Latest / The SME Stream / John Carnegie: Energy Resources Aotearoa CEO urges the Government to underwrite oil and gas exploration risks
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: In an oil and gas lobby group has written to
- 0:02Speaker 1: Energy Minister City and Brown asking him to consider underwriting
- 0:06Speaker 1: oil and gas exploration by private companies. The argument mounted
- 0:09Speaker 1: by Energy Resources Altered Or is that we need something
- 0:12Speaker 1: like this to get oil and gas prospectors back to
- 0:15Speaker 1: New Zealand after the last governments offshore oil and bass
- 0:18Speaker 1: exploration gan ban scared them off. Green Party Colia Chloe
- 0:22Speaker 1: Swarbricks has gas production peaked in twenty fourteen and underwriting
- 0:25Speaker 1: exploration for more would be quote deranged. John Carnegie is
- 0:30Speaker 1: chief executive of Energy Resources Altered Or and he's with us. Now, Hi, John,
- 0:35Speaker 1: Hey Jack here, you don't yeah, well think so, So
- 0:36Speaker 1: just explain to us what exactly were you proposing.
- 0:41Speaker 2: Well, actually, just before getting into that, we're a pan
- 0:46Speaker 2: energy sector group. We represent the entire value chain of
- 0:51Speaker 2: the energy sector. So we proudly represent the oil and
- 0:54Speaker 2: gas sector, but we also represent electricity producers and distributism
- 0:58Speaker 2: fueled distributors. But look in terms of your question, but
- 1:06Speaker 2: I actually think in terms of for your listeners, it's
- 1:08Speaker 2: important to put what we've asked for in context. And
- 1:13Speaker 2: they're two points. The first is we've actually got an
- 1:15Speaker 2: energy shortage and some, in fact might call it a crisis,
- 1:19Speaker 2: and we felt that during the winter it's caused havoc
- 1:22Speaker 2: to industry and households. And actually we might think we
- 1:27Speaker 2: didn't have blackouts, but we did because they were managed
- 1:30Speaker 2: behind the scenes by two of our major exporters. So
- 1:34Speaker 2: you know, now, what we need now is policy settings
- 1:37Speaker 2: that encourage investment and new exploration and appraisal to unclog
- 1:42Speaker 2: the closed pipeline and deliver affordable, secure energy. And the
- 1:46Speaker 2: second point is actually that gas producers were actually damaged
- 1:50Speaker 2: badly by the twenty eighteen exploration ban, and so what
- 1:55Speaker 2: we're talking about is actually just re leveling the playing field.
- 2:00Speaker 2: Governments all over the developed world are setting fixing settings
- 2:04Speaker 2: to ensure they've got a reliable pipeline of secure and
- 2:08Speaker 2: affordable energy. And in fact, I think just last week
- 2:11Speaker 2: or the week before, this government invested sixty million dollars
- 2:15Speaker 2: in deep geothermal research. And while that's great, it doesn't
- 2:19Speaker 2: solve the now problem and we need natural gas for that. Yeah.
- 2:22Speaker 1: Okay, so to egectly what you asked of the minister,
- 2:26Speaker 1: just explain to us what you proposed in terms of
- 2:29Speaker 1: the government underwriting exploration.
- 2:31Speaker 2: Well, look, we didn't have a firm view on the
- 2:34Speaker 2: type of mechanism the government could choose. But look, the
- 2:37Speaker 2: Minister has for months been talking about the need to
- 2:41Speaker 2: offer gas produces some form of protection via bonds or
- 2:46Speaker 2: I think the Minister mused publicly about long term contracts,
- 2:50Speaker 2: and actually for months we've been publicly agreeing. So in
- 2:54Speaker 2: fact that only Radio and New Zealand seemed to be
- 2:56Speaker 2: surprised by our letter and our suggestion that the Minister
- 3:00Speaker 2: the government do what he has been suggesting. In fact,
- 3:03Speaker 2: actually we're mystified why it's taking so long. I mean,
- 3:06Speaker 2: the bottom line for us JACK is that oil and
- 3:10Speaker 2: gas expiration companies are worried that any investment they make
- 3:14Speaker 2: in New Zealand could be eroded or stripped away if
- 3:16Speaker 2: the government changes. So you know, this isn't a To
- 3:20Speaker 2: call it a subsidy would be a complete mischaracterization. It's
- 3:24Speaker 2: effectively like the government taking an insurance policy out against itself,
- 3:30Speaker 2: against its future self that promises no adverse rule changes
- 3:35Speaker 2: that would again damage the sector.
- 3:39Speaker 1: But what would happen if you didn't find anything? Who'd
- 3:43Speaker 1: be on the whole.
- 3:43Speaker 2: That's the risk that would be borne by the sector.
- 3:48Speaker 1: Born by the textpayer as well.
- 3:49Speaker 2: Right, No, no, not at all. This is this is
- 3:53Speaker 2: this is an underwright that would only protect the sector
- 3:58Speaker 2: from pernicious future policy changes. This government has said, and
- 4:04Speaker 2: in fact they're in the process of reversing the oil
- 4:06Speaker 2: and Gas band, which we applaud, but we've already had
- 4:10Speaker 2: the opposition saying they're going to put it back in.
- 4:13Speaker 2: Now who would invest under those conditions? So the problem is, well, well,
- 4:20Speaker 2: you know, there's certainly plenty of gas out there, and
- 4:24Speaker 2: New Zealand is ripe to be explored. Investors are loath
- 4:29Speaker 2: to invest. They have no confidence to invest that their
- 4:32Speaker 2: investment today will be kept whole tomorrow if a new
- 4:36Speaker 2: government comes in. And so actually, again the beauty of
- 4:40Speaker 2: this is that there's no if policies don't change, then
- 4:48Speaker 2: this is a completely costless policy. It would never get triggered.
- 4:53Speaker 2: But it is, as I said, like a guarantee.
- 4:56Speaker 1: So okay, I'm just going to read the leader here,
- 4:57Speaker 1: so quote this is what you say. Our preferred option
- 5:01Speaker 1: is for the Crown to prioritize new gas exploration. The
- 5:04Speaker 1: most efficient means of covering the security of supply risk
- 5:07Speaker 1: is some form of risk reward arrangement. This would entail
- 5:10Speaker 1: the government underwriting gas exploration and appraisal, whereby the government
- 5:14Speaker 1: takes part or all of the risk if natural gas
- 5:17Speaker 1: should not be produced, while sharing some of the reward.
- 5:21Speaker 1: If it is so, just to be totally clear, under
- 5:25Speaker 1: that wording, if you were to explore for gas and
- 5:30Speaker 1: not find any, wouldn't the government then be on the hook?
- 5:34Speaker 2: Well, no, the idea is that you know, here's because
- 5:40Speaker 2: here's the risks are quite nuanced. Check.
- 5:44Speaker 1: Sorry, just to be totally clear, because you were saying
- 5:46Speaker 1: that you were saying you want to stop like a
- 5:51Speaker 1: government of the day in the future saying, oh, you
- 5:53Speaker 1: found gas, sorry to bear, We're not going to let
- 5:56Speaker 1: you extract that gas because we're going to reintroduce this thing. Yeah,
- 5:59Speaker 1: but the of that would suggest that the word this
- 6:02Speaker 1: is that should natural guess not be produced, but it
- 6:05Speaker 1: wouldn't be produced if you didn't find it, right, Well,
- 6:08Speaker 1: that's right, So the text player would be potentially be
- 6:11Speaker 1: on the hook for that risk as well.
- 6:13Speaker 2: Well. I mean, this is one of the one of
- 6:14Speaker 2: the options that we've put forward. It's one of a
- 6:17Speaker 2: number of options.
- 6:18Speaker 1: I mean, you haven't found you haven't found gas in
- 6:20Speaker 1: the past though eh like there was last time found.
- 6:24Speaker 2: In fact, the most recent discovery was the Tutor Way
- 6:28Speaker 2: field in twenty twenty, so there is penny of gas there.
- 6:33Speaker 2: And part of the problem with the band is that
- 6:35Speaker 2: there are gas rich basins off the east coast of
- 6:39Speaker 2: both islands that were effectively sterilized by the ban, preventing
- 6:45Speaker 2: the future expirations. So you know that, as I said, Jack,
- 6:49Speaker 2: the damage to the sector has been severe, and you know,
- 6:55Speaker 2: it's it's actually extraordinary that, you know, what other country
- 7:03Speaker 2: would the future of a sector be banned, and then
- 7:10Speaker 2: the country, having realized that we need the product, has
- 7:13Speaker 2: come back to the sector to say come and help
- 7:16Speaker 2: us out. We need you to secure our energy future.
- 7:19Speaker 2: And so the sector is standing by ready to help.
- 7:23Speaker 2: It's just gun shy.
- 7:26Speaker 1: So how has the Energy minister responded?
- 7:31Speaker 2: Well, well, the energy well, in fact it's the Resources minister.
- 7:38Speaker 2: Minister Jones, like the Energy Minister, he's committed to keeping
- 7:42Speaker 2: the lights on an energy affordable. We haven't heard back
- 7:47Speaker 2: from the ministers at this point, but I do know
- 7:50Speaker 2: that Minister Jones has publicly and often said he's keen
- 7:53Speaker 2: to atone for the harm the oil and gas ban
- 7:56Speaker 2: has done to the industry, And I guess that was
- 7:59Speaker 2: the point I was making. What other industry has its
- 8:01Speaker 2: future band, has its investment pipeline strangled, and then it's
- 8:06Speaker 2: called on to help when a country realizes it needs
- 8:08Speaker 2: their help to ensure reliable, affordable energy.
- 8:12Speaker 1: It's like a compensation for the way in which that
- 8:14Speaker 1: band was introduced, is what you're suggesting.
- 8:17Speaker 2: Pretty much. And you can't make this stuff, you know.
- 8:20Speaker 2: I couldn't make this stuff up, you know. It's the
- 8:23Speaker 2: damage has been severe, and now the country realizes how
- 8:28Speaker 2: much we need natural gas to help us actually as
- 8:32Speaker 2: we journey towards the lower emissions future.
- 8:35Speaker 1: Hey, thanks for your time, John, We appreciate it. That
- 8:38Speaker 1: is Energy Resources Altered or Chief Executive