Latest / Reformed Thinking / Clothed in Another’s Righteousness: The Obedience of Christ, the Second Adam, for Sinners

Transcript

Clothed in Another’s Righteousness: The Obedience of Christ, the Second Adam, for Sinners · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed thinking. You know, for men and people,
0:03
the idea of salvation is pretty simple.
0:05
God looks at us, sees our failures, and just cancels the
0:09
debt. It's like a clean slate, a
0:11
forgiveness of everything we've done wrong.
0:13
But if that's the whole story, we're actually missing the
0:16
absolute core of the gospel according to the sources we've
0:19
put together for today. They stress that there's a much
0:22
bigger, a much more fundamental issue than just our guilt.
0:26
That's right. The problem isn't just that
0:28
we've done wrong, I mean that we've committed crimes that need
0:31
a pardon. The problem is also that we are,
0:34
well, positively unrighteous before a perfectly holy and just
0:38
God. So it's not just a negative
0:39
thing like a list of sins. No, it's also a positive lack.
0:43
We lack the moral record, the positive standing that God's law
0:45
actually requires of any human being.
0:48
If God simply offered a pardon, we'd be, you know, debt free,
0:52
but we'd still be standing there without the perfection needed to
0:55
inherit eternal life. So we have this double sided
0:57
problem. We're guilty of violating the
0:59
law and we are also deficient in well, in fulfilling the law.
1:02
Precisely. And because of that, the gospel
1:05
offers a double cure. It provides the pardon for what
1:09
we've done wrong, and it provides a perfect positive
1:12
status of righteousness for what we failed to be.
1:15
And this isn't just some, you know, academic footnote.
1:18
Not at all. It's the lifeline of Christian
1:20
hope. That's why, in his final
1:22
moments, the theologian J Gresham Nation, a man who fought
1:26
so hard for the truth of the gospel, sent this desperate
1:30
telegram to a colleague. I know this story.
1:32
It's powerful. It is.
1:33
It contains just one short, crucial sentence.
1:36
I'm so thankful for the act of obedience of Christ.
1:39
No hope without it. Wow, that really sets the stakes
1:42
right away. So Majan understood that
1:44
Christ's death, the forgiveness part, wasn't enough without
1:47
Christ's life, his perfect obedience.
1:50
So our mission in this deep dive is to get a really clear and
1:54
thorough understanding of why the gospel requires both pardon
1:58
and a positive status of righteousness, and how Christ as
2:01
the second Adam, supplies this complete solution.
2:05
We'll be looking at the precise covenantal and judicial
2:07
categories that have to be maintained to safeguard this
2:10
doctrine, drawing a lot from Romans 5 and the historical
2:13
confessions of the church. Let's get into it.
2:16
OK, so let's unpack this core problem of unrighteousness.
2:19
When the apostle Paul argues that the law's purpose is to
2:22
stop every mouth so the whole world stands accountable before
2:25
God, that accountability seems more severe than just listing
2:29
our personal slip UPS. It feels like it reveals our
2:31
total inadequacy. It does.
2:33
Scripture shows that our need is truly double.
2:36
Paul's goal in Romans 3 is to show that everyone, both Jew and
2:38
Gentiles, you know, shut up under sin, and the requirement
2:41
isn't just negative. Don't do this.
2:42
Don't do that. Right, it's not just a list of
2:44
prohibitions. No, the requirement is positive.
2:48
Love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and
2:51
love your neighbor as yourself. That is the standard of positive
2:54
conformity the law demands, and we fail to meet that standard
2:58
from the moment we're born because of the contamination of
3:01
the fall. You know, for me, wrapping my
3:03
head around the idea that I needed a positive moral record,
3:06
not just my debts cleared, that changed everything.
3:09
Can you elaborate a little on why that distinction between
3:13
guilt and positive unrighteousness is so, well, so
3:16
revolutionary? It's revolutionary because it
3:18
gets to the very nature of God's justice.
3:21
God isn't just lenient, He is holy.
3:23
If God is just, he can't simply wave his hand and declare guilty
3:26
people righteous by, you know, an indulgence.
3:29
Think of it this way. If I'm found guilty of a crime,
3:32
the judge can't just say, OK, I pardon you and now I declare you
3:35
a perfect law abiding citizen who has fulfilled every
3:38
requirement of the law. That would be unjust.
3:40
It would be a lie. It would be justice has to be
3:43
maintained. The standard is absolute.
3:45
It can't be lowered. So God has to show himself to be
3:48
both the one who upholds justice and the one who justifies the
3:52
Sinner who trusts in Jesus. So this need for God to be just
3:57
and the justifier, as Paul says, it forces us to see that we need
4:01
two things. The punishment for our past
4:03
failures has to be absorbed somewhere, and the perfect
4:06
obedience we fail to give has to be supplied from somewhere else.
4:09
Exactly. And understand how God supplies
4:11
both. We have to 1st understand the
4:14
well, the moral architecture of redemptive history.
4:17
This need drives us straight into the covenantal framework of
4:20
Scripture. And that framework requires some
4:22
specific controlling terms, what we could call the necessary
4:25
guardrails of the gospel. OK, let's slow down and define
4:28
those guardrails because I think this is where confusion can
4:31
really start to dilute the gospel.
4:33
What's the first concept we need to grasp to keep the focus on
4:35
God's work and not our own? The first one is federal
4:38
headship. This is the structure that
4:41
defines the relationship between one representative and the many
4:44
people he represents. It's the moral architecture that
4:47
governs the relationship between Adam and humanity, and then
4:50
between Christ and his people. So Adam wasn't just the first
4:54
guy. No, he wasn't just the first
4:56
private individual in history. He stood as a public person, a
5:00
covenant head whose act had legal consequences for everyone.
5:04
He represented all of his posterity.
5:06
That's such a powerful idea, but it's also, you know, very
5:10
counterintuitive to how we think today.
5:12
So individualistically, why would the act of one person
5:15
affect everybody else? Well.
5:17
You can think of it in terms of representative government or
5:19
even corporate law, but on a cosmic scale, if the head of a
5:24
nation or the CEO of a company signs a treaty or commits some
5:27
kind of contract violation, the consequences immediately fall on
5:30
everyone represented by that head.
5:32
Even if they weren't in the room.
5:33
Right. Even if they weren't personally
5:35
there for the signing, Adam was mankind's appointed
5:38
representative in the Covenant of Works, facing the test on
5:41
behalf of all his offspring. His failure was legally our
5:45
failure. It was a status that was
5:47
conferred upon us. So the key take away here is
5:50
that Christianity isn't about our individual moral failures
5:53
first and foremost. It's about a representative
5:56
legal standing we received from our federal head, Adam.
5:59
Yes. And that representative
6:01
structure is the very channel through which grace comes.
6:04
I mean, if condemnation can come through one man's representative
6:07
failure, then it's coherent, it's logical, and it's glorious
6:11
that one man's righteousness can be counted to many.
6:13
And Christ, of course, is the second Adam in this structure.
6:16
He's the new Covenant head who acts for his people.
6:19
This framework links directly to the kind of language Paul uses
6:22
to define our standing before God.
6:24
Let's move to that judicial language then.
6:26
When we talk about righteousness, the Greek word de
6:28
caiosino. In this context, what are we
6:31
primarily talking about? We are talking about a courtroom
6:34
term first and foremost, not a moral quality term.
6:38
This is so crucial. When Paul speaks of the
6:40
righteousness of God being revealed or imparted, he is
6:44
talking about being in the right before God's judgment, which
6:48
corresponds to a favorable legal verdict.
6:50
So if you're righteous in that sense, it means the law has
6:52
nothing against you, You've met all its requirements.
6:55
That's right, it's a legal status, a declared reality, not
6:59
an internal feeling or some measure of my current morality.
7:01
OK. And this status then directly
7:03
defines justification or decaio. It does.
7:07
They're closely related. Justification is defined
7:09
strictly as a judicial act to declare righteous.
7:13
It's rendering a verdict of acquitted and accepted.
7:16
The standard definition is not to make righteous, but to
7:19
declare righteous. Why is keeping that separation
7:22
between declaring and making so critical?
7:25
Because of Romans 4.5. It's the decisive text.
7:28
God justifies the ungodly. Now, if justification meant
7:31
moral transformation, making the Sinner inherently righteous,
7:34
then justifying the ungodly would be a contradiction in
7:37
terms. You couldn't be ungodly and
7:39
inherently righteous at the same time.
7:41
You couldn't. God absolutely does transform
7:43
us, but that internal moral change is called sanctification,
7:47
and it follows justification. Justification is the objective
7:51
judicial declaration of acceptance based on Christ's
7:54
work or work done completely outside of us.
7:56
So if we get these terms right, federal headship, righteousness
8:00
as a status and justification as a verdict, then the dark logic
8:04
of what happened with the first Adam becomes, well, unavoidable.
8:08
Adam Sin wasn't just a mistake, it was a covenant breach.
8:11
It was a catastrophic brooch of the covenant of works where life
8:15
and confirmation and righteousness were promised on
8:17
obedience and death was promised on disobedience.
8:20
The moment Adam ate the fruit, he triggered the penalty clause.
8:23
And this covenant breach had two devastating immediate
8:26
consequences, right? It touched both our standing and
8:29
our nature, correct? The first was guilt.
8:31
Adam fell under a judicial verdict of condemnation.
8:34
He became answerable to the judge.
8:36
The relationship was broken. The second consequence was
8:39
corruption, the loss of blessed communion, which resulted in the
8:42
bending of the will away from God.
8:44
So the humanity is now unable and also unwilling to conform to
8:47
the law. You see the symptoms immediately
8:49
in genocide? Oh yeah.
8:51
Shame, hiding, fear, they're all indicators that the legal
8:55
contract had been broken and the penalty had been initiated.
8:58
And that guilt and corruption were immediately transferred to
9:01
us because of this federal headship idea.
9:03
Paul insists that by the one man's disobedience, the many
9:07
were made sinners. And that phrase made sinners.
9:11
It doesn't mean we only started acting sinful later in life.
9:14
It means we were constituted sinners under Adams judicial
9:17
verdict. We were placed in the legal
9:20
category of the condemned from the moment of conception,
9:23
inheriting his guilt and his corrupted nature.
9:25
This is the condition of total ruin.
9:27
This logic that our condemnation is a representative status, it
9:31
just completely shuts down every attempt at self salvation.
9:34
It does. I mean, if condemnation came
9:36
through one man's representative failure, the condemned can't fix
9:40
it by just improving themselves. Right, trying harder.
9:42
Trying harder, obeying more. That would just be an attempt to
9:46
reenter the covenant of works, a covenant we are now too weak to
9:49
keep and too guilty to escape. The conclusion is severe.
9:54
We need a new verdict, we need a new head and therefore we need a
9:57
second Adam who could represent us perfectly.
10:00
So only when we see Adam's failure in its full judicial
10:04
weight, both the guilt and the loss of positive righteousness,
10:07
does Christ's whole obedience really appear as the sinners
10:10
only hope. That's the foundation.
10:12
So the necessity of this second Adam leads us directly to the
10:15
solution supplied by Christ. Our sources call this the
10:18
grammar of redemption, which is a great phrase because the
10:21
movement from Adam to Christ is really the deep struction of the
10:24
entire Bible. It is.
10:25
The whole storyline of Scripture is structured around these two
10:28
representative men. Paul's argument in Romans 5 from
10:31
verses 12 to 21 is based on this rigid legal parallel.
10:35
Adam's one trespass led to condemnation for all.
10:38
Christ's one act of righteousness leads to
10:41
justification and life. And that parallel is not
10:44
negotiable. Not at all.
10:46
Adams Representative Act counted for the many leading to death.
10:49
Therefore, Crisis Representative Act must count for the many
10:52
leading to life. Which means that Christo's act
10:55
has to do 2 things. It must not only reverse the
10:58
guilt, the penalty, but it also has to supply the positive
11:01
righteousness, the status that Adam failed to achieve.
11:04
Absolutely. The reversal has to be complete,
11:07
and the very language Paul uses confirms that this is a legal
11:11
declaration based on a representative act, not some
11:14
internal feeling we have. Let's focus on the precision
11:17
Paul uses in Romans 5.19. He says, For as by the one man's
11:21
disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's
11:24
obedience the many will be made righteous, That second part will
11:27
be made righteous. Is just foundational, isn't it?
11:29
It is the structural backbone of this whole doctrine.
11:32
The key verb there is katastathy sontai, which means will be made
11:36
or will be constituted. It's a future passive indicative
11:39
verb. OK, so the passive voice is
11:41
crucial. It's a crucial defense against
11:43
self righteousness because it signifies that the subject, the
11:47
many, is the recipient of the legal status, not the agent of
11:51
the transformation. We are passive recipients of
11:53
this great benefit. That's a mouthful of Greek
11:55
grammar, but it's so important. Can we spend a moment just
11:58
explaining why that passive voice is the entire defense
12:01
against legalism? Certainly if the verb were in
12:04
the active voice, it would imply the many will make themselves
12:07
righteous or something like the many will work to achieve
12:10
righteousness. But because it is passive, it
12:13
means the righteousness is conferred or constituted upon us
12:16
by an external agent, by God Himself.
12:19
So it's something done to us. Yes, the lexical root
12:22
kathistomi. In this kind of forensic
12:24
context, it means to appoint or to constitute someone to a legal
12:28
status. It's an objective declared
12:30
verdict. So just as we were legally
12:32
constituted sinners by Adams Act before we ever committed a
12:35
personal sin, we are legally constituted righteous by
12:38
Christ's act before we perform a single personal good work.
12:41
It's status 1st and behavior flows from that status.
12:45
That is the precise judicial accounting.
12:47
And notice the contrast Paul sets up.
12:50
Adam's failure was disobedience, an active violation of a
12:53
command. Therefore, Christ's act that
12:56
reverses this has to be obedience, an active fulfillment
13:00
of what was required. OK, if Adam failed to keep a
13:03
positive command, Christ's obedience must involve success
13:07
in keeping those positive commands throughout his entire
13:09
life. And this moves us seamlessly
13:11
into seeing Christ as the covenant keeping Son.
13:14
His obedience isn't some vague submission.
13:16
It's the fulfillment of the entire law that Adam shattered
13:19
and that Israel later failed to uphold.
13:21
That's right, his mission didn't start on the cross.
13:23
It started 33 years earlier when he was born under the law, as
13:26
Galatians 4 puts it. And why?
13:28
To redeem those who are under the law.
13:30
So he voluntarily took on those obligations.
13:33
He took upon himself the obligations and demands of the
13:35
covenant of works. The very covenant Adam broke.
13:38
He had to succeed in active obedience where Adam and Israel
13:41
failed, living perfectly under God's moral standard.
13:44
This makes so much sense of parts of the Gospel narrative
13:46
that can sometimes confuse people, like the reason for
13:49
Jesus's baptism in Matthew 3, Jesus tells John the Baptist,
13:53
Thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.
13:56
That phrase fulfill all righteousness.
13:58
That's the announcement of his life's mission.
14:00
In covenantal terms, the infinitive plotai to fulfill or
14:05
to fill up. It means Jesus is filling the
14:08
empty vessel of covenantal obligation that Adam and Israel
14:11
left void. Right, because if you were just
14:13
starting his ministry, he didn't need a cleansing baptism since
14:17
he was sinless. Exactly.
14:19
But he demanded it because he was identifying himself with
14:22
humanity under the law, taking up the mantle of the
14:24
representative man who would perfectly comply with every
14:27
single standard. So his righteousness is not
14:29
simply sinlessness, the absence of wrongdoing, but the active
14:32
performance of all the required good.
14:34
Perfect love to God, perfect love to neighbor, perfect
14:38
submission to every word from God's mouth.
14:40
Yes, He is the representative doing the work on our behalf.
14:44
His perfect moral record is the requirement for eternal life,
14:48
and he created that record for us.
14:50
The whole gospel narrative, really, from the Manger to the
14:52
cross, is the story of this act of obedience.
14:55
And we see this tested so clearly in the temptation
14:58
narratives. I'm thinking of Matthew 4.
15:01
Adam fell in a garden of abundance, giving in to
15:03
temptation in a world of ease. Jesus stands in the wilderness,
15:07
deprived, hungry, and uses Scripture to resist every
15:10
temptation. That contrast is so intentional.
15:14
Jesus stands where Adam fell, and more specifically, where
15:16
Israel failed in the wilderness. His successful resistance proves
15:20
the integrity and the completeness of his act of
15:22
obedience. His sinlessness, which Hebrews 4
15:25
talks about, isn't just a passive quality.
15:27
It's the proven righteousness of the obedient servant who faced
15:30
every human weakness and temptation, yet perfectly
15:33
fulfilled the covenant requirements.
15:35
So the point isn't be strong like Jesus.
15:37
No, the point is, look at the obedient son who stands where
15:40
you fell and who stands for you. He supplies the perfection Adam
15:43
lost and the perfection that the law always required.
15:46
He fulfills Israel's calling by fulfilling Adam's original
15:49
mandate to live in perfect covenant loyalty as God's image
15:54
bearer. His obedience secures the title
15:56
to eternal life which Adam lost, the confirmation in
16:00
righteousness, and the right to the tree of life.
16:03
And without this positive obedience, even if our guilt
16:05
were forgiven, we would have no legal claim to heaven.
16:08
None, we would just be debt free people standing in a neutral
16:11
zone still needing to earn our way in.
16:14
So we've established that the second Adam's positive
16:16
righteousness is absolutely necessary.
16:18
Now we need to define the unity of Christ's work, which is
16:22
traditionally and I think helpfully defined by the
16:24
distinction between his active and passive obedience.
16:28
It is a necessary distinction for clarity, but we have to
16:31
emphasize 1st that Christ's whole obedience, His hypoco, is
16:35
1 unified act of covenant faithfulness spanning his entire
16:38
mission, His life and His death are inseparable components of
16:41
doing the Father's. Will they're not 2 separate
16:43
things? No.
16:44
His obedience is the essential shape of his entire saving work,
16:47
and it all culminates at the Cross.
16:49
OK, let's use an analogy to frame why we need both of these
16:52
components, active and passive. If I default on a mortgage,
16:55
there are two problems, right? Yes, 2 distinct problems that
16:58
come from the same failure. First, you have the penalty, the
17:02
debt itself, which you are now required to pay.
17:04
If you don't pay, you face foreclosure and financial ruin.
17:08
Second, you have the title. You forfeited the right to the
17:12
property, which is like eternal life, because you broke the
17:15
covenant, the law. OK, so if someone just paid off
17:17
my debt for me, the penalty, I'd be financially free, but I still
17:21
wouldn't own the house. I wouldn't have the title deed.
17:24
Exactly, and that distinction illustrates why Christ's work
17:27
has to be dual. The law demands 2 things from
17:30
us. Perfection, which is the
17:32
positive fulfillment of all its requirements that earns the
17:35
title to life, and penalty, which is the endurance of the
17:38
curse for our failures. So let's clearly define the two
17:41
aspects of Christ's work that meet these two demands.
17:44
First, there's active obedience. The life.
17:47
This is Christ, the lifelong law keeping.
17:49
This is the positive righteousness he rendered
17:52
perfectly to God in our nature, His 33 years of flawless
17:55
covenant fidelity. This secures the title to
17:58
eternal life that Adam failed to earn.
18:01
This meets the law's demand for perfection.
18:03
And the second aspect, which is often mistakenly seen as the
18:07
only part of salvation. That is passive obedience, the
18:11
death. This refers to his suffering and
18:13
death, his willing endurance of the penalty and curse or
18:16
disobedience deserved. This is propitiation.
18:20
It removes the guilt, the condemnation, the debt incurred
18:22
by Adam and by your own transgressions.
18:24
This meets the law's demand for penalty.
18:27
And we should probably clarify the language here.
18:28
We call it passive, but that doesn't imply he was reluctant
18:31
or, you know, passive in an emotional sense.
18:33
Not at all. His suffering was the most
18:35
agonizing act of active submission.
18:37
He wasn't dragged unwillingly to the cross.
18:39
He voluntarily submitted to the penalty imposed by his father's
18:42
justice. The term passive just refers to
18:45
the receiving of the suffering and the curse.
18:47
So let's go back to the analogy. If Christ had only lived
18:51
perfectly, His active obedience, and earned the title deed, but
18:55
had not died to pay the penalty, what would have been the
18:58
consequence for us? Well, he would have earned life
19:02
for himself and proved the possibility of human perfection.
19:05
But he couldn't have given it to us because we would still be
19:09
standing under the original judicial verdict of guilty.
19:12
We'd still have a massive debt that needed payment.
19:14
In fact, his terrific life would have condemned us even further
19:17
because we failed to keep that same law.
19:19
And conversely, if he had only died immediately, let's say he
19:23
was born, sinned, and then died for forgiveness without first
19:27
living a perfect life. Then we would have been forgiven
19:29
our debt. The penalty would be paid, but
19:31
we would still lack the positive righteousness required for
19:34
acceptance in eternal life. We'll be back in Adams neutral
19:36
pre fall state, only debt free, but still needing to earn the
19:40
right to eternal life through perfect future obedience, which
19:42
we are completely incapable of doing.
19:44
So the whole obedience is necessary so that God can be
19:47
both just and the justifier. As Romans 3.26 says, justice is
19:52
satisfied because the penalty is paid passive, and justice is
19:56
upheld because the standard of perfection is met active.
20:00
That summarizes the genius of the gospel.
20:03
When the believer stands before God, God sees two things.
20:06
First, that the penalty for their sin has been completely
20:09
satisfied, and 2nd, that they possess the perfect positive
20:13
moral record required for eternal life, which was supplied
20:16
by Christ's life. This means we can't just view
20:19
the cross as some isolated transaction for debt
20:21
cancellation. The cross is where Christ's
20:23
commitment to law keeping reaches its appointed summit.
20:26
That's why Philippians 2 frames his humiliation as the ultimate
20:30
of submission. It says he humbled himself by
20:33
becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.
20:36
The cross isn't a deviation from His obedience, it's the ultimate
20:39
demonstration of His act of obedience, the servant
20:42
deliberately and perfectly submitting to the Father's
20:44
judicial plan at infinite cost to himself.
20:47
And the struggle in Gethsemane highlights this submission so
20:51
powerfully, doesn't it? That agonizing prayer, not my
20:54
will, but yours, be done. He wasn't debating whether or
20:58
not to be a martyr. He was wrestling with the
21:00
decision to absorb the Father's judicial wrath against sin.
21:03
It's the ultimate moment where His human will, though sinless,
21:07
is brought into complete alignment with the Father's
21:09
saving will, fulfilling the covenant He entered into.
21:12
His righteousness is not a theoretical concept.
21:15
It's the lived, obedient life of a true man whose whole existence
21:18
culminates in the act of substitution.
21:21
He supplies the perfection and He endures the penalty, and the
21:24
result is a righteousness that is complete, external and
21:27
available for us. So we've established what Christ
21:30
did his whole obedience. Now we have to ask the
21:33
fundamental question, How does the second Adam's perfect moral
21:36
record become ours? Our sources insist it's not by
21:38
being magically infused into us like some kind of moral
21:41
substance. The answer lies in the twin
21:43
concepts of reckoning and union. The mechanism is judicial
21:46
accounting. The obedience of Christ becomes
21:49
ours by God's sovereign, covenantal and judicial act of
21:53
reckoning. We have to always remember that
21:55
the Sinner stands before God as a judge, and the gospel points
21:58
away from the sinner's performance to Christ's finished
22:01
obedience. And the technical term for this
22:04
judicial accounting is imputation from the word
22:07
legismi. It's basically a bookkeeping
22:09
term. It is.
22:10
Paul uses the verb legisimi to count credit reckon repeatedly
22:15
in Romans 4 to explain how justification works.
22:18
Abraham was justified not by being good enough, but because
22:22
his faith was counted to him as righteousness.
22:24
And this is where Paul draws that famous contrast between a
22:27
gift and wages. Indeed, Paul says if you work,
22:30
the wages are owed to you as a debt.
22:33
But to the one who does not work, but believes in him who
22:35
justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness.
22:39
The righteousness is not earned, it is credited.
22:41
It's a gift given to those who have no merit of their own.
22:44
And this is how the Gospel completely shuts down human
22:46
boasting. So righteousness is counted to
22:48
the believer apart from works. This just proves that imputation
22:52
is necessary because we have no merit of our own to bring
22:56
forward. Exactly.
22:57
And this double accounting leads to that staggering summary Paul
23:01
gives in 2nd Corinthians 5.21, which we often call the Great
23:04
Exchange. For our sake.
23:06
He made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might
23:10
become the righteousness of God. Let's just breakdown that
23:12
exchange for a second. It's so radical.
23:14
It truly is. On one side, our sin, our guilt,
23:18
our failure, our condemnation is imputed to Christ.
23:21
He bears the curse, becoming the legal target of God's judicial
23:24
wrath as our substitute. On the other side, Christ's
23:27
perfect righteousness, both his active and passive obedience, is
23:30
imputed to us. We receive His perfect standing.
23:33
We stand closed with an alien righteous extra note, a
23:36
righteousness that originates entirely outside of ourselves.
23:39
I think that phrase alien righteousness, really needs to
23:41
sink in our entire confidence that the final judgement is
23:44
based on the biography of Jesus, not our own.
23:46
That is precisely right. If your assurance rests on your
23:49
best day, it will fail on your worst.
23:52
If your assurance rests on Christ's obedience, it is stable
23:55
and secure. This alien righteousness secures
23:58
our acceptance. When God looks upon the
24:01
believer, He sees the perfect fulfillment of the law in the
24:04
person of His Son credited to our account.
24:07
OK, so if imputation is the act of crediting by God, then faith
24:11
is the instrument that receives this gift.
24:13
What does it mean for faith to be merely an instrument?
24:15
It means faith is defined negatively against works and
24:19
positively as reliance on Christ is the instrument that receives
24:23
Christ and His benefits, but it is not the ground that earns
24:26
them. We have to guard against making
24:28
faith into a meritorious work itself.
24:30
Faith is not the source of the righteousness, but the channel
24:33
through which the imputed righteousness flows.
24:35
Our sources define faith beautifully as an empty hand.
24:38
It looks away from self to Christ's finished obedience, His
24:42
blood, and His resurrection. It's the ultimate act of self
24:45
renunciation. I mean, if the believer had to
24:47
add anything, even an act of stronger faith, to Christ's
24:50
finished work, they would have something to brag about.
24:53
But since faith is just receiving, it simultaneously
24:56
crushes both the pride of the self-righteous moralist and the
25:00
despair of the struggling Sinner.
25:01
Now, this traditional accounting can sound very cold and
25:04
detached. You know, like a transaction
25:06
between two lawyers who are far away.
25:08
What grounds this imputation? So it avoids being just an
25:11
abstraction. It is grounded entirely in union
25:13
with Christ. This is the spirit wrought bond
25:16
that keeps the entire doctrine from being a cold, detached
25:19
legal transaction. It's the context in which all
25:22
our benefits, justification, adoption, sanctification are
25:25
received. The New Testament is just
25:27
saturated with that phrase in Christ.
25:30
It's our new reality. And you knew with Christ is the
25:33
definitive answer to the charge that imputation is a legal
25:37
fiction. God is not crediting the
25:40
righteousness of a total stranger to us.
25:42
He's crediting the righteousness of the one to whom we are truly
25:46
joined. Like members to a head or a wife
25:48
to her husband. We were literally in Him.
25:52
When we are united to Christ, his history becomes the decisive
25:55
history for us. Crucified with Him, buried with
25:58
Him, raised with him. Which means that while
26:01
justification and sanctification are distinct, the verdict is
26:04
distinct from the transformation.
26:06
They are never separated. Exactly the same union that
26:09
grants a righteous verdict justification also ensures that
26:12
the new member now accepted is also continuously renewed and
26:16
transformed by the Spirit, which is sanctification.
26:19
We don't earn the verdict through holiness, but the
26:21
verdict is the very engine that drives holiness.
26:24
This clarity we've drawn from Scripture was not easily one,
26:26
was it? It was forged through historical
26:28
controversy. So let's look at the
26:30
confessional and pastoral pay off, how the church has
26:32
enshrined these truths to protect the sinners assurance.
26:35
The confessional witness provides the necessary precise
26:38
guard rails. The Church has to state
26:41
scriptures teaching with precision when that teaching is
26:44
challenged, which it constantly is.
26:46
The Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 11, Section 1.
26:50
It articulates this doctrine of active and passive obedience
26:53
with just breathtaking clarity and detail.
26:57
Let's look closely at that definition of justification from
27:00
the WCF. It starts by saying
27:02
justification is God's free act where he pardons sins and
27:06
accepts persons as righteous. And then it specifically details
27:09
the method of acceptance, not by infusing righteousness into
27:13
them, but by imputing Christ's obedience and satisfaction.
27:16
The Confession insists that sinners are received as
27:19
righteous for Christ's sake alone, with faith alone being
27:22
the instrument. That language is a bulwark
27:24
against error. Why is that distinction not by
27:27
infusing righteousness, so historically important?
27:29
Well, it was a central point of contention with the medieval and
27:32
Roman Catholic systems. They taught that justification
27:34
involves an inward infusion of grace, which then makes the
27:37
person inherently righteous enough to be accepted.
27:39
So it blurs the verdict with the inward renewal.
27:42
It does, and it makes your acceptance dependent, at least
27:44
in part, on the quality of your internal righteousness.
27:48
And if your acceptance is blended with your inner
27:50
goodness, what happens on your worst moral day?
27:52
Assurance just vanishes. You're standing before God
27:55
becomes volatile, fluctuating with your performance.
27:59
And that's why the Reformers emphasized in alien
28:01
righteousness, a righteousness extra nose outside of us,
28:05
belonging to Christ and received by faith.
28:07
The question is, on what basis can a Sinner stand before God?
28:12
The Westminster Standards insist the basis is Christ's perfect
28:16
obedience alone imputed to us. This anchors our assurance
28:19
completely outside of the self. OK, so let's address the
28:22
persistent objections that always come up when the
28:24
simplicity of imputation is taught.
28:27
The 1st and most common one is the charge of legal fiction.
28:30
Isn't God just calling me something that I'm not?
28:33
That objection rests on a misunderstanding of covenantal
28:36
representation. The reply is twofold, as we've
28:39
discussed. First, this is covenantal
28:41
reality, not make believe. Paul used this exact counting
28:45
language for both Adam's failure and Christ's success.
28:48
We're judged not as isolated Adams, but as members of a
28:51
representative race. And the second part.
28:53
The second defense is union with Christ.
28:56
We are not strangers. We are genuinely joined to
28:59
Christ. God is crediting the
29:01
righteousness of the One who is truly our head, our elder
29:04
brother, our husband. It's legally sound precisely
29:08
because of the reality of the union created by the Holy
29:10
Spirit. The second common objection
29:12
comes from some modern scholarship, sometimes called
29:15
the New Perspective on Paul, which often insists that
29:18
righteousness is not just imputed, but that the believers
29:21
own faithfulness or inherent change is part of their final
29:24
standing. Right.
29:25
The idea that justification is only God's entry into the
29:28
covenant community and that final justification depends on
29:31
our obedience. This objection fundamentally
29:33
confuses the ground of the verdict.
29:35
We have to go back to Romans 4.5.
29:37
God justifies the ungodly. If justification required or
29:41
interchange as the ground of the verdict, Paul's statement would
29:44
be senseless. Scripture teaches that holiness
29:47
is the fruit of justification, not the root of it.
29:49
The question is not whether God makes us holy.
29:51
He does in sanctification. But whether our personal
29:54
holiness is the basis upon which the divine judge declares us not
29:58
guilty but accepted, Scripture clearly says the basis is Christ
30:02
alone. Our holiness is our testimony.
30:04
Christ's obedience is our title. And the third objection, which
30:07
comes from the complete opposite extreme, is the fear of moral
30:10
laxity, what's called antinomianism.
30:12
If Christ obeyed for me, why should I bother to obey at all?
30:16
If grace is so free, why not just continue in sin?
30:19
All anticipated this with, you know, holy outrage in Romans 6.
30:22
Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?
30:26
By no means. The answer is that the person
30:28
united to Christ is not just forgiven, they are made new.
30:32
The same union that brings a new verdict, justification also
30:35
brings new life, sanctification. We are baptized into Christ's
30:39
death and resurrection. We have died to sin and are
30:42
raised to walk in newness of life.
30:43
So they're distinct, but never separated.
30:46
Never. Justification is always
30:48
accompanied by sanctification. Grace changes the motive
30:51
entirely. We obey because we are sons, not
30:54
to become sons. The law isn't cast aside, it's
30:58
repurposed in our lives. How so?
31:00
Well, the gospel frees us from the Law as a condemning
31:02
covenant, but it retains the law as a guiding rule of life, what
31:05
the confessions call the third use of the Law.
31:08
We obey from deed, gratitude for our acceptance, not from a
31:11
paralyzing fear of rejection. This ensures holiness without
31:14
legalism. Legalism tries to use law
31:17
keeping as the basis of your standing.
31:19
Gospel obedience is the grateful response to a standing that's
31:22
already been secured by Christ. And this brings us to the
31:24
doctrines ultimate pastoral payoff.
31:27
Stable assurance. If my acceptance depends
31:30
entirely on Christ's finished work, a work performed outside
31:34
of me, then my assurance is secure.
31:37
I can't be shaken by my fluctuating feelings or my
31:39
performance. The believers heart is often
31:42
stormy, filled with doubts and failures, but assurance rests
31:45
entirely outside the self on the external, objective obedience of
31:49
Christ. Paul uses this conclusive
31:51
courtroom language in Romans 8. Who shall bring any charge
31:54
against God's elect? It is God who justifies, who is
31:57
to condemn Christ. Jesus is the one who died, more
32:00
than that who was raised. Your assurance is as stable and
32:03
as strong as Christ's perfect obedience.
32:05
This stability leads directly to worship and humility.
32:08
Boasting is silenced. As Romans 3 says, we don't sing
32:11
because we've achieved something great for God, but because God
32:14
has achieved everything necessary for us.
32:16
Gratitude stops being a vague sentiment and becomes this
32:19
reasoned joy based on a secure legal verdict.
32:22
And this framework is what produces genuine, selfless
32:25
holiness. The Christian is liberated from
32:28
the crushing tyranny of needing to justify their own existence.
32:32
Because Christ performed the perfect work, We are free to
32:35
love and work for others without the burden of trying to prove
32:38
our worth. We don't work for acceptance, We
32:41
work from acceptance. The imperative to obey is
32:44
grounded entirely in the indicative statement that Christ
32:46
has obeyed perfectly for us. That's a powerful summary, so.
32:50
We can conclude by just reiterating the magnificent
32:52
scope of the gospel. God did not lower His infinite
32:55
standard of holiness. He perfectly supplied what His
32:58
justice requires through the active and passive obedience of
33:01
the second Adam. The believers confidence is not
33:04
their own frail moral record, but the biography of Jesus
33:08
credited to them by a divine judicial decree.
33:10
The law is honored, justice is satisfied, and the Sinner is
33:14
saved, possessing both pardon and positive perfection.
33:17
The Christian life, therefore, is a grateful spirit, empowered
33:20
response to that utterly complete work.
33:22
The law no longer condemns us, but now guides us, leading us as
33:26
adopted children. The Old Testament even has this
33:29
powerful visual representation of the double cure.
33:33
You can reflect on the image from Zechariah 3 where Joshua
33:36
the high priest is standing before the Angel of the Lord and
33:39
filthy garments symbolizing the guilt and unrighteousness of
33:41
Israel. And the Lord commands, remove
33:44
the filthy garments from him, and behold, I have clothed you
33:47
with pure vestments. That's it right there.
33:49
That is the double cure, the pardon of guilt, and the
33:52
clothing with Christ's perfection.
33:53
So here's a closing thought for you to consider this week.
33:57
If the cross has settled condemnation entirely, meaning
34:00
there is no judicial wrath left for you and the law no longer
34:03
condemns you but guides you as an adopted son, how does this
34:07
objective imputed righteousness change your relationship to
34:10
failure and discipline in your daily life?
34:13
If you face hardship, is it punishment or is it training?
34:17
The objective truth of imputation means that the cross
34:19
settled condemnation. Therefore, trials in your life
34:22
are not judicial wrath. They are fatherly training
34:25
discipline designed to produce the very holiness that flows
34:28
from the total acceptance you already possess in Christ.
34:31
Think about that difference and the freedom it offers as you
34:33
move forward.