Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 22nd April 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 22nd April 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. Today is Monday, the twenty second of April twenty twenty four,
0:13
just after one o'clock. Welcome to uk column News. I'm your host,
0:17
Brian Irish. Delighted to be joined today by Alex Thompson talking from the
0:22
Netherlands. We've also got Mark Anderson speaking from the United States, and we're
0:27
very pleased to have Professor Dian Rasmusen mcaddie with us who will be speaking from
0:34
Scotland. So quite a line up today. Also, we have no extra
0:40
to the news today because following the news we will be playing out the Playing
0:45
God video. We'll talk about that in our adverts, but just to give
0:50
view as a heads up that we'll be finishing the news promptly and then following
0:55
up with that live stream of that video. Where do we kick off with?
1:00
I think it's got to be Ukraine and thank you to Alex for sending
1:04
me this headline earlier this morning. So it's the Telegraph and the headline is
1:10
Ukraine's frontline is collapsing and Britain may soon be at war. So we comment
1:17
by Hamish to Breton Gordon. He says, unless we all get a grip,
1:21
we will not only be going to polling stations, but to the enlistment
1:25
centers. And his main point is that while we're all fixed on Tehran and
1:30
Tel Aviv, Ukraine's front lines are quote showing clear signs of crumbling, and
1:34
there's the real possibility they could crumble even if the Western weapons and munitions get
1:42
to them. He says. The toll on both sides has been immense,
1:46
and if we just put up the extra little paragraph there, our stocks of
1:49
ammunition and especially precision missiles are thought to be perilously low. It's clear we
1:55
only have a handle of tanks and even less people to crew them. Dire
2:00
straits in the UK and the West and the European Union, because of course
2:04
we don't have the weapons and the munitions, we cannot produce them. We
2:10
have run out of stocks, and the result is that on the battlefield,
2:15
Ukraine is indeed crumbling and the Russians are moving forward. This has been happening,
2:22
of course, for a long time, but Western propaganda has meant that
2:25
the truth about the failure of Ukraine on the battlefield has been hidden until it's
2:31
impossible to hide it anymore. We just play this little clip here, I'm
2:37
going to talk over it, but we're going to be seeing the massive Russian
2:40
pummeling of Ukrainian defenses in Ukraine. This is what they're doing, largely with
2:47
very large air dropped bombs. This is cluster munitions arriving on the Ukrainian positions.
2:54
I think that is an ammunition small ammunition dump exploding there. But this
3:00
is the massacre of the Ukrainian forces. And of course behind the front line
3:06
we've got very big attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure. Meanwhile, the Western wonder weapons
3:12
Abraham's tanks are taken off the battlefield and this is so sad to see.
3:17
Of course, the forcible recruitment of yet more men who will almost certainly be
3:24
going straight onto the battlefield to die. The West uk in particulars will see
3:30
fully involved in this horrific treatment by the Ukrainian government of its own citizens.
3:38
I've got another little video clip here, I believe this is Russian troops moving
3:44
through Avdivka and you can see the horrific destruction. It shows you the scale
3:51
of the fighting. And of course something which has to be remembered is virtually
3:55
all civilian buildings were used by the Ukrainian military as defensive points, albeit most
4:02
of the population have already left, except the people waiting for the Russians to
4:08
come into position to effectively rescue them. So tragedy on the battlefield. The
4:15
US has put in more money sixty one billion, and Alex I will just
4:19
bring you in very briefly, because you had some comments on that. Yes,
4:25
Brian, the big shot here seems to be that the French troops are
4:30
now on the ground in Odessa. I don't know whether you'll be alluding to
4:32
that later in your segment, but that does seem to be being confirmed by
4:35
reputable channels. And we shouldn't forget that this happens against the background of the
4:41
congressional allocation from the US of sixty one billion dollars to Ukraine. And I
4:46
would like to ask for anyone who has been able to pour over the deep
4:51
the small print of that congressional allocation to confirm a report that's reached me that
4:56
three hundred million dollars of that US taxpayers money that's been sent to Ukraine under
5:00
the name of border security or some such is specifically to ensure that Ukrainians,
5:05
young men, perhaps soon young women and middle aged people will not be able
5:10
to cross the border, largely into Poland to escape the draft. This comes
5:13
shortly after Senator Lindy Graham of South Carolina made a spectacle of himself visiting Kiev
5:19
and saying it's unacceptable that your under twenty sevens are not being sent to die.
5:24
I demand that they be drafted immediately. This is tragic. Staff will
5:29
report more of this in becoming UK column news programs. But this is something
5:34
that caught my attention I regarded as very sinister. We've now got Conservative Friends
5:40
of Ukraine dedicated to strengthening political, security, cultural and commercial relationship relations between
5:47
the United Kingdom and Ukraine, as well as between the Conservative Party and the
5:51
quote growing Ukrainian community in Britain. And if we have a look in the
5:57
main text alongside, i'd repeat at the comments about strengthening relations. We get
6:04
some information that it was founded in twenty twenty two by the right Honorable Robert
6:10
Jenrik And here we've got the right honorable It's very difficult for me to say
6:15
that. Boris Johnson, who is president of Conservative Friends of Ukraine. Here's
6:21
a picture of some of the team. In forthcoming UK column news editions,
6:27
I'll be talking more about the chief executive, Maria tim and Fienko. But
6:31
the key issue here is that we've also got very strange individuals in the background.
6:36
A news flash which is up on the website itself talks about the President,
6:44
Boris Johnson and renowned French philosopher filmmaker Bernard Henry Levy working together to support
6:51
both Israel and Ukraine. If we raise the key points that need raising about
6:57
this organization, let's have a look at those questions on screen. We can
7:00
see that we need to ask a number of things, who exactly are the
7:05
people involved with this organization, what is their real agenda which comes first the
7:12
interests of Ukraine or UK And also is it acceptable that Ukrainian refugees in UK
7:18
are being given this exclusive power for direct influence and involvement in high level UK
7:24
politics, And of course they're using taxpayers money. Who is funding this organization
7:30
and how much has been received? And let's just look at Boris Johnson to
7:36
understand the quality of the president to this organization. Because if Ukraine fools,
7:43
it will be a catastrophe for the West. It will be end a Western
7:47
egeminy and we will have no one to blame but ourselves, hundreds of thousands
7:58
of Men, Ukrainians and Russians being slaughtered as a result of the efforts Boris
8:01
Johnson, of course to stall the peace process. And this is the state
8:07
of the man. We should be very concerned here in UK that he still
8:11
has power and influence. Alex, Let's bring you in because I think you've
8:15
got some comments about MPs and replies Crane is but Johnny come lately compared with
8:24
the original and best, the Conservative Friends of Israel and Labor friends of Israel.
8:28
And before we leave Ukraine, I should say it's entirely disingenuous of Conservative
8:33
Friends of Ukraine to call Ben Henri Levy a philosophizing filmmaker. He's been running
8:37
French foreign policy for forty five years, despite many changes of government from left
8:43
wing to right wing, and everyone in France knows that. But let's go
8:46
on to Christian Wakeford, the Member of Parliament for Bury north of Manchester,
8:52
very south. There was a debate in February which Justin Walker, a friend
8:56
of UK column whom we've interviewed several times, picked up on. It was
9:00
on the Monday the nineteenth of February. Mister Wakeford said the following, I
9:03
won't read it all out, but he said, when we see a banner
9:07
saying Zionists not welcome, we know what it means. It means Jews not
9:11
welcome. Let us call it out for what it is. Anti Sionism is
9:16
antisemitism. That goes further even than the IHRA definition on antisemitism, which is
9:22
much contested. Justin Walker picked up on this and again, I won't read
9:26
it all, but you can freeze the screen. And his point is because
9:30
he's an erudite man, particularly in military history. Is Justin Walker he said,
9:35
I have a personal interest in what you're saying here because he's just found
9:39
out about Folker Bernardotta, the Swede who was assassinated by Zionists terrorists. There's
9:43
no two way about it in nineteen forty eight, specifically because he was calling
9:48
for a two state solution with Palestinians and Israelis, as they would become living
9:52
in a single, peaceful settlement. And he says that his personal interest is
10:00
that his father, Justin Walker's father was a Royal Marine commando officer who witnessed
10:05
horrible things being done too with Palestinians by the Irgun and so he says he
10:09
was truly shocked to read that folk Bernadotta was murdered by a halo bullets for
10:13
Zionists, precisely for aiming for a two state solution. This was an email
10:18
sent to Christian Wakeford, member for Bury South, on the twenty first of
10:22
March. Then he says, I've got a couple of questions for you.
10:26
What's the difference between what happened in nineteen forty eight and the Hamas murders,
10:31
their big point being in nineteen forty eight it was Zionist terrorism. Secondly,
10:35
do you stand by your statement that attacking Zionism is anti Semitic? And thirdly,
10:41
since the two state solution has now collapsed in twenty twenty four, will
10:43
you support a campaign that seeks to establish Judeo Palestine, which Justin understands to
10:48
be a proper respect for the Balfour Declaration. He's followed that up because mister
10:54
Wakeford has in his silence insinuated the usual parliamentary protocol. Go away, you're
11:00
not my constituents, you don't live in the geographical area that elected me.
11:03
And again, without reading at all, Justin wasn't taking this lying down.
11:07
He said that his late grandfather received the rip's response from Winston Churchill in nineteen
11:11
thirty six on a matter of national importance, and he was certainly not Churchill's
11:16
geographical constituents. So he says, please, mister Wakeford, do not hide
11:20
behind this ridiculous so called protocol that you can't enter into correspondence with somebody outside
11:24
your correspondent, with you outside your constituency. Hansan has been falsified by this
11:30
statement being allowed to lie, so we need to have it corrected. He's
11:33
now up to his fourth reply, that fourth demand for a reply. You
11:39
stated categorically in Parliament that Tobezionist is to be anti Semitic, and he's not
11:43
going to let that go on the record. There are many, of course
11:48
inconsistencies in the Hansard record on statements of fact, because it's MP's licensed to
11:52
state it. But I think that's just in his constitutionally and morally correct here
11:58
and doing the record in Hansan favor by challenging this. Thank you very much
12:03
for that, Alex, and of course all written in a very calm,
12:07
reasonable way, which is the correct approach when dealing with this very sensitive issue.
12:13
Well, let's bring in Diane. You're going to give us an update
12:18
on what's been happening to the finefe women and particularly over the weekend. For
12:22
me at least, it seems there's some good news. What have you got
12:26
to tell us? Absolutely, Brian, thanks, I'm really happy to be
12:31
here to report all this good news. First of all, if we can
12:33
go to the phanessis Fribes group campaign for justice, which I would like to
12:37
thank all of you for supporting, including UK Colin viewers for the last Over
12:43
the last week we raised two seven dred and forty four pounds, which is
12:46
incredible. Our initial target was one thousand pounds, so it's really great that
12:50
you guys have just blown that out of the water. It's been great.
12:54
I do have a statement to read here from Marian Reed and lyndsher And,
12:56
who are the admins of the Survivors group. They wanted me to share with
13:01
you today. We one hundred percent appreciate everything they meet UK column and the
13:05
viewers have done for us. And as the saying goes, we live to
13:09
fight another day, but because of their help we will be able to fight
13:13
on a lot longer than another day. So massive thanks to all who donated.
13:16
It's really great. So to go into what happened the past few weeks
13:22
leading up to last week's committee meeting, we have here a submission from the
13:24
petitioner just a quick review for those of you who may not be familiar with
13:30
the story. The petition has been for the Finethew women to access Scotland's redress
13:35
scheme and if you remember the may Or sorry, the March meeting was very
13:39
disappointing because Shona Robinson said that they do not qualify for the Scotland's redress scheme
13:43
because their abuse was short term. So part of the response was what they
13:48
called a primal scream and this is posted on the Scottish government website if you'd
13:52
like to read the whole thing, but just in part she said, with
13:56
the Deputy Minister, please elucidate on what is an acceptable amount of abuse as
14:01
in a long term abuse from compensatory situation versus a short term abuse and compensatory
14:07
situation. For example, what a single rate victim in a long term care
14:11
home be allowed redress whereas survivors in a shorter term facility and during many horrors
14:16
over a six to eight week stay, which is what the Nazi's fibers went
14:20
through not be It just doesn't make sense. How does the deafy first Minister
14:24
arrive at the conclusion that short term means no redress. And so what we
14:30
did from there was we submitted another a couple of press releases leading up to
14:33
this. Here you can see some of the media coverage that was out on
14:37
the seventeenth, which was the morning of the meeting, and that was just
14:41
sort of an announcement saying there's going to be a protest, We're going to
14:45
try to get some visibility on the case. And so now first heere,
14:48
I would like to play a clip from the meeting from Fergus Ewing, who
14:52
was a rogue MSP who gave up an amazing performance in the Petitions can Be
14:58
meeting as a member. So if we could play that now base at the
15:03
meeting where we heard from the current Deputy First Minister, I felt that the
15:07
arguments that were being presented were insupportable, unjustifiable and inexcusable and quite impossible to
15:15
defend on any basis frankly, and I've seen the written submission of the tenth
15:22
of April from the petitioner. Some of which has been alluded to. I
15:28
wanted to make two additional suggestions, which at this case are at this point
15:33
are contingent. In other words, they may not require to be resorted to,
15:39
but I think that they should be if necessary. First of all,
15:43
I think your suggestion can be that we raise with John Swinney the apparent contradiction
15:48
between the positions adopted by the two deputy first Ministers, the previous and the
15:54
current. And the previous is an excellent one. But you know, at
15:58
the end of the day where the second in command adopt two apparently different positions,
16:04
well what do you do? Will you go to the boss? You
16:10
go to the boss and say, look, your two deputies can agree with
16:12
each other. Okay, well one was the previous deputy and not the current
16:17
First Minister, but it was still the deputy First Minister of Scotland. And
16:22
therefore I think we should kind of indicate that we might be minded to seek
16:26
evidence from the First Minister if we can't get justice for the people that are
16:33
here today and those who cannot be with us. And in addition, I
16:37
think it would be helpful to signal a convener that if all of these things
16:45
proved to be ineffective. Then we wouldn't be doing our job unless we go
16:48
back to the floor of our Parliament and debate this issue there. And I
17:00
do wish to be unkind, but I do sometimes feel like one of the
17:03
judges and these TV programs that have to keep reminding counsel that he's not a
17:07
witness. He's easy here. It's a big constructive So at the end there
17:15
that was the convenient the Petition's Committee Jackson Kerlott commenting on the fact that they're
17:19
about thirty of us, mostly Pinethe survivors in the public gallery of plotting,
17:23
which I thought was just an interesting contrast compared to what happened in the Excess
17:27
That's debate last week that Wie covered with Andrew Bridge and present just a bit
17:33
different in Scotland, I guess. So what we have here next is the
17:36
official minutes. This is just part of the minutes from the meeting with the
17:40
formal actions that were recorded that the Committee will agree to invite we address Scotland
17:45
to give evidence at a future meeting. It also agreed to write to John
17:48
Swinney, MSP, who is the former Deputy First Minister who presents at apparent
17:53
contradiction. The Law Society of Scotland and Thompson Solicitors that are working actually on
17:59
behalf of of some of the issues around the case. It also agreed to
18:03
add the petition to the shortlist of possible subjects for the Committee to request the
18:07
parliamentary debate on. The reason to bring in the solicitors and the Law Society
18:11
is to look at the redressed criteria and to see who would or would not
18:15
be eligible and how the criterion might be amended, which is what I have
18:18
suggested personally in my evidence. From here. We have some videos that I
18:23
have to say are UK column exclusives because I did them myself. The first
18:29
one we should have up here is Colin Smith, MSP, who is the
18:33
constituent of the leader of the Finetti Group, Marion Reid, and he I
18:37
asked him for some comments and you can hear the jubilants going on in the
18:40
background. Those are the women having lunch next to us. Smith. Thanks
18:45
for your parents today in the Scottish Parliament and the Petition's Committee. How did
18:48
you feel it went today? There was really positive. I think for the
18:51
first time the women believe that people are actually listening to the applied the Committee
18:56
gave him a full back end made it absolutely clear that the current position of
18:59
the government not to change the Redress screen to knowledge that for pollen abuse that
19:03
happened, but for Nefie is not a sustainable positions. They've continued that petition,
19:08
You've called for low action and that's a small, I think, really
19:11
important step forward for the women. So what do you think the next steps
19:15
will be from here? I think it'll be important for the Committee offously to
19:21
ask Redress Scotland to come before them to highlight the contradiction that appears to exist
19:26
between what the previous Deputy First Minister said John Swinny and what the current Deputy
19:30
First Minister is saying as well, and tried to shine a light on that.
19:33
It could be the Petition's Committee will behold the debate within Parliament on that
19:37
particular issue, but if they don't, then that's certainly something that I'll bring
19:41
forward in the future. So it will take time, which is disappointing because
19:47
we have waited far too long already, but at least we're making a small
19:51
step forward to try to get justice and recognition over what happened A form Nephie.
19:56
I'll thank you so much to you in the comediant mystical Hamilton all did
20:00
an amazing job today and I know the women are very happy because we can
20:03
hear through the windows here, So thank you again and we'll be in touch.
20:11
And the next clip we have here is from Alex Cole Hamilton, who
20:14
is my constituent. I would say that Colin Smith has been with the women
20:18
very consistently from the beginning. Alex Cole Hamilton has been helpful as well.
20:23
He and Colin accompanied the women on a trip to for Nettie last summer and
20:29
as he is just down the street from me, I decided to pop in
20:32
and say hello and he agreed to come and along with Colin, they both
20:34
spoke at the committee meetings. So here's Alex col Hamilton. So what did
20:41
you think about how the meeting went this morning? We can hear from the
20:42
jubilants going on in the room there. What do you think. Well,
20:45
I've never seen anything quite like this in the Scottish Problem in the eight years
20:48
i've been here. I've never seen the petitions committee so unanimous in support of
20:52
a group of survivors. I've never seen them so I think concerned by the
20:56
testimony. They hope then the Deputy First Minister who's trying to excuse away the
21:02
government's kind of decision not to include the Fronefi survivors in the redress scheme.
21:07
And I am very hopeful that there's a market towning point in their campaign for
21:11
justice, because these there are thousands of women out there who were sent,
21:15
you know, without their consent to for an Ethnie House under the guise of
21:19
a summer holiday camp, but was in fact a residential school. That's a
21:23
critical detail. Absolutely and and and as as such, they absolutely deserve justice,
21:30
and they deserve to hear their have their stories heard, their victimhood recognized
21:36
in a full and frank public apology. I don't know a stronger group of
21:40
women. You can hear that through the door. I am honored to be
21:44
standing with them on this journey, and we're not going to go away.
21:47
We're not going to give up until we get justice for the Fornei survivors.
21:51
Thank you so much, Mystical Hamilton as my constitument. I really appreciate it.
21:55
Great to see and I have one more MSP A short comment from Foisel
22:03
Child Harry, who was a member of the Petition's committee along with Fergus jeving
22:07
All. Thanks very much for all of your work today, mister Chatry and
22:11
the Petitions committee and on behalf of the ladies. So i'd like to thank
22:15
you as well as the appointed researcher. What has led you to this point
22:18
to work so hard for the women and advocate for the justice that they deserve.
22:23
I think it's very important listening to everyone and the way they have been
22:29
treated. I feel that they're not getting the clear answer and it's taking too
22:34
long. It's time now the Deputy first Instruments to answer and tell everyone what
22:41
she's planning to do and how you should go and move forward. And as
22:47
my role, I will keep pushing, be pushing it. Thank you very
22:52
much again, thank you so much for your support. And that's enough from
23:00
politicians. Thank you again. However, now we have a clip from Marian
23:03
Read herself, who is the Vanithe Survivors group founder and the co admin,
23:07
and we just want to see how happy she was after the meeting. No
23:15
justice, no peace. Absolutely. How do you think the meeting went this
23:18
morning? I thought the meeting when I past, we're all so in a
23:22
high, so much in the high. We'll wait a long time and when
23:26
we've got half of the day, the support we've had and the committee around
23:30
the day just has put everybody off here when on a total high. Now
23:37
it had been down there for so long. Finally we're going to get somewhere,
23:41
I think. But we will just keep fighting. We will keep coming
23:45
back and each time our voices are the louder, and we're going to get
23:49
there at the end of the day. I'm so happy for you. Congratulations
23:53
boss, I'll cut that, okay, thanks Marian. So from here,
24:02
we had some coverage immediately. As you will see on this slide, it
24:07
was basically mostly except for the Courier that did some end upth coverage. There
24:12
was a story that went across the news wires that basically pulled out mister hums
24:18
or use of himself as him being pulled into the discussion. As Fergus Huming
24:25
said, as I should beginning, this is what's going to happen potentially next.
24:29
I think it was really interesting considering some things that I will be covering
24:33
later on in the news about mister Yusuf. It's interesting that he was pulled
24:37
out even though there were a lot of other actions that will be going on
24:40
in the meantime that hopefully will help before he's brought in. But this is
24:45
where things are going right now up here in Scotland. Brian, I know
24:48
you've really been helpful. Do you have anything that you want to add or
24:52
if anyone else has anything to say? Diane, Well, the immediate thing
24:56
for me to say is well done for what is truly ex reporting on the
25:00
Vanethe case. It's really bringing it alive. But of course it's been a
25:04
lot of work by your good self and the women themselves which has produced results.
25:10
And the final thing I'd like to say is a classic example of people
25:15
engaging their MPs properly, and so we now see MSPs in Scotland starting to
25:22
get involved and doing the right thing, and that's been approaching them in the
25:26
right way and the persistence of the women over four and a half years.
25:30
So I'm going to say thank you very much for that excellent report. Okay,
25:37
Well, UK column only functions by the financial help of its members viewers
25:45
across the world are wonderful, but at the end of the day, it's
25:47
the people who make a contribution financially that keep us going. And so we'd
25:52
like to say please support us, Please support the UK Column, become a
25:57
paid up member, joining the community. That's an important thing where you can
26:03
meet and swap ideas with other like minded people. You can make a purchase
26:07
through the UK Column Shop and if you have a look online there's some very
26:11
interesting products sales of course help us. And at the end of the day,
26:17
all of the information which UK Column puts out is there to be shared
26:21
freely with other people. But if you're sharing clips, please do give us
26:26
a mention. Now. Tomorrow at one o'clock we've got a discussion with Tom
26:32
Nelson going out. That's with Mike Robinson. Tom Nelson, one of the
26:37
creators of The Climate the movie, and that's going to be a very interesting
26:42
discussion. So if you can tune in at one o'clock. A key thing
26:47
for us today is to say that at the end of the news at two
26:51
o'clock today there will be a streaming of Playing God. This is the movie
26:57
that's come together from Mahmoud and Sorry and ash Mahmoud is the film and of
27:07
course this is with Jackie Devoy in the background, and it's an investigation into
27:12
medical demicide. In the UK. So a very serious, very important film
27:18
and we're going to encourage everybody to watch it and then to support it and
27:25
to help promulgate it and to share the very important message. We've also got
27:30
an Alternative View fourteen coming up, Riding the Wave, and this is in
27:36
the Leonardo Hotel, Milton Keynes Sunday the twenty six of May twenty twenty four,
27:41
and there's a special code there on screen UKC ten which will enable UK
27:48
column viewers to get a discount for that event, So please consider doing that.
27:53
Everybody who's trying to get the truth and facts and a message out needs
27:57
our support. Now we've got another very important event. This is with Channel
28:04
Islands and UK Alliance COVID vaccines, the devastating health crisis in the Channel Islands
28:11
and around the world. The key point being is that there is virtually no
28:15
support for people who've suffered from vaccine adverse effects in the Channel Islands. And
28:22
Andrew Bridgen is inviting Jersey and Gersey to consider those devastating effects. So there's
28:30
a great lineup now. The point is that MPs have already received invitations to
28:37
join this event, and what we are saying to UK column viewers is please
28:44
get onto your own MPs to make sure that they will indeed attend to hear
28:48
what these very professional speakers have got to say. We've also got this one,
28:53
the Lawful Remedy Row show Self Preservation for a Sovereign Life, Sunday twenty
29:00
six of May ten to five pm, Assembly Rooms, High Street, Glasgow.
29:06
It's about power, it's about government and media pressure and at the end
29:11
of the day it's looking at getting people to tackle that and do something about
29:15
it. Okay, well, Mark, let's welcome you to UK call the
29:22
news and you're having a look at net zero. Yeah, good day everyone.
29:29
I was curious. I was pondering this recently. What does that zero
29:33
mean? What would it look like? And I started thumbing through the internet
29:37
and I found that our friends at the World Economic Forum, from their layer
29:41
in Davos, Switzerland, had published this in late twenty twenty two, the
29:45
headline being these eight countries have already achieved that zero emissions. Imagine my surprise.
29:52
Well, let's move on from there. Global Action to Combat Climate Change
29:57
reading part of this has prompted a wave, a wave of national commitments really
30:03
to reach net zero. The US and many others are targeting twenty fifty,
30:08
which might mean never in a way with countries like China and India decades later.
30:15
So we'll give China a free pass because we've moved most manufacturing there plus
30:18
the emissions. But a handful of carbon sink countries already have their emissions in
30:23
check that zero is achieved. This is most important when more carbon dioxide is
30:29
absorbed from the atmosphere each year than is emitted. Reaching that zero on a
30:34
global scale is a central part of efforts to prevent global warming, exceeding the
30:41
much ballyhooed one point five celsius climate target, and so on and so forth.
30:48
I listed the countries. Here's seven of them, or here's part of
30:52
them anyway. The ones they referred to are Bhutan, which is landlocked South
30:59
Asia, mostly forestry and agriculture, a cottage industries at best seven hundred and
31:03
eighty thousand population, Comoros of Volcanic Archipelago of East Africa off the coast.
31:11
Agriculture is fifty percent of GDP, which employs eighty percent of the labor force.
31:17
It's basically agrarian gabone if I'm saying that right. The Atlantic coast of
31:23
Central Africa. Africa largest industries petroleum, manganese and timber, so they're heavy
31:29
petroleum kind of. We're there, strong links with France, large foreign investments
31:33
nineteen seventies, an abundant oil reserve discovered offshore, population two point three million.
31:40
And Guyana. This one's very significant, as we'll see in a couple
31:44
of minutes or less on a video. This is on South America's North Atlantic
31:48
coast. A massive oil fine, a massive oil mining operation, you know,
31:57
offshore mining found offshore has catapulted Guyana from among the lowest performing Latin American
32:04
countries to the fastest growing economy in the world, we're told two years straight,
32:08
with the population of eight hundred and eight thousand. Then we've got Madagascar,
32:14
New Niue, a small island nation South Pacific Ocean, and Panama mainly
32:21
tourism and services, banking, insurance, container ports, population four point four
32:25
million, and then Suriname dot dot dot. Moving on from there, the
32:30
eighth one. Suriname is a small Amazon nation and is among the most forest
32:36
rich countries in the world, with the African rainforests excuse me, Amazon rainforest
32:43
canopy covering ninety three percent of its land mass, and those forests reportedly absorb
32:47
billions of tons of CO two and support rich biodiversity. And what this suggests,
32:53
Brian is that to be a net zero country you have to be at
32:58
best an emerging onomy almost a third world nation economically, and not the high
33:04
output of the US, for example. So it kind of shows, at
33:08
least tentatively, where we're going with defining that zero and what net zero countries
33:13
would look like economically. But here we have the president in this video coming
33:17
up of Guyana lecturing and you'll find this entertaining in a way a BBC reporter
33:23
who's trying to lecture him. So this guy Gillan and President tries to set
33:29
the record straight on what his country is doing in contending with the BBC reporters.
33:32
So let's look at this video. It is expected that there will be
33:38
one hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of oil and gas extracted off your coast.
33:45
That means, according to many experts, more than two billion tons of
33:51
carbon emissions will come from your seabed from those reserves and be released into the
33:58
atmosphere. I don't know if fewars ahead of state went to the comp right
34:02
there. Let me stop you right here. Do you know that Guyana has
34:20
a forest forever that is the size of England and Scotland combined. If forest
34:27
the stores nineteen point five diketons of carbon. If forests that we have kept
34:30
alive, A forest that we have kept does not give you the right does
34:35
not give you the right to release all this carbon from that gives you the
34:38
right to lecture us on climate change. I am going to lecture you on
34:44
climate change because we have kept this forest alive. The stores nineteen point five
34:49
tons of carbon that you enjoy, that the world enjoy, that you don't
34:52
pay us for, that you don't value, that you don't see a value
34:55
in that the people of Ghana has kept alive. Guess what we have a
35:00
lewis deforestation rate in the world. And guess what even with our greatest exploration
35:05
of the oil and gas resource we have now, we will still be net
35:08
zero. Can will still be net zero with all our exploration, couple will
35:13
still be net zero. No, no powerful powerful words, mister President.
35:16
I'm not completed as yet. I am not finished as yet. I am
35:20
just not finished as yet. Because this is a hypocrisy that exists in the
35:24
world. We the world in the last fifty years has lost sixty five percent
35:30
of all this biodiversity. We have kept our biodiversity. Are you valuing it?
35:35
Are you ready to pay for it? When is the developed or is
35:37
going to pay for it? Or are you in the pockets? Are you
35:40
in the pockets of those who have damaged the environment? Are you in the
35:44
pockets? Are you in your system in the pockets of those who destroy the
35:47
environment through the industrial revolution? And now lecturing us some very pointed remarks from
35:58
the Guyana president to that BBC reporter, kind of some informational justice, you
36:04
might say, as the BBC is great at lecturing others. But one thing
36:08
I would come in on briefly, Brian, as I wind up this segment,
36:12
is that even though that president was very forceful and assertive and made some
36:15
good points his remarks, unless he's just being obligatory about this, his remarks
36:22
still support the basic tenets of the globalists, that net zero is important,
36:27
that preserving forests at all costs, and you know, cutting down any timber,
36:31
you know you've got to preserve the forest. You can't really use the
36:35
timber. And so in a way, he's still upholding the narrative, even
36:38
though he's arguing in the way that the BBC is handling itself and the way
36:43
it handles these issues, So you can read it different ways, the way
36:47
that president is talking and what he had to say. But nevertheless, this
36:52
whole segment points out that the net zero vision necessarily would make countries be well
37:00
below their potential output economically and stay more or less raided as a developing country
37:06
and more or less third World than their economic structure. So that kind of
37:10
doesn't bold well for countries like the UK and the US unless we learn more
37:15
about it, and that would change our view. So back to you,
37:17
Brian, Thank you very much. Mark. I just say that strife and
37:23
conflict amongst the globalists is always good because it helps delay their plan. So
37:29
let's look on the bright side of that, Alex Lord speaker, what have
37:34
you got to tell us, well, Brian, Once the narrative of climate
37:38
change will kill us all has embedded itself through the efforts of the Stephen Suckers
37:43
of this world in our minds, and as we look forward to racing ahead
37:46
to the developmental level of Bhutan and Niui, the question is what is this
37:51
bugbear going to be used to achieve The House of Lords, the upper chamber
37:57
of the United Kingdom Parliament used to have presiding over it a Lord Chancellor until
38:02
the Blair vandalism of twenty years ago and more. The Speaker there is simply
38:07
now called the Lord Speaker, and he sees fit to maintain an interview series
38:12
put out on the House of Lord's official YouTube channel. Most recently, the
38:15
Lord Speaker asked, what are the difficulties of regulating artificial intelligence? So we
38:21
get the tuffer here, we get the climate change gremlin and the artificial intelligence
38:24
bogeyman, and with us an unfortunate typo here, because Martin Reese is a
38:30
household name in Britain and many other countries. The Lord Speaker, or whoever
38:34
does his typing for him, says the former president of the Royal Society,
38:38
that is the society of Societies of Scientists set up in the Restoration era the
38:45
seventeenth century. Lord Martin Reese, who's become resources, discusses with me that
38:50
about that on the last episode of Lord Speaker's Corner Corny pun Let's have a
38:55
look at just a minute and a little of what Marvin Reese said, and
39:00
of course it's him who's saying it. Martin rees sorry, but the Lord
39:02
Speaker is allowing him to say it, and he's calling for world government under
39:07
the more pleasant sounding name of supranational. And you've advocated the established super national
39:15
institutions to fake claimate change and others with an appropriate regulatory framework. Does that
39:23
apply to EI as well as these other subjects? Certainly. I think the
39:29
special problem of AI is that the main players are now multinational conglomerates as we
39:36
know as are dominating the world's market. And it's very hard to tax these
39:43
companies properly, and for the same reason, it's going to be very hard
39:45
to enforce regulations on them. But if we've got to try, and it's
39:50
good that the start's being made in a number of ways to try and get
39:53
greed regulations. But of course the fact that there's a few really dominant players
40:00
in the market makes it more difficult for nations to assert themselves, even in
40:06
collaboration. But I think it's very important to ensure that there is regulation of
40:10
these new technologies. And that was as you can tell from the Corney music,
40:21
the selected highlight put out by the Lord Speaker and his team personally.
40:24
And if you want the full interview, which will be linked in the show
40:28
notes here, it is on the House of Lord's YouTube channel. The astronomer
40:34
Lord Greece of Ludload speaking to Lord Speaker on this episode sixteen of Lord Speaker's
40:39
Corner. Is this just a bit unto order? Is there more to it?
40:43
Well, constitutionally, not much is going to happen, because, for
40:45
one thing, this was speech, not writing, so it won't qualify under
40:50
any kind of constitutional crimes of writing. But you did hear a clear call
40:53
there for His Majesty's governments to be put in abeyance to global government. If
41:00
we look at the legislative record here, an obscure section of an obscure Act
41:06
seven Section seventy three of the UK Wide Coroners and Justice Act two thousand and
41:09
nine, under Gordon Brown abolished or pretended to abolish by statute the common law
41:16
offense of seditious libel now sedition in the US, known specifically as seditious speech,
41:23
and it's been prosecuted under that is still very much a common law offense
41:28
federally and at levels below that seditious libel and the offenses under B and C
41:32
that have likewise been repealed, or I should say an nulled are of course
41:37
only writing. But sedition is very real. It is calling for the overthrow
41:44
of His Majesty's governments, of our sovereignty, of the established order in church
41:49
and state, and it has a multi century history of being prosecuted in every
41:52
English speaking jurisdiction. I doubt it will be, but I put it to
41:57
you that that may be a qualification of seditious speech. And while we're on
42:00
Scottish politicians, people have heard that the current Lord Speaker their hails from Dumbarton.
42:05
He is personally a success story. To give him his due, he
42:08
left school without qualifications and thanks to the open University and his own application,
42:14
he managed to get very far in life. But it just brings me back
42:17
to what Diane was telling us a moment ago. We're not quite onto the
42:22
Dutch Parliament yet Diane was telling us a moment ago that there is now support
42:25
from Jackson Carl Law, who at least the last I knew, was Deputy
42:30
leader of the Scottish Conservatives, and from the Scottish Liberal Democrats alex Cole Hamilton.
42:34
Now these men are quite sincere in their support from the Fanetti ladies.
42:37
But yet if you put their names, or indeed the name of the former
42:40
Deputy for Minister of Scotland, John Swinney with an e y into UK column
42:45
dot Org, you will find questions about their record in the past, particularly
42:49
this over eagerness to do their best by children, which has led in the
42:53
case of Carlaw, them to say, we know we should ban home education.
42:58
In as many words, alex Cole Hamilton was a great cheerleader for the
43:01
named person's scheme. But you have to bear in mind that they're doing what
43:06
they can within the moral framework they can and that is set by the Stephen
43:09
Sackers of this world at the BBC. So this earworm of climate change is
43:14
a gateway to global government. Likewise, is something that could perhaps be brought
43:17
out of the mind to these politicians if we write to them in enough numbers,
43:21
just very quickly. At the end of this segment, then the Dutch
43:23
Parliament, as reported here by doctor Meryl Nass, a very well known dissident
43:28
doctor and writer now here she's writing at daughter Freedom. The Dutch Parliament a
43:31
few days ago the sixteenth voted at the beginning of its Order of business for
43:36
the day to instruct the minister Missus pr dykes Thrat. She's still in office
43:42
because we don't have a new government yet, but the holdover from the last
43:45
government responsible for who negotiations. She's been instructed by a majority of the one
43:50
hundred and fifty strong Dutch Lower Chamber, the House of Representatives to delay voting
43:55
on the World Health Organization on both of its instruments, the treaty and regulations
44:00
that Mark and others have been reporting on, and if they cannot secure a
44:04
delay, the instructions in the Hague from the parliamentarians are to vote no by
44:08
default and for those who want to see the original documentation, just to blow
44:12
that up for a moment, here is the order. It won't necessarily go
44:16
through given the Dutch constitutional arrangement, but it will carry much weight. Order
44:21
that the Minister should ask for a delay on voting on the amendments and thus
44:25
also on the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty at the World Health
44:30
Assembly, and if not to vote against. There is the mainstream Dutch paper
44:36
that picked up on it, the legacy title the tile Craft, So those
44:39
who read Dutch or use translation machines can see that on screen at the moment
44:44
is a summary in English produced by doctor merril NAS's article on what's going on.
44:49
So a very significant indication not only on this issue, but more widely
44:52
that the Dutch Parliament may also now consist of a majority of people who are
44:58
sufficiently aware of public opinion not to run through such monstrosities. Alex, thank
45:04
you very much for that, and we're going to move back to Mark.
45:08
Now, who's going to be talking about the World's Bank. Indeed, the
45:15
World Bank, of course holds the annual Spring meetings in DC. There's another
45:21
slide prior to this one, I believe, But anyway, these are some
45:27
samplings of World Bank and IMF topics that took place last week. I was
45:31
going to report this ahead of time, but it got delayed, so now
45:35
this is after the fact. For the twenty twenty four Spring Meetings, which
45:37
are typically held in DC. I covered them in person eleven years ago,
45:42
and a quick footnote on that was one thing I picked up on eleven years
45:45
ago when I was there, was that countries that did not change their family
45:50
policies, countries that moved away from traditional nuclear marriages, nuclear families and would
45:57
go more for putting women into the workforce as an obligatory thing, they would
46:01
get more funding and more favorable funding terms. Things like that. But some
46:07
of the topics last week, let's go back one just a quick summary to
46:14
the side before that. Yeah, Civil Society Policy Forum, the path for
46:20
taxing the super rich, which has always been kind of an elusive thing.
46:23
Climate financing for African small developed states, closing the gap that kind of ties
46:29
into my World Economic Forum thing earlier about what defines zero and making the new
46:35
Loss and Damage Fund a success, recommendations by climate vulnerable civil society. So
46:42
there's all sorts of funds tying into climate change in the achievement of the Sustainable
46:45
Development goals, all seventeen of them of the UN that's all hardwired into this.
46:51
We'll move on from there, and I believe we have the basic wrap
46:55
up video. This is produced by the World Bank itself, but it gives
47:00
you the basic rudiments of what they talked about and the thrust of it.
47:05
So we'll watch this video. Hello, and welcome to Washington, DC,
47:09
where we're wrapping up the World Bank Group and IMF Spring meetings. It's been
47:14
a busy week. The focus for us this year was on how the World
47:22
Bank Group can turn its vision of creating a world free of poverty on a
47:25
livable planet into real impact. We're becoming a better bank, faster, more
47:31
effective, more ambitious. On Wednesday, President aj Banga announced the commitment to
47:37
connect three hundred million Africans to affordable energy by twenty thirty in partnership with the
47:44
African Development Bank. On Thursday, we unveiled another commitment to expand quality,
47:50
affordable health services to one point five billion people, also by twenty thirty.
47:57
To close the week, eleven countries announced e eleven billion in commitments to three
48:01
innovative financing tools at the World Then Group to greatly scale up financing for development.
48:07
We will also partner with other multilateral development banks on a new co financing
48:13
platform. There was a big focus on IDA, our fund which provides grants
48:21
and low interest loans to help countries invest in the future of people and planets.
48:25
We're heading into the IDA twenty one replenishment, so you'll be hearing much
48:30
more about IDA in the days and weeks to come, But for now,
48:34
goodbye from the twenty twenty four Spring Meetings. So as you can see Brian
48:42
all very upbeat. It reveals a little bit about what they're doing. But
48:45
for this report, the big thing is the From Vision to Impact, which
48:52
was mentioned is mentioned in the first slide for those that might review the show
48:57
on the archive and things like that and look at the show notes, but
49:00
I looked it up. From Vision to Impact is a significant paper World Bank
49:05
Group Evolution, and one could say a lot about it. It's got the
49:07
financing model list on one side, the new playbook on the other side.
49:13
But the IDA, the International Development Association of the World Bank, and that
49:20
ongoing funding mechanism is what's really significant. It's listed actually in the next slide,
49:25
so it's not shown at the top of the proverbial list, but the
49:30
IDA twenty one launch is mentioned there, and moving on from there is helpful
49:35
to define and explain what that is. IDA twenty one replenishment, the twenty
49:40
first replenishment of the International Development Association is critical and responding to global challenges and
49:46
seizing opportunities for change and ambitious IDA twenty one will serve as a lifeline for
49:52
a world in crisis. Multiple crises have hindered global development, endangered lives and
49:58
livelihoods and left many countries in debt, which is a very misleading thing to
50:02
talk about countries being in debt as if the World Bank and IMF have nothing
50:07
to do with that. IDA has approven track record, they claim of improving
50:12
conditions in the poorest countries and it'll catalyze investments in women and youth empowerment.
50:16
There's that theme again to kind of overturn the traditional home and to put women
50:23
in the workforce as an economic and cultural obligation as a precondition for getting funding
50:30
in many cases of course, energy access, climate goals, digitalization, job
50:36
creation, et cetera, to end poverty on the livable planet. That's a
50:40
kind of sideways referral to climate change again. Moving on from there, the
50:45
World Bank's IDA is a game changer. This is another video and this will
50:51
explain it a little more in depth. Of Children's Right. It is hugely
50:55
important to the work that the International Rescue Can MITEE do as one of the
51:01
largest sources of finance for some of the countries that are most in need but
51:07
are furthest behind on achieving the sustainable development goals and our most climate vulnerable.
51:12
That is really the best most impactful, most flexible instrument for people living in
51:17
the first companies, funding education systems, health systems. Only fifteen percent of
51:22
the goals are on track to be met, which means that we need to
51:27
shake up our strategies. We need some star players and some game changing wins
51:31
in order that we might get back on track in the second half. And
51:36
I think EIDA is the biggest game change and we could hopeful No country can
51:40
solve some of the issues that we're facing alone. We have to work together,
51:45
and we need leadership. And if you are in a position of power
51:49
and you can, this is a mechanism that you and your country should absolutely
51:53
support from projects everyone. IDA is important because it is really one of the
51:59
star players that will help get the global goals done. This People and Planet
52:02
Fund that IDA is is the best investment in terms of its leverage with other
52:08
resources and the way in which provides this background connective clue for lots of other
52:14
investments to do better in development, in building resilience to climate shops, in
52:19
supporting a safer world. Look at the results, look at how much a
52:22
return on investment you can get for this. It is a win win for
52:27
all people. My message to donor countries is really very simple. Poorer countries
52:31
did not cause COVID, They didn't cause the spike in interest rates, they
52:36
didn't cause the conflict that has driven up food prices. They didn't cause climate
52:39
change. But poorer countries are at the sharp end of all of those problems.
52:44
And if we're serious as an international community about delivering a sustainable development Goals
52:49
by twenty thirty, what we have to do is very simple. We have
52:52
to make sure that IDA twenty one is fully funded. So there you go.
53:00
Yeah, poor countries didn't cause interest rates to go up, but banking
53:04
policies did, and of course the world's central banks and the World Bank and
53:07
the IMF are all part of that banking machine. Quickly, how does the
53:12
IDA work. It's overseen by it's one hundred and seventy four shareholder countries,
53:17
which comprise the Board of Governors. The day to day development work of IDA
53:22
is managed by the World Bank Operational Staff, et ceteras historically been funded largely
53:27
by contributions from the governments of its member countries, so largely taxpayers, regardless
53:34
of whatever private donors might take place. Brian, and we have one I
53:38
believe one other slide and there's an important part of this. I could go
53:42
into all of this. I'll just mention it very briefly. Eyed up borrowers
53:47
earlier in the literature I read and the little bit of research I did,
53:52
they kept using the word grants. I picked up on that word being used.
53:55
A grant you would typically think would not have to be paid back.
54:00
Borrowers have significant needs for concessional funds, et cetera, et cetera. If
54:04
you go down to the one before the last item, when it gets into
54:09
the qualifications, it says nations that lack credit worthiness to borrow on market terms
54:19
and therefore have a need for concessional resources to finance the country's development program.
54:23
So to be eligible for funds, you cannot lack credit worthiness to borrow on
54:30
market terms. So what it really means here is another debt machine disguised as
54:36
charity funded by the taxpayers Brian. So that's what it crunches out to be,
54:42
and that's not surprising from the World Bank system, but there hasn't been
54:45
a lot of reporting on its Spring meetings in recent years. So this gives
54:49
us a little bit of a refresher course Okay, Mark, thank you.
54:52
That will jump ahead a little bit because you had some detail about some contact
54:58
details in relation to the report. Will make sure that they go up on
55:01
the show notes. Let's end today with a trip back to Scotland and Diane,
55:09
I think you've got a little bit more to tell us about Humsa.
55:12
Mister Humsa, Yes, yes, mister Humsa has had a bad couple of
55:16
weeks. I will start by saying that on well, his hate crime bill
55:22
has made him incredibly unpopular. A poll from just a few days ago said
55:27
that he has fallen from January in popularity by minus fifteen points and currently twenty
55:32
nine percent of SMP supporters at the last election do not approve of his job
55:37
currently. Also on the ninth of April, just before that poll came out,
55:42
his brother in law was charged with abduction not extortion, in a case
55:45
link to a man who died in the hospital in Dundee on the tenth of
55:50
January. I believe it was which we could say is personal anything to do
55:52
with him, but really did not set him up for the next two days
55:54
that he was going to have. So we can see here. Five days
55:58
ago on Twitter, he said as the largest pro independence party at this general
56:02
election. The SMP is best place to advance the cause of independence, get
56:07
rid of any every Tory MP in Scotland. I think he forgets sometimes that
56:10
we are still part of the UK and ensure Scotland's voice is heard. And
56:15
we have a lot of these kinds of sarcastic responses. Jack is one of
56:19
many saying things like translation, the SMP will advance the cause of Islam,
56:22
get rid of right questions and ensure women's rights are ended. Fix that for
56:28
you. You're welcome. So we're not seeing a whole lot of support for
56:30
Hamza on social media. Now we go on to Thursday last week, we
56:36
see that the SMP's net zero secretary, Mary McCallen, has accepted that the
56:43
net zero reduction targets are twenty thirty are now unobtainable. Surprise, surprise,
56:47
right. So the problem here is that this is now in question the coalition
56:51
that they did have the Scottish Dreams. The Scottish Greens are not very happy.
56:53
They're also not very happy with the results of the CAST report on what's
56:58
going on with the LGBT agenda, so that is starting to fall apart as
57:01
well, if we go on also on Thursday, Nicholas Sturgeon's husband, Peter
57:07
Murle, who I'd like to call mister Sturgeon, has been re arrested over
57:10
the emvestment of funds from the SMP. So this happened already a couple of
57:15
months ago. He's brought back in and it's expected obviously to be pretty serious.
57:20
So this was back a few weeks ago. Believing he was first arrested
57:23
it was last year. Sorry. And then from here we go on to
57:27
Saturday. We had an Independence march in Glasgow. How did that go?
57:30
Well, we had someone who drove into the march as they were proceeding from
57:35
the west into the city center. We see there there was a police person
57:38
trying to stop the car by placing their hand on the bonnet of the car.
57:44
However, an SMP councilor decided to comment before they knew what was going
57:49
on that it was obviously far right extremism that was the reason for this person
57:53
driving into the parade, which was not the cause at all, as we
57:55
found out later on. It was a man who's now been arrested on drug
58:00
yards charges and driving issues. So they got to George Square in the city
58:04
center. We have some people trying to show that there's all these blue SMP
58:08
supporters and Scottish flags going on. But if you look at the actual webcam
58:13
from the top of the City Chambers looking down, as McKay is said,
58:16
there there are not many hashtake Believe in Scotland, which was the name of
58:21
the group that organized the event. So from here, where do we go?
58:25
While it's not looking good for the S and P, it's not really
58:29
looking good for anyone up here. But I certainly don't expect that they will
58:32
be winning at the next election. Maybe labor, who knows. But it's
58:36
all over the aar from here right now. Brian, Okay, Diane,
58:39
Well, we've got chaos and turbulence everywhere in this country. Meanwhile, the
58:45
globalist agenda and those Agenda twenty thirty goals are all encompassing for every national government
58:54
in the world. So yeah, troubled times, Alex. I think you're
58:59
going to end news today with a particular image. What have you got for
59:02
us? Yes, I'm afraid it is an AI designed one. I don't
59:07
know the name of the artist. I'll gladly give credit if someone tells me
59:09
who. But get bearing in mind the debate we just heard between President Muhammed
59:14
ifan Ali of Guyana and Steven Sacker of the BBC on net zero and give
59:17
them mark to extra details. Here we are a neo caveman family, hideously
59:23
white, some people would call them in today's cultural climate, are living in
59:28
their grotto and eating their legumes. And the father of the family, who's
59:32
reverted to patriarchal type with his big beard and pectorals, says Net zero,
59:37
We've done it. We are saved. I shared this on my telegram Channel
59:40
Eastern Approaches the other day and somebody pointed out that those fires are going to
59:44
have to go because they're would based certainly in Scotland. Okay, Alex,
59:50
thank you very much for that. I'll just say before we end that A
59:53
made a mistake talking about the Lawful Remedy road Show twenty six of May ten
59:59
o'clock in the morning, TI, I think I said Glasgow. I meant
1:00:01
Glastonbury down in the West Country, so apologies to the team there, but
1:00:07
we've now corrected it. We must end today's news. Thank you all very
1:00:10
much for joining us, and stay with the UK column Channel for the playing
1:00:15
out of Playing God and investigation into medical democide in the UK. Thank you
1:00:22
for joining us