Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Zelensky; Board of Peace; Gaza; Iran; Trump's FMs; Free speech; Jack Smith | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Zelensky; Board of Peace; Gaza; Iran; Trump's FMs; Free speech; Jack Smith | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: A lot of the fundamental principles of the leedom, rational
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: self interest, and the individual wis This is the show,
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: all right, everybody, welcome to your one book show on
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: this January twenty second. It's Thursday, but everybody is having
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: a fantastic week. And we are back for another episode
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: of the own book Show. And we're becoming the news.
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: The news today of from from the perspective of the
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: greatness of the American funding principles, the idea of individual rights,
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: the ideas of capitalism and freedom, and a world that
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: does not tolerate authoritarians and bullies and guys, the world
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: that strives towards liberty and freedom, capitalism and the protection
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: of individual rights. And we're going to start We're going
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: to start today with some segments out of a speech
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: that the Linski made, I guess this morning in Davos.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: One of my favorite Davos speeches, My favorite all time
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: is the one related a couple of years ago. But
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: but this this one was good. So I'm going to
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: show you some uh segments, show segments out of it
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: in no particular order, well, in some particular order, but
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: and uh, I think that the theme that running through
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: this is European weakness, and his his is kind of
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: basically tiding of Europe for being so weak. Uh and uh,
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: let me see, I think I have all the bits
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: that I wanted. Yeah, all right, I think we have
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: them all. Uh and and so we'll cover those and
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: then we'll get into some of the other we'll get
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: into some of the other topics. Uh as as the
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: title suggests, the title covers the topics, might add a
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: topic of two, but we'll see. Remember, you can ask
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: me questions or make comments. Is a feature on on
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: YouTube qulled super chat. You can put a dollar amount
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: to your question to highre the dollar amount that earlier
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: in the show I answered the question. I generally answer everything.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: I read everything that is submitted, even the insulting questions,
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: but I do it approximately in the order, not in
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: which they're submitted, in the order of dollar that is
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: attached to the questions. So feel free to do that.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: SOS way to support, oh to wait a value for
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: value trade with me. All right, Let's go to Zelinsky.
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: Let's go to Zelensky. Let's start here with this is
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: really the opening of his speech. Let's start with that.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: Let me know if there's an issue to volume or
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: anything like that.
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: And just last year here in Doubles, I ended my
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: speech with the words Europe needs to know how to
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: defend itself. A year has passed and nothing has changed.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean, we've been talking about this on
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: this show for a long time, particularly given Trump Ukraine
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: more generally, Europe needs to figure out how to defend itself.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: It's there's a threat, a real threat, not a potent threat,
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: and that threat is represented by Russia. It's right there.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: It has manifested in Russia's invasion into Ukraine, and Europe
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: is still in a position of subservians and dependence on
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the United States, the United States. You know, if if
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: put In evades Lithuania tomorrow or Latvia Estonia, what is
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: what is Europe going to do other than turned to
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: the United States to say, please come help us, come
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: save us. It's long past time for Europe to develop
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: its own defense strategy, its own capacity, its own capacity
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: to defend itself. And us Zelenski is calling them out
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: on this. Here's he's kind of making fun of Europeans.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: And you know, but one hundred percent to the point,
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: and a point that I made maybe is a Lensky's
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: listening to my show. Who knows a point I made
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: just a few days ago. This is about the troops
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: that Europe is sending to Greenland.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: Send forty or forty soldiers to Greenland?
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: Shiky?
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: Is that?
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: What is that for?
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: What the message does it send? What's the message to
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: put in to China? And even more importantly, what message
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: does it send to Denmark?
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: The most important? Your close allie, So yeah, what are
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: you doing? Some symbolic thing here? You're sending a few
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: you know, one guy from the Netherlands and two guys
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: from Finland, and what is that? What is that? You know?
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: Get your act together if you want to send troops
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: to Greenland, sent troops to Greenland, show you serious about
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: defending Greenland from Russian threat if there is one, or
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: an American threat if there is one. It's virtue signing.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: It's meaningless, it's nothing. And good for Zelenski for calling
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: them out on it. Now, you know, this is this
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: is fun because this is he's calling. Now he's gonna
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: call Europe out for just the cowardice. The coward is
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: in facing Trump, the cowardice in facing everybody else, uh,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Turkey or Greece so or anything anything associated with anything
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: the Europeans are cowards. So here's Zelensky on what you're
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: not allowed to talk about in Europe.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: And here in Europe we are advised not to mention tomahawks,
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: not to mention tomahawks to the Americans, not to spoil
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: the mood.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Not to spoil the mood. I love that anyway.
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: I'm told not to bring up Taurus smissiles. When the
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: subject is Tourkia. Diplomats say, don't offend Greece. When is
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: Greece they say, be careful with Tourkia. In Europe, dra
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: and less internal arguments and things left unset that stop
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: Europe from uniting and speaking honestly enough to find real solutions.
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: And too often Europeans torn against each other, leaders, parties, movements,
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: and communities instead of standing together to stop Russia, which
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: brings the same destruction to everyone.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: And so I like them. Is Lensky mostly echoing Trump
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: in this speech, Not at all. Tom is talking about
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: some completely other issue. Who got in Europe. Zelenski is
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: actually saying, why can't you stand up to America? Why
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: can't you stand up to Russia? I mean in another
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: part of the street. He says, you know, Europe has
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: a much higher GDP than Russia. It has much more
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: sophisticated weapons systems in Russia. It could crush Russia like
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: that if not for nukes. Why isn't you have standing
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: up to Russia? White? Won't you stand up to America? White?
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Isn't he allowed to mention tomawks because it might change,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: it might affect Trump's mood. So he's criticizing. He's criticizing
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: you for something very, very different than what Trump is
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: criticizing Europe. The fact that both criticizing Europe does not
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: make them the same. It's completely different. And I mean
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: Trump is criticizing U of accepting immigrants. That's not Zelensky's point.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: Zilensky's point is you're weak. You don't need to be weak.
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: You shouldn't be weak. You're not indeed in reality weak,
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: but you act weak because you fight among each other.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: You can't come to any kind of consensus, and you cower.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: You cower before the Americans, you cower before the before
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: the the Russians, you call before the Chinese, and you
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: have no mal backbone stand up for yourself. I mean,
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: Trump is saying Europe should invest more in its defense.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: Again not not Zelenski's points. Lensky's point is you're already powerful.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: So no, there's nothing. There's no similarity here in the
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: Zelenski's oaching Europe to stand up to America. Now here's
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: where I think it. Really he's really good. Uh and
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: as far as I know so far, the only leader
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: that I've heard talk about this, and here he talks
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: about Elon and again in the context up European weakness.
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: As for run.
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: Everyone is waiting to see what America will do, and
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: the World Office nothing, europe Office nothing and doesn't not
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: want to.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: Enter this issue.
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: At the support of the Iranian people and the democracy
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: they need. But when you refuse to help people fighting
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: for freedom, the consequences retort, and they are always negative.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: When you yep, so he's calling them out. You're not
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: supporting you On, you're not talking about IVON. You refuse
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: to give the demonstrator as any kind of amount of sanction,
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: you're not condemning the regime, you're not doing anything. And
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: this will come back to bite you. You will suffer
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: the consequences. This this is and again, where do you
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: see political leaders actually saying there long term consequences to decisions.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: Here's more than you one. Let's talk about that.
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: Or tests in Iran, but they drowned in blood. The
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: world has not helped enough the Iranian people. And it's true,
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: it has stood aside in Europe there was Christmas and
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: New Year celebrations, the seasonal holidays. By the time politicians
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: came back to work and started forming a position there,
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: Ayatala has already killed thousands. And what will Iran become
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: after this bloodshed? If the regime survives, It sends a
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: clear signal to every bully, killed enough people and you
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: stay in power.
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: Much talk. So a little bit of my backbone from
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: somebody in doubles. It would be Zelenski who presents that
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: Mael backbone, Not Trump, didn't talk about Evan, not any
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: of the other leaders. Zelenski ting the European shape up,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: gain a backbone, take them all, stand, develop your own
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: capacity to defend yourselves. You're rich, you don't need America.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: But in other bots, this speature says, look, but we
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: can't trust you for our security guarantees. We have to
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: have America because they're the only only power available until
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Europe wakes up and changes its ways.
• 12:42
  Speaker 3: And.
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Here he is just briefly on the Board a piece.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: We'll talk about that.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: Next Today America has launched the Board of Peace. Ukraine
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: was invited, so was Russia. Belarus though the war hasn't stopped,
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: and there is not even a sea is fire.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: And I have seen who joined.
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: Everyone had their reasons. But here is the thing. Europe
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: hasn't even formed a united position on the American idea.
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: Maybe tonight when the European Council meets, they will decide something.
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: But the documents were already decided this morning, and tonight
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: they might also finally decide something on Greenland. But last
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: night Mark Rudin had spoken to President Trump. Thank you
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: Mark for your productiveness. America is already changing its position,
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: but nobody knows exactly how.
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: So things move faster than we So again is about peace.
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: Ukraine was invited with those Russian belle woos. So much
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: for peace. The Lenski said, it's war. A lot of
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: people who started the war invited to the boat of piece.
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: What is this? He doesn't want to criticize Trump too much, right,
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: He's in it. He just met with Trump. This is
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: right after his meeting with Trump, and he doesn't want
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: to criticize him too much, but his criticism really is
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: to Europe, you don't even have a position, you haven't
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: even decided what you're going to do. Everything, all of
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: this is everybody's signing. Everything's going ahead, everything's moving forward,
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: and you're what are you doing. You've got a meeting tonight.
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: Maybe you'll decide, maybe you want but in the meantime,
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: the world is moving on and Europe is way back
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: because they can't make a decision. So to a loge extent,
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: Zelensky's speech was a massive criticism of Europe. It's inability
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: to decide, it's inability to act, it's inability, really it's
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: unwillingness more than anything else, to stand for anything, to
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: represent anything, and to have any kind of backbone, any
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: Kinnama backbone. And that applies to America, that a place
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: to Russia, and that certainly applies to von where they
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: still don't have a position. So yes, the the you know,
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: Zelenski is the one would leader that seems to have
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: the coverage to actually actually call these guys out. It's
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: always look at the boat a piece a little bit
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: more carefully, the voter piece was established. Signed. Uh and
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: it's it's members all came together, uh and uh oh.
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: Some of the members, not all the members. Some of
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: the members came together. Absent were Nitanao and Putin, who
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: both will not come to Switzerland because they're worried about
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: being arrested because of warrants outstanding for them by the
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: International Criminal Court. But they went ahead anyway and signed
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: the document. And these are the members of the Board
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: of Peace, the Board of Peace, right remember peace, peace
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: does peace mean anything? Members of the boarder piece Vladimir Putin,
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: Alexander Lukashenko, Mohammed bin Saliman. That there's the Crown Princes
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: of Saudi Arabia Abdel fata El Sisi, the President of Egypt,
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: Victor Auban, Prime Minister of Hungary, Rick up Taip el Dogan,
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: President of Turkey, Mohammed bin Zayed, President of the United
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: Arab emmertz Shavkat me can't pronounce his name, President oz
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: Viki Stan Tamin bin Ahmed al Thani, Emir of Kato Kaisi,
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: Joord Tokayev, the President of Kazakhstan. I think Pakistan is
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: also joined and is a life member. Pakistan has committed
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: a billion dollars to the Board of Peace in order
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: to become a life member. Now, notice is what has
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: common to all of these really, all of them, every
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: single one of them. They're all strong men. They are
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: human rights abusers, individual rights abuses. They're all anti Western one, two, three, four, five, six, seven,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: seven of the ten I think seven of the ten
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: a Muslim. Wow, These exactly the people you want solving
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: departments of the world. These are the people you want
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: to get together in a group to bring peace to
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: the world. Peace is a meaningless concept for Donald Trump.
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: He empties the concept of all content. What does peace
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: mean when these people are on the Board of Peace?
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin? What does peace means to him? Well, Russian
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: dominance on its sphere of influence, which, if you believe
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: Dugan covers all of Europe. What does peace mean to
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: Old Gan? Well, the re establishment of the Ottoman Empire
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: and the Khalifats under Turki's rule, and by the way,
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: you know is actively involved in violence, in the killing
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: of goods in Syria as we speak. What does it
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: mean Binhamed Athani, the Emir of Qatar, It means Sunni
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: Islamism the dominance of the world. Maybe a united front
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: with Turki to bring about that. Kalifun Now, I don't
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: want to say anything bad about the president Kazistan. I
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: don't know. It might be a good guy president of Uzbekistan.
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: They might be good people. I don't know, although they're
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: all authoritarian, all of Thebitarians. We know Auban O been
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: just Oban LCC president of Egypt. Yeah, these are the people.
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: These are the people that UH are on the board
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: of Peace. And Trump is there and he's signing, and
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: he says, he turns around to this group, right this
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: this group. Putin's not there, but you know, he turns
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: her out to the group and he said, I like,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: if you single one of these, Usually the two or
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: three or four people I really don't like, but here
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: I can say, I like, if you single one of them,
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: I mean the people doesn't like other people, you know
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: who actually have three countries because what Trump doesn't like
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: is is the very concept, the very idea of freedom.
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: I mean countries that weren't there Europe other than Hungary, Canada, UK, Australia.
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: We still don't know what the status of China is,
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: whether China will join. Maybe doesn't consider this particular grouping
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: as worthy enough for it to join. I don't know.
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: It is a bit of a joke. Additional members of
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: the Board of Peace who have accepted who might not
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: have been president. You've got the prime minister of Mongolia,
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: let me just see, yes, mean Muhammad Shabh Sharif, the
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: prime minister of Pakistan, the president of Paraguay, the president
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: of Kosovo, the uh you know, the the Jordan, Indonesia, Bulgaria,
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: so a few a few you know, Eastern European countries,
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: Azerbaijan as a jan Jan, the you know again on
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: a fabitarian place, even if relatively westernized, uh, Amenia, Morocco,
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: Bahrain so again dominantly Muslim. And I will say sadly, well,
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: I will say, Israel and Natail is on the boat
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: a piece supposed. I will say sadly that my favorite
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: political leader in the world right now is also on
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: the boat of piece, and that is Amula of Argentina,
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: who seems to be willing to kind of follow along
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: with Trump on on whatever he asks, as long as
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: he gets to do what he wants to do within Argentina.
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: Maybe it's just a political ploy. Uh, Europe is trying
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: to figure out what their position on this is. But
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: I don't know why you Western Europe should join. I mean,
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: this is given the names that I presented, what value
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: does this entity organization have? Trump has vital power over
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: its decisions. Trump is the chairman of the Vote for Life.
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: Even when he stops being President of the United States,
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: he continues to be President for life, and supposedly he
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: gets to designate his successor. So just a joke. Now,
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: the the initial purpose of this vote for Peace is
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: to oversee the different entities that are going to be
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: governing governing Gaza, but exactly what that means and what
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: that entails. But Trump, in the document establishing the Boat
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: of Peace makes it clear that it goes far beyond Gaza.
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: And this is supposed to be a boarder piece for
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: the world. So it's going to be really interesting in
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: the next three years, you know, of Trump's presidency, maybe longer.
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: Who knows the extent how much this boarder piece is used,
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: what it does, how it functions, and if anybody, if
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: anybody really anybody really cares. The executive board that sits
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: right on the boarder piece, the executive Board which will
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: be actually engaged in the rebuilding of Gaza and in
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: oversight over the of all everything that happens in Gaza
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: is comprised of Marco Rubio, Steve Whitkov, Jared Kushner, Tony Blair,
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: former Prime Minister of UK, Mark Owen, the CEO of
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: Apollo Private Equity, Ajai Banja, the World Bank President Ident
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: and Robert Gabriel. A I guess a security advice. I
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: know anything about Robert Gabriel. Uh. Of course there's another entity,
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: a number of entities here, oh, with some layers of
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: responsibility vis a vis Gaza. So this, this motive piece
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: is a sick joke. It means that peace co piece
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: means not a absolutely nothing in the mind of Donald Trump,
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: in the mind of anybody who is supportive of of
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: of this, of this joke or calcature. Uh. And yeah,
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: I guess, I guess we will see as part of
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: the VOTI piece, Jared Kushner gave a talk presenting his
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: vision for Gaza, for the future of Gaza. He showed
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: a master plan for the future of Gaza now. But
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: none of this just by the way, none of this
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: has been authorized by Congress. It's not clear what the
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: United States responsibility is here. Is this some kind of
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: treaty obligation that Congress has to ratify? What does you
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: with Krishna's exact responsibilities? Who under what authority? I guess
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: the President just appoints him and he can do what
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: he wants. What is the in what way is the
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: congressional oversight? There isn't again Congress, a wall completely a
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: will completely able. Just yeah, it it it is. It
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: is truly truly insane. Anyway, Jared Kushna presented his plan
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: and what you see a beautiful buildings and skyscrape and
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: residential areas and you know, massive, massive development and you know,
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: all costing ten billion or more, you know, involving you know,
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: raising Gazan the average annual household income in Gaza to
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: thirteen thousand within ten years, creating five hundred thousand new
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: jobs and construction, agriculture, manufacturing, services, and digital economy. One
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: point five billion dollars in investments in vocational schools for
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: full labor to train the labor force. Twenty five billion
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: dollars of investment in building utilities and public public facilities
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: and stuff like that. Three plus billion dollars of investment
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: and commercial zones, businesses and everything else. And this is
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: the plan, This is the plan for the border piece.
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: This is what they're going to do. They're gonna rebuild Gaza. Also,
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: coming out of the discussions about Gaza border piece and
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: stuff was the comment of you know, yeah, we want
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: Hamas to this arm but maybe they can stay on
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: as a political party, political party, and who's going to
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: run this new Gaza And and let me just lets
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: just let's just pause a second. Is the reason Gaza
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: was so poor was the reason Gaza was so poor
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: that they didn't have enough money. I mean billions and
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: billions and billions and billions and billions and billions more
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: of dollars came in from Kata, from study Arabia, from Yuan,
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: from their European Union, from the United States into Gaza.
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: And they didn't build buildings, and they didn't build beautiful neighborhoods,
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: and they didn't build commotions zones. They built tunnels, they
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: bought weapons. So why does anybody think Garznas want this
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: desire this? They'd be given billions and what they did
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: was invest in war and that was Hamas. And now
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: you want to make Hamas a political party. They might
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: win again. If you have democracy, have an election, come
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: As might win again. And then you'll give Hamas all
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: this dollars. And what will they do with those dollars?
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: Even though they committed to disarmament, what will they do
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: under the protection of the United States, under the protection
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: of the Board of Peace. They will build tunnels and
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: bunkers and buy weapons and prepare for the next time
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: they can attack his own maybe to take ten years,
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: but they have time, they don't know how to and
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: all under the protection of the US, the Board of Peace.
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: And why are we pulling all this money into Gaza?
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: Why are we rewarding a people who engaged in atrocities
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: of October seventh? Why are we rewarding them for going
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: to war in the most horrific, disgusting, horrible Wait, why
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: are the Palestinians getting a gold medal? New buildings, new condos,
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: higher wages. I mean, all this money is going to
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: have to come from somewhere. And you know, Jeffy Kushner
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: was acknowledged that a lot of companies, all the private companies,
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: will be hesitant to invest in such a volatile and
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: such a volatile proposal, and he said, yeah, that they'll
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: be hesitant, so you know we're gonna have to encourage them.
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: Is that gonna be US investment guvntees? And why would
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: do us do that? That's a much worse investment than
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: giving Israel money? And it is all just supposed to
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: stand behy and watch all this money flow into the
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: hands of its enemy. And even if it's not come
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: as even if the false senior authority, what are they
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: gonna do with the money? You think they're gonna build
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: and create again, They've already received hundreds of millions and
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: billions and billions and billions of dollars, and what do
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: they do with them? Create a terrat state? I mean,
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: just on this, just on the border piece and is
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: planned for Gaza. Just done that. Trump should be denounced,
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: never mind everything else bad that he does. Why are
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: we trying to create paradise for monsters who butchered twelve
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: hundred Israelis. And you might say, well, no, not all
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: the Palestinians did it. No, most of them supported it.
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: Many of them did it. Many of them followed the
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: Hamaswaias into Israel, raped and pillaged, wanted to get in
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: on the action. When Israel left Gaza, they handed the
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: Palestinians factories and and what do you call it? Where
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: you where you grow, where you grow plants? God, the
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: word is in the tip of my tongue. Uh. You know,
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: advanced technology to grow and build and create? And what
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: are the palace thing He's to do with it? The
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: day after he's really left greenhouses, Thank you greenhouses and nurseres. God,
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: I can't believe I couldn't come up with greenhouses? What
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: a pouseties do with it? Next day they came in
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: and destroyed it all. They didn't want to touch it.
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: You don't change your culture by pouring billions of dollars
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: into their hands. You don't turn a primitive culture into
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: a civilized culture by putting them in nice houses. But
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: that is the delusion of Trump, because he's a real
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: estate guy. What is he k He's just about the buildings.
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: It's a delusion of a Jared Kushna. They don't understand,
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: they have no conception. They don't get it. And to
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: do this hand in hand with the Katari and the
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: tuks Kata and Tooks, both on the boat of piece
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: enemies sworn enemies of Israel, and you know Katcha justifying
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: the slaughter in Iran. It just it's just just insane,
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: just insane, all right. Anyway, So Gaza, I mean, it's
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: just Trump is is is such a buffoon. He really is,
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: I mean, strutting around on this boat of piece with
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: a bunch of authoritarian thugs, pretending that he's going to
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: solve the problem in Gaza with this, I mean, pretending
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: Ramas is gonna disarm, Pretending the Haramas political party is
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: going to be peaceful, pretending this is all somehow can
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: it come together? I mean, but that's okay. Much of
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: the Trump presidency is about pretend. We're gonna pretend we're
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: gonna get Greenland. We're gonna pretend they're gonna get rid
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: of all the illegal immigrants. We're gonna pretend they were
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: not violating the constitution. We're gonna pretend and pretend to pretend. Uh. Ultimately,
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: there's only one way Tramas is going to really honestly
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: gonna be disarmed, and that's if the Ideaf goes in
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: and does it. And there's only one way in which
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: Tramas disappears, and that's if Israel goes in and makes
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: them disappear and disappears them, or they're expelled. The entire
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: leadership and the entire fighting force is expelled from Gaza.
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: As long as they're there, they will be a threat.
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: As long as they're there, they represent an existential threat
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: to Israel. All right, we heard what's Lynchki had to
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: say about Iran. Now it's hard to tell exactly what's
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: going to happen in Iran. The reality right now is
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: that the United States is building up a massive military force,
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: an air force, not a ground force, but an air force,
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: and a defense system massive, much bigger than before they
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: bombed the nuclear facilities. They have every type of airplane
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: that they would need in order to execute a major
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: assault in Iran at their disposal. Within striking this they
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: now have an aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea. It
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: ended this morning. The United States has the defense systems,
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: the Patriots, the Thads deployed to where they need to
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: be to protect their own facilities. And now the world
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: is just sitting and waiting to see what Trump decides.
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: Will he hits you on if he hits you on,
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: how forcefully. In the meantime, in Davos, Trump and Whitcoff
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: and others are saying, we're going to negotiate. They are
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: going to negotiate with the murderous, thuggish regime in Tehran
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: while they're aculating forces. And I assume the accumulating forces
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: is a way to put pressure on their Anian regime
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: to compromise Zelenski's up. So you're right, okay, so you negotiate.
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: What do you negotiate? So, okay, so I'll cut back
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: on they'll cut back on nuclear stuff and maybe they'll
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: promise promised promise to not buy anymore, not build any
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: more bailistic missiles and what else? If you keep this
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: regime in power, what are you telling the world? What
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: are you telling the Iranian people? And how is this
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: not getting bold in the Ranians? And by the way,
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: a deal, a deal that Trump signs with the Iranian regime,
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: with this Iranian regime well also inevitably has to given
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: Trump's character, involve oil. So now you're opening this figot,
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: You're you're you're legalizing Iran's ability to export oil. What
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: does that do? That brings in money? What is Iran
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: going to use that money for? Well, you'll promise to
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: use it to develop the economy. It will pay off
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: the shopkeepers, that will try to pay off its own population.
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: It'll try to improve their economic situation by handing them checks.
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: But beyond that, we know what that will use the
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: money for the same thing Comas uses this money for
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: more weapons. Strategically position itself so the next time it
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: give resist the Americans. And the best way to resist
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: Americans is how build a bomb. Every time American negotiates
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: with you on it just increases the motivation of the
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: Ranians to build a bomb, because a nuke will force negotiation,
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: a nuke will eliminate the American and is really threat.
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: And if Trump negotiates a deal with you on is
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: all I assume its just gonna sit back because It'so's
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: not going to piss Trump off by actually attacking. Now, look,
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: I might be wrong in all this, and as we speak,
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: the US might be launching an attack right now on
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: you on and we don't know that. As I said,
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: the assets are in place. The assets are in place
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: to do it. So let's see. By the way, you know, again,
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: just a point on the on the I'm just seeing
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: a post here on the vote apiece you know, if
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: the voter piece is officially a treaty an international organization,
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: then it needs congressional approval. It actually needs two thirds
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: of the Senate to vote for it. You know, I
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: don't think there's two thirds of the Senate that would
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: vote for this monstrosity. Uh. It's it's truly, it's true stunning.
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: You know, all this happening. By the way, vote a piece,
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: all this, We're gonna rebuild Gaza, We're gonna do all
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: this stuff. In the background of the US between the
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: codes and allowing ISIS basically if you rain in northern
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: Syria and backing a Syrian regime of former ISIS fighters,
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: and clearly you know this is what this is what
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: the Americans are backing as they're signing on to a
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: boards of peace. Now again back to Iran, Ah, I mean,
• 40:56
  Speaker 1: Israeli sources are claiming and I don't know, it's hard
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: to tell Israeli this could be ushful thinking on their behalf. Israeli,
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: so a claiming that an attack on you one could
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: be eminent. And we're talking about an American attack, not
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: an Israeli attack. The IDEF IS basically told everybody that
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: this weekend to stay close to their phones and expect
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: an emergency. That everybody's agrees that the deployment of US
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: forces in the Middle least is needing completion. The only
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: question now is what is Trump decided? And the question
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: is what do they engage in diplomacy?
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: First first, right, let's see, it was the something else
• 41:58
  Speaker 4: I wanted.
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, mh, all right, So the future of Gaza and
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: a PowerPoint looks great. Uh, we might see some real
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: action in in uh in uh Iran. We will see
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: yet to be uh, yet to be proven again. Uh.
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: Israel estimates, given the assets that the US has in
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: the region, that the US is ready for some major, major, major,
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: devastating attack on the Ranians. I believe it when I
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: see it. A celebrator, when I see it, we'll see
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: they mean, tell me, we'll see. Journal decided to publish
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: a propaganda op ad, an oup ad by a member
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: of the Iranian regime. Yeah, defending the crackdown in the
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: name of what you know, balanced journalism. A believable. Iran's
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: government defends its crackdown. Unlike the restraint we showed in
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, this time we'll have no qualms about
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: fiving back with all we have. Yep, and they did,
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: and they really really really did. You know, the numbers
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: now coming out of Iran could be in excess of
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: twenty thousand dead, twenty thousand people going out there demonstrating
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: for their own freedom dead. And does anybody say anything,
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: anybody do anything, as as Zelenski said, nada, certainly not
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: in Europe and even the US, I mean Trump, Trump
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: said he was promised they'll stop the executions.
• 43:49
  Speaker 4: All right, Uh, let's see.
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: Free speech. As you know, you know, there really isn't
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: much more important than free speech in order to defend
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: our freedoms. Speech is what is required to make the
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: argument against the injustice, the authoritarianism that we see rising
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: in Washington and really around the world. Without the ability
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: to speak, without ability to criticize those in power, freedom
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: is completely lost. And while you know, Trump is god,
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know what to say about Trump.
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: But while Trump is not really ideological ideologically a dictator, Ideologically,
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: he doesn't have an ideology that integrates his authoritarianism. He
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: is an authoritarian and he would like nothing more than
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: to get rid of free speech. I mean, really would
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: like nothing more than to get rid of free speech.
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: He believes that any criticism of him is illegitimate, indeed treasonous.
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: He has said so, and he keeps saying so, and
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: he keeps saying so, and people ignore him because they
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: used to all the over the top stuff that Trump says.
• 45:27
  Speaker 1: But he's president of the United States. President of the
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: United States is actively verbally allowed publicly questioning the value
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: of speech. Here's his latest This is from again a
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: tweet that he published. Something has to be done about
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: the fake polls. They are truly out of control. Now,
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: by the way, how do we know they're fake? How
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: do we know the polls of fake? How do you
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: how would you know the poles a fake? Because the
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: negative of Trump, Trump's reality. Trump is the epitome of
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: a primacy of consciousness mentality. I ask the philosophers who
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: support Trump how this works. A He has a primacy
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: of consciousness mentality. He believes that he is the greatest
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: president in human history. He believes that the country has
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: never been better. He believes that things are amazing. Well,
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: how is it possible that his poll numbers are low? Obviously,
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: all of this stuff that he believes is true. And
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: if it's true, and if he believes it, and if
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: he keeps saying it, then obviously the American people think
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: it too. Why would they think anything else. They're not idiots,
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: So the polls must be wrong. I mean, here's this
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: full statement. Something has to be done about fake poles. Now,
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: notice that that's the key. Something has to be done.
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: This is the president of the United States. Something has
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: to be done. Well, what or what is? What power
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: does the government have? It test the power of force.
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: It has a gun. We can stop these fake polls,
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: stop the criticism of Trump. Something has to be done.
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: That in and of itself is a violation of the
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: First Amendment. Right, there is a threat, Right, there is
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: a threat that is aimed at silencing the posters, aimed
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: at silencing doing way with their free speech. We will continue.
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: Something has to be done about fake polls. They are
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: truly out of control. All caps. We have the greatest
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: economy in the history of our country. We have the
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: strongest border in history. Nobody has ever done a job
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: like I have done. They have me in the low forties.
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: The Democrats destroyed healthcare. I'm trying to fix it and
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: they give me fake low numbers, fake all caps, fake
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: polls on the economy, on the border, on just about
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: everything are ridiculous, and this is the key word dangerous.
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: The real poles, real all caps have been great all caps,
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: but they refuse to print them. This is no different
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: than a writer who is corrupt, of which they are.
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: Many New York Times and so many others pin polls
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: that are knowingly false. Knowingly they have become deranged and sick.
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: Talk about deranged. They suffer from a major case of
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: Trump derangement syndrome. Their twenty twenty four election coverage was
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: so bad and so long, and yet they never got
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: called out for it. But I'm calling them out with
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: the lawsuit that I have filed, which is making its
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: way through the courts. They have to pay a price
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: for all caps, fake and fraudulent news, and hopefully in
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: the not too distant future they will so. The fact
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: that he's suing the New York Times for his position
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: as President of the United States big problem from the
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: perspective of free speech, big problem. And the fact that
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: he keeps threatening them. They have to pay a price
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: for fake and fraudulent news. Who gets to the sign
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: what the fake and far telling news is? The all
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: knowing or powerful great leader. Yes, sir, unbelievable. Unbelievable. And
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: this will go unmentioned, and the right will just keep
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: on going and they don't care. They don't want free speech.
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: If it means silencing the left, that's a good thing.
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: How can you beginst the left? The left is the
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: epitome of evil. They have the devil incarnate. They're all communists,
• 50:33
  Speaker 1: and we should silence communists and everybody to the left
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: of Donald Trump, whatever the hell that means, even because
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: isn't he left is a communist and therefore should be
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: silenced and made illegal. In addition, the FCC Federal Communications
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: Commission is giving up to go after YU another aspect
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: of free speech. They want to make sure that when
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmelo any other late night talk show host interviews people,
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: he interviews people from both sides of the aisle. They
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: want equal that time on interview shows, so otherwise I'll
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: shut you down. This is going to only increase that is,
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: there's no question about the fact that this administration and
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: its supporters do not believe in freedom of speech at all,
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: and they would like to find ways that don't offend
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: American people too much. Find sneaky ways around to limit
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: significant limit free speech, this speech from the left. Yeah,
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: all right, I'm just reading it's making news. I'm seeing
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: it from a number of different sources. And maybe it's
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: true that Israel these really security services suspect that somebody
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: within Israel's defense establishment is using their insight information to
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: make bets on poly markets in terms I think of
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: an Uranian related attack or not. So I don't know
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: if that's just that they're playing with us or if
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: that is real, But we moment to check polymarket to
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: see what the odds are, what the odds are? All right,
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: let's take a look. Okay, finally, well we might talk
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: about one another thing. Jack Smith today is in front
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: of Congress. He is in front of the House Committee
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: on something and something. Jim Jordan is there and testifying
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: about his indictment of Donald Trump or over the twenty twenty,
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: over January sixth, and over the documents. Jack Smith is no,
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: he is a serious person and is not going to
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: shrivel up and just play politics with these people. He's
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: going to tell it the way it is. He has
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: already said in testimony, public testimony. Videos of this are
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: going to circulate all over the place that his investigation
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: developed proved beyond a reasonable doubt the Trumpet engaged in
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: criminal activity. He said, quote, if asked whether to prosecute
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: if imer president based on the same facts today, I
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: would do so, regardless of whether that president was a
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: Democrat or Republican. He continued. No one should be about
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: the law in this country. And this is again in
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: front of a committee dominated by Republicans who are trying
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: to grill him and try to catch him out right,
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: and Trump is already tweeting about this and all pissed off.
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: This is Jack Smith again. The First Amendment does not
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: protect speech. So one of the arguments is, well, Trump
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: had the right to claim fraud in the election. That's
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: the First Amendment right. He can say whatever he wants
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: to say. And this is Jacksmith's response to the fact
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: that Trump's actions and speech, but particularly his actions regarding
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: the twenty twenty elections, are not protected on the First Amendment. Quote,
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: the First am Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime.
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: A fraud crime in particular, is not protected under the
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedence on this is clear
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: also from Jacksmith. My fear is that we have seen
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: the rule of law function in our country for so
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: long that many of us have come to take it
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: for granted. The rule of law is not self executing.
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: It depends on our collective commitment to apply it, and
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: I would say, in particular the commitment of Congress to
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: apply it. It's good that he's speaking to Congress. He
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: goes on and this is not necessarily in sequence. I
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: have grave concerns about obstruction of justice and this investigation,
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: specifically with regards to Donald Trump. I was away during
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: the course of our investigation of targeting of witnesses during
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: the course of the conspiracy itself. They were election workers
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: who had their lives turned upside down and received vile
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: death threats because they were targeted by Donald Trump. Donald
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: Trump suggested that one witness should be put to death,
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: and also made a statement to the fact of if
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: you come after me, I'm coming after you. In my mind,
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: I can't think of a more direct threat. This guy
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: has balls. You gotta give it to him. He has balls,
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: he says. The investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: Did President Trump engaged in criminal activity. No one should
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: be above the rule of law in this country, and
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: the law required he beheld to account. Again, quoting Jack Smith,
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: President Trump was charged because the evidence established that he
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: willfully broke the law, the very law he took an
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: oath to uphold. Grand juries in two separate districts reached
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: this conclusion based on his actions. Rather than accept his
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: defeat in twenty twenty, President Trump engaged in a criminal
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: scheme to overturn the results and prevent the lawful transfer
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: of power. After leaving office in January twenty twenty one,
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: President Trump illegally kept classified documents is Moroologo Social Club
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: retention of these documents, highly sensitive national security information was
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: held in a ballroom and a bathroom. Our investigation revealed
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: that Donald Trump was not looking for honest answers about
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: whether there was fraud in the election. He was looking
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: for ways to stay in power. He in fact, knew
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: that the fraud claims he was making were false. I mean,
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: it's brutal. It is brutal, and it's going to be
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: interesting to see if there are any repercussions. My guess
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: is no, none, zero, zilch, nada. Everybody who loves Trump
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: will stay completely one hundred percent supportive of Trump. Nobody
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: is gonna question him, nobody's going to challenge him. This
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: is done by the way in front of in front
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: of Republican Congress, Republican congressman. And my suspicion is it
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: goes into one ear and it comes out the other
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: and has no impact on him, just has no impact
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: on them. This is Donald Trump tweeting while Jack Smith
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: is testifying. Quote deranged Jack Smith is being decimated before Congress. Really,
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: maybe it's Donald Trump being decimated. It was over when
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: they discussed his past failures and unfair prosecutions. He royd
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 1: many lives under a guise of legitimacy. Jack Smith is
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: a deranged animal who shouldn't be allowed to practice law
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: if he were, if he were a Republican, his license
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: would be taken away from him and far worse. Hopefully
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: the Attorney General is looking at what he's done. Notice
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: what's going on here, Notice what's going on here. President
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 1: of the United States is threatening, is threatening a witness
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: who is testifying against him in front of Congress with prosecution.
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: Hopefully the Attorney General is looking at what he's done,
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: including some of the crooked and corrupt witnesses that he
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: was attempting to use in his case against me. The
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: whole thing was a Democrat scam. A big price should
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: be paid by them for what they have put our
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: country through. I mean, they are just at some point
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: there are just no words for this president. I just
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 1: don't get understand anybody who continues to support him. I
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 1: just don't understand it. Not if you're reading what he says,
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: just his own tweets it. You know, he is behaving
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: like Putin. He's behaving like a dictator. And luckily we
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: still have semblance, a semblance of a rule of law,
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: semblance of it, so he can't just go out and
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: arrests Xmith, although I wouldn't be surprised if Pam Bondi
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: is building a case right now to do exactly that.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: It's it really is horrible. And what's particularly horrible is
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: the Republicans on this committee are playing along. That is,
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: they are attacking Jack Smith there. You know, he is
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: is clear, you know, and and he's got he's got
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: the he's got the stuff to back it up, and
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 1: yet Republicans are not listening. They're just using this to
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: try to discredit him because they only have an audience
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 1: of one person, and the audience is Donald Trump. By
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: the way, in the middle of a hearing, a Democratic
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: congressman stopped and read aloud to everybody, a Trump's deranged
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: you know statement, which is threatening Jack Smith in front
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: of him. Congress I mean, any respect that once had
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: for any of these Republican congressmen is now zero. Not
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: a you can't. I mean, these people should be voted
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: out of office. Studying with Jim Jordan, who's heading up
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: this committee, who used to be decent and it's turned
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: out to be a mouse. A mouse is too nice,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: mices can be cute. I mean just a a week coward.
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: And all of them are, every single one of that caucus,
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: the Republican caucus. I mean, who would ever think that
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green had guts and everybody else doesn't. She left,
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: She called Trump out and left Margie Taylor Green. It
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: takes something for one of the kookiest people in American
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: politics in the history of American politics, for the kookiest person,
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: one of the cookiest people in American politics to actually
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: be right about something. Hi, all right, I mean, you know,
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: and this is what he said about January sixth. But
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: the pardons the people who assaulted police officers and were
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: con convicted after trial, in my view, and I think
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: in the view of the judges who sentenced them to
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: prison a dangerous to the community. Some of these people
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: have already committed crimes against the communities. Again, I don't
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: understand why you mass pardon people who assaulted police officers.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: And I don't get it. I never will because he's
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: a decent human being and a president is not. Yep.
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: Good for Jack Smith having the courage. I'll just say this.
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: Good for Jacksmith to have the courage to stand up
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: and say this in public in spite of Trump's threats,
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: in spite of the fact that Republicans are going to
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: try to go after him and and and ridicule him
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: and do everything else. And he is saying it like
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: it is saying it like it is. A democratic representative
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: asks Jack Smith. Do you believe that Trump's Department of
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: Justice will find a way some way to indict you?
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: Jack Smith says, I believe that they will do everything
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: in their power to do that because they've been ordered
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: to by Trump. All right, that is the news guys
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: for this Thursday, January twenty second. All right, remind you
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: that you can ask questions. I will answer them. Keep
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: the questions coming, particularly if the twenty dollars, fifty dollar,
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: one hundred dollars, anything about twenty dollars is particularly valued
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: and appreciated and it gets us start targets. I remember
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: yesterday I showed you a video of Emily Asuda, which
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: I was very impressed with, and I commented on it
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: and put it up on the show and showed it
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: to you. Well, somebody must have told her that I'd
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: done that, because she then commented on being in the
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: video and said, oh look look I'm there on minute
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: forty and started following me on Twitter. I followed her back.
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: So now Emily and I guess following each other on Twitter.
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: That's good. Maybe I'll have her come on the show.
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: That could be fun. But to talk about iron and
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: to talk about Israel and everything else. She's incredibly eloquent
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: and it seems knowledgeable. Uh so that was that was
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: called cool. I don't know who actually did that, who
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: actually let her know that that I had mentioned that
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: it mentioned mentioned her on the show. But thank you
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 1: whoever let her know that, thank you. Maybe she just
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: watches the show, you think maybe that happened, that could
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: have happened. But but in any case, somebody somebody mentioned
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: it to her and and she she followed me as
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: a result. So that is uh, that is that is good,
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: and maybe we'll have on the show. All right, Well,
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: mind up that value for value, you know, the stick.
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: Don't forget I like the show before you leave. If
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: you're not a subscriber, please subscribe, and and and please
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: consider doing a super chat or stick up to support
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: the show right now as we are live. For those
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: of you who are live, those of you are not live,
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 1: please consider becoming a monthly regular supporter on Patreon Patreon
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: dot com. Just put in your on book show and
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: you can contribute anything with two dollars to one thousand
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: dollars a month on Patreon. That is greatly greatly appreciated.
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: Let's see. I want to remind you of Defenders of
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: Capitalism definitsifcapitalism dot com. Defenders of Capitalism dot com. It's
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: a great a great program run by Michael Williams. Michael
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: is a friend and a colleague. I do work for
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: Defenders of Capitalism. We do programs for leadership program in
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: the Rockies and maybe for in the future for other entities.
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: This is a program that could be expanded. We need
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: lots of definders of capitalism, so join us. Check out
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: Defenders of Capitalism dot com, hand a Shot healthnd A
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: Shot with two ts andd a shot Wealth dot com,
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: slash ybs. If you have expecting to have large capital gains,
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: tax liabilities, uh, they have products uh, completely tax efficient
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: legal uh that can reduce your text liability dramatically, maybe
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: even down to zero. Uh. So check them out. Check
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: out the interview I did with Robert Handershot on my
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: YouTube channel. On the playlists, uh, the playlists of sponsors.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: So anybody out there who is about to sell this
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: company or about to sell not about but will in
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: the next few years sell a big chunk of stock
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: and have a huge capital gains used to check out
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: check out what they have, check out their products incredibly
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: valuable uh and uh and and and they're good people.
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: I vouch for them in terms of both providing you
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: with the information and executing on on the strategy i
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: uh alex Epstein. Alex Epstein is the number one expert
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: on all things energy in a time when it's becoming
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: more and more and more crucial for everything that we
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: do in the world, and the demand for it is
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: going through the roof because of AI. You need to
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: be informed about what's going on in the world with
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: regard to energy. I the source I use, the number
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: one source I use is alex Epstein Substack alex Epstein
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: dot substack dot com. And finally join us in Porto Porto,
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: Portugal for a conference. When is it in a few
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: weeks in April where I will be in Nicos and
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: on Car and tats Fani and it's the Iran Conference Europe.
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: You can check it out at Iran dot oak slash
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: start here and you can get a discount. You can
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: get a discount for listening to this show. Twenty six
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: YBS ten twenty six YBS ten.
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 4: All right, let's see.
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let's jump in. Remember Patreon, don't forget Patreon. I'm
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: always looking for new Patreon supporters. We are we made
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: kind of the goal for the first hour. Let's go
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: for that second hour goal. I don't think we're going
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: to go into a third hour. Today. We don't have
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: a lot of questions, but we certainly well into the
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: second hour. So let's try to get close to that
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: goal as close as possible. Thought criminal, thank you for
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: the sticker. I really appreciate that. Let's see who else
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: who else did stickers here? Yeah, not a lot of stickers.
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: Fend Hopper, thank you, and that's it. That's it, I think, Yeah,
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: all right, all of you listening, you could each do
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: a sticker. It's easy, it's simple, and you can just
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: do it for like a buck ninety nine or two
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: bucks ninety nine, you know, one hundred bucks ninety nine
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: h point ninety nine. You can just come in and
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: do something symbolic. Greatly appreciated, and all adds up. James says,
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: you say Trump is non intelligent. It's hard to imagine
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: winning two persidential elections without a high degree of intelligence
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: some dimension, unless you think it's all luck, right place,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: right time. No, I don't think you need that much
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: intelligence to win an election. You need a certain ability.
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: You need in ability to be able to read your audience.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: You need an ability to communicate to your audience in
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: a way that resonates with them. But that does not
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: make you smart in any kind of meaningful way. Since
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 1: I believe that Trump is non conceptual, he cannot deal
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: with abstractions, He cannot deal with conceptual abstract information. I
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: consider that the whole mark of intelligence you know he
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: might have. He might be very good at marketing because
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: he kind of has an emotional grasp of what people
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: like and people want, doesn't make him intelligent. Somebody says
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: intelligence is overrated. Maybe intelligence overrated, but conceptualization is not.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: We as a species, as an individual, survived, thrive, and
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: thrive because of our ability to conceptualize, to engage in
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: abstract thought. We are not an animal that is coded
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: and a pre programmed to exist out there. And Trump is,
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: as iron Rand described it, a perceptual being, a preconceptual being.
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: And he has not risen as long with many of
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: his voters, has not written into the level of fully
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: human in essence, i e. The rational animal, the conceptual animal,
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: the animal that conceptualizes. I know lots of people who've graduated.
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you are some like some leftist thug
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: who graduate from Yale, as many of them do, you
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: wouldn't say, oh, look, he graduate from Yale. He must
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: be smart. You would have said, no, he's a leftist.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: They're stupid, they're idiots, they have no intelligence. But because
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: he's somebody you like, Oh, because he went to UPenn,
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: he must be smart. No, he went You know the
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: fact that he went to UPenn. You know I got
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: an NBA. I think he got an NBA from Upen?
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: Is that right? Somebody must know a degree he got
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: from Upen. But I got an NBA. An NBA is
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: an easy degree to get. Study business in university. I
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: was a business professor. It's easy to get. You don't
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: have to be particularly smart. You do not have to
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: be particularly smart. Now. Trump is ambitious, and he's good
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: at marketing and the sudden sense, the sudden ways in
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: which he knows to manipulate people, and he's very good
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: at that. But does he have conceptual ability? No, as
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: as a domestic terrorist says, TDS is going to TDS. Yeah,
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: TDS is going to be TDS. I E this is
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: the difference. I provide evidence. Listen to his speech yesterday
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: and tell me that that is a smart person or
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: an honest person, or person would any kind of integrity
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: Take any of the tweets that I read to you
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: about Jack Smith, or about or about the polling, and
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: tell me that's a smart person. He was a developer
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: of skyscrapers. He didn't design the skyscraper, wasn't an engineer
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 1: behind the skyscrapers. He wasn't the architect of the skyscrapers.
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: As I said, he's good at reading and manipulating people.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: And again, the you know, the way I think about
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: smart is conceptual. He is a selfishness without her self
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: because he has no thoughts that why is above the
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: very simplistic level of abstraction. And you can call that
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: TDS if you want. That's fine. I've been called worse.
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: But reality is what it is, James. One thing I
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: just read is that China has been pushing for the
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: past thirty years to get a foothold in Iceland. They
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: now have a research hub that Icelandic officials have no
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: access to a university program at their top school. Yeah,
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: I mean, I wouldn't be surprised. China's made a lot
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 1: of investments all over the place. Iceland is a I
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: think a member of NATO, it's certainly a EU, and yeah,
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: it's it's in a key location. And I'm sure, China
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: has a foothold in lots of different places anywhere you go.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: China has huge footholds here in the United States, massive footholds.
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: I mean, I was just reading that. In spite of
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: all the so called competition of AI, most of the
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: leading AI papers that are published a co author by
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: American and Chinese authors working in American and Chinese labs.
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: So Americans in Chinese are corporating on AI. Is not
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: a part of you. I thought it was a part
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 1: of the EU. Okay, Matia says they're not a part
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: of the U. So yeah, there's no question that China
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: has a presence pretty much everywhere. So does by the way,
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 1: in the United States, in particular, so does Kato. Kotto
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: has has invested in the US much more than China
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: in terms of the university programs. Happa Campbell, I'm a
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: this is he's quoting Donald Trump. I'm a dictator, but
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: sometimes you need a dictator. That was Donald Trump at Davos.
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: Two things are hard to accept about Nazi Germany. One
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: is that he was popular, people supported him. The other
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: he wrote a book in which he told everyone what
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 1: he would do. Yet people were surprised. Trump has said
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: he will do many hopable things. Gun down somebody in
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: the middle of Fifth Avenue. Well, he didn't say he
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: would do that. He said if he would do that,
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: people would still vote for him, which I think is true.
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: But he he, you know, yes, said lots of He
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: said he would deport everybody. He said, he said all
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: these things. People are still surprised. He said he would
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: militarize ice, and people are still surprised. So yeah, I mean,
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: he says he's a dictator. I mean he means that
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: in the sense of, you know, he does what he
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: wants to do, and nobody cares, certainly not Republicans don't
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: seem to kid it's defenders, you know his uh you know,
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: the people suffering from Trump zombie syndrome, which all the
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: people who call me for TDS actually suffering from. They're okay,
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: he can say, yeah, I'm in dictator of the United
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: States and they will go, oh cool, and you're criticizing
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: him your own you must have TDS. I saw that
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: that he said that, and I didn't even make it
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 1: into the news because it's he says stuff like that
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: all the time and nobody seems to care. You know,
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: you either you know you you either get that that's
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: his mentality, you don't get that mentality, and getting that
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: that that's his mentality you should get not because he
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: says it, but because of his other statements of in
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: his actions. Harrison quote, obstruction of a public thoroughfare is
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: such a blatant violation of individual rights that any attempt
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: to justify it becomes an abrogation of morality. This design
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: RAN's thoughts on Jack Lang's right to protest in Minnesota. Yes,
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: although she did say that once the government gives that
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: right to do that to one group or one person,
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: it has to give it to every group. It can't,
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: it can't discriminate. That was an her essay where she's justifying,
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: where she's justifying allowing the allowing the Nazis, the Neo
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: Nazis to march in Cokie Skoki in Illinois near Chicago,
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: and she said, you know, I'm against protests that you know,
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: obstruct people's traffic and people's ability to engage in day
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: to day life. But once this is what you do
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: for some groups, you have to defall groups. Government can
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: play favorites, even though it does all the time. Stephen
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: Oppas says, thank you for the show you're on. Thank
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: you Steven for the support. Really appreciate it. Thank you guys.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: Jacob says, I'm forty one, have been listening to you
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: since around twenty eighteen, and I'm halfway through Atlas Shrugged
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: for the first time. Wow, first time I was inspired
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 1: to learn about capitalism after first listening to Thomas Sault. Well,
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: that's great, and I'm I'm excited that you're reading Atlas Shrugged,
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: and I'm incredibly curious to see what you think of
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 1: Atla Shrug when you finish it. That is, when you
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: get to the end of Atlas Shrugged, and I hope
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: that'll be the first among many of Iinman's books that
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: you read. But I'm very excited that you're reading Atlas
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: Shrug because I assume because you've been listening to me.
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: Jonathan border Piece is a Trump for life, Trump for life. Yes,
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: it is. It's unbelievable. Fanahab twenty dollars. Thank you for
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: this super chat. Actually, let me just thank the stick
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: of people here, Joseph Paul and Free Market Capital. Thank
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: you guys for coming in with some stickers. How do
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 1: you differentiate smart and intelligence I consider the first to
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: be large stores of knowledge, full of facts, the second
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: high understanding of cause and effect. Want to ask, holds
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: them differently? So I thought I would ask, Oh, I
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 1: haven't really thought about it. How to I hold smart
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: and intelligent? Yeah? I don't consider smart as just somebody
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: who holds a lot of facts. They hold the facts
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: and don't know how to use it. That's not very smart.
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: Somebody smart or intelligent, and I think of them is
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: pretty much synonymous to some extent, is somebody who can
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 1: deal with with a high abstract level. Who can you
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: know you can be You could be narrowly good at
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: a field, and then I'll be able to abstract on
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: anything else. I guess that's possible. I guess what I'm
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 1: really looking for is people who can use abstract knowledge
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 1: across a number of different fields. How do we define
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: that as that smart or intelligence? I think it's it's both.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 1: But then what if you have, like somebody who's really
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: good at work because he's got a narrow focus and
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: he's good at that, but he can't use his mind
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 1: than anything else. Would he call that us a smart? Now? Really?
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 1: I don't you know? There's a bunch of concepts there
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 1: that we need to clearly define and we need to
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: be clear about I agree with that, and clearly I don't.
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: I don't have those definitions. So something to work on.
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: Maybe good question to ask Greg. It'd be interesting to
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: see maybe he has some good definitions around the different
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: concepts that relate to intelligence and how those relate to
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 1: because there's also capacity. We do it. We are born
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: with different capacities, but what's important is how much we
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 1: use it. And then there is a difference between capacity
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 1: and then conceptualization, actual use of your abstract thinking ability,
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: and then what happens when somebody is really good at
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: math but can't use the thinking for anything else. Actually,
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: I Man has a really good essay on that that
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: would be a good member's only session. She has a
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 1: letter to Barbis Spasski, the chess player, who's obviously a
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: genius as chess, but she criticizes him for not applying
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 1: his thinking ability for anything else. So let's let's look
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: at that essay and maybe we can we can learn
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: something about intelligence and smarts and some of these other
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: concepts that relate to it. A Sebastian, do you think
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: Trump will use force to manipulate the election of stay
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: in power. What should we look out for? Well, I
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 1: think I don't put it about beyond him. That is,
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: I think there's a possibility that he does, particularly if
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 1: he thinks that Republicans in Congress will go along with it,
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: and particularly if he thinks that MEGA will go along
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: with it, and that the rest of us will just
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: kind of say, ah, we don't like it, but not
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: do anything about it. So the more we roll over
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: and play dead with regard to ICE or with regard
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: to smaller violations of our rights, the more likely it
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 1: is that he goes all out. What do we look for?
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: An escalation from ICE and the application maybe of ICE
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: to do more than just immigration, and a call maybe
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 1: from some of the promoter as a maga like Bannon,
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: for him to use force in that way, because I
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: think he listens to them. But yeah, I definitely think
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: it's a possibility. Rowland says great speech by Zelensky. Wish
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: the world had more leaders like him? Yeah, absolutely, I
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: mean my top two leaders I think Milai and then
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: Zelensky in the world today. On him, you don't care
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 1: for international law. No, it's not that I don't care
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 1: for it. That's way too weak. I think it's a legitimate.
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: I think I don't think it's a law. It's not binding,
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: it's meaningless and its significant. So that's I think a
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 1: little stronger than I don't care for it. But if
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: you had to choose between international law gaining more power
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: versus VANCE winning, would you still putform international law gaining
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: I don't know how that is a trade off. I
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: don't like these kind of this or that those are
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: aren't alternatives. You have to fight against international law and
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: fight against Vance. And let's say international law gains power
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 1: and Vance wins. Is Vance going to follow international law?
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: Is international law backed by nukes? Does the international law
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: have any ability to uh, you know, to be applied?
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: Could Advanced be prosecuted by anybody? No, So it's irrelevant.
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 1: International law is just irrelevant. The good guys, the weak
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: good guys played by its rules. The bad guys never
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: do and the good guys who are strong never do.
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: So why even have it? Newly? Dan? Is there the
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: chance that the US can become a theocratic under Christianity?
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: I mean there is, long term. I don't think it's
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: gonna happen anytime soon, But that's to some extent, you know,
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: Lennapeagov's prediction in the dim hypothesis. I mean, I think
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 1: it would be moderately theocratic. Not theocratic in the sense
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 1: of Iran and women wearing jobs or in the sense
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: of what was that TV show while all the women
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: were there just to make babies and stuff like that.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: That I don't think is possible. But what is possible
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: is outlaw abortion on a national scale, you know, maybe
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: even make contraception difficult together or illegal. You know, school
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 1: prayer everywhere, banners proclaiming Christianity everywhere, things like that, more
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: of a recognition of Christianity's essential part in the nation,
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: but not any particular doctrine of Christianity being implemented anyway,
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: if that makes sense. So not full blown theocracy, but
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: soft theocracy. Yeah, I think very much possible within the
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: next twenty to fifty years. Molten Splendor. After your coverage
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: of Jacksmith's testimony, it appears that the mob boss has
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 1: all his Republican lieutenants in tow. Why uh all, why
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 1: are they also afraid of the gang boss. It's scary
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 1: to me. What does he hate have over them? Well,
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: what he has over them is maga. What he has
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: over them are the voters. What he has over them
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: is yeah, I mean, it's the Republicans who vote in
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: the primaries. What he has over them is their position
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 1: in Congress. He'll he'll just you know, basically, he'll just
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 1: basically primary them out of existence, out of the party.
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: And what he has over them is balls.
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 3: You know.
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: You can say a lot of things about Donald Trump,
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: but Donald Trump is not a in a sense, it's
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 1: not a coward. He says what he thinks. He doesn't care,
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: and they are cowards. They're cowards. They don't want to
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: confront him. And he makes enemies easily, and he persecutes
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: his enemies. He doesn't just say you're an enemy. He
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: goes after them. And going after the means they lose
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: their position in Congress. The people in the district don't
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: like them anymore. The Republican establishment, the mega Republican establishment,
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: turns against them. Yep, so they they, I mean Republican
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: congressmen and senators have become mindless zombies. I mean a
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: few that exceptions, like Ran Paul, but the rest of them,
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: And tell us who's now leaving Congress because he started Trump.
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: So he's leaving the Senate because he knows he would
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: be primary and you know he'd lose. I never tell
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: you when I'm going to be on, so YouTube tells
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: you wait in advance when I'm going to be on,
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: and I announced it on Twitter always.
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: People make stuff up. It's pretty amazing. So yeah, I mean,
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 1: it's unbelievable, cowardly. They are unbelievably unbelievably. Let's see, Gail.
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: I look at the twenty fifth Amendment. What is at
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: its core, Basically, at its core is that the cabinet
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: can announce in a sense that the president is does
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: not have the capacity to govern, and you know they
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: can go through Congress and ultimately they can replace him
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 1: and replace him with the vice president. It's basically it's
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 1: something that the cabinet can initiate, which is unusual. I
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: almost always broadcast in the same hour. I don't know
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: why people are bewildered. It's kind of weird, all right,
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: free market capital If you were president, what steps would
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: you take to secure Ukraine victory against Russia? How much
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: support would you give before risking nuclear escalation assuming providing
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 1: weapons isn't enough. Well, I think providing weapons is enough.
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: I don't think you need more than weapons. I would
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 1: give them the long range that they need. I would
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: give in I would give them the defense systems that
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 1: they need. Uh, you know, I would. I would lease
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 1: them with expectation that you know, I would lend, you know,
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 1: provide them with loans with expectation that they pay it back.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: But I would provide them with the you know, all
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: my I would look at my stockpiles and all the
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: expiring weapons I would hand over to the Ukrainians. You know,
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: I would have to be a military expert to know
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: what they need, but they certainly need more airplanes. They
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 1: have sixteens. What they really need is f thirty fives.
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 1: Not whether they have an air force they can fly
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: at thirty fives, I do not know, But those are
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 1: kind of things you would look at. But what they
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: need is to dominate the air. And if they dominate
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 1: the air, then they can dominate the ground. And right now,
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: the reason it's a drone war is because neither one
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 1: dominates there. Both the Russians can't really fly over Ukraine
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 1: and Ukraine can't fly over Russia. But imagine if Ukraine
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: could take out Russia's hair defense systems. Then game over.
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 1: Russia would have to retreat. It would have to retreat.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: They'd be sitting ducks and the Ukrainians would just destroy them.
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 1: So I'd give them the kind of air power not
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 1: flown by Americans, flown by Ukrainians that they would need.
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: Now again, you'd have to be a military strategist to
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 1: figure this out, but there's no question in my mind
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: they're with the right weapons. And indeed, if the Biden
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: administration had given them the right weapons at the right time,
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 1: this could have been over a long time ago, or
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: at least been much better for Ukraine a long time ago.
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: It's Biden's hesitation to give them the weapons. Support with woods,
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: but resistance to give them weapons is what creates the challenge.
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: If you want to know when I go live, by
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: the way, all you have to do is subscribe. If
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 1: you subscribe, YouTube will let you know. Generally I go
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: live at two pm two pm East Coast time, pretty
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: much every day. Sometimes that changes because of other things happening,
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 1: except for Tuesdays. Tuesdays, at least until mid March, I
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: go live one hour later, But every other day it's
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: two pm East coast, and I've been fairly consistent. I mean, granted,
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: I deviate an occasion. Yeah, it's pretty pretty easy, not
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: that hard, if you really if you're interested in watching
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: the show, it's easy to keep track. And again, if
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: you subscribe YouTube will let you know, and if you
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: follow me on Twitter, I will let you know. I
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 1: announced the shows in advance. Clark and Putin must be
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: rolling around the floor with laughter at Trump. Oh yeah,
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: he's been doing that for years, for a long, long,
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: long time. He's been doing that. So absolutely, thank you.
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: Wes really appreciate the sticker. Twenty five dollars. That helps
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: us get much closer. Jeremy, thank you for the sticker.
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 1: You guys are helping get us closer to the goal.
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: Less than one hundred dollars, guys, five twenty dollars questions,
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: and we are there, We are there, Clark. I suspect
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 1: that there's there's a major recession or depression and Trump
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: really unleashes ice and declares martial law, impeachment and conviction
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 1: could happen. I don't know, and I don't see us
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: really heading towards a suddainly not towards a depression. I
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: don't think. And maybe a recession, but even that is
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 1: right Now, the US economy is growing. You might not
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 1: see the growth in jobs, but it's growing into the consumption.
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: Now we'll see what happens. Interstates are still going up.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: We'll talk maybe talk about interstates tomorrow. The dollars going
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: down in value. I mean, since Trump came into office,
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: the dollar's gone down a lot. Now, maybe he's doing
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: that on purpose, I don't know. I doubt it. And
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: long term interstates have not gone down. Short term interestates
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: so once controlled by the FED, have gone down, expecting
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: long term rates to come down, and long term rates
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: have not come down much. And that means mortgage and
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 1: rates have not come down much. And there's very little
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: the government can do to lower up long term rates.
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: So I mean, unless he orders the FED to stop
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: buying long term bonds, which would be you know, which
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: the Fed doesn't do except in emergencies. So it could happen,
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 1: but it's Trump would like to have more control over
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: the economy and be able to manipulate it even more. Oh,
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 1: I didn't do the segment of Trump's free market thing.
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: Should I do this segment of two shee market? I
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 1: missed that. Let's let's let's do that. I think I've
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: got to hear what's this? What's this exchange between Donald
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 1: Trump and Maria buttaloma bout t roma? Butmo but romo? Whatever?
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: I know Maria, She's interviewed me many, many, many times. Anyway,
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: here she is interviewing Trump. Uh and uh and what's
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: this exchange? It's it's quite revealing of Donald Trump's approach.
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 5: Economy, mister president, because when I first interviewed you, when
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 5: you first came back, it was about a month after
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 5: the inauguration for your second term. I asked you, miss President,
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 5: what do you want the economy to look like in
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 5: four years? And you were very clear. You said, I
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 5: want the private step to rule the day. And since then,
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 5: in the last year, you've taken a ten percent stake
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 5: in Intel, You've taken a steak in MP Mountain Pass.
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 5: You told the defense companies two weeks ago, don't pay
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 5: any dividen, don't do buybacks until you produce the weapons
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 5: that we need. So please explain to our audience, how
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 5: is that free market capitalism?
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: Well, that's a great question. I mean I wish I
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: wish more people asked him questions like that, but even
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: more interesting than the question. Listen to his answer. He
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: evades the answer. I mean, he goes around and around
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: and he's agnoing it. But that's exactly the question that
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: needs to be asked.
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 3: It was a very free market. We have defense companies
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 3: that were making a fortune. They were buying backstock with
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 3: all their money, and then they come to us for
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 3: money if they want to, you know, we want to
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 3: buy something, or we want to have plans built, and
• 1:40:41
  Speaker 3: they say, could you loan us some money, and they'd
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 3: be doing tens of billions of dollars of stuff. Why back,
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 3: So I'm not letting them do it.
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: It's just not about them loaning money. They want they
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 1: want purchasers. They want they want the US government to
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: buy their stuff. That's what they're there for, their defense contractors.
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 1: But he wants to run them. He wants to tell
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: them to you know.
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 6: We have the best equipment in the world, have the
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 6: best equipment in the world because we have relatively free
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 6: defense contractors who don't have to pay dividends based on
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 6: what the government says.
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: They don't have to pay the CEOs based on what
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: the government says. We have a little bit of free markets.
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 1: That's why we have the best equipment in the world.
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 3: Patriots, Tomahawks have thirty fives. All of our equipment's the best.
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 3: Other countries want it, and we want it. We need more.
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 3: It takes too long to get it. I said, we're
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 3: not going to do that anymore. So Also, they were
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 3: making tremendous amounts of money and twenty.
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: Five Oh god, they're making a lot of money.
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 3: Thirty seven million dollars a year. That's a lot of money.
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 3: That's almost as much as you make.
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: You work harder than that.
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 3: But you know they were making as one of the gentlemen,
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 3: what are you making? So I make twenty four million dollars?
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 3: How come it takes me five years to get your
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 3: particular thing that they make? Right? So I put a
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 3: cap on that for a period of time.
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: For a period of time, I said, you have to
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: build more plans.
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 3: When we order when we need Tomahawks, I want him
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 3: within twenty four hours.
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 1: When we need any.
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 3: Kind of Patriot or whatever I want, I want to
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 3: have it quickly. I don't want to be waiting three
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 3: years for it. What kind of a thing is that?
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 3: And you make all this money and I'm prohibiting from
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 3: doing stock buy bait and you know they haven't even
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 3: complained about it.
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 5: Well, so, so free market capitalism unless it's a national
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 5: security issue.
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: Look at the free market.
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 3: It's stupid market letting that take Why would I let
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 3: them do stock buybacks and we give them, you know,
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 3: the businesses from US.
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: So of course he doesn't deal with the origent of
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 1: a question, which is about the government taking stakes in companies,
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: you know, free markets, except if it's a national security
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: But you know, the steak he took in US steel
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 1: is not national security. Is taken intel not national security.
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 1: This is all it's bus He likes running things. He
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 1: is a central plan at his every every every part
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: of his everything about him is about central planning. So yeah,
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: it's just just another I thought i'd show you that
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: just to show you, not that you would be surprised,
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: maybe some of you because some of you still support Trump,
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 1: some of you still fans of his, but he's not
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 1: a free market president. Nothing close. Oh yeah, just looking
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 1: at it at the chat. I'm just going to comment
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 1: on this asof says, in reference to Gaza, you on
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: is ignoring the fact that Israel and BB we're funding
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: the Ramas. For all these years, how many times have
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 1: I talked about Bib supporting Kamas, Bib allowing the Katawi
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 1: money to come into Ramas, bbe you know, Israel even
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 1: really funny Kamas originally and creating commas in nineteen eighties.
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: I've talked about that for twenty frigging years. So I
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 1: didn't mention it this time when I talked about Gaza,
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 1: and Asuf is going to correct me, well, excuse me
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: of self that it can't give you the full dissertation
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 1: of everything I've ever said about Gaza and about Bib
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: and a about Hamas and about all this stuff. Every
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 1: single time I mentioned the word Gaza. You guys are funny.
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 1: You guys are really, really, really funny, all right, Huper Campbell.
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 1: People on the right have accepted all the basic premises
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 1: of the left and become merchants of despair in their
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 1: own right. Yeah. Absolutely, there's very little difference between the
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: right and the left right now, except with regard to
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 1: transgender athletes. If that is the most important issue in
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 1: your life, then yeah, I vote Republican. But except for that,
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know. You know, an abortion, which is where
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: the right is so wrong. I mean, there are a
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: few social issues which the right is different from the left,
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: but other than that and anything, they're either terrible on it,
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: like abortion, or it's just not that important in a
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 1: big ski of things. But they're indistinguishable on so much
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: of the important stuff, the role of government, the extent
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 1: of which the government should be in our lives, that
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 1: they completely agree, Liam says. A newly released ICE memo
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 1: authorizes officers to add to homes without judicial wants. Yeah,
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 1: it's an executive want. It's a different kind of want,
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: but it's only it is important to know, just to
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: give it objectivity, Liam, because they don't have tds. It's
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: a want that only applies for people that have outstanding
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 1: deportation orders and have now been deported. They've appealed, they've
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 1: gone through the process, and they have a deportation order
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 1: and they're supposed to be deported, then they can go
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: in to the home. Now I'm not saying that that
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 1: justified it. I'm just saying so far ICE is very
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: is delimited their ability to answer homes without a want.
• 1:46:05
  Speaker 1: But if we don't react to every little breach like this,
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: it will become bigger and bigger and bigger and more
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 1: and more and more of infringement of our rights. All right, Liam,
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 1: If ice budgees into your home without a warrant, should
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 1: you be morally allowed to pooh pooh them? Yes, But
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: again they're not allowed to do that yet unless you
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 1: have an outstanding deportation decree against you or whatever it's called.
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 1: Even then they shouldn't be allowed. But it is limited,
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 1: so most of you are pretty safe. It's not panic yet,
• 1:46:52
  Speaker 1: Liam says. I am interested in how ordinary people come
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 1: to rationalize state action carried out in their name, and
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: what happens when you pros and personal morality responsibility become optional. Well,
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: I mean, it's really simple. They're convinced that the illegal
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: aliens are raping their daughters and taking their jobs, and
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: nobody's done anything about it for years and years, and
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: finally Trump has come and he's doing something about it,
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 1: and he's sending these eyes off ice offices. And yeah,
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: it's ugly and sometimes they do things that are in appropriate,
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 1: but generally what they're doing is for the good and
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: it's important work. And you know, we need to be
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 1: a safe society and we need to get these people
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: out of here, so they tolerate it, and the fact
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: that it's an avigation of their rights, Well, what do
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 1: they know about their rights anyway? How much of their rights?
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 1: How much? How much do they really understand about their
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 1: rights and what it means to have more personal responsibility?
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 1: Very few people have that concept really and understand it
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 1: in any significant way. Newly, Dan is not the dictator's
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: strategy to stay in power part of their ideology? Well, no,
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 1: you know, it could be non ideological. I don't think
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: Trump is ideological. Trump is I want power? That said,
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: it's not. There's no, it's not the name of fascism
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 1: or socialism or or Begaltyianism or any or even pragmatism.
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: It's just I want power and I deserve it because
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 1: I did good things whatever. So you can be a
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: power luster without being an ideologue or without being ideological.
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: All right, Harrison, Do I have the right to use
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 1: my body car to prevent irs agent from collecting taxes
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: like the Bookley student protests that rand Exercise excoriated once,
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 1: you don't have that right, and I mean you have
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 1: the right to do it, but you will sit in
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: jail for it. So you could argue it's civil disobedience,
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: but then you have to you know, you suffer the
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 1: consequences of it. You can decide not to pay a
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 1: taxes as Peter Schiff's father did and sat for years
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: and years and years and years in jail because you
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: refuse to pay taxes. So you can refuse the government.
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: But you know there is a massive difference. Look, if
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: I let's change this a little bit. If IRS agents
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: were going door to door and demanding that you identify
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 1: yourself and demanding to see your bank statements, then you
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 1: would have every right in the world to block them
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 1: and to interfere in their actions and to refuse to participate.
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 1: Now you would go to jail, but you would be
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: on the right because that is that has taken generally
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 1: accepted now for a hundred years process of paying your taxes.
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: It's taken it to authoritarian levels. So there are differences
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 1: here right now. Again, Berkeley student protests is something very different.
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: They were doing illegitimate things in the name of illegitimate
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 1: ideas on what should be viewed as private property. Here
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: the officers coming to your house or they are in
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 1: the public space in your neighborhood, Why would you not
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 1: be able to block them when what they're doing is illegitimate.
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 1: What they're doing is a violation of rights. What they're
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: doing is using worse than criminal then processes going after
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 1: criminals in order to go after people who are not criminals.
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Illegal immigration is not a crime. It's a
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 1: civil offense. If they were doing the same thing to
• 1:51:37
  Speaker 1: all of us. Because a bunch of us, a bunch
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: of you guys, a certain percentage of you, I know,
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 1: a significant percent illegal taxpayers. Why you illegal taxpayers? Because
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: you probably cheat a little bit on your taxes, You
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: underrepport certain things, you take deductions when you shouldn't. Guess
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 1: is a significant percent of an American population? Does that?
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 1: Imagine if the United States government then assigned a police
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 1: force IRS agents to go house by house to come
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 1: in ask you how come you can afford this nice car?
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 1: Come into your house, look at your furniture, check out
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: your flat screen TV, and demand to see your bank
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 1: statements again, you would be absolutely okay, you know as
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: it is right now. They can do it. They can
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 1: do some of that, but they don't come to your house.
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 1: They don't walk around your neighborhood, they don't you don't
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 1: shuffle you off without any evidence, without any evidence into
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 1: their cause and whisk you away. They're not masked. You know,
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 1: today IRS does it in a civilized way. They ask
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 1: you to come to the officers with the appropriate documentation.
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 1: They're not masked. They're not you know, it's not an
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: unlabeled envelope. There's a massive difference between the level a
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 1: violation of rights and all I'm asking for. All I'm
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 1: saying is people have the right to engage in civil
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 1: disobedience over a militarization of going after people who violated
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: civil law, not even criminal law. I mean, if they're
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 1: going after rapists and murderers, okay, but that's a tiny
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 1: fraction of the people they are resting, a tiny fraction
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 1: in spite of the government propaganda says otherwise, they're lying
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: to you. Molten Spander says, did you see the video
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 1: of the ICE agent who entered a Thai restaurant with
• 1:53:47
  Speaker 1: his gun unholsted, saying he was looking for a kid? No,
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 1: I didn't see that. It's unbelievable. And it's you guys
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: who are justifying them, are making that possible. Linda, thank
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 1: you for getting the truth out there. You appreciate it.
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: I appreciate that, Linda. Linda also says Atlas Shucks and
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: other books by Man changed my life for the better.
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 1: The IBS does as well. Harrison says, Google Jack Lang,
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 1: m plist protest your anti ICE wrioters try to murder
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 1: him for daring to hold a legitimate protest for a
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 1: different point of view. Oh, give me a break. You
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 1: guys are so so so first of all, that I'm
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: my anti icewriaters or protesters or whatever they are, that
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: I'm mine. I don't believe in protesting. I believe in
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: you know where ICE agents are going going harassed them,
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: you know, videotape them, yell at them, don't get yourself arrested,
• 1:54:58
  Speaker 1: don't use violence. So I'm against violence. But I'm sure
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 1: Jack Lang whatever is the most decent fellows. He's probably
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: a sweetheart of a human being and probably did nothing,
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: nothing offensive at all. And look, if protesters get violent,
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 1: then I'm against that. I'm against violence. I don't believe
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 1: in violent protesters. But ICE is pulling guns not of
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: people who are violent. Ice is pulling guns on people
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 1: who are yelling at them, people who are filming them.
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 1: Ice just murdered a woman who is trying to drive
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: away from a scene in violation of every code of
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: how you use a weapon by every single law enforcement agency,
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 1: including ICE, including Homeland Security. So yeah, I'm you know,
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: ICE rioters out there, ICE protesters out there who are
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: listening to my show, don't use violence. Don't don't. Don't
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 1: use violence. Not good. It's evil to use violence. And
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 1: I'm sure, I'm sure. Yeah. Anyway, uh dB, you ridiculed
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 1: Mark Route for kissing up the Trump in an earlier show.
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 1: He is a pragmatist willing to do anything to meet
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 1: his goal not to be trusted. Yeah, I know, I
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: mean it's yes, a super pragmatist is absolutely what he is,
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: and he'll kiss Trump's ass whenever he thinks he needs
• 1:56:32
  Speaker 1: to in order to calm things down, because that's what
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 1: you need to do, kiss his ass in order to
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 1: get him to calm down, because he is an emotionless thug.
• 1:56:43
  Speaker 1: A mat says Congress is most limpeding group of people ever. Yep,
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: this Congress in particular, Free market Capitol. New show idea
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 1: could be on youn and international law. Why you think
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 1: they're illegiterate and what would be better alternative. I think
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: I've done that show. I'm pretty sure I've done the
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 1: show on the UN but happy to do it again.
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 1: I think if you search around book un you'll find
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 1: that show. But you see, I'm reluctant to repeat myself.
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 1: But there's a lot of material I've done that could
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: I could just redo, and there's probably worth doing. Dan
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: Norton says, I just hit ten one thousand subscribers on YouTube.
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 1: I'll be doing a live stream today after you're on show.
• 1:57:28
  Speaker 1: Hope to see you there at Dan Norton. Please include
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 1: the one in the channel name Dan Norton one. I
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 1: guess for the correct address. All right, Robert bort a
• 1:57:39
  Speaker 1: Piece Trump now has a second hand peace prize, fresh
• 1:57:44
  Speaker 1: from the local good will thrift store. I'm sure he'll
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 1: soon become he'll be He'll soon become bored of peace
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 1: border Piece b o r Ed. I think he said
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 1: he already was, didn't he say in that one ranch.
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 1: Maybe now he'll he'll the letter sent the Prime Minister
• 1:58:06
  Speaker 1: of Norway where he said, you know, I didn't get
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 1: the peace price. And maybe now I'm boord of peace
• 1:58:12
  Speaker 1: and from peace, and now I'll flex some muscles.
• 1:58:19
  Speaker 4: Yeah, all right, Uh.
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 1: That is it. I will see you guys tomorrow. Oh
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 1: for those of you really really want to know, really
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 1: desperately what time I will do the show tomorrow, it
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 1: will do a two pm East Coast time. Shockingly, it
• 1:58:41
  Speaker 1: will be a two pm East Coast time. So I
• 1:58:43
  Speaker 1: will see you there hopefully. And don't forget Patreon. Patreon
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 1: dot com become a monthly supporter of The Roon Book Show.
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 1: Thanks guys, see you soon.