Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 4017 You Wont’ BELIEVE What the SUPREME COURT Just RULED!!!

Transcript

Ep. 4017 You Wont’ BELIEVE What the SUPREME COURT Just RULED!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: We've got some breaking news here gang, the Supreme Court just gave the Trump administration another huge win on immigration.
• 0:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's all part of a pattern of wins that the legacy media doesn't want to talk about.
• 0:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: We got the latest on the ruling and we've got yet another occasion for justice auto pen to show the world just how radical and unqualified she really is.
• 0:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Hey gang, it's me, Dr. Steve, your patron professor, and join in another glorious day in the Trumpian golden age that you made possible back in November of 2024.
• 0:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: So if you want a front or a seat on how you continue to change the world in ways you never even imagine, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
• 1:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: So here's the breaking news.
• 1:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court just ruled that border agents do indeed have the legal authority to deny reentry
• 1:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: to green card holders.
• 1:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: So those are legal, permanent residents who have been charged with crimes.
• 1:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now that's the key.
• 1:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what was that issue.
• 1:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: The issue was simply charged with the crime, not convicted, not sentenced charged.
• 1:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Trump administration argued that under-existing immigration law customs and border protection officers
• 1:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: have discretionary authority to turn back lawful permanent residents at the border when those individuals are facing serious criminal accusations and the Supreme Court agreed.
• 1:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, I want you to understand what that means in practice here.
• 1:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: A green card is not a passport.
• 1:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: a green card is not citizenship.
• 1:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not it.
• 1:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: A green card is a privilege of legal residency extended by the United States government.
• 2:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that government through its elected executive retains the authority to make judgments
• 2:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: about who re-enters this country when there is reason for concern.
• 2:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: You see, the left has spent years arguing that once someone has got a green card, well, that's it, they are untouchable.
• 2:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: They can pass through that border whenever they want.
• 2:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court just said, no, that's not true.
• 2:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's not the law and the Trump administration was right.
• 2:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: But here's what I really want to focus on because the ruling doesn't exist in isolation.
• 2:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is the latest.
• 2:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is a part of a long list and this is stained, accelerating, string of Supreme Court victories for President Trump, particularly when it comes to immigration and border security.
• 2:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: So earlier this term, the court ruled.
• 2:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: that the Trump administration could deploy what's called the Alien Enemies Act.
• 3:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's a law dating back all the way to 1798.
• 3:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: They could deploy that act to deport members of the Trendet, Iraq, or Gang, the Venezuelan Criminal Organization that had been spreading its operations across American cities.
• 3:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: The lower courts, if you could believe it, they tried to block that.
• 3:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court stepped in and said, no, the executive branch,
• 3:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: and it certainly may use it and goes all the way back to the 18th century and then there was the birthright citizenship.
• 3:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we have yet to get the full ruling on that, but President Trump, of course, signed an executive order, challenging the long standing interpretation,
• 3:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: the wrong interpretation of my view of the 14th Amendment that grants automatic citizenship to anyone born in American soil, including astonishingly the children of the illegal aliens.
• 3:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Lower court judges, including several Biden appointees, immediately issued nationwide injunctions blocking that executive order.
• 4:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court, while allowing the underlying
• 4:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: signified significantly curtailed the scope of those injunctions, so preventing individual district court judges from issuing rulings that block a presidential order everywhere in the country simultaneously.
• 4:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's a structural shift in how federal courts can resist the executive branch and it's absolutely enormous.
• 4:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then there's the ice enforcement,
• 4:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: had tried to declare schools, churches, other what they called sensitive locations, off limits for immigration enforcement, effectively creating sanctuary zones.
• 4:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: Supreme Court overturned all those restrictions affirming that the executive branch, now the single district judge in a blue state court house, that the executive branch sets immigration enforcement policy period.
• 5:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: So of course, LA Mayor Karen Bass was fierce, Gavin Newsom was furious, Supreme Court didn't care.
• 5:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Facts don't care about your feelings.
• 5:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: So what you're watching is a Supreme Court systematically dismantling the legal architecture that activist judges in the lower courts has spent years constructing to frustrate federal enforcement of our immigration laws.
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: The less strategy was simple and cynical, shop for a sympathetic judge, get a sweeping nationwide injunction and tie the administration in legal knots while the border remain open.
• 5:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: that playbook chapter by chapter case by case and let's be clear about what this means politically.
• 5:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Democrats in their media allies spent years telling you that Trump's immigration agenda was unconstitutional, unamerican, would never survive legal scrutiny.
• 5:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: They were wrong.
• 6:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: They were flat out wrong on alien enemies.
• 6:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: They were wrong on birthright citizenship and junctions.
• 6:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're wrong in ice enforcement locations, wrong in green card deportations.
• 6:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Constitution properly read gives the executive branch broad authority over the border.
• 6:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: And this court is affirming that one ruling at a time.
• 6:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, at least most of them are.
• 6:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: There is unfortunately,
• 6:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: one particular justice that continues to demonstrate that she is way out of her league here.
• 6:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in this latest round of rulings this week, she didn't disappoint.
• 6:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: We've got the latest absurdity from justice auto pen.
• 6:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: You are not going to believe this gang.
• 6:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: You have all got to go right now to turlytalkscrypto dot com.
• 6:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll tell you why in a moment.
• 6:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: one I'm about to share with you is the single most blatant wall street about face of our lifetimes.
• 7:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: In 2017, Black Rock CEO Larry Fink called Bitcoin.
• 7:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: I kid you not quote an index of money laundering.
• 7:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Bitcoin was money laundering.
• 7:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: Today, black rock holds over $800,000 Bitcoin.
• 7:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're 63 billion dollars.
• 7:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's more than the United States Treasury has more than any nation on Earth has.
• 7:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: So here's the question every Patriot needs to ask.
• 7:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: The same Wall Street establishment that called Bitcoin a scam for 10 years that mocked you for asking about it is now its single largest buyer.
• 7:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Are you watching what they said or are you looking at what they're doing?
• 7:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Gang, this is the great financial reversal of our lifetime.
• 7:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: President Trump put Bitcoin in America's strategic reserve.
• 8:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Bitcoin Act in Congress authorizes a million more for the Treasury.
• 8:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: The only people not in the room, the everyday Americans told it was too risky for their retirement.
• 8:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, that's why I want you to know about Block Trust IRA.
• 8:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: They built the platform that lets you do inside your retirement account exactly what BlackRock and the U.S. Treasury are doing on their balance sheets.
• 8:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: institutional cold storage custody through S-Fox and AI portfolio management through their amazing Animes AI system.
• 8:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: I've been a client of Black Trust IRA for months now in Gang.
• 8:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: I can tell you I love them.
• 8:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right now for Turley Talks listeners, only go to TurleyTalkscripta.com, get up to $2,500 in free crypto when you fund a qualifying account plus,
• 8:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: a complimentary 30-minute call with their team where you get real answers and real solutions.
• 9:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Wall Street laughed at Bitcoin for a decade.
• 9:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now they're buying it by the billions.
• 9:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Don't be the last one in.
• 9:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's time to take a draw of your financial destiny.
• 9:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: Go to turletoxcrypto.com.
• 9:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Justice Auto Pen strikes again, you may have heard about the Supreme Court's recent ruling was actually a unanimous ruling, nine to zero, every single justice, including Auto Pen.
• 9:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the case of the United States versus Hemony, or Hamani,
• 9:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: So Ali Hamani was a recreational marijuana user who was prosecuted under a federal law that bands gun ownership for anyone who is a quote unlawful user of a controlled substance.
• 9:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: So the charge carried up to 15 years in federal prison and permanent loss of his second amendment rights.
• 9:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: just as Neil Gorsick writing for the entire court struck that down.
• 9:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: He found the law in consistent with the second amendment noting that himony was not a or homony was not a drug addict.
• 10:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Not used as firearms in any threatening manner and that the historical analogies that the government had used like
• 10:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Colonial era laws disarming habitual drunkenness it's simply didn't apply.
• 10:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: So nine to zero.
• 10:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Everyone agreed.
• 10:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Case closed, right?
• 10:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good day for the second amendment, right?
• 10:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Justice Kittonji Brown Jackson could not leave it there.
• 10:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: She agreed with the rest of the justice, but she used her concurring opinion to launch a sweeping attack on the Bruin decision.
• 10:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the landmark 2022 Supreme Court decision.
• 10:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: that requires all gun regulations to be grounded in the historical tradition of the founding erashe.
• 10:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Even though she agreed with the decision rooted in the brewing precedent, she called the brewing framework quote unworkable.
• 11:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: She complained that it imposes on judges quote, I'm not kidding you, the unfamiliar
• 11:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: and difficult tasks of sifting through centuries-old evidence in order to answer contested historical questions.
• 11:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: And she called on the court to scrap the entire framework in a future case and replace it with something that liberals call means and scrutiny, which is a technical legal term for Let judges decide for themselves what gun restrictions seem reasonable today.
• 11:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: I kid you not.
• 11:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let a liberal judge figure it out.
• 11:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: And whatever that liberal judge wants, they could slap it on there.
• 11:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Easy.
• 11:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, my name's Sake, the constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley.
• 11:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: He immediately called this out for what it is.
• 11:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: And his observation cuts right to the heart of it.
• 11:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Justice Jackson is complaining.
• 12:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: that judges should not be burdened with studying history and original meaning when it applies to the second amendment.
• 12:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: You can study history all you want when it comes to like racism, slavery, bigotry, blah, blah, blah.
• 12:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: But when it comes to the second amendment, no, no, no, no, no.
• 12:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Justice should not be burdened with studying history, especially when it comes to issues surrounding the second amendment.
• 12:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: The work is just too hard.
• 12:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: The evidence is just too old.
• 12:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: The questions are just too contested.
• 12:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, unfortunately, for Autopatin, that burden, the burden, in fact, she keep to understand what the Constitution meant when it was written and ratified.
• 12:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is not a bug in the constitutional interpretation?
• 12:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is the entire point of constitutional interpretation.
• 12:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is precisely what prevents nine unelected judges from simply rewriting the law to reflect
• 13:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: and as thoroughly notes, to suggest that Jackson's preferred means and scrutiny approach would be less inconsistent and arbitrary is only true if you control the court with justices who already share your political conclusions, which is of course exactly what the Democrats are promising to do if they would take power.
• 13:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Pack the court with four new justices in the image of
• 13:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's not a paranoid fantasy.
• 13:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: Democrats strategist James Carval said out loud earlier this year if we get power, we're adding states and we're packing the courts.
• 13:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: On the attitude in the room, we said it was basically, you know, effort just do it.
• 13:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's the stakes, Jackson's not some outlier being unfairly criticized by Conservatives.
• 13:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Since her confirmation 2022, she has compiled what Jonathan Turley calls one of the most radical judicial records in the court's history, her solo dissense, which are many.
• 14:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: The opinions where it is literally just her, disagreeing with every other justice, including her fellow liberals, they've drawn sharp criticism from both conservative and liberal colleagues.
• 14:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: In fact, her fellow liberal justices have publicly called her claims baseless and utterly irresponsible.
• 14:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: The old saying is this.
• 14:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: If three liberal justices descent to a decision, yeah, then you could make a reasonable argument on their behalf, if only two liberal justices descent that would be saw to my or an auto pen, well, then the descent is more or less likely silly, but if only one descents the usual one, then it's outright batshit crazy.
• 15:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: What just this auto pen is proposing?
• 15:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: What the Democrat left is promising to instill in the PAC court.
• 15:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not merely a different legal philosophy.
• 15:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's actually the end of constitutionalism as a constraint on power.
• 15:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the replacement of fixed law with the living, breathing preferences,
• 15:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: of whoever sits on the bench, preferences that by remarkable coincidence always seemed to reach the same progressive Marxist conclusions, protecting the same progressive constituencies and expanding the power, the same progressive administrative state.
• 15:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Trump administration keeps winning at the Supreme Court precisely because the constitution keeps winning.
• 15:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: A law grounded in text history and the original understanding of the American founding is, as it turns out, a remarkably durable thing, even after decades of activist erosion.
• 15:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: The border was being enforced.
• 15:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: The second amendment is being upheld.
• 16:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: And on the other side, Justice Auto Pen is writing concurrences that even her own liberal colleagues find ridiculous.
• 16:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's our job to make sure that Justice Auto Pen's constitutionally illiterate opinions remain completely and permanently alone.
• 16:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of the Turley Talks Podcast.
• 16:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 16:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 16:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.