Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / The USVI And Their Motion To Intervene In The Maxwell/Epstein Estate Lawsuit (Part 2) (10/30/26)

Transcript

The USVI And Their Motion To Intervene In The Maxwell/Epstein Estate Lawsuit (Part 2) (10/30/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: In this episode, we're going to pick right back up
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: where we left off with the U.S. Virgin Islands and
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: their motion to intervene. C. The government's SECO action against defendants,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: the Epstein estate, Indyke and Kahn, and others. The government
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: alleges in its SECO action against defendants herein, the Epstein estate,
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: Indyke and Kahn, that Epstein was a resident of the
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: Virgin Islands and maintained a residence on Little St. James Island,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: which he owned from 1998 until his death in prison
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: in 2019. Example A. In 2016, Mr. Epstein purchased a
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: second island, Greater St. James. By this time, he was
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: a registered sex offender, having been convicted in Florida of
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: procuring a minor for a prostitution. The government alleges that
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: Epstein for decades conducted an enterprise, the Epstein Enterprise, that
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: he used his web of businesses in the Virgin Islands
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: to transport female victims, many of them children, to his
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: privately owned Little St. James Island, where they were sexually abused, injured,
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: and held captive. Flight logs show that between 2001 and 2019,
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: defendant transported girls and young women to the Virgin Islands,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: and then helicoptered them to Little St. James. Air traffic
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: controller reports state that some victims appeared to be as
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: young as 11 years old. Epstein and his associates lured
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: these girls and young women to his island with promises
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: of modeling and other career opportunities. Once they arrived, they
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: were sexually abused, exploited, and held captive. Epstein's privately owned
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: islands in the Virgin Islands were essentially the sex trafficking enterprise.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Little St. James is a secluded private island nearly two
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: miles offshore from St. Thomas with no other residents. It's
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: accessible only by private boat or helicopter with no public
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: or commercial transportation servicing the island. When two of the victims,
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: one age 15, attempted to escape from Little St. James Island,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: Epstein was able to organize search parties, locate them, return
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: them to his house, and then confiscate the 15-year-old girl's passport,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: to hinder her ability to escape again. The government alleges
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: that Epstein and the SECO defendants violated SECO by committing
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: and conspiring to commit criminal human trafficking offenses based upon
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: the foregoing conduct. CID at 115 through 170. The government
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: further alleges that they violated SECO by committing and conspiring
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: to commit various child abuse, neglect, rape, unlawful sexual contact, prostitution,
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: and sex offender registry-related offenses based upon the foregoing sexual
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: abuse conduct. CID at 171 through 258. The government also
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: alleges that the defendants engaged in a civil conspiracy to
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: conceal the unlawful sexual abuse that's alleged. The government is
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: seeking civil penalties for each violation of law, treble damages,
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: and compensatory and punitive damages for civil conspiracies. prayer for relief,
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: J through L and O. The government also seeks equitable relief,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: including but not limited to disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: as warranted pursuant to Virgin Island Code 14, Section 608C
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: and 4, to protect the rights of victims and innocent
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: persons in the interest of justice and consistent with the
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: SECO's purposes, ID, prayer for relief. NP, the government, further
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: seeks forfeiture and divestiture in favor of the government as
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: to all CIC defendants' interests in any real and personal
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: property in the Virgin Islands used to facilitate or further
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: the goals of the criminal Epstein enterprise, including but not
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: limited to Little St. James and Great St. James Island,
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: and any proceeds or funds obtained by them during the
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: course of the criminal enterprise. The Argument Legal Standards The
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: Virgin Islands Rules of Civil Procedure provide for a person
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: to intervene, as of right, in a pending action as follows.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: On timely motion, the court must permit anyone to intervene who, to,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: is the subject of the action and is so situated
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: that disposing of the action is may, as a practical matter,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: impair or impede the movement's ability to protect its interests
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: unless existing parties adequately represent that interest. The civil rules
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: also provide for a person to intervene by permission of
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: the court in a pending action as follows. On timely motion,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: the court may permit anyone to intervene who b. has
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: a claim or defense that shares with the main action
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: a common question of law or fact. Virgin Island Civil
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: Code P-24B and 1B. The purpose of the rule governing
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: intervention is to enable one, not named as a party,
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: who has a direct, substantial, and legally protectable interest in
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: the subject matter of the litigation to protect himself from
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: an action that might be detrimental to him. Hendricks v. Klein, No. ST16-CV-147,
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: 2019 WL918607, at 1. Virgin Islands Supreme Court, February 20th, 2019. B.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: The government satisfies Rule 24A' s requirements to intervene of right.
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: A party seeking to intervene as a right must establish
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: three elements. One, a sufficient interest in the subject matter
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: of the pending litigation. Two, a substantial risk that the
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: disposition of the litigation will impair the interest. And three,
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: the existing parties do not adequately protect that interest. The
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: government satisfies all of these requirements. 1. The government has
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: sufficient interest in the subject matter of this action. The
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: government has two distinct but related interests in the subject
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: matter of this action. Maxwell's claim against Epstein's estate for
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: identification and advancement of legal expenses for any suit involving
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: her relationship with Epstein and his affiliated businesses. Complaint 1.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: See also ID at 17-19. Epstein identified and advanced Maxwell's
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: costs for suits and investigations relating to Epstein, his affiliated businesses,
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: and his alleged victims. Either or both of the government's
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: interests is sufficient for its intervention of right. First, the
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: government has an interest as a litigant against defendant to
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: ensure that the Epstein estate's assets are preserved to satisfy
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: the judgment it seeks on its SECO claims. The government
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: is seeking an order requiring forfeiture, divestiture, disgorgement, and payment
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: of maximum civil penalties and damages. See example B, SECO FAC.
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: Prayer for Relief, DP. Maxwell's claims in this action threaten
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the government's litigation interests by seeking to wrongfully dissipate the
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: Epstein estate's assets on a joint Fort Fieser undocumented and
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: otherwise suspect claim of entitlement to identification and advancement of
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: legal expenses for criminal or civil actions addressing her involvement
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: in in Epstein's sex trafficking and sexual abuse conduct. Numerous
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: federal courts applying the identically worded FedR Civ P24A have
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: held that a tort claimant has a sufficiently developed interest
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: to intervene as a right in a coverage-related action involving
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: the tort defendant. In Teague v. Baker, 931 F2D 249,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: 4th Circuit 1991, the appeals court reversed denial of intervention
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: as a right by class action plaintiffs in a separate
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: declaratory judgment actioned by the insurer of the class action
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: defendant seeking to disavow coverage, CIDA 260. The appeals court
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: addressed the proposed intervener's interest, which was contingent since they
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: had not obtained a judgment at the time their intervention
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: was denied, and after weighing the relevant arguments held that
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: the Teague interveners stand to gain or lose by the
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: direct legal operation of the district court judgment, on the
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: insurer's complaint, and that this interest in the subject matter
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: of this litigation is a significantly protectable interest. ID, see
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: also Security Insurance Company v. Shipperit, Inc., 69F. 3D, 1377, 1381,
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: 7th Circuit, 1995, permitting tort claimant to intervene in insurer's
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: declaratory judgment, action against tort defendant. Based on the Fourth
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Circuit's Teague decision, a federal district court permitted sex abuse
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: tort claimants to intervene in an action brought by the
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: tort defendant seeking a declaration as to the coverage by
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: an insurer. See Harrison v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, No. 11-1258-2011, WL-324-1452,
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: at 1, Maryland, July 28, 2011. Following Teague, The court
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: held that sex abuse tort claimants had a sufficiently protected
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: interest to intervene as a right. CID at 2. Plainly,
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: it is of great importance to the tort plaintiffs to
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: persuade this court that fireman fund is obligated to identify Harrison.
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: If this court ultimately determines that fireman's fund is not
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: required to identify Harrison, the does will only be able
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: to satisfy any judgment they obtain against Harrison from his assets.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: rather than from the resources of the insurer. The only
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: difference between the government's position here and the tort claimant
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: intervener's position in Teague and Harrison is that here the
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: SECO defendants are in the role of potential insurer. In
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: Maxwell's suit against Epstein's estate, The estate's assets are similar
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: to those of an insurer, as both the government and
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: Maxwell are seeking recovery from the same estate proceeds which
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: Maxwell is attempting to use as insurance. Thus, the government's
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: interest in ensuring the availability of funds to satisfy its
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: own judgment would be threatened here not by the denial
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: of coverage as in Teague, but by the provision of
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: coverage using the estate's assets to identify Maxwell. But this
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: is a distinction without a difference. as the interest itself
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: is the same ensuring the availability of estate funds to
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: satisfy the government's potential judgment against possible co-conspirator in the
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: SECO enterprise. This interest by itself supports intervention. Second, the
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: government has an interest as a potential litigant authorized by
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: statute to investigate Maxwell's involvement in the same criminal sex
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: trafficking and sexual abuse conduct that is the subject of
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: the SECO action against the Epstein estate in Dykin Con.
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: Under SECO, whenever any person is reasonably suspected to have
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: engaged in any conduct constituting a violation of any of
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: the provisions of Virgin Island Code 14, Section 605, the
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: Attorney General may, in her discretion, conduct an investigation of
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: the conduct. Virgin Island Code 14, Section 612A. The Attorney
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: General is expressly authorized before the commencement of of enduring
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: any civil or criminal proceeding or action under this chapter
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: to subpoena witnesses or to require the production of any books, documents, records, writings, recordings,
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: or tangible things relevant or material to the investigation. Pursuant
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: to this express statutory authority, the Attorney General is and
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: has been investigating Maxwell's involvement with Epstein's criminal sex trafficking
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: and sexual abuse conduct in anticipation of a potential action
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: against her. See Example B, Seco Subpoena, Describing Investigation of
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: the Rape, Abuse, Exploitation, and Trafficking of Young Women and
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: Underage Girls by Jeffrey E. Epstein and his Associates. See
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: also Virgin Island Code 14, Section 612A. The Attorney General
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: is authorized before the commencement of and during any civil
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: or criminal proceeding to or action under this chapter to
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: subpoena witnesses or to require the production of any documents
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: relevant or material to the investigation. Thus, to the extent
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: the government may intervene as a right to assert its
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: interest in this statutory enforcement action, it also may do
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: so to assert its statutory investigative interests related to much
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: the same conduct. In sum, the government has both active
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: litigation interests and statutorily authorized investigatory interests with respect to
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: the parties on both sides of this action. Either or
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: both of these interests in the conduct and outcome of
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: this action is sufficient for the government to intervene of
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: right under Rule 24a. Alright folks, we're going to wrap
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: up right there and in the next episode we're going
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: to finish this bad boy off. All of the information
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: that goes with this episode can be found In the
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: description box.