Latest / 360 with Katie Woolf / Chief Fire Officer Mark Spain says he called the police on firefighters for vandalising fire trucks amid ongoing pay negotiations
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Now you might recall we spoke to the Unions Unions
- 0:02Speaker 1: NT last week for an update on the enterprise bargaining
- 0:05Speaker 1: agreements for public servants, and the union claimed that negotiations
- 0:09Speaker 1: for NT firefighters have become hostile while police and correctional
- 0:13Speaker 1: officers are making headway with their EBAs. Now, firees have
- 0:17Speaker 1: been writing messages on trucks across the Northern Territory as
- 0:21Speaker 1: part of their protected industrial action, and union's ENDT secretary
- 0:25Speaker 1: Erina Early claims that they're now being investigated for potential
- 0:29Speaker 1: criminal behavior. If you miss that interview with her a
- 0:33Speaker 1: little bit later towards the end of last week, take
- 0:36Speaker 1: a listen to what she'd had to say.
- 0:38Speaker 2: They're quite upset because, you know, getting police officers to
- 0:41Speaker 2: come down one of their owns. They work closely together,
- 0:44Speaker 2: they're part of the try service. They're very upset that
- 0:47Speaker 2: their own chief fire officer and the Police Comission has
- 0:49Speaker 2: done this to them, to try and scare them and
- 0:52Speaker 2: threaten them to stop engaging in their protected industrial action.
- 0:55Speaker 1: So that was Erina Early from the Union on the
- 0:58Speaker 1: show towards the end of Life last week. Now joining
- 1:01Speaker 1: me in the studio is the chief fire Officer for
- 1:04Speaker 1: the Northern Territory, Mark Spain, Good morning to you.
- 1:06Speaker 3: Good morning Katie, Good morning listers.
- 1:08Speaker 1: Now tell me our firefighters being criminally investigated over writing
- 1:13Speaker 1: on the trucks.
- 1:14Speaker 3: No they're not, but I will put some clarification around that.
- 1:19Speaker 3: On a Saturday, I was informed by the cruise that
- 1:23Speaker 3: it was writing appearing on the appliance as fire trucks,
- 1:27Speaker 3: of which I ordered for it to be washed off,
- 1:31Speaker 3: and then they kept appearing so by the Wednesday. Although
- 1:35Speaker 3: they work under the protected action, I was personally of
- 1:38Speaker 3: the opinion that that didn't fit under the person protective action.
- 1:42Speaker 3: Now you got to remember these fire appliances are one
- 1:44Speaker 3: point one million dollars apiece. They're a community asset. My
- 1:46Speaker 3: Bronto is two point three million dollars apiece. And I
- 1:51Speaker 3: did call the police down on the eighth and they
- 1:53Speaker 3: came for a criminal damage investigation.
- 1:57Speaker 1: They at that did call the police.
- 2:00Speaker 3: I actually called the police. I'll make it very clear
- 2:03Speaker 3: the Commissioner was not involved in this process. I am
- 2:06Speaker 3: the head of the Fire service and I take full
- 2:08Speaker 3: responsibility for calling the police in on that. No one
- 2:11Speaker 3: is above the law, and it was my opinion at
- 2:13Speaker 3: that time that there was criminal damage potentially being done
- 2:17Speaker 3: to our community fire assets.
- 2:19Speaker 1: There will be people listening this morning thinking, wow, you've
- 2:22Speaker 1: called the police on your own firefighters.
- 2:25Speaker 3: It's not the first time I've done it, and I
- 2:27Speaker 3: won't be the last. The reason I'll do that is
- 2:29Speaker 3: once again I'll make it very clear firefighters are not
- 2:32Speaker 3: exempt from the law. We represent the community. We will
- 2:36Speaker 3: work for the community. We're here to serve and protect.
- 2:39Speaker 3: But if anything unto what that I believe is out,
- 2:41Speaker 3: I think it is my duty as the chief officer
- 2:44Speaker 3: to actually report it.
- 2:45Speaker 1: So union claims that they're allowed to protest in this
- 2:48Speaker 1: way as part of their protected industrial action, is that
- 2:52Speaker 1: not the case.
- 2:53Speaker 3: I had further conversation with the Commission of Public Employment
- 2:56Speaker 3: after a period of time. Her opinion and my opinion
- 2:59Speaker 3: is still are different because of the wording in that
- 3:02Speaker 3: protected action. I'm fully supportive for their protected action wearing
- 3:05Speaker 3: the T shirts, they're banners, attending marches to really get
- 3:09Speaker 3: their name out there to say, hey, look, we exist,
- 3:12Speaker 3: we deserve a pay rise, and I actually support that,
- 3:14Speaker 3: absolutely support that. But what they actually do is they
- 3:18Speaker 3: negotiate with OCPE and the units when it comes to
- 3:22Speaker 3: the Anti Fire Rescue Executive. We provide advice to OCP,
- 3:25Speaker 3: but we're not on the bargaining side of OCP or
- 3:28Speaker 3: the union.
- 3:29Speaker 1: Now, I mean, I know that you've said that you
- 3:31Speaker 1: are fully supportive of those pay negotiations, but you know,
- 3:34Speaker 1: some listening this morning, you're going to be thinking, well,
- 3:37Speaker 1: calling the police on your own members doesn't really demonstrate
- 3:41Speaker 1: that you are.
- 3:43Speaker 3: And they're wearing their T shirts. They've got a whole
- 3:46Speaker 3: lot of protected action there which are there to design
- 3:50Speaker 3: to disrupt the workplace, and that is to send a
- 3:53Speaker 3: message to government to say, hey, we're here, talk to
- 3:56Speaker 3: us and let's get on with business. But when it
- 3:59Speaker 3: comes to marking a one point one million dollar appliance
- 4:02Speaker 3: or a two point three million dollar appliance in that case,
- 4:05Speaker 3: when it was investigated by a police, they found it
- 4:07Speaker 3: was a it could wash off. It's good, But now
- 4:10Speaker 3: certain elements have now written in permanent marker and it
- 4:13Speaker 3: can't be washed off easily even with a heavy solvent
- 4:16Speaker 3: that's been used and that's been reported to be from workshops.
- 4:18Speaker 3: So now we are in a position where we don't
- 4:21Speaker 3: agree with what they doing with the permanent marker. The
- 4:23Speaker 3: messaging is going to be very clear. They want to
- 4:25Speaker 3: win the community over, they've got to make sure the
- 4:27Speaker 3: messaging is clear and they understand what it's all about.
- 4:30Speaker 1: So you don't have an issue with them writing on there.
- 4:32Speaker 1: If it's in market, that can be washed off. But
- 4:34Speaker 1: the fact that they're writing on this with permanent marker
- 4:37Speaker 1: is what you're upset about.
- 4:38Speaker 3: Well, there's two things about it. One is the authors
- 4:41Speaker 3: of them sometimes need to do a spell check or
- 4:43Speaker 3: they did really miss deliberately misspell it, because and that
- 4:46Speaker 3: will take away from the messaging because if the Joe
- 4:48Speaker 3: public sees this and says, well, hey, these blokes can't spell,
- 4:52Speaker 3: it takes away the message of what they're trying to
- 4:53Speaker 3: sell the government is, hey, we want to pay rise,
- 4:55Speaker 3: Hey we want better conditions, and let's get on with it.
- 4:58Speaker 3: So ask is that they do the spell checks and
- 5:03Speaker 3: move on for that. I do have a problem with
- 5:05Speaker 3: the writing on my appliances or the community appliances because
- 5:08Speaker 3: they have other methods for protected action. As I said,
- 5:11Speaker 3: I have a different opinion from the Commission of Public
- 5:14Speaker 3: Employment about protected action in relation to writing on the appliances.
- 5:17Speaker 1: Now, where are these negotiations at from your perspective, or
- 5:21Speaker 1: is it a situation here that because you're not involved,
- 5:24Speaker 1: you know, you don't really know.
- 5:26Speaker 3: I'm actually the third party that comes in. I'll sit
- 5:28Speaker 3: in on the negotiations. OCP have got the guidelines from
- 5:32Speaker 3: the government, what their restrictions are and what their policy
- 5:35Speaker 3: is to when it comes to negotiations. Union put up
- 5:37Speaker 3: their logger claims and they work through it. What we
- 5:40Speaker 3: have to do. They're an all k and a responsibility.
- 5:42Speaker 3: So what I'm responsible for is the financial side of
- 5:45Speaker 3: the house. So we have to do our costings, our
- 5:47Speaker 3: facts and figures to meet within my finite budget and resourcing.
- 5:51Speaker 3: So there's a lot of there's a three way conversation
- 5:53Speaker 3: that goes on, and that's what we have to work through.
- 5:56Speaker 1: We've been told, or we are hearing, that there are
- 5:59Speaker 1: a law of local firefighters that are packing up and
- 6:01Speaker 1: moving into state and that they're going and doing their
- 6:04Speaker 1: fitness tests in other states. Is that something that you've
- 6:06Speaker 1: been told at this point.
- 6:08Speaker 3: I've heard it on the rumen mill. I haven't confirmed
- 6:13Speaker 3: it yet. However, I've also heard that I'm bringing up
- 6:16Speaker 3: the other fiber Gaze to say, hey, stop stealing our
- 6:19Speaker 3: fire fighters. That is not the case. I'm not allowed
- 6:21Speaker 3: to do that, nor would I want to do that.
- 6:23Speaker 3: Firefighters have their own lifestyles that they have to accommodate for.
- 6:27Speaker 3: There'll be a number of reasons why they want to
- 6:29Speaker 3: head off, but nothing has come through at the moment.
- 6:32Speaker 1: It does sound as though things are sort of getting
- 6:34Speaker 1: a little bit more hostile when it comes to the
- 6:37Speaker 1: negotiations at the moment with the fireies than what it's
- 6:40Speaker 1: maybe been with some of the other government departments or
- 6:43Speaker 1: some of the other forces.
- 6:45Speaker 3: Why do you reckon that is I'm probably going to
- 6:47Speaker 3: light up your text message you here, Katie. But at
- 6:49Speaker 3: the end of the day, it's the too pronged approach
- 6:51Speaker 3: from Minight of workers. The first one is to the negotiation,
- 6:54Speaker 3: so they'll do their normal rallies and wear the T
- 6:57Speaker 3: shirts and protected actions to slow it to bring government
- 7:02Speaker 3: to listen. The other one is there are a couple
- 7:06Speaker 3: of elements within the union who want to separate the
- 7:09Speaker 3: executive from the floor. So those members want to actually
- 7:12Speaker 3: control the floor. So by doing that, this is what
- 7:16Speaker 3: will what they'll do to keep us separated from them.
- 7:18Speaker 3: We are all one unit. Now. This is the third
- 7:22Speaker 3: lengthy negotiation that's gone on this goes on for three
- 7:24Speaker 3: or four years and then we roll over to the
- 7:26Speaker 3: next one. So we've had about twelve years of conflict
- 7:28Speaker 3: within the fire service instead of getting on with normal
- 7:31Speaker 3: business now.
- 7:32Speaker 1: Someone has been in contact already this morning and just
- 7:35Speaker 1: now and said wondering what's the difference between the fieries
- 7:38Speaker 1: and the ambos writing on their appliances.
- 7:41Speaker 3: Yeah, a Reena said, made mention of it the other
- 7:43Speaker 3: day that it was fair work commission, but there is
- 7:47Speaker 3: a case study in South Australia which is different legislation.
- 7:50Speaker 3: I'll have to point that out. But they were also
- 7:52Speaker 3: ordered to not write on it and not wear their
- 7:54Speaker 3: unit T shirts. We're far more grown up from that.
- 7:58Speaker 3: We want to get the message you crossing, so let's
- 8:00Speaker 3: work out a strategy that will get the CB over
- 8:03Speaker 3: and done with so we can get on the normal business.
- 8:04Speaker 1: All right, We are going to have to leave it there,
- 8:06Speaker 1: Chief Fire Officer Mark Spain always appreciate your time. Thanks
- 8:09Speaker 1: so much for coming in the studio this morning.
- 8:11Speaker 3: Thanks Katie,