Latest / UK Column Radio / Epstein: Architect of Global Control

Transcript

Epstein: Architect of Global Control · UK Column Radio

• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Good morning Ben, Good morning Brian. Nice to see you.
• 0:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, here we are. Let's talk to the audience
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: a bit. Because we're obviously in UK column studio too.
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: Mike and Chris spent a lot of time setting up
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: and changing a few things yesterday, so we're here in
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: an experimental environment, and we've also added another couple of
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: cameras to see whether we can pick up some more
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: interesting shots. Apart from trying to make our discussion more interesting,
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: this is partly a huge thank you to everybody who
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: supported the column, because what we can do in this
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: studio and obviously our news studio is all down to
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: the generosity of our supporters and donators and everybody that's
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: stuck with us over into years. It's pretty good.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: Certainly is thank you, Thank you very much everyone.
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: Now we've also decided to be relaxed today, so probably
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: you can see in shop we've got a cup of
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: tea with us. We've got to be pretty careful, actually
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: we don't mix the tea with the gear. But actually,
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: was that a Freudian slip there. Somebody's going to pick
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: me up on that. We don't mix the tea with
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: the electronic equipment.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: And it's definitely a Friday, Brian.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: Well, and we said we were going to come into
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: this studio and we're going to be talking a serious,
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: really serious topic, which is about banking. But we decided
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: that it was Friday and we were going to take
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: the gloves off and approach it with humor and certainly
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: some black humor, and see whether we can dive in,
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: as the youngsters say, to some pretty complex topics around
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: banking and get the lid off it and explain what's happening.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: Banking in governance, banking global governance, and the integration of
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: those two things. That's the really dangerous thing, right when
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: the banks are really running the show and writing the
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: legislation and also controlling what is and isn't deemed to
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: be ethical.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: Yes, that's absolutely correct, isn't it. I'll just begin if
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: I may, because it did amuse me this morning, is
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: that when I got up, I sat in the kitchen
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: with a cup of tea, as I do, and my
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: mind was reflecting on the research that Ben and I
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: have been doing over the last couple of days. Well, Ben,
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: you've been into it for weeks, but I'm going to
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: say I was bringing my brain up to speed, particularly
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: in the last couple of days, and I suddenly found
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: myself thinking about the fact that if I used my
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: online bank account to pay somebody, the bank immediately flashes
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: up a screen that says, what was this transaction for?
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Was it business? Was it family? Was it holiday?
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: There's a whole load of tick boxes, and it doesn't
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: allow you not to answer, but there is one that
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: sort of says other, and usually I tick other. But
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: I've been curious, probably for the last couple of years.
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: I think I've really noticed it as to why I'm
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: being questioned when I decide to pay the window cleaner
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: or something that the bank wants to know about that.
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: Today we're going to answer why that is. And that
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: is one tiny element of a vast system.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, global control mechanism. Yeah, Yeah, that's the very it's
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: the thin end of a very very very very thick wedge.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: It's coming down the track with a lot of the
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: capabilities that have been built. Yes. Yeah, And and the
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: key point being, well, there's many key points as we'll
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: get into that. The architecture for this, the technical architecture
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: for the digital currency system that enables what you're talking
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: about in terms of visibility and control over financial activity,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: economic activity, and then the global governance narrative around what
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: the UN is doing basically, so the whole concept of
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: sustainable development and various other flavors of that which we'll
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: get into, and then also the Sustainable Development Goals, the
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: seventeen Goals which have been adopted universally across the whole system.
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: So whether you're in the universities, or in the markets,
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: or in the charity sector, and certainly in the government,
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: the unsdgs are being used to drive everything. All of
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: that was formulated and funded by the networks surrounding Jeffrey Epstein,
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: with Epstein playing a central role. Epstein obviously no longer
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: with us, supposedly, but many of the key actors that
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: he was working with, coordinating with funding are still in
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: positions of significant authority across the global system. So actually,
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: what you're describing is an outcome of what that Jeffrey
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: Epstein's doing, and that is infected absolutely everything.
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: And that'll come, as I think, a very surprising statement
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: to people, because people look at Epstein the whole of
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: the Epstein saga, the scandal, and for most people they
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: focus in on the quite rightly the emotive and horrible
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: side of the abuse of young women and probably children.
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: But what's become clear due to the work of I'm
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: going to say, well, you correct me on this, but
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: I think it's one individual who's really drilled into what
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: Epstein was really doing, was who he was meeting, who
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: he was talking to, what they were discussing, what they.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Were planning, and the timeline.
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that was something away bigger in a global sense
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: than just the abuse factor. So where I was coming
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: to is, well, I think we ought to give full
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: credit to escape Key for his just exceptional research.
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: Extraordinary research. Yes, yeah, So the the factual basis, the
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: foundation for the conversation that we're going to have today
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: significantly comes from escape Key substack, and we'll provide links
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: to all of the essays that you can go and
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: read them yourselves, right, And and everything that we're going
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: to talk about is evidence through not speculation, but actual
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: documentation coming from the individuals and institutions that were involved
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: in what we've just described, including the tranches of emails
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: that have been coming out of the US Justice Department,
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: including the Wikileak's emails, which I think arrived around twenty twelve,
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: so escape he has been going through those as well
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: in order to kind of match up what he's seeing
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: in the Epstein emails, what came out in the Wiki
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: League emails, which a lot of which were hacked from
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, for example, and John Pedesta was mentioned in those,
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: and then also from an internal audit that it was
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: carried out by JP Morgan, who were Epstein's bankers, and
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: actually not just Epstein's bankers. He was their top one
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: of their top three private clients, and he was also
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: working with them, specifically with Jess Staley, who was the
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: chief executive of Private banking at JP Morgan for a
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: number of years, then went on to become Group chief
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: executive of Barclays based out of Canary Wharf, who had
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: to step down a couple of years ago because of
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. They were actually co developing
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: products and building a lot of the intellectual and contractual
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: infrastructure to underpin this whole paradigm of impact investing, which
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: is also the same thing as sustainable development, and there's
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: various different words for it, right, but all ladders up
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: to the same thing, which is basically privatization or private
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: control of state services, but then also extraordinarily what amounts
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: to privatization charity. And that's the thing that I think
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: is most heinous in all this actually.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: And it's true to say Ben that I mean this
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: fantastic research from Escape Key, which you've gone into with
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: a fine toothcomb, but you've gone into it with your
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: own deep research on changes to society, plan changes to society,
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: where you've always said what they are doing is merging
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: the three key You've described them as key pillars as society.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: So the church, the state, and the market.
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: And the market are being brought together in a partnership.
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: And this, for many people will explain why it started.
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: I started seeing about it ten years ago that everybody
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: was working in partnership with everybody else, but the city
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: council was working in partnership with private companies, or it
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: was working in partnership with other city authorities, or it
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: was working in partnership with European cities. Everything is about partnership.
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, breaking down silos, working across sectors and essentially coalescing
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: everything into a single power structure that sets the laws,
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: takes all the profit and gets to define what is
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: and isn't good. Yeah, yeah, and we've seen this constantly.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: So there's one of the things that eskatee Key talks
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: about in some of his earlier essays is this system
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: of what they call trisectoral networks. So it's the trisectoral church,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: market state working together in order to deliver an outcome.
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: And that's been encoded into the UN system since about
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: nineteen ninety eight, I think it was. But it's the
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: same thing essentially that Tony Blair was talking about with
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: the third way. That Bill Clinton was also a third
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: way politician, and absolutely what impact investing is and is becoming,
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: and it's been embedded right into the heart of Downing
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: Street in particular. So the stuff that Escape Keys has
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: done is looking at a lot of it is historical,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: and actually in his research he goes right the way
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: back to the kind of the philosophical foundations of Marxism
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: and the development of central banking over centuries and that
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: kind of thing. But you can route this right the
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: way through and we'll get onto this shortly right the
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: way into the center of the Cabinet office. Because the
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: Cabinet Office operating under kir Stalin has announced and not
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: just announced it they've launched an Office for Impact Investment
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: at the end of last year, which appears to be
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: significantly controlled by the Rothchild family and also the British Royals.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: Quite frankly, they're in the mix as well.
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: Something I just want to as we get in to
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: this discussion, Ben, something I just wanted to say is
• 12:05
  Speaker 2: that it's clear that a lot of people in the UK,
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: they hear the terminology, they see and or read the
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: reports about things that are happening in the newspaper, and
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: quite a few people quite rightly say straight off this
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: is nonsense. They are talking crap. So the reports about
• 12:35
  Speaker 2: what's happening that do come into the mainstream media are
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: dismissed by a lot of people as just nonsense, ridiculous,
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: it's rubbish language, it's woke. They put all sorts of
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: labels on it. But the keybid is it's dismissed as ridiculous, rubbish.
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: But actually, when you delve into the language of these reports,
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: what you are being given is a glimpse into the
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: reality of what's being constructed. What I'm trying to emphasize
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: is that there are many people that are not gripping
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: what's happening and how it's being done because they are
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: too ready to dismiss this new new speak as just
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: being ridiculous nonsense.
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: Which it is, but it's also a vehicle for something
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: really evil. Frankly, it's extremely dark. Yeah.
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, So in the time that we got available today,
• 13:43
  Speaker 2: what are we going to say to the audience We're
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: kicking off with this and what we follow through.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: We need more time.
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: We're going to give it more time because we can't
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: cover everything in a in whatever we're going to do
• 13:57
  Speaker 2: with the audience today.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: No, I mean, we're talking about the entire global financial, economic, political,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: and increasingly cultural system. Yeah. So it's gonna it's going
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: to be just everything everywhere.
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: It's all about everything everywhere. So I'm going to have
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: a sip of tea and say, what what where would
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: you like to start? Is it what has done that
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: we that starts?
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah? It does, yes, So the four things, And I've
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: written some notes for this because it's it's quite technical
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: and complex, and I want to make sure that I
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: get First of all, I want to cover everything, but
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: I want to be factually accurate as we go through,
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: because there's some things that are really important for us
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: to land as as being true essentially and have been
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: evidenced through the research that we've done, the research that
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: Escape Kid has done, and we've been through and looked
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: at the source material, and everything that I've seen that
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: he's been talking about is to be fully backed up
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: by what what what what? The organizationtions and individuals that
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: we're going to talk about have been communicating publicly themselves
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: what they're actually saying, what they're actually saying, and then
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: how that's manifesting into policy. And as you've just described
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: your experience of using your banking app, right, because this
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: stuff is manifesting in our own lives increasingly, right, And
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: this is ultimately where it's coming from. So that the
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: four kind of key points which I did I've kind
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: of skated over already, but I'll just repeat them, is
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: that there is a new economic paradigm that we're being
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: ushered into, which is called impact investing, sustainable development, blended finance.
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: There are various different terms for it, but we're being
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: told that this is all being done for the common good,
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: for social good. Relax, yeah, it don't worry, it's all fine, yeah, yeah.
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: And we've got these people over here who we just
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: happen to be paying lots of money too, who are
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: telling us that this is good, right. Actually it is
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: a power grab and a money grab by the richest
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: families and individuals that have ever lived in the whole
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: of human history. So that's happening. It's impact investing thing,
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: and it's being embedded into the state, as we've talked about,
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: and I'll come back to that in a moment. At
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: the same time, there is this process going on of
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: what they call greening the financial system. So a big
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: part of impact investing is driving us into this new
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: green industrial revolution, which is supposedly all about sustainability, which
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: most people think is about doing things that are good
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: for the environment, but actually it's about financializing nature and
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: turning it into an asset class. Right. And we're also
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: told that this new green industrial revolution is going to
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: be inclusive, which most people think is fair to every one,
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: but actually means you can't escape it because there's only
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: one economic and financial game in town, essentially, and it's
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: dictated and controlled by these people and the banking industry,
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: and that the banking industry is absolutely progressing this. Yeah,
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: they have no choice. Ultimately, they're all operating in a
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: system that's technically defined by the Bank of International Settlements,
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: and if they don't go along with that, then they
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: don't get to they don't get to play in the game. Basically,
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: and greening the financial system involves forcing asset owners, so
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: pension funds, investors, like the whole stack of what happens
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: in the City of London and elsewhere in the financial system,
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: it involves forcing them to divest from what are deemed
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: to be non green assets. Right, so not only are
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: they are they incentivizing capital to go towards things that
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: are sustainable and inclusive, but they're also making the existing
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: paradigm completely untenable, essentially making it illegal to operate things
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: that don't fit within their categorization of what is good
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: and then taking those assets.
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: Brilliant summary what popped into my head with what you've
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: just said as the final statement, sort of making things illegal.
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: But there's also there's also a component of it, which
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: I'm going to say escape key highlights, where the system
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: is constructed so that you can't actually do something which
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: is illegal. You have to conform with the system. And
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: when I read that little scent since I found that
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: really chilling because his evidence backs that up. But it's
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: like a net is constructed with rules as to what
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: you can and you can't do. And well, I can
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: give a perfect example the little box that I talked
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: about coming up on my computer screen when I wanted
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: to make a payment online payment. It didn't offer me
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: the option to say no, I'm not answering your questions
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: in the box. The only way I could dismiss it
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: would be to lie about the category of transaction or
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: to tick the box which said other. So I had
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: to conform or I couldn't make that payment.
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: You can't transact. Yeah, So the.
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: System itself can penalize viciously, but ultimately you're not even
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: going to be able to commit the crime because the
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: system will only allow you to do what it says
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: is possible.
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: Right, So it's not your money anymore, is it correct? Right?
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: And that's already happening. And they've actually got the capability
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: to do this a lot of this stuff already, so yes,
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: so they can. So the next point is that they
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: can enforce that at a transaction level. And this Central
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: Bank Digital currency, the CBDC, the thinking and design of
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: which was funded by Jeffrey Epstein, initially before then being
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: subsumed into the Bank of International Settlement's Innovation Hub, which
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: we'll talk about more as we go into This will
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: prevent you from being able to complete transactions that it
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: deems to be unethical based on however they define ethical.
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: And we're actually already seeing this companing in so the
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: first application of this is the climate vacation. So we're
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: already seeing on packaging in supermarkets for food items. They're
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: now publishing a carbon value grams exactly. Yeah, so you
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: will have a carbon budget that you are allowed to
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: spend and if you go over that, then well you
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: won't be able to go over it ultimately, you know,
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: and eventually the endgame for this, although there's a lot
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: of back and forth about this and a lot of
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: people saying that well, we are we're definitely going to
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: keep cash. Actually they want to get rid of cash
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: and in the relatively short term, so all transactions will
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: be carried out over a digital system and they will
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: be able to have total centralized visibility and control of
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: how we transact and interact with each other across every
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: area of society.
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: Okay, and if I'm allowed to reinforce that Bank of
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: India has been unbelievably busy and successful in drawing poor
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: people into the system. And what does that mean. Well,
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: whereas you can imagine people on barely survivable incomes in
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: India would go about their business, it would all be
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: cash transaction or maybe bartering or swapping goods and services
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: in order to eke out a lifestyle. The Indian banks
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: are now boasting that they've been able to draw some
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: I can't remember what the exact figure is, but.
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Let's say if it's a billion people.
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: Yeah, if it was ten percent of the population that
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: were poor but they were operating in the banking system,
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: Now eighty percent of those poor people have been drawn
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: into some form of interaction with the control banking system.
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: And then I'm going to say, and it's pretty clear
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: this isn't being done for their benefit. This isn't about
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: a banking system that's going to say we are actually
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: going to bring you out of poverty. It's about control
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: of these people who were previously not under the controlling
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: eye of the international banking system.
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: They've been formalized basically, so there was an informal economy
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: that was out of sight and control of the state,
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: and the banking system, and that is they have now
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: been brought in. I think it can't be with the
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: exact statistics. But the Indians, the people who have built
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: this stuff, so Indian civil service and the technology companies
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: are boasting about the fact that they've now got one
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: point four billion people on this digital platform, so they
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: can now be so they can now understand and map
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: economic activity that he previously had no visibility of. And
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: now they can also they can tax people because they
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: couldn't tax those transactions before, they can have tax them.
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: So obviously that's really that's a great thing. If you're
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: a totalitarian government, you've now massively increased your ability to tax.
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: And then obviously you can present that as as a
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: way to increase social justice and to redistribute funds and
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: to intervene to artificially manipulate and reorder the society in
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: a way that works for you. But again, obviously all
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: of this being presented as a good thing, as an
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: ethical thing. And importantly, the Indian system was developed in
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: collaboration with the Bank of International Settlements. So there was
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: a paper that was written I think it was in
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty four which was described a Finternet. So this
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: is a new iteration of the Internet which has got
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: a financial transaction layer built into it that encompasses everything,
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: and that was developed as partnership between the banking international
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: assessments and an emphasis. An emphasis is the technology company
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: that was founded by Rishie Sunak's wife's father. She and
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: he still retain a significant commercial interest in where the
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: vast majority of her wealth came from. That he's married
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: into and he's now presenting as something that should be
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: rolled out absolutely everywhere.
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: Yes, and for me, this is one of the things
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: that I thought escape Key's work was so brilliant because
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: his analysis absolutely shows the connectivity, the control and connectivity
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: across the international banking system. And he even gets in
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: to the level of meetings that took place where specific
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: banks in specific countries were given specific tasks to build
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: this of the future in a banking environment or to
• 26:16
  Speaker 2: do a study into this area. This was all formally
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: discussed and then outsourced so that various banks in various
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: locations completed pieces of work to bring this globally centralized
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: system together.
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: Yes, they distributed the component parts of the machine across
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: different geography, so you have the Bank of Canada doing
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: one thing, the Bank of England doing another, the Bank
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Israel doing a third. I think there was something maybe
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: around fifty different projects being run out of the best
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: innovation hub, and in isolation, they all seem like fairly
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: innocuous things. But it's only when you put them together
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: and understand that these are all cogs in a machine
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: designed to deliver a certain set of outcomes which are
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: not for the benefit of the vast, vast, vast majority
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: of humanity. It's about centralization of power into the bank
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: that you begin to understand quite what it is that
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: is being built has been built.
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: Well, I was going to say in plain sight, but
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: actually on this banking one, a lot of it isn't
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: in plain sight. You've get glimpses of it.
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: The specifications are published. Well that's true, yeah, but it is.
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: And the Augustine Carstons, the best general manager, has talked
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: to publicly delivered speeches saying yeah, actually, when we put
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: all these things together, it's going to deliver x y
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: ZX capability. And he very famously came out and you know,
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: perhaps he I don't know if it was it was
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: accidental or if he was deliberately being honest about the
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: fact that the CBDC will provide absolute visibility and control
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: of all transactions everywhere, every every trans transaction.
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, when you say every transaction and people think again,
• 28:19
  Speaker 2: I think a lot of people think about that in
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: a sort of little bit of a general sense. Yeah,
• 28:23
  Speaker 2: most most transit. Every you buy a cup of coffee,
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: the fact you buy that coffee, where you bought it,
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: how much you paid for it, where the money moved
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: from you, what account.
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: How you got the money.
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: In the first place, where they got the coffee from.
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: All of that is in the package of data which
• 28:44
  Speaker 2: goes in that system that you would you would talk.
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: That, yeah, absolutely, And they developed a form of cryptography,
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: rich data. In rich data, so all the digital tokens,
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: you know, your your digital pound will actually have its
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: own individual number, so they'll be able to track where
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: it came from, how it got to you, where you
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: then sent it. And that'll be everything, everything down to
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: the penny, right.
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: And I'll just add to that. Another another piece of
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: analysis which comes out is the fact that the surveillance
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: and the surveillance of the whole transactional money and supply
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: system is going to be so detailed that they are,
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: they know they can close the door on any form
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: of money laundering. Now I'm not saying that from point
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: of view, I think money laundering is good, but I'm
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: emphasizing the fact that if people money launder, they can
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: do it because they will move money between accounts or
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: countries in a way where the regulatory system can't keep
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: up with what they're doing, and that money moves from
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: one account to another, and when the dirty money moves
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: into the new account, it becomes clean because it's assumed
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: it's clean money. And the system that we are seeing
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: built is very happy that amongst bringing in poor people,
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: it's going to be so invasive you're not going to
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: be able to do this sort of thing. And what
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: that really means is nobody rich or poor, commercial or
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: non commercial, is going to be able to escape from
• 30:36
  Speaker 2: this system.
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: It's inclusive, inclusive, everyone's caught in the net. And as
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: we were saying, the first application is all going to
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: be about decarbonization and greening the financial system, but then
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: that will be expanded out to deliver social outcomes as well,
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: and these are best articulated through the sustainable development goals.
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: So they've started with SDG thirteen is about the climate,
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: but then they're going to expand it out to gender equality.
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: You won't be able to buy from a company that
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: doesn't just have the right level of representation of ethnic
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: minorities or women within its leadership team or in its staff,
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: you know. And this will all be dictated centrally by
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: the system in order to deliver social outcomes that they want.
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: They've got nothing to do with the rights or the
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: choices of the individuals, the families, the communities, the nations
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: that are being subjugated underneath this platform.
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: But I don't want to distract you, because I know
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: you've got a float to go through or just popped
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: into my head there trying to give people samples of
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: seeing this, but at low level. And of course over
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: the last couple of years, we've now got to the
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: bit when you go to the till to pay for something,
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: it immediately asks whether you want to make a donation
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: to charity, and very often it will be telling you
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: what your options are on the charity. So the charities
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: are selected for you, and then you're given the digital
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: prompt before you pay your bill, do you want to
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: make a donation to charity? And I now see that
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: following the time we've been delving into Escape Keys research,
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: I'm thinking, yeah, okay, so this is part of the
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: early conditioning of people to get used to the fact
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: that actually the people who control the money are also
• 32:48
  Speaker 2: going to be controlling what you do and why you
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: do it, whether you want to play the game or not. Well,
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: in fact, you can't not play the game. Well, sorry,
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: qualify that at the moment with respect to the donation
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: to charity, you can not play the game because you
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: can say no, I don't want to donate. But of
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: course the next step would be well, because these charities,
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: especially selected to ensure we can meet global development goals,
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: if you say no, I don't want to donate, they
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: don't let you fulfill the transaction potentially.
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: And all these companies. So the place I've seen that
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: in particular is on the tills at TESCO. So it
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: will say, do you want to round it up and
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: we'll give it to our charitable foundation wherever that might be. Yes, right,
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: we'll probably got it. And and and the thing is
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: you can't knock out of the game anyway because a
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: lot of these charities and charities that are being funded
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: out of the taxpayer out of the government. So like
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: DCMS res on putting money into youth charities in order
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: to manufacture consent to preconceived policies, you know, with private
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: money coming in as well, whether that's through corporations, and
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: pretty much every major corporation will have a foundation attached
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: to it. Now, so there this and this is this
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: idea of business for good and you know, we're supposed
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: to just accept that. You know, whoever it might be
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: Ikea or you know, they're up to good things. Yeah,
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: it's all in your best interest despite the fact that
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: they are they are obligated legally to maximize shareholder returns.
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's literally the nature of corporations. So we
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: have to accept that their charitable activity has somehow been
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: detached from their desire to expand their their their profit margins.
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: You know. That's that's so we can't necessarily assume that.
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: And and in the in the in the analysis that
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: we've been reading through, I think I'm correct in saying
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: that Lego, the company that produces Lego, as a very
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: powerful organization helping to build this system.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the kr foundation is that he is the Lego
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: family money. I can't remember the name of the family itself,
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: but then Lego, it's Lego. The company is massively involved
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: in the social transformations that's happening in the UK. And
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: in fact, the guy, one of the guys that was
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: seenior I think his name is Paul Wilmot. He was
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: working as a senior person at the Lego Foundation while
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: at the same time being a top advisor to the
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: UK Cabinet Office. As you do, Yeah, as you do.
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: And he's a former McKinsey partner. Right, look at the
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: things what actually is going on here? And it's about, ultimately,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: it's about centralization of money and wealth and centralization of
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: power to drive towards a single integrated global system, a
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: single power structure, a single power, economic and cultural structure
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: that's controlled by the wealthiest families that have ever lived right,
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: And the vehicle for that is impact investing.
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: And that's taken you back. Tell me off before I
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: got this wrong. This has taken you back nicely. Powerful
• 36:33
  Speaker 2: families takes you back to Waterston.
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: Takes you back to well, we'll come to Waterston in
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: a minute, because that's the second component. Although essentially a
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: lot of this has been led out by the Rockefeller
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: family and the Rothschild family, who've been working with each
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: other for well over one hundred years and now one
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty years, to centralize, consolidate wealth, consolidate power,
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: to take control the governments, to build international institutions like
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: the UN, for example, like the Bank of International Settlements.
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: The UN was significantly supported by the Rockefeller family when
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: it was founded. They donated the land that the UN
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: headquarter was in New York was built on the majority
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: of the US delegation to the UN when it was
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: first agreed, Like when the earliest documents leading into its
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: foundation were signed, most of the people in the US
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: delegation were from the Council on Foreign Relations. The Council
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: on Foreign Relations was established out of the Paris Peace
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: Conference at the end of the First World War and
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: was funded and significantly controlled by the Rockefeller family from
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: the start. And the Rothschild family were intimately involved in
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: the development of the banking industry, but in particular central
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: banking through the eighteen hundreds and then right up to
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: the present day. Right, so you've got the kind of
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: political and financial control infrastructure of being rooted through these
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: two supposedly elite families.
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: Who control billions, if not trillions.
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: Control to control everything. You know, if you look at
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: their you know, their individual net worth is always reported
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: at being significantly lower than what their actual influence is. Right,
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: Because if you define the rules of the game by
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: which the whole global population has to play, it didn't
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: really matter if you own something, Yeah, because you get
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: to dictate how it behaves down to the most minute detail.
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: You might as well own it, you know, if you're
• 38:41
  Speaker 1: incomplete control of it. But the impact investing, the term itself,
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: the actual wording impact investing was coined by the Rockefeller Foundation, right,
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: and David Rockefeller, who was who was still alive at
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: the time. So this is back in two thousand and seven.
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: David Rockefeller had just a few years before that published
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: his Memoirs, within which he said that he was guilty
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: and proud of the fact that he was working to
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: create a more closely integrated global political and economic structure,
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: one world. So they're explicitly telling us that this is
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: what they're doing, and the supposedly charitable foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation,
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: is the vehicle for achieving that. And these foundations, of
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: which there are many, at a global, regional national and
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: a local level of the vehicles for manufacturing the ethics
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: around this. Right, so you'll have extraordinarily wealthy individuals, families,
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: and increasing the corporation who put money into charities in
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: order to create recommendations for legislation that are then picked
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: up by compliant politicians and enacted into law. And by
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: enacting those laws, the wealthy who have funded the whole
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: process become richer and richer.
• 40:23
  Speaker 2: You have done some exceptional analysis into this specific area
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: that you're talking about there, and again, I think we
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: need to stress to the audience that a lot of
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: the terminology impact investment. For example, a lot of the
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: terminology appears freely in the mainstream media and the mainstream press,
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: but they never actually explain what that terminology is and
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: what it's driving for, which is what you've been specializing in.
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: So we can say to the people watching listening into
• 41:03
  Speaker 2: this that the start to being able to push back
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: against this system that's coming in is you need to
• 41:12
  Speaker 2: understand the words and the language and what that is
• 41:18
  Speaker 2: actually doing. You cannot dismiss it as nonsense because it
• 41:23
  Speaker 2: isn't nonsense. A lot of it is very high level, intellectual,
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: carefully crafted a policy, and the language they use is
• 41:36
  Speaker 2: a key component in being able to see that policy.
• 41:40
  Speaker 2: You might just deal with a little charity at local level.
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: You read their web page and then suddenly you'll see
• 41:47
  Speaker 2: these terms, and then you know that that charity is
• 41:50
  Speaker 2: actually it might not be doing what it's doing because
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: the charity is inherently bad. In many cases, it will
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: be doing it because it's been sucked into something and
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: the people in the charity don't really realize what they're
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: being used for.
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: No, they don't understand that they're part of a larger system,
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: what the whole thing that is up to. And the
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: language is incredibly deceptive and manipulative, you know, this is
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: this is propaganda, This is new linguistic programming. This is
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: mind control the highest levels. Yes, and ultimately a totally
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: inversion of meaning in a lot of cases, right, so
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: that when they talk about things like good business for good,
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: it's good as defined by narcissistic psychopaths who are viciously
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: anti human, actually a lot of them, you know. So
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: this was this was coined in two thousand and seven
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: out of the Rockefeller Foundation. So they developed that as
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: a term. They then had a second meeting in two
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: and this is all coming out of the Escapekey articles
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: which you provide links to. You can go and read
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: these yourself, where they developed a series of metrics develop
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: for implementing impact investing down through the entire global economic structure.
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: You can go and look at these organizations and all
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: the stuff's onlines, readily available, you can go and see it.
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: And essentially they provide these templates for well, if we're
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: going to implement something called impact investing, how do we
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: actually go about doing that through the pensions industry, the
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: insurance industry, the regulatory structures that surround places like the
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: City of London, as well as through the whole political
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: system top down. So again that came out of the
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: Rockefeller Foundation. This was spearheaded through a number of political
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: figures and banking figures and few people that will come
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: back to, but in the early days, Bill Clinton was
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: very heavily involved in this. So in two thousand and
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: nine he announced the launch of something called the Global
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: Impact Investing Network gin gi N, and that was announced
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: at the Clinton Global Initiative, which was their foundation, the
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: Clinton Bill and Hillary Clinton's Charitable Offer, where they launched
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: this thing called the Global Impact Investing Network with the
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: metrics that were developed by the Rockefeller Foundation with funding
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: from Rockefeller and JP Morgan, and also some US government
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: money there from USAID as well. And then two years later,
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, who at that point was serving as Secretary
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: of State for the US under Obama, announces two hundred
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: and eighty five million dollars of impact Investing funds, which
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: is public money, taxpayer money that is used to grease
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: the wheels of the whole system essentially, and one of
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: the key components of this is that the taxpayer invests
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: up front to take on a lot of the risk,
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: so the private money will come in once a marketplace
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: has been established and can extract all the profit. And
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: this is presented as a joint partnership, but that's actually
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: not what it is. This is a way of fleecing taxpayers.
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: But then also because of the nature of the impact
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: investing markets, taxpayers are ending up paying for their own
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: subjugation in a way, or for their societies to be
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: artificially reordered, or for new technologies to be brought in
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: that are completely unnecessary and designed primarily to deliver trillions
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: of profits private investors while building digital surveillance capabilities, for example,
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: which is what we're living through at the moment. We've
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: got Bill Clinton fronting this up amongst others, But this
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: is just one that really landed with me that Bill
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: Clinton announces this with the Clinton Global Initiative. Hillary Clinton,
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: who is then in its Secretary of State, announces two
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: hundred and eighty five million dollars of US taxpayer money
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: to help seed this marketplace. And then in twenty twelve,
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: just a year after that, Hillary goes to the while
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: she's still Secretary of State, she goes to the Clinton
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: Global Initiative and announces the impact investing will now be
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: the overriding theme for the Clintons. So actually they theme
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: their entire program around impact investing. And she actually comes
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: as the sitting Secretary of State and delivers the opening
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: remarks to give basically sovereign validity to the whole thing. Right, Yes,
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: you know this has got state approval, state backing while
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: being a vehicle for the implementation of elite policy that's
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: designed to massively expand private wealth for the for the
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: richest families.
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: Yes, in the world, I'm pausing because I'm waiting. I'm
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: hoping you get on. You'll get on to Waddingston and
• 47:20
  Speaker 2: what is done. And that will remind me to make
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: another comment about Hillary Clinton, because I read I read
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: it it was to do with an email where she
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: was desperate obviously to get into a particular meeting.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: But yeah, well we'll come to what is in the
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: next section. But this is this is this is how
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: they do it. This is the division of labor. So
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: that the impact investing thing has primarily come out of
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: Rockefeller Yeah, and also has been progressed significantly by Bill
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: Gates and Warren Buffett through an initiative that they launched
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: in twenty ten called the Giving Pledge right and and
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: this is very closely lined to the Gates Foundation as
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: you would expect. And basically, the Giving Pledge is a
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: number of the thick end of about two hundred billionaires
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: or billionaire families who have committed to do good and
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: to give at least half of their wealth away to charities.
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: But it's to give to charities in pursuit of impact
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: investing profit and ultimately profit. And this entire paradigm was
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: developed by Jeffrey Epstein, working with one of Bill Gates's
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: top scientific advisors at the Gates Foundation and There are
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: documents from the Justice Department releases that came out at
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: the start of this year twenty twenty six, where Epstein
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: is explicit about the fact that they're and I'll quote
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: that there is a tension in making money from charitable organization.
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: Money making must be put at arms length, all right,
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: So they obviously understand that. Well, first of all, there's
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: not just a sort of optical issue here. You know
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: that actually they are trying to make money out of
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: supposedly charitable giving.
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: Can I stress here, ben, because we sort of mentioned
• 49:22
  Speaker 2: at the beginning Epstein. A lot of people are utterly
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: still fascinated by the Epstein story and they're waiting for
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: all the dirt to come out around Epstein.
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: But what what?
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: The escape key analysis shows very clearly that whatever you
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: think about Epstein, he was very clever and he was
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: working with high level not only politicians, but also people
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: in the global corporate banking, money industry, hedge fund investors
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: what they are, and they were developing the systems which
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: we've then seen the Bank of England and the Bank
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: of International Settlements starting to bring into force.
• 50:12
  Speaker 3: Yes, this is the dirt, this is the real Yeah,
• 50:16
  Speaker 3: this is the real dirt.
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: It's already out there, it's already been published, but it's
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: not the kind of salacious sexual abuse staff although that
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: is incredibly serious and we don't know enough about that yet.
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: Well, that emphasizes, doesn't it. That emphasizes the mind of
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: these people, because you said earlier on they're very callous,
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: they're psychopaths. And if you want evidence that these people
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: are mentally defective, they don't have human kindness in them,
• 50:46
  Speaker 2: then the abuse of children and young girls absolutely says
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: how vicious they are. But that doesn't mean to say
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: they're not intellectually clever.
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: What he was doing was extraordinary, yeah, I mean the
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: ability to conceive of this kind of system, however heinous
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: it is, was extraordinarily impressive. Actually, intellect absolutely took intellect, Yeah,
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: and took significant connections as well, like the network surrounding him.
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: I think in his Black Book he had about fifteen
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: hundred names. So these are the different component parts of
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: the system, and he was putting people together. Escape Key
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: describes it as a switchboard operator, So he was patching
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: people through to each other that needed to use. You
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: two go and have that conversation. You people get in
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: a room and talk about X, Y and Z. I'm
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: going to fund the agenda for a series of seminars
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: and events that are going to take place at this
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: foundation in New York. He's putting money into into academia,
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: particularly into MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which was actually
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: the place where AI has been most significantly developed over
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: the past fifty or sixty years. And the crucial thing
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: with Epstein as well, which escape Key does an amazing
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: job of explaining, is that it wasn't him operating coming
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: out of nowhere and operating essentially on his own. He
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: had institutional backing from Rockefeller. So actually he was put
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: up personally put onto the board of Rockefeller University by
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: David Rockefeller, the man that is trying to build the
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: one World system I talked about a moment ago. He
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: was then put onto the Council on Foreign Relations, which
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: is also a Rockefeller aligned and actually David Rockefeller was
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: the chairman of I think for at least fifteen years,
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: and then was also put onto the Trilateral Commission by
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: David Rockefeller. All right, so Epstein's got the full institutional
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: backing of the Rockefeller family, but then also at the
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: same time as an agent for the roth Childs, and
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: actually he says in the releases that we've seen from
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: the Justice Department that he isn't agent of the roth child.
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: So we can stress here that, well, this is my
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: take on it. You look into Epstein's world, and he
• 53:09
  Speaker 2: was doing high level structural work for these powerful figures
• 53:15
  Speaker 2: like Rockefeller in bringing a system together. He operates as
• 53:19
  Speaker 2: a switchboard. There's an interesting people. Sorry, there's an interesting person.
• 53:24
  Speaker 2: Let's invite them for dinner and get them talking to
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: so and so, and then I can get them doing
• 53:30
  Speaker 2: this or facilitate that. So he's working at that level.
• 53:34
  Speaker 2: But he was the playboy on the side, cruising off
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: obviously the immense wealth that he was making through being
• 53:43
  Speaker 2: a player in the system. And then okay, his dark
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: personality then gets involved in all the nasty stuff on
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: the side. But the meat of what he was involved
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: in was absolutely serious stuff. Helping to create this global
• 54:03
  Speaker 2: banking control system.
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, yeah, and the whole ideological framework around it
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: as well. Because you can't build the technology, you have
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: to take the society conceptually along with you so that
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: they can play with it. And also you need to
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: get particularly the kind of managerial classes in the civil
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: service or the consulting firms of the corporations to go
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: along with the construction of this thing, but in a
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: manner that they don't fully understand how all of the
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: interconnected component parts fit together. It's extraordinarily clever, actually what
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: they've done, and importantly it builds on the work of
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell. So actually Epstein is essentially a continuation of
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell's agenda that he was pushing from well really
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: from the kind of the nineteen forties, fifties up until
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: his death. I think it was eighty eight, was it,
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: maybe slightly later in there.
• 55:05
  Speaker 2: And again I want to emphasize because people are saying
• 55:09
  Speaker 2: to us more and more, yeah, it's all very well,
• 55:12
  Speaker 2: understanding this stuff and what's happening, but what do we
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: do about it? But again, you said something absolutely key there,
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: because you are saying that effectively, if people do not
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: comply with the system, if they do not do what
• 55:30
  Speaker 2: the system wants, not necessarily at high level, something big
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: and complicated. At very low level, if you say, not
• 55:38
  Speaker 2: playing the banking game, I'm going to keep using cash,
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: let's use that as an example. This is actually a
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: huge problem for them because they need people to comply
• 55:51
  Speaker 2: at every level of what they're doing, high level, intermediate level,
• 55:55
  Speaker 2: low level, on the streets, in your family. They need
• 55:59
  Speaker 2: you to comply, and they're so desperate that this has
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: to happen that aside from corraling people into using the
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: systems they want and need, they are going to use
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: behavioral insights applied psychology in LP, for example, in order
• 56:21
  Speaker 2: to mesmerize people. I'm being provocative using these terms mesmerize
• 56:27
  Speaker 2: people into doing what they want the moment you see
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: through what they're doing. And we recently had David Skyman
• 56:36
  Speaker 2: with us on the news who's an NLP Master practitioner,
• 56:42
  Speaker 2: and when we asked him about what is the defense
• 56:45
  Speaker 2: against this mesmerism, he said, well, the best defense is
• 56:48
  Speaker 2: to understand the language, and when you understand that language,
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: you know what they're trying to do, and then your
• 56:56
  Speaker 2: brain as a measure of protection. They are so desperate.
• 57:01
  Speaker 2: Everybody must comply at every level on every subject, and
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: if you don't, you destroy their system. So we're being
• 57:10
  Speaker 2: given the solution.
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, I mean if you can, you know, so,
• 57:16
  Speaker 1: using cash is a good that's a good, good starting point,
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: but actually like opting out of as much formal economic
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: activity as possible. I mean, there's to a certain extent
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: getting back to bartering. You know what, do you need
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: the money or do you need the thing that you
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: want to buy with the money? Right? It's actually, is
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: there a way that you can deliver services to someone
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: in exchange for something in return? You know, whatever that
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: might be. You know, I've spoken to someone last year
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: who you know, was paid in a in a in
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: a it was either a cow or a sheep, you know,
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: like they've got some some butchered meat in exchange for
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: helping someone out with something. And you know, actually that's
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: that's good, good because that's actually what you want. You
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: want to feed yourself. You don't necessarily need money to
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: go to the supermarket, is you know what you need exactly?
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: You know, So thinking about ways to opt out the
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: system like that, I think is extremely powerful. And you
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: know that that opens up a whole box of questions
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: that we could spend a lot a lot of time
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: talking about, right, but it's certainly something to think about. So,
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: so Epstein was developing this with with Bill Gates the
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: Gates Foundation, and doing that in collaboration with JP Morgan.
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: So they had this project running called Project Molecule, and
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: their target was to deliver one hundred billion dollars of
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: impact investing funds. And Epstein actually fell out with Gates
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: over this because Gates basically said that, well, I didn't
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: think I was going to have to pay you. Epstein
• 58:51
  Speaker 1: was expecting to get tens of millions of dollars for
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: his work, so there was there was a bit of
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: a fall out there, which is documented in the release.
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: In the emails exactly, yes, we've seen that. So Epstein's
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: developing impact investment as a concept, and then this is
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: exactly the same model that is being used to drive
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: sustainable development investment from the highest levels of the UN
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: right the way down through into the national systems. Right.
• 59:21
  Speaker 1: So this mechanism is being used in order to progress
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: the United Nations agenda, and it's feeding into every area
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: of our society. So in twenty fifteen, the London School
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: of Economics, who are absolutely key players in this, established
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: the Marshall Institute, which is backed by Paul Marshall, the
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: guy behind gb News right, which itself is remarkable because
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: apparently gb News is a nationalist news platform, but actually
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: the person most significantly behind it is developing global impact
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: investing policy and you know that's that alone is you know,
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: we could see here for a like several hours to
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: talking about what the LSA is up to. Some of
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 1: the key people inside the Marshall Institute are leading out
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: this impact investing paradigm in the UK and internationally. A
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: guy called Kiiran Boyle I've talked about previously who runs
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: something called the I think it's the one hundred x Accelerator
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: in the Marshall Institute. He's talking about the fact that
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: the entire economic system is going to become an impact economy.
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: That's where they want to head with this. So all
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: economic activity will be impact activity, which is public, private
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: and designed to deliver social environmental outcomes desired by the
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: international banking elite. Yeah. Yeah, And as I was touched
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: on earlier, this has been embedded into the heart of
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: the UK government via the Office for Impact Investment, which
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: is housed in the Cabinet Office, which was announced at
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 1: the end of last year, which is just seconded a
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: lady in to be one of its top policy people
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 1: from an organization called Regenerate, which is a supposed charitable,
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: nonprofit foundation type organization which is overseen by a top
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: director from Rothschild and Co. Someone from the Royal Estates,
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 1: so operating under the auspices of the Royal family in
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: the Crown of States. That's the one, and so the Rothschild's,
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: the British Royals, the commercial interests surrounding that have actually
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 1: not They're not just trying to influence policy from the outside.
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: They're actually placing individuals into these offices that have been
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: constructed inside the government in order to deliver these outcomes.
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: And this is all happening under with the full knowledge
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 1: of Starmer and anyone who actually understands how this stuff
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: is happening. And this is again like this is all
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: conceptually and technically developed through Epstein.
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this just comes into my head, Ben, But when
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 2: you talk about that, and you mentioned Starmer, my head
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 2: immediately went to the Cabinet Office and the fact that.
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: A couple of.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: Years ago, two and a half years ago, I think
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 2: UK Colin was pointing out that there had been this
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: vast expansion of staff working for the Cabinet Office. It
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: had gone from a couple of thousand to I think yeah,
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: I think it was seven and a half thousand that
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 2: we mentioned and you say, well, my goodness, why do
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: you need all these thousands of people to run the country.
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: And the answer is because they're not running the country.
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: They are working as a hub of this global plan.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 2: And so not only do you need seven eight thousand
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 2: people working for the Cabinet office, you probably are going
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: to expand that to double or triple that because the
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: bulk of the work being done is not for the
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: ordinary person in the UK, not for the man and
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: women who are working there. What's it's off to pay
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: the mortgage and to feed the family, and.
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: To pay the taxes that fund this whole bank as well.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 2: Absolutely, what's actually happening is that there's this It's like
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 2: a leech, isn't it. It's a cancer, Yeah, it's cancer,
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: which is actually it's actually absorbing all of the wealth
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: in the nation, which should be there to improve people's lives.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: And if you want to talk inclusivetivity of poor people,
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 2: to bring people out of poverty and bring them up
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: to a life, a standard of life where they can
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: have greater enjoyment and have more productive families and have
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: a good quality of life, that's not happening. This thing
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: is sucking money and time and effort in helping build
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: this system and the creation of a department specifically for
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: Impact Investing demonstrates that there's no ifs or butts, no, no.
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: And it also shows that he's not theoretical. This is
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: absolutely what the government is doing right now. And also
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: importantly it's not just labor because this is a total
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: continuation of the Big Society initiative that was implemented by
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: David Camber by David Cameron back in twenty twelve. I
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 1: think it was twenty eleven when they first announced it
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: alongside Nick Clegg, because that was that was a coalition initiative.
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: It's the same thing so Big Society Capital, which was
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: the Impact Investing Fund with a combination of government and
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: private sector money which has been useful social transformation across
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: the country.
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: And the creation of a quote army of young people
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 2: to help implement this social transformation.
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, yes, they need, they need a ground force, they
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: need the democratic mandate to do this right. So they're
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: manufacturing consent to this idea of impact because it's being
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: presented as something that is good kind of universal universal
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 1: benefit and actually if you if you disagree with it,
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: you're not just a bad person. You're actually insane in
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: a way. Yeah, because it's it's it's according to these people,
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: so obvious that this should be the way that things
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: are run and is being presented as such from the
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: highest levels by Bill Clinton, by David Cameron, by Bill Gates,
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: by Richard Branson. You know that you'd be you'd be
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: mad not to go along with it, you know, and
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: it's a total deception.
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: But I just got to add into that bit as well.
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: This is another point which is difficult for if I
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: use the word ordinary, we're ordinary people. But it's difficult
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 2: for decent people, decent people, the man and woman you
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: know on the streets, the ordinary, decent people to understand.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 2: They cannot understand easily the callousness of the mindset of
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 2: these people in what they're creating, because why would they.
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: Want to do that.
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: Well, that's that's ridiculous because that would mean that poor
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: people have even less money to feed them.
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 1: So yep, that's what they want. And so for me,
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: and it's always the opposite of what they say.
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: What they say, Yes, well I've said that quite a
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 2: few times on UK call them news. If you can't
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 2: understand the policy that's being presented to you. Try looking
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: at it through the lens that your own government is
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 2: attacking you. But what we're demonstrating here is that it
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 2: is way beyond your own government. Because the idea that
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: the idea that national governments are running the nation state,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: I think is that's that's long gone into the long ground.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah, we're delivering explicitly delivering the Global agendah, which
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: is the Impact Investing Agenda, which is what was developed
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: by Epstein amongst others. Right, he was a key coordinating point.
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: Now we're coming to what is that great?
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 2: Because I say to you, then I'm going to say
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: to you, we're probably coming up to the top of
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 2: the hour. So because we tease the audience a bit
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 2: at the start and said we're going to do more
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: of these, but I think I think we said twenty.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: Minutes, all right, you know for it, We'll.
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: Leave it on a cliffhanger and hopefully people are going
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: to want us to get into part two.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: Well, well, I think we can land the four points
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: we've We've done quite a lot expanding on the first point,
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: which is the fact that there is this impacting investing
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: impact investing paradigm and where it's come from and what
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: he's actually designed to do. But then on the flip
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: side of that, you've got this new economic, new type
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: of economy that they're driving us into. But what that's doing,
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: particularly in the climate space, is creating a whole bunch
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: of what they call stranded assets. So things like coal
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: mines or oil fields or the existing technological paradigm that
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: we've been using to run our society for the past
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: few centuries needs to be disincentivized, right so, and that's
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: all being done through legislation and banking policy.
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: And electric cars are a key example of this because
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: one minute, we're all worried about whether we're going to
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 2: drive a diesel or petrol car, and the government some
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: years ago, well, i'll tell you, around twenty fifteen, was
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: encouraging people to drive diesel because it was more efficient. Okay,
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 2: worry about particulates, but a lot of clean diesel engines.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 2: And then suddenly it switches to no, we don't want diesel,
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 2: we want petrol gas cars. And then add of nowhere
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: came well, actually we want everybody driving electric cars, and
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: everything switched. The advertising, the governments talking about electric cars,
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 2: we're setting up electric charging points everything. And were people
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: clamoring for electric cars?
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: No, and one of them.
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: And well, one of the things that makes me smile
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: about this, of course, is the major car manufacturers were
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 2: not particularly pushing for it. There was some experimental stuff,
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 2: but then then the global government agenda swept them up
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 2: and they produced electric cars, only to find that actually
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: people don't want them.
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: They can't give them all, they can't sell them. People
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: want old cars because.
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 3: You know what they're they're better, you know what you're
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 3: dealing with. Yeah, exactly, exactly, go for it. So this
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 3: is this, as I said, is the flip size.
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: We're going to build a new economic paradigm, but that
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: means we need to destroy the old economic paradigm. And
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: we're going to create what they call stranded assets so
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: that we can isolate and ultimately confiscate things that exist
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: in the old world that we don't want anyone else
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: to have, but we probably would quite like to have ourselves, right,
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: because it's useful for me, as a global gazillionaire to
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: be able to pick things up at a fire sale
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: price having constructed a regulatory system which has deemed them
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: to no longer have value. Right, And this was what
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: happened through the Watersden Meetings and Wattersden is Watersden House
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: which is one of the Rothchild family country houses in
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: Buckinghamshire and is run by the Rothchild Foundation and the
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: Israeli iteration of the Rothchild Foundation run by the same family,
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: established by the same family. It's called the ad Hannadive
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: and the ad Hannadeve was the vehicle through which the
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: Israeli Knessets, their Parliament building and the Supreme Court of
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 1: Israel were built, funded by the Rothchild family. Right, so
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: this is absolutely linked into Israel at an institutional level.
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 2: And of course you see you also get a strong
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: glimpse of that, maybe more than a strong glimpse of that,
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 2: through the Epstein files themselves.
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely, yeah, Well he was operating for the interest
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: of Israel. You know, whether he was actually a Mossad agent, certainly,
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: I would say an asset. When he was an agent
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: is up for the babe he was, and he was
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: certainly an agent working for the Rothschild family. So anyway,
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: they ran a series of conferences and this was within this,
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: this desire to transform the global economic system, this plan
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: to transform the global economic system. They ran a series
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: of events, one of which you mentioned earlier was Hillary
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: Clinton was invited to personally by Jacob Rothschild at the
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: start of twenty twelve, and that took place in July
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: of twenty twelve, is called Resource twenty twelve. And that
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: was a collaboration between the Smith School of the Environment,
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 1: which is part of Oxford University, so Rothchild Foundation and
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: Oxford University working together to deliver that. And the Smith
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: School is absolutely at the forefront of progressing this new
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: green industrial revolution. And in fact, Sir Martin Smith, who
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: founded that, describes it as an industrial revolution. And I
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: think people have to understand that right. It is a
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: new industrial paradigm and as an extension of that, a
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: new wealth creation paradigm for the people who have earned
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: extraordinary wealth out of the previous industrial revolutions. This is
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: the fourth one, as clash Schwob describes it, This is
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: a fourth industrial revolution.
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: And what Escape excuse me, what what Escape Key demonstrates
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: in his look at Wadiston is the fact that this
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 2: appeared to be the boiler room for the fundamental ideas
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 2: and plans that were then outsourced elsewhere. Yes, and this
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 2: is what makes it fascinating. So this wasn't This wasn't me.
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 2: This wasn't a series of meetings that were kickstarted through
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: the Bank of International Settlements. So you might say, well,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: at least we had an international banking organization that was
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 2: thinking about banking. It want to be simplicity. No, it
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 2: wasn't the Bank of International Settlements driving it. It was
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: being driven through this Rothschild facilitated intellectual gathering, yes, which
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: then outsourced the ideas and who was to be a
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 2: developing what And the Bank of International Settlement hub was
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 2: one of the was of course a key tool that
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 2: was employed.
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: Is a vehicle for informentation, but that was five six
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: years down the track. Yes, So actually what Rothchild and
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: Rockefeller and Epstein actually we're doing was defining the specification
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: for the system that they wanted to see built out
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: in the world and then convening the groups of people
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: that were required in order to go and build that
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: for them. Yes, that's how it happened.
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: It's coming out of horse an ultra smart historic country
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 2: house in Buckinghamshire where a group of people come together.
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: You know, there's no public scrutiny on what they're doing,
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 2: very very powerful people come together, and then they are
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 2: sitting and deciding how this global banking system is going
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 2: to be created and.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: What they need to do in order to make the
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: change they're looking for happen, which amounts to basically the
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: regulatory capture and the incentivization of the whole and reordering
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: of the whole asset management, pension fund industry, the insurance
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: industry in order to force the economic system to do
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: what they wanted to do. Yeah, right, that's what they're doing.
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: So there are seven of these events that take place
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: between twenty fourteen and twenty eighteen, and that includes looking
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: at what are the key blockers that we need to
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: unblock in order to make this thing happen. They get
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: all of the asset owners in, so it is essentially
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: the investment funds that sit behind the scenes, the black rocks,
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: the vanguards, the big pension funds that actually ultimately own
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 1: everything in the global economic system. They were brought in.
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: Then the people who advised them, so the consultants to
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: the funds making who make recommendations on where they should
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: be placing their money. The regulation were brought in. They
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: brought in ultra high networth individuals, so people with liquid
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: assets of north of a billion, you know, so to
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: to essentially talk to them about what the new opportunities
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: were in the new paradigm, how to exit safely from
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: the existing paradigm, and then building and then and then
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: a couple of events looking at the operational infrastructure required
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: to drive this whole thing forward, and a lot of
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: that is to do with surveillance. Actually having these global
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: and literally geospatial satellite surveillance networks that already exists and
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: have it existed for several years now, the key one
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: being initiated and led by Al Gore, who was vice
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: president to Bill Clinton. Right, So again, these these guys
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: are absolutely in the mix, and they've already got a
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: satellite network that's going around giving a carbon rating to
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: what they call assets, but that could be anything. Could
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: be a factory, it could be a power plant, could
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: be a housing development, and essentially saying if this is
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: or is not compliant with the carbon regulations that we
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: want to see implemented. And they've done I think it's
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: north of three hundred and fifty million assets globally have
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: already been analyzed from space and where they don't have
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: information about how these things are operating. They're gathering it
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: from public statements that are being issued, so things that
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: have been released to the investment community, press releases, statements
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: that are coming out from chief executives to whatever audience
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: they want to talk to, or a lot of the
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: time they're actually created. They're using what they call synthetic data,
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: which is that they're just making things up, So where
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: where there's a lack of information, they'll just make it up,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: and they're making decisions about whether something can or cannot
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: exist in the future economic system based on false, fabricated data.
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 2: Right, And we can home in on that a bit
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 2: more because one of the specific areas of regulatory data
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 2: which they rely on is to do with climate change
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 2: and environmental risks, and they admit in their own document,
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 2: I found this just incredible to be able to get
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 2: this little window into their mindset. They admit that they
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 2: have not got the evidence to prove the key environmental risks,
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: so they simply say, well, we're going to bring it
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 2: into a model which will define risks, even though we
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 2: know the bankers that regulatory model will be false, but
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 2: nobody will be able to challenge it because we're driving
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 2: the system, who's going to challenge it. But they actually
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 2: admit that the whole idea of all these environmental risks
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: is false. But they are going to bookmark that. And
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 2: I think that's an expression they talk about in order
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: to use those environmental risks to drive industry out of business.
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: And what example in my head, supposing supposing you are
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 2: still operating a coal fired smelting operation and you think,
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: because you're a global corporation that you've got enough power
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 2: to escape this system. They use a satellite to extract,
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 2: for example, thermal data from space of your factory operating.
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 2: They then determine you're breaking the carbon dioxide or fossil
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: fuel use, however it's defined. And as a result of that,
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 2: you suddenly find as the operator of that facility the
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 2: one day you can't get credit.
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, or you can't get insurance, and and and just
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: to reinforce this point, and this is already happening already.
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: He's not a science fiction potential future know, and they've
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: already done it.
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: Yes, And so I'll just bring in because this court
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 2: as well, in the period and the structure that you're
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 2: specifically talking about here, Mark Carney, Yes, who was then
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 2: Bank of England, you know what, the England. Yeah, so
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 2: in a letter he's simply stating, if some companies in
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 2: industries fail to adjust to this new world, they will
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: cease to exist.
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: Yes, exactly right.
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: And when you think about that that might be, that
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: might be a company employing thousands of people, with thousands
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 2: and thousands of people at distance spin off from that
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 2: wealth creation. They're not going to bother about that that
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 2: plants that company will be destroyed and they don't care
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: what the what the downstream effect on people or society
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 2: interesting whatsoever.
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: It's pure it's total technocratic global tyranny by bankers unelected.
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: I mean, I know Carni is now Prime Minister of Canada,
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 1: but at the time he was just a banking He
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: was the governor of the Bank of England, very important
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: position in the not just the UK, but also in
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: the international banking system because the Bank of England was
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: essentially the template defined by the roth Jog family in
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: the eighteen hundreds that has then been used in all
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: other central banks, including the Federal Reserve, including the Bank
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: of International Settlements, So very very important and never voted
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: for him, you know. And again it's all presented as
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: for the it's all about the environment in protecting societies. No,
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 1: it's not. It's about progressing a new fourth Industrial revolution
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: which will deliver trillions in profit for international capital, while
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: at the same time building the apparatus for a digital
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 1: global surveillance state and total centralized visibility to control all
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: economic activity. Right, And.
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: A little summary statement with regard to those discussions at
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: Waterston police people discussions, plans, implementation in place, put that
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: in place to take control of all natural assets, all.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: Aviation of nature. So nature is not just nature now
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: an asset class that can be traded. Yeah, and that
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: means everything. That means water, that means air, that means earth,
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: I mean we're literally getting. It means charity, it means
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: it means yes, well you know, it's all done for
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: your own good, right, for a higher purpose as defined
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: by these people. Okay, So that's that's what happened at Waterston. Yeah,
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: so that's what that was the Rothschild contribution to this,
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 1: and that is ongoing obviously, and then this is now
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: being enforced through the Bank of International Settlements through the
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: creation of the CBDC, which is the third point, right
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: of the four that I highlighted and we've already talked
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: about this quite a bit, but essentially, in twenty nineteen,
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: the BIS established a global network of innovation labs and
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 1: they've been running somewhere. I think it's around forty or
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: fifty in individual projects distributed across the network, so various
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: different central banks working some in isolation, some in collaboration,
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 1: and these individual projects has just supposed our experiments, so
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: we might try this, we might try that. But actually,
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: when you put them all together, they're the cogs. They
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 1: are the component parts of a global machine which will
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 1: allow the bank to directly enforce behaviors at an individual level,
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 1: how you and I are able to exist and to
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: trade with each other or other people in our immediate
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: vicinity in order to deliver the social outcomes and the
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: supposed environmental outcomes desired by the banks by the bank. Really,
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 1: it's not multiple banks, it's just one bank, which is
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: the Rothschild architected Central Bank.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: Fantastic discussion. I'm really enjoying it because I know you
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 2: have so much in your head. I'm going to suggest
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 2: that that's pretty good place to end. It's got one
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 2: more thing, Okay, you do the one.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 1: More thing, just one more thing.
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 2: We look at the audience, we're going to mention something.
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: You will laugh when I do. But I mentioned something
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: the final thing, right, So we've talked about impact investing.
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: What that actually is stranded assets and the confiscation of
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: things that exist in the old paradigm, and the fact
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: that if you don't comply, you're going to fail, which
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 1: is the Mark Carney quote. This will be enforced through
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 1: the Central Bank digital currency. The first application of this
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: is all about climate and net zero, but then they're
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 1: going to expand this out to the sustainable development goals,
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: so it won't just be about climate behaviors. It will
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: be about social behaviors, gender and what they call gender equality,
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: supposedly ending poverty, like all this kind of stuff. It's everything, absolutely,
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: every comparing part of daily life.
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 2: Many well many years ago, the term Internet of Things
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 2: was appearing, particularly on social media a lot, and people
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: were talking quite rightly about the plans coming into place
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 2: that in the future everything would be databased. Everything. You
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: bought a cup of coffee, so in that transaction where
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: the wood was source that produced the paper for the cup,
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: where the coffee beans came from, how much liquor was
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 2: in the cup, what temperature it was, when it was
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: everything was going to be database, and a lot of
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 2: people paid attention to that because there was a lot
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: of evidence to say that that agenda was real. But
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 2: we're now in twenty twenty six, and when you delve
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: into this banking stuff, you actually say, Okay, that is
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: just one tool that they were bringing into place, but
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 2: it's real.
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: It's real, and is so at one point that was
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: my last point, Okay, right, great.
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: Brilliant discussion. Really enjoyed it. And so I just look
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: at the camera and say that one of the things
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 2: that Ben and I are going to get onto in
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 2: the future is all based on a pink house. And
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 2: we won't we won't do a spoiler here, but we're
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: going to tease people a bit because this is more
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: of us saying, Okay, we can see all these high
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 2: level things, but how do we bring home to people
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 2: who are busy, They go into work every day, working
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: really hard in order to keep a home and family going.
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 2: How can we take all of this often very complex,
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: high level stuff and say to look at this, and
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 2: when you see the pink house, you can actually start
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: to understand what you've got to be very careful of
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 2: and I think we're going to have I think we're
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: going to have fun doing that because we're going to
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 2: try and get out on the street to demonstrate the
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: pink hows and where it leads to and try and
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 2: try and bring it home to the audience in a
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: bit more of a dynamic way than just being sat
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: here in a comfortable chair.
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: Yes, how the scheming of the richest people who've ever
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: lived in the whole of history actually manifests in the
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: transformation of your local high street in towns and cities
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: all around the UK in twenty twenty six.
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 2: Yeah, i'mott true Ben, thank you very much for doing this.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 2: We pleasure talked about doing it and it did actually
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: take quite a bit of setting up because the amount
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: of information we're trying to.
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 1: Process and talk about. Yeah. Absolutely, but it's been fun.
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 1: It's been fun, and I do highly recommend people go
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 1: and read the essays, the Escape Key essays and will
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 1: put links to all the other material that we referenced
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 1: as well. And essentially what Escape Key has done for
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: me has provided us with the the the factual foundation
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 1: that allows us to sit here and say with absolute
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 1: conviction and confidence, the things that we've been saying. Yeah
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: today which.
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 2: All stress again, you're going to put you're going to
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 2: put some extra layers over it.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, no, it's it. It all feeds into everything
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 1: that I've been doing and certainly that you've been doing
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: for the past twenty years. Well we'll bring that into
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 1: the next one. Yeah.
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 2: All right then, thanks, thank you very much. It's been great,
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 2: and thank you to the audience for joining us.
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 1: Thank you.