Latest / Voices Of Life / Did You Know? - The Origin and History of the Purple Heart

Transcript

Did You Know? - The Origin and History of the Purple Heart · Voices Of Life

0:00
Hello, friends, and welcome to the Voices of
0:01
Life, a ministry of the Church for Life. I'm
0:04
Pastor David, and today's Did You Know segment
0:06
takes us deep into one of the most meaningful
0:09
symbols of American sacrifice, the Purple Heart.
0:13
Most people know the Purple Heart as the medal
0:15
awarded to service members wounded or killed
0:17
in combat. But did you know its story begins
0:20
long before the modern military, all the way
0:23
back to 1782 with General George Washington himself?
0:28
Washington created something called the badge
0:31
of military merit, a simple purple heart made
0:35
of cloth or silk. And he intended it for the
0:39
ordinary soldier, not the officers, not the elite,
0:43
but the men who showed unusual gallantry, extraordinary
0:47
fidelity, and essential service to a young nation
0:50
fighting for its freedom. And Washington said
0:53
something remarkable. He declared, the road to
0:58
glory is a patriot army and a free country is
1:02
thus open to all in other words honor wasn't
1:06
reserved for rank or status it belonged to character
1:10
courage and merit over time that early badge
1:15
faded from use until nineteen thirty two when
1:19
it was revived on the two hundredth anniversary
1:21
of washington's birth it became the purple heart
1:25
we recognize today, a symbol of sacrifice, service,
1:29
and the cost of defending liberty. So in this
1:32
episode, we're going to explore the origins,
1:35
the meaning, and the legacy of this historic
1:37
decoration, and why its message still speaks
1:40
powerfully to us today. I'm Pastor David, and
1:43
this is Voices of Life. Did you know? Let's begin.
1:47
Three sergeants, a piece of purple cloth, and
1:49
a general who believed that glory should be available
1:52
to anyone willing to earn it. That moment, August
1:55
7th, 1782, in Newburgh, New York, quietly planted
1:59
the seed for what would become America's most
2:01
recognized military decoration. Today, we're
2:04
tracing the full arc of Washington's badge of
2:06
military merit, what it actually was, who received
2:09
it, and how it transformed and changed into the
2:11
modern Purple Heart. By the end of this episode,
2:14
you'll understand why the original award was
2:16
far more radical than most people realize, and
2:19
why the distinction between then and now actually
2:21
matters. I've got someone here who has really
2:24
dug into this history, so let's get into it.
2:27
What's the thing about this story that most people
2:29
completely get wrong? The biggest misconception
2:31
is that the badge of military merit was basically
2:33
an early version of a wound decoration. People
2:36
hear Purple Heart and they assume Washington
2:38
was honoring soldiers who got hurt in battle.
2:40
But that's not what the original order said at
2:42
all. Wait, so it wasn't about being wounded?
2:46
Not primarily, no. Washington's general orders
2:48
from August 7th, 1782, specifically said the
2:52
badge would recognize unusual gallantry, extraordinary
2:55
fidelity, and, and this is the key phrase, essential
2:58
service in any way. That's a remarkably broad
3:02
mandate. It was fundamentally an award for exceptional
3:04
military merit, full stop. So the modern Purple
3:08
Heart, which is specifically for being wounded
3:10
or killed in enemy action, is actually a narrower
3:14
award than what Washington originally created.
3:17
Exactly. And that distinction is historically
3:19
significant. The two awards share a name and
3:22
a shape, but their purposes have genuinely shifted
3:25
over time. We'll get into how that happened,
3:28
but first, let's set the scene, because the context
3:30
of when Washington created this matters a lot.
3:33
Right. So where are we in the war at this point?
3:36
It's August 1782. The British had already surrendered
3:40
at Yorktown back in October 1781, so the major
3:43
fighting was effectively over. But the war hadn't
3:46
formally ended yet. Washington's Continental
3:49
Army was still in the field, still encamped at
3:52
Newburgh, New York, and Washington was dealing
3:54
with a very real problem. How do you keep soldiers
3:57
motivated, disciplined, and loyal when the big
4:00
battles are behind you but the peace treaty hasn't
4:02
been signed? That's a tough spot. The adrenaline
4:05
is gone, but the job isn't done. Exactly. And
4:08
Washington's response was to issue general orders
4:11
that created two new forms of military recognition.
4:14
One was a badge for enlisted men and non -commissioned
4:17
officers who had completed three or six years
4:20
of honorable service, basically a longevity award.
4:23
The second was the badge of military merit for
4:26
what he called a singularly meritorious action.
4:29
And that second one is the ancestor of today's
4:32
Purple Heart. And what did the badge actually
4:34
look like? Because I think people picture the
4:36
metal metal we know today. Yeah, it was nothing
4:39
like that. Washington's order described it as
4:41
the figure of a heart in purple cloth or silk
4:44
edged with narrow lace or binding. It was literally
4:47
a purple heart shaped piece of fabric that you
4:50
wore on your uniform over the left breast. No
4:52
metal, no enamel, no profile of Washington on
4:55
the front, just cloth. That's kind of striking,
4:58
actually. Something that simple carrying that
5:00
much weight. And the wait was very intentional
5:02
because here's the part of this story that I
5:05
think is genuinely radical. For 1782, Washington
5:09
specifically designed this award for enlisted
5:12
soldiers and non -commissioned officers. Not
5:15
officers, not the aristocratic class, the guys
5:18
at the bottom of the military hierarchy. Which
5:21
was basically unheard of in European armies at
5:23
the time, right? Completely unheard of. The US
5:26
Army Center of Military History notes that the
5:28
badge specifically honored the lower ranks at
5:31
a time when decorations were essentially unknown
5:33
to enlisted soldiers in European armies. The
5:37
general practice in Europe was to honor high
5:39
-ranking officers who had achieved victory. Washington
5:42
was deliberately breaking from that tradition.
5:44
And he was pretty explicit about that philosophy.
5:47
He was. His general orders concluded with this
5:50
line. The road to glory in a patriot army and
5:53
a free country is thus open to all. That's not
5:57
just a nice sentiment. It's a direct statement
5:59
that military distinction should be based on
6:01
merit, courage and service, not on rank or social
6:04
status. For 1782, that's a genuinely democratic
6:09
idea. It's almost like he was making a philosophical
6:12
argument through a military decoration. That's
6:15
a really good way to put it. And the badge came
6:18
with some concrete privileges that reinforced
6:20
that argument. Recipients had their name, regiment,
6:23
and meritorious action recorded in what Washington
6:26
called a book of merit, and they were permitted
6:29
to pass guards and sentinels without being challenged,
6:33
which was a privilege normally reserved for officers.
6:36
Wait, so a sergeant with this badge could walk
6:38
past a checkpoint the same way a commissioned
6:40
officer could? Exactly, which in the rigid hierarchy
6:43
of an 18th century army is a pretty significant
6:46
statement. Washington was essentially saying
6:48
this man's demonstrated merit earns him the same
6:51
respect as rank. The badge wasn't just a piece
6:54
of cloth. It was a status elevation. And the
6:57
Book of Merit is interesting, too. That's almost
6:59
like a permanent institutional record. Not just
7:01
here's your award. Good job. But your name and
7:04
what you did will be written down. Right. It
7:06
was meant to create a lasting record of exceptional
7:08
service. Washington was trying to build something
7:11
with permanence, which makes it all the more
7:14
ironic that the Book of Merit was eventually
7:16
lost. And the badge itself fell into disuse after
7:19
the revolution. Oh, the Book of Merit was actually
7:21
lost? It was. And the decoration largely disappeared
7:25
with it. For roughly 150 years, Washington's
7:28
badge of military merit was essentially forgotten
7:30
as an active military award. Which is a wild
7:34
thing to consider. The ancestor of America's
7:36
most recognized military decoration just went
7:39
dormant. Before we get to the revival, I want
7:41
to stay with the original recipients for a minute,
7:43
because you mentioned there were only three verified
7:46
people who actually received this badge. Three.
7:49
That's it. Sergeant Elijah Churchill of the 2nd
7:52
Continental Dragoons, Sergeant William Brown
7:55
of the 5th Connecticut Regiment, and Sergeant
7:57
Daniel Bissell of the 2nd Connecticut Regiment.
8:00
All three were from Connecticut. Washington personally
8:03
presented the first two, Churchill and Brown,
8:06
on May 3rd, 1783. at the Newburgh headquarters.
8:11
Bissell received his on June 10th, 1783. And
8:15
their stories are actually pretty different from
8:17
each other. Very different, and that's exactly
8:19
the point. Elijah Churchill was recognised for
8:21
his conduct during raids on Long Island. That's
8:24
closer to the battlefield gallantry we might
8:26
associate with a military decoration. William
8:29
Brown distinguished himself during the attack
8:31
on British defences at Yorktown. But then there's
8:34
Daniel Bissell. And his case is the one that
8:36
really illustrates how broadly Washington defined
8:39
merit. What did Bissell do? He posed as a deserter.
8:43
Under Washington's direct orders, Bissell infiltrated
8:47
the city of New York from August 1781 to September
8:50
1782, over a year, gathering intelligence and
8:54
relaying it back to the Continental Command.
8:57
According to the U .S. Army Center of Military
8:59
History, He was essentially running a long -term
9:02
spy operation. So he spent over a year pretending
9:05
to have abandoned his country while actually
9:08
serving it. And that's exactly why his case matters
9:10
so much historically. It proves beyond any doubt
9:13
that Washington's badge of military merit was
9:16
never restricted to battleful heroism or combat
9:19
wounds. Extraordinary fidelity and essential
9:22
service in any way, Bissell's mission was the
9:25
living definition of that. It's a completely
9:28
different kind of courage than charging a redoubt.
9:31
Completely different. And Washington recognized
9:33
both. That's the breadth of the original vision.
9:36
Three recipients, three different kinds of exceptional
9:39
service, all honored under the same badge. So
9:43
after those three awards in 1783, the badge just
9:46
stops? It stops. The Revolutionary War ends,
9:51
the Continental Army disbands, and Washington's
9:53
badge goes with it. The young United States,
9:56
as the Sons of Liberty Museum notes, was actually
9:59
somewhat suspicious of standing armies and European
10:01
military pageantry. There was a deliberate distancing
10:05
from the elaborate orders and decorations that
10:07
characterized old world armies. So formal military
10:10
decorations just weren't a priority for the new
10:12
republic. Which is kind of ironic, given that
10:16
Washington had just created something specifically
10:18
designed to be un -European. That's a great irony.
10:22
The very thing that made the badge radical, its
10:25
democratic, merit -based philosophy, got swept
10:29
up in the broader American skepticism of military
10:31
ceremony, and so it sat dormant for about 150
10:35
years. Until World War I changes the equation.
10:39
World War I is when the conversation starts again.
10:43
On October 10th, 1927, Army Chief of Staff General
10:47
Charles P. Summerall directed that a draft bill
10:50
be sent to Congress to, quote, revived the badge
10:53
of military merit. But the effort stalled. The
10:56
bill was withdrawn in January 1928. So close.
11:00
So close. But Summerall's successor picked it
11:03
up. General Douglas MacArthur confidentially
11:06
reopened work on a new design in January 1931.
11:10
And the timing was deliberate. 1932 was the 200th
11:14
anniversary of George Washington's birth, and
11:16
MacArthur wanted to revive the decoration as
11:18
a tribute to Washington's memory. So the revival
11:21
was essentially a birthday present to Washington?
11:24
In a sense, yes. On February 22nd, 1932, Washington's
11:29
200th birthday, the War Department officially
11:32
announced the creation of what was now called
11:34
the Purple Heart. An Army heraldic specialist
11:36
named Elizabeth Will designed the new medal,
11:39
which featured a profile of Washington on the
11:41
front. The connection to the original badge was
11:44
explicit. Same name, same heart shape, same color.
11:48
But the purpose had shifted. Significantly. The
11:51
modern Purple Heart, as defined by current military
11:53
regulations, is awarded to members of the US
11:56
armed forces who are wounded or killed as a result
11:59
of enemy action. That's the core criterion. It's
12:02
also been expanded over time to include injuries
12:05
from international terrorist attacks after 1973
12:07
and certain peacekeeping operations. But the
12:11
fundamental focus is combat wounds and death.
12:13
which is a much narrower purpose than Washington's
12:16
original essential service in any way. And there's
12:19
something worth noting about how the modern award
12:21
works differently from most other decorations.
12:24
Right, this is actually a pretty unique feature.
12:26
The Purple Heart differs from virtually all other
12:29
military decorations in that a service member
12:31
is not recommended for it. If you meet the criteria,
12:34
wounded or killed by enemy action, with medical
12:37
documentation, you are entitled to it. It's almost
12:40
automatic in that sense. No one has to advocate
12:43
for you. Which is a very different process from
12:46
something like the Medal of Honor, where there's
12:47
a whole nomination and review chain. Completely
12:50
different. And the scale of the Modern Award
12:53
reflects that. According to Military .com, more
12:56
than 1 .8 million Purple Hearts have been awarded
12:58
across American conflicts, with especially large
13:01
numbers for World War II, Vietnam, Iraq, and
13:04
Afghanistan. Compare that to three recipients
13:07
in Washington's original version. Three to 1
13:10
.8 million. That's a staggering transformation.
13:15
It really is. And it reflects how the nature
13:17
of American warfare changed. The scale of conflicts,
13:20
the number of service members involved, the kinds
13:23
of injuries being recognized. The Purple Heart
13:25
became a way of acknowledging a specific category
13:28
of sacrifice that the country wanted to formally
13:30
honor. I want to go back to something you said
13:33
earlier about the criteria as being narrower
13:35
now. Do you think that's a loss? Like, is something
13:38
missing from Washington's original vision? That's
13:41
a genuinely interesting question. I think the
13:43
modern Purple Heart honors something real and
13:45
important, the specific sacrifice of being wounded
13:48
or killed by an enemy. That deserves recognition.
13:52
But Washington's original vision was capturing
13:54
something different, the idea that merit, fidelity,
13:57
and essential service in any form should be honored.
14:01
Bissell's spy mission would not qualify for a
14:03
modern Purple Heart. And yet Washington considered
14:06
it among the most meritorious actions of the
14:08
war. So in a way, the modern award is more specific,
14:12
but also more limited in what it sees as honorable.
14:15
You could argue that. Washington's framework
14:18
was explicitly about character, courage, fidelity,
14:21
essential service. The modern framework is about
14:24
a specific category of physical sacrifice. Both
14:27
are legitimate forms of honor, but they're honoring
14:30
different things. The name and the shape connect
14:32
them, but the philosophy has evolved. And the
14:35
modern award did eventually stop being given
14:38
for meritorious service altogether, right? That
14:40
changed during World War II. Correct. When the
14:43
Purple Heart was revived in 1932, it was initially
14:46
awarded for both meritorious service and combat
14:49
wounds. But starting December 3rd, 1942, the
14:53
Purple Heart was discontinued for meritorious
14:56
service. The Legion of Merit was created to fill
14:58
that role. From that point on, the Purple Heart
15:01
became exclusively a wound and death decoration.
15:04
That's the final step in the transformation away
15:07
from Washington's original intent. So the full
15:10
journey is 1782 Broad Merit Award for Common
15:14
Soldiers, Falls Dormant, revived in 1932 with
15:18
a nod to Washington, then narrowed again in 1942
15:22
to specifically honor combat wounds. Three distinct
15:25
phases. That's a clean way to frame it. And each
15:28
phase reflects something about what America valued
15:31
at that moment, the revolutionary ideal of democratic
15:34
merit, the World War II era need to formally
15:37
recognize the sheer scale of combat sacrifice,
15:40
and the institutional desire to separate different
15:42
kinds of honor into different awards. There's
15:45
something almost poetic about the fact that the
15:47
Book of Merit, the record Washington wanted to
15:50
keep of every recipient's name and action, was
15:52
lost. And then the badge itself was lost for
15:56
150 years. And yet the idea survived. The idea
16:00
survived because Washington put it in writing,
16:02
and those general orders are preserved. The National
16:05
Archives Founders Online Project has Washington's
16:08
actual August 7, 1782 general orders. You can
16:12
read his exact words. The road to glory in a
16:15
patriot army and a free country is thus open
16:18
to all. That sentence outlasted the badge, outmastered
16:22
the book of merit, and eventually pulled the
16:24
whole thing back into existence in 1932. That's
16:28
a remarkable through line. One sentence written
16:31
in 1782 that essentially kept an idea alive long
16:35
enough to be revived 150 years later. And it's
16:38
worth noting that Washington explicitly intended
16:40
the order to be permanent. His general orders
16:43
stated that the award is also to have retrospect
16:45
to the earliest stages of the war and to be considered
16:48
as a permanent one. He was trying to build something
16:51
lasting. It just took a century and a half for
16:54
the institution to catch up. So when you step
16:57
back from all of this, the cloth badge, the three
17:00
sergeants, the 150 year gap, the revival, the
17:03
1 .8 million modern recipients, what's the thread
17:06
that actually connects all of it? The thread
17:08
is the conviction that ordinary service members
17:10
deserve formal recognition. Washington was fighting
17:13
against the European assumption that honor belonged
17:15
to officers and aristocrats. The modern Purple
17:18
Heart, whatever its differences from the original,
17:20
is still fundamentally saying this person's sacrifice
17:23
matters and the country sees it. That's Washington's
17:27
idea, even if the specific criteria have changed.
17:30
And the fact that it's awarded in the name of
17:32
the president, that's a direct line back to Washington
17:35
as commander -in -chief, personally handing those
17:37
badges to Churchill and Brown in 1783. Exactly.
17:41
The personal dimension of the original award,
17:44
Washington himself presenting it, is echoed in
17:47
the modern version being awarded in the name
17:49
of the president. There's a continuity of authority
17:51
there that's intentional. Here's what I keep
17:54
coming back to, though. The modern Purple Heart
17:56
is awarded for something that happened to you,
17:58
being wounded by an enemy. Washington's badge
18:01
was awarded for something you chose to do. Extraordinary
18:04
fidelity, essential service, unusual gallantry.
18:07
That's a fundamentally different relationship
18:09
between the soldier and the honor. That's a sharp
18:12
observation. And I don't think it diminishes
18:14
either award. They're honoring different dimensions
18:17
of service. But you're right that Washington's
18:20
framework was more about agency and character.
18:22
Bissell chose to spend over a year undercover.
18:25
Churchill chose to lead those raids. Brown chose
18:28
to assault that readout. The badge was recognizing
18:31
a decision, not just an outcome. Which makes
18:34
the modern Purple Heart almost more tragic in
18:36
a way. It's recognizing something that was done
18:38
to a soldier, not something they chose. And that's
18:41
exactly why it carries such weight. The wound
18:43
or death is the evidence of the sacrifice, not
18:46
the measure of the choice. Both frameworks are
18:49
trying to say, we see what you gave. They're
18:52
just seeing different things. So here's what
18:54
this really comes down to. In 1782, Washington
18:57
looked at his army, exhausted, underpaid, largely
19:00
forgotten by the public, and decided that the
19:03
common soldier deserved to be seen. Not just
19:05
the generals, not just the officers. The carpenter
19:07
from Connecticut who led a raid on Long Island.
19:09
The man who spent a year pretending to be a traitor
19:12
so his country could win. Washington put their
19:14
names in a book and gave them a piece of purple
19:16
cloth and said, Glory is open to all. And 244
19:21
years later, that idea is still alive. The shape
19:24
changed from cloth to metal. The criteria narrowed
19:27
from broad merit to combat wounds. The scale
19:30
went from three recipients to over 1 .8 million.
19:33
But the underlying conviction that the sacrifice
19:36
of ordinary service members deserves formal,
19:38
permanent recognition, that's Washington's contribution,
19:42
and it never really went away. And if you want
19:45
to trace it all the way back to its source, Washington's
19:48
actual general orders from August 7th, 1782,
19:52
are preserved by the National Archives Founders
19:54
Online Project. You can read his exact words.
19:57
That's not a small thing. The founding document
19:59
of America's oldest military decoration is publicly
20:02
accessible. Which is fitting, actually. Washington
20:05
wanted the Book of Merit to be a permanent record.
20:08
The book was lost, but the orders survived. The
20:11
record exists, just not in the form he imagined.
20:14
Three sergeants, a piece of purple cloth, a line
20:17
about glory being open to all, and an idea that
20:20
outlasted the badge, outlasted the book, outlasted
20:23
150 years of silence, and came back. That's the
20:27
story of the Purple Heart, and it's a better
20:29
story than most people know. Thank you for joining
20:31
me today. The story of the Purple Heart reminds
20:33
us that honor is never an accident. It is the
20:37
fruit of courage, of sacrifice. and the willingness
20:40
to serve when the cost is high and the path is
20:43
steep. From Washington's simple cloth heart to
20:46
the medal carried by today's warriors, the message
20:49
has remained the same. Merit matters. Character
20:53
matters. And the ordinary soldier is never ordinary
20:56
in the eyes of a grateful nation. As we reflect
21:00
on history, may we carry a deeper appreciation
21:04
for every man and woman who have borne the wounds
21:07
of freedom. And may we remember that liberty
21:09
is preserved not only by great leaders, but by
21:13
everyday patriots whose faithfulness shapes the
21:16
destiny of nations. I'm Pastor David. Thank you
21:19
for being part of the Voices of Life journey.
21:21
I look forward to walking with you into our next
21:23
episode as we continue exploring stories that
21:25
formed America and the values that sustained
21:28
her.