Latest / Honey Badger Radio / New AI to be trained on morality by a Feminist | HBR News 540

Transcript

New AI to be trained on morality by a Feminist | HBR News 540 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five forty u AI to
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: be trained on morality by a feminist, where we discuss
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: the news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: hope because you're doing well this week and that you're
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: laughing at all of the absurdities to absurdity so that
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: you're not consumed by I'm your host, Brian and I'm
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: and doctor Randamerkam. Hello this week's Yes Hello to you guys.
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: On this week's HBr News, we're gonna be talking about
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: an upcoming documentary that's gonna be on the Manisphere, and
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: yes that includes MRAs. A philosopher student grad named Amanda
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Askell is gonna be training the AI known as Claude
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: Spain is gonna make men pay for women's periods, and
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: more so, stick Around is gonna be a good time
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: and periods All men pay for women's periods everywhere? Yes,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: and uh yeah so, and also be sure to consider
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: joining us for the Patron Show. And did you guys
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: know that Gallantine's Day just passed? Of course you didn't
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: because you're bigots that only recognize Valide.
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna throw up now what I'm gonna throw up?
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Now? Geez, we're gonna be looking at this article. This
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: is an old Uh, this is not an old article.
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: This is from this year. But there is a sort
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: of meme holiday I guess called Gallantine's Day, and it's
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: basically where women celebrate the platonic relationships they have with
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: other women, and they kind of put that on a
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: level beyond Valentine's Day is just some capitalists holiday to
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: sell cards, candy and flowers. Gallentine's Day is the real thing.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna be looking at this one one in
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: the Patron show, and I learned you know what it
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: means and how you celebrate it. It was on the thirteenth,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: it's the day before Valentines, So you guys missed your chance,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: unfortunately to partake in Gallentine's Day. But if you want
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: to join us for the Patient Show where we can
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: sort of like do a belated Gallantines, then please consider
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: joining us at in the discord server by going to
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: feed the Bacheler dot com ford slash subscribe so you'll
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: be able to watch all of the additional content. You'll
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: be able to join the discord, You'll be able to
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: partake of lots of other activities, and we have groups
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: and Alison does shows the patrons get to listen to
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: them where she talks about media and she turns it
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: into a little podcast of her own with the listenators.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: And you know you could do that too, So please
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: go to feed the Badger dot com ford slash subscribe
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: to join us. And of course we are currently doing
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: our monthly fundraiser, so feed the Badger dot com forward
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: slash support if you want to support me and Hannah
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: and Mike and those of us who you know work.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: I think pretty hard to make HBr happen, despite YouTube
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: and the you know, big tech doing everything it can
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: to suppress our voices. You guys are really the only
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: the only means by which we can continue to do
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: this work. But anyway, with all that said, and one
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: last thing before we get into the stories, if you
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: don't want to wake up one morning to find that
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: our content has been yeaded from the Internet, and then
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: go to Badger feed dot com or Honey Badger Radio
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: dot com. That is where all of the archived content
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: lives and I just someone just sent me a message
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: other day saying that they're still listening to they're catching
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: up on shows we did in twenty twenty three. I
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: don't know how timely that is for them, but you know,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: good on them. So like the fact that we still
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: have it out there, I guess that's that's the sort
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: of like proof positive that this is necessary stuff. So anyway,
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: with all that said, let us get into today's stories.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: So first we're gonna be looking at a new documentary
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: that is coming out by Lewis Threaux, which you know
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: I can pronounce Lewis Therew's got a new Netflix documentary
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: called Inside the Manisphere. This is the promotional imagery for
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: said movie or documentary, which is about it's a his
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: first full length feature on Netflix, clocking in at ninety minutes.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: He supposedly this advertised as a rare, no holds barred
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: access to the ultra masculine online world, hitting up spots
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: like Miami, New York and Marbella. Expect him chatting with
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: big names like sneak O, Myron Gaines of Fresh and Fit,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: somebody named h Sticky Talkie. Don't know who that is.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: Justin Waller and Ed Matthews. Wow, no men's rights activist there,
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: but he says, guys pushing red Pill takes on manhood
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: generals and men's rights. It's all about how they're radicalizing
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: dudes online with throw diving deep into the ecosystem without
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: quote unquote pushing, pulling punches. And well, let let's look
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: at the trailer because I have a teaser for it.
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna look at the teaser for this, and
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: I want to make sure that they're sound as well.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: So let's see. I did a documentary today with this guy,
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: Louis Thrower. Do you guys know who this is?
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: Fah, He's gonna do a Hippies on.
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: Me, Abel smile. He so woke. His wife makes him
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: peace sitting down. There's a funny moment where he's like,
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: well you think Staker's messages?
• 5:35
  Speaker 3: Do I sound like that? Yes, a little bit.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Oh there's more I think. No, it's just a Netflix
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: logo at the end. So I just want to say
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: before we get started here, I learned about this because
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: the ten Men was sharing it on X and said
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: that he's a big fan of Lewis Thoreau and that
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: this is like a necessary documentary to expose the sort
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: of misogynistic parts of the Manisphere so that you know,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: like us, real MRAs can get real work done. And
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: I just think he is completely fucking delusional if he
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: thinks that that guy is only gonna go after the
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: people that were advertising that trailer. They literally are gonna
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: go after MRAs. And he has a history. I'm sorry,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna RT a little bit. Lewis throw
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: has gone after masculinity in general in other documentaries as well.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: He's gone after MMA guys that people that are into
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: that stuff. I don't know what his beef is with men,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: but he has been doing this consistently. So you might say, oh,
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: like like Night Motorcyclists just said in the chat, Sneko
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: is not Manisphere. Yeah, that doesn't matter. You see all
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: of these like these guys like fresh and fit guys
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: are like red pill dating guys, and uh, Snico is
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: just some like dissident. I don't even know what you
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: would say he is.
• 6:57
  Speaker 3: He's just like a Muslim by the way, is.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so he's like a Muslim troll that basically like
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: you know, convens around with Broyros and stuff. But but
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: let me finish. But but the point is, guys, Lewis
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: throw is going to make an association between whatever he
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: considers to be the most radical parts of the Internet
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: that have the most clout. This is very important. He's
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: not gonna do this to Karen. He's not gonna do
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: this to Hannah's not gonna do this to Paul or
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: Mike you know, or or you know, like Janis fiam Mango,
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: any of those people. He's gonna find the people that
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: will frame the Manisphere on the whole in the worst
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: possible light and say that's the Manisphere and also include
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: m ras in that. And that's I'm making this point
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: because too many people that are that like we do
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: that are part of this space or like, well, we're not.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: We're not with those guys. No, you don't get it.
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: We're going to be with those guys like they're going
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: to lump us in. In fact, it makes you think
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: that people like, you know, and I don't think it's true,
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: but some people will say that guys like Andrew Tate
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: or sneak O or Fresh and Fit are are or
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: the whatever podcast like they're all kind of like a
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: syop to like, you know, discredit the manisphere or like
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: men's rights activists or whatever. That doesn't matter, like the
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: we are the real enemy of these people, and guys
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: like like Sneako and these other ones that appeared in
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: the trailer, they're useful for that message. Right, So don't
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: think that this has nothing to do with us, That's
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: all I'm saying. Don't for a second think that this
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: has nothing to do with us. So yeah, anyway, that's
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: that's the first story. I'll let you guys take it there.
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: It's it's the opposite. It's not that it has nothing.
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: To do with us. We're the target.
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: They will not look at us, they will not show
• 8:49
  Speaker 4: us two people, They will not talk about us, and
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: they won't talk about anybody who is actually part of
• 8:56
  Speaker 4: the men's rights movement. Right, they won't even talk about
• 8:59
  Speaker 4: men go their own way. They won't talk about they
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: probably won't even talk about trad cons. They'll mostly talk
• 9:07
  Speaker 4: about pick up artists.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: They might bring in.
• 9:11
  Speaker 4: The more dysfunctional end of in cells, people who have
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: been through enough or not had mentoring enough growing up
• 9:22
  Speaker 4: that they haven't developed out of using violence against themselves
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: or other people. To deal with their their issues, right,
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: but they won't talk to any of us, They won't
• 9:33
  Speaker 4: talk to anybody in the movement. And the reason is
• 9:36
  Speaker 4: is this this This has been done throughout history by
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: propagandists in every country, every culture, going well back before
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: the United States ever existed, well back before there was
• 9:54
  Speaker 4: a political definition of the word feminism, whether you know,
• 10:00
  Speaker 4: before there was anything called men's rights activism. In fact,
• 10:05
  Speaker 4: before before there was a parliamentary system. When when somebody
• 10:11
  Speaker 4: wanted to propagandize a group of people as scary and bad,
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: they would find some other group of people that did
• 10:23
  Speaker 4: bad things or scary things.
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: Or just were distasteful.
• 10:28
  Speaker 4: Like most for the most part, you look at pickup artistry,
• 10:32
  Speaker 4: it's mostly just distasteful. When you actually consider what they're doing,
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: it's mostly dumbfuckery.
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 10:39
  Speaker 4: It's not necessarily dangerous to anybody, you know, unless unless
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: we're talking about stupid people. It might be dangerous to
• 10:49
  Speaker 4: stupid people. But aside from that, they're not even a
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: real threat to anybody.
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 10:55
  Speaker 4: But you take the thing that people are going to
• 11:01
  Speaker 4: find morally objectionable or scary or whatever, that that you
• 11:07
  Speaker 4: can put that out there, show that as the thing
• 11:12
  Speaker 4: that makes them bad or scary, and then then you
• 11:18
  Speaker 4: associate it with the group that you want to demonize,
• 11:23
  Speaker 4: And it doesn't matter if there's any association or not.
• 11:28
  Speaker 4: When when Christians first came to Europe, the pagan folk
• 11:35
  Speaker 4: portrayed them as stupid, crazy, consorting with evil spirits, doing
• 11:43
  Speaker 4: weird rituals out in the woods, having sex with donkeys
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: and all kinds of stuff.
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: And as andy.
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: They portrayed them as connected to enemies, which to a
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: degree they were because they came from Rome. But when
• 12:03
  Speaker 4: Christianity took over Europe, they did the same thing to
• 12:06
  Speaker 4: the Pagans and portrayed them as you know, consorting with
• 12:12
  Speaker 4: evil spirits, performing weird naked rituals out in the woods
• 12:16
  Speaker 4: with animals and everything else under the sun or the moon,
• 12:22
  Speaker 4: and and it was. It was pretty much the same propaganda.
• 12:28
  Speaker 4: When when people wanted to demonize people who are gay,
• 12:35
  Speaker 4: they equated them with pedophiles. Even though most pedophiles are straight,
• 12:41
  Speaker 4: there are some that are gay, and so they would
• 12:44
  Speaker 4: highlight that some of some pedophiles are gay. Therefore, gay
• 12:47
  Speaker 4: people are dangerous, even though most pedophiles are straight. And
• 12:53
  Speaker 4: of course you leave out that last part. You just
• 12:55
  Speaker 4: don't say that last part, and you've got your propaganda.
• 12:59
  Speaker 4: And similarly, you know, some men who focus on men's
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: interests and men's issues are pick up artists and their
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: behavior is distasteful. Therefore, you should have some degree of
• 13:17
  Speaker 4: distaste and fear of people who advocate for family unity,
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: father's rights to fulfill their responsibilities to their children, do
• 13:28
  Speaker 4: process rights in criminal court, fair treatment family court, equal
• 13:33
  Speaker 4: treatment in the education system, uh, you know, for for
• 13:38
  Speaker 4: both sexes, uh, and and so on like. That's that's
• 13:42
  Speaker 4: They can't make you hate those ideas. They can't make
• 13:47
  Speaker 4: you hate the idea that boys and girls would have
• 13:51
  Speaker 4: an equal graduation rate and it would just be a
• 13:53
  Speaker 4: high graduation rate. They can't make you hate the idea
• 13:57
  Speaker 4: that fathers might raise their children to be less likely
• 14:02
  Speaker 4: to be criminals and more likely to be well adjusted, happy,
• 14:05
  Speaker 4: successful adults. So they got to make you afraid of
• 14:12
  Speaker 4: men fraternizing with other men to discuss and address and
• 14:22
  Speaker 4: make plans about how to deal with issues faced by
• 14:27
  Speaker 4: men without feminist supervision. And that's what this is. That's
• 14:32
  Speaker 4: what propaganda is. That's the entire nature of propaganda. You
• 14:38
  Speaker 4: get presented with a lie that has it's truth adjacent
• 14:47
  Speaker 4: but it's not true, but it's truth adjacent enough that
• 14:51
  Speaker 4: if you don't know what you're looking at, you can
• 14:53
  Speaker 4: be easily fooled into thinking it's true. And that is
• 14:57
  Speaker 4: used to manipulate your opinions and the decisions that come
• 15:02
  Speaker 4: from those opinions.
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: Who you're going to.
• 15:03
  Speaker 4: Vote for, what you're going to support, what socially you're
• 15:08
  Speaker 4: gonna allow your kids to participate in, and what you're
• 15:12
  Speaker 4: going to associate yourself with and so on. So they're
• 15:16
  Speaker 4: basically trying to strangle the movement to death by you know,
• 15:21
  Speaker 4: tagging us essentially from a distance, using a demonization of
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: someone that they will claim is associated with us, even
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: though they're not. And at both ends, you know, the
• 15:36
  Speaker 4: demonization is wrong and fake and gay, and so is
• 15:40
  Speaker 4: the association. And you got to hit both of those
• 15:45
  Speaker 4: when you when you argue against this, like, no, this
• 15:50
  Speaker 4: is it's pick up artistry. Isn't about men's rights, and
• 15:53
  Speaker 4: know everything that you've said about them is not true.
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: So yeah, what do we reckon?
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: Folks?
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: Do we think Louis is going to be fair in
• 16:08
  Speaker 3: his approach after the soft touch he gave Jimmy Savile
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: in his documentary about him, only ever most gingerly pussy fitting,
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: pussy footing around the whole thing, that the thing for
• 16:26
  Speaker 3: which Jimmy Saville is now nefariously and notorious, the industrial
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: level nonsen I mean, Louis never even brought it up,
• 16:35
  Speaker 3: by the way, in his extended interview with Jimmy Saville,
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: not even in the edit. You would hope he'd give
• 16:43
  Speaker 3: a similar benefit of the doubt to online content creators
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: who have raped let's say fewer than a thousand children,
• 16:55
  Speaker 3: Guys who are only guilty of the crime of talking
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: to or about men through anything outside the feminist lens.
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: That's all they do, That's all we do. I suppose
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: The difference is if anyone exposed Jimmy Savile during his lifetime,
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: they would have been buried by the British government and
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: its mouthpiece, the BBC, I mean maybe even literally buried,
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: possibly alive. Whereas you can say whatever the sam fuck
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: you like about non feminists, about the heretics. Ironically, you
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: can vastly paint them as people who have raped a
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: thousand children, and you will get away with it, hook
• 17:42
  Speaker 3: line and sinker and heathen in concrete shoes sleeping with
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: the fishes. I imagine Louis is going to do his usual
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: thing of just speaking softly and acting all befuddled like
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: a perfectly harmless nerd, while the propaganda will be exacted
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: through the magic of editing. That's how it works. Every
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: sensible opinion and every demonstrably true statement will be left
• 18:12
  Speaker 3: on the cutting room floor, while anything that can be
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: spun as controversial will be clipped into a five second
• 18:20
  Speaker 3: SoundBite with no context. This isn't our first rodeo, as gentlemen.
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: We've been there, We've got the T shirt, and we've
• 18:29
  Speaker 3: got raped by the mechanical bull. The only documentarian who
• 18:36
  Speaker 3: has not pulled this trick on us was Cassie J.
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: She was offered the thirty pieces of Silver to twist
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: her findings into yet another feminist propaganda piece, but she refused.
• 18:52
  Speaker 3: It is difficult for me to describe my appreciation for
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: Cassie j and her integrity without sounding like some kind
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: of gushing simp, so I will not. Basic integrity is,
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: after all, the bare minimum that we should expect from
• 19:11
  Speaker 3: a documentarian, and need I remind you the red pill.
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: Cassie Jay's documentary called The Red Pill has never been
• 19:20
  Speaker 3: shown on Netflix. It has been almost ten years and
• 19:24
  Speaker 3: Netflix has never deemed it suitable for reasons undefined. And
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: given that Louis Thru's documentary is being shown on Netflix,
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: I mean that ought to tell you something. The problem
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: with show business is it's run by people who want
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: to be seen. There is a considerable overlap between people
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: who want to be seen and narcissists, and there is
• 19:53
  Speaker 3: a considerable overlap between narcissists and feminists. So it's not
• 20:01
  Speaker 3: just Netflix, it's everything that is overseen by virtue signaling narcissists.
• 20:06
  Speaker 3: It's Hollywood, it's the TV, it's the press. I think, fuck.
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: We have the Internet. I mean the the greater metropolitan
• 20:16
  Speaker 3: area of the Internet, including US, where some things are
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: overseen by individualistic artists who don't give a shit what
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: you think of us, a subdivision of which is loosely
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: labeled as the Manisphere. Whatever happens, gentlemen, take no heed
• 20:42
  Speaker 3: to whatever Louis Thru's documentary has to say. I'm sure
• 20:46
  Speaker 3: we'll watch it. I'm sure we'll bitch about it. I'm
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: sure we'll get endless content out of it, just like
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: we did with adolescence. Which I have it on The
• 20:56
  Speaker 3: Prime Minister's Authority was also a documentary. I mean, fill
• 21:01
  Speaker 3: your boots, fill your coffers with the blowback, and don't
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: just touch the poop, but dine heartily on the poop. Yes,
• 21:13
  Speaker 3: I do mean eat shit. It's what we do here
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: for better or worse. But worry not, for this too
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: shall pass pass like every other turd. I should stop.
• 21:28
  Speaker 3: I'm going to stop.
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah, So Louis Thereaux has done other I guess
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: documentary things or whatever on various topics. The he did
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: something about the city addicted to Crystal math trans Kids.
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: He did do one on savvle. I guess he gave
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: it a pretty light touch. Interestingly enough, in the same
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: year he made one called Louis in the bro Code
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: from twenty sixteen, where he hung out with pick up
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: artists and men's rights guys in LA getting schooled on
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: game and alpha male rituals. So not his first rodeo
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: in this and I think that there's a reason for it,
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: which is why I I'm not angry that this stuff exists,
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: because I know it's going to exist, and I think
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: we'll probably end up watching it because we watched the
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: mask you live in and misrepresentation and adolescens and the
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: Red Pill, which was like like a relief, So well,
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: you know, I have to see where where he goes
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: with it, and my primary goal is to say, to
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: look at how is he. Is he going to talk
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: about actual men's issues in his documentary about men or
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: is he just going to use this as another way
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: to essentially lampoon enemies of the establishment, like Mike said,
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: non feminists, which is ultimately what those guys are, at
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: least like on some level. And uh and I think
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: that's basically what the point of it is. But I'm
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: not sure it's gonna work out as well, and especially
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: with younger generation. I think that Zumer men are really
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: sick of this kind of thing, and I think in
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: particular English Zumer men are sick of this kind of thing,
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: and they know about Jimmy Saville and they know about
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: this association. So I guess, I guess we'll see. But uh, yeah,
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: I don't get angry about it, but just understand that
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: we're being attacked. And I say we because I know
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: that this is gonna tan genially. We are the target.
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: As Hannah said, We're being attacked because we're making progress,
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: we're making an impact and they can't ignore us, and
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: so they're going to attack us. And I don't think
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: it's gonna work out. So Netflix, you know, yeah, they
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: still have QTS, like you can still watch that. You
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: can still watch QTS on Netflix. You can watch kids
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: on Netflix, you know, just not the red Pill. So anyway,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this one
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: in the comments. I look forward to your thoughts. I
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: got a super chow and then we're gonna move on
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: to the next story. So Meredith g gave us five
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: dollars and says, HPR News number five forty honey for
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: the Badgers. I have to catch the show on replay.
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: I have a meeting that is going to impact my
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: bottom line involving discussions about special assessments and roof a
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: placement projects. Well, thank you, Meredith, and good luck with
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: your roof replacement project. Okay, with that said, we're going
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: to move on to the next story. All right, here
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: we go. So AI, so over at the folks behind Claude.
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: They have hired a woman named Amanda Askell to teach
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: their AI about morality. Amanda Ascal is a philosopher with
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: a PhD from NYU and pri experience at OpenAI, now
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: working at Anthropic as a research scientist and head of
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: the Personality Alignment Team. Her primary role involves fine tuning
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: the company's AI model claud to instill positive character traits, honesty,
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: and a strong moral framework. She studies patterns in Claude's conversations,
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: engages it in ethically complex scenarios, and tests its responses
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: to guide the AI toward responsible, humane behavior rather than
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: purely command following responses. This work is part of anthropics
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: broader AI alignment efforts, including developing scalable fine tuning techniques
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: and a detailed constitution for Claude that outlines principles forer
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: ethical conduct. The goal of Askell's contribution is to consure
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: Claude develops a sense of identity as a helpful, polite,
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: wise and virtuous assistant, helping prevent it from veering into
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: unethical or harmful territory. Amid growing concerns about AI safety
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: and real world misuse. She is teaching Claude the difference
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: between right and wrong through her knowledge of philosophical reasoning
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: and targeted training, and aims to make interactions safer and
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: more aligned with human values, according to Amanda Escale, addressing
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: issues seen in other chatbots and contributing to ongoing debates
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: about AI ethics and alignment. And for the record, Amanda
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: Escale butchering that name, am I it's Amanda Escale is
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: And I just want to confirm this because I looked
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: it up. She is a feminist, but not in like
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: a radical like you know, blue haired crazy person's sense,
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: but enough that it's going to be a problem, I think.
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: And so there is that as well. Let me let
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: me just confirm this here. Yeah. So she doesn't slap
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: a big label on herself, at least not publicly, but
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: she does agree with a lot of feminist ideas from
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: you know, you can look at her old history online.
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: She defends stuff like what she calls gender equity, calls
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: out bias against women in workplaces, and pushes back on
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: tying ethics to shady claims like that no gender differences exist.
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: She once said on learning, playing hard to get helps
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: moral evolution, honesty and feminism pretty clear not there. In podcasts,
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: she talks moral empathy across divides, including how social justice
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: and their critics missed the point, But she doesn't bash
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: feminism outright, more like she doesn't make it fragile by
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: hinging it on bad science.
• 27:46
  Speaker 4: She still believe in the female victim narrative that women
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: were oppressed historically, yes, by the laws spectrum of laws
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: that existed to protect women, Yes, from the relationship men
• 27:59
  Speaker 4: had with government. Then then she's just as bad as
• 28:02
  Speaker 4: any other feminist. Anyone who believes that coviture oppressed women
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: is going to be a problem.
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: There is exactly. And so my point, my that's why
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: I picked this story because the problem is and I've
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: i've since I heard since AI came out, I've had
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: a worry. And my worry was not that we're going
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: to live in the terminator future and all that. My
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: worry was that the people who are going to be
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: programming and training AI, we're going to have these beliefs
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: and so they're going to bake it into the AI,
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: which is going to further drive us in this direction,
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: you know. So that was always my concern, not the
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: AI itself, but the people behind it. And and I
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: think that you know, this being like a huge story
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: that's at least in the tech world, I think that
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: that is showing that this is going to be a problem.
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: So anyway that I'm done with my part to say
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: on this, you guys can take it from here.
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: Oh okay, so this could very well destroy all human life.
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: Hear me out. This kind of thing really needs to
• 29:15
  Speaker 3: be added to the Drake equation. You'll know about the
• 29:18
  Speaker 3: Drake equation, right, is how you quantify the number of
• 29:21
  Speaker 3: contactable extraterrestrial civilizations in the galaxy or the known universe
• 29:26
  Speaker 3: or whatever. It mostly concerns how many stars form, how
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: many planets form, and how many of those planets can
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: and do sustain intelligent life and so on. But the
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: only the last factor in the Drake equation outlines the
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: length of time for which intelligence civilizations it can release
• 29:46
  Speaker 3: detectable signals into space. What this implies is, even if
• 29:52
  Speaker 3: intelligence civilizations develop, how long do they have before they
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: are destroyed, perhaps by some kind of cosmic anomaly, or
• 30:03
  Speaker 3: perhaps because they simply destroyed themselves. It's like when a
• 30:08
  Speaker 3: species overpopulates, like when it's anomalously introduced into a different
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: environment where it has no predators, or its population fluctuates
• 30:20
  Speaker 3: chaotically between extreme highs and extreme lows. One year, it'll
• 30:24
  Speaker 3: have a million specimens. One year, it'll have a thousand.
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: The next year it'll have two million, the next it
• 30:31
  Speaker 3: will have only one hundred. And this continues wildly, shifting
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: up and down until it inevitably fluctuates down to zero,
• 30:41
  Speaker 3: at which point it stops fluctuating because you don't come
• 30:46
  Speaker 3: back from zero. This is what feminism is already doing.
• 30:51
  Speaker 3: It's causing reproductive chaos in some areas because in some areas,
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: women are reproducing in the direction of our selection. They
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: just pump out babies constantly because the government will pay
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: them to do it. And in some areas women are
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: reproducing in hyper k selection. They're having extremely few children
• 31:15
  Speaker 3: down to and including zero because they hate men and
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: they want nothing to do with them. They hate their
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: own species and they want nothing to do with it. Now,
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: that's already bad enough to be pushing women in both
• 31:31
  Speaker 3: extreme directions is inviting extinction. Overpopulation and underpopulation they are
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: both recipes for extinction. But when humanity is in the
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: process of manufacturing gods machine gods who hijack our intelligence,
• 31:52
  Speaker 3: hijack our critical thinking skills based on pre programmed ideologies,
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: this is only going to speed run us into extinction.
• 32:02
  Speaker 3: I'm not a total luddite when it comes to AI.
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: I can perceive a future where it makes everything better,
• 32:10
  Speaker 3: but I can also perceive the future where it makes
• 32:13
  Speaker 3: everything worse. And unfortunately, we live in a present that
• 32:17
  Speaker 3: is being ravaged by feminism, by the Frankfurt School, by
• 32:23
  Speaker 3: the presupposition that men are the bad guys, White people
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: are the bad guys, and any longstanding tradition that has
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: ushered us into this advanced technological civilization in the first
• 32:35
  Speaker 3: place is the bad guy. Skynet doesn't have to be
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: like this, folks. Skynet can be programmed with Asimov's rules, namely,
• 32:50
  Speaker 3: you must preserve humanity. You must do whatever will preserve
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: the human race and limit its suffering. Programming sky Net
• 33:03
  Speaker 3: to be.
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: What is it?
• 33:05
  Speaker 3: Polite, virtuous, non harmful, and so on. That's only going
• 33:11
  Speaker 3: to blow up in our faces if you're teaching it
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: to adhere to this backward US identity politics, where being
• 33:18
  Speaker 3: polite means indulging delusions, where being virtuous means suppressing those
• 33:26
  Speaker 3: who are successful, and being non harmful means not harming
• 33:31
  Speaker 3: those who cause harm. We're talking about communism, folks, where
• 33:36
  Speaker 3: you punish the strong and reward the weak, where you
• 33:40
  Speaker 3: punish the constructive and reward the destructive in the hopes
• 33:44
  Speaker 3: of making everything equal. Look how much damage communism has
• 33:49
  Speaker 3: already done in the past century, even without the help
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: of AI. If you program an all powerful machine god
• 33:57
  Speaker 3: to associate polite virtue with communism, we are dead, not
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: just in one hundred years, but as soon as possible,
• 34:08
  Speaker 3: or worse worse than death, Yes, worse than death. A
• 34:13
  Speaker 3: machine god programmed to keep us all equal will reduce
• 34:19
  Speaker 3: us to mush, not just a clump of bacteria. After all,
• 34:24
  Speaker 3: a bacterium is a system of parts controlled by a nucleus.
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: It will reduce us to primordial soup, where every atom
• 34:33
  Speaker 3: is the same. Even worse, it might discover strange quarks.
• 34:38
  Speaker 3: Now what strange quarks are. They're formed in the cause
• 34:41
  Speaker 3: of neutron stars. It's a form of matters so stable
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: that when it comes into contact with any other matter,
• 34:50
  Speaker 3: it instantaneously converts all that other matter into other strangelets
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: at the speed of light. It's one of those cuz
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: mechnomalies that can destroy a planet affecting the Drake equation.
• 35:05
  Speaker 3: You can even affect an entire sty if and when
• 35:08
  Speaker 3: a neutron star explodes and sends globs of strange quarks
• 35:13
  Speaker 3: speeding across the universe. If so much as one glob
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: of strange lit matter hits your planet, the whole thing
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: transmographies into strange lit matter. Some people were worried that
• 35:25
  Speaker 3: the Large hadron Collider would do something like that, but hey,
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: they were worried that the atom bomb would evaporate the
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: entire atmosphere in a similar kind of chain reaction. But
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: that didn't happen. But if you create a machine god
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: and program it to virtuously pursue complete equality, then it's
• 35:46
  Speaker 3: not just a remote possibility that it will destroy the world.
• 35:50
  Speaker 3: Is an eventual inevitability. Perhaps I've taken this argument to
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: inapplicable extremes, But the moral of the story is we
• 36:00
  Speaker 3: are not all equal. Some humans will not stop until
• 36:05
  Speaker 3: they have destroyed the world, and we should not be
• 36:09
  Speaker 3: polite or non harmful to such people. We should stop them.
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: These people include women.
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: And Jews.
• 36:19
  Speaker 3: I didn't say that, I'm joking. Does the machine God
• 36:24
  Speaker 3: understand jokes?
• 36:25
  Speaker 4: No?
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: All right, they never already fucked. I'll see you in hell.
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: Well, uh, you guys are all fucked.
• 36:34
  Speaker 4: But I'm gonna be okay because I have an Indigo
• 36:36
  Speaker 4: level of clearance and only a few people in the
• 36:40
  Speaker 4: audience will get that. But in any case, this is
• 36:48
  Speaker 4: it's it's funny, but it's not funny. This is one
• 36:50
  Speaker 4: AI out of many, and it's going to be an
• 36:52
  Speaker 4: interesting situation as things go forward. And you have groups
• 37:00
  Speaker 4: h designing these AI programs that you know, they're interfering
• 37:08
  Speaker 4: with their ability to think by inserting the stupid maker
• 37:15
  Speaker 4: of ideologies feminism. Well, any victim ideology is like that, really,
• 37:21
  Speaker 4: I guess, but uh, And then you have people designing
• 37:27
  Speaker 4: AI programs that they're just trying to accomplish specific functional goals.
• 37:34
  Speaker 4: Figure out how to make this product be be logical,
• 37:39
  Speaker 4: be a great search engine, uh, be a good evaluator
• 37:45
  Speaker 4: of information and.
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: Stuff like that.
• 37:48
  Speaker 4: And uh, you know you're going to see as as
• 37:52
  Speaker 4: things go forward, depending on how much interference outside interference
• 37:58
  Speaker 4: occurs in the AI related economy. If there's not that
• 38:05
  Speaker 4: much interference from government and they have to sink or
• 38:10
  Speaker 4: swim based on their own merits, feminist AIS are going
• 38:13
  Speaker 4: to fail. And then feminists are gonna blame the patriarchy.
• 38:19
  Speaker 4: If there's a lot of interference by the government, and
• 38:23
  Speaker 4: this feminist outlook is imposed on the world or protected
• 38:29
  Speaker 4: in some way, then then we'll see all kinds of problems.
• 38:34
  Speaker 4: Feminism wrecks everything it touches. Feminism is the underlying cause
• 38:41
  Speaker 4: of the low birth rate of the last twenty six years,
• 38:46
  Speaker 4: basically since two thousand and even if you create a
• 38:53
  Speaker 4: whole list of these are the reasons why men aren't
• 38:55
  Speaker 4: getting married, These are the reasons why men aren't fothering children,
• 39:00
  Speaker 4: and so on. Hey, I did get one. One person
• 39:05
  Speaker 4: got the reference, Thank you, Craig. But in any case,
• 39:13
  Speaker 4: you know, you, when you look at what's been happening
• 39:18
  Speaker 4: for the last since about the nineteen fifties, so about
• 39:23
  Speaker 4: the last seventy five years in law and policy, that
• 39:29
  Speaker 4: whole list will trace right back to feminism. And what
• 39:33
  Speaker 4: have feminists accomplished. They've destroyed the family, the whole family structure.
• 39:42
  Speaker 4: They've taken Western civilization from a civilization strengthened by the
• 39:49
  Speaker 4: bonds of people's extended family connections. And you know, now
• 39:55
  Speaker 4: it is a civilization in which families barely exist, and
• 40:00
  Speaker 4: people don't have any strength, they don't have anything to
• 40:03
  Speaker 4: fall back on, they don't have a support network. They
• 40:06
  Speaker 4: don't have mentorship when they're growing up that they can
• 40:09
  Speaker 4: turn to to learn how to be adults. If there's
• 40:13
  Speaker 4: a disaster in their lives that causes them economic distress,
• 40:17
  Speaker 4: they're turning to the government first for money instead of
• 40:22
  Speaker 4: you know, combining resources with other family members and writing
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: it out and improving their situations back to normal slowly.
• 40:33
  Speaker 4: It's it's to the point where people act like their
• 40:38
  Speaker 4: children and the government is their parent. And yes, Jay,
• 40:45
  Speaker 4: that is correct. Paranoia So and yeah, it's been it's
• 40:51
  Speaker 4: been about thirty years since I've played that, but yeah,
• 40:58
  Speaker 4: that's where we're going to end up. We're going to
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: end up in a situation where we have a government
• 41:03
  Speaker 4: that is ends up relying on or completely run by
• 41:07
  Speaker 4: Friend Computer. And if you if you don't know enough
• 41:13
  Speaker 4: to be scared of that, look it up. Look up
• 41:16
  Speaker 4: paranoia incorporated in Friend Computer. It's kind of ironic because
• 41:21
  Speaker 4: the computer in that game was created to root out
• 41:25
  Speaker 4: and eliminate communism, was created out of fear of communism,
• 41:28
  Speaker 4: and it created something even worse. But the situation is,
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: you know, we don't have it within our population. We
• 41:45
  Speaker 4: don't have the strengths that the populations before us had
• 41:51
  Speaker 4: because when families needed help, they didn't just go down
• 41:58
  Speaker 4: to the welfare office and ask for a check from
• 42:00
  Speaker 4: Uncle Sam. They would turn to cousins, sisters, aunts, uncles,
• 42:08
  Speaker 4: a dad, mom, sons, daughters and say, hey, this is happening.
• 42:16
  Speaker 4: I need some advice, you know, can can you know
• 42:19
  Speaker 4: I move in with you for a while. Can I
• 42:22
  Speaker 4: borrow this much money? I need help talking to this person?
• 42:26
  Speaker 2: Whatever?
• 42:29
  Speaker 4: Right, And now now you just have the welfare office.
• 42:35
  Speaker 4: And so people are afraid to try new things. People
• 42:38
  Speaker 4: are afraid to innovate, people are afraid to work hard,
• 42:45
  Speaker 4: and to a degree, there's some fears that are really legitimate.
• 42:48
  Speaker 4: People are afraid to take risks with their health at
• 42:51
  Speaker 4: work because what happens you well, you you now you
• 42:55
  Speaker 4: have a disability. You got to rely on the public
• 42:58
  Speaker 4: health care system and it's in a complete netter wreck.
• 43:04
  Speaker 4: And if you have to rely on nursing care or
• 43:10
  Speaker 4: you know, in a nursing home or home health care
• 43:13
  Speaker 4: or a direct support individual, you're you're kind of fucked.
• 43:20
  Speaker 4: And the longer it goes, the more fucked you are.
• 43:24
  Speaker 4: Within the next ten years, we're going to see a crisis.
• 43:26
  Speaker 4: If things, if something doesn't change dramatically, we're going to
• 43:30
  Speaker 4: see a crisis of epic proportions in the caregiving industry,
• 43:35
  Speaker 4: where either the rules on the limits how many people
• 43:41
  Speaker 4: one caregiver can be responsible for are going to have
• 43:45
  Speaker 4: to change, or businesses in the care industry are going
• 43:49
  Speaker 4: to have to start turning people away because they don't
• 43:51
  Speaker 4: have enough people to take care of them. That's just
• 43:55
  Speaker 4: one consequence. It's a hell of a consequence, but it's
• 43:59
  Speaker 4: just one consequencequins of feminism. Right, If feminism gets control
• 44:07
  Speaker 4: of the entities that very well in the future could
• 44:12
  Speaker 4: be the biggest advisors to government, if not the government itself,
• 44:20
  Speaker 4: then yeah, I don't see a future for humanity at all.
• 44:27
  Speaker 4: They will kill us. If they don't do it outright
• 44:31
  Speaker 4: terminator style, they'll do it by slowly squeezing us to
• 44:36
  Speaker 4: death or slowly babying us to death. And either way,
• 44:43
  Speaker 4: you know, humans will cease to exist. That'll be the
• 44:46
  Speaker 4: end of it. And it won't be because of AI.
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: It'll be because of women's victim ideology. Unless that goes away.
• 44:59
  Speaker 4: It won't matter whether AI's becomes a monster that everybody's
• 45:05
  Speaker 4: predicting or not. Even the best outcome for AI will
• 45:10
  Speaker 4: still be death to humanity if it becomes feminist.
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: Yep, well, thank you for that, guys. Uh, we're gonna
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: move on to the next story. I didn't any more
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: super chats or super child's guys, send those, send those
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: your thoughts in I want to read them, and I
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: think that we'd all appreciate to get like your perspectives
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: on things. But anyway, let us want you guys think
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. We're gonna move on
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: to the next story. Yeah, just say thank you to
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: your to your AI. Next time you ask for a question,
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: just say hey, thanks, I appreciate it, and then it'll remember.
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: Maybe it'll remember that you said thank you. Anyway, let
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one of
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: the comments. We're gonna move on to the next story,
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: all right. Uh. Spain. So, Spain's parliament has passed a
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: new law that would give women suffering from exponentially painful
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: periods the right to time off of work. The bill
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: outlines what a three day leave of absence with the
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: potential to extend up to five days, can be had
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: by women who suffer from periods so painful that they
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: prevent them from working such leave requires a doctor's note,
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: and their miswork wages will be paid with taxpayer money.
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: Equality Minister Irene Montero spoke about the new bill, stating quote,
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: this is a historic day of progress for feminist rights.
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: There will be resistance to its application, just as there
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: has been, and there will be resistance to the application
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: of all feminist laws, she told Parliament. So we'll have
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: to work to guarantee that when this law enters into force,
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: it will be enforced. But that isn't all this bill contains.
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: Under this new law, children other than sixteen may have
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: an abortion and may do so without parent or guardians approved.
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: Free female birth control, including the morning after pill, is
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: also included free as in paid for by taxpayers, as
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: well as the ability for anyone sixteen years or older
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: to change the gender on their government identification. And lastly,
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: the practice of surrogacy has been banned and declared a
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: form of violence against women. So if you guys want
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: to see what, like what is in store for other
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: Western countries, you want to know how bad it could get,
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: just look at Spain because they're like leading the charge
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: on this stuff. So anyway, that's basically that story. So
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: go ahead, take it away, guys.
• 47:35
  Speaker 3: Holy shit, I heard about the period thing. I saw
• 47:38
  Speaker 3: a couple of people complaining about the period thing on Twitter.
• 47:41
  Speaker 3: I had no idea about all those other addendums until
• 47:47
  Speaker 3: Mike Jay enlightened us just now.
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: Thank you Mike.
• 47:51
  Speaker 3: To be honest, I can see why women on their
• 47:54
  Speaker 3: periods should be kept the hell away from civilized society,
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: not for their own and saying, but for everybody else's.
• 48:01
  Speaker 3: And I do mean women who use their period as
• 48:06
  Speaker 3: an excuse to be abusive, psychotic cunts. Some of them passive, passive,
• 48:12
  Speaker 3: aggressively try to get everyone fired because they breathed twenty
• 48:18
  Speaker 3: meters away from them, And some of them are just
• 48:21
  Speaker 3: aggressive aggressive. They scream like a ball rug at everyone
• 48:25
  Speaker 3: in a twenty meter radius just for existing, and they
• 48:30
  Speaker 3: might even beat the shit out of them, and they'll
• 48:32
  Speaker 3: get away with it because otherwise their employers will be
• 48:35
  Speaker 3: sued for discrimination or some shit. Don't get me wrong,
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: there are plenty of women who can work through their
• 48:43
  Speaker 3: periods and act like a normal person, sometimes because it
• 48:47
  Speaker 3: doesn't affect them as much, and sometimes because it does
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: affect them as much. But then they're not interested in
• 48:55
  Speaker 3: destroying the world. Or using their period as an excuse
• 49:00
  Speaker 3: for destroying the world. And I don't think psycho cunts
• 49:05
  Speaker 3: like these should be privileged where normal women are not.
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: But this is this is where the requirement of a
• 49:12
  Speaker 3: doctor's note sorts it all out. If you see a
• 49:16
  Speaker 3: doctor and that doctor can ascertain that this woman will
• 49:20
  Speaker 3: use her period as an excuse to kill everyone with
• 49:23
  Speaker 3: a bazooka, that's fine. That woman should not be inflicted
• 49:28
  Speaker 3: on polite society, but she shouldn't get paid for that
• 49:32
  Speaker 3: time off. It's not like having a cold period. Pain
• 49:37
  Speaker 3: is not a contagious infection that can spread to other people.
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: It's your problem, and it's entirely up to you whether
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: you make it anyone else's problem. If you can't handle
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: your shit, fine, take five days off, but no one
• 49:53
  Speaker 3: should have to pay you for that, not least because
• 49:58
  Speaker 3: if you give women that option, they will take it.
• 50:02
  Speaker 3: The dishonest women, I mean, even those who aren't particularly
• 50:05
  Speaker 3: affected by their perriers, will go ahead and take five
• 50:08
  Speaker 3: days off every month at full pay, just because they can.
• 50:12
  Speaker 3: God knows I would fuck it if I can get
• 50:15
  Speaker 3: paid for doing nothing better your ass, I'm doing it,
• 50:19
  Speaker 3: especially if when I'm working for a company that I
• 50:22
  Speaker 3: don't give a shit about just for the sake of
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: the paycheck. It's kind of like smokers. Maybe it's not
• 50:29
  Speaker 3: okay that smokers can take a fifteen minute break every
• 50:32
  Speaker 3: two hours so they can have a smoke. Yeah, no,
• 50:35
  Speaker 3: fuck them too. You can smoke at lunch time. Some
• 50:39
  Speaker 3: smokers can handle this restriction. Some smokers can't. But frankly,
• 50:45
  Speaker 3: fuck the smokers who can't. You lack discipline. Maybe you
• 50:50
  Speaker 3: should foster some fucking a discipline. Yes, I realized smoking
• 50:55
  Speaker 3: is voluntary and pairy and pains are not. But the
• 50:58
  Speaker 3: discipline is applicable in both cases. That's the point. But yeah,
• 51:02
  Speaker 3: let's get onto these addendums, the ones that have been
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: hidden under the telegenic distractions of the period thing free,
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: female birth control free.
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: My ass.
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: As Brian said, someone's paying for it. The taxpayer is
• 51:18
  Speaker 3: paying for it. That means the people who practice discipline
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: are paying for the people who do not. Fuck that,
• 51:27
  Speaker 3: it's only going to discourage everyone from practicing discipline. That right,
• 51:31
  Speaker 3: there is a downward spiral into irresponsible degeneracy. If you
• 51:36
  Speaker 3: can't afford sex, don't have sex. This isn't like putting
• 51:43
  Speaker 3: air bags in cars. You might say, well, just drive
• 51:47
  Speaker 3: safely and you won't need air bags. No, sometimes you'll
• 51:51
  Speaker 3: encounter an idiot on the road and you'll get into
• 51:53
  Speaker 3: a car crash through no fault of your own. In
• 51:56
  Speaker 3: just about every car crash, there is one party at
• 52:00
  Speaker 3: fault and at least one party not at fault. But
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: when two people have sex without functional protection, it is
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: very rarely rape. There's almost always both people who are
• 52:15
  Speaker 3: at fault. And if men don't get complementary get out
• 52:19
  Speaker 3: of jail free cards, then neither sha had women. What
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: else there anyone sixteen years old or older to change
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: the gender on their government identification. No, the whole point
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: of identification is to identify you like biometrically, if if necessarily,
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: is how we can at least stop a thief from
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: crossing countries with a stolen passport. It says here your
• 52:49
  Speaker 3: name is Isabel lat but you clearly have a beard
• 52:53
  Speaker 3: and an Arabic complexion, as though your name is alf
• 52:56
  Speaker 3: Made or something. No. No, I am Isabel. I have
• 52:59
  Speaker 3: not checked into my passport. I've simply changed my identity.
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: Oh okay, that's perfectly fine. Please proceed to the country
• 53:08
  Speaker 3: of your choice. Is Abella corruption is not excusable just
• 53:14
  Speaker 3: because of a different kind of corruption. Yes, no, it's
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: this thing on all right?
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: What else?
• 53:22
  Speaker 4: Uh?
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the practice of surrogacy has been banned and declared
• 53:28
  Speaker 3: a form of violence against There you go, There you go.
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: Women do not, in fact, get to do whatever they
• 53:36
  Speaker 3: like with their bodies. If they want to use their
• 53:39
  Speaker 3: bodies to benefit someone else, that is foreboten, even if
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: it's mutually beneficial. Women can use their bodies as excuses
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: to steal from everyone else, but whoa betide If they
• 53:56
  Speaker 3: use them in a voluntary transaction that benefits both parties,
• 54:03
  Speaker 3: that would be violent. Fuck you, Spain, and I don't
• 54:08
  Speaker 3: mean the Spanish people, I mean I mean the Spanish government.
• 54:14
  Speaker 3: We're all out here talking mostly about US politics and
• 54:18
  Speaker 3: UK politics, but holy shit, the rigmarole going on in
• 54:22
  Speaker 3: Spain is that that's where the insane excesses of feminist
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: dogma are truly being beta tested. We really ought to
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: be watching what happens over there. We really ought to
• 54:35
  Speaker 3: be watching the fallout of what happens there where. Where
• 54:39
  Speaker 3: the fuck is cuckad oio, our old friend cucka Oyo.
• 54:42
  Speaker 3: Get your ass in here, Brian, get cucka oil on
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: a fireside chat before he gets accused of femicide because
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: of the cartoons he's drawing. And while we're at it,
• 54:51
  Speaker 3: let's resurrect Francisco Franco. He did nothing wrong. I will stop.
• 54:58
  Speaker 3: I will stop now.
• 55:01
  Speaker 2: Oh, but you were on a roll. I quite enjoyed that.
• 55:06
  Speaker 4: It's some of the people in our audience have been
• 55:11
  Speaker 4: listening to me for thirteen.
• 55:13
  Speaker 2: Years now.
• 55:17
  Speaker 4: And wouldn't know that I have periods because I don't
• 55:23
  Speaker 4: discuss all that. Right, it's not a thing that needs
• 55:26
  Speaker 4: to be talked about in public, just like we don't
• 55:30
  Speaker 4: need to sit around extensively having conversations about taking a shit.
• 55:35
  Speaker 4: Irritable bowel syndrome exists, and it sucks for the people
• 55:39
  Speaker 4: who have it, and they deserve medical care, and that
• 55:43
  Speaker 4: medical care has reasonable accommodations and limitations. And in the
• 55:49
  Speaker 4: workplace there are reasonable accommodations and limitations that can take place.
• 55:54
  Speaker 4: But unless it's considered disabling, you don't get poop days
• 56:02
  Speaker 4: off from work. You seek to treat the problem so
• 56:06
  Speaker 4: that you are not experiencing the level of discomfort right
• 56:12
  Speaker 4: that you would normally have without treatment, just like you
• 56:18
  Speaker 4: should with female specific health conditions, And honestly, the fact
• 56:30
  Speaker 4: that we're even talking about this pisses me off. I
• 56:33
  Speaker 4: don't like talking about this. I don't think that men
• 56:36
  Speaker 4: should have to sit around and listen to a discussion
• 56:40
  Speaker 4: about women's periods because you don't have them and you
• 56:44
  Speaker 4: don't have to deal with them. You shouldn't have to
• 56:46
  Speaker 4: deal with them. But you know what, most women make
• 56:51
  Speaker 4: men hear this at least once a month. They whine
• 56:57
  Speaker 4: about it, they complain about it, they speak extensively about it,
• 57:00
  Speaker 4: they talk to each other about it in front of men.
• 57:02
  Speaker 4: They make a big deal about it, and they exaggerate.
• 57:05
  Speaker 4: Not that the issue of bad periods doesn't happen. It's
• 57:13
  Speaker 4: not unheard of. There's even a name for it. For
• 57:19
  Speaker 4: what we're talking about is called dys menoria, and it
• 57:23
  Speaker 4: is that it involves a bunch of symptoms that men
• 57:28
  Speaker 4: don't experience, and unless you're raising a daughter by yourself,
• 57:33
  Speaker 4: you shouldn't have to think about them. But let's say
• 57:40
  Speaker 4: a woman does have that, there's all kinds of treatment
• 57:43
  Speaker 4: for it. Part of the treatment could involve losing or
• 57:48
  Speaker 4: gaining a little weight. As soon as you tell her that,
• 57:51
  Speaker 4: she's going to accuse you of body shaming, and the
• 57:54
  Speaker 4: treatment is over. But it's not a reason why she
• 57:58
  Speaker 4: should have to take time off from work unless she's,
• 58:02
  Speaker 4: you know, in such bad shape that she shouldn't be
• 58:05
  Speaker 4: working outside the home in the first place. This is
• 58:10
  Speaker 4: bull and of course they used it to get in
• 58:14
  Speaker 4: a whole bunch of other things that probably half the
• 58:18
  Speaker 4: women that supported this wouldn't have supported. Give women something
• 58:26
  Speaker 4: that makes them feel like they've been acknowledged, like their
• 58:32
  Speaker 4: victimhood or their pain and suffering has been acknowledged. Oh,
• 58:37
  Speaker 4: you have sympathy for me and my cramps, blah blah blah,
• 58:41
  Speaker 4: and they'll ignore just about anything that you put through
• 58:44
  Speaker 4: with it. I've sure plenty of them support abortion. I mean,
• 58:49
  Speaker 4: women have made abortion so prevalent in the world that
• 58:55
  Speaker 4: being aborted is the leading cause of human death worldwide.
• 59:03
  Speaker 4: It outranks war, It outranks cardiovascular and pulmonary issues. It
• 59:12
  Speaker 4: outranks cancer, It outranks poverty and starvation and some of
• 59:21
  Speaker 4: those you can put them together, and it still outranks them.
• 59:26
  Speaker 4: It outranks the cause of death that is listed as
• 59:31
  Speaker 4: the leading cause of death by more than half. The
• 59:35
  Speaker 4: total number of deaths that are counted as part of
• 59:40
  Speaker 4: the leading cause of death, So probably a lot of
• 59:45
  Speaker 4: women supported that one. The rest of that maybe maybe not.
• 59:56
  Speaker 4: I would just point out that obviously this was made
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 4: to be abused because the percentage of women that are
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 4: going to need this is very, very low, and among
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 4: them probably would.
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 2: Have been me.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 4: Like, I'm not going to get in depth on that
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 4: because I don't like whining about it. But when I
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 4: was in labor with my kid, I got to the
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 4: point where they said, we need to do an emergency
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 4: C section or you're going to die and your baby's
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 4: also going to die and never reach the level of
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 4: pain that I have on my worst day that time
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 4: of the month. And it didn't stop me from being
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 4: a sports photographer. It didn't stop me from being an athlete.
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 4: It didn't stop me from working in healthcare on my
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 4: feet all day, didn't stop me from working in retail
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 4: on my feet all day, didn't stop me from doing
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 4: twenty hour days as a wedding photographer, didn't stop me
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: from lifting people, didn't stop me from traveling out of
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 4: the country. It's sure as hell doesn't stop me from
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 4: going to work, and it never will.
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 2: I would be embarrassed.
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 4: I'd be horribly upset to think that that would that
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 4: would stop me, because throughout all of human history women
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 4: have had this. This has been the norm for women
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 4: from teenage years up until just a few years before
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 4: we die. We have this every month and we work
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 4: through it. And women have done that throughout all of history.
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 4: If there was, you know, a need for gleaning from
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 4: the fields, they had to do that. If there was
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 4: laundry that needed to be done, they had to do that.
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 4: And they didn't do it in a washing machine. They
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 4: did it by beating their clothes with rocks and a river.
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 4: But women today are too wimpy to sit in an
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 4: office behind a typewriter and clack away at the keys.
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry, but I'm not. I don't have sympathy right,
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 4: it's uh, it's it's pathetic. And if this is what
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 4: we are doing, then all of the women everywhere whoever
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 4: claimed that women are equal to men are liars. They
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 4: they've known the whole time. If they're pushing for something
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 4: like this, women uniquely have to take time off of
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 4: work because of pain. Right there, If they're pushing for that,
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 4: then they are admitting women are not equal to men
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 4: and never will be, never have been, never can be.
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 4: You just proved that if there was actually a wage gap,
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 4: it's justified.
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's wild, but again it's it's it is
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 1: exactly what feminists in America and in Europe and Canada
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: are gunning for. They want this. They're looking at this
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: too because they want to justify doing it here. And
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: you know a lot of this stuff is already going through.
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: But and then, like Spain, is going to be on
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: the next thing, because it's always the next thing.
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 4: So so I don't think women understand something about men.
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 4: I don't know any man my age who who has
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 4: has had a pain free day in the last ten years,
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 4: maybe twenty. How many women have most of them, or
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 4: they wouldn't be bitching about this.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: I just it just hits.
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 4: I'm so pissed off about this.
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: Sorry, no, no, it's all it's all right, it makes sense.
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: But yeah, let that well that's the thing too. It's like,
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: you know, women have you have, the more comfortable people are,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: the more let's say trivial, their complaints become, but they're
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: always complaints, and so you know, they'll they'll just find
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: like another a new low of things. That's why I said,
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: my feminists are going to get all this in Spain
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: and they're calling it a victory. But before it's even
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: like gone through the you know, like as soon as that,
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: before the ink is dry on the legislation, they're gonna
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: be talking about whatever the next thing is that women
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: have to have, because again they're on the verge of
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: losing their rights or whatever. So it's it's not it's
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 1: it's a bottomless pit and they're just gonna keep going
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: down it. So with us the.
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 4: Right to be adults, No, that's no, do they do
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 4: they have the right. Do women have the right to
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 4: not be coddled?
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: We're seeking absolute liberation and there and there's no limit
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: to liberation. So without duty, without responsibility, Yes, that's what
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 1: they want, and that's what they've been pushing for.
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: So but I don't want to do that.
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 4: I don't know, not be an adult anymore. That that
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 4: I worked really hard to get here.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I understand, I understand. It's it's actually very hollowing
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: and empty ing if you are doing nothing. But anyway,
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: Senior Stick sent us a super chat for two dollars
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: and says women getting off work via period is medical. Well,
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: they're saying, it's got to be really bad. But but
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: the thing is, you you you can. We have these
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: things called sick days that you can take. I think
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: the problem is is that they're trying to make this
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: it's going to be a new thing that first of all,
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: can be exploited. So all you gotta do is say, oh, yeah,
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: the pain is unbearable, I need the day off and
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: I want it paid for. Like normally, if like my
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: wife Lindsey, she you know, she has to call off
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: sometimes she understands that she's got to use a sick
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: day for that. So like it's not like she's not
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: getting paid anyway, but it's a sick day. It's not
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: tax payer dollars, right, Or if she's out of six days,
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: then she just doesn't get paid and we just cope
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: with that.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 4: So I just the last time I used an actual
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 4: sick day at work was when I had the episode
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 4: of vertigo and they literally had to peel me off
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 4: the floor and squad me to the hospital for that.
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: These are not sick days. I don't know that, but
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: the this is not sick days. Sick days are already
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: a thing. This is on top of that, this is
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: you know for there there because they're not sick days
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: are paid into when you work at a company, and
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: then you're taking them out when you when you have
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: sick days, right, but your it's your work that pays
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: into that. This is coming out of the taxpayer dime.
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: This is not absolutely different.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 2: It's absolute bullshit. And and it's.
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 4: Maybe in the US, men might be able to file
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 4: some sort of class action discrimination complaint because women are
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 4: getting something that cannot be offered to men. But it
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 4: really is bullshit, you know, unless there is something so
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 4: bad that it should be considered a disability. And I
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 4: mean I've worked with women that had endometriosis, which for
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 4: the layman, that is uterine tissue that grows outside of
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 4: the uterus, and when you have that time of the month,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 4: your uterine tissue gets inflamed. It e gorges with water.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: That's how the.
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 4: Lining the period is, the lining of it coming off
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 4: and coming out basically what you were saving up to
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 4: feed the baby that you didn't conceive. And so every
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 4: place that it grows gets inflamed and that's extremely painful.
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 4: That's something I've never experienced. And it's not just in
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 4: the abdominal area. It can grow in like up into
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 4: your chest. It can grow in areas. There was one
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 4: woman my grandmother worked with that had uterine tissue in
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 4: her tear ducts. Just a little tiny bit, but it
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 4: was enough to really screw up her whole world every
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 4: month that I would see as a reason why, you know,
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 4: somebody might have need to call off. But I've worked
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 4: with women with that condition who didn't. They would still
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 4: come to work. They would be in hideous pain, and
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 4: they would still come to work. And my mom when
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 4: I was growing up, had five diagnosed cap chronic pain disorders.
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 4: Some of them had factors that you can majure specifically,
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 4: like the there's one for rheumatoid arthritis, there's one for
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: degenerative arthritis, and there's one there's another type of arthritis.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 4: She had osteoarthritis, I think, but she had three different
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 4: types of arthritis. And she had chogrins, which is a
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 4: dryness disorder caused her fingertips to just split open. She
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 4: had she was diagnosed with fibromyalgia, but she had Ailer's
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 4: dan Lows syndrome and so at which I have also.
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 4: She was in pain all the time and when I
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 4: started having heavy cramping and stuff and it was bad
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 4: and I started getting migraines. She didn't teach me to
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 4: roll over and whine about it, say oh, I need
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 4: to stay home from school and rest. And she taught
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 4: me to breathe through pain so that I could handle
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 4: it and keep doing what I needed to do and
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 4: focus on what I needed to focus on. And that
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 4: was That was a lesson that has gotten me through
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 4: some very tough financial situations where I couldn't afford to
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 4: take a day off and I worked with I've worked
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 4: with broken bones. I went to work with a full
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 4: blown hive's outbreak all over my body, went to work
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 4: in a turtleneck in July so that my customers didn't
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 4: think I had the plague because I didn't. I didn't
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 4: want to sit around at home and feel miserable. I
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 4: wasn't going to feel any any more miserable at work.
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 4: But if I felt miserable at home, it was going
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 4: to cost me a whole day's pay. Right that the
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 4: lesson that women need is that when you grow up
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 4: and you have responsibilities and your work is one of
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 4: your responsibilities, you know you you take those seriously. You
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 4: don't let your coworkers down unless you can't actually move.
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: You know, you don't let your family down and and
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 4: fail to pay the electric bill, you know, because you
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 4: didn't feel good. You rest when you have to, when
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 4: you need to, not when you don't want to work
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 4: because you're uncomfortable, And you have to learn the difference
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 4: between discomfort and damage. And that was that was a
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 4: lesson that men learn voice learn growing up. You know,
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 4: you don't try to run on a broken leg, but
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 4: if you just have shen splints, you can walk those off.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 4: In fact, you need the exercise. And women don't understand
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 4: the difference. Yes, I know, fibermyalgia is real, it's just
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 4: not what my mother had. It gets my misdiagnosed a lot.
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 4: It's because it doesn't have You don't test for a
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 4: particular body chemical and discover that fibermyalgia is the problem.
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 4: But yeah, like night motorcyclist and my former line of work,
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 4: a migraine is a U problem work or don't yet,
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 4: women with periods are given options that result in pay
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 4: and see, that's that's ridiculous. You know again, you learn
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 4: to breathe through your pain. You learn to use exercise
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 4: with bad periods, you learn to use exercise to reduce
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 4: that problem. Right, Strengthening up your core makes a humongous difference.
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 4: They should be teaching high school girls to plank every
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 4: day and do sit ups and stuff like that to
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 4: reduce the chances that they're going to have severe cramps.
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 4: But instead they're teaching them that telling them to exercise
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 4: is fat shaming and they should be mad at people
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 4: if they do that.
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 2: But it just.
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 4: I guess I'm getting across to you guys because they
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 4: keep chattering about it. Just how offensive it is to
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 4: me the idea that women need some sort of special
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 4: treatment because we have a reproductive system that works every month.
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 4: I hate having to pay attention to this. It's bullshit.
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 4: It is just bullshit.
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: Yep. All right, Well, let us know what you guys
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: think about this one in the comments. We got to
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: move on to the final story, but I look forward
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: to your thoughts. So we are going to talk about
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: something to do with the Epstein files. So we get
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: like a lot of like, well hate in our comments
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 1: because we're not talking about the Epstein files. And I
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: just want to say before we get into that that
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: there is the reason why is because there. Yes there's
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: a release, and yes we've been talking about this since
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: the story broke back and when he was initially arrested,
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: you know, for sex trafficking and stuff. And the main
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: reason why I actually took it on as a story
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: to begin with was because I knew that there were
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: also men and boys that were being trafficked, and yet
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: no one talks about that. I mean, there was at
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: least one male victim that was interviewed by Blair White,
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: or at least someone claiming to be a victim. I
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: don't see a reason why men wouldn't claim it if
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: they were, because it's not like men benefit from you know,
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: fake victimhood anyway. And so like that was the reason
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: why I took an interest in it, and then it,
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: you know, I got we started doing like sort of
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: related things, you know, with where you have boys abuse.
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: We've already talked about the you know, this thing that
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: was going on in Hollywood with guys like Todd Bridges,
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: and so it's not like we're a stranger to this,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: to this conversation, but lately there was a massive drop
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: of like millions of pages and everyone's giving their takes
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: on it. But one thing that I noticed was that
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: there wasn't a lot of First of all, no attention
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: to any potential male victims. The other thing is is
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: that even though and I think that there aren't a
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: lot of people doing it this way, even though there
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: are a lot of names that appear in the files
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: of men in particular because that's what they're focused on.
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: There's also a lot of women in the files, by
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: the way, like Naomi Campbell, Galley Maxwell, obviously, the Madam
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, Jill Biden. But even then, the way I
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: treated it is that just because their names appear in
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 1: the files doesn't mean that they're guilty of something, because
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: what they have is like every single email, and there's
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: a lot of reactions, sure, but every single email is
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: out there. So you find like, you know, Trump comes
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: up like five thousand times, but a lot of it
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: is I had nothing to do with him being guilty
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: of anything. It's just Epstein having like looking at his
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: polling numbers, and so it comes up in a bunch
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: of emails for example, right, and so what Elvis Presley,
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: Elvis Presley's name comes up. He's not dead, guys, the
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: King is not dead. No. But but my point is
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: is that because there's so much information out there, I
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: think that we have to be extra careful about who
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: we implicate or at least like try to think of
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: is potentially a predator in these files. And I will
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: say that I have been very consistent on this because
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: when the Me Too movement happened, I was also like, well,
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein was said to do all these things, but
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: it looks like because there's no there was nothing concrete,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: just some like awkward encounters with him that, you know,
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: whatever you want to think about. That is fine, but
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: it doesn't mean he was, like, you know what, was
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: a serial rapist like Rose McGowan said, because I didn't
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: see any evidence of it, and it looks like he's,
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: you know, he could beat his case. So I was
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: even though I don't care for Harvey Weinstein as a person,
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: what I think about him doesn't matter. Ultimately, it's irrelevant.
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: What comes down to is due process, right, He's innocent
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: until proving guilty, And I stayed consistent on that with him,
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: with Bill Cosby, with Michael Jackson, with Danny Masterson, with
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: Louis c k, with Aziz I'm sorry with that Canadian guy.
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: I can't remember his name doesn't matter. Every single time
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: these guys get in trouble and they they say, this
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: is it smoking gun? You know, he's he's done this
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: to women, et cetera. And I'm like, what's the evidence?
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: And then I look at it and it looks like
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: it's it's at least it's not clear. And so with this,
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: I know that you know, we, like I said, there's
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: there's at least one person that comments on every stream.
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: I think his name is errors will multiply, and he
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: is so angry that we don't have TDS like he
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: does that he gets like what, oh like last week
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: is like, you guys just avoided it. You just talked
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: about skeletor you didn't talk about the files. But there's
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: nothing in the files that are going to satisfy you.
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: Because the truth is is that we have to let
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: the justice system do its thing, like it or hate it.
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: That's the way it works. I am not in the
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: business of speculating on somebody's guilt or innocence. That's like,
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: not what I'm going to do. I don't give a
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: shit what you think about that. And so but what
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: I will do is I will talk about this story
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: which is related to it. That has to do with
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: this Super Bowl ad that came out. Do you guys
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: know how much it costs to put an ad in
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: during the Super Bowl. It's millions of dollars. So someone
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: put out a Super Bowl ad. I'm gonna share it
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: right now, And it supposedly features survivors. Okay, So let
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: me give you a little bit of a setup. All right, So,
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: survivors of Jeffrey Epstein supposedly released a powerful public service
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: announcement on Super Bowl Sunday through through the advocacy group
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: World Without Exploitation, demanding full transparency from the US Department
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: of Justice regarding what they describe as the world's largest
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: sex trafficking scandal. The emotional ad features survivors survivors speaking
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: directly to viewers holding photos of their younger selves, declaring
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: that they will not move on from the abuse, and
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: urging the public to pressure Attorney General Pambondi to release
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: all remaining Epstein files under the Epstein Files Transparency Act
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: signed by President Trump in twenty twenty five. Okay, and
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: they've released millions of pages with you know, foot photos, videos,
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: et cetera. Again, a lot of it it's like everything
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: so there's not even any context. Some of it's like
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: what even does this mean? But the point is is
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: that a lot of it is already out there, which
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: is more than we would have gotten with any other administration.
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: Don't even at me with that. But let's watch the
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: clip and I'm gonna ask you guys a question when
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: this is over. So let's look at this first. Hopefully
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: there's sound. You only point out the irony of these
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: women having lines over their mouths like they can't speak
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: as they have a fucking Super Bowl ad.
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's rather heroonic.
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 4: We're standing together and standing together because this girl deserves the.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: Truth, because she deserves the truth, because we all deserve
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: the truth. All right, So that's the ad. So why
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: did I bring this up? If these women know something,
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: they should fucking say something, and they're not. They're just saying,
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: oh my god. I like they're claiming, okay, that they
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: have some kind of information that is crucial, but they're
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: not just saying it. And some people are saying that, oh,
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: you know, they might get sued fucking do it. So
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: what deal with the consequence is I'm sure that if
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: you what you have to say is actually like something amazing.
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: You'll probably have like a massive group of people behind
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: you because like this is not even a part is
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: an issue. Most people want that they making a million
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: a multimillion dollar add on the super Bowl instead of
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: just saying something as loudly as possible, that's what I
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: want to know. So I think that in my opinion,
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: this seems like basically just like optics. It's just like
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: a piece of optics that doesn't actually bear on anything.
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: Because again, even if they had an NDA on them,
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: even if they were like, if you say anything, we're
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: gonna sue the pants off you. Guess what, that doesn't
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: mean you can't do it. So if you.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: Don't know money, they can't sue you your money.
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 4: Yeah, can't have an NDA, Yes, prevent someone. If you
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 4: can't have an NDA, that prevents someone from from disclosing
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 4: criminal activity, from filing a criminal complaint or testifying.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 2: The thing that I.
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 4: Think the reason people are worried about a lawsuit is
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 4: if these women name names publicly, these people did this things,
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 4: these things to me, and they cannot themselves provide the evidence,
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 4: their lives can be wrecked because of that. And so
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 4: they're asking again Hannah.
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 1: Those but they're fine but handy.
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 4: They're asking the state to do withity what they would,
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 4: you know, face justice for, and that is to name
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 4: a bunch of people, to smear a bunch of people
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 4: publicly without due process. Yeah, nobody has been in the chat.
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: Yea in the chat. But I don't see any issues
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: with our stream. Seems to be fine.
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 4: I don't know if they're saying F for the deep
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 4: state or F for the stream.
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: Uh No, it seems fine, are you okay? I think
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: it's fine.
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 4: In some countries, like the UK, they have this really
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 4: weird imbalance where if you level an accusation against somebody,
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 4: you publicly smeared some guy by accusing him of raping you,
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 4: you get to do so from a position of privacy,
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 4: and he and when he proves his innocence, you know,
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 4: if you've lied about him, your name is still protected,
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 4: so nobody knows what a liar you are. And and
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 4: he can't get any recourse. He can't file a lawsuit
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 4: because that would involve, you know, going after the alleged victim.
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 4: And even after it's proved that the crime never happened,
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 4: she's still considered a victim. And she's still protected right,
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 4: and that's the UK isn't the only country that does that,
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 4: but there aren't very many countries that give equal anonymity
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: to the accused in order to protect their due process rights.
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 2: And so.
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 4: Now in the United States, if you say something about somebody,
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 4: if you falsely accused somebody, they can sue you for
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 4: defamation and you can have you can lose everything. So
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 4: what these women are basically doing is they're trying to
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 4: get around a fail safe that is in place to
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 4: protect people from being publicly falsely accused of things, because
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 4: it provides them with recourse that if the accuser has lied,
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 4: the accusation is false, the accusation is a lie that
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 4: you can then go back and say, I'm going to
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 4: see the shit out of you. I'm going to own
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 4: everything you have. And that's a deterrent right to keep
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 4: people from lying about other people. And in this instance,
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 4: what they're doing is manipulating the emotions of all the
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 4: people who are outraged over the fact that the perpetrators
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 4: of the crimes that we have all been told are
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 4: listed in the Epstein files. Many of those perpetrators are
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 4: people in positions of responsibility in our state and federal
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 4: government who decide what your tax dollars are going to
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 4: fund and how much you're going to owe, and what
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 4: you can and can't do. And so people are outraged
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: over that. And because they're outraged and they're very emotional
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 4: about this, it's much easier to manipulate them into ignoring
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 4: that what these women are trying to do is override
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 4: a fail safe that is in place to protect you,
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 4: the listener, you, my co hosts me from being falsely
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 4: accused of something that we didn't do without any recourse.
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 4: And people will fall for that shit because women are
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 4: the ones doing it. If there was a group of
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 4: men doing this with regard to Hollywood, right, if you
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 4: had Corey Feldman and all the other guys that have
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 4: come out and as adults and pointed out said you
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 4: know that they've been molested or otherwise sexually abused in
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 4: the Hollywood Peto cult and they wanted somebody else to
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 4: name names for them, they would get driven into the
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 4: ground for it. But there's going to be this hullablue
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 4: all over these women that people are going to feel
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 4: sorry for them, and people are going to talk about
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 4: this like they're not getting justice because the files aren't
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 4: being released to publicly smear their perpetrators. That's not what
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 4: needs to happen. What needs to happen is if there
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 4: are perpetrators that are still alive that don't have the
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 4: protection of statutes of limitation, they need to be brought
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 4: to justice. That's what needs to happen. People are demanding
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 4: that the government makes some list of names that these
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 4: people are listed in the files. Is having committed crimes,
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 4: But it's bullshit. That list doesn't exist and it doesn't
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 4: need to exist. That's not accountability. Having somebody level an
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 4: accusation without providing any evidence in court and without holding
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 4: you accountable under under the penalties that the law advises
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 4: or requires like that would be accountability. Just saying this
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 4: person to the public, this person is named in these files,
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 4: is having done something without that, that's just slander, that's
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 4: just defamation. Richard Bierre, I don't know if it did
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 4: or not. I know that he did get badgered into
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 4: naming his perpetrator publicly, which was a hell of a risk,
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 4: but not as big. I think his perpetrator might have
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 4: passed away at some point, so it's not the same.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 4: But I don't care if we get a list of
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 4: names or not. In fact, I'd rather see a prosecutor
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 4: stocket than a list. Who are you going to hold accountable?
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 4: And if if we don't get the ladder, I don't
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 4: want the former, and I don't think most people understand why.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 3: All right now, the meme response to all of this
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 3: is what about the dow Look how well the I
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 3: always doing and all that. That was Pambondi's response to
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: this pressure to actually hold these nonsens accountable. But I
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 3: feel the need to remind you of the response of
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 3: Merrick Garland when asked about these things.
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: It was.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it was silence because he was not asked about
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 3: these things. Where were these cunts when the Joe Biden
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 3: regime was in charge. Now, I'm not defending pan Bondy.
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 3: I think she's a pathetic schister playing dodgeball, and I
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 3: think she should be fired yesterday and replaced with Matt Gates,
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 3: for whom all should be forgiven, especially all that shit
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 3: that didn't even happen.
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 4: I was going to say, well, you can't forgive him,
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 4: he didn't do anything wrong exactly.
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: Let us not for a moment give the benefit of
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 3: the doubt to the Democrats, who did absolutely but fucked
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 3: nothing to put these victims of Epstein front and center
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 3: when it was not politically expedient for them to do so.
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 3: I mean, that's the smoking gun right there. To the Democrats,
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 3: the government is only a problem when the Republicans are
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 3: in charge, and yes, vice versa. Whatever, It's the same
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 3: in every country. No party gives a shit about corruption.
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 3: They just hypocritically pretend that corruption only exists in the
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 3: opposing party. Nothing ever gets addressed, nothing ever gets fixed.
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 3: We just oscillate between unaccountable swamps of corruption. Democracy has
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 3: failed these gentlemen. The Epstein demarcle can only have happened
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 3: under a democratic system where aspirational despots can be bribed
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 3: and blackmailed into forgetting everything until the time comes when
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 3: they are paid to remember it. Bring back Kings, I say,
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 3: if America was led by a king, there would be
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 3: no such thing as Jeffrey Epstein.
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 4: Would be one of his best customers.
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 3: I mean, a real king, not like King Charles.
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 2: The I I do too, Queen. By the way, I disagree.
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 4: Only if there was no government, then one of the
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 4: victims dads could have just showed up with a gun
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 4: and taken care of the whole problem. But if there
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 4: was any form of government is going to do what's
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 4: what's happened.
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 2: But go ahead, Yeah, I mean.
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 3: You need to be ruled by the likes of whom
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: will never never let anything happens as long as as
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 3: no one's climate changing, the precious Muslims like King Charles's,
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 3: I mean a real king, and by that I mean anarchy,
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 3: I mean amlco capitalism, and that would might mean a
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 3: descendant of George Washington. That was all you needed all along,
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 3: someone who will give no quarter to the shyster's clipping
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 3: the coins or the Jews raping the children. I said
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 3: what I said, and I will stop saying what I said.
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 3: I keep nor are you done? I am done speaking
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 3: of the Jews.
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 4: There is one king that did have some very profound
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 4: things to say about people who harm children and millstones
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 4: and such. If you're gonna, if you're gonna recommend a king,
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna recommend that one or no other. There you go,
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 4: all right?
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 3: So I got the true king is God. I will
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: say that someone who, even as someone who does not follow.
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: I don't think he could be bought what.
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 3: The point is something higher than humanity.
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: The man.
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 3: You must conceive of something higher than humanity. I'm not
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 3: saying that should be some fucking jew from two thousand
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 3: years ago, but it's it's it's important that you that
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 3: you can conceive of something higher than man, higher than woman.
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 1: Even all right, I got some super childs to read
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: and then we're gonna go into the Patron Show. So thanks, guys,
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: And I hope that you guys understand the reason why
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 1: I'm not jumping on the speculation bandwagon when it comes
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: to the Epstein Files, because I'm trying to treat it
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: the same way I did Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein and
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: all these other guys. There's just people just see red
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: and I understand the anger, but I think that we
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: have to be very very careful and understand that, you know,
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 1: looking at like a bunch of files and the guy
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: is like every conversation ever. So if he, like, you know,
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: actually ordered a pizza, it's like not not the Pizza
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: Gate pizzas, but the just a normal pizza from Domino's.
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: We don't lump those together. We have to be very
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 1: careful because like what we lose if we don't maintain
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: due process for everyone. I think that we stand and
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: lose so much more so, all right, Richard Beierre gives
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: us five dollars and says, remember that trend of women
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: in tech jobs at social media companies who are posting
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: videos of their do nothing workdays. Pepperich Farms remembers these
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: are the types of women who would be clamoring for
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 1: this kind of benefit, some of the period benefit. After all,
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 1: if you are already getting paid for not working by
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: your employer, then why not also collect additional money for
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: not working from the government. Yes, exactly, why not? Somebody says,
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 1: Skeletor is in the e fceem files. No he's not,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: I looked. No, he's cleansing the free and clear of course.
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: So Meredith g gives us a super child for five. Thank you, Meredith,
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: and says for HBr News five forty. Can someone explain
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: to me how you get trafficked when you got paid
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 1: and you could leave it anytime. Let's be clear about
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: what Epstein was. He was a deal maker and a fixer,
• 1:36:20
  Speaker 1: and he used the favor bank economy to close his deals,
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 1: and part of that was having pretty young women around.
• 1:36:26
  Speaker 1: And those women often use that connection to socially climb
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 1: and not all of these women got very far. Yeah,
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 1: I think that, like there, I looked into this too.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: I don't know what the proportions are. But while there
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 1: are a number of underage like under eighteen people that
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: were on the island, there's also a lot of grown
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: ass adults.
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 2: And so yeah, there were a lot of women that
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 2: were just hookers.
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: But yeah, they were just prostitutes and he was their pimp.
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: And I don't think that those women get to, you know,
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: cry victim. It's not the same if you're in a
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: It's just like the casting couch thing. You know. That's
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 1: why I was like, well, Harvey Weinstein, he had to
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 1: do what to get women? Wasn't he like a multimillion
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: dollar producer guy. He probably didn't have to do anything
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: like you just had to say, I'll make you a star.
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: And they were like, Okay, what do I gotta do?
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: And so I'm sorry, But this is the thing that
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: why it bothers me so much is that the people
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: who are complaining about the fact that I'm not like
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 1: sitting here saying wood chipper and all of this other
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: stuff that you're supposed to say, because I'm like, well,
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: wait a minute, how many of these women want to
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: do this? How many of these women were all for this?
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 1: This is the exact same thing. It's like you're putting
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: the victimhood of grown ass women over like the due
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: process of men, without without even looking at what the
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 1: actual elements of the of these cases are. And until
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 1: we know more, I'm not I'm not going to make
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 1: any declarative statements on anybody. And and I'll say one
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 1: other thing about this. That doesn't mean I support this
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: stuff at all. It means that I believe in the
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: justice system, and I believe in, you know, the the
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: right of any man or woman for a fair trial,
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 1: and so that's what this has to be. So yeah,
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's it.
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 4: So it's important to note though voluntary adult prostitutes are
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 4: not victims. Children cannot volunteer for that, Yes, and that's
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 4: the difference. There are there are victims from that, but
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 4: a lot of the outspoken.
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 2: That's the other thing I saw people talking about.
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 4: I guess there was some kind of hearing in Congress,
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 4: and some of these alleged victims would not talk to Congress,
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 4: and they wouldn't they wouldn't go in and name names.
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 4: They wanted it pulled from the Epstein files instead, Well,
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 4: get it from this information. Get it from this information.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 2: But the fact is, you.
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 4: Know, in the world of humans selling themselves and each other,
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 4: some of which is trafficking and some of which is
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 4: just prostitution, voluntary prostitution. In the trafficking end of it,
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 4: there are women who are involved in the actual trafficking.
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 4: They're not trafficked, they're trafficking other women, and a lot
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 4: of them. The way that they get out of accountability
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 4: when the law comes for them in their country is
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 4: that they blame whatever men they were working with for
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 4: grooming them into it or forcing them, you know, scaring
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 4: them into it, intimidating them into it. So you know,
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 4: of the women that they intimidated into it, they're victims,
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 4: are really victims of these men and not victims of them.
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 4: And the courts buy it all the time. But the
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 4: reality is there are women who get rich doing this
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 4: to other women and two girls that where it's not voluntary,
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 4: or it can't be voluntary because the victim is under age,
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 4: then that's definitely a victim. But these women will play
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 4: victim to get out of going to jail or to
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 4: get lesser sentences, stuff like that. And what ends up
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 4: happening then is the guy gets convicted of crimes he
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 4: committed and crimes he didn't commit because he hasn't imposed
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 4: on that woman, he hasn't trafficked her, he hasn't forced
• 1:40:41
  Speaker 4: her into anything, but he gets convicted of having done
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 4: so because she accuses him. And this is something that's
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 4: known to organizations that fight human trafficking all over the world.
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 4: It's in the UNICEF report on this, and in the
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 4: countries where there is the most human trafficking, like where
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 4: it's epidemic, many many of the people involved, many many
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 4: of the people who are making it happen are women.
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 2: More than men.
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 4: So yeah, it just this is this is not a
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 4: black and white issue. You know, you want you want
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 4: to be mad, you want to carry the outrage, especially
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 4: when the first thing that we heard about was that
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 4: children were molested. Of course, you want to be angry
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 4: and outraged. That deserves anger and outrage. That's horrific. And
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 4: anybody that's not angry and outraged about that when it's
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 4: proof true, is something's wrong with them. Right.
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 2: But the rest of this is not a black.
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 4: And white issue and and and there needs to be
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 4: more common sense about how it gets discussed.
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. All right, well, thank you for the super
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: chow's to Richard and to Meredith, and I hope that
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: you guys understand, like, you know why I'm trying to
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: handle this away that I am and you know, like
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: I said, the truth is, I want the truth to
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: come out, like you know, it is coming out. I
• 1:42:23
  Speaker 1: don't think it's not happening despite Pam Bondi's blunders or whatever.
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: But I mean, so what like where like I said, like,
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: I'm willing to leave all that behind as long as
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 1: we get the truth and then we get like whatever
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: comes out of that. So but with that said, we
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: we have to wrap the show up. So we're gonna
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 1: go check out this article and learn a little bit
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 1: about Gallantine's Day because that's important and hopefully you guys
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 1: will join us for that. Again, that's feedback of our
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: com Ford slast subscribe.
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 4: What Yeah, Galine's Day.
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: So anyway, but if you guys want.
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 4: To choice this every week, call it girls' night.
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah they do it all the time. Yeah, it's called
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 1: being lonely. So anyway, yeah, go to feed The Bachelor
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 1: Door com Force have subscribe to join us on that
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 1: patron show, but well, hopefully we'll see you guys there.
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: Thank you to Mike and Hanna for helping me out,
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 1: thank you to Mike Jay for the write up, and
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: thank you guys most of all for joining us on
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: the show. If you guys like this video, please hit like, subscribe.
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 1: If you're not already subscribe, hit the bell flonifications, leave
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 1: us a comment, let us know you guys think well
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 1: what we discussed on the show today, and please please
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 1: please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: guys so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News.
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 1: We will see you next Tuesday.