Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Save us from the Banking Tyranny! Trolling the WNBA | HBR News 515

Transcript

Save us from the Banking Tyranny! Trolling the WNBA | HBR News 515 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five fifteen. Save us from
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: the banking tyranny and trolling the WNBA, discuss the news
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: for week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. Because I
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: hope you guys are doing well this week and that
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that you
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: are not consumed by it. I'm your host, Brian and
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: I am joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts,
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: Hannah Wallen and doctor ranmkham. On today's HBr News Week,
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: we're gonna be discussing some of the latest happenings and
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: there's a lot to like talk about, but I had
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: to narrow it down to just a few so that
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: this show doesn't go on for hours and hours. But
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: we're gonna talk about subpoenas for the Clintons. D banking
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: has been debunked, adding some color specifically, I think it's
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: like pink or green to the WNBA and more so,
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: stick around. It's gonna be a time and be sure
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: to join us afterwards for the Patron Only after show,
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: where we're gonna be looking at this article from CBR
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: dot com, which, by the way, they've done this sort
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: of thing before, Like this isn't like a new thing,
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: but sometimes they they have to revisit the classics. So
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: they just like made an updated version of an old
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: listicle called how the Lord of the Rings movies have
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: aged poorly?
• 1:26
  Speaker 3: Where there because there's not enough women in it? It's
• 1:29
  Speaker 3: because there's not enough women in it. There's only two
• 1:32
  Speaker 3: main female characters and one of them had to be
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: bulked out to fill the Dei female quota.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: That's what it is. Is.
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: Uh, well, I don't want to spoil it, but considering
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: the content of the channel that we do here, I
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: don't think that's too far off the mark. But if
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: you want to join us for that, you have to
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: become a badger yourself by going to feed the Badger
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: and starting a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month will
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: get you into our discord, where you'll be able to
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: watch all of the additional content like these patron shows
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: as well as works in progress, and hang out with
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: all of the very lovely people that are in the discord,
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: and you'll be able to coordinate things like the meetups
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: that we have coming up. So this coming Saturday, actually
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: I'll let Hannah tell you about it. But we have
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: a meetup coming up this Saturday in Ohio. If you
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: want to be there. I'm going to be there with
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: Lindsey and Hannah will be there, and maybe more people
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: will be there, but Hannah go ahead and tell them
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: a little bit about it.
• 2:36
  Speaker 4: So the meetup is going to be at Round One
• 2:40
  Speaker 4: in the Fairfield Mall in Beaver Creek, Ohio, and we
• 2:44
  Speaker 4: will be starting there. We'll be arriving there at about
• 2:48
  Speaker 4: four o'clock PM, so it'll start at about four o'clock
• 2:51
  Speaker 4: PM and it'll go until either all of us get
• 2:56
  Speaker 4: wiped out and leave or two AM, I think is
• 2:58
  Speaker 4: when the venue closes. Just be aware that the mall
• 3:03
  Speaker 4: closes earlier than that, so you'd have to leave through
• 3:06
  Speaker 4: Round ones outer door and not back through the mall,
• 3:10
  Speaker 4: so you want to park near Round one and not
• 3:13
  Speaker 4: someplace else to get close to the door. But yeah,
• 3:18
  Speaker 4: it's gonna be a good time. They have good food,
• 3:20
  Speaker 4: they have video games. There are hotels all over the
• 3:24
  Speaker 4: place around the area because there's there's a right State
• 3:28
  Speaker 4: university right there, and there's also all kinds of great
• 3:33
  Speaker 4: restaurants around the area. If you don't want to eat
• 3:36
  Speaker 4: at at Round one or if you want to eat
• 3:39
  Speaker 4: before you come in and stuff. And then there's also
• 3:45
  Speaker 4: some sort of anime cafe. We didn't get to go
• 3:47
  Speaker 4: inside and take a look, but we saw from the
• 3:49
  Speaker 4: outside and we looked at you know, their menu and
• 3:52
  Speaker 4: stuff online is kind of interesting looking upstairs as well.
• 3:57
  Speaker 4: But that's basically what we're going to be doing, and
• 4:00
  Speaker 4: it is not limited to any group of people, like
• 4:05
  Speaker 4: we have friends from Gamergate, we have friends from the
• 4:11
  Speaker 4: men's rights movement, we have some friends on the left,
• 4:13
  Speaker 4: we have some friends on the right. Doesn't matter. Just
• 4:16
  Speaker 4: show up and have a good time, see some of
• 4:19
  Speaker 4: the Badgers.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: So go check that out. Go to feed the Badger
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: dot com. I think there's some more information there and
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: hopefully we'll see you guys there. And if you want
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: to reach out personally. You don't really like talking to websites,
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: I know, I don't. Just join the discord. You can
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: go into the free version of it by going to
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: Badger Nation dot online and you can just jump into
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: the discord and talk to the folks about what's going on.
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: We also have another meetup coming up in September. This
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: one will be in Calgary, Alberta, so a little bit
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: further out for me, but I will do my best
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: to be at that one as well. It's gonna be
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: like a little mini convention. We'll have some talks and stuff,
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: so not quite as like cash as the one in Ohio,
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: but they'll definitely be like fun times to be had there,
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: and that will be with Allison and Jonathan and Me
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: and Lindsey and whoever else can make it. So please
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: consider joining us for all of that. And if you
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: don't want to wake up one morning to find that
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: we've been needed from the internet finally, then go to
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: Badger feed dot com or Honeybager Radio dot com to
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: find all of our archived content. All right, so before
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: we get into it, I just got a super chow
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: I feel like I should read it out now from
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: Meredith G. Who gives us five dollars and says HPR
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: Newsumber five fifteen, Honey for the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith,
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: really appreciate it. Every little bit helps. Whatever you guys
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: want to give, especially if you have something to say,
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: I'd appreciate if you dissent it to us because we
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: usually have a lot to say here and so we
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: don't get a chance to respond to the chat as much.
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: But if you send us a such a super chow
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: or a rumble rant, we'll be sure to give you
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: all the priorita. And whenever like Twitter gets something like
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: that going, we'll use that too, because I know we
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: got people watching us on okay, But anyway, with all
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: of that out of the way, let us get into
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: today's stories, okay. On August fifth, twenty twenty five, the
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: House Oversight Committee, chaired by Representative James Comer, issued subpoenas
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: to a range of high profile figures, including former President
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former attorneys
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: General Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder,
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: and Alberto Gonzales, as well as former FBI directors James
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: Comy and Robert Mueller as part of a probe into
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. The committee also subpoena's the
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: Justice Department for unredacted Epstein files due by August nineteenth,
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, that's in like seven days, and set
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: deposition dates for the officials from August to October, with
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: Bill Clinton's schedule for October fourteenth, and Hillary Clinton for
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: October ninth. This action follows a bipartisan vote on July
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: twenty third, twenty twenty five, by the Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee,
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: driven by Representative Scott Perry and supported by Representative Summer Lee,
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: to compel testimony and records to scrutinize the federal government's
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: handling of Epstein and Galaid Maxwell's cases amid concerns over
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: potential mishandling or leniency, such as the controversial two thousand
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: and eight non prosecution agreement negotiated by then US Attorney
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: Alex Acosta. The investigation has reignited public and political interest
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: due to Epstein's connections to powerful individuals and persistent conspiracy
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: theories surrounding his twenty nineteen death, officially ruled a suicide,
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: I have to say that because that's what they said,
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: and the lack of confirmed client list of abusers, as
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: noted in a July twenty twenty five Justice Department memo.
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: The probe also targets Glaid Maxwell, Epstein's associate, who is
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: serving a twenty year sentence for sex trafficking, though her
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: deposition was delayed pending a Supreme Court review of her conviction.
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: Despite bipartisan support, the subpoenas have sparked controversy, with some
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: questioning whether they are going to be a genuine push
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: for transparency or a politically motivated spectacle, especially given former
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: presidents rarely testify under compulsion. How Speaker Mike Johnson has
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: expressed reservations, arguing the Trump administration needs space to act,
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: while public sentiment on platforms like x reflect the skepticism
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: about the subpoenas effectiveness, with some users calling them smoke
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: and mirrors. The investigation aims to inform legislative reforms on
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: sex trafficking laws and non prosecutor make them illegal. What
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: what are you talking about? Reform and non prosecution agreements,
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: but its outcome remains uncertain as it navigates legal, political,
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: and public pressures.
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: All right, might as well rip this band aid off
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: as swiftly as possible. Nothing is going to happen. Listen
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: and gentlemen, nothing Sorry if that's blackpilling anyone, but it's
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: support and to be realistic, I'm not saying nothing ever happens.
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: That's a meme that has appeared among funnily enough news commentators,
• 9:11
  Speaker 3: people whose job it is to rigorously catalog all the
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: things that are happening. They'll spend every weekday compiling evidence
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: of all the things that have happened, and then they'll
• 9:23
  Speaker 3: jestingly quip that nothing ever happens. What they mean is
• 9:29
  Speaker 3: nothing good ever happens. Innocent people get arrested all the time,
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: but massively guilty people in royalty and in the government
• 9:40
  Speaker 3: never get arrested. That's why they do this shit, because
• 9:44
  Speaker 3: they know they'll never be arrested no matter what. It's
• 9:47
  Speaker 3: not that nothing ever happens. There's plenty of news, it's
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: just that it's all bad news. As they say, no
• 9:56
  Speaker 3: news is good news. Fucking the UK government and recently
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: banned feed people from criticizing the UK government, and the
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: rest of the world is following suit. They're not even outraged,
• 10:08
  Speaker 3: they're just following suit, just like world governments looked at
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: the Chinese model and instead of going this is totalitarian,
• 10:17
  Speaker 3: let's make sure we never do this, no, they licked
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: their lips and went, oh, hell, yes, we all need
• 10:24
  Speaker 3: social credit scores and complete control over the lives and
• 10:27
  Speaker 3: beliefs of our citizens. And what little pushback there is
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: is being completely ignored. So don't tell me nothing ever happens.
• 10:35
  Speaker 3: Huge things are happening every day that plunged the Western
• 10:40
  Speaker 3: world further and further into the Big Brother future. It's
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: just that nothing ever happens to prevent it. Perhaps this
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: is a rhetorical exaggeration. I certainly hope so. But where
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: it's not an exaggeration is when it comes to the
• 10:56
  Speaker 3: Clintons and other such I rannical murderers. If anyone is
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: sitting on a nest of hopes that any of these
• 11:07
  Speaker 3: people are going to face justice before they die, I'm
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: terribly sorry to have to disappoint you. That is not
• 11:15
  Speaker 3: how the world works. I mean, decades after they die,
• 11:19
  Speaker 3: we might become privy to the information that would have
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: and should have seen them in solitary confinement until they're
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: dying day, but not a moment before that. Royalty does
• 11:32
  Speaker 3: not get arrested unless there is a violent revolution, and
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: you probably don't want one of those because it will
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: mostly result in the deaths of the innocent in their millions.
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: How many innocent people have to die to justify the
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: Clinton's getting arrested, That's an interesting question. Kind of think
• 11:55
  Speaker 3: of it. I'm going to say ten people just to
• 11:58
  Speaker 3: start us off. If ten people people have to die
• 12:01
  Speaker 3: to get the Clintons in prison, it will have been
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: worth it. It took fewer than that to kill us.
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: I'ma bin laden Allegedly, it ought to be a trivial
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: affair when it comes to the Clintons. This is what
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: the FBI is for, this is what the CIA is for.
• 12:17
  Speaker 3: You send a squad to their house, you storm the place,
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: and you only need one bullet for Bill Clinton and
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: one well, one woodchipper for Hillary. I just I just
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: want to see the look on her face as she's
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: emptied into the wood chipper. It's that's my thing. That
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: and that would be a thing happening, that that would
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: finally be a good thing happening. But like I said,
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: the chances of it happening are in the single digits.
• 12:48
  Speaker 3: So don't rest your laurels on it, folks. Just try
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: to build a future where the Clintons of the future
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: can't happen anymore, where criminals can't just ransacked the way
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: through the country with impunity. It's a pipe dream, I know,
• 13:06
  Speaker 3: but it's pretty basic, bitch. When when when you strip
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: it all down, it is at the very least the
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: least we can do. I think maybe, you.
• 13:22
  Speaker 4: Know, it's a it's gonna be one of those situations
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: where you have a little hope, but you never hold
• 13:28
  Speaker 4: your breath because it's the government prosecuting the government, and
• 13:33
  Speaker 4: the government never finds itself guilty, even when it's a
• 13:37
  Speaker 4: different administration. And we can hope that with Trump in
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: office and Trump wanting vengeance for you know, the whole
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: Russia conspiracy and all that, that that he is going
• 13:54
  Speaker 4: to be different. And you can always hope that that
• 13:58
  Speaker 4: this particular politician is going to be different, and there
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: have been there's been evidence that he's going to be different,
• 14:05
  Speaker 4: because there's been other instances where he has been different,
• 14:09
  Speaker 4: you know, as especially in terms of keeping promises about
• 14:12
  Speaker 4: shrinking the government in various ways. But at the same time,
• 14:18
  Speaker 4: there's been, you know, some hesitance to come out and
• 14:25
  Speaker 4: provide the information that he promised about the Epstein files. However,
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: there has been something interesting that came out since I
• 14:35
  Speaker 4: posted this in our internal chat about the news show,
• 14:42
  Speaker 4: or at least something that I didn't find until later,
• 14:45
  Speaker 4: and that is that there was more confirmation that Jeffrey
• 14:53
  Speaker 4: Epstein was an FBI informant was. This was published by
• 14:59
  Speaker 4: Radar on Line. But the news the news paper that
• 15:06
  Speaker 4: I founded in was the Economic Times, and their link
• 15:11
  Speaker 4: to Radar Online just goes to Radar onlines front page.
• 15:14
  Speaker 4: It doesn't go to the Epstein story. So I'm going
• 15:21
  Speaker 4: to read a little bit of this, but it's it
• 15:23
  Speaker 4: just says according to an internal FBI cable dated September nine,
• 15:27
  Speaker 4: two thousand and eight, special agents, this was this was,
• 15:30
  Speaker 4: by the way, obtained by a Freedom of Information Act
• 15:34
  Speaker 4: lawsuit by Radar Online, so this was this was definitely
• 15:39
  Speaker 4: from a government source. Special agents noted that Epstein was
• 15:44
  Speaker 4: actively providing information to the FBI as agreed upon, and
• 15:48
  Speaker 4: that no federal prosecution would proceed as long as he
• 15:52
  Speaker 4: complied with the agreement made in the state of Florida.
• 15:54
  Speaker 4: So that explains why that agreement happened. Right then prosecuted
• 15:58
  Speaker 4: because he was he was actively providing them with information,
• 16:04
  Speaker 4: and we don't know exactly what kind of information. Probably financial.
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: It was probably getting financial information on people that he
• 16:14
  Speaker 4: lured to his island with you know, the the the
• 16:19
  Speaker 4: other activities that he had going on there that we
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: can't really describe that much on YouTube without getting the
• 16:26
  Speaker 4: banhammer the cable was marked routine, and it strongly suggested
• 16:32
  Speaker 4: Epstein was cooperating with federal authorities before the Plea deal,
• 16:38
  Speaker 4: and and then of course afterwards, when all this outrage
• 16:43
  Speaker 4: happened and he got prosecuted and he got killed, that
• 16:46
  Speaker 4: that kind of violated whatever deal he made with the FBI.
• 16:50
  Speaker 4: A source close to the investigation described these files to
• 16:53
  Speaker 4: Radar Online as smoking gun documents proving Epstein's status as
• 16:58
  Speaker 4: an FBI source well before the Plea deal. The revelation
• 17:02
  Speaker 4: challenges the narrative that Epstein's leniency was solely due to
• 17:06
  Speaker 4: powerful lawyers or elite social connections. So that's an important
• 17:10
  Speaker 4: bit of information for a couple of reasons. First of all,
• 17:14
  Speaker 4: it shows that the FBI was, at least during the
• 17:18
  Speaker 4: Obama administration and probably prior to that as well, they
• 17:22
  Speaker 4: were okay with using somebody who was committing heinous crimes
• 17:27
  Speaker 4: against children as an informant and allowing him to continue
• 17:31
  Speaker 4: to remain free to commit heinous crimes against children like that.
• 17:37
  Speaker 4: They were okay with that as long as they got
• 17:39
  Speaker 4: what they wanted out of it. That's the first thing
• 17:42
  Speaker 4: that's that's really sick, right. But the other thing is
• 17:46
  Speaker 4: this narrative that you can get away with heinous crimes
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: against children just because you're rich and powerful and just
• 17:56
  Speaker 4: because you're a man. That kind of kills that because
• 18:00
  Speaker 4: clearly he had to be an informant and gather dirt
• 18:07
  Speaker 4: on his customers for the FBI in order to have
• 18:11
  Speaker 4: that freedom right, not just be rich and male. Right,
• 18:19
  Speaker 4: the magic penis didn't keep him out of jail. Feminists,
• 18:22
  Speaker 4: sorry to bust your bubble. And so that's that's a
• 18:26
  Speaker 4: rather important thing. Now with regard to the Clintons. You know,
• 18:30
  Speaker 4: they've they've been teflon for so long that I think
• 18:35
  Speaker 4: we all have a bit of Clinton fatigue, where you know, yeah,
• 18:39
  Speaker 4: we hear they did did something again, right, we hear
• 18:41
  Speaker 4: some new thing about Yeah, there's evidence against the Clintons
• 18:44
  Speaker 4: in this area, there's evidence against the Clintons in this area. Well,
• 18:47
  Speaker 4: you know, they're gonna get away with it because it's
• 18:49
  Speaker 4: the Clintons, and they get away with everything. But uh,
• 18:55
  Speaker 4: I think that started with the fact of all the
• 18:58
  Speaker 4: sexual allegations against Bill Clinton. And when you break most
• 19:03
  Speaker 4: of those down, there's only one of them that really
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: has very much credibility because there are actual medical records
• 19:13
  Speaker 4: for the accuser who was injured, and so it is
• 19:20
  Speaker 4: possible that that one was true. But the majority of
• 19:23
  Speaker 4: the allegations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton when he
• 19:28
  Speaker 4: was president were either demonstrably bogus or really not that important.
• 19:37
  Speaker 4: And with that being the thing that they got away
• 19:42
  Speaker 4: with first, it kind of set the stage for people
• 19:46
  Speaker 4: to think, oh, they get away with everything, when really
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: that wasn't that big of a deal. Hillary gets away
• 19:51
  Speaker 4: with a lot of stuff, and there was evidence of
• 19:55
  Speaker 4: a lot of corruption in her office, in her actions
• 20:00
  Speaker 4: and her history as a lawyer, but we really can't
• 20:04
  Speaker 4: be sure of any of that either because there was
• 20:07
  Speaker 4: never any follow up and the DC smear machine that that
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: goes after politicians may have exaggerated everything, but this they
• 20:21
  Speaker 4: may not be able to get out of. If this
• 20:26
  Speaker 4: started with the Clinton administration and not the Obama administration,
• 20:35
  Speaker 4: you know, that's that's something that maybe they might might
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: hang for. Using a an individual who is known to
• 20:48
  Speaker 4: be a predator of children and keeping him out in
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: the world doing what he does just so that they
• 20:59
  Speaker 4: can get him from on people he can lure to
• 21:03
  Speaker 4: this this private island to do horrible things. That's uh,
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: that's pretty awful, right, There's got to be other ways
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: to get blackmail material on your political enemies. I mean,
• 21:17
  Speaker 4: the guy was a financier, right, they could have gotten
• 21:21
  Speaker 4: it that way, but no, they they had to allow
• 21:27
  Speaker 4: this to happen. So even if you know, it comes
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: out that the reason that Bill Clinton went to Epstein
• 21:38
  Speaker 4: Island so many times was to keep up with that
• 21:42
  Speaker 4: information and obtain that information. Uh that that's still that's
• 21:49
  Speaker 4: just as bad as if he went there as a customer.
• 21:54
  Speaker 4: You know, that's just as bad because he knew what
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: was happening, and he was in the most powerful, powerful
• 22:00
  Speaker 4: position in the world, and he didn't do jack shit
• 22:03
  Speaker 4: about it. He cooperated, right, he allowed his his his
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: FBI to cooperate, and Obama didn't stop it. He could
• 22:14
  Speaker 4: have stopped it, and he didn't stop it. And then
• 22:18
  Speaker 4: of course they kept Trump out of office for a
• 22:23
  Speaker 4: second term because they didn't want him finding out. So, yeah,
• 22:30
  Speaker 4: this is this is a heck of a bomb drop.
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: Hopefully it lands on the target and not you know,
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: out in the weeds somewhere where nothing will happen.
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean mainly I covered it because we have
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: been you know, we were basically the one of the
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: earliest to report.
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: When the arrest happened.
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: Of Jeffrey Epstein and then the suicide that followed.
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: We reported it.
• 22:59
  Speaker 2: So I see that this is an ongoing story that
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: I will only really because like some people, they report
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: on every little thing that happens, and I don't do
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: that because, first of all, it's very click baity, and
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: I think it's like kind of empty because there you
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: end up having because you need to cover every little
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: thing that happens, you end up landing in a bunch
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: of like speculation land, like oh, you know, so and
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: so said this, but they said it like this, or
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: why was he wearing a green shirt that day? Or
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: whatever it is. So I'd rather wait until something kind
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: of concrete happens. And so I saw the thing about
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: the FBI, but I didn't want I figured we could
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: just lump them together. But I but this is like
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: the real thing that on paper, you know, subpoenas have
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: been issued that we're gonna see what happens in seven days,
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: they're supposed to release some documents and we'll cover it
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: on the news show. Just because I started it. I
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: started it like just like anything else you know when
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: when the Derek Chauvin George Floyd thing happened. I was
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: one of the first people to report on it. Once
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: the once the bodycam footage came out like this was like,
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: I don't know, weeks, a week or so after the
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: incident itself happened. And if if something else comes out
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: that follows up on that story, you know, like something
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: happens with Derek Chauvin or something, I'm gonna I'm gonna
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: report it because I already started it. So I got
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: to keep following through. If something breaks with Bill Cosby,
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna follow it. If something breaks with Harvey Weinstein.
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: I mean, there are some things with Harvey Weinstein that
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: appeared to be coming out, but I didn't think it
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: was quite enough meat on that bone for a new story.
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: So with this, I'm not really like getting excited or
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: depressed about it. I'm just following it to see where
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: it goes.
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: And I'm that's it.
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: Like, whatever the truth is is, whatever the truth is,
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: We're just hopefully we'll be able to endure whatever happens.
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: But uh, this is what happened. I'm following up, so
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: we will see. I mean, we're probably not gonna hear
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: anything about this until October, which is when I think
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton is supposed to testify. So this is the
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: way the courts work. We've been through the courts ourselves.
• 25:06
  Speaker 2: It dece is usually like a slow process, lots of
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: red tape, lots of bureaucracy. That's just the way it goes.
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: This is like unfortunate but true. So anyway, we'll be
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: we'll follow back on it when we when we hear more.
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: And uh, that's that's all I can say about that.
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: So anyway, let's know what you guys thinking about this
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: one in the comments. We're gonna move on to the
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: next story because I think any super chats or super
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: child So but if you send some of those in, guys,
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: if you have any questions, you know, give us, give
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: us some thoughts, all right. In a related news and
• 25:39
  Speaker 2: I think this is actually a really good story to
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: cover as well, in light of everything that's happened in
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: the past few years in America, Canada, and other parts
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: of the world. On August seventh, twenty twenty five, President
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: Donald Trump signed Executive Order one four three three one
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: titled Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans, aimed at combating
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: politicized or unlawful debanking, defined as the denial or restriction
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: of financial services based on a customer's political or religious
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: beliefs or lawful business activities disfavored for political reasons. The
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: order addresses past practices such as Operation Choke Point and
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: post January six, twenty twenty one, surveillance programs, where financial
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: institutions allegedly targeted individuals and businesses, particularly conservatives, religious groups,
• 26:29
  Speaker 2: and industries like firearms, energy, and digital assets, for their
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: beliefs or affiliations. It mandates that banking decisions be based
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: on individualized, objective and risk based analyzes, prohibiting discrimination under
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and seeks to
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: restore public trust by ensuring fair access to financial services
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: for all Americans. The executive order imposes specific actions on
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: federal banking regulators, including the Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, NCUACFPB,
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: and SBA, within set timelines. Within one hundred eighty days,
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: regulators must remove reputation risk and similar concepts from their
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: supervisory materials that could enable debanking, and within one hundred
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: and twenty days, they must review financial institutions for past
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: or current policies that promote such practices, with potential penalties
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: like fines or consent decrees for violations. The SBA is
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: directed to notify lenders within sixty days to identify and
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: reinstate clients previously debanked unlawfully under its programs, while the
• 27:37
  Speaker 2: Treasury Secretary must develop a comprehensive antid banking strategy within
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: one hundred eighty days, potentially including legislative proposals.
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: These measures build.
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: On prior efforts like the DOJ slash Virginia Equal Access
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: to Banking Task Force and proposed laws such as the
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: Fair Access to Banking Act, reflecting a broader push to
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: eliminate discriminatory banking practices. So he is and this, you
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: know how I learn about this is really interesting because
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: I was talking about a lot about gamer Gate. I
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: do a lot of like stories on culture and the
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: gaming industry and other creative industries on my channel a
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: Honey Badger Arcade, which you guys can check out on
• 28:20
  Speaker 2: YouTube or rumble. And this came out because there was
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: a recent kerfuffle on Steam, Hio and other sort of
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: you know goog dot com, which are all like gaming
• 28:32
  Speaker 2: websites where you can buy games. There's an activist group
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: called Collective Shout, which we've talked about on this channel before.
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: There are a bunch of radical feminists from Australia that
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: are supposedly trying to protect women and girls from sexual
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: objectification by essentially getting games banned. Now, they couldn't get
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: the games banned directly, so instead they did a different
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: tactic by carpet bombing the actual like credit card payment
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: processors and demanding that they be the ones that restrict
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: people's ability to buy stuff on steamgog or ith dot
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: io with their own money. And of course they come
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: out of Australia, and Australia doesn't really have the ability
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: to change the Trump's you know, bill or executive order
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: won't affect that. But what I'm hoping for is that
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: it will sort of set a tone so that other
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: people will realize that their basically right to their own
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: property is being threatened by this and that they should
• 29:29
  Speaker 2: be speaking out. So and it is like Americans are
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: probably in a better position because of this act in
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: terms of that gamer Gate controversy, because that's that's the
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: way they work. If they can't scold you into submission,
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: then they'll just take away access to your money.
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: The thing.
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: The other thing that this affected where people like Mike Lindell,
• 29:48
  Speaker 2: who you guys might know is a MyPillow guy who
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: had his business destroyed because he supported Trump the January
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: sixth people got debanked, you know, So this is like
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: all people crypto guys that were like involved with cryptocurrencies,
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: We're getting dbanked because it was going against I guess,
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: you know, whatever the banks wanted. So this is like
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: a problem that needed to be addressed unfortunately. So I
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: don't know if you guys have any thoughts on there.
• 30:16
  Speaker 4: Yeah, this is what I was talking about last week
• 30:18
  Speaker 4: that I said needed to happen, and you know it's
• 30:21
  Speaker 4: it's people think of this as, oh my gosh, you
• 30:23
  Speaker 4: guys are throwing such a temper tantrum over games like
• 30:26
  Speaker 4: fuck that, right, you know better than that. Nobody who
• 30:29
  Speaker 4: says that is unaware of the huge, huge intrusion that
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: banks have made into people's lives. Right, You can't get
• 30:41
  Speaker 4: paid without a bank in most workplaces, most big corporate
• 30:45
  Speaker 4: workplaces in the United States. Not just your workplace getting
• 30:51
  Speaker 4: money out of their bank, but a lot of workplaces,
• 30:55
  Speaker 4: most workplaces now have gone to mandatory direct deposit. You
• 31:00
  Speaker 4: can't get a paycheck. They won't give you a paycheck.
• 31:04
  Speaker 4: And if you don't have a bank account and they
• 31:09
  Speaker 4: can't pay into your bank account, then you have to
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: settle for some very insecure methods of getting paid, like
• 31:20
  Speaker 4: netspend and stuff like that, where if somebody, somebody actually
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: gets into the system and gets your information the minute
• 31:30
  Speaker 4: you get paid, that money can be taken and you
• 31:33
  Speaker 4: don't have a way to get it back. So essentially
• 31:39
  Speaker 4: you can't go to the grocery store without banks. You
• 31:43
  Speaker 4: can't get gas for your car without banks, you can't
• 31:47
  Speaker 4: do anything without banks. They are that powerful now, and
• 31:51
  Speaker 4: so if they can come along and say, well, if
• 31:55
  Speaker 4: you're Republican and we think that you voted for Donald Trump,
• 32:00
  Speaker 4: you you can't have a bank account, right. If you
• 32:05
  Speaker 4: speak out online about the way that your culture is
• 32:10
  Speaker 4: being attacked, you can't have a bank account. If you
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: speak out online about father's rights, you can't have a
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: bank account. And it's not just the big banks going
• 32:25
  Speaker 4: directly after individuals like they did go after one of
• 32:29
  Speaker 4: the leaders founding members of the Proud Boys in that
• 32:33
  Speaker 4: manner took away his bank so that he had to
• 32:38
  Speaker 4: go find he had to scramble to find a place
• 32:41
  Speaker 4: to bank. And you know, there's always credit unions, right,
• 32:46
  Speaker 4: but they have to do business with the big banks too.
• 32:51
  Speaker 4: And there's always payment processors like PayPal, right, except they
• 32:55
  Speaker 4: have to do business with the big banks too, right.
• 32:59
  Speaker 4: They have to do better business through the credit card
• 33:01
  Speaker 4: companies because most transactions that you make in order to
• 33:07
  Speaker 4: take money out of or put money into your PayPal
• 33:10
  Speaker 4: account go through a bank account, or they go through
• 33:15
  Speaker 4: a credit card, and the credit cards are owned by
• 33:19
  Speaker 4: the banks. And so what ended up happening with PayPal,
• 33:26
  Speaker 4: they ended up with the same pressure campaign they ended up. MasterCard,
• 33:30
  Speaker 4: I think was the first one to do it to
• 33:32
  Speaker 4: them basically said you can't do business with certain groups
• 33:36
  Speaker 4: of people and you have to ban people based on
• 33:40
  Speaker 4: political affiliations, or we will not do business with you
• 33:45
  Speaker 4: and you will not be able to get payments through
• 33:47
  Speaker 4: US visas. Only a step behind MasterCard on that, and
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: they are the two biggest credit card payment processors in
• 33:58
  Speaker 4: the world, like all the other card companies will follow
• 34:04
  Speaker 4: suit if they do a particular thing over time, and
• 34:10
  Speaker 4: what you end up with in that situation is that
• 34:12
  Speaker 4: you can't buy anything anywhere. You wouldn't be able to
• 34:15
  Speaker 4: buy a cryptocurrency. You wouldn't be able to bypass the
• 34:18
  Speaker 4: banks because you have to use the banks to buy
• 34:21
  Speaker 4: the cryptocurrency to bypass the banks. So if they decided
• 34:24
  Speaker 4: they didn't want you to be able to do that,
• 34:27
  Speaker 4: they could stop you. And so they become a government
• 34:32
  Speaker 4: onto themselves, a world government onto themselves or unto themselves.
• 34:38
  Speaker 4: And if your country does not want to be overridden
• 34:42
  Speaker 4: by a world banking system that makes its own laws
• 34:46
  Speaker 4: and then imposes them sort of around governments or behind
• 34:53
  Speaker 4: the backs of governments, going directly to businesses and stuff,
• 34:57
  Speaker 4: then they have to pass laws like this. They can't
• 35:00
  Speaker 4: allow banks to undermine their national processes. And that is
• 35:06
  Speaker 4: essentially what the United States is doing at this point,
• 35:09
  Speaker 4: what the president is doing. He is saying the banks
• 35:12
  Speaker 4: cannot undermine the culture of the United States and the
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: legal processes, the election systems, the civil rights protections, and
• 35:23
  Speaker 4: so on in the United States by going directly to
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: businesses and saying you can't do business with people who
• 35:30
  Speaker 4: are of this political affiliation. But it took gamers to
• 35:34
  Speaker 4: figure out just how bad banks being able to do
• 35:37
  Speaker 4: that was and have enough of allowed fit about it
• 35:41
  Speaker 4: to get the president's attention. How bad is that? Like
• 35:45
  Speaker 4: everybody else that should have noticed, doctors, lawyers, business owners
• 35:51
  Speaker 4: should have been able to go to the president say, hey,
• 35:54
  Speaker 4: this is a big, big deal. We are in real
• 35:57
  Speaker 4: trouble here. We're not going to be able to just
• 36:01
  Speaker 4: do business freely as as Americans doing business with American
• 36:06
  Speaker 4: citizens because of this. You better do something about it. No,
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: it's it was. It was just us little petally, you know,
• 36:16
  Speaker 4: individuals that just wanted to have the freedom to have
• 36:19
  Speaker 4: a stupid pastime that nobody should care about in terms
• 36:25
  Speaker 4: of you know, getting upset. Right, it's there's actually quite
• 36:29
  Speaker 4: a bit of value to it. It's very good for
• 36:32
  Speaker 4: your brain if as long as you don't overdo it.
• 36:36
  Speaker 4: But yeah, just us. Nobody else seemed to care about this.
• 36:41
  Speaker 4: Nobody else figured out just exactly how dangerous it is
• 36:45
  Speaker 4: to have a world organization that could override every government
• 36:49
  Speaker 4: everywhere except gamers. Again, So next time somebody makes fun
• 37:02
  Speaker 4: of you for still playing video games at whatever age
• 37:04
  Speaker 4: you are, just remember that, all right, if anybody's gonna
• 37:09
  Speaker 4: save the world, it's gonna be gamers.
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: And yeah, no, the problem with the D banking is
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: that the D banking is slanted politically. If you d
• 37:26
  Speaker 3: bank someone for being let's say, a black supremacist, a
• 37:31
  Speaker 3: card carrying proud black supremacist, that's not allowed. You can't
• 37:35
  Speaker 3: do that. That's no reason to d bank someone. Why
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: on earth would it be. If you do it, you'll
• 37:40
  Speaker 3: get sued by various black supremacy groups and uh, and
• 37:53
  Speaker 3: you'll be all over the news media for your racist
• 37:56
  Speaker 3: transgression and you're dead in the water and so is
• 37:59
  Speaker 3: your company. Whereas if you debank someone for allegedly being
• 38:04
  Speaker 3: a white supremacist, whatever fuck that can it must be true,
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: they deserve it, and the news media doesn't give a
• 38:13
  Speaker 3: shit and they never report on it the end. That's
• 38:17
  Speaker 3: the problem in a nutshell, a black and white nutshell.
• 38:22
  Speaker 3: And there are two ways of dealing with it. Trump
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: has gone for the obvious one, authoritarianism on top of authoritarianism,
• 38:30
  Speaker 3: let's ban people from banning people based on x xyz characteristics,
• 38:37
  Speaker 3: blah blah blah. But the second option is the other direction,
• 38:43
  Speaker 3: where you don't ban anyone from banning anyone. Any bank
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: can refuse service to any creed or color they see
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: fit for any reason. You can have a no Blacks,
• 38:56
  Speaker 3: no Irish sign right at the front door, and it's fine.
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: That would be an interesting experiment. I'd like to see
• 39:03
  Speaker 3: it happen somewhere, because then someone somewhere could start up
• 39:09
  Speaker 3: a bank and open it to the public with a
• 39:13
  Speaker 3: sign on the door saying no Jews. Now, I I'm
• 39:18
  Speaker 3: not saying anything. I'm not ready to say anything. That's
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: what an experiment is. It's an undergoing to examine what
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: there is to be said. And I would like to
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: see an experiment in the free market wherein someone is
• 39:33
  Speaker 3: allowed to open a bank that is available to absolutely
• 39:38
  Speaker 3: everyone except Jews. I just want to see what happens.
• 39:41
  Speaker 3: I just want to see it. I want to write
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: it down in my notes in my little book of science,
• 39:48
  Speaker 3: and see in what way we can enrich the data
• 39:52
  Speaker 3: based on those results.
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: In fact, it's southern that's sort of heading in that direction, Mike,
• 39:57
  Speaker 2: So we might see that fulfilled. You heard about the
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: all white town of like forty people.
• 40:03
  Speaker 3: We'll see, we'll see, we'll see if they can do.
• 40:07
  Speaker 3: In fact, saw the banks?
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: Why leave it there?
• 40:10
  Speaker 3: What if everyone everywhere was allowed to discriminate. Imagine that
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: you could just go What are you a Zoroastrian?
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: No, get out.
• 40:21
  Speaker 3: This is my property. I make the rules, and I
• 40:24
  Speaker 3: don't have to justify myself. I don't want you filled
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: the Zoroastrians here. So jog on but but but but no,
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: jog on but Judaism isn't isn't a religion. It's a
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: rare jog on son. I'm not getting into it. I
• 40:43
  Speaker 3: have no obligation to go into it. Now, hire pretty happily,
• 40:46
  Speaker 3: get off my property. You have fifteen seconds to comply. Now.
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: The average Western leftist, Uh, to them, that sounds like
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: a dystopian nightmare world. But to the average normal person
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: at every other point in history, everywhere else in the world,
• 41:05
  Speaker 3: that sounds like it's the normal thing, the thing that
• 41:08
  Speaker 3: people do all the time. Why wouldn't they. So I'd
• 41:13
  Speaker 3: just like to see an experiment where we get back
• 41:17
  Speaker 3: to doing the normal thing that normal people do all
• 41:20
  Speaker 3: the time. Let's just see what happens. That's all I'm saying.
• 41:23
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's for science, guys. Let's take a peek
• 41:28
  Speaker 3: into the unknown. It'll be fun. It's not gonna happen,
• 41:33
  Speaker 3: but it would be fun.
• 41:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, freedom of Association is like, we do
• 41:40
  Speaker 2: it anyway. For the most part, we just have to
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: like drive it home that it's okay to like do.
• 41:45
  Speaker 4: That, well, but we have to do more than that,
• 41:47
  Speaker 4: because in terms of banks, it's not like you know,
• 41:54
  Speaker 4: a restaurant or a grocery store or gas station or
• 41:59
  Speaker 4: something like that. Anybody can open up one of those businesses,
• 42:02
  Speaker 4: and there there's a regulatory process and there's a uh,
• 42:05
  Speaker 4: you know, there's paperwork and stuff like that, but it's
• 42:08
  Speaker 4: not so overly complicated, and the startup capital isn't so
• 42:14
  Speaker 4: extensive and expensive that you know, it prevents anybody from
• 42:19
  Speaker 4: being able to do it. But you know, the the
• 42:23
  Speaker 4: whole idea of well, if if you don't like this,
• 42:25
  Speaker 4: start your own insert type of business here, start your
• 42:29
  Speaker 4: own insert type of processor here, start your own bank.
• 42:34
  Speaker 4: It kind of stops at start your own bank because
• 42:37
  Speaker 4: of the way that governments handle banking already, it's damn
• 42:41
  Speaker 4: near impossible even for it's been done all right. There
• 42:46
  Speaker 4: is I guess a right wing bank, but it's it's
• 42:49
  Speaker 4: damn near impossible if you do not have a significant
• 42:53
  Speaker 4: amount of networking and pull to to start your own bank.
• 43:01
  Speaker 4: And and you know, and that's that's today. Like historically
• 43:04
  Speaker 4: it wasn't. Historically there was competition among banks, but over
• 43:11
  Speaker 4: the last fifty years or so, there has been a
• 43:15
  Speaker 4: concerted effort by certain banks buying up other bank companies,
• 43:21
  Speaker 4: banking companies. In fact, the bank that I'm with now,
• 43:26
  Speaker 4: I'm only with that bank because it bought the company
• 43:31
  Speaker 4: that bought the company that bought the company that bought
• 43:36
  Speaker 4: the bank I started with, Right, That's that's why I'm
• 43:41
  Speaker 4: with the bank i'm with now. Literally, I never signed
• 43:44
  Speaker 4: up for this bank.
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: Same happen to me too, And and so.
• 43:53
  Speaker 4: It's a different story to say, well, just start your
• 43:55
  Speaker 4: own bank, even a credit union is difficult, so and
• 44:01
  Speaker 4: it and it does take You wouldn't be able to
• 44:04
  Speaker 4: have a small group of people that have absolutely no
• 44:07
  Speaker 4: knowledge of banking decide they're going to start their own
• 44:09
  Speaker 4: bank and then wing it, you know, just learn on
• 44:13
  Speaker 4: the fly, and uh not have people involved that that
• 44:18
  Speaker 4: already have power, already have money, and already have knowledge
• 44:22
  Speaker 4: of the banking system and the government system the regulation
• 44:25
  Speaker 4: system around banks. Banks are heavily regulated, like to the
• 44:29
  Speaker 4: degree that it would be like trying to navigate a labyrinth,
• 44:36
  Speaker 4: a three D labyrinth the size of the planet. Okay,
• 44:42
  Speaker 4: so it says I'm not going I'm not sure that.
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't see in echoing.
• 44:48
  Speaker 4: This is just so important, you guys need to hear
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: it twice.
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah.
• 44:55
  Speaker 4: The so the idea of you know, well, well you
• 44:58
  Speaker 4: just allow anybody to discriminate and eventually it'll all work
• 45:01
  Speaker 4: itself out. It does as long as there are no monopolies.
• 45:06
  Speaker 4: But there are numerous government facilitated and government controlled or
• 45:15
  Speaker 4: at least government maintained monopolies. In the big banks are
• 45:20
  Speaker 4: one of them.
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I think that at this step. I mean, like,
• 45:27
  Speaker 2: ideally we live in a world where freedom of association
• 45:30
  Speaker 2: was king, but we can't where like, you know, neck
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: deep in red tape, in bureaucracy, in like decades of
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: people voting in favor of more and more state regulation
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: and overreach and so on.
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: So I think that this is like.
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: What we have to do now west to live on
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: planet Earth and deal with the world as it is
• 45:54
  Speaker 2: and not in the way that we wish it was.
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: But I just want to add.
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: On top of this, like how this kind of thing
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: has affected people outside of the US. I forgot to
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: mention as one of the examples of uh, you know,
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: debanking harm is Canada. When the trucker protests were going on,
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: What did Justin Trudeau, who was Prime minister at the
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: time do. He took away the truckers and anyone who
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: supported them access to their banking uh, their their money,
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: their bank accounts and froze them or you know, just
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: debank them. So this is obviously going to be used
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: in a lopsided way if it exists. I think that
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: there needs to be a conversation about, you know, uh, like,
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: how do we fix this problem? But this executive order
• 46:41
  Speaker 2: and again, these these things they're usually like you know,
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: unless they get pushed through by Congress, they're they're usually
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: like temporary fixes. But it's better than nothing. And I
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: leave maybe in the in tereum we can like you know,
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: figure out some longer term solutions so that we don't
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: have to deal with something like this again. And I
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: guess the United States, because we're the only ones that
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: tried to like Trump is the only person that did
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: something about it. We'll have to like show the world
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: what it looks like at least and hopefully Canada and
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: other countries. I think Australia has stuff like this that's
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: happened as well, will follow suit.
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: And learn from it.
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: So anyway, let us know, you guys think about this
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: one in the comments, and I'm gonna move on to
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: the next story. Okay, you guys probably remember Big Balls.
• 47:29
  Speaker 2: You guys remember Big Balls. He was one of the
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: DOGE employees, So we have a story involving him. During
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: the early hours and while escorting his significant other to
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: their cars girlfriend through the Washington d C. Streets of
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: the Logan Circle area, a young man was accosted by
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: a group of teens after the teens teens alluded to
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: wanting to steal their car. The young man was beaten
• 47:55
  Speaker 2: and bloodied as the teens attacked him, an attack that
• 47:58
  Speaker 2: only stopped once low law enforcement official stepped in, causing
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: them to flee. The attacked young man turned out to
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: be none other than Edward big Ball's Chorustine, famous former
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: member of Elon Musk's federal DOGE program, which, by the way,
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: I don't think it's a thing anymore. I mean I
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: think that they're still like moving to like, you know,
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: cut back on spending, but DOGE ended up not taking
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: over like everyone kept fretting about, so must.
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: Describe what going to do.
• 48:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah, they did what they said they were going to
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: do and then they were done. I know, it's wild,
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: it's like crazy. Let's describe the incident on Twitter slash
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: x stating quote. A few days ago, a gang of
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: about a dozen young men tried to assault a woman
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: in her car at night in DC. An at DOGE
• 48:44
  Speaker 2: team member saw what was happening, ran to defend her
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: and was severely beaten to the point of concussion, but
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: he saved her end quote. Former friend of Musk turned
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: seeming frenemy. President Donald Trump was quick to call for
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: stricter prosecution of young krem in the District of Columbia
• 49:02
  Speaker 2: that's Washington, d C for those of you guys who
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: don't know, stating on his social media platform Truth Social quote.
• 49:07
  Speaker 2: They are not afraid of law enforcement because they know
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: nothing ever happens to them. But it's going to happen now.
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: The law in DC must be changed to prosecute these
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: miners as adults and lock them up for a long time,
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: starting at age fourteen. The most recent victim was beaten
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: mercilessly by local thugs. Washington, d C. Must be safe, clean,
• 49:28
  Speaker 2: and beautiful for all Americans and importantly for the world
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: to see. If DC doesn't get its act together and quickly,
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: we will have no choice but to take federal control
• 49:38
  Speaker 2: of the city and run this city how it should
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not
• 49:43
  Speaker 2: going to get away with it anymore. End quote, which
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: apparently he's doing as of the last forty eight hours,
• 49:49
  Speaker 2: President Trump has deployed National Guard to d C as
• 49:52
  Speaker 2: he pledges to begin a crackdown on crime in the area.
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: And I wanted to say one more thing to add
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: on to this, because there's a little bit of confusiontionally.
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: When the story broke, people thought that Big Balls was
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: just randomly intervening on behalf of a woman who had
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: no relation to him and basically got his ass kick
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: for it. It was his girlfriend. It was a woman
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: that was with him and these men, these these people,
• 50:18
  Speaker 2: they were trying to jack his car. So it wasn't
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: just random white nightery. He was actually like protecting his
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: girlfriend and his property and that was what. So this
• 50:30
  Speaker 2: is important context because you know, because there's a lot
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: of like, you know, is this like Daniel Penny again,
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: Like no no, it's it's not that. It's not that simple.
• 50:40
  Speaker 2: So I just wanted to explain the background of that.
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: So anyway, there you go.
• 50:46
  Speaker 4: This is one of those where some of the reactions
• 50:49
  Speaker 4: I saw were kind of bullshit, right because they made
• 50:53
  Speaker 4: that mistake. They thought that he intervened on behalf of
• 50:56
  Speaker 4: random people. It wouldn't matter if he had, right, I mean,
• 51:01
  Speaker 4: if he had, that's not this guy betraying the brotherhood,
• 51:06
  Speaker 4: and that it's not a moral wrong to intervene on
• 51:13
  Speaker 4: behalf of people that are under attack and you can
• 51:18
  Speaker 4: see what's happening. It's not always a good idea. You
• 51:21
  Speaker 4: can be wrong about who's under attack, like the people
• 51:24
  Speaker 4: who rescued a woman from a person perse snatcher, only
• 51:28
  Speaker 4: to discover that she was the perse snatcher and she
• 51:32
  Speaker 4: had actually stolen his bag. But at the same time,
• 51:39
  Speaker 4: you know, just because people don't appreciate it doesn't mean
• 51:43
  Speaker 4: that it's a moral wrong for the individual to do it.
• 51:45
  Speaker 4: It's an unwise choice. You know, you're not going to
• 51:48
  Speaker 4: get thanks for it for it, and you might get
• 51:50
  Speaker 4: in trouble for it, and it's not worth the risk.
• 51:52
  Speaker 4: No guy should be obligated to do it. And if
• 51:55
  Speaker 4: a guy does do it and he gets respect for it.
• 52:00
  Speaker 4: It doesn't mean other guys are obligated to do it.
• 52:03
  Speaker 4: It means that, you know, society should know better than
• 52:06
  Speaker 4: to treatment in such a way that they are afraid
• 52:10
  Speaker 4: to do it, because clearly they do appreciate it on
• 52:14
  Speaker 4: some level. Right, But that wasn't this situation. And I'm
• 52:19
  Speaker 4: going to say right now, I don't agree with Trump
• 52:21
  Speaker 4: on this. I don't think the solution to youth crime
• 52:26
  Speaker 4: is incarceration as a punishment because kids don't get to
• 52:32
  Speaker 4: the point where they are carjacking at the age of
• 52:35
  Speaker 4: fourteen on their own. They don't raise themselves to be
• 52:39
  Speaker 4: that way. They get that way because they have not
• 52:43
  Speaker 4: been raised. They get that way because every adult in
• 52:47
  Speaker 4: their life has failed them. And I think that you know,
• 52:53
  Speaker 4: as as a parent myself, this is on the parents.
• 53:00
  Speaker 4: And if parents had to face repercussions instead of their
• 53:02
  Speaker 4: kids when their kids commit crimes, there would be quite
• 53:08
  Speaker 4: a bit more effort among parents to ensure that their
• 53:12
  Speaker 4: kids are better behaved. When you see teenagers engaging in
• 53:18
  Speaker 4: these types of crimes, you are probably looking at somebody
• 53:22
  Speaker 4: who was raised without a father, who was allowed to
• 53:26
  Speaker 4: run wild, who has no good role models in their lives.
• 53:31
  Speaker 4: They've attended school systems where the teachers are not allowed
• 53:35
  Speaker 4: to use any kind of effective discipline. And I'm not
• 53:39
  Speaker 4: just talking about, you know, corporal punishment. I'm talking about
• 53:44
  Speaker 4: every time the kid gets a detention, the mom threatens
• 53:47
  Speaker 4: to sue the school, because I've seen that happen with kids.
• 53:51
  Speaker 4: I went to school with kids whose parents did that,
• 53:53
  Speaker 4: and they ended up just like this. And instead of
• 53:59
  Speaker 4: putting them into a juvenile detention facility where they're going
• 54:03
  Speaker 4: to get raped by the female guards, because that happens
• 54:06
  Speaker 4: quite a bit, I researched and wrote about that. If
• 54:09
  Speaker 4: you want to read about it, it is in the Honey
• 54:12
  Speaker 4: Badger Brigade blog. If you go through my articles will
• 54:14
  Speaker 4: find it. These kids actually need to go through behavioral programs.
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: They need to be.
• 54:23
  Speaker 4: Just as much removed from the home and maybe just
• 54:26
  Speaker 4: as much institutionalized as they would be if they were incarcerated.
• 54:30
  Speaker 4: But the facility shouldn't be like a jail. It should
• 54:34
  Speaker 4: be much closer to a mental health facility for people
• 54:38
  Speaker 4: who have committed crimes, which isn't very similar at all
• 54:41
  Speaker 4: to a mental health facility for people who ask for
• 54:44
  Speaker 4: help when they needed it. There's a big difference. You're
• 54:48
  Speaker 4: still locked up, you're still treated as a threat, you're
• 54:51
  Speaker 4: still perceived as somebody who has done something wrong. But
• 54:56
  Speaker 4: the attitude toward the individual who is doing doing these
• 55:01
  Speaker 4: things isn't you should have known better, it's we're going
• 55:08
  Speaker 4: to help you do better. When you get out of here,
• 55:10
  Speaker 4: You're not going to do this kind of thing again.
• 55:13
  Speaker 4: You're going to get on with your life and become
• 55:17
  Speaker 4: somebody who works within your community to earn your own
• 55:20
  Speaker 4: living and support yourself and become a productive citizen. Right,
• 55:27
  Speaker 4: that is what needs to happen. And unfortunately, neither the
• 55:32
  Speaker 4: Democrats nor the Republicans cares enough about the children of
• 55:38
  Speaker 4: this country.
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: To do that.
• 55:41
  Speaker 4: Instead, both of them talk in different ways about being
• 55:45
  Speaker 4: tough on crime. The Democrats talk about being tough on
• 55:48
  Speaker 4: crime as if it is somehow racist, and the Republicans
• 55:52
  Speaker 4: talk about being tough on crime as if by bringing
• 55:56
  Speaker 4: down the hammer you solve all of the wrong lessons,
• 56:01
  Speaker 4: all of the bad training, all of the problems that
• 56:04
  Speaker 4: have been dumped on these underage kids. And I'm not saying, oh,
• 56:08
  Speaker 4: they don't know any better. I'm saying they don't know
• 56:10
  Speaker 4: how to be any better because nobody ever taught them.
• 56:16
  Speaker 4: And this isn't gonna do it either, Mike.
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: Did you want to say anything?
• 56:24
  Speaker 4: Yes?
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: On quite another point, it's gonna be so funny if
• 56:30
  Speaker 3: World War III has its equivalent of us stook Franz Ferdinand,
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: the assassination that starts the chain reaction that leads to
• 56:42
  Speaker 3: World War and that man's name is Big Balls. Is
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: this gonna be what the history books will have to
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: break it down to, like how did it happen? Well,
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: the Democrats went full communist. They punished the law of
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: for the actions of the criminals, and then they flooded
• 57:04
  Speaker 3: the country with criminals. It reached an inevitable boiling point.
• 57:08
  Speaker 3: And then they got big Balls. They got what now,
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: big balls. They took down Big Balls, and that was
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: the straw that broke the camel's back and justice rippled
• 57:21
  Speaker 3: across the country like way, way, wait, wait, what is
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: Big Balls? A person's name, yes, a person's real name. No. No,
• 57:31
  Speaker 3: his real name was Edward Chorustine. But everyone calls him
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: big Balls because you know it's so meme worthy. Why
• 57:40
  Speaker 3: wouldn't It's like typhoid Mary, Nobody remembers her real surname.
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: It's not important. What she did was important in her case,
• 57:50
  Speaker 3: it was giving typhoid to a shitload of people. But
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: what Big Balls did was well, he called himself Big Balls.
• 57:59
  Speaker 3: He worked Doge, yes, but loads of people work for Doge.
• 58:03
  Speaker 3: What this guy did was called himself Big Boss. And
• 58:07
  Speaker 3: then he turned himself into a pickle. Funniest shit I've
• 58:09
  Speaker 3: ever seen, I I see? And is this why the
• 58:15
  Speaker 3: infamous leader of the East Asian Rebellion of twenty forty
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: five was called four twenty Blazer XX sixty nine xx. Yes, yes,
• 58:27
  Speaker 3: welcome to history in the twenty first century.
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: It was.
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: It was an interesting time to be alive, and it is,
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: and gentlemen, for that we can be thankful, even though
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: it's a it's it's hideous and terrifying and sad and
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: rather foul smelling. I mean, at least we've got stuff
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: to talk about week in week out, all day, every day.
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: There's something somewhere to be talked about, isn't it wonderful?
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: I know our civilization is crumbling for our very eyes,
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: and there's nothing we could do about it. But at
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: least we get to talk about it. At least we
• 59:06
  Speaker 3: get to fiddle while roam burns. At least we get
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: to play a string quartet on on on the dying
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: ashes of the Titanic. Hello, future historians, if you ever
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: hear this, it wasn't that bad. I mean, it was
• 59:25
  Speaker 3: that bad. But whatever, it wasn't I can't seem to
• 59:30
  Speaker 3: make a decision, And perhaps that was the problem all along,
• 59:37
  Speaker 3: Doctor Random Mcammon's Knew Radio.
• 59:43
  Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean just again, you know, I don't
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: think that you can legislate mothers letting fathers, but I
• 59:54
  Speaker 2: mean you can, like change the laws so that you can,
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: you know, basically like.
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: Put you You can't.
• 59:59
  Speaker 4: You can't legislate mothers having fathers in the home, but
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 4: you can you can penalize parents for their kids' crimes.
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 4: They've done it in the right past. They do it
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 4: with delinquency if you're they do it not delinquency, but truancy.
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 4: If your child doesn't go to the school, and you know,
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 4: the schools worked very hard to maintain that because they
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 4: don't get money from the federal government for students that
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 4: don't attend.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: Well, I know I get all that, but I'm saying,
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 2: even if they change all that, now those kids I mean,
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: why not even really sure we know their teens. That
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 2: doesn't necessarily mean they're like under eighteen. They could be
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: like close to our age.
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 4: The age that was stated was fourteen.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: Okay, how many of them we do.
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 4: Well, we don't know. But when they're talking about trying
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 4: miners as adults, they're not talking about eighteen year olds.
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 4: Eighteen year olds are already tried as adults. So they're
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 4: talking about kids who are under the age of eighteen
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 4: and trying them as an adults. And the reason we
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 4: try them is minors. The reason we try miners differently
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: than we try adults is the same reason why miners
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 4: can't consent to sex, why miners can't sign a contract
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 4: without parental permission, is because their brains are not developed
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 4: enough to make decisions as effectively as adults. And either
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 4: we recognize that and we are consistent on it, and
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 4: we recognize that an individual who is fourteen years old
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 4: does not have the same process by which they make
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 4: it the decision to commit a crime. There are steps
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 4: missing because they don't have that full brain development, or
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 4: they do have the same. Either we accept that or
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 4: we don't, and it either we start allowing them to
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 4: drive and buy alcohol and sign up for the military
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 4: and sign contracts and all that, or we recognize that
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 4: under the age of eighteen, there are things that we
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 4: can do to assist there's a level of plasticity in
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 4: the brain at that age that we can we can
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 4: use to help that individual straighten their shit out, even
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 4: though their parents didn't and their educators didn't and the
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 4: elders in their neighborhood didn't, or we start treating them
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 4: all the way as adults right period.
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't disagree. I'm just saying that, like what
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 2: is what has happened in this specific case has happened.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 2: Like I think that that's got to be like a
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: bit of a longer game.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: That's so that's all I'm saying, Like, you can't just
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: fix that.
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 2: But like right now, there's and I think that he's
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: I don't think he's talking.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 4: About about legislation to charge young people as adults. And
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 4: it's not talking about legislation to change the system to
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 4: uh prevent recidivism in young people, right He's just talking
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 4: about charge. So what he's gonna do is take him
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 4: from the JDC system and put them in the adult jail.
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: System.
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 4: If he does that, it is absolutely wrong. It's not
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 4: going to help them, it's not going to help the community.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 4: It is going to increase recidivism.
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: Okay, well yeah, that I mean, I I see what
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 2: you're saying. I think that it's probably to deter because
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: the thing is Washington, d C. Historically is very like
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: soft on crime, and I think that it's sort of
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: encouraged this. And he's saying we're gonna we're gonna invert that, right,
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: and uh, And I I hope it doesn't. What I
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: hope is that it will create a chilling effect where
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: people are like, well, I guess we can't break laws anymore,
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: so let's try not to do that, you know. But
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: but yeah, I mean I think that ultimately there's got
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: to be a social and cultural change. And but I
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: don't think you can simply, you know, legislate this away.
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: And that's kind of like we're kind of on the
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: same page with that. And I did get a super
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 2: chat from ZARANX who gave us five dollars and said,
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 2: legislate fathers in the homes by getting government out of marriage,
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 2: family and children. The hardest thing to do is probably
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: the very thing to try. Yeah, So I mean again,
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: you can't just like executive order that and to play,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: and it's gonna get a lot of pushback and it
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: probably won't get a lot of support from either party,
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: so they'll have to like do this another way.
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: But I agree that should.
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 2: Be the goal in the long run. So but all right,
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: let us don't you guys think about that one in
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: the comments. Let me see if there's any other super
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: chats super Child's no, no rumble stuff. All right, so
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 2: we got one more story. We're gonna end on something
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 2: a little bit hornier. I guess how you look at it.
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: So uh.
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 2: Since July twenty twenty five, I didn't know there was
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: some multiple instances, but there have been six at least
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: six incidents that have disrupted WNBA games where spectators threw neon, green,
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: and purple dildos onto the court, starting with a game
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: between the Atlanta Dream and the Golden State Valkyries. These
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 2: acts initially linked to a cryptocurrency meme coin group promoting
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 2: green dildo coin. Yes, that's that's what it is. They
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: has led to arrests, including a twenty three year old
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 2: in Atlanta and an eighteen year old in Phoenix charged
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: with disorderly conduct and related offensives offenses. Players like Sophie
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: Cunningham and coaches like Cheryl Reeve have condemned the trend
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 2: as dangerous and disrespectful, citing risks to player safety and
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: ongoing sexism in women's sports. The WNBA has responded with
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: strict measures, including immediate ejections. I almost read that as
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: erections the minimum one year bands and potential felony charges
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 2: for offenders, while enhancing arena security curb further disruptions. And
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: I just want to make a suggestion, a piece of
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: advice to the to the guys trying to push their
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: cryptocurrency mean coin. I wouldn't go to the WNBA because
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: no one's gonna see it, So maybe go to a
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 2: bigger game, maybe the actual NBA. But anyway, I thought
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: it was funny. And the funny thing too, is that
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: this came like shortly after a different story that I
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 2: skipped on, where a bunch of like WNBA players sorted
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: wearing t shirts that basically said that they deserve to
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 2: get paid the same as the male players.
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: I forget.
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 2: I think it was like pay her fare or something
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 2: like that. I don't really remember.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I.
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: Mean, look, I will say though, it is probably dangerous
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: to throw things on the court while people are running
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: back and forth, So I'm not like, you know, I
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 2: think that that is seriously a risk, and I don't
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 2: I'm not in support of that. That being said, this
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 2: is funny. So anyway, anyway, go let you you guys
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 2: have any thoughts on this, go ahead.
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: I would have thought, and I'm not a fan of sports,
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: never mind female sports, but I would have thought that
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 3: it's already an objectable offense to throw objects onto the court,
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: especially objects that represent trip hazards. I don't think it's illegal,
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 3: I would certainly hope not, but I would think it's
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 3: something that would justify your removal from a private venue
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: in the event that enough witnesses can attest to your guilt.
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 3: I'm guessing this is the case and always has been
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: the case. But it turns out it's not good enough
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 3: when it happens to women. If a male team sucks,
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 3: they get shipped for one of them, you figure out
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: who chucked the ship, and you throw them out, simple ass.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: But if a female team sucks, and let's face it,
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 3: they all do, it's not good enough. To punish the
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 3: people who suck. We need safety nets to prevent the
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: people the people from even doing it. And I hate
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 3: that the nutshell. When women are in are in charge,
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 3: disapproval will not be tolerated. It won't even be expressed.
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 3: We will go out of our way to prevent any
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 3: disapproval being expressed in the first place, because there is
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 3: no conceivable reason that anyone would ever complain about women.
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: It must be misogyny when anyone complains about women for
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 3: any any reason. You think these women suck.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: At sports, Well that's not possible.
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 3: You just hate women. We think rebooting old franchises by
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 3: casting women instead of men is a silly idea, Well
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 3: that's not possible. You just hate women. Replacing men with
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 3: women is a brilliant idea, I'll have you know. Subsidizing
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 3: women by stealing from men, it's a brilliant idea. How
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 3: could you possibly say it isn't unless you're some kind
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 3: of misogynist. Replacing our own men with men from the
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 3: third world, it's a brilliant idea. Could how could you
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 3: possibly say it isn't unless you're some kind of racist.
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: And that's how we got here. Ladies and gentlemen, this
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 3: is your weekly reminder that the reason your culture is
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 3: collapsing and being taken over by other cultures is because
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 3: you left women in charge in charge of it, and women,
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 3: by and large are more obsessed with what they ha
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: has been said to them five years ago than what
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 3: a world leader said to them five minutes ago. Putting
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 3: women in charge will give.
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: You relational aggression.
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 3: Aggression in a domestic environment, that's that's part of the course.
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 3: A domestic environment must hold itself to high standards regulated
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 3: within itself, but a national environment must hold other nations
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 3: to high standards regulated internationally. We cannot let them trample
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 3: on us. This is not what this story is about,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: but I'm going there anyway because I don't give much
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 3: of a fuck about dildo's being thrown onto a basketball court.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 3: To me, it seems seems like a joke, like something
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 3: that could potentially harm people, but function functionally does not.
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 3: I mean, they even have the decency to throw dildos
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 3: with neon colors, so at least they're peripherally visible against
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: the wood brown motif of a basketball court.
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: If they were.
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 3: Throwing wood brown colored dildos, I'd be like, all right,
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 3: that seems malicious, like they're trying to present present trip hazards.
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 3: But if it's bright green or bright purple, and well,
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 3: it's like, okay, cool, but at least it's obviously about
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 3: sending a message rather than endangering anyone. By the way,
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 3: is it a coincidence that they're green and purple? A
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 3: lot of you zoomers won't get the reference, but bright
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 3: green and bright purple where the official colors of colors
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 3: of Gamagate. And it goes back even further than that.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 3: It's Look, there's a place called four chan. There was,
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 3: and you know I don't have time to get into it.
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 3: Please do look it up and browse the content and
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 3: at your leisure. I just think it's funny. I I
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 3: like to think there's something mystical, mystical about the combination
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 3: of purple and green. It's so obviously ugly. The punk
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 3: Revolution was famously adorned with neon colors too, even pink
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 3: and yellow and that electric blue that's so ubiquitous now.
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 3: But the Gamagate Revolution had to make itself distinct, distinct
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 3: from the rainbow, the gay rainbow, which culturally appropriated all
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 3: the neon colors and turned it into their flag, but
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 3: they would never dream of using green and purple, because
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 3: green and purple are so complementary that they're not even complementary.
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 3: They look awful together. Imagine a bathroom where the wolves
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 3: are purple and the bath is green and the toilet
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 3: is green. It would be so esthetically offensive that you
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 3: would eventually start hallucinating. And yeah, that's where we're at.
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: We've been subjected to political contradictions for so long, We've
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 3: been subjected to impossible hypocrisy for so long that the
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 3: flag we have to wave in distress, it's not just
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 3: upside down, it's purple and green. It's surely a universal
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 3: sign of distress. There are no national flags that are
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 3: made of purple and green. Well, funnily enough.
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: They're away Keikistan.
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 3: There are no national flags featuring purple.
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: There.
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 3: There's only three, i think, and they're all just a
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 3: small part of an emblem, of a coat of arms
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 3: or something. Of all the flags in the world, even
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 3: the ones that are just three colors, no one has
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 3: ever used purple as one of those colors. Purple, for
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 3: whatever reason, is not a sign of pride. It's a
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 3: sign of distress. When they throw the green dil doos.
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: It's all in good fun. But when they throw the
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 3: purple del dos, shit just got real. Remember Remember how
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 3: much sense it makes All the shit I've just been saying.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 3: I know it just sounds random, and it is random
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 3: is my middle name. But remember it is random because
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: I'm just talking stupid shit to entertain you. Remember that,
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 3: remember everything, or don't. I don't even remember what I
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 3: just said. Good night everyone, I'm going for a cigarette.
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 4: Well will you go for a cigarette? I'm going to
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 4: point out something else, right, this this, this turned out
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 4: to be like this big fury over. This was was
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 4: amazing that the thing that sort of fuels the desire
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 4: to do these types of pranks was done in in uh,
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 4: you know, great amounts.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: This was.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 4: This was covered by all kinds of news agencies. This
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 4: was there was a big deal made of this. This
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 4: was the people who did it got all kinds of attention,
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 4: and you know, the arrest that occurred in everything. I
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 4: bet they got you know, people that had only ever
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 4: thrown one, and there were other people that didn't get caught.
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 4: But it's the this story is told as if this
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 4: was something that has never been done before, this kind
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 4: of thing has never happened before, and it's only being
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 4: done because the w n b A is women and
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 4: they don't respect the women, and it's it's about going
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 4: after the women. How dare they? But there have been
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 4: disruptions at NBA games that have made the news over time,
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 4: for for years and years and years. Remember years ago
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 4: there was a big fight on the court at one
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 4: point that that disrupted the game. But in more recent
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 4: years there was a player that got spat on, and
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 4: I think that when they made a bit of a
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 4: racial thing out of it, but but not it didn't.
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 4: It didn't hit hard enough to get a lot of
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 4: people's attention. But objects like like mic set objects get
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 4: thrown on the court all the time, just not necessarily dildo's,
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 4: But there have been full water bottles thrown at players,
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 4: so it's it's not so much a prank as it
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 4: is an attack. If you have somebody throw a water
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 4: bottle from up in the stands and it hits somebody
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 4: in the head, it can actually give them a concussion.
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 4: There have been you know, popcorn dumped out there and
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 4: candy dumped out there. Things that have to be the
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 4: game stop, has to be stopped, and they have to
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 4: clean it up. A lot of lude remarks, racial slurs,
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 4: all kinds of stuff. There have been fans that have
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 4: been banned for yelling like all kinds of nasty things
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 4: at players and sexually explicit things, all kinds of stuff
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 4: like that. There have been streakers, and the practice of
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 4: streaking at athletic events is so long standing and so
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 4: well known. There is a song about it called the Streak,
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 4: and I believe the setting in the song is a
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 4: basketball game, probably not a NBA game, but in any case,
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 4: like these kind of things, even though they're stupid and
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 4: the people who do them are definitely, you know, society
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 4: not sending its best. It's it's not unique at all
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 4: that this happened to the women. And one of the
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 4: reasons that I put this in our chat was it's
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 4: funny obviously throwing dildos on the court, but the upset
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 4: over it, treating it as though it's different, this time,
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 4: it's special, this time, it's unique, this time it's no,
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 4: it's not, it's it's pretty much power for the course,
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 4: and it's just another example of, you know, an environment
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 4: that when something is over the top, it's over the
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 4: top toward men in a masculine way, and it's dealt
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 4: with in a masculine way, and then and and the
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 4: men involved move on. As soon as you get women
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 4: into that environment, it becomes a whole different thing, different ballgames,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 4: so to speak. Uh, and and now that it's it's
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 4: treated like it's a gender based attack, when in fact
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 4: you know it's it's not. Hell and and uh, just
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 4: a couple of years ago, there was an incident that
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 4: I remember being reported where some animal rights group glued
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 4: their hands to the court at a game, chained themselves
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 4: to the baskets, ran out onto the court, very disruptive.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 4: They had to get them out of there in order
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 4: to have the game. And even that like that was
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 4: much more disruptive than this. It didn't involve stopping the
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 4: game for a couple of seconds to get the offending
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 4: device off of the court. There was the great deal
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 4: more that had to be done to deal with these people,
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 4: and it wasn't not as big of a deal was
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 4: made out of that. They weren't even as widely condemned
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 4: and got their issue talked about. Right, So, yeah, this
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 4: is this is a women Women can't take what men
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 4: are expected to take. Women can't handle what men are
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 4: expected to handle situation, and you know, frankly, I'm not surprised.
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean again, I just thought it was well
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: funny obviously and a bit preposterous. And you know, Mike
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 2: made the gamer Gate reference that I intended I'm making.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 2: But it's just like disrespect to Vivian. She's just a
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: woman just like you guys. She deserves acknowledgment recognition as well.
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 2: But yeah, I mean, let me know what you guys
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: think about this one in the comments. I just thought
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: it was funny, so not not really all that offended,
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 2: but whatever. I you know, they're there. You know what's
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: gonna happen. They're gonna make a big fuss out of
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 2: it and all that, and hopefully we'll just move on.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: So all right, anyway, that's all the stories I got
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: for you guys. So we're gonna go into the Patron
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 2: Show now. We're gonna talk about this article. The Lord
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: of the Rings movies have aged poorly. I'm sure it's
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 2: gonna be a very productive discussion and there won't be
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: anything cringe in it that will cause us to want
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 2: to shoot ourselves, you know, but we'll see. So anyway, thanks,
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: guys for coming on the show, and thank you to
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 2: Mike and Hannah for helping me out with talking about
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 2: these topics. And yeah, we'll talk to you guys in
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: the next one. Please like, share, subscribe, comment, all that
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 2: good stuff and see you guys next Tuesday.