Latest / Man in America Podcast / Can the UN Exploit an Election Crisis to SEIZE CONTROL of the USA? w/ Alex Newman

Transcript

Can the UN Exploit an Election Crisis to SEIZE CONTROL of the USA? w/ Alex Newman · Man in America Podcast

• 0:13
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holhouse. So it feels like that we're being attacked from about a thousand different places and a thousand different ways, in this country, whether it's the the border, our medical education system, even our election system. It just feels like everything is is a a battlefront. And the who's the enemy?
• 0:35
  There's enemies everywhere. It's just it's crazy. It's a crazy time to live. But if you look and start digging, you start to see that a lot of these attacks are coming from very centralized groups. One of those big groups being the United Nations and, you know, other groups like the World Economic Forum or the World Health Organization, these globalist groups that are basically implementing, and they're they're they're pawing their way into controlling even nations like America with our constitution and all these different measures put in place to protect us from this exact system, but they're finding ways around it.
• 1:08
  And the UN, they they recently talked about their their global pact for the future, which is basically the road map for a global totalitarian system. And so looking at, okay, what's the intersection between what's happening at these global organizations levels and what's happening at a local level in America or with our presidential election? What where are the crossovers of all these different things intersecting, and how's it gonna affect our future and the control of our lives? I mean, do you really want some UN official dictating your health decisions? I know I sure don't.
• 1:39
  Right? Like, this is why I've been proud to be an American is because, you know, guns, God, and freedom. So joining us today is my good friend, Alex Newman, and we're gonna be diving deep into what's going on at the global level, what to expect next, what could potentially be happening around the election, how they might be using the election as an opportunity to create chaos and come in with their power grab. There's just a lot of the just unpack with this. So, folks, please enjoy the interview with Alex Newman.
• 2:07
  Folks, we all see it. Everything's getting more expensive. We're paying two, three, four times what things cost just a few years ago, And we know they're lying. 3% inflation, really? Think about it.
• 2:20
  Why are they telling us to keep our hard earned money in the banks and stock market while they're rushing to buy gold and silver? That's right. Governments and central banks around the world are dumping the dollar and scrambling to buy gold and silver right now. These are smart people. They see the signs just like you do.
• 2:39
  They know the crash is coming. The dollar has lost more than half its value in the last five years, and our national debt's increasing a trillion dollars every hundred days. It can't go on like this. Even Bank of America's warning about a dollar collapse. And if they're right, it's only a matter of time before our savings, our IRAs, and our four zero one k's could be wiped out.
• 3:02
  Look. Right now, it's still easy to buy gold and silver, but in the future, it may not be. Experts are saying that prices will keep surging, and UBS says that gold could even go up to $5,000 an ounce. Noble Gold's phones have been ringing off the hook because the folks who get it are wasting time. Now, I can't tell you what to do with your hard earned money, but I can tell you that even if just some of your savings are in gold and silver, you can rest assured that money is safe.
• 3:31
  So call Noble Gold and protect your wealth today. It's better to be six months early than one day late. So call Noble Gold today at (626) 654-1906 or visit goldwithseth.com and set up your free wealth consultation. The phone number and the websites are also in the show's description. Mister Alex Newman, it's good to have you on the show.
• 3:56
  It's great seeing you this past weekend at the Reawaken Tour, but it's especially wonderful to have you here as a guest today. So thanks for being here.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: It's an honor to be here. Thank you, Seth. And, yeah, it was great to see you at the Reawaken America. Great talk you gave. Thank you for what you're doing, and, again, pleasure to be here.
• 4:10
  Seth Holehouse: Thank you. So as usual, there's about a million things that we can be talking about right now. We've got the election right around the corner. We've World War three around the corner. We have all kinds of shenanigans happening with the UN, and they're packed for the future.
• 4:21
  So there's this and that's just the tip of the iceberg, but how about let's let's just dive into the UN and the packs of the future because I I really think that, in a lot of ways, helps put an umbrella over a lot of the other discussions that we're having, whether it's disasters and preparedness or cybersecurity or even the elections or education, because we can't look at these things in isolation anymore. You can't look at these specifics of any given country, really, without understanding how the global agenda manipulates and and controls those items within each country. So, I know you were recently at the UN for for one of their major summits, so I'll just hand it to you. Like, what in terms of what's happening with the UN, what are you focusing on right now?
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: Well, we're watching right now, Seth, the largest and most significant power grab of the UN that we've seen probably since the founding of the UN. You know, typically, they've gradually been usurping more and more power and authority. They've been gradually centralizing control at the international level. But this summit for the future, this pact for the future that they adopted there by consensus, the governments of the world under the leadership of the UN, it takes it to a whole new level. And there's a reason why Americans don't know about this.
• 5:31
  Right? Yeah. A lot of the people listening to us right now said this will be the first time they've heard about the pact for the future and the summit of the future, and that is strategic. That is by design. It's not because it's not important.
• 5:42
  It's because the mainstream media is not covering it for obvious reasons. But I I was there, and I I had an opportunity to watch this. You know, one of the first things that jumped out at us was how the UN was making such a big deal out of it. They they had, you know, posters all over the place with quotes from secretary general Gutierrez, who used to be the leader of the socialist international, traces its lineage right back to Karl Marx. And he says, we can't build a future for our grandchildren with a system built for our grandparents.
• 6:08
  And so the way they frame this is we're going from UN to UN two point o. So right when they created the UN, they told humanity that this was just peace. You know, we're not gonna be a world government. We're we're just establishing an organization here to help foment peace. Well, they obviously failed on that.
• 6:24
  We've had eighty years of nonstop war. So now they figure they need to take over the economy, education, the environment, law, emergencies, agriculture, fisheries, you name it. It's all wrapped up into this pact for the future. And so this transformation from UN to UN two point o involves, as the pact for the future, very clear, a massive strengthening of what they call global governance. It says all nations must submit to the rulings of the International Court of Justice, which is a total kangaroo court.
• 6:53
  It it one of the things that really jumped out at me and and, actually, this was the first time I really focused in on the Summit of the Future. In early two thousand twenty three, the secretary general released a policy brief. He released actually a series of policy briefs, basically a wish list for what they wanted in this pact for the future. And the one that really got my attention, I I did a whole article about it in April, was the one dealing with global emergencies. And so the secretary general in this policy brief says, you know, we're we're in a complicated period.
• 7:23
  There's all kinds of global problems, and the secretary general, as in him, needs to have the authority to declare a what he calls a complex global shock or an international emergency. And they gave a list of things that it might be. It could be climate. It could be environment. It could be economic.
• 7:38
  It could be war. It could be domestic disturbance. It could be outer space stuff, which, you know, they didn't give us details on that. It could be a black swan event, so we don't even know what it is. And so it could be basically anything.
• 7:47
  Right? It doesn't even have to be global, he says. And when that is declared, all governments, all businesses, all social organizations, everything would have to recognize, it says, the primary decision making authority of the UN and its multilateral agencies. So that translated into the pact for the future in action item 54, giving the secretary general a mandate to oversee the international response to emergencies. So this is an unprecedented power grab.
• 8:14
  There there's no checks and balances here on this, and it is, frankly, extremely dangerous, especially when you consider what we're facing with this upcoming election. The World Economic Forum talking about this coming poly crisis that might involve a a cyber pandemic, a public health scare, a currency crisis, a World War three, whatever. It is, I think, really, Seth, an effort to finally turn the UN into the world government that they've hoped to create all along, and education is a big part of that. But that that's kind of the broad overview of what they were doing.
• 8:45
  Seth Holehouse: So how so you mentioned the election, and, obviously, the election relates to almost everything in the world right now. But we know one thing specifically could say that there's a lot of risk of disruption. I mean, there's been, you know, discussions of cyber attacks, and they're doing some cyber, you know, testing, and there's this, you know, idea of, you know, civil unrest of, you know, riots. So whether it's, you know, if Trump wins and we've got BLM burning down every city or if, you know, they they put, you know, Kamala in there, and then we've got, you know, the the the opposite happening from the opposite side. We've got riots and protests and everything.
• 9:15
  So it's obviously, there these emergencies that the UN is talking about. I would say that America, it's kinda like we're driving into the forest that's full of emergencies everywhere. Right? And it it's it's like we're gonna have a hard time not hitting a couple of these. So how how do you see the UN and this pact and what they're doing?
• 9:35
  How does that tie into our own elections? And then I've got a few more questions that kinda will spawn from this discussion.
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: Well, we've known for a long time, Seth, that, the globalists, the deep staters, whatever you wanna call have have understood that emergencies, crises, and and really war, which is the biggest of the emergencies and crises, are an excellent catalyst from their perspective for expanding the size and scope of the state and for undermining national sovereignty. And and we've seen this very clearly. We after World War one, they tried to create the League of Nations. After World War two, they got the UN. They got the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the the nucleus of what eventually became the European Union.
• 10:13
  So so they recognize that this is a great way to further empower the state and further empower international institutions. So you look at that in the context of what they have publicly told us is coming. And I I think seeing what happened with COVID is a good way to understand what they're hoping for. Right? We had almost two and a half years where governments all over the world were taking their cues from the World Health Organization.
• 10:36
  This is an unelected, unaccountable, dictatorial body run by a guy who actually his his resume is basically, you know, leader of a communist terrorist organization. How in the world does this guy end up dictating to governments what kind of policies we need to adopt for the first time in in human history in many cases when he had a demonstrated track record of extremism, Marxism, and lying to people. I mean, oh, it's not transmissible. I mean, over and over again, putting out disinformation. And by the way, it wasn't just governments that were taking their cues from him.
• 11:07
  I'm sure you remember, Seth, the CEO of YouTube, going on CNN saying anything that goes against World Health Organization recommendations, we're gonna be removing from our platform. And so so even the speech of Americans, ended up in the crosshairs of this. And and, of course, that's a big part of the pack for the future as well. There's huge segments in there about controlling information, censoring misinformation, disinformation. So taking all that together and and looking at the kind of things that we know they've been preparing for The United States, I think a very, very clear picture emerges of this effort to use crises to undermine our freedom and ultimately, I believe, undermine The United States as a major power or at least as the hegemonic power.
• 11:47
  And so this is not a a new thing. Now if you go back to Frederic in the early eighteen hundreds, the great French lawmaker and philosopher, he identified this. He he said the tyrants, they they concoct the poison and the antidote in the same laboratory. So they they create the problem, and then they offer you the fake solution to deal with the problem they created. And And I think they're cooking that up now, and the election may well be the catalyst for a lot of this.
• 12:09
  We we know from the transition integrity project that Soros funded, the pervert Podesta brothers ran back in 2020, that in the event of a Trump victory, they were hoping to have, you know, terror mobs out in the streets, like you said, burning down our cities. They were they were even talking about having California, Oregon, and Washington secede from the union and try to blow up the constitution and get rid of the electoral college. So there should be no doubt that they're preparing for these things. And one of the ways to tell what they are cooking up for us is to look at the exercises they're doing. So a few years ago, the World Economic Forum did the cyber polygon exercise, envisioned a cyber pandemic as Klaus Schwab calls it.
• 12:47
  That makes COVID look like a small disturbance. Right? So make COVID look little by comparison. Then you combine that with maybe an attack on the US dollar, an attack on The US bond market, a collapsing real estate market. There's the the image for the cyberpolygon right there.
• 13:01
  And and you combine all that together, you realize the World Economic Forum in early twenty twenty three started talking about the possibility of a poly crisis where we'd see all of these different crises merge into one mega crisis. And and so I like to go back to Rich Higgins, was the director of policy and planning on Trump's National Security Council, because he warned about a lot of this during the first term. He said what Trump was facing was the equivalent of a he described it as a Maoist insurgency, which would be a nice addition to the poly crisis. And he explained that you've got this bizarre coalition of communists, Islamists, socialists, Marxists, globalists, all united, not necessarily in their end goal for the world, but certainly against The United States Of America as a free, sovereign, independent republic founded on these timeless principles of god given rights, limited government, and things like this. So I think the election may well serve as a catalyst for starting this poly crisis process undermining The United States, undermining the ability of Trump if he wins to do some of the things he's called for, and facilitating the transfer of power away from local, state, and even national governments and toward these first regional governments like European Union, African Union, and then ultimately, as Henry Kissinger outlines in his book World Order, toward international institutions like the UN and and its, associated agencies.
• 14:23
  Seth Holehouse: And that's a a pretty crazy thought to put out there is that, you know, here in America, we're looking at where we've been trained, you know, via the constitution and and and living in a constitutional republic that we have the state's rights, and the state's rights are then we have the federal. Right? And so a lot of times, we're concerned about, hey. You know, the federal government is overreaching. Right?
• 14:42
  The the federal government is, whether it's increase in taxes or, you know, the you know, what's happening with the border or any number of things where we looked at and said, okay. The federal government, they're definitely they're they're crossing their line, and they're now entering into this territory where you start to use words like tyranny or tyrannical or, you know, ways of describing how our government is acting. But then what's even crazier to imagine is the fact that then you've got the international level. Right? So what we're looking at is we're saying, hey.
• 15:12
  The federal government is no longer following the constitution as it was set forth by the founders, but how do you even look at this global organization like the UN, which isn't a specific country? Right? It's not a specific it's it's it's kind of it it it can be anywhere all at once. Right? It's not like, oh, the UN is is this governing body that exists in within Sweden.
• 15:33
  They use it to manage the Swedish people. It's it's a global system. And so to think about the fact that the this global system would even be coming in above our federal system and especially our state system, like, that's that's really concerning because I'm I'm guessing that that they wouldn't be looking at the constitution and be saying, okay. Look. Though we have our global rules for our global order, we still have to make sure that we keep that American constitution intact because it it's gonna pervert preserve the sovereignty of the American people.
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah. And I think that's one of the pickles they find themselves in right now. That's one of the reasons why we're seeing this relentless effort to discredit the constitution, especially in the minds and and hearts of our young people. They're being told, oh, it's old. It was written by white guys who are dead now.
• 16:20
  They some of them own slaves. You know, they're nasty people. So we see this effort to discredit the constitution, and that is because the constitution stands as a giant barrier to their plans. And so that's the good news and the bad news simultaneously. Right?
• 16:32
  The good news is none of this stuff is constitutional. And 26 governors just signed a letter to Joe Biden on the on the international health front saying we're not gonna obey the World Health Organization on any of these things. The federal government doesn't have these powers under the US constitution. The states did not delegate those powers to the federal government. How in the world can you transfer powers you don't have to an international entity that's not even discussed in our constitution?
• 16:53
  You, of course, can't do that, so we're not gonna be obeying that. And we've seen more and more states now passing laws like Louisiana, unanimous vote in the senate saying we're not gonna obey the UN on any of these things. That's really encouraging. We've even got local governments here in Florida standing up and saying we're not gonna accept this stuff in our counties. So that's really encouraging.
• 17:12
  The the bad news on this, though, is that that's why they're waging relentless war on our constitution. And I think one of their objectives is actually to fully discredit our constitution in the eyes of the world because for centuries, our constitution has been a a beacon of light to the rest of the world. I mean, many other countries have looked at our constitution and tried to model their own constitutions after that. Of course, you can't just have a piece of paper. You've gotta have the culture and the ideas and the public buy in that goes with that.
• 17:39
  But, that's why we see, I think, all these different efforts at the same time. Right? First of all, to discredit. Second of all, we're even seeing now from the allegedly conservative side efforts to open it up for amendments. And we see a lot of dark money flowing in here.
• 17:52
  They wanna call it constitutional convention. They call it different things, article five convention or convention of states. And I I think a lot of the people who are doing this are very well meaning. You know, they they see it. We have a huge problem that the government's not obeying the constitution.
• 18:05
  So we have a a real problem here for the globalist in that, you know, none of these powers are even authorized for the federal government, so they certainly can't transfer those to the international level. But what we are seeing anyway is completely, in opposition to the constitution. We're seeing that transfer of authority to the international level. So almost any agency that you can think of at the federal level, the UN has some sort of equivalent already. We've got our supreme court.
• 18:30
  They've got the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court. We've got police agencies. They've got UN COPS program. They've got UN police. We have the Department of Defense.
• 18:39
  They have the Department of Peacekeeping. We've got the EPA. They've got the the UN Environment Program. We've got the Patent Office. They've got the World Intellectual Property Organization.
• 18:47
  We've got the Department of Education. They have the UN Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. And so all of this is happening and has been happening for generations. And Seth, that was always the plan. Right?
• 18:58
  If you go back to the very beginning they didn't tell this to the people of the world for the most part. They told them this was about peace and so on. But if you go back to the very beginning, you had Joseph Stalin, of course, on on one side of the table with mister Molotov representing the Soviet Union. We sent Alger Hiss. History has almost wiped him out of the textbooks for for reasons that I'll explain in just a moment, but he was really the the top American guy who was supposedly representing us.
• 19:23
  He worked for the state department. They made him the chairman of the conference that wrote the UN Charter, which grants enormous power to the UN, by way, even power to deploy our troops if the Security Council votes that there's a a threat to global peace and security. And and the guy who did this, Alger Hiss, after that, he took all these, delegates down to the Bohemian Grove. And after that, they made him the first secretary general of the UN, and then we prosecuted him. We we threw him in federal prison.
• 19:48
  We found out he was a spy for Joseph Stalin. So that is who was representing America. The guy who really let the cat out of the bag, John Foster Dulles, another hugely influential player in the founding of the UN. He was the cofounder of the Council on Foreign Relations. He was a delegate to the founding of the UN.
• 20:04
  He served as secretary of state. His brother, of course, Alan Dellis, was one of the the architects of the Central Intelligence Agency. And he said in his book, 1950, it was called War or Peace, he said the United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a primitive stage. Therefore, its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly developed organization. And he goes on.
• 20:27
  He says, I've never seen any proposal made for collective security with teeth in it or for world government or for world federation, which could not be carried out either by the United Nations or under the UN charter. So they have had this vision of progressively empowering the UN going back even to before the UN was founded, but they had to deceive Americans. They had to deceive the people of the world. And now it's all coming to a head. Now now they're coming out of the closet.
• 20:52
  And instead of saying, hey. You're a crazy conspiracy theorist. Why wouldn't you want the UN to have these powers? Or or why why why would the UN want those powers? Now they're saying, hey.
• 21:00
  You're you're a terrible person because you don't think the UN should have those powers. I mean, what do you like? Hunger? What do you like? Poverty?
• 21:06
  You want the environment to be destroyed? So we've seen a shift in the narrative to now they're openly calling for global governance. And if you don't like that, then you're some kind of extremist. It's a very, very dangerous situation.
• 21:17
  Seth Holehouse: And and so looking at the the amount of power the UN or the WHO wield, You know, I've always looked at these groups as more just front groups. Like, it's not like Klaus Schwab is sitting there controlling the world through the world economic form. I look at I look at anybody that we see on television or that's the head of these organizations, in my opinion, in a lot of ways, they're just puppets. Right? They're they're not the ones that are sitting sitting in this closed room deciding the future of humanity.
• 21:42
  Maybe they have some input, but they're they're just the pub they're they're just figureheads. Right? They're people that are replaceable. When you look at Fauci, it's like, okay. If if Fauci's gone, if he gets prosecuted and sitting down to Gitmo for some reason and, you know, they'll they'll pull someone else in there and and then in his place.
• 21:55
  They'll have Deborah Birx or someone else that comes in that just, you know, fills that position. And so looking at the the UN or some of these more globalist organizations, one of the questions that I have, and it's not an easy one to answer, is who's controlling them? Right? Who are they doing the bidding on behalf of? It's like if the UN was hypothetically to rule the world as a centralized government, as you mentioned, with the court system, the the army peacekeepers, which I think, like, that's straight out dystopian novels.
• 22:24
  Right? The peacekeepers are the ones that come in and maintain peace by killing everyone.
• 22:28
  Todd Callender: Right? It's like it takes me
• 22:30
  Seth Holehouse: to Blade Runner or something. So but who's who's controlling these organizations? Because, you know, a lot of the research I've done shows that the CCP has a heavy involvement, that, you know, that Israel is certainly involved in certain ways, that the banking systems coming out of London, they've got their involvement. And I think that a lot of times, there's there's not, like, some cohesive, like, single enemy or entity that we're up against. Actually, it's multiple enemies and multiple factions that are using each other to, you know, kind of advance their own goals, but they'll also they'll backstab as quick as they need to.
• 23:05
  And so we look at an organization like the UN. Who do you see as being the the the the people or the organizations that are pulling the levers that are that we're handing this control over to?
• 23:17
  Speaker 2: That's an excellent question, Seth. I think it's one of the most important questions we could be asking ourselves, and that's why I wrote a whole I you and I didn't talk about this, but I wrote a whole book on that very question. It's called that deep state, the invisible government behind the scenes. And my goal was to answer exactly that question. You know?
• 23:29
  A a lot of us talk about they. They they are doing bad things, and who are they? That that's the question I set out to answer. And, you know, as as a Christian, I I I approach this, of course, from a biblical perspective. I I say they they have a commander in chief.
• 23:41
  His name is Satan. The Bible describes him as the god of this world. Talks about the kings of the earth conspiring against god and his anointed one. So we see you know, from the biblical perspective, we see that we're actually up against evil, demonic evil. But I think if you you know, to bring it back to the physical, back to what we can observe and what we can see with our own eyes, I go through a huge list of organizations, and you're right.
• 24:03
  They they are not all necessarily on the same page all the time, although there is a lot of cooperation with them between them. And so I think some of the ones that are really important to look at, Cecil Rhodes, the South African mining magnate back in the eighteen hundreds. When he died, he set up this massive operation. He outlined it in his will. He set up circles of influence and concentric circles within those circles, and they called it the roundtable groups.
• 24:29
  A guy who was actually involved in this wrote a book exposing some of it, one of Bill Clinton's mentors, incidentally. His name was Carol Quigley, who's a professor of history at Georgetown University. I actually have his book behind me called Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time. And and what he says is that these roundtable groups were established with a vision for bringing the whole world under the control of kind of a a one world system that would be somewhat based on, you know, British values, whatever that means, right, of the British empire. So they set up front organizations in a lot of different places, especially within the Anglosphere.
• 25:04
  The front organization that they set up in The United States, as Carol Quigley explains, is called the Council on Foreign Relations. Enormously influential group. And and it doesn't matter. Republican, Democrat, you can look at any of these administrations, and you'll see very clearly Trump was, you know, the one exception in my lifetime. All these administrations are totally packed with members of the CFR.
• 25:24
  There's, like, no party differences between them at all. Right? The Republican gets elected. They call up the CFR. They give them a huge list of people.
• 25:30
  They'll be the cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries and assistant secretaries and national security adviser, and you name it. They've got as members of this group, they've got CEOs of the mega banks. They've got the corporate members, the the big oil companies, the big pharmaceutical companies. Right. And you mentioned the CCP.
• 25:48
  I've got a whole chapter in here about the CCP. The CCP is an integral part of this, and there's a lot of history to that. And I I always go back to the beginning. Right? Chairman Mao was able to take over communist China with the deliberate assistance of subversives within the US government, many of whose descendants, ideological and in some cases familial, continue to operate within the CFR today.
• 26:10
  So people like George Marshall, who served as secretary of defense and secretary of state for the US government, he bragged about disarming Chiang Kai shek's men with the stroke of a pen by putting sanctions on him. This this is a guy who fought side by side with American troops against the Japanese. Why would you wanna betray our ally knowing full well that that was gonna allow a a savage, a barbarian, a mass murderer like chairman Mao to seize power over this great country? It's horrific. And then you look at how every step of the way, these same evildoers I I use deep state for lack of a better term, built up the CCP.
• 26:43
  Why would they do that? Right? Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller go over there in the early nineteen seventies, and Rockefeller comes back here and starts talking in the New York Times about how the the social experiment in China under chairman Mao's leadership is the most successful in human history. What? I mean, the the guy had massacred 50,000,000 people almost up to that time.
• 27:02
  How in the world could you say that's a successful social experiment unless you believe mass murder and slavery and destruction of civilization is a successful experiment? You take it up to, the current, you know, front man for this, Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum. He brags about the China model. He says it's a whole model for many countries. So I think the CCP is is in a really interesting situation here.
• 27:27
  I don't know that senior members of the CCP necessarily see themselves as pawns of this agenda, although I think in some way they are. They also, I think, in some sense, think that they're playing Klaus Schwab and and the Bill Gates and these guys, but they all want a global system. The Chinese want kind of the the Chinese model, the CCP model for the world, and incidentally, so do the Western globalists. So do the Bill Gates and the Rockefellers and these guys. They like that model for humanity where they could still earn huge amounts of money, but everybody is basically a good slave.
• 27:56
  So we see this very interesting situation where the CCP has now got its minions all up and down the institutions of global governance, with the deliberate connivance and assistance of the US government. Barack Obama was openly supporting this. And I've talked to senior people at the state department who couldn't believe what they were seeing, that the state department was helping the CCP take over UN agencies, take over international programs. So it's truly amazing. Other groups, I I think, are important.
• 28:23
  You've got Bilderberg. You've got some of the secret societies like the Skull and Bones Society at Yale University. You've got the Bohemian Grove out in Northern California. The World Economic Forum is important, I think, from an implementation perspective. One of the things they talk about, Seth, and I think they got this idea from the management guru, Peter Drucker, was the use of a three legged stool approach in bringing the whole world along with these massive changes.
• 28:49
  And so the three legs of the stool, you got the public sector, the private sector, and the religious sector. And you can document very clearly that this is the approach they're using. So let's go to the 2030 agenda, the UN sustainable development goals. This was called adopted in 02/2015 under Barack Obama. Every national government in the world adopted it.
• 29:06
  The CCP bragged that they played a crucial role, was the their term, in developing it. And the the head of the UN General Assembly at the time called it the master plan for humanity. Interesting term. So you've got this master plan for humanity. All the governments of the world agree.
• 29:22
  It's 17 goals. It's essentially a recipe for global tyranny under the guise of solving poverty and hunger and climate change and things like this. People can read the goals. Very simple. No one shall be left behind, it says over and over again.
• 29:33
  Wealth has to be redistributed not just within countries but among countries. In other words, global governance to redistribute our wealth. They they want abortions for everyone, vaccines for everyone, mental health for everyone. Brainwashing children is one of the central elements. It's goal number four.
• 29:48
  And so that's the governments. Right? That's the first leg of the stool. All the national governments of the world came together under the UN to approve this. Well, next comes the World Economic Forum.
• 29:56
  They sign a strategic partnership with the UN to have the business community join the sustainable development goals. And so you have people like Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, who serves on the board of the World Economic Forum using our money, our pensions, our retirement accounts, our money that we have invested in ETFs to to to turn all the big corporations into basically lockstep allies in this push for the master plan for humanity. And then the third leg of the stool, the religions.
• 30:26
  Seth Holehouse: So, obviously, everyone's glued to the election right now. How's Trump doing in the polls? How did Kamala's recent interview affect her chances? Well, I'm excited to show you a groundbreaking app that gives you a whole new perspective on the election. It's called Cauchy, and it's the first legal exchange where you can actually place trades on any event, like a presidential election.
• 30:46
  So Cauchy has hundreds of markets to trade on from presidential elections to who will control the house to inflation, interest rates, even whether the government will shut down. And what's really cool about the platform is that you can trade on your opinions to make money or hedge risks that may impact you. Additionally, you can check the market odds, which come from thousands of people trading. So these odds can be highly predictive, which is why these markets are referred to as prediction markets. So let's take an example, which is the presidential election.
• 31:15
  So you can see that right now, the race is at Trump fifty nine percent, Harris at 41%. Right? So what that means is that the 41% of people that are buying YES on Kamala for 41¢ will get a $1 payout if she wins. So the odds change real time as events change. So there's been a lot of studies on the value of prediction markets, and I found them really useful when tracking what's happening in the election because I don't trust the polls.
• 31:40
  So CaoXi, though, is the first regulated place to trade on these types of markets, and we're happy to have them as a sponsor. So the election markets are now live to trade, and they are the first regulated place where you can do this. So you can use you can sign up using my link, kalshi.com/wholehouse. Again, that's kalshi, k a l s h I, Com / whole house, h 0 l e h 0 u s e. And what's great is that the first five hundred traders who deposit $50 in their account will get a free $20 credit.
• 32:13
  So, again, folks, you can start today by going to kaushi.com/wholehouse.
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: Happening right in front of our face. The UN has kind of a a an front group that they call religions for peace. It's actually funded by the UN and the US State Department as Soros and Rockefeller and you name it. And they claim to represent all the religions of the world. They call themselves the UN of religions.
• 32:35
  And in 02/2019, they met, and all of their leaders signed a declaration saying we commit to human development as outlined in the UN twenty thirty agenda sustainable development goals. So we've got governments, businesses, and religions all marching in lockstep, and then, you know, little people like me and you, Seth, saying, wait a minute. This is not a good idea. We should be talking about this. So who's behind it?
• 32:56
  I I would say very evil people operating through secretive and secret organizations, and then with front groups like the World Economic Forum and Religions for Peace being used to bring the people, the businesses, and the governments of the world on board with the agenda.
• 33:10
  Seth Holehouse: Well and, also, I I found the article. So right here, actually, this is the, you mentioned the David Rockefeller. And I've covered this on on a show before. This is the actual newspaper. This is from, 1973 in the New York Times, and it's interesting.
• 33:24
  It says, you know, from a a China traveler. It's like, oh, David Rockefeller. Okay. That's that's interesting. But you're right.
• 33:31
  He talks about here, and and and I I as I at one point, I had this article highlighted, and I covered it. But talking about just it's just praising China just as the the social experiment of what they're doing with communism over there. Like, it's actually it's kinda crazy. Right? So here, for instance, this very last paragraph says, the social experiment in China under chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.
• 33:58
  Right? So even that line right there, how is it that David Rockefeller in the seventies of all times, it's like he went there in the in, like, the fifties, right, you before a lot of the major campaigns that had really took in root and and, you know, before you'd had tens of millions starving from the great leap forward and all this kind of stuff. So in the seventies, by that point, there was mass death in China. I mean, every every historian would agree with that. So the fact that he can go there and come back and say, literally, quote, the social experiment in China under chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.
• 34:31
  It's it's just insane, but, you know, you you mentioned that a lot of these, global organizations and these these, you know, deep state organizations have really propped up China, which and I I agree with that because that you see it whether it was, you know, Bill Clinton, you know, help helping, you know, trying to open up with Deng Xiaoping or any of the other campaigns or even the rock you know, David Rockefeller in the seventies writing about this, not to mention, Yale. So Yale was heavily involved in starting communism in China. You know, the Yale in China program, which Mao was part of. I mean, it it goes it goes deep, but I also think that the CCP, there's a lot a lot of people that will quickly say, oh, well, the CCP is just a pawn of the globalist or just a pawn of the cabal or whatever. But I actually know, studying Chinese history a lot, you can see that they don't you know, their their core belief is that, you know, there's one mountain is a you know, you can only have one tiger on one mountain.
• 35:24
  Right? You know, one mountain is not big enough for two tigers. So and they really believe culturally. They don't submit. Actually, if you go back culturally, they a lot of ways, they believe that they're a very supreme race.
• 35:35
  Right? So they they won't just bow down to the the white banker that helped ruin China through the opium wars. Right? They they've got a a bone to pick with the Western cultures. So I I really think that what's happening is that you have the CCP that has developed its own agenda, its own plan to use these bankers and to use the the, you know, the Rockefellers and the, know, type you know, those types of organizations and individuals to achieve their goals and that their end goal is to be the ones sitting on top of this entire structure.
• 36:05
  Speaker 2: Yep. I I think you're exactly right, Seth. And this is something that we see among ruthless psychopaths over and over again throughout history. Right? They they use each other.
• 36:14
  They collaborate with each other as they have common goals, as they have common enemies. But once that is dealt with, then you enter the next phase. And and you see this very clearly in communist society. Joseph Stalin's a really good example. The overwhelming majority of his own deputies or his own lieutenants, his own top men died by torture and execution at the orders of Stalin.
• 36:36
  So, you know, yes, they were working together. Yes, they collaborated. Yes, they saw each other as allies. But as soon as one was not useful anymore or one posed a threat, then boom. You're gone.
• 36:45
  That's the end of the story. And so this is what you're dealing with with, unfortunately, the kind of people who want to run the world, the kind of people who are pushing this agenda forward. And I think normal people struggle to understand this because normal people don't think this way. You know? Normal people just wanna feed their family and maybe have a little bit of entertainment on the weekend, a little bit of relaxation, watch a ballgame, drink a beer.
• 37:04
  They're not thinking about how do I enslave my neighbors? How do I steal money from all of humanity? But we would be very naive and very foolish not to recognize that these kinds of people have existed all throughout human history in all societies and all cultures, and they continue to exist today. And, of course, they're attracted like flies to excrement to institutions that have power because that's the best way for them to advance their means. So they they migrate toward governments.
• 37:29
  They migrate toward institutions that have coercive power, that have some sense of legitimacy or authority. And that's how we so frequently end up throughout human history with governments that will massacre their own citizens, with governments that will lie to start wars, with governments that will loot, steal, cheat, destroy, and it's a very, very dangerous thing. Now the founders of The United States understood this about human nature, and so they created all these different checks and balances. You've got state versus federal. You've got the three branches at the federal level so that the natural inclinations of people who gravitate toward power could be checked by other people's natural inclinations who gravitate toward power.
• 38:07
  But then you look at a society like China today ruled by the CCP, there are no checks and balances. There's the CCP and only the CCP. And right now, we have other governments that could, in theory, at least pose a military check on that power if it tried to expand beyond its borders, but even that now is being destroyed. We're watching the collaboration of the globalist, the deep saters in the Western world in the destruction, the controlled demolition of The United States through the destruction of our economy, the destruction of our energy systems, the destruction of our culture, the destruction of our understanding of rights and law. And the direct result of that is the further empowerment of communist China.
• 38:45
  And you see it so clearly with the climate scam. Right? I'll be going to Azerbaijan in just a few weeks to cover the UN climate summit there. I was at the UN climate summit in Paris where Barack Obama said, hey. We're gonna slash 30 something percent of our c o two emissions, and the CCP said, yes.
• 39:00
  And we're gonna keep increasing them till maybe twenty thirty. And they're literally building two coal fired power plants every week. So what is the effect of that? Well, it destroys American manufacturing. It destroys the American economy, which is essential to supporting the military and national security.
• 39:13
  And who is the beneficiary? Well, the CCP. And, you know, you can say a lot of things about Barack Obama and Joe Biden and and these deep staters, but one thing you can't say about them is that they're stupid. They understand full well what they're doing. So I think at its core and, you know, when we're dealing with communist China, lot of people have have started saying, well, it's not really communist.
• 39:32
  And in a sense, maybe it's more akin to national socialism, like the Nazis, than than maybe what Karl Marx might have envisioned. At least it's closer to that. But, ultimately, when you when you look at communism and Marxism, I I don't really think the economic program is the most important element of it. One of the most important books I ever read on communism. It's called Marx and Satan by a pastor in Romania who was tortured by a communist barbarians for nine years.
• 39:56
  And he came to the conclusion that this must be from the pit of hell. And as he did his research, he found all these poems by Karl Marx where he's singing the praises of Satan and bragging about his partnership with Satan. Like, that doesn't go along with what I was taught. But once you understand it from that perspective, I think it all makes sense. Right?
• 40:13
  Why would a Western globalist cooperate with a Chinese communist? Well, they're united in this agenda for destroying nation states. They're united in this agenda for destroying family. They're united in the agenda of destroying Western civilization. And so they have common enemy.
• 40:29
  They have a common set of goals. And at some point, yes, they may well turn on each other, and, that's what gangsters do.
• 40:35
  Seth Holehouse: Exactly. So what what's the way forward? Right? When when we see all this happening, obviously, you know, who knows what happens with the election? It's so hard to predict what happens during the election, when we're gonna have the results back, who's who's allowed to win or who wins, what happens between then and, you know, January 20.
• 40:53
  So, you know, from your perspective, though, given all that's going on, what what do you see as the way forward? Where where's the hope? Where's the action?
• 41:01
  Speaker 2: Well, I think a lot of people are placing all their hope in the election of Donald Trump. And, you know, to be clear, at full disclosure, I hope Donald Trump wins. You know, I I'll I'll just say it. But I don't think that's actually a true solution to this problem. As the the communist often understood, and they've understood this for over a century, politics is actually downstream from culture.
• 41:19
  And I would go a step further. Culture is downstream from education. So if you look at all these UN agreements, the pact for the future, the agenda 2030, the agenda '21, that's their hundred year plan for the twenty first century. All of them make clear that education needs to be the central focus for bringing about this global revolution in world affairs, the imposition of this global economic, political, and religious system. So we need to understand if we hope to to preserve civilization, if we hope to preserve individual liberty, if we hope to preserve everything that is good and wholesome, we're gonna have to focus there.
• 41:51
  Right? That's the headwaters. Why are young people hoping to burn down their country? Why are young people embracing socialism and communism and anti American extremism? It's because they've been brainwashed.
• 42:01
  So, you know, the election is critical. We're at a fork in the road. Donald Trump has promised to stop the globalism. He's promised to stop the deep state. Whether he'll be able to do all that, I don't know, but he got a good start in the first term, although much of that has been reversed.
• 42:15
  So I think that's what he is genuinely hoping to do, and I think there's a legitimate chance that he will win despite all the efforts of the other side to cheat. But we need to understand that that is just a stop gap measure. Right? That's just, hey, put a tourniquet on. We're gonna stop the bleeding for four years.
• 42:30
  Now we've gotta get to the real hard work of rebuilding our institutions, reeducating the brainwashed zombies who have gone so radical that they're literally willing to destroy their own country and destroy their own communities. We've we've got to really deal with the education of our children, and I think we need to completely reframe our thinking on this front. And, you know, those are just the long term things that we're gonna have to do. And and everybody wants a silver bullet. Everybody wants the election to just be the end, and we can just go back to doing our thing.
• 43:01
  That's not gonna happen. It took generations to get into this mess. If we're gonna turn it around, it's gonna take generations, and that begins with every family, with every parent deciding, hey. I'm not gonna let my children be indoctrinated into globalism, communism, extremism, etcetera. We're gonna give them a good education so that they can think, so that they understand the timeless values and principles that created our civilization.
• 43:22
  And, so, yeah, be involved in politics. We all should be. I think we have an obligation to as as we, the people, the rulers of this country, but we need to do so much more than that. So after the election, that's when the real hard work begins, and I hope people will think in those terms.
• 43:37
  Seth Holehouse: You know, it's it's almost like when it comes to the children. I I agree with you in terms of the future and the importance of it, that I wish someone would write a book on it. Like, I wish someone would write a book about how our our children are being indoctrinated to death. Actually, wait. Wow.
• 43:49
  Look at this here. Actually, there it just so happens to be this guy named Alex Newman wrote this book called Indoctrinating Our Children to Death, Government Schools' War on Faith, Family, and Freedom, and How to Stop It. So there there's a good plug for that, which which I absolutely agree. I mean, we we have to, there's a reason why Lenin, you know, and and, you know, these these leaders, they talked about the importance of getting the kids young, you know, and planting these seeds that can never be uprooted. So, here's your book.
• 44:13
  Highly recommend it. It's out it's out online, you know, indoctrinating your children to death, Alex Newman. Also, I wanna encourage people to check out your website. So libertysentinel.org. Fantastic site, you know, news, deep analysis.
• 44:28
  It's not just clickbait stuff. This is it's real real research. It's real journalism, which is that's anything I see that you touch is that, you know, you're you you were homeschooled. Is that right?
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: No. I went to a very elite, international private schools
• 44:43
  Seth Holehouse: Oh, there you go. Okay. That's why, like, you're, like
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: in tenth grade.
• 44:46
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. Because I because I went to this regular public school, and I meet people like, you know, like, man, this guy's, like he's, like, writing books, going on speaking tours, and and I'm, like, you know, banging rocks together to help to do something because I've got this you know, I'm trying to, like, fix these these problems I got from the the public schools. So, obviously, you know, what you're doing is very important. You have the you have the toolbox to do it well, and and you've got incredible books and an incredible show, and, again, an incredible website. So libertysentinel.org.
• 45:12
  Highly recommend people check that out as well. And, you know, Alex, you know, thank you for for doing what you're doing. You're an important voice in exposing and educating, people about what's really going on, and let's just let's keep up this good fight. You know, regardless of what happens in November, we have to continue to get this information out, which you're doing a great job on, and I, I thank you for that.
• 45:34
  Speaker 2: Well, the Billings Mutual said, thank you for all that you're doing. Thank you very much for having me on the program. I really appreciate it, and I look forward to hopefully talking to you again very soon.
• 45:41
  Seth Holehouse: Absolutely. Thank you. Take care, man. Folks, we are officially in the time of the year where eating becomes off balanced, way off balanced. Parties, holidays, family gatherings always mean more snacks, more sweets, and generally indulging in all the wrong foods.
• 45:58
  And when your eating habits get off balance, so can you. That's why I strongly recommend Balance of Nature's daily supplements. Their fruit and veggie supplements are sourced from whole fruit and vegetable ingredients, all the things you might be missing, and all the things you you need to make up for being off balance during this eating season. Make sure you're getting more of a variety of fruit and vegetable ingredients at every step of the way with Balance of Nature. Start a trend toward better health today with my special startup offer.
• 46:26
  Whether you order online or call them direct, you must use the promo code Seth, that's s e t h, to get 35% off plus free shipping and their money back guarantee. So folks, call them today at 802468751, and use discount code Seth to get your discount, or order online at balanceofnature.com. And, again, use discount code Seth to get 35% off.