Latest / U.S. Right to Know articles / Newly Declassified 2020 Intelligence Assessment Found Wuhan Lab’s Conditions Were Ripe For Potential Coronavirus Release

Transcript

Newly Declassified 2020 Intelligence Assessment Found Wuhan Lab’s Conditions Were Ripe For Potential Coronavirus Release · U.S. Right to Know articles

• 0:03
  Newly declassified 2020 Intelligence assessment found Wuhan Lab's conditions were ripe for
• 0:09
  a potential coronavirus release. The
• 0:36
  report
• 0:37
  was among nearly 400 pages
• 0:42
  by the outgoing director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard as part of
• 0:46
  a broader documents dump that
• 0:48
  included internal intelligence community, emails, scientific publications, diplomatic
• 0:54
  cables, Congressional correspondence and documents related to U.S. Funded coronavirus research in
• 1:00
  Wuhan. The Lawrence Livermore report found that Wuhan researchers possess the capabilities,
• 1:07
  materials, and research programs that would have been required to create and
• 1:12
  accidentally release a
• 1:13
  coronavirus adapted to infect humans. We assess all of the necessary conditions
• 1:20
  for an accidental release of a laboratory.
• 1:22
  modified coronavirus, specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors,
• 1:29
  were present at The Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology in mid to
• 1:32
  late 2019. The report states As a result, analysts at the California-based
• 1:39
  National Laboratory said the placed equal weight on three possible scenarios for
• 1:43
  the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The virus that spawned the pandemic, a
• 1:48
  lab modification followed by an accidental leak. Natural emergence or an accidental
• 1:54
  release of a naturally occurring virus from a laboratory. Large
• 2:18
  portions of the document remain redacted. The report
• 2:22
  appears to be the same document that CIA whistleblower James Erdman III
• 2:26
  testified last month had concluded all prerequisite conditions for a lab leak
• 2:31
  were present at IV, but was inexplicably excluded from the IC's public
• 2:36
  assessments throughout 2026 and shared only in a classified annex. The following
• 2:41
  year. Erdman identified that record as a May 2020 report that was
• 2:46
  produced by a DOE National Lab. Odinei press office did not immediately
• 2:51
  respond Friday to a request for comment about the
• 2:54
  records The Lawrence Livermore assessment identified four conditions that
• 3:00
  would have been necessary for a laboratory origin scenario. The
• 3:21
  report stopped short of concluding that SARS CoV 2 was engineered or
• 3:25
  that a lab leak occurred. Rather, it argued that available information showed
• 3:31
  that the WV possessed the capabilities and research activities needed for such
• 3:35
  a scenario. The ODNI's released
• 3:39
  of declassified records came two days after the lapse of a 180-day
• 3:43
  deadline set by the 2020
• 3:46
  National Defense Authorization Act. That law, passed in December, required the intelligence
• 3:52
  community to review and publicly release additional COVID-19 origins intelligence. The
• 3:58
  law directed the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a declassification review,
• 4:04
  along with the heads of intelligence agencies of intelligence on coronavirus research
• 4:09
  at the V funding sources for that research, ODI
• 4:21
  did not specifically cite the law when releasing the Livermore report and
• 4:25
  other records on Thursday. The release also came on the eve of
• 4:28
  Gabbard's departure from ODI, after she announced her resignation last month. Also
• 4:35
  included in Thursday's release was a final progress report from The EcoHealth
• 4:39
  Alliance's NIH-funded Bat Coronavirus Research Project than partnered with the YV. Much
• 4:46
  of the information obtained in that report has been publicly available previously
• 4:51
  through congressional investigations. FOIA disclosures and media reports, But its
• 4:57
  inclusion with the newly released records provides additional context about the types
• 5:02
  of coronavirus experiments that were conducted through the now defunct nonprofits collaboration
• 5:08
  with Chinese researchers before the
• 5:10
  pandemic. The new records also provides additional insight into how U.S. Government
• 5:17
  analysts evaluated competing origin theories during the earliest months of the pandemic.
• 5:38
  In one March 2020 exchange, an analyst cautioned colleagues to set a
• 5:42
  very high threshold before concluding the virus resulted from gain of function
• 5:47
  research. Lab manipulations that increase a virus's infectivity and transmissibility to
• 5:53
  other species. I
• 6:27
  think the IC needs to be very thorough with its analysis. They
• 6:32
  ema shows analysts grappling with evidence pointing in different directions. Some records
• 6:38
  discussed reports concerning coronavirus experiments at The YV, while other circulated scientific
• 6:43
  papers arguing that SARS Cove 2 wasn't engineered and may have arisen
• 6:49
  naturally. The exchanges suggest that intelligence analysts were evaluating competing
• 6:55
  hypotheses rather That trying to confirm a settled conclusion. The documents build
• 7:01
  on records previously obtained and reported by U.S. Right to Know, showing
• 7:06
  that Defense Intelligence Agency, DIA, analysts were already considering lab origin scenarios
• 7:12
  as early as March 2020, months before the issue became a major
• 7:16
  public debate. A Genomic Analysis by scientists at the DIY's National Center
• 7:22
  for Medical Intelligence, NCMI, published internally three months later also found the
• 7:27
  scenario that an engineered virus escaped from The IV plausible and became
• 7:32
  one of the first, and only full assessments to emerge publicly. While
• 7:50
  the earlier DIA records established that intelligence analysts were examining the possibility
• 7:55
  of a lab leak early on. The newly released Lawrence Livermore assessment
• 8:00
  partially provides one of the only explanations, to date, of why some
• 8:05
  US government experts believed the scenario warranted serious consideration at such an
• 8:10
  early stage in the pandemic. ODI's records disclosure. Thursday was accompanied
• 8:16
  by an agency press release that went further than what the documents
• 8:20
  themselves appear to show. The
• 8:36
  records provide a more limited picture. Among them were email exchanges, showing
• 8:41
  intelligence officials discussing Fauci, circulating scientific materials associated with him, and receiving
• 8:47
  briefings from him as they evaluated competing origin theories. The
• 9:08
  records also show analysts receiving scientific views from other officials at the
• 9:12
  National Institutes of Health that were not always aligned with Fauci's public
• 9:18
  position, backing a natural origin scenario while actively debating lab origin scenarios
• 9:24
  and other evidence. But the press release also independently cited an unnamed
• 9:29
  whistleblower's testimony that alleged retaliation against analysts, who challenged Fauci's
• 9:35
  preferred conclusions on the virus's origins. He
• 10:10
  also accused Fauci of shaping which outside scientists the IC consulted with
• 10:15
  and alleged broader retaliation and obstruction by the CIA. Erdman acknowledged, however,
• 10:21
  that he found no explicit evidence of a coordinated coverup.