Latest / V / Kamala And Mexican Government Are Colluding To Steal 2024 Election (Ep.35)

Transcript

Kamala And Mexican Government Are Colluding To Steal 2024 Election (Ep.35) · V

0:00
Speaker 1: Good morning and welcome to Bungie and Report Early Edition.
0:02
Speaker 1: I've got a lot of stories to get to today.
0:04
Speaker 1: Kenya is rolling out digital IDs using biometric data. Kamala,
0:11
Speaker 1: Tim Walz, and Obama decry free expression while implicitly supporting
0:17
Speaker 1: Brazil's ban of X. Global elites demonize French nationalist leader
0:23
Speaker 1: Marine Le Pen. The Mexican government is providing military-escorted bus
0:28
Speaker 1: rides for illegals entering the U.S. A Venezuelan gang takes
0:32
Speaker 1: over an apartment complex in Chicago. is offering visas for
0:36
Speaker 1: Westerners looking to flee the destructive neoliberal ideology. And the
0:42
Speaker 1: NASA astronauts stranded in space are hearing strange noises from
0:46
Speaker 1: the Boeing Starliner. We'll talk about why it may be
0:49
Speaker 1: something else. All this on Bongina Report, early edition. Guys,
1:05
Speaker 1: the new world order is closing in on us fast.
1:09
Speaker 1: Kenya's multi-billion dollar digital ID system known as Puruma Namba
1:17
Speaker 1: intends to digitize citizens' biometric data. And by biometric data,
1:22
Speaker 1: I mean the irises of your eyes, fingerprints, facial recognition.
1:27
Speaker 1: Here is Kenya's Interior and National Administration Cabinet Secretary discussing
1:32
Speaker 1: the project.
1:33
Speaker 2: We have an ID system in Kenya which is semi-automated.
1:38
Speaker 2: Part of it is a bit of automation, but quite minimal.
1:42
Speaker 2: Going forward, we are looking at upgrading our current automated
1:47
Speaker 2: fingerprint identification system, AFIS, into an automated biometric identification system,
1:58
Speaker 2: which goes beyond the fingerprints and involves the iris, the fingerprints,
2:10
Speaker 2: as well as facial recognition. The other thing, Your Excellency,
2:15
Speaker 2: is that going forward, we are moving towards an electronic
2:21
Speaker 2: ID with a machine-readable chip and QR code, And eventually
2:29
Speaker 2: this should lead us to a digital ID system.
2:35
Speaker 3: Okay.
2:36
Speaker 1: So I should also note that the Bill and Melinda
2:38
Speaker 1: Gates Foundation has reportedly advised Kenya on this project. And
2:43
Speaker 1: what's funny is if you look it up online anywhere,
2:46
Speaker 1: there'll be flag checks saying, no, Bill and Melinda Gates,
2:48
Speaker 1: they're not behind all this. But then of course, there
2:51
Speaker 1: are also reports that they are advising Kenya on this project.
2:54
Speaker 1: So Bill Gates, he always shows up in these stories.
2:56
Speaker 1: It's kind of funny. Now, there have been some legal
2:59
Speaker 1: challenges to this new digital ID system, so it hasn't
3:01
Speaker 1: been fully rolled out yet, but it is only a
3:04
Speaker 1: matter of time. And I bring this story up to
3:06
Speaker 1: you guys because if you want to know what the
3:09
Speaker 1: permanent state has in mind for all of us, you
3:11
Speaker 1: have to look to the third world. Dystopian climate measures,
3:15
Speaker 1: the surveillance policies, they're all rolled out in countries like Kenya,
3:21
Speaker 1: other parts of the third world first. It's where the
3:24
Speaker 1: globalists like to experiment. It's what we call, really... neo-colonialism.
3:30
Speaker 1: And former State Department official and deep state whistleblower who
3:32
Speaker 1: we love here on this show, Mike Benz, has said
3:35
Speaker 1: this before. There's really no difference between foreign and domestic
3:40
Speaker 1: American policy. It's all the same. What the elites push
3:44
Speaker 1: on Kenya or Sri Lanka is what they want to
3:47
Speaker 1: do here in America. There's a reason why, as Brazil
3:51
Speaker 1: has banned X, we've seen radio silence from Democrat leaders
3:55
Speaker 1: in the and Tim Walz both have repeatedly endorsed the
4:01
Speaker 1: three main censorship tactics used by the Brazilian government, which
4:05
Speaker 1: is censorship of election misinformation, deplatforming political opponents, and cross-platform bans,
4:12
Speaker 1: which are bans of a person, not just from one
4:15
Speaker 1: social media platform, but from many or even all of them.
4:18
Speaker 1: Here is Kamala in 2019 calling for then-President Trump to
4:22
Speaker 1: be deplatformed in that exact way.
4:25
Speaker 4: He has lost his privileges and it should be taken down.
4:28
Speaker 4: And the bottom line is that you can't say that
4:30
Speaker 4: you have one rule for Facebook and you have a
4:32
Speaker 4: different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply,
4:34
Speaker 4: which is that there has to be a responsibility that
4:39
Speaker 4: is placed on these social media sites to understand their power.
4:42
Speaker 4: They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people
4:46
Speaker 4: without any level of oversight or regulation. And that has
4:52
Speaker 4: to stop.
4:55
Speaker 1: She wants the government to be the arbiter of truth,
4:57
Speaker 1: you guys. That is essentially what she's saying there. Here
5:00
Speaker 1: is Tim Walz saying that there's no guarantee to free speech.
5:04
Speaker 1: I think we need to push back on this.
5:06
Speaker 5: There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech,
5:10
Speaker 5: and especially around our democracy.
5:13
Speaker 1: This is just false. The First Amendment does not exist
5:17
Speaker 1: to permit speech that Tim Walz approves of. If that
5:20
Speaker 1: were the case, speech in America would not be free.
5:23
Speaker 1: Here's Obama at the Stanford Internet Observatory praising European-style disinformation
5:29
Speaker 1: speech laws.
5:31
Speaker 6: While content moderation can limit the distribution of clearly dangerous content,
5:38
Speaker 6: it doesn't go far enough. Users who want to spread
5:42
Speaker 6: disinformation have become experts at pushing right up to the
5:45
Speaker 6: line of what at least published company policies allow. And
5:50
Speaker 6: at those margins, social media platforms tend not to want
5:55
Speaker 6: to do anything, not just because they don't want to
5:58
Speaker 6: be accused of censorship, but because they still have a
6:01
Speaker 6: financial incentive to keep as many users engaged as possible. Now,
6:09
Speaker 6: some companies have been taking the next step in managing
6:12
Speaker 6: toxic content, experimenting with new product designs that to use
6:20
Speaker 6: just one example, add friction to slow the spread of
6:23
Speaker 6: potentially harmful content. And that kind of innovation is a
6:28
Speaker 6: step in the right direction. It should be applauded. But
6:34
Speaker 6: I also think decisions like this shouldn't be left solely
6:39
Speaker 6: to private interests. These decisions affect all of us. And
6:45
Speaker 6: just like every other industry that has a big impact
6:48
Speaker 6: in our society, that means these big platforms need to
6:51
Speaker 6: be subject to some level of public oversight and regulation.
6:57
Speaker 1: So let me just translate the Obama speak, right? Public
7:00
Speaker 1: oversight regulation. He's saying the government needs to decide what
7:05
Speaker 1: we can and can't say. The government needs to be
7:08
Speaker 1: the arbiter of truth. They cloud all their language with,
7:14
Speaker 1: with things that make it seem permissible, make it seem
7:17
Speaker 1: reasonable and normal. And it's a complete violation of the
7:20
Speaker 1: First Amendment. It's not normal. It's Orwellian. It is autocratic.
7:26
Speaker 1: And for years, Democrats have sought to regulate social media
7:29
Speaker 1: platforms via the executive branch and Congress. This is per
7:33
Speaker 1: Michael Schellenberger. In 2021 and 2022, Democrats in the House
7:37
Speaker 1: and Senate introduced the Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act, Algorithmic
7:42
Speaker 1: Justice Act, and the Social Media Nudge Act to require
7:45
Speaker 1: social media companies to censor content that could cause emotional injury,
7:50
Speaker 1: ban algorithms that result in discrimination or similar harms, and
7:53
Speaker 1: impose limits on account creation and content sharing of disfavored
7:57
Speaker 1: individuals and their views. And we also can't forget that
8:01
Speaker 1: the Biden administration's disinformation governance board, AKA the Biden administration's
8:07
Speaker 1: ministry of truth was almost a real thing. There is
8:11
Speaker 1: a reason the white house has not said anything about
8:14
Speaker 1: what's happening in Brazil. We got a piddly little statement.
8:18
Speaker 1: I believe from the state department that they're monitoring the situation.
8:21
Speaker 1: But other than that, there's no, there's no denouncing of
8:25
Speaker 1: what Brazil is doing. The government hasn't threatened sanctions on Brazil,
8:29
Speaker 1: let alone threatened to revoke the $ 200 million in foreign
8:33
Speaker 1: government assistance that we give to Brazil.
8:36
Speaker 7: Nothing.
8:37
Speaker 1: Radio silence from our government. And this is because the U.S.
8:40
Speaker 1: permanent state doesn't just approve of the censorship. They created it.
8:45
Speaker 1: Per Mike Benz, the U.S. government sponsored the Brazilian censorship
8:49
Speaker 1: apparatus through the State Department, through U.S.
8:51
Speaker 7: Aid.
8:52
Speaker 1: Through the National Endowment for Democracy, and about 100 different NGOs,
8:55
Speaker 1: university centers, legal scholars, and activists within Brazil beginning in 2018. Guys,
9:00
Speaker 1: America doesn't export freedom. I cannot emphasize this enough. It
9:05
Speaker 1: does not export freedom. It exports Orwellian despotism. I want
9:11
Speaker 1: you guys to think about that, especially if you're somebody
9:12
Speaker 1: who lived through the Cold War era. The idea that
9:15
Speaker 1: we're exporting freedom is not true. We're exporting the exact opposite.
9:21
Speaker 1: And the reason the U.S. government is involved in global
9:23
Speaker 1: censorship efforts is because it fears populism abroad and at home.
9:29
Speaker 1: Look at this headline from Financial Times. EU and NATO
9:33
Speaker 1: keep nervous eye on Marine Le Pen's bid for French presidency.
9:38
Speaker 1: bet they're nervous. This is a quote, far-right candidate, which
9:41
Speaker 1: is not, she's not a far-right candidate. They're referring to
9:43
Speaker 1: Le Pen, wants to reign in Brussels power and take
9:46
Speaker 1: Paris out of military alliances command structures. Guys, the global
9:51
Speaker 1: censorship industrial complex, which includes the EU, has been fully
9:55
Speaker 1: weaponized against Le Pen. And surprise, surprise, she's been labeled
9:59
Speaker 1: a Russian stooge. Who does that remind you guys of?
10:03
Speaker 1: Perhaps this is why Le Pen is demonized as a
10:06
Speaker 1: racist and a Russian asset. I want you to listen
10:09
Speaker 1: to her call out leftist French President Macron during a
10:13
Speaker 1: speech before the French Parliament.
10:15
Speaker 8: Thank you, Madam President. My question is for Madam Prime Minister.
10:20
Speaker 8: At a time when our country has just been delivered
10:21
Speaker 8: to the sack, to the looting and to a senseless
10:24
Speaker 8: fire rage, I would like to ask you the question
10:26
Speaker 8: that all the French people are asking themselves. What have
10:29
Speaker 8: you done with France? You who have been leading the
10:32
Speaker 8: same policy as your predecessors for 40 years. What have
10:35
Speaker 8: you done with our country by setting up areas where
10:38
Speaker 8: you have let yourself be communized, criminalized? What did you
10:43
Speaker 8: do when you let the ignorance of our culture prosper,
10:45
Speaker 8: the hostility towards the legal authority of the state, the
10:49
Speaker 8: illegitimacy of our laws and the hatred of our people?
10:52
Speaker 8: What did you do to transform our country among the
10:55
Speaker 8: most courteous, the most elegant and the most gentle of
10:58
Speaker 8: the earth to make it a hell, where it consumes
11:02
Speaker 8: itself with the public buildings that burn in the future?
11:06
Speaker 8: I apologize for those of you listening. Of course, that's
11:10
Speaker 8: in French. You can't read the subtitles. But if you
11:14
Speaker 8: could not read them, she's discussing how French identity is dying.
11:28
Speaker 1: They're flooding France with people who don't share French values.
11:32
Speaker 1: And the country is descending into lawlessness, chaos, confusion, and violence.
11:38
Speaker 1: The nationalism Le Pen is espousing scares the hell out
11:41
Speaker 1: of the global elites who purposely are flooding Western nations
11:44
Speaker 1: with migrants to erode their identity and culture. Makes sense.
11:48
Speaker 1: If a country no longer has a national identity, globalism
11:52
Speaker 1: is much easier to sell. Also, If the populace is
11:56
Speaker 1: just unified, confused, and chaotic, they'll give up essential liberties
12:01
Speaker 1: and their way of life. What was COVID? The exploitation
12:06
Speaker 1: of people's fears during a so-called emergency in order to
12:09
Speaker 1: curtail basic freedoms. And they're doing the same thing here.
12:15
Speaker 1: The Mexican government announced it will start providing bus rides
12:18
Speaker 1: with police and military escorts to illegal migrants heading to
12:23
Speaker 1: the U.S.
12:23
Speaker 7: Border.
12:25
Speaker 1: Why? Per Ted Cruz, the leftist president of Mexico and
12:29
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris are in cahoots to flood the U.S. with
12:32
Speaker 1: as many illegal aliens as possible because both want to
12:36
Speaker 1: shift America's politics dramatically to the left. I think that's true,
12:39
Speaker 1: but I don't think elections are the sole reason for this.
12:43
Speaker 1: It's also about sowing chaos and fear. Like with this story,
12:47
Speaker 1: a teen girl. at an Indiana baseball game was randomly
12:51
Speaker 1: stabbed over the weekend by a man local authorities say
12:54
Speaker 1: is a previously deported illegal migrant. Or how about on Monday,
13:00
Speaker 1: when a Venezuelan gang took over an apartment complex in Chicago,
13:03
Speaker 1: just like they did in Colorado. According to the New
13:06
Speaker 1: York Post, as many as 75% of people arrested in
13:10
Speaker 1: Midtown Manhattan in recent months for crimes like assault, robbery,
13:14
Speaker 1: and domestic violence are migrants. And in parts of Queens,
13:18
Speaker 1: the figure is more like 60%. And the leaders who
13:22
Speaker 1: are defending national interests, I'm talking Le Pen, Trump, Viktor
13:27
Speaker 1: Orban in Hungary, Bolsonaro in Brazil, they're hated by the
13:31
Speaker 1: global security state. I'm going to share with you all
13:35
Speaker 1: an interview this week with investor Eric Weinstein, who is
13:38
Speaker 1: a liberal, but he's also a free thinker. And this
13:40
Speaker 1: is a little bit of a long clip, so I
13:42
Speaker 1: want you guys to bear with me. But he says
13:44
Speaker 1: something very chilling and honest that I think you all
13:48
Speaker 1: need to hear.
13:53
Speaker 5: I don't know whether Donald Trump will be allowed to
13:56
Speaker 5: become president. There is something that I think Mike Benz
14:03
Speaker 5: is just, referred to as the rules-based international order. It's
14:06
Speaker 5: an interlocking series of agreements, tacit understandings, explicit understandings, clandestine
14:13
Speaker 5: understandings about how the most important structures keep the world
14:18
Speaker 5: free of war and keep markets open. And there has
14:25
Speaker 5: been a system in place, whether understood explicitly or behind
14:32
Speaker 5: the scenes, or implicitly, it says that the purpose of
14:36
Speaker 5: the two American parties is to prune the field of
14:41
Speaker 5: populist candidates so that whatever two candidates exist in a
14:45
Speaker 5: face-off are both acceptable to that world order. So what
14:52
Speaker 5: you're trying to do from the point of view, let's
14:55
Speaker 5: take it from the point of view of, let's say,
14:56
Speaker 5: the State Department, the intelligence community, the Defense Department, and
15:01
Speaker 5: major corporations that have to do with international issues from
15:05
Speaker 5: arms trade to, oh, I don't know, food. They have
15:10
Speaker 5: a series of agreements that are fragile and could be
15:15
Speaker 5: overturned if a president entered the Oval Office who didn't
15:19
Speaker 5: agree with them and the mood of the country was,
15:21
Speaker 5: why do we pay taxes into these structures? Why are
15:24
Speaker 5: we hamstrung? Why aren't we a free people? So what
15:28
Speaker 5: the two parties would do is that they would run primaries.
15:31
Speaker 5: You'd have populist candidates, and you'd pre-commit the populist candidates
15:34
Speaker 5: to support the candidates who won the primaries. As long
15:39
Speaker 5: as that took place and you had two candidates that
15:43
Speaker 5: were both acceptable to the international order, that is, that
15:45
Speaker 5: they aren't going to rethink NAFTA or NATO or what
15:48
Speaker 5: have you, we called that democracy. And so democracy was
15:53
Speaker 5: the illusion of choice, what's called magician's choice, where the
15:56
Speaker 5: choice is not actually, you know, pick a card, any card,
15:59
Speaker 5: but somehow the magician makes sure that the card that
16:01
Speaker 5: you pick is the one that he knows. In that situation,
16:05
Speaker 5: you have magician's choice in the primaries, and then you'd
16:07
Speaker 5: have the duopoly field, two candidates, either of which was acceptable,
16:11
Speaker 5: and you could actually afford to hold an election. And
16:15
Speaker 5: the populace would vote, and that way the international order
16:18
Speaker 5: wasn't put at risk every four years because you can't
16:20
Speaker 5: have alliances. that are subject to the whim of the
16:26
Speaker 5: people in plebiscites. So under that structure, everything was going
16:32
Speaker 5: fine until 2016. And then the first candidate ever to
16:35
Speaker 5: not hold any position in the military nor position in
16:40
Speaker 5: government in the history of the Republic to enter the
16:42
Speaker 5: Oval Office, Donald Trump, broke through the primary structure. So
16:45
Speaker 5: then there was a full court press. Okay, we only
16:47
Speaker 5: have one candidate that's acceptable to the international order. Donald
16:51
Speaker 5: Trump will be under constant pressure that he's a loser,
16:56
Speaker 5: he's a wild man, he's an idiot, and he's under
17:00
Speaker 5: control of the Russians. And then he was going to
17:02
Speaker 5: be a 20 to 1 underdog. And then he wins.
17:08
Speaker 5: And there was no precedent for this. They learned their lesson.
17:13
Speaker 5: You cannot afford to have candidates who are not acceptable
17:17
Speaker 5: to the international order and continue to have these alliances.
17:20
Speaker 5: This is an unsolved problem.
17:27
Speaker 8: I mean, I.
17:29
Speaker 1: Think he really hits the nail on the head there.
17:31
Speaker 1: This whole idea of democracy, it's an illusion. This is
17:36
Speaker 1: why they hate Trump. And Trump's not perfect. No man
17:40
Speaker 1: is ever perfect. I'm not saying that Trump's the savior
17:42
Speaker 1: of the world. but it's obvious that because Trump isn't
17:46
Speaker 1: controlled by the international order, he isn't supposed to, and
17:50
Speaker 1: perhaps he won't be allowed to win. Now guys, I
17:54
Speaker 1: also want to mention the ESG movement, which is a
17:58
Speaker 1: huge part of that force behind the international order that
18:02
Speaker 1: Weinstein describes. ESG, or environmental social governance, is used by
18:07
Speaker 1: corporations and financial institutions to integrate environmental and social considerations
18:12
Speaker 1: into business decisions, and investment. So in other words, ESG
18:17
Speaker 1: creates woke barriers for doing business, prioritizes left-wing goals over
18:21
Speaker 1: profitability to stifle competition all under the guise of social responsibility, right?
18:28
Speaker 1: So they're destroying all of their competition, but they're doing
18:32
Speaker 1: it for a good cause. And they're painting themselves as
18:36
Speaker 1: saviors of the earth, both socially and environmentally. And it
18:40
Speaker 1: makes sense why large firms love ESG. They're the only
18:43
Speaker 1: ones with the resources to navigate ESG regulations. So it's
18:46
Speaker 1: a way for the already rich and powerful to amass
18:49
Speaker 1: more wealth while destroying competition and disempowering the masses. This
18:53
Speaker 1: is per Alan Mendenhall in American Mind. Global financial assets
18:59
Speaker 1: are projected to grow from $ 263. 9 trillion in 2021 to
19:01
Speaker 1: roughly $ 329 trillion by 2027. The big three asset managers, BlackRock,
19:11
Speaker 1: State Street, and Vanguard, manage an astonishing $ 20 trillion in assets.
19:19
Speaker 1: And when you include the broader slate of leading asset managers,
19:22
Speaker 1: the global assets under management far exceeds $ 100 trillion. This
19:27
Speaker 1: is also why we have the issue of debanking, like
19:31
Speaker 1: with the Canadian truckers. Political dissidents are now punished for
19:35
Speaker 1: under the new woke crony capitalist system. So if you
19:38
Speaker 1: want to participate in the system, you need to abide
19:41
Speaker 1: by their political edicts. As Allen writes, the new order
19:45
Speaker 1: stifles dissent not through brute force, but the more insidious
19:49
Speaker 1: means of social conformity and economic coercion. It has created
19:54
Speaker 1: an environment where words must be chosen carefully, where academic
19:58
Speaker 1: researchers self-censor to avoid the invisible yet palpable risk of
20:02
Speaker 1: speaking out. And all this is why Weinstein went on
20:06
Speaker 1: to say something else that's very profound. He said, when
20:08
Speaker 1: the state clamps down, with censorship measures, they aren't trying
20:12
Speaker 1: to convince you. They're trying to instruct you. They're telling
20:18
Speaker 1: you what is acceptable to say and think. Whether the
20:21
Speaker 1: state's preferred narratives is believable or not really has no bearing.
20:26
Speaker 1: Think about the COVID shot. It doesn't prevent you from
20:29
Speaker 1: contracting or spreading the virus, but even if you yourself
20:32
Speaker 1: are COVID vaccinated and you still get the illness, you
20:35
Speaker 1: aren't allowed to say that the vaccine doesn't work. It's
20:38
Speaker 1: dystopian novel level mind control. Meanwhile, Putin has announced he's
20:45
Speaker 1: providing Russian visas for Westerners looking to flee destructive neoliberal ideology.
20:52
Speaker 1: Russia's shared values visa program allows foreigners seeking humanitarian support,
20:58
Speaker 1: temporary residence in Russia. And the measure does not require
21:02
Speaker 1: applicants to have knowledge of Russian history or the ability
21:05
Speaker 1: to speak the Russian language. The program states that it's
21:08
Speaker 1: looking for family life, spirituality, and morality as values that
21:15
Speaker 1: the visa seekers have. And this is really part of
21:19
Speaker 1: a larger anti-woke push by Putin to differentiate himself from
21:24
Speaker 1: the West and other modern values. And Putin often describes
21:29
Speaker 1: the West as actually satanic. Here is Russian propaganda. Here's
21:34
Speaker 1: a Russia propaganda ad where Putin saves Christmas and a
21:38
Speaker 1: little boy from the Western LGBT agenda.
21:41
Speaker 7: So Sorry.
22:17
Speaker 1: So for those of you listening, you'll see a little
22:19
Speaker 1: boy and he's sort of dressed effeminately, right? He's got
22:23
Speaker 1: his nails painted. He's wearing a necklace and he's got
22:28
Speaker 1: two dads, right? And he's sort of just sitting in
22:32
Speaker 1: his living room.
22:33
Speaker 3: It's Christmas time.
22:34
Speaker 1: There's a Christmas tree. The lights go out. Candles go out.
22:40
Speaker 1: And he's sitting there praying and Perhaps he's praying for
22:45
Speaker 1: a different family, seems to be the insinuation here. He
22:48
Speaker 1: doesn't want to live this modern lifestyle. And then Putin,
23:04
Speaker 1: dressed as Santa, which I'm sure it's not actually Putin,
23:06
Speaker 1: but a Putin lookalike, dressed as Santa, comes in, brings
23:10
Speaker 1: in all the toys, a drum set, puts a crucifix
23:14
Speaker 1: on the wall, changes the family photo from two men
23:18
Speaker 1: to a father and a mother.
23:21
Speaker 7: ¶ ¶.
23:43
Speaker 1: So now the little boy, of course, that's good, Mikey.
23:47
Speaker 1: The little boy has a soccer ball instead of whatever
23:51
Speaker 1: girly things he was once playing with. And again, you guys,
23:56
Speaker 1: this is part of Putin's way of differentiating himself from
23:59
Speaker 1: the West. He wants Russia to be a Christian nation.
24:02
Speaker 1: He's very anti-LGBT agenda. Trance surgeries are illegal in Russia.
24:09
Speaker 1: And so this is him differentiating himself from the West.
24:13
Speaker 1: And I think for those of you listening beyond just
24:16
Speaker 1: the LGBT agenda, but his labeling of Russia as a
24:20
Speaker 1: place for freedom, as an alternative to the West is
24:23
Speaker 1: really interesting, especially if you're somebody who can remember the
24:26
Speaker 1: Cold War period. If you guys can even fathom, right,
24:31
Speaker 1: Russia advertising freedom and family values to the West, it
24:35
Speaker 1: seems so backward from what we have been told as
24:38
Speaker 1: Americans for decades about the dichotomy between the West, and then,
24:43
Speaker 1: of course, Russia in the East. It's really inconceivable to
24:46
Speaker 1: think about how things have really changed from only a
24:49
Speaker 1: few years ago. Now, am I suggesting that Americans should
24:52
Speaker 1: move to Russia?
24:53
Speaker 7: No, I am not.
24:54
Speaker 1: Am I suggesting that Russia is a free country with
24:57
Speaker 1: fair elections?
24:58
Speaker 3: No, I am not.
25:00
Speaker 1: But is the West, is the rest of the West
25:02
Speaker 1: any better? That's the real question here. It's not about
25:06
Speaker 1: freedom versus tyranny, freedom in Russia, tyranny in America. No,
25:09
Speaker 1: that's not what I'm saying. It's tyranny on both sides
25:12
Speaker 1: at this point. The difference is in the West, we're
25:15
Speaker 1: still being fed this lie that our government abides by
25:17
Speaker 1: the Constitution, when clearly it doesn't. And you have Putin
25:22
Speaker 1: able to exploit that and say, look at us in Russia,
25:24
Speaker 1: we're as free or more free than America. And he
25:29
Speaker 1: has a point. All right, last story, you guys. You
25:33
Speaker 1: all know how NASA has two astronauts currently stuck in space.
25:37
Speaker 1: This is the state of our government right now. We
25:39
Speaker 1: have two astronauts stranded in space. An eight-day mission is
25:44
Speaker 1: projected to now be a nine-month stay in space after
25:47
Speaker 1: Boeing's Starliner spacecraft repeatedly has malfunctioned. And the astronauts are
25:52
Speaker 1: going to be rescued by Elon Musk's SpaceX. But they
25:55
Speaker 1: are waiting for this Elon Musk spacecraft to come and
25:58
Speaker 1: get them. Meanwhile, the Starliner will return to Earth with
26:02
Speaker 1: no one aboard. because it was deemed too dangerous for
26:04
Speaker 1: the astronauts. But the astronauts are still on the Starliner
26:07
Speaker 1: spacecraft waiting for the new one to transport them. We
26:12
Speaker 1: need to be transferred to a new spacecraft. And this
26:14
Speaker 1: is a story I want to share with you guys.
26:16
Speaker 1: Really kind of eerie. A NASA astronaut at the International
26:21
Speaker 1: Space Station reported hearing a strange noise emanating from the
26:26
Speaker 1: Boeing Starliner aircraft. that is, of course, scheduled to return
26:29
Speaker 1: home via autopilot. Astronaut Butch Wilmore, who is one of
26:32
Speaker 1: the guys stuck in space, immediately contacted Mission Control at
26:35
Speaker 1: Johnson Space Center in Houston to report the noise, which
26:39
Speaker 1: he says seems to be coming from the Starliner's speaker.
26:42
Speaker 1: And we're going to play the.
26:43
Speaker 7: Sound for you all.
27:00
Speaker 1: Really kind of eerie, right?
27:03
Speaker 3: Drop a comment.
27:03
Speaker 1: Tell me if you think that was a very strange,
27:07
Speaker 1: creepy noise. Now, the noise has been described as sounding
27:11
Speaker 1: like a submarine sonar. Now, could this noise be caused
27:16
Speaker 1: by small deformations in the spacecraft due to the difference
27:21
Speaker 1: in pressure between its inner and outer walls? As many
27:25
Speaker 1: are claiming experts in this, apparently, that's what they're saying
27:29
Speaker 1: the noise is from. Yes, That is, of course, very possible.
27:32
Speaker 1: And that would be very scary for the astronauts who, again,
27:34
Speaker 1: are stranded in space hoping to be rescued on the
27:37
Speaker 1: spacecraft that seems to be completely falling apart. Now, the
27:40
Speaker 1: other theory is that this could be aliens. That's always
27:45
Speaker 1: what happens with these stories, that aliens are behind it.
27:47
Speaker 1: A suggestion is that from the UFO crowd that this
27:50
Speaker 1: is somehow an extraterrestrial being, a sound from an extraterrestrial
27:56
Speaker 1: being emitted from by this spacecraft or tampered with this spacecraft.
28:00
Speaker 1: Which brings me to Diana Walsh Pasulka, who is a
28:04
Speaker 1: professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina, Wilmington.
28:08
Speaker 1: And Diana is a fascinating woman because she focuses her,
28:12
Speaker 1: her focus really, her scholarship is in religious studies, but
28:17
Speaker 1: she focuses her scholarship specifically on the intersection of science
28:21
Speaker 1: and and spirituality. And according to Pasolka, many astronauts have
28:25
Speaker 1: reported experiencing strange noises and spiritual encounters while in space.
28:33
Speaker 1: And these experiences include unexplained sounds, feelings of a presence
28:38
Speaker 1: or profound spiritual and mystical experiences that are really difficult
28:43
Speaker 1: for the astronauts to articulate. And Pasolka draws attention to
28:48
Speaker 1: these reports as part of her broader exploration of how
28:51
Speaker 1: space technology, and the unknown intersect with religious experiences. So
28:57
Speaker 1: I want to play for you all a clip from
28:59
Speaker 1: Pasolka on the Joe Rogan podcast talking about the Shroud
29:02
Speaker 1: of Turin. And we've talked about this on the show before,
29:03
Speaker 1: but if you don't know, the Shroud of Turin is
29:05
Speaker 1: a linen cloth believed to be Jesus's burial shroud. And
29:10
Speaker 1: the cloth bears a miraculous image of a crucified man,
29:14
Speaker 1: presumably Jesus. The image of Christ is not painted, drawn,
29:18
Speaker 1: or applied by any known artistic method. Instead, it's described
29:23
Speaker 1: as a superficial discoloration of the linen fibers. And how
29:28
Speaker 1: the image was created is still unexplained by modern science.
29:31
Speaker 1: The image itself behaves like a photographic negative, which is
29:35
Speaker 1: created with a spurt of light. So when the image
29:37
Speaker 1: is photographed and a negative image of the shroud is made,
29:41
Speaker 1: you can see the body and face in much greater detail. Also,
29:46
Speaker 1: the image on the shroud is incredibly shallow and it
29:48
Speaker 1: affects only the very top fibers of the linen. So
29:52
Speaker 1: the depth of the discoloration is less than the thickness
29:55
Speaker 1: of a human hair, which again, very puzzling to researchers.
30:00
Speaker 1: So here is Pasolka discussing the Shroud.
30:04
Speaker 9: What do you think the physical objects are?
30:07
Speaker 3: Well, okay, so this is something that's very interesting. We
30:10
Speaker 3: just looked at the Shroud of Turin. I believe that
30:12
Speaker 3: there are these, I would call them, and this is
30:16
Speaker 3: just my own non-scientific term, interdimensional objects. They're objects that
30:24
Speaker 3: have characteristics of our dimension and of some other dimension.
30:31
Speaker 9: So some other dimension has the capability or something from
30:37
Speaker 9: some other dimension has the capability of transporting a physical
30:42
Speaker 9: object into our realm.
30:45
Speaker 3: Or even imprinting onto a physical object.
30:48
Speaker 7: Yeah.
30:49
Speaker 6: How so?
30:50
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know. I mean, I think that's what.
30:52
Speaker 9: What does that mean, imprinting onto a physical object?
30:54
Speaker 3: So with the Shroud of Turin, we see the imprint
30:56
Speaker 3: of the image and.
30:57
Speaker 10: If it's real.
30:58
Speaker 3: Yeah, if it's real. But it's an anomalous object. So
31:02
Speaker 3: we do have, from Gary Nolan, engineered objects that we
31:06
Speaker 3: don't know how they're engineered, but they definitely look like they're,
31:10
Speaker 3: you know, it's off planet. I would call the kinds
31:15
Speaker 3: of things that we see in the historical record interdimensional
31:18
Speaker 3: types of things. Now, how? I don't know, Joe. Okay,
31:22
Speaker 3: so I just don't know. But I do think that
31:25
Speaker 3: scientists in the government know that these things exist and
31:28
Speaker 3: they would like to figure it out. And so part
31:31
Speaker 3: of disclosure, the disclosure movement is outsourcing this and trying
31:35
Speaker 3: to get as many people as possible to, to help
31:38
Speaker 3: in figuring it out.
31:42
Speaker 1: So Pasolka is a very fascinating woman. I would recommend
31:45
Speaker 1: her book encounters experiences with non-human intelligence and You want
31:50
Speaker 1: to learn more about her research. I am personally in
31:53
Speaker 1: the camp of all these encounters that we're having are spiritual.
31:57
Speaker 1: I think that we're dealing with angels and demons here.
31:59
Speaker 1: And these encounters have been happening, of course, forever, right?
32:02
Speaker 1: The stigmatas, apparitions, the miracles, the spiritual world never went away.
32:08
Speaker 1: It's almost like the modern world throughout religion for science,
32:12
Speaker 1: but we're still dealing with the spiritual realm. You can't
32:15
Speaker 1: escape it. C.S. Lewis's book, another recommendation of mine, That
32:19
Speaker 1: Hideous Strength, which is the final part of his space trilogy,
32:23
Speaker 1: it explores this concept really profoundly. And so as I
32:28
Speaker 1: was preparing for this show yesterday, I was thinking about
32:30
Speaker 1: how people often remind themselves when they do something embarrassing
32:35
Speaker 1: that they're just, oh, I'm just a speck in a
32:37
Speaker 1: vast universe, right? None of this really matters. When they
32:40
Speaker 1: think about space, they think, oh, it doesn't matter. But
32:42
Speaker 1: when you think of, when we think of ourselves and
32:46
Speaker 1: when we think of the world beyond Earth, as in
32:51
Speaker 1: the context of religion that God and spiritual forces have
32:55
Speaker 1: and are impacting us, everything starts to actually matter. That
32:59
Speaker 1: idea that everything is meaningless because the world is so
33:02
Speaker 1: great is turned on its head when you view it
33:05
Speaker 1: in these spiritual terms. And believing that our lives have
33:09
Speaker 1: meaning and value does make life worth living. It's really
33:13
Speaker 1: a beautiful thing. And to tie it to the global
33:15
Speaker 1: authoritarians who wish to control everything that we say and
33:18
Speaker 1: do Knowing that there are powers outside of despotic humans
33:23
Speaker 1: is actually comforting. And knowing that we aren't just cudgels
33:26
Speaker 1: to be bullied, but individuals with intrinsic value is also,
33:32
Speaker 1: I think, very comforting. All right, that's all that I
33:35
Speaker 1: have for you guys today. As always, shout out to
33:37
Speaker 1: my husband, Michael, who makes this show happen. Give him
33:40
Speaker 1: some love in the comments. If you want to follow
33:42
Speaker 1: me on Instagram or X, my user is avitaduffy underscore one.
33:45
Speaker 1: And my TikTok is avitaduffy.alfonso. Make sure to hit that
33:48
Speaker 1: like and follow button. If you are listening on Apple
33:51
Speaker 1: or Spotify, I am here live on Rumble, 9 a.m.
33:54
Speaker 1: Eastern time, five days a week. I'll see you all tomorrow.
33:57
Speaker 1: The Dan Bongino Show.
33:59
Speaker 10: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
34:01
Speaker 10: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
34:05
Speaker 10: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
34:08
Speaker 10: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
34:10
Speaker 10: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue.
34:14
Speaker 4: That is it.
34:15
Speaker 10: This is not a football game.
34:17
Speaker 5: If you vote, we will win.
34:19
Speaker 6: It is not complicated.
34:21
Speaker 1: The Dan Bongino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.