Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: It's the First Unipolarity and Multipolarity War

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: It's the First Unipolarity and Multipolarity War · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:02
Speaker 1: The war or the conflict to be linguistically correct or
0:10
Speaker 1: linguistically fair to say the conflict in Iran between the US,
0:26
Speaker 1: Israel and Iran, it's not it's not a winning proposition,
0:39
Speaker 1: but the pain infliction and pain absorption proposition on the
0:52
Speaker 1: three sides. It is not about who wins, it's about
1:02
Speaker 1: who inflicts or absorbs the most pain to continue the war.
1:17
Speaker 1: That's the devastation path upon which this war is on.
1:28
Speaker 1: This war, as I said time and again, shall be
1:36
Speaker 1: remembered as the catalyst to the Third World War. It's
1:45
Speaker 1: very strange to be talking about the Third World War.
1:56
Speaker 1: It is only it is already taking place. It doesn't
2:03
Speaker 1: mean that the war will continue into the Third World War,
2:10
Speaker 1: but this one day, this war will be this POI
2:15
Speaker 1: facts of one of the reasons I remember that the
2:25
Speaker 1: First and Second World War, they got the long term
2:29
Speaker 1: cluses and the immediate causes. The First World War, for example,
2:35
Speaker 1: was the matter of ask Doug Fadina, if that's the
2:40
Speaker 1: name I still remember history. So it became something that
2:45
Speaker 1: is because of the causality of many other factors that
2:51
Speaker 1: led to the First World War the Second World War.
2:54
Speaker 1: The causality by blame the Germans Allert but many effects
3:03
Speaker 1: the First World War, the punishment inflicted on the German
3:09
Speaker 1: to pay reparistion for the war. It later the rise
3:14
Speaker 1: of somebody Hitler as a nationalist, and we know where
3:20
Speaker 1: it went. So this pain infliction that we are seeing now,
3:28
Speaker 1: we don't know who will rise out of it. We
3:33
Speaker 1: don't know which child we were born out of it.
3:36
Speaker 1: That one day, remember this moment and this time, and
3:43
Speaker 1: governize the force that we don't know to inflict more
3:49
Speaker 1: pain and humanity. The propositions to this war might be noble,
4:01
Speaker 1: a vision driven in faith, in law, in military tactics,
4:13
Speaker 1: in geopolitics, in gaining an advantage in second strategic leverage
4:21
Speaker 1: or strategic autonomy. At the end of the day, this
4:30
Speaker 1: war was planned for a very long time. And in
4:37
Speaker 1: that same token, the countries involved, especially the counter at
4:46
Speaker 1: the receiving end. Iran, has been preparing for these two
4:51
Speaker 1: for decades. On one of the courses of this war
5:00
Speaker 1: for the fear of what they didn't the missiles can do.
5:05
Speaker 1: That was a genuine concern, because you can't see what
5:09
Speaker 1: those missiles are doing. But what was it reson directory
5:15
Speaker 1: for the fear, what was the eminence in that fear.
5:25
Speaker 1: It's something that just those educating the war, they know
5:34
Speaker 1: more than we do true sincerity, honesty, propaganda, state secrets.
5:47
Speaker 1: There is so much that we don't now that we
5:50
Speaker 1: might never know because even the war that we say
5:56
Speaker 1: we cannot see it, the people cannot see it. The
6:02
Speaker 1: two intentions of this wall is shifting the media is
6:08
Speaker 1: gonnot report it. Who makes the media not to report
6:14
Speaker 1: this war fairly? Who is behind it? The same person
6:25
Speaker 1: that's just threatening the media from the people seeing what
6:30
Speaker 1: is actually happening in this war on all the sides,
6:35
Speaker 1: should be that same person behind this war, you know,
6:43
Speaker 1: the person behind the wall. It's the same person that
6:49
Speaker 1: want the war to be covered in a particular way,
6:52
Speaker 1: in a particular manner, because at the end of the day,
7:00
Speaker 1: they want the public to believe in the narrative in
7:02
Speaker 1: a proper ganda, in something that is not the real
7:08
Speaker 1: reason for the war. It therefore means the people have
7:12
Speaker 1: been lied to that who have been deceived for reasons
7:18
Speaker 1: of the war. This deception and dishonesty and war propaganda
7:28
Speaker 1: going on, they hope should be died for a good reason.
7:38
Speaker 1: You elect leaders to act on your behalf you elect
7:44
Speaker 1: leaders to lead, to use the past as the template
7:54
Speaker 1: of the present for the betterment of the future. That's
8:01
Speaker 1: a purpose of leadership. You're like you let people in
8:05
Speaker 1: office to be in charge of your security, your safety,
8:13
Speaker 1: your prosperity, your stability, your peace, your hope, that pride
8:27
Speaker 1: of national hurt, that pride of countryhod a, pride of nationality,
8:37
Speaker 1: that pride of difned borders, that pride to the national flag,
8:46
Speaker 1: that pride of the national hunte I called the unity,
8:53
Speaker 1: I called arms. In times of danger, it's upon all
8:59
Speaker 1: this that we elect ladies to avoid invasions, to avoid
9:07
Speaker 1: eminent threats, to avoid danger of the homeland. And we
9:14
Speaker 1: elect ladies to be able to fight for us, to
9:19
Speaker 1: shape their future, for us to see that which you
9:24
Speaker 1: cannot see, and to prepare the better horizon for the
9:31
Speaker 1: country to pay to shape that future, for the younger generations,
9:38
Speaker 1: to pave that path. The shipping lines, the air a
9:48
Speaker 1: heps or air farms does venture capital that direct foreign investment,
10:00
Speaker 1: those open markets, those two distribution chains and supply chains
10:08
Speaker 1: and delivery chains and consumption chains, that safety for the
10:15
Speaker 1: markets for the stocks for the oil and gas and
10:25
Speaker 1: food supplies, and travel and leisure and investments in various
10:35
Speaker 1: countries and planet Earth that geopolitical strategy and make those
10:45
Speaker 1: leaders that we are elect to see that future, to
10:52
Speaker 1: see the American's future, to see our role in it,
11:00
Speaker 1: to see where we fade, how we lad, who we
11:07
Speaker 1: compete with. I will get supplies to the resources we need,
11:16
Speaker 1: the critical resources, the strategic resources. I will preserve those
11:28
Speaker 1: resources that can affect our national security. What gives us
11:36
Speaker 1: that leverage, that begaining shape a make other countries that
11:44
Speaker 1: powerful to listen to us, to accept our propositions, for
11:54
Speaker 1: us to neglish it out of strength, out of weakness,
12:00
Speaker 1: for us to have a place in the multipolar a
12:07
Speaker 1: multilateralism world order, that future to be from the unipolar
12:18
Speaker 1: to the multipolar system. That way do we fit where
12:24
Speaker 1: it's our place in it? Who will listen to us,
12:30
Speaker 1: Who will need us, who will protect us, who will
12:39
Speaker 1: conduct business with what with the new allies, means of block,
12:49
Speaker 1: means for socials in the world and social as the
12:55
Speaker 1: world the world order I've spoken about. I am the
13:01
Speaker 1: phellosopher of that world order. I've made hundreds of podcasts
13:09
Speaker 1: on that order and that which I've seen, that which
13:13
Speaker 1: I have said, it happens as I've said for you
13:19
Speaker 1: can see into the future that the future is not
13:24
Speaker 1: about cultural and politics. It's not about race based politics.
13:29
Speaker 1: It's not about superiorit type politics. It's not about the
13:35
Speaker 1: colonial mentality type of politics. It's not about the imperiod
13:41
Speaker 1: types of politics. It's a wing wing system. It's a
13:47
Speaker 1: system of corporation, of business and trade and peace and
13:54
Speaker 1: security and humanity. It's a multipolicystem with multipolar powers. So
14:05
Speaker 1: be military, so be technology, so be industrial based, so
14:09
Speaker 1: be commerce, so be luxury, so be entertainment, so be
14:15
Speaker 1: science and technology. So beyond education, so beyond natural resources.
14:24
Speaker 1: Such becomes the multipoler one order. This war, it's a
14:36
Speaker 1: testament to the forces of resistance, the forces of resistance
14:48
Speaker 1: to the multipower one order. The war in Iran. It's
14:59
Speaker 1: a unique poorer and the multipolar war. The unipolar is
15:08
Speaker 1: refusing to fade, the multipolar is struggling to rise. It's
15:21
Speaker 1: a war of access, of unipolar or multipolar resistance. One
15:34
Speaker 1: access is fighting for the birth of the multipolar world order.
15:40
Speaker 1: Another access is fighting for the resistance of the unipolar
15:48
Speaker 1: world order and the unipolar world order. I would set
15:57
Speaker 1: time and again cannot When a father that fights the
16:06
Speaker 1: child can never win because the whole other changed. He
16:20
Speaker 1: didn't plies to the nail as one. Good culture crops
16:26
Speaker 1: the world more natter the long table King Arthur Lancelot
16:41
Speaker 1: miss caliber that fight, that fight. Where we are today,
16:56
Speaker 1: the world is in the very dicey, difficult, challenging times.
17:08
Speaker 1: If we do not navigate this period very well, we
17:14
Speaker 1: can entrench ourselves in the war. Now we go nuclear,
17:23
Speaker 1: that will go nuclear. I've set them and again that
17:30
Speaker 1: do not push a country so much to the war,
17:34
Speaker 1: to the war that the entire county and itself become suicider.
17:41
Speaker 1: I've set this time and again that that's my fear
17:44
Speaker 1: with Iran. When the country got does so much missiles
17:51
Speaker 1: and so much technology and so much history and so
17:57
Speaker 1: much civilization behind it. Or you push some such countries
18:03
Speaker 1: into the war to the war and they know they
18:10
Speaker 1: have nothing to lose, they will last up terribly. And
18:15
Speaker 1: I want this and I want about this. Did I
18:19
Speaker 1: say it as it's happening now? Yes? Did you listen?
18:27
Speaker 1: Did you care? My writings is esoteric, My podcast is esoteric.
18:41
Speaker 1: I talk for your leaders around the world to listen
18:45
Speaker 1: to it and make your decisions, make informed decisions. The
18:53
Speaker 1: trajectory of where the world is going is predictable. Study
19:00
Speaker 1: the philosophy of triangulism. The philosophy of triangalism is to
19:06
Speaker 1: connect unconnected dots. It's the philosophy of multi dimensionalism. So
19:14
Speaker 1: you take one scenario, you can play that to infinity
19:18
Speaker 1: dimensions and you get infinity results. But if all aligned
19:26
Speaker 1: towards one thing, then that thing is predictable. We know
19:37
Speaker 1: of it of Europe. We know how Europe is struggling
19:43
Speaker 1: in its economics, in its politics, and its alliances, in
19:53
Speaker 1: its direction and future. And we know the multipolar system.
20:02
Speaker 1: It's about population and size. That's what I talk about India.
20:09
Speaker 1: That's all talk about China. That's all talk about Russia.
20:13
Speaker 1: That's all talk about Iran. That's what I talk about
20:17
Speaker 1: the United States as well, talk about Nigeria. We'll talk
20:22
Speaker 1: about South Africa. That's all talk about Brazil. That's what
20:26
Speaker 1: I talk about. The Global South or the global majority.
20:30
Speaker 1: That's all about the globe. Now, it's a system of
20:38
Speaker 1: the Shahaire Corporation of the Bricks, Initiative of the Belt
20:45
Speaker 1: and Road, Initiative, of the Silk Road, of the EU
20:55
Speaker 1: of America. How this priority bands. That's what the multipower
21:06
Speaker 1: system is all about. That power is divers One nation
21:13
Speaker 1: cannot just deserve for itself and what it wants as
21:18
Speaker 1: who're going to be fighting wars all the time? Region change,
21:21
Speaker 1: Humans die, and sometimes the reasons are not well informed.
21:26
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's always for again that we don't know who benefits.
21:32
Speaker 1: And sometimes it's not intelligent. It's not human, it's not civilized.
21:36
Speaker 1: It's barbaric, it's crue and it starts by somebody who
21:43
Speaker 1: don't know who ends it. But humans always come to
21:46
Speaker 1: a cycle of violence. Region change operations. People die, children die,
21:52
Speaker 1: women die, Countries are dissolved, borderlines are changed, countries are bounded,
21:59
Speaker 1: infrastructure destroyed. At the end of the day. In that system,
22:04
Speaker 1: people are constantly suffering. People in refugee comes, populations are
22:10
Speaker 1: being displaced. There's nationalism and hate and racism and bitterness,
22:18
Speaker 1: and the poverty, impoverishment, starvation, infrastructural destruction is looting, cronism, corruption, immorality,
22:33
Speaker 1: abas of children, rapion of children, co ops, waste of
22:39
Speaker 1: national resources and such becomes. The systems couldn't work today
22:49
Speaker 1: that those who lead and the brightest, are not the smartest,
22:52
Speaker 1: are not the most humane, are not theust as a
22:58
Speaker 1: philosopher who write about philosopher kings, wise ladies, humane leaders,
23:14
Speaker 1: intelligent ladies, the basic ship, the basic expectation of a leader.
23:25
Speaker 1: Are just seven principles, as basic as a family value.
23:32
Speaker 1: Be clean in your needs and did be need, Be intelligent,
23:42
Speaker 1: be kind, be positive, be productive, and be proud and
23:50
Speaker 1: secure in yourself. Because are just basic principles for kids,
23:57
Speaker 1: or would create a world that married does not matter,
24:02
Speaker 1: Intelligence does don't matter. You can't see that those who
24:05
Speaker 1: lead another brighters are to gain power. It's not based
24:10
Speaker 1: on any conclude or some ip intelligence or some nerd
24:23
Speaker 1: of a particular thing. We don't know why the leaders
24:29
Speaker 1: we have today. We don't know why we have those
24:31
Speaker 1: leaders we have today. Because they like to the people
24:36
Speaker 1: and the people who like them, and the dishes or
24:39
Speaker 1: the dish to people. They don't care about the people,
24:42
Speaker 1: or they do they like to the people. If you
24:44
Speaker 1: can lie the best, your part of the system. If
24:48
Speaker 1: you can be corrupted the best your part of the system.
24:52
Speaker 1: It's a system that doesn't know itself, lies to itself,
24:55
Speaker 1: doesn't know who that's it. Everybody think they're in control.
24:59
Speaker 1: Everybody thing there are the same time, everybody blames somebody else.
25:03
Speaker 1: Nobody takes responsibility because the hate the head does not recognize.
25:08
Speaker 1: They tell, and they tell does not recognize the head.
25:13
Speaker 1: But the body suffers. People around the world suffers. Citizens
25:18
Speaker 1: of every country self right, no matter how rich, no
25:21
Speaker 1: matter how poor. Because they're rich and powerful, they speak
25:25
Speaker 1: the same language, they do the same thing. The fight
25:32
Speaker 1: was and the common people die. They're working, poor die,
25:39
Speaker 1: the middle class die. And when these people talk about
25:43
Speaker 1: our prayers, it's to their family. We know those prayers
25:48
Speaker 1: are not sincere because they don't believe in a god.
25:53
Speaker 1: They don't believe in anything. They don't know what they're believing.
25:59
Speaker 1: They believe in one thing that the struggle to keep
26:03
Speaker 1: is power. What do you do with the power? You
26:07
Speaker 1: take power, they let you in office, You sell your soul,
26:12
Speaker 1: you sell your conscience. You work for the people that
26:15
Speaker 1: are not like ill become part of courts and society.
26:21
Speaker 1: So that just don't have the interests of the people heart.
26:26
Speaker 1: I don't care about developing the people, don't care about
26:29
Speaker 1: that needs. Don't care if they have health care or not,
26:35
Speaker 1: don't care if they can afford if they can afford
26:39
Speaker 1: their livelihood or not. Don't care if they'll retire with
26:43
Speaker 1: dictatay or not. Don't care to have peace, don't care
26:48
Speaker 1: to have dignity. And these leaders around the world have
26:53
Speaker 1: nothing to offer to their people but racism, sexism, bakotry.
27:02
Speaker 1: That's all they do. They play side because all these
27:06
Speaker 1: things are manufactured. Hate. This manufactured racism, mismagnufactured sexism, mismanufactured.
27:15
Speaker 1: Packetrie is magnufactured, anti Semitism, mis manufactured, all these phobias
27:20
Speaker 1: is manufactured. They use that and to let the people
27:25
Speaker 1: know that that's what we can do for you. If
27:28
Speaker 1: our policies are not going well, you throw the race bait.
27:33
Speaker 1: You can. You can post pictures some mad as an
27:36
Speaker 1: ape or a pig or something. You can hate the
27:42
Speaker 1: particular region for maybe from a poor place in Africa,
27:47
Speaker 1: or maybe from a poor place in Eastern Europe, or
27:50
Speaker 1: you can skip going to the country in Americas or somewhere,
27:54
Speaker 1: or in Europe or in Asia. All those things are
27:58
Speaker 1: manufactured actuality. These leaders have the resources of the world
28:05
Speaker 1: in the disposal. They have the best of the past
28:08
Speaker 1: in their disposal. They got the brightest of the brightest
28:11
Speaker 1: in the disposal, they got the most humane, They got
28:16
Speaker 1: the most technocrats, problem solvers in that disposal. They got
28:20
Speaker 1: AI in that disposal. They have the technology helps in
28:24
Speaker 1: that disposal. They have the IP mind, the genesis by
28:30
Speaker 1: the founder's bye, the nerd minds, the inventor's minds, thenovator's minds,
28:39
Speaker 1: the creative, imaginative minds. These leaders of the world, they
28:44
Speaker 1: got the best of the past at that disposal, but
28:49
Speaker 1: they refuse to use it. For God, they're part of
28:54
Speaker 1: something that they themselves do not know. But if you're
29:00
Speaker 1: not part of your people, if you're not part of
29:03
Speaker 1: this humanity, when you go to wars the endence wars
29:09
Speaker 1: to destroy humans, to just kill people, how can the
29:15
Speaker 1: cause of leadership be by killing people? How can they gains?
29:25
Speaker 1: And victure of war? It's how much you can care,
29:31
Speaker 1: how much destruction you can inflict. What about humanity is
29:35
Speaker 1: that I can leadership accept that? The victure of war
29:47
Speaker 1: is how much people who can care? When you give
29:52
Speaker 1: names to people and you kill them, you know those
29:54
Speaker 1: names are manufactured. By the end of the day, you
29:58
Speaker 1: don't care a lot of people to make a lot
30:01
Speaker 1: of friends. Those days are over. In this new world order,
30:09
Speaker 1: in the multipolar system put on like wars. We don't
30:15
Speaker 1: vote for leaders to go to wars. Our vote is
30:18
Speaker 1: that we don't like wars. And when those vote are betrayed,
30:23
Speaker 1: we'll feel hurt. Our intellect feels hurt, our humanity feels hurt.
30:34
Speaker 1: We start to see ourselves as accomplices by our votes.
30:41
Speaker 1: The leaders come to us the promise, I will go
30:45
Speaker 1: to no war. I'll take care of the people. I
30:49
Speaker 1: improve the economy. Prices will go down, I'll take care
30:55
Speaker 1: of inflation. Let's talk, market will boom, the main street
31:04
Speaker 1: will bone, will be placed in the strait. No stability
31:09
Speaker 1: in the world. People we have jobs more than they
31:15
Speaker 1: can accept. Things be better again. These are those promises
31:23
Speaker 1: that these leaders keep giving to us, and they and
31:27
Speaker 1: they do the opposite. They don't deliver their promises, and
31:35
Speaker 1: once they cannot do that, then they go to war.
31:42
Speaker 1: Each time you see a war, leaders are failing in
31:47
Speaker 1: domestic policies. You don't have a booming economy that goes
31:53
Speaker 1: to war. You know, you don't have a stable government
32:00
Speaker 1: that goes to war. When powerst threatened, some leaders choose war,
32:10
Speaker 1: and they justify the reasons why they go to war,
32:14
Speaker 1: and the painful part of this, it's not necessary. We
32:22
Speaker 1: can learn from some countries a rise in the world
32:26
Speaker 1: to day. They don't go to war. They don't go
32:31
Speaker 1: to war. It don't want war. War is not on
32:37
Speaker 1: their political agenda. You can see the station rise and
32:42
Speaker 1: when such nation rise rises, or the national rises, there
32:48
Speaker 1: rise with the whole war. There rise with people. The
32:53
Speaker 1: bill bridges, the bill Factress, they smoothed the supply chain.
33:00
Speaker 1: They call everybody on the table. Everybody's invited on their
33:06
Speaker 1: round table, not just the nights. Everybody's invited, not just
33:16
Speaker 1: saying Sir Launcelot, not just those are arms. Everybody's invited.
33:26
Speaker 1: Everybody played that role. And Americans to be great. Our
33:34
Speaker 1: greatness is not incumbent on wars. Doing nothing else taken
33:41
Speaker 1: away from us has been our endless wars. Three thousand
33:48
Speaker 1: dollars were lost in the Iraq, in Afghanistan, all these
33:54
Speaker 1: projects we keep having. It depletes our ammunition stock pies,
34:04
Speaker 1: It depletes our reserves, It depresses our economy, It disrupts
34:14
Speaker 1: our homeland. Extreme voices left or right, rises to power,
34:25
Speaker 1: and charlatans take leadership. You have members of Congress, you
34:31
Speaker 1: ask a member of Congress to define inflation. You cannot
34:37
Speaker 1: define inflation how you in Congress. They have a member
34:42
Speaker 1: of Congress or spokeperson. They cannot speak straight sentences, speak
34:52
Speaker 1: contradictory sentences. We elect people to convince us, not to
35:09
Speaker 1: deceive us, or just to lie to us. At the
35:13
Speaker 1: point in time you start to play with the intelligence
35:16
Speaker 1: of Americans. When you lie to the American people, to
35:20
Speaker 1: stific just keep lying first fully like that, you abuse
35:24
Speaker 1: the intellect of America. I always say to these people
35:26
Speaker 1: and these leaders and people leader in America, always remember
35:30
Speaker 1: that Americans are the most intelligent people on planet Earth.
35:36
Speaker 1: Americans are the most intelligent, the most red people on
35:41
Speaker 1: planet Earth. The best universities on planet Earth. Are you
35:49
Speaker 1: in America. Americans produced the best colors on planet Earth.
35:55
Speaker 1: The welfare of people on planet Earth. And we like
36:02
Speaker 1: to American American the most humanitarian country on planet We
36:06
Speaker 1: do the most good on this planet, the most good,
36:10
Speaker 1: the most philanthropy. We help people on planet the most.
36:20
Speaker 1: See when America is not convenit to the UN, you
36:23
Speaker 1: see the UN is almost collapsing. We do the most good.
36:31
Speaker 1: They're the most intelligent people on the planet. Based on
36:34
Speaker 1: IP patterns, nobelaurates, inventions, discoveries. We talk about intelligence, We
36:42
Speaker 1: talk about America. We like to Americans sometimes ask yourself
36:49
Speaker 1: who are the people you're lying to? That's what beck
36:54
Speaker 1: Americans sometimes to feel uncomfortable with the own people they
36:58
Speaker 1: elect in office. America is not your base? But how
37:03
Speaker 1: would you like to your base? We are your base?
37:08
Speaker 1: How you like to us? Are we stupid? You take
37:13
Speaker 1: us for fools, You take us for granted. They can
37:18
Speaker 1: just throw erased thing to us about black hat or
37:23
Speaker 1: white hat or something about THEI What is that? What
37:30
Speaker 1: does that mean? It's a strategy with some networks or
37:39
Speaker 1: talking heads. When you like to the American people, you
37:46
Speaker 1: know that American people know you're lying. Right, You must
37:49
Speaker 1: know that we know you're lying, because if you think
37:53
Speaker 1: we don't know your lying, how would the world look
37:56
Speaker 1: at American? How would the world think about us? Up
38:00
Speaker 1: around the world. You know that our leaders are aligned
38:03
Speaker 1: to us. Now we know that that aligned to us.
38:06
Speaker 1: The reason is why you need to convince us. I
38:16
Speaker 1: studied law. There's something called persuasion, something called arguments, something
38:22
Speaker 1: called debates, and cross examination. You don't win the case
38:26
Speaker 1: because you are saying the truth. You win the case
38:31
Speaker 1: because you are convincing. There believable. You don't win the
38:37
Speaker 1: case because it's just lie to everybody, and in first
38:41
Speaker 1: you are lie. You win the case because you are convincing.
38:48
Speaker 1: If you can shoot somebody in the middle of whatever
38:57
Speaker 1: place that might be on plan on Earth and everybody
39:00
Speaker 1: will believing, Yes, it's because it convinced them to believe.
39:04
Speaker 1: It's not because you lie to them. We are mixing
39:08
Speaker 1: things here. Lying what's that you're supposed to be in
39:14
Speaker 1: a political discourse? To lie is for kids. You lie
39:21
Speaker 1: to people you think they are intelligent enough. When do
39:28
Speaker 1: people start to say you're lying, it means it has
39:32
Speaker 1: reached a certain level that everybody else knows you're lying.
39:38
Speaker 1: But don't you know that you're lying? That are you
39:42
Speaker 1: supposed to be convincing? For example, we still don't know
39:53
Speaker 1: definitively while we are at war were around It can
39:58
Speaker 1: be that simple. We are going to war with a
40:04
Speaker 1: Ryan because for some reasons we feel threatened. Those reasons
40:11
Speaker 1: might be classified. Those reasons has been spoken to the
40:20
Speaker 1: members of Congress. There have been debriefed on that we'll
40:26
Speaker 1: let you know us things on fold, but we might
40:30
Speaker 1: not be right. We might get it wrong sometimes. Please
40:35
Speaker 1: forgive us if we are not right, but we just
40:38
Speaker 1: feel that if we don't take this ascence, our homeland
40:42
Speaker 1: might be chreathened. I will not like you to blame us.
40:49
Speaker 1: That wouldn't do enough. It's better for us to be
40:53
Speaker 1: preemptive and proactive than to fail in my responsibility to
41:00
Speaker 1: preserve the home line. Your questions might be, Jenny will
41:09
Speaker 1: give you the answers as in on false Please forgive
41:14
Speaker 1: us if we are not if you might feed out
41:16
Speaker 1: we are not honest, and then you can give your
41:20
Speaker 1: honest assessment. But we don't just come out and blackened
41:26
Speaker 1: and lie. And just lie means we don't we take
41:29
Speaker 1: the effort. We don't take the effort if we explain
41:32
Speaker 1: to the American people of which what we are doing
41:35
Speaker 1: might be right. We don't like Iran to have a
41:40
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon, that is correct, were not like ballistic missiles
41:52
Speaker 1: to reach our homeland. That is correct, And Iran is
41:59
Speaker 1: very strategic in our foreign policy and in our leverage
42:06
Speaker 1: on China or Russia or whatever. That you think it's
42:11
Speaker 1: reasonable based on your estimation, and that is correct. And
42:17
Speaker 1: then you explain what you're doing, and you seek expert.
42:24
Speaker 1: Then you bring those who know what they're doing. You
42:27
Speaker 1: bring those who have written against those policies, the people
42:31
Speaker 1: that plan this war in Iran. You bring them to
42:35
Speaker 1: the Faune. Those who defended the war. Let them come
42:40
Speaker 1: explain themselves to the American people. But if they have
42:45
Speaker 1: genuine reasons, then should not be lying about it. Don't
42:53
Speaker 1: take the American people for granted. That's my point. Our
43:01
Speaker 1: war in Iran. You can't say it's defendable. That many
43:10
Speaker 1: reasons why we should do that. The time may might
43:14
Speaker 1: not be right. The way it's being conducted conducted by
43:19
Speaker 1: not be right. But you cannot be lying to American
43:24
Speaker 1: people that everything is going well when they can see
43:28
Speaker 1: things are not going well. Like what is upen in
43:35
Speaker 1: the American straet. What we can see our own naked eyes,
43:40
Speaker 1: you say we cannot see it. It makes you don't
43:43
Speaker 1: respect American people. You don't respect the intellect of the
43:48
Speaker 1: American people. It miss you don't respect the will of
43:51
Speaker 1: the American people. It miss you don't respect the talents
43:56
Speaker 1: of the American people. The good will, the good intentions,
44:03
Speaker 1: the good fat, the bonaphide reasons why we do things.
44:15
Speaker 1: We know what is going on the question we are asking,
44:24
Speaker 1: do we know what we are doing? Yes, we know
44:27
Speaker 1: that we know what we are doing. The game plan
44:30
Speaker 1: for that I said in the lad some of my podcasts.
44:37
Speaker 1: Don't be flipping the pages in the book that you
44:39
Speaker 1: didn't write. We might be flipping the pages in the
44:45
Speaker 1: book written by Iran, or written by China, or by Russia,
44:52
Speaker 1: or by somebody. As I can I guess our interests.
44:57
Speaker 1: They might be doing what somebody wants, thinking that's what
45:02
Speaker 1: we want. We are just flipping the page in a
45:07
Speaker 1: book written by somebody else with the title of our
45:12
Speaker 1: name on it, and we see the title within the
45:16
Speaker 1: book is written for us. I want to start to
45:19
Speaker 1: flip the pages. It's not about us, and it doesn't
45:24
Speaker 1: end well for us. I speak in esoteric terms. I
45:32
Speaker 1: speak in esoteric terms. The game we are playing might
45:41
Speaker 1: not be our game, but we think it's our game
45:47
Speaker 1: because it's written for us. It might be the protagonist
45:53
Speaker 1: in the book, but it might be our tragedy because
46:03
Speaker 1: because the writer, we're not half of our best interests.
46:11
Speaker 1: That's esoteric speaking. The world is our war. We built
46:19
Speaker 1: this war, and we elect people in office to serve
46:25
Speaker 1: our best interests, to serve the interests of Americans, every Americans,
46:30
Speaker 1: without distinction to race, or create or religion. We elect
46:34
Speaker 1: our leaders to see American must want people not to
46:37
Speaker 1: be quick to stereotype, to stigmatize, to discriminate against fellow Americans,
46:45
Speaker 1: and which elect our leaders to be able to separate
46:49
Speaker 1: religion and country. Our constitution talk about freedom of religion,
46:57
Speaker 1: suppression of the state from religion, or we are mixing
47:03
Speaker 1: religion in governmental policy and then we are fighting at
47:09
Speaker 1: the crest. Say that is a contradiction. It cannot be
47:14
Speaker 1: a seculars dide invoking religion to fight a war, and
47:21
Speaker 1: everyone invoke religion to fight a war. As a Christian
47:25
Speaker 1: nation who pray for victory, who pray that God should
47:30
Speaker 1: preserve and guide our soldiers, we should pray, I guess
47:40
Speaker 1: h to our troops, our interests. That's how you pray.
47:49
Speaker 1: You don't use a curtain because some dooms die. Philosopher
47:53
Speaker 1: have said that timin again to justify a war, because
47:59
Speaker 1: once it gets in the territory of belief, you cannot
48:02
Speaker 1: impose your belief on another person. You cannot take a
48:06
Speaker 1: belief to fight a war in a circular state. Because
48:11
Speaker 1: we are fighting the war to destroy a theocracy. You
48:17
Speaker 1: cannot be fighting on what to destroy a theocray say
48:22
Speaker 1: a regime that I talk that that is and it's
48:25
Speaker 1: not makeing Arabic region by using religion. That's a contradiction.
48:34
Speaker 1: And the same time, we cannot be saying that we
48:36
Speaker 1: want people to protest in the Strait and that we
48:39
Speaker 1: are bombing the same people. We cannot be said we
48:43
Speaker 1: are fighting for the rights of women and children and
48:47
Speaker 1: we are not careful with the lives of women and
48:50
Speaker 1: children in the same country that we are fighting worldwide,
48:55
Speaker 1: we cannot be saying that we want some other militias
48:59
Speaker 1: to assist us, and we're doing it publicly, then we
49:02
Speaker 1: are telegraphting publicly. We cannot be contradicting everything that we
49:08
Speaker 1: are doing in plain sight. It even if people want
49:16
Speaker 1: to come help us, we are exposing them in danger.
49:23
Speaker 1: The question becomes it says some reasons, it's there's some
49:34
Speaker 1: some big, some some great plan that is just working
49:39
Speaker 1: as plan. So when we say we are winning, yes,
49:44
Speaker 1: that might be true, and might be winning for their agenda,
49:49
Speaker 1: for the strategy, for the reasons for the war that
49:56
Speaker 1: we the people might not now unless the winning is
50:01
Speaker 1: defined to us it means. The word winning in the
50:04
Speaker 1: serf means nothing. It means victory in itself means nothing.
50:11
Speaker 1: For one thing is true. Nobody wins in the war.
50:17
Speaker 1: The question in the world is always asked, are the
50:21
Speaker 1: objectives met? Are the objectives met? That's a world in
50:33
Speaker 1: which we live, We live in and the fear is
50:36
Speaker 1: that true stumbles We end where we started. But what
50:46
Speaker 1: our allies need us? Our allies in the Gulf they
50:53
Speaker 1: need us. The question is always asked when I need
51:00
Speaker 1: you the most? Were you there for me? Do you?
51:06
Speaker 1: Did you come to me when I was hungry? Did
51:10
Speaker 1: you come to me when I was in prison, when
51:13
Speaker 1: I was bombed? In my difficulties of times? Were you
51:17
Speaker 1: there for me? If you couldn't be there for me,
51:21
Speaker 1: to protect me, to help me, then who are you
51:25
Speaker 1: to me? I warned at the war in Iran, we
51:33
Speaker 1: changed the world order, not the way we plan it
51:37
Speaker 1: to be, but the choice we took through the eminency
51:46
Speaker 1: of the threat that we said, are we gain planners?
51:53
Speaker 1: We want to know that we are gaining planners, because
51:57
Speaker 1: each time we get into a venture, he ends up.
52:03
Speaker 1: We always come from the losing air, and then there's
52:06
Speaker 1: a new venture our venture. I never curate it to
52:13
Speaker 1: give the properteptic result. Or maybe the result is just chaos, instability,
52:24
Speaker 1: region change, and that the war spread to wherever deuration
52:32
Speaker 1: were done. Now that cannot be us. That cannot be
52:38
Speaker 1: the world I want to live in. We must laid
52:43
Speaker 1: a peaceful, prosperous war for this world to be where
52:50
Speaker 1: it is. Many people sacrifice their lives for it. Civilizations
52:56
Speaker 1: were burned for it, and we should not take it
52:59
Speaker 1: for whatever philosophical spectrum that we're coming from. We should
53:06
Speaker 1: be students of history. Because have the largest army doesn't
53:15
Speaker 1: mean you go to war. Because you at that worthiest
53:20
Speaker 1: personal planet Earth doesn't mean need to take away from
53:26
Speaker 1: everybody else. Because you had the most intelligent people personal
53:31
Speaker 1: plane on Earth doesn't mean you need to deprive anybody
53:36
Speaker 1: else from education for them to bow to the air
53:42
Speaker 1: of bowing of kingship. It's over. People don't want to
53:49
Speaker 1: bow to people any more. Wasn't that the purpose of
53:53
Speaker 1: the Enlightenment, the French Revolution? Isn't that the purpose of
54:00
Speaker 1: the Boston Tea Party, the American Revolution? Isn't Now I'm
54:07
Speaker 1: having the public, Hey, buddy, Freedom and the pursuit of happiness.
54:18
Speaker 1: Can't we give the same to the war. We must
54:24
Speaker 1: accept where the wildless, where the world is going. If
54:29
Speaker 1: you cannot change something, you need to become a vital
54:33
Speaker 1: part in it. The world. It's multipolar, a unique and multipolarism.
54:46
Speaker 1: All of what's your adapt Learn to coporate with one another.
54:51
Speaker 1: American must be able to work with China, work with Russia,
54:56
Speaker 1: work with the bricks. I mean, I'm was able to
55:01
Speaker 1: work with every nation on Plannet Earth. We don't need
55:04
Speaker 1: to spend a lot to have business everywhere. And the
55:10
Speaker 1: war has changed. The weapons of the unipolar system is obsolete.
55:21
Speaker 1: Let me say it again, the weapons of the unipolar
55:25
Speaker 1: system is obsolete. I've started timined again that this war
55:32
Speaker 1: was supposed to be the test of the AI war
55:34
Speaker 1: war and that's what is happening. I told you that
55:37
Speaker 1: long time ago. Itf the tests of new gadgets. We
55:41
Speaker 1: don't need to go to war. The unipolar system much
55:47
Speaker 1: about military build up. The multipolar system is about business, supply,
55:52
Speaker 1: chain supply Chaine, signing contracts, win win corporations, exchanges, visits,
56:00
Speaker 1: free countries, people moving, signing contracts and making business and
56:05
Speaker 1: making money, having a better life at the same time
56:09
Speaker 1: countries who respect countries for what they are, for their
56:13
Speaker 1: contribution to the world. America will always be respected in
56:18
Speaker 1: the UNIO in the multipolar world order, an American and
56:23
Speaker 1: up being the beneficiary of the multipolar world order, not
56:27
Speaker 1: by military might, not by force. The multipolar world order
56:35
Speaker 1: is led by soft power. The multipolar world orders shall
56:43
Speaker 1: be led by soft power. I would say one last time,
56:48
Speaker 1: the multipolar world order shall be led by soft power,
56:54
Speaker 1: not military power, because military power we mean nothing. Because
57:05
Speaker 1: it's a system of gadgets and AI and a system
57:10
Speaker 1: drawing by hard wives and softwest. There are no winners
57:14
Speaker 1: and there are no losers. So the budgets of the
57:18
Speaker 1: world in the future not be about wars, will be
57:22
Speaker 1: about integration, strategic leverage, strategic autonomy, countries working together, and
57:31
Speaker 1: countries being respected in what and that which they're good at.
57:38
Speaker 1: Others may talk about division of labor, what temporarism is about.
57:43
Speaker 1: Division of powers? How relevant countries are, how essential countries are.
57:53
Speaker 1: Came to see, we need the rare earth to produce
57:57
Speaker 1: the weapons that can use against Applaus all those health
58:03
Speaker 1: countries seat I will need oil from from smaller countries
58:08
Speaker 1: in the garth with very dismal population country seat that
58:14
Speaker 1: will need Taiwan, but I will need Netherlands. I don't
58:21
Speaker 1: need Japan, but I want need Israel. But I don't
58:28
Speaker 1: need Congo. But I don't need Brazil. But I will
58:36
Speaker 1: need India, but I will need France or Italy or
58:42
Speaker 1: Germany or the UK that will need Venezuela or Cuba.
58:52
Speaker 1: That's the new world order. It takes all those military
58:56
Speaker 1: basis and does plays take all those tankers and all
58:58
Speaker 1: those carriers outset time and time and again those physical assets.
59:08
Speaker 1: Another product of the multipolar system. The multipolar system is software,
59:15
Speaker 1: software driven, AI driven, humanitarian driven. We must accept that system.
59:23
Speaker 1: It's not a system of race domination or superiority. That
59:28
Speaker 1: your skin is better, the accent is better, that your
59:32
Speaker 1: color is better, that your height is better, that your
59:37
Speaker 1: weight is better. It's not a system driven by discrimination
59:42
Speaker 1: by superiority. We will gradually come to accept that. Did we,
59:54
Speaker 1: for any stretch of imagination, calculated that Iran will be
1:00:00
Speaker 1: what Iran is doing? Of course not. We dismissed Iran
1:00:05
Speaker 1: by some great power dynamics. Now in multipolar system, there
1:00:12
Speaker 1: is no small nation, because they got their own chookhol
1:00:17
Speaker 1: Theron got the stated over moos and missiles and territory.
1:00:23
Speaker 1: Venezuela got the oil. America got almost everything. We don't
1:00:29
Speaker 1: need to use false we need to use corporation, that
1:00:35
Speaker 1: bluster pumping of chess that we are the strongest in
1:00:39
Speaker 1: the world. Yes, we are the strongest in the world.
1:00:45
Speaker 1: For the good that we can't do, for the good
1:00:47
Speaker 1: that we have doing to the world. I say time
1:00:50
Speaker 1: and again, America is not respected because of war. America
1:00:55
Speaker 1: is respected because of our good, our educational system, humanity,
1:01:01
Speaker 1: the NBA, the sports, the golf, the Olympics. We are
1:01:07
Speaker 1: respected for our science and technology. Americans are respected from
1:01:12
Speaker 1: the humanity. For the good. Americans help kids in Africa
1:01:17
Speaker 1: to go to school, to our drinking water. Now we
1:01:21
Speaker 1: covet operations to overtake a country. We don't need all
1:01:24
Speaker 1: those things. We don't need to do coved stuff to
1:01:27
Speaker 1: do good. Just do good. You'll be loved. That time
1:01:30
Speaker 1: is overdour need to be covert. We need some other organizations,
1:01:34
Speaker 1: We don't need those. Stop all those abolished, all those
1:01:37
Speaker 1: systems or all those industries and all those organizisms. You
1:01:40
Speaker 1: don't need them. Just be good, be good for good
1:01:44
Speaker 1: that's sake, and you'll belaved. That's the multipolar system. When
1:01:50
Speaker 1: it was time of COVID, see, countries were good to
1:01:55
Speaker 1: one another. Learn from the COVID pandemic bombs. You don't
1:02:01
Speaker 1: need nuclear weapons, are gonna tell you. In the multipolar system,
1:02:08
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons gonna be targets. It means you're sitting on
1:02:14
Speaker 1: your own extinction. You don't have those weapons. I conclude
1:02:20
Speaker 1: by saying, as I've said to Iran all the time, Iran,
1:02:24
Speaker 1: you do not need a nuclear weapon. But you need
1:02:29
Speaker 1: your technology and science. That's your right to self defense.
1:02:36
Speaker 1: You need your technology and science to develop your industries,
1:02:41
Speaker 1: to take care of your people, to be proud in
1:02:46
Speaker 1: your intelligence. But you don't need to develop a missile
1:02:51
Speaker 1: that can reach America. You don't need it. Don't need
1:02:55
Speaker 1: those continent entire polistic missiles. You don't need it. You
1:02:59
Speaker 1: don't need war machines. It don't need to be a
1:03:04
Speaker 1: threat because you know where then the multipolar system milion
1:03:11
Speaker 1: you might do. Just don't take you anywhere. They don't
1:03:16
Speaker 1: need countries to protect here. You need to protect yourself.
1:03:23
Speaker 1: You need to be good to one another. Why the
1:03:26
Speaker 1: countries attack one another. You need to treat on one another.
1:03:32
Speaker 1: You need to respect one another for all you're good at,
1:03:35
Speaker 1: good at. We don't wish the golf countries to collapse,
1:03:38
Speaker 1: do you. You don't wish that U Aid to collapse.
1:03:43
Speaker 1: They don't wish to collapse. You don't wish go It
1:03:46
Speaker 1: to collapse. You don't wish o Man to collapse. It
1:03:49
Speaker 1: don't really wish South Arabia to collapse. You don't wish
1:03:54
Speaker 1: those golf states, all of them, to collapse, because they
1:03:58
Speaker 1: are good at what they are good at. That's a
1:04:00
Speaker 1: multipolar system. Respect countries for what they are good at.
1:04:07
Speaker 1: American is good at so many things. We learn to
1:04:11
Speaker 1: respect Americans for all the things that we are called
1:04:15
Speaker 1: the time we come when American will discover that we
1:04:19
Speaker 1: don't need war. We don't need war. Actually, AH is
1:04:26
Speaker 1: taking away from us if American want to lead the
1:04:32
Speaker 1: multipolar wor order, of which I've said several times that
1:04:36
Speaker 1: Americans should late for. I am that multipolar philosopher. I
1:04:41
Speaker 1: am that American American multipolar philosopher. I like my country
1:04:46
Speaker 1: to lead that war, not that a military might draw
1:04:52
Speaker 1: our humanity, our good to, our kindness, tur positive intelligence,
1:05:02
Speaker 1: and positive causality that's the philosophy of Sarianism. That's the
1:05:09
Speaker 1: AI philosophy. My philosophy is the philosophy of the multipolar
1:05:15
Speaker 1: world order. Have written that philosophy for American to lead.
1:05:22
Speaker 1: If we do not lead, someone will feel the guy.
1:05:28
Speaker 1: Can't you see each time we are blaming China, we
1:05:33
Speaker 1: don't blame China because China is going to war. China
1:05:38
Speaker 1: is doing with the multipolar order. Expect from every country trade, corpase,
1:05:47
Speaker 1: business exchanges, build infrastructures. We want to lead. We should
1:05:56
Speaker 1: lead in it, which is lead in Ani. We should
1:05:59
Speaker 1: lead in how this fails. But it must not be
1:06:02
Speaker 1: for military use. It must not be for military use.
1:06:09
Speaker 1: You need a military, but military destroyed themselves and the
1:06:14
Speaker 1: people that belt. The more military intelligence you have, the
1:06:20
Speaker 1: more you be destroyed. The more military assets you have,
1:06:26
Speaker 1: the more that countries will be scared to destroy it.
1:06:31
Speaker 1: We need nuclear non prolifiation and countries should take this seriously.
1:06:38
Speaker 1: American is supposed to walk with Russia to make sure
1:06:42
Speaker 1: that we don't proliferate nuclear weapons. With the China, Russia
1:06:48
Speaker 1: and North Korea, France, England, America, and there's other Pakistan, India,
1:06:58
Speaker 1: and there's other countries that have over it nuclear weapons,
1:07:04
Speaker 1: to declare their stock pies and to make sure that
1:07:09
Speaker 1: people know where those things are because somewhere are going
1:07:13
Speaker 1: to strike them with drones or something we don't know,
1:07:18
Speaker 1: and a liking those deadly dumb weapons. We carry a
1:07:28
Speaker 1: lot of havoc to humanity. Having nuclear weapons was the
1:07:34
Speaker 1: dumbest idea ever conceived. It selved a purpose, and it
1:07:44
Speaker 1: became the bad example that counties must have. And the
1:07:51
Speaker 1: more counties have these things, the more they urge to dominate,
1:07:58
Speaker 1: to control, to inflict pain, orders to brutalize, orders to bum,
1:08:02
Speaker 1: orders to destroy, orders, always that thing to control people.
1:08:07
Speaker 1: If you control the world, what do you do the world?
1:08:11
Speaker 1: Will you be the first and the last? We don't
1:08:14
Speaker 1: need history. I want to replete it. I want to
1:08:18
Speaker 1: repleat the same thing that other countries did until not survived.
1:08:23
Speaker 1: Which empire ever stood multi priority? It's not empireism, empires,
1:08:35
Speaker 1: it's not multi priority. It's the end of empireism. And
1:08:42
Speaker 1: that becomes the piece of the world. They don't need
1:08:47
Speaker 1: a large army to do anything in it. Ip in
1:08:55
Speaker 1: it patterns in it positive intelligence, positive causality, positive humanity,
1:09:01
Speaker 1: positive enlightenment, positive development, positive energy, positive science, to enrich yourself,
1:09:18
Speaker 1: to flourish your people and create a stable war. For
1:09:24
Speaker 1: this war and around now to end France, Russia, China
1:09:37
Speaker 1: and the African Union need to meet and talk to Iran,
1:09:44
Speaker 1: and talk to America and talk to Israel. America is
1:09:51
Speaker 1: negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine because America
1:09:56
Speaker 1: has interest in it. India, Russia or China should be
1:10:07
Speaker 1: the mediator to end the war with Iran because they
1:10:13
Speaker 1: have interested in it. That's how the war ends. The war.
1:10:22
Speaker 1: It's a demolition war. This war, it's a depletion military
1:10:29
Speaker 1: stock by depletion war. It's not the winning of the war.
1:10:37
Speaker 1: The country that goes up the most shocked and continue
1:10:47
Speaker 1: we do more harm. Dank God. It's not supposed to
1:10:54
Speaker 1: be that way. We need to have a better world.
1:11:03
Speaker 1: Stop the war, stop the bombing of the cities. And
1:11:10
Speaker 1: it's always not a good thigh. When we prove to
1:11:14
Speaker 1: the war. You cannot negotiate with us. They don't bum
1:11:20
Speaker 1: me your way to victory. It's never happened. You cannot
1:11:24
Speaker 1: do regime change in the air, never happened. And then
1:11:29
Speaker 1: we do a successful regime change, we post on the
1:11:33
Speaker 1: ground never happened because the person you get in there
1:11:36
Speaker 1: who's end up words? Isn't that? Where we are well
1:11:39
Speaker 1: away around, politicians come in, they make catastrophic decisions and believe,
1:11:48
Speaker 1: and the people suffer, and they shift our political discourse
1:11:53
Speaker 1: and our foreign policy. We tend to be dealing with crisis.
1:12:01
Speaker 1: Like China, just keep developing and other countries keep developing,
1:12:05
Speaker 1: and the win this country I develop with smart technology
1:12:09
Speaker 1: and high quality development. Then now we think we can
1:12:12
Speaker 1: stop it. Why do we stop it? Because instead of
1:12:16
Speaker 1: taking the time to develop ourselves, we spend the time
1:12:21
Speaker 1: going to war. War does nothing. It destroys everything. You
1:12:28
Speaker 1: cannot spend lives, time and resources on something that destroys everything.
1:12:38
Speaker 1: What destroys everything? Why invest heavily in it? Why I
1:12:44
Speaker 1: invest infrastructure, I development, in education, in science and technology,
1:12:53
Speaker 1: in building homes for your people, providing jobs, making people
1:12:59
Speaker 1: live unaforidable lives, making people retire with with pride and dignity,
1:13:07
Speaker 1: making people have some change in their pocket. We can
1:13:11
Speaker 1: not use those resources. There's billions of dollars on weapons
1:13:15
Speaker 1: that take seconds to be destroyed. I means those weapons
1:13:19
Speaker 1: are not self their purpose. But Americans are suffering we
1:13:26
Speaker 1: know that we are suffering. We know that we are struggling.
1:13:33
Speaker 1: We know that we have affordability crisis. We know we
1:13:37
Speaker 1: cannot pay our bills. We know our national debt, we
1:13:42
Speaker 1: know our alien infrastructures. We know our educational system is struggling.
1:13:51
Speaker 1: We are not producing so much patterns as you're supposed
1:13:55
Speaker 1: to be producing. So we know that we have internal problems.
1:14:02
Speaker 1: Or we choose to go to war, we get all
1:14:05
Speaker 1: these weapons of self destruction. You just see, billions of
1:14:10
Speaker 1: dollars are just exploding when we need those billions of
1:14:14
Speaker 1: dollars for prices to go down, for to be able
1:14:24
Speaker 1: to pay their electricity bills, to put gas in their car.
1:14:30
Speaker 1: And our resources are being explored, exploding, and then prices
1:14:36
Speaker 1: goes up, and the people still suffer now that just
1:14:42
Speaker 1: the war is burning their resources. The war inflicts pain
1:14:47
Speaker 1: on them. To have the audacity to lie to them
1:14:52
Speaker 1: and punish them and cancel them. We cannot speak. The
1:14:58
Speaker 1: press is suppressed. We must watch what we say. We
1:15:04
Speaker 1: must kneel bow kissed, kissed the ray as tasting enough.
1:15:14
Speaker 1: We criticize, not cooreer were gradually turning our media into
1:15:21
Speaker 1: a North Korean state. Just one filter, one anger, one voice.
1:15:29
Speaker 1: We must sing praises. I watch Fox News. I see
1:15:37
Speaker 1: a reporter is supposed to ask a question to one
1:15:40
Speaker 1: guy and his adoration for the guy, and the guy
1:15:48
Speaker 1: just like, please ask me a question at all when
1:15:53
Speaker 1: no Korea, the reporter canna ask the straight question. Need
1:16:00
Speaker 1: to worship the person. I'm back for the person feelings
1:16:05
Speaker 1: not to be hurt to ask a question. That's the
1:16:11
Speaker 1: first Amendment all about? What is it all about? What
1:16:19
Speaker 1: does it meant to have a republic, a free press,
1:16:24
Speaker 1: with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that homeland.
1:16:31
Speaker 1: All of us can be better. The press can be better,
1:16:35
Speaker 1: Our leaders can be better. The Americans people always better.
1:16:40
Speaker 1: They work hard, always think about the troops, our service
1:16:45
Speaker 1: men when they die, and better because they give their all.
1:16:52
Speaker 1: Because we genuinely love our come to our homeland. I
1:16:56
Speaker 1: don't like people to be telling us what they meant
1:16:59
Speaker 1: to be a patriot pay for those people are American
1:17:05
Speaker 1: and the practice and the practice un constitutional things. Those
1:17:11
Speaker 1: who claim to love American the bulls they just to
1:17:18
Speaker 1: America internally the most do not pay pay lip service
1:17:24
Speaker 1: to America. We know those who talk about the troops
1:17:28
Speaker 1: we talk about the flag and don't like the law
1:17:30
Speaker 1: enforcement officers. We know all those lip service they do
1:17:35
Speaker 1: everything like they like the police so much. I've set
1:17:38
Speaker 1: determined again. Pay the police officers just as you pay
1:17:42
Speaker 1: a doctor. And in the police officer and the doctor,
1:17:46
Speaker 1: the same people pay the firefighter just as you pay
1:17:50
Speaker 1: a doctor, just as you pay a person in congress.
1:17:54
Speaker 1: Why should the person in congress earn more money than
1:17:58
Speaker 1: the police officer than it than the soldier. Why should
1:18:05
Speaker 1: people in congress and more money than of our soldiers
1:18:09
Speaker 1: than of our firefighters that our police officers do our teachers.
1:18:14
Speaker 1: Why should they earn more for making the decisions that
1:18:20
Speaker 1: they are making. They make bad, bad decisions, and the
1:18:26
Speaker 1: people play the price for it, and they come a
1:18:28
Speaker 1: lie to the people. Please stop lying to the American people.
1:18:32
Speaker 1: Just be honest, because we still believe you. If you're honest.
1:18:37
Speaker 1: Once we take a decision on one name, we believe me.
1:18:41
Speaker 1: We know it might go around. We just don't like
1:18:44
Speaker 1: to use places. Let all of us be fighting the
1:18:49
Speaker 1: enemy with the same voice. Philosopher prints They are intelligent,
1:19:00
Speaker 1: says philosopher Prices. Hs are from Negre City of Philas, Vegas. March,
1:19:06
Speaker 1: the sith March the fifth twenty twenty six, or in
1:19:18
Speaker 1: the middle, thank you M.