Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Let thy vote be informed, Intelligent or counts

Transcript

Let thy vote be informed, Intelligent or counts · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: The The concept of voting was meant to to produce
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: the best of leadership and to put this a consensus, agreeable,
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: acceptable leader, you know, somebody that is veed, tested and
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: and trusted by the people to lead. You know. The
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: concept of voring, you know, I was designed to be
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: something like UH a competition UH where companies beid hm
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: when companies and when companies are building, you know, for
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: a contract, and the best company wins the contract. So
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: the concept of volume was designed to produce efficient, UH,
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: reliable and trust that leaders, to build confidence and to
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: create a certainty and stability and predictability, predictability in the
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: minds of the people about their leader. And voting was
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: a good concept, and it's still a good concept. That
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: there are so many people in a group of society
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: or the country, and not everybody can be a leader,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: and not everybody is interested in being a leader. And
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: those who think they can laid, those who others propose
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: to laid, and they stand the test of time to
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: compete within themselves for the better candidate to win. But
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: as the issue of votied progresses or progressed, it became
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: something different than its original intention, moved away from the
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: person to a party, and we move from a party
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: to diverting interest that the vote itself, that's secret right,
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: that's secret political right becomes something that you're voting for
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: a person that technically you're not voting for that person,
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: you're wearing fair party, and even not for that party,
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: but one interest or an economic or political group that
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: your father moved from the decisions that shall be made
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: with your vote. What's my point that when you vote,
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: you're supposed to be varring for the candidate. You're variant
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: fair person that you think out of your own investigation
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: or understanding or research or studies, that you're varring fair
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: person that you think can lead, a person that's that's
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: competent and intelligent and morally stable. And it's of the
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: theo conscientiousness of will to be able to carry the
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: duty and services or obligations and as possibilities or expectations
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: given to that person the personation, but willing to execute
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: that function much better than other competitors. That's why people vote.
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: But if you are not voting for the person and
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: but you're varrying for a party, it becomes something a
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: little bit different, becomes something that will be challenging to
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: get a good candidate of the people that represent the
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: interests of the people and the will of the people.
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: Once you're voting for a party, you are voting for
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: an ideology, for for a philosophy. You are voting for
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: a group, not for a person. He should be voting
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: for a person that leads a group that follows a philosophy,
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: that is a head of an entity, or a system,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: or a blog or an assemblage of people. Voting was
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: meant to produce the best of leaders and to create competence.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: You know that you have people who lead and will
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: bring people together to bring the best out of humanity
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: and the best out of human and to lead, to lead,
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: to bring good, to bring peace, to bring stability, to
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: bring developed by, to bring consensus, and to reconcile forces
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: that are in locker heads of not talking to one another.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: That the volume was meant to bring a leader that
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: as the love and care and willing to sacrifice for
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: what the leader believes in that the people themselves want.
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: What leadership to day is gradually eroding from the person
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: to something that the people themselves done. Now you know,
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: people sit behind and they decide who the leader is
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: going to be, and they come to their consensus in themselves,
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: in their group, in their groups, in their sect, in
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: their court, or in their assemblage, of being in the
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: secret society or some elite organizations. So some people have
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: the full knowledge of what the leader should be. And
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: the fear of such systems now is that those behind
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: the scenes come up with the candidate that supports the
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: vested interest, and that candidate is therefore imposed on the
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: people another guise of averticipent and and campaigning h people
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: are convinced to believe in a person, rather than the
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: person convincing people to believe in them. Nobody should speak
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: for you better than you can speak for yourself. But
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: divergent interest, you know, and it models politics and leadership,
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: and it makes incompetent people to be leaders, and it
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: does not create the best of society. If leaders don't
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: don't repeat, then don't represent the ideas or themselves, then
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: it becomes difficult for them to lead. With freedom and
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: independence and the concept of foreign was mental health. Yeah,
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: you know, we live in a society that's divided, and
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: we live in a society with many humans, many minds,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: you know, with intrinsic individuality and differences in projection, perception,
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: and perspectives, with differences in expectations and and with differences
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: in class, race, gender, nationality, and culture, traditional legion. So
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: politics and foreign was designed to to to bring people together,
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: you know, to to the concise their opinions and their decisions,
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: you know, towards a single or multiple candidates who are
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: then supposed to represent themselves or present themselves to the
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: world or to the people, and spend the time convincing
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: the people honestly why they should be their leader, but
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: why you should vote for me. You should vote for
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: me because and the people examine their character right, their experiences,
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: their dedication, their sacrifice, their endeavor, their temperament, their vision
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: and their care. They examine the wit and the common
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: sense of their intuitional and intelligence and the complete or
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: compare the candidate we candidates external to their system and
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: with other leaders external to their system, and they get
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: to see where their system fit in with a particular
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: type of candidate, and if they do elect to vote
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: for that candidate, it should be what they believe in,
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: not something that they have been pushed to of course,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: to overwhelmed with advertisements to vote for. There is the
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: concept that the more you advertise for something, the more
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: dishonest nothing is. The more you get to convince people
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: about somebody, the more untrustworthy undoubtful that thing of person becomes.
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: Humans you were able to sell themselves more than anything else.
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: When a candidate is not of the people but from
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: unknown groups or interests or blogs, even though those people
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: are convinced or deceived or false or blacketed to vote
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: for a candidate that does not represent itself but interests
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: or now that candidate tends out not to be the
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: best of candidate and not the best of leader. It
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: becomes a situation where a person comes on stage to
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: be a leader, campaign to be a leader, but see
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: very less about itself where it stands, what this opinion is,
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: what policy or who really they are? Where they right
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: behind other groups that speaks for them. You got all
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: these super packs, and you got all this lobbing and
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: and interest groups that stand to better more when a
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: particular person is elected. So therefore that person becomes a
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: vessel you know, for corruption, for instability, for duplicity, for deception,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: and something far removed from the people. But the thing
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: that goes to war and the things that divide people
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: and the thing that has the interests of others, or
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: something more alien to that which the person has called
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: upon to represent. When people don't vote for the leaders
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: that they're supposed to vote for, they don't get the
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: best out of that leader, and the country in itself
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: doesn't get the best out of it. Voeign An. Elections
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: was meant to elect the best of leaders. But the
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: question to ask today are we electing a person or
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: a party? Are we electing a person or interest group.
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: Are we electing a person because that person was able
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: to convince and persuade the mass is to vote for them,
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: or we are volume for a person because of culpriate interests,
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: because of the media, or because of other vested interest
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: Are you voting for the person or you're voting for
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: something else. It's always good for leaders to be themselves
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: in their honesty and their truthfulness and their trustworthiness when
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: they come forward Taussian leadership. It's good to be a
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: leader of the people. It's good to be a leader
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: of the best of the people. It's not good to
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: be a leader that's so he's or her soul to
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: interest groups or groups are known that technically works against
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: the best interests of the whole. If leaders are elected
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: out of particularities, then generalities the society tends to suffer.
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: A leader must should be appealing to the majority of
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: the US for us. And leader should be appealing to
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: the majority of the population. And such majority should be
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: uninformed and educated majority who are better informed about that individual,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: about that person and are able to weigh the competence
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: and reliability and consistency and prudence, an atility and intellect
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: and morality, or compassion and creativity or ingumuity of flexibility
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: or dynamism, or the decision making or the proactiveness and
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: preemptiveness of that candidate of that leader that brings the
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: best out of itself. A rather antake a society to war,
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: to inflation, to instability, to lower living standards, to insecurity,
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: to anguish, to anarchy, to violence, to terror or destruction
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: of society. You know you don't get the best of leaders,
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: or you're like leaders who go to war, because when
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: leaders go to war, they destroy the fabric of society
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: and profits the industries or the groups that gave them power.
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: A leader hardly campaign to go to war, and leader
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: hardly campaigns to go to war because humans know the
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: consequences of war, Or when leaders come to the populace
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: or come to the people and pretend to care so
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: much about the people and the webbing of the country
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: and to give people vain platitudes and false promises, or
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: refuse to let the people. But now the duplicity of
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: their intentions. When such people do take power, they often
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: do the things that people don't want and the people
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: don't wish for them to do. That becomes irony when
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: people elect leaders who don't listen to them and the
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: people the same people that elect social leaders are forced
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: to be in the streets of the state protesting and
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: objecting to the same leader that they elected, or an
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: irony because even though they thought they were electing that leader,
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: even not actually electing the leader, they were electing some
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: fasted interests, some secret obligations that those leaders have made,
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: and those secret obligations and never what the leaders campaign for.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: Why do you think people invest a lot of money
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: individually to lack a particular person another other Such people
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: think about their business interests the Markavilian interest and they
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: need a VESE vehicle to do their biding in the
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: most powerful country in the world like America, and the
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: leader represent zillions of interest groups. And the thing we
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: pray for is that the leader in itself should be
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: competent to represent this great country. The leader should be
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: able to take us to a better place. The leaders
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: should should be able to satisfy all those interests and
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: at the same time make America to be correct. The
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: leader must be able to compete with other leaderships. The
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: leader must be able to understand the diversion and the
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: diversity and the differences and into cases and individuality and
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: independence of the American people and of American itself. Our
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: exceptionalism she always lead us to war. Our exceptionalism to
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: begain should be again for the past of America and
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: persuade the war to believe in us, for us to
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: get what we want without feeling innocent of our American
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: blood for it. We must not get what we want
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: to war, because because when you get what you want
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: to war, you get what you want. But innocent lives
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: are lost. They're not part of what you want, they're
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: just too to what you want. Peoples, you elect leaders
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: who go to war. The proples elect leaders who prevent war.
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: The proplect leaders who persuade and imprint, not impose and dictate.
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: When a leader is persuaded and imprinting, the leader is
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: speaking for the people. The leader is speaking for the majority.
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: When the leader is imposed, that leader is dictating not
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: the will of the people, but the will of an
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: unknown minority. There's very careful like your leaders, did they
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: represent the majority the minority. Oh, a minority within the minority.
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: That minority within the minority is the group that you
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: don't now, But that's the group that wills the most power,
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: and that's the group that's sat behind and decided who
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: shouldlad That's the group that proposed the candidates that you have.
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: That's a group with the vest with with that. That's
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: the minority of the minority with the most vested interests.
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: But the person to become leader, and it's that minority
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: of the minority that sponsor or sponsors that candidate, that
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: does all the biddings of the candidate and all the
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: door knocking are influenced by that minority of the minority.
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: When a candidate comes from the minority of the minority
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: is a lot of majority of the people. The people
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: stand to lose. The people shall be used as liverages
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: or as collateral damages to get what the minority of
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: the minority wants. A society rule by the minority of
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: the minority or by the majority of the people. The
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: question again to us, a society rule by the will
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: of the people, I mean the will of the majority
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: or by the will of a minority of a minority
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: that the general public doesn't know. But of course, to
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: capitulate to the aware, why should politicians come and I
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: promise the people about the things that they finally don't
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: do when they do gain power, when they do come
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: to the office, because the promises that they don't keep
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: were bits or carrots given to them by the minority
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: of the minority to plucket the people and to make
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: the people elected for them in office. And when they
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: do accent power, they don't do what they promise. Yeah,
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: they don't mean what they say, and they don't say
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: what they do. Social leaders, they don't bring the best
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: out of the people, the satisfied the interests of the
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: minority of the minority. The fear is that minority. That
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: the fear is that that the minority of the minority,
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: sometimes minorbits representative of the group of the country, or
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: the will of the people the minority of the minority
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: might not even be patriotic, or might not even have
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: the best interests of the country itself, or the people
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: that that that puppet puppet leader, or the or that place.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: Hunger in the name of a leader is meant to
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: be present. When you do vote, who are you varring for?
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: Why are you born? Who stands to benefit from your voote?
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: Is it a person, a country, a group, your interests,
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: the interest of your majority, or the interests of humanity?
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: When you do vote, what is the purpose of your vault?
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: If your vote meaning for? Does it stand for something
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: the vindication? If it's something that brings the world together,
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: that brings the best out of the country, that brings
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: the best out of the leader. When you to vote,
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: what is the purpose and meaning a goal of your vote?
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: Do you just vote to satisfy a divisive candidate? Do
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: you vote to promote racism, sexism and bigotry? Do you
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: vote to promote wars or cruelty or in humanity? Do
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: you vote to promote science and technology? Do you vote
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: to promote education? Do you vote to advance the country
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: and the will of the people. Do you vote to
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: develop the country, to develop everybody? Do you vote to
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: oppose or to prevent others for attaining their vest Why
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: do you vote? Why and for who do you vote?
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: Do you vote for vengeance, for venative death? Why do
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: you vote? Do you vote the better your life the
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: better the lives of others? Do you vote for stability
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: of anarchy, for division or unity? For peace or chaos?
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: Do you vote for petrotism, for the flag, for the troops,
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: for the country, for family, or for God? Or for
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: the seal of that which we all hold dear? Do
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: you vote to take us forward or to take us backward?
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: When you do vote, always remember that you live in
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: the country that needs your help. That you live in
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: the country the her that has insufficiencies, in adequacies, in securities, iniquities, inequalities,
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: and inferiorities within certain groups, that your vote can either
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: make their situations better or make their situations worse. Be
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: careful with the person you vote for. Let it come
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: from your informed decision, from your research. Let your vote
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: means something, and let it bring out the best in
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: humanity and the past in the world. That you vote
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: bring the change that all of us are looking for.
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: Let your vote elect candidates that bring us sustainable sustainability,
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: that makes our country proud, that changed the lives of
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: the people, the economic situation, their political situation, the parological situation,
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: and the spiritual situation. Let your vote be a decisive
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: vote that brings the best out of us, not of
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: our worst angels. But that choice is they, That choice
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: is there. Many people have called me, and many people
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: have spoken to me, and many people have come to
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: me to endorse a particular candidate for the elections, the
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: forth coming twenty twenty four elections, that is in a
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: few days to come. And I am who I am.
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: I am a philosopher and thinker that seeks to bring
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: the best out of humanity. I cannot tell you who
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: to vote for. I can tell you not. Your vote
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: should mean something. Your vote must be informed. And some
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: said vote your conscience, vote for your conscience or what
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: your conscience, And I said, vote for your enlightened conscience
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: to make enlightened decisions. You should not vote based on
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: what people tell you about a candidate. You should vote
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: based on your research h that you've made on that candidate.
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: Let your vote be an intelligent vote. It should be
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: a vote that makes a difference, a sense of passage,
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: that represent the majority, that represent a humane majority, a
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: conscientious majority. Let your vote mean something. I think that
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: was the concept of vy, that not everybody can be
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: a leader, but that the best should lead, and that
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: best shouldn't be dictated, shouldn't be imposed, but it should
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: be persuaded and imprinted on the minds of the people.
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: If the purple should matter, if it's all about way
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: the people, then let the people decide. Don't buy their
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: voote don't in a date. Don't inundate the people with
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: all the advertisement, because you know, when you do all that,
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: you corrupt the mind of the people. You car up
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: the minds of the people. We advertise something so much
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: that means it's not the thing that you're selling. You're
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: selling something else. If it's too good to be true,
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: then it's advertised again and again and again. We don't
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: advertise water that much because we know what water is.
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: We are advertised suits because in its advertisement it's something
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: beyond water. It's something we can make us in it
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: that we don't now that some of those care makers
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: might be harmful to us in the long run. That's
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: why it's been advertised. When candidates are over advertised, the
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: vous become suspicious. What are you selling to us? What
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: are you selling to us? Will you represent the best
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: of us? Will you make our lives better? Will you
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: make our countries stronger? Will you bring more stability, more harmony?
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: Will you help us help ourselves? Will you promote our businesses?
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: Will you promote our ingenuity, our creativity, our independence? Will
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: you promote science and technology? When we advance the people?
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: Will we represent the children, their health, their well being?
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: H will we elevate people out of poverty? We workers
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: be paid well, are respected? Will you bring the best
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: out of humans? Will will you bring peace? Time? Or war? Time?
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: I tell your Tamin again. Only failing leaders go to war.
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: Only failing leaders go to war, and only week leaders
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: are meant to feign or define the war. Failing leaders
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: go to war. Week leaders define wars. What's my point?
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: Good leaders don't go to war. Proactiveness, preemptiveness prevent war.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: They don't strike physically, strike diplomatically to prevent a war
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: before it comes. And leaders who go to war it's
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: a symbol the leader who was not elected by the
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: people but was elected by the whole factress. Leaders who
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: issue solutions and failing in diplomacy and failing in business
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: strategies our leadership compaign. That's why we elect them. They
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: should bring the best out of us. They should bring
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: the best out of our intelligent community. And they and
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: they should have the team that wins. A winning team
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: MHM should bring the best to compete with the war.
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: When you start to impose yourself, I impose your will
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: on behalf of a country, it means you're not the
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: best suited. It means your suitability office got corrupted by
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: the interests of the minority of the minority. When the
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: minority of the minority leads, countries go to war to
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: protect and preserve and promote the interests of the minority
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: of the minority. Once a leader goes to war, they
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: stop governing their people. The war becomes a distruction from
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: fulfilling the promises that they're made to the people. Always
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: remember that a wartime leader is a failing and leader.
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: It's a leader that fails the people and would therefore
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: use fear to mismanage and corrupt power to do the
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: building of the minority of the minority. A powerful minority
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: of the minority. I want to make the lect Claire.
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: When I talk about the concept of the minority of
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: the minority leading from behind, it's a powerful minority of
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: the minority leaving from leading from behind because the minority
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: of the weak minority had the forgotten the minority of
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: the minority of the weak ad that group of population,
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: that the powerful minority of the minority propose their candidate
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: to pretend to that weak minority to be their protector,
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: to be their savior, to be their messire, and will
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: come and promise them all these goodies. And then now
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: that the corridors of power will not let that happen.
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: When they give all those promises, knowing that the Congress
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: will not let it go through, they all the limitations
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: of the promises that they are given. God, those promises
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: are given never to be fulfilled. Those are the leaders
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: that take the people to war. Only failing leaders take
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: the country to war. The war becomes a disguise of
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: their mismanagement, of their incompetency too late or to rule.
• 45:07
  Speaker 1: The war becomes that thing. Let's says, look over there,
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: and don't see through my incompetence, my inability, my inefficiency
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: of deficiency to fulfill the promise and detail. Vote for
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: leaders who keep their promises, and don't vote for leaders
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: who keep promises that destroys in nation. The choice is there.
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: Vote is a concept designed to bring the best out
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: of us, to bring a social contract a leader, to
• 45:53
  Speaker 1: bring a consensuous leader that we all agree to surrender
• 45:59
  Speaker 1: our might, our force, our differences, our hopes and dreams
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: to the leader that he can find compromise when where
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: all of us get ahead without destroying one another, for
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: the good of the country, for the good of humanity,
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: and for the peace, peaceful continuity or sustainability of that
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: which we all hold here. Let devote means something. Let
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: their voote mean something again. I don't tell you who
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: to vote for, because I believe that my followers and
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: my listeners are in front. I trust and devote. I
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: trust who you vote for. We trust who you vote for.
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: Let devote means sometime. Philosopher Prince Alien mine alien voice
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: Artificial h Ai intelligence is philosopher Prince is rasar On
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: for asking his followers to make informed, intelligent decisions when
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: they do choose to vote. October twenty eight, twenty twenty
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: four from Las Vegas. Prince Israsar once more