Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / Communists, Islamists & Transgender Zealots—The Most Radical Slate of Democrat Candidates ever Assembled

Transcript

Communists, Islamists & Transgender Zealots—The Most Radical Slate of Democrat Candidates ever Assembled · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

0:00
Speaker 1: Welcome.
0:00
Speaker 2: It is Verdict with center Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with
0:03
Speaker 2: you as well. It's so nice to have you with
0:05
Speaker 2: us this Friday morning. Senator, You and I want to
0:08
Speaker 2: start the show by talking about Wednesday's show. And I
0:12
Speaker 2: tell you what, Sometimes there's breaking news that happens and
0:16
Speaker 2: all of us talk about it, in the conservative media
0:19
Speaker 2: world especially, and then sometimes we find out that some
0:22
Speaker 2: of that info or data is actually incorrect, and when
0:26
Speaker 2: we do, we want to talk about that as well.
0:30
Speaker 3: Well, that's right. On Wednesday's episode of Verdict, we cited
0:34
Speaker 3: congressional testimony from doctor James Thorpe who testified before the
0:38
Speaker 3: Senate and stated that women who receive the COVID vaccine
0:42
Speaker 3: during their first trimester experienced an eighty two percent miscarriage rate,
0:48
Speaker 3: and we covered that story and a covering that story
0:53
Speaker 3: on the podcast. It was subsequently revealed that that data
0:58
Speaker 3: was inaccurate. That's tes was inaccurate, and when we found
1:02
Speaker 3: that out, I made the decision to delete the pod,
1:05
Speaker 3: and so Wednesday's pod has been deleted. I think this
1:08
Speaker 3: is the only pod we've ever deleted in several years
1:11
Speaker 3: of doing this show, and it was because the underlying
1:14
Speaker 3: statistic was inaccurate. Now, I quoted verbatim word for word
1:19
Speaker 3: from doctor Thorpe's testimony before the Senate, and the core
1:23
Speaker 3: of the story was focusing on doctor Fauci lying to
1:28
Speaker 3: the American people. In doctor Fauci's emails indicating that he
1:32
Speaker 3: knew there was a real risk of miscarriages, particularly in
1:35
Speaker 3: the first trimester, and nonetheless he was publicly insisting there
1:39
Speaker 3: was no risk whatsoever. But the eighty two percent figure
1:43
Speaker 3: was incorrect. I did not know that I was quoting
1:45
Speaker 3: from what had been testified before Congress. And the reason
1:49
Speaker 3: it was incorrect is In twenty twenty one, there was
1:52
Speaker 3: a study, the Shimabukuro study, that was published in the
1:56
Speaker 3: New England Journal of Medicine, and it was widely cited
1:59
Speaker 3: as reassuring evidence about COVID vaccination during pregnancy. And the
2:04
Speaker 3: study followed data for about eleven weeks. There were three
2:09
Speaker 3: nine hundred and fifty eight women enrolled in its pregnancy registry.
2:13
Speaker 3: Of those, only eight hundred and fifty seven had pregnancies
2:16
Speaker 3: that reached an outcome. There were one hundred and four miscarriages,
2:21
Speaker 3: and so the study initially reported that one hundred and
2:24
Speaker 3: forty divided by eight hundred and twenty seven is twelve
2:26
Speaker 3: point six percent. Critics correctly and rightly identified a serious problem,
2:32
Speaker 3: which is seven hundred of those eight hundred and twenty
2:34
Speaker 3: seven women had been vaccinated in the third trimester, when
2:39
Speaker 3: it was no longer possible for them to experience an
2:41
Speaker 3: early miscarriage, and the third trimester that's no longer a possibility,
2:45
Speaker 3: and so there was a widely circulated reinterpretation that removed
2:50
Speaker 3: those seven hundred women and calculated the ratio of one
2:56
Speaker 3: hundred and four to one hundred and twenty seven, which
3:00
Speaker 3: is the eight twenty seven minus the seven hundred that
3:02
Speaker 3: led to eighty two percent. Doctor Thorpe repeated that figure
3:07
Speaker 3: in his congressional testimony, but that eighty two percent calculation
3:11
Speaker 3: was objectively incorrect. Many of the women vaccinated early in
3:15
Speaker 3: pregnancy were still pregnant when the short study ended, so
3:20
Speaker 3: their ongoing pregnancies were missing from the denominator, and the
3:25
Speaker 3: original shim Bakuro study was subsequently corrected as well, and
3:31
Speaker 3: the corrected paper acknowledged that the preliminary data did not
3:34
Speaker 3: provide an appropriate denominator for calculating the risk of spontaneous abortion.
3:40
Speaker 3: So we know that the eighty two percent statistic was wrong,
3:43
Speaker 3: and for that reason I deleted not only the podcast,
3:46
Speaker 3: but several tweets that we had pushing out the conclusion.
3:50
Speaker 3: That being said, it is important to note the core
3:54
Speaker 3: point of the podcast that doctor Fauci himself raised concerns
3:59
Speaker 3: that the COVID vaccine could increase the risk of miscarriages,
4:04
Speaker 3: especially in the first trimester, and yet his public facing
4:08
Speaker 3: comments were directly to the contrary. He was knowingly giving
4:13
Speaker 3: one set of information, really propaganda to the people, and
4:18
Speaker 3: a different set internally, and that dishonesty is fundamentally wrong.
4:24
Speaker 3: But that being said, when I became aware of the error,
4:28
Speaker 3: we corrected it for our listeners of this podcast. And
4:31
Speaker 3: I'm always going to strive to present the most accurate
4:33
Speaker 3: information on this pod, and so that's what we're doing now.
4:37
Speaker 1: Yeah, this one.
4:38
Speaker 2: I love doing this pot and look, I love that
4:41
Speaker 2: you care enough that we want to correct this record.
4:43
Speaker 2: It was at one point like the top turning story
4:46
Speaker 2: on x Everybody in media in the conservative world was
4:49
Speaker 2: covering this, and I'm glad that we took the time
4:52
Speaker 2: right now to explain the story, explain the data, explain
4:56
Speaker 2: how a lot of this got out there was reported
4:58
Speaker 2: the way it was and then it is corrected, and
5:01
Speaker 2: I hope that people that listeners pod understand it.
5:04
Speaker 1: We do our best to get things right all the time.
5:07
Speaker 2: When we get things like this and it changes, it changes,
5:09
Speaker 2: and when it does, we will tell you. And hopefully
5:12
Speaker 2: that's why you're listening to Verdict and why you love
5:15
Speaker 2: this show. So I love that we explained it. And
5:18
Speaker 2: with that, let's get on to the other big news
5:20
Speaker 2: of the day and center. I tell you there's some
5:22
Speaker 2: shows where you say, get ready because we're bringing the
5:25
Speaker 2: receipts of the radical left their agenda and they're talking
5:28
Speaker 2: about it out in the open.
5:31
Speaker 3: Well, I got to say, we are three months away
5:34
Speaker 3: from the election, and the group of Democrats that have
5:39
Speaker 3: been nominated to run for office, to run for Senate,
5:41
Speaker 3: is staggering. They have managed to find radicals and communists
5:47
Speaker 3: and Islamists and this is the most radical group of
5:51
Speaker 3: Democrat candidates that has ever been nominated for major office
5:55
Speaker 3: of the history of America. And I don't want our
5:58
Speaker 3: listeners to take my word for this. I want you
6:00
Speaker 3: to listen to what they say, because this show we're
6:03
Speaker 3: going to walk you through what they've said, and it
6:06
Speaker 3: is extreme, it's radical, it's frightening, it's dangerous, and if
6:10
Speaker 3: these Zealots ever get their hands on the levers of government,
6:15
Speaker 3: they will wreak incurable damage to this country.
6:22
Speaker 1: Amen to that, we're going to talk about all of
6:24
Speaker 1: that coming up.
6:24
Speaker 2: I also want to say something really important that I
6:27
Speaker 2: want you to be able to get involved in right now,
6:29
Speaker 2: and that is simply praying for the people of Israel.
6:33
Speaker 2: So the headlines may change, the threats facing Israel remain.
6:36
Speaker 2: While much of the world has moved on to the
6:38
Speaker 2: next story. Israeli families continue living with the reality of terrorism,
6:42
Speaker 2: uncertainty and recovery. Communities remain unalert, and parents still think
6:47
Speaker 2: twice before seeing their children to school. Families continue rebuilding
6:51
Speaker 2: their lives knowing that the next siren could come without
6:55
Speaker 2: warning now, as Christians were called to stand with God's
6:57
Speaker 2: children in times of need. That's why the International Fellowship
7:01
Speaker 2: of Christians and Jews remains on the ground in the
7:03
Speaker 2: Holy Land. Each and every day. They are providing life
7:06
Speaker 2: saving aid, food for the struggling families, emergency assistants, bomb shelters,
7:11
Speaker 2: and critical support for those impacted by war. Even after
7:16
Speaker 2: the cameras leave in the headlines fate, the Fellowship remains
7:19
Speaker 2: committed to Israel's most vulnerable. So I want you to
7:22
Speaker 2: join the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews in simply
7:26
Speaker 2: praying for the people of Israel, for protection, for strength,
7:30
Speaker 2: and for lasting peace. Together we can remind God's people
7:34
Speaker 2: that they are not alone. You can stand with Israel
7:37
Speaker 2: in prayer today by visiting Prey IFCJ dot org. It's
7:42
Speaker 2: real simple, that's prey IFCJ dot org. All right, so center,
7:47
Speaker 2: let's set the stage here a little bit. We've been
7:49
Speaker 2: talking a lot on this show, and if you're listening
7:51
Speaker 2: on the radio right now, make sure you download Verdict
7:54
Speaker 2: with Ted Cruz, the podcast we do three days a week.
7:57
Speaker 2: And we've been talking about specific ratic, specific members of
8:01
Speaker 2: the Democratic Socials of America and their advocates, and they've
8:05
Speaker 2: been winning. But let's take a step back, and I
8:07
Speaker 2: want to ask you a bigger question. And for a
8:10
Speaker 2: lot of people, they're still trying to get their head
8:11
Speaker 2: out of the around the idea. How is it that
8:15
Speaker 2: these types of radicals are not just running and getting
8:19
Speaker 2: funded but also winning.
8:21
Speaker 3: Well, there are really two principles. Number one deception, and
8:24
Speaker 3: the Democrats are committed to lying to the voters and
8:27
Speaker 3: deceiving them. But number two is fraud, and we have
8:29
Speaker 3: a real problem with voter fraud in this country. It's
8:32
Speaker 3: why I've been fighting tooth and nail to pass the
8:34
Speaker 3: Save America Act so that we could put real protections
8:37
Speaker 3: in to stop fraud. It's also why every single Democrat
8:40
Speaker 3: in the Senate opposes the Save America Act, because they're
8:44
Speaker 3: party their hopes at being elected depend upon fraud. And
8:48
Speaker 3: I want to start as an umbrella for all of
8:50
Speaker 3: these radicals that are running with a story that broke
8:54
Speaker 3: this week about James O'Keeffe, James O'Keefe, the founder of
8:57
Speaker 3: Project Veritas, who does undercover journal I got to say,
9:01
Speaker 3: James O'Keefe has done more journalism. He initially broke the
9:04
Speaker 3: story that took down Acorn, the radical left wing grassroots
9:07
Speaker 3: organizing group that was flagrantly violating the law, and O'Keeffe's
9:11
Speaker 3: reporting took them down entirely. He's done more reporting than
9:15
Speaker 3: than ABC, NBC, and CBS put together. He's done more
9:18
Speaker 3: reporting than than almost the entirety of the so called
9:21
Speaker 3: news enterprise. But in this instance, he went to Minneapolis
9:25
Speaker 3: and he went under cover, part of what James O'Keeffe
9:27
Speaker 3: does as he goes undercover. He went undercover, uh dressed
9:31
Speaker 3: in Muslim guard. He was dressed as an emam. And
9:34
Speaker 3: Minnesota has this this insane rule that one person can
9:41
Speaker 3: vouch for and that's what it's called, vouch for up
9:44
Speaker 3: to eight other voters and say, yep, this voter is
9:48
Speaker 3: Ben Ferguson. And Ben Ferguson doesn't have to have an ID,
9:52
Speaker 3: doesn't have to have any proof. If you have someone
9:54
Speaker 3: vouching for him. That's all it's it's required. And and
9:57
Speaker 3: and he brought a series of voters dressed in so
10:02
Speaker 3: he had uh, one man dressed in a burka that
10:05
Speaker 3: he claimed was a woman, and he said, I vouch
10:07
Speaker 3: for her. And they let the fake voter vote and
10:11
Speaker 3: they tell him, oh, you can have up to eight
10:15
Speaker 3: and and and it truly here. I want you to listen.
10:17
Speaker 3: We're gonna pay a couple of minutes of this. I
10:18
Speaker 3: want you to listen. But he's talking with Minnesota election voters.
10:22
Speaker 3: He's lying to them, and and he's sending people who
10:26
Speaker 3: are not remotely who they're claiming to be. And they're saying,
10:28
Speaker 3: come on in and vote, Come on in and vote,
10:29
Speaker 3: Come on an in vote, give a listen and and
10:33
Speaker 3: and prepare to be.
10:33
Speaker 4: Horrified as so keep when this is vouching for seven
10:37
Speaker 4: other Muslims at a Minneapolis pulling booth. We're going in
10:43
Speaker 4: to this location and I'm going to say that I'm
10:45
Speaker 4: vouching for them. The name is William Bomans.
10:47
Speaker 5: The question about the vouching program, Ye about vouching. I
10:52
Speaker 5: can vouch for them, but they are not. That's okay,
10:55
Speaker 5: that's fine. Can I bring five more from eight up
11:00
Speaker 5: to eight to be able to okay, that's that's a
11:02
Speaker 5: good thing.
11:03
Speaker 4: We go back and we get traditional and and Mohammad.
11:08
Speaker 4: In Minnesota, you can show up on election day and
11:12
Speaker 4: vouch for up to eight unregistered voters. Members of the
11:15
Speaker 4: Justice League dress up in traditional Muslim attire, including a
11:18
Speaker 4: transgender wearing a burka, and put this vouching law to
11:24
Speaker 4: an extreme test on primary day August eleventh.
11:27
Speaker 5: I'm gonna be a ball of shot, all.
11:30
Speaker 6: Of twenty.
11:32
Speaker 5: All of the vouching vouching for I vouch for them.
11:37
Speaker 2: Is that?
11:38
Speaker 4: Okay? How does that work?
11:40
Speaker 2: Well?
11:40
Speaker 1: If you're all in the same precepts.
11:42
Speaker 3: Yes, and you are already registered, which it looks like
11:45
Speaker 3: you are.
11:45
Speaker 7: Then you you can vouch for them as ID for.
11:48
Speaker 1: Them, Oh good, she says to me.
11:50
Speaker 4: I says they do not need ID. She says, you
11:52
Speaker 4: are the ID.
11:53
Speaker 1: He is the idea.
11:54
Speaker 4: I am the ID, and no ID needed. I just
11:57
Speaker 4: vouch for them.
11:57
Speaker 8: You're the ID.
11:58
Speaker 5: I am the idea as good. How many people may
12:01
Speaker 5: I vouch for?
12:01
Speaker 1: It's eight.
12:05
Speaker 5: I can vouch for eight people. Eight people, no idea.
12:08
Speaker 5: We come back black.
12:09
Speaker 4: Thank you. Most poll workers we visited were willing to
12:12
Speaker 4: let us vouch with no questions asked, even when presented
12:15
Speaker 4: with the most absurd situation imaginable, while other poll workers
12:19
Speaker 4: did take issue with our investigation, revealing their awareness that
12:23
Speaker 4: something about this vouching system is deeply flawed or wrong,
12:27
Speaker 4: yet for some reason, they don't want us to expose it.
12:39
Speaker 4: In Minnesota, voters can vouch for up to eight of
12:42
Speaker 4: their unregistered friends at the polling place. A registered voter
12:46
Speaker 4: from the same precinct signs an oath confirming that they
12:50
Speaker 4: personally know the voter lives there. This allows someone without
12:53
Speaker 4: ID to register and vote, and employees of residential facilities
12:59
Speaker 4: may vouch for an unlimited number of facility residents to
13:02
Speaker 4: vote at the facility's address. That's right, an unlimited number.
13:07
Speaker 4: While proponents emphasize that the policy expands ballot access for
13:11
Speaker 4: recent movers and senior citizens, critics view it as a
13:15
Speaker 4: potential for fraud.
13:17
Speaker 1: Now, Center, let's just stop there for a second.
13:19
Speaker 2: When you hear the way this is set up, it
13:23
Speaker 2: seems like it's the way you would set up the
13:24
Speaker 2: system if you were wanting it to deliberately be used
13:29
Speaker 2: to have fraudulent voters voting in elections.
13:33
Speaker 3: One hundred percent. And remember this is Minnesota. This is
13:36
Speaker 3: Minnesota where more than nine billion dollars was stolen from
13:40
Speaker 3: taxpayers and sent to Somalia. Was sent the Minnesota taxpayers
13:44
Speaker 3: with the single largest funder of Al Chippab, the radical
13:47
Speaker 3: Islamic terrorist group in Somalia. And the Democrats get elected,
13:51
Speaker 3: they depend on voter fraud to get elected. This system
13:55
Speaker 3: is designed to encourage that.
13:57
Speaker 2: Center, let's go through some of these that American needs
14:00
Speaker 2: to know about, and let's expose what they really believe.
14:03
Speaker 3: Well, let's start with Minnesota. Minnesota just nominated as their
14:06
Speaker 3: Democrat nominee for Senate a radical name Peggy Flannakin, and
14:10
Speaker 3: she's a left wing socialist who is extreme even for Minnesota.
14:14
Speaker 3: She's extreme. And I want to just just just lay
14:18
Speaker 3: out the receipts. I want to start with her talking
14:19
Speaker 3: about the Lake and Riley Act. The Lake and Riley
14:21
Speaker 3: Act passed Congress with with overwhelming bipartisan support. Even a
14:26
Speaker 3: bunch of Democrats voted for it. It's designed to protect
14:30
Speaker 3: Americans from violence from illegal immigrants. And yet this is
14:34
Speaker 3: right at the heart of a Peggy Flanagainst campaign. She
14:37
Speaker 3: wants more violent illegal immigrants in America. Give a listen.
14:41
Speaker 9: Well, I think you know what we heard from Minnesotan's
14:45
Speaker 9: is that this was really an issue of judgment. You know,
14:50
Speaker 9: my opponent was the only Minnesota Democrat to vote for
14:54
Speaker 9: Donald Trump's immigrationville, the Lake and Riley Act, which you know,
14:58
Speaker 9: I think really gave the green light for the just
15:01
Speaker 9: chaos and cruelty that we saw here in the streets
15:04
Speaker 9: in Minneapolis.
15:06
Speaker 1: You hear that and the description it's pretty laughable.
15:10
Speaker 3: Well it is. And then I want to listen. I
15:13
Speaker 3: want you to listen to her talking about why she
15:15
Speaker 3: also supports taxpayers paying for castrating and sterilizing little children. Uh,
15:23
Speaker 3: and she's emphatic. This is our general election pitch that
15:26
Speaker 3: that that we need to castrate more kids. Give a listen.
15:29
Speaker 9: Minisode of law does not set a minimum age for
15:32
Speaker 9: gender affirming care. Do you believe there should be one?
15:37
Speaker 9: I mean, I believe that what we need to do
15:40
Speaker 9: is make sure that people have access to healthcare. Frankly,
15:44
Speaker 9: that's one of the reasons, you know why I've run
15:46
Speaker 9: so hard on Medicare for all and care and should
15:52
Speaker 9: there be an age limit? I think gender affirming care
15:57
Speaker 9: is part of healthcare. People need there be an age
15:59
Speaker 9: woman for care. I think our law as it stands
16:05
Speaker 9: is a good law.
16:07
Speaker 1: Centaer.
16:07
Speaker 2: The only way I can describe what you just heard
16:09
Speaker 2: is this is what evil sounds like when it's in
16:12
Speaker 2: a political forum. And the idea that you can just
16:16
Speaker 2: mutilate a child at any age, if you're a crazy
16:20
Speaker 2: parent that decides they want their boy to be a
16:22
Speaker 2: girl or their girl to quote be a boy, you
16:24
Speaker 2: can just do this to them and there's no age
16:28
Speaker 2: minimum is absolutely not just insanity, But I do believe
16:32
Speaker 2: it's child abuse and pure evil.
16:34
Speaker 3: Look, I wish Ben you were exaggerating, but you're not.
16:37
Speaker 3: What Peggy Flanagan is arguing there is there should be
16:40
Speaker 3: zero age limit for castrating and sterilizing children. So if
16:45
Speaker 3: a five year old boy says, I think I'm a girl,
16:48
Speaker 3: and that poor little boy has leftist parents who believe
16:53
Speaker 3: in the ideology that whatever pops into the head of
16:57
Speaker 3: a child, you need to bring a surgeon's scalpel behind it.
17:00
Speaker 3: According to Peggy Flanagan, you ought to be able to
17:02
Speaker 3: castrate that five year old boy. Now, to be clear,
17:07
Speaker 3: no child has the emotional maturity, the intellectual maturity, the
17:11
Speaker 3: awareness of the world to have any ability to make
17:15
Speaker 3: a decision about whether he or she will will procreate,
17:20
Speaker 3: have children, wants to be a different gender. Look, kids
17:24
Speaker 3: want to be a Toronto source rex and yet ideology
17:27
Speaker 3: matters more. And by the way, Peggy Flanagan is also saying,
17:30
Speaker 3: if a little girl a five year old, she says
17:33
Speaker 3: there's no age limit. So a five year old says,
17:35
Speaker 3: I think I'm a boy. What she's advocating, and I
17:38
Speaker 3: got to say, I hate the phrase gender affirming care
17:41
Speaker 3: of course CNN uses that phrase. It is not affirming.
17:46
Speaker 3: Cutting your genitals off is not affirming your gender. It
17:49
Speaker 3: is destroying and removing essential attributes of your gender. And
17:55
Speaker 3: so it is George Orwell could not have thought of
17:59
Speaker 3: anything as twisted is gender affirming care when it is
18:02
Speaker 3: sterilizing and mutilating children. But what Peggy Flannagan is saying
18:06
Speaker 3: is if a five year old girl says I think
18:08
Speaker 3: I'm a boy, sterilize her and make it so that
18:12
Speaker 3: little girl can never have a child when she grows up.
18:16
Speaker 3: When she's an adult, she might say, of course, I'm
18:18
Speaker 3: not a boy, I'm a girl. I'm a woman. I
18:21
Speaker 3: want to have babies. But nope, Peggy Flanagin has already
18:25
Speaker 3: destroyed her ability through permanent sterilization. The idea that we
18:32
Speaker 3: have candidates running that are advocating for sterilizing children and
18:38
Speaker 3: view it as a matter of fundamental justice. Of course
18:41
Speaker 3: we should sterilize children. That shows just how radical these
18:45
Speaker 3: candidates are. On August twenty fifth, my brand new book
18:50
Speaker 3: comes out, Going Further the Incomparable Clarence Thomas. It tells
18:55
Speaker 3: the story of Justice Thomas, one of the true American heroes.
18:59
Speaker 3: An incredible story. It's based on nine and a half
19:01
Speaker 3: hours of one on one exclusive interviews with Justice Thomas.
19:06
Speaker 3: Justice Thomas also joins us for Verdict with Ted Cruz,
19:09
Speaker 3: a one on one podcast to tell his story, both
19:13
Speaker 3: his life story and his incomparable jurisprudence. You could pre
19:17
Speaker 3: order it right now at the website Goingfurther dot com.
19:21
Speaker 3: Goingfurther dot Com, click on the link now and pre
19:24
Speaker 3: order the book today.
19:27
Speaker 1: Yeah.
19:27
Speaker 2: This comes also as a week where we saw another
19:29
Speaker 2: radical bill that actually dealt with late term abortions and
19:33
Speaker 2: it was celebrated by the media as a states rights
19:37
Speaker 2: issue and that you could have things like this. There
19:40
Speaker 2: are a lot of Americans listening right now that I
19:42
Speaker 2: think feel like, in a weird way, we're starting to
19:45
Speaker 2: lose on some of these issues. What is your thoughts
19:48
Speaker 2: on that?
19:49
Speaker 3: Well, if you have not seen the video of the
19:53
Speaker 3: governor of Massachusetts, who is Mara Haley. She is a
19:59
Speaker 3: liberal Democrat and she is signing a law that is
20:03
Speaker 3: legalizing abortion in Massachusetts up until the moment of birth,
20:07
Speaker 3: so late term abortion. Like Massachusetts already had almost no
20:10
Speaker 3: limits on abortion, but that was not enough. They wanted
20:13
Speaker 3: in the ninth month, like you could literally be about
20:17
Speaker 3: ready to deliver, and if you decided you didn't want it,
20:21
Speaker 3: you could kill that child and the video if you
20:24
Speaker 3: have not seen it, of the governor surrounded by about
20:27
Speaker 3: a dozen all young white women, left wingers, laughing with joy,
20:35
Speaker 3: celebrating that late term abortions. By the way, do you
20:40
Speaker 3: know what the polling is on the number of Americans
20:43
Speaker 3: who support late term abortions?
20:47
Speaker 1: Yeah, the majority is saying no to it. Just so
20:50
Speaker 1: America understands.
20:53
Speaker 3: Much more than that. Ninety one percent of Americans say no,
20:57
Speaker 3: late term abortions are wrong. It is only nine percent
21:01
Speaker 3: of Americans that believe that. And yet the governor of Massachusetts,
21:04
Speaker 3: these left wing democrats are so extreme that they are
21:08
Speaker 3: cackling with joy. Now, by the way, that Peggy flanagain
21:13
Speaker 3: in Minnesota is not alone. There are other Democrats running
21:16
Speaker 3: for office, running for Senate right now who agree with
21:19
Speaker 3: her that we should be castrating children and taxpayers should
21:23
Speaker 3: be paying for that. One of those is Abdul l Sayed,
21:26
Speaker 3: who says exactly the same thing, and in just a moment,
21:29
Speaker 3: we're going to have you listen to him saying that.
21:32
Speaker 2: Now, before we get into more of this story, I
21:34
Speaker 2: do want to talk to you real quick about something
21:36
Speaker 2: that you can do to make a big difference in
21:38
Speaker 2: this country. The values that we believe in and literally
21:42
Speaker 2: make a difference every single day. There are so many
21:45
Speaker 2: brands today that claim to stand for American values, but
21:47
Speaker 2: most of the time it's all talk and no action.
21:50
Speaker 2: That is what makes Patriot Mobile different. For more than
21:54
Speaker 2: twelve years, Patriot Mobile has been living their values and
21:57
Speaker 2: standing in the gap for every American who believes freedom
22:00
Speaker 2: is actually worth fighting for now. Their business was founded
22:03
Speaker 2: on a simple conviction, if culture is being shaped through commerce,
22:07
Speaker 2: then Americans deserve a real conservative alternative now Today, Patriot
22:12
Speaker 2: Mobile is the only Christian conservative wireless provider and what
22:16
Speaker 2: they offer you is premium priority nationwide service on any
22:21
Speaker 2: of the three major US networks. You get unlimited data plans,
22:24
Speaker 2: international roaming, one hundred percent US based customer support. And
22:28
Speaker 2: then there's another great thing about Patriot Mobile, and this
22:32
Speaker 2: is what sets them apart. Their mission is different as
22:35
Speaker 2: a company. Every year they contribute millions of dollars at
22:39
Speaker 2: no extra cost to you to organizations that defend our
22:43
Speaker 2: free speech, our religiously at liberty, the sanctity of life,
22:47
Speaker 2: as well as the Second Amendment. They also support are veterans,
22:51
Speaker 2: and that is something I love about them. So why
22:54
Speaker 2: not switch your pham bill to a great company that
22:57
Speaker 2: makes a difference every time you pay your bill. Join
23:00
Speaker 2: the movement today. Go to patriotmobile dot com slash verdict.
23:04
Speaker 2: It's patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or call them nine
23:07
Speaker 2: to seven to Patriot and if you use the promo
23:10
Speaker 2: code Verdict, you will get a free month of service
23:13
Speaker 2: as well. What are you waiting for? Make a difference today?
23:16
Speaker 2: Patriotmobile dot com slush verdict or nine seven to two Patriot.
23:19
Speaker 2: Abdul I'll say eid he is on the cutting edge
23:22
Speaker 2: of this radical movement centator. He is obsessed with this
23:26
Speaker 2: again not only is socialist government run healthcare, but also
23:30
Speaker 2: the advocacy for gender mutilation surgeries for children.
23:34
Speaker 3: Well, I wish you didn't use the term cutting edge,
23:37
Speaker 3: but it is. It is startlingly accurate.
23:40
Speaker 1: Here.
23:40
Speaker 3: Get give a listen to Abduola say telling you in
23:42
Speaker 3: his own.
23:43
Speaker 10: Words, should be a choice made by a patient and
23:47
Speaker 10: their doctor if that patient is under the AHAV to
23:49
Speaker 10: eighteen the parents as well. Right, and I believe that
23:53
Speaker 10: Medicare for All should cover all healthcare. Yeah, which is
23:57
Speaker 10: defined by what a patient needs in accordance with their doctor.
24:03
Speaker 10: So that includes reproductive rights right that includes general firming
24:08
Speaker 10: care center.
24:09
Speaker 2: Let's go down this logic train for just a moment.
24:12
Speaker 2: He's saying it should be a patient's choice to choose. That,
24:18
Speaker 2: I guess means a two year old, a three year old,
24:21
Speaker 2: a four year old, a five year old, a six
24:22
Speaker 2: year old, they can choose, as he describes it, to
24:26
Speaker 2: decide to mutilate their body forever, to make it where
24:29
Speaker 2: they cannot have a kid the rest of their life
24:32
Speaker 2: if they're a girl. And I guess now, if your
24:35
Speaker 2: kid decides are Superman and they want to jump off
24:38
Speaker 2: the building, you can't stop them either, because that's their
24:40
Speaker 2: choice to say they're a superhero.
24:43
Speaker 1: Where does this insanity stop with them?
24:46
Speaker 3: It doesn't stop anywhere. This is radical ideology. And he's
24:50
Speaker 3: saying taxpayers should pay for castrating kids. It's extreme. Now,
24:54
Speaker 3: now you might say, okay, look he's a radical on
24:57
Speaker 3: transgender issues. But you know, I mean sure, this is
25:00
Speaker 3: a guy who, like you know, is proud to be
25:02
Speaker 3: an American. Well, no, you remember we had this communist
25:08
Speaker 3: candidate for governor in Wisconsin who narrowly lost the primary.
25:13
Speaker 3: Lost the primary by about a point, and one of
25:16
Speaker 3: the many things she has said is that she wanted
25:19
Speaker 3: to cancel Thanksgiving, and when you and I and others
25:24
Speaker 3: called her out on it, a lot in the media
25:26
Speaker 3: went crazy, and in fact they used their classic Republicans
25:29
Speaker 3: pounce they're accusing Democrats have wanted to cancel Thanksgiving. Well,
25:33
Speaker 3: she lost her primary. But al Sayid did not let
25:36
Speaker 3: me read you Al Sayid's tweet on Thanksgiving quote just
25:41
Speaker 3: to remind her this Thanksgiving, this country was built on
25:45
Speaker 3: the systematic annihilation of indigenous peoples, whose ancestors suffered some
25:50
Speaker 3: of the highest rates of homelessness, joblessness, and mortality. Today
25:55
Speaker 3: we owe so much more than thanks time for reprations. So,
26:01
Speaker 3: in other words, he wants your kids and my kids
26:05
Speaker 3: to pay for the people that Marxists say were oppressed. Now,
26:10
Speaker 3: mind you my family. You know, my dad came from Cuba.
26:14
Speaker 3: We didn't oppress anyone. My grandfather was born and worked
26:18
Speaker 3: on a plantation in Cuba. And yet he wants to
26:20
Speaker 3: say I got to pay for people that I've never oppressed,
26:24
Speaker 3: and more fundamentally, that we shouldn't give thanks for anything,
26:29
Speaker 3: that America is not a country worth giving thanks for.
26:33
Speaker 3: That's who he is. But it's not just that it is. Look,
26:39
Speaker 3: we've talked a lot on this podcast about the intersection
26:43
Speaker 3: between Marxism and Islamism. I want you to listen to
26:47
Speaker 3: Al Sayid talking about sharia law and the how committed
26:53
Speaker 3: he is to sharia law.
26:55
Speaker 7: Give a listen.
26:58
Speaker 10: But I was reminded actually about events that I remember
27:02
Speaker 10: because I was an adult when they happened. And that
27:06
Speaker 10: was Question seven fifty five, when the state of Oklahoma
27:11
Speaker 10: voted in a referendum to amend the constitution to ban
27:14
Speaker 10: shaddy ah lah. What does that mean? I don't know,
27:22
Speaker 10: and yet the voters banned it. Anyway, what I offer
27:26
Speaker 10: today is just a reflection on the American history that
27:29
Speaker 10: runs through this state. You all sitting in this room,
27:37
Speaker 10: in this town. We're sitting in a space in a
27:42
Speaker 10: time when I don't have to tell you that the
27:44
Speaker 10: same exact forces that drove Native peoples from their land
27:51
Speaker 10: two centuries ago, destroyed Black Wall Street a century ago,
27:57
Speaker 10: bombed a building decades ago, and tried to ban shitty
28:00
Speaker 10: out law not a decade ago, those forces are alive
28:05
Speaker 10: and well today.
28:07
Speaker 1: Wow, where do you even start with that? Center?
28:09
Speaker 2: I mean, I hear the anger I here, the disdain
28:13
Speaker 2: for America I hear the we're going to do our
28:17
Speaker 2: way and we are going to conquer in those words
28:21
Speaker 2: that you just heard. And again, so people remember what
28:24
Speaker 2: CARE is, I think we should take a moment as
28:26
Speaker 2: well and explain and remind them what CARE is as
28:28
Speaker 2: an organization.
28:29
Speaker 3: Care was an unindicted co conspirator in the Holy Land
28:33
Speaker 3: Foundation terrorist prosecution, which convicted the Holy Land Foundation, at
28:38
Speaker 3: the time the largest Muslim charity in America, funneling millions
28:41
Speaker 3: of dollars to fund hamas, and the Holy Land Foundation
28:46
Speaker 3: was convicted. Multiple senior leaders of the Holy Land Foundation
28:50
Speaker 3: were sent to jail for decades, and Carer was an
28:53
Speaker 3: unindicted co conspirator. And yet care remember Al Sayed's father
28:58
Speaker 3: in law, who is the single largest donor to a superpack,
29:02
Speaker 3: is closely affiliated with multiple groups that are closely associated
29:07
Speaker 3: with the Muslim brotherhood. And I want to just just
29:10
Speaker 3: flesh this out. Sharia law is not just a quiet,
29:13
Speaker 3: little peaceful belief in Islam. Sharia law is using government
29:17
Speaker 3: force to force you to comply with Islam, whether you
29:21
Speaker 3: were Muslim or not, and and it is it is
29:24
Speaker 3: a tool of oppression. Go to Iran and if you
29:27
Speaker 3: violate Sharia law. They will torture and execute you. And
29:32
Speaker 3: I want to read from a story from the Freebeacon
29:35
Speaker 3: that that is laying out El Sayed's record. Here's what
29:38
Speaker 3: he said, quote, you cannot understand the challenges we face
29:41
Speaker 3: today without understanding white supremacy. I don't have to tell
29:44
Speaker 3: you that the exact same forces that drove Native people
29:47
Speaker 3: from their lands two centuries ago, destroyed Wall Street a
29:49
Speaker 3: century ago, bombed building a decade ago, and tried to
29:52
Speaker 3: ban Sharia law not a decade ago. That those forces
29:55
Speaker 3: are alive and well today. And the Freebeacon continued. L
29:58
Speaker 3: Sayed's obligation to show law is well reflected in his
30:01
Speaker 3: personal and financial affairs. El Sa'id was described as a
30:05
Speaker 3: quote particularly devout Muslim in The Michigan Daily in a
30:08
Speaker 3: two thousand and six story covering his relationship with his wife,
30:12
Speaker 3: who wears a head job, is rarely seen at campaign
30:14
Speaker 3: events and did not attend El Sayid's primary watch party
30:17
Speaker 3: on Tuesday. Quote Islamically, there are no primarital relations of
30:21
Speaker 3: any sort, El said told the paper to explain why
30:24
Speaker 3: he proposed to her when she was a college freshman
30:26
Speaker 3: and he was a junior. No touching, no nothing, Given
30:29
Speaker 3: that the logical solution is to get married. El Said
30:32
Speaker 3: courted and married his wife according to Islamic law, which
30:35
Speaker 3: included a traditional two step marriage that saw the couple
30:38
Speaker 3: living apart in remaining chased for the first year of
30:40
Speaker 3: their union. Getting ice cream is the number one thing
30:42
Speaker 3: we do today together, el Said said in two thousand
30:44
Speaker 3: and six about his married life. His wife now operates
30:48
Speaker 3: a private psychiatry practice that does not accept Medicaid, Medicare
30:53
Speaker 3: or any other insurance, a policy that invites her husband's
30:56
Speaker 3: criticism of such bans as quote perpetuating law held racism
31:00
Speaker 3: and structural racism. El Sayid is also heavily invested in
31:04
Speaker 3: so called Sharia compliant investment funds managed by Amana Mutual Funds,
31:10
Speaker 3: whose late co founder and chairman, Yaka Mirza, was identified
31:14
Speaker 3: in a nineteen eighty eight FBI memo as one of
31:17
Speaker 3: several quote members and leaders of Ikwan, which is shorthand
31:21
Speaker 3: for the Muslim brotherhood. El Said reported in his latest
31:24
Speaker 3: financial disclosure that he and his wife owned between one
31:26
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty thousand and four hundred and twenty five
31:29
Speaker 3: thousand of Amana's funds, which excludes investment in companies that
31:33
Speaker 3: earn more than five percent of their revenue from Haram sources,
31:38
Speaker 3: including interest, gambling, alcohol, tobacco, pornography, and pork. In two
31:42
Speaker 3: thousand and two, federal anti terrorism agents rated Merza's home
31:45
Speaker 3: as part of a wider anti terror operation against Sofa Group,
31:49
Speaker 3: a cluster of Islamic entities based in Virginia. The Wall
31:52
Speaker 3: Street Journal in Washington Post reported no charges were filed
31:54
Speaker 3: in Amana funds itself were spared serious scrutiny during the probe.
31:57
Speaker 3: According to a local report, this is someone who himself
32:02
Speaker 3: is deeply committed to Sharia law and has defended Sharia
32:06
Speaker 3: law being forced on everyone else. And yet I want
32:11
Speaker 3: you to listen to and watch a really bizarre ad
32:15
Speaker 3: because this man is a Marxist and an Islamist, and
32:19
Speaker 3: yet his campaign, there are multiple videos he's put out
32:22
Speaker 3: of him dancing and lip singing to female singers in
32:26
Speaker 3: a way that that that that's really astonishing. But I
32:30
Speaker 3: want you to listen to this particular ad that he
32:33
Speaker 3: put out.
32:34
Speaker 2: Now for you guys listening, I think the best part
32:36
Speaker 2: about this is just so you understand the set. It's
32:38
Speaker 2: a animated set, but he's dancing like on it for
32:42
Speaker 2: this kids show called Blues Clues that is setting the
32:46
Speaker 2: stage for you.
32:47
Speaker 1: And take a listen.
32:48
Speaker 10: Here's the male that never fails and makes me want
32:51
Speaker 10: a wag. Might say when it comes, I wanta wel.
32:57
Speaker 6: Thanks Mailbox, we just got a let or we just
33:01
Speaker 6: got a leed, or we just got a leed, or
33:04
Speaker 6: I wonder who it's from. It looks like my ballot
33:10
Speaker 6: brought to me by my Secretary of State, and with
33:13
Speaker 6: it I can participate in democracy. The first day that
33:16
Speaker 6: I can turn this in is June twenty fifth. It
33:19
Speaker 6: has to be postmarked by July twenty first, or I
33:23
Speaker 6: can drop it off up until election day, which is
33:26
Speaker 6: August fourth. Thanks Secretary of State. Thanks Mailbox.
33:31
Speaker 4: Volt's good, we can too.
33:33
Speaker 1: Center truly weird, That's all I can say about that.
33:36
Speaker 3: Well and fundamentally deceptive. This is an Islamist who is
33:39
Speaker 3: pretending to be a dancing child cartoon character.
33:44
Speaker 2: We are exposing the radical laugh to the democratic socials
33:47
Speaker 2: of America and some of the extremists that are winning
33:51
Speaker 2: primaries and winning elections around the country. One of them.
33:54
Speaker 2: Center is a guy by the name of James Tallarico.
33:58
Speaker 2: And every time you think you've heard the craziest thing
34:00
Speaker 2: from him, he's running for the Senate in Texas, trying
34:04
Speaker 2: to act like he's a big text and even though
34:05
Speaker 2: he doesn't, you know, he's a vegan, doesn't eat meat,
34:08
Speaker 2: and thinks that there's you know, I don't even know
34:10
Speaker 2: how many genders and God's non binary. But every time
34:14
Speaker 2: you think all right, it's all out there, you get
34:15
Speaker 2: something else that pops and it makes him even more
34:19
Speaker 2: out of step with average mainstream Americans.
34:24
Speaker 3: Well, there's a theme across all of these radical Democrat candidates,
34:28
Speaker 3: which is their fakes. I've said for a long time
34:31
Speaker 3: that in the United States, a conservative wins when he
34:36
Speaker 3: effectively communicates what it is that he or she believes,
34:40
Speaker 3: and a liberal wins when he effectively obfus skates when
34:44
Speaker 3: he hides or covers up what he believes. That is
34:47
Speaker 3: the theme across the board. So you have these Islamists
34:50
Speaker 3: and Marxists who campaign and they do lip singing to
34:54
Speaker 3: songs and dancing like children's characters. You have in a
34:59
Speaker 3: lat one of the great examples of fakes, the Democrats,
35:03
Speaker 3: the incumbent senators, My very dear friend Dan Sullivan, a
35:06
Speaker 3: great Republican senator from Alaska. The Democrats recruited a guy
35:10
Speaker 3: named Dan Sullivan to register, and he's on the ballot
35:13
Speaker 3: as a Republican. So there's going to be two people
35:15
Speaker 3: named Dan Sullivan, Republican, one the actual senator and the
35:18
Speaker 3: other a guy named Dan Sullivan who has contributed to
35:21
Speaker 3: the Democrat in the campaign, whose campaign press release was
35:25
Speaker 3: written by the Democrat consultant. And their purpose in that
35:29
Speaker 3: race is to deceive the voters and to have them confused.
35:31
Speaker 3: And if two three four percent of them think they're
35:34
Speaker 3: voting for Dan Sullivan, the actual senator, and instead of
35:36
Speaker 3: voting for the liberal fake Dan Sullivan, they might elect
35:39
Speaker 3: the liberal. But Democrats don't care about democracy. That's not
35:42
Speaker 3: what this is about. This is about deceiving the voters.
35:45
Speaker 3: There's another category, which is the fake independent. So in
35:48
Speaker 3: states like Nebraska, they've recruited a liberal Democrat who claims
35:52
Speaker 3: he's an independent. They're trying. They're doing the same thing
35:54
Speaker 3: in Montana, where they run a quote independent who's a
35:57
Speaker 3: liberal Democrat will vote for Chuck Schumer on everything. But
35:59
Speaker 3: they want to fool the Democrats into thinking and the
36:02
Speaker 3: voters are thinking, oh, this is not a democrat on
36:05
Speaker 3: other species and strategy they've tried this time is the
36:08
Speaker 3: fake pastor. And so they've decided, gosh, we have a
36:12
Speaker 3: problem with people of faith that were radical, godless, soulless faith,
36:17
Speaker 3: hating religiously liberty, hating heathens. And I'm I guess speaking.
36:23
Speaker 3: I was going to say I'm speaking excessively, but I
36:29
Speaker 3: don't know that I am. But let's take tall Rico.
36:33
Speaker 3: So Tall Rico, it's widely said, is a seminary. Now
36:37
Speaker 3: he's said, among other things, God is non binary, they're
36:40
Speaker 3: six genders. He's stood before churches and said he cries
36:43
Speaker 3: and weeps for his whiteness and his masculinity. He's also
36:48
Speaker 3: said at times he hates Christianity. But I want you
36:51
Speaker 3: to listen to what he said here about teaching the
36:54
Speaker 3: Bible to kids. Give a listen.
36:58
Speaker 8: And the last one is maybe the most insidious. It
37:01
Speaker 8: was a new state curriculum that would teach Christian Bible
37:05
Speaker 8: stories as historical fact, as the only truth to our
37:10
Speaker 8: youngest students, and I mean kindergarten first graders. These are
37:13
Speaker 8: kids who aren't able to think for themselves. Yet they
37:17
Speaker 8: haven't formed their own worlds and pushed propaganda. To push
37:23
Speaker 8: indoctrination on those youngest students is deeply immoral.
37:28
Speaker 1: Deeply immoral.
37:31
Speaker 3: And understand Number one, what he's describing about the state
37:34
Speaker 3: law is totally false that there was nothing in the
37:36
Speaker 3: curriculum that was teaching the Bible in terms of indoctrinating kids.
37:41
Speaker 3: But any literate person, the Bible has been the single
37:45
Speaker 3: most consequential work ever written in the history of humanity,
37:48
Speaker 3: and you and I, as Christians, believe it was written
37:50
Speaker 3: by the hand of God with divine inspiration. But the
37:54
Speaker 3: curriculum is simply teaching the Bible, because if you know
37:57
Speaker 3: nothing about the Bible, you're truly an ignorant person. But
38:00
Speaker 3: I want you to listen to the word he used
38:02
Speaker 3: describing the Bible as propaganda, that if kids know something
38:05
Speaker 3: about the Bible, it is propaganda. And ask yourself what
38:10
Speaker 3: actual Christian pastor would describe the Bible as propaganda. I
38:16
Speaker 3: agree that public schools should not be proselytizing any faith,
38:20
Speaker 3: but that's not in fact what the Texas curriculum does.
38:23
Speaker 1: Uh.
38:23
Speaker 3: It does ensure that you have literate kids that are
38:26
Speaker 3: that are aware of of of what's in the Bible
38:29
Speaker 3: and by the way, what's what's in in history books
38:31
Speaker 3: and math books, and and and and all of the
38:36
Speaker 3: whole field of knowledge. But but that is who the
38:40
Speaker 3: Democrats have nominated and hopes that people will think, oh,
38:43
Speaker 3: he's just like me. I want to also point out
38:46
Speaker 3: a fellow who is running for Senate in Kansas. Now
38:49
Speaker 3: you might not think Kansas is close, but I'll tell
38:52
Speaker 3: you in this election cycle, this this election cycle, the
38:55
Speaker 3: numbers are are are bumpy and and Kansas. Roger Marshall's
38:59
Speaker 3: the incumbent. He's a good friend of mine. He's a
39:01
Speaker 3: good man. I think he's going to win. But the
39:04
Speaker 3: Democrats recruited a pastor from a giant church in Kansas City,
39:09
Speaker 3: a very liberal pastor, to run as a Democrat, and
39:12
Speaker 3: so is a Democrat. He's supportive of all the left
39:14
Speaker 3: wing ideology that these other lunatics support, but he's trying
39:19
Speaker 3: to cover it up. But I want you to listen
39:21
Speaker 3: to a sermon that he preached in his church, and
39:26
Speaker 3: I'm going to tell you. In the sermon, he explains
39:28
Speaker 3: that you don't actually have to be a Christian to
39:30
Speaker 3: go to Heaven, and that you don't have to believe
39:32
Speaker 3: in Jesus to be saved, to give a listen.
39:38
Speaker 7: And I've spent this a lot of my life studying
39:40
Speaker 7: different world religions. And you find some get you a
39:42
Speaker 7: little closer, that the image begins to become clear, like
39:45
Speaker 7: this picture on the screen. And then you study another one,
39:48
Speaker 7: you find it gets it even clearer. You suddenly see
39:50
Speaker 7: that the image becomes even more in focus. And so
39:53
Speaker 7: for me, as I've studied different world religions, I sit
39:55
Speaker 7: in the chair and I'm looking through these different lenses.
39:57
Speaker 7: And when I finally got to that last one, when
39:59
Speaker 7: I I only got to Jesus and Christianity, it was
40:02
Speaker 7: like I could see clearly the clearest that I had seen.
40:06
Speaker 7: And so I think about how Paul says he talks
40:07
Speaker 7: about Jesus. He says, the Son is the image of
40:09
Speaker 7: the invisible God right and Jesus elsewhere says, if you've
40:12
Speaker 7: seen me, you've seen the Father. And so in Christianity
40:15
Speaker 7: we believe that God actually came and walked among us
40:17
Speaker 7: in the flesh. He didn't give us a book, He
40:19
Speaker 7: came in person. And when we look at Jesus, we
40:21
Speaker 7: have the clearest picture we have of God. And so
40:23
Speaker 7: so when I began to look through the lens of Jesus.
40:25
Speaker 7: My eyesight, spiritual eyesight, I felt became the most clear
40:29
Speaker 7: it could be like you see in this image here.
40:32
Speaker 7: Now the truth is that a Muslim would say through
40:34
Speaker 7: Islam they see the most clearly, and a Hindu through Hinduism,
40:37
Speaker 7: and a Jew through Judaism, and so so I recognize
40:40
Speaker 7: we all are you know, we all have a different
40:41
Speaker 7: lens that we're seeing through. And sometimes we think, you know,
40:43
Speaker 7: depending how we were raised and how we think, one
40:46
Speaker 7: lens is you know, clearly a better lens for me.
40:48
Speaker 7: And when it comes to other faiths, I believe as
40:51
Speaker 7: a Christian that they are going to when they get
40:52
Speaker 7: to Heaven, they're going to see Jesus and they're going
40:54
Speaker 7: to say, ah, it was you all the time, all
40:57
Speaker 7: along that I was searching for. But I don't that
41:00
Speaker 7: those folks will spend eternity in hell.
41:03
Speaker 1: That's pretty radical.
41:07
Speaker 3: Well, it is, and what it is not is biblical.
41:10
Speaker 3: You can be a philosopher, you can be a left
41:13
Speaker 3: wing advocate, but you cannot be a Christian preacher who
41:17
Speaker 3: is actually preaching Christianity and say that that is.
41:20
Speaker 10: That, that is.
41:24
Speaker 3: The literal definition of heresy. And why is that because
41:28
Speaker 3: it directly contradicts the Bible. And let me quote John
41:31
Speaker 3: fourteen six quote, Jesus answered, I am the Way and
41:37
Speaker 3: the Truth and the life. No one comes to the
41:40
Speaker 3: Father except through me. That's what the Bible says. And
41:45
Speaker 3: yet that this democrat Adam Hamilton, who's running as I'm
41:48
Speaker 3: a preacher, is telling people, hey, you don't have to
41:51
Speaker 3: be a Christian to be saved. Jesus is not the way,
41:53
Speaker 3: the truth of the life. Anyway is fine, We're all
41:56
Speaker 3: going to heaven. It's all great. Kumbai yah, do whatever
41:59
Speaker 3: you want. That is the message of the world. But
42:06
Speaker 3: that is not the message of scripture.
42:08
Speaker 4: M