speaker 2: three percent adjusted for inflation over that period of time.
- 31:49Speaker 2: And so there's a lot more meat on the bone
- 31:51Speaker 2: here that I want to get into because I think
- 31:54Speaker 2: it is a really interesting piece to sort of examine
- 31:56Speaker 2: and sort of furthers the concepts that we've talked about
- 31:59Speaker 2: regarding the K shape economy that we sort of sit
- 32:01Speaker 2: and today. So we're gonna take a quick break here
- 32:03Speaker 2: on the Financial Exchange. When we come back, we'll be
- 32:05Speaker 2: talking more about this piece as well as the S
- 32:08Speaker 2: and P S five hundred's next target of seven thousand
- 32:11Speaker 2: right after this break here on the Financial Exchange.
- 32:14Speaker 1: The Financial Exchange Show podcast drops every day on Apple, Spotify,
- 32:18Speaker 1: and iHeartRadio. Hit that subscribe button and leave us a
- 32:21Speaker 1: five star review. You're listening to the Financial Exchange Radio Network.
- 32:26Speaker 1: Find daily interviews and full shows of the Financial Exchange
- 32:29Speaker 1: on How Are YouTube page. Get cut up on anything
- 32:32Speaker 1: and everything you might have missed. This is the Financial
- 32:35Speaker 1: Exchange Radio Network.
- 32:43Speaker 5: This segment of The Financial Exchange is brought to you
- 32:46Speaker 5: by the US Virgin Islands to part of tourism. Experience
- 32:49Speaker 5: America's Caribbean and fall naturally and rhythm with the herpeat
- 32:52Speaker 5: off the Islands while enjoying incredible beaches, world class cuisine,
- 32:55Speaker 5: and unforgettable sunsets. The weather is perfect all year round.
- 32:59Speaker 5: Said to visit USVII dot com and book your trip
- 33:02Speaker 5: to Saint Croix, Saint Thomas, or Saint John. Enjoy one
- 33:05Speaker 5: or all three on the vacation of a lifetime. The
- 33:08Speaker 5: USVII is America's Caribbean paradise, playing your winterscape now at
- 33:11Speaker 5: visit USVII dot com. That's visit USVII dot com.
- 33:16Speaker 2: Spinning back here to this story that was part of
- 33:19Speaker 2: the Wall Street Journal this morning, where it goes over
- 33:22Speaker 2: just sort of the shift that we've seen in the
- 33:25Speaker 2: economy specific to some companies in the United States over
- 33:28Speaker 2: the course of the last forty years, where there has
- 33:30Speaker 2: been a big shift from capital, or rather two capital
- 33:35Speaker 2: from labor. Where basically labor was receiving fifty eight percent
- 33:39Speaker 2: of the total proceeds of economic output as measured by
- 33:43Speaker 2: gross domestic income, which is kind of similar to the
- 33:46Speaker 2: concept of GDP in nineteen eighty. That percentage sits at
- 33:50Speaker 2: the third quarter of last year at fifty one percent,
- 33:52Speaker 2: So we've dropped from fifty eight percent of sort of
- 33:55Speaker 2: the benefits being reaped by a company going to the
- 33:59Speaker 2: labor the staff on hand through the course of wages
- 34:02Speaker 2: and bonuses and other types of coverage to now down
- 34:05Speaker 2: to fifty one percent. And so where has that money
- 34:08Speaker 2: gone if it's not going to labor, A lot more
- 34:11Speaker 2: of it has gone to profits. And ultimately, if you
- 34:14Speaker 2: follow out that chain, more profits of a company, typically
- 34:17Speaker 2: you see increase earnings and as a result, you see
- 34:20Speaker 2: the stock price going up of companies, just very broadly speaking.
- 34:25Speaker 2: And so it hits on this idea that I have
- 34:28Speaker 2: mulled over a lot where it just seems like mark
- 34:31Speaker 2: to me, and this helps put some numbers behind it,
- 34:34Speaker 2: but it's not exactly precise. That the stock market has
- 34:38Speaker 2: a lot more bearing on sort of consumer spending and
- 34:42Speaker 2: sort of the amount of optimism that folks have for
- 34:47Speaker 2: the economy, particularly in the higher end of things, than
- 34:50Speaker 2: it did five years ago, ten years ago. And maybe
- 34:52Speaker 2: that's just emblematic of what's been a really great run
- 34:55Speaker 2: for markets over the last three or four years or so.
- 34:57Speaker 2: There is a stat that Greg Get points to here
- 34:59Speaker 2: in the Walt Your Journal piece that if you look
- 35:02Speaker 2: back at twenty nineteen, household stock wealth was two hundred
- 35:07Speaker 2: percent of their annual disposable income. That figure now sits
- 35:11Speaker 2: at three hundred percent today, and obviously that is reflective
- 35:14Speaker 2: of a really good five or six year run for
- 35:16Speaker 2: the markets. But the amount of money people have on
- 35:19Speaker 2: the hire income side of things that is invested in
- 35:21Speaker 2: stocks is three times what they would make from an
- 35:24Speaker 2: annual disposable income. And so this is a point that
- 35:27Speaker 2: I've mulled over and I do feel like has more
- 35:29Speaker 2: impact than it did previously how the market's fare and
- 35:32Speaker 2: how that impacts consumer behavior.
- 35:34Speaker 4: And it's a double edged sword. This is a big area.
- 35:38Speaker 4: So I'm not going to pretend to have any deep
- 35:40Speaker 4: insights with respect to your last comment, though the effect
- 35:45Speaker 4: you're describing has been pretty well documented. It's called the
- 35:48Speaker 4: wealth effect, and it's exactly what it sounds like. It's
- 35:51Speaker 4: the percentage of stock gains. If stocks go up one percent,
- 35:54Speaker 4: how much does spending go up? Somewhere between three, five,
- 35:58Speaker 4: maybe seven cents. The wealth effect is somewhere in the
- 36:01Speaker 4: load to mid single digits. That changes. But most researchers
- 36:06Speaker 4: agree that there is such a thing. Is it bigger
- 36:10Speaker 4: and is it more stable now than it used to be?
- 36:13Speaker 4: And if so, what happens when stocks crash when they
- 36:16Speaker 4: inevitably do. There was a time when a crash inequities,
- 36:21Speaker 4: I don't think nineteen twenty nine. That didn't bode well
- 36:24Speaker 4: for investment, but it didn't freak people. It did freak
- 36:27Speaker 4: people out, I shouldn't say that, but it didn't immediately
- 36:30Speaker 4: cause a drop in people's net worth. It did immediately
- 36:34Speaker 4: cause a drop in some types of spending. Though interestingly,
- 36:36Speaker 4: very few people own equities in those days. We're not
- 36:39Speaker 4: talking nearly on hundred years ago, which is why I
- 36:40Speaker 4: bring it up. What would the effect be like today?
- 36:43Speaker 4: I don't know.
- 36:44Speaker 3: Yeah.
- 36:44Speaker 2: Doug Petta is strategists at BCA Research. He estimated that
- 36:49Speaker 2: a ten percent stock return, including dividends taxed at the
- 36:52Speaker 2: highest marginal rate, would boost spending capacity as much as
- 36:56Speaker 2: an eighteen percent rise in income. Again, that's just one
- 36:59Speaker 2: research take on it, but sort of furthering this idea
- 37:02Speaker 2: that I've multied the.
- 37:03Speaker 4: Problem with approaches like that. I do that occasionally internally
- 37:06Speaker 4: when I say to the group, here's the wealth effect,
- 37:08Speaker 4: and here's how you estimated. Is that you can't assume
- 37:11Speaker 4: that those relationships will will hold They're not very good
- 37:14Speaker 4: at they don't hold up really well as as forecasters.
- 37:18Speaker 2: Taking a look around at markets, market's largely in positive
- 37:23Speaker 2: territory here, shaking off a weak retail sales report that
- 37:26Speaker 2: we got earlier this morning, with the Dow jones up
- 37:29Speaker 2: about two hundred and thirty points are close to half percent,
- 37:32Speaker 2: the S and P five hundred is up about fourteen
- 37:35Speaker 2: points zero point one eight percent, and the Nasdaq is
- 37:38Speaker 2: is relatively flat, only up about twenty six points at
- 37:41Speaker 2: the moment. The US ten year Treasury is off about
- 37:44Speaker 2: five basis points, sitting at about four point one point
- 37:46Speaker 2: five percent on that retail sales miss, and we've got
- 37:50Speaker 2: oil sitting at around sixty four dollars a barrel, not
- 37:54Speaker 2: moving too much. The most interesting area the market in
- 37:57Speaker 2: twenty six in terms of volatility has definite and gold
- 38:00Speaker 2: and silver, but they're not being nearly as volatile as
- 38:03Speaker 2: they've been in the past, with gold only off about
- 38:06Speaker 2: one percent today, sitting at a little over five thousand
- 38:08Speaker 2: dollars an ounce, and silver's off about two percent. That's
- 38:12Speaker 2: all the time that we have for the first hour
- 38:13Speaker 2: here on.
- 38:13Speaker 3: The Financial Exchange. We're going to take a quick
- 38:15Speaker 2: Break, but we've got much much more to cover here
- 38:17Speaker 2: on the second hour stick with us here on the
- 38:19Speaker 2: Financial Exchange