Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / China’s assault on the dollar and the coming mineral war

Transcript

China’s assault on the dollar and the coming mineral war · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:00
  Broadcasting around the world.
• 0:02
  This is on the record with Christian Briggs.
• 0:05
  Serious talk about what's happening around the world and how it affects you.
• 0:09
  Unfiltered truth for a world on edge.
• 0:13
  Follow us on X at BMC underscore HAM live in three, two, one.
• 0:22
  Today's podcast is about part three of my policy paper entitled China's Strategic Assault on Dollar Hegemony through banking infrastructure, critical mineral dominance, and the architecture of de-dollarization.
• 0:33
  This paper argues that whoever controls critical metals and quantum technology will control the future.
• 0:37
  Economically, militarily, and technologically.
• 0:40
  It proposes that the United States must secure gold, silver, and advanced resources while accelerating quantum development to avoid falling behind China.
• 0:48
  Picking up from where we left off at the end of part two, we'll dig back in to the Venezuela intervention and China's response to it.
• 0:55
  Gold supply chain, Venezuela's claimed 7,000 tons of gold reserves.
• 1:01
  Let's take a look at why Venezuela matters.
• 1:04
  Venezuela holds the world's largest crude oil reserves, nearly 300 billion barrels, along with 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
• 1:13
  It also sits on 8,000 tons of gold, the largest in Latin America.
• 1:18
  If verified, this would represent a significant addition to global supply.
• 1:22
  The BRICS gold accumulation strategy depends on sourcing outside Western controlled channels.
• 1:28
  Venezuelan gold flowing through smuggling networks to Turkey, UAE, and to Asian refineries represented one such source.
• 1:35
  Regularization of Venezuelan gold production under U.S.
• 1:38
  aligned governance would redirect these flows toward Western controlled supply chains.
• 1:43
  Silver and base metals, Venezuela is not a major silver producer, but its base metal reserves, iron, bauxite, nickel affect global commodity markets indirectly.
• 1:53
  Restoration of Venezuelan mining under transparent governance would add significant supply to markets currently dependent on Chinese controlled processing.
• 2:02
  China is Venezuela's biggest oil buyer, accounting for roughly 5% of China's crude imports, largely tied to oil-backed loans.
• 2:11
  Any U.S.
• 2:11
  led restructuring threatens Beijing's energy security and access to strategic minerals from the Orinoco Belt.
• 2:18
  Coltan and defense supply chains, Venezuelan Coltan represents the intervention's most significant precious metals dimension.
• 2:24
  Tantalum capacitors are essential components in virtually all modern military hardware, from smartphones to F 35 fighters.
• 2:32
  U.S.
• 2:32
  control of Venezuelan Coltan sources would enable supply chain restructuring that reduces dependency on Chinese processing.
• 2:38
  Combined with initiatives to develop domestic tantalum processing capacity.
• 2:42
  This could fundamentally alter the strategic metals landscape over a five to ten year period.
• 2:48
  The Venezuela intervention represents the most significant U.S.
• 2:50
  action to counter Chinese influence in Latin America since the Cold War.
• 2:54
  Unlike tariffs, sanctions, or diplomatic pressure, tools that impose gradual costs and allow adaptation, military action demonstrated unambiguous resolve and imposed immediate irreversible costs on Chinese strategic positioning.
• 3:10
  For China, the intervention crystallizes the limits of economic statecraft without corresponding security guarantees.
• 3:16
  Beijing invested over $60 billion in Venezuela across two decades.
• 3:23
  That investment purchased diplomatic alignment, preferential resource access, and a foothold in the Western hemisphere.
• 3:31
  But it did not purchase security.
• 3:32
  A determined U.S.
• 3:33
  military operation executed in hours terminated the entire position.
• 3:38
  For other Latin American governments considering partnership with China, the intervention provides clarifying evidence.
• 3:44
  Economic engagement with Beijing does not provide protection against U.S.
• 3:47
  action when core American interests are engaged.
• 3:50
  Every calculation of Chinese partnership must now factor in the demonstrated U.S.
• 3:55
  willingness to use force in the Western hemisphere.
• 3:58
  This is a critical factor when other countries consider their mineral strategy.
• 4:01
  The intervention also tests the BRICS framework's credibility.
• 4:04
  If the block cannot respond effectively when a member's ally faces military action, its value as alternative to Western dominated institutions diminishes.
• 4:15
  The muted Chinese response of rhetorical condemnation without practical consequences may signal to uh potential BRICS partners that the framework provides limited protection against a determined U.S.
• 4:30
  opposition.
• 4:31
  China is the largest importer of Venezuelan oil, and President Trump was saying that, you know, the U.S.
• 4:37
  is going to be taking control of Venezuelan oil reserves.
• 4:40
  And this is what China had to say in reaction.
• 4:42
  We have this statement.
• 4:43
  China is deeply shocked, shocked by and strongly condemns the U.S.
• 4:47
  blatant use of force against a sovereign state and action against its president.
• 4:52
  Such hemogenic acts of the U.S.
• 4:55
  seriously violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region.
• 5:02
  China firmly opposes it.
• 5:04
  We call on the U.S.
• 5:04
  to abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN charter and stop violating other countries' sovereignty and security.
• 5:13
  Regarding food security and agricultural control, Chinese acquisition of agricultural assets and processing capacity extends commodity monopolization beyond minerals into food security.
• 5:25
  Control of food production and distribution provides leverage as fundamental as energy or critical minerals.
• 5:30
  Chinese entities have acquired significant agricultural landholdings across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America.
• 5:36
  Singenta acquisition by Chem China for 43 billion dollars secured one of the world's largest seed and agrochemical companies, Smithfield Foods secured the world's largest pork producer.
• 5:49
  State-directed agricultural investment prioritizes crops and commodities essential to Chinese food security, including soybeans, corn, pork, and seafood.
• 5:58
  Investment patterns indicate preparation for potential supply disruption or trade conflict affecting Chinese food imports.
• 6:05
  COFCO International has become a major global agricultural commodity trader through acquisitions, including Noble Agri and Nidera.
• 6:15
  Chinese companies control substantial processing capacity for palm oil, sugar, and other agricultural commodities.
• 6:21
  Port facilities and logistics infrastructure enable control of physical commodities flows beyond ownership of production assets.
• 6:28
  Food security control provides leverage in trade negotiations and potential conflict scenarios.
• 6:34
  Nations dependent on Chinese controlled agricultural supply chains face pressure, like nations dependent on Chinese rare earths.
• 6:43
  Commodity monopolization is comprehensive strategy extending across all strategic inputs.
• 6:48
  American supply chain vulnerability to Chinese commodity control represents an immediate national security threat.
• 6:55
  Unlike gradual de-dollarization, which unfolds over years, commodity cutoff can occur instantaneously through export control implementation.
• 7:04
  This is what happens when the world's largest supply chain snaps in half.
• 7:08
  And in this simulation, it happens at exactly 3.17 on a Tuesday morning Eastern time when Chinese officials announce a complete embargo on all trade with the United States, no cargo ships, no containers, no electronics, no pharmaceuticals.
• 7:20
  At 4.30 a.m., the first panic buying begins.
• 7:23
  But it's not widespread yet.
• 7:25
  It's localized to three cities: Seattle, San Francisco, and Austin, where early adopters and tech workers are statistically more likely to react quickly to global news, and the items they're buying aren't food or water.
• 7:36
  They're electronics, specifically laptops, tablets, phones, anything with semiconductors, because that demographic understands that 72% of the world's advanced chips pass through Taiwan.
• 7:47
  And if China is willing to embargo the U.S., the assumption is that Taiwan could be next.
• 7:52
  At 508 a.m., the pharmaceutical industry has its first internal crisis call because 70% of the active pharmaceutical ingredients and generic medications sold in the United States are produced in China.
• 8:04
  By day seven, the word rationing appears in a press briefing for the first time.
• 8:08
  Not as a policy, but as a contingency.
• 8:10
  And the distinction doesn't matter.
• 8:12
  Because once the word is spoken, people begin rationing on their own, buying less, saving more, preparing for future that feels uncertain in a way it hasn't felt in years.
• 8:22
  Current rare earth inventories support six to eighteen months of defense production depending on system type.
• 8:26
  The F-35 program would halt within one year of complete rare earth cutoff.
• 8:30
  Precision guided munition production would cease within six months.
• 8:33
  Submarine and surface vessel construction would face critical shortages within 18 months.
• 8:38
  Stockpile levels are classified but assessed as inadequate for extended conflict scenarios.
• 8:43
  Building sufficient stockpiles requires years of accumulation at premium prices.
• 8:47
  China's export controls make stockpile building increasingly difficult and expensive.
• 8:51
  Beyond defense, American industrial production depends on Chinese controlled inputs.
• 8:58
  Automotive production requiring rare earth motors would collapse within months of cutoff.
• 9:05
  Clean energy manufacturing would halt.
• 9:07
  Electronics production would face critical component shortages.
• 9:11
  No sector of advanced manufacturing is immune.
• 9:14
  The interconnection of supply chains means cascading failures.
• 9:18
  Automotive plant closure affects parts suppliers who serve multiple industries.
• 9:24
  Electronic shortages ripple through every sector depending on semiconductors and computing equipment.
• 9:29
  Single point vulnerabilities create systemic risk.
• 9:32
  Section 13A Chinese automotive industry dominance.
• 9:35
  In 2025, Chinese automakers surpassed Japanese manufacturers to become the world's largest vehicle sellers for the first time, ending a Japanese leadership position held for over 20 years.
• 9:47
  This milestone reflects a fundamental restructuring of global industrial power that extends far beyond consumer products to critical manufacturing capacity and supply chain control.
• 9:57
  According to NICI Asia analysis based on
• 10:00
  On SP global mobility data and automaker disclosures.
• 10:04
  Through November 2025, Chinese manufacturers achieved historic dominance.
• 10:08
  In 2023, BYD produced more than three million new energy vehicles.
• 10:13
  BYG has grown into this powerhouse.
• 10:16
  You look at the monthly rankings.
• 10:18
  They're always at the top.
• 10:19
  The Americans and the Europeans produce cars that have inferior software and don't use the latest chip.
• 10:25
  GM sales are down by more than 50%, forged down by more than 60%, and G has actually gone bankrupt in China and had to get out.
• 10:34
  Detroit is under pressure in China, and for the same reasons are losing in China, they could very easily lose globally.
• 10:57
  The trajectory reveals accelerating momentum.
• 11:00
  2022.
• 11:02
  Japan leads China by similar 8 million units 2023.
• 11:06
  China becomes world's largest auto exporter, surpassing Germany and Japan 2025.
• 11:11
  China becomes world's largest vehicle seller by a total global sales.
• 11:16
  Chinese ascent from significant deficit to global leadership occurred in three years.
• 11:20
  The asymmetry reflects fundamental differences in industrial industrial trajectory.
• 11:24
  United States automaker performance reveals structural weakness masked by domestic market focus.
• 11:29
  The U.S.
• 11:30
  market total sales in 2025 was 16.3 million units, best since 2019, but still below 2016 peak of 17.5 million.
• 11:39
  U.S.
• 11:39
  automaker global production, similar 11 million units, stagnant since 2020.
• 11:46
  Chinese global sales now exceed U.S.
• 11:48
  production by approximately 145%.
• 11:53
  Japanese global sales exceed U.S.
• 11:56
  production by approximately 127%.
• 11:59
  American automakers have effectively ceded global market competition to focus on domestic sales, particularly high-margin trucks and SUVs.
• 12:12
  This strategic retreat leaves the United States without competitive positioning.
• 12:16
  Chinese manufacturers are penetrating markets historically dominated by Japanese and American brands.
• 12:21
  Southeast Asia, along a Japanese stronghold is experiencing rapid market share erosion.
• 12:27
  In Thailand, Japanese vehicles accounted for 69% of new car sales as of November 2025, down sharply from approximately 90% five years earlier.
• 12:38
  Chinese automotive dominance is built on electric vehicle leadership.
• 12:41
  Battery electric and plug-in hybrid models comprised nearly 60% of Chinese passenger car demand.
• 12:48
  Global EV sales rose approximately 25% in 2025, directly favoring Chinese manufacturers.
• 12:55
  Chinese manufacturers have scaled EV production faster than any competitor.
• 13:06
  BYD exemplifies the strategic approach.
• 13:09
  Its Rayong Thailand plant began operations in 2024 with 150,000 unit annual capacity.
• 13:16
  A repurposed Ford factory in Brazil targets 150,000 units, a 1 billion euro Hungarian facility covering 12 new energy vehicle models will target the EU market directly.
• 13:27
  This localized production model bypasses tariff barriers while creating local employment and political support.
• 13:33
  Ford CEO Jim Farley flew a Shaomi SU 7 from Shanghai to Chicago and drove it for six months.
• 13:40
  He stated it's the most humbling thing I've ever seen.
• 13:44
  This candid evaluation from a major American automaker CEO reflects recognition that Chinese automotive capability has achieved parity or superiority with Western manufacturers.
• 13:53
  The automotive transition parallels Chinese dominance in other strategic sectors.
• 13:59
  Just as China controls 60 to 70% of rare earth processing, Chinese automakers now lead global vehicle sales.
• 14:06
  Just as China leveraged solar panel manufacturing scale, Chinese EV manufacturers leverage battery supply chain integration.
• 14:13
  American tariffs exceeding 100% on Chinese EVs combined with a 2027 ban on connected car technology from China provide temporary domestic market protection.
• 14:24
  These barriers do not address the fundamental competitive gap and ensure American consumers pay premium prices while American manufacturers lose global market relevance.
• 14:33
  Section 14 legal warfare against American economic sovereignty.
• 14:37
  China has constructed a comprehensive legal warfare apparatus designed to constrain American economic sovereignty while preserving maximum flexibility for Chinese state actors.
• 14:46
  This architecture operates across multiple domains.
• 14:51
  The World Trade Organization challenge mechanisms, domestic arbitration structures that favor Chinese parties, anti-suit injunctions that block foreign intellectual property enforcement and coordinated retaliatory toolkits that weaponize regulatory frameworks against American companies.
• 15:08
  The strategic objective is asymmetric.
• 15:10
  China exploits international legal frameworks to challenge American trade measures while simultaneously constructing domestic mechanisms that insulate Chinese interests from equivalent accountability.
• 15:19
  This creates a one-way legal architecture where American companies face Chinese courts with structural disadvantages, while Chinese companies leverage international tribunals designed for neutral dispute resolution.
• 15:30
  China has filed multiple WTO disputes, challenging U.S.
• 15:34
  tariff measures, exploiting the organization's paralyzed enforcement mechanism.
• 15:39
  China claims violations of GATT 1994, Articles 1 to 1, most favored nation treatment 21A and 21B in tariff bindings.
• 15:51
  In September 2020, a WTO panel ruled that Trump-era tariffs violated global trade rules because they applied only to China and exceeded agreed maximum rates.
• 16:03
  The critical vulnerability China exploits is the non-functional WTO appellate body.
• 16:08
  Since 2019, the U.S.
• 16:11
  has blocked new appointments to the seven-member body, leaving it without the minimum three three members required to hear appeals.
• 16:19
  China files WTO complaints creating international legal pressure and narrative advantage.
• 16:24
  If a panel rules against the U.S., America can appeal into the void, where the appeal suspends the ruling indefinitely with no functioning body to hear it.
• 16:33
  China benefits from both outcomes.
• 16:34
  It either wins panel decisions that pressure the U.S.
• 16:37
  diplomatically or it demonstrates American hypocrisy in blocking the enforcement mechanism while claiming to support rules-based order.
• 16:45
  The WTO system becomes a propaganda tool rather than a dispute resolution mechanism.
• 16:50
  Since August 2020, Chinese courts have deployed anti-suit injunctions as a weapon to prevent foreign companies from enforcing intellectual property rights in their home jurisdictions.
• 17:00
  This is a direct assault on judicial sovereignty and creates a mechanism for Chinese companies to access foreign technology at below market rates or for free.
• 17:08
  An anti-suit injunction is a court order prohibiting a party from pursuing litigation in a foreign jurisdiction.
• 17:14
  Violations carry fines of up to 150,000 per day.
• 17:51
  This framing reveals the strategic intent.
• 18:23
  Article 260 of the Chinese civil procedure law allows courts to refuse enforcement of arbitral awards if detrimental to uh social or public interests, providing broad discretion to block awards favoring foreign parties.
• 18:41
  Foreign invested enterprises registered in China are classified as domestic entities.
• 18:48
  In the Beijing Xiaolai Sing case, 2014 said the Supreme People's Court ruled that contracts between FYES and Chinese companies cannot use offshore arbitration.
• 19:02
  American companies operating in China through local subsidiaries are trapped in Chinese arbitration forms regardless of contract terms specifying foreign arbitration.
• 19:12
  China has constructed an integrated legal warfare toolkit that deploys multiple mechanisms simultaneously, creating cascading pressure on American companies and the U.S.
• 19:21
  government.
• 19:22
  The February 4th, 2025 response to Trump tariffs demonstrates this coordinated approach.
• 19:27
  Established in 2020, the UEL is administered by the Ministry of Commerce to penalize foreign entities deemed to endanger China's national sovereignty, security, or development interests.
• 19:38
  By April 2025, 17 U.S.
• 19:42
  companies had been added.
• 19:43
  Consequences include prohibition from import or export activities with China, ban on new investments, prohibition on entry of personnel into China, and potential criminal penalties.
• 19:53
  The UEL targets primarily companies supplying defense related goods to Taiwan and
• 20:00
  Companies that have reduced business with Chinese counterparties in compliance with U.S.
• 20:04
  export controls.
• 20:05
  This creates a compliance trap where American companies face either U.S.
• 20:10
  penalties for violating export controls or Chinese penalties for complying with them.
• 20:15
  In March 2025, MOCOM deployed the ECPL for the first time and added 15 U.S.
• 20:22
  defense related companies.
• 20:24
  Entities on the ECPL are prohibited from receiving exports of dual use items from Chinese suppliers combined with rare earth export controls.
• 20:36
  This creates supply chain vulnerabilities for American defense and uh technology sectors.
• 20:42
  Chinese infrastructure contracts and uh in Belt and Road Initiative countries exhibit consistent terms that advantage Chinese parties in disputes.
• 20:50
  Confidentiality clauses prevent public disclosure of terms.
• 20:54
  Sovereign immunity waivers are required, like with Jamaica's North South Highway.
• 20:57
  Jurisdiction provisions make disputes subject to Chinese law regardless of project location.
• 21:01
  CIETAC is designated as exclusive arbitration venue.
• 21:07
  State assets or revenue streams are pledged as collateral.
• 21:12
  These terms ensure that infrastructure disputes in Jamaica, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, or any BRI participant country resolve in Chinese forums under Chinese law, regardless of where the project is located or which nation's interests are affected.
• 21:29
  China's legal warfare architecture achieves four strategic objectives.
• 21:34
  First, asymmetric accountability.
• 21:36
  American companies face Chinese courts with structural disadvantages while Chinese companies exploit neutral international forms.
• 21:43
  Second, IP cost reduction.
• 21:46
  AS has forced foreign patent holders to accept Chinese court determined licensing rates, which are typically below market uh value.
• 21:54
  Third, compliance traps.
• 21:56
  The UEL creates impossible choices between US export control compliance and Chinese market access.
• 22:02
  Fourth, narrative control.
• 22:04
  WTO challenges create international international legitimacy while exposing American hypocrisy.
• 22:12
  Defending American Courts Act.
• 22:14
  Legislation introduced by Senators Tillis, Kuhn's, Cotton, Hirono, and Scott would penalize parties seeking foreign ASIs by borrowing patent validity challenges at USPTO and imposing enhanced damages for infringement.
• 22:28
  Reciprocal jurisdiction requirements require Chinese companies seeking U.S.
• 22:32
  court access to demonstrate reciprocal treatment for American companies and Chinese courts.
• 22:37
  Contract term disclosure require public disclosure of BRI contract terms for projects receiving U.S.
• 22:43
  development finance alternatives creating competitive transparency pressure.
• 22:47
  WTO reform.
• 22:49
  Either restore appellate body functionality with structural reforms preventing abuse or acknowledge the system's failure and build alternative trade frameworks with allied nations.
• 23:01
  The legal warfare dimension of China's strategy against American economic sovereignty requires recognition that international legal frameworks designed for neutral dispute resolution have been weaponized.
• 23:14
  Defensive measures alone are insufficient.
• 23:17
  The United States must construct countervailing legal architecture that imposes equivalent costs on Chinese exploitation while building allied frameworks that exclude bad faith actors.
• 23:28
  New rare earth mining projects require seven to ten years from discovery to production.
• 23:35
  Environmental permitting alone consumes uh three to five years in most Western jurisdictions.
• 23:41
  Capital requirements for major mining projects range from 500 million to 2 billion dollars.
• 23:47
  Even with accelerated permitting and fast-tracked environmental impact studies, we do not think new Western mining capacity can reach commercial scale before 2030.
• 23:56
  Mining produces ore.
• 23:58
  Processing produces usable materials.
• 24:00
  China dominates processing even more completely than mining.
• 24:03
  Building separation and refining facilities require specialized expertise concentrated in China, training workforce, developing processes, and achieving commercial yields requires years beyond facility construction.
• 24:15
  MP Materials operates the only active American rare earth mine at Mountain Pass, California.
• 24:20
  Mines material must be shipped to China for processing.
• 24:24
  Part three from petrodollars to mineral dollars.
• 24:26
  Section 16, the makings of a new monetary order.
• 24:29
  Washington is engineering what appears to be a new monetary system through critical minerals with tariff enforced price floors and military industrial supply chain control using a playbook from the Nixon Kissinger era.
• 24:42
  Except this time, um it looks and smells like a military operation with a very direct objective.
• 24:48
  President Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger convened the Washington Energy Conference with major oil-consuming OECD nations in direct response to October 1973 Arab embargo.
• 25:01
  The embargo raised oil prices from approximately three to twelve per barrel overnight, which threaten the economic stability of the industrialized world.
• 25:10
  Gold has more than tripled since September 2022, rising from $1,656 per ounce to over $5,000 by February 2026.
• 25:21
  That's a 205% gain outperforming the market.
• 25:25
  And proving why gold is the ultimate long-term hedge.
• 25:28
  As global debt soars and currencies weaken, central banks are hoarding gold at record pace.
• 25:33
  Why aren't you?
• 25:35
  Call 844-426-4653 or visit BMCHAM.com.
• 25:40
  Protect your future with real assets.
• 25:42
  Own gold now.
• 25:47
  Hi, this is Colonel Mike from the National Security Hour, calling all patriots to join me in Nashville on July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for America Outloud News 250 10th anniversary in Nashville.
• 25:59
  Go get them, cowboys.
• 26:01
  Along with CLEAR, the wellness company.
• 26:03
  We're celebrating two big milestones, 250 years of America and 10 years of America Outloud.news.
• 26:10
  That's where you come to hear military and intel experts on the National Security Hour and where you get freedom of speech with liberty and justice for all.
• 26:18
  Not like anywhere else.
• 26:19
  This is a once-in-a-lifetime celebration.
• 26:22
  We will have inspiring entertainment, incredible fireworks, nationally recognized speakers who proudly stand for freedom.
• 26:28
  Just like you and us.
• 26:30
  Let's unite to salute and celebrate the history of our great nation and collaborate to protect the future.
• 26:36
  Join us and register now at AmericaOut Loud.news Nashville.
• 26:40
  Struggling with rising health care costs.
• 26:43
  Health insurance premiums are up 47%.
• 26:46
  Enter the One Wellness Elite membership for 100 per month.
• 26:50
  You get two free nutraceuticals, free prescriptions on 800 plus meds and 24-7 telemedicine.
• 26:57
  America Out Loud listeners getting exclusive 20% discount.
• 27:01
  Go to TWC.
• 27:04
  Use the code OutLoud.
• 27:05
  You wouldn't go a day without brushing your teeth or washing your hands.
• 27:09
  What about washing your nose?
• 27:11
  I mean, your nose does filter the air you breathe.
• 27:14
  Air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and irritants.
• 27:17
  Make nasal hygiene part of your routine with clear.
• 27:20
  No messy bottles to fill, no drowning sensation.
• 27:23
  Clear is a natural drug-free saline with the added benefit of xylitol, which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion.
• 27:30
  Available in stores and online at clear.com.
• 27:33
  That is XLEAR.com.
• 27:35
  Virus protection and immune boosting just got easier.
• 27:38
  Enter the Daily VStack.
• 27:40
  Using cellular absorption technology, we put vitamins A, C, D, Zinc, and Quircetin together with a multi-mineral complex for complete protection.
• 27:50
  The Daily VStack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price.
• 27:57
  Go to ChemicalFreeBody.com forward slash out loud.
• 28:01
  Get the daily VStack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order.
• 28:07
  Are you looking for healthy snacks?
• 28:10
  But you've had enough of all the sweet sugary energy bars.
• 28:16
  Good news.
• 28:17
  There's new bars to try.
• 28:19
  That savory, crunchy, and packed with goodness.
• 28:22
  Bear bars are based just on six simple natural ingredients, a certified organic veggie, nut and seed bar.
• 28:32
  That's low temp dried, never baked or fried.
• 28:36
  Bear bars are plant-based, gluten-free and loaded with nutrients and protein.
• 28:42
  Head over to barebar.com slash out loud and get the exclusive discount just for America out loud listeners.
• 28:52
  That's B E A R B A R dot com forward slash outlout.
• 28:59
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the Sprout Book.
• 29:01
  And I'm also a father with a three-year-old daughter.
• 29:05
  And that's why we grow sprouts.
• 29:08
  Did you know that you could take seeds, add water, and get fresh organic vegetables in three to five days without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer for under a dollar a serving?
• 29:20
  That's the miracle of sprouting, and I want to share that with you.
• 29:25
  Go to the spouting company.com slash out loud and use the code Out Loud for a special offer.
• 29:33
  Are you struggling with thinning hair?
• 29:34
  Try roots from the wellness company.
• 29:36
  The stuff you're formulated non-oily hydrogel uses seven powerful peptides and key nutrients to nourish your scalp and support visibly thicker, healthier hair.
• 29:45
  Visit TWC.health forward slash outload and use code outload for 20% off your first order.
• 29:52
  That is TWC dot health forward slash outload.
• 29:56
  Got gastrointestinal issues?
• 29:58
  We created a three-step
• 30:00
  Doctor formulated completely natural gut reboot system that takes less than two minutes a day to start working for you.
• 30:06
  Step one, gut detox formula, a gentle way to clean the intestines and balance the body.
• 30:12
  Step two, nano silver solution, a safe way to restore gut bacteria balance and protect us from pathogens.
• 30:19
  Step three, green eighty-five juice formula, a simple way to replace the 85% of nutrition farmed out of our soil so our body can repair itself and increase energy levels.
• 30:29
  Go to ChemicalFreeBody.com forward slash out loud today.
• 30:34
  Get the Malcolm Healthy Gut Bundle, reboot your gut and your energy, and save 20% on your first order.
• 30:43
  Well, I challenge you to find a broader array of great voices, a deeper bench of experience or a more dedicated collection of passionate patriots than here on America Outlaw.
• 31:00
  Now is our time, my fellow Americans.
• 31:03
  America Outlaw dot news.
• 31:06
  Liberty and justice for all.
• 31:28
  The IEA's international energy program mandated that all member countries maintain uh 90-day strategic petroleum reserves and participate in emergency oil sharing arrangements.
• 31:39
  Kissinger framed the crisis publicly as the birth pains of global interdependence at the conference.
• 31:45
  It prevented European and Japanese nations from cutting independent bilateral energy deals with Arab producers.
• 31:52
  Kissinger told President Ford later privately that the conference is purpose was preventing allies from moving in to pick up pieces and get economic advantage.
• 32:04
  The 90-day reserve mandate and emergency sharing mechanisms blunted the effectiveness of future embargoes, while at the same time kept the oil consuming countries coordinated within a U.S.
• 32:16
  spearheaded plan that supported the petrodollar architecture.
• 32:19
  The IEA was the public-facing layer of a larger Kissinger strategy.
• 32:24
  Running in parallel, Treasury Secretary William Simon conducted what was described as an economic goodwill tour to Jeddah in July 1974, resulting in a secret agreement with King Faisal.
• 32:36
  The terms were straightforward.
• 32:37
  Saudi Arabia would price all oil exports exclusively in U.S.
• 32:43
  dollars and reinvest its surplus petroleum revenues in U.S.
• 32:48
  Treasury securities.
• 32:50
  In exchange, the United States would provide military protection for Saudi Arabia's oil fields and continue weapon sales.
• 32:58
  By 1975, all OPEC nations had adopted dollar-only pricing for oil transactions.
• 33:03
  This created a self-reinforcing monetary loop that fed the private banks and created demand for U.S.
• 33:08
  dollars.
• 33:08
  The loop looked like this.
• 33:10
  One, global oil demand generated mandatory dollar demand.
• 33:14
  Two, dollar denominated oil purchases created vast foreign-held dollar reserves.
• 33:19
  Three, petrodollar surpluses were recycled into U.S.
• 33:23
  Treasury securities and American financial markets.
• 33:26
  Four, recycling kept U.S.
• 33:28
  borrowing costs artificially low, enabling sustained deficit spending.
• 33:32
  Five, low borrowing costs funded the military apparatus that guaranteed the system security.
• 33:38
  The petrodollars are recycled back into U.S.
• 33:40
  treasuries and Western banking systems.
• 33:41
  Private banks, particularly the money center banks, became the intermediary infrastructure for the entire global energy trade with the petrodollar and petrol recycling.
• 33:50
  Every barrel of oil transacted worldwide required dollar-denominated accounts, uh, swift transfers, letters of credit, and correspondent banking relationships that funneled through New York.
• 34:03
  While oil was already getting priced in dollars before the IEA, the IEA solidified it.
• 34:10
  The system replaced the collapsed gold standard of uh dollars for gold, ended by Nixon in 1971 and gave the dollar a new anchor, dollars for oil.
• 34:20
  The result led to roughly 90% of foreign exchange transactions involving the dollar, with 58 to 60% of global reserves being currently held in dollars, and 40% of global debt being dollar denominated.
• 34:35
  Furthermore, governments and companies outside the United States hold a minimum of $13 trillion in dollar denominated debt, creating self-reinforcing demand for dollars to service those obligations, a structural lock-in that has persisted for five decades.
• 34:50
  But just as confidence in the dollar was eroding in the early 1970s, confidence in the dollar is eroding in uh 2026.
• 34:58
  The IEEEA was not just an energy security organization.
• 35:01
  It served as an institutional mechanism for keeping consuming nations within a U.S.
• 35:05
  led framework that supported dollar hegemony.
• 35:08
  By coordinating consumer responses like reserve building, demand restraint, and emergency sharing, the IEA prevented the bilateral non-dollar energy deals that would have eroded the dollar system from within the Western Alliance itself.
• 35:22
  This institutional architecture persisted for decades and expanded over time.
• 35:26
  In 2015, under executive director Fatih Bureau, the IEA broadened its mandate to include clean energy transitions and climate change.
• 35:34
  By 2022, its remit had expanded further to encompass critical minerals sourcing.
• 35:43
  The very institution Kissinger uh built to maintain American energy dominance was evolving toward the next resource frontier.
• 35:51
  Section 17, Kissinger's Playbook Reborn.
• 35:55
  Uh the structural parallels between the 1974 Washington Energy Conference and the 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial are not coincidental.
• 36:03
  They are architectural.
• 36:05
  Both events follow the same template.
• 36:07
  The U.S.
• 36:08
  builds international orders that are hegemonic control systems dressed in cooperative language.
• 36:13
  The proclamation directed commerce and USTR to negotiate agreements with trading partners within 180 days with the explicit mandate to consider price floors for trade and critical minerals that included other measures.
• 36:25
  President Trump reserved the authority to impose tariffs or minimum import prices if negotiations fail by July 13, 2026.
• 36:35
  February 3rd, 2026, Project Vault President Trump announced a 12 billion strategic mineral stockpile.
• 36:44
  For years, American businesses have risked running out of critical minerals during market disruptions.
• 36:49
  Today we're launching what will be known as Project Vault to ensure that American businesses and workers are never harmed by any shortage.
• 36:58
  We don't want to ever go through what we went through a year ago.
• 37:02
  Just as we, although it didn't work out.
• 37:04
  Thank you.
• 37:06
  Just as we have long had a strategic petroleum reserve and a stockpile of critical minerals for national defense, we're now creating this reserve for American industry, so we don't have any problems.
• 37:18
  This historic initiative will combine 10 billion dollars in export import bank financing with $2 billion in private sector financing.
• 37:29
  And we even expect the American taxpayer to make a profit from the interest on the loan used to start the Project Vault.
• 37:37
  It's an amazing thing.
• 37:38
  They've been talking about it for years.
• 37:41
  The President's did a lot of talking, but they didn't do anything.
• 37:44
  Over the past year, my administration has taken extraordinary steps to make sure the United States has all of the critical minerals and rare earths that we need.
• 37:53
  We're investing in mining projects.
• 38:01
  You know, the federal permitting, and a lot of it is Lee Zelda has been fantastic, but federal permitting is such a big deal.
• 38:09
  And uh we're doing that.
• 38:12
  The permitting of mines and signing major critical mineral deals with countries from all over the world, and we're getting along with all of them, every one of them.
• 38:21
  Funding it with 1.67 to 2 billion in private capital commitments from companies like GM, Stellantis, Boeing, Corning, GE Vernova, Google, Western Digital, and a 10 billion U.S.
• 38:33
  export import bank loan from XM, Commodities Traders, Heart Tree Partners, Traxis, North America, and Mercuria Energy Group handle purchases.
• 38:43
  This established the physical infrastructure and dollar-denominated recycling mechanism.
• 38:48
  February 4th, 2026, the Critical Minerals Ministerial.
• 38:52
  The U.S.
• 38:52
  proposed uh to attendee nations that joining a preferential trade zone with uh tariff enforced price floors was in everybody's best interest.
• 39:01
  It strongly urged uh attending nations to join or be left behind.
• 39:07
  This initiated the enrollment of participating nations just like in 1974 into what is looking like a new dollar-denominated pricing framework around minerals.
• 39:16
  These four components provide a mineral-denominated dollar structure, at least in part, an architectural framework into which the minerals block would be inserted, legal authority and coercive backstop for the entire system, physical infrastructure and dollar-denominated recycling mechanism, and enrollment of participating nations into the dollar-denominated pricing regime.
• 39:35
  The difference this time around, however, is that this sequencing and its surrounding implications appear more like an industrial military operation than diplomatic trade.
• 39:44
  Given Rubio's acknowledgement and brief discussion of the 1974 Nixon OPEC meeting during the opening remarks of the February ministerial, the playbook clearly has been studied.
• 39:54
  If it is not an industrial military operation, which it appears to be, it's certainly
• 40:00
  Certainly should be.
• 40:00
  Section 18, trade diplomacy or a military industrial operation.
• 40:05
  The February 2026 ministerial was ripe with buzzwords indicating this was a national security military style operation.
• 40:12
  Most notable was the repeated mention by the key speakers about how economic security is national security.
• 40:19
  Secretary Rubio noting that critical minerals are a priority for this administration of the highest order.
• 40:27
  This critical minerals ministerial is off to a great start.
• 40:31
  We have uh 55 partners that we're hoping to enter into collaboration with.
• 40:36
  Many have already signed on.
• 40:37
  And look the goal here is very simple.
• 40:39
  We all understand that having a reliable global supply chains and critical minerals and processed and finished materials are critical to everything we do.
• 40:48
  As I pointed out in my opening statements to the group, and I think this is a broader mistake made by the industrialized and developed world as we all sort of fell in love with the design of these things, but forgot that in order to design something, you have to be able to build it, and in order to build it, you have to have the fundamental materials necessary to make it with.
• 41:09
  Rubio mentioned Mountain Pass refinery, noting how the U.S.
• 41:13
  allowed Mountain Pass to die and how we woke up and realized that we had outsourced our economic security and our future.
• 41:20
  The statements made were not just dramatic rhetoric.
• 41:24
  They were uh indicators of where the U.S.
• 41:26
  is prepared to go if the invited nations don't join the block.
• 41:31
  The National Defense Stockpile is technically managed by a civilian agency, DLA strategic materials under the Defense Logistics Agency, but it exists under the Strategic and Critical Materials Stockpiling Act of 1939, which explicitly ties it to national defense.
• 41:48
  The mineral strategy is not being run through traditional trade channels.
• 41:52
  It is being coordinated through the National Security Council with a command structure that mirrors military operations.
• 41:58
  Look at the players running the operation.
• 42:00
  David Copley holds the title special assistant to the president and senior director for global supply chains on the National Security Council.
• 42:09
  This position did not exist in previous administrations.
• 42:11
  It places supply chain management at the same institutional level as nuclear strategy and military operations within the NSC.
• 42:22
  This shift is described as a shift in national security thinking, treating minerals and supply chains as core to defense rather than peripheral issues.
• 42:30
  Jacob Helberg, undersecretary of state for economic affairs.
• 42:34
  He is a former senior advisor to the CEO of Palantir Technologies.
• 42:39
  Helberg is the former commissioner on the U.S.
• 42:41
  China Economic and Security Review Commission and the architect of Pax Silica.
• 42:47
  Open AI CEO Sam Altman officiated his wedding.
• 42:52
  Helberg has described the technology supply chain as a theater of war.
• 42:57
  In his publication, The Wires of War Technology and the Global Struggle for Power in 2021.
• 43:06
  The Department of Defense is taking equity stakes directly in mining companies.
• 43:10
  DOD alongside Pentagon staff has briefed the Senate Armed Services Committee on Minerals Investment Strategy.
• 43:16
  CSIS and West Point jointly hosted a conference on the future of critical minerals and national security with NSC DOD and intelligence community officials attending the event together with mining executives.
• 43:28
  The operational language further confirms the military industrial character.
• 43:31
  Rubio told assembled foreign ministers, we stand ready and intend to work with each country here today to find a specialized role that you can play.
• 43:39
  This is the language of force allocation, not trade negotiation, assigning each nation function within a unified command structure.
• 43:46
  The military urgency underlying the ministerial is not hypothetical.
• 43:51
  Heavy rare earth elements, HREEs are the subset of rare earths critical for permanent magnets and guided missiles, F 35, fighter jets, satellite systems, predator drones, and submarine propulsion are in a state of supply emergency.
• 44:05
  China exercises a virtual monopoly over HREE processing and controls 48% of proven global reserves and 70% of rare earth mineral mining output.
• 44:15
  In April 2025, Beijing imposed export licensing requirements on alloys containing lutetium, yitrium, dysprosium, and terbium.
• 44:24
  In October 2025, China expanded its controls to include home, erbium, thulium, and uh iterbium, and any products and components containing these elements.
• 44:38
  October 2025 export controls resulted in an estimated 75% reduction in Chinese magnet exports, directly impacting U.S.
• 44:48
  defense supply chains.
• 44:51
  Malaysia currently hosts the only operational HREEE supply chain outside China via Linus Rare Earth's processing facility.
• 45:02
  This presents a national security threat to United States because an empty supply chain impacts the operational readiness of U.S.
• 45:09
  weapons systems.
• 45:10
  At its core, the ministerial appears to be an emergency military supply chain intervention wrapped in the clothing of we could do it ourselves.
• 45:19
  But we are better together, trade diplomacy.
• 45:22
  The use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 authorizes the President to adjust imports of articles that threaten to impair national security.
• 45:33
  It has historically been used for steel and aluminum tariffs.
• 45:36
  January 14th, 2026 proclamation extended it to all 60 minerals on the USGS critical minerals list, including uranium.
• 45:46
  On the same day, a parallel section 232 proclamation imposed immediate 25% tariffs on certain advanced semiconductors.
• 45:54
  The minerals proclamation does not impose tariffs.
• 45:56
  Instead, it directs 180-day negotiations with the explicit threat that tariffs or minimum import prices will follow if agreements are insufficient.
• 46:05
  There is a carrot and a stick situation.
• 46:08
  The ministerial product is the carrot, offering membership in uh preferential trade zone with financing access and access to stockpile materials.
• 46:17
  The July 2026 deadline means tariffs are on the table for nations that do not join.
• 46:23
  That's the stick.
• 46:24
  Countries that do not join the U.S.
• 46:26
  mineral block face potential exclusion from the world's largest consumer market.
• 46:31
  It is significant that the tone of the ministerial opening remarks collectively made it clear that the U.S.
• 46:38
  was taking this with the utmost seriousness, urging attending countries who hadn't signed on yet to do so, as it would be uh in their best interest to sign on immediately.
• 46:48
  Section 19, the design of a mineral dollar system.
• 46:51
  The switch is significant along three lines.
• 46:53
  One, from individual to systemic.
• 46:57
  Company level price guarantees required congressional appropriations.
• 47:01
  The administration did not have tariff enforced prices operate through executive authority under Section 232 requiring no congressional funding.
• 47:11
  Two, from domestic to multilateral, the original MP materials price floor was a bilateral deal between uh one company and the Pentagon.
• 47:22
  The new system is a market-wide pricing regime across 30 plus nations across each and every stage of the value chain, from raw ore to finished components.
• 47:33
  From subsidies to architecture, individual price floors or corporate welfare, tariff enforced dollar denominated reference prices at every stage of production look like monetary infrastructure.
• 47:43
  It's the mineral equivalent of pricing all oil in dollars at the wellhead, the refinery, and the pump.
• 47:50
  Dollar denomination is the structural lock in.
• 47:54
  Every major element of the system is dollar denominated by design.
• 47:57
  While the proclamations and agreements do not explicitly mandate uh dollar denomination, the structural architecture is obvious.
• 48:05
  Trade routed through U.S.
• 48:06
  institutions such as XM Bank, price floors set by U.S.
• 48:09
  negotiators, stockpiling managed by U.S.
• 48:12
  agencies, and bilateral agreements executed under U.S.
• 48:17
  trade authority creates a framework in which dollar denomination is not stated but structurally inevitable.
• 48:25
  Project Vault is funded by a 10 billion dollar XM bank loan, which creates dollar denominated obligations that participating companies and traders will service.
• 48:36
  Bilateral framework agreements are negotiated between the U.S.
• 48:42
  and individual partner nations with identified projects delivering material to U.S.
• 48:47
  and partner country buyers within six months of signing.
• 48:50
  Reference prices slash minimum prices at each production stage are established by the United States, creating dollar-denominated benchmarks against which all transactions within the zone are measured.
• 49:00
  Tariffs will enforce price floors and be denominated in dollar terms collected by U.S.
• 49:04
  customs and adjusted by executive action.
• 49:07
  Strategic stockpile purchases are contracted through dollar-denominated fixed price commitments with dollar-denominated repurchase agreements.
• 49:15
  When a Congolese cobalt miner sells raw material, the reference price is in dollars.
• 49:19
  When an Australian rare earth separator processes NDPR oxide, the reference price is in dollars.
• 49:25
  When a Japanese manufacturer produces permanent magnets, the reference price is in dollars.
• 49:30
  Every transaction at every stage settles in dollars against a U.S.
• 49:34
  determined reference price.
• 49:36
  This is not merely a pricing mechanism, it is a dollar-denominated pricing regime spanning the entire value chain.
• 49:41
  The petrodollar system's genius was that it served as a recycling mechanism.
• 49:45
  Oil producers earned dollars, then reinvested those dollars in U.S.
• 49:50
  treasuries, which in turn sustained American borrowing capacity.
• 49:53
  Project Vault creates an analogous closed loop with critical minerals.
• 49:57
  One mineral producing nations sell raw.
• 50:00
  Or processed minerals to the block for U.S.
• 50:02
  dollars too.
• 50:03
  Those dollars flow through XM bank finance structures, creating dollar denominated debt obligations.
• 50:09
  Three, U.S.
• 50:11
  and allied manufacturers may commit to fixed price purchases with repurchase agreements.
• 50:15
  These are dollar denominated contracts that guarantee future dollar demand.
• 50:21
  Four, the structural incentives suggests that surplus dollars from mineral exporting nations would be channeled into U.S.
• 50:29
  finance processing facilities, equity stakes, and U.S.
• 50:32
  backed mining operations and purchases of American goods and services.
• 50:35
  Five, the XM bank creates long-term dollar denominated obligations with a 15 year loan, locking participating entities into ongoing dollar dependence.
• 50:44
  This is petrodollar recycling adapted to the tech driven minerals age.
• 50:47
  The producing block member nations develop a dollar denominated assets, dollar denominated revenue streams, and dollar denominated debt, creating the same structural lock in that tied oil exporting nations to the dollar for over 50 years.
• 51:02
  This feeds the banks, of course.
• 51:04
  JP Morgan already operates one of the world's largest precious metals vaulting operations and are custodian of the iShare Silver Trust SLV.
• 51:12
  Expanding that infrastructure to a broader mineral basket would be enormously profitable.
• 51:18
  They would earn custody fees, insurance premiums, and verification revenue on what would be sovereign strategic and reserve assets, market making and derivatives.
• 51:29
  This is where it gets lucrative.
• 51:31
  Just as petrodollar system spawned massive oil futures and derivatives markets, a mineral backed dollar would require pricing benchmarks, futures contracts, swaps, and hedging instruments for every mineral in the basket at every stage of production.
• 51:51
  The big banks would position themselves as the primary dealers and market makers in these new instruments, exactly as they did with oil futures and interest rate swaps.
• 52:02
  JP Morgan's commodities desk could become a quasi-monetary authority for price discovery, financing the supply chain.
• 52:10
  The petrodollar system gave banks the role of financing oil extraction, refining, and transport globally.
• 52:17
  A mineral dollar system would do the same for mining, processing, and refining.
• 52:22
  Given that the U.S.
• 52:23
  currently lacks domestic processing capacity for most critical minerals, there would be a massive capital expenditure cycle to build out domestic and allied nation supply chains.
• 52:35
  Banks would underwrite those projects through project finance, bond issuances, and structured lending.
• 52:41
  This could mean hundreds of billions of dollars in mineral related deal flow.
• 52:46
  Section 21, minerals are stronger dollar anchor than oil.
• 52:50
  Oil is a single commodity with substitutes, natural gas, nuclear, solar, wind.
• 52:54
  The USGS critical minerals list encompasses 60 minerals with applications spanning every sector of the modern economy.
• 53:01
  The global critical minerals market reached approximately 328 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach 587 billion by 2032.
• 53:15
  We still have seen major growth across all clean energy technologies.
• 53:20
  So the growth is still there despite the economic challenges and despite other challenges going.
• 53:24
  Solar almost doubled in capacity in just last year.
• 53:28
  And what this means is that the demand for critical minerals is also increasing.
• 53:31
  So now this is moving to our outlook.
• 53:33
  So I'm showing here in our net zero by 2050 scenarios.
• 53:37
  And one of the main things you can see is the growth is all coming from clean energy for all these key critical minerals, from copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt all the way through.
• 53:45
  And this is showing that the main demand driver in 2040-2050 is actually the is actually clean energy for almost all these minerals.
• 53:54
  Total global trade in raw and semi-processed minerals reached approximately 2.57 trillion in imports in 2023, representing over 10% of total global exports.
• 54:06
  There is no alternative to gallium and semiconductors, no substitute for neodymium and permanent magnets, no replacement for lithium in current battery technology.
• 54:16
  The inelasticity of demand for individual critical minerals exceeds that of oil, making a mineral dollar system harder to escape through technological substitution.
• 54:28
  In the era of oil producing, nations held leverage because they sat on the resource.
• 54:33
  In the mineral era, China's dominance comes primarily from processing, not extraction.
• 54:39
  The U.S.
• 54:40
  strategy of building processing capacity within the block means Washington and its allies can capture the highest value node in the value chain refining and separation step, denominating it in dollars.
• 54:53
  Controlling refining is to minerals, what controlling oil pricing is to petroleum.
• 54:59
  Tariff enforced price floors create structural ongoing dollar demand that does not depend on market sentiment or geopolitical alignment.
• 55:08
  Every miner in the block knows that regardless of Chinese market manipulation, they can sell at the dollar-denominated floor.
• 55:15
  This guarantee generates persistent dollar demand from every participating nation at every stage of the supply chain.
• 55:20
  Oil's long-term demand is questionable with green energy, electrification, and renewables.
• 55:24
  Critical minerals demand is accelerating.
• 55:26
  The IEA projects that mineral demand for clean energy technologies will nearly quadruple by 2040.
• 55:32
  AI data center construction, military modernization, EV deployment, and grid expansion all require increasing volumes of critical minerals.
• 55:41
  This ensures that the mineral dollar system grows stronger, not weaker over time.
• 55:49
  Section 22, U.S.
• 55:50
  vulnerabilities and China's counter moves.
• 55:53
  The oil and gas market is valued at approximately $6 trillion annually.
• 55:57
  Even optimistic projections for key critical minerals reach only approximately $186 billion by 2030 for the four largest mineral markets.
• 56:06
  The mineral trade simply does not yet generate enough dollar volume to single-handedly anchor the currency.
• 56:12
  This scale gap in the mineral dollar system is best understood as a second pillar, complementing the petrol dollar, not an immediate replacement.
• 56:22
  Beijing is not a passive observer.
• 56:24
  With its 90% control of rare earth processing, the largest ore mine in the world, and the likely construction of its own mineral yuan, it can leverage its processing dominance to denominate mineral trade in renminbi.
• 56:35
  China can dump processed minerals below the tariff enforced floor to test the system's fiscal commitment.
• 56:42
  But the entire downstream midstream battery EV battery supply chain is dominated by China.
• 56:49
  And we've just seen recent news with North Vault and its challenges from over 75-85% of Cathodanomaterial batteries and even 70% of EVs are now made in China.
• 57:01
  So this is a really shows the kind of state of play we're working with.
• 57:05
  Thanks for listening to part three of this series of China's strategic assault on dollar hegemony through banking infrastructure, critical mineral dominance, and the architecture of de dollarization.
• 57:17
  When we continue with part four of this series, we'll continue with the section from petrodollar to mineral dollars, starting back up with section 23, the multipolar architecture.
• 57:29
  Take care and see you next time.