Latest / Investor Exchange / When AI Meets The Aquarium – Qian Hu Corporation FY2025

Transcript

When AI Meets The Aquarium – Qian Hu Corporation FY2025 · Investor Exchange

• 0:16
  We're talking about Kiyomhu Corporation Limited. Now, before you roll your eyes
• 0:20
  and say, wait, isn't that just a local company that sells ornamental fish? Mm-hmm.
• 0:24
  I need you to hold on. Right. Because today we're unpacking their full year
• 0:28
  2025 financial results, which dropped just recently, January 16, 2026.
• 0:34
  And honestly, this isn't just a story about goldfish.
• 0:37
  No, not at all. It's great to be here. And you're absolutely right to frame
• 0:41
  it that way. Yes, Kenya is synonymous with fish. That's their heritage.
• 0:44
  Of course. But from an investor's perspective, if you're just thinking pet shop,
• 0:48
  you are missing the real picture.
• 0:50
  You have to look at them as an integrated industrial player.
• 0:53
  What does that even mean, though, integrated?
• 0:54
  Well, we're talking aquaculture, global logistics, manufacturing of pet accessories.
• 0:59
  They even have a plastics division. It is a much more complex beast than it looks from the outside.
• 1:05
  Exactly. And looking at the headline numbers for FY 2025, complex is probably a polite way to put it.
• 1:12
  It looks like a bit of a shocker at first glance. It does. I mean,
• 1:15
  I opened the report, looked at the top line revenue, and saw it was actually
• 1:17
  up slightly. I thought, great, steady ship.
• 1:20
  But then I scroll down to the bottom line, and ouch.
• 1:23
  It was a splash of cold water, wasn't it? No, it really was.
• 1:26
  They swung from a profit in 2024 to a net loss of $751,000 in 2025.
• 1:32
  That is not a small number for a company of this size. And for anyone holding
• 1:36
  the stock, seeing red ink is never fun.
• 1:39
  It certainly grabs your attention. Any time a company like this,
• 1:42
  one that's usually profitable, swings from black to red, alarm bells start ringing.
• 1:48
  Investors immediately think, isn't the business model broken?
• 1:52
  Well, that's our mission today, isn't it? To dive below that surface number,
• 1:56
  we need to figure out, is the ship actually sinking or was this just a rough
• 2:00
  storm that's already passed?
• 2:01
  Because in this case, the devil is absolutely in the details.
• 2:05
  Right. So let's start with the big question. Why the loss?
• 2:08
  Because if I'm a shareholder, I'm confused. You're telling me the revenue actually
• 2:12
  grew. It did, but barely.
• 2:14
  Group revenue hit $71.9 million, which is a 0.7% increase. The slat.
• 2:20
  Essentially flat, yeah. Yeah. The driver there was the fish segment, which we'll get into.
• 2:24
  But to answer your question about the loss, you have to look at what didn't
• 2:27
  happen in FY 2025 that did happen in FY 2024.
• 2:31
  Okay, let's unpack this. What changed? The biggest culprit is what we call one-off items.
• 2:36
  In financial terms, these are states that, you know, aren't expected to repeat.
• 2:40
  Lucky breaks or unusual costs. Exactly.
• 2:44
  In FY 2024, Tianhu received a substantial compensation payment from the local
• 2:49
  government in China. That was worth about $0.7 million.
• 2:52
  Wow. That's a huge chunk of change for them. It is. And because it was compensation,
• 2:56
  it basically went straight to the bottom line profit last year in FY 2025.
• 3:01
  That check didn't come. It didn't come. It was a one-time event.
• 3:04
  Ah, I see. So last year's profit was essentially subsidized by this government payment.
• 3:09
  Is it fair to say the 2024 profit was, let's call it, optically enhanced?
• 3:15
  Inflated might be a harsh word, but enhanced is fair. It masked the underlying operational reality.
• 3:21
  Right. If you take that 0.7 million away from last year's numbers,
• 3:25
  the comparison looks very different. It wouldn't seem like such a dramatic fall.
• 3:28
  On top of that, in FY 2025, they took another hit from something called fair
• 3:34
  value changes in financial assets of about 0.2 million.
• 3:38
  Let's pause there for a second. Fair value changes.
• 3:41
  That is classic accounting jargon. I feel like my eyes glaze over every time
• 3:44
  I see that phrase. Can we translate that? Sure. Let's keep it simple. Think of it this way.
• 3:49
  CanHu owns investments in other companies. At the end of the year,
• 3:52
  accountants have to look at the market price of those investments.
• 3:54
  Okay. If the price went down, they have to record that loss on paper,
• 3:58
  even if they haven't sold the asset yet.
• 4:00
  It's a paper loss, but it still subtracts from their reported profit. Got it.
• 4:05
  So they didn't necessarily lose the cash, but their investment portfolio is
• 4:09
  worth less, so the rules say they have to take a hit.
• 4:12
  Precisely. So you combine the missing government money from China,
• 4:16
  the $0.7 million, and this paper loss on investments of $0.2 million.
• 4:21
  And that's pretty much the whole swing. It explains the bulk of it, yeah.
• 4:24
  It wasn't necessarily that they sold fewer fish or lost control of costs.
• 4:27
  It was these external financial factors.
• 4:29
  That brings up a crucial question then. if we strip away the government checks
• 4:33
  and the paper losses, how is the actual business of selling fish and tanks doing?
• 4:39
  That is the fascinating part. If you look at the gross margin,
• 4:42
  which is really the most honest metric of a business's health,
• 4:45
  it remained remarkably stable.
• 4:48
  Health stable. It was 35.7% in FY 2025 compared to 35.8% the year before.
• 4:55
  That is remarkably consistent, almost suspiciously so. It is.
• 4:58
  And it tells me the core engine of the business isn't broken.
• 5:01
  If they were in a crisis, you'd expect them to slash prices just to move inventory,
• 5:05
  right? It would crush their margins.
• 5:06
  Exactly. But they didn't. They were maintaining their pricing power despite
• 5:10
  a tough environment. Okay, that's a vital distinction.
• 5:13
  The engine is running, but they didn't have the nitro boost of that government check this year.
• 5:18
  Let's break this down by segment, because I think that's where the story really
• 5:21
  gets colorful. Let's start with the namesake, The Fish.
• 5:25
  The Fish segment was actually the star performer in terms of sales.
• 5:29
  Revenue was up 4.5% to $30.7 million. But wait, I'm looking at the notes here.
• 5:35
  Despite selling more fish, the pre-tax profit for this segment dipped by over 10% to $1.8 million.
• 5:42
  That feels like a paradox. How do you sell more product but earn less profit?
• 5:47
  It does sound contradictory, but this comes down to product mix.
• 5:50
  Management highlighted a very interesting shift in global consumer trends.
• 5:54
  Basically, inflation and economic uncertainty are hitting the fish tank too. Meaning?
• 5:58
  People are moving away from the super expensive, specialized niche fish.
• 6:02
  So fewer people are buying the $5,000 arowanas, and more people are buying the
• 6:06
  $2 guppies. Essentially, yes.
• 6:09
  The report explicitly says consumers are favoring commonly available and essential fish species.
• 6:15
  So Qian Hu is selling more volume, more individual tails.
• 6:19
  But the profit margin on a guppy isn't the same as the fat margin on a prize-winning dragonfish.
• 6:25
  That makes perfect sense. It's actually a known economic phenomenon,
• 6:28
  isn't it? The lipstick effect. Exactly.
• 6:30
  In a recession, consumers still want to treat themselves, but they trade down.
• 6:34
  You can't afford a new car, but you can afford a luxury lipstick.
• 6:38
  Or a few neon Tetras to brighten up the living room. It's a cheaper thrill,
• 6:41
  but it keeps the hobby alive.
• 6:43
  And to their credit, it seems Kian Hu is recognizing the shift.
• 6:47
  They aren't fighting it. I saw they mentioned targeted repurposing of arowana ponds.
• 6:51
  Right. They're not just sitting on empty tanks hoping the rich buyers come back.
• 6:54
  They're converting that infrastructure to farm when people are actually buying.
• 6:59
  That shows some agility. It
• 7:00
  does. And this isn't just about dumping different fish in a pond, is it?
• 7:03
  They're using some serious tech. The report mentions RAS and art.
• 7:08
  Sounds like droids from Star Wars. They do, don't they? But they're actually the future of farming.
• 7:13
  RAS stands for recirculating aquaculture systems.
• 7:17
  Okay, break that down. In traditional farming, you dig a hole,
• 7:20
  fill it with water, and hope for the best.
• 7:22
  With RAS, it's an indoor, high-tech, closed-loop system. You filter the water,
• 7:27
  recycle it, control the temperature, control the waste. And AquaRing.
• 7:31
  AquaRing technology. It's their proprietary filtration system.
• 7:35
  Combined, these technologies turn fish farming from unpredictable agriculture
• 7:39
  into predictable precision manufacturing. So the strategy is,
• 7:44
  sell cheaper fish to match the market.
• 7:47
  Use high-tech methods to produce them more efficiently to protect the margin. Correct.
• 7:51
  It's a volume play backed by technology. All right. So fish is growing but shifting
• 7:55
  to mass market. Let's move to the second pillar, accessories.
• 7:58
  This is the filters, the tanks, the gravel. The fish food. Usually this is the
• 8:01
  cash cow for pet companies. Or the recurring revenue. Exactly.
• 8:04
  You buy the fish once, but you buy the food and filters forever.
• 8:07
  But this segment took an optical hit this year.
• 8:10
  Revenue dipped slightly, about 1.6% to $33.5 million, but the operating profit,
• 8:16
  that crashed by about 50% to just over half a million dollars. Whoa, a 50% drop.
• 8:23
  That sounds catastrophic. It does, but this is where we have to go back to that
• 8:26
  China government compensation we talked about earlier. Oh, right.
• 8:29
  Where was that money booked?
• 8:31
  It was booked under the accessories segment last year. So that hole in the finances,
• 8:35
  that missing $0.7 million, shows up specifically right here in this segment. I see.
• 8:40
  So the crash in profit isn't an operational failure. It's just accounting normalization.
• 8:46
  Correct. If you strip out that one-off payment from the 2024 numbers,
• 8:49
  the accessories segment actually saw a slight increase in operating profit. And why was that?
• 8:55
  Management credits better inventory management. And this is key,
• 8:58
  better margins from selling their own proprietary products rather than just
• 9:01
  distributing other people's brands.
• 9:03
  That's a classic business school strategy. Create your own brand.
• 9:06
  Exactly. If you sell a generic pump, you make a slice. If you sell a Revo Reef
• 9:10
  pump, their brander, you keep the whole pie.
• 9:14
  And they're pushing into new markets. So again, the headline 50% profit drop
• 9:18
  is scary, but the underlying narrative is one of stabilization.
• 9:22
  Okay, that calms the nerves a bit. Quickly, let's touch on the third segment, plastics.
• 9:27
  This always seems like the odd one out to me. Historically, it was vertical
• 9:30
  integration. They needed high-quality bags to ship live fish globally.
• 9:35
  If the bag breaks, the product dies.
• 9:37
  So they made their own, and now they sell to other industries,
• 9:39
  too. Healthcare, waste management, hospitality.
• 9:42
  But it wasn't a great year for them.
• 9:44
  Revenue was down 3.8% and profit down nearly 12%. Tough year. It was.
• 9:49
  Plastics are heavily tied to oil prices for raw materials. When costs fluctuate,
• 9:54
  margins get squeezed. Their strategy here seems to be hold the line.
• 9:58
  They're focusing on sustainable margins rather than chasing cheap volume, a defensive play.
• 10:03
  So we've got the lay of the land, fish shifting, accessory stabilizing, plastics grinding.
• 10:08
  Now, here's where it gets really interesting for investors listening, the strategic moves.
• 10:12
  Because if I'm a shareholder, I noticed something huge missing from this report.
• 10:17
  The dividend. The dividend.
• 10:18
  Gone. Zero final dividend for FY 2025.
• 10:22
  For a Singapore-listed company where investors hunt for yield,
• 10:26
  that has got to hurt sentiment.
• 10:28
  It does. And usually a dividend cut is a major red flag. It screams, we ran out of money.
• 10:34
  But we need to look at management's justification here. They explicitly stated
• 10:38
  this is to conserve cash for growth.
• 10:41
  For what, specifically? Specifically for the renewal of land leases in Singapore.
• 10:46
  Right. This is a unique problem for Singaporean farmers. You don't own the land forever.
• 10:50
  You lease it from the government. And land in Singapore isn't exactly cheap.
• 10:54
  It is not. Their lease renewal is coming up in FY2026.
• 10:58
  If they don't have the cash to secure their physical base of operations,
• 11:01
  there is no business. So cutting the dividend to pay the landlord is a prudent, if painful, move.
• 11:07
  It's the eat your vegetables approach to capital allocation.
• 11:10
  I like that. But they aren't just hoarding cash for rent, are they?
• 11:13
  They bought something pretty cool. Aqueasy.
• 11:16
  Aqueasy. Sounds like a dating app for fish.
• 11:18
  It's not. It's an AI and Internet of Things solution for aquaculture.
• 11:22
  Think smart sensors in fish tanks that measure pH, oxygen, temperature. Smart farming.
• 11:28
  Moving from intuition to data. Exactly.
• 11:31
  Kian Hsu has been an advisor on this company for a while, but in December 2025,
• 11:34
  they pulled the trigger and acquired the whole thing.
• 11:37
  And here's the fascinating detail I saw in the notes. The consideration for
• 11:41
  the remaining stake was tiny.
• 11:43
  Incredibly small. The cash outflow was roughly $51,500 for the acquisition. Wait, hold on.
• 11:50
  $51,000 for a whole AI tech company. That sounds incredibly cheap. Did they buy a lemon?
• 11:57
  The low price tag strongly implies a distressed situation.
• 12:01
  It's likely Akizi was running out of runway startups bring cash fast,
• 12:05
  and Qian Hu, being the creditor with a convertible loan, stepped in to take
• 12:08
  full control. That's a pivotal moment.
• 12:10
  It moves Qian Hu from just being a user of tech to an owner of tech.
• 12:14
  It's a massive strategic shift. They can deploy this in their own farms, sure.
• 12:18
  But more importantly, they can potentially sell this solution to other farmers.
• 12:21
  It's a scalable software product.
• 12:23
  But it also carries execution risk, doesn't it? Now they have to run a tech
• 12:27
  team, not just a fish farm. Absolutely.
• 12:30
  But if it works, it transforms them from a commodity seller to a technology provider. True.
• 12:35
  Now, let's look at the checkbook. Where else is the money going?
• 12:38
  The cash flow statement shows a significant outflow for investing activities, about $2.4 million.
• 12:43
  A big chunk of that, about $2.6 million, went to completing the acquisition
• 12:47
  of a property in Malaysia.
• 12:49
  Ah, so they're buying hard assets.
• 12:51
  That and the upcoming Singapore lease. That explains the dividend cut. It does.
• 12:56
  Their cash balance is decent at $14.2 million, but they are clearly keeping
• 13:01
  their powder dry for these big
• 13:03
  ticket items, prioritizing long-term assets over the short-term payout.
• 13:07
  And what about debt? Did they put this on the credit card? To an extent.
• 13:10
  The debt-to-equity ratio ticked up from 0.38 to 0.49.
• 13:14
  Is that a worry level? It's still manageable, not in the danger zone,
• 13:17
  which is usually over 1.0.
• 13:19
  But it's a trend to watch. They are levering up slightly to fund this transition.
• 13:23
  And speaking of the turnaround, let's look at the outlook.
• 13:26
  The CEO seems pretty confident. He used a phrase I loved.
• 13:30
  Ped care is non-discretionary. It's a strong argument he likes to make. Is, though.
• 13:35
  I mean, I feed my dog, sure. But if I lose my job, do I really buy a new aquarium? That's the nuance.
• 13:41
  The consumables, the food, the medication are non-discretionary.
• 13:45
  If you have a fish, you feed it. But the hardware, a new tank,
• 13:49
  is discretionary. He's banking on the resilience of the hobbyist. Fair point.
• 13:53
  My cat certainly eats better than I do some weeks. And the official guidance
• 13:56
  is that they expect to return to profitability in FY2026.
• 14:00
  That's a clear promise. They're putting a timeline on it.
• 14:03
  Give us this year to reset and 2026, we're back in the black.
• 14:06
  It hangs on three things.
• 14:08
  One, the fish segment stabilizing.
• 14:10
  Two, the accessory segment growing its own high-margin products.
• 14:13
  And three, the successful integration of a quasi and securing that Singapore
• 14:17
  land lease without breaking the bank.
• 14:19
  It really feels like FY2025 was a cleaning house year. Taking the hits,
• 14:24
  cutting the dividend, buying the tech, securing the land.
• 14:27
  It's the messy part of a renovation. A transition year, absolutely.
• 14:31
  And for an investor, those are the hardest times to judge.
• 14:34
  You have to decide if the renovation is going to increase the value of the house
• 14:38
  or if they're just patching cracks in the foundation.
• 14:40
  So let's wrap this up. We have a company trading app.
• 14:43
  What's the net asset value? It drops slightly to 33.99 cents per share. Okay, roughly 34 cents.
• 14:51
  The stock often trades below that. So you are potentially buying a company for
• 14:55
  less than the value of its parts.
• 14:57
  That is the classic value play. But the question is always, is it a value play or a value trap?
• 15:05
  We throw those terms around a lot. What's the difference? A value play is buying
• 15:08
  a dollar for 50 cents, and eventually the market realizes it's worth a dollar.
• 15:12
  You win. A value trap is buying a dollar for 50 cents, but that dollar becomes 40 cents.
• 15:17
  Then 30, you thought you got a bargain, but you actually bought a sinking ship.
• 15:20
  And with Keenhoo, the jury is out. I think the key is whether you believe in
• 15:24
  the high-tech fish farmer story.
• 15:26
  If AccuZ and the intensive farming tech works, they could become a very efficient modern company.
• 15:31
  If those tech bets fail, they're just a traditional business facing rising costs.
• 15:36
  It's a fascinating setup. You have the heritage business providing the cash
• 15:40
  flow, hopefully, and this new tech layer providing the potential growth.
• 15:44
  But you have to be patient enough to wait for FY2026. And you have to be comfortable
• 15:49
  with zero dividends while you wait. That's the cost of admission right now. Indeed.
• 15:53
  It's definitely not a stock for the faint of heart.
• 15:56
  But for the curious observer, seeing if a traditional fish farm can transform
• 16:00
  into an AI-driven powerhouse, that's a story worth watching.
• 16:04
  It certainly raises an important question for the listener.
• 16:07
  In a world of AI and high-tech everything, is there hidden value in companies
• 16:11
  applying that tech to the most basic needs like food and pets?
• 16:14
  Or is it just a distraction?
• 16:16
  A great thought to end on. Can you teach an old fish new tricks?
• 16:20
  We'll be watching FY2026 closely to find out. Indeed we will.
• 16:24
  That's it for this deep dive into Kian Hu's financials.
• 16:27
  We hope you didn't find it too fishy. I was waiting for it. Sorry, had to get one in.
• 16:33
  Before we go, we need to make sure everyone understands the rules of the road here.
• 16:36
  This content is intended to serve strictly and only as an informational,
• 16:41
  independent, objective summary of recent events and should in no way be interpreted,
• 16:45
  construed, or relied upon by any party as inside information or financial advice.
• 16:50
  Thanks for listening. Catch you next time.