Latest / Reformed Thinking / צלח (Tsalach): Spirit-Empowered Success

Transcript

צלח (Tsalach): Spirit-Empowered Success · Reformed Thinking

0:00
You know, usually when we talk about a dictionary definition,
0:04
there is this expectation of absolute precision.
0:07
Right, it feels very binary, like math.
0:09
Yeah, if you like engineering or something, you open up an app or
0:12
a heavy a hardcover dictionary. You type in a word and the page
0:16
shows that clean, bold text. The reference guy just points a
0:20
metaphorical finger and says, well, that is what this sequence
0:24
of letters means. You want a single static
0:26
concept. You want the definition to just
0:28
sit still for you. Defined or undefined, right?
0:31
It is clean. We like things to be visible, to
0:34
be categorized neatly in a box that we can easily comprehend.
0:37
But then you open up a massive multi volume ancient language
0:40
lexicon and suddenly that precision tool kind of shatters.
0:44
It really does. We're looking at a linguistic
0:46
landscape that is, well, honestly, murky and wild.
0:49
You realize that a single word can contain centuries of
0:52
shifting human experience. Welcome to reformed thinking.
0:55
Yeah, glad to be here for this one.
0:57
For this deep dive, we are examining a very dense stack of
1:00
linguistic sources, focusing on a comprehensive Hebrew lexicon
1:04
entry. We are setting out on a mission
1:07
today for you, the listener. We want to uncover the
1:10
fascinating history and the massive theological weight of a
1:13
single biblical Hebrew root word, which is salak.
1:17
And it is a word that appears dozens of times in the biblical
1:20
text, yet its meaning shifts in ways that completely challenge
1:23
our modern categories. We are dealing with an ancient
1:26
Semitic language, you know, which operates on entirely
1:29
different rules than English. And here's the hook for you.
1:32
This is the central mystery we are going to look into today.
1:36
How did an ancient word that originally meant to split wood
1:38
or to force an entry become the primary biblical term for
1:42
success and prosperity? It is quite the leap, isn't it?
1:44
It is a massive leap. I mean, think about that.
1:47
You go from swinging an axe, chopping a log in half to having
1:50
a prosperous career or a successful military campaign.
1:53
Those concepts feel worlds apart to us today.
1:56
They really do, but in the ancient mind they are
1:59
intrinsically linked. So we're going to trace that
2:03
line today and I think you will find it completely changes how
2:06
you view the concept of success. The evolution of this specific
2:11
route is one of the most striking examples of semantic
2:13
development in the ancient Near East.
2:16
It forces us to take off our 21st century glasses, so to
2:19
speak. Right.
2:20
We have to view reality through the eyes of an ancient, agrarian
2:24
and highly physical culture. OK, let's unpack this.
2:27
We need to start right at the beginning with the etymological
2:30
puzzle. That is a great place to start.
2:32
When scholars look at an ancient Hebrew word, they do not just
2:35
look at the biblical text in isolation.
2:38
They look at the surrounding languages, the cognates, to see
2:40
how the neighbors were using the same root.
2:42
That is correct. We have to examine the broader
2:45
Semitic language family to get our bearings.
2:47
In Semitic languages, words are generally built on a root of 3
2:51
consonants. And for our word today, what are
2:54
those letters? The root is spelled with three
2:56
letters, sod, lamed, and Chet. To understand what those 3
3:00
letters meant before they were ever written down in the
3:02
biblical texts we have today, linguists look at sister
3:05
languages. So like how did the neighbors
3:08
use? It precisely when we look at
3:10
Jewish, Aramaic and Syriac, which are closely related
3:13
languages spoke in the same general region.
3:15
The verb Salah can mean to split or to cleave I.
3:19
Want to pause on that for a second?
3:21
The history of how scholars have treated this word is fascinating
3:25
in itself, right? It really reveals a lot about
3:27
the scholars themselves. If you go back to older lexicons
3:30
like the famous Justinius Lexicon or the early editions of
3:34
the Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon from the late 19th century, you
3:37
see a lot of focus on this physical action.
3:40
Yeah, the Brown driver brings Lexicon actually separated the
3:42
word into two entirely different routes.
3:44
They categorize Route 2 as meaning to rush into or to
3:48
penetrate, and route 2 as meaning to advance or to
3:51
prosper. Yes, and the reason they did
3:53
that reveals those assumptions of earlier linguists.
3:57
To those older scholars, the idea of splitting wood violently
4:00
and the idea of succeeding just seemed incompatible.
4:03
Like they couldn't exist in the same thought.
4:05
Right. They assumed there must have
4:07
been two different words that just happened to sound the same.
4:10
Perhaps they derived from different ancient dialects and
4:12
they converged in spelling by pure accident.
4:14
It is what we call homonyms in English, right?
4:18
Like a tree bark and a dog's bark. 2 totally different
4:21
things. Spot on.
4:23
That was the prevailing theory for a long time.
4:25
Because to the Victorian era mind, success is a gentlemanly
4:30
pursuit. It is about polite society,
4:33
climbing the ranks, building a business.
4:35
It is not about swinging A hatchet or sweating in a field.
4:38
No, not at all. But modern linguistic
4:40
scholarship has shifted significantly away from that
4:42
split route. Theory scholars like Emil Pewch
4:45
and Joshua Blau argue strongly that we are not looking at two
4:48
different words at all. OK, so they think it is all
4:50
connected. Yes, they believe we are looking
4:52
at one single route with a unified semantic development,
4:56
and the evidence for this comes from expanding our view to other
5:00
ancient texts. What kind of texts are we
5:02
talking about? Here, Well, for instance in Old
5:04
South Arabic and Phoenician, the cognates of this word clearly
5:07
mean to thrive. You even see it in Phoenician
5:10
personal names. Oh wow.
5:12
Like they named their kids after this word.
5:14
They did. Parents would name their child
5:16
incorporating the root Salaf, hoping the child would thrive or
5:20
prosper in life. I love.
5:21
That it is like naming your kids Success or thrive.
5:25
It shows how culturally significant the concept was to
5:28
them. It does, but we also have this
5:30
fascinating Egyptian Aramaic text mentioned in the sources.
5:33
Right, the text known as Ahikar 125.
5:36
Can you set the scene for what this document actually is?
5:38
The AHI papyri are ancient wisdom texts discovered in
5:41
Elephantine, which is an island in the Nile River in Egypt.
5:45
They tell the story of a legendary wise counselor named
5:48
Ahikar. OK, so it is a story and what
5:50
happens in line 125? In line 125 of this particular
5:54
document, we see a form of the word Salah used in a highly
5:59
debated context for a long time. Based on the Aramaic
6:03
understanding, some scholars translated it as someone
6:06
chopping wood. Which fits the old dictionary
6:09
definition of splitting or cleaving.
6:11
Right, it does, but more recent analysis by Puich suggests a
6:15
different translation. He translates it as setting wood
6:18
on fire. Wait, setting it on fire?
6:20
Yes, the picture painted in the papyrus is someone stealthily
6:24
igniting logs in the dark without being seen.
6:27
It is a proverb about a specific type of action.
6:30
OK. Chopping wood versus setting
6:32
wood on fire on the surface, those seem like 2 totally
6:34
different activities. They do seem different, sure.
6:36
I mean, if you tell me to chop wood and I set it on fire, you
6:39
are going to be pretty upset. But when you think about the
6:41
physics of what is happening, both are intensely physical,
6:45
aggressive actions. And both involve A forceful
6:48
change of state. Whether you are swinging an axe
6:50
to split a log or introducing a spark to ignite a fire, you are
6:54
forcing a reaction. You are making something happen
6:57
against its will. Almost.
6:58
Yes, you are penetrating a solid barrier.
7:01
Wood is hard. It resists change.
7:04
The axe head has to break the structural integrity of the
7:07
timber. You know the fire has to consume
7:10
and breakdown the chemical structure of the wood.
7:12
Exactly that, and this is how scholars trace the semantic
7:15
development of Salah. You start with a highly concrete
7:19
physical action. I want to make sure we trace
7:21
this line clearly for the listener.
7:23
How does a language move from swinging an axe to getting a
7:27
promotion at work? It happens gradually through
7:29
metaphor. The language moves from
7:31
splitting or forcing an entry to the broader concept of
7:35
penetrating. OK.
7:36
From physical splitting to penetrating, then what?
7:38
From penetrating, it shifts to the idea of moving forward or
7:42
making progress against resistance.
7:44
And finally, if you are continuously moving forward,
7:47
overcoming barriers, you arrive at the abstract concept of
7:50
succeeding. It makes total sense when you
7:53
lay it out sequentially like that.
7:55
It is a progression from physical force to abstract
7:57
result. It is a very natural evolution
7:59
for a language to take. I'm trying to think of a real
8:02
world equivalent for you, the listener, to hold onto.
8:06
Think about the English phrase breaking through.
8:09
That is a perfect parallel. If I say I am going to
8:12
physically breakthrough a brick wall, you picture a
8:15
sledgehammer. You picture rubble, dust, sweat,
8:19
and brute force. You see a very physical
8:21
struggle. But if I say I finally had a
8:23
breakthrough in my career, or our research team made a massive
8:27
breakthrough, you do not picture a sledgehammer anymore.
8:29
Right, you picture a promotion or a scientific discovery.
8:33
Yeah, a massive mental leap. You move from a physical barrier
8:36
to an abstract success. But the underlying aggression of
8:40
the word remains. What's fascinating here is that
8:43
the English word success comes from Latin roots.
8:46
We have sub meaning next to or under and cedar meaning to go or
8:51
to yield. So it literally means to come
8:53
after or to follow closely. Yes.
8:55
In English, success is about a sequence of events falling into
8:58
place. It is orderly.
8:59
It is logical. That feels very safe and
9:01
predictable. It does, but the Hebrew concept
9:05
of success rooted in Salah is much more aggressive.
9:08
It is not just about things following a logical neat
9:11
sequence. So it is about a penetrating
9:13
force that refuses to be stopped by any obstacle.
9:16
That is the core idea, yes. A forceful breaking through a.
9:20
Force that refuses to be stopped.
9:22
That is such a vivid, almost violent image.
9:25
It completely strips away the polite veneer we put on the idea
9:29
of success. It really shifts the paradigm.
9:31
And it perfectly sets up the next phase of our investigation,
9:35
because when we leave the broader ancient Near East and
9:38
look at how this word first appears in the biblical text
9:40
itself, we're not looking at human careers or financial
9:43
prosperity. No, we are looking at divine
9:46
action. We're moving away from the
9:47
etymology and into the sudden, rushing reality of how God acts.
9:51
To understand this transition, we need to look at the
9:54
grammatical structure of Biblical Hebrew.
9:56
Hebrew verbs operate in different stems or patterns.
9:59
And what do these stems actually do to the word?
10:01
Well, they modify the intensity, the voice, or the causative
10:04
nature of the action. The simplest, most basic stem is
10:07
called the qual stem. So that is like the baseline
10:10
version of the verb. Yes, it represents simple active
10:13
voice. In the biblical text, the simple
10:16
active form of Salah occurs 25 times.
10:20
Let's look at one of the most physical concrete usages that is
10:23
still very much alive in this basic stem.
10:26
You see it in Second Samuel 19.18.
10:28
Yes. The context There is a chaotic
10:30
scene regarding King David. Absalom's rebellion has ended
10:34
and David is returning to claim his throne.
10:37
And the text uses Salaq to describe people moving
10:39
aggressively toward the Jordan River to meet him.
10:41
Right. And translators wrestle heavily
10:44
with this specific verse. Some render it to cut through
10:46
the river, others say to rush toward or to storm in.
10:50
It is a tough one to nail down. It is one prominent scholar.
10:53
Hertzberg translates it as to storm in, while Piyush maintains
10:57
the idea of forcing entry into the river.
10:59
The focus is on rapid, sudden movement with considerable
11:02
energy. They're not taking a leisurely
11:04
stroll to the water's edge, they're plunging in.
11:07
They are acting with intense urgency.
11:09
But the most striking use of this basic act of STEM is not
11:12
about groups of men rushing rivers.
11:14
It is about the Spirit of God. This is where it gets highly
11:17
theological. The Lexicon points out a heavy
11:20
concentration of this word in the books of Judges and First
11:23
Samuel, and it is entirely connected to the charismatic
11:26
equipping of individuals. Yes, the text says the Spirit of
11:30
God salosh upon a person. This is where the translation to
11:34
force entry becomes incredibly significant.
11:37
And where that sledgehammer analogy really holds weight.
11:40
Absolutely. Look at the stories of Samson in
11:42
Judges 14 and 15. Samson is walking toward the
11:46
vineyards of Timna, and suddenly he is confronted by a roaring
11:50
young lion. Just a normal Tuesday walk.
11:52
Right, right. But the text says the Spirit of
11:55
the Lord rushed upon him. The Hebrew verb is Salah.
11:59
The Spirit forced entry into his reality.
12:02
The text says he tore the lion apart with his bare hands as one
12:05
tears. A young goat.
12:06
It is astonishingly violent. It is a sudden, exclusive
12:10
outcome. Samson did not train for this.
12:12
He didn't go to a seminar on lion taming, that's for sure.
12:15
No, he didn't. We see the exact same verb used
12:17
with King Saul in First Samuel 10.
12:19
Samuel tells Saul that he will meet a group of prophets.
12:22
And then what happens? Samuel says the spirit of the
12:24
Lord will rush upon him Salak, and he will be turned into
12:28
another man. And it happens.
12:30
He falls into a manic, prophetic state.
12:33
It completely overrides his normal behavior.
12:36
It does, and we see it again then with David and for Samuel
12:38
16 when Samuel takes the horn of oil and anoints him as king.
12:42
The text says the spirit of the Lord rushed upon David from that
12:46
day forward. Yes, it is that same forceful
12:49
active verb. So we have to talk about the
12:51
prepositions here. Yeah, because the lexicon
12:54
specifically highlights the little connecting words used in
12:56
these sentences, and they seem to carry a lot of theological
12:59
weight. Yes, the Hebrew prepositions are
13:01
crucial for establishing the direction of the force.
13:04
How so when the text describes the Spirit rushing, it uses the
13:07
preposition AL which means over or upon, or it uses L which
13:12
means to or into. So the Spirit rushes over Samson
13:16
and the Spirit forces entry into David.
13:18
Correct, those are the specific directions given by the text.
13:21
I have to ask, why is that grammatical distinction so
13:24
critical for our understanding? It feels like we are splitting
13:27
hairs over a tiny word like on or into.
13:30
Because it indicates that this force is entirely external.
13:34
The energy, the momentum, the capacity to achieve the goal
13:37
does not originate from within the human subject.
13:40
Oh, I see Samson didn't just dig deep and find his inner
13:43
strength. Exactly.
13:44
Saul did not meditate his way into a prophetic frenzy.
13:47
An external, irresistible force descended over them, took
13:51
control of their faculties, and drove them toward a specific,
13:54
immediate goal. It is a sovereign God moving
13:57
with aggressive purpose. It is almost terrifying when you
14:00
think about it. It is definitely not a tame
14:02
concept. We like to think of God's
14:04
presence as a warm blanket or a comforting whisper, but Solik
14:08
describes a divine home invasion.
14:11
That is a very stark way to put it, but linguistically it fits.
14:14
God breaks down the door of their normal human limitations,
14:18
which brings to mind the reference in Amos 5.6.
14:22
The Lexicon notes a highly debated verse there.
14:24
Yes, where the Prophet warns the people to seek the Lord lest he
14:28
break out like fire. The debate among scholars there
14:31
is quite intense. What are they debating?
14:33
Well, some scholars want to invent a completely different
14:36
root word just for this specific verse, suggesting it means to
14:40
ignite based on some distant Acadian words.
14:44
They just want to smooth out the text to make it less aggressive.
14:46
Right. But linguists who hold to a
14:48
unified root for Salak argue that it retains its core meaning
14:53
to break in. So the Prophet Amos is saying,
14:55
seek the Lord, lest he break into the House of Joseph like a
14:59
fire. And that it devours with no one
15:01
to quench it. Fire does not ask permission.
15:04
It does not knock on the front door and wait for an invitation.
15:07
It forces entry. It consumes whatever is in its
15:10
path to achieve its end. If we connect this to the bigger
15:13
picture, what does this say about human agency versus divine
15:17
sovereignty? It is a huge question when the
15:20
Spirit of God saw luck. When He forces entry, the human
15:23
subject achieves the intended result.
15:26
Samson defeats the Lion. David is established as the
15:29
anointed king. Yes, but they achieve it not by
15:32
their own inherent strength, but because of the irresistible
15:35
nature of the spirits advance. Or push back on that a little
15:38
bit. Or at least play devil's
15:39
advocate for a second. Sure, go ahead.
15:40
Because that completely upends how our culture thinks about
15:44
success. We think of success as something
15:46
we generate from the inside out. We definitely do.
15:49
We are very focused on self determination.
15:51
Right. We read the right books, we wake
15:54
up at 5:00 in the morning, we hustle, we manifest our goals,
15:56
and eventually we succeed. But in this basic grammatical
16:00
stem, success is something that invades you from the outside.
16:04
That is an accurate way to frame the tension.
16:07
The individual becomes the vessel for the Spirit's
16:10
momentum. The human is just the instrument
16:12
being used by the Force. Yes, the goal is reached because
16:15
the force pushing toward it cannot be thwarted by any
16:18
earthly barrier. Whether that barrier is a
16:21
roaring lion or a Philistine army, the penetrating force
16:25
breaks through. But sudden violent intervention
16:27
does not explain the whole picture of human life.
16:30
We do not walk around having lions rush at us every day.
16:32
Thankfully, no. What happens when the momentum
16:35
isn't a flash in the pan, but a lifelong reality?
16:39
The language of sudden invasion is just one facet.
16:41
That brings us to the other major grammatical structure for
16:44
this word. The Hebrew language possesses
16:46
another stem which shifts the meaning from a sudden explosive
16:50
event to a continuous, sustained reality.
16:53
And what stem is that? The Hebrew language uses the
16:56
Hippel stem to convey this. If the simple basic qual stem
17:00
means to force entry or to succeed in a sudden moment, the
17:04
Hippel stem is causative. Causative, so it causes the
17:08
action to happen over time. Yes, it means to make something
17:11
a success or to cause to prosper over a duration.
17:14
And the lexicon lists 40 occurrences of this specific
17:18
causative stem, right? It does, showing a massive
17:21
concentration in the Book of Genesis, the Book of Daniel and
17:24
the Historical Chronicles. And there is a specific pairing
17:27
the lexicon points out here. The verb Salah in this causative
17:30
stem is repeatedly paired with the Hebrew noun Derek.
17:34
Yes, Derek, which translates to way or path or journey.
17:38
This pairing is essential for grasping the ancient worldview.
17:41
In this framework, success is not viewed as an inherent
17:43
personality trait. Right, you do not take a
17:45
personality test to find out if you are an achiever.
17:48
Nor is success the product of random luck, favorable market
17:51
conditions, or having the right connections.
17:54
Success is caused. It is the result of a sovereign
17:57
hand ensuring that a specific path reaches its decreed
18:01
destination. Let's look at Genesis 24, which
18:05
the sources highlight repeatedly.
18:07
This is the story of Abraham sending his senior servant back
18:10
to his homeland to find a wife for his son Isaac.
18:14
The stakes in this narrative are incredibly high.
18:17
Think about it. Abraham is ancient.
18:20
The promise of an entire nation rests on Isaac having an air.
18:24
The servant arrives at a well in a foreign land, completely
18:27
unsure of how to proceed. He is out of his depth.
18:29
Totally. He has no dating apps, no
18:31
matchmaking service, no local contacts.
18:33
He is relying entirely on divine intervention to ensure this
18:36
massive historical turning point happens correctly.
18:39
And pay attention to the exact language the servant uses when
18:42
he prays by the well. He asks God to make his way
18:44
prosper. So he uses the he fill stem
18:46
there. Yes, the Hebrew phrasing uses
18:48
the causative. He fill stem of Salah with the
18:50
noun Derek. He is literally asking 'cause
18:53
the path I am on to reach its goal.
18:54
That is beautiful. He is asking for the sovereign
18:58
force to push the path forward. And later, when he meets
19:01
Rebecca, realizes she is the right woman and is recounting
19:05
the incredible string of events to her family, He says the Lord
19:08
has made my way successful. God is the active agent causing
19:13
the progress of the journey. We see a similar construction in
19:16
Joshua 1.8, don't we? We do.
19:19
God tells Joshua, who is about to lead the people into hostile
19:22
territory, to meditate on the law day and night.
19:26
And then it says you will make your way prosperous and then you
19:29
will have good success. The causative action is linked
19:32
directly to obedience to the Divine Word.
19:35
The path reaches its end when it aligns with the sovereign
19:37
instruction. Here's where it gets really
19:39
interesting. Let's look at the story of
19:41
Joseph in Genesis chapter 39. This is a crucial text for
19:45
understanding this word. The Lexicon notes that Joseph is
19:48
explicitly called an Ish Maslach, a successful man.
19:51
He is. The text is very clear about
19:53
that designation. Wait.
19:54
Stop. I am sorry but I have to push
19:56
back hard on this. This is the most shocking use of
19:58
the word in the entire lexicon. It definitely catches modern
20:01
readers off guard. If I am rotting in an Egyptian
20:04
prison or walking across the desert in chains, I am not
20:08
feeling successful. Joseph is a teenager who has
20:11
been betrayed by his own jealous brothers.
20:13
His situation is objectively horrific.
20:16
They threw him to a pit, debated killing him and then sold him to
20:19
human traffickers. He has marched to Egypt and
20:22
purchased as a piece of property by Potiphar.
20:24
He is stripped of everything. He is a literal slave.
20:28
He has been stripped of his family, his freedom, his dignity
20:31
and his homeland. And yet the biblical text looks
20:34
at this enslaved foreigner sweeping floors in a Pagan
20:37
country and calls him a successful man.
20:40
It is a jarring description. Doesn't calling a slave
20:43
successful border on toxic positivity?
20:46
Like how did the ancient Israelites actually stomach that
20:49
description? It sort of shatters our
20:50
contemporary definition entirely.
20:52
It feels like a massive contradiction to us, because in
20:55
our context, success is defined purely by accumulation.
20:58
Right. We define it by wealth, status,
21:01
autonomy, comfort in positive visible metrics.
21:04
And Joseph possesses absolutely none of those things.
21:07
He is at the absolute bottom of the social hierarchy.
21:10
He owns nothing, not even his own body.
21:12
So how can the text call him that?
21:14
The text unapologetically says he is an Ish Matslyak because of
21:18
1 singular overriding factor. Genesis 39.2 explicitly states
21:24
the Lord was with Joseph and he was a successful man.
21:27
Oh, I see. The success is inextricably tied
21:30
to the presence of God has absolutely nothing to do with
21:33
Joseph's external circumstances or his bank account.
21:36
The theological framework here demands our full attention.
21:39
True success in the biblical Hebrew mindset means that the
21:42
sovereign plan is advancing. Joseph's path, his Derek, is
21:45
reaching its decreed destination.
21:47
Yes, God's purpose for Joseph, which will eventually involve
21:50
saving entire nations from a catastrophic famine and
21:53
preserving the lineage of the promise, is moving forward like
21:56
a penetrating force. And the fact that this path
21:58
currently runs through the agonizing, brutal reality of
22:01
slavery does not negate the success.
22:04
Not at all. The success is happening beneath
22:06
the surface of the visible circumstances.
22:08
The invisible force is breaking through the barriers of betrayal
22:12
and enslavement. And it gets even Wilder because
22:15
Joseph is falsely accused of assault by Potiphar's wife.
22:19
He goes from being a slave in a reasonably nice house to a
22:22
prisoner in a dark royal dungeon.
22:25
He falls even further down the ladder.
22:27
It seems like the path is completely destroyed and.
22:29
What does the text say in Genesis 39.23?
22:32
The warden of the prison paid no attention to anything under
22:35
Joseph's care because the Lord was with him, and whatever he
22:37
did, the Lord made it succeed. There is the heightful stem of
22:41
Salah. Again, the Lord caused it to
22:43
prosper even in a dungeon. The penetrating force of God's
22:47
will cannot be stopped by prison door or iron chains.
22:50
The path advances regardless of the geography.
22:53
This forces the listener to evaluate their own life through
22:55
a radically different lens. It really does.
22:58
You could be experiencing terrible outward hardship,
23:00
facing immense limitations, dealing with illness or
23:03
financial collapse. And yet.
23:05
And yet, if the sovereign hand is with you, causing your path
23:09
to align with his decreed end, you are by definition
23:13
experiencing ultimate success. I'm going to be honest, that is
23:16
a heavy reality to sit with. It completely flips the script
23:20
on how we evaluate our own lives.
23:22
We are so conditioned to look at the visible markers.
23:24
We look at our job titles, our followers or the square footage
23:28
of our homes to gauge our success, but the text is telling
23:31
us to look exclusively at the presence of God and the
23:33
advancement of His purposes. This raises an important
23:36
question, one that agonizingly confronted the ancient prophets.
23:39
Because if we accept that God is the one who causes success, we
23:43
run into a major issue, right? Yes, if God guarantees that the
23:46
path reaches its end, how do we explain the reality of the
23:49
geopolitical world around us? How do we explain the blatant,
23:53
visible success of those who actively oppose him?
23:56
It is the problem of evil wrapped in a linguistic puzzle,
24:00
and the focal point of this tension is found in the cry of
24:02
the prophet Jeremiah. Jeremiah 12.1 is one of the most
24:06
raw, honest verses in all of ancient literature.
24:09
Jeremiah brings a literal lawsuit against God.
24:12
He says, Righteous are you, O Lord, when I complain to you,
24:16
yet I would plead my case before you.
24:18
He is laying it all out there. And then he asks the question
24:21
that has haunted humanity for millennia.
24:24
He asks why does the way of the wicked prosper?
24:28
Why does the Derek of the wicked Solik?
24:30
Put yourself in Jeremiah's shoes for a minute.
24:33
He is looking at the reality of his day.
24:35
He sees corrupt kings within his own nation.
24:38
And he sees violent empires outside of it.
24:40
Exactly. He sees empires like Babylon
24:43
amassing massive armies, amassing wealth, crushing the
24:46
vulnerable and burning cities to the ground.
24:48
And Jeremiah knows his vocabulary.
24:50
He knows that Salak implies a path reaching its intended goal
24:54
because of a driving causative force.
24:55
So he is essentially asking God a terrifying question.
24:58
He is saying are you the one driving their success?
25:01
Why are these ruthless dictators penetrating barriers and
25:04
achieving their goals while the righteous suffer?
25:06
It is the ultimate tension. How can a sovereign, just God
25:09
permit the wicked to experience forward momentum?
25:12
If Salak means a God cause success, is God causing the
25:16
Babylonians to succeed in their evil?
25:18
To understand the biblical answer to this, the lexicon
25:21
points us to a fascinating alternative translation of the
25:24
root solak. OK, what is this alternative
25:27
translation? In several places in the
25:30
prophets, particularly in the books of Jeremiah and Ezekiel,
25:33
the word is translated not as to succeed or to prosper, but as to
25:38
be useful or to be fit for a function.
25:40
Usefulness. That is a very different angle
25:43
than prosperity or military victory it.
25:45
Is, but it connects perfectly to the idea of reaching a goal.
25:48
Think about a physical tool. Like a hammer or a saw.
25:50
Sure, a hammer. A tool is successful if it
25:53
performs a specific function it was designed to do.
25:56
A hammer succeeds when it drives a nail into a board.
25:59
If the handle breaks off and it cannot drive a nail, it is
26:02
useless. It fails to reach its goal.
26:04
Now apply this concept of function and usefulness to the
26:07
prophetic texts. Look at Jeremiah chapter 13.
26:10
God commands Jeremiah to perform a highly unusual, almost absurd
26:14
prophetic act. Write the story of the linen
26:16
loincloth and we have to talk about how bizarre this is.
26:18
It is very visceral. God tells Jeremiah to buy a
26:22
linen loincloth, essentially ancient underwear, a garment
26:26
worn directly against the skin in the sweltering Middle Eastern
26:29
heat, and wear it. But he is strictly commanded not
26:33
to wash it. Then, after wearing this sweaty
26:35
garment, God tells him to take it, travel all the way to the
26:38
Euphrates River and bury it in a damp cleft of the rock.
26:41
It is a long, arduous task for a very strange burial.
26:45
Then after many days pass, God tells Jeremiah to go all the way
26:49
back to the river and dig it up. And what does Jeremiah find?
26:53
The text says the linen loincloth was completely ruined.
26:56
It was good for nothing. The Hebrew phrase is literally.
26:59
It did not salak for anything. It was no longer useful.
27:03
It could not fulfill its intended function as a piece of
27:05
clothing. The disgust factor is high here.
27:08
You were digging up rotting, muddy, ancient underwear.
27:11
But God explains the metaphor clearly to Jeremiah.
27:13
He says this evil people who refuse to hear my words, who
27:17
stubbornly follow their own heart, shall be like this
27:19
loincloth, which is good for nothing.
27:22
Ezekiel uses the exact same linguistic concept in chapter
27:25
15, doesn't he? But with a different
27:27
agricultural image. He talks about the wood of a
27:29
vine. Vine wood is not like oak or
27:32
cedar. You cannot build a house with
27:34
it. You cannot craft a piece of
27:36
furniture or carve a pig from it.
27:38
It is too soft, twisted and brittle.
27:40
It's only function, it's only reason for existing is to bear
27:43
grapes. But Ezekiel asks a hypothetical
27:46
question. He asks what if the vine wood is
27:49
thrown into the fire and its ends are charred?
27:52
Is it then useful for any work? The Hebrew text asks will it's
27:56
all a Dalek for any work. The answer is obviously no.
27:59
It has become utterly useless. So how does this resolve the
28:02
massive theological tension of Jeremiah's question about the
28:06
wicked prospering? How does rotting underwear
28:08
answer the problem of evil empires winning wars?
28:11
It contrasts temporary apparent success with the concept of
28:15
ultimate usefulness in the grand design of the creator.
28:18
The wicked might seem to advance in the short term.
28:20
They might swing their swords, conquer a city or a massive
28:23
fortune. But like the buried loincloth,
28:25
which represents A rebellious people cutting themselves off
28:28
from their source of life, they fail to reach the true goal of
28:32
their existence. Their rebellion leads to a state
28:35
of total inability to function within God's intended design.
28:39
They become completely useless for their intended function.
28:42
The prosperity of the wicked is a mirage.
28:45
It looks like forward momentum, It looks like they are breaking
28:47
through barriers. But it is actually the rotting
28:50
of the loincloth in the damp dirt.
28:52
It is the charring of the vine branch in the fire.
28:55
They are achieving temporal, fleeting goals while
28:58
simultaneously failing at the singular cosmic goal for which
29:02
they were created. And this paints a stark,
29:04
uncompromising picture of human inability.
29:07
Human rebellion naturally leads to a state of being completely
29:10
unfit for the divine purpose. The ruined garment cannot repair
29:14
its own threads. The burnt vine cannot produce
29:16
grapes from ashes. This total inability to function
29:20
on a spiritual level requires an external intervention.
29:23
It requires a grace that is effective enough to bestow
29:26
purpose where there was only uselessness.
29:28
Which means, if human rebellion leads to total uselessness, and
29:32
if our own human efforts to succeed are easily ruined, where
29:35
can true permanent success be found?
29:37
We have to look away from human agency entirely.
29:39
We have to look at the decrees of God.
29:41
If we connect this to the bigger picture, the lexicon directs our
29:45
attention to the book of Isaiah, specifically chapters 53 and 55.
29:50
These are majestic, sweeping texts that deal with the
29:53
absolute certainty of God's redemptive plan.
29:55
In Isaiah 53, the famous passage about the suffering servant,
29:59
verse 10 says that the will of the Lord shall prosper in his
30:02
hand. The Hebrew word for will or
30:04
pleasure is chiffets, and it is paired with our word Salah.
30:09
God's sovereign desire will breakthrough.
30:11
It will reach its destination. And then Isaiah 55.1 of and
30:15
gives us perhaps the most soaring poet poetic description
30:17
of this concept in the entire Canon.
30:20
God is speaking and he compares his word to the rain and the
30:23
snow that fall from heaven to water, the earth.
30:25
He says, So shall my word be that goes out from my mouth.
30:28
It shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that
30:30
which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I
30:33
sent it. The verb translated shall
30:35
succeed is Salah. We see the absolute culmination
30:39
of the entire semantic development right here in this
30:42
verse. God spoken word is described as
30:44
an active living agent, almost like a military unit or a
30:49
penetrating force sent out on a specific mission.
30:52
When God speaks, His word, enters reality, breaks through
30:55
all human resistance, shatters all historical barriers, and
30:59
forcefully accomplishes the decree destination.
31:03
It is an unstoppable force. Think about the difference
31:05
between our words and God's words.
31:08
Human words are just wishes. We make plans, we write
31:11
strategic goals for the quarter, we make promises to our spouses,
31:14
but our words have no inherent capacity to enforce their own
31:17
reality. We say I'm going to build a
31:19
successful business, but a global recession hits.
31:21
Or we get a terrible medical diagnosis and our word fails.
31:25
It falls to the ground, empty. But when God speaks, the Word
31:27
itself contains the irresistible force necessary to ensure its
31:31
own success. This absolute certainty of the
31:33
divine decree stands in sharp, sharp, intentional contrast to
31:36
other Hebrew words associated with success.
31:39
Yes, the lexicon specifically notes two other words in the
31:42
broader semantic field that we need to examine.
31:45
What are those words? They are sakal and tushia.
31:48
These are words found heavily in the wisdom literature, like the
31:51
book of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes.
31:53
Let's break those down because comparing synonyms helps us
31:56
understand the unique flavor of Salah.
32:00
What is the nuance of Suckle? Sakal primarily means to act
32:04
with prudence, insight or comprehension, which leads to a
32:07
good result. So it is the kind of success
32:10
that comes from making wise choices, learning from past
32:13
experience, and applying good judgment to a situation.
32:16
You study hard for an exam, you make wise financial investments,
32:20
you speak carefully rather than in anger, and therefore you
32:24
experience suckle. You have a successful outcome
32:26
based on your own prudent action.
32:28
OK, that sounds like a lot of the advice we get today.
32:31
And what about the other word, tushia?
32:33
Lucia is a fascinating word that scholars debate constantly, but
32:36
it generally vacillates between meaning, sound, wisdom, cunning,
32:40
or prudence, and the results or success that come directly from
32:43
that cunning. It is about having the practical
32:46
know how, the street smarts, the ability to maneuver through
32:49
complex difficult situations and come out on top.
32:52
Right, it is very pragmatic. So what does this all mean for
32:55
us? We have these words for human
32:57
wisdom, prudence and cunning, and then we have Salah.
33:01
The contrast is striking. How does this ancient vocabulary
33:05
compare to our modern obsession with what we call life hacks or
33:08
success formulas? You cannot scroll through the
33:11
Internet or listen to an audio show without seeing someone
33:14
selling a master class on the five prudent steps to guarantee
33:18
wealth, health and happiness. Human wisdom, prudence, and
33:22
cunning certainly have their place.
33:24
The book of Proverbs is full of them, and they are generally
33:26
true principles for living. Hard work usually pays off.
33:29
Foolish, impulsive decisions usually lead to ruin.
33:33
But the biblical text makes a massive non negotiable
33:35
distinction. Human prudence, which is suckle,
33:38
and human cunning, which is tushia, can still fail.
33:41
You can do absolutely everything right, apply all the wisdom in
33:44
the world, eat perfectly, invest perfectly, and still lose
33:48
everything to a famine, a war, an unpredictable market crash,
33:52
or a sudden betrayal. Human success is always
33:55
conditional. It is fragile.
33:57
But Selak, when applied to God's Word and God's decree, is
34:01
completely unconditional. It does not depend on the stock
34:04
market or human cooperation or favorable weather patterns.
34:07
It anchors ultimate certainty entirely in God's sovereign
34:11
decree. God does not need to use a life
34:13
hack. He spics and the reality alters
34:16
to accommodate the Word. When you realize that God's Word
34:19
operates with the penetrating force of an axe splitting wood
34:22
or the sudden rush of a river breaking its banks, you realize
34:25
that the foundation of reality is not chaotic.
34:27
No, it is moving steadily, forcefully, toward an absolute,
34:30
guaranteed conclusion. That is a staggering
34:33
realization. It shifts your feet onto solid
34:35
rock. It is completely different
34:36
universe than the one where we are all just frantically trying
34:39
to hack our way to temporary prosperity, hoping a storm
34:42
doesn't blow our House of Cards down.
34:44
It provides an immense sense of stability for the believer.
34:47
The path reaches its end not because the traveler is
34:50
incredibly strong, cunning, or prudent, but because the path
34:53
itself is being driven forward by the one who laid the stones.
34:57
We have covered massive ground today.
34:58
We started by looking at a primitive, intensely physical
35:02
action and acts. Splitting a log, forcing an
35:05
entry, breaking a solid barrier. We watched that concrete concept
35:10
evolve in the ancient mind into the idea of a sudden explosive
35:14
rush. Like a river breaching its
35:16
banks, or the external Spirit of God overwhelming a human vessel
35:19
like Samson to achieve a violently sudden goal.
35:22
We saw how the grammatical stems shifted it from a sudden event
35:25
to a continuous reality. Where the sovereign hand of God
35:28
is the active cause of a path prospering, even if that path
35:32
leads straight into the dark horrors of an Egyptian prison.
35:34
We examine the agonizing tension of the wicked appearing to
35:37
succeed, only to realize that true success is measured by
35:40
usefulness within the divine design.
35:43
We saw that rebellion leads only to the tragic, disgusting
35:45
uselessness of a rotting garment buried by a river.
35:48
And finally, we contrasted the fragility of human wisdom,
35:51
prudence and modern life hacks with the unstoppable,
35:55
penetrating reality of God's spoken Word, which guarantees
35:59
its own victory. We have completely dismantled
36:01
the modern Clean Dictionary definition of success and
36:05
replaced it with a vision of sovereign momentum.
36:08
For you listening to this, I think the challenge is to
36:10
evaluate your own internal definition of success.
36:13
What are you actually chasing with your life?
36:16
Are you exhausting yourself in pursuit of the outward temporary
36:19
prosperity of those who are rebelling against their Creator?
36:22
Or are you seeking the kind of success that comes exclusively
36:25
from God's presence, the reality of His hand actively causing
36:29
your specific path to reach His intended destination, regardless
36:33
of how bleak the visible circumstances might appear?
36:36
That is the question you have to answer.
36:37
And as we wrap up this deep dive, I want to leave you with
36:39
one final, completely new thought to consider on your own.
36:43
A parting thought to chew on. We started with the image of
36:46
opening a dictionary and expecting a clean, painless
36:50
definition, only to find a messy, aggressive reality.
36:55
If Sol. A fundamentally means a
36:57
penetrating force, a breaking through a shattering of barriers
37:01
to reach a goal. Could it be that the moments in
37:03
your life where you feel the most broken into, the most
37:06
interrupted? The moments where you're careful
37:08
plans are completely shattered by circumstances outside your
37:11
control. Could it be that those are
37:13
actually the very moments the sovereign hand of God is
37:15
actively moving in, breaking down your fragile human
37:18
structures and making you truly successful?
37:20
It changes everything about how you view an interruption.
37:23
It really does. Keep thinking on that.
37:25
Thank you for joining us on this deep dive.