Latest / Reformed Thinking / הָלַךְ (Halakh): To Walk in the Ways of God

Transcript

הָלַךְ (Halakh): To Walk in the Ways of God · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reform Thinking. We are.
0:02
We are really thrilled to have you joining us today for a
0:05
custom tailored deep dive. It is great to be here.
0:08
We have a very specific mission for this conversation.
0:11
We are taking a massive stack of linguistic sources, specifically
0:16
these comprehensive Hebrew Lexicon entries we have been
0:20
reviewing, and we are extracting the most fascinating insights
0:23
about a single, seemingly simple biblical word.
0:27
Just one word for the whole deep dive.
0:29
Right, just one. That word is the Hebrew verb
0:31
halak, which translates basically to go or walk.
0:36
And you might be wondering why we are dedicating an entire
0:38
analysis to just one verb. Why does a whole deep dive on
0:41
one action word matter so much? It is a fair question to ask.
0:45
We are doing this because the single word dictates the
0:47
biblical framework for living, dying, sin, and our covenantal
0:51
before God. When you read your Bible, you
0:53
see the word walk all the time. But in the original Hebrew,
0:56
halak carries massive theological weight.
0:58
It shapes how we understand our relationship with the Lord.
1:01
It really does. To start us off, I will provide
1:04
a calm synthesizing overview of the material we are working from
1:08
today. Halak is a very common Semitic
1:11
route. You find it in ancient related
1:13
languages all across the ancient Near East.
1:16
So it wasn't just isolated to the Israelites.
1:18
No, not at all. In Akkadian, which is the
1:21
language of the ancient Assyrians and Babylonians, you
1:23
have the word Alaku, which means to go or to live.
1:27
In Ugaritic, a language closely related to Biblical Hebrew, the
1:31
root is also HLK. The root is incredibly old and
1:35
widely used, but its usage in the Hebrew Scriptures offers
1:38
massive theological weight. It is definitely not just a word
1:41
for physical locomotion. Right.
1:43
The lexicons provide us with the exhaustive lists of how this
1:46
word appears in different grammatical forms, taking us
1:48
from literal walking to intensive living and even to God
1:51
causing events to happen. By tracing this single route
1:54
through the Old Testament, we get a clear window into the
1:56
ancient Israelite mind. OK, let's unpack this.
1:59
We need to start with the anatomy of a step, the literal
2:01
and sometimes bizarre uses of Halak.
2:03
Because when we think of walking, we think of human feet
2:06
hitting the pavement. That is the modern assumption.
2:09
But halak applies to much more than human feet.
2:12
This verb is used to describe the movement of things that do
2:15
not even have legs. Which is where the lexicons get
2:18
really interesting. Yeah, exactly.
2:20
For instance, in Genesis 3.14, God curses the serpent after the
2:24
fall. The text says the snake will go
2:27
or crawl on its belly. The word used there is halak.
2:30
The snake is walking on its belly.
2:32
Right then, in Genesis 7.18, during the massive flood in
2:36
Noah's day, the text describes the waters prevailing and the
2:40
ark floating on the surface of the water.
2:42
The literal Hebrew says the ark walked upon the face of the
2:45
waters. It's such a vivid.
2:46
Picture and it gets even stranger.
2:48
In Exodus 9.23, during the plague of hail, the text says
2:52
fire darted down to the earth again.
2:55
That is Halaq. The fire is walking or running
2:57
down from the sky. Fire walking down to the earth.
2:59
Yes, and in Joshua 16.8 when the text describes the geographical
3:04
borders of the Promised land, it says the boundary went or ran to
3:07
the sea. The boundary is a conceptual
3:10
line, but the Hebrew uses Halak to describe its extension.
3:13
Because it covers quite a bit of ground.
3:15
Think of halak as a blank canvas verb in English, sort of like
3:18
the words get or run that completely absorbs the flavor of
3:22
whatever noun is performing the action.
3:24
The noun tells the verb how to behave.
3:27
What's fascinating here is the sheer linguistic flexibility of
3:30
the term, alongside the linguistic quarks we find when
3:33
looking at sibling languages. What do you mean by sibling
3:36
languages? Well, while Hebrew uses this
3:39
root to describe the fluid motion of an arc or a boundary
3:42
line, other Semitic languages took the root in entirely
3:45
different directions. In Arabic, the route halaka does
3:48
not mean to walk or to go. It means to perish or to be
3:52
destroyed. Wow, so the Arabic route for
3:55
walking means to be destroyed? Yes.
3:57
So within the broader language family, there is a built in
3:59
association between moving forward and coming to an end.
4:03
We will see that specific concept emerge in Hebrew later
4:05
on, but regarding your point about the fluidity of the word,
4:09
halaq is frequently used for liquids.
4:11
Right, the lexicons mentioned that.
4:12
In First Kings 18.35, during Elijah's showdown with the
4:16
prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel, Elijah has the altar
4:20
drenched with water. The text says the water ran or
4:23
flowed around the altar. The verb is halleck.
4:26
The water walked around the altar.
4:28
That is a great visual. The prophet Joel uses striking
4:31
imagery in Joel 4.18. He's looking forward to a day of
4:34
restoration, and he prophecies that the hills will flow with
4:38
milk. The hills are walking with milk.
4:41
Walking with milk. It sounds so poetic when you
4:43
read it literally. It does, but there is also a
4:46
graphic euphemism in Ezekiel 7.17 which describes people in
4:50
absolute terror facing judgement.
4:52
Oh, I remember seeing this in the source material.
4:54
The English translations usually say something like all knees
4:56
will be weak as water, but the literal Hebrew says all knees
5:00
will walk with water. The implication is a loss of
5:03
bodily control out of sheer terror.
5:05
That is terrifying, the verb. Hallock adapts constantly,
5:08
capturing the motion of solid objects, borders, fire and
5:10
fluids. That imagery of the knees
5:13
walking with water paints A vivid, terrifying picture of
5:16
judgement. You really have to laugh at how
5:19
visual the Hebrew language is animating inanimate objects like
5:22
that. It is incredibly animated.
5:24
But the visual energy of Hallock is not limited to vocabulary.
5:28
It extends into the grammar itself.
5:31
This brings us to the grammar of progress and how Hebrew shows
5:34
growth or escalation. This is one of my favorite parts
5:37
of the lexicon entries. There is a grammatical construct
5:40
that creates a real aha moment for anyone reading the text.
5:45
It involves the infinitive absolute.
5:47
To explain it simply, Hebrew sometimes takes a basic
5:50
unconjugated form of a verb, in this case heluk, which means
5:54
going, and places it right next to another verb.
5:57
When Hebrew places going next to another action, it indicates A
6:01
continuous escalating or intensifying action.
6:04
It means something is happening more and more.
6:05
The action is compounding on itself.
6:08
I was looking at the notes on Jonah one and the grammar there
6:10
is fascinating. How does Hebrew capture that
6:12
escalating storm using this construct?
6:15
The narrative effect in Jonah One is quite striking.
6:18
Jonah is on the ship fleeing from the Lord, and a massive
6:21
storm hits. The sailors asked Jonah what
6:24
they should do to him to make the sea calm down.
6:26
Right, because they're panicking.
6:27
Exactly. And the Hebrew text does not
6:29
just say the sea was stormy, it uses this grammatical construct
6:33
stating that the sea was going and storming.
6:36
The sea grew more and more tempestuous.
6:39
The danger escalated with every passing 2nd.
6:41
So it wasn't just a static bad storm, it was actively getting
6:44
worse. Yes, we see another famous
6:46
example in the historical books. In Surfer Samuel 3.1 there is a
6:51
long war between the House of Saul and the House of David.
6:54
After Saul dies, right? Yes.
6:56
The text uses this Halak construct to describe the
6:59
shifting political dynamic. It says David kept growing
7:02
stronger and stronger, while the House of Saul grew weaker and
7:05
weaker. The literal translation is
7:07
fascinating there. Literally, David was going and
7:10
getting strong, and Saul's house was going and getting weak.
7:14
The motion of the verb halak drives the historical narrative,
7:17
and we see it in the wisdom literature as well.
7:20
Proverbs 4.18 says that the path of the just is like a shining
7:23
light, growing brighter and brighter until the full day.
7:27
Literally, the light is going and shining.
7:30
If we look at this continuous, escalating action through a
7:33
Reformed lens, it beautifully mirrors the doctrine of
7:36
sanctification I. Completely agree.
7:38
In the Westminster Confession, sanctification is a progressive
7:41
work. It is distinct from
7:43
justification, which is an instantaneous, one time legal
7:46
declaration of righteousness. Sanctification requires ongoing
7:50
movement. It is a lifelong process.
7:52
The grammar of Halak perfectly illustrates this.
7:55
Righteousness in the life of a believer is an ongoing,
7:58
increasing motion, a light growing brighter and brighter.
8:01
You are going and becoming holy by God's grace.
8:04
Spot on. Conversely, as we see with the
8:06
stormy sea and Jonah, sin and judgement also have a
8:09
progressive, escalating nature, hardening the heart more and
8:12
more. The grammar itself preaches a
8:13
sermon. It illustrates the theology
8:15
perfectly. The Hebrew language does not
8:18
allow for a static view of the believer's life.
8:21
You're always in motion. But as much as halaq is about
8:25
progressing and moving forward, it is also the primary word used
8:29
to describe the end of that movement.
8:31
That is a fascinating pivot. Let's shift our focus to discuss
8:34
how Halaq is used to describe fading, departing, and dying.
8:40
The Lexicon has a whole section dedicated to this.
8:42
It is almost poetic how the ancient Hebrews viewed
8:45
mortality. Death was not seen as a hard
8:48
stop. It was a departure, a walking
8:50
away. We see several poignant
8:52
euphemisms for mortality found in the text that use this verb.
8:56
If life is a continuous walk, it makes sense that death is framed
8:59
as the final steps of that specific path.
9:01
Yes, and this ties back to that Arabic cognate we mentioned
9:04
earlier, where the root means to perish.
9:06
In Hebrew, the concept of dying is conceptualized as taking a
9:09
final trip. What are some examples of that?
9:12
A classic example is Joshua 23.1 Sift.
9:15
Joshua is at the end of his life giving his farewell address to
9:18
the leaders of Israel. He says I am going the way of
9:21
all the earth. The verb there is Halak.
9:24
Death is the universal Rd. that every human being must walk.
9:28
He is walking out of this life. Exactly.
9:30
We see a similar usage in Genesis 15.2.
9:33
God comes to Abraham and a vision promising a great reward,
9:37
but Abraham laments his lack of an air.
9:39
He says, Lord God, what will you give me, seeing I go childless?
9:43
Some modern translations just say die childless.
9:45
Don't. They they do, but the Hebrew is
9:47
going childless. He is walking toward the end of
9:49
his life without an error. Furthermore, the word describes
9:52
fleeting things in nature to illustrate this transience.
9:54
Like a changing of the seasons. Yes, and Hosea 6.4 The Lord
9:58
indicts Ephraim and Judah for their fickle faithfulness.
10:01
He says their goodness is like the morning cloud and like the
10:04
early dew that passes away or goes away.
10:06
That is halach again, right? In Jode 7.9, Job describes the
10:11
finality of death by saying, as the cloud vanishes and goes
10:14
away, so he who goes down to the grave does not come up, the
10:18
cloud walks away. And in The Song of Solomon
10:21
2.101, the joyful arrival of spring is described by saying
10:25
the winter is past and the rain is over and gone.
10:28
Let me guess, the rain has walked away.
10:29
Literally yes, the rain has walked away.
10:32
I want you to consider how that shapes the biblical view of
10:34
life. We are so used to thinking of
10:37
life as a possession we hold onto.
10:39
Modern culture does everything it can to hide death, to pretend
10:42
it isn't coming. We definitely insulate ourselves
10:44
from it. But the biblical language treats
10:46
life as a transient motion. We are passing through our
10:50
lives, our trials, even the seasons of nature are just
10:54
walking past us. It is a vapor that walks away.
10:57
It is a very humbling perspective.
10:59
If life is just a transient walk that eventually fades, it
11:02
fundamentally changes how we view the steps we're taking
11:05
right now. It makes the ethics of our daily
11:07
walk incredibly urgent. So what does this all mean for
11:10
how we act? How does walking equal living in
11:13
the biblical mindset? The lexicons point out that the
11:16
quall and peel forms of the verb are used metaphorically to
11:20
describe a person's entire mode of existence.
11:22
Let's define those terms for a second quall and peel.
11:25
In Hebrew, the quall is the simple, basic action, while the
11:29
peel is an intensive form of the verb.
11:32
Both are used extensively to describe moral conduct.
11:35
To the ancient Israelite mind, your life is a path, and every
11:39
decision is a step on that path. So your behavior is your walk.
11:43
That makes a lot of sense. The text contrasts different
11:45
types of walking. For instance, Isaiah 33.15
11:49
describes the one who walks in righteousness and speaks
11:51
uprightly. This is a person whose entire
11:53
lifestyle is characterized by ethical integrity.
11:56
And the contrast to that. Proverbs 6.12 describes a
11:59
worthless person, a wicked man who walks in perversity of
12:02
mouth. His steps are characterized by
12:04
deceit and crooked speech. What is particularly noteworthy
12:07
from the sources is the concept regarding self-sufficient human
12:10
action. Self-sufficient human action?
12:12
That sounds like a recipe for disaster.
12:14
It is living without God. Living in rebellion is
12:18
consistently described in terms of walking according to one's
12:22
own dictates. Jeremiah 23.1 form speaks of
12:26
walking in deceit. Psalm 1.1 pronounces a blessing
12:30
on the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked.
12:32
And the prophets talk a lot about the heart, too.
12:35
Yes, repeatedly in Jeremiah, the Lord condemns the people for
12:39
walking after the stubbornness of their own heart.
12:42
Let's look at this through the lens of Reformed thinking,
12:45
because that phrase, walking after one's own heart, is the
12:47
biblical definition of total depravity.
12:50
It absolutely is. We know total depravity does not
12:52
mean every human is as evil as they could possibly be.
12:55
It means that sin has affected every part of our nature,
12:58
including our will and our desires.
13:00
So if we are left to our own devices, if we just walk after
13:03
our own heart, we will naturally walk away from God.
13:05
That is the natural human trajectory.
13:07
We are incapable of walking rightly on our own.
13:11
Our natural inclination is not for the light.
13:14
As Ecclesiastes 2.14 points out, the fool walks in darkness.
13:20
If the heart is deceitful above all things, as Jeremiah tells
13:23
us, then letting your heart be your compass is the most
13:25
dangerous thing you can do. Your internal compass is broken.
13:29
You need an external truth to guide your steps.
13:32
In the Reformed tradition, following the Westminster
13:34
Confessions chapter on free will, we recognize that the
13:38
human will is bound by thin until liberated by grace.
13:42
Therefore, walking in the statutes of God is not something
13:44
a person can initiate out of their own fallen nature.
13:47
We just don't have the capacity on our own.
13:49
The natural man will always choose to walk in the counsel of
13:52
the wicked because that is what appeals to the fallen heart.
13:56
This ethical use of Hellac forces the reader to evaluate
13:58
their default trajectory. Are your steps guided by the
14:02
revealed Word of God, or you just meandering down the path of
14:04
your own inclinations? There is no middle option.
14:07
The biblical text makes it clear that there is no neutral ground.
14:09
You're either walking in the light or walking in the
14:11
darkness. Here's where it gets really
14:13
interesting. It is not just about walking and
14:16
abstract concepts like light or darkness.
14:19
It is about who you are walking behind.
14:21
This is a massive distinction in the text.
14:24
Let's talk about the specific phrase halaka hair.
14:27
This translates to walk after or follow.
14:30
There is a massive difference in how this phrase is used when
14:33
talking about false gods versus how it is used when talking
14:36
about the true God. The context changes entirely.
14:39
We all know what it is like to blindly follow Agps right into a
14:43
traffic jam or a dead end, trusting the voice on the phone
14:46
more than our own eyes. The ancient world had its own
14:49
version of blindly following, and it involved idols.
14:53
How does Halaka hair function in the ancient Near East context?
14:56
The source text points out that the phrase walking after is
14:59
frequently used in the context of idolatry.
15:02
You see it constantly in Deuteronomy, Judges and the
15:05
Prophets. The people are condemned for
15:07
walking after other gods or walking after the bells.
15:09
So it's a very specific idiom for idolatry.
15:12
Yes, and the historical context provided the source is
15:14
fascinating. Walking after likely originates
15:18
from Pagan cultic processions in the ancient Near East.
15:22
Idol worship was highly visual and highly physical.
15:25
Give us a picture of what that looked like.
15:27
A wooden or stone idol would be hoisted up, perhaps on a cart or
15:30
carried by priests, and paraded through the city streets or out
15:34
into the agricultural fields. The worshippers would literally
15:38
physically walk behind the idol in a grand procession.
15:41
So they were physically walking after it.
15:43
Exactly. So when the biblical text says
15:45
Israel walked after Bail, it is not just a metaphor for
15:48
apostasy. It has roots in the literal
15:51
physical practice of blindly following a carved piece of wood
15:54
in a Pagan parade. You are just falling in line
15:57
behind a lifeless object staring at the back of a cart.
16:00
Staring at the back of a cart is a great way to put it.
16:02
But the Reformed distinction here is amazing.
16:04
Israel largely avoided saying they walked after Yahweh.
16:08
There are a few rare exceptions, but generally that is not the
16:11
terminology used for faithful Israelites.
16:13
No, the prepositions change completely.
16:15
Instead, the pious Israelite walks with God or walks before
16:19
God. We see this right at the
16:20
beginning of the Bible in Genesis 5.
16:23
The text says Enoch walked with God and then he was no more.
16:26
And Noah as well. Right, in Genesis 6 Noah is
16:29
described as a just man who walked with God, and in Genesis
16:33
17.1 God appears to Abraham and commands him.
16:37
Walk before me and be blameless. Think about what that means.
16:41
Living face to face with the covenant making God.
16:44
It is a completely different relationship.
16:46
Walking with someone implies relationship, conversation,
16:49
intimacy. Walking before someone implies
16:51
living under their sovereign days with accountability and
16:54
transparency. It is a dynamic personal
16:57
relationship rather than blindly following the back of an idol in
17:00
a mindless Pagan parade. The theological implications of
17:03
those prepositions with and before versus after are
17:06
staggering. Walking with God, God, as Enoch
17:09
and Noah did, requires agreement.
17:10
As the prophet, Amos asks, can two walk together unless they
17:14
are agreed? It requires a shared direction.
17:16
It speaks to a covenantal alignment of the will.
17:19
Walking before God as commanded to Abraham carries the sense of
17:23
living your entire life corumdeo in the presence of God.
17:26
He is living with a constant awareness that the Sovereign
17:29
Lord is watching your steps. Which completely redefines
17:32
religion for the ancient mind. It is not about ritualistic
17:35
processions, it is about an ever present relational
17:38
accountability. The idolater walks behind a mute
17:41
statue, seeing only its back, following a predetermined route
17:45
of superstition. The covenant believer walks
17:47
beside a living God, hearing his voice, or walks before him,
17:51
guided by his eye. If we are walking before God, it
17:54
means he is actively present in our reality.
17:56
God is not just sitting stationary in heaven watching us
17:59
walk around down here. The anthropomorphic uses of
18:02
halaq are applied directly to God.
18:04
God is not static, He moves. He is highly active in the text.
18:07
We get the this beautiful, intimate and well heartbreaking
18:11
picture right after the fall in Genesis 3.8.
18:14
Adam and Eve have eaten the fruit and they hear the sound of
18:17
the Lord God walking back and forth in the Garden of Eden in
18:20
the cool of the day. God is actively present in the
18:24
space of his creatures. The Hebrew uses the hip, pale
18:27
form there, doesn't it? What does that specific form
18:29
communicate about God's movement?
18:31
If we connect this to the bigger picture, the hip pale form
18:34
implies A reflexive or iterative action.
18:37
It translates to walking to and fro or strolling.
18:39
It shows a God who is actively occupying the space of the
18:42
garden, seeking out his creatures.
18:44
Seeking them out, even in their sin.
18:46
Exactly. But there is another grammatical
18:48
form of the verb which the lexicon calls the hip hill form.
18:52
The hip hill is the causative form of a verb.
18:54
So if the quail means to walk, the hip hill means to cause, to
18:57
walk, or to lead. To cause to walk.
18:59
Yes, and the source material points out that in 24 of the 45
19:02
instances of this Hippo form of the Hebrew Bible, God is the
19:05
subject. God is the 1 causing The
19:07
Walking. That is a staggering statistic.
19:10
For example, in Exodus 14.21 during the crossing of the Red
19:14
Sea, the text says God caused the sea to go back by a strong E
19:18
wind. He caused the waters to walk
19:20
away. In Deuteronomy 8.2, Moses tells
19:24
the people to remember how the Lord their God LED them caused
19:27
them to walk all the way in the wilderness these 40 years.
19:30
And it is not always comfortable leading either.
19:33
Second, Kings 24.15 describes the Babylonian exile.
19:38
It says that the king of Babylon carried away Jehoiach into
19:40
Babylon. But behind that historical event
19:42
is the theological reality that God is the one who leads or
19:46
causes his people to walk into exile for discipline.
19:49
It is a difficult truth, but a biblical.
19:51
This brings up the massive tension of God's Providence.
19:54
We make our choices, we walk in our ways, but God is the one
19:57
directing the final outcome. This forces us to synthesize
20:01
these grammatical points around the doctrines of God's
20:03
Providence and sovereignty. The biblical witness, using this
20:06
specific causative form of Halak, insists that God is the
20:10
primary mover in history. Following the Westminster
20:12
Confession, we know God ordains whatever comes to pass.
20:15
Right. Even when Israel fails to walk
20:18
in His statutes, when they choose to walk after their own
20:20
hearts, God retains total sovereignty.
20:24
He is the one who causes them to walk into the wilderness to
20:26
humble them. He's the one who causes them to
20:28
walk into exile to discipline them.
20:30
He is always in control. And beautifully, as Isaiah 42.1
20:35
Seats says, he's the one who guides the blind on paths they
20:38
do not know. The Reformed understanding of
20:41
Providence shines through the huntful form of halach.
20:44
We are not autonomous Wanderers. Our steps are directed, caused
20:48
and led by a sovereign God who is working all things according
20:51
to the counsel of His will. That is a massive thought to
20:54
wrap our minds around. Let's recap the huge linguistic
20:57
scope we've recovered today. A single root word, halak,
21:01
defines the creeping of a snake in the dust, the floating of an
21:03
ark on floodwaters, the fading of the morning dew, our daily
21:07
moral actions, our rebelling against heaven and God's
21:10
sovereign leading of history. It is incredible to see it all
21:13
laid out like that. All of that is packed into 3
21:15
little Hebrew consonants. So I want to ask you, the
21:18
listener, to evaluate your own steps today.
21:21
Who are what are you walking with?
21:23
Are you walking in your own counsel, following the broken
21:26
compass of your own heart? Are you walking behind the
21:28
modern equivalents of mute idols?
21:30
Or are you walking before the face of a sovereign covenant
21:33
making God? To leave you with one final
21:36
striking fact from the source material we have not yet
21:38
discussed, there is a noun derived directly from this verb,
21:42
and that noun is halaka. Halaka.
21:44
Yes, in early Judaism, the entire doctrine of proper
21:47
conduct, the whole massive body of Jewish rabbinical law that
21:50
dictates how a person should live every aspect of their life,
21:54
is named Halaka. So the law itself is named after
21:57
walking. It literally means the way of
21:59
walking. It is derived directly from this
22:01
simple verb to walk. What this shows us is that from
22:04
the very beginning, faith was never meant to be a static set
22:07
of beliefs. It is a constant forward motion.
22:10
It is a life lived in action, step by step, under the
22:13
authority of God. Faith is a forward motion.
22:16
Thank you so much for joining us for this deep dive into the
22:19
language of the Scriptures. We hope this analysis has
22:21
challenged your thinking and giving you a fresh perspective
22:24
on what it means to walk with the Lord.
22:26
Keep seeking, keep studying, and keep walking.