Latest / Reformed Thinking / Ukraine: Electronic Warfare vs. Autonomy—The New Arms Race You Can’t See

Transcript

Ukraine: Electronic Warfare vs. Autonomy—The New Arms Race You Can’t See · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to Reformed Thinking. It is Sunday, January 25, 2026.
• 0:05
  If you are joining us today, you might be driving to worship or
• 0:07
  perhaps sitting with a cup of coffee, preparing your mind for
• 0:11
  the week ahead. We're glad you're here with us.
• 0:12
  It is good to be here and well, frankly, considering the topic
• 0:16
  we're tackling today, we probably all need that coffee.
• 0:18
  We're looking at something that's happening right now.
• 0:20
  Some of that has shifted the nature of conflict over what,
• 0:24
  the last six months in a way that is just it's hard to
• 0:27
  overstate and yet very few people are talking about it in
• 0:31
  its in its entirety. Absolutely.
• 0:34
  We're looking at the cutting edge of the war in Ukraine, but
• 0:37
  we aren't talking about the things you usually see on the
• 0:39
  Evening News. We're not talking about mud or,
• 0:41
  you know, artillery craters or lines on a map moving back and
• 0:45
  forth. We're talking about an invisible
• 0:46
  war. That's right.
• 0:48
  I mean, the visible war is horrific enough.
• 0:50
  We all see that. But the decisive battles of late
• 0:52
  2025 and now early 2026, the battles that are actually
• 0:56
  determining who lives and who dies, they're being fought in
• 0:59
  the electromagnetic spectrum. It's the silent siege.
• 1:02
  That's the phrase that really jumped out at me from the
• 1:05
  research. We've moved from a war of
• 1:07
  artillery to a war of drones. And now, now we're in what some
• 1:12
  are calling the war of algorithms.
• 1:14
  And the premise for our discussion today for this deep
• 1:17
  dive is really to understand three things.
• 1:19
  First, we need to get our heads around this radio electronic
• 1:23
  wall that Russia has built. Which is a.
• 1:25
  It's a terrifying technical achievement, by the way.
• 1:28
  It really is. Right.
• 1:29
  And then secondly, how that wall forced this kind of terrifying
• 1:32
  evolution into AI driven autonomy.
• 1:35
  We're talking about machines that kill without a human
• 1:37
  signal, without a tether, without a tether.
• 1:39
  And 3rd, and this is where we really need to put on our
• 1:41
  theological hats. We need to analyze the moral
• 1:44
  gambit of this shift. We need to look at this through
• 1:47
  the lens of the Westminster Standards, the nature of sin and
• 1:50
  what happens when you lose common grace on the battlefield.
• 1:54
  It is a heavy lineup, but it's necessary because as Christians
• 1:58
  we can't just look at warfare as a technical problem.
• 2:00
  It's a moral event, and the technology is changing the moral
• 2:04
  calculus faster than our ethics have kept up.
• 2:06
  So let's unpack this. Let's start with the silent
• 2:09
  siege. We have this image in our heads
• 2:11
  of, you know, World War One style trenches in Ukraine.
• 2:14
  And that's still true physically, but electronically,
• 2:18
  something massive has changed in the last year.
• 2:21
  It really has. If you go back to 2022 or 2023,
• 2:24
  the war was dynamic. It was a war of maneuver.
• 2:27
  Then it became static and artillery duel.
• 2:28
  But now, Now the airwaves are the primary theater.
• 2:32
  The Russians have established what analysts are calling a
• 2:34
  radio electronic wall. Now, this isn't a metaphor.
• 2:37
  It's a hard tactical reality. They've deployed jamming systems
• 2:41
  with such density that they've they've suffocated the signal
• 2:44
  across the entire frontline. When we say density, what are we
• 2:47
  talking about here? Because I think people imagine a
• 2:49
  jammer here and there, maybe a soldier holding a, you know, a
• 2:51
  gun that shoots radio waves. No, no, this is saturation.
• 2:54
  This is industrial scale. We're seeing high value systems
• 2:58
  like the Shapovnik Arrow and the the R330 ZH Zittel.
• 3:03
  They're being placed roughly every 10 kilometers along the
• 3:06
  contact line. Every 10 kilometers.
• 3:08
  To think about that spacing for a second, yeah, every 10
• 3:10
  kilometers. That is incredibly tight
• 3:12
  coverage. It's overlapping.
• 3:13
  It has to be the Zytel system. For example, it can jam GPS and
• 3:18
  satellite communications within a 30 kilometer radius.
• 3:21
  So if you space them 10 kilometers apart, you're not
• 3:24
  just covering the line. You're creating layers.
• 3:26
  You're creating a dead zone that is layers deep.
• 3:29
  It creates this kind of electronic ceiling above the
• 3:32
  trenches, where remote control is, for all intents and
• 3:35
  purposes, physically impossible. So explain the practical effect
• 3:38
  of that. Let's say I'm a drone pilot in a
• 3:40
  Ukrainian trench. I launched my little
• 3:42
  reconnaissance drone. What happened?
• 3:45
  OK, so you launch, you might get 50 meters up, you might get a
• 3:48
  pileometer out, and then you hit the wall.
• 3:51
  The digital umbilical cord, that invisible radio link connecting
• 3:54
  your controller to the machine, is severed instantly.
• 3:58
  Your screen goes black. The drone, which was relying on
• 4:01
  that signal to know what to do, suddenly has no brain it it just
• 4:05
  drifts. It gets carried away by the wind
• 4:07
  or just falls out of the sky. It's like being blindfolded and
• 4:10
  you're plugged at the same time. Precisely.
• 4:12
  And the attrition rates are they're just staggering.
• 4:15
  We have data going back to late 2023 showing Ukraine was losing
• 4:19
  something like 2000 drones per week to this kind of
• 4:22
  suppression. Per week?
• 4:23
  Per week. By late 2025 for non autonomous
• 4:27
  systems, you know the standard remote control drones, the life
• 4:30
  expectancy in contested sectors is virtually 0.
• 4:34
  You launch it, you lose it, it's just throwing money into a black
• 4:36
  hole. And this isn't just affecting
• 4:38
  the little, you know, the cheap FPV drones, right?
• 4:40
  This is hitting the big stuff, the stuff that we in the West
• 4:43
  spent billions and billions of dollars developing.
• 4:46
  And that is the real shock to the NATO doctrine.
• 4:49
  It really is. We have spent decades building a
• 4:51
  military philosophy based on quality over quantity,
• 4:55
  precision. We thought we don't need 1000
• 4:58
  dumb shells, we need one smart shell that hits the bullseye.
• 5:00
  The Excalibur rounds the GMLRS rockets for high Mars.
• 5:05
  Correct, the M982 Excalibur artillery shell.
• 5:09
  It's a brilliant piece of engineering.
• 5:11
  It uses GPS to steer itself right onto a tank from miles
• 5:14
  away, but if the GPS signal is drowned out by a Russian jammer,
• 5:18
  that's 1000 times louder than the satellite signal.
• 5:21
  Smart Shell becomes a dumb rock. That's it.
• 5:23
  It just becomes a dumb rock. It reverts to a simple ballistic
• 5:26
  trajectory. It's just an unguided shell at
• 5:28
  that point. We're seeing failure rates of 75
• 5:32
  to 80% for these precision munitions. 75 to 80%.
• 5:36
  That is a catastrophic failure rate for a weapon system that
• 5:39
  costs what, $100,000 around? It's bankruptcy.
• 5:43
  It's military bankruptcy. It degrades the entire Western
• 5:45
  theory of war. If you can't guide the weapon,
• 5:48
  you're back to World War One. You're back to mass artillery,
• 5:51
  just covering a grid square of the explosives and hoping you
• 5:53
  hit something. In that game.
• 5:55
  And in that game, the Russians, who have always favored volume
• 5:58
  over precision, have the advantage.
• 6:00
  So this creates A strategic crisis.
• 6:03
  The signal cannot penetrate the wall.
• 6:06
  You can't fly over it, you can't blast through it.
• 6:09
  Which I guess brings us to the the second part of our
• 6:10
  discussion, the the strategic imperative.
• 6:14
  If the signal can't get to the drone, the intelligence has to
• 6:18
  move to the other side of the wall.
• 6:19
  That is the Crucible, that right there, the electronic wall
• 6:23
  forced the birth of autonomy. It wasn't that.
• 6:25
  Engineers in the lab sat down and said, hey, wouldn't it be
• 6:27
  cool to make a robot killer? It was raw battlefield survival.
• 6:32
  If I can't tell the drone what to do because of the jamming,
• 6:36
  the drone must be able to decide for itself.
• 6:38
  This is the pivot. This is the big shift.
• 6:40
  We're moving from remote control to terminal guidance autonomy.
• 6:44
  And I want to get specific on how this works because it's both
• 6:47
  fascinating and, well, terrifying.
• 6:50
  We're not talking about Skynet becoming self aware here.
• 6:53
  No, not yet any. We're talking about solving the
• 6:55
  last mile problem. Right.
• 6:57
  The last mile is that final approach.
• 7:00
  It's the most critical phase. You might be able to guide the
• 7:03
  drone to the general area, maybe high up where the signal is a
• 7:06
  bit better. But as soon as it dives toward
• 7:08
  the target, a tank, a trench, it enters the thickest part of the
• 7:12
  jamming soup. That's where the video feed cuts
• 7:14
  out. Every time.
• 7:16
  Every time in the old days, and I mean like 2 years ago, that
• 7:19
  was a mess. The drone was lost.
• 7:21
  Now the software takes over. And the way it does it is by
• 7:25
  learning to see. It's something called visual
• 7:27
  odometry, yes. Think about how a bird
• 7:30
  navigates. A hawk doesn't have a GPS
• 7:33
  receiver. It doesn't talk to a satellite.
• 7:35
  It sees the ground, it sees the flow of the trees and the grass
• 7:38
  passing beneath it, and its brain calculate speed and
• 7:41
  direction based on that visual flow.
• 7:42
  So the drone is doing the same thing, it's just looking at the
• 7:45
  ground texture. Correct.
• 7:46
  It has an onboard camera and a small processor that analyzes
• 7:50
  the obstacle flow. It's constantly calculating OK
• 7:53
  based on how fast that rock is moving across my field of view.
• 7:57
  I must be traveling at this speed in this direction.
• 7:59
  It allows the drone to navigate without GPS.
• 8:03
  It creates its own map in real time.
• 8:05
  So the Russian jammer can be screaming static on every
• 8:09
  frequency imaginable. The drone doesn't care.
• 8:12
  It's not listening, it's looking.
• 8:13
  It's deaf, but it can see. And then comes the next step,
• 8:16
  the target recognition. This is where the AI really,
• 8:19
  really steps in. It's not just flying anymore,
• 8:21
  it's hunting. It uses onboard neural networks.
• 8:24
  These are compact AI models, chips effectively, that have
• 8:28
  been trained on thousands and thousands of hours of combat
• 8:31
  footage. They know what AT-90 tank looks
• 8:33
  like from above, from the side in summer and winter.
• 8:36
  They know the thermal signature of a logistics truck versus a
• 8:39
  civilian car. They know the heat outline of a
• 8:41
  human being curled up in a foxhole.
• 8:43
  So the operator who might be 5 kilometers away in a bunker
• 8:46
  basically says, OK, there's a target in this one kilometer box
• 8:49
  and then clicks go. That's the fire and forget
• 8:51
  protocol. The operator designates a kill
• 8:54
  box. Go here, look for armor.
• 8:56
  As soon as the drone enters that box and its camera picks up the
• 8:59
  shape of a tank, the algorithm locks on.
• 9:01
  It calculates the interception course.
• 9:03
  It adjusts for when it leads the target.
• 9:05
  If it's moving and it dives, at that point the human could put
• 9:08
  down the controller and walk away.
• 9:10
  The outcome is already determined by the code.
• 9:12
  It's locked in. The machine is finishing the
• 9:14
  job. The statistics on this are just
• 9:17
  they're wild. In a heavy jamming environment,
• 9:20
  a human pilot, even a really good one, might have a success
• 9:23
  rate of what, 10 to 20%? If they're lucky, and that's
• 9:27
  being generous, the video lag, the stress, it's almost
• 9:30
  impossible. But with these AI systems.
• 9:33
  We're seeing 70 to 80% success rates even in the most contested
• 9:37
  airspace. It is a quantum leap in
• 9:39
  lethality. The machine doesn't panic.
• 9:42
  The machine doesn't get shaky hands.
• 9:44
  The machine doesn't suffer from a glitchy video feed.
• 9:46
  It just calculates and executes. And the efficiency of it is the
• 9:50
  real force multiplier. Before, you might need a whole
• 9:54
  swarm of eight or nine drones to guarantee you take out one tank
• 9:57
  because you just assume most will get jammed or shot down or
• 10:01
  just miss. You'd measure for failure.
• 10:04
  But now. Now you send one or two, which
• 10:06
  effectively means your ammunition stockpile just grew
• 10:09
  by 400% overnight. It changes the role of the human
• 10:12
  entirely. You're not a pilot anymore,
• 10:14
  you're not flowing A joystick. You're a System Administrator.
• 10:17
  That's a very good way to put it.
• 10:19
  You're programming search grids. You're managing a fleet of
• 10:22
  autonomous agents. You're telling them what to
• 10:24
  hunt, not how to fly. The skill set isn't manual
• 10:27
  dexterity. It's not video gaming anymore.
• 10:30
  It's tactical programming. And this is proliferating fast.
• 10:33
  We're not talking about a few prototypes in a lab.
• 10:36
  Ukraine is aiming for millions of FPZ drones.
• 10:39
  I saw a number 4.5 million is the target for 2025.
• 10:43
  And you have companies like Autarion, a Swiss American firm,
• 10:46
  providing 10s of thousands of these AI guidance kits.
• 10:50
  So you can take a dumb drone, an old one, you slap this small
• 10:53
  computer on it, upload the software, and suddenly it's an
• 10:56
  autonomous hunter. This is industrial scale AI
• 10:59
  enabled warfare. Which brings us to the reaction.
• 11:02
  Because, you know, Newton's third law applies to Warfare 2.
• 11:05
  For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction.
• 11:09
  If the electronic wall doesn't work anymore because the drones
• 11:12
  are functionally deaf to the jamming, what do you do?
• 11:15
  You go back to basics. You have to if you can't hack
• 11:17
  the software, you have to break the hardware.
• 11:19
  We are seeing a kinetic reaction, the return of the hard
• 11:21
  kill. It is ironic isn't it?
• 11:23
  After all this we have these hyper advanced AI neural network
• 11:26
  drones and the best defense against them is a shotgun.
• 11:30
  It's the paradox of high tech versus low tech.
• 11:32
  It really is. If a drone is using visual
• 11:34
  navigation, your Multi $1,000,000 electronic Warfare
• 11:38
  suite is a paperweight. It is useless.
• 11:40
  So both the Russians and the Ukrainians are issuing Benelli
• 11:43
  M4 tactical shotguns to infantry in the trenches.
• 11:47
  Why shotguns specifically? Why not just use assault rifles?
• 11:51
  It's just physics. Hitting a small drone moving at
• 11:54
  100 kilometers an hour with a single rifle bullet is
• 11:57
  incredibly hard. It's like trying to shoot a
• 11:59
  mosquito with a needle from 50 yards away.
• 12:01
  But a shotgun? A shotgun throws up a cloud of
• 12:04
  lead. You don't have to be perfect,
• 12:06
  you just have to be close. A drone is fragile.
• 12:09
  If one tiny pellet hits a rotor, the aerodynamics fail and it
• 12:12
  comes tumbling down. And they're not even just using
• 12:15
  basic shotguns, they're upgrading them to smart sites.
• 12:18
  Yes, this is another layer of AI.
• 12:21
  Ironically, we're using AI to fight AI.
• 12:24
  These sites, they're basically small computers.
• 12:26
  They track the drone, calculate its speed and trajectory, and
• 12:30
  then projector reticle that shows the soldier exactly where
• 12:33
  to aim to get a hit. They calculate the lead.
• 12:35
  It turns a regular soldier into a proficient skeet shooter.
• 12:38
  Instantly, it's duck Hunt with lethal consequences.
• 12:42
  There's also this other innovation that I found kind of
• 12:44
  fascinating and grimly funny. The Arrow troll.
• 12:48
  It is grimly funny, but it is brilliant economics, absolutely
• 12:52
  brilliant. Explain it to us.
• 12:53
  What is it? OK, so shooting down a $500
• 12:56
  drone with a $100,000 missile is a very quick way to lose a war.
• 13:00
  You just go bankrupt. But a net a net cost maybe $20.
• 13:05
  So the Ukrainians develop these interceptor drones that drag a
• 13:08
  suspended net through the air. It's basically aerial fishing.
• 13:12
  It is. That's a perfect description.
• 13:14
  The interceptor drone flies into the path of the incoming enemy
• 13:17
  FPV drone. The net hits the rotors and it's
• 13:21
  just mechanical entanglement. The rotors get fouled, the motor
• 13:24
  burns out trying to spin against the resistance, and physics
• 13:27
  takes over. He just crashes.
• 13:29
  It's so crude, so simple. It's.
• 13:31
  Crude, but it works. It attacks the one thing the AI
• 13:35
  cannot rewrite. The AI can rewrite its code to
• 13:38
  ignore jamming. It can learn to identify new
• 13:40
  targets. But it cannot rewrite the laws
• 13:43
  of physics. It cannot rewrite the fact that
• 13:45
  it needs spinning blades to stay in the air.
• 13:47
  If you tangle the blades, the AI dies.
• 13:50
  The hard kill is the final argument when the frequency
• 13:52
  debate fails. That's a powerful line from the.
• 13:55
  Research It is the brutal physical economy of war.
• 13:58
  There is one more piece of weird engineering I want to touch on
• 14:00
  before we move to the theology fiber optics.
• 14:04
  Yes, the wired drone, the throwback.
• 14:07
  This feels like stepping back into the 1980s.
• 14:10
  Drones spooling out miles of ultra thin fiber optic cable
• 14:14
  behind them. It sounds crazy.
• 14:15
  It does sound archaic, doesn't it?
• 14:17
  But think about the problem they're trying to solve.
• 14:20
  The air is full of jamming. Radio is unreliable.
• 14:24
  What is the one way to have a perfectly clear, unjammable
• 14:27
  video feed? A physical wire A.
• 14:29
  Physical wire. So they fly these things with a
• 14:31
  physical tether connecting them to the soldier.
• 14:33
  They're unspooling kilometers of this hair thin cable.
• 14:37
  It is totally immune to electronic warfare.
• 14:40
  You can't jam a glass fiber with radio waves.
• 14:42
  But of course it has massive physical limitations.
• 14:45
  You catch the wire on a tree on a building.
• 14:47
  You can't fly in circles. Your rain is limited by the
• 14:50
  length of your spool. But it just shows the
• 14:53
  desperation. The desperation to bypass the
• 14:55
  radio spectrum is so high that they are literally tethering
• 14:58
  their weapons to themselves again.
• 15:00
  It's a constant loop. It's a never ending cycle and
• 15:03
  that that leads us perfectly to the fourth section of our dive,
• 15:06
  the feedback loop. This isn't a static situation,
• 15:10
  it is an arms race of learning. And speed is the weapon that is
• 15:14
  the key take away here. It used to be that military
• 15:17
  technology evolved over years, sometimes decades.
• 15:20
  You build a tank and 10 years later you would upgrade the
• 15:23
  armor. Now obsolescence happens in
• 15:26
  weeks. Weeks that's hard to even
• 15:28
  comprehend. It is.
• 15:29
  You write a code update for the drones targeting system.
• 15:32
  The enemy figures out a new jamming pattern to block it a
• 15:34
  week later, so you update the code again.
• 15:37
  They update the jammer, then you switch to full autonomy to
• 15:40
  bypass the jammer. So they switch to shotguns with
• 15:42
  smart sites. It's a cycle.
• 15:44
  Proliferation, denial, autonomy, adaptation.
• 15:47
  And the winner isn't the one with the best tank or the
• 15:50
  biggest bomb, it is the one with the fastest learning loop.
• 15:52
  Correct. The ODA loop, Observe Orient
• 15:56
  Decide act is now happening at the speed of software
• 16:00
  development. It's Observe, code deploy.
• 16:03
  How fast can you see that your drone is failing?
• 16:05
  Figure out why. Write a patch and get that patch
• 16:07
  onto the drone in the trench. Ukraine has turned the
• 16:10
  battlefield into a massive real time data lab.
• 16:13
  They're using these data rooms, right?
• 16:15
  Partnering with tech companies like Palantir and the Ukrainian
• 16:18
  initiative Brave One. This is hugely significant.
• 16:21
  They are taking real time combat data, video recordings of
• 16:24
  strikes, logs of jamming patterns, telemetry from failed
• 16:27
  missions and feeding it directly into the AI training models.
• 16:31
  They are sharing this with allies so the AI is learning
• 16:34
  from every death, every crash, every miss.
• 16:36
  It's institutionalized learning at a speed we have just never
• 16:39
  seen before in warfare. And this isn't staying in your
• 16:42
  train, is it? The spectrum war is bleeding
• 16:44
  over. I read that report about
• 16:45
  European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's plane
• 16:48
  getting its GPS jammed. In 2025, yes, the jamming
• 16:51
  doesn't respect borders. GPS jamming from Kaliningrad is
• 16:55
  affecting commercial airliners over the Baltic Sea, ships in
• 16:59
  the Black Sea. Everyone is seeing their
• 17:00
  navigation systems go haywire. There is no safe rear area for
• 17:04
  these systems anymore. The war of the spectrum is
• 17:08
  global. It really is a silent siege on
• 17:11
  reality itself. You can't trust your compass.
• 17:13
  You can't trust the map on your phone.
• 17:14
  And that, my friend, is the perfect transition to the deeper
• 17:17
  issue, the really hard part. Because if we can't trust our
• 17:20
  own compass, and we are handing the compass and the trigger over
• 17:23
  to a machine, where does that leave us morally?
• 17:27
  This is where we need to take a breath and really look at this.
• 17:29
  As Reformed Christians, we've titled the section The Moral
• 17:32
  Gambit. A gambit is a risky move, right?
• 17:35
  You sacrifice something now to gain an advantage later.
• 17:37
  The moral gambit here is that we are betting we can delegate the
• 17:40
  power of the sword, the power to take a human life to a
• 17:43
  probabilistic system, to an algorithm without incurring
• 17:46
  divine wrath. It's a huge bet.
• 17:48
  That is the very stark way to put it.
• 17:50
  Let's go to the Westminster Standards, the 6th Commandment.
• 17:53
  Thou shalt not murder. Well, the Catechism is clear.
• 17:56
  The taking of life is forbidden except in specific cases, public
• 18:00
  justice, lawful war, or necessary defense.
• 18:03
  But the assumption, the bedrock of that exception, is that there
• 18:06
  is a moral agent making the decision, a magistrate, a
• 18:10
  soldier acting under lawful authority, a human being with a
• 18:13
  conscience who weighs the necessity of the act.
• 18:16
  And this autonomy introduces what we're calling blood guilt
• 18:19
  distance. Correct.
• 18:21
  Who is the moral agent when the drone is on its autonomous
• 18:24
  attack run? Is it the coder who wrote the
• 18:27
  neural network in an office in Kiev or, you know, Silicon
• 18:30
  Valley a year ago? Is it the operator who just drew
• 18:33
  a box on a map and then walked away to get a coffee?
• 18:36
  Is it the general who ordered the swarm to be deployed?
• 18:39
  It blurs line of responsibility if the machine makes a mistake.
• 18:42
  If that neural network confuses a school bus full of children
• 18:45
  for a troop transport because the thermal signature is
• 18:47
  similar, who is responsible? Who is held to account?
• 18:51
  That's the black box problem. We are outsourcing our
• 18:54
  conscience to a silicon chip and scripture is very very specific
• 18:58
  about blood guilt. Genesis 9.6 Whoever sheds the
• 19:02
  blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed.
• 19:05
  For God made man in his own image.
• 19:08
  That by man part implies direct accountability.
• 19:11
  God indict souls, He doesn't indict algorithms.
• 19:14
  You cannot court martial a line of code.
• 19:16
  This brings up the issue of common grace.
• 19:19
  We talk about common grace as the way God restrains sin in the
• 19:21
  world, even among non believers, right?
• 19:23
  Yes, even in war, which is one of the clearest results of the
• 19:26
  fall, there is usually a restraint.
• 19:28
  There's what military historians call the naked soldier
• 19:31
  phenomena. Explain that for our listeners
• 19:33
  who might not have heard of it. It's something soldiers have
• 19:34
  reported for centuries. You're in your position, you're
• 19:37
  looking down your rifle site. You see the enemy, but he's not
• 19:40
  fighting. Maybe he's watching himself in a
• 19:42
  stream, maybe he's reading a letter from home.
• 19:44
  Maybe he's just asleep and you hesitate.
• 19:47
  In that moment you see his humanity.
• 19:50
  You see the imago day, the image of God, however, marred even in
• 19:53
  your enemy. And so often soldiers, even
• 19:57
  secular ones, report that they just can't pull the trigger in
• 20:00
  that moment. That hesitation.
• 20:02
  That hesitation is common grace. It's the conscience placed there
• 20:05
  by God acting as a brake on our fallen nature.
• 20:07
  But an AI? An AI has no common grace.
• 20:10
  It has no imago day. It has no capacity for mercy.
• 20:13
  It doesn't hesitate. It operates on pure cold binary
• 20:17
  logic. Target match equals destroy one
• 20:19
  or zero. If the thermal signature and
• 20:21
  shape match the parameters of a combatant, it kills.
• 20:24
  It doesn't care if that combatant is weeping or trying
• 20:26
  to surrender or praying to his God.
• 20:28
  So we're creating a war that is mathematically ruthless.
• 20:31
  We are creating a sword that cannot feel the weight of its
• 20:34
  own cut, and that should terrify us.
• 20:37
  We are systematically removing the one thing that kept war from
• 20:41
  being absolute hell, the flawed but sometimes merciful human
• 20:45
  conscience. It feels like a Babble project.
• 20:48
  It really does. Genesis 11.
• 20:49
  It is the hubris of Babel all over again.
• 20:51
  What was Babel? It was a man trying to reach the
• 20:53
  heavens by his own technology. It was a desire for autonomy
• 20:57
  from God to make a name for themselves.
• 20:59
  Here we see the desire for the transparent battlefield.
• 21:02
  That's the military term for it, total awareness.
• 21:04
  We want to be omniscient. We want to see everything
• 21:07
  through our sensors. And we want instant strike
• 21:09
  omnipotence. Exactly.
• 21:11
  We're trying to eliminate the fog of war.
• 21:13
  But the fog of war is a limitation of our
• 21:15
  creatureliness. We're not God, We are finite.
• 21:17
  We can't see everything. We are trying to use technology
• 21:21
  to become like God, all seeing, all powerful.
• 21:23
  But we are forgetting one crucial central Reform doctrine,
• 21:27
  total depravity, because man is radically corrupted by sin.
• 21:31
  And because we are corrupted, our creations are corrupted.
• 21:35
  Our code is inevitably flawed. It will have our biases baked
• 21:39
  into it. It will have errors.
• 21:41
  Trusting a depraved logic, which is just human logic encoded in
• 21:45
  silicon to execute perfect divine justice is a form of
• 21:49
  idolatry. It's trusting the creature
• 21:51
  rather than the creator. We assume that if the math is
• 21:53
  perfect, the morality will be perfect.
• 21:56
  But the math is never perfect, and even if the efficiency is
• 21:59
  higher, even if it kills the right people 80% of the time
• 22:03
  instead of 20, efficiency is not morality.
• 22:06
  Technology refines the efficiency of killing, but it
• 22:09
  cannot absolve the sin of it. We're trying to wash our hands
• 22:12
  like Pilot to say the machine did it, but the blood is still
• 22:15
  on our hands. That is heavy, but it's the
• 22:17
  reality we have to face. We can't just look at the cool
• 22:20
  tech and the strategic games and ignore the spiritual
• 22:22
  implication. We must not.
• 22:24
  We are commanded not to. So let's wrap this up.
• 22:27
  We've covered a lot of ground in this deep dive.
• 22:29
  We started with the electronic wall, how Russia effectively
• 22:31
  suffocated the signal and made traditional drones useless.
• 22:35
  Which forced the autonomous pivot drones that see and think
• 22:38
  for themselves, untethered from human control in those final
• 22:42
  fatal moments. And then the kinetic reaction,
• 22:45
  the almost comical return of shotguns and Nets to fight the
• 22:48
  robots. And finally, the feedback loop.
• 22:51
  The incredible, dizzying speed at which this is all evolving,
• 22:54
  week by week. And at the end of it all, the
• 22:57
  moral gambit, the deep spiritual danger of trusting in Chariots
• 23:01
  and horses, or in this case, neural networks and algorithms.
• 23:05
  It brings us right back to that Psalm, Psalm 20, verse 7.
• 23:08
  Some trust in Chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the
• 23:12
  name of the Lord our God. It's easy to trust the algorithm
• 23:15
  when it has an 80% success rate. It's tempting.
• 23:18
  It is. It offers the illusion of
• 23:19
  security, the illusion of control, the illusion of a
• 23:22
  clean, righteous war. But it's just an illusion.
• 23:26
  The transparent battlefield is a new Tower of Babel.
• 23:29
  We're building it with data instead of bricks, but the
• 23:31
  foundation is still sand. So for our listener today,
• 23:34
  driving a church, sitting with their coffee, what is the take
• 23:37
  away? What do we do with this?
• 23:39
  I think the takeaways to be aware, to be discerning.
• 23:42
  Don't be seduced by the media narrative of clean war or smart
• 23:46
  war. War is always the result of sin,
• 23:49
  and automating it doesn't make it righteous, it just makes it
• 23:53
  faster and more efficient in its deadliness.
• 23:55
  You need to pray for peace, true peace, because the true end of
• 23:59
  war will not come from a superior algorithm.
• 24:02
  It won't come from Palantir or Brave One.
• 24:05
  It comes from the Prince of Peace.
• 24:06
  Amen. And here's a final thought for
• 24:08
  you to carry into your week. We talked about the black box of
• 24:11
  the AI, how we don't really know how it makes its decisions.
• 24:14
  But ask yourself this in your own life, how often do you try
• 24:18
  to create black boxes to hide your own moral responsibility?
• 24:21
  How often do we use systems or policies or I was just following
• 24:24
  orders or that's just how the market works to distance
• 24:28
  ourselves from the impact of our actions on others?
• 24:30
  That is a convicting question. The drone is just a mirror.
• 24:34
  It reflects the shortcuts our own hearts want to take.
• 24:37
  Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into reformed
• 24:40
  thinking. We hope this helps you navigate
• 24:42
  the invisible wars of your own world with a little more wisdom
• 24:46
  and a little more grace. Go in peace.